MANILA, Philippines Senator Juan Ponce Enrile once again sought the intervention of

the Supreme Court (SC) in the plunder case he is facing before the Sandiganbayan in
relation to the pork barrel scam.
In a 70-page petition dated September 4, Enrile questioned the decision of the
Sandigabayan Third Division not to grant his petition to post bail. He said the plunder
charge against him cannot even be considered a capital offense for bail to be denied.
The prosecution failed to show clearly and conclusively that Enrile, if ever he would be
convicted, is punishable by reclusion perpetua; hence, Enrile is entitled to bail as a
matter of right, the petition said.
He said that the practice of detaining a person charged with a capital offense before the
bail hearing even with no evidence presented against him is clearly wrong, even
unconstitutional.
He added that he is not a flight risk, and that his advanced age and voluntary surrender
should be considered in deciding his petition to post bail. The 90-year-old
senatorsurrendered to authorities shortly after the anti-graft court issued a warrant for
his arrest on July 4.
Considering the undisputed presence of two mitigating circumstances (advanced age
and voluntary surrender), the prescribed penalty, under the plunder law, is only
reclusion temporal, thus automatically entitling Enrile to post bail, the petition stated.
The detained senator also asked the High Court to expedite the proceedings, and to set
his case for oral arguments.
Enrile earlier petitioned for bail in relation to his case before the Sandiganbayan, but the
anti-graft court stated in a July 14 resolution that the senators petition was baseless.
He filed a motion for reconsideration, which was again denied on August 8, with the
Sandigabayan stating: No amount of legal hermeneutics can justify accused Enriles
insistence that the court should already grant him bail pending the prosecutions
presentation of its evidence showing proof evident of his guilt. (READ: Why Enrile's bail
efforts were to no avail)
Enrile faces plunder and graft charges due to his alleged diversion of P172 million
($3.92 million)* worth of his Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) to ghost
projects of bogus non-governmental organizations controlled by Janet Lim Napoles.
The senator first filed a petition before the Supreme Court on August 7 to temporarily
halt the proceedings in his case at the Sandiganbayan. This was after the anti-graft
court refused to grant his request to be provided by the prosecution details of the
plunder charges filed against him. Rappler.com