Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
) ( / ) ( ) (
) (
) (
) ( t sr t Q t K t sQ t Q t K t Q t r (3)
Equation (3) is a law of motion for the real rate of interest, which we can
relate to the other key dynamic variable, x(t), a little below.
We now invoke the HOTELLING RULE (Hotelling, JPE 1931) to
explore the dynamics of the price of oil, call it P(t). Assume that oil
exporters are neutral to risk, perfectly competitive, not subject to tax, and
free of any extraction costs. These assumptions imply that the price of
oil should be expected to rise at the real rate of interest. Given foresight,
and shocks apart, actual and expected paths of oil prices should coincide,
so:
) ( ) (
t r t P . (4)
Perfect competition among final output producers implies
4
) ( / ) ( ) 1 ( ) ( t E t Q t P (5)
Note that E should normally be falling over time (and must be in a steady
state), and also that Q will presumably be rising so the price of oil
should exhibit an upward trend over time.
So that, from (4) and (5) and the definition of x(t), we have
). ( ) ( ) (
) ( t x t x t Q t r (6)
Next, it helps to eliminate the growth rate of final output, ) (
t Q . From (1),
we have
) ( ) (
)( 1 ( ) ( ) ( )) ( ) ( )( 1 ( ) ( ) (
) (
t r t Q n b t sr t x t x n b t K t Q
using (6) and (2). Simplifying:
] 1 )[ ( ) ( ) )( (
s t r n b t Q . (7)
BY SUBSTITUTING (7) INTO (3) AND (6) WE CAN NOW FIND 2
KEY LAWS OF MOTION, for the extraction and interest rates, in terms
of these variables alone:
] / 1 )[ ( ) ( ) )( ( s t r n b t r (8)
) 1 )( ( ) ( ) )( ( ) )( ( s t r n b t x t x . (9)
(8) says that the stationarity locus for r is independent of x and always
attracts r (a standard feature of Solow-type and many Ramsey-type
models). In other words, the long run real interest rate is determined by
the production function characteristics, plus the parameters b, n and s.
The savings ratio tends to lower r; b and n to raise it. So r is stable the
dynamics of r are stabilizing. Diagram 1 refers.
(9) says that the stationarity locus for x is linear in r and x, which are
related positively. Intuition: higher r implies, from Hotelling, faster rate
of ascent of the price of oil, and therefore faster extraction. The
dynamics of x are unstable. Diagram 2 refers.
Putting (8) and (9) together, into Diagram 3, shows a steady state at point
E, where the 2 stationarity loci intersect and that there is a unique
5
saddle path towards E from either side. Given foresight, and knowledge
of the model and information about the parameters, agents should be able
to plot the evolution of r and x.
At point E, the steady state, the long run values of r and x (and also the
growth of final output) will be:
s
n b
g A s n b x A n b r
) 1 (
1
; ) / 1 )( ( ; ) ( , where
. / 1
1
s A
Many points of interest are apparent. One is that the (long run) growth
rate now INCREASES with s, the savings ratio. Reason: over time it
raises capital, reduces the rate of interest, and implies slower oil
extraction and therefore higher SUSTAINABLE growth. Note that the
faster oil is extracted, the faster oil inputs into production will decline,
and the slower output growth must be (eventually, at least). (Note too
that if the role of fossil fuels in production were to disappear suddenly,
1 would vanish, and g would be the sum of population growth and
labour augmenting technical progress). Another is that sensible results
require the profit share to exceed the savings ratio (otherwise we get a
nonsensical, negative solution for extraction).
The most interesting feature of all, perhaps, is how we can now use the
model to try to understand the dynamics of oil prices. An unexpected
permanent rise in the savings ratio would flatten the stationarity locus for
x, and push the stationarity locus for r leftwards, with the combined long
run effect of lowering both r and x. The saddle path to the new long run
equilibrium would show x slipping very slightly, and r slipping faster.
Diagram 4 illustrates. So the impact effect would be a big fall in x.
Counterpart: a big jump in the spot price of oil (which would
thenceforward increase more slowly). Similar consequences would
ensue from unanticipated permanent falls in (or reduced expectations of
future values of) b or n. (1970s? 2003-2006?). And falls in expected s
would have the opposite effect (mid 1980s? mid 09). As would the end
of traditional communism , adding large population, but little extra useful
capital, to the prospective advanced trading worlds endowments (late
1980s, early 1990s?). And although oil is currently (around US$83) far
below its July 2008 peak of US$ 143 per barrel, it has risen sharply over
this year so far, and now stands(in US$ at least) at well above its levels
of 3 or more years ago.
6
The decline in real interest rates in the period since the early 2000s is
startling. And it is noticeable that the period from late 2002 to late 2007
witnessed rises not just in oil prices, but in the prices of many other
assets, such as real estate (most economies), gold, equities, and copper,
as well as (rather more mutedly) in indexed bonds. Demography may
be partly responsible for this. Falling fertility (particularly in China,
Japan, Germany, Italy, Russia, Spain, and most of eastern Europe) has
coincided with increased life expectation (especially in most of Asia and
Europe). The Blanchard (1985) model of annuities and random mortality,
which excludes intergenerational altruism, generates the result that steady
state real interest is reduced by reductions in both fertility and mortality
hazard.
(If you want to read more on macro models with oil, you might like to
consult applications to global warming in Sinclair Manchester School
1992 or in a Ramsey framework - Oxford Economic Papers 1994.)
Krautkraemer (JEL 98) is sceptical about Hotelling curves; Lee et al
(Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2006) is one of
several recent papers to present arguments or pieces of evidence that take
a more favourable view of them.