0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
26 Ansichten1 Seite
Igor Polevitzky's Architectural Vision for a Modern Miami Author(s): Allan T. Shulman
Reviewed work(s):
Source: The Journal of Decorative and Propaganda Arts, Vol. 23, Florida Theme Issue (1998), pp. 334-359
Igor Polevitzky's Architectural Vision for a Modern Miami Author(s): Allan T. Shulman
Reviewed work(s):
Source: The Journal of Decorative and Propaganda Arts, Vol. 23, Florida Theme Issue (1998), pp. 334-359
Igor Polevitzky's Architectural Vision for a Modern Miami Author(s): Allan T. Shulman
Reviewed work(s):
Source: The Journal of Decorative and Propaganda Arts, Vol. 23, Florida Theme Issue (1998), pp. 334-359
By Allan T. Shulman Allan T. Shulman is a practicing architect who teaches at the Florida International University School of Architecture, Miami, Florida and the University of Miami School of Architecture, Coral Gables, Florida. He currently is working on mono- graphs on Morris Lapidus and L. Murray Dixon. He received his B.Arch. from Cornell University and his M.Arch. in Suburb and Town Design from the University of Miami. Photographs and drawings from the Historical Museum of Southern Florida, except where noted. etween 1934 and 1978 Igor Polevitzky (1911-1978) designed more than five hundred buildings in South Florida and the Caribbean. He explored the gamut of Florida building types, taking into account the most significant aesthetic and functional architectural issues of the emerging tropical city of Miami. The breadth of his work is impressive in that Polevitzky rejected repetition - each project was a complex initiative responding to the particular client, climate, and site. He did not subscribe to an established architectural doctrine, prefer- ring to develop a creative and personal style. Polevitzky had a thematic interest in spatial elements suitable to the tropics such as courtyards, loggias, porches, terraces, raised galleries, and patios. He experimented with the theme of the building envelope, which he progressively distorted and reduced from the white planar masses of the Bauhaus until the envelope itself became little more than a frame. He investigated the possibilities of movement and the corollary implications of the progression of spaces in his designs. Finally, he delved into the innovative programming and iconography critical to the emerging resort structure of Miami. The significance of Polevitzky's work lies in his consistent intent to make architecture appropriate to living in Florida and responsive to Florida's developing urban and suburban landscapes (fig. 1). Polevitzky was an important transitional figure in the development of South Florida's architecture. He realized the intrinsic value of vernacular and tradi- tional building elements such as the patio, porch, and loggia, yet came to view these not as fixed elements but as spatial themes. Combined with the open plan in his early work, these elements began to take on new forms, often becoming part of the structure itself. Polevitzky developed techniques govern- ing the gradation of space from indoor to outdoor, with nuanced levels of partial protection in between. This progression became thematic, establishing the logic of the entire structure. By adapting the climatic necessities of Florida to the language of Modernism, abstracting, and finally amplifying these ele- ments to define the whole structure, Polevitzky explored the Florida house in ways it had never been seen before and has not been seen since. Igor Boris Polevitzky was born in St. Petersburg, Russia, in 1911, the son of Boris Polevitzky, an electrical engineer who at one time was mayor of the Russian port city of Murmansk. Cast out during the Russian Revolution in 1918, the Polevitzky family took refuge in Finland until 1922, when they moved to the United States and settled in Philadelphia. Igor studied engineering at the University of Pennsylvania in 1929 but later switched to the prestigious de- partment of architecture. The excellent reputation the university enjoyed at the time was partially due to the presence of Paul Philippe Cret (1876 -1945), the architect and critic most associated with Modern Classicism, whose works DAPA 23 335
Kovtun - On The Ruins of The "Crystal Palace" or The Fate of Russian Utopia in The Classical Era (N.G. Chernyshevsky, F.M. Dostoevsky, M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin)