Kingsa FD90 Test Report Body Cote - Unlocked

Title:
Fire Resistance test of two single

leaf doorsets in general
accordance with BS 476: Parts
20 & 22: 1987 Section 6
BWA Report No:
2304900a
Test Applicant:
Danube Building Materials FZCO

Jebel Ali
Dubai
Test Date:
26th November 2008
© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd (formerly known as Warrington Fire Research (Aust) Pty Ltd)
NATA Accredited Laboratory in the field of Heat and Temperature since 1991.
Laboratory - Unit 2, 409 - 411 Hammond Road, Dandenong, Victoria 3175, Australia.
NSW Office – Level 20, Suite 2002A, 44 Market Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000
BWA Report No 2304900
Issue Number 2304900a.2
Page 2 of 35
DOCUMENT REVISION STATUS
Date Issued Issue No Description
26th December 2008 2304900a.1 Initial issue
12th January 2009 2304900a.2 Revised issue
SIGNATORIES
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
C. M. McLean K. G. Nicholls
On behalf of Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd
GENERAL CONDITIONS OF USE

This report may only be reproduced in full without modifications by the
report applicant only. Copies, extracts or abridgments of this report in any
form shall not be made distributed or published by other organisations
or individuals without the permission of Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd.

Page 3 of 35
CONTENTS
1 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 4
Test Assembly 4
Test Specimen 4
Assembly and Installation Methods 4
Orientation 4
2 SCHEDULE OF COMPONENTS 5
3 TEST PROCEDURE 8
Statement of compliance 8
Variations from test standards 8
Pre-test conditioning 8
Sampling / Specimen Selection 8
Ambient Temperature 8
Test Duration 8
Instrumentation and Equipment 8
4 TEST MEASUREMENTS 9
Furnace Temperature and Pressure Measurements 9
Specimen Temperatures 9
Deflection Measurements 9
Heat flux Measurement 9
Observations 9
5 TEST RESULTS 10
6 APPLICATION OF TEST RESULTS 11
Test Limitations 11
Variations from the Tested Specimens 11
Uncertainty of measurement 11
APPENDIX 1 DRAWINGS OF TEST ASSEMBLY 12
APPENDIX 2 TEST OBSERVATIONS 18
APPENDIX 3 INSTRUMENTATION POSITIONS 20
APPENDIX 4 TEST DATA 24
A 4.1 Furnace Temperature 24
A 4.2 Furnace Pressure 24
A 4.3 Specimen Temperatures 25
A 4.4 Deflection Measurements 31
A 4.5 Heat Flux Measurement 32
APPENDIX 5 PHOTOGRAPHS 33

Page 4 of 35
1 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
TEST ASSEMBLY
The test assembly comprised a nominal 3200mm × 3200mm × 140mm thick
hollow core concrete block wall incorporating two single leaf doorsets.
TEST SPECIMEN
The test specimens comprised two single leaf particle board core doorsets
referred to as Door A and Door B for the purposes of this test report. Further
details are provided in Figures A1.1 to A1.8 and the schedule of components
Section 2. The majority of dimensions have been provided by the test applicant
and have been verified wherever practical by Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty
Ltd.
ASSEMBLY AND INSTALLATION METHODS

The hollow core concrete block wall was built into a steel restraint frame,
incorporating openings for the doorsets, by a building contractor at BWA
Melbourne commencing on the 17th November 2008 and under the supervision of
a BWA representative. The test applicant supplied and installed the single leaf
doorsets (including leaves, frames and all door hardware) commencing on the
24th November 2008 and under the supervision of a BWA representative.
ORIENTATION
The specimen was installed with Door A swinging away from the furnace and
Door B swinging into the furnace.

Page 5 of 35
2 SCHEDULE OF COMPONENTS
ITEM DESCRIPTION
DOOR A
Leaf Size 2400mm high × 1000mm wide × 60mm (nominal) thick door leaf.
Leaf Core The leaf core was stated by the test applicant to be nominally 60mm thick
(made of two 30mm thick sheets laminated together) and designated as
DANUBE “KINGSA” Core supplied by DANUBE.
KINGSA, as stated by the test applicant, is a particleboard material and
has a nominal density of 695 kg/m3 at a nominal moisture content of
7+3%.
Leaf edging 3mm thick (nominal) hardwood Tasmanian Oak with a nominal density,
as stated by the test applicant, of minimum 660 kg/m3.
Leaf Seals Lorient LP4006 Intumescent Strip, as stated by the test applicant, was
rebated within the bottom of the door leaf.
Lorient LP2004DS (Type 617 – 20mm wide × 4mm thick) Intumescent
Strip, as stated by the test applicant, was rebated into the door edges
and top bypassing hinges.
Hinges Laidlaw Hinges Model ref LG LA161 - 102.01.53
102mm × 102mm × 3mm 2BB Laidlaw hinges, made from Grade 13 SS,
fixed with 4-off screw fixings (nom 10g × 50 mm long stainless steel
screws) through each plate to the door leaf and door frame. The hinges
were fitted to the west side of the door leaf (looking from the unexposed
side) with the door swinging away from the furnace. The hinges were
bedded on 2mm thick Lorient intumescent hinge protection pads.
Hinge Locations There were 4-off hinges positioned at 240mm, 1210mm, 1935mm and
2180mm respectively from the sill to the centre of the hinge.
Frame The solid timber door frame was 135mm wide × 32mm thick with a door
seat rebate of nominally 19 mm deep × 62 mm wide. The frame was
made from Tasmanian Oak of a nominal density, as stated by the test
applicant, of minimum 660 kg/m3.
Frame Seals Lorient LP2006 Intumescent Fire Seals, as stated by the test applicant,
were rebated within the perimeter of the frame, bypassing hinges.
Fixings The timber frame was secured to the opening in the masonry wall with
19-off (8-off per vertical side and 3-off in the head) No14 × 75mm long
socket head screws into plastic plugs, as stated by the test applicant, at
maximum spacing 300mm with nominal 150mm at the ends.
Lockset Laidlaw Mortise latch set Ref LG LA60 - 5572.01.153 Euro profile
Laidlaw Mortice latchset with striker centrally located nominally 870mm
from the sill and a backset of nominally 55mm. Laidlaw lever action door
handles were to the unexposed and exposed sides. The latch throw was
nominally 12 mm. The Mortice lockset was additionally protected with
2mm thick Lorient Intumescent Lock Protection Kit.
Closer Laidlaw (LA802) standard power adjustable overhead door closer,
nominal 240mm long × 55mm high × 37mm deep, fitted to the unexposed
side of the doorset.

Page 6 of 35
ITEM DESCRIPTION
DOOR B
Leaf Size 2400mm high × 1000mm wide × 60mm (nominal) thick door leaf.
Leaf Core The leaf core was stated by the test applicant to be nominally 60mm thick
(made of two 30mm thick sheets laminated together) and designated as
DANUBE “KINGSA” Core supplied by DANUBE.
KINGSA, as stated by the test applicant, is a particleboard material and
has a nominal density of 695 kg/m3 at a nominal moisture content of
7+3%.
Leaf edging 3mm thick (nominal) hardwood Tasmanian Oak with a nominal density,
as stated by the test applicant, of minimum 660 kg/m3.
Leaf Seals Lorient LP4006 Intumescent Strip, as stated by the test applicant, was
rebated within the bottom of the door leaf.
Lorient LP2004DS (Type 617 – 20mm wide × 4mm thick) Intumescent
Strip, as stated by the test applicant, was rebated into the door edges
and top bypassing hinges.
Hinges Laidlaw Hinges Model ref LG LA161 - 102.01.53
102mm × 102mm × 3mm 2BB Laidlaw hinges, made from Grade 13 SS,
fixed with 4-off screw fixings (nom 10g × 50 mm long stainless steel
screws) through each plate to the door leaf and door frame. The hinges
were fitted to the east side of the door leaf (looking from the unexposed
side) with the door swinging into the furnace. The hinges were bedded on
2mm thick Lorient intumescent hinge protection pads.
Hinge Locations There were 4-off hinges positioned at 240mm, 1210mm, 1935mm and
2180mm respectively from the sill to the centre of the hinge.
Frame The solid timber door frame was 135mm wide × 32mm thick with a door
seat rebate of nominally 19 mm deep × 62 mm wide. The frame was
made from Tasmanian Oak of a nominal density, as stated by the test
applicant, of minimum 660 kg/m3.
Frame Seals Lorient LP2006 Intumescent Fire Seals, as stated by the test applicant,
were rebated within the perimeter of the frame, bypassing hinges.
Fixings The timber frame was secured to the opening in the masonry wall with
19-off (8-off per vertical side and 3-off in the head) No14 × 75mm long
socket head screws into plastic plugs, as stated by the test applicant, at
maximum spacing 300mm with nominal 150mm ends.
Lockset Laidlaw Mortise latch set Ref LG LA60 - 5572.01.153 Euro profile
Laidlaw Mortice latchset with striker centrally located nominally 960mm
from the sill and a backset of nominally 55mm. Laidlaw lever action door
handles were to the unexposed and exposed sides. The latch throw was
nominally 12 mm. The Mortice lockset was additionally protected with
2mm thick Lorient Intumescent Lock Protection Kit.
Closer Laidlaw (LA802) standard power adjustable overhead door closer,
nominal 240mm long × 55mm high × 37mm deep, fitted to the unexposed
side of the doorset.

Page 7 of 35
ITEM DESCRIPTION
Supporting Construction
Description 140 mm thick hollow core concrete block wall.
Door Sill Four courses of solid concrete blocks 390mm × 190mm × 90mm with the
top course laid perpendicular (except two half end blocks) to the wall to
form a sill for the doorsets.
Blocks above sill Twelve (12-off) courses of hollow core concrete blocks were laid on the
sill to form the openings and an additional two (2-off) courses were laid
above the openings including one lintel beam course which included a
single D16 reinforcement rod with premixed concrete filling the void.
Sealant Lorient intumescent mastic was used to seal the gap (backed by
Rockwool) between the edge of the door frames and the openings in the
concrete block wall on both sides.

Page 8 of 35
3 TEST PROCEDURE
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
The test was performed in general accordance with the requirements of
BS 476: Part 20: 1987 and BS 476: Part 22: 1987 Section 6 as appropriate for
insulated doorsets, other than the variations stated below.
VARIATIONS FROM TEST STANDARDS

The furnace temperature was measured by 6-off mineral insulated metal
sheathed Type K thermocouples with wire diameters not greater than 1 mm and
overall diameter of 3 mm with the measuring junction insulated from the sheath.
The thermocouples protruded a minimum of 25 mm from steel supporting tubes.
BS 476: Part 20: 1987 specifies the furnace temperature to be measured by 6-off
Nickel chromium/nickel aluminium wire contained within a mineral insulation and
in a heat resisting steel sheet of diameter 1.5 mm, the hot junctions being
electrically insulated from the sheath. The thermocouple hot junction shall project
25 mm from a porcelain insulator.
This variation, is considered to make the test slightly more onerous, however
would not have significantly affected the results of the fire-resistance test.
The furnace pressure varied more than as prescribed by BS 476: Part 22: 1987
during the period of 90-95 minutes test duration but was below that prescribed
maximum pressure level variation +2 Pa. The deviation was only minor (pressure
average was -3 Pa) and for a short period, therefore it is considered that this
variation would not have significantly affected the results of the
fire-resistance test.
PRE-TEST CONDITIONING
The specimen was stored in the test laboratory and was subjected to indoor
ambient normal laboratory conditions for 48 hours prior to testing.
SAMPLING / SPECIMEN SELECTION

The laboratory was not involved in the selection of the test specimen for test.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
The ambient temperature at the start of the test was 27°C and varied between
27°C and 30°C throughout the test..
TEST DURATION
The test was terminated after approximately 97 minutes 30 seconds after
agreement between the test laboratory and applicant.
INSTRUMENTATION AND EQUIPMENT

The instrumentation was provided in accordance with BS 476: Part 22: 1987
except for the furnace control thermocouples as mentioned above.

Page 9 of 35
The furnace temperature was measured by 6-off mineral insulated metal

sheathed Type K thermocouples with wire diameters not greater than 1 mm and
overall diameter of 3 mm with the measuring junction insulated from the sheath.
The thermocouples protruded a minimum of 25 mm from steel supporting tubes.
The non fire side specimen temperatures were measured by Type K
thermocouples with wire diameters less than 0.5 mm diameter soldered to 12 mm
diameter × 0.2 mm thick copper discs covered by a 30 mm × 30 mm × 2.0 mm
inorganic insulating pads. The thermocouples positions are described in Table
A3.1, and are shown on Figure A3.1 in Appendix 3. A roving thermocouple was
available to measure temperatures at positions that appear hotter than the
positions monitored by fixed thermocouples.
Deflection measurements were taken from calibrated tapes, fixed to the test
specimen, using a Telescope Levelling Instrument (Dumpy Level) Model 200B, at
the positions shown on Figure A3.2 in Appendix 3.
The furnace pressure was measured approximately 1000 mm above sill level.
Cotton pads and gap gauges were available during the test to assess the
performance under the criteria for integrity up to unexposed face temperatures of
300°C for both Doorsets. After that time gap gauges only were available to
assess the performance under the criteria for integrity.
4 TEST MEASUREMENTS
FURNACE TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS

Furnace temperature and pressure data are provided in A4.1 and A4.2 in
Appendix 4.
SPECIMEN TEMPERATURES
Specimen temperature data is provided in A4.3 and Table A4.1 and A4.2 in
Appendix 4.
DEFLECTION MEASUREMENTS
Deflection measurement data is provided in A4.4 in Appendix 4.
HEAT FLUX MEASUREMENT

Heat Flux measurements are provided in A4.5 in Appendix 4.
OBSERVATIONS
A table that includes observations of the significant behaviour of the specimen
and details of the occurrence of the various performance criteria specified in
BS 476: Part 22: 1987 is provided in Appendix 2. Photographs of the specimen
are included in Appendix 5.

Page 10 of 35
5 TEST RESULTS
The specimen achieved the following performance when tested in accordance
with BS 476: Part 22: 1987 Section subject to the variations in section 3.
DOOR A
Loadbearing Capacity Not applicable
Integrity 96 minutes
Insulation 96 minutes
DOOR B
Loadbearing Capacity Not applicable

Integrity 87 minutes
Insulation 87 minutes
Note: - No failure of insulation on either specimen prior to integrity failure

Page 11 of 35
6 APPLICATION OF TEST RESULTS
TEST LIMITATIONS
The results of this fire test may be used to directly assess fire hazard, but it
should be recognized that a single test method will not provide a full assessment
of fire hazard under all fire conditions. The results only relate to the behaviour of
the specimen of the element of the construction under the particular conditions of
the test; they are not intended to be the sole criteria for assessing the potential
fire performance of the element in use nor do they necessarily reflect the actual
behaviour in fires.
VARIATIONS FROM THE TESTED SPECIMENS

This report details the methods of construction, the test conditions and the results
obtained when the specific element of construction described herein was tested
following the procedure outlined in BS 476: Parts 20 & 22: 1987. Any significant
variation with respect to size, constructional details, loads, stresses, edge or end
conditions, other than those allowed under the field of direct application in the
relevant test method, is not addressed by this report. It is recommended that any
proposed variation to the tested configuration should be referred to the test
applicant in the first instance to obtain appropriate documentary evidence of
compliance from Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd or another Registered
Testing Authority.
UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT
Because of the nature of fire resistance testing and the consequent difficulty in
quantifying the uncertainty of measurement of fire resistance, it is not possible to
provide a stated degree of accuracy of the result.

Page 12 of 35
APPENDIX 1 DRAWINGS OF TEST ASSEMBLY
Figure A1.1: Masonry Wall Elevation

Page 13 of 35
Figure A1.2: Test Specimen Elevation

Page 14 of 35
Door Frame 1086mm Overall
Door Leaf width 1000mm Overall

A
A
Door Frame height mm overall 2454mm
Door Leaf Height 2400mm Overall

B B
Lockset strike positioned 950mm above floor level
C C
D
Figure A1.3: Doorset Constructional Drawing (Provided By Client)

Page 15 of 35
Lorient LP2006
Lorient LP2004
(Type 617) SECTION AA
SECTION DD
Lorient LP4006
Figure A1.4: Doorset Frame & Leaf Vertical Sectional Drawing (Provided By Client)

Page 16 of 35
SECTION CC
SECTION BB
Figure A1.5: Doorset Frame & Leaf Horizontal Sectional Drawing (Provided By Client)

Page 17 of 35
Figure A1.8: Lorient Intumescent Kit (Provided By Client)

Page 18 of 35
APPENDIX 2 TEST OBSERVATIONS

Time
Observation
Min Sec
DOORSET A
0 0 Fire-Resistance Test was commenced and ambient air temperature was
approximately 28°C.
1 30 Smoke emissions had become evident from top section of the door leaf
2 15 Smoke emissions had become evident from the sides down to approximately
the height of the second hinge from the top. (Nominal 500mm).
3 48 Smoke emissions had become evident from hinge side of door down to the
middle of the door.
4 53 An increase in smoke emissions became evident from around the door leaf.
7 29 Small emissions of smoke had become evident from the latch side at the
bottom of the door.
10 30 Darkening of the face of door at hinge locations had become evident.
11 12 Darkening had become evident on the face of the door near to the latch set.
14 20 Reduction in smoke emissions had become evident.
19 55 Darkening that had become evident on the face of the door near to the latch
set had increased.
21 42 Darkening had become evident around the 3rd hinge down from the top.
27 38 Smoke emissions had become evident around the latch set
29 16 Intumescent seal appears to have closed the gap between the sill and the
doorset.
30 30 Some darkening had become evident at locations along the bottom of the door.
32 17 Smoke emissions almost stopped with minor emissions continuing around the
third hinge down.
43 30 Smoke emissions had stopped
60 00 The door system had continued to maintain integrity in accordance with
AS 1530.4-2005.
66 58 Some smoke had become evident emitting from along hinge side of door.
72 56 Increase in smoke emissions from above the door closer had become evident.
73 38 Charring of the area immediately above the top hinge had become evident.
74 46 Charring of the area near the 2nd hinge from the top had become evident.
79 41 Charring of the area near the 3rd hinge from the top had become evident.
87 14 Glowing of the door leaf edge had become evident immediately above the
second hinge from the top.
89 58 Darkening of the area below the latch on the door frame had become evident.
AS 1530.4-2005.
91 23 Increase in smoke emissions had become evident immediately above the
latchset at the edge of the door leaf.
95 21 Darkening of the door frame had become evident at the head of the specimen.
96 47 Sustained flaming of unexposed face at the mid-height hinge for greater
than 10 seconds. Integrity failure of Doorset A in accordance with
BS 476: Part 22: 1987. Failure on insulation in accordance with BS 476:
Part 22: 1987, due to integrity failure.
97 30 Fire resistance test was stopped at the request of the test applicant.

Page 19 of 35
Time
Observation
Min Sec
DOORSET B
0 0 Fire-Resistance Test was commenced and ambient air temperature was
approximately 28°C.
1 30 Smoke emissions had become evident along the top of the door.
2 55 Smoke emissions became evident along the sides of doorset and down
approximately 800mm.
4 53 An increase in smoke emissions had become evident from the specimen.
8 15 Darkening of the face of door had become evident above the latch set.
9 17 Darkening at the edge of the door on the hinge side had become evident at
various locations.
14 20 A reduction in smoke emissions had become evident from the specimen.
24 43 Smoke emission stopped.
29 16 Intumescent seal appears to have closed the gap between the sill and the
doorset.
30 30 Some darkening had become evident at locations along the bottom of the door.
49 30 Smoke emissions had become evident from upper latch side of the door.
54 30 Darkening of the top corners of the door had become evident
59 22 A 30 second cotton pad test was carried out at the upper west corner of the
door leaf. Slight discolouration evident. No glowing or flaming of the pad had
become evident.
AS 1530.4-2005.
77 15 A small glowing spot had become evident at the top hinge side corner of the
door leaf.
81 11 Glowing/charring had become evident at the top latch side corner of the door
leaf.
81 45 A 90 second roving thermocouple test was carried out 50mm from the top latch
side corner of the door leaf resulting in a temperature of 121°C.
85 53 A 30 second cotton pad test was carried out at the upper west corner of the
door leaf. Slight discolouration evident. No glowing or flaming of the pad had
become evident.
87 48 Sustained flaming of unexposed face at the upper latch corner of the
door leaf for greater than 10 seconds. Integrity failure of Doorset B in
accordance with BS 476: Part 22: 1987.
Failure on insulation in accordance with BS 476: Part 22: 1987, due to
integrity failure.

Page 20 of 35
APPENDIX 3 INSTRUMENTATION POSITIONS

West East West East
B9 B10 B11 C9 C10 C11
B1 B2 C1 C2
C8 C3 C12
B8 B3 B12
C6
B6 C7
B7
C4 C5
B4 B5
y
y
x
x
Figure A3.1: Thermocouple Locations
Table A3.1: Thermocouple Locations

Door A Door B
Location Location
T/C Description T/C Description
x y x y
B1 282 1810 Top west. C1 282 1810 Top west.
B2 782 1810 Top east. C2 782 1810 Top east.
B3 532 1210 Midpoint. C3 532 1210 Midpoint.
Leaf
Leaf
B4 282 660 Bottom west. C4 282 660 Bottom west.

B5 782 660 Bottom east. C5 782 660 Bottom east.
B6 982 928 50 mm above latch. C6 82 1020 50 mm above latch.
B7 912 868 50 mm east of latch. C7 132 960 50 mm west of latch.
B8 16 1210 West at mid-height. C8 16 1210 West at mid-height.
B9 1000 2426 Upper west corner. C9 1000 2426 Upper west corner.
Frame
Frame
B10 532 2426 Mid-width of door C10 532 2426 Mid-width of door
leaf. leaf.
B11 965 2426 Upper east corner. C11 965 2426 Upper east corner.
B12 1048 1210 East at mid-height. C12 1048 1210 East at mid-height.
East

Page 21 of 35
West East West
DA1 DBF1
DAF1
DB1
DAC DBC
y
y
DB2
DBF2
DA2 x
x DAF2
Figure A3.2: Deflection measurement Locations
Table A3.2: Deflection Locations

Door A Door B
Location Location
T/C Description T/C Description
X y x y
DA1 980 2360 Upper east corner of DB1 82 2310 Upper west corner of
leaf. leaf.
DAF1 1035 2335 Upper east corner of DBF1 32 2360 Upper west corner of
frame. frame.
DAC 535 1200 Midpoint. DBC 535 1200 Midpoint.
DA2 980 60 Lower east corner of DB2 80 110 Lower west corner of
leaf. leaf.
DAF2 1035 25 Lower east corner of DBF2 10 80 Lower west corner of
frame. frame.

Page 22 of 35
Figure A3.3: Doorset A clearance measurements

Page 23 of 35
Figure A3.4: Doorset B clearance measurements

Page 24 of 35
APPENDIX 4 TEST DATA
A 4.1 FURNACE TEMPERATURE
1200
1000
Temperature (°C)
800
600
400
200
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (Minutes)
BS 476: Part 20: 1987 Mean Furn Max Furn Min Furn
Figure A4.1: Furnace Temperatures vs. Time.
A 4.2 FURNACE PRESSURE
Time Pressure Time Pressure

(Pa) (Pa)
(minutes) (minutes)
Avg Avg
5-10 0 50-55 -2
10-15 -1 55-60 0
15-20 -1 60-65 1
20-25 -1 65-70 0
25-30 1 70-75 -1
30-35 1 75-80 -1
35-40 -1 80-85 -1
40-45 -1 85-90 -2
45-50 0 90-95 -3

Page 25 of 35
A 4.3 SPECIMEN TEMPERATURES
100
90
80
Temperature (°C)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (Minutes)
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 Integrity Limit
Figure A4.2: Doorset A Quarter point Temperatures vs. Time
100
90
80
Temperature (°C)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (Minutes)
Average Integrity Limit
Figure A4.3: Average of Doorset A Quarter point Temperatures vs. Time

Page 26 of 35
100
90
Temperature (°C) 80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (Minutes)
B6 B7 Integrity Limit
Figure A4.4: Doorset A Miscellaneous Temperatures vs. Time
200
180
160
Temperature (°C)
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (Minutes)
B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 Integrity Limit
Figure A4.5: Doorset A Frame Temperatures vs. Time

Page 27 of 35
100
90
80
Temperature (°C)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (Minutes)
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 Integrity Failure
Figure A4.6: Doorset B Quarter point Temperatures vs. Time
100
90
80
Temperature (°C)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (Minutes)
Integrity Failure Average
Figure A4.7: Average of Doorset B Quarter point Temperatures vs. Time

Page 28 of 35
100
90
80
Temperature (°C)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (Minutes)
C6 C7 Integrity Failure
Figure A4.8: Doorset B Miscellaneous Temperatures vs. Time
160
140
120
Temperature (°C)
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 15 30 45 60 75 90
Time (Minutes)
C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 Integrity Failure
Figure A4.9: Doorset B Frame Temperatures vs. Time

Page 29 of 35
Table A4.1: Individual Test Specimen Temperatures limits for Doorsets

Temp (°C) at t (minutes) Limit1
Location T/C Description2
t=0 t=30 t=60 t=90 t=97 (Mins)
Doorset A
B1 Top west. 26 30 61 81 #
¼& B2 Top east. 27 31 69 79 #
mid- B3 Midpoint. 30 32 70 83 #
points B4 Bottom west. 29 32 55 80 #
B5 Bottom east. 29 32 67 86 #
B6 50 mm above latch. 28 56 79 91 #
963
Misc. B7 50mm west of latch. 28 36 84 85 #
B8 West at mid-height. 28 50 57 170 #
B9 Upper west corner. 28 51 50 70 #
B10 Mid-width of door leaf. 29 34 44 68 #
Timber B11 Upper east corner. 29 39 55 72 #
frame B12 East at mid-height. 29 37 55 76 #
Doorset B
C1 Top west. 29 34 76 # #
¼& C2 Top east. 30 33 69 # #
mid- C3 Midpoint. 29 33 79 # #
points C4 Bottom west. 29 33 48 # #
C5 Bottom east. 28 31 56 # #
C6 50 mm above latch. 27 62 87 # #
873
Misc. C7 50mm west of latch. 27 39 86 # #
C8 West at mid-height. 28 32 70 # #
C9 Upper west corner. 28 31 50 # #
C10 Mid-width of door leaf. 28 29 46 # #
Timber
C11 Upper east corner. 29 31 46 # #
frame
C12 East at mid-height. 28 30 48 # #
1
Notes: Limit time is the time to the nearest whole minute, rounded down to the nearest minute, at which
the temperature recorded by the thermocouple does not rise by more than 180K above the initial
temperature.
2
Refer to Appendix 3 for locations of thermocouples as only a generic description is included in the
table.
3
Insulation failure due to integrity failure. No insulation failure prior to integrity failure.
‘-’ Under limit column indicates the temperature limit was not exceeded during the reported period or
up until the time of integrity failure if a failure occurred.
# Faulty thermocouple

Page 30 of 35
Table A4.2: Quarter and centre point average temperature limits of Doorsets.
Temp (°C) at t (minutes) Limit1
Doorset
t=0 t=30 t=60 t=90 t=97 (Mins)
Doorset A 28 31 65 82 # 963
Doorset B 29 33 66 # # 873
1
Notes: Limit time is the time to the nearest whole minute, rounded down to the nearest
minute, at which the average temperature recorded by the thermocouples (quarter
points) does not rise by more than 140K above the initial average temperature.
2
Refer to Appendix 3 for locations of thermocouples as only a generic description is
included in the table.
3
Insulation failure due to integrity failure. No insulation failure prior to integrity
failure.
‘-’ Under limit column indicates the temperature limit was not exceeded during the
reported period or up until the time of integrity failure if a failure occurred.

Page 31 of 35
A 4.4 DEFLECTION MEASUREMENTS
40
30
20
10
Deflection (mm)
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
0 15 30 45 60 75 90
Time (Minutes)
DA1 DAF1 DAC DA2 DAF2
Figure A4.10: Out-of-Plane Deflection vs. Time of Doorset A.

Positive measurements show movement of doorset towards furnace and
negative measurements show movement of doorset away from furnace.
40
30
20
Deflection (mm)
10
-10
-20
-30
-40
0 15 30 45 60 75 90
Time (Minutes)
DB1 DBF1 DBC DB2 DBF2
Figure A4.11: Out-of-Plane Deflection vs. Time of Doorset B.

Positive measurements show movement of doorset towards furnace and
negative measurements show movement of doorset away from furnace.

Page 32 of 35
A 4.5 HEAT FLUX MEASUREMENT
2.0
1.8
1.6
Irradiance (kW/m²)
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (Minutes)
Recorded Radiation Emitted Radiation Integrity Limit
Figure A4.12: Heat flux emitted from Doorset A vs Time

Radiometer located central to the door leaf at 1000 mm away from the specimen.
Recorded radiation is radiation level at radiometer position and emitted radiation is
radiation level (calculated) emitted from face of door leaf
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
Irradiance (kW/m²)
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (Minutes)
Recorded Radiation Emitted Radiation Integrity Limit
Figure A4.13: Heat flux emitted from Doorset B vs Time

Radiometer located central to the door leaf at 1000 mm away from the specimen.
Recorded radiation is radiation level at radiometer position and emitted radiation is
radiation level (calculated) emitted from face of door leaf

Page 33 of 35
APPENDIX 5 PHOTOGRAPHS
Door B Door A
Figure A5.1: Exposed face of test specimen prior to commencement of test
Door A Door B
Figure A5.2: Unexposed face of test specimen prior to commencement of test

Page 34 of 35
Door A
Door B
Figure A5.3: Unexposed face of test specimen after approximately

60 minutes test duration
Door A
Door B
Figure A5.4: Unexposed face of test specimen prior to

completion of test (approximately 7 minutes prior)

Page 35 of 35
Door B
Door A
Figure A5.5: Exposed face of test specimen after completion of test

Kingsa FD90 Test Report Body Cote - Unlocked

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Kingsa FD90 Test Report Body Cote - Unlocked

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Title:

Fire Resistance test of two single

BWA Report No:

Danube Building Materials FZCO

26th November 2008

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

DOCUMENT REVISION STATUS

Date Issued Issue No Description

26th December 2008 2304900a.1 Initial issue

12th January 2009 2304900a.2 Revised issue

Prepared by: Reviewed by:

On behalf of Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd

GENERAL CONDITIONS OF USE

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

ASSEMBLY AND INSTALLATION METHODS

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

VARIATIONS FROM TEST STANDARDS

SAMPLING / SPECIMEN SELECTION

INSTRUMENTATION AND EQUIPMENT

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

The furnace temperature was measured by 6-off mineral insulated metal

FURNACE TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS

HEAT FLUX MEASUREMENT

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

Loadbearing Capacity Not applicable

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

6 APPLICATION OF TEST RESULTS

VARIATIONS FROM THE TESTED SPECIMENS

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

APPENDIX 1 DRAWINGS OF TEST ASSEMBLY

Figure A1.1: Masonry Wall Elevation

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

Figure A1.2: Test Specimen Elevation

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

Door Frame 1086mm Overall

Door Leaf width 1000mm Overall

Door Leaf Height 2400mm Overall

Lockset strike positioned 950mm above floor level

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

Figure A1.8: Lorient Intumescent Kit (Provided By Client)

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

APPENDIX 2 TEST OBSERVATIONS

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

APPENDIX 3 INSTRUMENTATION POSITIONS

Figure A3.1: Thermocouple Locations

Table A3.1: Thermocouple Locations

B4 282 660 Bottom west. C4 282 660 Bottom west.

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

West East West

Figure A3.2: Deflection measurement Locations

Table A3.2: Deflection Locations

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

Figure A3.3: Doorset A clearance measurements

© Bodycote Warringtonfire (Aus) Pty Ltd 2008

Figure A3.4: Doorset B clearance measurements