0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
12 Ansichten11 Seiten
Turkey plays a key role in its region and the greater middle east, writes dr. Saeed aydin. He says it should develop relations with its neighbors in the field of education. Through shared endeavors on educational issues, the region will move closer to a global role, he says.
Originalbeschreibung:
Originaltitel
Higher Educationd and Future-Towards educational cooperation-Turkey and Middle East.docx
Turkey plays a key role in its region and the greater middle east, writes dr. Saeed aydin. He says it should develop relations with its neighbors in the field of education. Through shared endeavors on educational issues, the region will move closer to a global role, he says.
Turkey plays a key role in its region and the greater middle east, writes dr. Saeed aydin. He says it should develop relations with its neighbors in the field of education. Through shared endeavors on educational issues, the region will move closer to a global role, he says.
Turkey plays a key role in its region and the greater Middle East. However, this influence needs to have a firm foundation. Turkey should develop relations with its neighbors not only in economic and political terms but also in the field of education. Educational cooperation will allow both Turkey and its neighbors to build a joint future. Through shared endeavors on educational issues, the region will move closer to a more powerful global role.
In the early 21st century, I traveled across Morocco for over three weeks. I later moved on to Egypt, subsequently adding Iraq, Syria, Qatar, Dubai, and Lebanon to this long route. I made sure during these trips that I had extensive conversations with the young people I encountered. I still remember my chat with the youngsters in Tahrir Square and Umm Kulthum Caf. The image of a young man who responded to my optimism, suggesting that the new century will be an age of hope for Muslims, by recalling that he had nothing to eat tomorrow implying that there was no need for him to ponder the next century still lingers in my mind. I searched desperately for him when I watched the news coverage on Al Jazeera showing the Egyptian revolution in Tahrir Square. I was sure that he and his friends were there to experience the historic moment. My first impression of the Arab youth was that they got nothing useful out of the education they received. The curriculum and method were outdated and unable to do anything practical to improve their skills or lifestyle. German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (d. 1900) is still popular among young people around the world. The primary reason for his extensive popularity is his strong emphasis upon change and freedom, as well as on the potential of the youth to shape and formulate the future. His reliance on the snake metaphor in an attempt to explain the change is both interesting and important. The snake has been indispensible part of stories, sagas and mythologies since Adam and Eve. In his famous statement The snake that cannot shed its skin perishes, Nietzsche refers not only to the need for change but
* An earlier version of this article with the title Towards educational cooperation: Turkey and the Arab world in higher education was published in Turkish Review, 01 March 2011. The after the publication the region witnessed so-called Arap Spring. Many fremds asked me to apdate the earlier article. The author would like to thank for fruitful comments and contributions of my collegoues.
also to the subject of that change. The one who needs to sponsor the change is the one who has to survive. When the mission for change is outsourced to others, the change can occur only to the extent the powerful allow. From a Darwinian perspective, in such a case change would mean the survival and domination of the powerful. It is possible to better understand the global change and transformations by reference to this explanation. Philosopher Heraclitus, who lived around 500 B.C., eloquently explained the place of change within life itself: the only constant is change. In the current globalizing world, no further evidence is needed to confirm the magnitude and scope of the change and transformation. The new millennium introduced a new understanding that the world is making progress at an unprecedented pace. This new era has been labeled with bold statements, including post-industrial society, postmodern world and transition period. Everything is changing, even change itself. It is difficult to estimate the rate and speed of transformation. Everything is interconnected and interactions are becoming more complex and intricate. Change also influences the way education institutions operate. The traditional function of schools is to provide young people with the tools they will need in the future. To achieve this, educators have to be aware of the world they are living in. They should also be aware of the expectations young people may hold. However, it is difficult to predict what sort of world our children will grow up in. Therefore, the ability to deal with uncertainty appears to be the most vital skill for the future. For this reason, the goals of a modern and high-quality education should be to ensure students and young people acquire the following skills: The ability to focus on the future; comprehension of the world as a whole; understanding that present decisions and preferences shape the future; awareness of social change, human life, environment and nature; the ability to improve interaction, cooperation and discussion skills; the ability to utilize information and communication technologies; improvement of ability to acquire and generate knowledge through research; an effective and participatory citizenship style. The first four goals focus on thinking and values, whereas the following two concentrate on skills and the last on actions. Taking responsibility for ones actions and being open to motivation in the application of ones skills require awareness and further thought. In some cases, however, actions take priority. Skills emerge via actions, student awareness and a new type of comprehension that in turn leads to new actions. Unless this happens, the younger generations will become a source of trouble for a country. In fact, French futurist Jacques Attali warned us a few years ago: Its today that we decide what the world will be in 2050 and its today that we prepare what the world will be in 2100. Depending on how we behave, our children and our grandchildren will live in a livable world or they will live hate us to death. However, we did not have to wait until 2050 or 2100 to experience the impacts of change. The global winds of change and the impact of globalization have influenced the way the people think and behave. The authoritarian rulers of the Arab countries who always thought they would not be influenced by the wave of change faced this cruel reality. We all witnessed that leaders who failed to leave a sustainable world to their people and take responsibility have to step down from office in embarrassment and shame. I am not accusing anybody. Quite the contrary, I would like to draw attention to the possibility of cooperation with the Arab countries within the field of higher education under the conditions dictated and created by the process of change. Turkey realized the salience of globalization and change long before the Arab world, mostly because of historical and institutional ties with the West. Owing to this relationship, it introduced dramatic reforms and structural changes. Turkeys efforts to better understand the process of modernization and Westernization in the wake of the 1839 Royal Tanzimat Decree and Turkeys eventual EU bid consolidated its determination to renew and transform the way it perceives the world. Most of the radical changes were legitimized and justified within this context. This process of change has become visible in a number of fields, including the economy, foreign policy, education and social security. For instance Turkey, which once viewed its neighboring countries as a threat to its national security, has recently initiated a policy of zero problems with these countries, launching a brand new era. Both sides win during this process, thanks to the strong bilateral ties forged, and start to enjoy the benefits of relative peace and stability. It is clear this new style played a visible role in Turkeys ability to survive the global financial crisis. Despite these bold steps, Turkeys relations with the Arab world in the field of education are still insufficient. While visa requirements are lifted and landmines are cleared along borders, there still remain serious obstacles and prejudices when it comes to education. A number of issues, including recognition of degrees and qualifications and cooperation in the field of education, deserve greater attention and consideration. Interestingly, businessmen are much more successful than scholars in advancing cooperation with Arab countries. It is time to develop firm collaboration with the Arab countries in the field of education. It should be noted that many European countries have already taken action on this matter. I should note that by Arab world I refer to 22 countries, including Morocco, Yemen and the Gulf states, and the 350 million people living in this vast land. The most visible characteristics of this geography, host to a number of religions and civilizations throughout history, are under development, poverty, unemployment, environmental issues, ethnic issues, migration, violence and internal conflicts. Research sponsored to date by international organizations, including the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) underline that lack of education is the biggest problem in this region. This serves as the major source of other imminent problems. High-quality education and human capital Many thinkers, philosophers and prophets, including Confucius, Moses, Muhammed, Plato, Alfred North Whitehead and Jrgen Habermas, stressed the importance of education for humanity. Humanization, civilization and possession of a future are all made possible by education. Above all, education is a fundamental right to which all men and women are entitled. Social development is ensured via high-quality education. Likewise, better health services, greater participation in social activities and enjoyment of fundamental rights are possible via education. This suggests that education is a matter of survival for any nation in the 21st century. In a world of interconnectedness and interdependence characterized by high technology and enhanced means of communication, education appears to be the most important issue. It is not possible for countries ignoring the importance of education to gain full economic and political independence. In addition, high- quality education and investment in human capital is necessary to enjoy the benefits of the globalization process. Classical economists considered the natural assets of a country. The most famous example of this approach was Adam Smith (1723-1790), who institutionalized this in his seminal book, The Wealth of Nations. Smith held that a nations wealth depends on the amount of assets it needs for survival. However, this has significantly changed in the current information age. Prominent economists have expanded their perspectives, concluding that the wealth of a nation is actually calculated by well-educated and productive people. For this reason, this sort of asset is named human capital. The concept of human capital gained further prominence and popularity in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Famous economists, including 1979 Nobel Laureate Theodore Schultz (1902-1998), relied on the capital metaphor in an attempt to place emphasis upon the role of education in economic growth. They argued that people have developed a set of capabilities and skills by making an investment in their education, which will become a source of revenue in the long run. This investment may be also useful for the national economy, contributing to economic growth. The OECD reports underline that human capital has a number of economic and non-economic benefits, including better health, longer life expectancy and greater participation in society. From an economic perspective, the case is fairly different. The benefits of human capital positively affect the wealth of the nation as well as the individual. On an individual level, income increases with better education; in some OECD countries (including Denmark and New Zealand) the annual income of college graduates is 25 percent higher than that of non-graduates. This figure is as high as 120 percent in some countries. This suggests that education is the key to resolving global problems and achieving a state of sustainable development. To do this, education and training systems should be redesigned to ensure they will improve pupils innovative skills. Furthermore, they have to be able to teach students how to adapt to changing economic and social conditions, renew themselves and become flexible in a globalizing world. In short, education has an inherent power to transform national economies, nurture tolerance and social cohesion and create a sense of global citizenship. Therefore it is no exaggeration to argue that education is the key to the future of Middle Eastern countries. As eloquently stated by Dr. Don Olcott, chief executive of the Observatory of Borderless Higher Education (OBHE); the nations of the Middle East need to sense the power of education to transform life, cities, nations and regions, and to realize that efforts ignoring the importance of education will be inconclusive and ineffective. A problem that concerns us all In a globalizing world, problems affect both the countries in which they erupt and the entire international community. The high rate of unemployment among the Arab youth will eventually cause more serious problems for the entire globe, including terror, human trafficking, drug abuse and so on. For this reason, the resolution of the problem of lack of education in the Arab world should be handled globally. Turkey has the responsibility to address this problem, given its historical ties and common past with the region. The resolution or irresolution of these problems will of course also affect Turkeys future. While Turkey appreciated the requirements and trends of economic globalization and maintained firm ties with its neighbors, it failed to do the same with respect to the field of education. The growing trade volume with the nearby countries is evidenced by an 11.4 percent increase in trade in 2010, despite the global financial crisis. Businessmen in Gaziantep alone make exports to more than 180 countries; the share of the Arab states in the total amount of these exports is greater than 50 percent. The sustainability of the strong performance of Turkish foreign policy depends on education higher education in particular. This was emphatically confirmed by OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurra. As a result of global developments as well as its EU bid, Turkey has introduced some bold reforms in the field of education. I believe Turkeys efforts to share its experiences with nearby countries will have constructive results for the entire region. Shaping the future through education The precursor to todays EU was founded with the coming into effect of Treaty of Paris in 1952, establishing the European Coal and Steel Community. The goal was to maintain economic cooperation between member states. The heads of states who considered themselves responsible for the future of Europe believed the continent would have a better future if they built upon economic and social fundamentals. However, Jean Monnet, a French statesman known for his contribution to the establishment of European unity, reportedly said before he died that he would rather build a European community on education and culture, given that everything was actually connected to science, education and culture. Monnets concern has proven to be legitimate, as evidenced by the EUs failure to devise a common educational and cultural identity. In consideration of this gap, EU leaders have recently intensified efforts to achieve cooperation in the field of education. The Lisbon Strategy of 2000 sought to advance industry-university cooperation, whereas the Bologna Process initiated in 1999 attempted to open a new era in the field of higher education. The ministers for education who signed the Bologna Declaration on June 19, 1999, set the main goal of the declaration as seeking to create a common area of higher education in Europe by the end of 2010. The preamble to the declaration implies policy makers were eager to fulfill Monnets political will and requests: A Europe of Knowledge is now widely recognised as an irreplaceable factor for social and human growth and as an indispensable component to consolidate and enrich the European citizenship, capable of giving its citizens the necessary competences to face the challenges of the new millennium, together with an awareness of shared values and belonging to a common social and cultural space. The following excerpt on the future of the EU is also interesting: The importance of education and educational cooperation in the development and strengthening of stable, peaceful and democratic societies is universally acknowledged as paramount, the more so in view of the situation in South East Europe. It is therefore safe to argue that advancement of Turkeys economic and political relations with Arab countries in a democratic, stable and peaceful manner depends on the sustainability of these relations and achievement of cooperation in the field of education. There are some other reasons to focus on education and research as part of our bilateral ties with Arab countries. Turkey is the only Muslim country in NATO and the only Muslim democratic state in the OECD. The EU bid and Turkeys involvement in a number of EU and other European institutions is also significant. In short, Turkey needs to share its experience of modernization and democratization with its nearby countries and, in turn, to benefit from their experiences. State of education in the Arab world The first document to objectively discuss the state of education in the Arab world, the probable reasons for the situation and recommendations to resolve the problems was the Arab Human Development Report in 2002. The report is particularly important, since it was drafted by a group of courageous Arab researchers under the auspices and sponsorship of the UN. The reports content was not likely to have pleased Arab rulers, underlining that the underdevelopment in the Arab world was attributable to a lack of education, democratic deficit and eagerness to keep the people out of the political processes. Interestingly, the report content verified the evaluation by famous Islamic scholar Said Nursi in a notable sermon he delivered in Damascus, where he listed the reasons for the underdevelopment of the Arab world. Nursi upheld that while the European world made progress, the Islamic world had ceased to advance due to six inherent afflictions: hopelessness, disconnection with the truth and reality, love of enmity, unawareness of the divine ties connecting fellow Muslims, epidemic repression and observation of individual interests or selfishness. Muslim societies should move their attention in dealing with their problems away from an individual or territorial basis toward a framework of cooperation. This is why I refer in the title of this essay to cooperation focusing on education. It is also interesting to note that at a time when the reasons for the underdevelopment in the Muslim world were sought in the imperial ambitions of the Western nations, Nursi performed self-criticism, noting that the biggest enemy of the Islamic nations was lack of education and knowledge. The said report makes reference to the problems Arab leaders are displeased with, suggesting that the solution to these problems should be built upon education. To this end, two major issues stand out: democracy and the status of women. The Arab world lacks a democratic experience and deprives women of their fundamental right to education. Some Arab leaders took the report seriously and introduced some reforms to their education system accordingly, while the majority remained indifferent to its recommendations. A UNESCO-sponsored meeting held in Beirut on Jan. 19-23, 2007, was another endeavor focusing on the state of education in the Arab countries. The meeting was attended by the education ministers of the Arab states. The speech UNESCO Assistant Director General for Education John Daniel delivered at the opening was both interesting and important. Daniel, relying on examples from the experience of the Western world, explained that the actual reason for the current state of underdevelopment in Arab world was the Arab mentality itself. In fact, the title of his speech was enough to stress the core of the problem: Education for all in the Arab world: past, present and future. Daniel underlined the following points in particular: Despite ongoing problems, the Arab world has a rich intellectual past. The Muslim world is the origin of the tradition of the quest for knowledge and intensifying efforts for a better understanding of the world. A thousand years ago the Arab world was the most developed part of the world. The Arabs have been leaders of knowledge and science in many fields. Daniel upheld that the current situation is not attributable to Islam or traditions, but should be explained by lack of a democratic culture and the domination of dictatorial regimes. The Arab Knowledge Base 2009 report confirms this finding. According to this report, knowledge and freedom cannot thrive without the other. Knowledge, in both its enlightenment and developmental aspects, is freedom itself. The report makes the following points: Arab countries have the greatest unemployment rates in the world; the average in the Arab world in 2009 was 14.4 percent, whereas the world average was 6.3 percent. One in five persons in the region lives below the poverty line ($2 per day). Almost half of the population is deprived of basic needs. The number of people suffering from malnutrition due to unemployment is growing in Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon, Morocco, Saudi Arabia and Yemen. In the event the current trend continues, the Arab world will fail to meet its goals on food security and the elimination of hunger. The population growth rate is also cause for alarm. Under current projections, the population in the Arab world will reach 385 million by 2015. This means the rulers have to secure employment for 50 million young people by 2020. One in three in the Arab world is illiterate, despite the allocation of 5 percent of GDP and 20 percent of budget to education in the last four decades. In total, 60 million people are illiterate. Two-thirds of these 60 million are women. About 9 million children in Arab countries are unable to go to school at all; a huge number of children also do not attend secondary schools, jeopardizing economic growth and sustainable development. Arab countries do not allocate sufficient funds to research and development; this naturally affects innovation and invention. In most Arab states the funds allocated to research and development activities represent no more than 0.3 percent of GDP. The amount reserved for scientific research per head in Arab countries is $10, whereas it is $33 in Malaysia and $1,304 in Finland. The quality of college education is poor. The number of publications by Arab scholars is small. The number of registered patents is also low. Arabs read relatively less because of the high rate of illiteracy, poor education, poor purchasing power and cultural factors. The presence of different education models in Arab countries leads to serious problems in education systems. The curriculum is outdated and ideological. The teachers are not qualified. The methods are outdated; new technology is not used in education What these findings state is obvious: the Arab world lacks a youth with the necessary competence and skills to offer solutions to the existing problems, introduce innovations and deal with the growing problem of unemployment. The 2009 report refers to three major reasons for the current situation: lack of democracy and freedom, the poor status of women, and the inability of uneducated women to contribute to society and the economy. The report issues a strong call to the Arab countries: Act now and start a dialogue with countries that are better than you! Turkey can also respond to this call and it should. What can be done? To start a new era with Arab countries, the Higher Education Board (YK) needs to take action. In its present form the board was designed to deal with internal issues. A renovated YK would be able to serve as a guide for both Turkey and the entire region. In addition, it should share with Arab countries the experience acquired through the Bologna Process and Turkeys EU membership bid. To do this, the current situation should first be properly identified. This could be done by holding official visits to Arab countries in an effort to gain firsthand experience and appreciation of their education systems. The most up-to-date report on this subject is the Arab Human Development Report 2009 that I referred to above. Sadly, the number of detailed and objective reports concluded by our scholars on Arab countries is too small. Comprehensive studies should be sponsored and promoted in this field. Even though it still struggles with some problems, Turkey has introduced some bold reforms in the field of higher education. The EU membership bid, inclusion in the Bologna Process, OECD membership and other global endeavors promoted significant change in the country in the field of education. As a result of this transformation, a number of private and state universities were founded. This should be taken as Turkeys response to the global demand for education. Bearing in mind that higher education is being internationalized, Turkey could build joint campuses in the region, or Turkish universities could construct affiliate campuses in Arab states. The US, EU and Australia have already taken action in this respect. Agreements and protocols signed with Arab countries regarding education should be updated, and proper measures should be taken to ensure recognition of qualifications. Diplomas granted by Turkish universities are not recognized in some Arab countries, while YK still rejects degrees awarded by some Arab universities. Our universities should promote freedom and universal values, and be ready to embrace the different cultures, religions and languages represented by international students; the customs, attire and traditions of people from all backgrounds should be respected in colleges. In addition, Turkey is the only Muslim country represented in the Bologna Process; this is a great advantage that needs to be used. The value of the diplomas received from Turkish universities should be better underlined. The central exam that international students had to take for admission to Turkish universities was cancelled last year; this is a positive development, but something more should be done. Instead of short-term college fees, Turkish universities should adopt a long-term strategy focusing on the future and sustainable development. Global trends should be taken into consideration when fees are determined. Cooperation could be maintained with Arab countries in the following fields to modernize higher education: Mutual visits to ensure a greater degree of familiarity and cooperation; proper steps to make sure rectors, professors and researchers from Arab states have firsthand experience of education and research in our country. A conference on the current situation. Encouragement of Arab postdoctoral scholars to carry out research in our universities; this will have a positive impact on our education system as well as the national economy. Considering work and travel firms play a significant role in sending students to Western states, they could be encouraged to do the same with respect to the Arab states. Sponsorship and support for young academics in the region. Establishment of regional research and education networks; cooperation between universities toward social development in the region. Support for projects developed by young academics focusing on regional development; Turkeys experience in the EU process could serve as a strong incentive. Project specifications requiring cooperation between students and scholars from different countries in the region; plurality and greater participation should be considered during the process. Summer schools, joint workshops and conferences, as well as research projects, would be promising attempts to maintain close cooperation between universities in the region. These endeavors would help students and academics in the region get to know each other, explore common denominators and realize their capacity to work together and offer plausible solutions to existing problems. A process of dialogue and cooperation with Arab countries, sponsored by Turkey and focusing on education and research, would consolidate the view and feeling that peoples in the region have a common future of peace and stability. For this reason, resolution of the chronic educational problems in the Arab world is crucial for international society and world peace.
Education and Development: Alternatives to Neoliberalism - A New Paradigm, Exploring Radical Openness, the Role of the Commons, and the P2P Foundation as an Alternative Discourse to Modernisation.