0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
145 Ansichten7 Seiten
The document summarizes a journal article that studied students' attitudes toward e-learning in English for Specific Purposes courses. It reviewed literature on e-learning and described the study's methodology, which used questionnaires to examine differences in attitudes between law students and law/management students. The study found no significant differences in attitudes between student groups. It concluded that more research is needed to better understand students' e-learning attitudes but that e-learning may be suitable for tertiary education.
The document summarizes a journal article that studied students' attitudes toward e-learning in English for Specific Purposes courses. It reviewed literature on e-learning and described the study's methodology, which used questionnaires to examine differences in attitudes between law students and law/management students. The study found no significant differences in attitudes between student groups. It concluded that more research is needed to better understand students' e-learning attitudes but that e-learning may be suitable for tertiary education.
The document summarizes a journal article that studied students' attitudes toward e-learning in English for Specific Purposes courses. It reviewed literature on e-learning and described the study's methodology, which used questionnaires to examine differences in attitudes between law students and law/management students. The study found no significant differences in attitudes between student groups. It concluded that more research is needed to better understand students' e-learning attitudes but that e-learning may be suitable for tertiary education.
MATRIC NUMBER : TGB140028 CODE & COURSE TITLE : TXGX 6304 (LANGUAGE FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES) DATE OF SUBMISSION : 9 OCTOBER 2014 LECTURERS NAME : DR. BALJIT KAUR ASSIGNMENT TITLE : JOURNAL ARTICLE REVIEW
2
JOURNAL ARTICLE REVIEW Kavaliauskiene, G. (2012). English for Specific Purposes: E-Learning. ESP World, 34 (12). Retrieved from http://esp-world.info/Articles_34/Issue_34.htm
1.0 OBJECTIVES / AIM OF THE RESEARCH Kavaliauskiene (2012) conducted a study on the influence of e-learning between two groups of students from different specializations. This research sought to examine students attitude towards e-learning in the traditional English for Specific Purposes (ESP) classes thus drawing conclusions about suitability of e-learning at the tertiary level. The study reveals that students from the two groups responded differently towards online learning. The results agreed with the prediction since considerable differences existed in personal interest. In addition, the results also differ within the different groups of the same specialization. The results of this study prove insight into the importance of recognizing students attitude in educational experiences via online technology.
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW The term e-learning has broad concepts as it comprises of all forms of electronically supported learning (Hockly & Clandfield, 2010). Online learning could refer to the learning out- of-classroom or in-classroom using technology. There are four types of e-learning courses. First, the course outlines face-to-face learning where 70% are to be done in the classroom with the 3
online support. Second, blended learning course where 50% learning is in the classroom and 50% via online learning. Third, the course is mainly online with infrequent classroom meetings. Lastly, the well-known distance learning. The researcher focuses more on the blended learning as her previous study was regarding blended learning in online listening. The practice of blended learning has proved to be beneficial for improving students listening skills and improving professional vocabulary. Blended learning is more relevant in the world of education (Sharma, 2010) as it integrate traditional learning with web based online approaches and technologies. Rapid development and opportunities in the Internet technology make possible the practice of all language skills needed in learning and teaching of English. Few conditions were outlined by Egbert et al (1999) in order to create a successful online teaching. Learners should have the opportunities to interact and negotiate meaning as well as interact in the target language. In addition, learners have to be intricate with the authentic tasks in a stress-free language learning environment. Teachers also have to provide feedback to learners regarding their success and achievement in learning. According to Means et al (2009), most empirical studies of online learning focuses on the comparison of online learning to a face-to-face condition and the degree of student learning outcomes. Most participants in a study by Manca et al. chose face-to-face learning rather than online activities. The factors of online approach resistance are mainly due to cultural and logistic factors. On the other hand, reasons to opt for online are mainly due to personal interest and motivation. A follow up research to examine the factors affecting students satisfaction with flexible online learning suggested that students positive perceptions of technology lie in terms 4
of ease of access and flexible online learning materials. They also prefer the autonomous and innovative learning mode in online learning classes (Drennan, J. et al., 2005).
3.0 METHODOLOGY & THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK The sample was nonrandom, including 75 full time 1 st year students at Mykolas Romeris University. Within the sample, 27 students (2 groups) study English for Law, while 48 students (4 groups) study English for Law and Management. Students proficiency was B2 or C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. The design of the ESP course was adjusted to the requirement for a Bachelor of Social Science degree as well as to cater students needs in professional language. The instrument utilized includes a questionnaire on students attitude to e-learning. The questionnaire consists of 7 statements. A Likert Scale was then given to each statement ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). This produced an ordinal level data set. The Software Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used to analyze the data for differences between Law students and Law & Management groups. Statistical processing of the findings by a means of SPSS included frequencies of responses, Cronbachs Alpha coefficients of reliability, Standard Deviations of two samples of respondents, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Pearsons correlation coefficients. The methods used to gather the data in this article were not clearly explained as the instruments, development and the reliability of all stated tests were not given.
5
4.0 ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS The researcher presented the findings using bar chart included negative responses (strongly disagree and disagree) and positive responses (strongly agree and agree). The analysis showed there were no significant differences between students of different specializations as well as students of different groups within the same specialization. Internal consistency reliability has been estimated by computing Cronbachs Alpha coefficient. The computed values for the positive have been equal to .874 and .880 for the negative responses. Therefore, the obtained results are reliable. No linear relationship has been found for the positive responses between both samples by using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. However, a linear relationship for negative responses has been found at the significance of .009 which indicates that the findings may be extended beyond the examined limited number of respondents.
5.0 STRENGTHS The natural generalizability for the study is fairly high because the respondents were from similar background which is Law (English for Law and English for Law & Management). Besides, English level proficiency was slightly similar for all respondents (B2 and C1). The results and data are reliable as the researcher chose to obtain them by the means of SPSS. The feature of SPSS is testable including comprehensive statistical for the analysis of quantitative data (Punch, 2009).
6
6.0 LIMITATIONS The population was inadequate due to limited number of respondents. The power of the study needs to be increased by obtaining a larger sample size. The researcher did not follow a specific theoretical framework as methodology descriptions were unclear and too simple. Approaches of conducting the ESP courses and procedures of collecting data were crucial, yet were not expressed by the researcher. In addition, only questionnaire with 7 statements were used as an instrument in this study. Additional statements of questionnaire could have helped reduce internal validity in the study. With additional information, the researcher may have been able to analyze the result in details and more specific. In summary, it has to be admitted that this research is still far from being conclusive. Further studies must be undertaken which will better measure students attitude towards e-learning.
7
REFERENCES Drennan, J., Kennedy, J., & Pisarski, A. (2005). A Factor Affecting Student Attitudes Toward Flexible Online Learning in Management Education. Journal of Educational Research, 98 (6), 331-338. Egbert, J., Chao, C., & Hanson-Smith, E. (1999). Computer-Enhanced Language Learning Environments: An Overview. In CALL Environments. VA: TESOL. Hockly, N., & Clandfield, L. (2010). Teaching Online: Tools and Techniques, Options and Opportunities. Delta Publishing. Kavaliauskiene, G. (2012). English for Specific Purposes: E-Learning. ESP World, 34 (12). Retrieved from http://esp-world.info/Articles_34/Issue_34.htm Manca, S., Persico, D., & Sarti, L. On Students Teachers Attitude Towards Online Learning. Retrieved from http://www.actapress.com Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of Evidence- Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Retrieved from http://repository.alt.ac.uk/629 Punch, K.F. (2009). Introduction to Research Methods in Education. London: Sage. Sharma, P. (2010). Blended Learning. ELT Journal, 64 (4), 456-458.