0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
35 Ansichten30 Seiten
This presentation was delivered by Dr. Karen Lucas (Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds, UK) on 10 September 2014, the first day of the Designing Socially Inclusive Transport Projects Training, a pre-Transport Forum event.
Originaltitel
DSIT_Introductory Lecture: Transport and Social Inclusion
This presentation was delivered by Dr. Karen Lucas (Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds, UK) on 10 September 2014, the first day of the Designing Socially Inclusive Transport Projects Training, a pre-Transport Forum event.
This presentation was delivered by Dr. Karen Lucas (Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds, UK) on 10 September 2014, the first day of the Designing Socially Inclusive Transport Projects Training, a pre-Transport Forum event.
Dr Karen Lucas Institute of Transport Studies University of Leeds, UK Training on Designing Socially Inclusive Transport Session 3 Aims for this lecture 1. To offer some early insights on the transportation and accessibility needs of low income and deprived population groups 2. To understand the relevance of unequal mobility to social development goals 3. To begin to appreciate the importance of understanding local context 4. To introduce some case study evidence and background readings for your future reference Travel is now an essential part of peoples everyday lives Travel is part of the way we live our lives and this must be taken into account as we look ahead to consider the options open to us for how we live within and as part of our environment (County Surveyors Service Transport Futures Group , 2008: 4) Everyone needs to travel more Towns and cities are being increasingly designed around car ownership and use People need to travel further: Home and work locations are no longer co-located Key amenities and services are no longer local Peoples lives and working patterns are more complex and fragmented But not everyone has a car or can drive and so many people still rely on walking and other non-motorised modes Public transport is expensive and is often poorly connected with people activity needs So the informal transport sector remains very important to people in poverty Global Cities 1. Population growth rates 2. Global environmental risks 3. Urban planning and provision of infrastructure a) Density and sprawl b) Polycentric development or concentrated decentralisation c) Car growth as investment 1900 2000 2030 2050 13% 47% 60% 70% 0.25 Billion 2.8 Billion 4.3 Billion 6.0 Billion 1.8 Billion 6.0 Billion 7.2 Billion 9.0 Billion And it is a very unequal playing field Womens travel patterns characterized by deep and persistent inequalities less access to private and public transport, whilst assuming higher responsibility for burden of travel Children and young people overlooked by transport policy and made vulnerable by transport system 27% and 47% of population Needs of older and disabled people (1/3 of pop. by 2050) not considered by transport providers Travel opportunity diminishes by income (UN Habitat Report, 2010 UK STUDY FINDINGS Background context Around 85% of all British households own at least 1 car and 33% have 2 or more 80% of males and 66% of females hold a full car driving licence (35 million people) Trips by car (as a driver or passenger) account for 64% of all trips and 78% of distance travelled But 49% of lowest 5 th income households do not own a private motor vehicle but this gap is narrowing 23% of households approx. 13.5 million people live in absolute poverty in UK They make about 1/3 of the trips and only travel 1/2 as far per year as people living in car-owning households. They mostly walk, use public transport or get lifts from others Joseph Rowntree Foundation study 2000 Key concerns: Lack of local amenities and activities Inadequate public transport services Timing and frequency Inappropriate routing Cost of fares Poor disabled access and supporting infrastructure Lack of timetable and routing information Exposure to traffic and busy roads Unwillingness to travel outside local area Personal safety issues Lack of knowledge of areas Cant afford activities Focus groups with 14 different deprived groups in 6 different communities Inner city, urban, peri- urban, ex-industrial, suburban and rural locations Jobseekers, low-skilled workers, unemployed, lone parents, children, disabled people, ethnic minorities, young ex-offenders, single parents, older people. If youve got to go and sign on you have to make sure youve got the money and the petrol to get there You got to have a car, man, if you want a job - one that pays. There aint no decent work round here. Im going to get me a car and then Im off to London to look for a proper job The buses go all round the world and takes too long when youre waiting and on most of the bus stops it doesnt tell you what time the bus is going to come so you are waiting for ages. I used to nick cars because theres nothing else to do. Youre just walking around at two in the morning and theres a car and why not? Its better than just walking around Why does it matter Social Exclusion Unit study 2003 40% of jobseekers say transport is a problem getting to jobs 1/2 of 16-18 year olds in education find their transport costs hard to meet 1.4 million people either miss or turn down hospital appointments because of problems with transport People without cars find it more difficult to access healthy affordable food Child are 5 times more likely to be in traffic accidents in low income households Individual isolation for older people Communities become cut off and isolated from mainstream activities SOUTH AFRICAN STUDY 2006 Background context 72% of people live in households that are income and/or materially deprived. 37.8% of the relevant working age population are unemployed or unable to work due to sickness/disability. 27.4% of the adult population aged 1865 are educationally deprived (have had no secondary schooling). 67.2% of the population experience environmental deprivation. Levels of deprivation vary greatly by province but that levels of deprivation also vary greatly within provinces. Only 26% of low income h/hshave access to a car and 75% have no access to a train station 65% h/h in lowest income quintile did not use any form of motorised transport in 7 day diary period 40% of low income workers walk to work and 76% of learners walk to their place of education 80% households undertake their food shopping trips on foot and 40% access health care this way Transport is expensive ... Its cheaper to live in the township [on the outskirts of the city centre]. The problem is transport. You have to use taxis to come to town on a daily basis and we cannot afford that money. If we are here, at least we can walk or use a train and therefore we spend less on transport Journeys are long and difficult ... I walk to the taxi for 10 minutes and I wait for the taxi to get full and its takes the taxi 35 minutes to get to the taxi rank and then I get another taxi, but I dont wait for the taxi because it gets full fast. Then it drops me near to the clinic. Then I walk to the clinic for 35 minutes. Taxis are often the only way ... If you want to take your child to the clinic, there is no other way you will have to use a taxi and it is expensive there are many taxis available but the buses are only available to transport people who are going to work and students But they are unsafe and expensive ... The taxis speed a lot and they dont care about our lives It costs me R12 for a one way trip New perspectives on transport and social exclusion? Transport did matter and was an important part of peoples lives even for those on lowest incomes Motorised transport was characterised as a basic need alongside food, shelter and clothing Travel is very expensive relative to incomes largely due to over-dependence on minibus taxis Lack of transport led to similar social consequences as in the UK but with more sever outcomes Journeys are longer, more arduous and less safe numerous reported rapes, killings and thefts Government seems unwilling or is incapable to act BRAZILIAN STUDY 2010/12 Cabo de Sto. Agostinho Paulista Olinda Igarassu Camaragibe S. Loureno da Mata Abreu e Lima Itapissuma Itamarac Moreno Ipojuca J aboato dos Guararapes Recife Araoiaba 1. Rapidly urbanising cities and new employment opportunities >80% of the population living in urban areas Complex and fragmented urban structures High density +suburbanization Poor physical infrastructure 2. Demographic changes in the structure of population, household composition and lifestyle Population getting older and probably travelling more (1996: 4,0 people/hh 2006: 3,3 people/hh) 3. Expanding economy but grwoth in GDP has not been evenly distributed or led to social development for many 4. Car ownership levels currently at about 40% Background context Study areas 2 communities Coque - inner city Recife Santa Terezinha (hillside altos) Focus groups 4 in each area 1 x student males - Coque 1 x student females Alto Santa Terezhina 2 x women carers 2 x employed women 2 x unemployed men in each area Plus 5 x semi- structured interviews with older people in each area Coque- a no go area The taxi does not come here, it just doesnt. Its scared. And in the matter of work here if you are looking for work do not put your name not here, otherwise you wont get it. (Employed womans group, Coque) Access is bad here, you can see the bias, the ambulance does not enter here, no one comes here ... (Unemployed males group, Coque) The Altos getting back up is the problem The Samurai (bus) takes too long to arrive, the buses are always crowded and slow, but there is an additional van that serves the community well. (Unemployed male, AST) Traders have invaded the sidewalks and we have to walk down the [middle of] the street, but near where I live has no trade and have to walk far. (Female carer AST) Some concluding remarks Unequal mobility is not a problem in itself The broader social and spatial context is needed to understand and articulate its unequal social consequences Transport-related social disadvantage is universal problem which is universally overlooked by indices of social wellbeing and thus social policy-makers Qualitative evidence shows it is experienced to different degrees and with differential consequences in different geographical contexts and by different social groups Research needs to move beyond qualitative evidence to quantify and compare its incidence and intensity It is only in this way that the social consequences of transport can be factored into the decision-making process Communicating the social consequences Many (but not all) people living on low incomes in the UK alsoexperiencesignificant degreesof transport disadvantage There is evidence of a link between their lack of transport andother aspectsof their social disadvantage Transport is a key cited reason given for unemployed not takingupjoboffersandtrainingopportunities Lack of mobility and low travel horizons can be associated withreducedsocial learninginearlyyearsandsocial isolation inlater life Peoplearelesslikelytoseekmedical attentionif they livein areasof poor transport andlowaccessibility Deprived communities are more likely to experience crime andanti-social behaviour People on low incomes are more exposed to traffic and so suffer more pedestrian deaths/casualties and pollution- relatedillnesses Further reading Bryceson, D.F., Bradbury, A. and Bradbury, T. (2008) Roads to Poverty Reduction? Exploring Rural Roads Impact on Mobility In Africa and Asia Development Policy Review 26: 4: 459-482 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2008.00418.x/abstract Currie G., Stanley J. and Stanley J. (2007) No Way To Go: Transport and social disadvantage in Australian CommunitiesMelbourne: Monash University ePress. http://books.publishing.monash.edu/apps/bookworm/view/No+Way+To+Go%3A+Transport+and+Social+Disadvan tage+in+Australian+Communities/133/xhtml/chapter01.html Lucas K., Grosvenor T. and Simpson R. (2001) Transport, the Environment and Social Exclusion York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation/ York Publishing Ltd. http://www.jrf.org.uk/publications/environment-and-equity-concerns- about-transport McCray, T. (2004) An issue of culture: the effects of daily activities on prenatal care utilization patterns in rural South Africa Social Science and Medicine 59: 1843-1855 http://www.google.co.uk/url?url=http://soa.utexas.edu/file/2124/download&rct=j&frm=1&q=&esrc=s&sa=U&ei= mpbrU-zMKsvH7Aat_oHABA&ved=0CB8QFjAC&usg=AFQjCNH0ib9KpgL7pZdBGU6kqjZJ9DnpUg Porter, G. (2002) Living in a Walking World: Rural Mobility and Social Equity Issues in Sub-Saharan Africa World Development 30: 2: 285-300 http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/PDF/Outputs/R7575038.pdf Rose, E., Whitten, K. and McCreanor T. (2009) Transport Transport related social exclusion in New Zealand: evidence and challenges New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1177083X.2009.9522454 Salon, D. and Gulyani, S. (2010) Mobility, Poverty and Gender: Travel Choices of Slum Residents in Nairobi, Kenya Transport Reviews 30: 5: 641-657. http://www.africafiles.org/printableversion.asp?id=24650 Social Exclusion Unit (2003) Making the Connections: Final report on Transport and Social Exclusion London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. http://assets.dft.gov.uk/statistics/series/accessibility/making-the-connections.pdf