Sie sind auf Seite 1von 28

1

1
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Small Area Estimates: For Evidence-based Policy-
making and Better Targeted/Focused Programs
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
The BayLeaf, Manila, 7-8 November 2012
Presented by
Ms. Jessamyn O. Encarnacion
Director, Social Statistics Office
National Statistical Coordination Board
2
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Outline of Presentation
I. What Do We Want To Achieve?
II. Efforts of the Philippine Statistical System in the
Generation of Small Area Estimates
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
IV. Some Policy/Program Implications
V. Challenges and Opportunities
2
3
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
I. What Do We Want To Achieve?
The Philippine Statistical System (PSS) to GENERATEhigh
quality official statistics, at lower levels of
disaggregation forBETTER TARGETED/FOCUSED
programs
Policy- and Decision-makers to USE high quality official
statistics for EVIDENCE-BASEDpolicy-making
Better DEVELOPMENToutcomes: The MDGs in 2015 &
Beyond
4
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
II. Efforts of the Philippine Statistical System in
the Generation of Small Area Estimates
3
5
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
II. Efforts of the Philippine Statistical System in the
Generation of Small Area Estimates
Demand for statistics has been increasing
exponentially
More statistics and indicator systems to address new
and emerging concerns, such as the following:
Good governance and anti-corruption
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
Child poverty and disparities
Climate change
Measures of well being/progress of
societies, Information Society
Hunger index
Child/gender-related development indexes
Among others.
6
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
II. Efforts of the Philippine Statistical System in the
Generation of Small Area Estimates
To address these demands and to keep pace with our
competitors in the Third Millennium, there is a strong
need to rethink the relevance of traditional statistics
and statisticians to be able to address the information
needs of emerging concerns of society!
Official statisticians need to be relevant to all
stakeholders statistics must be useful to society!
4
7
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Small areas
Not just geographically
(i.e., provincial, congressional district
level, city, municipal)
But also sectoral
(i.e., children, women, senior
citizens, farmers, fisherfolks, etc.)
II. Efforts of the Philippine Statistical System on the
Generation of Small Area Estimates
8
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
1. Economic statistics, frameworks and indicator systems
Satellite accounts
(tourism, health, education, womens contribution to
the economy)
Provincial product accounts (for two pilot areas)
II. Efforts of the Philippine Statistical System on the
Generation of Small Area Estimates
2. Social statistics, frameworks and indicator systems
Provincial level Human/Gender-related/Child
Development Index
Statistics on middle-income class
Hunger index
5
9
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
3. Multi-sectoral statistics, frameworks and indicator
systems
Subnational monitoring of the Philippine Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs) indicators
Governance index and other governance indicators
Measures of wellbeing/progress of societies
Statistical indicators on Philippine Development
(StatDev Philippines)
II. Efforts of the Philippine Statistical System on the
Generation of Small Area Estimates
10
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
6
11
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
1. Official poverty statistics for the basic sectors
NSCB Resolution No. 11, Series of 2007 provides for the
official methodology for the estimation of poverty
statistics for the basic sectors.
The NSCB computes official poverty statistics for 9 of the
14 disadvantaged sectors of the Philippine Society:
1. Women;
2. Youth;
3. Children;
4. Seniorcitizens;
5. Individualsresidinginurbanareas;
6. Migrantand formal sectorworkers;
7. Self-employed and unpaid family
workers;
8. Farmers;and
9. Fishermen.
Statistics available for 2003, 2006, and 2009.
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
12
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
1. Official poverty statistics for the basic sectors
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
Variable Data source
1. Income Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES)
was used for classifying households as poor
or non-poor
2. Sectoral
characteristic of
the population
Labor Force Survey (LFS) was used to assign
household members into sectors
3. Total
population
Estimated total population of the sector
based on the FIES and LFS.
However, for years when the conduct of the
CPH and FIES coincide, data from the CPH will
be used (e.g., 2000) to estimate the total
population for four sectors, namely, women,
youth, children, and senior citizen.
Otherwise, data from LFS will be used.
7
13
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
1. Official poverty statistics for the basic sectors
Fishermen, farmers, and children comprise the poorest
three sectors in 2009 with poverty incidences of
41.4%,36.7%, and 35.1%, respectively.
41.4
36.7
35.1
25.1
21.8
16.7
15.8
12.8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Fishermen Farmers Children Women Youth Migrant and
Formal Sector
Senior Citizens Individuals
residing in
urban areas
Poverty Incidence by Basic Sector: 2003, 2006, and 2009
2003
2006
2009
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
14
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
1. Official poverty statistics for the basic sectors
Children, women, and individuals residing in urban areas
accounted for the largest number of poor population at
12.4, 11.2, and5.7million, respectivelyin2009.
Magnitude of poor population for all sectors increased
between the period 2006 and 2009 except for farmers and
fishermensectors, whichhada decrease.
12,400,000
11,200,000
5,709,170
5,367,308
3,118,701
1,685,148
1,181,121
346,345
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
Children Women Urban Youth Migrant and
Formal
Sector
Farmers Senior
Citizens
Fishermen
Magnitude of Poor Among the Basic Sectors: 2003, 2006, and 2009
2003
2006
2009
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
8
15
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
2. City and municipal level poverty statistics
Before 2003 2003 to 2005 2005 to Present
Nati onal Nati onal Nati onal
Regi onal Regi onal Regi onal
Provi nci al Provi nci al
Ci ty and muni ci pal
Identification of the poorest 44
provinces for the
implementation of the KALAHI-
CIDSS of the DSWD
Reference for the
implementation of the national
Household Targeting System for
Poverty Reduction (NHTS-PR)
Poverty statistics released by the NSCB:
16
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
The NSCB, with funding assistance from the World Bank
implemented three projects on small area estimation
(SAE) to generate poverty incidences at the
city/municipal levels.
NSCB-WB Project Reference year of
city/municipal level
poverty estimates
Year Released
1. Poverty Mapping in the
Philippines
2000 2005
2. Intercensal Updating of Small
Area Poverty Estimates
2003 2008
3. Generation of the 2006and 2009
Small Area Estimate of Poverty
2009 2012
2006 To be
released in
J anuary 2013
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
2. City and municipal level poverty statistics
9
17
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
2. City and municipal level poverty statistics
The Elbers, Lanjouw and Lanjouw (ELL) Methodology was
modified to generate intercensal City and Municipal level
Poverty Statistics
2007 Census of
Population and Housing
2009 Family Income and
Expenditure Survey
2009 Labor Force Survey
poverty estimates for 1,622 cities and municipalities of the country
for 2009 were released in J uly 2012 by the NSCB.
2009 City and
Municipal Level
Poverty Statistics
based on SAE
18
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
2. City and municipal level poverty statistics
10
19
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Siayan in Zamboanga del Norte remains to be the poorest municipality in 2009
were 80 of 100 individuals are poor compared to the national count of 26 to 27
out of 100 individuals!
POORESTMUNICIPALITIES: 2009
Region Province City
Poverty
Incidence
Rank
1/
2009 2003
overall
among
municipalities
(n=1494)
overall
among
municipalities
(n=1473)
Region IX Zamboanga del Norte Siayan 79.9 1 1 1 1
CAR Abra Bucloc 77.2 2 2 161 160
Region IX Zamboanga del Norte Baliguian 75.3 3 3 72 72
Region XI Davao del Sur
Jose Abad
Santos (Trinidad)
72.3 4 4 8 8
Region XI Davao del Sur Sarangani 72.1 5 5 19 19
Region IX Zamboanga del Norte Godod 71.1 6 6 9 9
Region IX Zamboanga del Norte Gutalac 70.4 7 7 48 48
ARMM Maguindanao Pandag
2/
70.1 8 8
Region X Lanao del Norte Tagoloan 69.4 9 9 24 24
Region IX Zamboanga Sibugay Mabuhay 68.9 10 10 27 27
Source: National Statistical Coordination Board, with funding supportfrom the World Bank and the AusAID.
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
20
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Gingoog City in Misamis Oriental where 49 out of 100 individuals were poor, the
poorest city in 2009, and which was the 7
th
poorest in 2003!
POORESTCITIES: 2009
Source: National Statistical Coordination Board, with funding supportfrom the World Bank and the AusAID.
Region Province City
Poverty
Incidence
Rank
1/
2009 2003
overall
among
cities
(n=149)
overall
among
cities
(n=149)
Region X Misamis Oriental Gingoog City 48.7 290 1 487 7
Caraga Agusan del Sur Bayugan 48.4 297 2 310 5
Region VI Negros Occidental Sipalay City 45.9 381 3 596 9
Region VII Negros Oriental Guihulngan 45.0 414 4 295 4
Region X Misamis Occidental Tangub City 43.1 470 5 255 3
Region VII Negros Oriental Bayawan City 42.6 488 6 231 2
Region VI Negros Occidental Kabankalan City 40.9 551 7 615 10
Region V Albay Ligao City 40.5 567 8 1504 97
Caraga Surigao del Norte Surigao City 40.1 581 9 811 21
Region IX Zamboanga del Norte Dapitan City 40.0 582 10 806 20
Region VIII Samar (Western) Calbayog City 38.7 639 12 108 1
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
11
21
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Poorest Municipalities/Cities, by region: 2009
Source: National Statistical Coordination Board, with funding supportfrom the World Bank and the AusAID.
Regi on Provi nce Muni ci pal i ty/Ci ty Poverty
Inci dence
Standard
Error
Rank i n the
Regi on
(2003 SAE)
NCR 1st di stri ct Port Area 11.87 6.83 1
CAR Abra Bucl oc 77.18 10.05 9
Regi on I Il ocos Sur Sugpon 35.4 7.4 3
Regi on II Cagayan Amul ung 27.85 2.1 6
Regi on III Nueva Eci j a Tal ugtug 36.03 2.99 3
Regi on IV-A Quezon San Franci sco (Aurora) 41.37 3.28 1
Regi on IV-B Ori ental Mi ndoro Bul al acao 51.48 6.34 2
Regi on V Camari nes Sur Garchi torena 58.97 3.2 17
Regi on VI Akl an Madal ag 63.34 4.18 1
Regi on VII Bohol Pi l ar 67.08 3.86 29
Regi on VIII Northern Samar Si l vi no Lobos 64.78 3.83 29
Regi on IX Zamboanga del Norte Si ayan 79.86 4.53 1
Regi on X Lanao del Norte Tagol oan 69.38 5.76 3
Region XI Davao del Sur Jose Abad Santos (Trinidad) 72.32 4.06 1
Regi on XII Sul tan Kudarat Pal i mbang 63.68 3.95 6
ARMM Magui ndanao Pandag
3/
70.10 8.6
Caraga Agusan del Sur La Paz 66.71 3.94 2
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
22
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
LEASTPOOR MUNICIPALITIES AND CITIES
Some notes:
-Least poor areas are those with the lowest poverty
incidences.
-There are still poor population in these areas ... they are
just classified as least poor relative to the
number/proportion of poor in other municipalities/cities.
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
12
23
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
San Pedro, Laguna is the least poor municipality in 2009. It is also the least poor in
2003!
LEASTPOOR MUNICIPALITIES: 2009
Source: National Statistical Coordination Board, with funding supportfrom the World Bank and the AusAID.
Region Province City
Poverty
Incidence
Rank
1/
2009 2003
overall
among
municipalities
(n=1494)
overall
among
municipalities
(n=1473)
Region IV-A Laguna San Pedro 1.4 1639 1494 1621 1473
Region IV-A Rizal Cainta 1.4 1638 1493 1618 1471
Region IV-A Laguna Los Baos 1.6 1634 1492 1603 1465
Region IV-A Laguna Bian 1.7 1631 1490 1597 1463
Region IV-A Laguna Cabuyao 1.7 1631 1490 1600 1464
Region IV-A Rizal San Mateo 2.2 1622 1489 1612 1469
Region IV-A Rizal Morong 2.2 1619 1488 1608 1467
Region IV-A Laguna Santa Cruz 2.3 1618 1487 1547 1439
Region IV-A Cavite Imus 2.3 1616 1486 1616 1470
Region IV-A Rizal Angono 2.4 1614 1485 1620 1472
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
24
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Binondo, Manila retains its position as the least poor city/district in 2009 where
only one out of 100 individuals is poor.
LEASTPOOR CITIES: 2009
Source: National Statistical Coordination Board, with funding supportfrom the World Bank and the AusAID.
Region Province City
Poverty
Incidence
Rank
1/
2009 2003
overall
among cities
(n=149)
overall
among cities
(n=149)
NCR 1st district Binondo 1.0 1643 149 1622 149
NCR 1st district Sampaloc 1.3 1642 148 1615 146
NCR 4th district Makati City 1.4 1641 147 1617 147
NCR 1st district San Miguel 1.4 1640 146 1580 123
NCR 2nd district San Juan 1.5 1637 145 1619 148
NCR 1st district Ermita 1.5 1635 143 1611 143
Region IV-A Laguna Santa Rosa City 1.5 1635 143 1614 145
NCR 1st district Santa Cruz 1.7 1633 142 1599 136
NCR 4th district Pasay City 1.7 1630 141 1591 132
NCR 1st district Malate 1.8 1629 140 1587 128
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
13
25
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Regi on Provi nce Muni ci pal i ty/Ci ty
Poverty
Inci dence
Standard
Error
Rank i n the
Regi on
(2003 SAE)
NCR 1st di stri ct Bi nondo 1.03 0.7 1
CAR Benguet Bagui o Ci ty 2.43 0.76 1
Regi on I Il ocos Norte Laoag Ci ty 9.91 0.81 18
Regi on II Batanes Basco 5.14 1.89 2
Regi on III Bul acan Mari l ao 3.37 1.25 3
Regi on IV-A Laguna San Pedro 1.41 0.58 1
Regi on IV-B Pal awan Puerto Pri ncesa Ci ty 15.48 2.2 4
Regi on V Camari nes Norte Daet 20.97 2.08 24
Regi on VI Il oi l o Il oi l o Ci ty 7.57 1.01 2
Regi on VII Negros Ori ental Dumaguete Ci ty 7.42 1.38 5
Regi on VIII Leyte Tacl oban Ci ty 20.45 1.46 1
Regi on IX Zamboanga del Sur Zamboanga Ci ty 19.87 2.03 2
Regi on X Mi sami s Ori ental Cagayan De Oro Ci ty 22.75 2.24 1
Region XI Davao del Sur Davao City 13.24 1.25 1
Regi on XII Sul tan Kudarat Tacurong Ci ty 18.47 2.52 4
ARMM Lanao del Sur Marantao 19.56 4.03 18
Caraga Suri gao del Sur Canti l an 25.71 2.8 9
Least Poor Municipalities/Cities, by region: 2009
III. Small Area Estimates of Poverty
26
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Nationally, the municipality with the highest reduction in poverty from 2003 to
2009 was Linapacan in Palawan where the number of poor individuals per 100
was reduced by 58, compared with an increase of less than 1 per 100 individuals
at the national level!
Municipalities/Cities with the Highest Poverty reduction from 2003 to 2009
Note:
1/ Rank 1 = Poorest Municipalities/Cities
Test of significant difference between the 2003 and 2009 municipal and city
level poverty estimates - NATIONALLY
Region Province Municipality
2009 2003
Difference in
Poverty
Incidence
Poverty
Incidence
Stan
dard
Error Rank
1/
Poverty
Incidence
Stan
dard
Error Rank
1/
2009-2003
Region IV-B Palawan Linapacan 18.1 5.3 1267 76.4 5.2 31 58.3
CAR Kalinga Tanudan 30.7 6.1 902 88.1 4.2 2 57.4
Region I La Union Bagulin 35.1 3.6 779 85.5 9.6 6 50.4
CAR Kalinga Tinglayan 34.1 5.3 804 82.1 5.8 12 48.1
CAR Kalinga Pasil 26.5 4.5 1016 70.0 5.8 76 43.5
Region I La Union Santol 32.7 3.2 843 73.1 9.5 51 40.4
Region IV-B Palawan Busuanga 26.5 4.8 1018 66.7 4.3 104 40.2
Region IV-B Palawan San Vicente 25.6 4.7 1050 64.2 4.3 134 38.6
Region IV-B Palawan Magsaysay 17.6 3.6 1284 54.0 4.5 315 36.3
Region II
Nueva
Vizcaya Ambaguio 15.5 3.9 1364 51.0 9.1 376 35.5
14
27
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Municipalities/Cities with the Highest Poverty reduction from 2003 to 2009
Test of significant difference between the 2003 and 2009 municipal and city
level poverty estimates - NATIONALLY
Region Province Municipality
2009 2003
Difference in
Poverty
Incidence
Poverty
Incidence
Stand
ard
Error Rank
1/
Poverty
Incidence
Stand
ard
Error Rank
1/
2009-2003
Region VIII
Samar
(Western) Calbayog City 38.7 1.9 639 66.5 1.8 108 27.8
Region VIII
Samar
(Western) Catbalogan City 33.6 2.6 817 51.7 2.8 363 18.1
Region IV-A Quezon Tayabas City 10.5 1.4 1487 27.3 2.9 1128 16.8
Region VI Iloilo Passi City 24.5 2.9 1079 41.1 2.5 684 16.6
Region VII Negros Oriental Bayawan City 42.6 3.3 488 58.3 3.8 231 15.6
Region X
Misamis
Occidental Tangub City 43.1 2.5 470 57.2 3.3 255 14.1
Region IX Isabela City Isabela City 23.0 2.9 1118 37.0 3.4 822 14.0
Region XI Davao del Norte
Island Garden City
of Samal 32.8 2.8 840 44.5 3.6 571 11.7
Region V Masbate Masbate City 28.9 2.3 944 40.1 1.9 712 11.2
CAR Kalinga Tabuk City 17.3 2.8 1298 28.1 3.8 1105 10.8
Source: Nati onal Stati sti cal Coordi nation Board, wi th funding support from the Worl d
Bank and the AusAID.
Note: 1/ Rank 1 = Poorest muni ci pal i ti es/cities
Among the cities, the highest reduction in poverty from 2003 to 2009 was
achieved in Calbayog City in Samar with a reduction of 28 poor individuals per
100!
28
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Municipalities/Cities with the Highest Poverty reduction from 2003 to 2009
Test of significant difference between the 2003 and 2009 municipal and city
level poverty estimates BY REGION
Region Province Municipality
2009 2003
Differen
ce
Poverty
Incidenc
e
Standa
rd
Error
Rank
1/
Poverty
Incidence
Standar
d Error
Rank
1/
2009-
2003
Municipalities
NCR
2/ 2/ 2/ 2/ 2/ 2/ 2/ 2/ 2/
CAR Kalinga Tanudan 30.7 6.1 902 88.06 4.23 2 -57.41
Region I La Union Bagulin 35.1 3.6 779 85.50 9.61 6 -50.43
Region II
Nueva
Vizcaya
Ambaguio 15.5 3.9 1364 50.95 9.05 376 -35.45
Region III Bulacan Dona Remedios Trinidad 35.2 5.4 769 51.58 6.36 365 -16.40
Region IV-A Quezon Padre Burgos 17.2 2.4 1305 50.61 5.12 385 -33.42
Region IV-B Palawan Linapacan 18.1 5.3 1267 76.37 5.23 31 -58.27
Region V Masbate Cawayan 47.6 3.2 320 72.46 2.91 55 -24.88
Region VI Iloilo Maasin 22.6 2.7 1136 45.23 3.34 550 -22.67
Region VII
Negros
Oriental
Santa Catalina 39.5 3.6 599 61.41 4.39 176 -21.89
Region VIII
Samar
(Western)
Santa Rita 41.3 3.2 537 76.49 2.46 30 -35.24
Source: National Statistical Coordination Board, with funding support from the
World Bank and the AusAID.
Note: 1/ Rank 1 = Poorest
municipalities/cities
2/ - No municipality/city with statistically significant poverty reduction
between 2003 and 2009.
15
29
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Municipalities/Cities with the Highest Poverty reduction from 2003 to 2009
Test of significant difference between the 2003 and 2009 municipal and city
level poverty estimates BY REGION
Region Province Municipality
2009 2003
Differen
ce
Poverty
Incidenc
e
Standa
rd
Error
Rank
1/
Poverty
Incidence
Standar
d Error
Rank
1/
2009-
2003
Region IX
Zamboanga
del Sur
Midsalip 52.7 6.4 183 86.32 3.12 5 -33.67
Region X
Misamis
Occidental
Baliangao 37.7 4.0 666 60.51 5.55 190 -22.83
Region XI
Davao del
Norte
Kapalong 21.5 4.0 1163 51.23 5.00 370 -29.77
Region XII
Sultan
Kudarat
Esperanza 33.2 3.5 828 53.78 6.61 319 -20.57
ARMM
Lanao del
Sur
Pualas 25.7 4.9 1046 58.68 6.79 226 -32.94
Caraga
Surigao del
Sur
Lanuza 35.1 4.4 778 63.45 3.96 145 -28.37
Source: National Statistical Coordination Board, with
funding support from the World Bank and the AusAID.
Note: 1/ Rank 1 = Poorest
municipalities/cities
2/ - No municipality/city with statistically
significant poverty reduction between 2003 and
2009.
30
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
IV. Some Policy/Program Implications
16
31
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
A. Doesitpay to be a City?
IV. Some Policy/Program Implications
If we take all the population living in cities as one group (and the
same for municipalities)
On the average, poverty incidence in cities is lower by 22 and 18
percentage points in 2003 and 2009, respectively, compared with
the municipalities.
Poverty Incidence among Individuals (in %) Difference
2003 2009 2003 2009
Cities Municipalities Cities Municipalities
Cities-
Municipalities
with NCR 12.9 35.0 12.5 30.2 -22.1 -17.7
without NCR 17.6 35.1 17.3 30.2 -17.5 -12.9
Sources of data:
2003 and 2009 Small area poverty estimates
2000-based population projections
32
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
IV. Some Policy/Program Implications
B. Poverty and CPC Areas Covered by UNICEF: Do the Numbers
Match?
Camari nes Norte
Basud
Capalonga
Labo
Marcedes
Paracale
Vinzons
Masbate
Aroroy
Milagros
Monreal
Cawayan
Eastern Samar
Taft
Northern Samar
Bobon
Mapanas
Zamboanga del Norte
Siayan
Tampilisan
Bacungan
Zamboanga del Sur
Midsalip
Tukuran
North Cotabato
Aleosan
Arakan
Pres Roxas
UNICEF initiative on the 2012 Multiple Indicators Survey
21 CPC areas covered by UNICEF
17
33
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Poverty and Environment among CPC Areas Covered by UNICEF
CPC Area 2009 2012
Poverty
Incidence
among
Population
Rank among
CPC Area
Percentage
using
improved
sources of
drinking
water
1/
Rank among
CPC Area
Percentage
using
appropriate
water treatment
method
2/
Rank
among
CPC Area
Municipality Province
Siayan Zamboanga del Norte 79.9 1 46.5 1 22.8 13
Bacungan Zamboanga del Norte
66.0 2 70.9 6
16.8 9
Mapanas Northern Samar
58.4 3 97.8 21
28.4 17
Mi dsal i p Zamboanga del Sur
52.7 4 68.1 4
10.8 4
Capal onga Camari nes Norte
48.2 5 64.3 2
33.1 19
Arakan North Cotabato
48.0 6 87.1 16
13.1 6
Cawayan Masbate
47.6 7 69.7 5
17.8 10
Al eosan North Cotabato
47.1 8 80.4 13
8.5 2
Bobon Northern Samar
45.9 9 85.3 14
29.5 18
Aroroy Masbate
45.5 10 79.1 12
19.3 11
Mi l agros Masbate
45.3 11 68.0 3
28.2 16
Tampi l i san Zamboanga del Norte
45.0 12 75.1 8
21.4 12
Monreal Masbate
44.7 13 77.5 9
45.7 21
Marcedes Camari nes Norte
43.4 14 89.5 18
9.8 3
Taft Eastern Samar
42.2 15 93.5 20
16.2 8
Vi nzons Camari nes Norte
42.1 16 90.3 19
15.5 7
Basud Camari nes Norte
38.3 17 78.1 10
26.9 15
Tukuran Zamboanga del Sur
36.5 18 86.0 15
10.8 5
Labo Camari nes Norte
36.5 19 87.3 17
26.7 14
Paracal e Camari nes Norte
35.6 20 74.3 7
34.6 20
Pres Roxas North Cotabato
35.3 21 78.7 11
7.5 1
Siayan, the poorest municipality in 2009, has the lowest percentage of improved
sources of drinking water among CPC areas covered by the UNICEF in 2012!
Source: 2009 City and Municipality Poverty Estimates, NSCB
2012 Multiple Indicators Cluster Survey, NSO
34
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Poverty and Environment among CPC Areas Covered by UNICEF
CPC Area 2009 2012
Poverty
Incidence
among
Population
Rank among
CPC Area
Percentage
storing
drinking
water in
container
with cover
Rank among
CPC Area
Percentage of
population
using
improved
sanitation
facilities
3/
Rank
among
CPC Area
Municipality Province
Siayan Zamboanga del Norte 79.9 1 96.4 3 60.0 5
Bacungan Zamboangadel Norte 66.0 2 93.6 7 73.2 11
Mapanas Northern Samar 58.4 3 92.1 11 68.5 6
Midsalip Zamboangadel Sur 52.7 4 91.7 12 72.0 10
Capalonga Camarines Norte 48.2 5 96.4 2 70.2 8
Arakan North Cotabato 48.0 6 87.6 18 85.7 19
Cawayan Masbate 47.6 7 92.1 10 30.4 1
Aleosan North Cotabato 47.1 8 95.2 5 81.4 17
Bobon Northern Samar 45.9 9 90.5 14 71.9 9
Aroroy Masbate 45.5 10 86.7 19 59.4 4
Milagros Masbate 45.3 11 94.9 6 48.5 3
Tampilisan Zamboangadel Norte 45.0 12 93.2 8 80.7 16
Monreal Masbate 44.7 13 97.6 1 39.2 2
Marcedes Camarines Norte 43.4 14 88.4 16 80.4 15
Taft Eastern Samar 42.2 15 89.7 15 78.9 14
Vinzons Camarines Norte 42.1 16 77.6 21 69.6 7
Basud Camarines Norte 38.3 17 92.3 9 94.4 21
Tukuran Zamboanga del Sur 36.5 18 91.7 13 73.6 12
Labo Camarines Norte 36.5 19 88.3 17 86.6 20
Paracale Camarines Norte 35.6 20 85.9 20 77.6 13
Pres Roxas North Cotabato 35.3 21 95.9 4 83.7 18
InSiayan, only about 6 of 10 individuals used improved sanitation facilities in 2012
posting 5
th
lowest among CPC areas!
Source: 2009 City and Municipality Poverty Estimates, NSCB
18
35
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Poverty and Nutrition among CPC Areas Covered by UNICEF
CPC Area 2009 2012
Poverty
Incidence
among
Population
Rank among
CPC Area
Percent who
receive
foods from
4 or more
food groups
(minimum
dietary
diversity)
Rank among
CPC Area
Percent who
were given
multiple
micronutrient
powders
Rank
among
CPC Area
Municipality Province
Siayan Zamboanga del Norte 79.9 1.0 31.8 2 - 2
Bacungan Zamboanga del Norte 66.0 2.0 47.8 10 1.4 11
Mapanas Northern Samar 58.4 3.0 39.1 6 4.1 17
Midsalip Zamboanga del Sur 52.7 4.0 34.4 4 4.7 18
Capalonga Camarines Norte 48.2 5.0 50.8 12 - 7
Arakan North Cotabato 48.0 6.0 35.9 5 1.1 9
Cawayan Masbate 47.6 7.0 58.4 19 2.0 13
Aleosan North Cotabato 47.1 8.0 32.4 3 - 3
Bobon Northern Samar 45.9 9.0 42.3 7 - 4
Aroroy Masbate 45.5 10.0 54.8 16 - 8
Milagros Masbate 45.3 11.0 53.9 15 2.0 12
Tampilisan Zamboanga del Norte 45.0 12.0 50.5 11 2.9 16
Monreal Masbate 44.7 13.0 51.9 13 7.0 20
Marcedes Camarines Norte 43.4 14.0 44.5 9 - 6
Taft Eastern Samar 42.2 15.0 25.5 1 - 1
Vinzons Camarines Norte 42.1 16.0 57.6 18 2.1 14
Basud Camarines Norte 38.3 17.0 60.8 20 6.2 19
Tukuran Zamboanga del Sur 36.5 18.0 52.4 14 2.6 15
Labo Camarines Norte 36.5 19.0 62.4 21 7.2 21
Paracale Camarines Norte 35.6 20.0 55.4 17 1.2 10
Pres Roxas North Cotabato 35.3 21.0 43.8 8 - 5
InSiayan, only 3 of 10 children received foods from 4 or more food groups
registering second lowest! None were given multiple micronutrient powders in 2012!
Source: 2009 City and Municipality Poverty Estimates, NSCB
36
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Siayan is the least performing municipality among CPC areas in 2012 in terms of
proportion of population aged 12-24 years, who completed elementary - with only
4 of 10 males and 5 of 10 females completing elementary!
Source: 2009 City and Municipality Poverty Estimates, NSCB
2012 Multiple Indicators Cluster Survey, NSO
Poverty and Education among CPC Areas Covered by UNICEF
CPC Area 2009 2012
Poverty
Inci dence
among
Popul ati o
n
Rank among
CPC Areas
Proportionof
childrenage 12-
24yearswho
completed
elementary
education
Rank among
CPC Areas
Proportionof
childrenage 12-
24yearswho
completed
elementary
education
Rank among
CPC Areas
Muni cipali ty Provi nce Mal e Femal e
Si ayan Zamboanga del Norte 79.9 1 40.5 1 52.4 1
Bacungan Zamboanga del Norte 66.0 2 47.3 3 65.3 3
Mapanas Northern Samar 58.4 3 58.7 7 68.4 4
Midsalip Zamboanga del Sur 52.7 4 43.9 2 57.8 2
Capalonga Camarines Norte 48.2 5 69.5 15 73.6 8
Arakan North Cotabato 48.0 6 56.7 5 74.0 9
Cawayan Masbate 47.6 7 54.9 4 69.0 5
Aleosan North Cotabato 47.1 8 69.3 13 76.0 13
Bobon Northern Samar 45.9 9 61.5 10 78.0 15
Aroroy Masbate 45.5 10 61.4 9 74.7 12
Milagros Masbate 45.3 11 57.2 6 72.7 7
Tampilisan Zamboanga del Norte 45.0 12 69.4 14 74.4 10
Monreal Masbate 44.7 13 59.0 8 70.6 6
Marcedes Camarines Norte 43.4 14 79.8 21 84.7 19
Taft Eastern Samar 42.2 15 71.4 16 77.6 14
Vinzons Camarines Norte 42.1 16 78.9 20 89.5 21
Basud Camarines Norte 38.3 17 78.7 19 85.5 20
Tukuran Zamboanga del Sur 36.5 18 65.3 11 78.7 16
Labo Camarines Norte 36.5 19 76.5 17 84.3 17
Paracale Camarines Norte 35.6 20 76.9 18 84.4 18
Pres Roxas North Cotabato 35.3 21 65.4 12 74.6 11
19
37
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Further, of the 21 municipalities covered by UNICEF, Siayan ranked poorly on basic
literacy rate of children 6-11 years old!
Source: 2009 City and Municipality Poverty Estimates, NSCB
2012 Multiple Indicators Cluster Survey, NSO
Poverty and Education among CPC Areas Covered by UNICEF
CPC Area 2009 2012
Poverty
Inci dence
among
Popul ati on
Rank among
CPC Areas
Basic literacy
rate of children
6-11yearsold
Rank among
CPC Areas
Basic literacy
rate of children
6-11yearsold
Rank among
CPC Areas
Muni cipali ty Provi nce Mal e Femal e
Si ayan Zamboanga del Norte 79.9 1 76.8 2 77.8 1
Bacungan Zamboanga del Norte 66.0 2 73.8 1 78.0 2
Mapanas Northern Samar 58.4 3 91.7 9 93.9 7
Midsalip Zamboanga del Sur 52.7 4 88.1 4 86.7 3
Capalonga Camarines Norte 48.2 5 97.4 21 99.0 21
Arakan North Cotabato 48.0 6 88.7 5 91.8 5
Cawayan Masbate 47.6 7 93.6 12 96.5 17
Aleosan North Cotabato 47.1 8 90.9 6 92.8 6
Bobon Northern Samar 45.9 9 95.1 18 94.7 11
Aroroy Masbate 45.5 10 92.7 10 96.4 15
Milagros Masbate 45.3 11 96.1 19 94.9 13
Tampilisan Zamboanga del Norte 45.0 12 91.1 7 94.7 10
Monreal Masbate 44.7 13 95.1 17 94.7 12
Marcedes Camarines Norte 43.4 14 95.1 16 94.4 8
Taft Eastern Samar 42.2 15 86.9 3 91.3 4
Vinzons Camarines Norte 42.1 16 94.6 13 97.1 18
Basud Camarines Norte 38.3 17 96.8 20 97.5 19
Tukuran Zamboanga del Sur 36.5 18 93.1 11 95.9 14
Labo Camarines Norte 36.5 19 94.8 14 98.7 20
Paracale Camarines Norte 35.6 20 95.0 15 96.4 16
Pres Roxas North Cotabato 35.3 21 91.6 8 94.5 9
38
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
C. Poverty and Local Government Finance
Region Province City Poverty Incidence
Total
Current
Operating
Income
Rank
Total Current
Operating
Expenditures
Rank
Poorest Municipalities
Region IX Zamboanga del NorteSiayan
1/
79.9
CAR Abra Bucloc 77.2 21,772,221 1,307 22,059,944 1,397
Region IX Zamboanga del NorteBaliguian 75.3 60,828,339 615 52,848,907 696
Region XI Davao del Sur
Jose Abad
Santos (Trinidad) 72.3 111,893,729 176 77,925,293 377
Region XI Davao del Sur Sarangani 72.1 39,150,684 1,055 30,579,155 1,220
Region IX Zamboanga del NorteGodod 71.1 42,196,826 1,126 33,802,131 1,136
Region IX Zamboanga del NorteGutalac 70.4 72,809,807 571 38,085,415 1,018
ARMM Maguindanao Pandag
2/
70.1
Region X Lanao del Norte Tagoloan 69.4 26,798,730 1,401 106,071,795 236
Region IX Zamboanga Sibugay Mabuhay 68.9 48,075,760 989 51,007,860 731
4 of the 10 poorest municipalities in 2009 also have poor rankings (i.e., ranked
more than 1000 of the 1494 municipalities )in terms of total operating income and
total operating expenditures
Sources: National Statistical Coordination Board
Department of Finance
Notes: 1/ No data
2/ Pandag, Maguindanao is a newly created municipality in December 2006
20
39
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
C. Poverty and Local Government Finance
Correspondingly, least poor municipalities in 2009 have better rankings (i.e.,
ranked less than 500 of the 1494 municipalities )in terms of total operating
income and total operating expenditures
Region Province City
Poverty
Incidence
Total
Current
Operating
Income
Rank
Total Current
Operating
Expenditures
Rank
Least Poor Municipalities
Region IV-A Laguna San Pedro 1.4 430,947,232 8 296,096,973 92
Region IV-A Rizal Cainta
1/
1.4
Region IV-A Laguna Los Baos 1.6 157,651,820 54 102,353,546 248
Region IV-A Laguna Bian 1.7 692,348,149 3 434,169,025 55
Region IV-A Laguna Cabuyao 1.7 685,692,624 4 548,521,248 38
Region IV-A Rizal San Mateo 2.2 302,600,068 12 210,211,050 126
Region IV-A Rizal Morong 2.2 75,422,733 415 69,199,453 471
Region IV-A Laguna Santa Cruz 2.3 179,414,770 38 153,060,914 160
Region IV-A Cavite Imus 2.3 523,863,403 5 435,403,296 54
Region IV-A Rizal Angono 2.4 141,725,731 81 112,018,821 220
Sources: National Statistical Coordination Board
Department of Finance
Notes: 1/ No data
40
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
C. Poverty and Local Government Finance
Region Province City Poverty Incidence
Education,
Culture &
Sports/
Manpower
Development
Rank
Health,
Nutrition &
Population
Control
Rank
Poorest Municipalities
Region IX Zamboanga del NorteSiayan
1/
79.9
CAR Abra Bucloc
2/
77.2 2,347,762 1,042
Region IX Zamboanga del NorteBaliguian 75.3 59,440 1,042 2,911,197 924
Region XI Davao del Sur
Jose Abad
Santos (Trinidad) 72.3 129,100 952 6,148,063 316
Region XI Davao del Sur Sarangani 72.1 74,395 1,027 2,272,085 1,058
Region IX Zamboanga del NorteGodod 71.1 520,624 583 2,829,891 940
Region IX Zamboanga del NorteGutalac 70.4 578,159 551 670,464 1,232
ARMM Maguindanao Pandag
3/
70.1
Region X Lanao del Norte Tagoloan
2/
69.4 198,752 1,246
Region IX Zamboanga Sibugay Mabuhay 68.9 64,415 1,036 2,957,355 911
3 and 4 of the 10 poorest municipalities in 2009 also have poor rankings (i.e.,
ranked more than 1000 of the 1494 municipalities )in terms of government
expenditures on education and health, respectively.
Sources: National Statistical Coordination Board
Department of Finance
Notes: 1/ No data
2/ Nio data onExpnedituresonEducation, Culture &Sports/Manpower Development
3/ Pandag, Maguindanao isa newlycreated municipalityin December 2006
21
41
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
C. Poverty and Local Government Finance
Correspondingly, least poor municipalities in 2009 have better rankings (i.e.,
ranked less than 300 of the 1494 municipalities )in terms of government
expenditures on education and health.
Region Province City
Poverty
Incidence
Education,
Culture &
Sports/
Manpower
Developmen
t
Rank
Health, Nutrition
& Population
Control
Rank
Least Poor Municipalities
Region IV-A Laguna San Pedro 1.4 24,538,564 11 24,866,248 10
Region IV-A Rizal Cainta
1/
1.4
Region IV-A Laguna Los Baos 1.6 7,109,679 45 7,335,036 225
Region IV-A Laguna Bian 1.7 22,221,369 13 12,285,142 59
Region IV-A Laguna Cabuyao 1.7 51,131,625 1 65,863,030 1
Region IV-A Rizal San Mateo 2.2 42,308,019 3 18,538,796 21
Region IV-A Rizal Morong 2.2 2,905,201 137 8,584,509 161
Region IV-A Laguna Santa Cruz 2.3 13,847,389 25 11,911,183 63
Region IV-A Cavite Imus 2.3 27,535,621 8 31,622,179 4
Region IV-A Rizal Angono 2.4 6,135,624 62 6,614,904 277
Sources: National Statistical Coordination Board
Department of Finance
Notes: 1/ No data
42
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
C. Poverty and Local Government Finance
Region Province City Poverty Incidence
Education,
Culture &
Sports/
Manpower
Development
Rank
Health,
Nutrition &
Population
Control
Rank
Poorest Cities
Region X Misamis Oriental Gi ngoog Ci ty 48.7 9,047,265 84 38,199,150 43
Caraga Agusan del Sur Bayugan 48.4 1,632,414 121 19,378,411 81
Region VI Negros Occidental Si pal ay Ci ty 45.9 1,530,813 124 21,594,149 72
Region VII Negros Oriental Gui hul ngan1/ 45.0
Region X Misamis Occidental Tangub Ci ty 43.1 18,534,384 54 6,955,128 127
Region VII Negros Oriental Bayawan Ci ty 42.6 559,642 126 19,270,717 82
Region VI Negros Occidental Kabankal an Ci ty 40.9 10,931,554 77 40,287,192 41
Region V Albay Li gao Ci ty 40.5 9,031,916 85 13,987,408 105
Caraga Surigao del Norte Suri gao Ci ty 40.1 18,390,190 55 30,783,050 53
Region IX Zamboanga del Norte Dapi tan Ci ty 40.0 3,700,256 106 16,935,877 95
7 and 5 of the 10 poorest cities in 2009 also have poor rankings (i.e., ranked
more than 75 of the 149 cities )in terms of government expenditures on
education and health, respectively.
Sources: National Statistical Coordination Board
Department of Finance
Notes: 1/ No data
2/ Nio data onExpnedituresonEducation, Culture &Sports/Manpower Development
3/ Pandag, Maguindanao isa newlycreated municipalityin December 2006
22
43
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
C. Poverty and Local Government Finance
Correspondingly, most of the least poor cities have the highest rankings in terms
of government expenditures on education and health
Region Province City
Poverty
Incidence
Education,
Culture & Sports/
Manpower
Development
Rank
Health, Nutrition
& Population
Control
Rank
Least Poor Cities
NCR 1st district Bi nondo
1/
1.0 1,415,360,488 1 1,720,633,459 1
NCR 1st district Sampal oc
1/
1.3 1,415,360,488 1 1,720,633,459 1
NCR 4th district Makati Ci ty 1.4 1,182,164,017 2 1,049,820,733 2
NCR 1st district San Mi guel
1/
1.4 1,415,360,488 1 1,720,633,459 1
NCR 2nd district San Juan 1.5 97,781,388 22 35,947,447 48
NCR 1st district Ermi ta
1/
1.5 1,415,360,488 1 1,720,633,459 1
Region IV-A Laguna Santa Rosa Ci ty 1.5 48,804,684 33 170,448,833 8
NCR 1st district Santa Cruz
1/
1.7 1,415,360,488 1 1,720,633,459 1
NCR 4th district Pasay Ci ty 1.7 203,507,096 12 227,438,523 6
NCR 1st district Mal ate
1/
1.8 1,415,360,488 1 1,720,633,459 1
Sources: National Statistical Coordination Board
Department of Finance
Notes: 1/ Included in the City of Manila
44
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Poverty Incidence for Employed and Unemployed Population: 2006 and 2009
Poverty incidence has been consistently higher for the employed
population than for the unemployed population.
Employment is not sufficient, quality of employment matters!
Source: 2009 Official Poverty Statisticsforthe Basic Sectors
IV. Some Policy/Program Implications
D. Poverty and Unemployment/Underemployment: Need for quality
employment
Employed Unemployed
2006 2009 2006 2009
Philippines 22.1 22.4 15.8 17.3
23
45
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
5,798 6,058
5,798 6,058 5,620 4
5,798 6,058 9,835 7
5,798 6,058 11,240 8
5,798 6,058 8,430 6
5,798 6,058 4,215 3
5,798 6,058 2,810 2
5,798 6,058 1,405 1
7,025 5
Agriculture (PhP 223/day) Non-agriculture (PhP 233/day)
Required monthly
income (in PhP)
Family size Monthly Income of a Minimum Wage Earner in 2009
REGIONAL (FOR Caraga): A minimum wage earner* in Caraga can support a family of at most four
members in 2009, to be classified as non-poor! However, average family size in Caraga is 5. Minimum
wage should have been at least PhP270/day in 2009 in order to support a family of 5 members. For 2011,
it should be at least PhP290/day. This means that the minimum wage as of 2010 of Php233 for
agriculture and Php243 for non-agriculture should be increased by Php57and Php47or 24.5% and
19.3%, respectively, to support a family of five members.
Minimum wage earner in Caraga employed in the agriculture and non-agriculture sector.
Rate is effective 20 June 2008, per Wage order No. 9 (Source of data:
http://www.nwpc.dole.gov.ph/pages/statistics/stat_wage%20rates1989-present_non-agri.html)
For this exercise, number of working days considered in a month is 26.
Gross family income was used.
E. Poverty and Minimum Wage-Setting: Need for more poverty-sensitive minimum wage
IV. Some Policy/Program Implications
46
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
5,460 5,460
5,460 5,460 5,444 4
5,460 5,460 9,527 7
5,460 5,460 10,888 8
5,460 5,460 8,166 6
5,460 5,460 4,083 3
5,460 5,460 2,722 2
5,460 5,460 1,361 1
6,805 5
Agriculture (PhP 210/day) Non-agriculture (PhP 210/day)
Required monthly
income (in PhP)
Family size Monthly Income of a Minimum Wage Earner in 2009
REGIONAL (FOR ARMM): A minimum wage earner* in ARMM can support a family of at most four
members in 2009, to be classified as non-poor! However, average family size in ARMM is 5. Minimum
wage should have been at least PhP262/day in 2009 in order to support a family of 5 members. For
2011, it should be at least PhP286/day. This means that the minimum wage as of 2010 of Php222 for
agriculture and non-agriculture should be increased by Php64.00 or 28.8% to support a family of five
members.
Minimum wage earner in ARMM employed in the agriculture and non-agriculture sector.
Rate is effective 29 June 2008, per Wage order No. 11 (Source of data:
http://www.nwpc.dole.gov.ph/pages/statistics/stat_wage%20rates1989-present_non-agri.html)
For this exercise, number of working days considered in a month is 26.
Gross family income was used.
IV. Some Policy/Program Implications
E. Poverty and Minimum Wage-Setting: Need for more poverty-sensitive minimum wage
24
47
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
5,590 6,240
5,590 6,240 5,052 4
5,590 6,240 8,841 7
5,590 6,240 10,104 8
5,590 6,240 7,578 6
5,590 6,240 3,789 3
5,590 6,240 2,526 2
5,590 6,240 1,263 1
6,315 5
Agri cul ture (PhP 215/day) Non-agri cul ture (PhP 240/day)
Requi red monthl y
i ncome (i n PhP)
Fami l y si ze Monthl y Income of a Mi ni mum Wage Earner i n 2009
REGIONAL (FOR Region IX): A minimum wage earner* in Region IX can support a family of at most
four members in 2009, to be classified as non-poor! However, average family size in Region IX is 5.
Minimum wage should have been at least PhP243/day in 2009 in order to support a family of 5
members. For 2011, it should be at least PhP259/day. This means that the minimum wage as of 2010 of
Php230 for agriculture and PHP255 for non-agriculture should be increased by Php29 and Php4or
12.6% and 1.6%, respectively, to support a family of five members .
Minimum wage earner in Region IX employed in the non-agriculture sector.
Rate is effective 3 July 2008, per Wage order No. 15 (Source of data:
http://www.nwpc.dole.gov.ph/pages/statistics/stat_wage%20rates1989-present_non-agri.html)
For this exercise, number of working days considered in a month is 26.
Gross family income was used.
IV. Some Policy/Program Implications
E. Poverty and Minimum Wage-Setting: Need for more poverty-sensitive minimum wage
48
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
IV. Some Policy/Program Implication
The increase in
economic
growth
between 2006
and 2009 in
Region IVB is
well distributed
across all
income decile
class. Poverty
incidence
decreased by
6.7% between
2006 and 2009.
Inc/Dec Inc/Dec
2006 2009 06-09 2006 2009 06-09
PHILIPPINES 1,276,155,599 1,432,115,499 12.2 21.1 20.9 (0.2)
NCR 414,437,924 465,688,965 12.4 3.4 2.6 (0.8)
CAR 28,396,925 31,547,310 11.1 18.6 17.1 (1.5)
RegionI 38,172,734 40,737,475 6.7 20.4 17.8 (2.6)
RegionII 25,523,961 28,157,464 10.3 15.5 14.5 (1.1)
RegionIII 107,039,140 115,947,511 8.3 12.0 12.0 0.1
RegionIV-A 156,688,378 165,572,379 5.7 9.4 10.3 0.9
Region IV-B 34,292,906 39,105,919 14.0 34.3 27.6 (6.7)
RegionV 35,394,007 42,877,886 21.1 36.1 36.0 (0.1)
RegionVI 91,865,954 109,252,408 18.9 22.1 23.8 1.7
RegionVII 90,297,893 102,052,820 13.0 33.5 30.2 (3.2)
RegionVIII 28,093,607 30,482,024 8.5 31.1 33.2 2.1
RegionIX 32,676,015 38,196,714 16.9 34.2 36.6 2.4
RegionX 62,729,335 73,206,779 16.7 32.7 32.8 0.2
RegionXI 57,877,947 67,366,644 16.4 26.2 25.6 (0.6)
Region XII 44,740,935 50,556,259 13.0 27.1 28.1 1.0
Caraga 11,290,530 12,409,350 9.9 36.9 39.8 3.0
ARMM 16,637,408 18,957,590 13.9 36.5 38.1 1.7
Region
Poverty
Inci dence
Among Families
(%)
Gross Regional Domesti c
Product (in thousand
pesos) constant
%change
06-09
Meanpercapitaincome
All incomegroups 21,631 29,727 37.4
Firstdecile class 6,049 8,488 40.3
Seconddecile class 8,755 12,342 41.0
Thirddecile class 10,536 14,969 42.1
FourthDecile class 12,665 17,588 38.9
FifthDecile class 15,192 20,823 37.1
SixthDecile class 18,255 24,924 36.5
SeventhDecileclass 22,172 30,386 37.0
EighthDecile class 27,861 39,161 40.6
NinthDecile class 39,545 55,363 40.0
TenthDecile class 89,490 123,781 38.3
Region IVB
2006 2009
Statistics/
Income decile class
%change
06-09
Meanpercapitaincome
All incomegroups 24,281 32,975 35.8
Firstdecile class 6,939 8,327 20.0
Seconddecile class 9,652 12,093 25.3
Thirddecile class 11,996 14,730 22.8
FourthDecile class 14,415 17,739 23.1
FifthDecile class 17,016 21,287 25.1
SixthDecile class 20,336 25,750 26.6
SeventhDecileclass 24,617 31,600 28.4
EighthDecile class 31,337 40,723 30.0
NinthDecile class 44,275 60,265 36.1
TenthDecile class 96,152 146,630 52.5
Statistics/
Income decile class
Region XII
2006 2009
In contrast, in
Region XII, the
increase in
economic
growth is
concentrated
in the upper
income decile
classes.
Poverty
incidence also
increased by
1.0% between
2006 and 2009.
F. Poverty and Economic Growth: Need for better income distribution,
inclusive growth
25
49
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
IV. Some Policy/Program Implications
G. Poverty and Population Management
All Food Poor Poor Non-Poor
Philippines 4.74 6.48 5.99 4.38
Average Family Size
Poor families have bigger Family Size!
Policy implication on population management.
50
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
H. Poverty and the Basic Sectors
Poorest sectors in 2003, 2006 and 2009:
Fi shermen (41.4%), farmers (36.7%) and
chi l dren (35.1%)!
8 of the 9 basic sectors in posted increases in
poverty incidence between the period 2006 and
2009!
Largest number of poor population in 2003,
2006 and 2009, by sector:
Children (12.4 million), women (11.2 million),
and individuals residing in urban areas (5.7
million)!
Source: National Statistical Coordination Board
Note: Poverty estimates were generated based on the refinements in the official poverty estimation methodology, which was approved on by the NSCB Executive Board
26
51
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
V. Challenges and Opportunities
52
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
SO MANY DEMANDS/CHALLENGES TO THE PHILIPPINE STATISTICAL
SYSTEM on the generation of small area estimates for evidence-based
policy-making and better targeted/focused programs:
Regular generation of small area estimates of poverty
Geographical (i.e., at the city, municipal, congressional district
levels)
Sectoral (PWDs, indigenous peoples)
Regular generation of good governance indicators at the local level
Convergence/Maximized utilization of statistical information available
at the local level (e.g., National Household Targeting System for Poverty
Reduction)
Well-being/Happiness of the poor;
AND THE LISTGOES ON AND ON BUT(nextslide)
V. Challenges and Opportunities
27
53
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
V. Challenges and Opportunities
1. For the Philippine Statistical System to continuously undertake
improvements in its work
Relevance/Emerging concerns (e.g., happiness/genuine
progress of society, governance, etc.)
Timeliness
Frequency
Levels of disaggregation
To strengthen its M and E efforts
M and E is included in the latest Philippine Statistical
Development Program 2011-2017
The greater challenge is the implementation part and the
provision of resources to implement this.
Manpower and financial resources
Capacity building on M and E
TO AID THE PHILIPPINE STATISTICAL SYSTEM IN RESPONDING TO
THESE MANY DEMANDS/CHALLENGES:
54
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
2. For the local governments to serve as key players in
strengthening data support at smaller areas
The statistical development of the LGU is affected by the
level of statistical appreciation of the head of the LGU.
o Appreciation meetings/forums to focused/target
groups (e.g. League of Municipalities, etc.)
There is a need for statistical capacity building, especially of
the line agencies and the LGUs
o Many LGUsdo not have a statistical unit or statistical
personnel;
o Low compensation scheme for statistical personnel;
o Non-statisticians doing statistical work.
TO AID THE PHILIPPINE STATISTICAL SYSTEM IN RESPONDING TO
THESE MANY DEMANDS/CHALLENGES:
V. Challenges and Opportunities
28
55
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
3. For Policy- and Decision-Makers
To recognize and understand the importance of
statistics and statistical systems as BASIC
INFRASTRUCTUREtowards development
Must USEstatistics towards EVIDENCE-BASED
decision-making
Must address the UNDERSPENDING FOR STATISTICS
and have the political will to INVESTin statistics,
INVESTin statisticians, INVESTin statistical offices
Reference: Virola, Romulo A. Measuring Well-Being/ Progress of Societies: Initiatives & Perspectives from The
Philippines. Round Table 1: Measuring Well-Being Initiatives in Individual Countries. 4th OECD World Forum on
Statistics, Knowledge, and Policy. India. October 2012.
V. Challenges and Opportunities
56
2
nd
Annual M&E Forum
JOEncarnacion/7-8 November 2012
NATIONALSTATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD
Maraming Salamat po!
URL: http://www.nscb.gov.ph
e-mail: info@nscb.gov.ph

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen