Individual Performance Commitment And Review Form

Name of Employee: JOSEPHINE M. VITO

Position: PRINCIPAL II
Review Period: JULY 2014 TO DECEMBER 2015
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED/PINA EAST./PILI ELEM .SCHOOL
Name of Rater: MA. MAGDALENA D. LO
Position: OIC-Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Date of Review: MARCH 2015
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES
TIME
LINE
Weigh
t per
KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING SCORE
Instructional
Leadership
Account for learning
outcomes of schools and
centers viz-a-vis goals
and targets

Performed instructional
supervision to teaching
personnel to achieve
_____% learning
outcomes
July and
October
2014

July to
December
2014


50% 5-NAT and GSA and no. of instructional supervision is
130% and above.
4- NAT and GSA and no. of instructional supervision is
115-129%.
3- NAT and GSA and no. of instructional supervision is
110-114%.
2- NAT and GSA and no. of instructional supervision is
51-99%.
1- NAT and GSA and no. of instructional supervision is
50 and below.

Learning
Environment
Provided safe and child-
finely learning and
school environment
through provisions of
different school facilities
and equipments, school
signage information
materials and seeking
assistance to barangay
officials for
students/learners


July
December
2014
5% 5-130% accomplishments on the following (supported
by evidence like school policy reports, information
materials, regular meetings. Inventory)
- adhered to Child Friendly environment standards
and programs.
- Institutionalized child protection mechanisms
and processes (Deped Order No. 40, s. 2012)
- Has clear DRMM Mobilization plans.
4-All mechanisms mentioned above are present except
for some minimal requirements.
3- All mechanisms mentioned above are present but was
not able to comply on time.
2-Incomplete mechanisms and absence of reports.


1-Absence of all reports and mechanisms.
Human
Resource
Engagement
and
Development
Provided assistance to
teachers on matters
pertaining to
enhancement of
classroom management,
preparation of Daily
Lesson Logs and
facilitation of tEaching-
Learning process and
instructional comeptence
to non-teaching
personnel for support
services to RPMS cycle.
July to
December
2014
10% 5-130% and above teachers provided with technical
assistance with corresponding evidences: teacher
portfolio containing observation reports, TSNA
results, performance analysis and recommendations
for development interventions.
4-At least 115-129% of teachers provided with technical
assistance with the required evidences.
3-At least 100-114% of the teachers provided with
technical assistance with required evidences.
2-51-99% of the teachers provided with technical
assistance with required evidences.
1-50% and below of teachers provided with technical
assistance with evidences.


Parents
Involvement
and
Community
Partnership
Established school,
family and community
partnership for
performance.
July to
December
2014
5% 5-has conducted PTA meetings with 85-100%
attendance (complete with reports and documentation,
meetings, agreements) with stakeholders, especially
parents for academic and other purpose obtained
resources for the school through stakeholders
partnership.
4-has conducted PTA Meetings to stakeholders with 75-
84% participation.
3-Has occasionally meet stakeholders but not resulting
to resources generated and evidences are missing.
2-Seldom meet stakeholders.
1-No evidence in this area.

School
Leadership
Management
nad
Operations
Performed School
Leadership and
Management and
operations Functions
July to
December
2014
30% 5-With clear financial management system for the
school supported by evidences such as reports, accounts
logs, database system.
- Allocated/Prioritized funds for programs and
school facilities improvement and maintenance.

- Monitored, accounted and reported utilization of
school fund.
- Reported sources and uses of funds.
- Ensured quality standards for facilities given to the
school
- Coordinated with stakeholders on resource
mobilization.
- Maintained school EMIS and regularly submit
MIS reports to the Division Office..
4-With clear financial and resource management system
but one or requirements were missing were negligible
(with complete evidences)
3-with clear financial and resource management system
but two requirements and/or reports were lacking.
2-financial Management System and reporting were in
its Initial stages.
1-No Financial Management System and/or reports
observed.
*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned.

OVERALL
RATING
FOR
ACCOMPLIS
HMENTS





MA. MAGDALENA D. LO JOSEPHINE M. VITO
Rater Ratee





DEPED RPMS form-For Head of Office