Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

Why all Traffic Infrigements are illegal in

Australia (Vic)
Thanks to:

www.ReligiousWord.com
www.CLRG.info
www.LawAlert.info
The following information is based on my own research and knowledge of our Australian Law. The
author and publisher disclaim all liabilities in connection with the use of this information.
There are several ways to approach this question, but each way will bring us to the same answer.
Traffic law is Business law, it has nothing to do with the laws of Australia. In fact they are all in
conflict with our Commonwealth Constitution Act of 1901 which is in full force in Australia…
Reason No 1:
The Infringement Act 2006 and Road Safety Act 1986 cannot be considered valid Acts in Australia
because they begin with:
“The Parliament of Victoria enacts as follows”
This is an example of Parliament trying to exercise sovereignty which has been impossible since
1900 when the Commonwealth of Australian Constitution Act was passed by the Sovereign people
of Australia, the passing of this Act converted all the parliaments into Constitutional parliaments
which means that they have limited powers of creating legislation and absolutely no authority to
amend or repeal any part of the Constitution that forms law in Australia.
In Victoria, a proper Act of Parliament should begin with:
“BE IT ENACTED by the Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty by and with the advise and
consent of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly of Victoria in this present
Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same as follows ( that is to say ):”
This is the beginning to ALL Acts that are binding on subjects of Her Majesty as Quasi Laws
Reason No 2:
An Australian Subject cannot be subjected to the exercise of Commonwealth judicial power except
by a Chapter III, Commonwealth court. This, coupled with the principle of separation of power, and
the independence of the judiciary, denies to Parliament and the executive government the capacity
to administer civil or criminal justice.
Therefore it is illegal for any police officer, parking inspector or corporate body to convict you
guilty (without your fullest consent) of any alleged offense (by means of a penalty/fine) whether
criminal or civil. Only your Piers (Jury) has that obligation & responsibility.
These are your CONSTITUTIONAL rights & can be found under:
Australian Commonwealth Constitution Act of 1901 Section 71 & 80,
Imperial Acts Application Act 1980
Section 8, division 3, paragraph 12,and
Judiciary Act 1903, Section 80.
Reason No :3
All traffic infringements are in direct contradiction to section 92 of our Commonwealth
Constitution which ensures the free use of Commonwealth Roads.
Commonwealth Constitution Act of 1901
92. On the imposition of uniform duties of customs, trade, commerce, and intercourse among
the States, whether by means of internal carriage or ocean navigation, shall be absolutely free.
This Constitutional right ensures us that NO government or corporate body can force any type
payment for traveling freely on commonwealth roads. This
inconsistency between our Federal & State law must be dealt with under Section 109
Commonwealth Constitution Act of 1901
109 Inconsistency of laws
When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail,
and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.
Therefore we are obligated to treat Traffic penalties/fees as void & invalid under the letter of the
Law.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So how are both the Infringement Act 2006 and Road Safety Act 1986 operating legally in our
system? Only by your fullest consent under Administrative Law (business law) and the Australian
Act 1986.
The Australian Act 1986, which was illegally introduced by Bob Hawke, has allowed the Victorian
State Parliament the authority to enacts Sovereign laws, thus allowing equalization of powers. But,
according to the Australian Electoral Commission pocketbook, revised edition (April 09), the
referendum to introduce “Interchange (equalization) of Powers” held on the 1st of December 1984,
did not carry through. This lawfully confirms that the Australian public is obligated to recognize the
Infringement Act 2006 and Road Safety Act 1986 as invalid and void in Australia.
Australian Commonwealth Constitution Act of 1901
71 Judicial power and Courts
The judicial power of the Commonwealth shall be vested in a Federal
Supreme Court, to be called the High Court of Australia, and in such
other federal courts as the Parliament creates, and in such other courts
as it invests with federal jurisdiction. The High Court shall consist of
a Chief Justice, and so many other Justices, not less than two, as the
Parliament prescribes of the Constitution Act of 1901

Australian Commonwealth Constitution Act of 1901


80 Trial by jury
The trial on indictment of any offence against any law of the
Commonwealth shall be by jury, and every such trial shall be held
in the State where the offence was committed, and if the offence
was not committed within any State the trial shall be held at such
place or places as the Parliament prescribes.
Imperial Acts Application Act 1980
Section 8, division 3, paragraph 12
“That all grants and promises of fines
and forfeitures of particular persons before
conviction, are illegal and void”

Judiciary Act 1903


80. Common law to govern
So far as the laws of the Commonwealth are not applicable
or so far as their provisions are insufficient to carry them into
effect, or to provide adequate remedies or punishment, the
common law in Australia as modified by the Constitution and
by the statute law in force in the State or Territory in which the
Court in which the jurisdiction is exercised is held shall, so
far as it is applicable and not inconsistent with the Constitution
and the laws of the Commonwealth, govern all Courts exercising
federal jurisdiction in the exercise of their jurisdiction in civil
and criminal matters.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen