1

www.pm.gov.au





PRIME MINISTER

10 October 2014

TRANSCRIPT OF THE PRIME MINISTER
THE HON. TONY ABBOTT MP
COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENTS PRESS CONFERENCE
PARLIAMENT HOUSE, CANBERRA

Subjects: Council of Australian Governments Meeting.

E&OE.

PRIME MINISTER:

Id like to thank my colleagues, my colleague heads of government, for the constructive work that weve
done so far today. Obviously these are challenging times for our country, there are difficulties and
uncertainties abroad. The great thing about our country is that we always rise to the challenges that we face
and whatever the challenges are they are always best faced by a country which is strong, prosperous and
united. This whole COAG process is about the different levels of government working constructively and
cooperatively together to face the internal and external challenges that our country has to meet. Weve had a
very good discussion today but as always the objective of all of our discussions is to produce higher
economic growth and more jobs. One of the key elements of our discussions today was our commitment to
more and better infrastructure. As you know the recent Commonwealth Budget was, amongst other things,
the biggest infrastructure budget in Commonwealth history. As you know I wish to be known as the
infrastructure Prime Minister and I like to think that my colleague first Ministers are competing with each
other to be known as the infrastructure Premiers certainly together we want to build the 21
st
century
infrastructure that our country so badly needs.

There were various other issues that we looked at in some depth today. We obviously talked about the need
for constant cooperation and vigilance in internal and national security matters. We talked quite extensively
about the appropriate response to some of the issues identified in the Forrest Review of indigenous
employment. We talked about the upcoming White Paper on Reform of the Federation. From time to time
inevitably there are issues on which we disagree but I do think that I can say that there was very constructive
spirit today, a desire for all levels of government in this country to work together wherever we can to make a
difference for the Australian people. Yes, we would like our federation to be in some ways less complex.
We would like our federation to be less marked by overlap and duplication and that is one of the
fundamental objectives of the White Paper process upon which we are embarked.

But we do know that whatever happens, different levels of government in this country will continue to work
together constructively, collegially and cooperatively to solve the problems that we face.

2
www.pm.gov.au
So I thank my brother and sister first Minister colleagues and I might ask Campbell Newman, as the Leader
of the Council of the Australian Federation to offer his thoughts.

PREMIER NEWMAN:

Thanks very much Prime Minister. Ladies and gentlemen todays COAG meeting has been a very
constructive and productive meeting and there really is a sense of collegiality in those deliberations. The two
things particularly I think are most significant are firstly; that Australians should know that the
commonwealth, its agencies, the AFP and the state and territory police services and police forces are
working together very closely in these challenging times to protect the nation, to protect our families and we
received briefings on the situation and obviously discussed preparations as well for G20 and I just want to
assure people that there is no stone being left unturned in terms of doing the very best for our community
and Australians should be reassured of that. We also reflected on the need to maintain that great sense of
community harmony that we have in this wonderful multicultural country and there will be efforts of both
the commonwealth and the states working to ensure that we maintain that community cohesion, again in
some very challenging times. Turning to the White Paper on the Federation, this is something I think that is
incredibly important and I believe that we now have a very clear path forward, and we had a very productive
informal conversation this morning, actually over breakfast with the PM, we all want to make a difference
here. Its particularly important, why does it matter? I say to the man and woman in the street and
particularly young people that our federation is a federation that works well in terms of a global comparison
but it could be potentially made to work better. If we can make it work better we can get economic benefits,
we can create more jobs, we can see government deliver services more efficiently and effectively and
basically spend the taxpayers dollar more wisely. There are also great opportunities to improve that frontline
service delivery. So for example in health and education particularly, I think ultimately resolving some of
these issues can see the states and territories and the commonwealth do a better job for all Australian
citizens. So we have a path forward for the White Paper and I think thats an incredibly important initiative
and probably in my view, putting aside the current challenges of the security situation, is probably the
biggest single issue for COAG to deal with. Thank you.

PREMIER NAPTHINE:

Thank you very much Prime Minister and it has been a very constructive and productive day. From
Victorias perspective we appreciate the briefing on the security issues and particularly we want to highlight
the $13.4 million that has been allocated for community engagement. We believe that working with our
diverse multicultural community and particularly with our Islamic community, I think this is the best way to
make our community safer in the long run, to celebrate our peaceful, harmonious, multicultural community.
I also welcome the decision with regard to infrastructure funding. We appreciate the funding provided in the
budget for asset recycling but we also appreciate the work done today so that interest earned can be used for
more productive assets into the future for infrastructure for states to drive jobs, drive our economy and grow
the economy of our states and Australia.

PREMIER WEATHERILL:

Thank you Prime Minister. We appreciated the briefings we received from commonwealth agencies about
the steps taken to keep Australians safe and we were reassured in those briefings. I think that I speak for
everybody when we say that we want to send the clearest possible message to our Islamic communities, here
in Australia, to say that they are valued citizens of Australia. Our thoughts in particular are with women in
those communities who because of the nature of their dress may attract some attention and we are aware of
some negative attention that theyve received. We want to commit ourselves to reaching out to those people
that have perhaps been the subject of unfair criticism and say that you are welcome, you are a valued part of
our community. I want to say just one thing about the White Paper process. When we came to the last
COAG meeting we had an agreed process, we then had a federal budget that left us all $80 billion short in
terms of our health and education funding. Thats something that we continue to agitate with the
commonwealth, its something which amounts in our view to a breach of agreement and is something thats
3
www.pm.gov.au
not sustainable for states and territories. Having said that, todays resolution is that in the future there will be
a joint process and we hope that the processes will be joint processes in the future.

CHIEF MINISTER GALLAGHER:

Thank you Prime Minister and again I support the comments that have been previously made by other first
Ministers. I think the briefings on counter terrorism and security were very useful and did certainly I think
ensures the Australian communities safety is first and foremost in those agencies, actions and the work thats
underway. I think it also made it very clear that for the political leadership of this country our focus needs to
be in the area that Jay spoke around, around ensuring community cohesion, ensuring that we are providing
the leadership thats needed to ensure that there arent particular communities targeted during this time of
security uncertainty. So it was good to hear everyone spoke very passionately about that. In relation to the
Federation White Paper, again, I sense there is a strong will around the table on the federation and tax
reform White Paper to really see what opportunities there are to improve the federation and the federal
financial arrangements of the country. But with opportunities come risk and I think everybody has those in
front of their minds as well. So theres a lot more work to do but at least the conversation is being prepared
to be had. The only other thing Id say is on the NDIS, the reports on the NDIS and from the ACTs point of
view were very happy with how NDIS is being implemented. I think you know this is a massive change.
Weve given a lot of responsibility to the NDIA and I think we should acknowledge the hard work thats
done by that agency and the board in implementing this massive change and from the ACTs point of view,
were very happy with how its going. Its early days but I think credit where credit is due and it is to all of
those people whove been prepared to take a risk and get involved in NDIS and its working well.

FELICITY-ANN LEWIS:

Thank you Prime Minister. I guess I want to reiterate the comments made by the first Ministers with the
issues around the counter terrorism provisions that have been undertaken. I think like the previous speakers
have said, the issues around community harmony and particularly for us at the Local Government level, who
are very much at the interface on a daily basis with the citizenship ceremonies and other festivals and
celebrations and just the front counter engagement with people across all cultural groups, I have also heard
stories of women, particularly being targeted in our shopping malls and so on. So we certainly want to reach
out to all of the citizens in the community and you know talk to them about the fact that we need to all live
together, be respectful of each other and try and continue to develop the fabulously multicultural community
that we have. I guess the other issue for us, the Federation White Paper, is one as I mentioned at the last
COAG meeting that sees for Local Government an opportunity for us to talk with the other spheres of
government about how Local Government will actually be identified and actually realistically portrayed in
the way we operate and its very different to what the constitution currently identifies as the way that the
governance of the country actually was outlined back 114 years ago, so for us in our failed attempt at a
referendum last year, I think for us were hoping that well get to see, particularly an alignment with the
taxation White Paper as well, those fiscal challenges that we have and the opportunities that will present.
But as Katy said I mean with these kinds of things there are always risks as well, so certainly we want to be
part of that and I thank the Prime Minister for allowing us to be part of that and on the steering committee
and we look forward to hearing more about the steering committee that youre working on bringing forward
as well to get the community engaged with this process. Prime Minister its my last COAG so I just want to
thank you and previous Prime Minister Gillard and the first Ministers for their acceptance and warmth and
friendship over the last two years. Its been a pleasure to be here and to represent Local Government. Thank
you.

PREMIER BAIRD:

Thanks Prime Minister. I think the word that comes to my mind on the back of the discussion today is
partnership. I think what we saw in the counter terrorism measures was a clear collective will around the
table on working together on partnership. What weve seen was an unbelievable effort by our agencies
today, a deep appreciation of the effort and work that has been undertaken and a firm commitment to
4
www.pm.gov.au
continue that partnership because it is critical it happens, it is happening and its happening in a way I think
that every Australian could be very proud and certainly the Prime Minister has stressed that. This is
something that we need to do together. At the same time, on the issue thats been raised, in terms of
community cohesion, a partnership, the Federal Government has allocated additional resources, it is
something we all welcomed and something that all the states and territories will come alongside. We need to
ensure that harmony is maintained where communities are hurting, and they are, we need to ensure we
provide an opportunity to help them and to ensure that harmony is at the core of what we do and certainly
not fear. So thats a positive response. On the matters of white papers, in terms of taxation and federation,
again, it is partnership. We have challenges. There are many challenges we face fiscally, service delivery,
but ultimately the way we can achieve reform is in partnership by doing it together and that was a
commitment of the Prime Minister, it was a commitment around the table that this is a genuine process and a
real opportunity to undertake meaningful reform. Its something that we look forward to with relish and
were very excited to participate in and we certainly believe partnership will achieve many things rather than
try to do it alone.

PREMIER BARNETT:

Ill choose some different topics. First one; I was pleased today that we basically concluded and agreed that
the commonwealth would have a single agency for handling overseas adoptions, that is sensible. Personally
Ive made the case that I think that agencies should ultimately take responsibility for surrogacy. The states
have got no opportunity or no prospect of managing that in a sensible way, though I acknowledge that thats
probably an issue for a little bit further down the track. You would be disappointed if I didnt raise the GST
as I have done on every COAG I have been to. I just make one comment about that, and I know its probably
sounded over the years as a little bit like a whinge from the west, today I made the point and I think I got
some understanding that the GST which was introduced to be a source of stability to the states and a source
of stability in commonwealth state relations, has now become the greatest source of instability. Now,
Western Australia has been adversely affected over recent years but the point I would emphasise today is
that the system has failed to the extent that unfortunately Campbell your state is next in the firing line,
Queensland will lose funding and then New South Wales will lose funding. So I would like to think I might
have made some progress in terms of eventually winning the argument, the challenge now is to put in a
stable system of funding otherwise were going to have I think a fair bit of chaos from one state to another
in a cyclical pattern.

PREMIER HODGMAN:

Thanks, Prime Minister: My commitment to Tasmanians when I come to these meetings is to work sensibly
and constructively to get good outcomes for my state, not to use it as a platform for political grandstanding. I
believe that Tasmanians expect that from me and my commitment is to work in partnership with my federal
and state and territory colleagues to get good outcomes and we have discussed a wide range of issues today.
Not all of which have been mentioned at this forum so far, but a number of which will be, in my view,
positive developments out of today's meeting as well. Tasmania is a state that needs to be open for business
and the new government, just a few weeks after delivering our first budget, is determined to work in
partnership and to invest strategically and to secure good partnerships.

The infrastructure partnership we have just signed will mean about $800 million in road funding into
Tasmania to improve our road networks. That is an important investment in unlocking Tasmania's economic
potential. I am very interested, in fact came here to seek assurances about our safety as the island state and to
be assured by federal agencies that we, as an island state, are indeed under constant supervision and
receiving the necessary support and I was pleased to receive that today. As Tasmania's minister for
Aboriginal affairs I was really pleased to see significant progress at a national level and to understand how
that might be applied to my state and to indigenous people in Tasmania via the Forrest review. There are
some very important ideas for us to consider. Some recommendations to contemplate that I think can deliver
broad benefit to our community and especially the indigenous community.

5
www.pm.gov.au
CHIEF MINISTER GILES:

Prime Minister, thanks very much for the opportunity today and thanks very much for your leadership over
the security of the nation, I think its been an outstanding job, both you and the security forces in this
country. You should be congratulated on that. I think the update we were provided today was sound advice
for us. It is a challenge for all Australians. We have to get it right 100 per cent of the time. The bad guys
have to get it right once. So, congratulations to date, we all need to remain very diligent in the way we do
our job.

In regards to the white paper, that presents an opportunity for the Northern Territory to raise particular issues
around the future of the Northern Territory in terms of statehood, an opportunity for us to talk about the
Aboriginal Land Rights Act and the ownership or the management of land tenure for 50 per cent of the
jurisdiction. It also gives us an opportunity to talk about the ownership of national parks in the Northern
Territory, something that is really important to Territorians in how we move forward progressively on an
economic sense. The discussion around indigenous affairs allowed myself the opportunity to again talk
about those similar issues, to talk about how if we want to advance indigenous Australians within the
Northern Territory's jurisdiction, we have got to stop looking at things through a social prism and start
looking at them through an economic prism. Weve got to reflect on things such as since the commencement
of the Aboriginal Land Rights Act in 1976, no new mines of any national significance have been created.
Only two new hydrocarbon leases have actually been introduced in 2014 nothing for 38 years. The Land
Rights Act has held Aboriginal people back in the Northern Territory. We continue to hear about it, we
continue to hear negative statistics about it. If we are going to be serious about Aboriginal reform in COAG,
we have to address these fundamental issues. So that was an opportunity to talk about that.

I would like to thank COAG first ministers for their support around the developments of constructing a gas
pipeline between the Northern Territory and Moomba in South Australia. An opportunity to start to create a
wholesale domestic gas market which can meet the needs of both state and territory jurisdictions on the
eastern sea board but also start to support the manufacturing industry who face certain challenges around
increases in domestic gas prices on the eastern sea board. We are working hard to be able to bring that to
realisation through financing through the private sector and to have COAG's support to be able to do that, in
principle I think represents a good solid state where we can start moving towards nation building
infrastructure rather than just doing things such as putting shelters over basketball courts as we saw in the
Northern Territory under the building the revolution programme.

Thank you.

PRIME MINISTER:

Thank you, Adam. Thank you, colleagues.

Are there any questions?

QUESTION:

The communique mentions that the state parliaments or state governments have committed to introduce
amendments to their parliaments in relation to security laws. Are you, Prime Minister, or any of the Premiers
able to give any clarity on what sorts of amendments you're looking at in the security space that the state
parliaments should bring into effect?

PRIME MINISTER:

If you look at the security laws that the Howard Government introduced from 2003 onwards, they were all
mirrored in the state relevant state legislation and my hope and expectation is that the new security laws
that we are bringing in at the moment will likewise be mirrored in state legislation. So, were all in this
6
www.pm.gov.au
together. This is not a party political issue. This is a national security issue. This is an issue of keeping
Australians safe and we all want to ensure that and the best way to do so is to make sure that there are no
loopholes that can be exploited by people who would do us harm and a harmonisation of security laws is
very important.

Andrew?

QUESTION:

My question is to both Mike Baird and to Campbell Newman. You have heard from your WA colleague, he
says that your states are next in line. Are you willing conscripts to Colin Barnett's war on the GST? And
Will Hodgman, you can jump in whenever you like.

PRIME MINISTER:

But Andrew, if I may say so, this was not your bunfight over money that I know makes great sport for the
media, but which doesn't make for a very constructive government. We all know that there are issues with
horizontal fiscal equalisation. We all know that there are issues with vertical fiscal imbalance. The important
thing is to address these things in a calm and measured and collegial way and that is what this white paper
process is about. I hope at the end of the white paper process that we have a system which is more rational,
more transparent and no less fair than the existing system. We all appreciate that in the end the stronger
states will in a sense allow for the less strong states. The question is getting an arrangement which is
transparent and fair. Maybe the current arrangement is fair but it is certainly isnt transparent and these are
the sorts of things that we need to explore as part of the white paper process.

PREMIER BAIRD:

The Prime Minister is absolutely right. We have a forum to discuss them. We are on the record for a
considerable period supporting earnings per capita. That is something that makes a lot of sense and it gives
much more stability to your budgeting and thats really what Colin is talking about. He forgot to say that
WA did for a considerable period get a large donation from New South Wales. That is the issue. It is the
stability in your budgeting and that is something that can be addressed as the Prime Minister said as part of
the white paper process.

PREMIER CAMPBELL:

I think Colin's point is well made and it is recognised and the processes that we have outlined for the white
paper and for the federation and the tax white paper allow us to work through those things. But frankly, if
you ask me what keeps me awake at night, or my treasurer Tim Nicholls, it is dealing with the fact that right
now we pay $4 billion a year on the accumulated debt that we have inherited and the asset leasing
programme we announced this week will see that reduced by 25-30 per cent, that interest bill. Yes, the GST
is significant but as a here and now, that is the thing that we have got to deal with and we're thinking about,
if I may say so. We structurally have to deal with the whole HFE thing and the GST. Colin is right but we
have a process in place now I think to deal with that.

PRIME MINISTER:

The point I keep making, Andrew whenever we have these issues thrown at us is, sure, they should be
dealt with. They have got to be dealt with fairly. They have got to be dealt with in a way which doesn't
disadvantage the areas of our country that are less economically strong but, in the end, everything goes
better if you have got a strong and growing economy. Jobs and growth that is what we're all focused on.



7
www.pm.gov.au
QUESTION:

Prime Minister, you said that you discussed the Forrest report but you have already said that that won't be
implemented in full. What recommendations were agreed upon today and will we see any immediate
changes in the running of indigenous affairs?

PRIME MINISTER:

Well, we had a discussion today, not a let's go through each recommendation in detail and say yes or no.
There is a Commonwealth process in place which we are currently going through. Once we have done that
we then need to go through a process with the states and that is going to happen very soon and at some point
in the not too distant future there will be a public response which will involve all of us in some respects to
the Forrest report. What we do need to ensure is that much more in the future than in the past is coordination
and consistency between different levels of government. All of us are full of good intentions here. There has
been no end of good intentions over the last 30 or 40 years and there has been a hell of a lot of very worthy
programmes and projects, but all too often as everyone along this bench knows you have got one lot
doing a whole lot of useful things, another lot doing a whole lot of useful things and we can quite often end
up unconsciously, subconsciously, inadvertently working against each other. Sometimes, we all end up
running around like headless chooks here rather than making headway together. So, there needs to be a lot
more coordination in all areas of indigenous policy in the future than there has been in the past.

QUESTION:

Prime Minister, on health we know there are differences on health funding in the out years and I think I
heard the Victorian Premier on the way in this morning saying he had an agreement with the former
government on this issue and we know that the Premier believes incoming governments should honour deals
that have been done by a current or former government. What have you agreed today can you clear this up
in terms of how youre going to progress this?

PREMIER NAPTHINE:

My comments were about education.

QUESTION:

Ok, but on health we know there is a disagreement there as well. So what have actually because you did
talk about health today what have you agreed in terms of the discussion that will go forward from here?

PRIME MINISTER:

What we have agreed on is a white paper process going forward. I know that there was a lot of reaction to
some elements of the recent Budget and I think that everyone along this bench accepts that in the end each
government will do what each government feels it has to do in particular circumstances. But, obviously, our
federation will work better if there is as much communication as possible and over time if governments can
be more sovereign in their own sphere. We only had that problem arising out of the Budget because
Commonwealth Governments fund public schools and public hospitals, but we don't actually run public
schools and public hospitals. Now, we don't have a prescriptive answer. What we have is a process. And I
want to say about the process that there are some basic parameters within which it will work. First of all, we
don't want to see any increase in the overall burden of tax. Second, we don't want to see any reduction in the
overall level of service and very importantly, things will only change if there is a substantial consensus,
because while there are many aspects of our federation that do leave something to be desired, it is still, by
any normal consideration, a strong and successful federation.


8
www.pm.gov.au
QUESTION:

You all meet today with the latest constitutional survey showing that faith in the Federal Government has
fallen in the last two years and faith in state governments isn't that great either. Why do you think the public
continues to lose faith in the Federal Government? And I wonder if any of the Premiers have any view on
why the states aren't doing a particularly well? I wonder if you sought any advice from the local government
people who seem to be doing better?

PRIME MINISTER:

Well, I think these surveys are lagging indicators, if I may say so! Look, at any time, there are always going
to be sections of our community that are disappointed with government, whether it is local government, state
government, national government, there are always going to be people who are disappointed with
government because, let's face it, we cannot do everything that everyone would like us to do immediately.
We just can't. What we have to strive to do is to effectively meet the challenges of our nation and I have got
to say that I think that this Government, not perfectly, but with far more success than our critics might have
conceded, we have repealed the carbon tax, we have repealed the mining tax. We have more or less stopped
the boats. We are working more effectively than the critics would concede to bring the Budget back into
balance and I think over time, if government is competent and trustworthy, the public will respond
appropriately. Now, Im certainly not in the business of panicking in the face of opinion polls, and look, you
ask people do you trust government and the typical Australian reaction is to say, "Of course not". But I think
that over time competent and trustworthy government will build the sort of public respect that we would all
like to see.

QUESTION:

Could I ask a question, perhaps if Premiers Newman or Baird would like to comment, too, on a tangential
issue the decision by China overnight to place tariffs on Metallurgical and coking coal. Prime Minister, do
you see this as an impediment towards the FTA and does anyone have any revenue concerns, lowering
exports, et cetera?

PRIME MINISTER:

Well, I think this is a sign of how valuable the FTA will be to our country should we secure it in the next
few months because this is the kind of hiccup in our biggest and most important trading relationship that we
just don't want or need. I think that we will work with the Chinese to get to the bottom of what seems to
have happened overnight but at least as important as that is trying to ensure that this vital relationship is put
on the strongest possible long-term footing and that is what the Free Trade Agreement is all about.

QUESTION:

Does that mean that thats now become another sticking point in the final stages of that FTA process?

PRIME MINISTER:

No. When I last spoke to Andrew Robb about this and it was a few days ago because I haven't had a
chance to talk to him about this particular issue he was confident that things were on track. What we want
is an agreement which secures better access to Chinese markets for our exports, particularly our agricultural
exports, in return for giving Australian consumers lower cost access to Chinese imports to this country.
Now, I think it is clearly in the interests of both countries that this agreement be finalised and finalised soon.
From time to time, there are always hiccups in trade relationships even the very best of relationships
sometimes they have hiccups but the more reliable, the more solid the foundation, the less likely these
hiccups are and that is why this Free Trade Agreement is very important.

9
www.pm.gov.au
QUESTION:

In your discussion about indigenous affairs, did you touch on the referendum and where are you up to on
that?

PRIME MINISTER:

Michelle, I did give my colleague first ministers an update on where I think it is all going. I don't want to say
publicly anything about that at this stage because if we are to achieve the outcome all of us want, it is
important that there be a high level of bipartisanship and its also important that there be a high level of
discussion not just with the indigenous community but certainly including the indigenous community and
there are some discussions that need to take place before I think I can be too prescriptive about what the next
steps are, suffice to say that I am determined that we will have this referendum. I am determined that we will
soon set a date for the referendum and I am determined that we should try as hard as we humanly can to
conduct the referendum discussion in a constructive way; that we should try to avoid the kind of high-
pitched shouting which sometimes mars public debates in this country. Over recent months and weeks, we
have managed to have, I think, a very constructive bipartisanship on national security. For some years now,
we have been able to avoid a hyper-partisanship in indigenous affairs and I certainly want that to continue in
the weeks and months and years ahead.

QUESTION:

Do you want to settle on a form of words before you set the date?

PRIME MINISTER:

No. I think it is important to set a date because I think that will help to crystallise the debate. There are
obviously a number of ongoing processes, most particularly the process which is being led by Ken Wyatt's
parliamentary committee. Those processes will continue for a period of time but I think prior to those
processes concluding, we certainly can set a date so that everyone knows that we are serious about trying to
make this happen.

QUESTION:

[inaudible] the date is beyond the next election?

PRIME MINISTER:

Im just not going to get into further discussion, Michelle.

QUESTION:

What have you agreed to in relation to setting up a single agency for handling overseas adoptions? How will
that work in with state laws?

PRIME MINISTER:

We are not into changing laws here, so much as trying to ensure that the process of overseas adoption is
much easier than it currently is. At the moment, if you want to adopt, you typically go to a state adoption
agency, you consider the issue generally and at some point, often enough, you will decide that you are going
to have a go at overseas adoption because that is more prospective than local adoption. Then, as things
stand, you have got to navigate, largely unaided, a thicket of Commonwealth agencies, and so what we want
to establish is a Commonwealth agency, it might be a governmental agency or it might be an NGO, but a
Commonwealth agency one way or another that will basically take people by the hand and lead them from
10
www.pm.gov.au
agency to agency; lead them through the process of getting the relevant approvals for overseas adoption so
that it can happen more quickly, I hope less expensively and certainly with much less heartache than is so
often the case. This is basically about making it easier to adopt. It is not about usurping the rights of the
states to set the rules about who can adopt and under what particular circumstances. It is not about watering
down standards under the various international conventions for the adoption of people from overseas. It is
about making it easier for people to navigate the federal agencies that need to be onside in order to
successfully complete an overseas adoption.

QUESTION:

Prime Minister, when do you want that set up?

PRIME MINISTER:

Well, as soon as possible as soon as possible, within months

QUESTION:

By the end of the year, possibly?

PRIME MINISTER:

We have got a very busy timetable and I think it would be unrealistic to ask of us to do it by the end of the
year but hopefully in the first quarter of next year.

QUESTION:

[inaudible]

PRIME MINISTER:

We haven't got to the stage of costing this but the costs will be relatively modest.

QUESTION:

Prime Minister, Mr Giles raised some issues about the operation of the Native Title Act in the Northern
Territory and the fact that there has been few petrochemical leases written. Is that something that will be
reviewed as part of the white paper process?

PRIME MINISTER:

This is the Northern Australia white paper process and yes, it will be. Look, we all want to ensure that rights
are respected but one of the things that was coming through to me loud and clear from my recent visit to
East Arnhem Land is that the vast majority of indigenous people, at least in East Arnhem Land, and I would
say in Cape York as well where I have spent a lot of time recently, they want land to be an economic asset as
well as a spiritual and cultural and environmental asset. This is something that certainly does need to be
addressed as part of the Northern Australia process.

QUESTION:

A question for Premiers Baird and Napthine. To be clear, years five and six of the Gonski funding, are you
still pursuing those as broken contracts or are you happy to leave that discussion to the white paper as the
Prime Minister seems to be suggesting?

11
www.pm.gov.au
PREMIER BAIRD:

That is the process that has been agreed. There is a range of challenges we face, responsibilities which
obviously we have articulated, fiscal and that discussion is going to take place as part of that process. It is an
important one. Our position is well documented on that issue, as is Victoria's, but we obviously need to get
to a position, as the Prime Minister said, where we are constructively engaging on the issues that matter and
certainly the framework for the white paper does that perfectly. So, we will be putting all of our concerns
and all of our passions and all of our ideas into this process. I think we need to be very clear. This is not a
tick-the-box exercise. This is a genuine opportunity to make some significant reform to issues that matter, to
families and communities across this country. It is a responsibility that every single person here is very
excited to participate in and we look forward doing that.

PREMIER NAPTHINE:

Can I respond by saying we believe we have signed a six-year agreement. We will be pursuing that
agreement to the full. We believe that should be ongoing and quite separately there is a further debate about
the issues in the white paper and the white paper may overtake that discussion but the white paper is a
broader review of the whole arrangements between federal and state and funding arrangements. I think it is a
great opportunity, 100-plus years since federation for us to have this root and branch examination of how we
can do it better and I think the Prime Minister said very well that our federation by world standards works
very well but it is an opportunity to look at where we can do it even better and I think the white paper
provides that broader review, that broader opportunity, but in the meantime, for the education of children in
Victoria, we have a six-year agreement. We have funding agreed for the first four years between the federal
and state governments. We will continue to pursue the fifth and sixth year in the best interests of students in
Victoria.

QUESTION:

Prime Minister, [inaudible] one stop shops for environmental approvals. Do you think that a single line in a
COAG communique is going to convince any of the crossbench senators to change their minds on this?
Have you asked or have any of the first ministers offered their help in negotiations in the Senate?

PRIME MINISTER:

We have actually achieved pretty substantial progress on one stop shops. There is a lot which is now being
handled by the states under the kind of memoranda of understanding which are typical between different
levels of government. There are a number of matters which do need to be advanced by legislation and we
will keep pursuing that legislation because we want these one stop shops to be as comprehensive and as
complete as possible to encourage investment and to create jobs. So, thats why we are doing this: to
encourage investment, to create jobs, to boost economic growth. But very substantial progress has already
been made without legislation. We will continue to make progress without legislation, but obviously we do
want the legislation because if the one stop shop is to be as complete as possible, legislation is necessary.

QUESTION:

Premier Newman, Dr Bruce Flegg has been cleared by Queensland's corruption watchdog today of any
wrongdoing. Should he stand now be able to stand for pre-selection in the seat of Moggill or anywhere else?

PREMIER NEWMAN:

Ive got a couple of thoughts about that. The first one is that Dr Flegg was the subject of quite scurrilous
accusations by the former Labor government going back three and a half years ago. That is where this all
started. Finally, after three and a half years, we have seen again that the 2011/12 Labor Party state campaign
was based on smear and innuendo and I welcome and applaud the clearance of Dr Flegg by the Crime and
12
www.pm.gov.au
Corruption Commission. Thats good that that cloud has been lifted. As to a review of the decision of the
LNP last Friday, that is a matter for the LNP executive. It is a highly democratic organisation. The state
executive are elected by the 14,000 men and women that are members of our party and the members of the
state executive have a legitimate right to assess the people who go forward under our party banner. So it is a
matter for them. I have indicated previously that I support all my MPs if they are prepared to fight for jobs in
Queensland, to fight to sort out the state of frontline services and to make sure that it is a safe state. So, Dr
Flegg has filled those criteria and my position hasn't changed in the last seven days.

QUESTION:

So will you be urging the executive to possibly rethink?

PREMIER NEWMAN:

I have made my position pretty clear. I haven't changed my position in the last seven days. That is a matter
for the state executive. I support my parliamentary team.

QUESTION:

Mr Newman, will the one stop shop issue come up at the Palmer inquiry and what is the latest position from
the Queensland Government's point of view? Are you going to appear before that inquiry? Are you going to
give them access to documents and officials or are you taking the sort of position that Victoria took some
years ago where it didn't cooperate with such an inquiry?

PREMIER NEWMAN:

Let me be very clear that this inquiry is only happening because of the Australian Labor Party. I go back to
what I just said about Dr Flegg they made unfounded accusations against him all those years ago, and what
we're seeing now is a politically motivated inquiry, basically on the say so of the Australian Labor Party.
Let's be very clear about it. Theres a lot of talk about the independents and the minor parties making this
happen. I place the responsibility for this inquiry at the feet of the Australian Labor Party. There are many
things that this inquiry may look at. I note that the Greens have talked about coal seam gas approvals. I note
some political commentators often get a bit mixed up about who actually gave those approvals. Those
approvals were almost entirely made by the former Labor state government. Indeed, my opponent, it's
expected in the seat of Ashgrove, was the relevant minister. So, look, that's all I will say about the inquiry
today. It is a politically motivated thing. I think people see it for what it is. But what people havent seen,
and I think it does need to be seen in these terms, it is the work of the Australian Labor Party, and they are
responsible for it.

QUESTION:

So why wouldnt your government cooperate with them?

PREMIER NEWMAN:

Im not giving out a position today. People will have to wait and see what we do.

PRIME MINISTER:

Ok, thank you so much.

[ends]