Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
S
/
c
m
)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
p
H
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
R
e
d
o
x
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
m
V
)
-200
0
200
400
600
(A)
Time (day)
0 20 40 60 80 100
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
(
S
/
c
m
)
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
p
H
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
R
e
d
o
x
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
m
V
)
-200
0
200
400
600
(B)
Time (day)
0 20 40 60 80 100
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
(
S
/
c
m
)
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
p
H
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
R
e
d
o
x
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
m
V
)
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
(C)
Time (day)
0 20 40 60 80 100
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
(
S
/
c
m
)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
p
H
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
R
e
d
o
x
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
m
V
)
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
(D)
Time (day)
0 20 40 60 80 100
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
(
S
/
c
m
)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
p
H
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
R
e
d
o
x
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
m
V
)
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
(E)
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Environmental, Earth Science and Engineering Vol:1 No:4, 2007
18
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
S
c
i
e
n
c
e
I
n
d
e
x
4
,
2
0
0
7
w
a
s
e
t
.
o
r
g
/
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
/
7
2
1
7
Time (day)
0 20 40 60 80 100
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
(
S
/
c
m
)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
p
H
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
R
e
d
o
x
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
m
V
)
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
(F)
Time (day)
0 20 40 60 80 100
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
(
S
/
c
m
)
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
p
H
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
R
e
d
o
x
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
m
V
)
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
(G)
Fig. 2 Conductivity, pH, and Redox potential at adsorption step in (A)
control, (B) EX1, (C) EX2, (D) EX3, (E) EX4, (F) EX5, and (G) EX6
For investigating the neutralization capacity, the change in
pH, Eh, and EC as a function of time was tested. A summary of
the results illustrating the dependence of chemical properties of
adsorbing agent on the rate of neutralization is represented in
Fig. 2.
The results obtained for limestone and white limestone are
consistent with those reported by Maree et al. (1999). They
mentioned that neutralization and partial sulfate removal were
highly dependent on the surface area exposed to the liquid and
the OH
, oxygen, CaCO
3
, suspended solids and iron(II)
concentrations, and less dependent on specific surface area and
pressure. They mentioned that two stage processes on the
neutralization were occurred. The first stage is associated with
the neutralization of pure sulfuric acid. The slower second
stage can be attributed to the increasingly thick layer of ferric
hydroxide precipitate forming on the limestone particles,
masking them from further dissolution. The pH for both
limestones was maintained at the neutral range and Eh showed
that the system fulfilled with limestone keeps at the reduced
environment (< 0 mV) after 90 days. The chief difference
between limestone and white limestone is the percentage of
calcite. Similar trends are also present in the starfish for pH, Eh,
and EC.
Especially, Jumunjin sand and black shale lost the
neutralization capacity easily (pH<5), other agents can keep the
pH as above 7.0. In the case of black shale, the pH was reached
at 3.5 after 90 days and Eh was increased to acidic environment
( +200). Otherwise, initial EC is smaller than other agents, and
was decreased from 1500 S/cm to 1100 S/cm since its
property is consisted of hydrophobic material, clay mineral and
organic matter, and then less soluble in the system.
As a result, for each of the 6 agents, only concrete reached
sufficiently low values of Eh, alkaline pH value, low Fe and Mn
concetrations after treatment. However, adsorption ability of
agents for Fe and Mn is very different due to the dissimilar
element character. In addition, the order of adsorption ability of
Fe and Mn onto the various components is inconsistent, which
might indicate that different sorption mechanisms occurred
simultaneously rather than only one sorption mechanism works
in the sorption process of heavy metals onto components. In
this study the effect that various particle sizes of the treated
agents have on the neutralization rate is not investigated. In
general an increased surface area resulted in an increased
neutralization rate, as can be expected. To verify these
conclusions further studies are needed, which are based on
comparisons with different flow rate, redox chemistry with
coexisted ions, and which are competed with other inorganic
cations and anions, and organic materials coexisting in AMD.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The project was financially supported by the
KIST-Gangneung Institute (Grant. 2Z03040).
REFERENCES
[1] Akcil, and S. Koldas, Acid Mine Drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and
case studies, J. Clean. Prod. Vol 14, 2006, pp.1139-1145.
[2] T. J. Beveridge, and R.J. Doyle, Metal Ions and Bacteria (Book style),
New York, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1989.
[3] J. P. Maree, W.F. Strydom, M. de Beer, Integrated iron(II) oxidation and
limestone neutralisation of acid mine water, Water Sci. Technol. Vol 39,
1996, pp. 231-238.
[4] W. D. Schecher, D.C. McAvoy. MINEQL+, A chemical equilibrium
modeling system. Version 4.0 for window, Environmental Research
Software, ME, USA, Hallowell, 1998.
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Environmental, Earth Science and Engineering Vol:1 No:4, 2007
19
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
S
c
i
e
n
c
e
I
n
d
e
x
4
,
2
0
0
7
w
a
s
e
t
.
o
r
g
/
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
/
7
2
1
7