Toxic Hazards: Phase II Subsurface Investigation (March 22, 2013)

San Francisco HQ
Atlanta
Chicago
Costa Mesa
Dallas
Denver
Los Angeles
Miami
New York
Phoenix
Portland
San J ose

March 22, 2013

PHASE II SUBSURFACE
INVESTIGATION

Property I dentification:
1185 1245 West Sunset Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90026

AEI Project No. 316456

Prepared for:
Mr. Fred Shaffer
Aragon Properties Ltd.
1590 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite #D-303
Manhattan Beach, California 90266

Prepared by:
AEI Consultants
5933 West Century Boulevard, Suite 360
(310) 798-2455

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 SITE DESCRI PTION ............................................................................................................. 1
2.0 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE ............................................................................................. 2
3.0 INVESTIGATION EFFORTS .................................................................................................. 3
3.1 Health and Safety Plan ............................................................................................................... 3
3.2 Permitting and Utility Clearance .................................................................................................. 4
3.3 Geophysical Survey .................................................................................................................... 4
3.4 Drilling and Soil Sample Collection ............................................................................................... 4
3.5 Groundwater Sample Collection ................................................................................................... 6
3.6 Boring Destruction ..................................................................................................................... 6
3.7 Laboratory Analyses ................................................................................................................... 6
3.8 Investigation Derived Wastes ...................................................................................................... 6
4.0 FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................ 6
4.1 Geology and Hydrogeology ......................................................................................................... 7
4.2 Soil Sample Analytical Results ..................................................................................................... 7
5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................... 7
6.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS AND RELIANCE ............................................................................... 8

FIGURES
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map

TABLES
Table 1 Soil Sample Data Summary
Table 1 Groundwater Sample Data Summary

APPENDICES
Appendix A Geophysical Survey Report
Appendix B Boring Logs
Appendix C Laboratory Analyses

March 22, 2013

Mr. Fred Shaffer
Aragon Properties Ltd.
1590 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite #D-303
Manhattan Beach, California 90266

Subject: Phase I I Subsurface Investigation
1185 1245 West Sunset Boulevard
AEI Project No. 316456

AEI Consultants (AEI) is pleased to provide this report which describes the activities and results
of the Phase II Subsurface Investigation (Phase II) performed at the above referenced subject
property (Figures 1 and 2). This investigation was completed in general accordance with the
authorized scope of services outlined in our authorized proposal number 33288.
1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
The subject property, which consists of a hardware store with associated storage buildings, a
residence, a car wash, a vacant lot, and a restaurant, is located on the east side of West Sunset
Boulevard in a mixed commercial and residential area of Los Angeles, California. The property
totals 2.66 acres and is improved with 10 single-story, slab-on-grade buildings totaling 30,000
square feet. The subject property is currently occupied by a car wash business, Reliable Do It
Center, film storage company, and residential tenants. On-site operations include car wash and
small-scale auto repair operations, retail of home improvement goods, film storage, and daily
residential activities. In addition to the subject property buildings, the property is improved with
asphalt-paved parking areas and associated landscaping (Figure 2).

Based on a review of the US Geological Survey (USGS) Hollywood, California Quadrangle
Topographic Map, the subject property is at an elevation which ranges from approximately 410
feet above mean sea level in the southern portions to approximately 500 feet above mean sea
level in the northeastern portion. The nearest surface water is Echo Lake, located approximately
0.56 mile to the west of the subject property.

Based upon topographic map interpretation and the Underground Storage Tank Low Risk Case
Review Form for G.H. Palmer & Associates at 867 Cesar Chavez Avenue, located approximately
0.42 mile southeast of the subject property, obtained from the Regional Water Quality Control
Boards (RWQCBs) GeoTracker website, the direction of groundwater flow beneath the subject
property is inferred to be to the southwest. According to a Limited Phase II conducted in March
2005 by Petra Geotechnical, Inc., (Petra) for the subject property, soil borings were advanced

Project No. 316456
March 22, 2013
Page 2
to 30 feet below ground surface (bgs) and groundwater was not encountered. However,
according to the Underground Storage Tank Low Risk Case Review Form for G.H. Palmer &
Associates at 867 Cesar Chavez Avenue, located approximately 0.42 mile southeast of the
subject property, groundwater was encountered at approximately 12 to 20 feet bgs.
2.0 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I) was performed by AEI as detailed in a
report dated February 26, 2013. According to the Phase I, in 1927, the southern portion of the
subject property associated with the addresses 1181 (historical address) and 1185 West Sunset
Boulevard, was developed with a gas station. The current structures were developed for gas
station and auto repair purposes in the early 1960s. Gas station operations were conducted
until at least 1970 and were subsequently phased out.

During AEIs Phase I site reconnaissance, AEI observed patched areas of asphalt on the
southern portion of 1185 West Sunset Boulevard. The patched areas appear to be the locations
of underground storage tanks (USTs) associated with the historical gas station. According to Mr.
Steve Wintner, subject property owner, four USTs are currently located at the subject property.
No information regarding the sizes or dates of installation of the USTs was available.

AEI reviewed a portion of the 2005 Phase I and Limited Phase II for the property located at
Sunset Boulevard and Everett Street, prepared by Petra. According to these previous reports, a
subsurface geophysical survey conducted at the subject property delineated the location of four
UTs and a waste oil UST in the rear of the car wash. Petra conducted soil sampling in the
vicinities of the USTs. The results of the soil sample analysis were that trace amounts of total
petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) were encountered in one sample collected at 22 feet bgs from
the vicinity of the waste oil UST. Petra was unable to find evidence that the site had been
impacted from petroleum hydrocarbons and/or volatile organic compounds (VOCs) related to
the former site use. However, borings could only be collected from the vicinity of the USTs and
not directly below them. Based on the findings of the Phase I, the presence of the USTs and
that subsurface sampling was conducted over 7 years ago at the subject property represents a
recognized environmental condition (REC).

AEI observed two clarifiers at 1185 West Sunset Boulevard. One clarifier was located in the
garage and the other clarifier was located in the car washing area. According to records from
the Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation Industrial Waste Management District (LABS IWMD),
permits to operate a clarifier were issued to the subject property in 1961, 1994, 2009, and 2011
for auto wash activities. It is unknown if all of the permits refer to the same clarifier. However,
since the permits were issued for auto wash activities, it is presumed that these permits refer to
the clarifier located in the current car washing area. The clarifier located in the garage appears
to have been associated with auto repair operations. Based on the presumed use of this clarifier
for auto repair operations and the on-site historical use of hazardous materials, the clarifier
located in the garage represents a REC.

Areas of the subject property have historically been used for various industrial purposes since
the 1920s. The southern portion of the subject property associated with the addresses 1181
(historical address) and 1185 West Sunset Boulevard, was used for car washing and auto repair

Project No. 316456
March 22, 2013
Page 3
operations from the mid 1960s to the present. These operations are typically associated with
the use of hazardous materials, including solvents and oils.

According to building records, in 1933, the portion of the subject property associated with 1201
West Sunset Boulevard was issued a permit for an oil depot. The portion of the subject property
currently associated with the addresses 1205 and 1207 West Sunset Boulevard, was historically
used for industrial purposes. The southern portion of the building was occupied by a plastic key
tag manufacturer from 1956 to 1958, and time controls manufacturer from 1962 to 1970. The
northern portion of the building was occupied by a chemical manufacturer of disinfectants from
1950 to 1954 and a valve manufacturer from 1957 to 1970. Since no information was available
regarding the use of the building from 1927 to 1950, there is a possibility that chemical
manufacturing was conducted since as early as 1927. These manufacturing operations are
typically associated with hazardous materials including petroleum hydrocarbons and solvents.

The portion of the subject property currently associated with the address 1211 West Sunset
Boulevard was developed with a commercial/industrial building from at least 1927. This building
was occupied by a shade manufacturer in at least 1942 and a printing facility from at least 1950
to at least 1971. Many printing industries generate waste ink and ink sludges that might contain
solvents. Photographic processes are also typically associated with major printing operations for
image conversion and plate making. Photographic wastes, including heavy metal solutions,
developers, hardeners, plating chemicals, and spent solvents, make up a large portion of the
hazardous waste generated in these industries.

The portion of the subject property currently associated with the address 1229 Sunset
Boulevard was historically occupied by a hood & pad manufacturer/sign manufacturer/painting
company in 1953 and a sign manufacturer/sign manufacturer/painting company from 1954 to
1960. In addition, the portion of the subject property currently associated with the addresses
1235, 1237, and 1239 Sunset Boulevard was developed with a commercial/industrial building.
The building was occupied by a woodworking and sign painting company in 1950, a sign
manufacturer and painting company in 1954, a sash and door warehouse from 1957 to 1960,
and sign painting company from 1964 to 1970. It is likely that these former industrial tenants
utilized hazardous materials including oils, lubricants, and solvents. Records pertaining to the
use of hazardous materials for the previous industrial tenants were not available as they
operated during a time when the regulatory measures governing the use of hazardous materials
of this nature were not as stringent as they are today. Based on the length of time the
industrial operations were conducted, the historical on-site industrial operations represent a
REC.

The purpose of this Phase II at the subject property is to assess subsurface soils and
groundwater with regard to the historical and current on-site operations.
3.0 INVESTI GATI ON EFFORTS
3.1 Health and Safety Plan
A site-specific health and safety plan was prepared, reviewed by onsite personnel, and kept
onsite for the duration of the fieldwork.

Project No. 316456
March 22, 2013
Page 4
3.2 Permitting and Utility Clearance
A soil boring into groundwater service request application was submitted to the Los Angeles
County Department of Public Health Drinking Water Program for this investigation (pending).
The public underground utility locating service Underground Service Alert (USA) was notified to
identify public utilities in the work area. This work was performed under the oversight of a
California-licensed Professional Geologist.
3.3 Geophysical Survey
On February 28, 2013, prior to drilling activities, Subsurface Surveys & Associates, Inc.
(Subsurface Surveys) of Carlsbad, California, (Appendix A) under the supervision of AEI,
conducted a geophysical survey throughout the property addressed as 1185 West Sunset
Boulevard (Figure 2). The purpose of the geophysical survey was to locate and identify any
potential USTs, associated piping, conduits, and other buried features (i.e. septic tank,
excavations, and/or drums) that may exist on the subject property.

The equipment used in this investigation consisted of a Geonics electromagnetic (EM)-61 high
sensitivity metal detector, a Fischer M-Scope, and ground penetrating radar (GPR). A utility
locator with line tracing capabilities was also used, where risers exist, onto which a signal could
be induced and traced.

Items detected were marked on site in industry standard colors including red for electric, blue
for water, green for sewer and drain lines, and white for the edge of the UST tank vault.

Within the area surveyed, the USTs were identified and mapped along the southwestern
property addressed as 1185 West Sunset Boulevard. No other undocumented USTs, buried
drums or any other anomalous buried objects were detected.
3.4 Drilling and Soil Sample Collection
On February 28 and March 1, 2013, 17 soil borings (AEI-B1 through AEI-B17) were advanced
throughout the subject property (Figure 2). All borings were advanced by Minuteman Drilling of
Simi Valley, California using a limited-access or truck-mounted direct-push drilling rig. The
borings were advanced to depths of 4.5 to 20 feet bgs. The location and purpose of each boring
are listed below:

Boring AEI-B1 was advanced near the northwestern property boundary of 1185 West
Sunset Boulevard. For the purpose of soil sampling, boring AEI-B1 was advanced to a
refusal depth of approximately 16 feet bgs.
Boring AEI-B2 was advanced northwest of the clarifier located in the car washing area of
1185 West Sunset Boulevard. For the purpose of soil sampling, boring AEI-B2 was
advanced to a refusal depth of approximately 17.5 feet bgs.
Boring AEI-B3 was advanced adjacent to the east of the USTs located at 1185 West
Sunset Boulevard. For the purpose of soil sampling, boring AEI-B3 was advanced to a
maximum depth of approximately 20 feet bgs.

Project No. 316456
March 22, 2013
Page 5
Boring AEI-B4 was advanced southwest of the clarifier located in the car washing area
of 1185 West Sunset Boulevard. For the purpose of soil sampling, boring AEI-B4 was
advanced to a maximum depth of approximately 20 feet bgs.
Boring AEI-B5 was advanced southwest of the USTs located at 1185 West Sunset
Boulevard. For the purpose of soil sampling, boring AEI-B5 was advanced to a
maximum depth of approximately 20 feet bgs.
Boring AEI-B6 was advanced adjacent to the north of the waste oil storage area located
at 1185 West Sunset Boulevard. For the purpose of soil sampling, boring AEI-B6 was
advanced to a refusal depth of approximately 10 feet bgs.
Boring AEI-B7 was advanced south of the clarifier located in the car washing area and
southwest of the USTs located on 1185 West Sunset Boulevard. For the purpose of soil
sampling, boring AEI-B7 was advanced to a maximum depth of approximately 20 feet
bgs.
Boring AEI-B8 was advanced adjacent to waste oil UST located at 1185 West Sunset
Boulevard. For the purpose of soil sampling, boring AEI-B8 was advanced to a refusal
depth of approximately 14 feet bgs.
Boring AEI-B9 was advanced adjacent to west of the subject property building
addressed as 1201 & 1197 West Sunset Boulevard. For the purpose of soil sampling,
boring AEI-B9 was advanced to a terminal depth of approximately 10 feet bgs.
Boring AEI-B10 was advanced in the northern interior of the subject property building
addressed as 1233 West Sunset Boulevard. For the purpose of soil sampling, boring
AEI-B10 was advanced to a refusal depth of approximately 4.5 feet bgs.
Boring AEI-B11 was advanced in the southern interior of the subject property building
AEI-B11 was advanced to a refusal depth of approximately 8.5 feet bgs.
Boring AEI-B12 was advanced in the northern interior of the subject property building
AEI-B12 was advanced to a terminal depth of approximately 10 feet bgs.
Boring AEI-B13 was advanced in the southwestern interior of the subject property
building addressed as 1229 West Sunset Boulevard. For the purpose of soil sampling,
boring AEI-B13 was advanced to a refusal depth of approximately 6 feet bgs.
Boring AEI-B14 was advanced in the northwestern interior of the subject property
boring AEI-B14 was advanced to a terminal depth of approximately 10 feet bgs.
Boring AEI-B15 was advanced in the southeastern interior of the subject property
boring AEI-B15 was advanced to a refusal depth of approximately 6.5 feet bgs.
Boring AEI-B16 was advanced in the southern interior of the subject property building
AEI-B16 was advanced to a terminal depth of approximately 10 feet bgs.
Boring AEI-B17 was advanced near the southern property boundary of 1185 West
Sunset Boulevard. For the purpose of groundwater sampling, boring AEI-B17 was
advanced to a terminal depth of approximately 20 feet bgs. Groundwater equilibrated at
approximately 16 feet bgs.

All borings were advanced using 2-inch outer diameter rods and samples were collected by
advancing the rods with acetate sample liners. At designated sampling intervals, the core was

Project No. 316456
March 22, 2013
Page 6
retrieved, core barrel disassembled, and the sample liner was removed and transferred to the
onsite geologist.

All soil borings were logged using the Unified Soil Classification System. A photo ionization
detector (PID) was used to screen soil samples in the field and the PID readings for each
sample were included on the boring logs (Appendix B). Boring depths and sampling schedule
are also included on the boring logs.

Down-hole equipment was decontaminated using a triple rinse system containing detergent.
3.5 Groundwater Sample Collection
Groundwater was collected from boring AEI-B17 using the truck-mounted direct push drilling rig
by advancing a Hydropunch
equipped with a 4-foot screen to approximately 20 feet bgs. The

Hydropunch
was opened to expose the screened interval and allow groundwater to enter the
screen. Before extracting samples, groundwater was permitted to equilibrate to a static level.
Groundwater equilibrated at approximately 16 feet bgs. New -inch diameter polyethylene
tubing was inserted into the Hydropunch

and groundwater was sampled utilizing low flow
methods and transferred into three clean, laboratory-supplied 40-mL VOA containers with
hydrochloric acid (HCl) preservative. Neither headspace nor air bubbles were visible in the vials
once capped.
3.6 Boring Destruction
Following sampling, each boring was backfilled with hydrated granular bentonite and capped
with concrete at ground surface.
3.7 Laboratory Analyses
All samples were labeled and placed into a cooler with ice following sampling. The samples
were transferred under appropriate chain-of-custody documentation by AEI to Alpha Scientific
Corporation (ASC), a state-certified laboratory (California DHS Certified Laboratory) in the City
of Cerritos, California. Laboratory analytical documentation is provided in Appendix C.

Laboratory analysis of soil and groundwater consisted of the following:
VOCs by EPA Method 8260B
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) following carbon-chain methods and reported as
gasoline range (C4-C12), diesel range (C13-22) and oil range (C23-C40) (TPH-g, TPH-d
and TPH-o) via USEPA Method 8015M
3.8 Investigation Derived Wastes
No investigation derived waste was created during this investigation.
4.0 FINDINGS
The soil results of this investigation were reviewed and compared to the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Regional Screening Levels (RSLs). The RSLs are risk-
based concentrations derived from standardized equations combining exposure information

Project No. 316456
March 22, 2013
Page 7
assumptions with EPA toxicity data. The RSLs are used for site "screening" and as initial
cleanup goals, if applicable. The RSLs are considered by the USEPA to be protective for
humans (including sensitive groups) over a lifetime; however, they are not always applicable to
a particular site and do not address non-human health endpoints, such as ecological impacts.

The results of this investigation were also compared to the Environmental Screening Levels
(ESLs) from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. The ESLs are considered to be
conservative. Under most circumstances, and within the limitations described, the presence of a
chemical in soil, soil gas or groundwater at concentrations below the corresponding ESL can be
assumed to not pose a significant, threat to human health and the environment. Additional
evaluation will generally be necessary at sites where a chemical is present at concentrations
above the corresponding ESL.
4.1 Geology and Hydrogeology
The soils encountered at the subject property primarily consisted of interbedded well and poorly
graded sands and gravels, and silty clays and sands from ground surface to a depth of
approximately 20 feet bgs (Appendix B). Groundwater was encountered and equilibrated at
approximately 16 feet bgs in boring AEI-B17.
4.2 Soil Sample Analytical Results
The following information is a summary of the soil sample analytical test results (Appendix C).
This information has also been included in Table 1.

VOCs and TPH were not detected in soil samples above the laboratory detection limits.

The following information is a summary of the groundwater sample analytical test results
(Appendix C). This information has also been included in Table 2.

VOCs and TPH were not detected in the groundwater sample above the laboratory
detection limits.
5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
AEI has completed a Phase II at the property to evaluate if the current and historic on-site
operations had adversely impacted the subject property. A total of 17 borings were advanced
throughout the subject property for the collection of 1-groundwater sample and soil samples.
Borings were advanced at select locations of current and previously suspected industrial
operations that could have impacted the subject property.

The results of this investigation were compared to USEPA RSLs and California RWQCB ESLs.

Due to the lack of a release detected, AEI does not recommend any further action for the
subject property at this time.

Project No. 316456
March 22, 2013
Page 8
6.0 REPORT LI MI TATI ONS AND RELI ANCE
This report presents a summary of work completed by AEI Consultants. The completed work
includes observations and descriptions of site conditions encountered. Where appropriate, it
includes analytical results for samples taken during the course of the work. The number and
location of samples are chosen to provide the requested information, subject to scope of work
for which AEI was retained and limitations inherent in this type of work, but it cannot be
assumed that they are representative of areas not sampled. This report should not be regarded
as a guarantee that no further contamination beyond that which could have been detected
within the scope of this investigation is present beneath the subject property. Undocumented,
unauthorized releases of hazardous material, the remains of which are not readily identifiable
by visual inspection and are of different chemical constituents, are difficult and often impossible
to detect within the scope of a chemical specific investigation.

Any conclusions and/or recommendations are based on these analyses and observations, and
the governing regulations. Conclusions beyond those stated and reported herein should not be
inferred from this document. These services were performed in accordance with generally
accepted practices, in the environmental engineering and construction field, which existed at
the time and location of the work. No other warranty, either expressed or implied, has been
made.

This investigation was prepared for the sole use and benefit of Mr. Fred Shaffer of Aragon
Properties, Ltd. All reports, both verbal and written, whether in draft or final, are for the benefit
of Aragon Properties, Ltd. This report has no other purpose and may not be relied upon by any
other person or entity without the written consent of AEI. Either verbally or in writing, third
parties may come into possession of this report or all or part of the information generated as a
result of this work. In the absence of a written agreement with AEI granting such rights, no
third parties shall have rights of recourse or recovery whatsoever under any course of action
against AEI, its officers, employees, vendors, successors or assigns. Reliance is provided in
accordance with AEIs Proposal and Standard Terms & Conditions executed by Mr. Shaffer on
February 18, 2013. The limitation of liability defined in the Terms and Conditions is the aggregate
limit of AEIs liability to the client and all relying parties.

If there are any questions regarding our investigation, please do not hesitate to contact AEI at
310-798-4255.

Sincerely,
AEI Consultants

Noel Hernandez Kent Vollmer, PG
Project Manager Site Mitigation Dept. Manager

FIGURES

FIGURE 1
SITE LOCATION MAP
Legend
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
HOLLYWOOD, CA QUADRANGLE
Project Number: 316456
N
1185 - 1245 West Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90026
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
FIGURE 2
AEI-B1
AEI-B2
AEI-B3
AEI-B4
AEI-B5
AEI-B6
AEI-B7
AEI-B8
AEI-B9
AEI-B10
AEI-B12
AEI-B11
AEI-B13
AEI-B14
AEI-B15
AEI-B16
AEI-B17
SITE MAP
Legend
N
Approximate USTs Location
Project Number: 316456
AEI-B1 AEIs Phase II Boring Location - March 2013
Approximate Subject Property Line
W
E
S
T
S
U
N
S
E
T
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
E
V
E
R
E
T
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
1243
1233
1211
1205
1201/
1197
1185
959

TABLES

Sample
Depth
TPH-g*
(C4-C12)
TPH-d
(C13-C23)
TPH-o
(C24-C40) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene
Total
Xylenes
All Other
VOCs
(feet bgs) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (g/kg) (g/kg) (g/kg) (g/kg) (g/kg)
AEI-B1 2/28/13 10 <0.2 <1.0 <25 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B1 2/28/13 15 <0.2 <1.0 <25 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B2 2/28/13 10 <0.2 <1.0 <25 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B2 2/28/13 15 <0.2 <1.0 <25 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B3 2/28/13 15 <0.2 <1.0 <25 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B3 2/28/13 20 <0.2 <1.0 <25 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B4 2/28/13 15 <0.2 <1.0 <25 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B4 2/28/13 20 <0.2 <1.0 <25 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B5 2/28/13 15 <0.2 <1.0 <25 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B5 2/28/13 20 <0.2 <1.0 <25 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B6 2/28/13 10 <0.2 <1.0 <25 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B7 3/1/13 10 N/A N/A N/A <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B7 3/1/13 15 <0.2 <1.0 <25 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B7 3/1/13 20 <0.2 <1.0 <25 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B8 3/1/13 5 N/A N/A N/A <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B8 3/1/13 10 <0.2 <1.0 <25 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B9 3/1/13 5 N/A N/A N/A <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B9 3/1/13 10 N/A N/A N/A <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B10 3/1/13 4.5 N/A N/A N/A <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B11 3/1/13 5 N/A N/A N/A <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B11 3/1/13 8.5 N/A N/A N/A <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B12 3/1/13 5 N/A N/A N/A <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B12 3/1/13 10 N/A N/A N/A <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B13 3/1/13 4 N/A N/A N/A <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B13 3/1/13 6 N/A N/A N/A <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B14 3/1/13 5 N/A N/A N/A <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B14 3/1/13 10 N/A N/A N/A <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B15 3/1/13 5 N/A N/A N/A <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B16 3/1/13 5 N/A N/A N/A <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
AEI-B16 3/1/13 10 N/A N/A N/A <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 ND
Comparison Values:
100
(mg/kg)
100
(mg/kg)
1,000
(mg/kg)
11
(g/kg)
300
(g/kg)
700
(g/kg)
1,750
(g/kg)
N/A
Notes:
mg/kg milligrams per kilogram TPH-d total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel
g/kg micrograms per kilogram TPH-o total petroleum hydrocarbons as oil
bgs below ground surface VOCs volatile organic compounds
N/A not applicable/not analyzed Bold Result exceeds applicable Comparison Value
TPH-g total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline ND not detected above method reporting limit
* TPH-g result obtained from purge and trap analysis
using LUFT GC/MS Method
CRWQCB Los Angeles Region Maximum
Soil Screening Levels for Distance Above
Groundwater: <20 feet
Location
ID
Date
TABLE 1: SOIL SAMPLE DATA SUMMARY
Page 1 of 2
TPH-g*
(C4-C12)
TPH-d
(C13-C23)
TPH-o
(C24-C40) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene
Total
Xylenes
All Other
VOCs
(g/L) (g/L) (g/L) (g/L) (g/L) (g/L) (g/L) (g/L)
AEI-B17 2/28/13 AEI-GW17 <50 <500 <2,500 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.0 ND
Comparison Values:
N/A N/A N/A
1.0
(g/L)
150
(g/L)
300
(g/L)
1,800
(g/L)
N/A
Notes:
g/L micrograms per liter TPH-d total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel
N/A not applicable/not analyzed TPH-o total petroleum hydrocarbons as oil
TPH-g total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline VOCs volatile organic compounds
* TPH-g result obtained from purge and trap analysis Bold Result exceeds applicable Comparison Value
using LUFT GC/MS Method ND not detected above method reporting limit
California Regional Water Quality
Control Board - Groundwater Screening
Levels (May 2008)
Sample ID
Location
ID
Date
TABLE 2: GROUNDWATER SAMPLE DATA SUMMARY
Page 2 of 2

APPENDIX A

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY REPORT
2075 Corte Del Nogal, Suite W
Carlsbad, CA 92011

S Su ub bS Su ur rf fa ac ce e S Su ur rv ve ey ys s
& & A A s s s s o o c c i i a a t t e e s s , , I I n n c c . .
A An n A Ap pp pl li ie ed d G Ge eo op ph hy ys si ic ca al l C Co om mp pa an ny y
Office: (760) 476-0492
Fax: (760) 476-0493

Subsurface Surveys & Associates, Inc. www.subsurfacesurveys.com contactus@subsurfacesurveys.com

March 7, 2013

Project/Invoice No. 13-093
AEI Consultants
5933 West Century Blvd., Suite 360

Attn: Noel Hernandez

Re: Geophysical Investigation Report, 1185 West Sunset Blvd, Los Angeles, California.

This report is to present the results of our geophysical survey carried out over an area located at 1185 West
Sunset Blvd, Los Angeles, California (Figure 1). The survey was performed on February 28, 2013, and its
purpose was to locate and identify, insofar as possible, pipes, conduits, utilities, and other underground
obstructions within a 10 foot radius of four (4) proposed borehole.

A combination of electromagnetic induction (EM), magnetometry, and ground penetrating radar (GPR)
were applied to the search. Utility locators with line tracing capabilities were also brought to the field and
used where risers exist onto which a signal could be impressed and traced.

FIGURE 1. Site location map.

2
Survey Design The area to be surveyed was indicated in the field by the client and included four (4)
boreholes located on a former gas station which is currently a car wash.

In site situations and survey objectives such as this, the best use of time is achieved by systematically free-
traversing with the instruments while monitoring them continuously to determine which responses are
significant and due to true subsurface targets, and which are due to other non-target or above-ground
features and must be ignored (an example being nearby cars). Where applicable, the EM devices, magnetic
gradiometer, and GPR were traversed systematically over the survey areas in multiple, organized directions.
Other traverses were taken for detailing and confirmation where anomalous conditions were found.

In addition, the line tracers were used to impress signals onto pipes, generally through accessible risers and
tracer wires when present, to delineate the lines locations and orientations. The instruments were also used
in passive mode, configured to detect 60 Hz electrical signals and other common radio-frequency signals
found in active electrical and communication lines.

Hard copy of the EM data was not acquired, that is, discrete readings on the nodes of a grid were not
recorded that could be put into a contoured map format. Rather, the instruments meters were read
continuously, and in real-time, during each traverse. This free-traversing method allowed for immediate
detection of anomalous objects and facilitated the opportunity to investigate them further, without the need
to first download and process data in the office. The lack of hard copy for EM data sets does not degrade
the quality of the survey in any way. Hard copy merely provides a basis for report documentation of these
geophysical fields, if such documentation is needed.

A Geonics model EM61, and a Fischer M-Scope, was used for the EM sampling. A Sensors & Software
Noggin Ground Penetrating Radar unit with a 500 MHz antenna produced the radar images. The magnetic
gradiometer was a Schonstedt GA-52, and a Metrotech 9890 and RIDGID SR-60 SeekTech utility locator
rounded out the tools applied.

Brief Description of the Geophysical Methods Applied The EM61 instrument is a high resolution, time-
domain device for detecting buried conductive objects. It consists of a powerful transmitter that generates a
pulsed primary magnetic field when its coils are energized, which induces eddy currents in nearby
conductive objects. The decay of the eddy currents, following the input pulse, is measured by the coils,
which in turn serve as receiver coils. The decay rate is measured for two coils, mounted concentrically, one
above the other. By making the measurements at a relatively long time interval (measured in milliseconds)
after termination of the primary pulse, the response is nearly independent of the electrical conductivity of
the ground. Thus, the instrument is a super-sensitive metal detector. Due to its unique coil arrangement, the
response curve is a single well-defined positive peak directly over a buried conductive object. This
facilitates quick and accurate location of targets.

The M-Scope device energizes the ground by producing an alternating primary magnetic field with AC
current in a transmitting coil. If conducting materials are within the area of influence of the primary field,
AC eddy currents are induced to flow in the conductors. A receiving coil senses the secondary magnetic
field produced by these eddy currents, and outputs the response as anomalous conditions. The strength of
the secondary field is a function of the conductivity of the object; say a pipe, tank or cluster of drums, its
size, and its depth and position relative to the instrument's two coils. Conductive objects, to a depth of
approximately 7 feet below ground surface (bgs) for the M-Scope are sensed. The device is also somewhat
focused; that is, it is more sensitive to conductors below the instrument than they are to conductors off to the

3
side.

The magnetic gradiometer has two flux gate magnetic fixed sensors that are passed closely to and over the
ground. When not in close proximity to a magnetic object, that is, only in the earth's field, the instrument
emits a sound signal at a low frequency. When the instrument passes over a buried iron or steel object, so
that locally there is a high magnetic gradient, the frequency of the emitted sound increases. The frequency
is a function of the gradient between the two sensors.

The line locator is used to passively detect energized high voltage electric lines and electrical conduit (50-
60 Hz), VLF signals (14-22 kHz), as well as to actively trace other utilities. Where risers are present, the
utility locator transmitter can be connected directly to the object, and a signal (9.8-82 kHz) is sent traveling
along the conductor, pipe, conduit, etc. In the absence of a riser, the transmitter can be used to impress an
input signal on the utility by induction. In either case, the receiver unit is tuned to the input signal, and is
used to actively trace the signal along the pipes surface projection.

The GPR instrument beams energy into the ground from its transducer/antenna, in the form of
electromagnetic waves. A portion of this energy is reflected back to the antenna at a boundary in the
subsurface across which there is an electrical contrast. The instrument produces a continuous record of the
reflected energy as the antenna is traversed across the ground surface. The greater the electrical contrast,
the higher the amplitude of the returned energy. The radar wave travels at a velocity unique to the material
properties of the ground being investigated, and when these velocities are known, the two-way travel times
can be converted to depth. The depth of penetration and image resolution produced are a function of ground
electrical conductivity and dielectric constant.

Interpretation and Conclusions - The interpretation took place in real time as the survey progressed, and
accordingly, the findings of our investigation were marked on the ground cover at the site using spray paint,
reported to the client, and are further documented with site photographs of the areas investigated (Figures
2-5).

Items detected in the vicinity of the compound were marked in industry standard colors including green for
sewer, red for electric, white for the edge of the tank pits and blue for water

As shown in Figure 3, white was used to mark the edge of the pea-gravel in which onsite USTs reside in.
Note that the proposed borehole was placed outside this region. Please refer to the site photographs for the
locations of the boreholes and the orientation of all items found in their vicinity.

At the conclusion of the survey, the proposed boreholes were placed, so as to avoid all detected
obstructions. The boreholes were marked in white with a yellow SSS to indicate that they had been
checked by company personnel.

Limitations and Further Recommendations - It should be understood that limitations inherent in
geophysical instruments and/or surveying techniques exist at all sites, and nearly all sites exhibit conditions
under which such might not perform optimally. Consequently, the detection of buried objects in all
circumstances cannot be guaranteed. Such limitations are numerous and include, but are not limited to,
rebar-reinforced ground cover, abrupt changes in ground cover type, above-ground obstacles preventing full
traverses or traverses in one direction only, above-ground conductive objects interfering with instrument
signal, nearby powerlines or EM transmitters, highly conductive background soil conditions, limited GPR

4
penetration, non-metallic targets, shallower or larger objects shielding deeper or smaller targets, tracing
signal jumping from one line to another, and inaccessible risers, cleanouts, valve boxes, and manholes. If
one or more geophysical instrument is rendered ineffective and cannot be utilized, the quality of the survey
can be somewhat degraded.

For the above reasons, and in the interest of maximum safety, we encourage our clients to take advantage of
Underground Service Alert (USA), Dig Alert, or other similar services, when possible. Furthermore, we
recommend hand-auguring and the use of a drilling method known as air knifing or vacuum extraction,
when feasible or if applicable to this project. These methods may significantly limit damage to underground
pipes, conduits, and utilities that might not have been detectable during the course of this survey. Please
bear in mind, that geophysical surveying is only one of several levels of protection that is available to our
clients.

SubSurface Surveys may include maps in some reports. While they are an accurate general representation
of the site and our findings, they are not of engineering quality (i.e., measured and mapped by a licensed
land surveyor).

SubSurface Surveys and Associates makes no guarantee either expressed or implied regarding the accuracy
of the findings and interpretations present. And, in no event will SubSurface Surveys and Associates be
liable for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages resulting from interpretations
and opinions presented herewith.

All data generated on this project are in confidential file in this office, and are available for review by
authorized persons at any time. The opportunity to participate in this investigation is very much
appreciated. Please call, if there are questions.

Todd Barker Travis Crosby
Staff Geophysicist, SubSurface Surveys California State Geophysics Registration GP1044
Senior Geophysicist, SubSurface Surveys

TITLE:
SSS PROJECT NO:
1185 W. Sunset Blvd
Los Angeles, California
13-093
February 28, 2013
SITE: SURVEY DATE:
PREPARED FOR:
AEI Consultants
Utility Clearance for Boreholes
Figure 7 Figure 6
Figure 5 Figure 4
Figure 3 Figure 2
BH
BH
BH
BH

APPENDIX B

BORING LOGS
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
SHEET 1 OF 17
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION REMARKS
END DATE:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B1
Backfilled with hydrated granular bentonite and concrete capped. B. Campbell N. Hernandez
Truck mounted direct-push drill rig Approx. 16 feet bgs
Minuteman Drilling 2/28/13 2/28/13
Aragon Properties, Ltd. 316456 / Phase II Subsurface Investigation
1185 - 1245 W. Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90026 Ranges from 410 to 500 feet amsl
Not encountered Not encountered
AEI-B1-10 0.0 SM
AEI-B1-15 0.0 SM
Approximately 1 of asphalt at ground surface
As above, very stiff to hard
Boring advanced to a refusal depth of approx. 16 feet below
ground surface (bgs). Soil samples collected at 5, 10, and 15
feet bgs. Borehole backfilled to ground surface with hydrated
granular bentonite and concrete capped after soil sampling.
AEI-B1-5 0.0 ML
Clayey SILT, trace gravel, light brown, moist, firm to stiff,
homogeneous
Silty SAND, trace clay, light brown, moist, stiff to very stiff,
homogeneous
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
SHEET 2 OF 17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
END DATE:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B2
Truck mounted direct-push drill rig Approx. 17.5 feet bgs
Approximately 2 of concrete at ground surface
AEI-B2-10 0.0 ML
AEI-B2-15 0.0 ML
AEI-B2-5 0.0 ML
SILT, with clay, trace gravel, brown, moist, firm to stiff,
homogeneous
As above, some clay, olive-gray
Boring advanced to a refusal depth of approx. 17.5 feet below
As above, some clay, olive-gray
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
SHEET 3 OF 17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
END DATE:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B3
AEI-B3-10 0.0
ML AEI-B3-15 0.0
AEI-B3-20 0.0 As above, hard
Boring advanced to a terminal depth of approx. 20 feet below
SP
Poorly Graded SAND, trace gravel, olive-gray, moist, loose to
medium dense, homogeneous
SILT, with clay, trace gravel, red-brown, moist, very stiff to hard,
homogeneous
ML
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
SHEET 4 OF 17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
END DATE:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B4
AEI-B4-10 0.0 SP
AEI-B4-15 0.0 SP
AEI-B4-20 0.0 ML
ground surface (bgs). Soil samples collected at 5, 10, 15, and 20
AEI-B4-5 0.0 CL
SILT, with clay, trace gravel, olive, moist, very dense,
homogeneous
Lean CLAY, trace gravel, olive-gray, moist, firm, homogeneous
Poorly Graded SAND, some clay, red-brown, moist, medium
dense to dense, homogeneous
As above
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
SHEET 5 OF 17
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
END DATE:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B5
AEI-B5-5 0.0 ML
AEI-B5-10 0.0
ML As above
SILT, with clay, trace gravel, brown, moist, firm to stiff,
homogeneous
AEI-B5-20 0.0 ML
ground surface (bgs). Soil samples collected at 5, 10, 15, and 20
SILT, with clay, trace gravel, red, moist, very dense,
homogeneous
SP AEI-B5-15 0.0
Poorly Graded SAND, trace gravel, light brown, moist, medium
dense, homogeneous
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
SHEET 6 OF 17
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
END DATE:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B6
AEI-B6-5 0.0 ML
AEI-B6-10 0.0
ML As above
ground surface (bgs). Soil samples collected at 5 and 10 feet
bgs. Borehole backfilled to ground surface with hydrated
SILT, with clay, trace gravel, red-brown, moist, stiff to very stiff,
homogeneous
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
SHEET 7 OF 17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
END DATE:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B7
Minuteman Drilling
3/1/13 3/1/13
AEI-B7-10 0.0
ML AEI-B7-15 0.0
AEI-B7-20 0.0 As above, interlayered gray, red-brown, and yellow-brown
ML
SILT, with fine sand, trace gravel, olive with yellow-brown, moist,
very stiff, homogeneous
SILT, with fine sand, gray to gray-brown, moist, very stiff to hard,
homogeneous
ML
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
SHEET 8 OF 17
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
END DATE:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B8
AEI-B8-10 0.0 SM
AEI-B8-14 0.0 ML
Fine Sandy SILT, red-brown, Fe-oxide staining, moist, hard,
homogeneous
AEI-B8-5 0.0 ML
SILT, with fine sand, trace gravel, gray with red-brown, moist,
stiff to very stiff, homogeneous
Silty Fine SAND, with silt, olive-gray, Fe-oxide staining, moist,
stiff to very stiff, homogeneous
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
SHEET 9 OF 17
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
END DATE:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B9
Minuteman Drilling
3/1/13 3/1/13
AEI-B9-5 0.0 CL
AEI-B9-10 0.0
As above, with fine sand, dark yellow and red-brown
Lean CLAY, trace fine sand, red-brown, moist, stiff to very stiff,
homogeneous
CL
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
SHEET 10 OF 17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
END DATE:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B10
Limited-access direct-push drill rig Approx. 4.5 feet bgs
Minuteman Drilling
3/1/13 3/1/13
AEI-B10-4.5 0.0 SM
AEI-B10-2 0.0 SM
Silty Fine SAND, trace gravel, olive-gray, moist, dense to very
dense, homogeneous
As above, very stiff to hard
ground surface (bgs). Soil samples collected at 2 and 4.5 feet
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
SHEET 11 OF 17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
END DATE:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B11
Truck mounted direct-push drill rig Approx. 8.5 feet bgs
Minuteman Drilling
3/1/13 3/1/13
AEI-B11-8.5 0.0 ML
ground surface (bgs). Soil samples collected at 5 and 8.5 feet
AEI-B11-5 0.0 ML
Sandy SILT, gray-brown, moist, very stiff to hard, homogeneous
Fine Sandy SILT, gray to red-brown, moist, very stiff to hard,
homogeneous
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
SHEET 12 OF 17
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
END DATE:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B12
Minuteman Drilling
3/1/13 3/1/13
AEI-B12-5 0.0 ML
AEI-B12-10 0.0
SM
SILT, with clay, trace gravel, red-brown, moist, stiff to very stiff,
homogeneous
Silty SAND, trace gravel, red-brown, moist, very dense,
homogeneous
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
SHEET 13 OF 17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
END DATE:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B13
Limited-access direct-push drill rig Approx. 6 feet bgs
Minuteman Drilling
3/1/13 3/1/13
AEI-B13-4 0.0 SM
AEI-B13-2 0.0 SM
Silty Fine SAND, trace gravel, yellow-brown, moist, dense to
very dense, homogeneous
ground surface (bgs). Soil samples collected at 2, 4, and 6 feet
Silty SAND, trace gravel, gray, Fe-oxide staining, moist, dense
to very dense, homogeneous
AEI-B13-6 0.0 SM
Silty Fine SAND, trace gravel, yellow with gray, moist, very
dense, homogeneous
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
SHEET 14 OF 17
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
END DATE:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B14
Minuteman Drilling
3/1/13 3/1/13
AEI-B14-5 0.0 SP
AEI-B14-10 0.0
Fine to medium Poorly Graded SAND, with clay, red-brown,
Fe-oxide staining, moist, dense to very dense, homogeneous
SC
Clayey Fine SAND, red-brown, Fe-oxide staining, moist, dense
to very dense, homogeneous
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
SHEET 15 OF 17
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
END DATE:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B15
Limited-access direct-push drill rig Approx. 6.5 feet bgs
AEI-B15-5 0.0 SM
Silty SAND, with clay, trace gravel, red-brown, moist, very
dense, homogeneous
ground surface (bgs). Soil sample collected at 5 feet bgs.
Borehole backfilled to ground surface with hydrated granular
bentonite and concrete capped after soil sampling.
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
SHEET 16 OF 17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
END DATE:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B16
Limited-access direct-push drill rig Approx. 10 feet bgs
Minuteman Drilling
3/1/13 3/1/13
AEI-B16-10 0.0 CL
AEI-B16-5 0.0 SC
Clayey SAND, dark-brown, moist, dense to very dense,
homogeneous
Sandy CLAY, red-brown, moist, stiff to very stiff, homogeneous
LOG OF BOREHOLE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DRILLING METHOD:
CLIENT:
START DATE:
TOTAL DEPTH:
DEPTH TO FIRST
GROUNDWATER:
LOGGED
BY:
SHEET 17 OF 17
DEPTH TO STATIC
GROUNDWATER:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
D
E
P
T
H
(
f
e
e
t
b
g
s
)
S
A
M
P
L
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
SAMPLE DATA
P
I
D
(
p
p
m
)
U
S
C
S
L
I
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
END DATE:
CHECKED
BY: NOTES:
AEI CONSULTANTS
ELEVATION:
AEI-B17
Minuteman Drilling
Approx. 16 feet bgs Approx. 18 feet bgs
3/1/13 3/1/13
3/1/13
ground surface (bgs) for groundwater sampling. oil samples
collected.
Borehole backfilled to ground surface with hydrated granular
bentonite and concrete capped after sampling.
No s
For the purpose of groundwater sampling, boring AEI-
B17 was advanced to a terminal depth of approximately 20 feet
bgs. Groundwater equilibrated at approximately 16 feet bgs.

APPENDIX C

LABORATORY ANALYSES

Alpha Scientific Corporation
Environmental Laboratories
16760 Gridley Road, Cerritos, CA 90703, Phone (562) 809-8880 Fax (562) 809-8801 1
03-08-2013
Mr. Noel Hernandez
AEI Consultants
5933 W. Century Blvd, Suite 360
Los Angeles, CA 90045
Project: Sunset/316456
Project Site: 1185-1245 W. Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles, CA
Sample Date: 02-28/03-01-2013
Lab Job No.: AI303008
Dear Mr. Hernandez:
Enclosed please find the analytical report for the sample(s) received by Alpha Scientific Corporation on
03-04-2013 and analyzed by the following EPA methods:
EPA 8015M (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons)
EPA 8260B (VOCs & Oxygenates by GC/MS)
All analyses have met the QA/QC criteria of this laboratory.
The sample(s) arrived in good conditions (i.e., chilled, intact) and with a chain of custody record attached.
Alpha Scientific Corporation is a CA DHS certified laboratory (Certificate Number 2633). Thank you for giving
us the opportunity to serve you. Please feel free to call me at (562) 809-8880 if our laboratory can be of further
service to you.
Sincerely,
Roger Wang, Ph. D.
Laboratory Director
Enclosures
This cover letter is an integral part of this analytical report.
Client: AEI Consultants Lab Job No.: AI303008
Project Site: 1185-1245 W. Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles, CA Date Sampled: 02-28-2013&
03-01-2013
Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03-04-2013
Batch No. for TPH-g: BMC05-GS1 Date Analyzed: 03-05-2013
Batch No. for TPH-d: BC06-DS1 Date Analyzed: 03-06-2013
Date Reported: 03-08-2013
Reporting Unit: mg/kg (ppm)
Sample ID Lab ID
Gasoline Range
(C4-C12)*
Diesel Range
(C13-C23)
Oil Range
(C24-C40)
MDL 0.2 1 25
PQL 0.5 5 50
Method Blank ND ND ND
AEI-B1-10 AI303008-1 ND ND ND
* Gasoline Range TPH result is obtained from purge and trap analysis using LUFT GC/MS Method
MDL: Method Detection Limit.
PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit.
ND: Not Detected (at the specified limit).
J: Trace value. Result is lower than PQL but higher than MDL.
Project Site: 1185-1245 W. Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles, CA Date Sampled: 03-01-2013
Matrix: Water Date Received: 03-04-2013
Batch No. for TPH-g: EMC05-GW1 Date Analyzed: 03-05-2013
Batch No for TPH-d: BC06-DW1 Date Analyzed: 03-06-2013
Date Reported: 03-08-2013
Reporting Units: g/L (ppb)
Sample ID Lab ID
Gasoline Range
(C4-C12)*
Diesel Range
(C13-C23)
Oil Range
(C24-C40)
MDL 50 500 2500
PQL 100 750 4000
Method Blank ND ND ND
AEI-GW17 AI303008-31 ND ND ND

* Gasoline Range TPH result is obtained from purge and trap analysis using LUFT GC/MS Method
MDL: Method Detection Limit.
PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit.
J: Trace value. Result is lower than PQL but higher than MDL.
Client: AEI Consultants Lab Job No.: AI303008 Date Reported: 03-08-2013
Project: Sunset/316456 Matrix: Soil Date Sampled: 02-28-2013
EPA 8260B (VOCs by GC/MS, Page 1 of 2)
Reporting Unit: g/kg(ppb)
DATE ANALYZED 03-05 03-05-13 03-05-13 03-05-13 03-05-13 03-05-13
DILUTION FACTOR (DF) 1 1 1 1 1 1
LAB SAMPLE I.D. AI303008-1 AI303008-2 AI303008-3 AI303008-4 AI303008-5
CLIENT SAMPLE I.D. AEI-B1-10 AEI-B1-15 AEI-B2-10 AEI-B2-15 AEI-B3-15
COMPOUND MDL PQL MB
Dichlorodifluoromethane 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Chloromethane 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Vinyl Chloride 1 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Bromomethane 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Chloroethane 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Iodomethane 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Methylene Chloride 5 10 ND ND ND ND ND ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Bromochloromethane 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Chloroform 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Carbon tetrachloride 1 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Benzene 1 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Trichloroethene 2 4 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Bromodichloromethane 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Dibromomethane 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Dibromochloromethane 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether 2 10 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Bromoform 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Isopropylbenzene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Bromobenzene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
EPA 8260B (VOCs & Oxygenates by GC/MS, Page 2 of 2)
COMPOUND MDL PQL MB AEI-B1-10 AEI-B1-15 AEI-B2-10 AEI-B2-15 AEI-B3-15
Toluene 1 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Tetrachloroethene 2 4 ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Chlorobenzene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Ethylbenzene 1 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 2 4 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Styrene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
n-Propylbenzene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
2-Chlorotoluene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
tert-Butylbenzene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sec-Butylbenzene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
p-Isopropyltoluene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
n-Butylbenzene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-
Chloropropane
2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Naphthalene 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Acetone 50 100 ND ND ND ND ND ND
2-Butanone (MEK) 35 50 ND ND ND ND ND ND
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
(MIBK)
2-Hexanone 35 50 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Ethanol 500 1000 ND ND ND ND ND ND
MTBE 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
ETBE 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
DIPE 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
TAME 2 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND
T-Butyl Alcohol 20 50 ND ND ND ND ND ND
MDL=Method Detection Limit; PQL=Practical Quantitation Limit; MB=Method Blank;
ND=Not Detected (below DF MDL), * Obtained from a higher dilution analysis. J:Trace value.
DATE ANALYZED 03-05 03-05-13 03-05-13 03-05-13 03-05-13 03-05-13
LAB SAMPLE I.D.
AI303008-
6
AI303008-
7
AI303008-
8
AI303008-
9
AI303008-
10
COMPOUND MDL PQL MB
1,2-Dibromo-3-
Chloropropane
(MIBK)
Project: Sunset/316456 Matrix: Soil Date Sampled: 02-28/03-01-2013
DATE ANALYZED 03-05 03-05-13 03-05-13 03-05-13 03-05-13 03-05-13
LAB SAMPLE I.D.
AI303008-
11
AI303008-
12
AI303008-
13
AI303008-
14
AI303008-
15
COMPOUND MDL PQL MB
Project: Sunset/316456 Matrix: Soil Date Sampled: 02-28/03-01-2013
1,2-Dibromo-3-
Chloropropane
(MIBK)
DATE ANALYZED 03-05 03-05-13 03-05-13 03-05-13 03-06-13 03-06-13
LAB SAMPLE I.D.
AI303008-
16
AI303008-
17
AI303008-
18
AI303008-
19
AI303008-
20
CLIENT SAMPLE I.D. AEI-B8-10 AEI-B9-5 AEI-B9-10 AEI-B10-4.5 AEI-B11-5
COMPOUND MDL PQL MB
COMPOUND MDL PQL MB AEI-B8-10 AEI-B9-5 AEI-B9-10 AEI-B10-4.5 AEI-B11-5
1,2-Dibromo-3-
Chloropropane
(MIBK)
DATE ANALYZED 03-06 03-06-13 03-06-13 03-06-13 03-06-13 03-06-13
LAB SAMPLE I.D.
AI303008-
21
AI303008-
22
AI303008-
23
AI303008-
24
AI303008-
25
CLIENT SAMPLE I.D. AEI-B11-8.5 AEI-B12-5 AEI-B12-10 AEI-B13-4 AEI-B13-6
COMPOUND MDL PQL MB
COMPOUND MDL PQL MB AEI-B11-8.5 AEI-B12-5 AEI-B12-10 AEI-B13-4 AEI-B13-6
1,2-Dibromo-3-
Chloropropane
(MIBK)
DATE ANALYZED 03-06 03-06-13 03-06-13 03-06-13 03-06-13 03-06-13
LAB SAMPLE I.D.
AI303008-
26
AI303008-
27
AI303008-
28
AI303008-
29
AI303008-
30
COMPOUND MDL PQL MB
1,2-Dibromo-3-
Chloropropane
(MIBK)
Project: Sunset/316456 Matrix: Water Date Sampled: 03-01-2013
EPA 8260B (VOCs by GC/MS, Page 1 of 2) Reporting Unit: g/L (ppb)
Date ANALYZED 03-05 03-05-13
DILUTION FACTOR 1 1
LAB SAMPLE I.D. AI303008-
31
CLIENT SAMPLE I.D. AEI-GW17
COMPOUND MDL PQL MB
Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 5 ND ND
Chloromethane 1 5 ND ND
Vinyl Chloride 0.5 1 ND ND
Bromomethane 1 5 ND ND
Chloroethane 1 5 ND ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 1 5 ND ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 1 5 ND ND
Iodomethane 1 5 ND ND
Methylene Chloride 2 10 ND ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 5 ND ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 1 5 ND ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 1 5 ND ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 5 ND ND
Bromochloromethane 1 5 ND ND
Chloroform 1 5 ND ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 5 ND ND
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 5 ND ND
Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 5 ND ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 1 5 ND ND
Benzene 0.5 1 ND ND
Trichloroethene 1 2 ND ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 1 5 ND ND
Bromodichloromethane 1 5 ND ND
Dibromomethane 1 5 ND ND
Trans-1,3-
Dichloropropene
1 5 ND ND
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 5 ND ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 5 ND ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 0.5 5 ND ND
Dibromochloromethane 1 5 ND ND
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether 1 10 ND ND
Bromoform 1 5 ND ND
Isopropylbenzene 1 5 ND ND
Bromobenzene 1 5 ND ND
Project: Sunset/316456 Matrix: Water Date Sampled: 03-01-2013
EPA 8260B (VOCs by GC/MS, Page 2 of 2) Reporting Unit: ppb
COMPOUND MDL PQL MB AEI-GW17
Toluene 0.5 1 ND ND
Tetrachloroethene 1 2 ND ND
1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) 1 5 ND ND
Chlorobenzene 1 5 ND ND
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 5 ND ND
Ethylbenzene 0.5 1 ND ND
Total Xylenes 1 2 ND ND
Styrene 1 5 ND ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 5 ND ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1 5 ND ND
n-Propylbenzene 1 5 ND ND
2-Chlorotoluene 1 5 ND ND
4-Chlorotoluene 1 5 ND ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 5 ND ND
tert-Butylbenzene 1 5 ND ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 5 ND ND
Sec-Butylbenzene 1 5 ND ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 5 ND ND
p-Isopropyltoluene 1 5 ND ND
n-Butylbenzene 1 5 ND ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 5 ND ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-
Chloropropane
1 5 ND ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 1 5 ND ND
Naphthalene 1 5 ND ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1 5 ND ND
Acetone 25 50 ND ND
2-Butanone (MEK) 25 50 ND ND
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 25 50 ND ND
2-Hexanone 25 50 ND ND
Ethanol 250 500 ND ND
MTBE 1 2 ND ND
ETBE 1 2 ND ND
DIPE 1 2 ND ND
TAME 1 2 ND ND
t-Butyl Alcohol 10 20 ND ND
MDL=Method Detection Limit; PQL=Practical Quantification Limit; MB=Method Blank;
ND=Not Detected (below DF MDL), * Obtained from a higher dilution analysis. J:Trace value (between DF MDL & DF PQL).
03-08-2013
TPH-Gasoline
Batch QA/QC Report
Matrix: Soil Lab Sample ID: AI303008-1
Batch No: BMC05-GS1 Date Analyzed: 03-06-2013
I. MS/MSD Report
Unit: ppb
Analyte Sample
Conc.
Spike
Conc.
MS MSD MS
%Rec.
MSD
%Rec.
% RPD %RPD
Accept.
Limit
%Rec
Accept.
Limit
TPH-g ND 1,000 1,030 1,150 103.0 115.0 11.0 30 70-130
II. LCS Result
Unit: ppb
Analyte LCS Value True Value Rec.% Accept. Limit
TPH-g 1,130 1,000 113.0 80-120
03-08-2013
TPH-Gasoline
Batch QA/QC Report
Matrix: Water Lab Sample ID: AS302109-2
Batch No.: EMC05-GW1 Date Analyzed: 03-05/06-2013
I. MS/MSD Report
Unit: ppb
Analyte Sample
Conc.
Spike
Conc.
MS MSD MS
%Rec.
MSD
%Rec.
% RPD %RPD
Accept.
Limit
%Rec
Accept.
Limit
TPH-g ND 1,000 1,220 1,240 122.0 124.0 1.6 30 70-130
II. LCS Result
Unit: ppb
Analyte LCS Report Value True Value Rec.%
%Rec
Accept. Limit
TPH-g 959 1,000 95.9 80-120
03-08-2013
EPA 8015M (TPH)
Batch QA/QC Report
Batch No. for TPH-d: BC06-DS1 Date Analyzed: 03-06-2013
I. MS/MSD Report
Unit: ppm
Analyte Sample
Conc.
Spike
Conc.
MS MSD MS
%Rec.
MSD
%Rec.
% RPD %RPD
Accept.
Limit
%Rec
Accept.
Limit
TPH-D ND 200 206 192 103.0 96.0 7.0 30 70-130
II. LCS Result
Unit: ppm
TPH-D 199 200 99.5 80-120
03-08-2013
EPA 8015M (TPH)
Batch QA/QC Report
Matrix: Water Lab Sample ID: SW303006-1
Batch No. : BC06-DW1 Date Analyzed: 03-06-2013
I. MS/MSD Report
Unit: ppm
Analyte Sample
Conc.
Spike
Conc.
MS MSD MS
%Rec.
MSD
%Rec.
% RPD %RPD
Accept.
Limit
%Rec
Accept.
Limit
TPH-D ND 20 20.6 19.2 103.0 96.0 7.0 30 70-130
II. LCS Result
Unit: ppm
Analyte LCS Report Value True Value Rec.%
%Rec
Accept. Limit
TPH-D 19.9 20 99.5 80-120
03-08-2013
EPA 8260B
Batch QA/QC Report
Batch No: 0305-VOBS1 Date Analyzed: 03-05/06-2013
I. MS/MSD Report
Unit: ppb
Analyte Sample
Conc.
Spike
Conc.
MS MSD MS
%Rec.
MSD
%Rec.
% RPD %RPD
Accept.
Limit
%Rec
Accept.
Limit
1,1-
Dichloroethene
ND 20 15.0 15.6 75.0 78.0 3.9 30 70-130
Benzene ND 20 19.3 18.3 96.5 91.5 5.3 30 70-130
Trichloro-
ethene
ND 20 20.5 20.3 102.5 101.5 1.0 30 70-130
Toluene ND 20 21.7 21.9 108.5 109.5 0.9 30 70-130
Chlorobenzene ND 20 16.8 18.0 84.0 90.0 6.9 30 70-130
II. LCS Result
Unit: ppb
1,1-Dichloroethene 20.9 20.0 104.5 80-120
Benzene 19.1 20.0 95.5 80-120
Trichloro-ethene 21.4 20.0 107.0 80-120
Toluene 23.1 20.0 115.5 80-120
Chlorobenzene 23.7 20.0 118.5 80-120
ND: Not Detected (at the specified limit)
03-08-2013
EPA 8260B
Batch QA/QC Report
Matrix: Soil Lab Sample ID: WP303016-6
Batch No: 0306-VOBS1 Date Analyzed: 03-06/07-2013
I. MS/MSD Report
Unit: ppb
Analyte Sample
Conc.
Spike
Conc.
MS MSD MS
%Rec.
MSD
%Rec.
% RPD %RPD
Accept.
Limit
%Rec
Accept.
Limit
1,1-
Dichloroethene
ND 20 15.3 18.6 76.5 93.0 19.5 30 70-130
Benzene ND 20 17.2 19.1 86.0 95.5 10.5 30 70-130
Trichloro-
ethene
ND 20 18.4 19.7 92.0 98.5 6.8 30 70-130
Toluene ND 20 17.1 19.8 85.5 99.0 14.6 30 70-130
II. LCS Result
Unit: ppb
1,1-Dichloroethene 20.5 20.0 102.5 80-120
Benzene 20.4 20.0 102.0 80-120
Toluene 22.3 20.0 111.5 80-120
Chlorobenzene 22.8 20.0 114.0 80-120
03-08-2013
EPA 8260B
Batch QA/QC Report
Matrix: Water Lab Sample ID: AS302109-2
Batch No: 0305-VOEW1 Date Analyzed: 03-05/06-2013
I. MS/MSD Report
Unit: ppb
Compound Sample
Conc.
Spike
Conc.
MS MSD MS
%Rec.
MSD
%Rec.
% RPD %RPD
Accept.
Limit
%Rec
Accept.
Limit
1,1-
Dichloroethene
ND 20 19.1 24.2 95.5 121.0 23.6 30 70-130
Benzene ND 20 18.3 22.6 91.5 113.0 21.0 30 70-130
Trichloro-
ethene
ND 20 18.4 23.1 92.0 115.5 22.7 30 70-130
Toluene ND 20 19.1 22.5 95.5 112.5 16.3 30 70-130
II. LCS Result
Unit: ppb
Compound LCS Report Value True Value Rec.% Accept. Limit
1,1-Dichloroethene 17.1 20.0 85.5 80-120
Benzene 16.6 20.0 83.0 80-120
Toluene 16.3 20.0 81.5 80-120
Chlorobenzene 18.1 20.0 90.5 80-120
u
OJ
= a )
q J - =
a J u
F X
L
- e -
6.r C
- c o
0 r d
E O J
u 2
x q
L ,
O C
I
D . ' v
: = !
? , u Z
9 9 -
r - o 9
t ? u
6
\ - z
; r 9 o -
E 6J. - . 1
Y t -
2 ' D . =
i i E_ ?
a
c , , ,
z , a - T
6
3 =
n ' o S
C J E
^ = -
a !
^
e O L
- E : :
z E a
a)
i o o O
. ; o o
- o o o o
xoo
co
L ^ ^
O ...1 a.l
G - e
- - / -
g 0 J d
U I F t L
. E
o : 6
: : t s
= >\o\
F 9 . +
. 9 . : u
a e 2
O-F\ L
= t o ' 9
o 3
: 9 E
' = Z '
: i 5 <
z - >
ll ii- rl
2 A - >
i :
9 n -
E < ( i
o t t l
(-1
<
(j
(u
0
(9
o
q
)
0
(sJoAS)
J0tz8
(sJoA)
90928
1srl euc3. {x()' x3. l . B ) 8092g
-1
5
;f
J
c)
z
J
$^l
+-
I
I
0)
oo
z
9 a
F &
t y r \
= -
v t t
0-
(v
/ . \ r '
} < A
v =
Y F
I L A
F X
z \ r
td lr
u v
0 z
* ?
- H
L *
J I J
+
()
d
q 0 J
O -
a J o
F X
L
- ! '
C ) E
S o J
0 ) ;
o 2
x a
0 . ) O
' - c r
I . y . Y
J ( J J
9 0 -
: . U ;
Q
\ - z
h P A
d 3 -
: 6 r . =
U E '
o
a i - -
a o 5
^ = e
( t L
^
E ;
z E a
>.1
s l
\ t l
r l
sf.
I
F \ l
\J
e)
z
Fl
J
u
s o o o
. ; 6 6
h o a o o
xoo
L , ^ , ^
O. - n a\ l
.:
e - Y -
c o 6
f r l L r '
' t
r
O Y m
? i s
= >\o\
7 9 . +
. 9 . : U
q v 2
F' E
7 ' 9
. . o
: 3 E
_ ; >
: : ; <
4 - >
l l i t l
z c - >
u
a :
v n -
E < t '
o L l t l
C)
0
{)
q)
q
q,l
0
6t
(sBJd)
2808
sl?131,\
hlvJ
1s:rluuo3,{x1)' x:-lJ.B ) 80929
r,
*' =
-t
. J '
- Z
l n -
2 . - J
/ o >
a b
E O
h 9
(,
o-
9,
c{l
L l
c.)
ho
z
: a
F &
t y r \
= -
v h E l
0- lv
l Y -
A '
X A
v =
= F
I L A
F -
z v
l.l fr
r l v
0 z
+
- - t
q i :
+
I
I
MI
'
ql'
I
()al
C)
co
z
9 n
F &
= -
v t l
0- fl
t Y -
/ . \ /
X A
v =
X t -
l t 0
F -
z v
r i h
a z
* ?
- H
0 - *
J 9
+
q)
!
q)
t r q )
O -
a o d
s E x
t r a )
! - !
s c J
O J J
u 9
x q
L .
' - c ;
e . = ' i
A . :
9 r o -
i e J
U U
6
\ - z
>, l,) a_
E aJ .-.i
Y t '
! o r . =
U E '
. -
c a
: ; F
Y q T
c
= i -
n ' o 3
^ = -
q N o
U ) L I
t u ( ) !
r ' U I
Z E A
do
\
\
\
^fr
q
tr
()
z
F!
rl
i r
\,r
0)
N w v
.; oo oo
i: oO oo
xoo
oo
L ^ ^
O .-.1 a.l
? _ ,
q 0 J d
f r l L r ,
!
O Y 6
:.9 ts
= >\o\
7 9 2
. 9 . : u
a e
2
O-F\ L
=
\ o. q
ol J
_ ; >
s ; <
1 ; >
i l ? r l
> a >
: -
5 = i
o
q
CJ
q)
a
o
0
6!
(sJoAs)
J0/ 28
\
(sJoA)
80928
1sa1euri , (xg' X: l l . g) B09ZB
X
=={
-
v)
J

Toxic Hazards: Phase II Subsurface Investigation (March 22, 2013)

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Toxic Hazards: Phase II Subsurface Investigation (March 22, 2013)

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

San Francisco HQ

equipped with a 4-foot screen to approximately 20 feet bgs. The

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen