Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BALANCE TABLE
In the case of contributory schemes where the benefits are predetermined, the
calculations are complicated because part of the cost is met by the employee's
contributions and the remaining cost is met by the employer's contributions.
If the whole of the future service pension of a member is to be purchased under
the same type of annuity,the total cost for each year's pension can be worked out
according to the premium table and the employee's contribution can be deducted
there from to find out the employer's cost
The employee's and employer's contributions are applied under different
premium tables. To find out the employer's cost, ascertain the amount of pension
which will be purchased by the employee's contribution by applying the relevant
premium rate and deduct the resulting pension from the total pension to be
provided in that year, the balance being the amount of pension to be secured by
he employer's contribution.
The cost to the employer is then ascertained by applying the appropriate premium
rate. Under large membership schemes where thousands of employees participate,
it will be very tedious to undertake individual calculations to arrive at the
employer's cost every year.
To simplify , use is made of a specially prepared table known as 'balance table' in
which the results of the calculations in relation to one unit of pension and one unit
of employee's contribution are recorded for each age.
The balance table showing the premium payable by employer to purchase a
pension of Rs. 200 p.a. from normal retirement date after deducting therefrom the
pension purchased by employee's contribution of Rs. 240 per annum is shown
below.
The balance table can be applied only if the employee's contribution has a
fixed relationship with the amount of pension. For example,it is assumed that
for every pension of Rs. 200 p.a the employee's contribution will be Rs. 240 p.a.
The unit of pension can also vary with the salary class.
Pension secured by the employee's contributions at younger ages is more than
the pensions required to be provided for that year , the employer does not have
to pay anything in that year because there is no balance of pension to be
purchased
When the employee's contribution does not purchase the required amount of
pension, the excess pension purchased in the previous years will be drawn to
make up the shortfall, and this process will continue repeated in the succeeding
years until the total of excess pension purchased at younger ages is exhausted
The employer will start contributing from this point of time. The effect of this
operation is to defer the date on which the employer has to begin contributing
towards the pension.
The cost is lowest in the early years of the scheme because the employer does not
contribute in the earlier years of the scheme.
It makes it easier for an employer to install a pension scheme, when he has not
been setting aside any substantial sums out of his profits as reserve for pension.
When the employer starts contributing the premiums will be directed towards
securing pensions to the older employees , the employer feel satisfied because
whatever money he is able to contribute towards the scheme is applied to a greater
advantage
It is convenient to make any major alterations in the benefit structure of a scheme
which has been in force for a number of years, if the scheme is costed on single
premium basis.
In this method of costing the wastage is reduced to the minimum possible in case
of surrenders & withdrawls during the early years of the scheme.
SINGLE PREMIUM
Employer could pay a lump sum initial contribution, for purchasing full past
service pension but the employer may find it inconvenient to put down a large
initial payment at one point of time without straining his working capital.
Employer will get income tax exemption as admissible expenses only 80% of the
initial contributions, and it will be spread over five years commencing from the
year of payment.
In our country-no restrictions as to the period during which such initial
contribution could be spread over. But every payment made for securing the past
service pension will qualify for tax relief only to the extent of 80% with the relief
allowed in the following five assessment years by way of deduction of one-fifth
of the contribution in each of the five years
various methods of spreading the cost over a period of time -ANNUAL
PREMIUM, DEFINITE FUNDING METHOD,INDEFINITE FUNDING
METHOD, CONTROLLED FUNDING
ANNUAL PREMIUM
1. The cost is spread over future service up to normal retirement date
2. An additional annual contribution is paid along with the ordinary annual
contribution
3. The past service liability is not liquidated until the youngest member entitled to
the past service pension reaches his normal retirement date
INDEFINITE FUNDING
1. The lump sum cost is taken as a guide to decide the annual payment spread for
appropriate number of years
2. The employees are arranged on roster in order of normal retirement date
3. First premium payment is used as a single premium for purchasing full past
service pension of the oldest employee and this process will continues every year
4. Each purchase is made at single premium rate corresponding to the attend age at
the date of purchased
5. In case of death and early withdrawal the concerned member are remove from the
roster as no purchase has been made for them and there is no reallocation of the
premium ones utilized in the purchase of pension
6. If employers discontinue the premium the past service pension for those who have
already retire or about to retire would have been purchase but no provision will
have been made for young employees
CONTROLLED FUNDING
1. Accrued pension rights are purchased when a member becomes eligible for
receiving the pension i.e. just before his retirement.
2. The premium received each year is utilized to secure the total to expected benefits
of the oldest employees at the normal retirement date.
3. The employer and the insurance company should agree upon the level of funding
which is desired over,a period of years
4. The employer and insurer agree upon certain level of funding keeping in view the
pension rights which have already been accrued and the funding should be such
that a pension of a member who is about to reach the normal pension date is
finally purchased before the due date of payment.
5. The insurer calculate the cost of achieving this level as percentage of pensionable
salary. This "percentage will be applied to calculate the premium required from
the employer. The premiums will be allocated each year to the employees nearest
to the normal pension date to secure all their pension entitlements and the
subsequent premiums may also be allocated in part to the same employees as their
salaries and pension entitlements increase
6. No distinction made between past service liability & future service liability.
7. No attempt is made to purchase a specific amount of pension each year.
8. No pension is purchased for younger members so if an employee leaves the
service or dies before his pension has been secured; there is no loss to the
employer.
9. The method can be called as unallocated method of funding as there is no relation
between the outlay of the employer & the past service & future sevice pension of
employees.
10. After assessing the level of funding the insurer will determine the cost as
percentage of pensionable salary, which will be applied to calculate the premium
from the employer.
11. The calculation will take into consideration assumed date of bonus under with
profit plan and will also make allowance for withdrawal from service.
12. The rates are reassessed by insurer and 3-5 years in view of changes due to
membership age and salary.
13. In case of early retirement on pension full pension of an employee may not have
been purchased at the date of leaving service and this cost has to be met from the
current year’s premium secured by reallocation of the premium already allotted to
other members.
14. There is no loss to employer in case of early death or employee leaving service.
15. Cost expressed as percentage of salary bill tends to remain stable.
16. It is a more flexible scheme and is comparable to the trustee administered scheme.