0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
18 Ansichten11 Seiten
The World's Most ethical companies designation recognizes companies that truly go beyond making statements about doing business --ethically and translate those words into action. The honorees not only promote ethical business standards and practices internally, they exceed legal compliance minimums and shape future industry standards by introducing best practices today.
The World's Most ethical companies designation recognizes companies that truly go beyond making statements about doing business --ethically and translate those words into action. The honorees not only promote ethical business standards and practices internally, they exceed legal compliance minimums and shape future industry standards by introducing best practices today.
The World's Most ethical companies designation recognizes companies that truly go beyond making statements about doing business --ethically and translate those words into action. The honorees not only promote ethical business standards and practices internally, they exceed legal compliance minimums and shape future industry standards by introducing best practices today.
Assessment and Evaluation of the Ethical Requirements of the Microsoft Corporation
Dawn Shell
(ACC 573) Prepared for Dr.XXXXXXXX
In Partial Fulfillment for the Requirements for a Masters Degree in Business Administartion Strayer University
August 25, 2014
Running Head: MICROSOFT 2
Worlds Most Ethical Companies: Assessment and Evaluation of the Ethical Requirements of the Microsoft Corporation
I. Conceptual Framework II. Determine at least two (2) ways in which the chosen company behaves in a morally responsible way toward each of the following: III. Predict the effects that these morally conscious decisions would have on the company's bottom line. IV. Review the company's policies from a critical perspective, and list at least two (2) areas where the company could improve its treatment of consumers, the environment, or employees. Justify the response with specific examples. V. Recommend viable policy options that address the selected business areas, reflect key ethical considerations, and foster an ethical work environment. VI. Recommend ways in which businesses can be partners with nature by applying the concepts of business ethics, business ecology, and environmental ethics. VII. Analyze the concepts of public safety and government regulation along with the role of business responsibility. VIII. Analyze the concepts of public safety and government regulation along with the role of business responsibility. IX. Executive Summary
Running Head: MICROSOFT 3
Conceptual Framework The Worlds Most Ethical (WME) Companies designation recognizes companies that truly go beyond making statements about doing business ethically and translate those words into action. The WME honorees not only promote ethical business standards and practices internally, they exceed legal compliance minimums and shape future industry standards by introducing best practices today (www.ethisphere.com). This years 144 honorees represent 41 industries and include 21 first-time honorees. In this eighth year of recognizing companies, Ethisphere is honoring the largest group of organizations based outside the U.S. 38 organizations from 21 countries and 5 continents (www.ethisphere.com). . Earlier in the year, the Ethisphere Institute announced their seventh annual list of the Worlds Most Ethical Companies. The aim of this work is to select one company that behaves morally responsible to their consumers, the environment, and their employees. As such, this paper has chosen the Microsoft Corporation. The Microsoft Corporation develops, licenses, markets, and supports software, services, and devices worldwide. Microsoft's ambitions are anything but small. The company markets and distributes its products through original equipment manufacturers, distributors, and resellers, as well as online. Microsoft Corporation was founded in 1975 and is based in Redmond, Washington (www.Hoover.com, 2014). Now, I caveat. Although they may try, NO large corporation makes a profit by performing their business ethically. The criticism of Microsoft has followed the company's existence because of various aspects of its products and business practices. The ease of use,
Running Head: MICROSOFT 4
stability, and security of the company's software are common targets for critics. More recently, Trojan horses and other exploits have plagued numerous users due to faults in the security of Microsoft Windows and other programs (www.ethisphere.com). Microsoft is also accused of locking vendors into their products, and not following and complying with existing standards in its software total cost of ownership comparisons of Linux as well as OS X to Windows are a continuous point of debate (www.ethisphere.com). The company has been in numerous lawsuits by several governments and other companies for unlawful monopolistic practices. In 2004, the European Union found Microsoft guilty in a highly publicized anti-trust case (www. hoovers.com). Additionally, Microsoft's EULA for some of its programs is often criticized as being too restrictive as well as being against open source software (www.hoover.com). More importantly, Microsoft has been criticized for its involvement in censorship in the People's Republic of China (www.ethisphere.com). Microsoft has also come under criticism for outsourcing jobs to China and India. Also, there are reports of poor working conditions at a factory in southern China that makes some of Microsoft's products. Determine at least two (2) ways in which the chosen company behaves in a morally responsible way toward each of the following: Personally, I am on an opposite side of the view. There is no such thing as an ethical big corporation. They cannot exist without exploitation of cheap labor. There is the science that gives us knowledge, but only philosophy can give us wisdom. The standards of business conduct are an extension of Microsofts values and reflect our continued commitment to ethical business practices Running Head: MICROSOFT 5
and complying with the law. Most people expect the companies to be well informed and exercise good judgment when making business decisions (Columbus, 2012). The standards are designed to help us make the right decisions for ourselves and Microsoft. The standards are not intended to cover every issue or situation a company may face. These standards summarize, and are supported by, the principles and policies that govern the company. If all goes as intended, people should use the standards, in conjunction with corporate policies, to guide and inform their conduct. All Microsoft employees are responsible for understanding and complying with the standards, Microsoft policies, laws, and regulations. All have a responsibility to raise compliance and ethics concerns. Predict the effects that these morally conscious decisions would have on the company's bottom line. The concept behind the triple bottom line is that companies are responsible first and foremost to all their stakeholders, and these include everyone that is involved with the company whether directly or indirectly, as well as the planet we're all living on (www mindtools, 2014). This approach sees shareholders as part of the stakeholder group, but only as part of it. With this paper would like to awaken the reader to the fact that we're destroying the very thing that we should value: the opportunity to live together with meaning and purpose (Liebs, 2013), Leaders have to step outside the daily issues surrounding profitability and say, "What's this all about? I say, "You bet it's hard to be a good steward of people, but what's the alternative? This is the fabric of life." (Liebs, 2013). All employees need to feel as though they can discuss everything with their bosses even the negative news. If employees arent aware of Running Head: MICROSOFT 6
organizational news, team shakeups, and how they need to operate, dont throw it in their face when they are going in the wrong direction (Columbus, 2012). Be clear and transparent with what you expect from them. First, Microsoft needs to know how their employees work. As a manager of people it is their job to make sure everyone on their team is being as productive as possible, even if they have to treat everyone a little bit differently to do so. The more effective you are at flexing their managing style, the more effectively your employees will carry out their assignments (Columbus, 2012). If an employee works better in groups or with flexible work schedules, encourage this behavior. If they are the loner type, thats okay, too. Dont force them to change how they perform; its essentially ingrained in them and will likely backfire and decrease their morale. The company should adjust to them (Columbus, 2012). Next, the company should encourage their employees strengths. If Microsoft has a star performer who is great at hands-on presentations, dont have them only work on preliminary research. This isnt what theyre good at and its not what will make them the happiest. If employees are doing work theyre passionate about, the output will more likely be positive (L Columbus, 2012). Encourage their unique strengths. Push the employees and use their skills to your advantage. Review the company's policies from a critical perspective, and list at least two (2) areas where the company could improve its treatment of consumers, the environment, or employees. Justify the response with specific examples.
Running Head: MICROSOFT 7
First, Microsoft needs to know how their employees work. Over time, the morale of any company's employees can drop, and this leads to lack of motivation to produce. As a manager of people it is their job to make sure everyone on their team is being as productive as possible, even if they have to treat everyone a little bit differently to do so (Columbus, 2012). The more effective you are at flexing their managing style, the more effectively your employees will carry out their assignments. If an employee works better in groups or with flexible work schedules, encourage this behavior. If they are the loner type, thats okay, too. Dont force them to change how they perform; its essentially ingrained in them and will likely backfire and decrease their morale (Columbus, 2012). The company should adjust to them. The company should encourage their employees strengths. If Microsoft has a star performer who is great at hands-on presentations, dont have them only work on preliminary research (L Columbus, 2012). This isnt what theyre good at and its not what will make them the happiest. If employees are doing work theyre passionate about, the output will more likely be positive. Encourage their unique strengths. Push the employees and use their skills to your advantage. Recommend viable policy options that address the selected business areas, reflect key ethical considerations, and foster an ethical work environment. The company needs to be clear and transparent. Employees need to feel as though they can discuss everything with their bosses even the negative news (Vivian Giang, 2012). If Microsofts employees are not aware of organizational news, team shakeups, and how they need to operate, dont throw it in their face when they are going in the wrong direction. Be clear and transparent with what you expect from them. Instead of yearly reviews, employees now want feedback and they want it often especially the younger workers (Vivian Giang, 2012). By offering employees real-time Running Head: MICROSOFT 8
feedback helps them with their individual goals. This gives employees the answers they need now, rather than later. A company should not wait till yearly or quarterly performance reviews to offer advice and direction. "By the time those roll around, that feedback doesnt really matter anymore since its probably old news." The company should encourage their employees strengths. If the company has a star performer whos great at hands-on presentations, dont have them only work on preliminary research. This isnt what theyre good at and its not what will make them the happiest. If employees are doing work theyre passionate about, the output will more likely be positive. Encourage their unique strengths. Push your employees and use their skills to your advantage. Analyze the concepts of public safety and government regulation along with the role of business responsibility. As a manager it's your job to make sure everyone on your team is being as productive as possible, even if you have to treat everyone a little bit differently to do so. The more effective you are at flexing your managing style, the more effectively your employees will carry out their assignments. If an employee works better in groups or with flexible work schedules, encourage this behavior. If they are the loner type, thats okay, too. Dont force them to change how they perform; its essentially ingrained in them and will likely backfire and decrease their morale. Microsoft will be better served adjusting to their employees needs. Recommend ways in which businesses can be partners with nature by applying the concepts of business ethics, business ecology, and environmental ethics. Running Head: MICROSOFT 9
According to the Nature Conservancy (2014), the private sector has an important role to play in advancing our conservation mission. Most, businesses around the globe can, and do, have significant impacts on our climate and on the lands and waters that people and nature rely upon for survival. Thats why by applying our science, reach, expertise in conservation planning, and on-the- ground experience businesses make better decisions and understand the value of nature, and ultimately protect it (www.nature conservancy.com, 2014). Most companies increasingly understand that investments in conservation help protect business assets, mitigate risk and create opportunities (www.nature conservancy.com, 2014). To not work with companies as they seek to become more environmentally sustainable is to miss an opportunity to create real conservation gains around the world.
Running Head: MICROSOFT 10
Works Cited Columbus, L. (2010). The World's Most Ethical Software Companies: What They All Have in Common. Business Ethics, 12(16). Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2013/03/25/the-worlds-most-ethical- software-companies-what-they-all-have-in-common/ Columbus, L. (2012, August/September). Putting People before the Bottom Line (and Still Making Money) . Retrieved from http://www.inc.com/audacious-co Be clear and transparent Ethisphere Institute. (2014). The Worlds Most Ethical Companies. Retrieved from http://ethisphere.com/worlds-most-ethical/wme-honorees/#sthash.dGwkkNtC.dpuf Giang, V. (2012). 7 Ways To Boost Employee Morale. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/7-ways-to-boost-employee-morale-at-your-company- 2012-11#ixzz3BKbzUtVB The Hoovers. (2014). Hoover's proprietary company profiles and industry information: Microsoft Corporation. Retrieved August 22, 2014, from http://www.hoovers.com/microsoft.. Liebs, S. (2013). Audacious Companies. Inc. Retrieved from http://www.inc.com/audacious- companies/scott-leibs/barry-wehmiller.html The Nature Conservancy. (2014). Businesses Partnering with Nature. Retrieved from https://support.nature.org/site/Donation2?df_id=13500&13500.donation=form1&matcht ype=b&creative=30955432598&device=c&network=g&src=sea.AWP.PR91.CP105.AD 781.KW6092.MT92.BU553&gclid=Cj0KEQjwveufBRDlsNb3kb- Running Head: MICROSOFT 11
twMIBEiQASNH0xjaQq3xs4mpRrjiIK6JaiLqEatRLokZYpFD4GtznA1caAnMW8P8H AQ