0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
46 Ansichten5 Seiten
This document is a petition for annulment of marriage filed by Eva W. Manggay against respondent Betty O. Melina. The petitioner alleges that during their 9 year marriage, the respondent exhibited psychological incapacity through extreme jealousy, violence, restricting the petitioner's movement, and lack of understanding of the petitioner's feelings and safety. The petitioner is seeking to have the court declare the marriage null and void based on the respondent's alleged psychological incapacity. The court has issued an order granting summons by publication to notify the respondent of the petition.
Originalbeschreibung:
Originaltitel
Annulment-summons by publication Civil 8202 Manggay vs Manggay.doc
This document is a petition for annulment of marriage filed by Eva W. Manggay against respondent Betty O. Melina. The petitioner alleges that during their 9 year marriage, the respondent exhibited psychological incapacity through extreme jealousy, violence, restricting the petitioner's movement, and lack of understanding of the petitioner's feelings and safety. The petitioner is seeking to have the court declare the marriage null and void based on the respondent's alleged psychological incapacity. The court has issued an order granting summons by publication to notify the respondent of the petition.
This document is a petition for annulment of marriage filed by Eva W. Manggay against respondent Betty O. Melina. The petitioner alleges that during their 9 year marriage, the respondent exhibited psychological incapacity through extreme jealousy, violence, restricting the petitioner's movement, and lack of understanding of the petitioner's feelings and safety. The petitioner is seeking to have the court declare the marriage null and void based on the respondent's alleged psychological incapacity. The court has issued an order granting summons by publication to notify the respondent of the petition.
7 th Judicial Region Branch 3 Tagbilaran City EVA W. MANGGAY, Petitioner, -verss- C!v!" Case N#. $%&% For: Annulment of Marriage 'E((Y O. ME(INA, Respondent ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -* (UMMON( BY +UBLICATION !"#R#A$, petitioner, through counsel, %led a Petition for Annulment of Marriage, &hich is 'uoted as follo&s: UNTO THIS HONORABLE COURT, petitioner by undersigned counsel ost respect!ully st"tes# $% T&"t petitioner is '( ye"rs o! "ge, "nd presently residing "t B"c"ni, Cl"rin, Bo&ol, )&ere s&e "y be ser*ed )it& t&e notices o! t&e Honor"ble Court '% T&"t respondent is "lso '( ye"rs o! "ge but &is present "ddress is "llegedly not +no)n to petitioner% He )"s &o)e*er born in Bonbon, Cl"rin, Bo&ol, )&ere "ll counic"tions "ddressed to respondent )ere ost li+ely !or)"rded to &i by &is recei*ing +in "nd could ost prob"bly re"c& petitioner,s end- .% T&"t petitioner "nd respondent got "rried on /"nu"ry $0, '11. be!ore t&e 2residing /udge o! t&e ' nd 3CTC o! Tubigon4 Cl"rin, Bo&ol, "c&ine copy o! t&e certi5c"te o! "rri"ge is &ereto "tt"c&ed "nd "r+ed "s Anne6 A7 "nd "de "n integr"l p"rt &ereo!- 8% T&"t petitioner "nd respondent li*ed "t petitioner,s p"rent"l &oe "t B"c"ni, Cl"rin, Bo&ol, in t&e e"rly p"rt o! t&eir union "nd soeties "t respondent,s p"rents "t Bonbon, Cl"rin, Bo&ol- 9% T&"t "llegedly in "ny occ"sions, petitioner,s p"rents &"*e )itnessed nuerous &e"ted :u"rrels "nd *iolent con;icts bet)een petitioner "nd respondent, )&ic& "crionious con!ront"tions bet)een t&e t)o, ore o!ten t&"n not, steed !ro s&eer unre"son"ble <e"lousy o! respondent "nd upon ot&er petty origins "nd c"uses% Allegedly, petitioner could &"rdly rec"ll o! " d"y during t&eir union )it& no incident o! :u"rrel occurring bet)een t&e t)o% S&e &"d not i"gined in &er younger ye"rs t&"t s&e )ould be spending " turbulent "rit"l li!e% Accordingly, e*ery tie petitioner &"d &er t&oug&ts lingering in t&ose d"ys, nine ye"rs b"c+, s&e could not "*oid bre"+ing into te"rs "nd dr")n ine6tric"bly to t&e s&"do)s o! one un&"ppy eory, 5lled )it& d"r+ oods "nd desper"tion% T&e t&oug&t o! t&ose d"ys &o)e*er &"s rein!orced "nd strengt&ened no) &er resol*e ne*er to li*e )it& t&"t +ind o! li!e "g"in- 0% T&"t respondent seeed indi=erent o! t&e !eelings o! petitioner% S&e, being " )o"n "nd inn"tely )e"+, eotion"lly "nd p&ysic"lly, s&e s&"red t&e coon belie! o! ot&er )oen t&"t s&e "lso deser*ed soe degree o! underst"nding "nd respect% But contr"ry to &er e6pection &o)e*er, respondent inste"d !"iled to deonstr"te t&"t &e )"s psyc&ologic"lly c"p"cit"ted or possessed o! suc& degree o! "turity to &"ndle situ"tions )&ere di=erences "nd isunderst"nding could be "*oided "nd inii>ed% ?&"t &e &"d inste"d tried to ipose )"s &is o)n "rbitr"ry )ill "lone "nd t&e "ggr"ndi>eent o! &is o)n pride, unind!ul t&"t in "ny occ"sion s&e &"d put petitioner,s li!e in " *ery serious ris+ "s )&en petitioner )"s "t one tie constr"ined to <up o*er t&e )indo) )it& " c&ild in &er "rs- @% T&"t in "ny occ"sions petitioner )"s "llegedly constr"ined to use t&e )indo) "s &er entr"nce in getting inside t&e &ouse bec"use respondent &"d "ll doors o! t&e &ouse closed to pre*ent petitioner,s entry% Allegedly, i! not only !or t&e c&ild t&"t respondent &"d custody, t&e l"tter )ould not &"*e gone to suc& liit o! clibing on t&e )indo) <ust to get inside% 2etitioner "c+no)ledged t&"t it )"s indeed one "ctu"tion dee"ning to &er &onor "s " )o"n but it being t&e only )"y to get close to t&e c&ild, s&e &"d &er &onor, pride "nd sense o! dignity set "side during t&e &orrible p"st- (% T&"t in soe occ"sions, petitioner !ound it &"rd to coply &er oblig"tion to t&e sc&ool )&ere s&e )"s t&en studying, bec"use respondent )ould not e*en "llegedly "llo) petitioner to "ttend " C&rist"s 2"rty due to respondent,s un!ounded suspicion t&"t petitioner )"s &"*ing " secret "="ir )it& "not&er "n in t&e sc&ool c"pus% Not only t&"t, bec"use &is suspicious c&"r"cter gre) )orst, to t&e point t&"t respondent "llegedly "de nuerous surreptitious *isits "t CASCABT C"l"pe, 2 Civil 8202 Manggay vs Manggay - Summons by Publication C"pus, C"l"pe, Bo&ol% T&ere"t, respondent,s seeingly "ccusing "nd suspicious st"res "g"inst soe o! &er "le cl"ss"tes &"d un)"rr"ntedly "de petitioner t&e center o! ridicule "nd contept "ong &er close "ssoci"tes "nd !riends% As " conse:uence, e*en t&e ere e=ort o! "ttending cl"sses &"d becoe one gre"t burden on &er p"rt- C% T&"t respondent,s )"nt o! underst"nding to &er )e"+nesses "nd liit"tions )ere "de e*ident by &is l"c+ o! genuine concern to petitioner,s s"!ety "s s&o)n in t&e circust"nces "bo*e4st"ted% 2etitioner,s l"c+ o! respect )"s e*ident by petitioner,s re!us"l to listen "ndDor e*en discuss on "tters t&"t concerns t&eir )el!"re "nd !uture% All t&ese spe"+s loud o! " "n )&o lost &is instinct !or sur*i*"l "nd t&e )"nt o! " r"tion"l sense o! <udgent on &is p"rt in re"c&ing responsible "nd "ture decisions !or t&e betterent o! " !"ily- $1% T&"t prior to t&e "rri"ge, respondent "llegedly did not e6&ibit "ll t&ese neg"ti*es signs o! )"nt o! ep"t&y to petitioner,s !eelings% T&"t it )"s only "!ter t&e "rri"ge t&"t respondent,s psyc&ologic"l inc"p"city &"d cryst"lli>ed "nd bec"e "pp"rent "s deonstr"ted by t&e circust"nces e"rlier s"id% ?it&out t&e bene5t &o)e*er o! s"id union, "ll t&ese inc"p"cities, )&ic& under present dispens"tion "re "ccepted grounds !or t&e se*er"nce o! t&e "rri"ge bond, )ould not &"*e been +no)n- $$% Allegedly, petitioner,s resol*e to 5le t&is inst"nt petition )"s re"c&ed "!ter s&e soug&t "d*ice !ro &er p"rents, rel"ti*es "nd close "ssoci"tes )&o )ere too !"ili"r o! t&e situ"tion% T&eir "ppro*"l "nd con!ority "lso ser*ed "s petitioner,s inspir"tion in &oping t&e success o! t&is petition% WHEREFORE, it is pr"yed t&"t t&e "rri"ge bet)een petitioner "nd respondent be decl"red null "nd *oid "ndDor nulli5ed% 2r"yer is soug&t !urt&er t&"t t&e sep"r"tion4in4!"ct bet)een petitioner "nd respondent !or o*er " period o! nine ye"rs, be "lso t"+en into "ccount "s "n "dded !"ctor !or t&e gr"nt o! t&e relie! &erein sincerely soug&t !or% Ot&er relie!s consistent to l") "nd <ustice "re li+e)ise pr"yed !or% City o! T"gbil"r"n, Bo&ol, 2&ilippines, Bebru"ry $9, '1$.% SGD. ATTY. RAINERO Z. BAUTISTA 2TR No% C0@808@ IB2 No% @CC9@1 Attorney,s Roll No% .9@'$ 3CLE No% 11$8CC'R 3 Civil 8202 Manggay vs Manggay - Summons by Publication Lind"*ille Subdi*ision, T"gbil"r"n City VERIFICATION RE2UBLIC OB THE 2HILI22INES E 2ROAINCE OB BOHOLFFFFFF%% E S%S% GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGE A!ter &"*ing been duly s)orn to in "ccord"nce )it& l") do &ereby depose "nd s"y# T&"t I &"*e c"used t&e prep"r"tion o! t&e !oregoing petition- T&"t I &"*e re"d its contents "nd understood t&e s"e- T&"t to t&e best o! y +no)ledge t&e s"e "re true "nd correct- T&"t I &"*e not 5led siil"r copl"int or petition "g"inst t&e s"e de!end"nt !or t&e s"e c"use o! "ction% T&"t t&ere is no "ppe"l pending be!ore t&e Court o! Appe"ls "nd t&e Supree Court bet)een t&e s"e p"rties% S&ould I le"rn o! "ny, I undert"+e to in!or t&e Honor"ble Court o! t&e s"e )it&in " period o! 5*e d"ys !ro +no)ledge &ereo!% IN ?ITNESS ?HEREOB, I &"*e &ereunto set y &"nd t&is C t& d"y o! 3"rc&, '1$., in t&e City o! T"gbil"r"n, Bo&ol, 2&ilippines% SGD. EVA W. MANGGAY 2etitioner SUBSCRIBEH ANH S?ORN to be!ore e t&is C t& d"y o! 3"rc&, '1$. in t&e City o! T"gbil"r"n, Bo&ol, 2&ilippines, by t&e "bo*e4n"ed% SGD. ATTY. NICASIO R. BALAGA Not"ry 2ublic Until Heceber .$, '1$8 TIN $8$4@1@4$@1 Roll o! Attorney No% $@009 2TR .C(C('9 I /"n% @, '1$. IB2 @CC(8C I Hec% ., '1$' Hoc% no% '$0 2"ge no% $8 Boo+ no% 'C Series o! '1$. !"#R#A$, on April (), *+(), an ,rder &as issued granting the summons by publication in a ne&spaper of national circulation, once a &ee- for t&o .*/ consecuti0e &ee-s NOW, THEREFORE, respondent 'E((Y O. ME(INA is hereby summoned through this medium of publication and is therefore re'uired to %le &ith the ,1ce of the Cler- of Court, Regional Trial 4 Civil 8202 Manggay vs Manggay - Summons by Publication Court, 2ranch 3, Tagbilaran City, your responsi0e pleading and4or ans&er to the abo0e5'uoted petition, &ithin thirty .3+/ days from the date of last publication, ser0ing at the same time a copy of your pleadings to Atty Rainero 6 2autista, counsel for the petitioner, at 7inda0ille $ubdi0ision, Tagbilaran City, 83++ 2ohol, and your failure to do so &ithin the period prescribed &ill enable the abo0e5named petitioner to ta-e 9udgment against you and demand from the "onorable Court the remedies and reliefs prayed for in the Petition 7et this $ummons be published at the e:pense of the petitioner in a ne&spaper of national circulation in the Philippines once a &ee- for t&o .*/ consecuti0e &ee-s !;T<#$$ the "on 7#, M,;$#$ 7;$,<, Presiding Judge of this Court this day () th of April, *+() at Tagbilaran City, 2ohol, Philippines ATTY. ANGIE M. UCAT-LOGARTA 2ranch Cler- of Court AULD<tc 5 Civil 8202 Manggay vs Manggay - Summons by Publication