Stormwater Stormwater Performance of Performance of
Two Green Roofs in Two Green Roofs in
Vancouver Vancouver Cheryl Cheryl Nelms Nelms, B.Eng - Public Works and Government Services Canada , B.Eng - Public Works and Government Services Canada Chris Johnston, P.Eng Kerr Wood Leidal Associates Ltd. Chris Johnston, P.Eng Kerr Wood Leidal Associates Ltd. KERR WOOD LEIDAL Green Roof Conference, Portland, OR June 2 - 4, 2004 Purpose Purpose n n To quantify stormwater runoff To quantify stormwater runoff benefits associated with green roofs benefits associated with green roofs in Vancouver, British Columbia in Vancouver, British Columbia n n To begin building a case to allow To begin building a case to allow green roof costs to be off-set by green roof costs to be off-set by reduced off-site development cost reduced off-site development cost charges charges The Problem: The Problem: n n Increasing imperviousness from Increasing imperviousness from new development degrades new development degrades downstream fish habitat. downstream fish habitat. n n What we have done to date, isnt What we have done to date, isnt working. working. Stormwater Stormwater Detention Detention alone, does not protect the alone, does not protect the downstream environment. downstream environment. Detention Pond Key Findings Key Findings n n Green roofs are effective stormwater Green roofs are effective stormwater source controls at reducing runoff volumes source controls at reducing runoff volumes n n Intensive green roofs significantly Intensive green roofs significantly attenuate 2 and 5 year design storm events attenuate 2 and 5 year design storm events n n There appears to be an optimum break There appears to be an optimum break point in soil depth where added benefits point in soil depth where added benefits are more difficult to achieve. are more difficult to achieve. Location and Climatic Location and Climatic Context Context Canada USA Vancouver Vancouver Public Library White Rock Public Works Building Rainforest Climate Rainforest Climate n n Average annual rainfall 1100 mm Average annual rainfall 1100 mm n n 70% of rain during wet winter season 70% of rain during wet winter season n n Wet winters - long duration, low Wet winters - long duration, low intensity frontal storms intensity frontal storms n n Dry summers - shorter duration, more Dry summers - shorter duration, more intense convective storms intense convective storms Vancouver Vancouver Public Library Public Library Vancouver Public Library Green Roof Vancouver Public Library Vancouver Public Library n n Intensive green roof - 350 mm (14) soil Intensive green roof - 350 mm (14) soil layer with vegetation layer with vegetation n n 1850 m 1850 m 2 2 (20,000 sq ft) roof top garden with (20,000 sq ft) roof top garden with 20% impervious area 20% impervious area n n Designed by Designed by architect Moshe architect Moshe Safdie Safdie and and Landscape Architect Cornelia Hahn Landscape Architect Cornelia Hahn Oberlander Oberlander n n Constructed in 1995 Constructed in 1995 White Rock White Rock Public Works Building Public Works Building White Rock Public Works Building White Rock Public Works Building White Rock Public Works Building n n Extensive green roof 100 mm (4) soil Extensive green roof 100 mm (4) soil layer with slight vegetation layer with slight vegetation n n 200 m 200 m 2 2 (2,150 sq ft) rooftop. 72% of (2,150 sq ft) rooftop. 72% of rooftop is green rooftop is green n n Designed by Busby Associates Architects Designed by Busby Associates Architects n n Constructed in 2002. Building received Constructed in 2002. Building received LEED LEED Gold Gold certification certification VPL VPL Monitoring Program Monitoring Program Climate Station Monitoring Program Monitoring Program Climate Station Climate Station n n Rainfall Rainfall n n Humidity Humidity n n Wind speed/direction Wind speed/direction n n Gust speed Gust speed n n Soil moisture Soil moisture n n Temperature Temperature n n Solar radiation Solar radiation June 2003 to present June 2003 to present Flow Monitoring Equipment Monitoring Program Monitoring Program Flow Monitoring Flow Monitoring n n Water Meters for measuring large and low flows Water Meters for measuring large and low flows n n Teleg Teleg Datalogger Datalogger n n Collecting Data 5 min Collecting Data 5 min n n Maintenance - Monthly Maintenance - Monthly Monitoring Program Monitoring Program Rainfall June 2003 to present Rainfall June 2003 to present 64.4 64.4 40.2 40.2 September 2003 September 2003 May 2004 May 2004 74.9 74.9 17.0 17.0 April 2004 April 2004 105.4 105.4 135.8 135.8 March 2004 March 2004 115.6 115.6 83.4 83.4 February 2004 February 2004 131.6 131.6 161.4 161.4 January 2004 January 2004 161.2 161.2 113.2 113.2 December 2003 December 2003 167.2 167.2 167.4 167.4 November 2003 November 2003 115.3 115.3 248.2 248.2 October 2003 October 2003 38.1 38.1 4.1 4.1 August 2003 August 2003 36.1 36.1 19.8 19.8 July 2003 July 2003 45.7 45.7 12.8 12.8 June 2003 June 2003 Normal Normal Rain Rain Month Month Very Dry Oct 15-17 Nov 28 Monitoring Program Monitoring Program Challenges Challenges n n No Rain! No Rain! n n Too Much Rain! Too Much Rain! Stormwater Criteria Stormwater Criteria Targets Targets Protecting Our Pacific Salmon Protecting Our Pacific Salmon Stormwater Criteria Stormwater Criteria n n Federal Criteria (Fisheries and Oceans Canada) Federal Criteria (Fisheries and Oceans Canada) nn Capture Criteria (6-month - 24 hour) Capture Criteria (6-month - 24 hour) nn Flow Criteria (6-month, 2-year, 5-year 24 hour) Flow Criteria (6-month, 2-year, 5-year 24 hour) nn Water Quality Criteria Water Quality Criteria n n Provincial Criteria (Ministry of Water, Land and Provincial Criteria (Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection) Air Protection) nn Capture Criteria (50% Mean Annual Rainfall) Capture Criteria (50% Mean Annual Rainfall) nn Detention Criteria (6-month, Mean Annual Rainfall or 2- Detention Criteria (6-month, Mean Annual Rainfall or 2- year) year) nn Flood Criteria (100-year) Flood Criteria (100-year) Measured Relationships Between GVRD Watersheds Imperviousness based in 06-1996, B-IBI collected 01-1999 y = -0.4843x + 44.174 R 2 = 0.9197 y = 46.378e -0.0174x R 2 = 0.9462 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 %TIA B - I B I %TIA Linear (%TIA) Expon. (%TIA) Source: Greater Vancouver District, 2001 Roof Areas are Significant ! Roof Areas are Significant ! Typical Developed Watershed: Typical Developed Watershed: n n Commercial/Multi-family Commercial/Multi-family TIAs TIAs: : Roofs Roofs 40 - 60 % 40 - 60 % Parking/Driveways Parking/Driveways 30 - 10 % 30 - 10 % Streets Streets 30 - 20 % 30 - 20 % Landscaping Landscaping 0 - 10 % 0 - 10 % Definitions Definitions n n TIA - Total Impervious Area TIA - Total Impervious Area impenetrable areas (roofs, roads, impenetrable areas (roofs, roads, driveways, sidewalks) driveways, sidewalks) n n EIA - Effective Impervious Area EIA - Effective Impervious Area TIA that is directly connected to the TIA that is directly connected to the drainage system and provides a direct drainage system and provides a direct runoff response runoff response Rainfall Capture Target Rainfall Capture Target n n To maintain creek health and To maintain creek health and aquatic biodiversity and abundance, aquatic biodiversity and abundance, maintain maintain EIA less than 10% EIA less than 10% Approach Approach What growing medium depth is required What growing medium depth is required on both roofs to meet the 10% EIA on both roofs to meet the 10% EIA target (both capture and attenuation) ? target (both capture and attenuation) ? n n Calibrate computer model Calibrate computer model n n Run typical year rainfall for capture Run typical year rainfall for capture n n Run design storms for attenuation Run design storms for attenuation n n Select soil depths Select soil depths Hydrologic Hydrologic Modelling Modelling Hydrologic Modeling Hydrologic Modeling To estimate relative runoff responses To estimate relative runoff responses within the context of green roof, within the context of green roof, traditional roof and natural forested traditional roof and natural forested site site n n XPSWMM XPSWMM n n Physically based model based on EPA SWMM Physically based model based on EPA SWMM model model n n Key is the Groundwater Routine Key is the Groundwater Routine VPL Green Roof Runoff Calibration VPL Green Roof Runoff Calibration VPL Green Roof 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Oct 01 Oct 11 Oct 21 Oct 31 Nov 10 Nov 20 Nov 30 Dec 10 Dec 20 Dec 30 2003 R o o f
R u n o f f
( L / s ) 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 H o u r l y
R a i n f a l l
( m m ) Recorded Flow SWMM - Green Roof Rainfall White Rock Green Roof White Rock Green Roof Runoff Calibration Runoff Calibration White Rock Green Roof 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Oct 15 Oct 16 Oct 17 Oct 18 Oct 19 Oct 20 Oct 21 Oct 22 2003 R o o f
R u n o f f
( L / s ) 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 H o u r l y
R a i n f a l l
( m m / h r ) Recorded Flow SWMM - Green Roof Hourly Rainfall Green Roof Effectiveness Green Roof Effectiveness n n Stormwater effectiveness measured Stormwater effectiveness measured in two ways: in two ways: n n Runoff Volume Reduction (Capture criterion) Runoff Volume Reduction (Capture criterion) n n Runoff Peak Flow Attenuation (Detention Runoff Peak Flow Attenuation (Detention criterion) criterion) Effectiveness of VPL Green Roof Effectiveness of VPL Green Roof 2003-2004 Cumulative Volume 2003-2004 Cumulative Volume 100 % 0 % VPL Green Roof 1785 2147 1766 1559 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 Jul-03 Sep-03 Nov-03 Jan-04 Mar-04 May-04 C u m u l a t i v e
V o l u m e
( m 3 ) SWMM - Traditional Roof Recorded Volume SWMM - VPL Green Roof SWMM - Pre Development EIA 100% 35% 0% Effectiveness of VPL Green Roof Effectiveness of VPL Green Roof 1976 Typical Year Cumulative Volume 1976 Typical Year Cumulative Volume VPL Green Roof (Typical Year) 2084 1342 990 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan C u m u l a t i v e
V o l u m e
( m 3 ) SWMM - Traditional Roof SWMM - VPL Green Roof SWMM - Pre Development EIA 100% 32% 0% n n 350 mm soil provides 32% EIA and 350 mm soil provides 32% EIA and partial detention requirements partial detention requirements n n If green roof was 100% rooftop If green roof was 100% rooftop coverage, EIA would be 18% coverage, EIA would be 18% n n Close to 10% EIA target ! Close to 10% EIA target ! Effectiveness of VPL Green Roof Effectiveness of VPL Green Roof With Complete Roof Coverage: With Complete Roof Coverage: n n 200 mm soil required for 30% EIA 200 mm soil required for 30% EIA n n 350 mm soil required for 18% EIA 350 mm soil required for 18% EIA n n 575 mm soil required for 10% EIA 575 mm soil required for 10% EIA (Annual Rainfall 1200 mm) (Annual Rainfall 1200 mm) (Pan Evaporation 670 mm) (Pan Evaporation 670 mm) Effectiveness of VPL Green Roof Effectiveness of VPL Green Roof Effectiveness of VPL Green Roof Effectiveness of VPL Green Roof 6-month Design Storm - Wet Soils 6-month Design Storm - Wet Soils VPL Green Roof - Wet Initial Conditions (6-month 24-hour event) 0 0.0002 0.0004 0.0006 0.0008 0.001 0.0012 0.0014 0.0016 Feb-01 00:00 Feb-01 06:00 Feb-01 12:00 Feb-01 18:00 Feb-02 00:00 Feb-02 06:00 Feb-02 12:00 Feb-02 18:00 Feb-03 00:00 F l o w
( m 3 / s ) SWMM - Traditional Roof SWMM - VPL Green Roof SWMM - Pre Development Effectiveness of VPL Green Roof Effectiveness of VPL Green Roof 2-Year Design Storm - Wet Soils 2-Year Design Storm - Wet Soils VPL Green Roof - Wet Initial Conditions (2-year 24-hour event) 0 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0025 Feb-01 00:00 Feb-01 06:00 Feb-01 12:00 Feb-01 18:00 Feb-02 00:00 Feb-02 06:00 Feb-02 12:00 Feb-02 18:00 Feb-03 00:00 F l o w
( m 3 / s ) SWMM - Traditional Roof SWMM - VPL Green Roof SWMM - Pre Development Effectiveness of VPL Green Roof Effectiveness of VPL Green Roof 5-Year Design Storm - Wet Soils 5-Year Design Storm - Wet Soils VPL Green Roof - Wet Initial Conditions (5-year 24-hour event) 0 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0025 0.003 0.0035 Feb-01 00:00 Feb-01 06:00 Feb-01 12:00 Feb-01 18:00 Feb-02 00:00 Feb-02 06:00 Feb-02 12:00 Feb-02 18:00 Feb-03 00:00 F l o w
( m 3 / s ) SWMM - Traditional Roof SWMM - VPL Green Roof SWMM - Pre Development Peak Flow Attenuation (Real Rainfall) Peak Flow Attenuation (Real Rainfall) n n 80% reduction in dryer summer 80% reduction in dryer summer conditions with small rainfall events conditions with small rainfall events n n 50% reduction in wetter winter 50% reduction in wetter winter conditions with small rainfall events conditions with small rainfall events and <5% with larger events and <5% with larger events Effectiveness of VPL Green Roof Effectiveness of VPL Green Roof 1976 Typical Year Cumulative Volume 1976 Typical Year Cumulative Volume Effectiveness of White Rock Roof Effectiveness of White Rock Roof White Rock Green Roof (Typical Year) 208 152 96 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan C u m u l a t i v e
V o l u m e
( m 3 ) SWMM - Traditional Roof SWMM - WR Green Roof SWMM - Pre Development EIA 100% 50% 0% n n 100 mm soil provides 50% EIA 100 mm soil provides 50% EIA n n If green roof was 100% rooftop If green roof was 100% rooftop coverage, EIA would be 37% coverage, EIA would be 37% n n Higher than our adopted 10% Higher than our adopted 10% target, but significantly lower than target, but significantly lower than the 100 % TIA prior to construction the 100 % TIA prior to construction n n Less than 10% reduction in Less than 10% reduction in stormwater stormwater peaks during saturated peaks during saturated soil conditions soil conditions Effectiveness of White Rock Roof Effectiveness of White Rock Roof Conclusions Conclusions Conclusions Conclusions n n Intensive Green Roofs are working to Intensive Green Roofs are working to reduce reduce stormwater stormwater runoff peaks runoff peaks n n Extensive and Intensive green roofs are Extensive and Intensive green roofs are working to reduce working to reduce stormwater stormwater volumes volumes n n Soil depths must be sized appropriately Soil depths must be sized appropriately n n Meets capture criterion but requires Meets capture criterion but requires additional detention to meet full SW additional detention to meet full SW criteria criteria Conclusions Conclusions Other Benefits Other Benefits n n Reduction in Thermal Loading to Creeks Reduction in Thermal Loading to Creeks Water leaving the green roof is considerably Water leaving the green roof is considerably cooler than traditional roof surfaces cooler than traditional roof surfaces Other Suggestions Other Suggestions n n Promote more wind activity on roof tops Promote more wind activity on roof tops (ET values will increase substantially over (ET values will increase substantially over ground values) ground values) n n Plant vegetation that doesnt require Plant vegetation that doesnt require irrigation after becoming established irrigation after becoming established n n WATCH SOIL MIX ! Sandy soils do little WATCH SOIL MIX ! Sandy soils do little for rainfall capture. Try to pick mixes for rainfall capture. Try to pick mixes with higher field capacities (i.e. > 26%) with higher field capacities (i.e. > 26%)