0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
50 Ansichten11 Seiten
Drug-resistant malaria has posed a major problem in malaria control. More than ten African countries have switched their first-line drug to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. Pfmdr1 polymorphisms may also be associated with resistance to chloroquine and mefloquine.
Drug-resistant malaria has posed a major problem in malaria control. More than ten African countries have switched their first-line drug to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. Pfmdr1 polymorphisms may also be associated with resistance to chloroquine and mefloquine.
Drug-resistant malaria has posed a major problem in malaria control. More than ten African countries have switched their first-line drug to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. Pfmdr1 polymorphisms may also be associated with resistance to chloroquine and mefloquine.
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group.
Since the first reports of chloroquine-resistant falciparum
malaria in southeast Asia and South America almost half a century ago, drug-resistant malaria has posed a major problem in malaria control. By the late 1980s, resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and to mefloquine was also prevalent on the Thai-Cambodian and Thai-Myanmar (Thai- Burmese) borders, rendering them established multidrug- resistant (MDR) areas. Chloroquine resistance spread across Africa during the 1980s, and severe resistance is especially found in east Africa. As a result, more than ten African countries have switched their first-line drug to sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine. Of great concern is the fact that the efficacy of this drug in Africa is progressively deteriorating, especially in foci in east Africa, which are classified as emerging MDR areas. Urgent efforts are needed to lengthen the lifespan of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and to identify effective, affordable, alternative antimalarial regimens. Molecular markers for antimalarial resistance have been identified, including pfcrt polymorphisms associated with chloroquine resistance and dhfr and dhps polymorphisms associated with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance. Polymorphisms in pfmdr1 may also be associated with resistance to chloroquine, mefloquine, quinine, and artemisinin. Use of such genetic information for the early detection of resistance foci and future monitoring of drug-resistant malaria is a potentially useful epidemiological tool, in conjunction with the conventional in-vivo and in-vitro drug-sensitivity assessments. This review describes the various features of drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum, including its determinants, current status in diverse geographical areas, molecular markers, and their implications. Lancet Infect Dis 2002; 2: 20918 Drug resistance in malaria is a vitally important public- health concern. Each year, an estimated 0727 million people die of malaria, and over 75% of them are African children. 1 Amid such a disease burden, the development of resistance has a significant influence on the control of malaria in affected countries. Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to chloroquine, a 4-aminoquinoline, was first observed almost 50 years ago. Today, chloroquine resistance occurs almost everywhere that P falciparum does. Strains of falciparum parasites have developed resistance to most of the commonly used antimalarials, including sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (Fansidar) and mefloquine. Resistance commonly develops within 1015 years after an antimalarial is introduced (table 1). 26 The development of resistance to sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine in P falciparum in Africa is particularly serious, because this drug combination is the only affordable, effective, practical, and well-tolerated alternative to 4-aminoquinolines. We review here the changing patterns of drug resistance and our current understanding of its development, including molecular clues that have recently been elucidated. The resistance pattern in each geographical region provides useful treatment guidance, because there are no bedside methods for assessment of antimalarial-drug susceptibility. Although drug resistance occurs in both P falciparum and Plasmodium vivax, only the former is discussed in this paper because it accounts for most of the disease burden. We emphasise those areas where multidrug resistance is emerging. Resistance to chloroquine in P vivax largely concentrates in Papua New Guinea and Irian Jaya (Indonesia) with sporadic reports from elsewhere in Asia and South America. No resistance has been documented for Plasmodium malariae or Plasmodium ovale, the other species that infect human beings. THE LANCET Infectious Diseases Vol 2 Xxxxxx 2002 http://infection.thelancet.com 209 Epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria Chansuda Wongsrichanalai, Amy L Pickard, Walther H Wernsdorfer, and Steven R Meshnick CW is an epidemiologist at the Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand. ALP is a doctoral student and SRM is professor of epidemiology at the Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. WHW is professor at the Department of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Institute of Pathophysiology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Correspondence: Dr Chansuda Wongsrichanalai, AFRIMS, 315/6 Rajvithi Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand. Tel +66 (0) 2 644 5775; fax +66 (0) 2 644 4784; email chansudaw@thai.amedd.army.mil Reviews Table 1. Dates of introduction and first reports of antimalarial drug resistance Antimalarial drug Introduced First reported Difference Refs resistance (years) Quinine 1632 1910 278 2 Chloroquine 1945 1957 12 3 Proguanil 1948 1949 1 2,4 Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine 1967 1967 0 2,4 Mefloquine 1977 1982 5 5 Atovaquone 1996 1996 0 6 For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group. THE LANCET Infectious Diseases Vol 2 April 2002 http://infection.thelancet.com 210 Historical perspectives Quinine is one of the oldest malaria remedies known, although its use has never been as widespread as that of more contemporary drugs. Quinine occurs naturally in the bark of cinchona trees in South America. Cinchona bark was introduced into Europe as a treatment for the ague in the early 17th century. In 1820, the alkaloid quinine was isolated from cinchona bark. 7,8 Chloroquine was first synthesised in Germany but was not recognised as a potent antimalarial until the 1940s as part of the US World War II military effort. By 1946, it was found to be far superior to other contemporary synthetic antimalarials. 9 It became the cornerstone of antimalarial chemotherapy for the next 40 years. However, the advent of chloroquine resistance led to the development of other drugs such as mefloquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, artemisinin derivatives, and atovaquone-proguanil (Malarone). 7,8 Subsequently, resistance has developed to many of the newer drugs. In China, infusions prepared from wormwood (Artemisia annua) were used for treating fever over a thousand years ago. The efficacy of the infusions has been ascribed to the sesquiterpene lactone, artemisinin. As a result of increasing drug-resistant malaria, artemisinin from wormwood and semisynthetic derivatives of this substance have become a very important antimalarial drug group. Assessment of P falciparum antimalarial susceptibility P falciparum susceptibility to antimalarial drugs is commonly assessed by therapeutic response (in-vivo test). In-vivo response to drugs was originally defined by WHO in terms of parasite clearance (sensitive [S] and three degrees of resistance [RI, RII, RIII]). 10 This classification remains valid for areas with low or no malaria transmission, but it is difficult to apply to areas with intensive transmission, where new infections may be mistaken for recrudescences. Therefore, WHO introduced in 1996 a modified protocol based on clinical outcome (adequate clinical response, early treatment failure, and late treatment failure) targeted at a practical assessment of therapeutic responses in areas with intense transmission, where parasitaemia in the absence of clinical signs or symptoms is common. 10,11 The protocol has also been adapted for use in areas of low to moderate endemicity, taking into consideration that the objectives of malaria treatment are both parasite clearance and disappearance of symptoms. A summary of the original and modified protocols is shown in table 2. If not otherwise indicated, the term resistance in this review is based on therapeutic response according to one of these established protocols. Antimalarial-drug susceptibility can also be assessed by in-vitro assays measuring the intrinsic sensitivity of P falciparum from the inhibition of growth or schizont maturation. 3,11 Recently, the use of molecular markers has been proposed as an additional tool for the early detection of drug resistance in malaria. 12 Each assessment method has its advantages and disadvantages, and the results may not be directly comparable with each other. In-vitro test results, in particular, do not necessarily correspond to in-vivo outcomes, largely owing to the role of host immunity in the latter. In addition, pharmacokinetic information may be required for differentiation between true resistance and failure to achieve adequate drug concentration profiles. 13 Determinants of antimalarial resistance Many factors contribute to the development and spread of resistance. Gene mutations conferring resistance to antimalarial drugs do occur in nature, independently of drug effect (the common antimalarial drugs are not mutagenic). Although the natural proportion of such mutants in the parasite population is low, and malaria isolates from populations and individuals show heterogeneity, selection of the most fit parasites occurs under drug pressure. Single or multiple point mutations in the plasmodium genome may confer resistance in the face of chemotherapy. Reasons for the development and spread of drug resistance involve the interaction of drug-use patterns, characteristics of the drug itself, human host factors, parasite characteristics, and vector and environmental factors (table 3). 3,5,1416 Characteristics of the drug are important determinants of resistance. First, drugs with a long elimination half-life, such as mefloquine, may exert substantial residual selection on new infections contracted after the treatment of the primary infection when the drug persists at subtherapeutic concentrations in the Review Epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria Table 2. Classifications of in-vivo antimalarial-drug sensitivity test outcomes according to the original WHO protocol and the modification (1996) for areas with substantial malaria transmission 10 Classification Definition Original classification S (sensitive) Reduction to <25% of initial parasitaemia on day 2 with smears negative for malaria from day 7 to the end of follow-up (28 days or longer for drugs with a long half-life, such as mefloquine) RI response Initial clearance of parasitaemia, a negative smear on day 7, followed by recrudescence 8 or more days after treatment RII response Initial clearance or substantial reduction of parasitaemia (<25% of the initial count on day 2) but with persistence or recrudescence of parasitaemia during days 47 RIII response No significant reduction of parasitaemia Modified classification (1996) Early treatment failure (ETF) Aggravation or persistence of clinical symptoms in the presence of parasitaemia during the first 3 days of follow-up Late treatment failure (LTF) Reappearance of symptoms in the presence of parasitaemia during days 414 of follow-up Adequate clinical response (ACR) Absence of parasitaemia on day 14 irrespective of fever, or absence of clinical symptoms irrespective of parasitaemia, in patients not meeting ETF or LTF criteria For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group. THE LANCET Infectious Diseases Vol 2 April 2002 http://infection.thelancet.com 211 plasma, 16 especially in areas with intense malaria transmission. Second, the maintenance of adequate drug concentrations over a long enough time is important for clearing the entire population of parasites within a given individual. Subtherapeutic drug concentrations eliminate the most susceptible parasites and leave those that may be more fit to recover and reproduce. As a result, the necessary therapeutic dose may increase beyond the maximum tolerated, and manifest drug resistance will emerge. Third, widespread use of drugs at high intensity serves to increase drug pressure and is a determinant for selection of resistant parasite populations. More potent immune responses increase the efficacy of chemotherapy. A semi-immune patient might be cured by a drug despite the fact that his parasites are partially drug resistant. Individuals who are naive to malaria generate a non-specific immune response that is not as effective as the specific immunity elicited by repeated infections. Thus, the introduction of resistant malaria into non-immune populations such as refugees or migrants increases the opportunity for manifestation and spread of resistance, because parasites with low or moderate resistance would be cleared in semi-immune populations. Level of transmission influences the rate of development and spread of drug resistance but its exact role is complex and is most probably multifactorial. Increased risk of drug- resistance development has been postulated to occur in areas of both low 17 and high 15 transmission. The general observations that resistance developed earlier in areas of low transmission (such as Thailand and Brazil) and is still more prevalent in such areas than in those with higher transmission tend to support the low-transmission hypothesis. As an example of the high transmission hypothesis, full chloroquine resistance in children occurred and spread within 25 years in an area of high transmission in east Africa that had been under massive chloroquine pressure. 18 Finally, vector and environmental factors may influence the proliferation of resistant parasites. For example, chloroquine- resistant parasites may be more fit for reproduction in certain anopheline mosquitoes than non-resistant strains. 16 Description of drug resistance worldwide Chloroquine Chloroquine resistance has been reported from wherever falciparum malaria is endemic, except Central America and the Caribbean. 3,10 In the late 1950s, resistance to chloroquine was noted on the Thai-Cambodian border and in Colombia. 3 All endemic areas in South America were affected by 1980 and almost all in Asia and Oceania by 1989. In Africa, chloroquine resistance was first documented in the east in 1978. Resistance spread to the central and southern parts of the continent before arriving in west Africa in 1983. By 1989, chloroquine resistance was widespread in sub-Saharan Africa. Extensive reviews of the spread of chloroquine resistance have been published by Wernsdorfer and Payne 3 and Peters. 2 In general, resistance is currently less severe in west and central Africa than in east Africa, but even in west Africa, its intensity varies from an advanced stage with severe effects on mortality and morbidity in focal areas of Senegal, 19,20 to a moderate degree in Ghana 21 and Cameroon, 22 and a low level in Mali. 23 Owing to high- intensity chloroquine resistance, more than ten countries in Africa have already switched their first-line treatment to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or a combination of chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. Chloroquine-resistant parasites in Africa were thought by some to share the same origin as the Indochina strains, but by others to have developed locally as a result of mass drug administration plus intrinsic entomological, epidemiological, and parasitological factors that promoted local resistance selection. 3,16 Current molecular studies suggest the Asian origin of African isolates, but at least four different foci of chloroquine resistance have so far been identified. 12 Polymorphisms in two genes of the P falciparumgenome are the focus of studies on the molecular basis of chloroquine resistance (panel 1). The pfcrt gene 24 is located on chromosome 7, and codes for PfCRT, a vacuolar membrane transporter protein. Many polymorphisms that Review Epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria Table 3. Determinants of antimalarial-drug resistance Factor and characteristics Example Drug Half-life Resistance to LAPDAP (short half-life) develops more slowly than that to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (long half-life) 14 Dosing Use of subtherapeutic doses in self-treatment such as with antifolate drugs in Thailand in the 1970s; poor drug compliance; mass drug administration with subtherapeutic doses; use of chloroquinised salt 3 Non-target drug pressure Presumptive use of antimalarial drugs without laboratory diagnosis or for indications other than malaria Pharmacokinetics Use of drug formulations with reduced bioavailability Cross-resistance Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim Human Host immunity Non-immune, migrant gem-miners and resistance to mefloquine on the Thai-Cambodian border 5 Maintenance of resistant Non-detection of drug failure parasite reservoir Parasite Genetic mutations See panel 1 Transmission level Whether low or high transmission has more influence on drug resistance is debatable; prevalence of drug resistance is higher in regions of low transmission, whereas a model suggests the benefits of transmission control in delaying resistance development 15 Vector and environment Vector affinity of parasites Increased infectivity and productivity of chloroquine-resistant parasites in Anopheles dirus and the propagation of chloroquine resistance in southeast Asia and western Oceania 16 LAPDAP=chlorproguanil plus dapsone. For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group. THE LANCET Infectious Diseases Vol 2 April 2002 http://infection.thelancet.com 212 are associated with chloroquine resistance have been identified, but the substitution of threonine for lysine in codon 76 was recently shown in vitro to associate absolutely with resistance in isolates from Africa, South America, Asia, and Papua New Guinea. 23,25 Findings from an in-vitro study of isolates from various origins 26 and several clinical studies in diverse geographical areas support the association between the Thr76 mutation and chloroquine resistance in Africa (Mali, 23 Cameroon, 27 Sudan, 28 Mozambique 29 ), Asia (Laos, 30 Thailand 31 ), and South America (Brazil 32 ). However, one study in Uganda, where chloroquine resistance is more prevalent than in west Africa, reported no association. 33 Most of the studies reporting an association note that, although the Thr76 mutation may be essential for the resistant phenotype, it is also present to a lesser degree in chloroquine-sensitive strains, suggesting that other polymorphisms in pfcrt are necessary or that several genes are involved. Additionally, host immunity is known to have a significant role in parasite clearance, therefore chloroquine treatment success in semi-immune individuals even in the presence of chloroquine-resistant parasites with the Thr76 mutation is not unexpected. Djimde and colleagues 23 found that the lack of the Thr76 mutation was highly predictive of chloroquine treatment success, whereas its presence accounted for only a third of treatment failures. Another gene, pfmdr1, which is located on chromosome 5 and codes for P-glycoprotein homologue 1 (Pgh1), has generated interest in resistance to chloroquine and other antimalarials. The aspartic acid to tyrosine point mutation in codon 86 has been associated with chloroquine resistance in some clinical and in-vitro studies (Mali, 23 The Gambia, 34 Sudan, 28 Uganda, 35 Thailand, 36 Brazil 37 ), but not in others (Uganda, 33 Laos, 30 Thailand, 38 Brazil 39 ). Several other pfmdr1 polymorphisms, notably Phe184, Cys1034, Asp1042, and Tyr1246, have been implicated to varying degrees in chloroquine resistance (table 4). Although evidence for the association of pfmdr1 with chloroquine resistance has not been as convincing as for pfcrt, a recent parasite transfection experiment showed that polymorphisms in the pfmdr1 gene modulate susceptibility to chloroquine (as well as to mefloquine and the structurally related compounds quinine and halofantrine). 49 Linkage disequilibrium between pfcrt Thr76 and pfmdr1 Tyr86 has been noted in Africa (Nigeria 50 and Sudan 28 ) and provides support for a convergence of polymorphisms necessary for a resistance phenotype. The slow development of chloroquine resistance may signal such a multifactorial mechanism. 12 Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine Resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was first noted on the Thai-Cambodian border in the mid-1960s, 4 and it became an operational problem in the same area within a few years of its introduction to the malaria-control programme in 1975. 51 Currently, high-level resistance is found in a large part of southeast Asia, southern China, and the Amazon Basin. 10,46,52 Lower degrees and frequencies of resistance are observed on the Pacific coast of South America, southern Asia east of Iran, and western Oceania. 11 In Africa, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine sensitivity started declining in the late 1980s. Resistance is rapidly gaining ground on this continent, more so in the east than in the west. In east Africa, the degree of resistance is variable. High percentages of RII/RIII responses were documented in children in an endemic area of Tanzania as early as 1994. 53 This finding was thought to be attributable to previous drug pressure due to the use of pyrimethamine-dapsone prophylaxis. The 19992000 data from the East African Network for Monitoring Antimalarial Treatment indicated that the proportion of clinical failures (combined late and early treatment failures) at some sentinel sites in Kenya was already more than 25%, and the proportion of parasitological failures at day 7 in children has reached 45% at one site in Tanzania. Focal areas of low to moderate sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance exist throughout Africa. 21,5456 Resistance is likely to progress geographically and in its intensity at an alarming rate if nothing is done to interrupt its course. An in-vitro study in Kenya showed low sensitivity to both pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine from the late 1980s to the early 1990s and the presence of pyrimethamine-resistant isolates in the late 1980s, even before sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine was widely used. 57 In-vitro sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine resistance was documented across sub- Saharan Africa, varying in prevalence from 1330%: in Tanzania in 1994, 58 Equatorial Guinea in 199092, 59 Gabon in 1994, 60 and Ghana in 1991. 21 Cross-resistance between trimethoprim and pyrimethamine in P falciparum was recently demonstrated. 61 Therefore, widespread use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for prophylaxis against opportunistic in people with AIDS in Africa might further shorten the useful lifespan of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. The molecular basis of resistance to sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine is the best characterised of all antimalarial resistance. Specific mutations in P falciparum that lead to resistance to both sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine have Review Epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria Panel 1. Molecular markers of antimalarial resistance Chloroquine pfcrt Thr76 strongly associated pfmdr1 Tyr86, Phe184, Cys1034, Asp1042, Tyr1246 possibly associated Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine Principal mutations in codons 108, 51, 59, and 164 of dhfr gene and codons 436, 437, 540, 581, and 623 of dhps gene dhfr Asn108 essential for pyrimethamine resistance Degree of resistance increases with additional mutations, Leu51 and Arg59, or triple mutation Absolute resistance conferred by the addition of Leu164, thus quadruple mutation, irrespective of dhps mutations Mefloquine, quinine Genetic basis of resistance not yet clearly understood pfmdr1 polymorphism may modulate mefloquine and quinine susceptibility Point mutations being explored at positions 86, 184, 1034, 1042, and 1246 of pfmdr1. Artemisinin No clinically relevant resistance as yet. For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group. THE LANCET Infectious Diseases Vol 2 April 2002 http://infection.thelancet.com 213 been identified. Sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine act synergistically. The former inhibits dihydropteroate synthetase (DHPS) and the latter inhibits dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). These two enzymes are involved in folate synthesis. Point mutations in the following five codons of the dhps gene known to date are implicated in conferring resistance by decreasing the binding affinity of the enzyme (table 4): serine at codon 436 to alanine or phenylalanine; alanine at 437 to glycine; lysine at 540 to glutamic acid; alanine at 581 to glycine; alanine at 613 to serine or threonine. Gly437 and Glu540 have been reported to occur together or singly in various parts of the world (Indonesia, 40 Vietnam, 42 Malawi, Kenya, Bolivia, 44 and Gabon 43 ). Gly581 has been observed in South America alone or with Gly437. 44,45 Specific point mutations in the dhfr gene known to be associated with pyrimethamine resistance by reduction in drug-binding affinity of DHFR include: alanine at 16 to valine, asparagine at 51 to isoleucine, cysteine at 59 to arginine, serine at 108 to asparagine or threonine, and isoleucine at 164 to leucine (table 4). This combination of mutations has been observed in Thailand, where high-level sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance is well recognised. The triple mutation of Ile51, Arg59, and Asn108 has been observed in Vietnam 42 and east Africa (Kenya and Malawi). 44 Asn108 and Arg59 have been observed in combination in Indonesia. 40 Asn108, Ile51, Leu164, accompanied by mutation of cysteine at 50 to arginine and a repeat between codons 30 and 31 were also noted in Bolivia 44 and Brazil, 46 areas where sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine resistance is prominent in South America. Arg50, in addition to Asn108 and Ile51, was also associated with sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine resistance in Venezuelan isolates by Urdaneta and colleagues, 45 who noted that mutations in both genes (Asn108 and Ile51 in dhfr and Gly437 and Gly581 in dhps) might be necessary for sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine resistance in that region. Leu164 has so far been reported only from areas with high- level sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance (southeast Asia, 42 Bolivia, 44 and Brazil 46 ). The Ala16, Thr108 genotype is known to be specific for cycloguanil resistance and does not confer resistance to pyrimethamine. 62 Overall, a change from serine at codon 108 to asparagine is known to be the key mutation for pyrimethamine resistance. Additional point mutations in three other codons, Ile51, Arg59, and Leu164, are known to increase progressively the degree of resistance. Thus, quadruple mutants (those with the Leu164 mutation) confer the most severe resistance, more severe than triple mutants (those with Ile51 and Arg59). Although the precise relation between mutations in the dhfr and dhps genes in clinical sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance is unclear, current Review Epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria Table 4. Drug-specific polymorphisms reported in P falciparum Drug and polymorphism Location Refs Chloroquine pfcrt Thr76, Ile74, Glu75 Asia, Africa 26 Thr76 Africa 28 Thr76 Africa 27 Thr76, Ile74, Glu75, Ser220, Ile371 Africa 23 Thr76, Ser72 (one isolate) S America 26 pfmdr1 Tyr86 Asia 36 Tyr86, Asp1042 Indonesia 40 Tyr86 Africa 28 Tyr86 Africa 34 Tyr86 Africa 41 Tyr86, Asp1042, Tyr1246 Africa 35 Tyr86, Asp1042, Tyr1246, Phe184, Cys1034 S America 37 Asp1042, Tyr1246 S America 39 Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine dhps Gly437, Glu540 Asia 42 Gly437, Glu540 Indonesia 40 Gly437 Africa 43 Glu540 Africa 44 Gly437, Gly581 S America 45 Gly581 S America 44 Gly437, Glu540, Gly581 S America 46 dhfr Asn108, Ile51, Arg59 Asia 42 Asn108, Arg59 Indonesia 40 Asn108, Ile51, Arg59 Africa 44 Asn108, Arg50, Ile51, Leu164, Bolivia repeat S America 44 Asn108, Arg50, Ile51, S America 45 Asn108, Arg50, Ile51, Leu164, Bolivia repeat S America 46 Mefloquine pfmdr1 Tyr86* Thailand 36 Copy number Thailand 36 Copy number Thailand 47 Tyr86* Africa 48 Quinine (decreased sensitivity) pfmdr1 Tyr86, Phe184, Cys1034, Asp1042, Tyr1246 S. America 37 Tyr86 Africa 48 Artesunate pfmdr1 Copy number Thailand 36 Dihydroartemisinin pfmdr1 Tyr86* Africa 48 * Increases sensitivity. For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group. THE LANCET Infectious Diseases Vol 2 April 2002 http://infection.thelancet.com 214 data show that the presence of a sensitive dhfr allele is highly predictive of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine treatment success irrespective of the dhps allele. 62 Quinine Although recrudescence strongly suggestive of quinine resistance was noted in Brazil nearly 100 years ago, successive observations of clinical resistance to quinine only began to accumulate during the mid-1960s, especially from the Thai-Cambodian border. 2 Currently, clinical resistance to quinine monotherapy occurs sporadically in southeast Asia and western Oceania. Data from in-vitro assays indicate that resistance is less frequent in South America 37 and Africa. 63 Widespread use of quinine in Thailand in the early 1980s as an interim therapy in the face of declining sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine efficacy resulted in significant reduction of its sensitivity. 16 Therefore, for the past two decades, quinine has been consistently used in combination with a partner antibiotic such as tetracycline or doxycycline to increase the effectiveness of treatment. Quinine is presently reserved as a second-line or third-line drug and is used in cases of severe malaria. There is some suggestion that pfmdr1 mutations associated with chloroquine resistance may also account for reduced susceptibility to quinine. In a Brazilian study of pfmdr1 mutations (Asn86, Phe184, Cys1034, Asp1042, Tyr1246), chloroquine-resistant strains were found to have low susceptibility to quinine. 37 In The Gambia, pfmdr1 Tyr86 was weakly associated with decreased sensitivity. 48 Mefloquine Mefloquine resistance was first observed near the Thai- Cambodian border in the late 1980s. 5,64 The advent of mefloquine resistance in Thailand may have been influenced by the heavy use of the chemically related drug quinine just before the introduction of mefloquine. 16 Mefloquine alone is no longer effective on the Thai-Myanmar and Thai- Cambodian borders, although it is still operationally useful in most other endemic areas in and around Thailand with field efficacy of more than 75%. By in-vitro assays, resistant strains are common in the neighbouring countries. 65 Migrant gem-miners returning from Cambodia may have been the means of the spread of mefloquine resistance to Bangladesh and India. 16 There are also case-reports of mefloquine resistance from the Amazon Basin, but the degree and scope of resistance in South America are still far below those of southeast Asia. In-vitro studies suggest the presence of P falciparum strains with low mefloquine sensitivity in Africa, 63,66 but clinical mefloquine resistance is rare in Africa. Copy number and polymorphisms of the pfmdr1 gene have been investigated as molecular markers of mefloquine resistance. The evidence on increased pfmdr1 copy number as a molecular marker for mefloquine resistance remains conflicting. Two studies in Thailand suggested that a higher copy number confers mefloquine resistance, 36,47 but other studies did not confirm that finding (Thailand, 38 Brazil, 37 Africa 41 ). Some studies have shown increased sensitivity to mefloquine with the pfmdr1 Tyr86 mutation (The Gambia, 48 Thailand 36 ), suggesting a possible inverse relation between sensitivity to mefloquine and to chloroquine. 48 Reed and colleagues 49 showed in a parasite transfection experiment that Ser1034, Asn1042, and Asp1246 mutations were the cause of resistance to mefloquine (as well as the structurally related drugs quinine and halofantrine). These findings strengthen the role of pfmdr1 as the key modulator of mefloquine resistance. Artemisinin Artemisinin and derivatives (eg, artemether, artesunate, and dihydroartemisinin) are associated with a high rate of recrudescences after monotherapy, probably because of the pharmacodynamic properties of these agents. 13 Therefore, artemisinins are not used alone for clinical treatment; they are usually combined with longer-acting antimalarials such as mefloquine or lumefantrine. Adequate dose regimens of combinations of artemisinins and mefloquine or artemether and lumefantrine have not been shown to produce treatment failures due to artemisinin resistance. On the whole, both in-vivo and in-vitro sensitivity testing of P falciparum in the multidrug-resistance area of the Thai- Myanmar border, where the combination of artesunate and mefloquine has been the first-line regimen for the past 7 years, remains satisfactory (Thai Ministry of Public Health statistics). Except in an animal model, so far there has not been any solid evidence of artemisinin resistance. The development of artemisinin resistance may be delayed by the characteristics of this drugnamely, short elimination half-life and ability to reduce gametocyte- carriage rate. 13 In mice, artemisinin resistance has been associated with diminished drug uptake and the overexpression of a potential target protein, the translationally controlled tumour protein. 67 A molecular study has suggested that the pfmdr1 Tyr86 variant may also be associated with increased sensitivity to artemisinin. 48 The transfection study mentioned above also showed that Ser1034, Asn1042, and Asp1246 mutations additionally alter the sensitivity of P falciparumto artemisinin. 49 Multidrug resistance Multidrug resistance of P falciparum was defined previously as resistance to more than two operational antimalarial compounds of different chemical classes. 16 For the purpose of this review, the definition is slightly modified by further specifying the extent of resistance to a third drug class. Generally, the first two classes are 4-aminoquinolines (eg, chloroquine) and antifolates (eg, sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine). Areas where the third drug is no longer operationally effective are classified as having established multidrug resistance. Although the precise criterion for the loss of operational usefulness has not yet been clearly defined, 25% treatment failure is widely quoted as the maximum tolerated before the treatment policy should be changed. 10 The figure shows the established multidrug-resistant areas together with those where resistance to both Review Epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group. THE LANCET Infectious Diseases Vol 2 April 2002 http://infection.thelancet.com 215 chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine has been documented, which thus have the potential for multidrug resistance to emerge. Established multidrug resistance Established multidrug resistance occurs mainly in southeast Asia, particularly the border regions of Thailand. Since 1995, high-level mefloquine resistance led to replacement of this drug alone with the combination of artesunate and high- dose mefloquine for microscopically confirmed cases of falciparum malaria in established multidrug-resistant areas of Thailand. These areas include Maesod on the western border with Myanmar and an area on the southeastern border with Cambodia. 5 One study conducted in a confined population near Maesod suggested that use of artemisinin derivatives in combination with mefloquine might have reduced mefloquine resistance. 68 Two important issues are of particular relevance. First, the efficacy of this therapeutic regimen must be maintained, because no practical alternative to artemisinin is yet available. Second, multidrug resistance must be limited to its present area. Self-treatment with artesunate and mefloquine is common outside Thailand, thus posing a threat of further resistance spread in the region as a result of drug pressure. Some focal areas in the Amazon Basin may also fall into this category (figure). These areas have sporadic reports of mefloquine resistance and reduced susceptibility to quinine. Artesunate-mefloquine combination therapy is being adopted as the first-line regimen on the border of Peru and Brazil. Emerging multidrug resistance Areas are classified as having emerging multidrug resistance on the basis of the widespread loss of clinical efficacy of chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, representing drugs of the first two chemical classes, and the potential for emergence of resistance to a third class of drug. Because the third drug has not been widely used, its efficacy is still maintained, especially in semi-immune individuals. These areas are epidemiologically most important, because they are generally associated with more intense malaria transmission and less effective control measures. By definition, these seem to be limited to areas of east Africa (such as Tanzania and Kenya) and the Amazon Basin with high-degree sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance. However, in practice, precise boundaries of emerging multidrug resistant areas are difficult to determine because of the lack of reliable drug-susceptibility surveillance data. Therefore, all areas with signs of progressive loss of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine efficacy are considered at risk of emergence of multidrug resistance. Progression to severe or complicated manifestations and increased mortality associated with sulfadoxine-pyri- methamine resistance have not yet been reliably assessed in tropical Africa, but they are likely to be substantial in the absence of affordable alternative medication. Measures to counteract this threat are urgently needed. The selection of the next operational drug after the loss of efficacy of the two cheapest, chloroquine and sulfadoxinepyrimethamine, is difficult. Review Epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria Malaria transmission areas Chloroquine resistance Sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine reistance Multidrug resistance Malaria-free islands Areas with reduced susceptibility of P falciparum to chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and areas designated as multidrug resistant according to WHO. Reproduced from map 00344 (WHO/CDS/RBM/2001.33) 10 with updated data and slight modification by colouring. For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group. THE LANCET Infectious Diseases Vol 2 April 2002 http://infection.thelancet.com 216 Drug combinations offer a logical, albeit temporary, solution. 13,69 The artesunate-mefloquine combination currently used in the established multidrug-resistant areas of Thailand cannot be expected to offer similarly favourable operational prospects for Africa, where malaria epidemiology and peripheral health-care systems in remote areas differ substantially from those in Thailand. 70,71 In fact, at the cost of US $35 per artesunate-mefloquine treatment (330 times more than medication with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or chloroquine), economic constraints prohibit this regimen for Africa. Future prospects There are two issues particularly relevant to the future scenario of drug-resistant malarianew antimalarial regimens and use of molecular information for the control of parasite drug resistance (panel 2). New antimalarial regimens Besides strengthening of overall malaria-control strategies, current efforts have focused on the use of combination chemotherapy in dealing with multidrug-resistant malaria. Experience with drugs for treatment of HIV infection and tuberculosis points to the importance of combination chemotherapy in delaying the onset of resistance, because the parasite has to mutate in several sites simultaneously to become resistant to a combination, an event that is much less likely than a single mutation conferring resistance to single drugs. In malaria, options are combinations of existing agents (chloroquine plus sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine, artesunate plus sulfadoxine-pyri- methamine, artesunate plus mefloquine, chlorproguanil plus dapsone [LAPDAP]), and those involving new agents (artemether plus lumefantrine [Coartem, Riamet]). However, the efficacy of combinations involving old drugs may be short-lived, since resistance-conferring mutations already exist. LAPDAP may be an affordable alternative to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in semi-immune individuals in Africa. 14 Like sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine, both chlorproguanil and dapsone are antifolates, but they have shorter half-lives than sulfadoxine or pyrimethamine. Therefore the use of LAPDAP is likely to delay the development of resistance. Besides, LAPDAP is also effective against infections associated with triple mutants in dhfr that normally do not respond to sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine therapy. Unfortunately, strains of P falciparum with high-degree resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, such as those with quadruple mutants in dhfr, are also resistant to LAPDAP. Several other combination regimens are undergoing field testing, especially in Africa, to find out which would be the most effective and appropriate for a given specific endemic region. 10 Malarone is a combination of atovaquone, a new antimalarial drug of the naphthoquinone class, and proguanil. Atovaquone disrupts electron transport in the mitochondria of parasites, but it does not affect the mitochondria of the human host. It was first shown to be effective against P falciparum in vitro and was subsequently found to be effective in treating patients harbouring resistant organisms. 6 A recent study in Tanzania showed its efficacy in the treatment of sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine-resistant cases. 72 When the drug was used alone, however, resistance developed rapidly. It is therefore partnered with proguanil, with which atovaquone shows synergy, 73 in the hope that atovaquone resistance may be delayed. The molecular mechanism of resistancemutations in cytochrome bwas first identified in Pneumocystis carinii and was later found to apply for malarial parasites as well. 74 The high cost of Malarone, however, will make it unrealistic for use in Africa. 14 Use of molecular information In the near future, more alleles that lead to drug resistance are likely to be identified, and the full genome sequence of P falciparum will be elucidated. This valuable genetic information should be used efficiently, for example, to identify new drug targets, construct an effective vaccine, or design a tool for rapid diagnosis of antimalarial resistance. Some genetic markers are potentially useful for the surveillance of drug resistance. 12 They can also be used in support of in-vitro and in-vivo studies such as the application of pfcrt Thr76 mutation in predicting chloroquine treatment outcomes. 23 Conclusions Drug resistance is probably the greatest challenge that most malaria-control programmes are facing. Although the problem of drug-resistant malaria is worldwide, Africa is of greatest concern. Development of resistance to chloroquine in P falciparum forced several African countries to rely on sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine as the first-line drug. Loss of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine sensitivity is progressing rapidly, especially in parts Review Epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria Panel 2. Future concerns and prospects Areas with no drug-resistant malariaCentral America north of Panama Canal and the island of Hispaniola (Haiti and Dominican Republic) G Efforts needed to extend chloroquine efficacy as long as possible. Areas with no multidrug resistanceMost of Africa, parts of South America, and parts of Asia G Constant surveillance needed for the early detection of development of multidrug resistance Emerging multidrug-resistant areasFoci in tropical Africa, many areas of South America, southern Asia east of Iran, and western Oceania G Prevention and rapid detection of new foci development G New regimens and alternative drugs needed G Shifting to drugs other than 4-aminoquinolines and antifolates is expensive G Rational drug use must be reinforced to limit drug pressure Established multidrug-resistant areasSoutheast Asia with concentration in the western and eastern borders of Thailand, foci in the Amazon Basin G Efforts needed to limit geographical spread G New combinations may preserve efficacy of current drugs G The development of new drug candidates needed For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group. THE LANCET Infectious Diseases Vol 2 April 2002 http://infection.thelancet.com 217 of east Africa, rendering them potentially emerging multidrug-resistant areas. Given the limited resources for other malaria-control measures, rational drug use is critical, although this is known to be hampered by economic constraints and scarcity of drug choices. There is no over-riding answer to the challenge of multidrug-resistant malaria. The useful lifespan of a new antimalarial may be lengthened if it is used in combination with other drugs, and therefore combination therapy has been the focus for the management of multidrug- resistant malaria. The advantages and drawbacks of each candidate regimen must be carefully considered for specific endemic areas. Todays drug choice may affect future drug policies and the ability to prevent epidemics and to control morbidity and mortality due to malaria. Review Epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria Search strategy and selection criteria We identified the data for this review by searches of Medline, WHO documents, and books that have been cited in previous publications by authorities on malaria chemotherapy. Search terms were: malaria, drug resistant, chemotherapy, and epidemiology. Only papers published in English were included. The past decade has brought progress in the understanding of the molecular basis of drug resistance in P falciparum. Sets of mutations in dhfr and dhps genes have been implicated as the causes of sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine resistance. The pfcrt and pfmdr1 genes are the focus of studies on resistance to other drugs. The former is strongly associated with chloroquine resistance, and polymorphisms in the latter may alter the parasites susceptibility to mefloquine, halofantrine, quinine, and artemisinin as well as chloroquine. Overall, the right combination of point mutations in specific falciparum genes may be necessary for a drug-resistant phenotype. As more information on the genetics of antimalarial resistance becomes available, design of new, improved, molecular-based tools for early detection and interventions that aim at limiting the extent of established multidrug resistance and preventing new foci of drug resistance from emerging may become possible. Acknowledgments The authors work was supported by the US Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance (GEIS) Program and NIH grant AI 45426. We thank G Dennis Shanks for comments. The views of the authors do not purport to reflect those of the US Army or US Department of Defense. References 1 Breman JG. The ears of the hippopotamus: manifestations, determinants, and estimates of the malaria burden. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2001; 64 (12 suppl): 111. 2 Peters W. Resistance of Human Malaria I, III, and IV. In: Chemotherapy and drug resistance in malaria, 2nd edn. London: Academic Press, 1987: 54368, 593658, 659786. 3 Wernsdorfer WH, Payne D. The dynamics of drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Pharmacol Ther 1991; 50: 95121. 4 Bjorkman A, Phillips-Howard PA. The epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1990; 84: 17780. 5 Wongsrichanalai C, Sirichaisinthop J, Karwacki JJ, Congpuong K, Miller RS, Pang L, Thimasarn K. Drug resistant malaria on the Thai-Myanmar and Thai-Cambodian borders. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2001; 32: 4149. 6 Looareesuwan S, Viravan C, Webster HK, Kyle DE, Hutchinson DB, Canfield CJ. Clinical studies of atovaquone, alone or in combination with other antimalarial drugs, for treatment of acute uncomplicated malaria in Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1996; 54: 6266. 7 Meshnick SR, Dobson MJ. The history of antimalarial drugs. In: Rosenthal PJ, ed. Antimalarial chemotherapy: mechanisms of action, modes of resistance, and new directions in drug development. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2001: 1525. 8 Meshnick SR. From quinine to qinghaosu: historical perspectives. In: Sherman I, ed. Malaria: parasite biology, pathogenesis, protection. Washington, DC: ASM Press, 1998: 34153. 9 Coggeshall LT, Craige B. Old and new plasmodicides. In: Boyd ME, ed. A comprehensive survey of all aspects of this group of diseases from a global standpoint. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1949: . 10 WHO. The use of antimalarial drugs. Report of an informal consultation, 1317 November 2001, Geneva, Switzerland. WHO/CDS/RBM/2001.33. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001. 11 Bloland P. Drug resistance in malaria. WHO/CDS/CSR/DRS/2001.4. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001. 12 Wellems TE, Plowe CV. Chloroquine-resistant malaria. J Infect Dis 2001; 184: 77076. 13 White N. Antimalarial drug resistance and combination chemotherapy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1999; 354: 73949. 14 Winstanley P. Modern chemotherapeutic options for malaria. Lancet Infect Dis 2001; 1: 119. 15 Molyneux DH, Floyd K, Barnish G, Fevre EM. Transmission control and drug resistance in malaria: a crucial interaction. Parasitol Today. 1999; 15: 23840. 16 Wernsdorfer WH. Epidemiology of drug resistance in malaria. Acta Trop 1994; 56: 14356. 17 Hastings IM, DAlessandro U. Modelling a predictable disaster: the rise and spread of drug-resistant malaria. Parasitol Today 2000; 16: 34047. 18 Draper CG, Brubaker G, Geser A, Kilimali VA, Wernsdorfer WH. Serial studies on the evolution of drug resistance in an area of East Africa receiving intermittent chemosuppression. Bull World Health Organ 1985; 63: 10918. 19 Trape JF. The public health impact of chloroquine resistance in Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2001; 64(12 suppl): 1217. 20 Haruki K, Winstanley PA, Watkins WM, Marsh K. Quinine sensitivity of isolates of Plasmodium falciparum from the coast of Kenya. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1998; 92: 19596. 21 Landgraf B, Kollaritsch H, Wiedermann G, Wernsdorfer WH. Plasmodium falciparum: susceptibility in vitro and in vivo to chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in Ghanaian schoolchildren. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1994; 88: 44042. 22 Ringwald P, Same Ekobo A, Keundjian A, Kedy Mangamba D, Basco LK. Chemoresistance of P falciparum in urban areas of Yaounde, Cameroon: part 1, surveillance of in vitro and in vivo resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to chloroquine from 1994 to 1999 in Yaounde, Cameroon. Trop Med Int Health 2000; 5: 61219. 23 Djimde A, Doumbo OK, Cortese JF, et al. A molecular marker for chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 25763. 24 Wellems TE, Walker-Jonah A, Panton LJ. Genetic mapping of the chloroquine-resistance locus on Plasmodium falciparum chromosome 7. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88: 338286. 25 Fidock DA, Nomura T, Talley AK, et al. Mutations in the P falciparum digestive vacuole transmembrane protein PfCRT and evidence for their role in chloroquine resistance. Mol Cell 2000; 6: 86171. 26 Durand R, Jafari S, Vauzelle J, Delabre JF, Jesic Z, Le Bras J. Analysis of pfcrt point mutations and chloroquine susceptibility in isolates of Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2001; 114: 95102. 27 Basco LK, Ringwald P. Analysis of the key pfcrt point mutation and in vitro and in vivo response to chloroquine in Yaounde, Cameroon. J Infect Dis 2001; 183: 182831. 28 Babiker HA, Pringle SJ, Abdel-Muhsin A, Mackinnon M, Hunt P, Walliker D. High-level chloroquine resistance in Sudanese isolates of Plasmodium falciparum is associated with mutations in the chloroquine resistance transporter gene pfcrt and the multidrug resistance gene pfmdr1. J Infect Dis 2001; 183: 153538. 29 Mayor AG, Gomez-Olive X, Aponte JJ, et al. Prevalence of the K76T mutation in the putative Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter (pfcrt) gene and its relation to chloroquine resistance in Mozambique. J Infect Dis 2001; 183: 141316. 30 Pillai DR, Labbe AC, Vanisaveth V, et al. Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Laos: chloroquine treatment outcome and predictive value of molecular markers. J Infect Dis 2001; 183: 78995. 31 Chen N, Russell B, Staley J, Kotecka B, Nasveld P, Cheng Q. Sequence polymorphisms in pfcrt are strongly associated with chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. J Infect Dis 2001; 183: 154345. 32 Vieira PP, das Gracas Alecrim M, da Silva LH, Gonzalez-Jimenez I, Zalis MG. Analysis of the PfCRT K76T mutation in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from the Amazon region of Brazil. J Infect Dis 2001; 183: 183233. 33 Dorsey G, Kamya MR, Singh A, Rosenthal PJ. Polymorphisms in the Plasmodium falciparum pfcrt and pfmdr-1 genes and clinical response to chloroquine in Kampala, Uganda. J Infect Dis 2001; 183: 141720. 34 von Seidlein L, Duraisingh MT, Drakeley CJ, Bailey R, Greenwood BM, Pinder M. Polymorphism of the Pfmdr1 gene and chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum in The Gambia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1997; 91: 45053. 35 Flueck TP, Jelinek T, Kilian AH, et al. Correlation of in vivo-resistance to chloroquine and allelic polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Uganda. Trop Med Int Health 2000; 5: 17478. 36 Price RN, Cassar C, Brockman A, et al. The pfmdr1 gene is associated with a multidrug-resistant phenotype in Plasmodium falciparum from the For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group. THE LANCET Infectious Diseases Vol 2 April 2002 http://infection.thelancet.com 218 western border of Thailand. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 43: 294349. 37 Zalis MG, Pang L, Silveira MS, Milhous WK, Wirth DF. Characterization of Plasmodium falciparum isolated from the Amazon region of Brazil: evidence for quinine resistance. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998; 58: 63037. 38 Chaiyaroj SC, Buranakiti A, Angkasekwinai P, Looressuwan S, Cowman AF. Analysis of mefloquine resistance and amplification of pfmdr1 in multidrug- resistant Plasmodium falciparumisolates from Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1999; 61: 78083. 39 Povoa MM, Adagu IS, Oliveira SG, Machado RL, Miles MA, Warhurst DC. Pfmdr1 Asn1042Asp and Asp1246Tyr polymorphisms, thought to be associated with chloroquine resistance, are present in chloroquine-resistant and -sensitive Brazilian field isolates of Plasmodium falciparum. Exp Parasitol 1998; 88: 6468. 40 Nagesha HS, Din S, Casey GJ, et al. Mutations in the pfmdr1, dhfr and dhps genes of Plasmodium falciparum are associated with in-vivo drug resistance in West Papua, Indonesia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2001; 95: 4349. 41 Basco LK, Le Bras J, Rhoades Z, Wilson CM. Analysis of pfmdr1 and drug susceptibility in fresh isolates of Plasmodium falciparum from subsaharan Africa. Mol Biochem Parasitol 1995; 74: 15766. 42 Masimirembwa CM, Phuong dung N, Phuc BQ, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Plasmodium falciparum antifolate resistance in Vietnam: genotyping for resistance variants of dihydropteroate synthase and dihydrofolate reductase. Int J Antimicrob Agents 1999; 12: 20311. 43 Mawili-Mboumba DP, Ekala MT, Lekoulou F, Ntoumi F. Molecular analysis of DHFR and DHPS genes in P. falciparumclinical isolates from the Haut- Ogooue region in Gabon. Acta Trop 2001; 78: 23140. 44 Plowe CV, Cortese JF, Djimde A, et al. Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase and epidemiologic patterns of pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine use and resistance. J Infect Dis 1997; 176: 159096. 45 Urdaneta L, Plowe C, Goldman I, Lal AA. Point mutations in dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase genes of Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Venezuela. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1999; 61: 45762. 46 Vasconcelos KF, Plowe CV, Fontes CJ, et al. Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase of isolates from the Amazon region of Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2000; 95: 72128. 47 Wilson CM, Volkman SK, Thaithong S, et al. Amplification of pfmdr 1 associated with mefloquine and halofantrine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum from Thailand. Mol Biochem Parasitol 1993; 57: 15160. 48 Duraisingh MT, Jones P, Sambou I, von Seidlein L, Pinder M, Warhurst DC. The tyrosine-86 allele of the pfmdr1 gene of Plasmodium falciparum is associated with increased sensitivity to the anti- malarials mefloquine and artemisinin. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2000; 108: 1323. 49 Reed MB, Saliba KJ, Caruana SR, Kirk K, Cowman AF. Pgh1 modulates sensitivity and resistance to multiple antimalarials in Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 2000; 403: 90609. 50 Adagut IS, Warhurst DC. Plasmodium falciparum: linkage disequilibrium between loci in chromosomes 7 and 5 and chloroquine selective pressure in Northern Nigeria. Parasitology 2001; 123: 21924. 51 Hurwitz ES, Johnson D, Campbell CC. Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum malaria to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (Fansidar) in a refugee camp in Thailand. Lancet 1981; 1: 106870. 52 Aramburu Guarda J, Ramal Asayag C, Witzig R. Malaria reemergence in the Peruvian Amazon region. Emerg Infect Dis 1999; 5: 20915. 53 Ronn AM, Msangeni HA, Mhina J, Wernsdorfer WH, Bygbjerg IC. High level of resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in children in Tanzania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1996; 90: 17981. 54 Deloron P, Mayombo J, Le Cardinal A, et al. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for the treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Gabonese children. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2000; 94: 18890. 55 Bijl HM, Kager M, Koetsier DW, van der Werf TS. Chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine- resistant falciparum malaria in vivo - a pilot study in rural Zambia. Trop Med Int Health 2000; 5: 69295. 56 Nzila AM, Mberu EK, Sulo J, et al. Towards an understanding of the mechanism of pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum: genotyping of dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase of Kenyan parasites. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 44: 99196. 57 Mberu EK, Mosobo MK, Nzila AM, Kokwaro GO, Sibley CH, Watkins WM. The changing in vitro susceptibility pattern to pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine in Plasmodium falciparum field isolates from Kilifi, Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2000; 62: 396401. 58 Alin MH. In vitro susceptibility of Tanzanian wild isolates of Plasmodium falciparum to artemisinin, chloroquine, sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine and mefloquine. Parasitology 1997; 114: 50306. 59 Benito A, Roche J, Molina R, Amela C, Alvar J. In vitro susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to chloroquine, amodiaquine, quinine, mefloquine, and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine in Equatorial Guinea. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1995; 53: 52631. 60 Philipps J, Radloff PD, Wernsdorfer W, Kremsner PG. Follow-up of the susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to antimalarials in Gabon. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998; 58: 61218. 61 Iyer JK, Milhous WK, Cortese JF, Kublin JG, Plowe CV. Plasmodium falciparum cross-resistance between trimethoprim and pyrimethamine. Lancet 2001; 358: 106667. 62 Sibley CH, Hyde JE, Sims PF, et al. Pyrimethamine- sulfadoxine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum: what next? Trends Parasitol 2001; 17 (12): 58288. 63 Jelinek T, Grobusch MP, Loscher T. Patterns of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance in nonimmune travellers to Africa. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2001; 20: 28486. 64 Shanks GD. The rise and fall of mefloquine as an antimalarial drug in Southeast Asia. Military Med 1994; 159: 27581. 65 Wongsrichanalai C, Lin K, Pang LW, et al. In vitro susceptibility of P falciparum isolates from Myanmar to antimalarial drugs. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2001; 65: 45055. 66 Brasseur P, Kouamouo J, Moyou RS, Druilhe P. Mefloquine resistant malaria in Cameroon and correlation with resistance to quinine. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1992; 87 (suppl 3): 27173. 67 Walker DJ, Pitsch JL, Peng MM, et al. Mechanisms of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium yoelii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 44: 34447. 68 Nosten F, van Vugt M, Price R, et al. Effects of artesunate-mefloquine combination on incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria and mefloquine resistance in western Thailand: a prospective study. Lancet 2000; 356: 297302. 69 Vugt MV, Wilairatana P, Gemperli B, et al. Efficacy of six doses of artemether-lumefantrine (benflumetol) in multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1999; 60: 93642. 70 Bloland PB, Ettling M, Meek S. Combination therapy for malaria in Africa: hype or hope? Bull World Health Organ 2000; 78: 137888. 71 Wongsrichanalai C, Thimasarn K, Sirichaisinthop J. Antimalarial drug combination policy: a caveat. Lancet 2000; 355: 224547. 72 Mutabingwa T, Nzila A, Mberu E, et al. Chlorproguanil-dapsone for treatment of drug- resistant falciparum malaria in Tanzania. Lancet 2001; 358: 121823. 73 Canfield CJ, Pudney M, Gutteridge WE. Interactions of atovaquone with other antimalarial drugs against Plasmodium falciparum in vitro. Exp Parasitol 1995; 80: 37381. 74 Korsinczky M, Chen N, Kotecka B, Saul A, Rieckmann K, Cheng Q. Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum cytochrome b that are associated with atovaquone resistance are located at a putative drug-binding site. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 44: 210008. Review Epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria Reproducedwith permission of thecopyright owner. Further reproductionprohibited without permission.