Sie sind auf Seite 1von 31

Intelligent Agent

Informatics Engineering Study Program


School of Electrical Engineering and Informatics
Institute of Technology Bandung
Outline
Review
Agents & Environment
Rationality
PEAS (Performance Measures, Environment, Actuators,
Sensors)
Environment types
Agent types
28-Ags-14 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
2
Review
Berdasarkan keempat pendekatan IB, tentukan pendekatan yang
digunakan pada aplikasi/ teknologi berikut ini, ataukah aplikasi
tersebut tidak menggunakan pendekatan inteligensi buatan.
Jelaskan dengan singkat jawaban anda.
NuPIC, platform perangkat lunak yang berbasiskan pada model
struktur dan operasi pada neocortex (bagian pada otak
mamalia).
PXDES, aplikasi yang melakukan diagnosis X-ray untuk
penentuan pneumoconiosis (penyakit paru-paru yang
disebabkan oleh penghisapan debu).
Pc-Nqthm, aplikasi proof-checker yang berlandaskan pada teori
automated reasoning, berdasarkan aturan formal logika.
AceMoney, aplikasi yang membantu mengorganisasikan dan
mengatur keuangan individu.
28-Ags-14 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
3
Agent & Environment
28-Ags-14 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
4
Environment
Agent
Percepts
Actions
sensors
actuators
?
Agents
[1]: Software that gathers information about an
environment and takes actions based on that
information.
A robot
A factory
A web shopping program

[2]: computer system that is situated in some
environment, and that is capable of autonomous action
in this environment in order to meet its design objectives
Computational agents that behave autonomously
28-Ags-14 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
5
Agents
Anything that can be viewed as perceiving its
environment through sensors and acting upon that
environment through effectors.
A robot
A factory
A web shopping program

Computational agents that behave autonomously
Human agent: eyes, ears, and other organs for sensors;
hands, legs, mouth, and other body parts for actuators
Robotic agent: cameras and infrared range finders for
sensors; various motors for actuators
28-Ags-14 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
6
The Agent & the Environment
How do we begin to formalize the problem of building an
agent?
Make a dichotomy between the agent and the environment
28-Ags-14 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
7
Vacuum-cleaner world
Percepts: location and contents, e.g.,
[A,Dirty]
Actions: Left, Right, Suck, NoOp
28-Ags-14 8 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
World Model
A the action space
P the percept space
Define:
S internal state [may not be visible to agent]
Perception function: S P
World dynamics: S x A S
28-Ags-14 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
9
Perception
Function
World
Dynamics
a p
s
Agent Design
U utility function: S real (or S* real)
The agent design problem: Find P* A
mapping of sequences of percepts to actions
maximize the utility of the resulting sequences of
states (each action maps from one state to next state)
28-Ags-14 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
10
Planning Agent Policy
Planning is explicitly considering future consequences of actions in order to
choose the best one.
So, planning is the process of generating possible sequences of actions,
simulating their consequences, picking which is the best and committing to
one of these actions.
28-Ags-14 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
11
a
i
that leads
s
a
1
a
a
2
a
3
u
u
u
u
u
u
to max U
s
1
s
2
s
3
a
4
a
5
Rational agents
An agent should strive to "do the right thing", based on
what it can perceive and the actions it can perform. The
right action is the one that will cause the agent to be
most successful
Performance measure: An objective criterion for success
of an agent's behavior
E.g., performance measure of a vacuum-cleaner agent
could be amount of dirt cleaned up, amount of time
taken, amount of electricity consumed, amount of noise
generated, etc.
28-Ags-14 12 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
Rational agents
Rational Agent: For each possible percept
sequence, a rational agent should select an
action that is expected to maximize its
performance measure, given the evidence
provided by the percept sequence and whatever
built-in knowledge the agent has.
28-Ags-14 13 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
Rationality
A rational agent takes actions it believes will achieve its goals.
Assume I dont like to get wet, so I bring an umbrella. Is that rational?
Depends on the weather forecast and whether Ive heard it. If Ive heard
the forecast for rain (and I believe it) then bringing the umbrella is
rational.
Rationality omniscience
Assume the most recent forecast is for rain but I did not listen to it and I
did not bring my umbrella. Is that rational?
Yes, since I did not know about the recent forecast!
Rationality success
Suppose the forecast is for no rain but I bring my umbrella and I use it to
defend myself against an attack. Is that rational?
No, although successful, it was done for the wrong reason.
28-Ags-14 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
14
Limited Rationality
There is a big problem with our definition
of rationality
The agent might not be able to compute
the best action (subject to its beliefs and
goals).
So, we want to use limited rationality:
acting in the best way you can subject to
the computational constraints that you
have.
28-Ags-14 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
15
Limited Rationality (2)
The (limited rational) agent design problem:
Find P* A
mapping of sequences of percepts to actions
maximizes the utility of the resulting sequences of
states
subject to our computational constraints
To design an agent specify PEAS
28-Ags-14 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
16
PEAS
PEAS: Performance measure, Environment,
Actuators, Sensors
Must first specify the setting for intelligent agent
design
Consider, e.g., the task of designing an
automated taxi driver:
Performance measure: Safe, fast, legal, comfortable
trip, maximize profits
Environment: Roads, other traffic, pedestrians,
customers
Actuators: Steering wheel, accelerator, brake, signal,
horn
Sensors: Cameras, sonar, speedometer, GPS,
odometer, engine sensors, keyboard
28-Ags-14 17 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
Another Example of PEAS
Medical diagnosis system Agent
Performance measure: Healthy patient, minimize
costs, lawsuits
Environment: Patient, hospital, staff
Actuators: Screen display (questions, tests,
diagnoses, treatments, referrals)
Sensors: Keyboard (entry of symptoms, findings,
patient's answers)
28-Ags-14 18 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
Another Example of PEAS
Part-picking robot Agent
Performance measure: Percentage of parts in
correct bins
Environment: Conveyor belt with parts, bins
Actuators: Jointed arm and hand
Sensors: Camera, joint angle sensors
28-Ags-14 19 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
Environment types
Fully observable (vs. partially observable): An agent's
sensors give it access to the complete state of the
environment at each point in time.
Deterministic (vs. stochastic): The next state of the
environment is completely determined by the current
state and the action executed by the agent. (If the
environment is deterministic except for the actions of
other agents, then the environment is strategic)
Episodic (vs. sequential): The agent's experience is
divided into atomic "episodes" (each episode consists of
the agent perceiving and then performing a single
action), and the choice of action in each episode
depends only on the episode itself.
28-Ags-14 20 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
Environment types
Static (vs. dynamic): The environment is unchanged
while an agent is deliberating. (The environment is
semidynamic if the environment itself does not change
with the passage of time but the agent's performance
score does)
Discrete (vs. continuous): A limited number of distinct,
clearly defined percepts and actions.
Single agent (vs. multiagent): An agent operating by
itself in an environment.
28-Ags-14 21 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
Environment types
Chess with Chess without Taxi driving
a clock a clock
Fully observable Yes Yes No
Deterministic Strategic Strategic No
Episodic No No No
Static Semi Yes No
Discrete Yes Yes No
Single agent No No No
The environment type largely determines the agent design
The real world is (of course) partially observable, stochastic,
sequential, dynamic, continuous, multi-agent
28-Ags-14 22 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
Agent functions and programs
An agent is completely specified by the agent
function mapping percept sequences to actions
One agent function (or a small equivalence
class) is rational
Aim: find a way to implement the rational agent
function concisely
We can use table lookup that maps sequence of
percepts to action
28-Ags-14 23 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
Table-lookup agent
Drawbacks:
Huge table
Take a long time to build the table
No autonomy
Even with learning, need a long time to learn the table
entries
Alternatives reflex agent: agent respond very
flexible to a very broad range of stimuli
Drawback: coulds not store the response
Next: Types of agent based
28-Ags-14 24 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
Agent types
Four basic types :
Simple reflex agents
Model-based reflex agents
Goal-based agents
Utility-based agents
28-Ags-14 25 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
Simple reflex agents
28-Ags-14 26 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
Model-based reflex agents
28-Ags-14 27 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
Goal-based agents
28-Ags-14 28 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
Utility-based agents
28-Ags-14 29 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
Learning agents (later on)
28-Ags-14 30 IF3170/ NUM (Hwee Tou Ng's &
Kaelbling)
THANK YOU

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen