0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
438 Ansichten8 Seiten
The GRI G4 deadline is looming and in this issue of Directions, Salterbaxter MSLGROUP looks at the first movers, frame the problem and break the decision down into a series of next steps to ensure that the transition is seamless and timely.
Share your feedback with the Salterbaxter team @salterbaxtermsl or reach out to us on Twitter @msl_group.
The GRI G4 deadline is looming and in this issue of Directions, Salterbaxter MSLGROUP looks at the first movers, frame the problem and break the decision down into a series of next steps to ensure that the transition is seamless and timely.
Share your feedback with the Salterbaxter team @salterbaxtermsl or reach out to us on Twitter @msl_group.
The GRI G4 deadline is looming and in this issue of Directions, Salterbaxter MSLGROUP looks at the first movers, frame the problem and break the decision down into a series of next steps to ensure that the transition is seamless and timely.
Share your feedback with the Salterbaxter team @salterbaxtermsl or reach out to us on Twitter @msl_group.
of GRI G4: A roadmap to the December 2015 deadline. INSIDE The GRI G4 deadline is looming and in this issue of Directions, we look at the rst movers, frame the problem and break the decision down into a series of next steps to ensure that the transition is seamless and timely. A roadmap to the December 2015 deadline NOW DECEMBER 2015 Cutting through the complexity of GRI G4 hen the GRI G4 guidelines were rst released, the implementation deadline of the end of December 2015 seemed a long way off. Now that we are heading towards the nal year of reporting under the GRI G3 and 3.1 guidelines, the decision to go early or wait until the nal countdown is vexing quite a few reporters. In this issue of Directions, we look at rst movers, frame the problem and break the decision down into a series of next steps to help ensure that the transition is seamless and timely. Looking globally at industries, brands and countries, we can clearly see a move towards G4 adoption and the role that governments and exchanges play in encouraging reporting transparency and disclosure. For a few brave reporters who have already taken the plunge, it has been a journey of discovery. My conversation with some of these early adopters provides some rst-hand insight and advice. We know you might be wondering whether to go for GRI G4 or not. Thats why weve created a decision tree, to answer some of the key questions you may have, as well as case studies to help inform your own roadmap to the December 2015 deadline. SHOULD I STAY OR SHOULD I GO? 1 Cutting through the complexity of GRI G4 FAY HOGG Head of Reporting CONTENTS 1 Introduction 2 First movers 3 Decision tree 4 Brands who have made the journey 6 Conclusions 7 About SALTERBAXTER MSLGROUP INTRODUCTION FIRST MOVERS TOP 10 INDUSTRIES (Based on total GRI reports) In the sector table, industry heavies who take on the lions share of impacts and regulatory requirements are producing the highest number of G4 reports. This is more or less proportional to the inter-industry take-up of the GRI framework. BY COUNTRY, THERE ARE A FEW SURPRISES Countries such as the United States, Colombia, Brazil, South Africa and the Netherlands are leading the way. The US has market- and government-led initiatives to address corporate disclosure requirements; they also have a lot of big companies. Brazil and the Netherlands both have market- and government- led reporting initiatives, respectively. But Colombia? Yes, thats a surprise. Back in the late 90s their government decided that a Green Economy could give them a competitive advantage. National policy followed that specically promotes the disclosure of information using the GRI guidelines. Colombia is also one of the GRIs Focal Points that were set up to actively engage organisations in the development of sustainability reporting. Those efforts appear to be paying off. What about countries like France, South Africa and Denmark, who also have extra nancial reporting requirements for listed or state-owned companies? Many reporters in these countries are considering the additional value of developing their reporting to meet international standards against simply being compliant with local legislation. The truth is: governments have a key role in setting the baseline for companies to report on social and environmental issues. Many work in collaboration with the GRI in drafting legislation. Some stock exchanges actively promote the GRI framework for guidance. The move towards rules-based reporting is gaining ground, and alignment with the GRI framework puts organisations in a good place should environmental and social reporting legislation become mandatory. So far in 2014, more than 35% of GRI reporters have made the leap to G4. Depending on government-, market- and sector-led initiatives, we can see how reporters in some parts of the world have come further than others. Cutting through the complexity of GRI G4 Source: Reports listed on the GRI database and published in 2014 and correct as of 21st October 2014 164 150 66 54 51 39 30 33 16 13 62 55 34 34 25 20 17 14 14 9 CANADA 29% (65) SPAIN 32% (75) SWITZERLAND 27% (67) UK 30% (44) SOUTH AFRICA 42% (43) UNITED STATES 35% (165) BRAZIL 34% (97) COLOMBIA 56% (43) NETHERLANDS 33% (70) GERMANY 17% (69) TOP 10 GRI REPORTING COUNTRIES % of GRI reports that are G4 (total GRI reports in brackets) 2 G4 reports G3 or G3.1 reports I C T
&
T E C H N O L O G Y R E T A I L M I N I N G
A N D
M A T E R I A L S T E L E C O M M U N I C A T I O N S C O N S T R U C T I O N
A N D
E N G I N E E R I N G C H E M I C A L S H E A L T H C A R E
A N D
P H A R M A C E U T I C A L S F O O D
A N D
B E V E R A G E
P R O D U C T S E N E R G Y
A N D
U T I L I T I E S F I N A N C I A L
S E R V I C E S DECISIONS, DECISIONS... Have you decided? Heres the full journey. IS YOUR SECTOR COVERED BY ONE OF THE 10 SECTOR DISCLOSURES? These are: Airport operators, Food processing, Construction and real estate, Media, Electric utilities, Mining and metals, Event organisers, NGO, Financial services, Oil and gas. IS YOUR REPORT EXTERNALLY ASSURED? Conduct a gap analysis against the GRI criteria. This is helpful to get ready for the December 2015 deadline. YES The Sector Disclosures have been reorganised to t this structure but contain no new content. NO No further action required. DO YOU BASE YOUR CURRENT REPORTING ON MATERIAL ISSUES? Do the criteria for prioritising the material issues identify those that: Reect the organisations signicant economic, environmental and social impacts; or Substantively inuence the assessments and decisions of stakeholders PREPARE REPORT As Core and all indicators for each material aspect Direct Management Approach and at least one indicator for each material aspect Include a statement in report YES A reference to the external assurance statement should be included in the Content Index for each Standard Disclosure Item. NO Consider the value of assurance or other ways to validate the report, e.g. independent expert panel review or include stakeholder feedback. Cutting through the complexity of GRI G4 3 YES There are two in accordance options to choose from: Core and Comprehensive. The options reect compliance with guidelines rather than business performance. NO Materiality is a pivotal principle of the GRI G4 guidelines. See our publication Beyond the Matrix for further insight on tackling materiality. G4 CORE Core contains the essential elements of a sustainability report: its economic, environmental, social and governance impacts. New elements of G4 include disclosures on strategy, governance, ethics and integrity. G4 COMPREHENSIVE Builds on Core by requiring additional disclosure on strategy, governance, ethics and integrity. You must report on the Disclosures on Management Approach (DMA) and all indicators for each identied material aspect. G4 NOT YET READY You can include the following statement in your report: This report contains Standard Disclosures from the GRI Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, along with a list of the disclosures and their location. STORA ENSO, TERHI KOIPIJRVI, HEAD OF GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY, FINLAND The Finnish wood pulp, paper and packaging producer has been reporting using the GRI framework since 2003. For their 2013 report, published in February of this year, they took a practical approach to move to G4 reporting, in accordance with the comprehensive level. Having reported for a decade using G3, Stora Enso took the decision to go for G4 ahead of the deadline. The companys ambition is to be a frontrunner in sustainability, and in reporting, and it acknowledges that the new G4 framework brings with it interesting developments to move their reporting forward. Terhi Koipijrvi, Stora Ensos Head of Global Responsibility, explained that the company took a practical approach to moving to G4. We conducted a gap analysis to see what was needed, and then systematically went through each of those areas with content owners, she explained. Materiality was, of course, central to the process, along with incorporating the results of an internal project around value-chain thinking. Stora Enso conducts a thorough materiality review, using an online advisory panel. In 2013, the company reached over 600 stakeholders in over 40 countries using this tool, with a majority of those being external stakeholders. In addition, the company analysed feedback from investors, customers and the global and social media landscapes. Terhi points to some clear benets of moving early to G4. Our environmental reporting has been made more concise, while we have given more attention to the social responsibility aspects that were emphasised by our stakeholders. Stora Enso took a practical approach to the transition to G4. Terhis advice? Gain leadership commitment to the process, conduct a gap analysis, and invest time in the materiality analysis up front, she says. STANDARD BANK, KARIN IRETON, HEAD OF SUSTAINABILITY MANAGEMENT, SOUTH AFRICA Standard Bank is a leading African nancial services provider, based in South Africa. Market-led initiatives there, have paved the way for the banks transition to G4 reporting at a core level. The King Code is South Africas denitive approach to good corporate governance. Now on its third iteration, the journey to King III has put listed companies in a strong position when it comes to governance and stakeholder engagement because they are required to produce an Integrated Report. This reporting context has denitely helped their transition to G4, says Karin Ireton, Head of Sustainability Management at Standard Bank. Karin chaired the Stakeholder Council convened for the G4 consultation process, so she knows the content of the G4 well. Even still, with the countrys market-leading approach and experience on both sides, she says the process can be daunting. With a team of two, step one was a complete gap analysis. From this, Karin said, they could see what criteria they were already meeting and which aspects were not material. Taking it step-by-step made the whole index a lot less frightening. Some of the indicators are complex with multiple parts: the supply chain indicators, for example, are a little scary. For companies with complex supply chains, the breakdown by type or product and service, by point of origin and by quantum can assist the honing and decision on the most material issues, Karin advises. By analysing the types of suppliers and the amount of spend, it became clearer and a little less scary, Karin explained. Materiality is also one of the harder areas to crack. Not because of the concept itself, which is familiar to them: its applying the materiality lens in practice to lter what you actually report on. Karin says: you need condence to determine which parts are applicable to your business and to decide when you have adequately met the requirements of a particular indicator. Karins advice: The direction you take depends on where youre starting from, and very few companies have a clean slate to start with. 4 BRANDS WHO HAVE MADE THE JOURNEY TO GRI G4 Cutting through the complexity of GRI G4 INTEL, LINDA QIAN, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMUNICATIONS, US Intel is one of the worlds best-known technology brands. As a mature reporter, theyve been using the GRI framework for the past 10 years. Implementing the G4, in accordance with the comprehensive level, was just the next step on their reporting journey. As a highly visible company in its sector, Intel fully appreciates the principles of stakeholder engagement and materiality. Linda Qian, CSR Communications at Intel, explains: Intel has had a robust CSR materiality process for many years, and we know who our stakeholders are and how to engage them in the materiality process. The focus on reporting material issues also means that we can narrow our reporting to key issues. The only sticking point with G4, Linda explains, is with newer indicators, for example, with remuneration. It can be challenging to get executive buy-in on indicators like these, which are not as material from a CSR perspective, and are not required from a regulatory standpoint in the US. Other aspects are much easier to achieve: we helped inform the changes in the G4 guidelines on supply chain, Linda reveals. Lindas advice: See the transition as an opportunity: the G4 guidelines put as much emphasis on the process and governance of CSR as they do on non-nancial reporting and increased disclosure. Think about how you can better leverage the reporting process with key stakeholders internally and externally to move your CSR practice forward. Todd Camp believes GRI G4 is a part of the journey towards integrated reporting and welcomes GRIs contribution towards unied reporting standards. For Hersheys the main benet was bringing reporting to a higher global level, something their stakeholders expect from them. It also helped break through the paradigm of compliance and developed a platform that demonstrated how to integrate sustainability into the core of Hersheys business strategy. The process is well worth the time and effort requirement, Todd argues. It will require some internal communication and change management, but ultimately its about identifying critical risks and main opportunities and demonstrating how our company is addressing these items. BRANDS WHO HAVE MADE THE JOURNEY TO GRI G4 CONTINUED Cutting through the complexity of GRI G4 M&S, ROWLAND HILL, SUSTAINABILITY AND REPORTING MANAGER, UK The UK retailers adoption of GRI G4 did not aim to be in accordance, rather it used the framework to cross-check its own reporting strategy Plan A. The process generated better indicators for carbon and energy and allowed M&S to improve their Plan A 2020 vision. For M&S, sustainability reporting has always been primarily structured around Plan A. Having a strong reporting strategy in place, the GRI G4 guidelines were used as a secondary navigation tool. Moving to G4, Rowland says, didnt pose a problem because were not aiming to be in accordance and it has no impact on our judgements of materiality. The main benets were using the GRI G4 indicator for carbon and energy, together with the gap analysis that needed to be done. The process also started a debate around materiality that turned out to be very relevant and improved the work on integrated reporting. Rowlands advice to rst-timers? Get an accurate benchmark of what your competitors are doing and dont be afraid to experiment with GRI. There are lots of issues and problems with both GRI and regular reporting. The key is to follow a logical trajectory. THE HERSHEY COMPANY, TODD H. CAMP, SENIOR DIRECTOR, CSR AND COMMUNITY RELATIONS, THE HERSHEYS COMPANY, US The American chocolate giant Hersheys adopted GRI G4 as a step in the right direction to bring sustainability reporting to a higher global common denominator. For Hersheys this was a natural step in harmony with their brand values. Having used GRI since their rst CSR report and with a commitment to increase disclosure and transparency, it was an easy decision for Hersheys to adopt the framework early. Regular meetings with internal data owners and legal team helped to develop a smooth process of collecting data. Support from Hersheys senior leaders made it an easy choice without pressure from government or industry requirements. 5 MINUS THE PLUS The GRI recommends external assurance but does not require it to report in accordance with G4. The omission of the + sign, that in G3 denoted whether or not a report had been externally assured, would seem, at rst glance, to weaken the argument for, and take-up of, external assurance. But this is not the case, according to Katherine Lampen, Director of Sustainability Services at Deloitte LLP, London. In fact, Deloitte are receiving more requests for external assurance rather than fewer, from G4 reporters. Katherine attributes this to the requirement to clearly show in the content index whether each Standard Disclosure Item has been externally assured and, if it has, to include the page reference for the External Assurance Statement in the report. This is actually a better way to show the scope of the assurance. Before, you could include a + sign even if only a small part of the report had been externally assured. Now the content index shows explicitly the areas that have been assured and those that have not. This is driving more, rather than less, assurance. CONCLUSIONS A main objective of the new G4 guidelines is to focus on the most material issues to ensure the report is both relevant and concise. Materiality, as we have suggested in our decision tree, becomes the starting point of the journey towards more meaningful reporting. However, there is a subtle nuance in the description of materiality in G4 compared with G3 and that is determining whether issues are likely to substantively inuence the assessments and decisions of stakeholders. This suggests a much more in-depth stakeholder engagement process and this is an area where new technologies can be a great help in reaching wider audiences. New requirements to validate these ndings with senior management will also help strengthen the credibility of GRI reports. For other reporters, GRI G4 is not the destination but the compass. It is a useful navigation tool to ensure that they are on track, but their goal is to communicate the value or impact of their business beyond the connes of reporting protocol. The ability to report against the guidelines but stopping short of full in accordance with requirements will ensure that GRI guidelines are also relevant for those that adopt this approach, such as M&S with Plan A. For new reporters and those in developing markets, a ready- made framework that is actively promoted by governments and exchanges around the world also extends the appeal of these guidelines. All these factors are likely to ensure that the GRI guidelines remain the de facto global standard for sustainability reporting for the foreseeable future. A popular myth holds that if you ask the people of Maine for directions they will likely say, You cant get there from here. Well Im with the Maine folks. The rst step in any journey is to fully appreciate your starting point and maybe move to a more advantageous point of departure. Cutting through the complexity of GRI G4 GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS Aspects: the list of specic subjects covered by the G4 Guidelines in each of the Economic, Social and Environmental categories Material Aspects: subjects that reect the organisations signicant economic, environmental and social impacts or that substantively inuence stakeholder decisions and assessments Reporting Content Principles: stakeholder inclusivity, materiality, sustainability context and completeness Reporting Quality Principles: includes balance, clarity and accuracy Disclosures on Management Approach (DMA): explanation of how the organisation is managing its material aspects why its material and how its managed 6 CONTACT US Jeff Sutton Business Development Director jsutton@salterbaxter.com Fay Hogg Head of Reporting fhogg@salterbaxter.com SALTERBAXTER MSLGROUP The Dome, Level 4 Whiteleys Centre 151 Queensway London W2 4YN Tel +44 (0)20 7229 5720 www.salterbaxter.com @salterbaxterMSL With an in-depth knowledge of both corporate and sustainability reporting, we work with some of the worlds leading businesses and brands to deliver powerful, individual reports that people want to engage with. Whether in print or online, we help our clients think through strategic challenges, cut through the complexity of regulation and best practice, and show you solutions that bring your story to life. Below, you will nd a few examples of our recent reporting clients. We work where business strategy, sustainability and creative communications meet, creating strategies and stories for some of the worlds leading businesses and brands. Our aim is to help business perform better; communicate better and deliver better long-term outcomes. We call this Ideas for Better Business. Anglo American BP Allianz GSK M&S Sustainable Development Report 2013 Annual Report 2013 Sustainability Report 2013 A-Z Sustainability Journey Climate Change Report to Society 2013 Annual Report 2013 Corporate Responsibility Report 2013 Plan A Report 2013 OUR CLIENTS Absolut adidas Group Allianz Anglo American ArcelorMittal BP BSkyB BUPA C&A Coca-Cola Enterprises De Beers Diageo Giorgio Armani GlaxoSmithKline H&M Harrods ING Jaguar Land Rover Kering LOral LEGO Group Maersk Group Marks & Spencer Philips Premier League PVH RSA Standard Chartered Toyota Europe Viacom ABOUT SALTERBAXTER MSLGROUP Cutting through the complexity of GRI G4 De Beers
Analysis of Brand Activation and Digital Media On The Existence of Local Product Based On Korean Fashion (Case Study On Online Clothing Byeol - Thebrand)