IP SLA

__________________________
R14 - ip sla schedule 9 life forever start-time now
R17- access-list 17 permit 192.168.222.24 0.0.0.7

on R17 policy-map --> no drop
R14
===
clear IP SLA counters
conf t
ip sla restart 9
BGP
R17-- access-list 17 permit 192.168.222.24 0.0.0.7
R9- loo0 advertise in ospf area 5
under bgp-- no neigh 100.4.4.4 shutdown
R4-- under bgp ipv4 addr family-- neigh 100.5.5.5 activate
R12 - aspath permit it.
ip route 192.168.133.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.33.3 255-->> to uninstalled
in from routing table. otherwise traffic will be dropped when u will do ping fr
om R14.
R20-- -Standard IP access list 20
10 permit 192.168.133.0, wildcard bits 0.0.0.255
R20-- ip access 121- 10 permit icmp any any for BGP ticket
ip access 121 20 permit tcp any eq 23 any (For ZBF ticket)

IGP
________________________
R4-- int lo 4 - shutdown it (It has ip add 4.2.2.2, otherwise when u will tracer
oute from SW1 then it will be on R4 and never will reach to R2 and R1. Tracerout
e output will be wrong)

under ospf process -- no passive int e0/0
Sw1- router os 3
max-lsa (max)
distributelist 1 - access list permit 0.0.0.0
R5-- int lo 10 - shutdown it (it has ip add of R32, reply of traceroute will be
dropped)
Note : Donot Remove "mpls ldp syn" from ospf process.. or donot use "mpls ldp ig
p syns" under e0/3
what is meaningof this command ?
when MPLS sync is enabled, then there should must be MPLS LDP neighbourship on t
he Interface on which mpls ip is configured. otherwise OSPF will not be sync wit
h MPLS, and the cost of all routes would be 65535. and r5 will never prefer R2..
and becuse of this ur traffic will be passed via R5 to r3 or R5 ro R4. (May be
chances of loop >Not verified)
verification: shut down the link which is facing to R4 and r3 and give command s
h ip route ospf u will get cost of 100.2.2.2 is 65535 even the int e0/3 has cost
of 10 "sh ip os inter brief"
solution:-
R2
Int e0/3
mpls ip

R5:
int e0/3
mpls ip
route-map LDP permit 10 (this route-map is on r5 and denying TCP 646 from R2)
no set in null 0 Now LDP neighbourship will be up and the cost will be 11 (
1 of R2's loopback 1 and R5's e0/0 is 10). traffic will be passed via r2 not
R3.
interface Ethernet0/3
no ip ospf cost 65535
On R2 or R4 Or R5- under bgp address family advertise -- network 10.1.1.0 mask 2
55.255.255.0, if none of router is advertising, so r1 can receive it)

On R2 : advertise loopback 0 in ospf 3 a 0 (for BGP neighbourship)


PC32-- ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.1 (it was 10.1.1.11)

SW1- interface Vlan11
no ip ospf shutdown
ip os 3 a 1
R2 or R3 or R4-- remove summary-only from
aggregate-address 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
MPLS
_______________________________________
SW3 - service dhcp
int vlan 34 - ip helper-address (R33 int e0/0)
R8- int e0/0 - ip vrf forwarding acme
R33 - manually type bgp password
reditribute rip into bgp address family

Sw6
int e1/2
spanning-tree root guard >> do not remove it (Question says not to change
any config on SW6), but SW5 is root and when it will recieve Supperior bpdu then
it will be placed into root inconsistence.. So make Root bridge to SW5
Sw5
spann mst 2 priority 36864 (Now SW6 will be Root bridge and it root gua
rd will not efect ur topology)

int e1/3
spanning-tree mst 2 cosst 0 because now sw5 is root bridge, and we have t
o change the port role on local switch
Note: when we change the port state for neighbour switch then we use "port-prior
ity" command
R8 int lo0
ip add 100.8.8.8 255.255.255.255
ip os 3 a 0
R9 under bgp --- no neighbor 100.4.4.4 shutdown
neighbor 192.168.209.29 as-override (so that before advertise the prefix
to CE router, PE router will change replace the AS no. with LOCAL AS)

int lo0- advertise in ospf area 5
R4-- ip access-list 12 - permit 100.2.2.2
R29-- under ospf - defult-information originate always metric-type-1
R8,R6,R7,R4,R9
ip cef
mpls label protocol ldp
mpls ldp router-id loopback 0 force
do sh mpls ldp nei | i Peer
mpls ip on interfaces (If required)
_________________________________________________________________
MST
SW5---
int vlan 56
ip ospf network BROADCAST
exit
Sw6
int e1/2
spanning-tree root guard >> do not remove it (Qst says not to change any c
onfig on SW6), but SW5 is root and when it will recieve Supperior bpdu then it w
ill be placed into root inconsistence.. So make Root bridge to SW5
Sw5
spann mst 2 priority 36864 (Now SW6 will be Root bridge and it root gua
rd will not efect ur topology)

int e1/3
spanning-tree mst 2 cosst 0 because now sw5 is root bridge, and we have t
o change the port role on local switch
Note: when we change the port state for neighbour switch then we use "port-prior
ity" command

================================================================================
====
MSDP
On All Routers
==================
ip multicast-routing
ip pim auto-rp-listner
do sh ip pim interface (to check the interface is enabled with PIM or not) or
user "sh ip pim neighbour"
R23
As Per diagram and "Multicast Boundary" command on R13, for R13 RP should be R2
3,
RP_Mapping is stored in RP cache if :- 1. Its is reciving RP announcement. (Th
ere should be IP pim auto-rp listner On R23)
2. RP must be rechable so R23 must Redistribute
RP add into BGP.
Route-map lsp permit 10
match ip add prefix-list LSP
ip prefix-list LSP seq 1 permit 198.23.23.23/32
>>>> So that, RP will be rechable from R13
ip prefix-list LSP seq 2 permit 100.0.0.0/8 le
32 >>>> Already Defined for MSDP peer and R28 Loopback.
ip prefix-list LSP seq 11 permit 10.10.10.24/29
>>> Permit exit interface of R28 as it is source
R4>> R4 is configured as RP which has ip add of 199.1.1.1 while R5 has ip add
198.23.23.23.. Now R4 will be elected as ACTIVE Rp because it has heigher IP add
than R5.
Solution.. Remove RP command from R4.
R5 >> Remove Static Mroute using AD value of 255.
On F.R. Link OSPF N/W type is non-broadcast. Solution a) If there no restricti
on , then u can change N/W type to Broadcast or u can create mannual naighbours
hip.
b) IF there is Restiction not to
change N/W type or default configuration then create mannual neighboship. etc.
SW2 >> IGMP joing group is wrong.
Remaining all error are same as per old tshoot!!!!!!!!!!!!
Best Of Luck........!!