Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
=
The AHP method can be divided into the following four
steps: setting up the hierarchy structure; on all levels of the
elements of the above level criterioncomparing the relative
importance of the two, and using 1 9 proportional scale to
transform comparison qualitative results into the quantitative
judgment data, constructing judgment matrix; and getting the
maximum characteristic root of matrix and the corresponding
eigenvector, determining the weights, and testing the
consistency, for each judgment matrix, according to the
characteristic equation
max
AW W = obtaining normalized
single sequencing weight vector W. If each order n judgment
matrix corresponds to the consistency of the judgment matrix
in proportion . . / . 0.1 C R C I R I = < , the matrix will be
with acceptable consistency
This paper, according to the above employee satisfaction
index system, and the AHP steps and methods, uses stratified
sampling method to select 25 delegates randomly from the
middle managers, first-line managers and general staff in the
target enterprise (participants required to have at least
college education, in order to facilitate understanding for
index system ), compares two of the index systems, and
assigns scores from1 to 9, then forms judgment matrix on the
basis of mode principle combined with median principle
values. Finally, it gets the relative important degree of each
index as well as the normalized weight index through
calculating, and through the test of consistency, C.R are less
than 0.1. Please refer to table 1 and 2.
TABLE I. THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF THE THIRD INDICATORS TO
THE SECOND INDICATORS AND THE NORMALIZED WEIGHT
The second-grade
index
The third grade index
The relative
importance
normalized
weight W
C.R
Job satisfaction Responsibility matching 1.817 0.540
Work fit
and competence
1.000 0.300 0.032
Work-life balance 0.550 0.160
Job reward
satisfaction
Salary and welfare 1.220 0.266
Work recognition
and appreciation
1.203 0.263
Learning and training 0.624 0.136 0.0016
Work security 1.000 0.218
Career development 0.535 0.117
Work group
satisfaction
supervisor 2.466 0.648
Department cooperation 0.464 0.122 0.008
Team cooperation 0.874 0.230
Work environment
Company culture
and principle
2.154 0.581
satisfaction Work time and workload 1.145 0.309 0.012
Work space and equipment 0.405 0.110
36
TABLE II. THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF THE SECOND INDICATORS
TO THE FIRST INDICATORS AND THE NORMALIZED WEIGHT
The first grade
index
The second grade index
The relative
importance
normalized
weight
W
C.R
Employees
satisfaction
Job satisfaction 1.165 0.201
0.015
Job reward satisfaction 2.043 0.352
Work group satisfaction 1.752 0.302
Work environment
satisfaction
0.841 0.145
IV. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION
SURVEY
This paper uses the multi-level fuzzy comprehensive
evaluation model to evaluate the employee satisfaction. The
steps are: first, evaluating the fourteen third-level indexes,
according to degree distribution probability on the issue of
satisfaction of the 464 effective questionnaires, determining
the items of membership degree, namely,
ij ij
r m n =
ij
m
expresses the selection item under each corresponding
evaluation, n is for effective questionnaire number; second,
attaching each item rights of the three-grade index to the
equal weight to get each item evaluation set (to derive the
weight data of the rest of the weight of index on the basis of
above by AHP method), and viewing the evaluation set as
the fuzzy relation matrix of the third-grade index to get the
evaluation results of the third-grade index; then, viewing the
evaluation results of the third-grade index as the fuzzy
relation matrix of the second-grade indicators to get the
evaluation results of the second-grade index; similarly,
viewing the evaluation of the results of the second-level
indicators as the fuzzy relation matrix of the first-level,
finally gets the overall comprehensive evaluation results of
the employee satisfaction. At the same time, according to the
evaluation set as: V={ quite satisfied, satisfied, in general,
dissatisfied, quite dissatisfied }, quantitative values for
V={5,4,3,2,1} quantized on the evaluation results, got
quantitative result of various index satisfaction, recorded as"
1
4 5 c is quite satisfied"," is
2
3 4 c satisfaction","
3
2 3 c general", "
3
1 2 c is dissatisfied","
4
0 1 c quite dissatisfied" ( for the quantitative
evaluation result ). Limited by the Length of this paper, the
results of three level index evaluation calculation process are
not listed here in detail, only the calculation processes of the
second-grade index and the first-grade index.
A . Job Satisfaction
The work satisfaction evaluation matrix is:
= =
003 . 0 282 . 0 517 . 0 167 . 0 030 . 0
004 . 0 022 . 0 513 . 0 155 . 0 306 . 0
044 . 0 228 . 0 522 . 0 207 . 0 000 . 0
) 160 . 0 300 . 0 540 . 0 (
1 1 1
R W B D
( ) 0.097 0.185 0.519 0.175 0.026 =
Based on the above formula, the degree of membership
of the job satisfaction is (0.097 0.185 0.519 0.175 0.026),
comprehensive score is 3.153, which claims the lower levels.
The distribution is normal. Evaluation of "general" about the
work itself satisfaction is accounted for 51.9%, the rest, i.e."
satisfaction"," dissatisfied"," quite satisfied" and" quite
dissatisfied" account for almost symmetrical distribution.
From the evaluation results of the third-level indicators,
dissatisfied for "job matching degree" gets 22.8%;
for"work-life balance" , 28.2%. Obviously, to develop the
growing model enterprise fast, the assignment of
responsibilities and staff work and life balance need to be
further improved.
B . Job Reward Satisfaction
The evaluation matrix of Job reward satisfaction is:
( )
= =
043 . 0 247 . 0 694 . 0 016 . 0 000 . 0
321 . 0 490 . 0 028 . 0 162 . 0 000 . 0
000 . 0 423 . 0 282 . 0 236 . 0 060 . 0
000 . 0 463 . 0 194 . 0 313 . 0 031 . 0
105 . 0 429 . 0 387 . 0 079 . 0 000 . 0
117 . 0 218 . 0 136 . 0 263 . 0 266 . 0
2 2 2
R W B D
( ) 103 . 0 429 . 0 279 . 0 172 . 0 016 . 0 =
Based on the above formula, the degree of membership
of job reward satisfaction is(0.016 0.172 0.279 0.429
0.103), comprehensive score is 2.571, which is "the general",
but the largest proportion(42.9%) is dissatisfied". From the
third-level indicators, in terms of "general", only" occupation
development" ranks quite high, reaching 69.4%. As for the
other four indicators, "remuneration and welfare",
"recognition and appreciation", "learning and training" and
"job security", the ratio of "dissatisfied" is relatively high.
Especially for the " job security index", the proportion of
quite dissatisfied" reaches 32.1%". Therefore, the growing
small and micro businesses should strengthen in maintaining
the stability of employees and improving staff reward
satisfaction.
C. Group Work Satisfaction
The degree evaluation matrix of group work satisfaction
is:
= =
030 . 0 012 . 0 105 . 0 593 . 0 287 . 0
036 . 0 230 . 0 542 . 0 180 . 0 012 . 0
006 . 0 019 . 0 126 . 0 0489 . 0 360 . 0
) 230 . 0 122 . 0 648 . 0 (
3 3 3
R W B D
( ) 009 . 0 043 . 0 172 . 0 475 . 0 301 . 0 =
Based on the above formula, the degree of the
membership of work group satisfaction is (0.301 0.475 0.172
0.043 0.009), the comprehensive score is 4.016, which
claims lower levels in "very satisfied". Viewing from
percentage terms,77.5% samples of work group is"
satisfaction" or over. Thus, the level of growing small and
micro businesses employees for work group satisfaction is
relatively high. But notably, in the third-grade index, 23% of
the samples are not satisfied with their departments
cooperation. Therefore, the growing small and micro
businesses should strengthen division and coordination,
promoting group work satisfaction in the process of the rapid
growth.
D. work environment Satisfaction
The evaluation matrix Work environment satisfaction is:
37
= =
038 . 0 200 . 0 545 . 0 207 . 0 010 . 0
026 . 0 216 . 0 603 . 0 138 . 0 017 . 0
000 . 0 169 . 0 559 . 0 257 . 0 015 . 0
) 110 . 0 309 . 0 581 . 0 (
4 4 4
R W B D
( ) 012 . 0 187 . 0 571 . 0 215 . 0 015 . 0 =
Based on the above formula, the degree of the
membership of work group satisfaction is (0.015 0.215 0.571
0.187 0.012), the comprehensive score is 3.033, which
claims the lower levels in satisfaction. Viewing from the
percentage, 57.1% samples feel general" for work
environment, 22.6% samples are satisfaction". Therefore,
the growing small and micro businesses employees are
basically satisfied with the work environment. But in the
third-grade index, 16.9% of the samples are not satisfied
with the company culture and system construction, 24.2% of
the samples are dissatisfied or quite dissatisfied with the
working time and workload, 23.8% of the samples are
dissatisfied or quite dissatisfied with the working space and
equipment. Therefore, the growing small and micro
businesses should improve employee satisfaction in the
construction of the system culture, working time distribution
and equipment configuration
V. OVERALL EVALUATION OF EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION
AND CLASSIFICATION STATISTICS
A. Overall Evaluation of Employee Satisfaction
The comprehensive evaluation matrix of the growing
small and micro businesses employee satisfaction
is:
( )
= =
012 . 0 187 . 0 571 . 0 215 . 0 015 . 0
009 . 0 043 . 0 172 . 0 475 . 0 301 . 0
103 . 0 429 . 0 279 . 0 172 . 0 016 . 0
026 . 0 175 . 0 519 . 0 185 . 0 097 . 0
145 . 0 302 . 0 352 . 0 201 . 0 R W B D
( ) 046 . 0 226 . 0 337 . 0 272 . 0 118 . 0 =
Based on the above formula, the degree of membership
of overall employee satisfaction indicators of the growing
small and micro businesses is(0.118 0.272 0.337 0.226
0.046), the comprehensive score is 3.191," which claims
lower levels in satisfaction" . Viewing from percentage,
"quite satisfied" samples account for 11.8%, "satisfied"
samples account for 27.2%, "the general" accounted for in
33.7%, dissatisfied" account for 22.6%, "quite dissatisfied
account for 4.6%. In general, the employees overall
satisfaction of the growing small and micro businesses is
basic satisfaction".
B. Results of Classification Statistics
According to the above statistical methods, this paper, on
the basis of personal information, classifies the sample
questionnaire to calculate employee satisfaction in order to
provide reference opinions for the enterprise managers,
Please refer to table 3.
TABLE III. EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION STATISTICS
age
Below 20 2.977
20-30 3.013
above30 3.451
The length of
service
Probationary period 3.713
1-2 3.073
2-3 2.501
Over 3 years 3.102
education
Below college education 2.932
College education 3.237
Bachelor degree or above 3.181
family
unmarried 2.941
Married without child 3.408
Married with child 3.129
position
middle managers 3.194
First-line manager 3.375
General staff 2.901
As is shown in the table, in the category of employee age,
the rate of satisfaction among 30-year-old or over staff is the
highest (3.451). in the category of working seniority in the
enterprise, namely the classification of length of service, the
rate of satisfaction among 2-3 year company employee is
minimum (2.501). In the classification of staff education, the
satisfaction of staff without college education is the lowest
(2.932). In the classification of staff family status, the
satisfaction of unmarried staff is the lowest (2.941). In the
position in hierarchy classification, the satisfaction of general
staff is the lowest (2.901 points).
Reference
! Zengming,Qinglu . Review of job satisfaction
study , | Journal of Henan Institute of Education
(Philosophy and social sciences edition),2003.01
?Changqi, Postmen -Based on the factor analysis ;
|Research of satisfaction and manage,2011.06
3Zhangmian,lishuzhuo. An Empirical Study on the
determinants of Enterprise employees' Job Satisfaction ,
|Statistical research
+Zhangwentong;Statistical analysis of SPSS course
(Advanced) MHope electronic press
38