11.04.14 PC Packet

Planning Commission November 4, 2014 - Page 1
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

COUNCIL CHAMBERS 495 SOUTH MAIN STREET PHONE 229-6011
CITY OF LAS VEGAS INTERNET ADDRESS: www.lasvegasnevada.gov

LAS VEGAS CITY COUNCIL

Mayor Carolyn G. Goodman, (At-Large)
Mayor Pro-Tem Stavros S. Anthony, (Ward 4)
Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian, (Ward 1)
Councilman Steven D. Ross, (Ward 6)
Councilman Ricki Y. Barlow (Ward 5)
Councilman Bob Coffin, (Ward 3)
Councilman Bob Beers, (Ward 2)
City Manager Elizabeth N. Fretwell

COMMISSIONERS

Gus W. Flangas, Chair
Todd L. Moody, Vice Chair
Byron Goynes
Richard Truesdell
Vicki Quinn
Trinity Haven Schlottman
Richard P. Bonar

Facilities are provided throughout City Hall Ior convenience oI persons with disabilities. For meetings held in the
Council Chambers, sound equipment is available Ior persons with hearing impairments. II you need an accommodation
to attend and participate in this meeting, please call the DEPARTMENT DESIGNEE at (702) 229-6301 and advise oI
your need at least 48 hours in advance oI the meeting. Dial 7-1-1 Ior Relay Nevada.

November 4, 2014
6:00 PM

ITEMS MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF THE ORDER PRESENTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIRPERSON. TWO OR
MORE AGENDA ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION MAY BE COMBINED; AND ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA MAY BE
REMOVED OR RELATED DISCUSSION MAY BE DELAYED AT ANY TIME. BACKUP MATERIAL FOR THIS AGENDA
MAY BE OBTAINED FROM CHRYSTAL JACOBS, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, 333 NORTH RANCHO DRIVE, 3
RD

FLOOR, (702)-229-6301 OR ON THE CITY`S WEBPAGE AT www.lasvegasnevada.gov.

NOTICE: This meeting has been properly noticed and posted at the Iollowing locations:

City Hall, 495 South Main Street, 1
st
Floor
Clark County Government Center, 500 South Grand Central Parkway
Grant Sawyer Building, 555 East Washington Avenue
City oI Las Vegas Development Services Center, 333 North Rancho Drive

ACTIONS: ALL ACTIONS EXCEPT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS, REZONINGS AND RELATED CASES
THERETO ARE FINAL UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED BY THE APPLICANT OR AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON, OR A REVIEW IS REQUESTED BY A MEMBER OF THE CITY
COUNCIL WITHIN TEN DAYS AND PAYMENT OF THOSE COSTS SHALL BE MADE UPON
FILING OF THE APPLICATION.

ANY ITEM LISTED IN THIS AGENDA MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF ORDER IF SO REQUESTED
BY THE APPLICANT, STAFF, OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
AGREED TO BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY
IMPOSE TIME LIMITATIONS, AS NECESSARY, ON THOSE PERSONS WISHING TO BE
HEARD ON ANY AGENDAED ITEM.


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RULES OF CONDUCT:

1. StaII will present each item to the Commission in order as shown on the agenda, along with a recommendation and
suggested conditions oI approval, iI appropriate.

2. The applicant is asked to be at the public microphone during the staII presentation. When the staII presentation is
complete, the applicant should state his name and address, and indicate whether or not he accepts staII`s conditions oI
approval.

3. II areas oI concern are known in advance, or iI the applicant does not accept staII`s condition, the applicant or his
representative is invited to make a brieI presentation oI his item with emphasis on any items oI concern.

4. Persons other than the applicant who support the request are invited to make brieI statements aIter the applicant. II
more than one supporter is present, comments should not be repetitive. A representative is welcome to speak and
indicate that he speaks Ior others in the audience who share his view.

5. Objectors to the item will be heard aIter the applicant and any other supporters. All who wish to speak will be heard,
but in the interest oI time it is suggested that representatives be selected who can summarize the views oI any groups
oI interested parties.

6. AIter all objectors` input has been received; the applicant will be invited to respond to any new issues raised.

7. Following the applicant`s response, the public hearing will be closed; Commissioners will discuss the item amongst
themselves, ask any questions they Ieel are appropriate, and proceed to a motion and decision on the matter.

8. Letters, petitions, photographs and other submissions to the Commission will be retained Ior the record. Large maps,
models and other materials may be displayed to the Commission Irom the microphone area, but need not be handed in
Ior the record unless requested by the Commission.

As a courtesy, we would ask those not speaking to be seated and not interrupt the speaker or the Commission. We appreciate
your courtesy and hope you will help us make your visit with the Commission a good and Iair experience.

BUSINESS ITEMS:

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW

3. ROLL CALL

4. PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS ON THE
AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR
THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE
SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

5. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
OF OCTOBER 14, 2014

6. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any Items Irom the Planning Commission, staII and/or the applicant wish to be stricken or
held in abeyance to a Iuture meeting may be brought Iorward and acted upon at this time.

CONSENT ITEMS:

CONSENT ITEMS ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND MAY BE ENACTED BY ONE
MOTION. HOWEVER, ANY ITEM MAY BE DISCUSSED IF A COMMISSION MEMBER OR APPLICANT SO DESIRES.


ONE MOTION - ONE VOTE

THE FOLLOWING ARE ITEMS THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED IN ONE MOTION/ONE VOTE. THEY ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE NON-PUBLIC AND PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS AND NON-PUBLIC HEARINGS
WILL BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. ANY PERSON REPRESENTING AN APPLICATION OR A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC
OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH THE CONDITIONS AND ALL
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR THE APPLICATION RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, SHOULD REQUEST TO HAVE
THAT ITEM REMOVED FROM THIS PART OF THE AGENDA.

7. TMP-55901 - TENTATIVE MAP - THE ROYALE (A COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION) - APPLICANT: BARNET
LIBERMAN - OWNER: LEAH PROPERTY, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Tentative Map FOR A
ONE-LOT COMMERCIAL MERGER AND RESUBDIVISION on 0.64 acres at the northeast corner oI Coolidge Avenue
and Casino Center Boulevard (APNs 139-34-410-056 through 059), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin)
|PRJ-55848|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

8. SUP-55880 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: VEGAS MARKET & LIQUOR -
OWNER: FRIENDLY BEAR PLAZA, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED 3,600 SQUARE-FOOT RETAIL ESTABLISHMENT WITH ACCESSORY PACKAGE LIQUOR OFF-
SALE USE WITHIN A PROPOSED GENERAL RETAIL STORE, OTHER THAN LISTED at 861 North Nellis
Boulevard, Suite #2 (APN 140-29-716-003), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin). StaII recommends
APPROVAL.

9. SUP-56127 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: EL SUPER, INC. - OWNER:
MLCFC 2006-4 SAHARA RETAIL, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A RETAIL
ESTABLISHMENT WITH ACCESSORY PACKAGE LIQUOR OFF-SALE USE WITHIN AN EXISTING 52,336
SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL RETAIL STORE, OTHER THAN LISTED at 4610 West Sahara Avenue (APN 162-06-
402-001), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-55893|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

10. SUP-56133 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: VETERANS VILLAGE THRIFT
STORE - OWNER: DIVERSIFIED INVESTMENTS LAS VEGAS, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a
Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 7,500 SQUARE-FOOT THRIFT SHOP USE at 6121 West Lake Mead
Boulevard, Suites #140 through #165 (APN 138-23-719-009), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow). StaII
recommends APPROVAL.

11. SUP-56135 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: 7 MARES - OWNER: RZMZ
FAMILY, LLC - SERIES 3 - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 2,770
SQUARE-FOOT BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE ESTABLISHMENT WITHIN AN EXISTING RESTAURANT at
2000 East Charleston Boulevard (APN 162-02-512-008) C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-56108|.
StaII recommends APPROVAL.

12. SUP-56138 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SOFIA'S RESTAURANT, LLC -
OWNER: 1EANNY THU HUYNH - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED
BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE ESTABLISHMENT WITHIN AN EXISTING 2,951 SQUARE-FOOT
RESTAURANT at 821 North Lamb Boulevard, Suite #1 (APN 140-29-301-010), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward
3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-55872|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

13. SUP-56149 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TCB LAS VEGAS, LLC - OWNER:
A1L PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED NIGHTCLUB
at 6750 West Sahara Avenue (APN 163-02-415-012), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-54092|.

14. SUP-56166 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: WING NUTZ - OWNER: SHADOW
MOUNTAIN MARKET PLACE, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use permit FOR A PROPOSED
2,021 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT WITH ALCOHOL USE WITH A 1,130 SQUARE-FOOT OUTDOOR
SEATING AREA at 6485 North Decatur Boulevard, Suite #190 (APN 125-24-811-003), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone,
Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-56140|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.


15. SDR-56111 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: UNIVERSAL
LAUNDRY'S & LINENS - OWNER: LINCOLN CENTER PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request
Ior a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 440 SQUARE-FOOT DETACHED MODULAR BUILDING
on 2.24 acres at 240 Spectrum Boulevard (APN 139-36-710-021), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-55050|.

16. SDR-56141 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SAHARA
EXECUTIVE PARK, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Major Amendment to an approved Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-18693) FOR A PROPOSED 4,295 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT (WITH DRIVE-THROUGH)
WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW NO LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST PERIMETERS
WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on approximately 0.91 acres at the northwest corner oI Sahara Avenue and
RichIield Boulevard (APN 162-05-403-005), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-55734|. StaII

17. SDR-56176 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CITRA REAL
ESTATE CAPITAL - OWNER: CITY PARKWAY V, INC. - For possible action on a request Ior a Major Amendment
oI an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-53067) FOR A PROPOSED TWO-BUILDING, 197-FOOT TALL,
379,202 SQUARE-FOOT MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF A 111,987 SQUARE-FOOT
CONVALESCENT CARE FACILITY, AN 84-UNIT ASSISTED LIVING APARTMENT COMPLEX, A 32-UNIT
HIGH-RISE HOUSING APARTMENT COMPLEX, GENERAL RETAIL SPACE, OFFICE SPACE AND A FIVE-
LEVEL PARKING FACILITY, WITH WAIVERS OF SYMPHONY PARK STREETSCAPE STANDARDS on 3.30
acres at the southeast corner oI City Parkway and Clark Avenue (a portion oI APN 139-34-211-003), PD (Planned
Development) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-56071|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

18. MSP-56105 - MASTER SIGN PLAN - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BONEFISH GRILL, LLC - OWNER:
MICAH 6:8 HOLDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - For possible action on a request Ior an amendment to a
previously approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-2858) TO ADD ONE FREESTANDING SIGN on 8.24 acres at the southeast
corner oI Charleston Boulevard and Odette Lane (APN 163-05-502-001), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 2
(Beers) |PRJ-55794|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

19. VAC-56124 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES
OF NEVADA, INC. - For possible action on a request Ior a Petition to Vacate a portion oI a nine-Ioot wide City oI Las
Vegas Equestrian Trail Easement generally located at the northeast corner oI Iron Mountain Road and Nolene Stream
Street, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-56104|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

20. VAC-56131 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GREYSTONE NEVADA, LLC - For
possible action on a request Ior a Petition to Vacate a 30-Ioot portion oI RuIIian Road between Centennial Parkway and
Regina Avenue and to Vacate U.S. government patent easements generally located south oI Centennial Parkway on both
sides oI Hualapai Way, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-55864|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

21. VAC-56147 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GREYSTONE NEVADA, LLC - For
possible action on a request Ior a Petition to Vacate U.S. government patent easements generally located on the south side
oI Centennial Parkway at Conquistador Street, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-55851|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

22. VAC-56260 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - OWNER:
RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES OF NEVADA, INC. - For possible action on a request Ior a Petition to Vacate all
existing public inIrastructure easements within Common Lot 'A' and a 10-Ioot public pedestrian access easement generally
located immediately east oI the eastern right-oI-way line oI Leon Avenue, north oI Iron Mountain Road, Ward 6 (Ross)

PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

23. ABEYANCE - SUP-55390 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: EARL M
MORIMOTO TRUST - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED OFF-PREMISE
SIGN at 3838 Meadows Lane (APN 139-31-510-021), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-55084|.
StaII recommends DENIAL.


24. ABEYANCE - SUP-55677 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ACE LOAN
COMPANY - OWNER: B F TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PAWN
SHOP WITHIN AN EXISTING 1,651 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A
50-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 200 FEET IS REQUIRED AND 920
FEET FROM A SIMILAR USE WHERE 1,000 FEET IS REQUIRED at 519 East St. Louis Avenue (APN 162-03-311-
017), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-55676|. StaII recommends DENIAL.

25. ABEYANCE - SUP-55682 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: THREE
TWENTY TWO, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 2,467 SQUARE-
FOOT LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT (TAVERN) WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 130-FOOT DISTANCE
SEPARATION FROM A LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT (TAVERN) AND A 1,200-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION
FROM A CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP WHERE 1,500 FEET IS THE MINIMUM DISTANCE SEPARATION
REQUIRED at 322 Fremont Street (APN 139-34-510-026), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-
55576|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

26. ABEYANCE - SUP-55786 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT HOUSE OF
BARGAINS - OWNER: DUCK HORN, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED 5,950 SQUARE-FOOT THRIFT SHOP USE at 4000 West Sahara Avenue (APN 162-06-812-002), C-1
(Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-55655|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

27. MOD-55735 - MA1OR MODIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BRENTWOOD CAPITAL
PARTNERS - OWNER: 1AMES R MARSH - For possible action on a request Ior a Major ModiIication oI the Town
Center Land Use Plan to Amend the Special Land Use Designation FROM: GC-TC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL -
TOWN CENTER) TO: EC-TC (EMPLOYMENT CENTER MIXED USE - TOWN CENTER) on 1.89 acres on the west
side oI Durango Drive, approximately 335 Ieet south oI Deer Springs Way (APN 125-20-301-028), Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-
54989|. StaII recommends DENIAL.

28. SDR-55737 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO MOD-55735 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: BRENTWOOD CAPITAL PARTNERS - OWNER: 1AMES R MARSH - For possible action on a
request Ior a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 17,158 SQUARE-FOOT THRIFT SHOP WITH
WAIVERS OF THE TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO ALLOW THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO
BE LOCATED AWAY FROM RIGHTS-OF-WAY WHERE 60 PERCENT OF THE BUILDING IS TO BE PLACED
AT THE BUILD-TO LINE on 1.89 acres on the west side oI Durango Drive, approximately 335 Ieet south oI Deer
Springs Way (APN 125-20-301-028), T-C (Town Center) Zone |GC-TC (General Commercial - Town Center) Special
Land Use Designation| |PROPOSED: EC-TC (Employment Center Mixed Use - Town Center)|, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-

29. ZON-56153 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: MCNICOLL INVESTMENTS, LTD. - OWNER:
DRS ESTATE, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Rezoning FROM: N-S (NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES)
TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 2.63 acres at 7395 Smoke Ranch Road (APN 138-22-102-004), N-S
(Neighborhood Service) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-55788|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

30. VAR-56152 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-56153 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: MCNICOLL
INVESTMENTS LTD. - OWNER: DRS ESTATE, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Variance TO ALLOW
A 41-FOOT SIDE SETBACK WHERE RESIDENTIAL ADJACENY STANDARDS REQUIRE A 49.5-FOOT
SETBACK FOR A PROPOSED CONVALESCENT CARE FACILITY/NURSING HOME on 2.63 acres at 7395 Smoke
Ranch Road (APN 138-22-102-004), N-S (Neighborhood Service) Zone |Proposed: C-1 (Limited Commercial)|, Ward 4
(Anthony) |PRJ-55788|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

31. SDR-56150 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-56153 AND VAR-56152 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: MCNICOLL INVESTMENTS, LTD. - OWNER: DRS ESTATE, LLC - For possible
action on a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 32,984 SQUARE-FOOT
CONVALESCENT CARE FACILITY/NURSING HOME WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT
LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE NORTHERN PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY WHERE
EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on 2.63 acres at 7395 Smoke Ranch Road (APN 138-22-102-004), N-S (Neighborhood
Service) Zone |Proposed: C-1 (Limited Commercial)|, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-55788|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.


32. VAR-56142 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: 1ULIE CONTRERAS - For possible
action on a request Ior a Variance TO ALLOW 21 PARKING SPACES WHERE 23 PARKING SPACES ARE
REQUIRED at 1585 North Decatur Boulevard (APN 138-25-503-004), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 5
(Barlow) |PRJ-56036|. StaII recommends DENIAL.

33. SDR-56145 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-56142 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: 1ULIE CONTRERAS - For possible action on a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review
FOR THE RESTRIPING, FENCING AND TRASH ENCLOSURE MOVEMENT WITHIN THE SITE FOR AN
EXISTING 5,100 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH AN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW A TRASH
ENCLOSURE ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY at 1585 North Decatur Boulevard (APN 138-25-503-004), C-1
(Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-56036|. StaII recommends DENIAL.

34. VAR-56129 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CSN HOLDINGS, LLC - OWNER: SDF
PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request Ior a Variance TO ALLOW 278 PARKING SPACES
WHERE 299 SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 4.1 acres at 9010-9080 West Cheyenne Avenue (APNs 138-08-417-003,
006, 008, 010, 011, 012 and 018 through 022), O (OIIice) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-54542|. StaII recommends
DENIAL.

35. SUP-56134 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: RODNEY ATAMIAN - OWNER:
SUNSTONE BUFFALO, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR AN ALTERNATIVE
PARKING ANALYSIS TO ALLOW ZERO ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES WHERE 32 ADDITIONAL SPACES
ARE REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED GENERAL PERSONAL SERVICE USE (NAIL SALON) at 2400 North BuIIalo
Drive, Suite #130 (APN 138-15-402-001), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-55975|. StaII
recommends DENIAL.

36. SDR-56167 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LV ASSET
HOLDINGS, LTD. - OWNER: HUGH H. TOLOUI - For possible action on a request Ior a Site Development Plan
Review FOR A PROPOSED 6,100 SQUARE-FOOT CAR WASH, FULL SERVICE OR AUTO DETAILING WITH
WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE WHERE
EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED AND ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE
WHERE FIFTEEN FEET IS REQUIRED on 1.36 acres at the northeast corner oI Joann Way and Cheyenne Avenue
(APN 138-12-801-016), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-56033|. StaII recommends DENIAL.

37. SDR-56172 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CARLOS ADLEY -
OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review FOR A
PROPOSED 20-STORY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING 84,942 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL
SPACE, 162 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND A 171 SPACE PARKING GARAGE on 1.23 acres at 601 Fremont Street
(APN 139-34-611-018), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-56112|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS:

38. DIR-56334 - DIRECTORS BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS -
For possible action on a request to approve the 2015 Planning Commission Meeting schedule. StaII recommends
APPROVAL.

CITIZENS PARTICIPATION:

39. CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE
LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAY
BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS
SCHEDULED FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME
FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT
OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

Agenda tem No.: 1.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: NOVEMBER 4, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING

SUB1ECT:
CALL TO ORDER

Agenda tem No.: 2.


SUB1ECT:
ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW

Agenda tem No.: 3.


SUB1ECT:
ROLL CALL

Agenda tem No.: 4.


SUB1ECT:
PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO
MATTERS ON THE AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO
THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF
DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS
ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

Agenda tem No.: 5.


SUB1ECT:
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER 14, 2014

Agenda tem No.: 6.

DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any items Irom the Planning Commission, staII and/or the
applicant wish to be stricken or held in abeyance to a Iuture meeting may be brought Iorward and
acted upon at this time.

Agenda tem No.: 7.


SUB1ECT:
TMP-55901 - TENTATIVE MAP - THE ROYALE (A COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION) -
APPLICANT: BARNET LIBERMAN - OWNER: LEAH PROPERTY, LLC - For possible
action on a request Ior a Tentative Map FOR A ONE-LOT COMMERCIAL MERGER AND
RESUBDIVISION on 0.64 acres at the northeast corner oI Coolidge Avenue and Casino Center
Boulevard (APNs 139-34-410-056 through 059), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3
(CoIIin) |PRJ-55848|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 12/17/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 7 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photos
5. JustiIication Letter
6. Abeyance Request Letter Irom APTUS Architecture

TMP-55901 PR1-55848]
SS

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 4, 2014
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: BARNET LIBERMAN - OWNER: LEAH
PROPERTY, LLC

`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``

CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
TMP-55901 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

`` CONDITIONS ``

IMF-5501 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. Approval oI the Tentative Map shall be Ior no more than Iour (4) years. II a Final Map is
not recorded on all or a portion oI the area embraced by the Tentative Map with Iour (4)
years oI the approval oI the Tentative Map, this action is void.

2. All development shall conIorm to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-55716).

3. The Final Map shall contain a note granting perpetual common access and parking across
the entire subdivision.

4. A Iully operational Iire protection system, including Iire apparatus roads, Iire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be Iunctioning prior to construction oI any
combustible structures.
TMP-55901 PR1-55848]
SS

Conditions Page Two
November 4, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting

5. In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation oI the subject common-interest
community, and prior to recordation oI the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions
('CC&R), or conveyance oI any unit within the community, the Developer is required to
record a Declaration oI Private Maintenance Requirements ('DPMR) as a covenant on
all associated properties, and on behalI oI all current and Iuture property owners. The
DPMR is to include a listing oI all privately owned and/or maintained inIrastructure
improvements, along with assignment oI maintenance responsibility Ior each to the
common interest community or the respective individual property owners, and is to
provide a brieI description oI the required level oI maintenance Ior privately maintained
components. The DPMR must be reviewed and approved by the City oI Las Vegas
Department oI Field Operations prior to recordation, and must include a statement that all
properties within the community are subject to assessment Ior all associated costs should
private maintenance obligations not be met, and the City oI Las Vegas be required to
provide Ior said maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to include a statement oI obligation oI
compliance with the DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to submit copies oI
the recorded DPMR and CC&R documents to the City oI Las Vegas Department oI Field
Operations.

6. All development is subject to the conditions oI City Departments and State Subdivision
Statutes.

Public Works

7. The onsite sewer shall be private and per Title 19.16.060.W. 2, sewer service Ior this
commercial subdivision shall be shown in accordance with one oI the Iollowing three
alternatives, and the appropriate note shall appear on the Iace oI the recorded Final Map:
I. Onsite sewers, 8 inches in diameter or larger, are public sewers where
located within 20-Ioot wide dedicated public sewer easements.
II. Onsite sewers are a common element privately owned and maintained per
the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) oI this commercial
subdivision.
III. Onsite sewers are a common element privately owned and maintained per
the Joint Use Agreement oI this commercial subdivision.

8. Site development to comply with all applicable conditions oI approval Ior SDR-55716
and all other applicable site-related actions.
TMP-55901 PR1-55848]
SS

Conditions Page Three

9. The approval oI all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative Map is
in concept only. SpeciIic design and construction details relating to size, type and/or
alignment oI improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer and drainage
improvements, shall be resolved prior to approval oI the construction plans by the City.
No deviations Irom adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless speciIic written
approval Ior such is received Irom the City Engineer prior to the recordation oI a Final
Map or the approval oI subdivision related construction plans, whichever may occur Iirst.
Approval oI this Tentative Map does not constitute approval oI any deviations. II such
approval cannot be obtained, a revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing
elimination oI such deviations.

TMP-55901 PR1-55848]
SS
Staff Report Page One

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is proposing to map the approved mixed-use development at the northeast corner
oI Coolidge Avenue and Casino Center Boulevard to allow Ior ground Iloor retail, oIIice on the
second story and residential units Ior rent on the remaining levels. Currently the site consists oI
eight narrow-width lots under single ownership. Mapping the site as a commercial subdivision
will give the applicant Ilexibility to sell oII portions oI the site and delineate ownership through
Iuture records oI survey. StaII recommends approval with conditions. II denied, the property
must remain under single ownership or some other mapping method must be used to combine the
existing lots.

ISSUES

A mapping action is necessary to consolidate the existing legal lots underlying the subject
site prior to issuance oI building permits; this was also a condition oI approval oI the
associated Site Development Plan Review (SDR-55716).

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.
04/19/06
The City Council approved an amendment to the Master Plan oI Streets and
Highways (MSH-11632) to include the Casino Center Boulevard/Third Street
Connector as an 80-Ioot Secondary Collector. The Planning Commission and
staII recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-41599) Ior a proposed
Mixed-Use Development on 0.64 acres at the northeast corner oI Casino
Center Boulevard and Coolidge Avenue. The Planning Commission and staII
recommended denial.
09/07/11
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-41829)
Ior a proposed 16-story mixed-use development, including 16,000 square Ieet
oI commercial space and 330 multi-Iamily residential units, and a Waiver oI
the Downtown Centennial Plan Streetscape Standards on 0.64 acres at the
northeast corner oI Casino Center Boulevard and Coolidge Avenue. The
Planning Commission and staII recommended denial.
11/19/14
The City Council will hear a request Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-55715)
Ior a proposed Mixed-Use Development at the northeast corner oI Casino
Center Boulevard and Coolidge Avenue. The Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval.
TMP-55901 PR1-55848]
SS
Staff Report Page Three


The City Council will hear a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-55716) Ior a proposed 17-story mixed-use development, including
34,500 square Ieet oI commercial space and 281 multi-Iamily residential
units, on 0.64 acres at the northeast corner oI Casino Center Boulevard and
Coolidge Avenue. The Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.

Most Recent Change of Ownership
11/07/06 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
01/04/96
A building permit (#96000299) was issued Ior demolition oI a building at 927
South Casino Center Boulevard. A Iinal inspection was not completed and the
permit expired 07/06/96.
05/13/99
A building permit (#99009154) was issued Ior demolition oI a shed/building
at 923 South Casino Center Boulevard. A Iinal inspection was not completed
and the permit expired on 11/13/99.
permit expired on 07/24/04.
01/23/04

Pre-Application Meeting
08/28/14
The applicant and staII discussed options Ior mapping the site, ultimately
deciding on a commercial subdivision. Because the site is being redeveloped
Irom an earlier at-grade development, the requirement Ior cross-sections
across the property will be waived.

Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.
TMP-55901 PR1-55848]
SS

Staff Report Page Four

Field Check
10/06/14
The site is vacant, with the exception oI several boarded up residential
structures at the corner oI Coolidge Avenue and Casino Center Boulevard.

Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 0.64

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
General Retail Store
Subject Property
Undeveloped
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
North
Multi-Family
Residential
(Apartments)
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
South Undeveloped MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
Undeveloped
OIIice
C-2 (General
Commercial)
East
Multi-Family
Residential
(Apartments)
MXU (Mixed Use)

R-4 (High Density
Residential) under
Resolution oI Intent to C-
2 (General Commercial)
Undeveloped
OIIice
C-2 (General
Commercial)
West
Multi-Family
Residential
(Apartments)
MXU (Mixed Use)
R-4 (High Density
Residential) under
Resolution oI Intent to C-
2 (General Commercial)

Master Plan Areas Compliance
Downtown Centennial Plan Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District Y
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (200 Feet portion) Y
Live/Work Overlay District N/A
TMP-55901 PR1-55848]
SS
Staff Report Page Five

Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to the Downtown Centennial Plan and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-5571),
the following standards apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size N/A 27,998 SF N/A
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 140 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
Front (Coolidge Ave)
Side
Corner (Casino Center Blvd)
Rear
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
Max. Building Height N/A 200 Feet Y

Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Casino Center
Boulevard
Major Collector
Master Plan oI Streets
and Highways Map
80 Y
Coolidge Avenue N/A N/A 80 N/A

ANALYSIS

The proposed development is subject to Downtown Centennial Plan standards, and pursuant to
Section VIII.A oI the Plan, qualiIies as a New Development. The project has three components:
a retail/commercial area on the ground Iloor; an oIIice/commercial area on the second Iloor; and
Ior rent-only residential units on all Iloors above the second Iloor. Mapping as a commercial
subdivision will give the applicant Ilexibility to sell oII portions oI the site and delineate
ownership through Iuture records oI survey.

StaII notes that no north/south/east/west cross sections are shown with this Tentative Map
submittal. However, due to the nature oI the proposed site, staII recognizes that the site is
relatively Ilat and that there will probably be no retaining walls constructed.
TMP-55901 PR1-55848]
SS

Staff Report Page Six

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 30

NOTICES MAILED N/A
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL INTEREST
Case Number: APN :
Name of Property Owner:
Name of Applicant
Name of Representative:
To the best of your knowledge, does the Mayor or any member of the City Council or
Planning Commission have any financial interest in this or any other property with the
property owner, applicant, the property owner or general or limited partners, or
an officer of their corporation or limited liability company?
If yes, please indicate the member of the City Council or Commission who is
involved and list the of the person or persons with whom the City Official holds
an interest. Also list the Assessor's Parcel Number if the property in which the interest is
held is different the case parcel.
City Official:
APN:
Signature of Property Owner:
Subscribed and sworn before me
Notary Public in and for County and State
KASYANCHUK
NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW
No.
In
September
Revised - 14-06 of Financial
September
of Financial
09/08/14
PRJ-55848
TMP-55901
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 1 of 2 9/8/2014 3:45:35 PM
Applicant Email: barnetlib1@gmail.com
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: Neuman
Rep First Name: Kristen
Applicant State: New York
Applicant Phone: (212)243-1320
Applicant Zip: 10014
Rep Address: 1200 S. 4th Street, Ste 206
Rep Email: kristen@aptusgroup.com
Rep Fax: (702) 839-1213
Rep State: Nevada
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: (702) 839-1200
Rep Zip: 89104
Assessors Parcel #(s): 13934410056, 13934410057, 13934410058, 13934410059
Project Name THE ROYALE
Is the Application Information
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 1 (LOIS TARKANIAN), WARD 3 (BOB COFFIN), WARD 5 (RICKI Y. BARLOW)
Application Number: PRJ-55848
Applicant City: New York
ProjectAddress (Location): NORTHEAST CORNER COOLIDGE AVE AND CASINO CENTER BLVD
Application/Petition For: Tentative Map for one-lot merger and resubdivision commercial subdivision
If no, ...change what
Applicant First Name: Barnet
Additional Information:
Applicant Address: 421 Hudson Street
Applicant Last Name: Liberman
Zoning District: Proposed: Select
General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres: .64
09/08/14
PRJ-55848
TMP-55901
Page 2 of 2 9/8/2014 3:45:35 PM
Is the Owner Information Correct: No
If no, ...change what 421 Hudson Street
! certify that ! am the applicant and
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. ! understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be re]ected. !
further certify that ! am the owner
or purchaser or option holder of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
! Accept:
Yes
LEAH PROPERTY L L C 801 MADISON AVE 4TH FLR NEW YORK, NY 10065
Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2
Kristen Neuman APTUS Project Architect kristen@aptusgroup.com
CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email
09/08/14
PRJ-55848
TMP-55901
S
2 7 4 0 2 0 " W
4 8 0 . 2 8
C
A
S
I N
O
C
E
N
T
E
R
B
L V
D
.
N
6
2

1
9
5
8
" W
3
7
9
. 9
5

N
2 7 3 9 5 4 " E 4 8 0 . 3 1
S
6
2

1
9
4
2
" E
3
8
0
. 0
1
H
O
O
V
E
R
A
V
E
.
T
H
I R
D
S
T
R
E
E
T
C
O
O
L
ID
G
E
A
V
E
.
L
O
T
1
2
7
,9
9
8
.1
S
Q
F
T
0
.6
4
A
C
R
E
S

N
2 7 4 0 2 0 " E 1 9 0 . 1 4
S
6
2
1
9
5
0
" E
1
3
9
. 9
9

S 2 7 4 0 0 7 " W
2 0 0 . 1 5
N
6
2
1
9
4
2
" W
1
3
0
.0
0

L
=
1
5
.7
1
'
R
=
1
0
.0
0
'
=
9
0
0
0
0
2
"
A
L L E
Y

IN
V
. (S
W
) =
2
0
1
3
.7
1
IN
V
. (N
E
) =
2
0
1
3
.4
6

C
O
O
L
ID
G
E
A
V
E
F
A
C
IN
G
W
E
S
T

A
L
L
E
Y
F
A
C
IN
G
N
O
R
T
H

8
0
.0
0

2
5
.0
0

1
5
.0
0

2
5
.0
0

1
5
.0
0
2
0
.0
0
2
" A
C
4
" T
Y
P
E
II A
B
6
" T
Y
P
E
I A
B

4
' C
O
N
C
.
V
A
L
L
E
Y
G
U
T
T
E
R
L
C
U
R
B
S
E
E
S
T
D
. 2
1
6
4
'
S
ID
E
W
A
L
K

U
N
P
A
V
E
D
A
R
E
A
A
C
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
. C
A
S
IN
O
C
E
N
T
E
R

B
L
V
D
.
F
A
C
IN
G
N
O
R
T
H

8
0
.0
0

4
'
S
ID
E
W
A
L
K
U
N
P
A
V
E
D
A
R
E
A
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
D

IS
L
A
N
D

1
5
.0
0

1
9
.0
0

1
2
.0
0

1
2
.0
0

7
.0
0

1
5
.0
0

L
C
U
R
B
S
E
E
S
T
D
. 2
1
6
L
C
U
R
B
S
E
E
S
T
D
. 2
1
6
S U B J E C T P A R C E L S U B J E C T P A R C E L
S U B J E C T P A R C E L
C
A
L
L
B
E
F
O
R
E
1
-
7
0
2
-
5
9
3
-
6
1
1
1
Y
O
U
D
O
O
V
E
R
H
E
A
D
C
a
l
l

b
e
f
o
r
e

y
o
u

D

g

C
a
l
l

1
-
8
0
0
-
2
2
7
-
2
6
0
0

1
-
7
0
2
-
2
2
9
-
6
6
1
1
1
-
7
0
2
-
4
5
5
-
7
5
1
1
C
a
l
l

d
o

u
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
E
N
G
IN
E
E
R
C
T E N T A T I V E M A P
C
O
V
E
R
S
H
E
E
T
T
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E

M
A
P
9 3 1 S . C a s i n o C e n t e r B l v d .
T h e R o y a l e
A C o m m e r c i a l C o n d o m i n i u m S u b d i v i s i o n
L A S V E G A S , N E V A D A 8 9 1 0 1
T
M
-
1
1
4
-5
3
0

S
O
U
T
H
2
7
4
0
2
0
"
W
E
S
T
,B
E
IN
G
B
E
A
R
IN
G
O
F
T
H
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
IN
E
O
F
C
A
S
IN
O
C
E
N
T
E
R

B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
B
E
T
W
E
E
N
C
O
O
L
ID
G
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
A
N
D
H
O
O
V
E
R
A
V
E
N
U
E
A
S
S
H
O
W
N
IN
F
IL
E
1
8
5
,
P
A
G
E
6
1
O
F
S
U
R
V
E
Y
S
O
N
F
IL
E
IN
T
H
E
C
L
A
R
K
C
O
U
N
T
Y
, N
E
V
A
D
A
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
R
'S
O
F
F
IC
E
.
B
A
S
I
S

O
F

B
E
A
R
I
N
G
S
C
IT
Y
O
F
L
A
S
V
E
G
A
S
B
E
N
C
H
M
A
R
K
B
E
N
C
H
M
A
R
K
N
o
. C
H
A
S
3
R
IV
E
T
A
N
D
P
L
A
T
E
IN
T
H
E
T
O
P
O
F
C
U
R
B
A
T
T
H
E
N
O
R
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
O
F
3
r
d
S
T
R
E
E
T
A
N
D
C
H
A
R
L
E
S
T
O
N
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
.
N
A
V
D
8
8
E
L
E
V
A
T
IO
N
: 6
1
7
.4
9
5
M
E
T
E
R
S
(
2
0
2
5
.9
0
F
E
E
T
)
N
O
R
T
H
A
M
E
R
IC
A
N
D
A
T
U
M
1
9
8
8

B
E
N
C
H
M
A
R
K
T
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E

M
A
P

O
F
t
h
e

R
o
y
a
l
e
9
3
1

S
.

C
a
s
i
n
o

C
e
n
t
e
r

B
l
v
d
.
(
A

C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L

C
O
N
D
O
M
I
N
I
U
M

S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
)
B
E
I
N
G

A
L
L

O
F

L
O
T
S

N
I
N
E

(
9
)

T
H
R
O
U
G
H

S
I
X
T
E
E
N

(
1
6
)

I
N

B
L
O
C
K

T
H
I
R
T
E
E
N

(
1
3
)

O
F
T
H
E

S
O
U
T
H

A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N

T
O

T
H
E

C
I
T
Y

O
F

L
A
S

V
E
G
A
S
,

A
S

S
H
O
W
N

B
Y

M
A
P

T
H
E
R
E
O
F

O
N

F
I
L
E
I
N

B
O
O
K

1

O
F

P
L
A
T
S
,

P
A
G
E

5
1
,

I
N

T
H
E

O
F
F
I
C
E

O
F

T
H
E

C
O
U
N
T
Y

R
E
C
O
R
D
E
R

O
F

C
L
A
R
K

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
E
V
A
D
A
E
X
C
E
P
T
I
N
G

T
H
E
R
E
F
R
O
M

T
H
A
T

P
O
R
T
I
O
N

O
F

S
A
I
D

L
A
N
D

A
S

C
O
N
V
E
Y
E
D

T
O

T
H
E

C
I
T
Y

O
F

L
A
S

V
E
G
A
S

B
Y
D
E
E
D

R
E
C
O
R
D
E
D

S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R

2
2
,

1
9
8
3
,

I
N

B
O
O
K

1
8
0
8

A
S

D
O
C
U
M
E
N
T

N
O
.

1
7
6
7
2
8
6
I
N
D
E
X

M
A
P
(
1
"

=

1
0
0
'
)
F
E
D
E
R
A
L

E
M
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

A
G
E
N
C
Y

F
L
O
O
D

IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E

R
A
T
E

M
A
P
C
O
M
M
U
N
IT
Y
P
A
N
E
L
3
2
0
0
3
C
2
1
7
0
F
, R
E
V
IS
E
D
O
N
N
O
V
E
M
B
E
R
1
6
, 2
0
1
1
IN
D
IC
A
T
E
D
T
H
A
T
T
H
E
S
U
B
J
E
C
T
S
IT
E
L
IE
S
W
IT
H
IN
U
N
S
H
A
D
E
D
Z
O
N
E
"
X
"
. A
R
E
A
S
D
E
T
E
R
M
IN
E
D
T
O
B
E
O
U
T
S
ID
E
T
H
E
0
.2
%
A
N
N
U
A
L
C
H
A
N
C
E
F
L
O
O
D
P
L
A
IN
.
F
L
O
O
D
P
L
A
I
N

I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
W
A
T
E
R
:
L
A
S
V
E
G
A
S
V
A
L
L
E
Y
W
A
T
E
R
D
IS
T
R
IC
T
1
0
0
1
V
A
L
L
E
Y
V
IE
W
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
(
7
0
2
)
8
7
0
-
2
0
1
1
S
E
W
E
R
:
C
L
A
R
K
C
O
U
N
T
Y
W
A
T
E
R
R
E
C
L
A
M
A
T
IO
N
D
IS
T
R
IC
T
5
8
5
7
E
. F
L
A
M
IN
G
O
R
O
A
D
(
7
0
2
)
4
3
4
-
6
6
0
0
E
L
E
C
T
R
IC
A
L
:
N
V
E
N
E
R
G
Y
6
2
2
6
W
E
S
T
S
A
H
A
R
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
(
7
0
2
)
3
6
7
-
5
0
0
0

G
A
S
:
S
O
U
T
H
W
E
S
T
G
A
S
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
IO
N
4
3
0
0
W
E
S
T
T
R
O
P
IC
A
N
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
(
7
0
2
)
3
6
5
-
1
1
0
0
T
E
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
C
E
N
T
U
R
Y
L
IN
K
2
3
4
0
E
a
s
t T
r
o
p
ic
a
n
a
L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
, N
V
8
9
1
1
9
S
O
L
ID
W
A
S
T
E
:
R
E
P
U
B
L
IC
S
E
R
V
IC
E
S
7
7
0
W
E
S
T
S
A
H
A
R
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
(
7
0
2
)
7
3
5
-
5
1
5
1
C
A
B
L
E
T
V
:
C
O
X
C
O
M
M
U
N
IC
A
T
IO
N
S
1
2
1
M
A
R
T
IN
L
U
T
H
E
R
K
IN
G
B
L
V
D
.
(
7
0
2
)
3
8
3
-
4
0
0
0
U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S

A
P
N
1
3
9
-
3
4
-
4
1
0
-
0
5
6
, 0
5
7
, 0
5
8
, &
0
5
9
C
U
R
R
E
N
T
Z
O
N
IN
G
:
C
-
2
(
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
IA
L
)
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
P
L
A
N
D
E
S
IG
:
M
IX
E
D
U
S
E
(
D
O
W
N
T
O
W
N
L
A
N
D
-
U
S
E
)
O
V
E
R
L
A
Y
Z
O
N
E
S
:
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
IA
L
P
L
A
N
/ A
R
T
S
D
IS
T
R
IC
T
S
IT
E
A
R
E
A
:
2
7
,9
9
8
S
F
0
.6
4
A
C
R
E
S
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
S
(
B
L
D
G
)
:
R
E
Q
'D

P
R
O
V
ID
E
D
F
R
O
N
T
:
0
'-
0
"

0
'-
0
"
IN
T
E
R
IO
R
S
ID
E
:
0
'-
0
"

0
'-
0
"
S
ID
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
:
0
'-
0
"

0
'-
0
"
R
E
A
R
:
0
'-
0
"

0
'-
0
"
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
IA
L
S
P
A
C
E
:
1
4
,1
8
1
S
F
O
F
F
IC
E
S
P
A
C
E
:
1
9
,1
6
0
S
F
R
E
S
ID
E
N
T
A
IL
:
2
6
3
U
N
IT
S
P
A
R
K
IN
G
S
P
A
C
E
S
:
4
3
8
Z
O
N
I
N
G

I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
C
R
O
S
S

S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
(
1
"

=

1
0
'
)
O
W
N
E
R
:
L
E
A
H
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
, L
L
C
4
2
1
H
U
D
S
O
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
N
E
W
Y
O
R
K
, N
Y
1
0
0
1
4
(
2
1
2
)
2
4
3
-
1
3
2
0
B
A
R
N
E
T
L
IB
E
R
M
A
N
A
R
C
H
IT
E
C
T
:
A
P
T
U
S
G
R
O
U
P
1
2
0
0
S
O
U
T
H
4
T
H
S
T
L
A
S
V
E
G
A
S
, N
V
8
9
1
0
4
S
U
IT
E
1
0
8
(
7
0
2
)
8
3
9
-
1
2
0
0
S
U
R
V
E
Y
O
R
:
H
E
R
IT
A
G
E
S
U
R
V
E
Y
IN
G
1
8
9
5
V
IL
L
A
G
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
C
IR
C
L
E
L
A
S
V
E
G
A
S
, N
V
8
9
1
3
4
(
7
0
2
)
4
7
4
-
6
2
7
7
C
IV
IL
E
N
G
IN
E
E
R
: A
P
T
U
S
G
R
O
U
P
1
2
0
0
S
O
U
T
H
4
T
H
S
T
.
S
U
IT
E
2
0
6
L
A
S
V
E
G
A
S
, N
V
8
9
1
0
4
G
E
O
T
E
C
H
N
IC
A
L
:
T
B
D

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T

T
E
A
M

T
H
E
R
E
A
R
E
N
O
K
N
O
W
N
G
E
O
L
O
G
IC
A
L
F
A
U
L
T
S
O
R
F
IS
S
U
R
E
S
O
N
T
H
IS
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
P
E
R
T
H
E
C
L
A
R
K
C
O
U
N
T
Y
G
E
O
L
O
G
IC
A
L
S
O
IL
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
F
A
U
L
T
S

A
N
D

F
I
S
S
U
R
E
S
T
H
E
R
E
A
R
E
E
X
IS
T
IN
G
W
A
T
E
R
A
N
D
S
E
W
E
R
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
IO
N
S
IN
C
A
S
IN
O
C
E
N
T
E
R
B
L
V
D
.
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y

S
E
R
V
I
C
E

C
O
N
N
E
C
T
I
O
N
S

T
H
E
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
S
S
H
A
L
L
F
O
R
M
A
N
D
R
E
C
O
R
D
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
IV
E
C
O
N
V
E
N
A
N
T
S
A
N
D
D
E
E
D
R
E
S
T
R
IC
T
IO
N
S
F
O
R
E
N
F
O
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
C
O
L
L
E
C
T
IV
E
L
Y
R
E
Q
U
IR
E
D
B
Y
E
A
C
H
L
O
T
O
W
N
E
R
C
C
&
R

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
C
R
O
S
S
A
C
C
E
S
S
O
F
T
H
E
S
IT
E
A
N
D
P
A
R
K
IN
G
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
S
A
N
D
/
O
R
R
E
Q
U
IR
E
M
E
N
T
S
A
R
E
T
O
B
E
D
E
T
E
R
M
IN
E
D
.
C
R
O
S
S

A
C
C
E
S
S

A
N
D

P
A
R
K
I
N
G

S
h
e
e
t

L
i
s
t

T
a
b
l
e
S
h
e
e
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

S
h
e
e
t

T
i
t
l
e

T
M
-
1

T
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E

M
A
P
T
M
-
2

B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y

A
N
D

T
O
P
O
T
M
-
3

C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L

A
R
E
A
S

T
M
-
4

O
F
F
I
C
E

A
R
E
A
S
T
M
-
5

R
E
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N

A
R
E
A
S
T
M
-
6

A
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T

A
R
E
A
S
T
M
-
7

B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
T
M
-
8

B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
B
E
F
O
R
E
5
9
3
-
6
1
1
1
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
OOOOOOOOOOOO
RRRRR
HH
E
A
D
0
9
/
0
8
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
8
4
8
T
M
P
-
5
5
9
0
1
S
2 7 4 0 2 0 " W
4 8 0 . 2 8
C
A
S
I N
O
C
E
N
T
E
R
B
L V
D
.
N
6
2
1
9
5
8
" W
3
7
9
.9
5
N
2 7 3 9 5 4 " E 4 8 0 . 3 1
S
6
2
1
9
4
2
"E
3
8
0
.0
1

H
O
O
V
E
R
A
V
E
.
T
H
I R
D
S
T
R
E
E
T
C
O
O
L
I D
G
E
A
V
E
.
L
O
T
1
2
7
,9
9
8
.1
S
Q
F
T
0
.6
4
A
C
R
E
S
N
2 7 4 0 2 0 " E 1 9 0 . 1 4
S
6
2
1
9
5
0
"E
1
3
9
.9
9

S 2 7 4 0 0 7 " W
2 0 0 . 1 5
N
6
2

1
9
4
2
" W
1
3
0
.0
0

L
=
1
5
.7
1
'
R
=
1
0
.0
0
'
=
9
0
0
0
0
2
"
A
L L E
Y
E
X
. 8
" P
V
C
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
IN
E
X
. M
E
T
E
R
S
(2
)
E
X
. M
E
T
E
R
S
(1
)
E
X
IS
T
IN
G
M
E
T
E
R
S
(2
)
E
X
. 6
" A
C
P
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
IN
E
X
. 8
"
S
A
N
IT
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
E
X
. 6
" A
C
P
W
A
T
E
R
S
S
M
H
R
IM
- 2
0
2
4
.1
6
IN
V
. (S
W
) =
2
0
1
3
.7
1
IN
V
. (N
E
) =
2
0
1
3
.4
6

S
S
M
H
R
IM
- 2
0
2
7
.0
4
IN
V
. (N
W
) =
2
0
1
5
.9
4
IN
V
. (S
E
) =
2
0
1
5
.6
4
S
S
M
H

R
IM
- 2
0
2
6
.8
0
IN
V
. (N
W
) =
2
0
1
5
.5
0
IN
V
. (S
E
) =
2
0
1
5
.3
7
IN
V
. (N
E
) =
2
0
1
4
.9
5
S
S
M
H
R
IM
- 2
0
2
6
.3
7
IN
V
. (N
W
) =
2
0
1
5
.9
9
IN
V
. (S
E
) =
2
0
1
6
.5
2
8
" P
V
C
8
" P
V
C

1
2
" P
V
C

8
" V
C
P
E
X
. F
IR
E
H
Y
D
R
A
N
T

4
0
.0
0
'
4
0
.0
0
'
8
0
.0
0
'
P
U
B
L
IC
R
/W
4
0
.0
0
'
4
0
.0
0
'
8
0
.0
0
P
U
B
L
IC
R
/W
2
0
.0
0
'
P
U
B
L
IC
R
/W
C
A
L
L
B
E
F
O
R
E
1
-
7
0
2
-
5
9
3
-
6
1
1
1
Y
O
U
D
O
O
V
E
R
H
E
A
D
C
a
l
l

b
e
f
o
r
e

y
o
u

D

g

C
a
l
l

1
-
8
0
0
-
2
2
7
-
2
6
0
0

1
-
7
0
2
-
2
2
9
-
6
6
1
1
1
-
7
0
2
-
4
5
5
-
7
5
1
1
C
a
l
l

d
o

u
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
E
N
G
IN
E
E
R
C
1
4
-5
3
0

T
M
-
2
L A S V E G A S , N E V A D A 8 9 1 0 1
A C o m m e r c i a l C o n d o m i n i u m S u b d i v i s i o n
T h e R o y a l e
9 3 1 S . C A S I N O C E N T E R B L V D .
T
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E

M
A
P
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y

A
N
D

T
O
P
O
T E N T A T I V E M A P
F
e
e
t
6
0
3
0
0

W
A
T
E
R
V
A
L
V
E
T
R
A
F
F
IC
S
IG
N
A
L
T
R
E
E
P
E
D
E
S
T
R
IA
N
S
IG
N
A
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
L
IG
H
T
F
IR
E
H
Y
D
R
A
N
T
S
IG
N
U
T
IL
IT
Y
P
O
L
E
L
E
G
E
N
D
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
L
IN
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
IN
E
R
IG
H
T
-O
F
-W
A
Y
C
U
R
B
B
L
O
C
K
W
A
L
L
B
U
IL
D
IN
G
C
H
A
IN
L
IN
K
F
E
N
C
E
O
V
E
R
H
A
N
G
/C
A
N
O
P
Y
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
V
A
L
L
E
Y
G
U
T
T
E
R
E
D
G
E
O
F
A
S
P
H
A
L
T
S
E
C
T
IO
N
L
IN
E
A
D
J
O
IN
IN
G
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
IN
E
F
O
U
N
D
M
O
N
U
M
E
N
T
A
T
IO
N
A
S
S
H
O
W
N
A
N
D
D
E
S
C
R
IB
E
D
C
A
B
L
E
T
V
B
O
X
/ V
A
U
L
T
E
L
E
C
T
R
IC
B
O
X
/ V
A
U
L
T
F
IB
E
R
O
P
T
IC
B
O
X
/ V
A
U
L
T
T
R
A
F
F
IC
S
IG
N
A
L
B
O
X
/ V
A
U
L
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
L
IG
H
T
B
O
X
/ V
A
U
L
T
W
A
T
E
R
B
O
X
/ V
A
U
L
T
S
A
N
IT
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
S
T
O
R
M
D
R
A
IN
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
T
E
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
U
T
IL
IT
Y
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
A
R
E
A
L
IG
H
T
H
A
N
D
IC
A
P
P
A
R
K
IN
G
S
T
R
IP
IN
G
A
S
S
E
S
S
O
R
'S
P
A
R
C
E
L
N
U
M
B
E
R

B
E
F
O
R
E
5
9
3
-
6
1
1
1
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
OOOOOOOOOOOO
RRRRR
HH
E
A
D
BBB
O
U
N
D
A
0
9
/
0
8
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
8
4
8
T
M
P
-
5
5
9
0
1
T
M
P
-
9
0
1

[
P
P
J
-
j

-

T
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E

M
A
P

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

A
P
N
E
T

L
I
E
P
M
A
N

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

L
E
A
H

P
P
O
P
E
P
T
Y

L
L
C

N
O
P
T
H
E
A
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

C
O
O
L
I
D
S
E

A
V
E
N
U
E

A
N
D

C
A
S
I
N
O

C
E
N
T
E
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

09/08/14
PRJ-55848
TMP-55901
09/08/14
PRJ-55848
TMP-55901

Agenda tem No.: 8.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-55880 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: VEGAS
MARKET & LIQUOR - OWNER: FRIENDLY BEAR PLAZA, LLC - For possible action on a
request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 3,600 SQUARE-FOOT RETAIL
ESTABLISHMENT WITH ACCESSORY PACKAGE LIQUOR OFF-SALE USE WITHIN A
PROPOSED GENERAL RETAIL STORE, OTHER THAN LISTED at 861 North Nellis
Boulevard, Suite #2 (APN 140-29-716-003), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin).



RECOMMENDATION:

1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps
4. Photos
6. Protest and Support Postcards

SUP-55880
MR


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: VEGAS MARKET & LIQUOR - OWNER:
FRIENDLY BEAR PLAZA, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-55880 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

N/A

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-55880 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Retail
Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All signage shall be permitted and meet minimum code requirements with 30 days oI Iinal
approval.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

5. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit, as well as submitted as part oI any business license application.
SUP-55880
MR

Conditions Page Two

6. Approval oI this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval oI a liquor license.

7. This business shall operate in conIormance to Chapter 6.50 oI the City oI Las Vegas
Municipal Code.

8. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.

SUP-55880
MR

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This application is a request Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a Retail Establishment with Accessory
Package Liquor OII-Sale use within a proposed 3,600 square-Ioot General Retail Store, Other
Than Listed at 861 North Nellis Boulevard, Suite #2. The applicant is requesting 143 square Ieet
oI Iloor space be dedicated to the sale oI alcoholic beverages, which represents less than one
percent oI the 2,505 square Ieet oI total retail Iloor area. The proposed use meets all the
minimum Special Use Permit Requirements and is not within 400 Ieet oI any protected uses. As
such, staII recommends approval with conditions. II denied, no alcohol may be sold on the
premises.

ISSUES

A Special Use Permit is required Ior a Retail Establishment with Accessory Package
Liquor OII-Sale use in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district.
A complaint was Iorwarded to Code EnIorcement Ior non-permitted signage throughout
the retail center.


Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
01/04/94
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0149-94) request Irom R-E
(Residence Estates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) in junction with a Plot Plan
Review oI a 47,165 square-Ioot shopping center and convenience store with
gasoline sales on the property located west oI Nellis Boulevard and south oI
Washington Avenue. The Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
04/03/96
The City Council approved a Reinstatement and Extension oI Time request
|Z-0149-94 (1)| Ior the propose shopping center, including a convenience
store with gasoline sales, on property located on the west side oI Nellis
Boulevard and south oI Washington Avenue. The Planning Commission and
01/26/98
The Planning Commission voted to strike a Review oI Condition |Z-0149-
94(3)| request to allow a 4.5-Ioot decorative wall along the southern property
line where an eight-Ioot decorative wall was required Ior a 47,165 square-Ioot
shopping center including a convenience store with gasoline sales, on the
property located west oI Nellis Boulevard and south oI Washington Avenue.
SUP-55880
MR
Staff Report Page Two

07/13/98
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0052-98) request Ior the
oII-premise sale oI beer and wine in conjunction with a proposed 3,600
square-Ioot convenience store located at 861 North Nellis Boulevard. The
Planning Commission recommended approval. This land use entitlement has
expired.
10/16/14 A complaint was Iorwarded to Code EnIorcement Ior non-permitted signage.


12/15/97
A building permit (#97024873) was issued Ior the building shells at 861 and
871 North Nellis Boulevard. The permit was Iinalized on 03/25/98.
07/06/98
A building permit (#98013860) was issued Ior a tenant improvement building
out at 861 North Nellis Boulevard, Suite #`s 1, 2 &3. The permit was
Iinalized on 09/09/98.
No recent business license is associated with the subject location.

09/02/14
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the Special
Use Permit submittal requirements Ior a Retail Establishment with Accessory
Package Liquor OII-Sale use.

A neighborhood meeting was not held, nor was one required.

Field Check
10/06/14
StaII conducted a Iield check oI the site and Iound a commercial building
with graIIiti on it and non-permitted signage throughout the retail center.

Site Area
Net Acres 1.85
SUP-55880
MR


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
General Retail Store,
Other Than Listed
Financial Institution,
SpeciIied
Restaurant
Subject Property
General Personal
Service
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North
Car Wash, SelI-
Service
GC (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
South
Multi-Family
Residential
M (Medium Density
Residential)
R-PD16 (Residential
Planned Development
16 Units per Acre)
Other Than Listed
CG (General
Commercial) Clark
County
C-2 (General
Commercial) Clark
County
Governmental
Facility
PF (Public Facilities)
Clark County
P-F (Public Facility)
Clark County
East
Motor Vehicle Sales
(Used)
CG (General
Commercial) Clark
County
C-2 (General
Commercial) Clark
County
West
Multi-Family
Residential
M (Medium Density
Residential)
R-PD16 (Residential
Planned Development
16 Units per Acre)

No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A
Trails Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance Y
SUP-55880
MR


Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
General Retail
Store, Other
Than Listed
9,471SF 1:175 SF
Financial
Institution,
SpeciIied
1,200 SF 1:300 SF

OIIice, Other
than Listed
4,540 SF 1:300 SF

2 SP Per
Barber
Chair

3 SP Per
Beautician
Station

General
Personal
Service
2,400 SF
Other Uses
1: 250 SF

1:50 SF
Seating
area

Restaurant 3,557 SF
1:200 SF
remain
gross
86*

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED

86*

Y*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 77* 4 Y*
Loading Spaces 1 1 Y*
*This site is parking impaired as deIined by Title 19.18.030(D).

ANALYSIS

The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit Ior a Retail Establishment with Accessory
Package Liquor use within an existing 3,600 square-Ioot general retail store at 861 North Nellis
Boulevard, Suite #2. The Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use is
deIined as 'a retail establishment:
SUP-55880
MR


1. Whose license to sell alcoholic beverages authorizes their sale to consumers only and
not Ior resale, in original sealed or corked containers, Ior consumption oII the premises
where the same are sold; and

2. In which the sale oI alcoholic beverages is ancillary to the retail use, and in which no
more than 10 percent oI the retail Iloor space is regularly devoted to the display or
merchandising oI alcoholic beverages.

This use includes an establishment that provides on-premises wine, cordial and liqueur tasting iI
the licensee also holds a wine, cordial and liqueur tasting license Ior that location.

The proposed use meets the deIinition above Per the provided Iloor plan and justiIication letter
the applicant intends to sell alcoholic beverages in conjunction with an existing retail
establishment. Furthermore, the applicant has indicated 143 square Ieet oI the existing 2,505
square Ieet oI retail Iloor area will be utilized Ior packaged liquor, which represents less than one
percent oI the total Iloor area.

1. Except as otherwise provided, no retail establishment with accessory package liquor oII-sale
(hereinaIter 'establishment) shall be located within 400 Ieet oI any church/house oI worship,
school, individual care center licensed Ior more than 12 children, or City park.

The proposea use meets this requirement, as there are no protectea uses within 400 feet of the
subfect property.

* 2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances reIerred to in
Requirement 1 shall be determined with reIerence to the shortest distance between two property
lines, one being the property line oI the proposed establishment which is closest to the existing
use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property line oI that existing use
which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall be measured in a straight line
without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes oI measurement, the term 'property line
reIers to property lines oI Iee interest parcels and does not include the property line oI:

a. Any leasehold parcel; or

b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area Ior on site parking and
which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation described in Requirement 1.

The proposea use meets this requirement, measurement is taken from the existing property line
of Lot 1 Plat Book 75 Page 1, locatea at the northwest corner of Broken Souna Drive ana Nellis
Boulevara.
SUP-55880
MR


* 3. In the case oI an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel oI at least 80 acres in size,
the minimum distances reIerred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight line:

a. From the nearest property line oI the existing use to the nearest portion oI the structure
in which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles; or

b. In the case oI a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping center
or other multiple tenant structure, Irom the nearest property line oI the existing use to the
nearest property line oI a leasehold or occupancy parcel in which the establishment will
be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.

This requirement aoes not apply to the proposea use, as the parcel on which it is proposea is less
than 80 acres in si:e.

4. When considering a Special Use Permit application Ior an establishment which also requires a
waiver oI the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning Commission shall take into
consideration the distance policy and shall, as part oI its recommendation to the City Council,
state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the reasons in support oI the
decision.

This requirement aoes not apply to the proposea use, as no aistance separation waiver is
necessary.

5. The minimum distance requirements in Requirement 1 do not apply to:

a. An establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection with a hotel
having 200 or more guest rooms on or beIore July 1, 1992 or in connection with a resort
hotel having in excess oI 200 guest rooms aIter July 1, 1992; or

b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square Ieet oI retail Iloor space.

Neither conaition applies to the proposea use.

* 6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conIorm to the provisions oI LVMC
Chapter 6.50.

The proposea use will meet this requirement, as a conaition of approval requires the
conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las Jegas Municipal Coae.

7. The minimum distance requirements set Iorth in Requirement 1, which are otherwise
nonwaivable under the provisions oI LVMC 19.12.050(C), may be waived:
SUP-55880
MR

Staff Report Page Seven

a. In accordance with the provisions oI LVMC 19.12.050(C) Ior any establishment which
is proposed to be located on a parcel within the Downtown Casino Overlay District;

b. In accordance with the applicable provisions oI the 'Town Center Development
Standards Manual Ior any establishment which is proposed to be located within the T C
(Town Center) Zoning District and which is designated MS TC (Main Street Mixed Use)
in the Town Center Land Use Plan;

c. In connection with a proposed establishment having between 20,000 square Ieet and
50,000 square Ieet oI retail Iloor space; or
d. In connection with a retail establishment having less than 20,000 square Ieet oI retail
Iloor space, iI the area to be used Ior the sale, display or merchandising oI alcoholic
beverages and each use to be protected are separated by a highway or a right oI way with
a width oI at least 100 Ieet.

This requirement aoes not apply to the proposea use, as the use meets Requirement 1 outlinea
above.

The proposed Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use would be
located within an established commercial center with other retail and oIIice uses. The site is
parking impaired as detailed in Title 19.18.030(D). The prior and proposed use is a General
Retail Store, Other Than Listed. The existing commercial center provides cross-access and
shared parking throughout the entire retail center. No additional parking is required Ior the
proposed use, as the parking requirements were addressed during the original development oI the
site.

The subject site is located within 500 Ieet oI a city boundary; thereIore, the request is deemed a
Project oI Regional SigniIicance. The required documents have been completed and distributed
to the appropriate agency. No comments were returned.

There are no protected uses within 400 Ieet oI the subject property and the proposed use adheres
to all Minimum Special Use Requirements as outlined in Title 19.12. As such, the use is
compatible with the surrounding land uses and staII recommends approval with conditions.

FINDINGS (SUP-55880)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.
SUP-55880
MR

Staff Report Page Eight

The proposed Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use is located
within a retail center with similar uses and can be operated in a manner that is harmonious
and compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with Iuture surrounding land uses
as projected by the General Plan.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

The proposed intensity oI a Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale
use is suitable Ior this location and the surrounding uses.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

Primary access to the site will be Irom a right-in, right-out driveway along Nellis
Boulevard and secondary access Irom Washington Boulevard. Both roadways are 100-
Ioot wide Primary Arterial with adequate access Ior the proposed Retail Establishment
with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.

Approval oI a Special Use Permit Ior the Retail Establishment with Accessory Package
Liquor OII-Sale use will not compromise the public health, saIety, or general welIare as
the use would be subject to regular inspections and licensing requirements.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use meets the
applicable minimum requirements oI Title 19.12.


NOTICES MAILED 464

APPROVALS 2

PROTESTS 1
S
U
P
-
0

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

V
E
S
A
S

M
A
P
k
E
T

&

L
I
Q
U
O
P

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

F
P
I
E
N
D
L
Y

E
A
P

P
L
A
Z
A

L
L
C

1

N
O
P
T
H

N
E
L
L
I
S

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
I
T
E

S
U
P
-
0

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

V
E
S
A
S

M
A
P
k
E
T

&

L
I
Q
U
O
P

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

F
P
I
E
N
D
L
Y

E
A
P

P
L
A
Z
A

L
L
C

1

N
O
P
T
H

N
E
L
L
I
S

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
I
T
E

S
U
P
-
0

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

V
E
S
A
S

M
A
P
k
E
T

&

L
I
Q
U
O
P

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

F
P
I
E
N
D
L
Y

E
A
P

P
L
A
Z
A

L
L
C

1

N
O
P
T
H

N
E
L
L
I
S

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
I
T
E

S
U
P
-
0

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

V
E
S
A
S

M
A
P
k
E
T

&

L
I
Q
U
O
P

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

F
P
I
E
N
D
L
Y

E
A
P

P
L
A
Z
A

L
L
C

1

N
O
P
T
H

N
E
L
L
I
S

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
I
T
E

S
U
P
-
0

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

V
E
S
A
S

M
A
P
k
E
T

&

L
I
Q
U
O
P

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

F
P
I
E
N
D
L
Y

E
A
P

P
L
A
Z
A

L
L
C

1

N
O
P
T
H

N
E
L
L
I
S

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
I
T
E

Agenda tem No.: 9.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-56127 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: EL SUPER, INC.
- OWNER: MLCFC 2006-4 SAHARA RETAIL, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a
Special Use Permit FOR A RETAIL ESTABLISHMENT WITH ACCESSORY PACKAGE
LIQUOR OFF-SALE USE WITHIN AN EXISTING 52,336 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL
RETAIL STORE, OTHER THAN LISTED at 4610 West Sahara Avenue (APN 162-06-402-
001), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-55893|. StaII recommends
APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos
6. Support Postcards

SUP-56127 PR1-55893]
MR


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: EL SUPER, INC. - OWNER: MLCFC 2006-4
SAHARA RETAIL, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL

/A

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-5127 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Retail
Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use.


approval.

SaIety.

SUP-56127 PR1-55893]
MR

Conditions Page Two


Municipal Code.


SUP-56127 PR1-55893]
MR

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This application is a request Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a Retail Establishment with Accessory
Package Liquor OII-Sale use within a proposed 52,336 square-Ioot General Retail Store, Other
Than Listed at 4610 West Sahara Avenue. The applicant is requesting 641 square Ieet oI Iloor
space be dedicated to the sale oI alcoholic beverages, which represents less than one percent oI
the 36,980 square-Ioot oI gross retail Iloor area. The proposed use meets all the minimum
Special Use Permit Requirements and is not within 400 Ieet oI any protected uses. As such, staII
recommends approval with conditions. II denied, no alcohol may be sold on the premises.

ISSUES

A Special Use Permit is required Ior a Retail Establishment with Accessory Package
Liquor OII-Sale use in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district.


08/05/87 The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0057-87) request Irom R-1 (Single
Family Residential), R-3 (Limited Multiple Residence) and C-1 (Limited
Commerclal) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 38.5 acres, including this
property, as part oI a larger request. The Board oI Zoning Adjustment and
05/31/91 The Planning Commission approved a Plot Plan Review (Z-0057-87) request
Ior a proposed shopping center on this site. StaII recommended approval.
06/17/92 The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0084-92) request Ior the
sale oI beer and wine in conjunction with an existing restaurant at 4750 West
Sahara Avenue, Suites #23 and #24. The Board oI Zoning Adjustment
08/05/92 The City Council granted an appeal, oI an approved a Special Use Permit (U-
0126-92) request to add Iive (5) additional slot machines to the existing
IiIteen (15) slot machines Ior a total oI twenty (20) slot machines in
conjunction with an existing grocery store at 4610 West Sahara Avenue. The
Board oI Zoning Adjustment denied the request. This use permit expired on
07/13/12.
12/16/92 The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0281-92) request Ior a
Service Bar in conjunction with a proposed restaurant at 4604 West Sahara
Avenue. The Board oI Zoning Adjustment recommended approval.
SUP-56127 PR1-55893]
MR

07/21/93 The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0108-93) request Ior the
sale oI beer and wine within a proposed restaurant at 4712 West Sahara
Avenue, and a Special Use Permit (U-0107-93) Ior the sale oI beer and wine
within a proposed restaurant at 4760 West Sahara Avenue. The Board oI
Zoning Adjustment recommended approval oI both applications.
05/18/94 The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0063-94) Ior a Supper
Club at 4760 West Sahara Avenue. The Board oI Zoning Adjustment


03/15/89
A building permit (#8901776) was issued Ior Building #2 at 4600 West
Sahara Avenue. The permit was not Iinalized.
08/21/89
A building permit (#89036287) was issued Ior an interior tenant improvement
at 4610 West Sahara Avenue. The permit was Iinalized on 06/04/90.
04/20/93
04/23/93
05/05/99
at 4610 West Sahara Avenue. The permit was not Iinalized.
02/10/10
A business license (#G50-0761) was approved Ior a General Retail Store at
4610 West Sahara Avenue. The license was marked out oI business on
07/13/11.
08/19/08
A business license (#G55-00055) was approved Ior General Services at 4610
West Sahara Avenue. The license was marked out oI business on 07/13/11.
09/18/06
A business license (#C08-01836) was approved Ior Coin Amusement
Machines at 4610 West Sahara Avenue. The license was marked out oI
business on 07/13/11.
05/13/09
A business license (#W10-00301) was approved Ior Wire Service at 4610
West Sahara Avenue. The license was marked out oI business on 08/28/14.
08/27/14
A building permit (#268048) Ior a tenant improvement Ior a certiIicate oI
occupancy has been applied Ior at 4610 West Sahara Avenue; however, it has
not been issued as oI 10/15/14.
SUP-56127 PR1-55893]
MR


09/08/14
Use Permit submittal requirements Ior a Retail Establishment with Accessory
Package Liquor OII-Sale use.


Field Check
10/06/14
StaII conducted a Iield check oI the site and Iound the shopping center clean
and well maintained.

Site Area
Net Acres 29.37

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Multi-Family
M (Medium Density
Residential)
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
Government Facility PF (Public Facilities)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North
Motor Vehicle Sales
(Used)
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial) Clark
County South Shopping Center
CG (Commercial
General) - Clark County
C-1 (Local Business)
Clark County
Multi-Family
M (Medium Density
Residential)
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
East
Other Than Listed
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
OIIice, Other than
Listed
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
West
Motor Vehicle Sales
(Used)
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
SUP-56127 PR1-55893]
MR


Trails N/A

Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Shopping
Center
336,829 SF 1:250 SF 1,348

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 1,348

1,408

Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 1,321 27 1,363 45 Y

ANALYSIS

The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit Ior a Retail Establishment with Accessory
Package Liquor use within an existing 52,336 square-Ioot general retail store at 4610 West
Sahara Avenue. The Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use is
deIined as 'a retail establishment:

1. Whose license to sell alcoholic beverages authorizes their sale to consumers only and
not Ior resale, in original sealed or corked containers, Ior consumption oII the premises
where the same are sold; and

2. In which the sale oI alcoholic beverages is ancillary to the retail use, and in which no
more than 10 percent oI the retail Iloor space is regularly devoted to the display or
merchandising oI alcoholic beverages.

This use includes an establishment that provides on-premises wine, cordial and liqueur tasting iI
the licensee also holds a wine, cordial and liqueur tasting license Ior that location.
SUP-56127 PR1-55893]
MR


The proposed use meets the deIinition above per the provided Iloor plan. Also, according to the
justiIication letter the applicant intends to sell alcoholic beverages in conjunction with an
existing retail establishment. Furthermore, the applicant has indicated 641 square Ieet oI the
existing 36,980 square Ieet oI retail Iloor area will be utilized Ior packaged liquor. The total area
dedicated Ior the sale oI alcohol is less than one percent oI the total Iloor area.

The minimum Special Use Permit requirements Ior this use include:

1. Except as otherwise provided, no retail establishment with accessory package liquor oII-sale
(hereinaIter 'establishment) shall be located within 400 Ieet oI any church/house oI worship,
school, individual care center licensed Ior more than 12 children, or City park.

The proposea use meets this requirement, as there are no protectea uses within 400 feet of the
subfect property.

*2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances reIerred to in
Requirement 1 shall be determined with reIerence to the shortest distance between two property
lines, one being the property line oI the proposed establishment which is closest to the existing
use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property line oI that existing use
which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall be measured in a straight line
without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes oI measurement, the term 'property line
reIers to property lines oI Iee interest parcels and does not include the property line oI:


b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area Ior on site parking and
which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation described in Requirement 1.

The proposea use meets this requirement, measurement is taken from the existing property line
of Part of Government Lot 7, locatea at the northeast corner of Sahara Avenue ana Decatur
Boulevara.

* 3. In the case oI an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel oI at least 80 acres in size,
the minimum distances reIerred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight line:

a. From the nearest property line oI the existing use to the nearest portion oI the structure
in which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles; or

b. In the case oI a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping center or
other multiple tenant structure, Irom the nearest property line oI the existing use to the nearest
property line oI a leasehold or occupancy parcel in which the establishment will be located,
without regard to intervening obstacles.
SUP-56127 PR1-55893]
MR


This requirement aoes not apply to the proposea use, as the parcel on which it is proposea is less
than 80 acres in si:e.

4. When considering a Special Use Permit application Ior an establishment which also requires a
waiver oI the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning Commission shall take into
consideration the distance policy and shall, as part oI its recommendation to the City Council,
state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the reasons in support oI the
decision.

necessary.


a. An establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection with a hotel
having 200 or more guest rooms on or beIore July 1, 1992 or in connection with a resort
hotel having in excess oI 200 guest rooms aIter July 1, 1992; or

b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square Ieet oI retail Iloor space.


* 6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conIorm to the provisions oI LVMC
Chapter 6.50.


7. The minimum distance requirements set Iorth in Requirement 1, which are otherwise
nonwaivable under the provisions oI LVMC 19.12.050(C), may be waived:

a. In accordance with the provisions oI LVMC 19.12.050(C) Ior any establishment which
is proposed to be located on a parcel within the Downtown Casino Overlay District;

b. In accordance with the applicable provisions oI the 'Town Center Development
Standards Manual Ior any establishment which is proposed to be located within the T C
(Town Center) Zoning District and which is designated MS TC (Main Street Mixed Use)
in the Town Center Land Use Plan;

c. In connection with a proposed establishment having between 20,000 square Ieet and
50,000 square Ieet oI retail Iloor space; or
SUP-56127 PR1-55893]
MR


d. In connection with a retail establishment having less than 20,000 square Ieet oI retail
Iloor space, iI the area to be used Ior the sale, display or merchandising oI alcoholic
beverages and each use to be protected are separated by a highway or a right oI way with
a width oI at least 100 Ieet.

This requirement aoes not apply to the proposea use, as the use meets Requirement 1 outlinea
above.

The proposed Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use would be
located within an established commercial center with other retail and oIIice uses. The existing
retail center provides cross-access and shared parking throughout the entire commercial center.
No additional parking is required Ior the proposed use, as the parking requirements were
addressed during the original development oI the site.

The subject site is located within 500 Ieet oI a city boundary; thereIore, the request is deemed a
Project oI Regional SigniIicance. The required documents have been completed and distributed
to the appropriate agency; however, no comments were returned.

There are no protected uses within 400 Ieet oI the subject property and the proposed use adheres
to all Minimum Special Use Requirements as outlined in Title 19.12. As such, the use is
compatible with the surrounding land uses and staII recommends approval with conditions.




The proposed Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use is located
within an existing Shopping Center with similar uses and can be operated in a manner that
is harmonious and compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with Iuture
surrounding land uses as projected by the General Plan.


The proposed intensity oI a Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale
use is suitable Ior this location and the surrounding uses.
SUP-56127 PR1-55893]
MR



Primary access to the site will be Irom a Sahara Avenue and secondary access Irom
Decatur Boulevard. Both roadways are 100-Ioot wide Primary Arterial with adequate
access Ior the proposed Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale
use.

General Plan.

Approval oI a Special Use Permit Ior the Retail Establishment with Accessory Package
Liquor OII-Sale use will not compromise the public health, saIety, or general welIare as
the use would be subject to regular inspections and licensing requirements.


The Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale use meets the
applicable minimum requirements oI Title 19.12.


NOTICES MAILED 603

APPROVALS 2

PROTESTS 0
09/24/14
PRJ-55893
SUP-56127
Page 1 of 2 9/24/2014 12:18:55 PM
Applicant Email: francisco.aguirre@elsuper.org
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: Winn, Esq.
Rep First Name: Jonathan
Applicant State: CA
Applicant Phone: 562-616-8800
Rep Address: 400 S Rampart Blvd Suite 400
Rep Email: jwinn@klnevada.com
Rep Fax: 702-362-9472
Rep State: NV
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: 702-362-7800
Rep Zip: 89144
Assessors Parcel #(s): 16206402001
Project Name EL SUPER
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 1 (LOIS TARKANIAN)
Applicant City: Paramount
ProjectAddress (Location): 4610 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
Application/Petition For: SUP- Retail Establishment with Accessory package liquor
Applicant First Name: Frank
Applicant Address: 14601 B Lakewood Blvd.
Applicant Last Name: Aguirre
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
09/24/14
PRJ-55893
SUP-56127
Page 2 of 2 9/24/2014 12:18:55 PM
Is the Owner Information Correct: Yes
! Accept:
Yes
M L C F C 2006-4 SAHARA RETAIL 1601 WASHINGTON AVE #700 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139-3165
Jonathan Winn, Esq. Kolesar & Leatham Attorney at Law jwinn@klnevada.com
09/24/14
PRJ-55893
SUP-56127
09/24/14
PRJ-55893
S
U
P
-
5
6
1
2
7
09/24/14
PRJ-55893
S
U
P
-
5
6
1
2
7
S
U
P
-
1
Z
7

[
P
P
J
-
9
3
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

E
L

S
U
P
E
P

I
N
C
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

M
L
C
F
C

Z
0
0
-
4

S
A
H
A
P
A

P
E
T
A
I
L

L
L
C

4
1
0

W
E
S
T

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

S
U
P
-
1
Z
7

[
P
P
J
-
9
3
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

E
L

S
U
P
E
P

I
N
C
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

M
L
C
F
C

Z
0
0
-
4

S
A
H
A
P
A

P
E
T
A
I
L

L
L
C

4
1
0

W
E
S
T

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

09/24/14
PRJ-55893
SUP-56127
09/24/14
PRJ-55893
SUP-56127

Agenda tem No.: 10.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-56133 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: VETERANS
VILLAGE THRIFT STORE - OWNER: DIVERSIFIED INVESTMENTS LAS VEGAS, LLC -
For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 7,500 SQUARE-
FOOT THRIFT SHOP USE at 6121 West Lake Mead Boulevard, Suites #140 through #165
(APN 138-23-719-009), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow). StaII recommends
APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos
6. Support Postcard

SUP-56133
JB


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: VETERANS VILLAGE THRIFT STORE -
OWNER: DIVERSIFIED INVESTMENTS LAS VEGAS, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-5133 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a ThriIt Shop use.

2. ConIormance to all the Conditions oI Approval and Minimum Requirements listed under
Master Sign Plan (MSP-5001).


SaIety.

5. There shall be no outdoor display or sales oI any merchandise shall be permitted.
SUP-56133
JB

Conditions Page Two

6. Donations shall be accepted only during normal business hours, and accepted only within
the business.


Municipal Code.


SUP-56133
JB

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Special Use Permit to establish a 7,500 square-Ioot ThriIt Shop use within
an existing shopping center at 6121 West Lake Mead Boulevard, Suites #140 through #165. The
subject site is located within a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. The subject tenant
spaces are located within an existing 60,247 square-Ioot shopping center. As this request meets
all the minimum Special Use Permit requirements and can be conducted in a compatible and
harmonious manner within the existing shopping center, staII recommends approval oI this
application. II denied, the applicant will not be allowed to conduct the ThriIt Shop use at this
location.

ISSUES

The ThriIt Shop use is permitted in a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district with the
approval oI a Special Use Permit.


11/02/00
The Planning Commission approved a request Ior a Site Development Plan
Review |Z-0096-84(17)| Ior a proposed 58,210 square-Ioot commercial
center on 8.69 Acres on the southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard and
Jones Boulevard. StaII recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (U-0128-02)
Ior packaged liquor sales Ior oII-premise consumption in conjunction with a
proposed (Wal-Mart Neighborhood) market adjacent to the southwest corner
oI Lake Mead Boulevard and Jones Boulevard. The Planning Commission
recommended approval oI the request.
11/20/02
The City Council approved a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review |Z-
0096-84(18)| and a Reduction in the Amount oI Perimeter Landscaping Ior a
proposed 39,910 square-Ioot (Wal-Mart Neighborhood) market on 8.03 acres
adjacent to the southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard and Jones
Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended approval oI the request.
09/23/04
The Planning Commission approved a Master Sign Plan (MSP-5001) request
Ior a Master Sign Plan Ior a proposed 39,910 square-Ioot Wal-Mart
neighborhood market on 8.03 acres adjacent to the southwest corner oI Lake
Mead Boulevard and Jones Boulevard. StaII recommended approval.
SUP-56133
JB

01/05/05
The City Council approve a request Ior an Extension oI Time (EOT-5744) Ior
an approved Special Use Permit (U-0128-02) which allowed packaged liquor
sales Ior oII-premises consumption in conjunction with a proposed Wal-Mart
neighborhood market adjacent to the southwest corner oI Lake Mead
Boulevard and Jones Boulevard. StaII recommended approval.
06/15/05
The City Council approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-6419) Ior
a proposed Financial Institution, SpeciIied within an existing retail store and
waivers oI the 1,000-Ioot minimum distance separation Irom a similar use,
200-Ioot minimum distance separation Irom residential use, and a waiver oI
the hours oI operation adjacent to the southwest corner oI Lake Mead
Boulevard and Jones Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended
approval and StaII recommended denial oI this application.
11/17/05
Review (SDR-9676) Ior a proposed 15,000 square-Ioot retail development
and waivers oI building placement, Ioundation, and perimeter landscaping
requirements on 1.71 acres at the southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard
and Jones Boulevard.


08/11/08
A building permit (#112763) was issued Ior a tenant improvement (Amsource
Shops) at 6121 West Lake Mead Boulevard, Suite #165. The permit was
08/28/08
A building permit (#123061) was issued Ior Iire sprinklers (Jones Crossing) at
6121 West Lake Mead Boulevard, Suite #165. The permit was Iinalized on
09/29/08.
10/08/08
A building permit (#125783) was issued Ior a non-work certiIicate oI
occupancy (Eclipse Wireless) at 6121 West Lake Mead Boulevard, Suite
#165. The permit was Iinalized on 01/26/09.
04/09/09
A building permit (#137096) was issued Ior a wall sign (Eclipse Wireless) at
6121 West Lake Mead Boulevard, Suite #165. The permit has not been
Iinalized.
A business license (#C05-02837) was issued Ior a Tobacco Dealer at 6121
West Lake Mead Boulevard, Suite #165. The license was marked inactive on
03/12/14.
02/14/12
A business license (#T50-00164) was issued Ior a Tobacco Sales/ Lounge at
6121 West Lake Mead Boulevard, Suite #165. The license was marked
inactive on 03/19/14.
SUP-56133
JB

06/06/12
A building permit (#212818) was issued Ior a wall sign (Smoke Shop) at 6121
West Lake Mead Boulevard, Suite #165. The permit has not been Iinalized.

09/23/14
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to go over the
application materials and submittal requirements Ior a Special Use Permit Ior
a proposed ThriIt Shop use.

A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one conducted.

Field Check
10/06/14
A routine Iield check was conducted by staII and Iound a well maintained
shopping center.

Site Area
Net Acres 8.68

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
South
Mini-Storage
Facility
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
East
Multi-Family
Residential
M (Medium Density
Residential)
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
West
Multi-Family
Residential
M (Medium Density
Residential)
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)

SUP-56133
JB

A-O (Airport Overlay) District (105 Feet) Y
Trails N/A


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Lake Mead
Boulevard
Primary Arterial
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
100 Feet Y
Jones Boulevard
Major Collector
Street
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
80 Feet Y

Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Shopping
Center
60,247 SF 1:250 SF 241

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 241 367 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 234 7 352 15 Y

ANALYSIS

The applicant is proposing to establish a 7,500 square-Ioot ThriIt Shop use within an existing
shopping center at 6121 West Lake Mead Boulevard, Suites #140 through #165. The subject site
is located in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. The subject tenant spaces are located
within an existing 60,247 square-Ioot shopping center. The existing commercial development
provides shared access and parking throughout the subject site.
SUP-56133
JB


A ThriIt Shop use is described in Tile 19.12 as: 'A retail Iacility that sells any new or used
merchandise that has been donated to the Iacility.

Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements:
* 1. No outdoor display or sales oI any merchandise shall be permitted.

No outaoor aisplays of merchanaise have been proposea with this application, the submittea
floor plan inaicates all sales areas are inaoors

* 2. The use shall comply with the applicable requirements oI LVMC Title 6.

The proposea use will be subfect to all business licensing requirements outlinea in LJMC
Chapter 6 if approvea.

3. Donations shall be accepted only during normal business hours, unless otherwise speciIically
approved in connection with the Special Use Permit. Where aIter-hours donation oI items is
approved, donation areas and containers, whether or not enclosed or screened, must be designed
so that donated items are not visible to the general public.

The applicant has inaicatea that aonations will only be acceptea auring normal business hours.

According to the submitted justiIication letter and Iloor plan, the proposed use meets the
deIinition outlined above. The proposed ThriIt Shop use adheres to all minimum Special Use
Permit requirements as outlined by Title 19.12. It has been determined that the proposed ThriIt
Shop use can be conducted in a manner that is compatible and harmonious manner with the
surrounding land uses, thereIore, staII is recommending approval, as the use is considered
appropriate Ior the surrounding area.




The subject tenant space was previously approved to operate as a general retail use. The
proposed ThriIt Shop use is compatible with the surrounding land uses and can be
conducted in a manner that is harmonious with surrounding land uses.
SUP-56133
JB



The subject site currently is an existing 60,247 square-Ioot commercial shopping center
that is physically suitable Ior the intensity oI the proposed land use.


Access to the site will not change. Vehicles may enter the property Irom Lake Mead
Boulevard, a 100-Ioot Primary Arterial or Jones Boulevard, a Major Collector Street as
classiIied by the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways.

General Plan.

Approval oI this Special Use Permit will not compromise the public health saIety and
general welIare oI the public. The use will be subject to regular inspections and is subject
to licensing restrictions.


The proposed use meets all applicable conditions oI approval Ior a ThriIt Shop use per
Title 19.12.


NOTICES MAILED 357

APPROVALS 1

PROTESTS 0
S
U
P
-
1
3
3

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

V
E
T
E
P
A
N
S

V
I
L
L
A
S
E

T
H
P
I
F
T

S
T
O
P
E

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

D
I
V
E
P
S
I
F
I
E
D

I
N
V
E
S
T
M
E
N
T
S

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S

L
L
C

1
Z
1

W
E
S
T

L
A
k
E

M
E
A
D

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
I
T
E
S

1
4
0

T
H
P
O
U
S
H

S
U
P
-
1
3
3

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

V
E
T
E
P
A
N
S

V
I
L
L
A
S
E

T
H
P
I
F
T

S
T
O
P
E

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

D
I
V
E
P
S
I
F
I
E
D

I
N
V
E
S
T
M
E
N
T
S

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S

L
L
C

1
Z
1

W
E
S
T

L
A
k
E

M
E
A
D

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
I
T
E
S

1
4
0

T
H
P
O
U
S
H

Agenda tem No.: 11.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-56135 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: 7 MARES -
OWNER: RZMZ FAMILY, LLC - SERIES 3 - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use
Permit FOR A PROPOSED 2,770 SQUARE-FOOT BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE
ESTABLISHMENT WITHIN AN EXISTING RESTAURANT at 2000 East Charleston
Boulevard (APN 162-02-512-008) C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

SUP-56135 PR1-56108]
MR


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: 7 MARES - OWNER: RZMZ FAMILY, LLC -
SERIES 3


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-56135 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: N/A

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-5135 CONDIIIONS

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use.


SaIety.

Ior building permit and business license.


Municipal Code.


SUP-56135 PR1-56108]
MR

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting approval oI a Special Use Permit to sell beer, wine and wine coolers
in an existing 2,770 square-Ioot restaurant at 2000 East Charleston Avenue. This use meets all
Title 19.12 requirements Ior the Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use and can be
conducted in a harmonious and compatible manner with the residential, commercial and oIIice
uses within the surrounding area. For these reasons, staII recommends approval oI the requested
Special Use Permit, with conditions. II denied, the restaurant may remain open; however, no
alcohol may be served on the premises.

ISSUES

A Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district with the approval oI a Special Use Permit.


05/21/58
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0046-56) Irom R-
4 (High Density Residential) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on the subject site
as part oI a larger request.


1958 The principal structure was built.
05/28/86
A building permit (#25797) was issued Ior a new rooI at 2000 East Charleston
Boulevard. The permit was Iinalized on 08/14/86.
09/26/13
A building permit (#245628) was issued Ior a Iire hood at 2000 East
Charleston Boulevard. The permit was not Iinalized.
03/24/14
A business license (G62-0619) was issued Ior a Restaurant at 2000 East
Charleston Avenue. The license is active as oI 10/01/14.
SUP-56135 PR1-56108]
MR

07/29/14
A business license (G62-06919) Ior a Restaurant at 2000 East Charleston
Avenue was applied Ior; however it has not been issued as oI 10/01/14.
09/02/14
A building permit (#268275) was issued Ior a Iire hood at 2000 East
Charleston Boulevard. The permit has not been Iinalized, as oI 10/15/14.

09/22/14
Use Permit submittal requirements Ior Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale
Establishment use.

A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held

Field Check
10/06/14
10/07/14
A Iield check conducted on the subject property revealed that it is clean. Also,
a survey oI the area within 400 Ieet oI the site Iound that Iour previously
identiIied houses oI worships that do not legally exist. Two oI the churches
identiIied (1928 and 1934 East Charleston) are retail establishments and the
other two (1922 and 2011 East Charleston) do not have a building permit or
business license to establish them as houses oI worship.

Site Area
Net Acres 0.6

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Restaurant
SpeciIied Subject Property
Other Than Listed
C (Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Restaurant with a
Tattoo Parlor/Body
Piercing Studio North
Church/House oI
Worship
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
SUP-56135 PR1-56108]
MR

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
South
Single-Family,
Residential
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
East
Other Than Listed
C (Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
West
Other Than Listed
C (Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)

Trails N/A


Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
1,697 SF
1 SP Per
50 SF oI
Seating
and
Waiting
Area Restaurant
1,073 SF
1 SP Per
200 SF
Remain
Square-
Iootage
40*

SUP-56135 PR1-56108]
MR


Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
General Retail
Store, Other
Than Listed
1,600 SF
1 SP Per
175 SF

Financial
Institution,
SpeciIied
1,511 SF
1 SP Per
250 SF

OIIice, Other
than Listed
2,709 SF
1 SP Per
300 SF

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 40

40

Y*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 37 40 37 3 Y*

ANALYSIS

The Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use is deIined by Title 19.18 as 'an establishment
whose license to sell alcoholic beverages is limited to the sale oI beer, wine and coolers only Ior
consumption on the premises where the same is sold.

The proposed use meets the deIinition, as the provided site and Iloor plans show a 2,770 square-
Ioot restaurant. Per the applicant`s justiIication letter, beer and wine will be sold in conjunction
with meals Ior consumption on the premises.


1. Except as otherwise provided, no Beer/Wine/Cooler on-sale establishment (hereinaIter
'establishment) shall be located within 400 Ieet oI any church, synagogue, school, child
care Iacility licensed Ior more than 12 children, or City park.

The proposea use meets this requirement, as there are no legally establishea protectea
uses within 400 feet of the subfect property.

2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances reIerred to in
Requirement 1 shall be determined with reIerence to the shortest distance between two
property lines, one being the property line oI the proposed establishment which is closest
SUP-56135 PR1-56108]
MR


to the existing use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property line
oI that existing use which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall be
measured in a straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes oI
measurement, the term 'property line reIers to property lines oI Iee interest parcels and
does not include the property line oI:

b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area Ior on-site
parking and which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation described
in Requirement 1.

The proposea use meets this requirement, as the measurement is taken from the existing
property line locatea at the southeast corner of Eastern Avenue ana Owens Avenue.

3. In the case oI an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel oI at least 80 acres in
size, the minimum distances reIerred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight
line:

a. From the nearest property line oI the existing use to the nearest portion oI the
structure in which the establishment will be located, without regard to
intervening obstacles; or
b. In the case oI a proposed establishment which will be located within a
shopping center or other multiple tenant structure, Irom the nearest property line
oI the existing use to the nearest property line oI a leasehold or occupancy
parcel in which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening
obstacles.

This requirement aoes not apply to the proposea use, as the parcel on which it is
proposea is less than 80 acres in si:e.

4. When considering a Special Use Permit application Ior an establishment which also
requires a waiver oI the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning Commission
shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part oI its recommendation to
the City Council, state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the reasons
in support oI the decision.

necessary.


a. An establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection with
a hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or beIore July 1, 1992 or in connection
with a resort hotel having in excess oI 200 guest rooms aIter July 1, 1992; or
SUP-56135 PR1-56108]
MR


b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square Ieet oI retail Iloor
space.

Neither conaition applies to this application.

6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conIorm to the provisions oI LVMC
Chapter6.50. (Nonwaivable)

The proposea use shoula meet this requirement, as it is a conaition of approval of the
Special Use Permit.

The proposed use will be located within an existing restaurant within an existing retail center
with other oIIice and retail uses. The site is parking impaired as detailed in Title 19.18.030(D).
The existing strip mall provides cross-access and shared parking throughout the entire
commercial center. No additional parking is required Ior the proposed use. There are no legally
established protected uses within the minimum distance separation. The proposed use (a
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment) can be conducted in a harmonious and compatible
manner with the existing and Iuture land uses. For these reasons staII recommends approval oI
this application. II denied, the restaurant may remain open; however, no alcohol may be served
on the premises.




The subject location is an existing 2,770 square-Ioot restaurant use within a retail center
with oIIice and other retail uses and can be operated in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with Iuture surrounding land uses as
projected by the General Plan.


The subject site is physically suitable Ior the proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale
Establishment use, as it will be operated within an existing retail center with adequate
parking and access.
SUP-56135 PR1-56108]
MR



The subject site has shared access to existing driveways onto Charleston Boulevard, a 100-
Ioot Primary Arterial (as designated by the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways), and
secondary access to Crestwood Avenue, a 60-Ioot Minor Collector. The proposed use will
not increase the intensity oI the existing use; thereIore, the existing roadways are adequate
in size.

General Plan.

The site will be subject to the business licensing process, building permit reviews and it
will be subject to annual building, Iire and licensing inspections. Approval oI this Special
Use Permit will not compromise the public health, saIety, and welIare, or the overall
objectives oI the General Plan.


The Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use meets the applicable minimum requirements oI Title
19.12.


NOTICES MAILED 438

APPROVALS 2

PROTESTS 0
09/24/14
PRJ-56108
SUP-56135
Page 1 of 2 9/24/2014 5:25:44 PM
Applicant Email: ROSADIAZ8196@YAHOO.COM
Applicant Fax: 7023999800
Rep Last Name: DIAZ
Rep First Name: ENRIQUE
Applicant State: NV
Applicant Phone: 7025399034
Rep Address: 346 WHISPERING TREE AVE
Rep Email: ROSADIAZ8196@YAHOO.COM
Rep Fax: 7023999800
Rep State: NV
Rep City: LAS VEGAS
Rep Phone: 7025399034
Rep Zip: 89183
Project Name 7 MARES
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 3 (BOB COFFIN)
Applicant City: LAS VEGAS
ProjectAddress (Location): 2000 EAST CHARLESTON BLVD
Application/Petition For: SUP for Beer/Wine/Cooler ON-Sale
Applicant First Name: ENRIQUE
Additional Information: COMERCIAL AREA
Applicant Address: 346 WHISPERING TREE AVE
Applicant Last Name: DIAZ
Lots/Units: 1
Gross Acres: 1
09/24/14
PRJ-56108
SUP-56135
Page 2 of 2 9/24/2014 5:25:44 PM
! Accept:
Yes
R Z M Z FAMILY L L C - SERIES 3 2010 E CHARLESTON BLVD LAS VEGAS, NV 89104-2018
Enrique Diaz Rosa Diaz LLC Owner rosadiaz8196@yahoo.com
09/24/14
PRJ-56108
SUP-56135
0 9 / 2 4 / 1 4
P R J - 5 6 1 0 8
S
U
P
-
5
6
1
3
5
10/08/14
PRJ-56108
SUP-56135 - REVISED
S
U
P
-
1
3

[
P
P
J
-
1
0
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

7

M
A
P
E
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

P
Z
M
Z

F
A
M
I
L
Y

L
L
C

-

S
E
P
I
E
S

3

Z
0
0
0

E
A
S
T

C
H
A
P
L
E
S
T
O
N

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
P
-
1
3

[
P
P
J
-
1
0
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

7

M
A
P
E
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

P
Z
M
Z

F
A
M
I
L
Y

L
L
C

-

S
E
P
I
E
S

3

Z
0
0
0

E
A
S
T

C
H
A
P
L
E
S
T
O
N

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
P
-
1
3

[
P
P
J
-
1
0
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

7

M
A
P
E
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

P
Z
M
Z

F
A
M
I
L
Y

L
L
C

-

S
E
P
I
E
S

3

Z
0
0
0

E
A
S
T

C
H
A
P
L
E
S
T
O
N

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
P
-
1
3

[
P
P
J
-
1
0
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

7

M
A
P
E
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

P
Z
M
Z

F
A
M
I
L
Y

L
L
C

-

S
E
P
I
E
S

3

Z
0
0
0

E
A
S
T

C
H
A
P
L
E
S
T
O
N

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
P
-
1
3

[
P
P
J
-
1
0
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

7

M
A
P
E
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

P
Z
M
Z

F
A
M
I
L
Y

L
L
C

-

S
E
P
I
E
S

3

Z
0
0
0

E
A
S
T

C
H
A
P
L
E
S
T
O
N

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

1
Mark Rex
From: Rosa Diaz <rosadiaz8196@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 5:01 PM
To: Mark Rex
Subject: Fw: 7Mares Restaurant 2000 E Charleston LV NV 89104
7 Mares Restaurant
2000 E Charleston Blvd
Las Vegas, NV 89104
To City Of Las Vegas Planning Division
I would like to apply for a beer and wine license for our seafood restaurant 7 Mares located atv 2000
E Charleston Blvd.
7 Mares Restaurant's business model is to provide good food and an enjoyable dining
experience. Our Restaurant will create
employment opportunities for about 10-20 people. We chose the City of Las Vegas area because of
all the new and exciting renovations
in Downtown. We want to bring new and modern seafood recipes which will include sushi with a
Mexican twist. It is concept that is very popular and hip in Mexico. I feel that this concept fits in with
the area of downtown Las Vegas. I feel that a good selection of beer and wine will compliment the
dining experience. We feel our business enhance the area.
Thank you very much for your consideration.
Enrique Diaz
09/24/14
PRJ-56108
SUP-56135

Agenda tem No.: 12.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-56138 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SOFIA''S
RESTAURANT, LLC - OWNER: JEANNY THU HUYNH - For possible action on a request
Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE
ESTABLISHMENT WITHIN AN EXISTING 2,951 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT at 821
North Lamb Boulevard, Suite #1 (APN 140-29-301-010), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone,
Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-55872|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos
6. Support Postcard

SUP-56138 PR1-55872]
MR


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: SOFIA'S RESTAURANT, LLC - OWNER:
JEANNY THU HUYNH


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL

N/A

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-5138 CONDIIIONS

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a


approval.

SaIety.

Ior building permit and business license.


Municipal Code.

SUP-56138 PR1-55872]
MR

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting approval oI a Special Use Permit to serve beer, wine and wine
coolers in an existing 2,951 square-Ioot restaurant located within an existing retail center at 821
North Lamb Boulevard, Suite #1. This use meets all Title 19.12 requirements Ior the
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use and is compatible with the other restaurant, retail
and oIIice uses within the shopping center. For these reasons, staII recommends approval oI the
requested Special Use Permit, with conditions. II denied, no alcohol may be served on the
premises.

ISSUES

A Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district with the approval oI a Special Use Permit.
A complaint was Iorwarded to Code EnIorcement regarding graIIiti and non-permitted
signage in the retail center.


11/19/86
The City Council approved Rezoning (Z-0077-86) request Irom R-HMP
(Residential Mobile Home Park) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on the east
side oI Lamb Boulevard, south oI Washington Avenue. The Planning
Commission and staII recommended approval.
10/18/95
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0108-95) request Ior
Restricted Gaming at 821 North Lamb Boulevard, Suite #9. The Board oI
Zoning Adjustment and staII recommended approval.
02/09/98
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0123-97) request Ior the
Sale oI Beer and Wine Ior OII-Premise Consumption in conjunction with a
mini-market at 821 North Lamb Boulevard, Suite #10. The Planning
08/13/98
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review |Z-
0077-86(1)| request Ior a 2,650 square-Ioot addition to an existing shopping
center at 821 North Lamb Boulevard. StaII recommended approval.
SUP-56138 PR1-55872]
MR

08/12/99
The City Council approved Variance (V-0046-99) request to allow 81
existing parking spaces where 87 are the minimum required in conjunction
with a proposed addition (Bakery) to an existing Commercial Center at 821
North Lamb Boulevard. The Board oI Zoning Adjustment and staII
10/16/02
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0109-02) request Ior a
Restaurant Service Bar, located at 821 North Lamb Boulevard, Suite #14.
The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
08/26/10
The Planning Commission approved a Variance (VAR-38827) request to
allow 74 parking spaces where 91 are required at 821 North Lamb
Boulevard. StaII recommended denial.
10/16/14
A complaint was Iorwarded to Code EnIorcement Ior graIIiti and non-
permitted signage.


06/13/98
A business license (R09-01583) was issued Ior a Restaurant at 821 North
Lamb Boulevard, Suite #1. The license expired on 06/01/14.
1988 The shopping center was constructed.
09/17/10
A building permit (#172366) was issued Ior a tenant improvement certiIicate
oI occupancy at 821 North Lamb Boulevard, Suite #1. The permit was

09/02/14
Use Permit submittal requirements Ior Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale
Establishment use.
09/09/14
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant and designated
representative to discuss the Special Use Permit submittal requirements Ior

A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.
SUP-56138 PR1-55872]
MR


Field Check
10/06/14
with graIIiti on it and non-permitted signage throughout the retail center.

Site Area
Net Acres 1.49

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Restaurant
Liquor
Establishment
(Tavern)
Other Than Listed
General Personal
Service
Subject Property
Other Than Listed
SC (Service
Commercial)

C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North Mobile Home Park
ML (Medium Low
Density Residential)
R-MHP (Residential
Mobile/ ManuIactured
Home Park)
South ThriIt Shop
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
East Mobile Home Park
ML (Medium Low
R-MHP (Residential
Mobile/ ManuIactured
Home Park)
West
OIIice, Other than
Listed
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)

Trails N/A
SUP-56138 PR1-55872]
MR


Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
2,605 SF
1:50 SF oI
Seating
Area
53
Restaurant
3,296 SF
1:200 SF oI
Remaining
Area
17
200 SF
1:50 SF oI
Seating
Area
4

Liquor
Establishment
(Tavern)
2,091 SF
1:200 SF oI
Remaining
Area
11

General Retail
Store, Other
Than Listed
4,270 SF 1:175 SF 25

General
Personal
Service
6 Barber
Chairs
2 SP Per
Chair
3

OIIice, Other
than Listed
2,100 SF 1:300 SF 7

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 120*

77

Y*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 73 4 Y*
* There are two parking Variances (V-0046-99 and VAR-38827) that allow the reduction oI 23
parking spaces and another 7 parking spaces were removed Ior utility installation and other site
improvements.

ANALYSIS

The Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use is deIined by Title 19.18 as 'An establishment
whose license to sell alcoholic beverages is limited to the sale oI beer, wine and coolers only Ior
consumption on the premises where the same is sold.

The proposed use meets the deIinition, as the applicant will serve beer, wine, and wine coolers
only with meals Ior consumption on the premises.

SUP-56138 PR1-55872]
MR


1. Except as otherwise provided, no Beer/Wine/Cooler on-sale establishment (hereinaIter
'establishment) shall be located within 400 Ieet oI any church, synagogue, school, child
care Iacility licensed Ior more than 12 children, or City park.

The proposea use meets this requirement, as there are no protectea uses within 400 feet
of the subfect property.

Requirement 1 shall be determined with reIerence to the shortest distance between two
property lines, one being the property line oI the proposed establishment which is closest
to the existing use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property
line oI that existing use which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance
shall be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes
oI measurement, the term 'property line reIers to property lines oI Iee interest parcels
and does not include the property line oI:
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area Ior on-site parking
and which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation described in
Requirement 1.

The proposea use meets this requirement, measurement is taken from the existing
property line Part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 29
Township 20 Rage 62, locatea north of the northeast corner of Harris Avenue ana Lamb
Boulevara.

3. In the case oI an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel oI at least 80 acres in
size, the minimum distances reIerred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight
line:
a. From the nearest property line oI the existing use to the nearest portion oI the
structure in which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening
obstacles; or
b. In the case oI a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping
center or other multiple tenant structure, Irom the nearest property line oI the
existing use to the nearest property line oI a leasehold or occupancy parcel in
which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.


When considering a Special Use Permit application Ior an establishment which also
requires a waiver oI the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning Commission
shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part oI its recommendation
to the City Council, state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the
reasons in support oI the decision.
SUP-56138 PR1-55872]
MR


necessary.

a. An establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection with a
hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or beIore July 1, 1992 or in connection
with a resort hotel having in excess oI 200 guest rooms aIter July 1, 1992; or
A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square Ieet oI retail Iloor
space.


6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conIorm to the provisions oI LVMC
Chapter 6.50. (Nonwaivable)

The proposea use will meet this requirement, as it is a conaition of approval of the
Special Use Permit.

The proposed use would be located within an established commercial center with other retail and
restaurant uses. No additional parking is required Ior this use, as it is ancillary to the primary use,
an existing Restaurant. Other than the minimum use requirements in Title 19.12, there are no
additional requirements Ior this proposal. There are no protected uses located within 400 Ieet oI
the subject property and there are similar uses within the existing retail center. For these reasons,
the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding uses in the area and staII recommends
approval with conditions.




The subject location consists oI an existing restaurant located within an established
commercial center along with other similar and compatible uses, and no waiver oI
minimum distance separation requirements Irom protected uses is required.

SUP-56138 PR1-55872]
MR


The 21,268 square-Ioot commercial center is designed to accommodate a variety oI retail,
restaurant and oIIice uses. This site has two parking Variances and a number oI the
parking spaces were removed Ior utility and other improvements. The existing restaurant
use has operated Ior more than Iour year and there is adequate parking Ior this use and all
other uses with the retail center. The Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use does
not generate the need Ior any additional parking spaces.


The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment can be accessed Irom Lamb
Boulevard, a 100-Ioot Primary Arterial that has adequate capacity to serve the entire
shopping center.

General Plan.

The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use will be subject to regular
inspections Ior licensing and will thereIore not compromise the public health, saIety, and
general welIare or any objective oI the General Plan.


The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use meets all distance separation
requirements per Title 19.12. Conditions oI approval will ensure conIormance with all
other minimum requirements Ior this use.


NOTICES MAILED 1489

APPROVALS 1

PROTESTS 0
09/25/14
PRJ-55872
SUP-56138
09/25/14
PRJ-55872
SUP-56138
Page 1 of 2 9/29/2014 11:55:04 AM
Applicant Email: heijinmaru@gmail.com
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: nenchev
Rep First Name: galentin
Applicant State: NV
Rep Address: 6729 pine valley dr
Rep Email: heijinmaru@gmail.com
Rep Fax:
Rep State: NV
Rep City: las vegas
Rep Phone: 7024613583
Rep Zip: 89103
Project Name SOFIA'S FAMILY RESTAURANT
Correct:
Yes
Applicant City: las vegas
ProjectAddress (Location): 821 NORTH NELLIS BLVD SUTIE #1
Application/Petition For: SUP Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale
Applicant First Name: galentin
Applicant Address: 6729 pine valley dr
Applicant Last Name: nenchev
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
SUP-56138
Page 2 of 2 9/29/2014 11:55:04 AM
I certify that I am the applicant and
belief. I understand that the City is
the application to be rejected. I
further certify that I am the owner
or purchaser (or option holder) of
I Accept:
Yes
HUYNH JEANNY THU 12532 9TH ST GARDEN GROVE, CA 92840-5402
galentin nenchev First R&G Associates owner vegasino@gmail.com
SUP-56138
09/25/14
PRJ-55872
S
U
P
-
5
6
1
3
8
09/25/14
PRJ-55872
S
U
P
-
5
6
1
3
8
0
9
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
8
7
2
S
U
P
-
5
6
1
3
8
0
9
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
8
7
2
S
U
P
-
5
6
1
3
8
S
U
P
-
1
3

[
P
P
J
-
7
Z
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

S
O
F
I
A
'
S

P
E
S
T
A
U
P
A
N
T

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

J
E
A
N
N
Y

T
H
U

H
U
Y
N
H

Z
1

N
O
P
T
H

L
A
M
O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
I
T
E

S
U
P
-
1
3

[
P
P
J
-
7
Z
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

S
O
F
I
A
'
S

P
E
S
T
A
U
P
A
N
T

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

J
E
A
N
N
Y

T
H
U

H
U
Y
N
H

Z
1

N
O
P
T
H

L
A
M
O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
I
T
E

S
U
P
-
1
3

[
P
P
J
-
7
Z
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

S
O
F
I
A
'
S

P
E
S
T
A
U
P
A
N
T

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

J
E
A
N
N
Y

T
H
U

H
U
Y
N
H

Z
1

N
O
P
T
H

L
A
M
O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
I
T
E

09/25/14
PRJ-55872
SUP-56138

Agenda tem No.: 13.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-56149 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TCB LAS
VEGAS, LLC - OWNER: AJL PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a
Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED NIGHTCLUB at 6750 West Sahara Avenue (APN 163-
02-415-012), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-54092|. StaII



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

SUP-56149 PR1-54092]
PDL


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: TCB LAS VEGAS, LLC - OWNER: AJL
PROPERTIES, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL

N/A

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-514 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Night Club use.

2. All temporary signage shall be permitted and meet minimum code requirements within 30
days oI Iinal approval.

3. ConIormance to the approved conditions Ior Special Use Permit (SUP-32144), with the
exception oI Condition #7 as amended herein.

4. The total number oI days per week live entertainment can be held on site shall be limited to
Iour (4) days only.


SaIety.


SUP-56149 PR1-54092]
PDL

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a Night Club use to be located within an existing
Supper Club located at 6750 West Sahara Avenue. The associated Supper Club use`s Special
Use Permit (SUP-32144) was conditioned to limit the number oI days oI live entertainment that
can be held to three (3) days a week, unless a new Special Use Permit application is approved.
Approval oI this request will allow the applicant the ability to hold live entertainment Iour (4)
days a week, as they have requested. The proposed night club will utilize the existing restaurant,
lounge and bar conIiguration previously approved Ior the Supper Club via Special Use Permit
(SUP-32144). As this request meets all the minimum Special Use requirements and can be
conducted in a compatible and harmonious manner within the existing shopping center, staII
recommends approval oI this application. II denied, the applicant will not be allowed to conduct
a Night Club use at this location.

ISSUES

A Night Club use is a permitted use within the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district
with the approval oI a Special Use Permit.


01/02/80
Ordinance #2066 related to Annexation (A-0027-79) was adopted to annex
47.9 acres oI land, generally located south oI O`Bannon Drive, east oI
Rainbow Boulevard, north oI Sahara Avenue and west oI Torrey Pines Drive.
07/06/88
The City Council approved a Zoning ReclassiIication (Z-0045-88) Ior this site
as a part oI a larger request. StaII had recommended approval and the
Planning Commission recommended approval.
04/13/95
The Planning Commission approved a Plot Plan Review |Z-0045-88(16)| Ior
the existing structure on the subject site.
05/17/95
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0045-95) Ior a Supper
Club. The Zoning Board oI Adjustment and staII recommended approval.
05/19/04
The City Council approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-3986) to
allow a Supper Club use on the subject property. The Planning Commission
and staII had recommended approval. The Special Use Permit became void on
11/25/05.
SUP-56149 PR1-54092]
PDL

07/07/04
The City Council denied an appeal oI a denial vote by the Planning
Commission Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-3972) Ior a 40-Ioot tall, 14-Ioot
by 48-Ioot OII-Premise Advertising (Billboard) Sign on the subject site. StaII
recommended approval and the Planning Commission recommended denial.
08/02/06
The City Council approved a request to Withdraw without Prejudice an
appeal oI the Planning Commission`s denial oI a request Ior a Special Use
Permit (SUP-13383) Ior a 40-Ioot tall, 14-Ioot by 48-Ioot OII-Premise
Advertising (Billboard) Sign on the subject site.
The City Council approved a request to Table a request Ior a Special Use
Permit (SUP-19103) Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a proposed Auto Dealer
Inventory Storage location with a Waiver oI the requirement that stored
vehicles be eIIectively screened so as not to be visible Irom adjoining
properties or public rights-oI-way at 6750 West Sahara Avenue. Planning
Commission and staII both recommended denial.
08/01/07
The City Council approved a request to Table a request Ior Review oI
Condition (ROC-19273) Ior a Review oI Condition Number 18 oI an
approved ReclassiIication oI Property (Z-0045-88) to allow Auto Dealer
Inventory storage where the original condition stated that there shall be no
outdoor storage oI any kind on 1.61 acres at 6750 West Sahara Avenue.
Planning Commission and StaII both recommended denial.
02/04/09
The City Council approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-32144)
Ior a proposed Supper Club with a Waiver to allow a zero-Ioot separation
Irom a church where 400 Ieet is required at 6750 West Sahara Avenue.
Planning Commission recommended approval. StaII recommended denial.
01/29/14
A routine Business Licensing Inspection (137028) was conducted, which
veriIied that the gaming machines were removed Irom the site.
04/16/14
A routine Business Licensing Inspection (139497) was conducted where in
violations pertaining to separation barriers, internal signage and use
restrictions related to the number oI days live entertainment can be held,
pursuant to SUP-32144 where noted.


07/06/09
A Tenant Improvement (A/P #132474) Ior a restaurant (Feelgoods) was
Iinalized.
06/30/09
A business license (R09-01515) Ior a Restaurant was issued. The license is
still active.
SUP-56149 PR1-54092]
PDL

01/24/11
A business license (C05-02724) Ior a Tobacco Dealer was issued Ior Count`s
Vamp`d at 6750 West Sahara Avenue.
02/07/11
A business license (L21-00080) Ior a Supper Club was issued Ior Count`s
Vamp`d at 6750 West Sahara Avenue.
02/07/11
A business license (L18-00066) Ior an Alcohol Caterer was issued Ior
Count`s Vamp`d at 6750 West Sahara Avenue.
02/10/11
A business license (G01-02407) Ior a Restricted Gaming (5 Slots) was issued.
The license became inactive on 01/15/14.

05/19/14
A pre-application conIerence was held in which the applicant and the City
discussed the current land use entitlements, the current site activities and
various courses oI action to achieve their goals.

A neighborhood meeting is not required Ior this land use application, nor was one held.

Field Check
10/06/14
A Iield inspection oI the subject site was conducted. The site was Iound to be
well maintained and clear oI any trash or debris. Non-permitted temporary
signage was noted on the site.

Site Area
Net Acres 1.61

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property
Restaurant w/
Alcohol
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North
Multi-Family
(Condominiums)
M (Medium Density
residential)
R-PD16 (Residential
Planned Development
16 Units per Acre)
South Auto Dealership Clark County Clark County
East
Church
Auto Repair
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
West Restaurant MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
SUP-56149 PR1-54092]
PDL


Trails N/A


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Sahara Avenue Primary Arterial
Planned Streets and
Highways Map

150 Y

Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Shopping
Center
221,051 SF
1 Space /
250 SF oI
GFA


1,172

Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 867 18 1,131 41 Y

ANALYSIS

The Night Club use is deIined as 'an establishment, other than a teen dance center, that is
operated as a place oI entertainment, characterized by any or all oI the Iollowing as principal
activities: 1. Live, recorded, or televised entertainment, including but not limited to perIormance
by magicians, musicians or comedians. 2. Dancing. The proposed use meets the deIinition as
the applicant is proposing to hold live music perIormance within the existing Supper Club Iour
(4) times a week.
SUP-56149 PR1-54092]
PDL


There are no Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements associated with the Night Club use.

The subject site is currently entitled as a Supper Club and is limited by Condition #7 oI the
associated Special Use Permit (SUP-32144) to a maximum number oI three (3) days a week in
which live entertainment can occur on site. The condition Iurther states that iI 'the applicant
desires live entertainment to become a principle use (more than 3 days a week), a Special Use
Permit will be necessary prior to such change. This application Iacilitates that desire and would
allow the applicant additional days in which to oIIer live entertainment at the subject site.

The subject site currently holds a Supper Club license. The Supper Club license will be utilized
to Iacilitate liquor sales within the night club, but the applicant will be subject to the Title 6.50
'Liquor Control regulations Ior a 'Restaurant with Alcohol, Iormerly known as a Supper Club.
Among the regulations Iound within Title 6.50.220, the applicant will be required to maintain
Iood sales oI not less than IiIty-Iive percent oI gross sales, as well as the sale oI alcoholic
beverages are limited to being served in a designated lounge area and in connection with a meal.
In addition, the operator cannot charge or collect any admission Iee, including, but not limited to,
soliciting donations or requiring ticket purchases Ior entry into the licensed establishment.

According to the submitted justiIication letter and Iloor plan, the proposed use will meet the
restriction outlined above. The proposed Night Club use adheres to all minimum special use
permit requirements as outlined by Title 19.12. It has been determined that the proposed Night
Club use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with the surrounding
commercial land uses to the east, west and south, as well as the residential condominium units to
the north, thereIore, staII is recommending approval, as the use is considered appropriate Ior the
surrounding area.

Pursuant to Ordinance No. 5477, the proposed project is deemed to be a 'Project oI Regional
SigniIicance as the Special Use Permit request is within 500 Ieet oI the unincorporated Clark
County. An Environmental Impact Assessment questionnaire was circulated to the aIIected
Agencies and Entities Ior the mandated 15-day period and no signiIicant issues have been
identiIied.



SUP-56149 PR1-54092]
PDL


The proposed Night Club use can be conducted in a compatible and harmonious manner
with the existing uses Iound within the shopping center, as well as the commercial uses in
the surrounding area. The night club can also be conducted in a compatible and
harmonious manner with the residential condominium use to the north, as the use will be
conducted within an enclosed building located approximately 220 Ieet to the nearest
condominium unit.


The subject site is located within an existing commercial shopping center that is physically
suitable Ior the intensity oI the proposed land use.


Access to the site will not change. Vehicles may enter the property Irom Sahara Avenue, a
150-Ioot Primary Arterial as classiIied by the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways.

General Plan.



The proposed use meets all applicable conditions oI approval Ior a Night Club use per
Title 19.12.


NOTICES MAILED 211

APPROVALS 2

PROTESTS 0
09/25/14
PRJ-54092
SUP-56149
09/25/14
PRJ-54092
SUP-56149
11/4/14 PC
0
9
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
0
9
2
S
U
P
-
5
6
1
4
9
0
9
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
0
9
2
S
U
P
-
5
6
1
4
9
S
U
P
-
1
4
9

[
P
P
J
-
4
0
9
Z
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

T
C

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

A
J
L

P
P
O
P
E
P
T
I
E
S

L
L
C

0

W
E
S
T

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

S
U
P
-
1
4
9

[
P
P
J
-
4
0
9
Z
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

T
C

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

A
J
L

P
P
O
P
E
P
T
I
E
S

L
L
C

0

W
E
S
T

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

10/16/14
PRJ-54092
SUP-56149

Agenda tem No.: 14.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-56166 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: WING NUTZ -
OWNER: SHADOW MOUNTAIN MARKET PLACE, LLC - For possible action on a request
Ior a Special Use permit FOR A PROPOSED 2,021 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT WITH
ALCOHOL USE WITH A 1,130 SQUARE-FOOT OUTDOOR SEATING AREA at 6485 North
Decatur Boulevard, Suite #190 (APN 125-24-811-003), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward
6 (Ross) |PRJ-56140|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos
6. Support Postcard

SUP-56166 PR1-56140]
MR


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: WING NUTZ - OWNER: SHADOW MOUNTAIN
MARKET PLACE, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-56166 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: N/A

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-51 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Restaurant with
Alcohol use.

2. All signage shall be permitted and meet minimum code requirements within 30 days oI Iinal
approval.


SaIety.

SUP-56166 PR1-56140]
MR

Conditions Page Two

6. Minors shall only be permitted in such areas wherein spirituous, malt or Iermented liquors
or wines are served only in conjunction with regular meals and where dining tables or
booths are provided separate Irom the bar in conIormance with Title 6.50.


Municipal Code.


SUP-56166 PR1-56140]
MR

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a proposed 2,021 square-Ioot Restaurant with
Alcohol use with 1,130 square-Ioot oI outdoor seating area at 6485 North Decatur Boulevard,
Suite #190. The existing tenant space is part oI a multi-suite building within an existing 366,830
square-Ioot shopping center. The shopping center provides shared parking and access throughout
the 35-acre site. The use is in compliance with all parking and minimum Special Use Permit
requirements outlined by Title 19.12. This use can be conducted in a harmonious and compatible
manner with the existing and Iuture land uses. For these reasons, staII recommends approval oI
the Special Use Permit request. II denied, the restaurant can open at this location; however,
alcohol would be prohibited.

ISSUES

A Restaurant with Alcohol use is permissible in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district with the approval oI a Special Use Permit.


08/25/97
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-0027-97)
request Irom DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) to SC (Service
Commercial) and a Rezoning (ZON-0062-97) Irom R-E (Residence Estates)
to C-1 (Limited Commercial) at the northwest corner oI Centennial Parkway
and Decatur Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended approval on
07/24/97.
11/03/04
The City Council approved a Site Development Review (SDR-5050) request
Ior a 365,700 square-Ioot shopping center at the northwest corner oI
Centennial Parkway and Decatur Boulevard. The Planning Commission
09/08/05
The Planning Commission approved a Master Sign Plan (MSP-8346) Ior a
365,700 square-Ioot shopping center at the northwest corner oI Centennial
Parkway and Decatur Boulevard. StaII recommended approval.
03/15/06
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-11170) request Ior a
Supper Club at 6555 North Decatur Boulevard. The Planning Commission
and staII recommend approval.
SUP-56166 PR1-56140]
MR

03/05/08
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-25983) request Ior a
Package Liquor OII-Sale Establishment at 6485 North Decatur Boulevard,
Suite, #140 in Shadow Mountain Marketplace. The Planning Commission
07/29/10
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-38276)
request Ior a Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OII-Sale
use at 6495 North Decatur Boulevard. StaII recommended approval.
06/14/14
The Planning Commission approved an amendment (MSP-53766) to a
previously approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-8346) to add one Ireestanding
Sing and one Monument sign to the interior oI a shopping center at 6415
North Decatur Boulevard. StaII recommended approval.


A building permit (#6003384) was issued Ior a building shell at 6485 North
Decatur Boulevard. The permit was Iinalized on 11/01/07.
05/12/06
A building permit (#6003383) was issued Ior on-site improvements at 6485
North Decatur Boulevard. The permit was not Iinalized.
06/11/07
A building permit (#7001919) was issued Ior a certiIicate oI completion at
6485 North Decatur Boulevard, Suite #190. The permit was Iinalized on
12/03/07.
08/20/07
A building permit (#7002545) was issued Ior a certiIicate oI occupancy at
6485 North Decatur Boulevard, Suite #190. The permit was Iinalized on
12/19/07.
12/24/07
A business licenses (R10-00893) was issued Ior a Food Service or CaIe. The
license was marked out oI business on 05/01/14.
A business license (P62-00282) Ior a Restaurant with Alcohol was submitted;
however, it has not been issued as oI 10/16/14.
10/02/14
A business license (G62-08633) Ior a Restaurant was submitted; however, it
has not been issued as oI 10/16/14.

09/25/14
Use Permit submittal requirements Ior a Restaurant with Alcohol use.
SUP-56166 PR1-56140]
MR



Field Check
10/06/14
StaII conducted a Iield check oI the site and Iound a commercial building and
surrounding site well maintained.

Site Area
Net Acres 20.95

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1(Limited Commercial)
M (Medium Density
Residential)
R-E (Residence Estates)
North Undeveloped
PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
South Freeway Right-oI-Way Freeway
East Shopping Center
Mixed Use Commercial
- North Las Vegas
C-2 (General
Commercial) - North Las
Vegas
Single-Family,
Detached
R-1(Single Family
Residential) West
Undeveloped
ML (Medium Low
R-E (Residence Estates)

Trails Y
SUP-56166 PR1-56140]
MR


Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Shopping
Center
366,830 SF
1 Per 250
SF
1,468

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 1,468

1,992

Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 1,438 30 1,944 48 Y
Loading Spaces 8 8 Y

ANALYSIS

The applicant is proposing to establish a Restaurant with Alcohol use within a proposed 2,021
square-Ioot tenant space with 1,130 square Ieet oI outdoor seating area. The existing building is
part oI a 366,830 square-Ioot shopping center with multiple buildings. The shopping center
provides shared parking and access throughout the 35-acre site. The proposed use is permissible
in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district with approval oI a Special Use Permit.

The Restaurant with Alcohol use is deIined as 'a restaurant and bar operation with alcoholic
beverage sales in which:

1. The actual seating available at all times within the dining area will accommodate at
least 100 persons. For purposes oI this requirement, the 'dining area does not include
bar stool seating at the bar or lounge seating, but may include table or booth seating
within the bar area and table seating within a patio area;

This requirement is met, as the floor plan illustrates that 114 seats are proviaea (52 seats
in the aining area ana 62 seats in patio area) with an aaaitional 12 sitting stools in the
bar area.

2. Alcoholic beverages are served in the restaurant area only in conjunction with the
service oI Iood;

3. Full-course meals are available during all hours the bar area is open to the public;

4. A cook and Iood server, other than a bartender, are available at all times the bar area is
open to the public; and

5. The restaurant operation is the principal portion oI the business.
SUP-56166 PR1-56140]
MR


deIinition outlined above. The justiIication letter details that the restaurant will make up the
principal portion oI the business and the sale oI alcoholic beverages will occur in the dining
room and bar areas. Compliance with the requirement that a cook and Iood server will be
available at all times the bar is open to the public will be enIorced through regular inspections
that occur throughout the licensing process. The Iloor plan illustrates a restaurant capable oI
seating 126 persons.


1. No restaurant with alcohol use shall be located within shall be located within 400 Ieet
oI any church/house oI worship, school, individual care center licensed Ior more than
12 children, or City park
The proposea use meets this requirement, as there are no protectea uses within 400
feet of the subfect property.

Requirement 1 shall be determined with reIerence to the shortest distance between
two property lines, one being the property line oI the proposed restaurant with alcohol
which is closest to the existing use to which the measurement pertains, and the other
being the property line oI that existing use which is closest to the proposed restaurant
with alcohol. The distance shall be measured in a straight line without regard to
intervening obstacles. For purposes oI measurement, the term 'property line reIers to
property lines oI Iee interest parcels and does not include the property line oI:
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area Ior on-site
parking and which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation
described in Requirement 1.
The proposea use meets this requirement, measurement is taken from the existing
property line of Lot 1 Plat Book 125 Page 5, locatea at the southwest corner of
Rome Boulevara ana Decatur Boulevara.

3. In the case oI a restaurant with alcohol proposed to be located on a parcel oI at least
80 acres in size, the minimum distances reIerred to in Requirement 1 shall be
measured in a straight line:
a. From the nearest property line oI the existing use to the nearest portion oI
the structure in which the restaurant with alcohol will be located, without
regard to intervening obstacles; or
SUP-56166 PR1-56140]
MR

b. In the case oI a proposed restaurant with alcohol which will be located
within a shopping center or other multiple tenant structure, Irom the
nearest property line oI the existing use to the nearest property line oI a
leasehold or occupancy parcel in which the restaurant with alcohol will be
located, without regard to intervening obstacles.

4. When considering a Special Use Permit application Ior a restaurant with alcohol
which also requires a waiver oI the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning
Commission shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part oI its
recommendation to the City Council, state whether the distance requirement should
be waived and the reasons in support oI the decision.
This requirement aoes not apply to the proposea use, as no aistance separation
waiver is necessary.

a. An establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection with
a hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or beIore July 1, 1992 or in
connection with a resort hotel having in excess oI 200 guest rooms aIter July
1, 1992; or
b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square Ieet oI retail Iloor
space.

6. The parcel or use is operated or controlled by an agency or subdivision oI local, state
or Iederal government. (C-V only)
This conaition aoes not apply as the parcel is C-1 (Limitea Commercial).

*7. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conIorm to the provisions oI
LVMC Chapter 6.50.

SUP-56166 PR1-56140]
MR

The proposed Restaurant with Alcohol use adheres to all minimum special use permit
requirements as outlined by Title 19.12. The subject site is not located within 400 Ieet oI any
church/house oI worship, school, individual care center licensed Ior more than twelve children,
or City park. StaII is recommending approval, as the use is considered appropriate Ior the
surrounding area.




The proposed Restaurant with Alcohol use is located within an existing shopping center
and can be conducted in a manner that is compatible with the existing and similar
surrounding land uses.


The subject site is physically suitable Ior this type oI intensity oI land use proposed as
evidenced by similar uses at this location in the past.


Access to the property will not change. Vehicles may enter and exit the property Irom
Decatur Boulevard, a 120-Ioot wide Primary Arterial, as classiIied by the Master Plan oI
Streets and Highways.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent
with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives
of the General Plan.

The proposed development is subject to permit review and inspection; thereIore
appropriate measures will be taken to protect the public health, saIety, and general
welIare.

SUP-56166 PR1-56140]
MR


This project meets all minimum conditions and special use requirements as outlined by
Title 19.12 Ior a Restaurant with Alcohol use.


NOTICES MAILED 711

APPROVALS 1

PROTESTS 0
09/25/14
PRJ-56140
SUP-56166
Page 1 of 2 9/29/2014 12:02:19 PM
Applicant Email: William@wingnutzllc.com
Applicant Fax: (801) 606-7705
Rep Last Name: Owens
Rep First Name: William
Applicant State: NV
Applicant Phone: (801) 518-8345
Rep Address: 6485 N Decatur
Rep Email: William@wingnutzllc.com
Rep Fax: (801) 606-7705
Rep State: NV
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: (801) 518-8345
Rep Zip: 89131
Project Name WING NUTZ
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 6 (STEVEN D. ROSS)
Applicant City: Las Vegas
ProjectAddress (Location): 6485 NORTH DECATUR BOULEVARD, SUITE 190
Application/Petition For: SUP for Restaurant with alcohol
Applicant First Name: William
Applicant Address: 6485 N Decatur
Applicant Last Name: Owens
Zoning District: Proposed: C-1 - Limited Commercial
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
SUP-56166
Page 2 of 2 9/29/2014 12:02:19 PM
I Accept:
Yes
SHADOW MOUNTAIN
MARKETPLACE LLC
1125 VEREDA DEL CIERVO GOLETA, CA 93117
William Owens Wing Nutz North Las Vegas, LLC Managing Member william@wingnutzllc.com
SUP-56166
1 0 / 0 7 / 1 4
P R J - 5 6 1 4 0
S
U
P
-
5
6
1
6
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1 0 / 0 7 / 1 4
P R J - 5 6 1 4 0
S
U
P
-
5
6
1
6
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1 0 / 0 7 / 1 4
P R J - 5 6 1 4 0
S
U
P
-
5
6
1
6
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
9
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
1
4
0
SUP-56166
S
U
P
-

[
P
P
J
-
1
4
0
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

W
I
N
S

N
U
T
Z

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

S
H
A
D
O
W

M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N

M
A
P
k
E
T

P
L
A
C
E

L
L
C

N
O
P
T
H

D
E
C
A
T
U
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
I
T
E

1
9
0

S
U
P
-

[
P
P
J
-
1
4
0
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

W
I
N
S

N
U
T
Z

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

S
H
A
D
O
W

M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N

M
A
P
k
E
T

P
L
A
C
E

L
L
C

N
O
P
T
H

D
E
C
A
T
U
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
U
I
T
E

1
9
0

Wing Nutz North Las Vegas, LLC Shadow Mountain Shopping Center
6485 N. Decatur Blvd Suite 190 Las Vegas, NV (Phone) 888-402-1333
Date: September 15, 2014
To: City of Las Vegas Business Licensing Division
RE: J ustification Letter
To whom it may concern:
Wing Nutz N Las Vegas, LLC is requesting a special use permit for its restaurant with alcohol license to be
located at the Shadow Mountain Shopping Center 6485 N. Decatur Blvd Suite 190 Las Vegas, NV. We
are a franchisee of Paradise on Wings Franchise Group, LLC who is a small franchisor that franchises its
restaurants throughout the intermountain west. Wing Nutz is a chicken wing themed sports
bar/restaurant that offers high quality baked wings, sandwiches, salads, wraps and other food items
including alcoholic beverages to their patrons. Their location guidelines require a bar area which
includes the serving of alcohol, beer and wine to the patrons who choose to partake.
The intended use of the property is as a restaurant providing the high quality food and customer
experience explained above. The restaurant is in a 1980 SF retail restaurant space with an adjacent
1130 SF patio. The restaurant and patio will house 126 total seats and will have a small bar area that will
have 5 gaming machines. The store will have between 15 and 20 employees and operate the following
hours: 11:00 AM to Midnight Monday Thursday and 11:00 AM 1:00 AM Friday & Saturday. The
property (Shadow Mountain Shopping Center) is a well-seasoned center that already has several other
eating establishments providing food, alcohol, wine and beer to their patrons. These include Chili s grill
& bar, Caf Rio, Panda restaurant and other local cafes. The shopping center supports a wide range of
other retail clients as well. Based upon the location of the space, which was already used as a food
concept and the surrounding restaurants that are already a part of the same project, we feel the area
meets and supports existing policies and regulations.
Additionally, concerning the special use of the property. Ownership and management have studied the
special use liquor licenses available and the regulations/policies concerning each and feel that the
restaurant is conducive to the use.
We appreciate your consideration in this process.

W. J. Miller
Sincerely,
William J . Miller Wing Nutz N Las Vegas, LLC
eeeeeeeenter
------------------1111111111133333333333333333333333
10/07/14
PRJ-56140
SUP-56166 - REVISED

Agenda tem No.: 15.


SUB1ECT:
SDR-56111 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
UNIVERSAL LAUNDRY''S & LINENS - OWNER: LINCOLN CENTER PROPERTIES, LLC
- For possible action on a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 440
SQUARE-FOOT DETACHED MODULAR BUILDING on 2.24 acres at 240 Spectrum
Boulevard (APN 139-36-710-021), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-55050|. StaII



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

SDR-56111 PR1-55050]
GK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: UNIVERSAL LAUNDRY'S & LINENS - OWNER:
LINCOLN CENTER PROPERTIES, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SDR-56111 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

`` CONDITIONS ``

SDk-5111 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Rezoning (Z-0111-88) shall be required, iI
approved.


3. All development shall be in conIormance with the site plan, landscape plan, and building
elevations, date stamped 09/22/14, except as amended by conditions herein.

SaIety.

Ior building permit.

6. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City Departments must be satisIied,
SDR-56111 PR1-55050]
GK

Conditions Page Two

Public Works

7. No additional Iixtures may be installed anywhere at this site, and no additional Ilow may be
introduced to the sewer until downstream sewer capacity improvements, acceptable to the
Sanitary Sewer Planning Section oI Public Works, have been made by the applicant.

SDR-56111 PR1-55050]
GK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

Currently, the subject site consists oI a 44,723 square-Ioot industrial building at 240 Spectrum
Boulevard. The applicant is requesting a Site Development Plan Review to address a citation
issued by Code EnIorcement and permit an existing illegal, detached modular building. The
applicant constructed the 440 square-Ioot detached modular building without proper building
permits. The existing modular building adheres to all minimum requirements as outlined by Title
19. As the modular building is compatible with the existing development and does not require
any Variances, staII recommends approval with conditions. II denied, the existing illegal
modular building would have to be removed Irom the subject site.

ISSUES

A code enIorcement case is active on this property Ior the unpermitted modular building.


12/21/88
The City Council approved a request Ior the ReclassiIication and Plot Plan
Review (Z-0111-88) oI property bounded by Stewart Avenue, Pecos Street,
Charleston Boulevard and Mojave Road Irom C-1 (Limited Commercial) to
R-3 (Medium Density Residential) and M (Industrial) Ior proposed
apartments and an industrial complex. The Planning Commission and staII


03/20/00
A building permit (#367951) was issued Ior a 45,000 square-Ioot concrete tilt-
up building at 240 Spectrum Boulevard. The permit received a Iinal
inspection on 10/17/00.
03/20/00
A building permit (#367952) was issued Ior onsite hardscapes at 240
Spectrum Boulevard. The permit expired on 02/09/01.
SDR-56111 PR1-55050]
GK

08/20/04
A building permit (#707521) was issued Ior a manual access gate at 240
Spectrum Boulevard. The permit expired on 02/19/05.
10/06/05
A building permit (#728974) was issued Ior a certiIicate oI occupancy Ior a
commercial cleaner use at 240 Spectrum Boulevard. The permit received a
Iinal inspection on 11/02/06.
02/14/06
A business license (D50-00112) was issued Ior a Cleaners,
Commercial/Industrial use at 240 Spectrum Boulevard. The business license
remains active.
11/13/07
A code enIorcement citation (#59769) was issued Ior Ilood damage at 240
Spectrum Boulevard. The citation was resolved on 06/01/09.
08/11/09
A code enIorcement citation (#80708) was issued Ior directing employees to
park along Spectrum Boulevard rather than the provided oII-street parking at
240 Spectrum Boulevard. The citation was resolved on 03/24/11.
03/24/11
A code enIorcement citation (#99509) was issued Ior a joint inspection with
the city oI Las Vegas Fire Department at 240 Spectrum Boulevard. The
citation was resolved on 10/12/11.
10/12/11
A code enIorcement citation (#106706) was issued Ior outstanding code
violations. The citation was resolved on 01/12/12.
01/30/12
A building permit (#203571) Ior a modular building was denied by the
Department oI Planning at 240 Spectrum Boulevard. A required Site
Development Plan Review was cited by staII as justiIication Ior the denial.
11/26/12
A building permit (#223120) was issued Ior a temporary exterior wall
opening to Iacilitate equipment removal at 240 Spectrum Boulevard. The
permit received a Iinal inspection on 04/03/13.
12/10/12
A building permit (#224101) was issued Ior a tenant improvement to replace
two laundry presses at 240 Spectrum Boulevard. The permit never received a
Iinal inspection and expired on 06/11/13.
06/13/13
A building permit (#238261) was issued Ior an interior and exterior remodel
at 240 Spectrum Boulevard. The permit has not received a Iinal inspection.
12/24/13
A code enIorcement citation (#136443) was issued Ior outstanding code
violations. The citation has not been resolved.
06/05/14
A building permit (#261469) to convert an illegal temporary modular building
into a permanent structure was denied by the Department oI Planning. A
required Site Development Plan Review was cited by staII as justiIication Ior
the denial.
07/21/14
A building permit (#260556) was issued Ior an interior remodel at 240
Spectrum Boulevard. The permit has not received a Iinal inspection.
09/04/14
A building permit (#264966) was issued to replace seven laundry washing
machines, repair a boiler and repair a lint trap at 240 Spectrum Boulevard.
The permit has not received a Iinal inspection.
SDR-56111 PR1-55050]
GK


07/15/14
StaII conducted a pre-application meeting with the representative to discuss
obtaining approval Ior an existing, illegal modular building on the subject
site. StaII determined that a Site Development Plan Review would be
required. In addition, the location oI the modular building is within a parking
area. A parking variance could be required contingent on a parking analysis to
be submitted by the representative.


Field Check
10/02/14
StaII perIormed a routine Iield check and noted an existing chain link Ience
with razor wire around the perimeter oI the site, parked delivery trucks
blocking required parking spaces, and linen containers being stored outside oI
the main commercial laundry primary structure.

Site Area
Gross Acres 2.24

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property
Cleaners,
Commercial/Industrial
LI/R (Light
Industry/Research)
M (Industrial)
OIIice, Other Than
Listed North
Warehouse
LI/R (Light
Industry/Research)
M (Industrial)
OIIice, Other Than
Listed South
Warehouse
LI/R (Light
Industry/Research)
M (Industrial)
East
Public School,
Primary
PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
OIIice, Other Than
Listed West
Warehouse
LI/R (Light
Industry/Research)
M (Industrial)
SDR-56111 PR1-55050]
GK


Las Vegas Spectrum Y
Trails N/A


Pursuant to 1itle 19.8, the following standards apply:
Min. Setbacks
Front
Side
Side
10 Feet
45 Feet
45 Feet
10 Feet
58 Feet
156 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Min. Distance Between Buildings 6 Feet 29 Feet Y
Max. Lot Coverage N/A N/A N/A
Max. Building Height 40 Feet
12 Feet, 5
Inches Y

Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Spectrum Boulevard Collector Street
and Highways
60 Feet Y

Pursuant to the Spectrum Development Standards, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Warehousing 45,163 SF
1:1,000
SF
46


54

Y
SDR-56111 PR1-55050]
GK


ANALYSIS

Currently, the subject site consists oI a 44,723 square-Ioot commercial building at 240 Spectrum
Boulevard. The existing industrial building has been utilized as a Commercial Cleaners use since
2006. In 2012, a building permit (#203571) was denied by staII Ior a temporary modular
building. A required Site Development Plan Review was cited by staII as justiIication Ior the
denial. The applicant constructed a 12-Ioot, Iive-inch tall, 440 square-Ioot detached modular
building without proper building permits. In 2013, a code enIorcement citation (#136443) was
issued Ior the illegal modular building. In 2014, a second building permit (#261469) was denied
by staII to convert an illegal temporary modular building to a permanent modular building.
Again, a required Site Development Plan Review was cited by staII as justiIication Ior the denial.

The applicant is now requesting a Site Development Plan Review to resolve the outstanding code
enIorcement citation. The modular building adheres to the minimum development standards
regarding height, setbacks, screening, and lot coverage. The existing modular building was
constructed within an existing parking lot adjacent to Spectrum Boulevard. As a result, Iive
parking spaces were removed Irom the overall site. According to the site plan date stamped
09/22/14, the site maintains compliance with minimum parking standards and provides 54
parking spaces where 46 spaces are required. The existing modular building serves as a break
room Ior the commercial cleaner employees. As the modular building is compatible with the
existing development and does not require any Variances, staII recommends approval with
conditions.

FINDINGS (SDR-56111)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and
development in the area;

The existing modular building is located within the parking lot oI the subject site. The
structure is compatible with the existing industrial buildings Iound adjacent and within the
neighboring community. The modular building will have no measurable impact to the
surround properties.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design
Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly-
adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed modular building is consistent with the General Plan and Title 19 minimum
standards.
SDR-56111 PR1-55050]
GK


3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic;

Access to the site is provided Irom Spectrum Boulevard, a 60-Ioot wide Collector Street,
according to the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways, which is suIIicient to continue to
provide adequate access.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

The building materials are appropriate Ior the industrial area and Ior the City. The existing
landscape buIIer adjacent to Spectrum Boulevard will provide additional screening to the
subject site.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic
features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible
with development in the area;

The modular building is Ilat and plain in appearance. However, the appearance oI the
modular building is consistent with the surrounding industrial neighborhood.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.

The modular building will not impact public health, saIety or general welIare, as the
development will be subject to the International Building Code and City inspections.


NOTICES MAILED 582

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
09/22/14
PRJ-55050
SDR-56111
Page 1 of 2 9/24/2014 11:25:01 AM
Applicant Email: brismanr@hotmail.com (Ran Brisman)
Rep Last Name: Seccombe
Rep First Name: Letitia
Applicant State: NV
Rep Address: 6440 S. Polaris Ave.
Rep Email: lseccombe@agcnv.com
Rep Fax: (702) 895-9336
Rep State: NV
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: (702) 370-2519
Rep Zip: 89118
Project Name MODULAR BUILDING
Correct:
Yes
ProjectAddress (Location): 240 SPECTRUM BLVD
Application/Petition For: SDR for a detached modular building at 240 Spectrum Blvd and possible parking variance
Applicant First Name: Universal Laundry's
Applicant Address: 240 Spectrum Blvd.
Applicant Last Name: & Linens
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
SDR-56111
Page 2 of 2 9/24/2014 11:25:01 AM
I Accept:
Yes
LINCOLN CENTER PROPERTIES L L
C
4 EXECUTIVE CIR #190 IRVINE, CA 92614-6792
Letitia Seccombe Austin General Contracting Drafter lseccombe@agcnv.com
SDR-56111
3
R
|
A
|

T
R
A
l
|
|
R

R
|
M
J
|
|
|
2
4
0

S
|
|
.
T
R
|
M

3
|
V
|
|
A
S

V
|
d
A
S

N
|
V
A
|
A
3
R
|
A
|

T
R
A
l
|
|
R

R
|
M
J
|
|
|
2
4
0

S
|
|
.
T
R
|
M

3
|
V
|
0
0
'-0
0
"

A
0
. J V | R S | | | T
A U S T I N G E N E R A L C O N T R A C T I N G , I N C .
6 4 4 0 S o u t h P o l a r i s A v e n u e
C o n t r a c t o r L i c e n s e s : A 7 0 9 7 7 / B 5 9 3 8 3 / C - 3 5 9 4 0 4 / C - 4 6 4 3 2 2
O f f i c e : 7 0 2 7 3 0 - 0 0 7 8 / F a x : 7 0 2 8 9 5 - 9 3 3 6
L a s V e g a s , N e v a d a 8 9 1 1 8
3 R | A | T R A l | | R R | M J | | |
2 4 0 S | | . T R | M 3 | V |
| N l V | R S A | | A | N | R J M A T
| A S V | d A S N V + 0
A
0
9
/
2
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
5
0
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
1
1
V
A
N
S l T | | | A N
O f f i c e : 7 0 2 7 3 0 - 0 0 7 8 / F a x : 7 0 2 8 9 5 - 9 3 3 6
L a s V e g a s , N e v a d a 8 9 1 1 8
3 R | A | T R A l | | R R | M J | | |
2 4 S | | T R | M 3 | V |
| N l V | R S A | | A | N | R J M A T
| A S V | d A S N V +
A
0
9
/
2
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
5
0
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
1
1
A
2
O f f i c e : 7 0 2 7 3 0 - 0 0 7 8 / F a x : 7 0 2 8 9 5 - 9 3 3 6
L a s V e g a s , N e v a d a 8 9 1 1 8
3 R | A | T R A l | | R R | M J | | |
2 4 S | | T R | M 3 | V |
| N l V | R S A | | A | N | R J M A T
| A S V | d A S N V `
A
0
9
/
2
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
5
0
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
1
1
A
2
| | M J | | R | | A N
O f f i c e : 7 0 2 7 3 0 - 0 0 7 8 / F a x : 7 0 2 8 9 5 - 9 3 3 6
L a s V e g a s , N e v a d a 8 9 1 1 8
3 R | A | T R A l | | R R | M J | | |
2 4 ` S | | T R | M 3 | V |
| N l V | R S A | | A | N | R J M A T
| A S V | d A S N V ` `
A
0
9
/
2
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
5
0
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
1
1
A
2
O f f i c e : 7 0 2 7 3 0 - 0 0 7 8 / F a x : 7 0 2 8 9 5 - 9 3 3 6
L a s V e g a s , N e v a d a 8 9 1 1 8
3 R | A | T R A l | | R R | M J | | |
2 4 ` S | | T R | M 3 | V |
| N l V | R S A | | A | N | R J M A T
| A S V | d A S N V + `
A
0
9
/
2
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
5
0
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
1
1
A
3
| \ l S T l N d | | | V S
O f f i c e : 7 0 2 7 3 0 - 0 0 7 8 / F a x : 7 0 2 8 9 5 - 9 3 3 6
L a s V e g a s , N e v a d a 8 9 1 1 8
3 R | A | T R A l | | R R | M J | | |
2 4 S | | T R | M 3 | V |
| N l V | R S A | | A | N | R J M A T
| A S V | d A S N V +
A
0
9
/
2
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
5
0
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
1
1
A
4
R A M | S | T l J N S
O f f i c e : 7 0 2 7 3 0 - 0 0 7 8 / F a x : 7 0 2 8 9 5 - 9 3 3 6
L a s V e g a s , N e v a d a 8 9 1 1 8
3 R | A | T R A l | | R R | M J | | |
2 4 S | | T R | M 3 | V |
| N l V | R S A | | A | N | R J M A T
| A S V | d A S N V +
A
0
9
/
2
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
5
0
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
1
1

A
5
R A M | | | T A l | S
O f f i c e : 7 0 2 7 3 0 - 0 0 7 8 / F a x : 7 0 2 8 9 5 - 9 3 3 6
L a s V e g a s , N e v a d a 8 9 1 1 8
3 R | A | T R A l | | R R | M J | | |
2 4 S | | T R | M 3 | V |
| N l V | R S A | | A | N | R J M A T
| A S V | d A S N V `
A
0
9
/
2
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
5
0
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
1
1
09/22/14
PRJ-55050
SDR-56111
S
D
P
-
1
1
1

[
P
P
J
-
0
j

-

S
I
T
E

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N

P
E
V
I
E
W

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

U
N
I
V
E
P
S
A
L

L
A
U
N
D
P
Y
'
S

&

L
I
N
E
N
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

L
I
N
C
O
L
N

C
E
N
T
E
P

P
P
O
P
E
P
T
I
E
S

L
L
C

Z
4
0

S
P
E
C
T
P
U
M

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
D
P
-
1
1
1

[
P
P
J
-
0
j

-

S
I
T
E

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N

P
E
V
I
E
W

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

U
N
I
V
E
P
S
A
L

L
A
U
N
D
P
Y
'
S

&

L
I
N
E
N
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

L
I
N
C
O
L
N

C
E
N
T
E
P

P
P
O
P
E
P
T
I
E
S

L
L
C

Z
4
0

S
P
E
C
T
P
U
M

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
D
P
-
1
1
1

[
P
P
J
-
0
j

-

S
I
T
E

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N

P
E
V
I
E
W

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

U
N
I
V
E
P
S
A
L

L
A
U
N
D
P
Y
'
S

&

L
I
N
E
N
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

L
I
N
C
O
L
N

C
E
N
T
E
P

P
P
O
P
E
P
T
I
E
S

L
L
C

Z
4
0

S
P
E
C
T
P
U
M

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

09/22/14
PRJ-55050
SDR-56111

Agenda tem No.: 16.


SUB1ECT:
SDR-56141 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: SAHARA EXECUTIVE PARK, LLC - For possible action on a request
Ior a Major Amendment to an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-18693) FOR A
PROPOSED 4,295 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT (WITH DRIVE-THROUGH) WITH
WAIVERS TO ALLOW NO LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST
PERIMETERS WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on approximately 0.91 acres at the
northwest corner oI Sahara Avenue and RichIield Boulevard (APN 162-05-403-005), C-1
(Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-55734|. StaII recommends APROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos
6. Protest and Support Postcards

SDR-56141 PR1-55734]
YK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: SAHARA EXECUTIVE PARK, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL

`` CONDITIONS ``

SDk-5141 CONDIIIONS

Planning


2. All development shall be in conIormance with the building elevations and Iloor plans, date
stamped 09/24/14, and the site plans, landscape plans, date stamped 09/25/14, except as
amended by conditions herein.

3. A Waiver Irom UniIied Development Code 19.08.070 is hereby approved, to allow no north
or west perimeter landscape buIIers where eight-Ioot wide buIIers are required.

4. Exceptions Irom UniIied Development Code 19.08.110 are hereby approved as Iollows: To
allow no parking lot screening where one is required; and to allow 11 parking lot shade trees
where 22 shade trees are required.

5. An Exception Irom UniIied Development Code 19.08.040 is hereby approved, to allow 8
perimeter landscape trees where 32 trees are required.

6. Any changes based upon right-oI-way, traIIic or drainage studies or street improvements
required by the city or public utilities shall not reduce the widths oI perimeter landscape
buIIers, height oI walls or quantities oI plant materials Irom that on submitted landscape
plans date stamped 09/25/14. Any changes based upon subsequently submitted studies must
be accommodated elsewhere on the site.
SDR-56141 PR1-55734]
YK

Conditions Page Two

7. Prior to occupancy, all necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections
shall be completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
oI Building and SaIety.


9. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staII to determine the
most appropriate mapping action necessary to create a new legal lot. The mapping action
shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance oI any building permits.

10. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape
Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the same
time application is made Ior a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler system
is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisIactory manner; the landscape
plan shall include irrigation speciIications. Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility
oI any traIIic control device.

11. A Iully operational Iire protection system, including Iire apparatus roads, Iire hydrants and
water supply, shall be installed and shall be Iunctioning prior to construction oI any


Public Works

13. In accordance with code requirements oI Title 13.16 and 13.56, remove all substandard
improvements and replace with new improvements meeting current City Standards
concurrent with development oI this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this
development shall be restored at its original location and to its original width concurrent
with development oI this site. The existing 'pan style driveway on Sahara Avenue
accessing this site may remain.

14. The applicant shall post a separate bond Ior the removal oI the existing on-site 'slip lane
between Sahara Avenue and the proposed drive thru lane. At the request oI the applicant,
the City will release this bond one year aIter the CertiIicate oI Occupancy has been issued
unless the City TraIIic Engineer determines it must be held longer Ior Iurther review. II the
City TraIIic Engineer determines that the 'slip lane must be removed, the property owner
must close the 'slip lane within the time speciIied by the City TraIIic Engineer or the bond
will be used to close the existing 'slip lane.
SDR-56141 PR1-55734]
YK


15. This site shall have its own independent connection to the public sewer system. The
applicant shall coordinate with the Sanitary Sewer Planning Section oI the Department oI
Public Works to determine an acceptable location to connect to the public sewer in Sahara
Avenue prior to the issuance oI any building permits.

16. Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-oI-way adjacent to this site. All landscaping
and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and maintained so as to
not create sight visibility obstructions Ior vehicular traIIic at all development access drives
and abutting street intersections.

17. As appropriate, submit an Encroachment Agreement to the City oI Las Vegas and/or obtain
an Occupancy Permit Irom the Nevada Department oI Transportation (NDOT) Ior all
landscaping and private improvements in the West Sahara Avenue and RichIield Boulevard
public rights-oI-way, iI any, adjacent to this site prior to the issuance oI any building
permits. The applicant must carry an insurance policy Ior the term oI the Encroachment
Agreement and add the City oI Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity on this insurance
policy. II requested by the City, the applicant shall remove property encroaching in the
public right-oI-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms oI the City's
Encroachment Agreement. The installation and maintenance oI all private improvements in
the public right-oI-way shall be the responsibility oI the adjacent property owner(s) and shall
be transIerred with the sale oI the property Ior the entire term oI the Encroachment
Agreement.

18. A TraIIic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department oI Public
Works prior to the issuance oI any building or grading permits or the submittal oI any
construction drawings Ior this site. Comply with the recommendations oI the approved
TraIIic Impact Analysis prior to occupancy oI the site. The TraIIic Impact Analysis shall
also include a section addressing Standard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and #234.3 to determine
additional right-oI-way requirements Ior bus turnouts adjacent to this site, iI any; dedicate all
areas recommended by the approved TraIIic Impact Analysis. All additional rights-oI-way
required by Standard Drawing #201.1 Ior exclusive right turn lanes and dual leIt turn lanes
shall be dedicated prior to or concurrent with the commencement oI on site development
activities unless speciIically noted as not required in the approved TraIIic Impact Analysis.
Phased compliance will be allowed iI recommended by the approved TraIIic Impact
Analysis. No recommendation oI the approved TraIIic Impact Analysis, nor compliance
therewith, shall be deemed to modiIy or eliminate any condition oI approval imposed by the
Planning Commission or the City Council on the development oI this site.

19. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by the
Department oI Public Works prior to the issuance oI any building or grading permits or
submittal oI any construction drawings, whichever may occur Iirst. Provide and improve all
drainageways recommended in the approved drainage plan/study. The developer oI this site
shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage Iacility improvements
as are recommended by the City oI Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and
approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with development oI this site.
SDR-56141 PR1-55734]
YK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a proposed 4,295 square-Ioot restaurant with drive-through at 3100 West
Sahara Avenue. There is a parking lot on the site that services the commercial subdivision and
this proposal consists oI creating a new pad on the southeast corner Ior the project. The removal
oI this section oI parking lot Irom the oIIice building parcel will leave ample parking Ior both the
oIIice building and the proposed restaurant. A cross access and parking agreement is recorded
on the deed and will remain in eIIect. A Waiver is being requested Ior the north and east
perimeter landscape buIIers. StaII supports this request since the oIIice center was designed to
have additional pads developed and these perimeters are internal to the center. For these reasons,
staII recommends approval, with conditions. II the application is denied, no permits can be
issued Ior the restaurant.

ISSUES

A Waiver is required to allow no north or west perimeter landscape buIIer where a
minimum eight Ioot wide buIIer is required. StaII supports the request since the oIIice
building was designed to have additional pads developed and a cross access and parking
agreement has been recorded on the deed.


09/26/73
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0066-73)
application Ior the reclassiIication oI property generally located between West
Oakey Boulevard on the north, West Sahara Avenue on the south, South
Valley View Boulevard on the west, and RichIield Boulevard on the east,
south oI Westwood Village Tract and west oI Springhurst Townhouses, Irom
R-1 (Single Family Residential) and R 3 (Medium Density Residential) to R-
PD6 (Residential Planned Development - 6 Units per Acre), R-4 (High
Density Residential) and C-1 (Limited Commercial). The Planning
09/27/84
The Board oI Zoning Adjustment approved a Variance (V-0099-84) to allow
auto sales Ior one day only in the months oI February, May, August and
November oI every year where such is not permitted on property located at
3100 West Sahara Avenue. StaII recommended denial.
SDR-56141 PR1-55734]
YK

12/02/04
The Planning Commission accepted a request to Withdraw Without Prejudice
a Special Use Permit (SUP-5471) Ior a Facility to provide testing, treatment,
or counseling Ior drug or alcohol abuse at 3150 West Sahara Boulevard
Avenue, Suite #B22. StaII recommended approval.
12/02/04
The Planning Commission accepted a request to Withdraw Without Prejudice
a Special Use Permit (SUP-5472) Ior a Sex OIIender Counseling Facility at
3150 West Sahara Boulevard Avenue, Suite #B22. StaII recommended
approval.
01/27/05
The Planning Commission accepted the applicant`s request to Withdraw
Without Prejudice a Special Use Permit (SUP-5783) and Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-5779) Ior a proposed Mixed-Use Development on the
properties located at the northwest corner oI Sahara Avenue and RichIield
Boulevard.
06/01/05
The City Council approved requests Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-6219) and
Ior a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-6220) Ior a seven-story mixed-use
development including 303 residential units and 20,250 square-Ieet oI oIIice,
and a waiver oI the 15-Ioot rear yard setback. The Planning Commission
recommended approval on 04/14/05. StaII had recommended approval.
10/19/05
The City Council approved a request Ior a Major Amendment to an approved
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-8583) Ior a seven-story mixed-use
development, consisting oI 325 residential units and 23,695 square Ieet oI
oIIice space and a waiver to permit a side yard setback oI zero Ieet where 10
Ieet is the minimum setback required on 7.78 acres adjacent to the north side
oI Sahara Boulevard, between Spanish Oaks Drive and RichIield Boulevard.
06/06/07
The City Council approved a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-18693) Ior a Iour-story, 42,000 square-Ioot oIIice building, with a
2,450 square-Ioot restaurant with Drive-through, and a 14,550 square-Ioot
General Retail Establishment on 7.68 acres at 3100-3190 West Sahara
Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended approval and StaII
recommended denial.
03/21/12
(SDR-44168) Ior a proposed 2,800 square-Ioot restaurant (with drive-
through) with Waivers to allow no landscape buIIer along the north and west
perimeters where eight Ieet is required on approximately 0.91 acres at the
northwest corner oI Sahara Avenue and RichIield Boulevard. The Planning
Commission and staII both recommended approval. This expired on 03/20/14
as it was not exercised.

SDR-56141 PR1-55734]
YK


No related permits have been issued Ior this project.

08/21/14
StaII met with the applicant and reviewed the proposed restaurant with drive-
through. It was noted that stacking Ior six vehicles in the drive-through lane
is required and needs to be shown on the site plan. TraIIic had concerns about
the driveway oII Sahara and how close it was to the drive-through lane.
TraIIic also suggested making the driveway to RichIield a one-way exit only
drive. The requirements Ior a site development plan review application were
reviewed.


Field Check
10/06/14 StaII visited the site and Iound a clean, well maintained parking lot.

Site Area
Net Acres 0.91

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property Shopping Center C (Commercial) C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North Single-Family
Dwellings
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-PD6 (Residential
Planned Development 6
Units per Acre)
South Restaurant C (Commercial) C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
OIIice East
Financial Institution
MXU (Mixed-Use) C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
West OIIice C (Commercial) C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
SDR-56141 PR1-55734]
YK


Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Yes Ao Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District 200 Feet X Y
Trails X N/A
Rural Preservation Overlay District X N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area X N/A
Development Impact Notification Assessment X N/A
Project of Regional Significance X N/A


Pursuant to Unified Development Code 19.8.7, the following standards apply:
Min. Setbacks
Front
Side
Corner
Rear
10 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
20 Feet
62 Feet
30 Feet
71 Feet
54 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
Max. Lot Coverage 50 13 Y
Trash Enclosure
Screened, Gated, w/
a RooI or Trellis
Screened
and Gated
Y
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y

Pursuant to Unified Development Code 19.8.4 and 19.8.7, the following standards
apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

BuIIer Trees:
North
South
East
West
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
6 Trees
6 Trees
11 Trees
9 Trees
0 Trees
7 Trees
5 Trees
0 Trees
N
Y
N
N
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 32 Trees 12 Trees N
Parking Area Trees
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
end oI each row oI spaces
22 Trees 10 Trees N
SDR-56141 PR1-55734]
YK


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Sahara Avenue Primary Arterial
and Highways
145 Y
RichIield N/A N/A 90 N/A

Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
OIIice 42,000 SF 1:300 SF 140
Restaurant,
2,000 SF or
more (with
Drive-
Through
4,295 SF 1:100 SF 43


214

Y
Loading
Spaces
44,800 SF
3 up to
50,000 SF
then 1 Ior
each
additional
50,000 SF
3 3 Y

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
Provide an 8` landscape buIIer
on interior perimeters.

To allow no landscape
buIIers on the north and west
interior perimeters.
Approval

Exceptions
To screen parking lots with a
low wall, berm or shrubs.
To allow a parking lot with
no screening.
Approval
SDR-56141 PR1-55734]
YK

Exceptions
To provide 22 shade trees in the
parking lot.
To provide 10 shade trees in
the parking lot.
Approval
To provide 32 perimeter
landscape buIIer trees.
To provide 12 perimeter
landscape buIIer trees.
Approval

ANALYSIS

A restaurant with drive-through is a permitted use in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) district. The
project will be surrounded on all sides by other commercial uses and Ironts onto a primary
arterial roadway. This is an appropriate use and location Ior this type oI a project.

The proposed restaurant with drive-through is being developed as a pad in an existing shopping
center complex. The complex was designed and built as three separate legal lots with each deed
having a cross access and parking agreement recorded on the deed. The proposed project is
being designed to blend in and compliment this complex creating the need Ior a waiver and three
exceptions Irom the UniIied Development Code.

The waiver is to allow no north or west perimeter landscape buIIer where a minimum oI an eight
Ioot wide buIIer is required. StaII supports this request since the parking lot already exists and
there is a cross access and parking agreement recorded on the deed. The waiver will allow this
project to appear as though it was developed at the time oI the rest oI the shopping center.

The three exceptions are required Ior the same reasons. The overall parking lot with all oI the
exterior landscape buIIers has been installed. When this was developed, no screening wall or
berm was required and the required number oI trees were Iewer than are now required. By
supporting these exceptions, staII Ieels the project will be more aesthetically complimentary to
the existing shopping center then iI the newer standards were applied to just this portion oI the
complex.

This project Iurthers the city`s Master Plan Neighborhood Revitalization Goal 2: Mature
neighborhoods will be sustained and improved through appropriate and selective high quality
redevelopment and preservation. This proposed development is situated on the Sahara Avenue
right-oI-way and provides easy access Ior both vehicle and pedestrian visitors. Another Iood
option is being provided and an under-developed, high traIIicked commercial corner is being
developed. For these reasons, staII recommends approval oI the application with conditions.

SDR-56141 PR1-55734]
YK


In order to approve a Site Development Plan application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the Planning
Commission and/or City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:


The proposed restaurant with drive-through is compatible with all adjacent commercial
development.


This project is being developed with minimal deviations Irom required codes. The Waiver
and Exceptions are supported by staII since the project will be developed within an
existing shopping center and the requests will allow Ior the development to appear as iI it
were developed at the same time as the rest oI the shopping center.


Sahara Avenue is adequate to handle the traIIic that will be generated with this proposal.
The exit onto RichIield Boulevard is a right turn only that will Iunnel traIIic directly to
Sahara Avenue. No negative circulation or congestion will occur with this development.


The building materials are typical oI restaurants with drive-through developments in the
immediate area and within the City and the landscape will match the existing shopping
center landscape that will be appropriate Ior the area.


The elevations and design characteristics are compatible with the design characteristics oI
the existing shopping center and the surrounding commercial area.

general welfare.
SDR-56141 PR1-55734]
YK


The proposed restaurant will not compromise the public health or general welIare and will
be inspected on a regular basis.


NOTICES MAILED 270

APPROVALS 3

PROTESTS 2
09/24/14
PRJ-55734
SDR-56141
Page 1 of 2 9/29/2014 12:08:09 PM
Applicant Email: richard.moles@kimley-horn.com
Applicant Fax: NA
Rep Last Name: Moles
Rep First Name: Richard
Applicant State: NV
Rep Address: 6671 Las Vegas Blvd S, Suite 320
Rep Email: richard.moles@kimley-horn.com
Rep Fax: NA
Rep State: NV
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: 702-862-3618
Rep Zip: 89119
Assessors Parcel #(s): 16205403004, 16205403005
Project Name PDQ
Correct:
Yes
ProjectAddress (Location): 3100 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
Application/Petition For: SDR
Applicant First Name: Richard
Applicant Address: 6671 Las Vegas Blvd S, Suite 320
Applicant Last Name: Moles
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
SDR-56141
Page 2 of 2 9/29/2014 12:08:09 PM
I Accept:
Yes
SAHARA WEST EXECUTIVE PARK L
L C
2080 ST LOUIS AVE SIGNAL HILL, CA 90755-5839
Richard Moles Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Vice-President richard.moles@kimley-horn.com
SDR-56141
N
O
R
T
H
P D Q
S A H A R A & R I C H F I E L D
C O N C E P T U A L
S I T E P L A N
S C H E M E A
S
C
H
E
M
E

A
0
9
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
7
3
4
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
4
1
N
O
R
T
H
P D Q
S A H A R A & R I C H F I E L D
C O N C E P T U A L
S I T E P L A N
S C H E M E A
S
C
H
E
M
E

A
0
9
/
2
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
7
3
4
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
4
1
0
9
/
2
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
7
3
4
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
4
1
0
9
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
7
3
4
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
4
1
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

K
E
Y

N
O
T
E
S

E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
P
A
IN
T
M
F
R
:
B
E
N
J
A
M
IN
M
O
O
R
E
C
O
L
O
R
:
P
D
Q
M
IL
IT
A
R
Y
B
L
U
E
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
:
O
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
S
O
F
F
IT
E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
P
A
IN
T
M
F
R
:
B
E
N
J
A
M
IN
M
O
O
R
E
C
O
L
O
R
:
P
D
Q
B
R
O
W
N
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
:
O
N
E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
W
IN
D
O
W
H
E
A
D
A
T
S
T
O
N
E
W
A
L
L
E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
P
A
IN
T
M
F
R
:
B
E
N
J
A
M
IN
M
O
O
R
E
C
O
L
O
R
:
P
D
Q
H
O
N
E
Y
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
:
O
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
W
A
L
L
E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
P
A
IN
T
M
F
R
:
B
E
N
J
A
M
IN
M
O
O
R
E
C
O
L
O
R
:
P
D
Q
G
R
E
E
N
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
:
O
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
B
A
N
D
E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
P
A
IN
T
M
F
R
:
B
E
N
J
A
M
IN
M
O
O
R
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
:
V
5
0
0
C
O
R
O
T
E
C
H
A
L
IP
H
A
T
IC
U
R
E
T
H
A
N
E
G
L
O
S
S
C
O
L
O
R
:
P
D
Q
G
R
E
E
N
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
:
O
N
S
T
E
E
L
E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
P
A
IN
T
M
F
R
:
B
E
N
J
A
M
IN
M
O
O
R
E
C
O
L
O
R
:
P
D
Q
G
O
L
D
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
:
O
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
W
A
L
L
S
T
O
N
E
V
E
N
E
E
R
C
O
L
O
R
:
C
O
R
O
N
A
D
O
S
T
O
N
E
P
R
O
F
IL
E
:
Q
U
IC
K
S
T
A
C
K
P
A
N
E
L
S
C
O
L
O
R
:
B
R
O
O
K
S
ID
E
S
T
A
N
D
IN
G
S
E
A
M
M
E
T
A
L
R
O
O
F
M
F
R
:
P
A
C
-C
L
A
D
C
O
L
O
R
:
C
A
R
D
IN
A
L
R
E
D
C
O
P
IN
G
, F
A
S
C
IA
S
, G
U
T
T
E
R
S
, D
O
W
N
S
P
O
U
T
S
M
F
R
:
P
A
C
-C
L
A
D
C
O
L
O
R
:
M
IL
IT
A
R
Y
B
L
U
E

C
A
N
O
P
Y
F
L
A
S
H
IN
G
S
M
F
R
:
F
R
Y
R
E
G
L
E
T
C
O
L
O
R
:
S
IE
R
R
A
T
A
N
P
A
T
IO
R
A
IL
IN
G
M
F
R
:
A
W
N
E
X

C
O
L
O
R
:
P
R
E
-F
IN
IS
H
E
D
A
L
U
M
IN
U
M
R
A
IL
IN
G
S
Y
S
T
E
M
T
O
M
A
T
C
H
P
-6
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R

F
I
N
I
S
H

S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E

N
O
T
E
: R
E
F
E
R
T
O
S
H
E
E
T
A
6
.3
F
O
R
A
D
D
IT
IO
N
A
L
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
A
N
D
P
A
IN
T
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
P
-2

P
-4

P
-5

P
-6
P
-7

S
T
V
-1
F
R
-1
F
R
-3
F
R
-4
P
R
-1

E
1
P
-3

A
2
.
1
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
M
H
S
C
O
0
6
-1
1
-2
0
1
4
1
4
4
0
9
P
R
O
J
E
C
T

IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N

B
L
O
C
K
J
O
B
#
D
A
T
E
:
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
C
H
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
S
H
E
E
T
T
IT
L
E
S
H
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
IS
S
U
E
/
B
Y

D
A
T
E

D
E
S
C
R
IP
T
IO
N
3 7 3 7 W e s t C r a i g R o a d
N o r t h L a s V e g a s , N V 8 9 0 3 2
S
E
A
L
P D Q
A
R
C
H
IT
E
C
T
/
E
N
G
IN
E
E
R
O
F
R
E
C
O
R
D
C
h
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
K
i
r
s
c
h
n
e
r
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
A
rc
h
ite
c
t o
f R
e
c
o
rd
:
C
h
ris
to
p
h
e
r G
a
ry
K
irs
c
h
n
e
r, A
IA
, L
E
E
D
A
P
N
V
R
e
g
. #
R
A
7
0
8
2
S
C
A
L
E

S
I
D
E

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

1

1
/
4
"=
1
'-0
"
S
C
A
L
E

F
R
O
N
T

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

2
1
/
4
"=
1
'-0
"
1

A
C

0
7
-2
9
-1
4

P
E
R
M
IT
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
E
S
2

A
C

0
7
-2
9
-1
4

O
W
N
E
R
R
E
V
IS
IO
N
S
D
A
T
D
R
A
C
H
S
H
E
E
T
S
H
E
E
TTTTT
S
C
A
L
E
1
1
/
4
"=
1
'-0
" 0
9
/
2
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
7
3
4
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
4
1
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

K
E
Y

N
O
T
E
S

E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
P
A
IN
T
M
F
R
:
B
E
N
J
A
M
IN
M
O
O
R
E
C
O
L
O
R
:
P
D
Q
M
IL
IT
A
R
Y
B
L
U
E
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
:
O
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
S
O
F
F
IT
E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
P
A
IN
T
M
F
R
:
B
E
N
J
A
M
IN
M
O
O
R
E
C
O
L
O
R
:
P
D
Q
B
R
O
W
N
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
:
O
N
E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
W
IN
D
O
W
H
E
A
D
A
T
S
T
O
N
E
W
A
L
L
E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
P
A
IN
T
M
F
R
:
B
E
N
J
A
M
IN
M
O
O
R
E
C
O
L
O
R
:
P
D
Q
H
O
N
E
Y
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
:
O
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
W
A
L
L
E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
P
A
IN
T
M
F
R
:
B
E
N
J
A
M
IN
M
O
O
R
E
C
O
L
O
R
:
P
D
Q
G
R
E
E
N
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
:
O
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
B
A
N
D
E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
P
A
IN
T
M
F
R
:
B
E
N
J
A
M
IN
M
O
O
R
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
:
V
5
0
0
C
O
R
O
T
E
C
H
A
L
IP
H
A
T
IC
U
R
E
T
H
A
N
E
G
L
O
S
S
C
O
L
O
R
:
P
D
Q
G
R
E
E
N
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
:
O
N
S
T
E
E
L
E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
P
A
IN
T
M
F
R
:
B
E
N
J
A
M
IN
M
O
O
R
E
C
O
L
O
R
:
P
D
Q
G
O
L
D
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
:
O
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
W
A
L
L
S
T
O
N
E
V
E
N
E
E
R
C
O
L
O
R
:
C
O
R
O
N
A
D
O
S
T
O
N
E
P
R
O
F
IL
E
:
Q
U
IC
K
S
T
A
C
K
P
A
N
E
L
S
C
O
L
O
R
:
B
R
O
O
K
S
ID
E
S
T
A
N
D
IN
G
S
E
A
M
M
E
T
A
L
R
O
O
F
M
F
R
:
P
A
C
-C
L
A
D
C
O
L
O
R
:
C
A
R
D
IN
A
L
R
E
D
C
O
P
IN
G
, F
A
S
C
IA
S
, G
U
T
T
E
R
S
, D
O
W
N
S
P
O
U
T
S
M
F
R
:
P
A
C
-C
L
A
D
C
O
L
O
R
:
M
IL
IT
A
R
Y
B
L
U
E

C
A
N
O
P
Y
F
L
A
S
H
IN
G
S
M
F
R
:
F
R
Y
R
E
G
L
E
T
C
O
L
O
R
:
S
IE
R
R
A
T
A
N
P
A
T
IO
R
A
IL
IN
G
M
F
R
:
A
W
N
E
X

C
O
L
O
R
:
P
R
E
-F
IN
IS
H
E
D
A
L
U
M
IN
U
M
R
A
IL
IN
G
S
Y
S
T
E
M
T
O
M
A
T
C
H
P
-6
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R

F
I
N
I
S
H

S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E

N
O
T
E
: R
E
F
E
R
T
O
S
H
E
E
T
A
6
.3
F
O
R
A
D
D
IT
IO
N
A
L
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
A
N
D
P
A
IN
T
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
P
-2

P
-4

P
-5

P
-6
P
-7

S
T
V
-1
F
R
-1
F
R
-3
F
R
-4
P
R
-1

E
1
P
-3

A
2
.
2
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
M
H
S
C
O
0
6
-1
1
-2
0
1
4
1
4
4
0
9
P
R
O
J
E
C
T

IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N

B
L
O
C
K
J
O
B
#
D
A
T
E
:
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
C
H
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
S
H
E
E
T
T
IT
L
E
S
H
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
IS
S
U
E
/
B
Y

D
A
T
E

D
E
S
C
R
IP
T
IO
N
3 7 3 7 W e s t C r a i g R o a d
S
E
A
L
P D Q
A
R
C
H
IT
E
C
T
/
E
N
G
IN
E
E
R
O
F
R
E
C
O
R
D
C
h
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
K
i
r
s
c
h
n
e
r
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
A
rc
h
ite
c
t o
f R
e
c
o
rd
:
C
h
ris
to
p
h
e
r G
a
ry
K
irs
c
h
n
e
r, A
IA
, L
E
E
D
A
P
N
V
R
e
g
. #
R
A
7
0
8
2
S
C
A
L
E

S
I
D
E

/

D
R
I
V
E

T
H
R
U

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

1

1
/
4
"=
1
'-0
"
S
C
A
L
E

R
E
A
R

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

2
1
/
4
"=
1
'-0
"
1

A
C

0
7
-2
9
-1
4

P
E
R
M
IT
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
E
S
2

A
C

0
7
-2
9
-1
4

O
W
N
E
R
R
E
V
IS
IO
N
S
D
A
T
D
R
A
C
H
S
H
E
E
T
S
H
E
E
TTTTT
S
C
A
L
E
1
1
/
4
"=
1
'-0
" 0
9
/
2
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
7
3
4
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
4
1
A
3
.1
1

A
3
.4
3

7
A
5
.6
2
0
0
S
U
N
R
O
O
M
P
8
P
1
0

T
Y
P
IC
A
L
P
5

A
4
.
8
5
.
8
B

D

E

H

I

J

K

L

G

M

N

C
D

F

N

9

8

7

6

5

4
3

2

3
.
2
7
.
2

1
0
1
1

H

I

J

K

L

G

1
1
.
1

F
.
1

G
A
S

W
O
B

W
H

F
E

S H
F
R

O
R
T

I-H
W
S
C
O
2

W
S

F
E
C
F
E
F
E
-K

F
E
A
3
.1

3

1
A
4
.5
A
2
.2

1

1
0
7

W
O
M
E
N

1
0
6
M
E
N
1
0
5

V
E
S
T
IB
U
L
E
1
1
2
H
O
U
S
E
H
O
S
P
IT
A
L
IT
Y
1
1
5
S
IN
K
M
O
P
1
1
1
F
O
O
D
P
R
E
P
1
0
8

O
F
F
IC
E
1
0
9
K
IT
C
H
E
N
E
X
P
O
1
0
2

R
O
O
M
D
IN
IN
G

1
0
0

E
N
T
R
Y

1
0
1
Q
U
E
IN
G

1
1
4

C
O
O
L
E
R
1
1
3
M
E
C
H
A
N
IC
A
L
1
1
6

P
R
E
P
B
E
V
E
R
A
G
E
A
3
.2

2

A
3
.5
A
5
.6
1
0
A
4
.4
9
"
1
'-0
"
1 ' - 0 "
P
2
T
Y
P
IC
A
L
P
1

P
1

P
1

P
3

P
7

P
7

C
E
N
T
E
R
E
D
W
IT
H
IN
W
A
L
L

P
8
C
E
N
T
E
R
E
D
W
IT
H
IN
W
A
L
L
P
1

P
1
1
P
2
P
9

P
1

P
1
3
T
Y
P
IC
A
L
P
1
2
S
E
R
V
IC
E
R
A
M
P
P
8

A
3
.2

1
A
2
.1

1
A
3
.1

2

1
0
4

V
E
S
T
IB
U
L
E

B
E
V
E
R
A
G
E
P
1

P
A
R
T
IA
L
E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
C
U
R
B
S
H
O
W
N
F
O
R
R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
. R
E
F
E
R
T
O
C
IV
IL
D
R
A
W
IN
G
S
F
O
R
A
D
D
IT
IO
N
A
L
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
, T
Y
P
IC
A
L

P
4

P
1

P
1

P
2

P
1
P
1
4

8
'-4
", F
IN
IS
H
W
A
L
L
T
O
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
IN
E
O
F
C
H
A
S
E
, V
.I.F
.
A
2
.1

2

1 ' - 4 "

A
2
.2
1
'-8
"
1
1
7

W
A
S
H
A
R
E
A
D
A
S
H
E
D
L
IN
E
IN
D
IC
A
T
E
S
E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
C
A
N
O
P
IE
S
A
B
O
V
E
, T
Y
P
IC
A
L
P
1
5

P
1
6

2 ' - 3 "
3
'-0
"
C
L
E
A
R
3 ' - 0 "
C L E A R
P
1
7

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

K
E
Y

N
O
T
E
S

P
1

L
IN
E
O
F
S
O
F
F
IT
A
B
O
V
E
P
2
E
L
E
C
T
R
O
N
IC
M
E
N
U
B
O
A
R
D
P
3

H
A
N
D
S
IN
K
W
IT
H
S
T
A
IN
L
E
S
S
S
T
E
E
L
B
A
C
K
S
P
L
A
S
H
P
4
S
M
O
K
E
S
T
A
N
D
P
5
P
A
T
IO
R
A
IL
IN
G
S
P
6

R
O
O
F
A
C
C
E
S
S
L
A
D
D
E
R
W
IT
H
S
E
C
U
R
IT
Y
L
O
C
K
A
B
L
E
D
O
O
R
P
7
M
E
N
/
W
O
M
E
N
S
IG
N
A
G
E
W
IT
H
A
D
A
S
Y
M
B
O
L
.
M
O
U
N
T
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
IN
E
O
F
S
IG
N
@
6
0
" A
.F
.F
.
P
8

O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
S
IG
N
A
G
E
, S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
A
0
.1
F
O
R
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
C
O
U
N
T
. M
O
U
N
T
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
IN
E
O
F
S
IG
N
@
6
0
" A
.F
.F
.
P
9
S
T
A
IN
L
E
S
S
S
T
E
E
L
S
O
D
A
L
IN
E
C
H
A
S
E
P
1
0
K
N
O
X
B
O
X
. V
E
R
IF
Y
L
O
C
A
T
IO
N
W
IT
H
L
O
C
A
L
M
U
N
IC
IP
A
L
IT
Y
T
O
IN
S
U
R
E
C
O
M
P
L
IA
N
C
E
P
1
1

E
L
E
C
T
R
IC
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
P
1
2
E
L
E
C
T
R
IC
A
L
M
E
T
E
R
P
1
3
B
O
L
L
A
R
D
, S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
A
0
.2
P
1
4

R
E
C
E
S
S
E
D
F
IR
E
E
X
T
IN
G
U
IS
H
E
R
C
A
B
IN
E
T
. B
A
S
IS
O
F
D
E
S
IG
N
: L
A
R
S
E
N
'S
G
E
M
IN
I S
E
R
IE
S
G
2
4
0
9
-R
2
. S
E
T
B
O
T
T
O
M
O
F
C
A
B
IN
E
T
@
2
7
"
A
.F
.F
.
P
1
5
E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
M
E
N
U
B
O
A
R
D
. R
E
F
E
R
T
O
C
IV
IL
D
R
A
W
IN
G
S
F
O
R
2
N
D
M
E
N
U
B
O
A
R
D
L
O
C
A
T
IO
N
(
N
O
T
S
H
O
W
N
O
N
A
R
C
H
IT
E
C
T
U
R
E
)
. M
E
N
U
B
O
A
R
D
S
A
N
D
M
E
N
U
B
O
A
R
D
F
O
U
N
D
A
T
IO
N
S
IN
S
T
A
L
L
E
D
B
Y
G
.C
.
P
1
6
B
IK
E
R
A
C
K
. C
O
O
R
D
IN
A
T
E
F
IN
A
L
L
O
C
A
T
IO
N
W
IT
H
A
R
C
H
IT
E
C
T
P
1
7

C
U
S
T
O
M
C
A
S
H
S
A
F
E
, S
E
E
A
6
.3
F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

L
E
G
E
N
D

F
E

F
IR
E
E
X
T
IN
G
U
IS
H
E
R
- W
A
L
L
M
O
U
N
T
F
E
-C
F
IR
E
E
X
T
IN
G
U
IS
H
E
R
C
A
B
IN
E
T
F
E
-K
F
IR
E
E
X
T
IN
G
U
IS
H
E
R
(
K
IT
C
H
E
N
R
A
T
E
D
)
C
O
2
C
O
2
T
A
N
K
G
A
S
G
A
S
M
E
T
E
R
S
H
S
P
A
C
E
H
E
A
T
E
R
A
B
O
V
E
D
O
O
R
F
R
F
IR
E
R
IS
E
R
I-H
W
A
L
L
M
O
U
N
T
E
D
IN
S
T
A
N
T
-H
O
T
O
R
T
O
IL
R
E
C
Y
C
L
IN
G
T
A
N
K
W
O
B

W
A
S
T
E
O
IL
B
O
X
W
H

W
A
T
E
R
H
E
A
T
E
R
(
M
O
U
N
T
E
D
IN
A
P
L
A
T
F
O
R
M
)
W
S
W
A
T
E
R
S
O
F
T
E
N
E
R
F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

G
E
N
E
R
A
L

N
O
T
E
S
1
.
N
O
S
P
E
C
IA
L
F
IR
E
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
IO
N
H
A
Z
A
R
D
S
E
X
IS
T
.
2
.
R
E
F
E
R
T
O
F
O
O
D
S
E
R
V
IC
E
D
R
A
W
IN
G
S
F
O
R
E
X
A
C
T
L
O
C
A
T
IO
N
O
F
K
IT
C
H
E
N
E
Q
U
IP
M
E
N
T
.
3
.
R
E
F
E
R
T
O
IN
T
E
R
IO
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
IO
N
S
, W
A
L
L
T
Y
P
E
S
A
N
D
F
IN
IS
H
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
S
F
O
R
A
L
L
W
A
L
L
H
E
IG
H
T
S
A
N
D
W
A
L
L
F
IN
IS
H
E
S
, T
Y
P
IC
A
L
.
4
.
V
E
R
IF
Y
W
IT
H
F
IR
E
M
A
R
S
H
A
L
L
O
N
F
IN
A
L
L
O
C
A
T
IO
N
O
F
A
L
L
F
IR
E
E
X
T
IN
G
U
IS
H
E
R
S
.
P
1

A
1
.
2
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
M
H
S
A
C
S
C
A
L
E

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

1

1
/
4
"=
1
'-0
"
0
6
-1
1
-2
0
1
4
1
4
4
0
9
P
R
O
J
E
C
T

IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N

B
L
O
C
K
J
O
B
#
D
A
T
E
:
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
C
H
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
S
H
E
E
T
T
IT
L
E
S
H
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
IS
S
U
E
/
B
Y

D
A
T
E

D
E
S
C
R
IP
T
IO
N
3 7 3 7 W e s t C r a i g R o a d
S
E
A
L
P D Q
A
R
C
H
IT
E
C
T
/
E
N
G
IN
E
E
R
O
F
R
E
C
O
R
D
C
h
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
K
i
r
s
c
h
n
e
r
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
A
rc
h
ite
c
t o
f R
e
c
o
rd
:
C
h
ris
to
p
h
e
r G
a
ry
K
irs
c
h
n
e
r, A
IA
, L
E
E
D
A
P
N
V
R
e
g
. #
R
A
7
0
8
2
1

A
C

0
7
-2
9
-1
4

P
E
R
M
IT
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
E
S
2

A
C

0
7
-2
9
-1
4

O
W
N
E
R
R
E
V
IS
IO
N
S
1
1
S
C
A
L
E
1
1
/
4
"=
1
'-0
"
D
A
T
D
R
A
C
H
S
H
E
E
T
S
H
E
E
TTTTT
0
9
/
2
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
7
3
4
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
4
1
F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N
2'
4'
0
8'
S
E
A
T
I
N
G

C
O
U
N
T

T
A
B
L
E
S
:

3
4
S
E
A
T
S
:

1
4
1
F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N
P
D
Q
-

S
U
N
R
O
O
M

P
R
O
T
O
T
Y
P
E
4
,
2
9
5

G
R
O
S
S

S
Q
U
A
R
E

F
E
E
T
P
U
B
L
I
C

U
S
E

A
R
E
A
:
1
,
8
6
5

N
E
T

S
Q
U
A
R
E

F
E
E
T
0
8
.
0
7
.
1
4
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
2'
4'
0
8'
0
9
/
2
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
7
3
4
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
4
1
SDR 56141
Sahara Executive Park, LLC
NEC Sahara Avenue and Richfield Boulevard
Proposed 4.295 thousand square foot fast food restaurant with drive-through.
Traffic produced by proposed development:
Proposed Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT
RATE/#
UNIT TOTAL
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
FAST-FOOD WITH DRIVE-THRU [1000
SF]
4.295
496.12 2,131
AM Peak Hour 49.35 212
PM Peak Hour 33.84 145
Existing traffic on all nearby streets:
Sahara Avenue
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 47,975
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 3838
Richfield Boulevard
Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Sahara Avenue 51,800
Richfield Boulevard 17,115
This project is expected to add about 2,131 trips per day on Sahara Ave. & Richfield Blvd. Currently, Sahara is at about
93 percent of capacity and Richfield is at about 17 percent of capacity. With this project, Sahara is expected to be at about
97 percent of capacity and Richfield to be at about 29 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this project will add about 212 trips in the peak hour, or about seven every two minutes.
Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.
S
D
P
-
1
4
1

[
P
P
J
-
7
3
4
j

-

S
I
T
E

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N

P
E
V
I
E
W

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

S
A
H
A
P
A

E
X
E
C
U
T
I
V
E

P
A
P
k

L
L
C

N
O
P
T
H
W
E
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

A
N
D

P
I
C
H
F
I
E
L
D

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
D
P
-
1
4
1

[
P
P
J
-
7
3
4
j

-

S
I
T
E

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N

P
E
V
I
E
W

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

S
A
H
A
P
A

E
X
E
C
U
T
I
V
E

P
A
P
k

L
L
C

N
O
P
T
H
W
E
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

A
N
D

P
I
C
H
F
I
E
L
D

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
D
P
-
1
4
1

[
P
P
J
-
7
3
4
j

-

S
I
T
E

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N

P
E
V
I
E
W

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

S
A
H
A
P
A

E
X
E
C
U
T
I
V
E

P
A
P
k

L
L
C

N
O
P
T
H
W
E
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

A
N
D

P
I
C
H
F
I
E
L
D

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

S
D
P
-
1
4
1

[
P
P
J
-
7
3
4
j

-

S
I
T
E

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N

P
E
V
I
E
W

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

S
A
H
A
P
A

E
X
E
C
U
T
I
V
E

P
A
P
k

L
L
C

N
O
P
T
H
W
E
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

A
N
D

P
I
C
H
F
I
E
L
D

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

kimley-horn.com 3660 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 200, Orlando, FL 32803 407 898 1511
September 22, 2014
City of Las Vegas
Department of Planning Development Services Center
333 North Rancho Drive, 3
rd
Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89106
Re: Proposed PDQ Restaurant Sahara & Richfield
Justification Letter
Dear Department of Planning Development Services:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. is assisting with the proposed PDQ restaurant to be
located at northwest corner of West Sahara Avenue and Richfield Boulevard in the City of
Las Vegas, Nevada.
Our application proposes to construct a 4,295 sf PDQ Restaurant and associated
infrastructure on the existing parking lot parcel. Our plan includes more than the
required minimum number of parking spaces and the restaurant is an allowed use for
the current C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning.
The proposed site plan will require a waiver from the perimeter landscape buffer along the
north and west perimeters. Additionally, an exception is being requested for the parking lot
landscape requirement of once landscape finger for every six uncovered parking spaces.
Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Brooks Allen Stickler, P.E.
Project Manager
K:\ORL_Civil\149448004-PDQ Sahara & Richfield NV\AGENCY PERMITS\City of Las Vegas\Design
Review\APPLICATIONS\Justification Letter 8-18-2014.docx
407 898 15555
09/24/14
PRJ-55734
SDR-56141

Agenda tem No.: 17.


SUB1ECT:
CITRA REAL ESTATE CAPITAL - OWNER: CITY PARKWAY V, INC. - For possible action
on a request Ior a Major Amendment oI an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
53067) FOR A PROPOSED TWO-BUILDING, 197-FOOT TALL, 379,202 SQUARE-FOOT
MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF A 111,987 SQUARE-FOOT
CONVALESCENT CARE FACILITY, AN 84-UNIT ASSISTED LIVING APARTMENT
COMPLEX, A 32-UNIT HIGH-RISE HOUSING APARTMENT COMPLEX, GENERAL
RETAIL SPACE, OFFICE SPACE AND A FIVE-LEVEL PARKING FACILITY, WITH
WAIVERS OF SYMPHONY PARK STREETSCAPE STANDARDS on 3.30 acres at the
southeast corner oI City Parkway and Clark Avenue (a portion oI APN 139-34-211-003), PD
(Planned Development) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-56071|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

SDR-56176 PR1-56071]
SS


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: CITRA REAL ESTATE CAPITAL - OWNER: CITY
PARKWAY V, INC.


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL

`` CONDITIONS ``

SDk-517 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
53067), except as amended by conditions herein.

2. ConIormance to the conditions oI approval listed in the action letter oI the Symphony Park
Design Review Committee (SPDRC) dated 09/24/14 pertaining to development oI this site.


4. All development shall be in conIormance with the Symphony Park Development Standards
and Downtown Centennial Plan as applicable, and shall also conIorm with the site plan and
landscape plan, date stamped 09/29/14 (black and white) and 10/09/14 (color) and building

5. Revised plans, elevations and documents shall be submitted to and approved by the SPDRC
as indicated on the SPDRC action letter dated 09/24/14. All revised conceptual plans
approved by the SPDRC shall be submitted to the Department oI Planning prior to submittal
oI an application Ior building permit.
SDR-56176 PR1-56071]
SS

Conditions Page Two

6. Construction documents shall be submitted to the SPDRC Ior review and approval prior to
the issuance oI a building permit in accordance with Section 5.0 oI the Symphony Park
Design Standards Manual. The review shall be limited to the conditions oI approval placed
upon the project by the city oI Las Vegas and the Symphony Park Design Standards. A
letter oI approval Irom the SPDRC must be submitted with the building permit application.

7. A Waiver Irom Symphony Park Design Standards Subsection 2.6 is hereby approved to
allow utility coordination zones along City Parkway where not otherwise allowed.

8. A Waiver Irom Symphony Park Design Standards Subsection 2.12 is hereby approved to
allow decorative pavers in the pedestrian walkway along the Clark Avenue extension where
100 percent scored concrete is allowed, and to allow street trees and planters in diIIerent
locations than required by the Symphony Park Design Standards.

SaIety.


oI any traIIic control device. The technical landscape plan shall be revised Irom the
conceptual landscape and streetscape plans to conIorm with the Symphony Park Design
Standards, except as amended herein.


Public Works

13. Site development to comply with all previous conditions oI approval Ior SDR-53067 and all
other applicable site related actions.

SDR-56176 PR1-56071]
SS

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting to amend the approved site development plans Ior construction oI a
residential and commercial campus in Symphony Park. This Mixed-Use development Ieatures a
126-bed skilled nursing Iacility, 84 assisted living apartments, 56 memory care units, 30 senior
citizen apartments, retail and oIIice space. The total Iloor area would increase Irom 318,975
square Ieet to 379,202 square Ieet within two buildings where three buildings had originally been
approved. The parking garage would also be reconIigured as a Iour-story (Iive-level) structure
situated along the rear oI the site as a buIIer Irom the Union PaciIic Railroad and as a landing
point Ior the existing pedestrian bridge connecting Symphony Park to the City's parking garage
on Main Street. The assisted living and senior apartments would be oriented to the northwest to
provide a view amenity oI Symphony Park, but in a taller tower. The overall height is proposed
to increase Irom 120 Ieet to 197 Ieet. A pedestrian area between the assisted living/residential
tower and skilled nursing Iacility will provide art and landscaping amenities as required by the
Symphony Park Design Standards. Ground level retail areas will provide opportunities Ior
restaurants with outdoor dining along City Parkway.

Technical aspects oI the development have been reviewed and conditionally approved by the
Symphony Park Design Review Committee (SPDRC), but the project is subject to Iurther
SPDRC review prior to Iinal approval. Concerns over building design will be addressed at that
time. StaII Iollows the SPDRC`s recommendation Ior approval oI the Major Amendment, as the
project is generally compatible with the surrounding development and uses. II denied, the
development could not be constructed on the site as proposed.

ISSUES

II approved, the project is subject to all applicable previous conditions oI approval and
additional conditions resulting Irom this review.
This project is in conIormance with the 200-Ioot height restriction oI the Airport Overlay
District.
The Symphony Park Design Review Committee (SPDRC) has conditionally approved the
proposed project, subject to Iurther plan revisions prior to submittal oI construction drawings.
Unresolved issues with respect to the Design Standards that require waivers will require
additional public hearings.
A Waiver oI the Symphony Park Design Standards Section 2.6 to allow clustered date palm
trees on the north end oI City Parkway where not allowed is supported by SPDRC and staII.
SDR-56176 PR1-56071]
SS


A Waiver oI the Symphony Park Design Standards Section 2.12 to allow alternate street
trees, paving materials and planters on the West Clark Avenue extension is supported by
SPDRC and staII.
A Waiver oI Symphony Park Design Standards is required Ior reduced storeIront heights
along City Parkway and Symphony Park Avenue. The SPDRC and staII do not support these
waivers, and the proposed plans must be revised to indicate conIormance with the design
standards.


08/06/08
The City Council approved the Petition to Vacate (VAC-28094) a 60-Ioot
wide drainage easement generally located at Grand Central Parkway and
Bonneville Avenue along the west side oI the Union PaciIic Railroad right-oI-
way to Ogden Avenue. Extensions oI Time have been granted through
08/06/17.
08/04/10
The City Council adopted the Symphony Park Design Standards and related
design documents through Ordinance #6102. The subject site was labeled as
Parcel L in this document.
08/30/11
Department oI Planning staII approved a Minor Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-42830) Ior a temporary parking lot on a portion oI 14.62 acres
at the northwest corner oI Bonneville Avenue and the Union PaciIic Railroad
right-oI-way. The approval expires three years aIter the date oI the Iinal
oIIsite inspection.
02/27/14
The Symphony Park Design Review Committee conditionally approved the
Block Plan Ior Symphony Park Parcel L.
03/24/14
The Symphony Park Design Review Committee (SPDRC) conditionally
approved a Design Development Review Ior the proposed development on
Parcel L oI Symphony Park.
04/02/14
The City Council adopted Ordinance #6311, which updates the Symphony
Park Development Standards Manual. Part oI this update included the
addition oI 'Assisted Living Apartments and 'Convalescent Care
Facility/Nursing Home to the list oI permitted uses in Symphony Park.
05/13/14
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
53067) Ior a proposed three-building, 318,975 square-Ioot mixed-use
development consisting oI Assisted Living Apartments, Senior Citizen
Apartments, General Retail and OIIice space with a six-level parking Iacility,
with waivers oI Symphony Park Building Design, Service Access and
Streetscape Standards on 3.30 acres at the southeast corner oI City Parkway
and Clark Avenue. StaII recommended approval.
SDR-56176 PR1-56071]
SS

07/07/14
A record oI survey (Survey File 192-47) was recorded, which includes land at
the southeast corner oI Clark Avenue and Promenade Place and abutting the
west side oI the Union PaciIic Railroad right-oI-way. (All oI the subject
property is included on this parcel.) A transIer deed to City Parkway V, Inc.
was recorded with the survey.
09/24/14
The Symphony Park Design Review Committee (SPDRC) conditionally
approved a Design Development Review Ior the proposed revised
development on Parcel L oI Symphony Park.


07/12/12
A building permit (189053) was issued Ior a pedestrian bridge over the Union
PaciIic Railroad right-oI-way at 394 South City Parkway. A Iinal inspection
was completed 09/03/13.
04/02/09
StaII approved civil improvement plans (#107V5199) Ior a perIorming arts
center generally located at the northeast corner oI Bonneville Avenue and
Grand Central Parkway. The project was completed 04/02/12.
11/28/11
StaII approved a revision (#107V5199) oI the civil improvement plans Ior the
perIorming arts center to include a temporary parking lot on the subject site
between City Parkway and the Union PaciIic Railroad right-oI-way.

09/15/14
The applicant`s architectural team presented an overview oI the project with
an emphasis on the changes Irom the previously approved development. It
was determined by staII that the increase in height and Iloor area would, by
Code, require a Major Amendment. The applicant chose to build oII the
previous approval, rather than to start over as a completely new project with
new conditions oI approval.

SDR-56176 PR1-56071]
SS


Field Check
10/06/14
The subject site is located east oI the Smith Center Ior the PerIorming Arts
and currently contains a temporary paved parking lot with light standards. A
chain link Ience separates the site Irom the Union PaciIic Railroad right-oI-
way. A pedestrian bridge connects this site to the City Hall parking garage on
the west side oI Main Street.

Site Area
Net Acres 3.30

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property
Temporary Parking
Lot
MXU (Mixed Use)
PD (Planned
Development)
North Undeveloped MXU (Mixed Use)
PD (Planned
Development)
South Government Facility PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
OIIice, Other Than
Listed
Hotel & Casino
(Parking)
M (Industrial)
East
Parking Facility
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
West
PerIorming Arts
Center
MXU (Mixed Use)
PD (Planned
Development)

PD (Planned Development) District Y
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District (Parkway Center District/
Symphony Park Sub-District)
Y
G-O (Gaming Enterprise Overlay) District N/A
Downtown Casino Overlay District Y
SDR-56176 PR1-56071]
SS

Trails N/A


Pursuant to the Symphony Park Development Standards, the following standards apply:
Min. Lot Width N/A 263 Feet N/A

Standard Approved SDR-537 Proposed Change Compliance
Min. Setbacks*:
Front (City Pkwy)
100 oI Iootprint at
build-to line
100 oI Iootprint
at build-to line
None Y

Side N/A N/A N/A N/A

Corner (Clark Ave/
Symphony Park
Ave extensions)
72 oI Iootprint at
build-to line, with
maximum 16-Ioot
setback
100 oI Iootprint
at build-to line
28 Y

Rear N/A 0 Feet -100 N/A
Max. Building Height 120 Feet 197 Feet 64 Y
Trash Enclosure
Covered--North and
south oI rear parking
entries
Coveredground
level parking
structure
Location
only
Y
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened None Y
*The Symphony Park Design Standards do not designate setback areas in the same manner as
Title 19; rather, a percentage oI the ground level oI the building(s) must be built to the back oI
the private sidewalk along street Irontages, with a maximum allowable setback Ior the remaining
portion.
SDR-56176 PR1-56071]
SS


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Clark Avenue
(east oI City Pkwy)
N/A
Symphony Park Civil
Plans
33 N/A
City Parkway N/A
Symphony Park Civil
Plans (#107V4816)
56 N/A
Symphony Park
Avenue South
(eastern extension)
N/A
Symphony Park Civil
Plans
25 N/A

Symphony Park Schematic Streetscape Design
Streetscape Standards Required Provided Compliance
(3) 60 box Thornless
Hybrid Mesquite (24` on
center)
center)
Y
4` square tree grates 4` square tree grates Y
5-gallon Thunder Cloud
shrubs
Not indicated but noted to
meet SP requirements
By condition
DwarI Rosemary
groundcover
(size varies)
5-gallon DwarI Rosemary
groundcover
Y
BuIIalo Grass in planters BuIIalo Grass in planters Y
Scored concrete Scored concrete at corner N
Backless benches 2 per SP standards Y
Trash receptacles 1 per SP standards Y
Type A planter pots 8 per SP standards Y
Centennial street lights 1 per SP standards Y
Clark Avenue
(East Ena/
Neighborhooa Street
Detail)
Pedestrian lights 3 per SP standards Y
center)
(5) 60 box Fan-Tex Ash By condition
5-gallon Thunder Cloud
shrubs
By condition
DwarI Rosemary
groundcover
(size varies)
groundcover
Y
Symphony Park Avenue
(East
Ena/Neighborhooa
Street Detail)
BuIIalo Grass in planters
By condition
SDR-56176 PR1-56071]
SS

Scored concrete Scored concrete at corner By condition
Centennial street lights 2 per SP standards Y

Pedestrian lights 3 per SP standards Y
(11) 60 box Red Push
Pistache (24` on center)
(11) 60 box Red Push
Pistache (24` on center)
Y
22` clear trunk height
Medjool Date Palm
(14) 22` brown trunk
height Medjool Date Palm
Y
DwarI Rosemary
groundcover
(size varies)
groundcover
Y
Scored concrete (50)
Special paving (25)
Plantings (25)
Scored concrete (50) to
match Smith Center paving
Special paving (25)
Plantings (25)
Y
City Parkway
Centennial street lights 2 per SP standards By condition
Pedestrian lights 8 lights per SP standards Y

Projects located within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subject to the
automatic application oI parking requirements. However, the Iollowing tables show an alternative
parking requirement Ior mixed-use developments as an indicator oI peak hour usage.

Land Use Category Aorth Bldg South Bldg 1O1AL
OIIice & ProIessional --- 79,667 SF 79,667 SF
Retail & Personal
Services
--- 15,500 SF 15,500 SF
Restaurant (included in
retail)
--- --- 0
Hotel (Skilled Nursing) --- 126 units 126 units
Residential (studio) 170 units --- 170 units
SDR-56176 PR1-56071]
SS


Weekdays Weekends
General Use
Category
Ratio
Floor Area
or Units
Midnight-7
a.m.
7 a.m.-6
p.m.
6 p.m.-
Midnight
Midnight-7
a.m.
7 a.m.-6
p.m.
6 p.m.-
Midnight
5 100 5 0 60 10
OIIice & ProIessional 1/300 SF 79,667 SF
13.28 265.56 13.28 159.33 26.56
0 100 80 0 100 60 Retail & Personal
Service
1/250 SF 15,500 SF
62 49.60 62 37.20
100 65 90: 100 65 80
Hotel 1/unit 126 units
126 81.90 113.40 126 106.60 100.80
100 55 85 100 65 75
170 units
212.50 69.30 180.63 212.50 108.88 159.38 Residential (Studio) 1.25/unit
TOTAL 351.78 478.76 356.91 338.50 436.81 323.94
479 437

Outside oI Downtown, this project could expect to require 479 spaces during weekdays and 437
spaces on weekends.

Waivers of Symphony Park Design Standards
2.12 Private street extensions:
tactile paving at corner, 100
scored concrete
Decorative paving along Clark
Avenue extension
Approval
2.12 Private street extensions:
streetscape locations
Locations oI planters and trees
to diIIer Irom SP Design
Standards
Approval
3.7.1/3.4.2 Street level
storeIront heights oI min. 16`-
20`. Canopies min. 16`
clearance
Min. oI 14` canopy height at
storeIronts
Denial
2.6 City Parkway: no utility
coordination zones indicated
Add zones on City Parkway to
coordinate water and sewer
Approval

These waivers are in addition to those approved through Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
53067).

ANALYSIS

The subject site is located within the PD (Planned Development) zoning district and the
Symphony Park District oI the Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District. Development
within this district is subject to the Symphony Park Design Standards Manual. Where silent,
Parkway Center standards apply. Development is also subject to the conditions oI approval Ior
the previous Site Development Plan Review (SDR-53067) approval, except where they are
amended by this project or are no longer applicable. For example, the previous remapping
condition has been satisIied through a 2014 record oI survey that removed all property lines in
conIlict with the project. Since the site is already mapped as a commercial subdivision, new
lines can be drawn by means oI a record oI survey along with a deed and legal description.
SDR-56176 PR1-56071]
SS

Staff Report Page Nine

The site development plan must be reviewed by the Symphony Park Design Review Committee
(SPDRC) prior to submittal to the City Ior public hearing. Conditional approval was granted
09/24/14 by the SPDRC.

Generally, more attention has been given to design and detail oI the buildings and streetscape
than Ior the previous approval, and an eIIort was made to limit the number oI additional waivers
oI the Symphony Park Design Standards. It should be noted that the previous conditions and
waivers oI the design standards still apply except as modiIied by this review. New waivers have
been requested; namely, the addition oI palm trees and overhead canopy on the north end oI City
Parkway and the modiIied location oI street trees and use oI planters on the West Clark Avenue
extension. SPDRC approves oI each waiver, as they will support outdoor dining along the Iront
oI the project and create improved pedestrian Ilow to the existing pedestrian bridge. The SPDRC
again rejected the request Ior reduced storeIront heights along City Parkway in support oI the
Symphony Park Design Standards; canopies oI 16-20 Ieet will be required.

The design has been improved to increase the walkable urban experience and to reduce possible
nuisances. The building envelope has expanded to 100 percent oI the build-to lines. The garage
is now situated on the east side oI the development to buIIer uses Irom noise, odors and possible
hazards oI the adjacent railroad corridor, and will provide a connection Ior the existing
pedestrian bridge to Main Street and Downtown. An eIIort has been made to add restaurant
space at the ground level oI both buildings with opportunities Ior outdoor dining.

As part oI the Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District, the project is not subject to the
automatic application oI Title 19 parking standards. The applicant justiIies the 460 spaces
provided by stating that Iewer spaces are required to accommodate the proposed skilled nursing
and assisted living uses, and a signiIicant number oI spaces will remain open during non-peak
hours oI operation. As the development is replacing an existing temporary parking lot Ior the
Smith Center Ior the PerIorming Arts, the developer intends to share parking resources with the
Smith Center during scheduled events. A more detailed valet plan must be submitted to staII Ior
approval prior to operation.

Several locations along City Parkway near the intersections oI Clark Avenue and Symphony
Park Avenue were indicated as candidates Ior seating Ior outdoor dining. This activity is
encouraged along the storeIronts, but more detail will be needed to show conIormance with the
Symphony Park Outdoor Dining Standards. A site plan must be submitted Ior approval through
the city`s Site Development Plan Review process.


SDR-56176 PR1-56071]
SS

Staff Report Page Ten


The proposed development generally Iollows the programmed objective oI a high-rise
Mixed-Use concept detailed in the Symphony Park Design Standards. The buIIering oI
proposed oIIice, retail, medical and residential uses Irom the Union PaciIic Railroad
increases the compatibility oI the development with the surrounding area.


The proposed development is generally consistent with the General Plan, Title 19, the
Downtown Centennial Plan and the Symphony Park Design Standards Manual. The
development will be subject to Iurther review by the SPDRC Ior building, site and
landscape design, and Ior onsite signage and outdoor dining.


Primary access into the site is provided Irom the Symphony Park Avenue extension into
the parking Iacility. Secondary access is provided Irom the rear service drive, which has
access to Clark Avenue and Symphony Park Avenue. These access points will not
negatively disrupt traIIic Ilow on streets in the area. Circulation through the parking
Iacility is logical.


Stone patterned stucco exteriors, limestone at the building bases and decorative aluminum
Ior accents are acceptable materials Ior Symphony Park and are responsive to the design oI
the adjacent Smith Center Ior the PerIorming Arts. Palm tree clusters are proposed
adjacent to outdoor dining areas along City Parkway, which will require a waiver, but
otherwise landscape materials prescribed by the Symphony Park Design Standards are
proposed.

SDR-56176 PR1-56071]
SS

Staff Report Page Eleven

Generally the proposed design creates a pleasing environment suited to its uses. Massing
oI the buildings is varied. The residential portions oI the development are designed to
have similar visual characteristics to the Smith Center Ior the PerIorming Arts. The
SPDRC is requesting greater variation in wall plane along the length oI the south building
on City Parkway.

general welfare.

The proposed development will be subject to permit review and inspections, thereby
protecting the health, saIety and general welIare oI the public.


NOTICES MAILED 92

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
09/29/14
PRJ-56071
SDR-56176
09/29/14
PRJ-56071
SDR-56176
Page 1 of 2 9/29/2014 7:18:03 AM
Applicant Email: lchristopherson@novusvi.com
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: ESTATE CAPITAL
Rep First Name: CITRA REAL
Applicant State: CA
Rep Address: 4807 Alla Road #5
Rep Email: lchristopherson@novusvi.com
Rep Fax:
Rep State: CA
Rep City: Marina Del Ray
Rep Phone: 702-419-4942
Rep Zip: 90292
Project Name CITRA SYMPHONY PARK AMENDMENT
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 5 (RICKI Y. BARLOW)
Applicant City: Marina Del Ray
ProjectAddress (Location): SE CORNER CITY PKWY AND W CLARK AVE
Application/Petition For: Major Amendment of approved SDR
Applicant First Name: CITRA REAL
Additional Information: none
Applicant Address: 4807 Alla Road #5
Applicant Last Name: ESTATE CAPITAL
Zoning District: Proposed: PD - Planned Development
General Plan Designation: Proposed: PCD
Lots/Units: 1
Gross Acres: 3.0
09/29/14
PRJ-56071
SDR-56176
Page 2 of 2 9/29/2014 7:18:03 AM
! Accept:
Yes
CITY PARKWAY V INC 495 S. MAIN ST LAS VEGAS, NV 89101-6200
Landon Christopherson DLC engineer lchristopherson@novusvi.com
09/29/14
PRJ-56071
SDR-56176
0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
1 0 / 0 9 / 1 4
P R J - 5 6 0 7 1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
0
4
0
'
-

0
"

L
E
V
E
L

1
2
0
4
0
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

2
2
0
6
0
'
-

0
"

L
E
V
E
L

2
2
0
6
0
'
-

0
"

L
E
V
E
L

3
2
0
7
5
'
-

0
"

L
E
V
E
L

3
2
0
7
5
'
-

0
"

L
E
V
E
L

4
2
0
9
0
'
-

0
"

L
E
V
E
L

4
2
0
9
0
'
-

0
"
S
.
A
.
3

S
.
B

S
.
C

S
.
D

S
.
E

S
.
F

S
.
G

S
.
H

S
.
I

S
.
J

S
.
K

S
.
L

S
.
M

S
.
N
A
.
E
A
.
B

L
E
V
E
L

5
2
1
0
1
'
-

2
"
L
E
V
E
L

6
2
1
1
2
'
-

4
"
L
E
V
E
L

7
2
1
2
3
'
-

6
"
L
E
V
E
L

8
2
1
3
4
'
-

8
"

L
E
V
E
L

9
2
1
4
5
'
-

1
0
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
0
2
1
5
7
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
1
2
1
6
8
'
-

2
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
2
1
7
9
'
-

4
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
3
2
1
9
0
'
-

6
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
4
2
2
0
1
'
-

8
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
5
2
2
1
2
'
-

1
0
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
6
2
2
2
4
'
-

0
"
S
N
F

L
E
V
E
L

5
2
1
0
2
'
-

6
"

S
N
F

L
E
V
E
L

6
2
1
1
5
'
-

0
"

S
N
F

L
E
V
E
L

7
2
1
2
7
'
-

6
"

S
N
F

R
O
O
F
2
1
4
0
'
-

0
"
S
.
A

A
.
C

A
.
A

A M E N I T Y A S S I S T E D L I V I N G
S N F
1
C
S
0
0
3
M O B
A
.
D

C
O
U
R
T
Y
A
R
D

C
O
U
R
T
Y
A
R
D
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
S
0
0
1
0

1
0

2
0

4
0
1
"
=
2
0
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
0
4
0
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

2
2
0
6
0
'
-

0
"

L
E
V
E
L

2
2
0
6
0
'
-

0
"

L
E
V
E
L

3
2
0
7
5
'
-

0
"

L
E
V
E
L

4
2
0
9
0
'
-

0
"

L
E
V
E
L

4
2
0
9
0
'
-

0
"
A
.
E
A
.
B

P
.
A

P
.
B

P
.
C

P
.
D

P
.
E

P
.
F

P
.
G

P
.
H

P
.
I

P
.
J

P
.
K

P
.
L
L
E
V
E
L

5
2
1
0
1
'
-

2
"
L
E
V
E
L

6
2
1
1
2
'
-

4
"
L
E
V
E
L

7
2
1
2
3
'
-

6
"
L
E
V
E
L

8
2
1
3
4
'
-

8
"
L
E
V
E
L

9
2
1
4
5
'
-

1
0
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
0
2
1
5
7
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
1
2
1
6
8
'
-

2
"

L
E
V
E
L

1
2
2
1
7
9
'
-

4
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
3
2
1
9
0
'
-

6
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
4
2
2
0
1
'
-

8
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
5
2
2
1
2
'
-

1
0
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
6
2
2
2
4
'
-

0
"
P
A
R
K
I
N
G

L
E
V
E
L

2
2
0
5
0
'
-

0
"
P
A
R
K
I
N
G

L
E
V
E
L

3
2
0
7
0
'
-

0
"
P
A
R
K
I
N
G

L
E
V
E
L

4
2
0
8
0
'
-

0
"
A
.
C

A
.
A

P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N

B
R
I
D
G
E
A M E N I T Y A S S I S T E D L I V I N G
A
.
D

C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
S
0
0
2
0

1
0

2
0

4
0
1
"
=
2
0
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
0
4
0
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

2
2
0
6
0
'
-

0
"

L
E
V
E
L

3
2
0
7
5
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

4
2
0
9
0
'
-

0
"
P
.
2

S
.
1

S
.
2

S
.
3

S
.
4
P
.
1

P
.
3
S
N
F

L
E
V
E
L

5
2
1
0
2
'
-

6
"

S
N
F

L
E
V
E
L

6
2
1
1
5
'
-

0
"
S
N
F

L
E
V
E
L

7
2
1
2
7
'
-

6
"
S
N
F

R
O
O
F
2
1
4
0
'
-

0
"
P
A
R
K
I
N
G

L
E
V
E
L

2
2
0
5
0
'
-

0
"
P
A
R
K
I
N
G

L
E
V
E
L

3
2
0
7
0
'
-

0
"

P
A
R
K
I
N
G

L
E
V
E
L

4
2
0
8
0
'
-

0
"
C
I
T
Y

P
A
R
K
W
A
Y

S
E
R
V
I
C
E
D
R
I
V
E

S N F M O B
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
S
0
0
3
0

1
0

2
0

4
0
1
"
=
2
0
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
P R O P E R T Y L I N E
S
ID
E
W
A
L
K

R
A
I
L
R
O
A
D
S
W
A
L
E

S
E
R
V
I
C
E

D
R
I
V
E

4
' -
0
"

3
' -
0
"

B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E

B
E
A
M
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D

B
O
X

C
U
L
V
E
R
T

R
E
T
A
I
N
I
N
G

W
A
L
L

S
L
O
P
E

E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

G
R
A
D
E

G
U
A
R
D
R
A
I
L
S
S
T

M
T
L
G
R
A
T
I
N
G
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
0
4
0
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

2
2
0
6
0
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

3
2
0
7
5
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

4
2
0
9
0
'
-

0
"
S
.
1
A
W
N
IN
G

S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
P
A
V
I
N
G

P
E
R
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
P
L
A
N
T
E
R

P
E
R
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
T
E
R
R
A
C
E

C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

D
E
T
A
I
L
S

-

S
I
T
E
C
S
0
0
4

1
/
2
"

=

1
'-
0
"
1

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

S
E
R
V
I
C
E

A
C
C
E
S
S

S
E
C
T
I
O
N

A
L
O
N
G

R
A
I
L
R
O
A
D
A
S
I
N
D
I
C
A
T
E
D

1
/
4
"

=

1
'-
0
"
2

S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K

A
N
D

S
T
R
E
E
T

W
A
L
L

S
E
C
T
I
O
N

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
2
4
' -
0
"
9 ' - 0 "
G
L

G
L
1 ' - 6 "
G
L
A
Z
IN
G
3
"
X
6
-1
/2
"
M
U
L
L
IO
N
G
Y
P
C
O
L
U
M
N
P
E
R
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
A
R
C
H
IT
E
C
T
U
R
A
L
P
R
E
C
A
S
T
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
C
O
L
U
M
N
C
O
V
E
R
S
L
A
B
E
D
G
E
B
A
C
K
O
F
M
U
L
L
IO
N
A
L
I
G
N
+

9
'
-

0
"
+

1
1
'
-

2
"
S
T
A
C
K

J
O
I
N
T

A
L
I
G
N
+

9
'
-

0
"
+

1
1
'
-

2
"
S
T
A
C
K

J
O
I
N
T

S
H
A
D
O
W

B
O
X
G
L
A
Z
I
N
G
G
L
A
Z
I
N
G
S
H
A
D
O
W

B
O
X
G
L
S
E
C
T
I
O
N

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
P
L
A
N
C
S
0
0
5
3 " 6 1 / 2 "
3
"
1 "
M
U
L
L
I
O
N
W
IT
H
F
I
N
G
L
A
Z
I
N
G
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

D
E
T
A
I
L
S

-

A
L
F
C
U
R
T
A
I
N

W
A
L
L
C
S
0
0
5

1
/
2
"

=

1
'-
0
"
1

C
U
R
T
A
I
N

W
A
L
L

-

A
L
F
1
/
2
"
=
1
'
-
0
"

3
"

=

1
'-
0
"
2

M
U
L
L
I
O
N

D
E
T
A
I
L

-

A
L
F

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
N
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

0

1
0

2
0

4
0
1
"
=
2
0
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
1
0
/
0
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
N
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

0

1
0

2
0

4
0
1
"
=
2
0
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
N
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

0

1
0

2
0

4
0
1
"
=
2
0
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
N
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

0

1
0

2
0

4
0
1
"
=
2
0
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
N
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

0

1
0

2
0

4
0
1
"
=
2
0
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
N
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

0

1
0

2
0

4
0
1
"
=
2
0
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
0
4
0
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

2
2
0
6
0
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

3
2
0
7
5
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

4
2
0
9
0
'
-

0
"
A
.
1

A
.
2

A
.
3

A
.
4

A
.
6

A
.
8

A
.
9

L
E
V
E
L

5
2
1
0
1
'
-

2
"
L
E
V
E
L

6
2
1
1
2
'
-

4
"
L
E
V
E
L

7
2
1
2
3
'
-

6
"
L
E
V
E
L

8
2
1
3
4
'
-

8
"
L
E
V
E
L

9
2
1
4
5
'
-

1
0
"

L
E
V
E
L

1
0
2
1
5
7
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
1
2
1
6
8
'
-

2
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
2
1
7
9
'
-

4
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
3
2
1
9
0
'
-

6
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
4
2
2
0
1
'
-

8
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
5
2
2
1
2
'
-

1
0
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
6
2
2
2
4
'
-

0
"
A
.
0

A
.
1
0

A
.
5

A
.
7

A
.
5
.
4

A
.
7
.
2

A
.
1
.
8

3
5
' -
0
"

1
4
' -
0
"

2
4
' -
0
"

2
4
' -
0
"

2
4
' -
0
"

2
4
' -
0
"

2
4
' -
0
"

2
4
' -
0
"

2
4
' -
0
"

1
0
' -
0
"

2
2
7
' -
0
"

1
6

(T
Y
P
IC
A
L
)

1
2

1
9

S
E
R
V
I
C
E

D
R
I
V
E

1
1

1
2

0
8

2
0

1
6

1
1

0
6
1
2
1
6
A
.
6
.
6

1
5

1
2

0
4
1 9 7 ' - 2 "
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

L
E
G
E
N
D
M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
C
L
A
D
D
IN
G
0
1

M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
1
0
2

M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
2
0
3

D
E
C
O
R
A
T
IV
E
M
E
T
A
L
S
C
R
E
E
N
0
4

M
E
T
A
L
F
A
C
IA
(P
A
IN
T
E
D
)
0
5

M
E
T
A
L
F
IN
(T
O
M
A
T
C
H
0
2
)
0
6

M
E
T
A
L
C
O
L
U
M
N
C
O
V
E
R
0
7

G
L
A
Z
E
D
A
L
U
M
IN
U
M
S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
0
8

S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
G
L
A
S
S
0
9

G
L
A
Z
IN
G
1
0

U
N
IT
IZ
E
D
C
U
R
T
A
IN
W
A
L
L
1
1

S
T
O
N
E
(P
R
E
C
A
S
T
O
R
T
E
R
R
A
C
O
T
T
A
)
1
2

S
T
E
E
L
T
R
O
W
E
L
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
1
3

M
E
T
A
L
R
O
O
F
1
4

M
E
T
A
L
R
A
IL
IN
G
1
6

G
L
A
S
S
R
A
IL
IN
G
1
7

S
T
E
E
L
A
N
D
G
L
A
S
S
C
A
N
O
P
Y
1
9

E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
1
5

M
E
T
A
L
C
A
N
O
P
Y
1
8

M
E
T
A
L
T
R
E
L
L
IS
(C
A
N
O
P
Y
)
2
0

C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

N
O
R
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
E
V
0
0
1
0

8

1
6

3
2
1
/1
6
"
=
1
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
0
4
0
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

2
2
0
6
0
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

3
2
0
7
5
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

4
2
0
9
0
'
-

0
"
A
.
E
A
.
B

P
.
A

P
.
B

P
.
C

P
.
D

P
.
E

P
.
F

P
.
G

P
.
H

P
.
I

P
.
J

P
.
K

P
.
L

L
E
V
E
L

5
2
1
0
1
'
-

2
"
L
E
V
E
L

6
2
1
1
2
'
-

4
"
L
E
V
E
L

7
2
1
2
3
'
-

6
"
L
E
V
E
L

8
2
1
3
4
'
-

8
"
L
E
V
E
L

9
2
1
4
5
'
-

1
0
"

L
E
V
E
L

1
0
2
1
5
7
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
1
2
1
6
8
'
-

2
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
2
1
7
9
'
-

4
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
3
2
1
9
0
'
-

6
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
4
2
2
0
1
'
-

8
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
5
2
2
1
2
'
-

1
0
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
6
2
2
2
4
'
-

0
"
P
A
R
K
I
N
G

L
E
V
E
L

2
2
0
5
0
'
-

0
"
P
A
R
K
I
N
G

L
E
V
E
L

3
2
0
7
0
'
-

0
"
P
A
R
K
I
N
G

L
E
V
E
L

4
2
0
8
0
'
-

0
"
A
.
C

A
.
A

2
3
' -
0
"

2
4
' -
0
"

3
7
' -
0
"
8
4
' -
0
"
4
4
4
' -
0
"
0
5

1
4

0
2

1
2

0
2

1
2
1
2
0
9
1
9
1
2

S
N
F

B
E
Y
O
N
D

0
6

A
.
D

1
1

1
2
1
4
0
3
1
1
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

L
E
G
E
N
D
M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
C
L
A
D
D
IN
G
0
1

M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
1
0
2

M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
2
0
3

D
E
C
O
R
A
T
IV
E
M
E
T
A
L
S
C
R
E
E
N
0
4

M
E
T
A
L
F
A
C
IA
(P
A
IN
T
E
D
)
0
5

M
E
T
A
L
F
IN
(T
O
M
A
T
C
H
0
2
)
0
6

M
E
T
A
L
C
O
L
U
M
N
C
O
V
E
R
0
7

G
L
A
Z
E
D
A
L
U
M
IN
U
M
S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
0
8

S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
G
L
A
S
S
0
9

G
L
A
Z
IN
G
1
0

U
N
IT
IZ
E
D
C
U
R
T
A
IN
W
A
L
L

1
1

S
T
O
N
E
(P
R
E
C
A
S
T
O
R
T
E
R
R
A
C
O
T
T
A
)
1
2

S
T
E
E
L
T
R
O
W
E
L
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
1
3

M
E
T
A
L
R
O
O
F

1
4

M
E
T
A
L
R
A
IL
IN
G
1
6

G
L
A
S
S
R
A
IL
IN
G

1
7

S
T
E
E
L
A
N
D
G
L
A
S
S
C
A
N
O
P
Y

1
9

E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
T
E
R
R
A
C
E

1
5

M
E
T
A
L
C
A
N
O
P
Y

1
8

M
E
T
A
L
T
R
E
L
L
IS
(C
A
N
O
P
Y
)

2
0

C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

E
A
S
T

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
E
V
0
0
2
0

8

1
6

3
2
1
/1
6
"
=
1
'-
0
"
0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
0
4
0
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

2
2
0
6
0
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

3
2
0
7
5
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

4
2
0
9
0
'
-

0
"
A
.
1

A
.
3

A
.
4

A
.
6

A
.
8

A
.
9

L
E
V
E
L

5
2
1
0
1
'
-

2
"
L
E
V
E
L

6
2
1
1
2
'
-

4
"
L
E
V
E
L

7
2
1
2
3
'
-

6
"
L
E
V
E
L

8
2
1
3
4
'
-

8
"
L
E
V
E
L

9
2
1
4
5
'
-

1
0
"

L
E
V
E
L

1
0
2
1
5
7
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
1
2
1
6
8
'
-

2
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
2
1
7
9
'
-

4
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
3
2
1
9
0
'
-

6
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
4
2
2
0
1
'
-

8
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
5
2
2
1
2
'
-

1
0
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
6
2
2
2
4
'
-

0
"
A
.
0

A
.
1
0

A
.
5
.
4

A
.
7
.
2

A
.
1
.
8

1
0
' -
0
"

2
0
' -
0
"

2
8
' -
0
"

2
4
' -
0
"

3
4
' -
0
"

1
4
' -
0
"

2
8
' -
0
"

2
0
' -
0
"

1
4
' -
0
"

3
5
' -
0
"
1
9
2
' -
0
"

0
5
0
2

0
3
1
1
1
1
1
8
T
O
W
E
R

B
E
Y
O
N
D
0
8

1
8

1
2

1
2

0
6

A
.
6
.
6

1
4
1
2

1
2
1
2
1
1

1
6

P
e
d
e
s
t
r
ia
n

B
r
id
g
e
0
4

0
3

1 0 3 ' - 9 "
1 9 7 ' - 2 "
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

L
E
G
E
N
D
M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
C
L
A
D
D
IN
G
0
1

M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
1
0
2

M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
2
0
3

D
E
C
O
R
A
T
IV
E
M
E
T
A
L
S
C
R
E
E
N
0
4

M
E
T
A
L
F
A
C
IA
(P
A
IN
T
E
D
)
0
5

M
E
T
A
L
F
IN
(T
O
M
A
T
C
H
0
2
)
0
6

M
E
T
A
L
C
O
L
U
M
N
C
O
V
E
R
0
7

G
L
A
Z
E
D
A
L
U
M
IN
U
M
S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
0
8

S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
G
L
A
S
S
0
9

G
L
A
Z
IN
G
1
0

U
N
IT
IZ
E
D
C
U
R
T
A
IN
W
A
L
L
1
1

S
T
O
N
E
(P
R
E
C
A
S
T
O
R
T
E
R
R
A
C
O
T
T
A
)
1
2

S
T
E
E
L
T
R
O
W
E
L
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
1
3

M
E
T
A
L
R
O
O
F
1
4

M
E
T
A
L
R
A
IL
IN
G
1
6

G
L
A
S
S
R
A
IL
IN
G
1
7

S
T
E
E
L
A
N
D
G
L
A
S
S
C
A
N
O
P
Y
1
9

E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
1
5

M
E
T
A
L
C
A
N
O
P
Y
1
8

M
E
T
A
L
T
R
E
L
L
IS
(C
A
N
O
P
Y
)
2
0

C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

S
O
U
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
E
V
0
0
3
0

8

1
6

3
2
1
/1
6
"
=
1
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
0
4
0
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

2
2
0
6
0
'
-

0
"

L
E
V
E
L

2
2
0
6
0
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

3
2
0
7
5
'
-

0
"

L
E
V
E
L

3
2
0
7
5
'
-

0
"
L
E
V
E
L

4
2
0
9
0
'
-

0
"

L
E
V
E
L

4
2
0
9
0
'
-

0
"
S
.
A
.
3

S
.
B

S
.
C

S
.
D

S
.
E

S
.
F

S
.
G

S
.
H

S
.
I

S
.
J

S
.
K

S
.
L

S
.
M

S
.
N

A
.
E

A
.
B

L
E
V
E
L

5
2
1
0
1
'
-

2
"
L
E
V
E
L

6
2
1
1
2
'
-

4
"
L
E
V
E
L

7
2
1
2
3
'
-

6
"
L
E
V
E
L

8
2
1
3
4
'
-

8
"
L
E
V
E
L

9
2
1
4
5
'
-

1
0
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
0
2
1
5
7
'
-

0
"

L
E
V
E
L

1
1
2
1
6
8
'
-

2
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
2
1
7
9
'
-

4
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
3
2
1
9
0
'
-

6
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
4
2
2
0
1
'
-

8
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
5
2
2
1
2
'
-

1
0
"
L
E
V
E
L

1
6
2
2
2
4
'
-

0
"
S
N
F

L
E
V
E
L

5
2
1
0
2
'
-

6
"
S
N
F

L
E
V
E
L

6
2
1
1
5
'
-

0
"
S
N
F

L
E
V
E
L

7
2
1
2
7
'
-

6
"
S
N
F

R
O
O
F
2
1
4
0
'
-

0
"
S
.
A
A
.
C

A
.
A

2
3
' -
0
"

2
4
' -
0
"

3
7
' -
0
"

8
4
' -
0
"

8
' - 0
"
2
0
' - 0
"
2
8
' - 0
"
2
8
' - 0
"

2
8
' - 0
"
2
8
' - 0
"
2
8
' - 0
"
2
8
' - 0
"

2
8
' - 0
"
2
8
' - 0
"
2
8
' - 0
"
2
8
' - 0
"

2
8
' - 0
"

2
8
' - 0
"
0
3

0
5

0
6
1
2
1
1
0
8

1
9

1
0

0
2

0
3
0
2

1
0

0
2

1
0

1
2

0
8
2
0

0
8

1
2

1
6

A
.
D

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

L
E
G
E
N
D
M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
C
L
A
D
D
IN
G
0
1

M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
1
0
2

M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
2
0
3

D
E
C
O
R
A
T
IV
E
M
E
T
A
L
S
C
R
E
E
N
0
4

M
E
T
A
L
F
A
C
IA
(P
A
IN
T
E
D
)
0
5

M
E
T
A
L
F
IN
(T
O
M
A
T
C
H
0
2
)
0
6

M
E
T
A
L
C
O
L
U
M
N
C
O
V
E
R
0
7

G
L
A
Z
E
D
A
L
U
M
IN
U
M
S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
0
8

S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
G
L
A
S
S
0
9

G
L
A
Z
IN
G
1
0

U
N
IT
IZ
E
D
C
U
R
T
A
IN
W
A
L
L
1
1

S
T
O
N
E
(P
R
E
C
A
S
T
O
R
T
E
R
R
A
C
O
T
T
A
)
1
2

S
T
E
E
L
T
R
O
W
E
L
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
1
3

M
E
T
A
L
R
O
O
F
1
4

M
E
T
A
L
R
A
IL
IN
G
1
6

G
L
A
S
S
R
A
IL
IN
G
1
7

S
T
E
E
L
A
N
D
G
L
A
S
S
C
A
N
O
P
Y
1
9

E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
1
5

M
E
T
A
L
C
A
N
O
P
Y
1
8

M
E
T
A
L
T
R
E
L
L
IS
(C
A
N
O
P
Y
)
2
0

C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

W
E
S
T

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
E
V
0
0
4
0

8

1
6

3
2
1
/1
6
"
=
1
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
D
N
D
N
U
P

U
P
U
P
E
V
0
0
1
1

E
V
0
0
3

1

E
V
0
0
2

1

E
V
0
0
4
1

1
C
S
0
0
1
C
S
0
0
2
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y

L
I
N
E

C
I
T
Y

P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
S Y M P H O N Y P A R K A V E N U E
W E S T C LARKA V E N U E
R
E
T
A
I
L

O
U
T
P
A
T
I
E
N
T

O
U
T
P
A
T
I
E
N
T

R
E
S
T
A
U
R
A
N
T

O
U
T
P
A
T
I
E
N
T

R
E
S
T
A
U
R
A
N
T
R
E
S
T
A
U
R
A
N
T
L
O
B
B
Y
L
O
A
D
I
N
G
L
O
A
D
I
N
G

L
O
B
B
Y

1
C
S
0
0
3

S
C
U
L
P
T
U
R
E
G
A
R
D
E
N
2
1
9
' -
3
"

2
5
' -
2
"

1
1
2
' -
4
"

3
9
' -
7
"

6
4
' -
1
1
"
4
6
1
' -
2
"
2 3 2 ' - 6 "
4
4
5
' -
7
"
A
W
N
IN
G
A
B
O
V
E

C
A
N
O
P
Y

A
B
O
V
E

C
A
N
O
P
Y

A
B
O
V
E
C
S
0
0
4

2
C
S
0
0
4
O
P
E
N

A
B
O
V
E

K
I
T
C
H
E
N

C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
N
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

L
E
V
E
L

1

F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
F
P
0
0
1
0

1
0

2
0

4
0
1
"
=
2
0
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P

U
P
U
P
E
V
0
0
1
1

E
V
0
0
3

1

E
V
0
0
2

1

E
V
0
0
4
C
O
N
D
.
W
A
T
E
R

M
E
N
R
E
S
T
R
O
O
M

R
E
S
T
R
O
O
M
S

D
A
T
A
E
. E
L
E
C

N
. E
L
E
C

E
L
E
V
E
L
E
V

C
O
R
R
ID
O
R

E
L
E
V

E
L
E
V
2
4
4
S
F
S
T
A
IR

P
A
R
K
I
N
G

L
E
V
E
L

E
L
E
V
1

E
L
E
V
1

E
L
E
V
1

2
4
1
S
F
S
T
A
IR

V
E
S
T
IB
U
L
E

M
E
D
I
C
A
L

O
F
F
I
C
E

B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
R
O
O
M

A
N
D
C
O
O
L
I
N
G
T
O
W
E
R
S
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
T
R
E
L
L
I
S

B
E
L
O
W
1
,9
5
5
S
F
M
U
L
T
I-P
U
R
P
O
S
E
O
P
E
N
T
O
A
B
O
V
E
O
P
E
N
T
O
B
E
L
O
W
A
S
S
I
S
T
E
D

L
I
V
I
N
G

A
M
E
N
I
T
Y

F
L
O
O
R

6
8
6
S
F
C
H
A
P
E
L

2
5
0
S
F
B
A
T
H
R
O
O
M
2
4
7
S
F

B
A
T
H
R
O
O
M
2
4
8
S
F
E
L
E
V
V
E
S
T
1
,5
2
1
S
F
L
IB
R
A
R
Y
8
5
2
S
F
L
IV
IN
G
R
O
O
M
7
0
6
S
F
S
A
L
O
N
9
1
3
S
F
F
IT
N
E
S
S
1
2
0
S
F
N
U
R
S
E
O
F
F
IC
E
1
1
7
S
F
E
X
A
M
R
O
O
M
3
1
4
S
F

C
O
N
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
R
O
O
M
1
1
8
S
F
C
H
A
N
G
IN
G
R
O
O
M
1
,7
9
7
S
F
A
D
M
IN
IS
T
R
A
T
IV
E
O
F
F
IC
E
S

6
4
1
S
F
E
L
E
C
1
9
5
S
F

H
O
U
S
E
K
E
E
P
IN
G

1
8
8
S
F

C
A
T
E
R
IN
G
K
IT
C
H
E
N
3
3
0
S
F
E
L
E
V
V
E
S
T
IB
U
L
E
1
7
1
S
F
M
E
D
IC
A
L
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
N
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

L
E
V
E
L

2

F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
F
P
0
0
2
0

1
0

2
0

4
0
1
"
=
2
0
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
U
P
U
P
E
V
0
0
1
1

E
V
0
0
3

1

E
V
0
0
2

1

E
V
0
0
4
C
O
N
D
.
W
A
T
E
R
M
E
N
R
E
S
T
R
O
O
M

R
E
S
T
R
O
O
M

D
A
T
A
E
. E
L
E
C

N
. E
L
E
C

C
O
R
R
ID
O
R
V
E
S
T
IB
U
L
E
M
E
D
I
C
A
L

O
F
F
I
C
E

B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G

A
S
S
I
S
T
E
D

L
I
V
I
N
G

A
M
E
N
I
T
Y

F
L
O
O
R

M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
R
O
O
M

A
N
D
C
O
O
L
I
N
G
T
O
W
E
R
S
T E R R A C E
O
P
E
N
T
O

B
E
L
O
W
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
1
,0
5
0
S
F
P
R
IV
A
T
E
A
C
T
IV
IT
Y
R
O
O
M
2
,5
7
4
S
F

O
U
T
D
O
O
R
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
1
,4
0
2
S
F
B
IS
T
R
O
4
0
4
S
F
C
IR
C
U
L
A
T
IO
N
E
L
E
V
V
E
S
T
IB
U
L
E

3
,3
4
3
S
F
D
IN
IN
G

5
4
6
S
F

P
R
IV
A
T
E
D
IN
IN
G

5
2
0
S
F
L
A
U
N
D
R
Y
2
,4
6
9
S
F

K
IT
C
H
E
N
3
2
6
S
F
E
L
E
V
. V
E
S
T
2
5
1
S
F
M
E
N

2
5
1
S
F

W
O
M
E
N
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
N
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

L
E
V
E
L

3

F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
F
P
0
0
3
0

1
0

2
0

4
0
1
"
=
2
0
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
U
P

U
P
E
V
0
0
1
1

E
V
0
0
3

1

E
V
0
0
2

1

E
V
0
0
4
S
K
I
L
L
E
D

N
U
R
S
I
N
G
T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

M
E
M
O
R
Y

C
A
R
E

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

T
R
E
L
L
I
S
B
E
L
O
W
T
E
R
R
A
C
E

C
O
U
R
T
Y
A
R
D

C
O
U
R
T
Y
A
R
D
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
N
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

L
E
V
E
L

4
-
6

F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
F
P
0
0
4
0

1
0

2
0

4
0
1
"
=
2
0
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
E
V
0
0
1
1

E
V
0
0
3

1

E
V
0
0
4
S
K
I
L
L
E
D

N
U
R
S
I
N
G

A
M
E
N
I
T
Y

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N
M
E
M
O
R
Y

C
A
R
E

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

A
D
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N

O
F
F
I
C
E
S

M
U
L
T
I
P
U
R
P
O
S
E

R
O
O
M
T
H
E
R
A
P
Y

R
O
O
M
S

O
P
E
N
T
O

B
E
L
O
W
O
P
E
N
T
O

B
E
L
O
W

B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
G
R
E
E
N

R
O
O
F

&

T
E
R
R
A
C
E
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
N
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

L
E
V
E
L

7

F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
F
P
0
0
5
0

1
0

2
0

4
0
1
"
=
2
0
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
A
S
S
I
S
T
E
D

L
I
V
I
N
G

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

O
P
E
N
T
O

B
E
L
O
W
O
P
E
N
T
O
B
E
L
O
W

C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
N
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

L
E
V
E
L

8

F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
F
P
0
0
6
0

1
0

2
0

4
0
1
"
=
2
0
'-
0
"

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
A
S
S
I
S
T
E
D

L
I
V
I
N
G

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N
M
E
M
O
R
Y

C
A
R
E

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
1 3 ' - 6 " 1 8 3 ' - 7 "
1 9 7 ' - 1 "
2
4
' -
0
"

4
1
' -
4
"
6
5
' -
4
"
3 2 ' - 9 " 1 6 4 ' - 4 "

1 9 7 ' - 1 "
I
N
D
E
P
E
N
D
E
N
T

L
I
V
I
N
G

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
N

5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

T
O
W
E
R
F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N
F
P
0
0
7
0

1
0

2
0

4
0
1
"
=
2
0
'-
0
"

1
"

=

2
0
'-
0
"
2

A
S
S
S
I
S
T
E
D

L
I
V
I
N
G

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

1
"

=

2
0
'-
0
"
1

M
E
M
O
R
Y

C
A
R
E

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

1
"

=

2
0
'-
0
"
3

I
N
D
E
P
E
N
D
E
N
T

L
I
V
I
N
G

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

1
"

=

2
0
'-
0
"
4

R
O
O
F

P
L
A
N

(
L
E
V
E
L

4

-

7
)

(
L
E
V
E
L

8

-

1
3
)

(
L
E
V
E
L

1
4

-

1
5
)

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

E
X
H
I
B
I
T
-
1
E
X
0
0
1
0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

E
X
H
I
B
I
T
-
2
E
X
0
0
2
0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

E
X
H
I
B
I
T
-
3
E
X
0
0
3
0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
N
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

E
X
H
I
B
I
T
-
4
E
X
0
0
4
0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
N
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

E
X
H
I
B
I
T
-
5
E
X
0
0
5
0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

S
O
L
A
R

S
T
U
D
Y
E
X
0
0
6
S
U
M
M
E
R

S
O
L
S
T
I
C
E
8
:
0
0

a
m

1
2
:
0
0

p
m

4
:
0
0

p
m
8
:
0
0

a
m

1
2
:
0
0

p
m

4
:
0
0

p
m
W
I
N
T
E
R

S
O
L
S
T
I
C
E
S
P
R
I
N
G
/
A
U
T
U
M
N

E
Q
U
I
N
O
X
8
:
0
0

a
m

1
2
:
0
0

p
m

4
:
0
0

p
m
0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

L
E
G
E
N
D
M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
C
L
A
D
D
IN
G
0
1

M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
1
0
2

M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
2
0
3

D
E
C
O
R
A
T
IV
E
M
E
T
A
L
S
C
R
E
E
N
0
4

M
E
T
A
L
F
A
C
IA
(P
A
IN
T
E
D
)
0
5

M
E
T
A
L
F
IN
(T
O
M
A
T
C
H
0
2
)
0
6

M
E
T
A
L
C
O
L
U
M
N
C
O
V
E
R
0
7

G
L
A
Z
E
D
A
L
U
M
IN
U
M
S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
0
8

S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
G
L
A
S
S
0
9

G
L
A
Z
IN
G
1
0

U
N
IT
IZ
E
D
C
U
R
T
A
IN
W
A
L
L
1
1

S
T
O
N
E
(P
R
E
C
A
S
T
O
R
T
E
R
R
A
C
O
T
T
A
)
1
2

S
T
E
E
L
T
R
O
W
E
L
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
1
3

M
E
T
A
L
R
O
O
F
1
4

M
E
T
A
L
R
A
IL
IN
G
1
6

G
L
A
S
S
R
A
IL
IN
G
1
7

S
T
E
E
L
A
N
D
G
L
A
S
S
C
A
N
O
P
Y
1
9

E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
1
5

M
E
T
A
L
C
A
N
O
P
Y
1
8

M
E
T
A
L
T
R
E
L
L
IS
(C
A
N
O
P
Y
)
2
0

C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
B
O
A
R
D
M
B
0
0
1
0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

L
E
G
E
N
D
M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
C
L
A
D
D
IN
G
0
1

M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
1
0
2

M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
2
0
3

D
E
C
O
R
A
T
IV
E
M
E
T
A
L
S
C
R
E
E
N
0
4

M
E
T
A
L
F
A
C
IA
(P
A
IN
T
E
D
)
0
5

M
E
T
A
L
F
IN
(T
O
M
A
T
C
H
0
2
)
0
6

M
E
T
A
L
C
O
L
U
M
N
C
O
V
E
R
0
7

G
L
A
Z
E
D
A
L
U
M
IN
U
M
S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
0
8

S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
G
L
A
S
S
0
9

G
L
A
Z
IN
G
1
0

U
N
IT
IZ
E
D
C
U
R
T
A
IN
W
A
L
L
1
1

S
T
O
N
E
(P
R
E
C
A
S
T
O
R
T
E
R
R
A
C
O
T
T
A
)
1
2

S
T
E
E
L
T
R
O
W
E
L
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
1
3

M
E
T
A
L
R
O
O
F
1
4

M
E
T
A
L
R
A
IL
IN
G
1
6

G
L
A
S
S
R
A
IL
IN
G
1
7

S
T
E
E
L
A
N
D
G
L
A
S
S
C
A
N
O
P
Y
1
9

E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
1
5

M
E
T
A
L
C
A
N
O
P
Y
1
8

M
E
T
A
L
T
R
E
L
L
IS
(C
A
N
O
P
Y
)
2
0

C
I
T
R
A
S
Y
M
P
H
O
N
Y
P
A
R
K
P
r
o
je
c
t N
o
: P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
5
0
5
5
W
ils
h
ire
B
o
u
le
v
a
rd
, 9
th
F
lo
o
r
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
le
s
, C
a
lifo
rn
ia
9
0
0
3
6
3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
5
0
0
p
h
o
n
e
, 3
2
3
.5
2
5
.0
9
5
5
fa
x
S
c
a
le
A
p
p
lic
a
tio
n
D
a
te
S
h
e
e
t N
u
m
b
e
r
S
h
e
e
t T
itle
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4

M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
B
O
A
R
D
M
B
0
0
2
0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
7
1
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
6

October 2, 2014
City of Las Vegas

Planning Department
333 N. Rancho Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89106
702-229-6301
Re: Shared Parking Analysis for Symphony Park Parcel L
Dear Planner:
The Symphony Park Parcel L development is a proposed shared use development

located at the northeast corner of South City Parkway and West Clark Avenue in the
City of Las Vegas, Nevada. The square footage for each use is as follows: skilled
nursing 111,987 s.f.; assisted living/senior living 172,048 s.f.; medical office 79,667 s.f.
and retail 15,500 s.f. The associated parking structure is five (5) floors 182,176 s.f. with
valet parking. These uses are listed in Figure 1 below per the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE) 4th Edition of Parking Generation.
Figure 1: Parking Required

Land
Use
Ind. Required Parking Required Parking
Variable ITE Code Total
Retail 15,500 sq.ft. 820 46
Medical
Office
79,667 sq. ft 720 254
Skilled
Nursing
126 beds 620 44
Memory
Care
56 beds 253 25
Assisted
Living
84 beds 254 34
Senior
Living
30 units 252 17
TOTAL 420
The difference in the required parking counts between the city and ITE is that ITE uses
a lower parking count for the Skilled Nursing and Senior Living.
In a mixed use development parking spaces can be shared by various land uses which
operate at different times from one another throughout the day. Based on the proposed
ous land uses whic
sed on the propos
10/09/14
PRJ-56071
SDR-56176 - REVISED

uses permitted figure 2 below is based on City of Las Vegas Table 2 Mixed-use
Developments-Alternative Parking Requirements page 549 of Title 19 which uses
percentages of the required parking at different times from one another.
Figure 2: Shared Parking Calculations

Land
Use
Ind. WEEKDAYS WEEKENDS
Variable Mid-7am
7am-
6pm 6pm-Mid Mid-7am
7am-
6pm
6pm-
Mid
Retail 15,500 sq.ft. 0 46 28 0 46 28
Medical
Office
79,667 sq.ft. 13 254 13 0 73 13
Skilled
Nursing
126 beds 3 44 3 6 42 6
Memory
Care
56 beds 2 25 2 2 25 2
Assisted
Living
84 beds 3 34 3 3 34 3
Senior
Living
30 units 17 10 15 17 12 13
TOTAL 38 413 64 28 232 65
Based on the results shown in Figure 2 above the proposed mixed-use development will
require a maximum of 413 parking spaces during the weekday 7am to 6pm time
period. The proposed project will consists of 460 parking spaces (using valet parking)
leaving spaces available during the following times:
Weekday Free Spaces

Mid-7am - 422
7am-6pm - 47
6pm-Mid - 396
Weekend Free Spaces

Mid-7am - 432
7am-6pm - 228
6pm-Mid - 395
Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Landon Christopherson, P.E.

Principal

10/09/14
PRJ-56071
SDR-56176 - REVISED
September 24, 2014
Mr. Michael Saltzman,

Citra Real Estate Capital
13428 Maxella Avenue #256
Marina Del Ray, CA 90292
by email to msaltzman@citrarecap.com
RE: Symphony Park Design Review Committee Design Development review of

Block L Proposal - Revised Submission
Dear Mr. Saltzman,
The Symphony Park Design Review Committee (SP-DRC) received your revised
Design Development submission for Parcel L on September 22, 2014. Parcel L
consists of a skilled nursing facility, medical office, assisted/senior living and parking
garage. Your submission included the required items for a Design Development
submission listed in our previous letters with the exception of an expanded LEED
analysis, physical materials samples board (although we received your image boards),
and a building signage package (which can come at a later time). The public art
requirement appears to be satisfied with items on the landscape plan.
The Design Development submittal is preliminarily APPROVED subject to the

following conditions which will need to be satisfied and approved by the SP-DRC
prior to entering into construction drawings for the project. We also suggest that
a few waivers of conditions be approved as noted below. We applaud the design
refinements that have modified the project.
Conditions Required for Final Design Development Approval:
1. The SP-DRC will require you to submit an expanded LEED analysis before final
approval is given. Although we received an initial LEED checklist for this revised
overall design, it did not explain in more detail your approach to LEED certification for
your project and how particular points might be achieved. In reviewing the points your
team has assumed, there are a number that are either not likely, not shown on the
drawings, or not able to be confirmed with the level of information provided. Since
these points may be necessary for you to achieve certified status for your project we will
require the expanded analysis. We also suggest that you have your future
commissioning agent involved in your LEED process at this point in order to achieve
your commissioning credits and confirm for us your LEED approach.
order to achieve
h.
09/29/14
PRJ-56071
SDR-56176
2. Submission and SP-DRC approval of the actual materials proposed for the project.
Although the general materials suggested by the image boards seem reasonable, a final
approval cannot be given without actual samples and a determination that they are
regionally appropriate and are not highly reflective.
3. Approval of the overall site drainage study. There are several assumptions on the
civil engineers plans that require this approval before the SP-DRC can approve the site
assumptions. In particular, the Symphony Park Design Standard requirement for twelve
(12) inches of separation from flow line elevation at the curb to finished floor elevations
may not be achieved in several places, but may still meet drainage plan requirements.
4. A master signage plan and signage criteria will be required to be submitted and
approved, but may come at a future date before actual signage is applied for.
5. A revised parking justification letter, to be approved by the Planning Department, that

updates the mixed use parking table and any new assumptions such as valet parking
and tandem parking spaces.
6. Compliance with all comments noted on the drawing sheets referenced below is
required.
Drawing Review Comments: to be incorporated (drawings dated September 15,

2014)
1. Site/Grading Plans 1 & 2:
a. Section A on both sheets is not consistent with the intended detail of the service
drive and drainage swale on sheet DT001. Please correct this section consistent
with later comments for this page. If you do pursue the detail on sheet DT001,
please make sure that the service drive exits the site as shown on the these civil
plans so it can connect correctly with adjacent sites.
b. On street section B, correct the spelling of "Symphony Park Avenue" from the
incorrect "Symphony Park". Also we believe the sidewalk is 30 feet from back of
curb to build-to-line. Please confirm.
c. An "L" curb is proposed for the head in end of the ADA parking on grade. If this is
a vertical curb all the striped ADA access ways need to ramp up to the walk. Not
enough elevation information was given to confirm this condition.
d. In the Grading Construction Notes, note 6 refers to a standard Clark County

sidewalk drawing. Please do not indicate in any way that the sidewalks will vary
from the approved sidewalk surface design in the Design Standards.
sidewalks will vary

ndards.
09/29/14
PRJ-56071
SDR-56176
e. In the Grading Construction Notes, note 4 refers to standard sidewalk ramps.
Please note that the color of the ADA tactile strip is to be yellow.
2. Level 1 Floor Plan (FP001):
a. Pedestrians at the south end of the handicap parking, as well as parking

garage exit stairs need some connection to the West Clark streetscape.
b. The approximately 4 foot nuisance space next to the existing pedestrian bridge
structure may be used as you describe, however some detail of this area in order
to fence it, will be required on construction drawings.
3. Level 2 Floor Plan (FP002):
a. The medical office building creates a very long monolithic building face at the
second level. Section 3.13.1 of the Design Standards requires variations in the
street wall every 100 feet or less. At least two variations of three (3) feet in depth
or projection in this wall plane along the building length will be required. Perhaps
these might match the wall breaks in the skilled nursing above.
4. South Elevation (EV003):
a. Approved with the addition of added garage wall treatment below the pedestrian
bridge.
5. West Elevation (EV004):
a. Approved subject to comment 3a above and revised canopy heights mentioned

below on sheet DT001.
6. Landscape Plan (LP001):
a. The addition of two palms on the south end of City Parkway is not approved. The
SP-DRC wishes to keep the four palm approach in the Streetscape Standards
and reflected across City Parkway.
b. The addition of palm trees and overhead canopy on the north end of City Parkway
will require a waiver of standards since the Streetscape Standards are also a City
ordinance. The SP-DRC supports this waiver for the purpose of supporting
outdoor dining in this area.
c. The location of the street trees on the private West Clark Avenue extension and
the use of planters is different from the Streetscape Standards. This modification
will require a waiver of standards. The SP-DRC supports this waiver to create
an improved pedestrian flow to the pedestrian bridge.
s waiver to create
09/29/14
PRJ-56071
SDR-56176
d. The Symphony Park Avenue street edge has been modified to create a parking
pocket. Although this is acceptable, not creating a return bump-out at the parking
entry may add to the street parking available.
e. The RPDA shown on Symphony Park Avenue needs screening of some type. The
intent for this is not clear.
f. In "Notes" the granite rock mulch is to be 3/8 inch Birds Eye Brown or 3/8 to 1/2
inch washed Apache Brown, not Mojave Gold.
g. On general or detailed landscape plans the required continuous tree trenches

should be shown to be clear about extent.
h. The required art for the project seems to be satisfied with the proposed
community sculpture gallery, decorative concrete paving, twig bench and stone
water feature. Please submit specifics for final approval.
7. Details- Site (DT001):
a. Detail 1 is generally acceptable in concept to the SP-DRC, however the sidewalk

is required to be five (5) feet wide between obstructions and four (4) feet at
obstructions i.e. columns.
b. The SP-DRC is concerned about the homeless use of the partly hidden and
roofed area created at the swale. Please add sufficient items to preclude this
misuse of the space.
c. Detail 1 implies that the location of the service drive will be closer to the property
line than originally anticipated in the master plan. This location is acceptable
within the site but the service drive location must return to the previously specified
location on the north and south edges of the site so as to connect to adjacent
parcels.
d. Detail 2 shows the canopy height to be fourteen (14) feet above the sidewalk.
Sixteen (16) to twenty feet is required per the Design Standards. The SP-DRC
does not support a waiver of standards for this dimension.
We look forward to the re-submittal of required and revised information before entering
into construction drawings. If these required conditions can be satisfied before your City
Council hearing a revised letter of approval can be created.
Sincerely,
Scott Carter, Chairman

Symphony Park Design Review Committee
09/29/14
PRJ-56071
SDR-56176
cc. Courtney Mooney, City of Las Vegas Department of Planning

Mark Sorensen, City of Las Vegas Department of Public Works
Charles Kubat AIA,AICP,LEED-AP, Kubat Consulting
Tom Jurbala (jturbala@aol.com)
Parini Mehta, Co Architects, (pmehta@coarchitects.com)
(all by email)
09/29/14
PRJ-56071
SDR-56176
SDR 56176
Citra Real Estate Capital
SWC City Parkway & Clark Avenue
Proposed 379.202 thousand square foot mixed use development.
RATE/#
UNIT TOTAL
NURSING HOME [1000 SF] 284.035
7.58 2,153
RATE/#
UNIT TOTAL
MEDICAL-DENTAL OFFICE BUILDING
[1000 SF]
79.667
36.13 2,878
RATE/#
UNIT TOTAL
SHOPPING CENTER/GENERAL RETAIL
[1000 SF]
15.5
42.94 666
Total Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT
RATE/#
UNIT TOTAL
MEDICAL-DENTAL OFFICE BUILDING
[1000 SF]
379.202
36.13 5,697
City Parkway
Symphony Park Ave.
Grand Central Pkwy.

Bonneville Avenue
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 1,250
City Parkway 25,875
Symphony Park Ave. 40,200
Grand Central Pkwy. 16,300
Bonneville Avenue 34,500
This project is expected to increase traffic by about 5,697 trips per day on City Pkwy., Clark Ave., Symphony Park Ave.,
Grand Central Pkwy. & Bonneville Ave. Currently, City Pkwy. is at about 5 percent of capacity, Symphony Park is at about
7 percent of capacity, Grand Central is at about 48 percent of capacity and Bonneville is at about 45 percent of capacity.
With this project, City Pkwy. is expected to be at about 27 percent of capacity, Symphony Park to be at about 21 percent
of capacity, Grand Central to be at about 83 percent of capacity and Bonneville to be at about 62 percent of capacity.
Counts are not available for Clark Ave. in this area, but it is believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this project will add about 544 trips in the peak hour, or about nine every minute.
S
D
P
-
1
7

[
P
P
J
-
0
7
1
j

-

S
I
T
E

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N

P
E
V
I
E
W

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

C
I
T
P
A

P
E
A
L

E
S
T
A
T
E

C
A
P
I
T
A
L

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

C
I
T
Y

P
A
P
k
W
A
Y

V

I
N
C
,

S
O
U
T
H
E
A
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

C
I
T
Y

P
A
P
k
W
A
Y

A
N
D

C
L
A
P
k

A
V
E
N
U
E

S
D
P
-
1
7

[
P
P
J
-
0
7
1
j

-

S
I
T
E

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N

P
E
V
I
E
W

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

C
I
T
P
A

P
E
A
L

E
S
T
A
T
E

C
A
P
I
T
A
L

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

C
I
T
Y

P
A
P
k
W
A
Y

V

I
N
C
,

S
O
U
T
H
E
A
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

C
I
T
Y

P
A
P
k
W
A
Y

A
N
D

C
L
A
P
k

A
V
E
N
U
E

S
D
P
-
1
7

[
P
P
J
-
0
7
1
j

-

S
I
T
E

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N

P
E
V
I
E
W

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

C
I
T
P
A

P
E
A
L

E
S
T
A
T
E

C
A
P
I
T
A
L

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

C
I
T
Y

P
A
P
k
W
A
Y

V

I
N
C
,

S
O
U
T
H
E
A
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

C
I
T
Y

P
A
P
k
W
A
Y

A
N
D

C
L
A
P
k

A
V
E
N
U
E

September 25, 2014
City of Las Vegas

Planning Department
333 N. Rancho Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89106
702-229-6301
RE: Symphony Park Parcel L Site Development Plan Review
To Whom It May Concern:
On behalf of our client, CITRA REAL ESTATE CAPITAL, I respectfully request consideration of the
enclosed site development plan review of the propose mixed use project. The site is currently zoned Planned
Development District (PD).
The project will consist of two mixed use structures and a parking garage. Building heights will range from
105 feet to 196 feet. The square footage for each use is as follows: skilled nursing 111,987 s.f.; assisted
living/senior living 172,048 s.f.; medical office 79,667 s.f. and retail 15,500 s.f. The associated parking
structure is five (5) floors 182,176 s.f. with valet parking on the top level, the structure will hold 460 total
parking spaces.
The proposed set backs are as follows:
Rear 0 where 0 is permitted

Side 12 where 10 is required
Front 25 where 25 is required
Using The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) has released the 4

th
Edition of Parking Generation in
July of 2010, the required parking for the proposed development is:
Retail: 45 spaces
Medical Office: 249 spaces
Skilled Nursing: 54 spaces
Assisted/Senior Living: 71 spaces
Totaling 419 spaces required, this number is lower than the City of Las Vegas number due to the low number
of vehicles that ITE counts for in the Skilled Nursing and Senior Living categories. Even with these lower
numbers the parking structure will accommodate 460 total spaces giving the project flexibility in parking.
We will provide the required Handicap Parking stalls per Title 19.10.
We respectfully request the consideration of the following waivers:
1. A waiver of subsection 2.12 of the Symphony Park Design Standards for Private Streets.
The Purpose of this waiver is to request the use of decorative paving along the street pedestrian
walkway.
09/29/14
PRJ-56071 SDR-56176

2. A waiver of subsection 2.6 of the Symphony Park Design Standards for utility coordination zones
along South City Parkway.
The purpose for this wavier is to allow the coordination of utility equipment along South City
Parkway where currently there is no provision for this in the Symphony Park Design Standards.
Existing stubs for water and sewer are off South City Parkway which will require some coordination.
The timing and scope of the project is driven by the DDA Agreement between CITRA and the City of Las
Vegas.
Should you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at (702) 521-7021.
Sincerely,
Landon Christopherson
09/29/14
PRJ-56071
SDR-56176

Agenda tem No.: 18.


SUB1ECT:
MSP-56105 - MASTER SIGN PLAN - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BONEFISH
GRILL, LLC - OWNER: MICAH 6:8 HOLDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - For possible
action on a request Ior an amendment to a previously approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-2858)
TO ADD ONE FREESTANDING SIGN on 8.24 acres at the southeast corner oI Charleston
Boulevard and Odette Lane (APN 163-05-502-001), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 2
(Beers) |PRJ-55794|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

MSP-56105 (PR1-55794)
GK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: BONEFISH GRILL, LLC - OWNER: MICAH 6:8
HOLDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
MSP-51851 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

`` CONDITIONS ``

MSF-5105 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Master Sign Plan (MSP-2858) shall be
required, except as amended herein.

pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time application may
be Iiled Ior consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conIormance with the sign elevations, date stamped 09/22/14
and the site plan, date stamped 09/25/14.

4. Any Iuture sign proposals or modiIications to the approved Master Sign Plan that meet
Title 19 signage requirements may be approved administratively by Department oI
Planning staII.

5. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed
in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

6. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set
submitted Ior building permits.

7. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be
satisIied, except as modiIied herein.
MSP-56105 (PR1-55794)
GK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting to amend the approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-2858) Ior an existing
shopping center located at the southeast corner oI Charleston Boulevard and Odette Lane. The
applicant is proposing to add a 20-Ioot tall, 55 square-Ioot Ireestanding sign (labeled on the site
plan as Sign A) at the southwest corner oI Charleston Boulevard and Merialdo Lane. The
proposed multi-tenant Ireestanding sign would provide advertising Ior the three existing
restaurant uses on the subject site. As the sign is compatible with the development and is in
conIormance with all Title 19 sign requirements, staII recommends approval with conditions. II
denied, the requested changes could not be made and only the designs allowed by the existing
entitlement would be permitted.

ISSUES

Pursuant to Title 19.16.270(E), a major amendment oI the approved Master Sign Plan Ior this
site is required to add the proposed Ireestanding sign. All other signs previously approved
through the Master Sign Plan are not part oI this request.


The Planning Commission approved a request Ior Rezoning (Z-0071-00) Irom
P-R (ProIessional OIIice) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on property located at
the southeast corner oI Charleston Boulevard and Odette Lane. Planning
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review |Z-0071-00(1)|
Ior a 54,947 square-Ioot shopping center with a Waiver oI the landscaping
requirements on 8.26 acres located at the southeast corner oI Charleston
Boulevard and Odette Lane.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-145-00) Ior a supper club
use at 8701 West Charleston Boulevard. Planning Commission and staII
10/18/00
MSP-56105 (PR1-55794)
GK

12/04/02
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-1307) Ior
a 51,718 square-Ioot retail/oIIice building on a portion oI 8.26 acres adjacent
to the southeast corner oI Charleston Boulevard and Odette Lane. StaII
10/29/03
The City Council approved a Master Sign Plan (MSP-2858) Ior an approved
retail center on 8.26 acres adjacent to the southeast corner oI Charleston
Boulevard and Odette Lane. The Planning Commission and staII
04/28/05
6244) Ior a 524 square-Ioot addition to an existing restaurant on 8.24 acres at
8721 West Charleston Boulevard. StaII recommended approval.
06/07/06
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-12594) Ior a
beer/wine/cooler on and oII-sale establishment at 8751 West Charleston
Boulevard. Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
01/11/07
18369) Ior a 534 square-Ioot addition to an existing restaurant on 8.24 acres at
8721 West Charleston Boulevard. StaII recommended approval.
04/12/11
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-40899) Ior a
massage establishment within an existing 20,189 square-Ioot spa Iacility with
waivers oI the distance separation requirements to allow 130 Ieet Irom
another massage establishment where 1,000 Ieet is required and a zero-Ioot
distance separation Irom a residential use where 400 Ieet is required at 8751
West Charleston Boulevard, Suite #150 and #160. StaII recommended
approval.
02/13/14
StaII administratively approved a Minor Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-52811) Ior a proposed building remodel and Iaade improvements on
8.24 acres at 8701 West Charleston Boulevard.
02/26/14
StaII administratively approved a Minor Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-52870) Ior a building remodel and Iaade improvements at 8771 West
Charleston Boulevard.
03/11/14
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-52704) Ior a
proposed restaurant with alcohol use at 8701 West Charleston Boulevard.
StaII recommended approval.
03/19/14
The City Council approved a Review oI Condition (ROC-52915) to delete
Condition number 5 oI Site Development Plan Review |Z-0071-00(1)|,
Condition number 2 oI Special Use Permit (U-0146-00) and condition number
2 oI Special Use Permit (U-0147-00) which state 'restaurant hours shall be
4pm to 10pm Sunday through Thursday, 3:30pm to 11pm Friday through
Saturday and open Ior six Sunday holiday luncheons only on property located
at the southeast corner oI Charleston Boulevard and Odette Lane. StaII
MSP-56105 (PR1-55794)
GK



07/13/01
A building permit (#1012745) was issued Ior a certiIicate oI occupancy at
8771 West Charleston Boulevard. The permit was Iinalized on 10/30/01.
10/16/01
A building permit (#1018312) Ior a sign at 8771 West Charleston Boulevard.
The permit was Iinalized on 10/19/01.
10/22/01
A business license (R09-00988) was issued Ior a restaurant at 8771 West
Charleston Boulevard. The license is currently active.
11/14/05
A building permit (#731156) was issued Ior an interior tenant improvement at
8771 West Charleston Boulevard. The permit was Iinalized on 02/01/06.
07/28/11
A business license (L21-00086) was issued Ior a supper club at 8771 West
Charleston Boulevard. The license is currently active.
09/28/11
A code enIorcement citation (#106295) was issued Ior weeds in the landscape
areas at 8701 West Charleston Boulevard. The issue was resolved on
09/29/11.
04/07/14
StaII denied a building permit (#257759) Ior a Ireestanding sign at 8701 West
Charleston Boulevard.
04/24/14
A code enIorcement citation (#140440) was issued Ior weeds in the median
and landscape areas. The issue has not been resolved.
08/04/14
A building permit (#263860) was issued Ior six wall signs at 8701 West
Charleston Boulevard. The permit has not received a Iinal inspection.

08/27/14
StaII met with the representative to discuss a proposal to install a multi-tenant
Ireestanding sign at the southwest corner oI Charleston Boulevard and
Merialdo Lane. Although the Ireestanding sign adheres to the minimum sign
requirements as outlined in Title 19, the original Master Sign Plan (MSP-
2858) did not include Ireestanding signs. StaII concluded that a major
amendment to the Master Sign Plan would be required to permit the
Ireestanding sign.

MSP-56105 (PR1-55794)
GK


Field Check
10/06/14
StaII perIormed a routine Iield check and Iound the existing shopping center
well maintained.

Site Area
Gross Acres 8.24

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per Title 19.12
Planned or Special Land
Use Designation
Subject Property
Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North
Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
South Single-Family
Residence
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
East
Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
West
Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)

Trails N/A


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Charleston
Boulevard
Parkway Arterial
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
130 Y
MSP-56105 (PR1-55794)
GK

Street Aame Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Odette Lane
Minor Collector
Street
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
60 Y
Merialdo Lane
Minor Collector
Street
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
60 Y

Freestanding Signs:
Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
Maximum Number
1 Ireestanding and
monument sign per 200
linear Ieet oI street
Irontage
1 existing monument
sign and 1 proposed
Ireestanding sign along
600 Ieet oI street
Irontage
Y
Maximum Area
2 SF per linear Ioot oI
street Irontage
(1,200 SF max)
Existing 150 SF
monument sign
Proposed 55 SF
Ireestanding sign

Y
Maximum Height 40 Feet 20 Feet Y
Minimum Setback 5 Feet 5 Feet Y
Minimum Setback
between Signs
100 Ieet between
Ireestanding and
monument signs on the
same lot
305 Feet Y
Illumination Internal/Direct Internal Y

ANALYSIS

The applicant is requesting to amend the approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-2858) Ior an existing
shopping center located at the southeast corner oI Charleston Boulevard and Odette Lane.
Currently, the existing Master Sign Plan does not allow Ireestanding signs. The applicant is
proposing to add a 20-Ioot tall, 55 square-Ioot Ireestanding sign (labeled on the site plan as Sign
A) at the southwest corner oI Charleston Boulevard and Merialdo Lane. According to Title
19.08, corner lots are permitted to have signs Ior each street Irontage and one Ireestanding or
monument sign is allowed per 200 linear Ieet oI street Irontage. Currently, the subject site
contains one monument sign adjacent to Charleston Boulevard. The 590 linear Ieet Ironting
Charleston Boulevard would allow a maximum combination oI two Ireestanding or monument
signs. The proposed Ireestanding sign represents the second sign Ironting Charleston Boulevard
MSP-56105 (PR1-55794)
GK


and is in compliance with the maximum number allowed. In addition, any combination oI
monument and Ireestanding signs adjacent to the same street Irontage must be separated by a
minimum oI 100 Ieet. According to the site plan date stamped 09/25/14, the proposed
Ireestanding sign would be set back 305 Ieet to the east oI the existing monument sign. The
proposed Ireestanding sign adheres to all minimum requirements as outlined by Title 19
including height, setbacks, sign area, number oI signs, illumination, and materials. The proposed
multi-tenant Ireestanding sign would provide advertising Ior the three existing restaurant uses on
the subject site. As the sign is compatible with the development, is in keeping with signage
objectives and does not require variances, staII recommends approval with conditions.

FINDINGS - MA1OR AMENDMENT TO MASTER SIGN PLAN (MSP-2858)

The changes proposed by this amendment would be compatible with the signs already approved
through the Master Sign Plan. The proposed Ireestanding sign adheres to all minimum
requirements as outlined by Title 19. StaII thereIore recommends approval oI the major
amendment with conditions.


NOTICES MAILED 128

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
09/22/14
PRJ-55794
MSP-56105
09/22/14
PRJ-55794
MSP-56105
09/22/14
PRJ-55794
MSP-56105
10/14/14 PC
09/22/14
PRJ-55794
MSP-56105
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

F
r
e
e
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g

S
i
g
n
1
5
0

S
q

F
t

T
o
t
a
l
3
0
5

s
e
p
a
r
a
t
io
n
0
9
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
7
9
4
M
O
D
-
5
6
1
0
5

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

S
i
d
e

V
i
e
w
S
c
a
l
e
:

3
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"

@

1
1
x
1
7

S
c
a
l
e
:

3
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"

@

1
1
x
1
7

C
L
I
E
N
T
:
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
:
D
A
T
E
:
D
R
A
W
I
N
G

#
D
R
A
W
N

B
Y
:
A
P
P
R
O
V
E
D

B
Y
:

C

U
S

S
u
m
m
e
r
lin
,

N
V

S
H
E
E
T
S
IZ
E

S
T
O
R
E
#
1
1

x

1
7

X

B
o
n
e
f
is
h

G
r
ill
0
6
.
0
5
.
1
4
B
O
N
-
S
u
m
m
e
r
lin
-
3
0
1
T
N
C
U
S
T
O
M
E
R

A
P
P
R
O
V
A
L
:
D
A
T
E
: _
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
A
P
P
R
O
V
A
L

R
E
C
E
I
V
E
D

B
Y

U
N
I
T
E
D
D
A
T
E
: _
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
S
I
G
N
A
T
U
R
E
IM
P
O
R
T
A
N
T
:
A
D
iv
isio
n
o
f U
n
ite
d
A
d
v
a
n
ta
g
e
S
ig
n
C
o
m
p
a
n
ie
s, In
c
.
U
N
IT
E
D
S
IG
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
IS
N
O
T
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
IB
L
E
F
O
R
R
E
M
O
V
IN
G
E
X
IS
T
IN
G
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
F
O
U
N
D
A
T
IO
N
S
O
R
U
N
K
N
O
W
N
U
N
D
E
R
G
R
O
U
N
D
O
B
S
T
R
U
C
T
IO
N
S
,
IN
C
L
U
D
IN
G
B
U
T
N
O
T
L
IM
IT
E
D
T
O
A
B
A
N
D
O
N
E
D
U
T
IL
IT
IE
S
, S
T
O
N
E
, S
E
P
T
IC
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
, E
T
C
.
8
8
8
-
7
0
4
-
1
5
1
6
A

D
iv
is
io
n

o
f

U
n
it
e
d

A
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
S
ig
n

C
o
m
p
a
n
ie
s
,

I
n
c
.
2
0
6

T
o
w
e
r

D
r
iv
e
O
ld
s
m
a
r
,

F
lo
r
id
a

3
4
6
7
7
u
n
it
e
d
s
ig
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
.
c
o
m
1 0 - 0 1 0 - 0
3 - 9 9 / 1 6 1 - 1 0 5 / 1 6 "
2 0 - 0 " O . A . H .
2 - 9
6
-
5

O
.
A
.
W
.

2
-
0
R
E
V
#

D
E
S
C
R
IP
T
IO
N

D
A
T
E

B
Y

G
3

G
1

G
6

G
4
G
2
G
7
P
M
S

2
0
1
2
2
8
3

R
e
d

w
i
t
h
2
3
0
-
5
3

1
s
t

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
W
h
i
t
e
T
B
D
P
M
S

3
5
0
#
4
5
0

F
4

G
r
e
e
n
2
0
3
0

G
r
e
e
n

A
c
r
y
l
i
c
B
l
a
c
k

B
l
a
c
k

G
5
P
a
i
n
t

W
h
i
t
e
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e

f
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n

p
e
r
L
o
c
a
l

c
o
d
e
s

T
.
B
.
D
.
T
.
B
.
D
.
T . B . D .
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
I
l
l
u
m
i
n
a
t
e
d

d
o
u
b
l
e
-
s
i
d
e
d

p
y
l
o
n
.
F
a
b
r
i
c
a
t
e
d

a
l
u
m
i
n
u
m

c
a
b
i
n
e
t
s
w
i
t
h

1

1
/
2

a
l
u
m
i
n
u
m
a
n
g
l
e

f
r
a
m
e
s
.
.
0
9
0

a
l
u
m
i
n
u
m

s
i
g
n

f
a
c
e
s

w
i
t
h

r
o
u
t
e
d
-
o
u
t

g
r
a
p
h
i
c
s
.
3
/
1
6

a
c
r
y
l
i
c

b
a
k
e
r
s
.
.
0
6
3

a
l
u
m
i
n
u
m

r
e
v
e
a
l
s

&

f
i
l
l
e
r
s
.
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l

i
l
l
u
m
i
n
a
t
e
d

w
i
t
h

L
E
D
.

E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l

S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
T
o
t
a
l

A
m
p
s

R
e
q
'
d
:

7
.
7
0
V
o
l
t
a
g
e

R
e
q
'
d
:

1
2
0
V

W
h
i
t
e

L
E
D
s
P
o
w
e
r

s
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
:

1
2
V
/
6
0
W

P
S
Q
t
y

r
e
q
d

:

6

@

1
.
1
0

A
m
p
s

E
a
R
e
d

L
E
D
s
P
o
w
e
r

s
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
:

1
2
V
/
6
0
W

P
S
Q
t
y

r
e
q
d

:

1

@

1
.
1
0

A
m
p
s

E
a
1
2
0
V

e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c

f
e
e
d
b
y

O
t
h
e
r
s
S
t
e
e
l

t
u
b
e

s
u
p
p
o
r
t
J

b
o
x

.
0
9
0

A
l
u
m
.

f
a
c
e

w
i
t
h
r
o
u
t
e
d
-
o
u
t

g
r
a
p
h
i
c
s
.
W
h
i
t
e

a
c
r
y
l
i
c

b
a
c
k
e
r
.
0
9
0

A
l
u
m
.

f
a
c
e

w
i
t
h
r
o
u
t
e
d
-
o
u
t

g
r
a
p
h
i
c
s
.
G
r
e
e
n
/
R
e
d

a
c
r
y
l
i
c

b
a
c
k
e
r
.
0
9
0

A
l
u
m
.

f
a
c
e

w
i
t
h
r
o
u
t
e
d
-
o
u
t

g
r
a
p
h
i
c
s
.
W
h
i
t
e

a
c
r
y
l
i
c

b
a
c
k
e
r
w
/
b
l
a
c
k

p
e
r
f

v
i
n
y
l

o
v
e
r
l
a
y
R
e
d

a
c
r
y
l
i
c

b
a
c
k
e
r
w
/

b
l
a
c
k

p
e
r
f
.

v
i
n
y
l

o
v
e
r
l
a
y
F
a
b
.

a
l
u
m
.

l
o
g
o

b
o
x
1

1
/
2

A
l
u
m
.

a
n
g
l
e

f
r
a
m
e
T
y
p
i
c
a
l

.
0
6
3

A
l
u
m
.

r
e
v
e
a
l

&

f
i
l
l
e
r
s
T
y
p
i
c
a
l
L
E
D

P
o
w
e
r

s
u
p
p
l
y
T
y
p
i
c
a
l
D
i
s
c
o
n
n
e
c
t

s
w
i
t
c
h
T
y
p
i
c
a
l
W
h
i
t
e

L
E
D
W
h
i
t
e

L
E
D

R
e
d

L
E
D

W
h
i
t
e

L
E
D

4

B
o
n
e
f
i
s
h
F
l
e
m
i
n
g
C
a
r
r
a
b
b
a
D
IM
P
O
R
T
A
TT
N
T
:
A
D
iv
isio
n
o
f
U
n
U
N
IT
E
D
S
IG
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
IS
N
O
T
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
IB
L
E
F
O
R
R
E
M
O
V
IN
G
E
X
IS
T
IN
G
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
F
O
U
N
D
A
T
AA
IO
N
S
O
R
U
N
K
N
O
W
N
U
N
D
E
R
G
R
O
U
N
D
O
B
S
T
R
U
C
T
IO
N
S
,
IN
C
L
U
D
IN
G
B
U
T
N
O
T
L
IM
IT
E
D
T
O
A
B
A
N
D
O
N
E
D
U
T
IL
IT
IE
S
,
S
T
O
N
E
,
S
E
P
T
IC
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
,
E
T
C
.
E
l
e
c
t
V
o
VV
l
t
a
g
e
R
e
q
'
d
::
W
h
i
t
e
L
E
D
s
P
o
w
e
r
s
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
Q
t
y
r
e
q
d
:
6
@
R
e
d
L
E
D
s
P
o
w
e
r
s
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
QQQQQQQQQQ
ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
qqqqqqqqqq
dddddddddd
::::::::::
111111111111111111111111111
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
0
9
/
2
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
7
9
4
M
S
P
-
5
6
1
0
5
M
S
P
-
1
0

[
P
P
J
-
7
9
4
j

-

M
A
S
T
E
P

S
I
S
N

P
L
A
N

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

O
N
E
F
I
S
H

S
P
I
L
L

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

M
I
C
A
H

H
O
L
D
I
N
S

L
I
M
I
T
E
D

P
A
P
T
N
E
P
S
H
I
P

S
O
U
T
H
E
A
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

C
H
A
P
L
E
S
T
O
N

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

A
N
D

O
D
E
T
T
E

L
A
N
E

M
S
P
-
1
0

[
P
P
J
-
7
9
4
j

-

M
A
S
T
E
P

S
I
S
N

P
L
A
N

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

O
N
E
F
I
S
H

S
P
I
L
L

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

M
I
C
A
H

H
O
L
D
I
N
S

L
I
M
I
T
E
D

P
A
P
T
N
E
P
S
H
I
P

S
O
U
T
H
E
A
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

C
H
A
P
L
E
S
T
O
N

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

A
N
D

O
D
E
T
T
E

L
A
N
E

09/22/14
PRJ-55794
MSP-56105

Agenda tem No.: 19.


SUB1ECT:
VAC-56124 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: RICHMOND
AMERICAN HOMES OF NEVADA, INC. - For possible action on a request Ior a Petition to
Vacate a portion oI a nine-Ioot wide City oI Las Vegas Equestrian Trail Easement generally
located at the northeast corner oI Iron Mountain Road and Nolene Stream Street, Ward 6 (Ross)



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

VAC-56124 PR1-56104]
SS


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES OF
NEVADA, INC.


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
VAC-56124 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

`` CONDITIONS ``

VAC-5124 CONDIIIONS

1. The limits oI this Petition oI Vacation shall be deIined as a portion oI the Equestrian Trail
Easement granted within Common Element "B1" by 'Iron Mountain/Bradley Final Map,
Book 146, Page 61.

2. Grant a nine-Ioot replacement Equestrian Trail Easement on an amended Final Map oI 'Iron
Mountain/Bradley immediately prior to the recordation oI this Order oI Vacation.
Alternatively, an amended Iinal map must show all easements that exist at the time oI
recordation.

3. All public improvements adjacent to and in conIlict with this vacation application are to be
modiIied, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the recordation oI an Order oI
Vacation.

4. All development shall be in conIormance with code requirements and design standards oI all
City Departments, including the requirements oI LVMC Title 19.06.040(F)(10) regarding
above ground utility installation adjacent to trail corridors.
VAC-56124 PR1-56104]
SS

Conditions Page Two

5. The Order oI Vacation shall not be recorded until all oI the conditions oI approval have been
met provided, however, that conditions requiring modiIication oI public improvements may
be IulIilled Ior purposes oI recordation by providing suIIicient security Ior the perIormance
thereoI in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance oI the City oI Las Vegas. City StaII
is empowered to modiIy this application iI necessary because oI technical concerns or
because oI other related review actions as long as current City right oI way requirements are
still complied with and the intent oI the vacation application is not changed. II applicable, a
Iive-Ioot wide easement Ior public streetlight and Iire hydrant purposes shall be retained on
all vacation actions abutting public street corridors that will remain dedicated and available
Ior public use. Also, iI applicable and where needed, public easement corridors and sight
visibility or other easements that would/should cross any right-oI-way or easement being
vacated must be retained.

6. II the Order oI Vacation is not recorded within one (1) year aIter approval by the City oI Las
Vegas or an Extension oI Time is not granted by the Planning Director, then approval will
terminate and a new petition must be submitted.

VAC-56124 PR1-56104]
SS

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The City oI Las Vegas requires a 20-Ioot wide equestrian trail along the north side oI Iron
Mountain Road generally located between Floyd Lamb Park and Bradley Road. A proposed NV
Energy switch to be located adjacent to the Iron Mountain/Bradley Subdivision conIlicts with the
existing trail alignment. The applicant is thereIore requesting to vacate the portion oI the trail
path that speciIically conIlicts with the switch. A new public trail easement would then be
dedicated adjacent to the switch by means oI an amendment to the recorded subdivision map.

As the new trail section would remain in conIormance with the Trails Element oI the Las Vegas
2020 Master Plan, staII recommends approval, subject to conditions. II denied, the equestrian
trail could not be constructed to the same standards and location as currently approved.


04/02/08
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-25905) to
change the Iuture land use designation Irom DR (Desert Rural Density
Residential) to L (Low Density) on 30.20 acres at the northeast corner oI Iron
Mountain Road and Leon Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended
approval; staII recommended denial.
06/09/13
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-48851) Irom R-PD4
(Residential Planned Development 4 Units per Acre) to R-1 (Single Family
Residential) on 11.44 acres at the northeast corner oI Iron Mountain Road and
Leon Avenue. The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
07/09/13
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-49575) Ior a 50-
lot single Iamily residential subdivision at the northeast corner oI Iron
Mountain Road and Leon Avenue.
03/07/14
A Final Map (FMP-51383) Ior a 50-lot single Iamily residential subdivision at
the northeast corner oI Iron Mountain Road and Leon Avenue was recorded.
07/16/14
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-54050) the east halI oI
Leon Avenue north oI Iron Mountain Road. The Planning Commission and
staII recommended approval. An Order oI Vacation has not been recorded.
09/10/14
An amended Final Map (FMP-55960) Ior 14 single Iamily residential lots and
one common lot along Leon Avenue north oI Iron Mountain Road was
submitted Ior technical review. The map has not yet been recorded.
VAC-56124 PR1-56104]
SS



01/30/14
Civil improvement plans (51217) Ior this subdivision were approved. The
approval expires 10/23/15.

09/02/14
The applicant and staII discussed the need Ior an NV Energy switch utility
along Iron Mountain Road, and possible solutions to the issue oI the conIlict
with the equestrian trail alignment on the north side oI Iron Mountain Road.


Field Check
10/06/14
The lots in the adjacent subdivision have been roughly graded, and there are
no utility boxes oI any kind visible along Iron Mountain Road.

Trails Y

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

The area to be vacated is generally described as Iollows:
VAC-56124 PR1-56104]
SS


A portion oI a nine-Ioot (9`) wide City oI Las Vegas equestrian trail easement as dedicated on a
portion oI Common Lot B1` oI 'Iron Mountain/Bradley as shown by map thereoI in Book 146
Page 61 oI Plats on Iile in the OIIice oI the County Recorder, Clark County, Nevada, lying
within the Southwest Quarter (SW/) oI the Southeast Quarter (SE/) oI the Southwest Quarter
(SW/) oI Section 1, Township 19 South, Range 60 East, M.D.M., in the county oI Clark,
Nevada.

ANALYSIS

NV Energy requires a switch to be placed along the north side oI Iron Mountain Road adjacent to
the Iron Mountain/Bradley Subdivision, which has not yet been Iully constructed. For maintenance
purposes, the switch must be close to the sidewalk. A 20-Ioot wide equestrian trail is located along
Iron Mountain Road between Lots 1-6 and 38 and the Iron Mountain Road right-oI-way. This area
is all labeled as 'common element on the recorded subdivision map, and contains a Iive-Ioot
sidewalk, nine-Ioot trail path and six-Ioot landscape buIIer. The proposed switch would come into
conIlict with the trail. AIter meeting with staII, applicant determined that the portion oI the
common area south oI Lot 38 would be a better location Ior the switch and would cause the least
disturbance to the trail alignment and existing lots.

An amended Iinal map showing the new location oI the easement has already been submitted Ior
technical review. Although staII recommends that the map and the Order oI Vacation vacating the
unused portions oI the trail easement be recorded concurrently, the map is not dependent on
recordation oI the Order oI Vacation and may be recorded separately. In that instance, the map
must show all oI the easements in existence at the time oI recordation.

The developer must ensure the trail will not be obstructed by the utility or any screening vegetation.
Title 19.06.040(F)(10) states that all utility boxes to be placed immediately adjacent to a trail
corridor shall be placed so that the access doors open parallel to the trail corridor and are accessible
without the need to cut down or reduce the eIIectiveness oI the landscaping within the trail area.
Adjacent landscaping must include tall grasses and/or shrubbery which, at maturity, will provide
adequate screening oI the utility structures. The standard condition requiring conIormance to all
city code requirements has been modiIied to more speciIically address this issue.

The Department oI Public Works notes that this Vacation application proposes to vacate a portion
oI an existing equestrian easement to accommodate a proposed NV Energy switch box. As no
right-oI-way is proposed to be vacated, and thus no Iranchise rights are involved, it is not necessary
to send this VAC request to the utility companies and Iranchise holders, nor wait Ior their responses.
VAC-56124 PR1-56104]
SS


FINDINGS (VAC-56124)

The easement proposed by the amended Iinal map Ior the adjacent subdivision ('Iron
Mountain/Bradley) corresponds to the speciIications Ior the equestrian trail cross section
required by the Trails Element oI the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan. The slight northward shiIt oI
the trail easement does not signiIicantly alter the approved trail alignment or require a General
Plan Amendment. The petition to vacate would eliminate the conIlict between the easement and
the current location oI the NV Energy switch gear pad. StaII thereIore recommends approval,
subject to conditions.


NOTICES MAILED 1

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
09/24/14
PRJ-56104
VAC-56124
09/24/14
PRJ-56104
VAC-56124
11/4/14 PC
09/24/14
PRJ-56104
VAC-56124
3
8
1

3
7
E
X
-
1
S 1
T 1 9 S
R 6 0 E
C I T Y O F L A S V E G A S , N E V A D A
E
X
H
I
B
I
T
F
O
R
I
R
O
N

M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
/
B
R
A
D
L
E
Y
A
N

S
I
N
G
L
E

F
A
M
I
L
Y

R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L

C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
L
O
C
A
T
E
D

I
N

C
I
T
Y

O
F

L
A
S

V
E
G
A
S
,

N
E
V
A
D
A
1
0
/
0
7
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
1
0
4
V
A
C
-
5
6
1
2
4

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
V
A
C
-
1
Z
4

[
P
P
J
-
1
0
4
j

-

V
A
C
A
T
I
O
N

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

P
I
C
H
M
O
N
D

A
M
E
P
I
C
A
N

H
O
M
E
S

O
F

N
E
V
A
D
A

I
N
C
,

N
O
P
T
H
E
A
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

I
P
O
N

M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N

P
O
A
D

A
N
D

N
O
L
E
N
E

S
T
P
E
A
M

S
T
P
E
E
T

V
A
C
-
1
Z
4

[
P
P
J
-
1
0
4
j

-

V
A
C
A
T
I
O
N

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

P
I
C
H
M
O
N
D

A
M
E
P
I
C
A
N

H
O
M
E
S

O
F

N
E
V
A
D
A

I
N
C
,

N
O
P
T
H
E
A
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

I
P
O
N

M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N

P
O
A
D

A
N
D

N
O
L
E
N
E

S
T
P
E
A
M

S
T
P
E
E
T

5740 S. Arville Street #216, Las Vegas, NV 89118 ph (702) 284-5300 fax (702) 284-5399
Page 1 of 1
RAH1305
September 16, 2014
City of Las Vegas
Planning and Development
333 S. Rancho Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89101
RE: Justification Letter for the Vacation of a Portion of the Equestrian Trail along Iron
Mountain Road for Richmond American Homes Iron Mountain/Bradley (FMP-51383,
Book 146, Page 0061)
Slater Hanifan Group, on behalf of the applicant, Richmond American Homes, respectfully submits
this justification letter in support of a Vacation (VAC) for the subject site. The subject site is located
at the northeast corner of Iron Mountain Road and Leon Avenue. The Final Map (FMP-51383) has
been recorded and is located in Book 146, Page 0061.
This vacation is being requested to accommodate the placement of an NVE switch within the
existing trail easement. The switch needs to be located adjacent to the right-of-way and accessible
from Iron Mountain Road per NVE requirements for maintenance purposes. In order to adhere to the
NVE requirements, the equestrian trail was re-aligned to meander around the proposed NVE switch
location (see attached exhibit). This re-alignment resulted in the need to vacate the portion (approx.
63 LF) of the existing trail easement where the switch is now proposed. If this vacation request is
approved, an amended final map will be recorded to grant a new equestrian easement for the re-
aligned portion of the trail.
Thank you for considering this application request. Please contact me at (702) 284-5300 if you have
any questions regarding these applications.
Sincerely,
Slater Hanifan Group, Inc.
Angela Pinley, P.E.
Project Engineer
Cc: Brian Walsh, Richmond American Homes
Todd Steadham, Slater Hanifan Group
Chelsea Peltier, Slater Hanifan Group
fax (702) 284-5399
09/24/14
PRJ-56104
VAC-56124

Agenda tem No.: 20.


SUB1ECT:
VAC-56131 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GREYSTONE
NEVADA, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Petition to Vacate a 30-Ioot portion oI
RuIIian Road between Centennial Parkway and Regina Avenue and to Vacate U.S. government
patent easements generally located south oI Centennial Parkway on both sides oI Hualapai Way,
Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-55864|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

VAC-56131 PR1-55864]
YK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: GREYSTONE NEVADA, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL

`` CONDITIONS ``

VAC-5131 CONDIIIONS

1. The limits oI this Petition oI Vacation shall be the western 30-Ieet oI RuIIian Road, south
oI Centennial Parkway and the U.S. Government Patent Easements generally located south
oI Centennial Parkway, north oI Regena Avenue, east oI Egan Crest Drive and west oI
Eula Street.

2. The Order oI Vacation shall record immediately prior to the recordation oI a Final Map Ior
this site, such as FMP-55622.

3. All public improvements, iI any, adjacent to and in conIlict with this vacation application
are to be modiIied, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the recordation oI an
Order oI Relinquishment oI Interest.

4. The Order oI Vacation and Order oI Relinquishment oI Interest shall not be recorded until
all oI the conditions oI approval have been met provided, however, the conditions requiring
modiIication oI public improvements may be IulIilled Ior purposes oI recordation by
providing suIIicient security Ior the perIormance thereoI in accordance with the
Subdivision Ordinance oI the City oI Las Vegas. City StaII is empowered to modiIy this
application iI necessary because oI technical concerns or because oI other related review
actions as long as current City right-oI-way requirements are still complied with and the
intent oI the vacation application is not changed. II applicable, a Iive Ioot wide easement
Ior public streetlight and Iire hydrant purposes shall be retained on all vacation actions
abutting public street corridors that will remain dedicated and available Ior public use.
Also, iI applicable and where needed, public easement corridors and sight visibility or other
easements that would/should cross any right-oI-way being vacated must be retained.
VAC-56131 PR1-55864]
YK

Conditions Page Two

5. Reservation oI easements Ior the Iacilities oI the various utility companies together with
reasonable ingress thereto and egress there Irom shall be provided iI required.

6. All development shall be in conIormance with code requirements and design standards oI
all City Departments.

7. II the Order oI Vacation (or Order oI Relinquishment oI Interest iI a Patent Reservation) is
not recorded within one (1) year aIter approval by the City oI Las Vegas or an Extension oI
Time is not granted by the Planning Director, then approval will terminate and a new
petition must be submitted.

VAC-56131 PR1-55864]
YK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This Petition is a request to vacate a 30-Ioot portion oI RuIIian Road between Centennial
Parkway and Regina Avenue and to Vacate U.S. Government Patent Easements on property
located on the south side oI Centennial Parkway at Hualapai Way. This Vacation will Iacilitate
the development oI the subject site, which has been approved Ior an 84-lot single-Iamily
residential development. As the easements are no longer required in their current conIiguration,
staII recommends approval. II denied, the existing easements would remain and would
encumber any development oI the site.


04/05/06
The Clark County Commission approved a Rezoning & Site Plan (ZC-2016-
05) Ior an 85-lot residential subdivision on the south side oI Centennial
Parkway at Hualapai Way.
08/06/14
The City Council approved an Annexation (ANX-54291) Ior 31.4 acres on the
south side oI Centennial Parkway at Hualapai Way. The eIIective date oI
action was 08/15/14.


No related permits on Iile.

09/02/14
StaII met with the applicant and reviewed the requirements Ior a Vacation
application. No issues oI concern were noted.

VAC-56131 PR1-55864]
YK


Field Check
10/06/14 StaII visited the site and Iound no issues related with this project.

Site Area
Gross Acres 31.4

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property Undeveloped
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
Undeveloped
North
School
PR-OS (Parks
Recreation Open
Space)
C-V (Civic)
Undeveloped
South Single-Family,
Detached
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)
R-E (Rural Estates
Residential District)
East Undeveloped
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)
R-E (Rural Estates
West Undeveloped
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)
R-E (Rural Estates

Trails N/A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

Us Patent Recorded December 8, 1959 in Book 224 Instrument No. 182111 OIIicial Records
VAC-56131 PR1-55864]
YK


The West 33.00 Feet, The East 33.00 Feet And The North 3.00 Feet OI The South 33.00 Feet OI
The West HalI (W ) OI The Northwest Quarter (Nw /) OI The Northeast Quarter (Ne /) OI
The Northeast Quarter (Ne /) OI Section 25, Township 19 South, Range 59 East, M.D.M., Clark
County, Nevada;

Excepting ThereIrom the North 50.00 Feet oI Said West and East 33.00 Feet Ior Centennial
Parkway;

Further excepting ThereIrom the South 30.00 Feet oI Said West and East 33.00 Feet Ior Regina
Avenue.

Us Patent Recorded November 21, 1965 in Book 114 Instrument No. 94001 OIIicial Records

The East HalI ( E ) OI The Northwest Quarter (Nw /) OI The Northeast Quarter (Ne /) OI
County, Nevada;

Excepting ThereIrom the North 50.00 Feet II Said West and East 33.00 Feet Ior Centennial
Parkway;

Further excepting ThereIrom the South 30.00 Feet II Said West and East 33.00 Feet Ior Regina
Avenue.

Public Street Dedication Recorded January 5, 1981 in Book 1336 Instr. No. 1295465 OIIicial
Records

The East 30.00 Feet OI The East HalI (E ) OI The Northwest Quarter (Nw /) OI The
Northeast Quarter (Ne /) OI The Northeast Quarter (Ne /) OI Section 25, Township 19 South,
Range 59 East, M.D.M., Clark County, Nevada;

Together With A 25' Radius Spandrel Area In The Northeast Corner Concave Southwesterly
And Being Tangent To The South Line OI The North 50.00 Feet And Tangent To The West Line
OI The East 30.00 Feet OI Said East HalI (E ).

Together With A 15' Radius Spandrel Area In the Southeast Corner Concave Northwesterly And
Being Tangent To The West Line OI The East 30.00 Feet And Tangent To The North Line OI
The South 30.00 Feet OI Said East HalI (E ).

Excepting ThereIrom the North 50.00 Feet oI Said East 30.00 Feet Ior Centennial Parkway;

Further excepting ThereIrom the South 30.00 Feet oI Said East 30.00 Feet Ior Regina Avenue.
VAC-56131 PR1-55864]
YK


Us Patent Recorded January 24, 1957 in Book 119 Instrument No. 98058 OIIicial Records.

The West HalI (W ) OI The Northeast Quarter (Ne /) OI The Northeast Quarter (Ne /) OI
County, Nevada;

Parkway;

Avenue.

Us Patent Recorded November 21, 1956 in Book 114 Instrument No. 94000 OIIicial Records.

The East HalI (E ) OI The Northeast Quarter (Ne /) OI The Northeast Quarter (Ne /) OI The
Northeast Quarter (Ne /) OI Section 25, Township 19 South, Range 59 East, M.D.M., Clark
County, Nevada;

Parkway;

Avenue.


The West 33.00 Feet, the East 33.00 Feet and the North 3.00 Feet oI the South 33.00 Feet oI
Government Lot 8 in Section 30, Township 19 South, Range 60 East M.D.M., Clark County,
Nevada;

Parkway;

Avenue.


Government Lot 7 In Section 30, Township 19 South, Range 60 East, M.D.M., Clark County,
Nevada;
VAC-56131 PR1-55864]
YK


Parkway;

Avenue.

ANALYSIS

This Vacation application proposes to vacate existing Patent Easements and Public Right-oI-
Ways. Public Works oIIers the Iollowing comments:

A. Does this vacation request result in uniIorm or non-uniIorm right-oI-way widths?
N/A as it will eliminate an unusea roaa.

B. From a traIIic handling viewpoint will this vacation request result in a reduced
traIIic handling capability? No, since it is currently unusea.

C. Does it appear that the vacation request involves only excess right-oI-way? No, it
will be incorporatea into a proposea subaivision.

D. Does this vacation request coincide with development plans oI the adjacent parcels?
Yes, a former County profect now annexea into the City of Las Jegas.

E. Does this vacation request eliminate public street access to any abutting parcel? No.

F. Does this vacation request result in a conIlict with any existing City requirements?
No.

The Department oI Public Works has no objection to the Vacation application request
generally located on property located on the south side oI Centennial Parkway at Hualapai
Way.


StaII has no objection to the Vacation oI these easements, as the easements are no longer required in
their current conIiguration. StaII recommends approval, with conditions.

VAC-56131 PR1-55864]
YK


NOTICES MAILED 2

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
09/24/14
PRJ-55864
VAC-56131
Page 1 of 2 9/29/2014 12:40:16 PM
Applicant Email: paulo.chavez@tce-lv.com
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: Macias
Rep First Name: Sonia
Applicant State: Nevada
Rep Address: 7080 La Cienga Street #200
Rep Email: smacias@tce-lv.com
Rep Fax: (702)932-6129
Rep State: Nevada
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: (702)932-6125
Rep Zip: 89119
Assessors Parcel #(s): 12625501007, 12625501008, 12625501009, 12625501010, 12625501011, 12625501012, 12625501013
Project Name CENTENNIAL/HUALAPAI
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 6 (STEVEN D. ROSS)
Applicant City: Henderson
ProjectAddress (Location): CENTENNIAL AND HUALAPAI
Application/Petition For: Vacation
Applicant First Name: Paulo
Applicant Address: 2490 Paseo Verde Pkwy #120
Applicant Last Name: Chavez
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres: 31.4
VAC-56131
Page 2 of 2 9/29/2014 12:40:16 PM
I Accept:
Yes
GREYSTONE NEVADA L L C 2490 PASEO VERDE PKWY #120 HENDERSON, NV 89074
Sonia Macias Thomason Consulting Engineers Project Coordinator smacias@tce-lv.com
VAC-56131
09/24/14
PRJ-55864
V
A
C
-
5
6
1
3
1
V
A
C
-
1
3
1

[
P
P
J
-
4
j

-

V
A
C
A
T
I
O
N

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

S
P
E
Y
S
T
O
N
E

N
E
V
A
D
A

L
L
C

S
O
U
T
H

O
F

C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L

P
A
P
k
W
A
Y

O
N

O
T
H

S
I
D
E
S

O
F

H
U
A
L
A
P
A
I

W
A
Y

09/24/14
PRJ-55864
VAC-56131

Agenda tem No.: 21.


SUB1ECT:
VAC-56147 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GREYSTONE
NEVADA, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Petition to Vacate U.S. government
patent easements generally located on the south side oI Centennial Parkway at Conquistador
Street, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-55851|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

VAC-56147 PR1-55851]
GK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: GREYSTONE NEVADA, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL

`` CONDITIONS ``

VAC-5147 CONDIIIONS

1. The limits oI this Petition oI Vacation shall be the 33-Ioot wide U.S. Government Patent
Easements located on the west and east sides oI Assessor Parcel Numbers 125-30-101-004
and 125-30-101-005 and the northerly 3 Ieet oI U.S. Government Patent Easements along
Regena Avenue.

Order oI Vacation.

3. The Order oI Relinquishment oI Interest shall not be recorded until all oI the conditions oI
approval have been met provided, however, the conditions requiring modiIication oI public
improvements may be IulIilled Ior purposes oI recordation by providing suIIicient security
Ior the perIormance thereoI in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance oI the City oI
Las Vegas. City StaII is empowered to modiIy this application iI necessary because oI
technical concerns or because oI other related review actions as long as current City right-
oI-way requirements are still complied with and the intent oI the vacation application is not
changed. II applicable, a Iive Ioot wide easement Ior public streetlight and Iire hydrant
purposes shall be retained on all vacation actions abutting public street corridors that will
remain dedicated and available Ior public use. Also, iI applicable and where needed, public
easement corridors and sight visibility or other easements that would/should cross any
right-oI-way being vacated must be retained.
VAC-56147 PR1-55851]
GK

Conditions Page Two


5. II the Order oI Relinquishment oI Interest is not recorded within one (1) year aIter approval
by the City oI Las Vegas or an Extension oI Time is not granted by the Planning Director,
then approval will terminate and a new petition must be submitted.

VAC-56147 PR1-55851]
GK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The subject site contains 10 net acres oI undeveloped land generally located at the intersection oI
Centennial Parkway and Conquistador Street. The applicant is requesting a Petition to Vacate the
existing 33-Ioot wide patent easements along the subject parcels east and west property lines and
a three-Ioot wide portion oI patent easements along Regena Avenue. The request is submitted in
order to accommodate the development oI the site Ior a 25-lot single-Iamily residential
subdivision. StaII has no objection to relinquish the City`s interest in U.S. Government Patent
Reservations and recommends approval.

ISSUES

A Iive-Ioot wide easement Ior public streetlight and Iire hydrant purposes shall be
retained on all vacation actions abutting public street corridors that will remain dedicated
and available Ior public use.


08/06/14
The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-54293) ten acres on the
south side oI Centennial Parkway at Conquistador Street.


09/10/14
The applicant submitted civil improvement plans (L-CIVIL-55906) Ior a 25-
lot single-Iamily residential subdivision. StaII has not reviewed the plans as oI
10/01/14.
09/30/14
A Final Map was submitted to staII Ior a 25-lot single Iamily residential
subdivision. StaII has not reviewed the Iinal map as oI 10/01/14.
VAC-56147 PR1-55851]
GK


09/02/14
A pre-application meeting was held with the representative to discuss
submittal requirements Ior a Petition to Vacate public rights-oI-way and the
existing Government patent easements.


Field Check
10/02/14
During a routine Iield check, staII visited the site and Iound an undeveloped,
ungraded site.

Site Area
Gross Acres 10.0

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R (Rural)
North Undeveloped
PF (Public Facilities)
U (Undeveloped)
South
Single Family
Residential
Clark County RNP
(Rural Neighborhood
Preservation)
Clark County R-E
(Residence Estates
Residential)
East Undeveloped
Clark County RNP
(Rural Neighborhood
Preservation)
Clark County R-E
(Residence Estates
Residential)
R (Rural)
West Undeveloped
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
VAC-56147 PR1-55851]
GK


Trails N/A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

Us patent recorded June 17, 1963 in book 453 instrument no. 365471 oIIicial records

The west 33.00 Ieet, the east 33.00 Ieet and the north 3.00 Ieet oI the south 33.00 Ieet oI
government lot 5 oI section 30, township 19 south, range 60 east, m.d.m., clark county nevada;
excepting thereIrom the north 50.00 Ieet iI said west and east 33.00 Ieet Ior centennial parkway;
Iurther excepting thereIrom the south 30.00 Ieet oI said west and east 33.00 Ieet Ior regena
avenue.

Us patent recorded august 27, 1979 in book 1108 instrument no. 1067381 oIIicial records. The
west 33.00 Ieet, the east 33.00 Ieet and the north 3.00 Ieet oI the south 33.00 Ieet oI the west halI
(w ) oI the northwest quarter (nw /) oI the northeast quarter (ne /) oI the northwest quarter
(nw /) oI section 30, township 19 south, range 60 east, m.d.m., clark county, nevada; excepting
thereIrom the north 50.00 Ieet oI said west and east 33.00 Ieet Ior centennial parkway; Iurther
excepting thereIrom the south 30.00 Ieet oI said west and east 33.00 Ieet Ior regina avenue.

ANALYSIS

The subject site contains 10 net acres oI undeveloped land generally located on the south side oI
Centennial Parkway and Conquistador Street. The applicant is requesting a Petition to Vacate the
existing 33-Ioot wide patent easements along the subject parcels east and west property lines and
a three-Ioot wide portion oI patent easements along Regina Avenue. The request is submitted in
order to accommodate the development oI the site Ior a 25-lot single-Iamily residential
subdivision.

The Department oI Public Works has no objection to the Vacation application request to
relinquish the City`s interests in U.S. Government Patent Reservations generally located on the
south side oI Centennial Parkway at Conquistador Street. This Vacation request has been sent
to all the utilities however, as no right oI way is proposed to be vacated, and thus no Iranchise
VAC-56147 PR1-55851]
GK


rights are involved, it is not necessary to wait Ior responses Irom any oI the public utilities or
other parties interested in preserving a right in this patent easement. Since only City interests are
involved; any utility company`s interests will need to be addressed with each respective utility
company and will not be aIIected by the City relinquishing its interest.

FINDINGS

StaII has no objection to the vacation oI these Government Patent Easements, as they are no
longer needed in their current conIiguration; thereIore, staII thereIore recommends approval with
conditions.


NOTICES MAILED 3

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
09/25/14
PRJ-55851
VAC-56147
09/25/14
PRJ-55851
VAC-56147
11/04/14 PC
09/25/14
PRJ-55851
V
A
C
-
5
6
1
4
7
V
A
C
-
1
4
7

[
P
P
J
-
1
j

-

V
A
C
A
T
I
O
N

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

S
P
E
Y
S
T
O
N
E

N
E
V
A
D
A

L
L
C

S
O
U
T
H

S
I
D
E

O
F

C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L

P
A
P
k
W
A
Y

A
T

C
O
N
Q
U
I
S
T
A
D
O
P

S
T
P
E
E
T

10/09/14
PRJ-55851
VAC-56147 - REVISED

Agenda tem No.: 22.


SUB1ECT:
VAC-56260 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CITY OF LAS VEGAS -
OWNER: RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES OF NEVADA, INC. - For possible action on a
request Ior a Petition to Vacate all existing public inIrastructure easements within Common Lot
''A'' and a 10-Ioot public pedestrian access easement generally located immediately east oI the
eastern right-oI-way line oI Leon Avenue, north oI Iron Mountain Road, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

VAC-56260 PR1-56259]
SS


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - OWNER: RICHMOND
AMERICAN HOMES OF NEVADA, INC.


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL

`` CONDITIONS ``

VAC-520 CONDIIIONS

1. The limits oI this Petition oI Vacation shall be described as the public Iire hydrant, public
streetlight, TraIIic Signal, conduit and appurtenance easements adjacent to Leon Avenue
and Iron Mountain Road within Common Lot 'A as well as a 10-Ioot public pedestrian
access easement generally located immediately east oI the eastern right-oI-way line oI
Leon Avenue, north oI Iron Mountain Road granted per Book 146, Page 61 oI Plats.

Order oI Vacation.


4. The Order oI Vacation shall not be recorded until all oI the conditions oI approval have
been met provided, however, the conditions requiring modiIication oI public improvements
may be IulIilled Ior purposes oI recordation by providing suIIicient security Ior the
perIormance thereoI in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance oI the City oI Las
Vegas. City StaII is empowered to modiIy this application iI necessary because oI
technical concerns or because oI other related review actions as long as current City right-
oI-way requirements are still complied with and the intent oI the vacation application is not
changed. II applicable, a Iive Ioot wide easement Ior public streetlight and Iire hydrant
purposes shall be retained on all vacation actions abutting public street corridors that will
remain dedicated and available Ior public use. Also, iI applicable and where needed, public
easement corridors and sight visibility or other easements that would/should cross any
right-oI-way being vacated must be retained.
VAC-56260 PR1-56259]
SS

Conditions Page Two

5. II the Order oI Vacation is not recorded within one (1) year aIter approval by the City oI
Las Vegas or an Extension oI Time is not granted by the Planning Director, then approval
will terminate and a new petition must be submitted.

VAC-56260 PR1-56259]
SS

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is petitioning to vacate public inIrastructure easements along the east side oI Leon
Avenue that were not part oI the recently approved Leon Avenue right-oI-way vacation north oI
Iron Mountain Road. These include public easements Ior streetlights, Iire hydrants, traIIic
signals and a pedestrian access easement linking Leon Avenue with the associated subdivision`s
interior streets. Those easements are thereIore no longer needed, and the rear yards oI the
adjacent parcels can be extended to the centerline oI Leon Avenue without encumbrance oI
public easements. StaII thereIore recommends approval with conditions.


04/02/08
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-25905) to
change the Iuture land use designation Irom DR (Desert Rural Density
Residential) to L (Low Density Residential) on 30.20 acres at the northeast
corner oI Iron Mountain Road and Leon Avenue. The Planning Commission
recommended approval; staII recommended denial.
06/09/13
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-48851) Irom R-PD4
(Residential Planned Development 4 Units per Acre) to R-1 (Single Family
Residential) on 11.44 acres at the northeast corner oI Iron Mountain Road and
Leon Avenue. The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
07/09/13
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-49575) Ior a
proposed 50-lot single Iamily residential subdivision on 11.44 acres at the
northeast corner oI Iron Mountain Road and Leon Avenue. StaII
03/07/14
The Final Map (FMP-51383) Ior a 50-lot single Iamily residential subdivision
on 11.43 acres at the northeast corner oI Iron Mountain Road and Leon
Avenue was recorded.
07/16/14
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-54050) the eastern halI
oI Leon Avenue north oI Iron Mountain Road. The Planning Commission
and staII recommended approval. An Order oI Vacation has not been
recorded.
09/10/14
An amended Final Map (FMP-55960) Ior 14 single Iamily residential lots and
one common lot (Common Lot 'A) on 3.15 acres at the northeast corner oI
Iron Mountain Road and Leon Avenue was submitted Ior staII review. This
map has not yet recorded.
VAC-56260 PR1-56259]
SS



01/30/14
Civil improvement plans (51217) Ior the Iron Mountain/Bradley subdivision
were approved. The approval expires 10/23/15.

A pre-application meeting was not held Ior this request.


Field Check
10/06/14
The east halI oI Leon Avenue is unimproved, as are the adjacent lots. The
west side oI Leon Avenue is Iully improved.

Site Area
Net Acres 0.25

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property
Single Family,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
North Undeveloped
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-PD4 (Residential
Units per Acre)
South
Single Family,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-PD4 (Residential
Units per Acre)
East
Single Family,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
West
Single Family,
Detached
R (Rural Density
Residential)
R-PD3 (Residential
Units per Acre)
VAC-56260 PR1-56259]
SS


Trails Y

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

The area to be vacated is generally described as Iollows:

A Iour and one-halI-Ioot (4.5') wide Public Fire Hydrant and Streetlight Easement, a Iive-Ioot
(5') wide Public Fire Hydrant, Streetlight, Conduit and TraIIic Signal Easement, and a ten-Ioot
(10') wide Public Pedestrian Access Easement as granted on Common Element 'A as shown on
File 146, Page 61 oI Plats, on Iile in the OIIice oI the County Recorder, Clark County, Nevada,
lying within the Southeast Quarter (SE/) oI the Southwest Quarter (SW/) oI Section 1,
Township 19 South, Range 60 East, M.D.M., in the City oI Las Vegas, Nevada.

ANALYSIS

This petition is a clean-up measure to remove the remnant public inIrastructure easements not
vacated through an earlier action (VAC-54050) approving the vacation oI the east side oI Leon
Avenue. These easements are located within Common Lot 'A oI the existing subdivision to the
east oI Leon Avenue. The public easements along Iron Mountain Road that are located within
Common Lot 'A would then be regranted through an amended Iinal map. Vacation oI the
easements will not aIIect the equestrian trail alignment running along the north side oI Iron
Mountain Road. In addition, removal oI the pedestrian access to Leon Avenue will not lower the
subdivision`s connectivity ratio below the 1.30 score required by Title 19.04. Access would still
be available to Iron Mountain Road and Honeycreek Avenue Irom the interior oI the subdivision.

As no right-oI-way is proposed to be vacated, and thus no Iranchise rights are involved, it is not
necessary to send this VAC request to the utility companies and Iranchise holders, nor wait Ior
their responses. Since only City easements are involved, any utility company interests will not
be aIIected.
VAC-56260 PR1-56259]
SS



This Petition to Vacate would eliminate the public inIrastructure easements that were granted
adjacent to Leon Avenue, which was partially vacated through a previous action. Those
easements are thereIore no longer needed, and the rear yards oI the adjacent parcels can be
extended to the centerline oI Leon Avenue without the need Ior installation oI public streetlights,
Iire hydrants or traIIic signals. StaII thereIore recommends approval with conditions.


NOTICES MAILED 2

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
VAC-56260
VAC-56260
VAC-56260
11/04/14 PC
VAC-56260
11/04/14 PC
10/09/14
PRJ-56259
V
A
C
-
0

[
P
P
J
-
9
j

-

V
A
C
A
T
I
O
N

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

C
I
T
Y

O
F

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

P
I
C
H
M
O
N
D

A
M
E
P
I
C
A
N

H
O
M
E
S

O
F

N
E
V
A
D
A

I
N
C
,

E
A
S
T

O
F

T
H
E

E
A
S
T
E
P
N

P
I
S
H
T
-
O
F
-
W
A
Y

L
I
N
E

O
F

L
E
O
N

A
V
E
N
U
E

N
O
P
T
H

O
F

I
P
O
N

M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N

P
O
A
D

September 30, 2014

Steve Swanton
Planning Department
City of Las Vegas
Peter:
The Department of Public Works requests a Petition of Vacation to eliminate existing public streetlight,
fire hydrant, pedestrian, traffic device, and conduit easements located east of Leon Avenue and north of
Iron Mountain Road. This petition is related to the previously approved Vacation of the east half of Leon
Avenue [VAC-54050], and is a housekeeping action to clean up the easements associated with a public
street that no longer exists.
Thank you,
Barton T. Anderson, P.E.

Engineering Project Manager, Development Coordination
City of Las Vegas Department of Public Works
10/01/14
PRJ-56259
VAC-56260

Agenda tem No.: 23.


SUB1ECT:
ABEYANCE - SUP-55390 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: EARL M MORIMOTO TRUST - For possible action on a request Ior a
Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED OFF-PREMISE SIGN at 3838 Meadows Lane (APN
139-31-510-021), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-55084|. StaII
recommends DENIAL.



RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved, subject to conditions:

4. Photos
6. Protest Postcards

SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: EARL M. MORIMOTO TRUST


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-55390 StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved subject to
conditions:

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-5530 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all OII-Premise Sign Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12.


SaIety.


5. This Special Use Permit shall be reviewed in Iive (5) year(s), at which time the City Council
may require the OII-Premise Sign be removed. The applicant shall be responsible Ior
notiIication costs oI the review. Failure to pay the City Ior these costs may result in a
requirement that the OII-Premise Sign be removed.
SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK

Conditions Page Two

6. The OII-Premise Sign and its supporting structure shall be properly maintained and kept Iree
oI graIIiti at all times. Failure to perIorm the required maintenance may result in Iines
and/or removal oI the OII-Premise Sign.

7. The property owner shall keep the property properly maintained and graIIiti-Iree at all times.
Failure to perIorm required maintenance may result in Iines and/or removal oI the OII-
Premise Sign.

8. Only one advertising sign is permitted per sign Iace.

9. Bird deterrent devices shall be installed on the sign.


SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This application is a request Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a proposed 18-Ioot by 31-Ioot OII-
Premise Sign to be located at 3838 Meadows Lane. The sign would be 40 Ieet tall, have 572
square Ieet oI sign area and no additional embellishments. The proposed OII-Premise Sign meets
all minimum code requirements; however the subject site is located within the city oI Las Vegas
Redevelopment Area. The proposal does not meet the Goals, Objectives and Policies oI the
Neighborhood Revitalization section oI the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan. Since the proposal is
not in accordance with the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan, it does not meet the goals and objectives
oI the Redevelopment Plan Area. By recommending denial oI this proposal, staII Iollows
Objective 2.4, ensuring that the quality oI existing residential neighborhoods are maintained and
enhanced. II denied, no OII-Premise Sign would be allowed on this site.

ISSUES

A Special Use Permit is required Ior an OII-Premise Sign in a C-1 (Limited Commercial)
zoning district.


12/28/77
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Plot Plan Review (Z-0102-73)
Ior property located at the northeast corner oI Valley View Boulevard and
Meadows Lane. Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
04/18/12
The City Council approved General Plan Amendment (GPA-43991) to
establish redevelopment area two and change the Iuture land use designation
on various parcels within the redevelopment area to commercial or mixed use.
The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.


c.1980
The existing oIIice and retail complex was constructed at the southwest
corner oI Valley View Boulevard and Meadows Lane.
SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK


07/16/14
StaII met with the applicant to discuss the proposed OII-Premise Sign at 3838
Meadows Lane. StaII determined that the sign met the minimum requirements
as outlined in Title 19.12.120; however a Special Use Permit would be
required to allow an OII-Premise Sign on property with an C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning designation. The submittal requirements Ior a Special
Use Permit were discussed.


Field Check
08/28/14
StaII conducted a routine Iield check and noted a well maintained shopping
center Iree oI any trash or debris.

Site Area
Gross Acres 2.94

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
OIIice, Other Than
Listed
North
General
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Church/House oI
Worship
South
OIIice, Other Than
Listed
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
East Government Facility PF (Public Facility) C-V (Civic)
West Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK


Trails N/A


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Valley View
Boulevard
Major Collector
and Highways
80 Feet Y
Meadows Lane Collector
and Highways
72 Feet Y

Standards Code Requirements Provided Compliance
Location No OII-Premise Sign may be
located within public right-oI-
way
The sign is not in public right-
oI-way, nor is it in the OII-
Premise Exclusionary Sign
Zone
Y
Zoning OII-Premise Signs are permitted
in the C-1, C-2, C-M and M
zoning districts with approval
oI a Special Use Permit.
The subject site has a zoning
designation oI C-1 (Limited
Commercial).
Y
Area No OII-Premise Sign shall have
a surIace area greater than 672
square Ieet, except that an
embellishment oI not to exceed
Iive Ieet above the regular
rectangular surIace oI the sign
may be added iI the additional
area contains no more than 128
square Ieet.
The sign is 572 square Ieet in
size and does not have a
proposed embellishment.
Y
SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK

Setback OII-Premise Signs shall not be
located closer than 50 Ieet to
the intersection oI the present or
Iuture rights-oI-way oI any two
public roads, streets or
highways
The proposed OII-Premise
Sign is set back 78 Ieet to the
closest intersection located to
the south at Meadows Lane
and Valley View Boulevard.
Y
Height No higher than 40 Ieet Irom
grade at the point oI
construction: may be raised to
be 30 Ieet above an adjacent
elevated Ireeway.
The sign is 40 Ieet in height.
Y
Screening All structural elements oI an
OII-Premise Sign to which the
display panels are attached shall
be screened Irom view.
All structural elements oI the
signs are screened Irom public
view.
Y
OII-Premise
Sign
At least 750 Ieet to another OII-
Premise Sign along US-95 or at
least 300 Ieet to another OII-
premise Sign (iI not along US-
95)
The proposed sign would not
be located along US-95. The
sign is at least 300 Ieet to
another OII-Premise Sign.
The closest sign is
approximately 1,500 Ieet to
the north.
Y
OII-Premise
Sign
At least 300 Ieet to the nearest
property line oI a lot in any 'R
or U zoned districts.
The sign is more than 700 Ieet
Irom any property line zoned
either 'R or 'U.
Y
Other All OII-Premise Signs shall be
detached and permanently
secured to the ground and shall
not be located on property used
Ior residential purposes.
The sign is permanently
attached to the ground and
detached Irom any other
structures.
Y

ANALYSIS

The OII-Premise Sign use is deIined as 'OII-premise signs are to be considered primarily a
speciIic type oI land use rather than as an incidental use to an existing land use. OII-premise
signs generally produce revenue to the property owner(s) as a land use as compared to on-
premise signs which in themselves do not produce revenue but are incidental to revenue
producing land use. However, because oI the special characteristics oI oII-premise signs as
compared to other types oI land uses and structures, certain qualiIications and requirements are
set Iorth in connection with oII-premise signs as a permitted use in certain zoning districts. The
proposed use meets the deIinition, since the property owner will be obtaining revenue Irom the
proposed signage.
SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK


The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements Ior this use include:

1. No oII-premise signs shall be erected in the public right-oI-way.
The proposea sign is not locatea in the public right-of-way.

2. No oII-premise sign certiIicate oI any kind shall be issued Ior an existing or proposed sign
unless the sign is consistent with all requirements oI this Title (including those protecting
existing signs).
The proposea sign meets all minimum requirements for an Off-Premise Sign.

3. Except as provided in Paragraph (12) below, oII premise signs are permitted in the C-1,
C-2, C-M and M Zoning Districts only.
The subfect site has a :oning aesignation of C-1 (Limitea Commercial), which permits
the Off-Premise Sign with approval of a Special Use Permit. The subfect site meets the
criteria.

4. No oII-premise sign shall have a surIace area greater than 672 square Ieet, except that an
embellishment oI not to exceed Iive Ieet above the regular rectangular surIace oI the sign
may be added iI the additional area contains no more than 128 square Ieet. Any
embellishment may include lettering, text, numerals or images, but only to the extent that
such items do not exceed IiIty percent oI any linear side oI the sign.
The proposea sign is 572 square feet, with no aaaitional embellishment.

5. OII-premise signs which are within 660 Ieet oI the right-oI-way and which can be read
Irom Interstate 15, US 95 Irom the north city limits to the Oran K. Gragson Highway, the
Oran K. Gragson Highway or Interstate 515 shall be no closer than 750 Ieet (measured
along the highway Irontage) to any other oII-premise sign along the same Irontage. Each
side oI the highway shall be considered a separate Irontage. The sign and all other oII-
premise signs not oriented toward the same highway shall be no closer than 300 Ieet in any
direction to any other oII premise sign, wherever located, including an oII premise sign
that is situated outside the corporate boundaries oI the City.

The proposea sign woula not be locatea within 660 feet of Interstate 15, US 95 or
Interstate 515. The closest Off-Premise Sign is more than 1,500 feet to the north of the
proposea sign. The proposea sign meets the 300-foot aistance separation criteria.

6. OII-premise signs shall be no higher than 40 Ieet Irom grade at the point oI construction,
except that an oII-premise sign within 60 Ieet oI the right-oI-way line oI the street to which
it is oriented which, at a height oI 40 Ieet, will have a signiIicant portion oI its display
surIace obscured Irom view Irom the travel lanes oI the street may be increased to a
maximum oI 55 Ieet when authorized by the City Council.
The proposea sign woula be 40 feet in height ana complies with this requirement.
SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK


7. OII-premise signs shall not be located closer than 10 Ieet to the right-oI-way line oI a
Ireeway nor closer than 50 Ieet to the intersection oI the present or Iuture rights-oI-way oI
any two public roads, streets or highways.
The proposea sign is not locatea in close proximity to a right-of-way line of a freeway
ana woula be more than 75 feet from the nearest intersection.

8. No oII-premise sign shall be erected or maintained within 660 Ieet oI the nearest travel
lanes oI the Summerlin Parkway Irom Station 499 78 to Station 601 30.

The proposea sign is more than 660 feet from the nearest travel lane of Summerlin
Parkway.

9. No oII-premise sign shall be allowed within 300 Ieet Irom the nearest property line oI a lot
in the 'U zoning district or any 'R zoning district.

The nearest 'R` :onea property is locatea 700 feet to the south of the proposea Off-
Premise Sign. There are no properties with a 'U` :oning aistrict in the vicinity of the
proposea sign.

The applicant is applying Ior a Special Use Permit to install an OII-Premise Sign at the Meadows
Mall, a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoned property at 3838 Meadows Lane. The proposed OII-
Premise Sign adheres to all minimum code requirements; however the proposed location oI the
OII-Premise Sign is within the Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area. There are existing
residential neighborhoods located to the south and west oI the subject site. The proposal to install
an OII-Premise Sign in close proximity to these low density residential neighborhoods Iails to
comply with Objective 2.4 oI the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan, which is to ensure that the quality
oI existing residential neighborhoods are maintained and enhanced. An OII-Premise Sign does
not Iurther mitigate the adverse eIIects associated with an existing residential neighborhood
being located in close proximity to non-residential land uses. Since the proposal is not in
accordance with the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan, it does not meet the goals and objectives oI the
Redevelopment Plan Area and cannot be conducted in a harmonious or compatible manner with
surrounding land uses. As a result, staII recommends denial.



SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK


The subject site is located within an existing shopping corridor and has been included in
the Las Vegas Redevelopment Area. There are existing residential neighborhoods to the
south and west. A proposed OII-Premise Sign does not Iurther mitigate the existing
adverse eIIects associated with a mature neighborhood being located near a major
shopping center. As a result, the proposed OII-Premise Sign Iails to adhere to Objective
2.4 oI the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan. As a result oI Iailing to comply with the Master
Plan, the proposal also Iails to adhere to the Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan and cannot be
conducted in a harmonious or compatible manner with surrounding land uses.


The existing shopping center site is physically suitable Ior the proposed use.


Site access is provided Irom Valley View Boulevard, an 70-Ioot wide Major Collector and
Meadows Lane, a 72-Ioot wide Collector as classiIied by the Master Plan oI Streets and
Highways. Both rights-oI-way are adequate in size to accommodate the proposed OII-
Premise Sign use.

General Plan.

Approval oI the proposed Special Use Permit will not be consistent with Objective 2.4 oI
the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan. As a result oI Iailing to comply with the Master Plan, the
proposal also Iails to adhere to the Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan.


The proposed OII-Premise Sign use complies with all Title 19 requirements.


NOTICES MAILED 348

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 4
07/30/14
PRJ-55084
SUP-55390
Page 1 of 2 8/26/2014 8:36:58 AM
Applicant Email: PKLENK@WAGNARCHITECTS.COM
Applicant Fax: 702-878-8430
Rep Last Name: KLENK
Rep First Name: PATRICK
Applicant State: NEVADA
Rep Address: 400 SOUTH 4TH STREET #215
Rep Email: PKLENK@WAGNARCHITECTS.COM
Rep Fax: 702-878-8430
Rep State: NEVADA
Rep City: LAS VEGAS
Rep Phone: 702-878-0000
Rep Zip: 89101
Project Name THE SHOPPES AT MEADOWS LANE SIGNAGE
Correct:
Yes
Applicant City: LAS VEGAS
ProjectAddress (Location): 3838 MEADOWS LANE
Application/Petition For: SUP
Applicant First Name: PATRICK
Additional Information: Sign Proposal - Revised corrections per pre-app meeting
Applicant Address: 400 SOUTH 4TH STREET #215
Applicant Last Name: KLENK
Lots/Units: 0
Gross Acres: 2.94
SUP-55390
Page 2 of 2 8/26/2014 8:36:58 AM
I Accept:
Yes
MORIMOTO EARL M TRUST 820 RANCHO LN #85 LAS VEGAS, NV 89106-3806
Patrick Klenk WESTAR President pklenk@wagnarchitects.com
SUP-55390
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
8
4
S
U
P
-
5
5
3
9
0
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
8
4
S
U
P
-
5
5
3
9
0
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
8
4
S
U
P
-
5
5
3
9
0
S
U
P
-
3
9
0

[
P
P
J
-
4
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

E
A
P
L

M

M
O
P
I
M
O
T
O

T
P
U
S
T

3

M
E
A
D
O
W
S

L
A
N
E

08/26/14
PRJ-55084
SUP-55390
08/26/14
PRJ-55084
SUP-55390

Agenda tem No.: 24.


SUB1ECT:
ABEYANCE - SUP-55677 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
ACE LOAN COMPANY - OWNER: B F TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on a request Ior
a Special Use Permit FOR A PAWN SHOP WITHIN AN EXISTING 1,651 SQUARE-FOOT
COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A 50-FOOT DISTANCE
SEPARATION FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 200 FEET IS REQUIRED AND 920
FEET FROM A SIMILAR USE WHERE 1,000 FEET IS REQUIRED at 519 East St. Louis
Avenue (APN 162-03-311-017), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-55676|.
StaII recommends DENIAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos
6. E Comments Received in Opposition

SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: ACE LOAN COMPANY - OWNER: B F TRUST,
ET AL


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
conditions:
N/A

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-5577 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Pawn Shop use.


3. A Waiver Irom Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a 920-Ioot distance separation Irom
a similar use where a 1000-Ioot distance separation is required.

4. A Waiver Irom Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a 50-Ioot distance separation Irom a
residential zoned property where a 200-Ioot distance separation is required.

SaIety.

SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR

Conditions Page Two


Municipal Code.

9. Prior to occupancy, all necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections
shall be completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
oI Building and SaIety.


SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR

`` STAFF REPORT ``

The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit Ior a proposed Pawn Shop use at 519 East St.
Louis Avenue. The proposed location will require two Waivers Irom the minimum distance
requirements, as the use is located 920 Ieet Irom the existing Pawn Shop use where a minimum
1,000-Ioot is required and 50 Ieet Irom a residential zoned property where 200 Ieet is required.
The proposed location does not conIorm to the minimum distance separation requirement Ior a
Pawn Shop use, as required by Title 19.12; thereIore, the use cannot be conducted in a
harmonious and compatible manner with the existing and Iuture land uses. StaII recommends
denial oI this application. II denied, a Pawn Shop use cannot be opened at this location.

ISSUES

A Pawn Shop use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district with the
The proposed use requires Waivers to allow a 50-Ioot distance separation Irom a residential
use where 200 Ieet is required and a 920-Ioot distance separation Irom an existing Pawn
Shop use where 1,000 Ieet is required. StaII recommends denial oI the Waiver requests.


09/01/76
The Board oI City Commissioners approved Rezoning and Plot Plan Review
(Z-0050-76) request Ior the property located at 519 East St. Louis Avenue
Irom R-4 (Apartment Residence) to C-1 (Limited Commercial). The
Planning Commission recommended approval.
08/02/78
The Board oI City Commissioners denied a Plot Plan Review (Z-0050-76)
request to allow an OII-Premise Sign on property located on the northwest
corner oI St. Louis Avenue and Weldon Place. The Planning Commission
and staII recommended denial.
03/19/86
The City Council denied a Plot Plan Review to allow an OII-Premise Sign on
property located on the northwest corner oI St. Louis Avenue and Weldon
Place (Z-0050-76). The Planning Commission recommended approval.
06/20/07
The City Council approved a table request Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-
15442) Ior a proposed Package Liquor OII-Sale Establishment at 519 St.
Louis Avenue. The Planning Commission and staII recommended denial.
05/04/11
The City Council approved a withdraw without prejudice request Ior a Special
Use Permit (SUP-40739) Ior a proposed Pawn Shop at 519 St. Louis Avenue.
The Planning Commission and staII recommended denial.
SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR

01/18/12
The City Council approved a withdraw without prejudice request Ior a Special
Use Permit (SUP-42648) Ior a proposed Pawn Shop at 519 St. Louis Avenue.
The Planning Commission and staII recommended denial.
10/14/14
The Planning Commission voted to hold this item in abeyance to the 11/04/14
Planning Commission meeting at the request oI the applicant.


1950 The building at 519 East St. Louis Avenue was constructed.
07/10/87
A business license (Q01-00052) was issued Ior a Real Estate Firm at 519 East
St. Louis Avenue. The license was marked out oI business on 0/11/09.
11/01/01
A business license (C05-01099) was issued Ior a Tobacco Dealer at 519 East
11/01/01
A business license (L15-00013) was issued Ior a Package Liquor at 519 East
09/04/03
A building permit (#03019166) was issued Ior a tenant improvement at 519
East St. Louis Avenue. The permit was Iinalized on 09/24/03.
06/14/07
A business license (G01-93893) was issued Ior Restricted Gaming at 519 East
07/26/11
A building permit (#192520) was issued Ior disaster repair at 519 East St.
Louis Avenue. The permit was Iinalized on 08/25/11.

08/21/14
Use Permit submittal requirements Ior a Pawn Shop use.


Field Check
08/28/14
vacant and without graIIiti on it.
SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR


Site Area
Net Acres 0.16

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property
Other Than Listed
C (Commercial) C-1 (Limited Commercial)
North Parking Lot C (Commercial) C-1 (Limited Commercial)
South Apartments C (Commercial) R-5 (Apartment)
East Apartments C (Commercial) R-5 (Apartment)
West
Retail Store, Other
Than Listed
C (Commercial) C-2 (General Commercial)

Beverly Green/Southridge Neighborhood Plan Y
Trails Y

Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Pawn Shop 1,651 SF 1/250 SF 7

4

Y*
SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR


Waivers
No pawn shop use may be
located closer than 1,000 Ieet
Irom any other pawn shop use.
To allow a 920-Ioot
separation distance
Irom another Pawn
Shop use.
Denial
No pawn shop use may be
located closer than 200Ieet Irom
a residential zoned parcel.
To allow a 50-Ioot
separation distance
Irom a residential
zoned parcel.
Denial

ANALYSIS

Per Title 19.18, the Pawn Shop use is deIined as,

'A Iacility (other than a bank, saving and loan or mortgage banking company) used Ior
the business oI lending money on the security oI pledged goods or Ior the business oI the
purchase oI tangible personal property on condition that it may be redeemed or
repurchased by the seller Ior a Iixed price within a Iixed period oI time.

The proposed use meets this deIinition, as the applicant is proposing to relocate an existing legal
nonconIorming Pawn Shop located at 215 North 3
rd
Street to 519 East St. Louis Avenue.


1. The use shall comply with the applicable requirements oI LVMC Chapter 6.60.

The proposea use will meet this requirement, as the minimum coae requirements for a
pawnbroker license will neea to be satisfiea for the change of location for the existing
license to be approvea. Also, conformance to LJMC Chapter 6.60 is a stanaara conaition
of approval that cannot be waivea.

2. No outdoor display, sales or storage oI any merchandise shall be permitted.

The proposea use will meet this requirement, as all merchanaise will be storea within an
enclosea builaing, ana the business will be subfect to regular licensing inspection.

3. No pawn shop shall be located on either side oI Fremont Street or on Las Vegas
Boulevard South, between Charleston Boulevard and Sahara Avenue.
SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR


The proposea use meets this requirement, as the proposea location is not locatea within
the excluaea areas statea above.

4. No pawn shop use may be located closer than 200 Ieet Irom any parcel used or zoned Ior
residential use. In addition, no pawn shop use may be located closer than 1,000 Ieet Irom
any other pawn shop use or speciIied Iinancial institution use. For purposes oI this
Regulation 4, distances shall be measured in a straight line Irom property line to property
line, without regard to intervening obstacles. The term 'property line reIers to property
lines oI Iee interest parcels and not leasehold parcels.

The proposea use aoes not meet this requirement, as the proposea location will be
locatea 50 feet from a parcel :onea for resiaential use ana 920 feet from an existing
Pawn Shop use. This conaition may be waivea, however, staff cannot support the
requestea waivers, as the lessening of the aistance separation is not compatible with the
existing ana future lana uses.

The applicant is proposing a Pawn Shop use at 519 East St. Louis Avenue. The existing building
was constructed in 1950 and is located in downtown Las Vegas. The site is parking impaired as
detailed in Title 19.18.030(D). The prior use was a General Retail Store, Other Than Listed
(parked at one parking space Ior every 175 square Ieet oI gross Iloor area) that has a parking
requirement greater the proposed use, a Pawn Shop (that is parked at one parking space Ior every
250 square Ieet oI gross Iloor). The applicant has requested two minimum distance separation
Waivers. The Iirst Waiver is to allow a Pawn Shop use to be located 50 Ieet Irom a residentially
zoned property where 200 Ieet is required and second is to allow this use 920 Ieet Irom a similar
use where 1,000 Ieet is required. The requested Waivers reinIorce the unsuitability oI a Pawn
Shop at this location. Furthermore, the required Waivers illustrate the use cannot be conducted in
manner that is compatible with the existing and Iuture land uses in the surrounding area. As such,
staII recommends denial oI this application. II denied, the applicant may not operate the Pawn
Shop use Irom this location.



SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR


The proposed Pawn Shop use cannot be conducted in a compatible manner with the
surrounding uses, as a protected use (a residential zoned property) is 50 Ieet Irom the
required use and similar use (a Pawn Shop) is within the minimum distance separation
required by code.


The site is physically suitable Ior the type and intensity oI land use proposed, as the use
would be located within an existing single tenant building with ample parking and easy
site access. The site is designed to accommodate a number oI uses such as oIIices, retail
shops or other similar uses and the physical needs oI a Pawn Shop are a hybrid between
oIIice, retail and Iinancial institution.


The proposed Pawn Shop use has primary access Irom St Louis Street, an 80-Ioot wide
Major Collector and secondary access is provided by Weldon Place, a 50-Ioot wide local
street. Both roadways have adequate capacity to meet the requirements oI the proposed
Pawn Shop use.

General Plan.

The proposed Pawn Shop use will be subject to licensing review and inspection, thereby
protecting the public health, saIety and welIare.


The location oI the proposed Pawn Shop use does not meet Requirement 4, as it would be
located 50-Ioot Irom a residential use and 920 Ieet Irom an existing Pawn Shop use. StaII
recommends denial oI the requested Waivers, and the Special Use Permit as it cannot be
conducted in a harmonious manner with the surrounding community.


NOTICES MAILED 170
SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR


APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 3
08/25/14
PRJ-55676
SUP-55677
Page 1 of 2 8/25/2014 7:10:46 AM
Applicant Email: bockfam7@yahoo.com
Rep Last Name: Company
Rep First Name: Ace Loan
Applicant State: NV
Rep Address: 2230 S. Paradise Road
Rep Email: bockfam7@yahoo.com
Rep Fax: 702-629-3176
Rep State: NV
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: 702-382-3489
Rep Zip: 89104
Project Name PAWN SHOP 519 EAST ST LOUIS AVE
Correct:
Yes
ProjectAddress (Location): 519 E ST LOUIS AVENUE
Application/Petition For: SUP Pawn Shop
Applicant First Name: Ace Loan
Applicant Address: 2230 S. Paradise Road
Applicant Last Name: Company
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
08/25/14
PRJ-55676
SUP-55677
Page 2 of 2 8/25/2014 7:10:46 AM
! Accept:
Yes
B F TRUST ETAL 2230 S PARADISE RD LAS VEGAS, NV 89104-2516
Richard Truesdell Cornerstone Company President/Broker sharon@cornerstonecompany.com
08/25/14
PRJ-55676
SUP-55677
08/25/14
PRJ-55676
SUP-55677
10/14/14 PC
08/25/14
PRJ-55676
S
U
P
-
5
5
6
7
7
08/25/14
PRJ-55676
S
U
P
-
5
5
6
7
7
S
U
P
-
7
7

[
P
P
J
-
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

A
C
E

L
O
A
N

C
O
M
P
A
N
Y

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

F

T
P
U
S
T

E
T

A
L

1
9

E
A
S
T

S
T
,

L
O
U
I
S

A
V
E
N
U
E

S
U
P
-
7
7

[
P
P
J
-
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

A
C
E

L
O
A
N

C
O
M
P
A
N
Y

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

F

T
P
U
S
T

E
T

A
L

1
9

E
A
S
T

S
T
,

L
O
U
I
S

A
V
E
N
U
E

08/25/14
PRJ-55676 SUP-55677
Public Comment Foim
l S Su SLClAL uSL L8Ml1 u8LlC PLA8lnC ALlCAn1 ACL LCAn CCMAn?
CWnL8 8 l 18uS1 L1 AL l S u lC8 A AWn
SPC Wl1Pln An LxlS1lnC SCuA8LlCC1 CCMML8ClAL 8ulLulnC Wl1P WAlvL8S 1C ALLCW A
lCC1 ulS1AnCL SLA8A1lCn l8CM A 8LSluLn1lAL uSL WPL8L lLL1 lS 8LCul8Lu Anu
lLL1 l8CM A SlMlLA8 uSL WPL8L lLL1 lS 8LCul8Lu L S L A An
C L C Z W C 8! S uLnlAL
1 n C
n S S
A 8 W
C L v
S n
Z
C l
1

l l
C

A
1 1 C L C S S
n 1 L 1M 1L LZ S C S C
8 ! L ! C n 1 L LZ
8 C 1
l A
A
1

uW

l S L L
u C
A L
A
l

1
S S
v A
Public Comment Foim

1 n C
n ! S
A 8 A
C L v
S n
Z
C nC1 Su A l

v A

Public Comment Foim

1 n C
n ! u
A 8 W
C L v
S n
Z
C l
v A

Public Comment Foim

1 n C
n k C k
A L S L A
C L v
S n
Z
C 1 W
l l A
1

8
k k
v A

Public Comment Foim

1 n C
n ! Lv
A
C L v
S n
Z
C 1
S
1
v A

Public Comment Foim

1 n C
n ! C
A C M
C L v
S n
Z
C l ! S
1
l 1
v A

Public Comment Foim

1 n C
n
A LLLLn WA?
C LAS vLCAS
S n
Z
C l W

uW

uCLSn1

1

v A

Public Comment Foim

1 n C
n n 1
A l A
C L v
S n
Z
C 1 1
S W

v A

Public Comment Foim

1 n C
n W S
A C
C L v
S n
Z
C A
v A

Public Comment Foim
1 n
n M C
A S A
C L v
S n
Z
C v u

v A

Agenda tem No.: 25.


SUB1ECT:
ABEYANCE - SUP-55682 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: THREE TWENTY TWO, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a
Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 2,467 SQUARE-FOOT LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT
(TAVERN) WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 130-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM
A LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT (TAVERN) AND A 1,200-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION
FROM A CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP WHERE 1,500 FEET IS THE MINIMUM
DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIRED at 322 Fremont Street (APN 139-34-510-026), C-2
(General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-55576|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: THREE TWENTY TWO, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-5582 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Liquor
Establishment (Tavern) use.


SaIety.


5. Minors shall only be permitted in such areas wherein spirituous, malt or Iermented liquors
or wines are served only in conjunction with regular meals and where dining tables or
booths are provided separate Irom the bar in conIormance with Title 6.50.


Municipal Code.

SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a proposed Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use
within a commercial space located at 322 Fremont Street. The proposed Tavern is 2,467 square
Ieet in size with seating Ior 25 people. This application is accompanied with a Waiver request to
allow a 130-Ioot distance separation Irom an existing Tavern and 1,200-Ioot distance separation
Irom an existing church/house oI worship use where a 1,500-Ioot minimum distance separation
is required. StaII has determined that the proposed use can be conducted in a compatible and
harmonious manner with the existing surrounding land uses; thereIore, staII recommends
approval oI this application. II denied, the applicant will not be allowed to conduct the Liquor
Establishment (Tavern) use at this location.

ISSUES

The Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use is permitted in the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning
district with the approval oI a Special Use Permit.
A Waiver may be requested Ior a reduction in the required separation distance Irom a similar
use Ior properties located within the Downtown Casino Overlay District.
A distance separation Waiver is required to allow a 130-Ioot distance separation Irom an
existing Tavern and 1,200-Ioot distance separation Irom an existing church/house oI worship
use where a 1,500-Ioot minimum distance separation is required.


12/16/64
The City Council approved Rezoning (Z-0100-64) Irom R-1 (Single Family
Residential), R-4 (High Density Residential), C-1 (Limited Commercial), C-2
(General Commercial) and C-V (Civic) to C-2 (General Commercial) Ior
approximately 230 Acres generally located on property bounded by Main
Street to the west, Bonanza Road on the north, Las Vegas Boulevard on the
east, and Charleston Boulevard on the south, Wards 1 and 3. The Planning
Commission recommended approval on 12/10/64.

SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB


A business license (L15-00073) was issued Ior Package Liquor at 322
Fremont Street. The license is still active.
A business license (C05-01555) was issued Ior Tobacco Dealer at 322
12/13/91
A business license (G50-03258) was issued Ior General Retail Sales at 322
10/30/97
A business license (R10-00699) was issued Ior a Restaurant at 322 Fremont
Street. The license is still active.
11/29/05
A building permit (#55057) was issued Ior a re-rooIing consisting oI the -
removal and replacement oI the rooI membrane only. The permit has not been
Iinalized.
07/01/14
A code enIorcement case (#143111) was processed Ior a broken plexiglass
sign above this location that poses a hazard iI it was to break loose and Iall to
the ground. This sign has been broken Ior the past 2 years and needs to be
replaced. The case was resolved on 08/05/14.

08/14/14
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the submittal
process Ior the Special use Permit Ior a proposed Liquor Establishment
(Tavern) use.


Field Check
08/26/14
A Iield inspection was conducted by staII which revealed a well maintained
commercial site located under the Fremont Street Experience canopy.

Site Area
Net Acres 0.14
SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property General Retail C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
North General Retail C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
South Right-oI-Way ROW (Right-OI-Way)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
East General Retail C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
West General Retail C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)

Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District (Central Casino Core) Y
Downtown Casino Overlay District Y
Live/Work Overlay District Y
Trails N/A


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Fremont Street Pedestrian Plaza
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
80 Feet Y
SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB


Parking Requirement - Downtown
Base Parking Requirement Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Liquor
Establishment
(Tavern)
715 SF
seating area
1,752 SF back
oI house
1:50 SF oI
seating
area plus
1:200 oI
remaining
Iloor area
24

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 24 0 N*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 23 1 0 0 N*
*Profects locatea within the Las Jegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subfect to the
automatic application of parking requirements. However, the above table shoula be usea to illustrate
the requirements of an analogous profect in another location in the City.

Waivers
A 1,500-Ioot minimum distance
separation is required Irom any
other Liquor Establishment
(Tavern), church/house oI
worship, school and individual
care center licensed Ior more
than 12 children.
To allow a 130-Ioot
distance separation
Irom an existing Liquor
Establishment (Tavern)
and to allow a 1,200-
Ioot distance separation
Irom an existing
church/house oI
worship
Approval

ANALYSIS

The applicant is proposing to establish a 2,467 square-Ioot Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use
within a commercial space located at 322 Fremont Street. The submitted Iloor plan indicates that
this Tavern will provide seating Ior 25 people. The subject site is located within the C-2 (General
Commercial) zoning district, which allows the Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use with an
approved Special Use Permit.

The subject site is located in the Downtown Centennial Plan (Central Casino Core); in the
pedestrian mall controlled and operated by the Fremont Street Experience. The existing
commercial development provides shared access and parking throughout the subject site, through
the utilization oI existing parking lots in the area.
SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB


A Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use is described in Title 19.12 as: 'A Iacility which sells
alcoholic beverages Ior consumption on the premises where the same are sold and authorizes the
sale, to consumers only and not Ior resale, oI alcoholic beverages in original sealed or corked
containers, Ior consumption oII the premises where the same are sold.

Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements:

* 1. Pursuant to its general authority to regulate the sale oI alcoholic beverages, the City Council
declares that the public health, saIety and general welIare oI the City are best promoted and
protected by generally requiring both a minimum separation between liquor establishments
(tavern), and a minimum separation between a liquor establishment (tavern) and certain other
uses that should be protected Irom the impacts associated with a liquor establishment (tavern).
ThereIore, except as otherwise provided below, no liquor establishment (tavern) may be located
within 1500 Ieet oI any other liquor establishment (tavern), church/house oI worship, school,
individual care center licensed Ior more than 12 children, or City park.

The proposea Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use aoes not meet this requirement, as the
applicant has requestea Waivers to allow a 130-foot aistance separation from an existing Tavern
ana 1,200-foot aistance separation from an existing church/house of worship use where a 1,500-
foot minimum aistance separation is requirea. This conaition can be waivea in this instance
pursuant to Title 19.12.010 conaition =5a, because the subfect site is locatea within the
Downtown Casino Overlay District. Staff supports this requestea waiver, as the use will be
locatea within the peaestrian corriaor of the Fremont Street Experience that will proviae
security ana control over the aaministration of alcohol sales ana consumption.

* 2. The distance separation reIerred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured with reIerence to the
shortest distance between two property lines, one being the property line oI the proposed liquor
establishment (tavern) which is closest to the existing use to which the measurement pertains,
and the other being the property line oI that existing use which is closest to the proposed liquor
establishment (tavern). The distance shall be measured in a straight line without regard to
intervening obstacles.

Distances have been measurea from Commercial Subaivision 'Clarks Las Jegas Townsite`
Book 1, Page 37, Lot 19, Block 31.

* 3. For the purpose oI Requirement 2, and Ior that purpose only:

a. The 'property line oI a protected use reIers to the property line oI a Iee interest parcel that has
been created by an approved and recorded parcel map or subdivision map, and does not include
the property line oI a leasehold parcel; and
SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB


b. The 'property line oI a liquor establishment (tavern) reIers to:
i. The property line oI a parcel that has been created by an approved and recorded parcel
map or commercial subdivision map; or
ii. The property line oI a parcel that is located within an approved and recorded
commercial subdivision and that has been created by a record oI survey or legal
description, iI:
A. Using the property line oI that parcel Ior the purpose oI measuring the distance
separation reIerred to in Requirement 1 would qualiIy the parcel under the
distance separation requirement;
B. The proposed liquor establishment (tavern) will have direct access (both
ingress and egress) Irom a street having a minimum right-oI-way width oI 100
Ieet. The required access may be shared with a larger development but must be
located within the property lines oI the parcel on which the proposed liquor
establishment (tavern) will be located;
C. All parking spaces required by this Subchapter 19.12.070 Ior the liquor
establishment (tavern) use will be located on the same parcel as the use; and
D. The owners oI all parcels within the commercial subdivision, including the
owner oI agreement, satisIactory to the City Attorney, that provides Ior perpetual,
reciprocal cross-access, ingress and egress throughout the commercial
subdivision.

Distances have been measurea from Commercial Subaivision 'Clarks Las Jegas Townsite`
Book 1, Page 37, Lot 19, Block 31.

4. The distance separation requirement set Iorth in Requirement 1 does not apply to an
establishment which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection with a hotel having 200 or
more guest rooms on or beIore July 1, 1992, or in connection with a resort hotel having in excess
oI 200 guest rooms aIter July 1, 1992.

This conaition is not applicable, as there are no existing non-restrictea gaming licenses in
connection with a hotel having 200 or more guest rooms associatea with this proposal.

5. The distance separation requirement set Iorth in Requirement 1 may be waived in accordance
with the provisions oI LVMC 19.12.050(C), but only in connection with a proposed liquor
establishment (tavern) that:

a. Will be located on a parcel within the C-V District, the Parkway Center District within
the Downtown Centennial Plan, the Gaming Enterprise Overlay District, or the
Downtown Casino Overlay District;
b. Will be located on a parcel or within a building that, pursuant to State law or City
ordinance, has been designated as an historic property, historic building, or landmark;
c. Will be located within a regional mall; or
d. Will be located within a mixed-use development
SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB


i. That has been approved by means oI Special Use Permit pursuant to LVMC
Chapters 19.12 and 19.16;
ii. That has a minimum net site area oI 15 acres; and
iii. Whose gross Iloor area oI nonresidential space is a minimum oI 250,000
square Ieet; or
e. Will be separated Irom the existing use by a street or highway with a minimum right-
oI-way width oI 100 Ieet.

The proposea Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use aoes not meet this aistance separation
requirement set form in conaition =1, as the applicant has requestea Waivers to allow a 130-foot
aistance separation from an existing Tavern ana 1,200-foot aistance separation from an existing
church/house of worship use where a 1,500-foot minimum aistance separation is requirea.

However, the aistance separation requirements outlinea in conaition =1 can be waivea in this
case pursuant to Title 19.12.010 conaition =5a, because the subfect site is locatea within the
Downtown Casino Overlay District.

* 6. The use shall conIorm to, and is subject to, the provisions oI LVMC Chapters 6.40 and 6.50.

The proposea use will be subfect to all business licensing requirements outlinea in LJMC
Chapter 6.40 ana 6.50 if approvea.

deIinition outlined above. The proposed Liquor Establishment (Tavern) also adheres to all
minimum special use permit requirements as outlined by the Title 19.12, except Ior the
associated Waiver to allow a 130-Ioot distance separation Irom an existing Tavern and 1,200-
Ioot distance separation Irom an existing church/house oI worship use where a 1,500-Ioot
minimum distance separation is required. In addition, staII has added a condition oI approval
requiring the business conIorm to all provisions oI LVMC Chapter 6.50 with regards to running
a Liquor Establishment (Tavern). The proposed use meets the intent oI the Downtown
Centennial Plan by providing opportunities Ior community gathering; and is compatible with the
existing entertainment-based uses within the immediate area; thereIore, staII recommends
approval with conditions.



SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB


The proposed Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use is compatible with the surrounding land
uses and can be conducted in harmonious manner with surrounding land uses.


The subject site is located within an approved 2,467 square-Ioot commercial space that is
physically suitable Ior the intensity oI the proposed land use.


Access to the site will not change. There is no vehicle access to the subject site. The site is
accessed by pedestrian mall under the canopy controlled by the Fremont Street
Experience. Fremont Street is an 80-Ioot Major Collector, as classiIied by the Master Plan
oI Streets and Highways.

General Plan.



The proposed use meets all applicable conditions oI approval Ior a Liquor Establishment
(Tavern) use per Title 19.12, with the exception oI the proposed Waivers to allow a 130-
Ioot distance separation Irom an existing Tavern and 1,200-Ioot distance separation Irom
an existing church/house oI worship use where a 1,500-Ioot minimum distance separation
is required.


NOTICES MAILED 190

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
08/21/14
PRJ-55576
SUP-55682
Page 1 of 2 8/21/2014 3:13:22 PM
Applicant Email: athiguchi@aol.com
Rep Last Name: Floyd
Rep First Name: Seth
Rep Address: 2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200
Rep Email: sfloyd@mcdonaldcarano.com
Rep Fax:
Rep State: Nevada
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: 702-873-4100
Rep Zip: 89102
Project Name 322 FREMONT STREET - LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT TAVERN
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 5 (RICKI Y. BARLOW)
ProjectAddress (Location): 322 FREMONT STREET
Application/Petition For: 322 Fremont Street - Liquor Establishment Tavern
Applicant First Name: Aliza
Applicant Address: 5151 S. Procyon St. #108
Applicant Last Name: Elazar-Higuchi
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
SUP-55682
Page 2 of 2 8/21/2014 3:13:22 PM
Is the Owner Information Correct: No
If no, ...change what The owner should be Three Twenty Two, LLC.
I Accept:
Yes
1602LAMPLIGHT GARDENS AT
PINNAC
LOT 160 BLOCK 2,
Seth Floyd McDonald Carano Wilson LLP Attorney sfloyd@mcdonaldcarano.com
SUP-55682
08/21/14
PRJ-55576
S
U
P
-
5
5
6
8
2
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
5
7
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
6
8
2
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
5
7
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
6
8
2
S
U
P
-
Z

[
P
P
J
-
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

T
H
P
E
E

T
W
E
N
T
Y

T
W
O

L
L
C

3
Z
Z

F
P
E
M
O
N
T

S
T
P
E
E
T

08/21/14
PRJ-55576
SUP-55682
08/21/14
PRJ-55576
SUP-55682

Agenda tem No.: 26.


SUB1ECT:
ABEYANCE - SUP-55786 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT
HOUSE OF BARGAINS - OWNER: DUCK HORN, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior
a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 5,950 SQUARE-FOOT THRIFT SHOP USE at 4000
West Sahara Avenue (APN 162-06-812-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1
(Tarkanian) |PRJ-55655|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

SUP-55786 PR1-55655]
MR


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT HOUSE OF BARGAINS - OWNER: DUCK HORN,
LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL

N/A

SbF-5578 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a ThriIt Shop use.

2. All signage shall be permitted and meet minimum code requirements within 30 days oI Iinal
approval.

3. Outdoor donation bins or drop oII areas shall be prohibited.


SaIety.


7. This business shall operate in conIormance to Chapter 6 oI the City oI Las Vegas
Municipal Code.


SUP-55786 PR1-55655]
MR

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant has requested a Special Use Permit Ior a 5,950 square-Ioot ThriIt Shop use at 4000
West Sahara Avenue. StaII recommends approval oI this application, as all minimum Title
19.12 requirements Ior a ThriIt Shop use are met and the use can be conducted in a harmonious
and compatible manner with the surrounding area. II denied, a ThriIt Shop will not be allowed
to open at this location.

ISSUES

A ThriIt Shop use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district with the


02/17/60
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0044-59) request
Irom R-1 (Single Family Residential) to CC (Neighborhood Commercial).
The Planning Commission recommended approval.
06/02/76
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Plot Plan Review (Z-0044-59)
request Ior the property located on the northwest corner oI West Sahara
Avenue and Las Verdes Street. The Planning Commission recommended
approval.
05/27/97
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0029-97) request Irom CC
(Neighborhood Commercial) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) as part oI broad
rezoning action. 4000 West Sahara Avenue was included in this rezoning
case. The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
08/29/07
A complaint (#57334) was Iiled with Code EnIorcement Ior a non-permitted
sign on a block wall. The complaint was resolved on 09/13/07.
07/09/08
A complaint (#67565) was Iiled with Code EnIorcement Ior graIIiti on the
north side oI the building. The complaint was resolved on 07/10/08.
12/28/09
A complaint (#85198) was Iiled with Code EnIorcement Ior the business not
being handicapped accessible. The complaint was resolved on 01/05/09.
10/14/14
The Planning Commission voted to hold this item in abeyance to the 11/04/14
Planning Commission meeting at the request oI the Planning Commission.
SUP-55786 PR1-55655]
MR



1977 The building was constructed.
06/26/06
A business license (G50-01768) was issued Ior General Retail Sale at 4000
West Sahara Avenue. The permit was marked out on 12/01/11.
07/27/09
A building permit (#144228) was submitted; however, no permit was issued.
The building permit application expired on 05/01/12.
10/02/13
A building permit (#244252) Ior HVAC change out was issued. The permit
was not Iinalized.
08/05/09
Civil Improvement Plans (#24921 L-CIVIL) were submitted; however, they
were not approved.

08/20/14
Use Permit submittal requirements Ior a Secondhand Dealer or ThriIt Shop
use at 4000 West Sahara Avenue.


Field Check
08/28/14
vacant and graIIiti Iree; however, there is signage Irom a prior tenant.

Site Area
Net Acres 0.43

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property
Other Than Listed
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North
OIIice, Other than
Listed
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
SUP-55786 PR1-55655]
MR

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
South Restaurant C (Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
East Auto Repair, Minor C (Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
West
Single-Family,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)

Trails Y

Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
ThriIt Shop 5,950 SF 1:250 SF 24*

20

Y*
*The site is Parking Impaired as detailed in Title 19.18.030 (D)

ANALYSIS

The ThriIt Shop use is deIined by Title 19.18 as 'A retail Iacility that sells any new or used
merchandise that has been donated to the Iacility. Per the justiIication letter, date stamped
08/26/14, the applicant intends to sell purchased and donated items.

SUP-55786 PR1-55655]
MR


1. No outdoor display or sales oI any merchandise shall be permitted (non-waivable
condition).

The proposea use will meet this requirement, as the submittea site plan ana floor plan
show conformance to this conaition, ana it is a conaition of approval of the Special Use
Permit.

2. The use shall comply with the applicable requirements oI LVMC Title 6 (non-waivable
condition).

The proposea use will meet this requirement, as it is a conaition of approval of the
Special Use Permit.

3. Donations shall be accepted only during normal business hours, unless otherwise
speciIically approved in connection with the Special Use Permit. Where aIter-hours
donation oI items is approved, donation areas and containers, whether or not enclosed or
screened, must be designed so that donated items are not visible to the general public.

The proviaea floor plan ana fustification letter illustrate the aonation bins are locatea
insiae the builaing ana will be receivea auring business hours.

The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit Ior ThriIt Shop use located at 4000 West Sahara
Avenue. The site is parking impaired, as detailed in Title 19.18.030 (D). The prior use was
General Retail Store, Other Than listed (which has a parking requirement oI one parking space
Ior every 175 square Ieet oI gross Iloor area) that has a greater parking requirement than the
proposed use oI a ThriIt Shop (which has a parking requirement oI one parking space Ior every
250 square Ieet oI gross Iloor area). The submitted site plan and Iloor plan illustrate donation
bins are located inside the existing building. A condition oI approval was added that prohibits
donation bins or a drop oII area outside to ensure code requirements are met and required
parking will not be utilized as a drop oII area. StaII recommends approval oI this application, as
the minimum Title 19 requirements Ior a ThriIt Shop use are being met and the use can be
conducted in a harmonious and compatible manner with the surrounding neighborhood. II
denied, a ThriIt Shop use will not be allowed to open at 4000 West Sahara Avenue.



SUP-55786 PR1-55655]
MR


The proposed ThriIt Shop use can be conducted in compatible and harmonious manner
with the existing and Iuture surrounding land uses.


The site is physically suitable Ior the type and intensity oI land use proposed, as the use
would be located within an existing single tenant building with adequate parking and easy
site access. The site is designed to accommodate a number oI uses such as oIIices, retail
shops, thriIt shops and other similar uses.


The site has direct access to Sahara Avenue, which is a 100-Ioot wide Primary Arterial and
secondary access is provided by Las Verdes Street, a 60 Ioot wide local street. Both
roadways provide adequate capacity to serve the proposed use.

General Plan.

The ThriIt Shop use is subject to regular inspections and will not compromise the public
health and saIety. Additionally, the donation drop oII area and bins are located inside the
building.


The use meets all Title 19.12 requirements Ior a ThriIt Shop use and no Waivers are
required.


NOTICES MAILED 320

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
08/26/14
PRJ-55655
SUP-55786
Page 1 of 2 8/26/2014 8:47:15 AM
Applicant Email: houseofbargains@ymail.com
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: Roberson
Rep First Name: Wallace
Applicant State: Nv
Rep Address: 2187 N Decatur Blvd
Rep Email: houseofbargains@ymail.com
Rep Fax:
Rep State: Nv
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: 7026085319
Rep Zip: 89108
Project Name HOUSE OF BARGAINS
Correct:
Yes
ProjectAddress (Location): 4000 WEST SAHARA AVE
Application/Petition For: SUp thrift shop
Applicant First Name: Maryetta
Applicant Address: 2187 N Decatur Blvd
Applicant Last Name: Brewer
General Plan Designation: Proposed: OTHER
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
08/26/14
PRJ-55655
SUP-55786
Page 2 of 2 8/26/2014 8:47:15 AM
! Accept:
Yes
DUCK HORN L L C 14737 E MARK LN SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85262-7814
Wallace Roberson House Of Bargains representative houseofbargains@ymail.com
08/26/14
PRJ-55655
SUP-55786
0
8
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
5
5
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
8
6
S
U
P
-

[
P
P
J
-
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T

H
O
U
S
E

O
F

A
P
S
A
I
N
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

D
U
C
k

H
O
P
N

L
L
C

4
0
0
0

W
E
S
T

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

S
U
P
-

[
P
P
J
-
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T

H
O
U
S
E

O
F

A
P
S
A
I
N
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

D
U
C
k

H
O
P
N

L
L
C

4
0
0
0

W
E
S
T

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

S
U
P
-

[
P
P
J
-
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T

H
O
U
S
E

O
F

A
P
S
A
I
N
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

D
U
C
k

H
O
P
N

L
L
C

4
0
0
0

W
E
S
T

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

Justification Letter:
House Of Bargains
2187 N Decatur Blvd
Las Vegas, Nv 89108
To whom it may concern:

We are applying for a special use permit for thrift store license for the purpose of a operating a used
retail store. We will be selling new & used items from clothes, appliances, furniture, electronics and
other household items. There will also be donations excepted only during business hours. The propose
project is located at 4000 W. Sahara Blvd which is a stand - alone building without any other businesses
in the location. We will be conducting business hours between 9am 9pm open 7 days a week.
Sincerely,
Maryetta Brewer
Maryetta Brewer
08/26/14
PRJ-55655
SUP-55786

Agenda tem No.: 27.


SUB1ECT:
MOD-55735 - MAJOR MODIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
BRENTWOOD CAPITAL PARTNERS - OWNER: JAMES R MARSH - For possible action on
a request Ior a Major ModiIication oI the Town Center Land Use Plan to Amend the Special
Land Use Designation FROM: GC-TC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL - TOWN CENTER) TO:
EC-TC (EMPLOYMENT CENTER MIXED USE - TOWN CENTER) on 1.89 acres on the west
side oI Durango Drive, approximately 335 Ieet south oI Deer Springs Way (APN 125-20-301-
028), Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-54989|. StaII recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 12/17/2014


RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends DENIAL

2. Conditions and StaII Report - MOD-55735 and SDR-55737 |PRJ-54989|
3. Supporting Documentation - MOD-55735 and SDR-55737 |PRJ-54989|
4. Photos - MOD-55735 and SDR-55737 |PRJ-54989|
5. JustiIication Letter - MOD-55735 and SDR-55737 |PRJ-54989|

MOD-55735 and SDR-55737 PR1-54989]
SS


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: BRENTWOOD CAPITAL PARTNERS - OWNER:
JAMES R MARSH


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
MOD-55735 StaII recommends DENIAL.
SDR-55737
StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved subject to
conditions:
MOD-55735

`` CONDITIONS ``

SDk-55737 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. Approval oI a Major ModiIication (MOD-55735) shall be required, iI approved.


3. All development shall be in conIormance with the site plan and building elevations, date
stamped 10/07/14, and the landscape plan date stamped 10/22/14, except as amended by
conditions herein.

4. The donation drop-oII lanes shall only be operational during normal business hours.

5. A Waiver Irom the Town Center Development Standards Manual is hereby approved, to
allow zero percent oI the proposed retail building to be built at the setback lines where 60
percent is required.

6. An Exception Irom Title 19.08.040(E) is hereby approved, to allow an internal trash
collection Iacility in lieu oI a screened trash enclosure on the property.
MOD-55735 and SDR-55737 PR1-54989]
SS
SaIety.


Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the
same time application is made Ior a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler
system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisIactory manner; the
landscape plan shall include irrigation speciIications. Installed landscaping shall not
impede visibility oI any traIIic control device. The technical landscape plan shall include
the Iollowing changes Irom the conceptual landscape plan:

Provide eight additional 24-inch box shade trees in the parking area Ior a total oI 21
parking lot trees. Three additional islands shall also be provided.


11. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City Departments must be

Public Works

12. Grant pedestrian access easements Ior all public sidewalks located outside oI the public
right-oI-way on Echelon Point Drive and Durango Drive, iI any, prior to the issuance oI
any building permits.

13. Construct halI-street improvements on Durango Drive and Echelon Point Drive meeting
Town Center Development Standards adjacent to this site, concurrent with development.
All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its
original location and to its original width concurrent with development oI this site.

14. Per condition #15 oI SDR-50105, construct sidewalk on at least one side oI all access
drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets concurrent with development oI
this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend Irom the sidewalk on the public street to
the Iirst intersection oI the on-site roadway network; the connecting sidewalk shall be
terminated on site with a handicap ramp.

15. Per condition #16 oI SDR-50105, extend public sewer in Echelon Point Drive Irom
Durango Drive to the western edge oI this site at a size, depth and location acceptable to
the Collection System Planning section oI the Department oI Public Works. Provide
public sewer easements Ior all public sewers not located within existing public street right-
oI-way prior to the issuance oI any permits as required by the Department oI Public
Works. Improvement Drawings submitted to the City Ior review shall not be approved Ior
MOD-55735 and SDR-55737 PR1-54989]
SS
construction until all required public sewer easements necessary to connect this site to the
existing public sewer system have been granted to the City.

and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and maintained so as
to not create sight visibility obstructions Ior vehicular traIIic at all development access
drives and abutting street intersections.

17. Submit an Encroachment Agreement Ior landscaping and private improvements in the
Echelon Point Drive and Durango Drive public rights oI way prior to the issuance oI
permits Ior these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy Ior the term
oI the Encroachment Agreement and add the City oI Las Vegas as an additionally insured
entity on this insurance policy. II requested by the City, the applicant shall remove
property encroaching in the public right oI way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the
terms oI the City's Encroachment Agreement. The installation and maintenance oI all
private improvements in the public right oI way shall be the responsibility oI the adjacent
property owner(s) and shall be transIerred with the sale oI the property Ior the entire term
oI the Encroachment Agreement. Coordinate all requirements Ior the Encroachment
Agreement with the Land Development Section oI the Department oI Building and SaIety
(229 4836).

Department oI Public Works prior to the issuance oI any building or grading permits or
submittal oI any construction drawings, whichever may occur Iirst. Provide and improve
all drainageways recommended in the approved drainage plan/study. The developer oI
this site shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage Iacility
improvements as are recommended by the City oI Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage
Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with development oI this site.

19. Site development to comply with all applicable conditions oI approval Ior SDR-50105 and
all other applicable site-related actions.

MOD-55735 and SDR-55737 PR1-54989]
SS

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting to construct a new 17,158 square-Ioot ThriIt Shop on the subject
property. The ThriIt Shop use was previously only permitted as a conditional use in the EC-TC
(Employment Center Mixed Use - Town Center) District; however, no parcel in Town Center is
designated EC-TC at this time. The district was phased out oI the Town Center land Use Plan,
and all related development standards were removed Irom the Town Center Development
Standards Manual in March 2014. The applicant is applying Ior a Major ModiIication to
designate this site as EC-TC in order to accommodate the ThriIt Shop use, which is not
otherwise permitted in Town Center. The EC-TC designation was originally envisioned to be
located at the periphery oI Town Center along U.S. 95 and is not compatible with the
surrounding land uses at the proposed location. Thus, staII recommends denial oI the requested
modiIication to the Town Center land use plan. Further, the project is designed so that the
building is situated at the rear oI the property with parking in the Iront, contrary to Town Center
Development Standards. StaII does not support the requested waiver and thereIore recommends
denial oI the Site Development Plan Review, with conditions iI approved.

ISSUES

BeIore a modiIication oI the land use plan can be approved and Iinalized, an ordinance must
Iirst be adopted reestablishing the EC-TC District and its standards. A Text Amendment
(TXT-54143) was approved by the Planning Commission on 07/08/14 and the resulting bill
(2014-58) was adopted at the 10/01/14 City Council meeting.
A Waiver oI the Town Center Development Standards is requested to allow zero percent oI
the proposed retail building to be built at the setback lines in the Town Center Urban Zone
where 60 percent is required.
No trash enclosure is proposed, as reIuse would be stored in an interior collection area at the
rear oI the building, and then sent daily to an oIIsite Goodwill distribution center Ior
processing, either as trash or recyclables. Title 19.08.040(E) requires screened dumpsters
and trash collection areas oI suIIicient size and number to meet the needs oI the development.
StaII does not support an exception to this requirement, as the proposed arrangement will
then require any Iuture tenant oI the building to transport its reIuse away Irom the building or
build its own screened trash Iacilities on site Ior customary pick-up.


04/03/13 The City Council approved a Major ModiIication (MOD-47016) to change
MOD-55735 and SDR-55737 PR1-54989]
SS
the Town Center special land use designation Irom EC-TC (Employment
Center Mixed Use - Town Center) to ML-TC (Medium-Low Density
Residential - Town Center) on 36.36 acres at the northeast corner oI Gilcrease
Avenue and Fort Apache Road. This was the last conglomeration oI property
to have this designation. Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a request Ior a Major ModiIication (MOD-48831)
oI the Town Center Land Use Plan to amend the Special Land Use
Designation Irom UC-TC (Urban Center Mixed Use - Town Center) to GC-
TC (General Commercial - Town Center) on 3.96 acres at the southwest
corner oI Deer Springs Way and Durango Drive. The Planning Commission
recommended approval; staII recommended denial.
The City Council approved a request Ior a Rezoning (ZON-50104) Irom U
(Undeveloped) |TC (Town Center) General Plan designation| to T-C (Town
Center) on 3.96 acres at the southwest corner oI Deer Springs Way and
Durango Drive. The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
10/16/13
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-50105)
Ior a proposed 3,940 square-Ioot Convenience Store (With Fuel Pumps), a
1,996 square-Ioot Car Wash, Full Service and an associated encroachment
agreement into the public right-oI-way, with a waiver oI the Town Center
Development Standards to allow the gas station to be located away Irom
public rights-oI-way on 1.50 acres at the southwest corner oI Deer Springs
Way and Durango Drive. The Planning Commission recommended approval;
staII recommended denial.
02/19/14
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-50106) a portion oI
Durango Drive containing an existing bus turnout. The Planning Commission
and staII recommended approval. An Order oI Vacation has not been
recorded.
03/19/14
Ordinance #6307 was adopted by City Council. This ordinance readopted the
Town Center Development Standards Manual and included the removal oI
standards and permitted uses Ior the EC-TC (Employment Center Mixed Use
Town Center) District.
04/08/14
A two-lot parcel map (PMP-52372) on 3.98 acres at the southwest corner oI
Deer Springs Way and Durango Drive was recorded in Parcel Map File 119
Page 59.
07/08/14
The Planning Commission recommended approval oI a Text Amendment
(TXT-54143) to amend the Town Center Development Standards to
reintroduce the EC-TC (Employment Center Mixed Use Town Center)
District. The amendment was Iorwarded to the City Council in ordinance
Iorm.
10/01/14
The City Council adopted Bill 2014-58 to amend the Town Center
Development Standards to reintroduce the EC-TC (Employment Center
Mixed Use Town Center) District.


MOD-55735 and SDR-55737 PR1-54989]
SS
There are no permits or licenses related to this site.

07/09/14
Submittal requirements Ior development oI a ThriIt Shop in Town Center
were discussed. Prior to submittal Ior a Major ModiIication oI the Town
Center Land Use Plan, a city ordinance to add the EC-TC (Employment
Center Mixed Use Town Center) land use designation and standards would
need to be adopted. A neighborhood meeting would also be required. StaII
determined that the drop-oII lane would not require a Special Use Permit, as
the Town Center Development Standards do not recognize a Drive-Through
as a separate use. The applicant explained that in lieu oI a trash enclosure, the
ThriIt Shop would collect and transport its own trash Irom the property. An
exception Irom Title 19 would be required in this situation.

10/09/14
A neighborhood meeting to discuss the project and land use change was held
at the Centennial Hills Community Center YMCA, 6601 North BuIIalo Drive,
Las Vegas, NV 89131. There were Iive members oI the public, Iour members
oI the development team, one member oI the Council OIIice, and one member
oI Planning staII in attendance. The development team gave a presentation oI
the project that included renderings oI the proposed building. Concerns were
raised about how donations would be handled and what impact the right turns
into the site would have on traIIic on Durango Drive. The public in
attendance had no objection to the project iI the concerns were addressed.

Field Check
08/28/14 The subject site is undeveloped and Iree oI trash and debris.

Site Area
Net Acres 1.89

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle
19.12/1CDS
Planned or Special
GC-TC (General
Commercial Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
North
Undeveloped
(approved
Convenience Store
with Fuel Pumps and
GC-TC (General
Commercial Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
MOD-55735 and SDR-55737 PR1-54989]
SS
Car Wash, Full
Service)
South Undeveloped
UC-TC (Urban Center
Mixed Use Town
Center)
U (Undeveloped)
East Undeveloped
UC-TC (Urban Center
Mixed Use Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
West Undeveloped
UC-TC (Urban Center
Mixed Use Town
Center)
U (Undeveloped)

Town Center Master Plan N
T-C (Town Center) District Y
Trails (Town Center Parkway Trail) Y


Pursuant to the 1own Center Development Standards, the following standards apply:
Min. Lot Width N/A 299 Feet (avg) N/A
Min. Setbacks
Front
Side
Corner
Rear
15 Feet
10 Feet
15 Feet
20 Feet
120 Feet
73 Feet
86 Feet
20 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
Max. Lot Coverage N/A 21 N/A
Build-to line percentage
(TC Urban Zone)
60 0 N
Max. Building Height
(TC Urban Zone)
7 stories 1 story/29.5 Feet Y
Trash Enclosure
Screened, Gated, w/ a RooI
or Trellis
Interior ReIuse
Collection/Recycling
N
Mech. Equipment Screened Parapet screened Y

Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and the 1own Center Development Standards Manual, the following
standards apply:
MOD-55735 and SDR-55737 PR1-54989]
SS
Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

BuIIer Trees:
North
South
East
West
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 Trees
7 Trees
11 Trees
7 Trees
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES N/A 25 Trees N/A
Parking Area Trees
21 Trees 13 Trees N
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North
South
East
West
N/A
15 Feet
15 Feet
N/A
0 Feet
15 Feet
10 Feet
20 Feet
N/A
Y
Y*
N/A
Wall Height Not required Not Indicated N/A
*The reduced buIIer width is to accommodate a new bus turnout, which is permitted.

Open Space - 1own Center
Provided Provided Compliance 1otal
Acreage
Density
Percent Area Percent Area
82,328 SF N/A 20 16,466 SF 20 16,500 SF Y

Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Town Center
Parkway
Town Center
Development Standards
Manual Durango Drive
Parkway Arterial
and Highways Map
130 Y
Echelon Point Drive
Town Center
Collector
Town Center
Development Standards
Manual
40 N

9.5` sidewalk 9.5` sidewalk Y
5` amenity zone 5` amenity zone Y
36 box shade trees
alternating with 25` BTH
Mexican Ian palm tree
pairs at 35` intervals
36 box Rio Grande
Ash
25` BTH Mexican Fan
Palm pairs at 35`
intervals
Y
Town Center Parkway
(Durango Drive)
Amenity zone and Per TCDS Y
MOD-55735 and SDR-55737 PR1-54989]
SS
sidewalk treatment
7` sidewalk 7` sidewalk Y
5` amenity zone 5` amenity zone Y
36 box shade trees and
Ilowering trees at 30`
intervals
Alternating 36 box
Rio Grande Ash and
Purple Robe Locust at
30` intervals
Y
Town Center Collector
(Echelon Point Drive)
Amenity zone and
sidewalk treatment
Per TCDS Y

Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
ThriIt Shop 17,158 SF
1 space/
250 SF
GFA
69


83

Y
Loading
Spaces
17,158 SF
Range:
10,000-
29,999 SF
2 3 Y

Waivers
TCDS C.1.C: 60 Build-To
Line in Town Center Urban
Zone (remaining 40 plaza)
0 oI the building at the setback
lines; parking in Iront oI building
Denial

Exceptions
19.08.040(E): Trash collection
areas oI suIIicient size and
number shall be provided to
meet the needs oI the
development. Such areas shall
be properly screened.
Provide interior trash collection
area at rear oI building in lieu oI
trash enclosure
Denial

ANALYSIS

The EC-TC (Employment Center Mixed Use Town Center) designation was established in 1998
with the adoption oI the Town Center Land Use Plan. It was intended to provide areas Ior low-
MOD-55735 and SDR-55737 PR1-54989]
SS
impact light manuIacturing and high density residential uses that would not otherwise be located
in a central business district. Properties designated EC-TC were originally located at the
northern periphery oI Town Center along U.S. 95, where their impact on surrounding properties
would be minimal. Over time, the development pattern in this area changed and the EC-TC
District was phased out by March 2014. The area along Durango Drive proposed Ior change in
designation Irom SC-TC (Service Commercial Town Center) to EC-TC is well established as a
high traIIic retail corridor. There is no need to establish more intense uses in this area, as the
development pattern envisioned by the Town Center Land Use Plan has already been
implemented. ThereIore, modiIication oI the land use plan Ior the purpose oI allowing a ThriIt
Store is unwarranted and not supported by staII. The property is on a boundary separating
General Commercial uses Irom a more restrictive commercial area that allows some higher
density residential uses (Urban Center Mixed Use); introduction oI a more intense land use
category that could include ThriIt Sis not compatible with the existing and surrounding land
uses.

Site development is subject to the requirements oI the Town Center Development Standards
Manual as amended by Ordinance 6359, which reintroduced standards Ior the EC-TC District.
'ThriIt Shop is a conditional use; it must comply with all Title 6 requirements and have no
outdoor sales, display or storage, or a special use permit would be required. Where the Town
Center Development Standards are silent, Title 19 applies.

Access will be Irom both Echelon Point Drive and Durango Drive south oI the new bus turnout
location. Ingress and egress on Durango Drive must be right-in, right-out only, as no median
cuts are permitted in this location. The parcel map that created the lot (File 159 Page 59) allows
intersite access between the subject parcel and the parcel to the north.

A covered customer drop-oII area (no window proposed) is proposed on the north side oI the
building to be in operation only during business hours. Stacking space Ior six vehicles in two
separate lanes is provided. No special use permit is required as there is no 'Drive-Through use
associated with a retail store in Town Center.

A single-story structure is proposed with a stucco and glass storeIront with awnings at the
entrance. The average height oI the sloped portion oI the rooI is 29 Ieet, which allows Ior a tube
steel architectural Ieature near the rooI and clerestory windows on the non-storeIront sides oI the
building. Approximately 65 percent oI the Iloor space is devoted to retail sales. The remainder
oI the building contains a loading area, warehouse and administrative oIIices.

The objective oI the Town Center requirements in this area is to encourage developments at a
similar scale to small downtowns, which place the buildings at the street, create interest Ior the
pedestrian and de-emphasize auto usage by placing parking areas to the rear oI the building. The
proposed development`s design does not promote this objective. Parking is situated on the east
side oI the building adjacent to Durango Drive, but this site conIiguration is unnecesary. Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) methods emphasize development designs
that deter criminal activity. The CPTED natural surveillance strategy can easily be eIIective with
the building at the setback lines, as the standards allow Ior a plaza area at the corner where
citizens and law enIorcement can maintain 'eyes on the street. However, the applicant is
requesting a waiver Irom the build-to line and plaza standard using the same rationale. StaII
supports Town Center land use policies and thereIore recommends denial oI the waiver.

MOD-55735 and SDR-55737 PR1-54989]
SS
The site complies with all Town Center street section and streetscape requirements. Eight shade
trees and three planter islands are missing Irom the parking area and can be provided without a
signiIicant reduction in parking provided. A condition has been added to provide the necessary
trees and islands Ior shading, cooling and aesthetic purposes.

No trash enclosure is proposed, as reIuse would be stored in an eight-Ioot by eight-Ioot interior
collection area at the rear oI the building, and then sent daily to an oIIsite Goodwill distribution
center Ior processing, either as trash or recyclables. Title 19.08.040(E) requires screened
dumpsters and trash collection areas oI suIIicient size and number to meet the needs oI the
development. StaII does not support an exception to this requirement, as the proposed
arrangement will then require any Iuture tenant oI the building to transport its reIuse away Irom
the building or build its own screened trash Iacilities on site Ior customary pick-up.

FINDINGS (MOD-55735)

The EC-TC designation was originally envisioned to be located at the periphery oI Town Center
along U.S. 95 and is not compatible with the surrounding land uses at the proposed location. Thus,
staII recommends denial oI the requested modiIication to the Town Center land use plan.




The proposed ThriIt Store would be located near a Ireeway interchange and major
intersection within the Town Center. However, a ThriIt Store is only permitted in the EC-
TC (Employment Center Mixed Use Town Center) District, which may contain uses that
are incompatible with the existing retail and oIIice uses in the area.


Ordinance 6359 reintroduced the EC-TC District and development standards within the
Town Center Development Standards Manual, which makes these requests possible. The
development is inconsistent with the objective and requirements oI the Town Center Urban
Zone, which is intended to create a dense, walkable urban area similar to a downtown.


Access to the property is controlled by a median in Durango Drive that limits turns to
right-in, right-out. Secondary access is provided through the corner property to the north.
With this design, impacts to area traIIic should be minimal.
MOD-55735 and SDR-55737 PR1-54989]
SS


Landscape materials are in Iull conIormance with the requirements oI the Town Center
Development Standards Manual, and are appropriate Ior the area. Some trees and planter
islands are missing Irom the parking area; these will be required to be provided as a
condition oI approval.


The submitted elevations indicate changes in wall plane, rooIline and materials, with
distinctive architectural Ieatures such as metal tubing being carried around all sides oI the
building. The design is in keeping with other development in this area oI the Town
Center.

general welfare.

Development is subject to permit review and physical inspection, thereby securing the
public health, saIety and general welIare.

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED

NOTICES MAILED

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

08/21/14
PRJ-54989
MOD-55735
08/21/14
PRJ-54989
MOD-55735
10/14/14 PC
A

P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

&

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s

C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
y

2
0
1
4
E
c
h
e
l
o
n

P
o
i
n
t

&

D
u
r
a
n
g
o
T
o
w
n

C
e
n
t
e
r

L
a
n
d

U
s
e

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

&

P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

E
x
h
i
b
i
t

D
E
E
R

S
P
R
I
N
G
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

S
i
t
e
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
:

G
C
-
T
C
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
:

E
C
-
T
C
G
C
-
T
C
S
C
-
T
C
P
F
-
T
C
M
-
T
C
M
L
-
T
C
M
-
T
C
M
L
-
T
C
M
L
-
T
C
M
L
-
T
C
M
L
-
T
C
M
L
-
T
C
P
F
-
T
C
M
L
A
-
T
C
U
C
-
T
C
L
-
T
C
M
S
-
T
C
(
S
e
e
L
e
g
e
n
d
)
(
S
e
e
L
e
g
e
n
d
)
L
-
T
C
L
-
T
C
I
-
2
1
5

E
C
H
E
L
O
N

P
O
I
N
T
D U R A N G O
M
L
-
T
C
=

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

S
i
t
e
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
9
8
9
M
O
D
-
5
5
7
3
5
1
0
/
0
7
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
9
8
9
M
O
D
-
5
5
7
3
5

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
3
7

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
0
/
0
7
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
9
8
9
M
O
D
-
5
5
7
3
5

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
3
7

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
0
/
2
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
9
8
9
M
O
D
-
5
5
7
3
5

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
3
7

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1 0 / 2 2 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 9 8 9
M
O
D
-
5
5
7
3
5

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
3
7

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
0
/
0
7
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
9
8
9
M
O
D
-
5
5
7
3
5

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
3
7

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
0
/
0
7
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
9
8
9
M
O
D
-
5
5
7
3
5

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
3
7

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
0
/
0
7
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
9
8
9
M
O
D
-
5
5
7
3
5

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
3
7

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
E
C
H
E
L
O
N

P
O
I
N
T

D
R
I
V
E
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
9
8
9
M
O
D
-
5
5
7
3
5

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
3
7
N
O
R
T
H

D
U
R
A
N
G
O

D
R
I
V
E
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
9
8
9
M
O
D
-
5
5
7
3
5

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
3
7
08/21/14
PRJ-54989
MOD-55735 & SDR-55737
M
O
D
-
7
3

[
P
P
J
-
4
9
9
j

-

M
A
J
O
P

M
O
D
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-
7
3
7

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

P
E
N
T
W
O
O
D

C
A
P
I
T
A
L

P
A
P
T
N
E
P
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

J
A
M
E
S

P

M
A
P
S
H

W
E
S
T

S
I
D
E

O
F

D
U
P
A
N
S
O

D
P
I
V
E

A
P
P
P
O
X
I
M
A
T
E
L
Y

3
3

F
E
E
T

S
O
U
T
H

O
F

D
E
E
P

S
P
P
I
N
S
S

W
A
Y

10/07/14
PRJ-54989
MOD-55735 & SDR-55737 - REVISED
10/07/14
PRJ-54989
10/07/14
PRJ-54989
10/07/14
PRJ-54989
10/07/14
PRJ-54989
10/07/14
PRJ-54989

Agenda tem No.: 28.


SUB1ECT:
SDR-55737 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO MOD-55735 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: BRENTWOOD CAPITAL PARTNERS - OWNER: JAMES R
MARSH - For possible action on a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review FOR A
PROPOSED 17,158 SQUARE-FOOT THRIFT SHOP WITH WAIVERS OF THE TOWN
CENTER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO ALLOW THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO BE
LOCATED AWAY FROM RIGHTS-OF-WAY WHERE 60 PERCENT OF THE BUILDING IS
TO BE PLACED AT THE BUILD-TO LINE on 1.89 acres on the west side oI Durango Drive,
approximately 335 Ieet south oI Deer Springs Way (APN 125-20-301-028), T-C (Town Center)
Zone |GC-TC (General Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation|
|PROPOSED: EC-TC (Employment Center Mixed Use - Town Center)|, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-

C.C.: 12/17/2014


RECOMMENDATION:

1. Consolidated Backup

Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
08/21/14
PRJ-54989
SDR-55737
08/21/14
PRJ-54989
SDR-55737
10/14/14 PC
SDR 55737
Brentwood Capital Partners
W side of Durango Drive, S of Deer Springs Way
Proposed 17.158 thousand square foot thrift shop.
RATE/#
UNIT TOTAL
[1000 SF]
17.158
42.94 737
Deer Springs Way
Durango Drive
Deer Springs Way 16,300
Durango Drive 51,800
This project is expected to add about 737 trips per day on Deer Springs Way & Durango Dr. Currently, Deer Springs is at
about 64 percent of capacity and Durango is at about 64 percent of capacity. With this project, Deer Springs is expected
to be at about 69 percent of capacity and Durango to be at about 66 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this project will add about 64 trips in the peak hour, or about one every minute.

Agenda tem No.: 29.


SUB1ECT:
ZON-56153 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: MCNICOLL
INVESTMENTS, LTD. - OWNER: DRS ESTATE, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a
Rezoning FROM: N-S (NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES) TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL)
on 2.63 acres at 7395 Smoke Ranch Road (APN 138-22-102-004), N-S (Neighborhood Service)
Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-55788|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 12/17/2014


RECOMMENDATION:

1. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 |PRJ-55788|
2. Conditions and StaII Report - - ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 |PRJ-55788|
3. Supporting Documentation - - ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 |PRJ-55788|
4. Photos - - ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 |PRJ-55788|
5. JustiIication Letter - - ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 |PRJ-55788|

ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 PR1-55788]
JB


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: MCNICOLL INVESTMENTS, LTD. - OWNER:
DRS ESTATE, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
ZON-56153 StaII recommends APPROVAL.
VAR-56152 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: ZON-56153

ZON-56153
VAR-56152

`` CONDITIONS ``

VAk-5152 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Rezoning (ZON-56153)
and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-56150) shall be required, iI approved.


SaIety.

submitted Ior building permit.

ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 PR1-55788]
JB

Conditions Page Two

SDk-5150 CONDIIIONS

Planning


2. All development shall be in conIormance with the site plan date stamped 10/06/14,
landscape plan date stamped 10/09/14, and building elevations date stamped 09/25/14,
except as amended by conditions herein.

3. A Waiver Irom Title 19.08.070 is hereby approved, to allow to allow a 10-Ioot wide
landscape buIIers along the north and west perimeters where 15 Ieet is the minimum
required.

SaIety.


most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The mapping
action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance oI any building permits.

Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the
same time application is made Ior a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler
system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisIactory manner; the
landscape plan shall include irrigation speciIications. Installed landscaping shall not
impede visibility oI any traIIic control device.


ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 PR1-55788]
JB


Public Works

10. A Petition oI Vacation, such as VAC-56154, shall record prior to the issuance oI any
building permits to eliminate any right-oI-way conIlicts with this site.

11. Remove all substandard public street improvements and unused driveway cuts adjacent to
this site, iI any, and replace with new improvements meeting current City Standards
concurrent with development oI this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by
this development shall be restored at its original location and to its original width
concurrent with development oI this site.

12. Unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer, construct sidewalk on at least one side oI
all access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets concurrent with
development oI this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend Irom the sidewalk on the
public street to the Iirst intersection oI the on-site roadway network and shall be
terminated on-site with a handicap ramp.

13. Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-oI-way adjacent to this site. All
landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and
maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions Ior vehicular traIIic at all
development access drives and abutting street intersections.

14. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by
the Department oI Public Works prior to the issuance oI any building or grading permits,
submittal oI any construction drawings or the submittal oI a Map subdividing this site,
whichever may occur Iirst. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the
approved drainage plan/study. The developer oI this site shall be responsible to construct
such neighborhood or local drainage Iacility improvements as are recommended by the
City oI Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study

ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 PR1-55788]
JB

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review Ior a proposed 32,984 square-Ioot
Convalescent Care Facility/ Nursing Home with a Waiver to allow a zero-Ioot landscape buIIer
along the north perimeter where eight Ieet is required on 2.63 acres at 7395 Smoke Ranch Road.
In addition to this application, the applicant has submitted a request Ior a Rezoning (ZON-
56153) Irom N-S (Neighborhood Service) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) and a Variance (VAR-
56162) to allow a 41-Ioot side setback where residential adjacency standards require a 49.5-Ioot
setback. StaII has determined the proposed project is compatible with surrounding development
in the area, and the requested landscaping Waivers and Variance Ior residential adjacency will
have a minimal negative impact to the residential development to the north. ThereIore, staII is
recommends approval oI this project with conditions.

ISSUES

The applicant has proposed to rezone the property Irom N-S (Neighborhood Service) to C-1
(Limited Commercial) Ior a proposed 32,984 square-Ioot Convalescent Care Facility/
Nursing Home.
The applicant has requested a Waiver oI Title 19.08.070 landscaping requirements have been
requested to allow a zero-Ioot landscape buIIer along the north perimeter where eight Ieet is
the minimum required. StaII supports this request Ior a Waiver because the subject site is an
irregularly shaped lot.
The applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-56152) to allow a 41-Ioot side setback where
residential adjacency standards require a 49.5-Ioot setback. StaII supports this request Ior a
Variance because the subject site is an irregularly shaped lot.


The City Council approved a request Ior a General Plan Amendment (GPA-
3455) to amend a portion oI the Southwest Sector Plan oI the General Plan
Irom ML (Medium Low Density Residential) to O (OIIice) on 2.67 acres at
7401 Smoke Ranch Road. StaII recommended approval oI the request.
02/18/04
(Undeveloped) |ML (Medium Low Density Residential) General Plan
designation| to P-R (ProIessional OIIices and Parking) on 2.67 acres at 7401
Smoke Ranch Road. StaII recommended approval oI the request.
ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 PR1-55788]
JB


(SDR-3457) Ior a proposed 31,555 square-Ioot oIIice building with a Waiver
oI commercial development standards on 2.67 acres at 7401 Smoke Ranch
Road. StaII recommended approval oI the request.
10/07/04
The Planning and Development Department administratively approved a
Parcel Map (PMP-4315) Ior 2 lots on 5.4 acres on property located on Smoke
Ranch Road, approximately 1320 Ieet west oI Tenaya Way. The map
recorded on 04/18/05.
02/23/06
The Planning Commission accepted a Withdrawal Without Prejudice Ior a
Variance (VAR-10780) to allow a 3.25-Ioot side yard landscape buIIer and a
two-Ioot rear yard landscape buIIer where eight Ieet is required adjacent to
the south side oI Smoke Ranch Road, approximately 1,300 Ieet east oI
BuIIalo Drive. StaII recommended denial oI the request.
General Plan Amendment (GPA-10776) to amend a portion oI the Southwest
Sector Plan oI the General Plan Irom O (OIIice) to SC (Service Commercial)
on 2.72 acres adjacent to the south side oI Smoke Ranch Road, approximately
1,300 Ieet east oI BuIIalo Drive.
Variance (VAR-10781) Variance to allow a 39-Ioot residential adjacency
setback where 135 Ieet is the minimum setback required adjacent to the south
side oI Smoke Ranch Road, approximately 1,300 Ieet east oI BuIIalo Drive.
StaII recommended denial oI the request.
03/23/06
Rezoning (ZON-10778) Irom U (Undeveloped) |O (OIIice) General Plan
designation| under Resolution oI Intent to P-R (ProIessional OIIice and
Parking) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 2.72 acres adjacent to the south
side oI Smoke Ranch Road, approximately 1,300 Ieet east oI BuIIalo Drive.
StaII recommended denial oI the request.
The City Council approved a request Ior a Variance (VAR-12669) to allow a
three-story building where two stories is the maximum height allowed on 2.72
acres at 7401 West Smoke Ranch Road. The Planning Commission
05/17/06
(SDR-10784) Ior a proposed three-story, 45-Ioot high, mixed-use
development consisting oI 25 residential units and 13,243 square Ieet oI oIIice
space, waivers to allow a minimum lot width oI 59 Ieet where 100 Ieet is the
minimum lot width required, and to allow a reduction oI perimeter
landscaping standards on 2.72 acres adjacent to the south side oI Smoke
Ranch Road, approximately 1,300 Ieet east oI BuIIalo Drive. The Planning
Commission recommended approval oI the request.
ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 PR1-55788]
JB


*The application was amended to reduce the number oI residential units Irom
25 to 21; increase the square Iootage oI oIIice space Irom 13,243 square Ieet
to 15,670 square Ieet and to delete the waiver request to allow a reduction oI
perimeter landscaping standards*

Ior a proposed mixed-use development adjacent to the south side oI Smoke
02/21/07
(Undeveloped) |O (OIIice) General Plan designation| to P-R (ProIessional
OIIices and Parking) on 2.7 acres adjacent to the south side oI Smoke Ranch
Road, approximately 1,300 Ieet east oI BuIIalo Drive. The Planning

(SDR-18657) Ior a three-story 40,971 square-Ioot OIIice building with
Waivers to allow a zero-Ioot landscape buIIer where eight Ieet is required
along the southern property line and along the on-site public trail, a reduction
in the perimeter landscape required and oI required parking lot landscaping on
2.7 acres adjacent to the south side oI Smoke Ranch Road, approximately
1,300 Ieet east oI BuIIalo Drive. The Planning Commission recommended
approval oI the request.
04/16/08
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-26629) a 10-Ioot wide
public drainage easement generally located 1265 Ieet east oI the southeast
corner oI BuIIalo Drive and Smoke Ranch Road. The Planning Commission
05/21/08
The City Council approved an Extension oI Time (EOT-27700) Ior an
approved Variance (VAR-12669) to allow a three-story building where two
stories is the maximum height allowed. StaII recommended approval oI this
request.
one-Ioot setback along the south perimeter where 25 Ieet is required; to allow
a one-Ioot setback along portions oI the north and west perimeters where 10
Ieet is required; to allow a Iive-Ioot setback along a portion oI the east
perimeter; to allow a lot coverage oI 59 where 30 is the maximum
permitted; and to allow a 60-Ioot wide lot where 100 Ieet is the minimum
required on 2.63 acres adjacent to the south side oI Smoke Ranch Road,
approximately 1,300 Ieet east oI BuIIalo Drive. The Planning Commission
05/06/09
Ior a proposed mini-storage Iacility adjacent to the south side oI Smoke
ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 PR1-55788]
JB


32550) to Amend a portion oI the Southwest Sector Plan oI the General Plan
Irom O (OIIice) to SC (Service Commercial) on 2.63 acres adjacent to the
south side oI Smoke Ranch Road, approximately 1,300 Ieet east oI BuIIalo
Drive. The Planning Commission recommended approval oI the request.
(Undeveloped) |O (OIIice) General Plan designation| under resolution oI
intent to P-R (ProIessional OIIice and Parking) to N-S (Neighborhood
Service) on 2.63 acres adjacent to the south side oI Smoke Ranch Road,
approximately 1,300 Ieet east oI BuIIalo Drive. The Planning Commission

(SDR-32555) Ior a proposed 99,549 square-Ioot mini-storage Iacility with a
waiver to allow a zero-Ioot landscape buIIer along the east, south, north and a
portion oI the west perimeter where eight Ieet is required on 2.63 acres
adjacent to the south side oI Smoke Ranch Road, approximately 1,300 Ieet
east oI BuIIalo Drive. The Planning Commission recommended approval oI
the request.


01/11/08
A Code EnIorcement case (#61269) was processed Ior sign code violations
and a semi parking on the subject property. The case was resolved 02/01/08.
02/20/09
A building permit (#134048) was issued Ior a chain link Ience at 7395 Smoke
Ranch Road. The permit has not been Iinalized.

09/22/14
A Pre-Application meeting was conducted with the applicant to go over the
application materials and submittal requirements Ior a Site Development Plan
Review, Rezoning, Variance and Vacation Ior a proposed Convalescent Care
Facility/Nursing Home use.

A neighborhood meeting is not required Ior this type oI request, nor was one held.
ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 PR1-55788]
JB


Field Check
10/06/14
StaII conducted a routine site visit a Iound the subject site to be an
undeveloped parcel oI land with an existing trail adjacent to the eastern
property line.

Site Area
Net Acres 2.63

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
SC (Service
Commercial)
N-S (Neighborhood
Service)
North OIIice Development
LI/R (Light Industry /
Research)
C-PB (Planned Business
Park)
South City Park
PR-OS
(Parks/Recreation/Open
Space)
C-V (Civic)
East
Multi-Use
Transportation Trail
R.O.W (Right-oI-Way) R.O.W (Right-oI-Way)
Church
ML (Medium Low
U (Undeveloped) |ML
(Medium Low Density
Residential) General Plan
designation|
West
Single-Family
Residential
ML (Medium Low
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)

Trails Y
ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 PR1-55788]
JB



Min. Lot Width 100 SF 60 SF Y*
Min. Setbacks
Front
Side (west)
Side (east)
Rear
10 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
20 Feet
420 Feet
41.5 Feet
37 Feet
37 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
Trash Enclosure
Screened, Gated, w/
a RooI or Trellis
Screened,
Gated, w/
a RooI or
Trellis
Y
*Jariance (JAR-32553) was approvea to allow a 60-foot wiae lot where 100 feet is the minimum
requirea.

Residential Adjacency Standards Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
3:1 proximity slope 49.5 Feet 41.5 Feet N*
Trash Enclosure 50 Feet 210 Feet Y
*The submittea elevations show a 16.5-foot builaing height aafacent to the existing R-CL (Single
Family Compact-Lot) :one single-family resiaences to the west. The applicant has requestea a
Jariance (JAR-56162) to allow a 41.5-foot siae setback where resiaential aafacency stanaaras
require a 49.5-foot setback.

Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

BuIIer Trees:
North
South
East
West (adjacent to
church)
West (adjacent to
Residence)


10 Trees
18 Trees
30 Trees
13 Trees

12 Trees

0 Trees
18 Trees
30 Trees
13 Trees

12 Trees

N*
Y
Y
Y

Y

ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 PR1-55788]
JB

Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 83 Trees 73 Trees N`
Parking Area Trees
6 Trees 7 Trees Y
Min. Zone Width
North (adjacent to
Smoke Ranch Road)
North (adjacent to
church)
South
East
West
15 Feet

8 Feet

8 Feet
8 Feet
8 Feet
15 Feet

0 Feet

8.5 Feet
8.5 Feet
8.5 Feet
Y

N*

Y
Y
Y
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential Not Indicated Y
* A Waiver has been requestea to allow :ero-foot wiae lanascape buffers along the northern
perimeter where an eight foot lanascape buffer is the minimum requirea. Lanascaping materials
in this area have also been waivea as part of the request.

Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Smoke Ranch Road Primary Arterial
and Highways
100 Feet Y

Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area &
Aumber of
Units Beds/
Employees
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped

Convalescent
Care Facility/
Nursing
Home
32,984 SF
(80 Beds
w/ 14
Employees)
One space:
Six beds
plus,
One space
Ior each
employee
on largest
shiIt, plus
three spaces
31

ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 PR1-55788]
JB


Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area &
Aumber of
Units Beds/
Employees
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped

Loading
Spaces
32,984 SF
30,000 SF
to 50,000
SF
3 3 Y

Waivers
A 8-Ioot landscaping buIIer is
required along the northern
perimeter adjacent to the
existing church
To allow a zero-Ioot
landscaping buIIer
along the northern
perimeter adjacent to
the existing church
Approval

ANALYSIS

The applicant has proposed to develop the site with a 32,984 square-Ioot Convalescent Care
Facility/Nursing Home on 2.63 acres at 7395 Smoke Ranch Road. The subject site is located in
the Southwest Sector oI the General Plan and has a current land use designation oI SC (Service
Commercial) and zoning designation oI N-S (Neighborhood Service). The applicant has
proposed to rezone the subject site to C-1 (Limited Commercial) to allow conIormance with the
existing General Plan designation and proposed Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home land
use.

The proposed site design complies with all applicable Title 19.08.070 site design requirements
pertaining to building setbacks, which requires a 10-Ioot distance separation Irom the Iront, side
and corner property lines and a 20-Ioot distance separation Irom the rear property line. However,
the submitted elevations show a 16.5-Ioot building height adjacent to the existing R-CL (Single
Family Compact-Lot) zone single-Iamily residences located to the west. The applicant has
requested a Variance (VAR-56162) to allow a 41.5-Ioot side setback where residential adjacency
standards require a 49.5-Ioot setback. The proposed 32,984 square-Ioot building will cover
approximately 29 oI the 2.63 acre site, which is below the 50 lot coverage maximum allowed
by code. The proposed building is 20 Ieet in height measured to the mid-point oI the eaves oI the
rooI line above the primary entrance to the building. The submitted building elevations indicate
the building Iaades will have a 'Dry Earth and 'Deep Walnut stucco Iinish, with slate
brownstone rooI tiles and decorative stone stacked veneer accents.
ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 PR1-55788]
JB


The site will provide 32 total parking spaces with two van-accessible handicapped parking
spaces, which exceeds the 31 spaces required by Title 19.12.010 Ior a Convalescent Care
Facility/Nursing Home with 80 beds and 14 employees on the largest shiIt. The parking area also
provides space Ior three loading zones and one trash enclosure, which have been designed to
comply with Title 19.08 standards.

All interior parking lot landscaping and landscape buIIer planting materials have been designed
to comply with code requirements Ior spacing and quantities; except Ior the landscaping buIIer
area adjacent to the northern perimeter oI the property where the applicant has requested a
Waiver to allow a zero-Ioot landscape buIIer where eight Ieet is the minimum required. The
primary tree species being utilized are the 24 box AIrican Sumac, 24 box Shoestring Acacia,
24 box Ruby Lace Honey Locust and 24 box Ornamental Fruitless Plum Tree. There is also an
existing 10-Ioot wide sidewalk (multi-use) trail which runs along the eastern property line, which
will have trees spaced at one per 20 Ieet in the adjacent landscaping buIIer.

Since the subject site subject parcel is an irregularly shaped 'Flag Lot, which creates site
constrictions that are not selI-imposed. StaII has determined the proposed project is compatible
with surrounding development in the area and the requested landscaping Waiver and Variance
Ior Residential Adjacency will not have a negative impact to the existing church to the north and
residential land uses to the west. ThereIore, staII is recommends approval oI this project with
conditions.

FINDINGS (ZON-56153)

In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning
Commission or City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

The proposed Rezoning Irom N-S (Neighborhood Service) to C-1 (Limited Commercial)
is in conIormance with the existing SC (Service Commercial) designation under the
Southwest Sector Plan oI the General Plan.

2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the rezoning
will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.

The applicant has proposed to develop the site with a 32,984 square-Ioot Convalescent
Care Facility/Nursing Home which is a permitted land use within the proposed C-1
(Limited Commercial) zoning designation; the proposed.

3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.
ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 PR1-55788]
JB

Staff Report Page Ten

The proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial) is an appropriate zoning designation, which will
allow conIormance with the existing SC (Service Commercial) designation under the
Southwest Sector Plan oI the General Plan.

size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.

Primary site access is Irom Azure Drive, a 100-Ioot Primary Arterial, which provides
adequate capacity to serve the proposed use.

FINDINGS (VAR-56152)

In accordance with the provisions oI Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City Council,
in considering the merits oI a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;
2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, selI-created or Iinancial in nature.

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:
'Where by reason oI exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape oI a speciIic piece oI
property at the time oI enactment oI the regulation, or by reason oI exceptional
topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition oI
the piece oI property, the strict application oI any zoning regulation would result in
peculiar and exceptional practical diIIiculties to, or exceptional and undue hardships
upon, the owner oI the property, a variance Irom that strict application may be granted so
as to relieve the diIIiculties or hardship, iI the relieI may be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good, without substantial impairment oI aIIected natural resources
and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose oI any ordinance or
resolution.

StaII has determined the subject site subject parcel is an irregularly shaped 'Flag Lot, which
creates site constrictions which are not selI-imposed. The proposed Variance (VAR-56162) to
allow a 41-Ioot side setback where residential adjacency standards require a 49.5-Ioot setback
will minimal negative impact to the existing single-Iamily residential land uses to the west. In
view oI the existing hardships imposed by the site`s physical characteristics, it is concluded that
the StaII can support the request Variance, since the applicant`s hardship is not preIerential in
nature, and it is not outside the realm oI NRS Chapter 278 Ior granting oI Variances.
ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 PR1-55788]
JB

Staff Report Page Eleven




The proposed Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home development is compatible with
adjacent commercial and residential development in the area. StaII has determined the
subject site subject parcel is an irregularly shaped 'Flag Lot, which creates site
constrictions which are not selI-imposed. The proposed 20-Ioot tall structure is
contextually appropriate with other buildings in the area and the applicant has provided the
suIIicient landscaping, creating an attractive commercial development.


The proposed Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home development is consistent with
the General Plan and complies with all Title 19 development standards; with the exception
oI the requested Waivers to allow a zero-Ioot wide landscape buIIers along the northern
perimeter oI the property where eight Ieet is the minimum required and Variance (VAR-
56162) to allow a 41.5-Ioot side setback where residential adjacency standards require a
49.5-Ioot setback. StaII has determined the requested landscaping Waiver and Variance
will have a minimal negative impact to the overall development.


The site is accessed Irom Smoke Ranch Road, which is classiIied by the City oI Las Vegas
Master Plan oI Streets and Highways, as a 100-Ioot Primary Arterial and will easily carry
the minimal amount oI traIIic this proposed development will generate.


The project design and style are appropriate Ior the subject location and will be
harmonious with buildings in the surrounding area. The submitted building elevations indicate
the building Iaades will have a 'Dry Earth and 'Deep Walnut stucco Iinish, with slate
brownstone rooI tiles and decorative stone stacked veneer accents. The primary tree species
being utilized are the 24 box AIrican Sumac, 24 box Shoestring Acacia, 24 box Ruby Lace
Honey Locust and 24 box Ornamental Fruitless Plum Tree, which are consistent with the
Southern Nevada Regional Plan Coalition Regional Plant List.
ZON-56153, VAR-56152 and SDR-56150 PR1-55788]
JB

Staff Report Page Twelve


The design characteristics oI the proposed building elevations are not unsightly and are
compatible with development in the area. The proposed materials are suitable Ior the
surrounding commercial and residential uses and the desert environment.

general welfare.

The proposed commercial development will be subject to inspections in order to protect
the public health, saIety and general welIare by City staII.


NOTICES MAILED 205 - ZON-56153 & VAR-56152 |PRJ-55788|
205 - SDR-56150 |PRJ55788|

APPROVALS 0 - ZON-56153 & VAR-56152 |PRJ-55788|
0 - SDR-56150 |PRJ55788|

PROTESTS 0 - ZON-56153 & VAR-56152 |PRJ-55788|
1 - SDR-56150 |PRJ55788|

09/25/14
PRJ-55788
ZON-56153
09/25/14
PRJ-55788
ZON-56153
09/25/14
PRJ-55788
ZON-56153
09/25/14
PRJ-55788
ZON-56153
11/4/14 PC
09/25/14
PRJ-55788
ZON-56153
11/4/14 PC
T
O
S
C
A
S
T
I
R
E
M
E
S
A
S
T
EUGENE AVE
FIGARO ST
LORINDA AVE
E
C
H
O

B
A
Y
S
T
C
A
L
V
I
L
L
E
S
T
P
R
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
C
T
HOLLORAN CT
MAYCREST CIR
C
L
U
B

P
A

C
I
F
I
C
W
A
Y
B
L
U
E

B
R
E
E
Z
E

D
R

R
I
G
A
L
E
T
T
O

S
T
T
E
C
H
C
E
N
T
E
R

C
T
N

B
U
F
F
A
L
O

D
R

SMOKE RANCH RD
ZON-56153 (PRJ-55788)

FROM N-S TO C-1
Date: Monday, September 29, 2014
GIS maps are normally produced
only to meet the needs of the City.
Due to continuous development activity
this map is for reference only.
Geographic Information System
Planning & Development Dept.
702-229-6301
City Limits
1000ft Buffer
Subject Property
Zoning
R-2 - Medium-Low
Density Residential
R-3 - Medium Density
Residential
R-4 - High Density
Residential
R-MH - Mobile/Manufactured
Home Residence
R-5 - Apartment
R-MHP - Residential Mobile/
Manufactured Home Park
P-R - Professional Offices
and Parking
P-O - Professional Office
N-S - Neighborhood Service
O - Office
C-D - Designed Commercial
C-1 - Limited Commercial
C-2 - General Commercial
C-PB - Planned Business
Park
C-M - Commercial/Industrial
M - Industrial
C-V - Civic
P-C - Planned Community
T-D - Traditional Development
PD - Planned Development
T-C - Town Center
R-E - Residential Estates
U - (GPA Designation)
Undeveloped
R-A - Ranch Acres
R-D - Single-Family
Residential-Restricted
R-PD - Residential
Planned Development
R-1 - Single Family
Residential
R-CL - Single-Family
Compact-Lot
P-O - Professional Off ff ice
N-S - Neighborhood Serv rr ice
O - Off ff ice
C-D - Designed Commercial
C-1 - Limited Commercial
C-2 - General Commercial
C-PB - Planned Business
Park
C-M - Commercial/////I
M - Industrial
C-V - Civic
P-C - Planned Com
T- TT D - Tra rr ditional De
PD - Planned Deve
T- TT C - To TT wn Center
09/29/14
PRJ-55788
ZON-56153
1 0 / 0 6 / 1 4
P R J - 5 5 7 8 8
Z
O
N
-
5
6
1
5
3
,

V
A
R
-
5
6
1
5
2

&

S
D
R
-
5
6
1
5
0

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1 0 / 0 6 / 1 4
P R J - 5 5 7 8 8
Z
O
N
-
5
6
1
5
3
,

V
A
R
-
5
6
1
5
2

&

S
D
R
-
5
6
1
5
0

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1 0 / 0 9 / 1 4
P R J - 5 5 7 8 8
Z
O
N
-
5
6
1
5
3
,

V
A
R
-
5
6
1
5
2

&

S
D
R
-
5
6
1
5
0

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1 0 / 0 9 / 1 4
P R J - 5 5 7 8 8
Z
O
N
-
5
6
1
5
3
,

V
A
R
-
5
6
1
5
2

&

S
D
R
-
5
6
1
5
0

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0 9 / 2 5 / 1 4
P R J - 5 5 7 8 8
Z
O
N
-
5
6
1
5
3
,

V
A
R
-
5
6
1
5
2

&

S
D
R
-
5
6
1
5
0
0 9 / 2 5 / 1 4
P R J - 5 5 7 8 8
Z
O
N
-
5
6
1
5
3
,

V
A
R
-
5
6
1
5
2

&

S
D
R
-
5
6
1
5
0
SLATE T
VALSPA
TILE ROOF
AR DEEP W
BROWNS
WALNUT
STONE
20049A
C

ULTURED
VALSPAR
STONE C
R DRY EAR
CEDAR CRE
RTH 6008
EEK
84A
09/25/14
PRJ-55788
ZON-56153, VAR-56152, SDR-56150 & VAC-56154 XXXXXXXXX
Z
O
N
-
3

[
P
P
J
-
j

-

P
E
Z
O
N
I
N
S

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

V
A
P
-
Z

A
N
D

S
D
P
-
0

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

M
C
N
I
C
O
L
L

I
N
V
E
S
T
M
E
N
T
S

L
T
D
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

D
P
S

E
S
T
A
T
E

L
L
C

7
3
9

S
M
O
k
E

P
A
N
C
H

P
O
A
D

Z
O
N
-
3

[
P
P
J
-
j

-

P
E
Z
O
N
I
N
S

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

V
A
P
-
Z

A
N
D

S
D
P
-
0

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

M
C
N
I
C
O
L
L

I
N
V
E
S
T
M
E
N
T
S

L
T
D
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

D
P
S

E
S
T
A
T
E

L
L
C

7
3
9

S
M
O
k
E

P
A
N
C
H

P
O
A
D

Z
O
N
-
3

[
P
P
J
-
j

-

P
E
Z
O
N
I
N
S

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

V
A
P
-
Z

A
N
D

S
D
P
-
0

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

M
C
N
I
C
O
L
L

I
N
V
E
S
T
M
E
N
T
S

L
T
D
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

D
P
S

E
S
T
A
T
E

L
L
C

7
3
9

S
M
O
k
E

P
A
N
C
H

P
O
A
D

Z
O
N
-
3

[
P
P
J
-
j

-

P
E
Z
O
N
I
N
S

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

V
A
P
-
Z

A
N
D

S
D
P
-
0

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

M
C
N
I
C
O
L
L

I
N
V
E
S
T
M
E
N
T
S

L
T
D
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

D
P
S

E
S
T
A
T
E

L
L
C

7
3
9

S
M
O
k
E

P
A
N
C
H

P
O
A
D

October 8, 2014

City of Las Vegas
PIanning Department
731 S. Fourth Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 98101

Re: Smoke Ranch Memory Care
APN 138-22-102-004

We respectfully submit this application requesting a zone change, site development plan
review and variance for a proposed 32,984 s.f. convalescent care/nursing home facility
located at 7395 Smoke Ranch Road.

This +/- 2.63 acre property is currently shown as Neighborhood Services NS in the City of
Las Vegas's Land Use Plan, with a zoning designation of GC General Commercial. We are
requesting a change of Land Use to C-1 Commercial to permit the development of the
memory care facility.

Smoke Ranch Memory Care is currently planned for 60 rooms with 80 beds. The facility will
provide accommodation, health-related services, and a variety of activities for its residents.

The proposed building is a single storey structure organized into four "communities, around
two interior courtyards. ln addition to resident rooms, the facility will also include
administration, service, visitor, and resident activity areas. A total of 32 parking spaces,
including 2 handicap accessible spaces, are proposed. We are requesting a waiver for the
eight 8 feet of landscaping on the north property line to allow a 24 foot travel lane.

Adjacent land uses and zoning are as follows:

North East South West
Land
Use
Low Density
Residential PS
Public and
Semipublic PS

Public and
Semipublic PS
Low Density
Residential PS
Zoning U-ML

C-V U O ClR
U ML
Current
Use
Church facility
with special use
U-255-90
Buffalo drainage
channel and
Cimarron
Memorial High
School
Public City park Single family
residential

10/09/14
PRJ-55788
ZON-56153, VAR-56152 & SDR-56150 - REVISED
The development of Smoke Ranch Memory Care is consistent with land use as envisioned in
the City of Las Vegas's Comprehensive Plan, and also compliments existing uses in the
neighborhood.

The variance being request is for the adjacency to the residential on the west property line.
Code requires three 3 feet separation for every one 1 foot of building elevation. The height
as measured is 16.5 feet requiring 49.5 feet of separation. The project is providing 41 feet
minimum with a maximum separation of 51 feet to the north. The flag shape lot requires that
a 24 foot travel lane be around the property to allow fire department access.

The vacation being requested is at the request of the utility department to release a sewer
easement along the east property line.

Smoke Ranch Memory Care will have minimal noise and traffic impacts on the
neighborhood, by virtue of the fact that residents of the facility do not drive and that all
activity will be predominantly contained within the facility. Any traffic will be limited to that
generated by staff and visitors.

We look forward to receiving comments and the opportunity to discuss this project at the Pre-
Application Meeting.

Respectfully Submitted,

Landon Christopherson, P.E

10/09/14
PRJ-55788
ZON-56153, VAR-56152 & SDR-56150 - REVISED

Agenda tem No.: 30.


SUB1ECT:
VAR-56152 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-56153 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
MCNICOLL INVESTMENTS LTD. - OWNER: DRS ESTATE, LLC - For possible action on a
request Ior a Variance TO ALLOW A 41-FOOT SIDE SETBACK WHERE RESIDENTIAL
ADJACENY STANDARDS REQUIRE A 49.5-FOOT SETBACK FOR A PROPOSED
CONVALESCENT CARE FACILITY/NURSING HOME on 2.63 acres at 7395 Smoke Ranch
Road (APN 138-22-102-004), N-S (Neighborhood Service) Zone |Proposed: C-1 (Limited
Commercial)|, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-55788|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 12/17/2014


RECOMMENDATION:

1. Consolidated Back up
paper use, backup
09/25/14
PRJ-55788
VAR-56152
09/25/14
PRJ-55788
VAR-56152
09/25/14
PRJ-55788
VAR-56152
09/25/14
PRJ-55788
VAR-56152
11/4/14 PC
09/25/14
PRJ-55788
VAR-56152
11/4/14 PC

Agenda tem No.: 31.


SUB1ECT:
SDR-56150 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-56153 AND VAR-
56152 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: MCNICOLL INVESTMENTS, LTD. - OWNER:
DRS ESTATE, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review FOR
A PROPOSED 32,984 SQUARE-FOOT CONVALESCENT CARE FACILITY/NURSING
HOME WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG A
PORTION OF THE NORTHERN PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY WHERE EIGHT FEET
IS REQUIRED on 2.63 acres at 7395 Smoke Ranch Road (APN 138-22-102-004), N-S
(Neighborhood Service) Zone |Proposed: C-1 (Limited Commercial)|, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-

C.C.: 12/17/2014


RECOMMENDATION:

3. Protest Postcard
paper use, backup
09/25/14
PRJ-55788
SDR-56150
09/25/14
PRJ-55788
SDR-56150
09/25/14
PRJ-55788
SDR-56150
09/25/14
PRJ-55788
SDR-56150
11/4/14 PC
09/25/14
PRJ-55788
SDR-56150
11/4/14 PC
SDR 56150
McNicoll Investments, Ltd.
7395 Smoke Ranch Road
Proposed 80 bed convalescent care facility.
RATE/#
UNIT TOTAL
ASSISTED LIVING [BEDS] 80
2.66 213
Smoke Ranch Road
Buffalo Drive
Smoke Ranch Road 34,500
Buffalo Drive 51,800
This project is expected to add about 213 trips per day on Smoke Ranch Rd. & Buffalo Dr. Currently, Smoke Ranch is at
about 37 percent of capacity and Buffalo is at about 42 percent of capacity. With this project, Smoke Ranch is expected to
be at about 38 percent of capacity and Buffalo to be at about 43 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this project will add about 18 trips in the peak hour, or about one every three minutes.

Agenda tem No.: 32.


SUB1ECT:
VAR-56142 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JULIE
CONTRERAS - For possible action on a request Ior a Variance TO ALLOW 21 PARKING
SPACES WHERE 23 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED at 1585 North Decatur Boulevard
(APN 138-25-503-004), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-56036|. StaII
recommends DENIAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 |PRJ-56036|
2. Conditions and StaII Report - VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 |PRJ-56036|
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 |PRJ-56036|
4. Photos - VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 |PRJ-56036|
5. JustiIication Letter - VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 |PRJ-56036|

VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 PR1-56036]
GK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: JULIE CONTRERAS


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
VAR-56142 StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved subject to
conditions:

SDR-56145 StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved subject to
conditions:
VAR-56142

`` CONDITIONS ``

VAk-5142 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-56145) shall be required, iI approved.


SaIety.


VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 PR1-56036]
GK

Conditions Page Two

SDk-5145 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Variance (VAR-56142)
shall be required, iI approved.


3. All development shall be in conIormance with the site plan and landscape plan, date
stamped 10/08/14 and the Iloor plan and building elevations, date stamped 09/25/14,
except as amended by conditions herein.

4. The two access gates adjacent to Vegas Drive shall remain open during business hours.

5. An Exception Irom Title 19.08(C)(12) is hereby approved, to allow zero shade trees in
the parking lot where six are required.

SaIety.



VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 PR1-56036]
GK


Public Works

10. Remove all substandard public street improvements and unused driveway cuts adjacent to
this site, iI any, and replace with new improvements meeting current City Standards
concurrent with development oI this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by
this development shall be restored at its original location and to its original width

11. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section oI the Department oI Fire Services to
discuss Iire requirements Ior this site.

12. Landscape and maintain all unimproved right-oI-way adjacent to this site. All
landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and
maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions Ior vehicular traIIic at all
development access drives and abutting street intersections.

13. Meet with the Flood Control Section oI the Department oI Public Works Ior assistance
with establishing Iinished Iloor elevations and drainage paths Ior this site prior to
submittal oI construction plans, the issuance oI any building or grading permits or the
submittal oI a map Ior this site, whichever may occur Iirst. Provide and improve all
drainage ways as recommended.

VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 PR1-56036]
GK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The subject site contains a vacant 5,100 square-Ioot commercial building at 1585 North Decatur
Boulevard. The applicant is locating a Clinic use at the subject site and is proposing site
modiIications to support the new use. The applicant is proposing to restripe the existing parking
lot to provide additional parking spaces, relocate the on-site trash enclosure and construct a
combination wall/Ience around the perimeter oI the property. As proposed, the improvements do
not adhere to all requirements as established by Title 19. Although the applicant is adding
additional parking stalls by restriping the subject site, the site remains parking deIicient Ior the
proposed Clinic use. As a result, the applicant is requesting an associated Variance (VAR-56142)
to address the issue. In addition, a landscape exception is needed Ior insuIIicient islands and trees
within the parking lot. Furthermore, the proposed trash enclosure would locate within the Iront
yard setback, which is visible Irom Vegas Drive. The applicant is requesting a second exception
Ior the trash enclosure location.

Although the Clinic use is permissible in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district, it is too
intense Ior this particular site. The proposed project cannot be developed in accordance with
Title 19 Development Standards due to the over-development oI the site. The Variance request
and three exception requests reinIorce the unsuitability oI the proposed site modiIications meant
to support the proposed Clinic use. StaII recommends denial oI the parking Variance and Site
Development Plan Review.

ISSUES

A Variance Irom Title 19.12.010 is required to allow 21 parking spaces where 23 spaces
are required, representing an 8.7 deviation Irom standard.
An Exception Irom Title 19.08.040 is required to allow a trash enclosure to be located
adjacent to Vegas Drive where such enclosures are to be located away Irom the street
Iront and screened Irom view oI rights-oI-way.
An Exception oI Title 19.08.110(C)(12) is required to allow three landscape islands
where six islands are required and zero parking lot trees in islands where six trees are
required.
VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 PR1-56036]
GK



05/24/61
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0018-61) Irom R-
1 (Single Family Residential) to R-4 (High Density Residential) and C-1
(Limited Commercial) on approximately 18.3 acres generally located at the
southwest corner oI the intersection oI Vegas Drive and Decatur Boulevard.


c.1964 The existing 5,100 square-Ioot commercial building was constructed.
07/10/98
A building permit (#98014215) was issued Ior plumbing at 1585 North
Decatur Boulevard. The permit received a Iinal inspection on 10/16/98.
09/04/14
A building permit (#55483) was denied by staII Ior a new trash enclosure,
wrought iron Ience, parking lot restripe and interior remodel at 1585 North
Decatur Boulevard.

09/17/14
StaII conducted a pre-application conIerence with the representative to
discuss the minor site improvements associated with a clinic use locating at
1585 North Decatur Boulevard. StaII concluded that a Variance would be
required Ior parking, and exceptions would be required Ior inadequate parking
lot landscaping and trash enclosure location. As a result oI the Variance
request, the associated Site Development Plan Review would require a public
hearing.


Field Check
10/02/14
StaII conducted a routine Iield check and noted a vacant building with two
unpermitted temporary banner signs and a chain link Ience with razor wire
surrounding the perimeter oI the site.
VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 PR1-56036]
GK


Site Area
Gross Acres 0.48

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property Vacant
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North
Car Wash, SelI
Service
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
South Undeveloped
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
East General Retail
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
House oI Worship
Restaurant West
General Retail
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)

A-O (Airport Overlay) District - 105 Feet Y
Trails N/A


Min. Setbacks
Front
Side
Side
Rear
10 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
20 Feet
28 Feet
67 Feet
19 Feet
23 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 PR1-56036]
GK

Max. Building Height N/A 21 Feet N/A
Trash Enclosure Screened, Gated, w/
a RooI or Trellis
Screened,
Gated, w/
a Trellis
Y
Mech. Equipment Existing Existing Y

Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

Parking Area Trees
6 Trees 0 Trees N
Min. Zone Width
North
South
East
West
0 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
Y*
Y*
Y*
Y*
Front Yard Wall
Height
5 Feet 5 Feet
Y
Side and Rear Yard
Wall Height
6 to 8 Feet 8 Feet
Y
*The existing subject site does not provide landscape buIIers.

Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Vegas Drive Major Collector
and Highways
80 Y
VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 PR1-56036]
GK


Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
2,000 SF 1:200 SF 10
Clinic
3,100 SF 1:250 SF 13


21

N
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 21 2 19 2 N
Loading
Spaces
1 1 Y
Percent Deviation 8.7

Exceptions
One landscape island Ior every
six parking spaces and at the ends
oI each parking row (6 required)
3 Islands Denial
24-inch box shade trees in islands
per six spaces and at the ends oI
each parking row (6 required)
Zero Trees Denial
Collection areas and dumpsters
shall be located away Irom the
street Iront and screened Irom
view Irom rights-oI-way,
sidewalks, and abutting properties
through the use oI landscaping
and screening.
A trash enclosure to
be located adjacent to
Vegas Drive.
Denial

ANALYSIS

The subject site is located within the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. The C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zone is designed to provide local services Ior area residents. This category allows
retail, service, automotive, wholesale, oIIice and other general business uses oI a medium-to-low
intensity character.

The subject site contains a vacant 5,100 square-Ioot commercial building at 1585 North Decatur
Boulevard. The applicant is proposing to locate a Clinic use at the subject site and is proposing site
VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 PR1-56036]
GK


modiIications to support the new use. The proposed Clinic use is appropriate Ior the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zone. The submitted site plan, date stamped 10/08/14 reIlects a proposal to restripe the
existing parking lot to provide additional parking spaces, relocate the on-site trash enclosure and
construct a combination wall/Ience around the perimeter oI the property.

The existing commercial building was constructed in 1964 and designed to accommodate a
Financial Institution. The building was constructed with minimal windows and architectural Ieatures
Ior security purposes. As a result, the existing structure is a box-like monolithic Iorm and does not
contain variations in massing or articulation to reduce the visual length oI long walls. The existing
structure is in need oI Iaade improvements to provide visual interest, however, the applicant is not
proposing any changes to the building Iootprint or building elevations, with the exception oI new
beige paint. The use oI beltlines, pilasters, recesses, pop outs, changes in material, would improve
upon the existing Ilat, plain and unsightly building.

The proposed combination block wall and wrought iron Ience adheres to Title 19 requirements.
According to the site plan, the perimeter wall and Ience would be Iive Ieet tall adjacent to Vegas
Drive and within the ten-Ioot Iront yard setback area. An access gate would be installed Ior the two
existing driveways Ironting Vegas Drive. According to the submitted justiIication letter, the access
gates would remain open Irom 8 a.m. to 7 p.m., seven days a week, which would be the clinics
business hours. The combination wall and Ience increases to eight Ieet in height along the side and
rear property lines.

As proposed, the parking lot re-striping and trash enclosure relocation do not adhere to all
requirements as established by Title 19. Although the applicant is adding additional parking stalls
by restriping the subject site, the site remains parking deIicient Ior the proposed Clinic use. As a
result, the applicant is requesting an associated Variance (VAR-56142) to allow 21 parking spaces
where 23 spaces are required. In addition, a landscape exception is needed in the parking lot.
According to Title 19.08.110(C)(12), one landscape island is required Ior every six parking spaces
and at the ends oI each parking row. In addition, the applicant must install one 24-inch box tree Ior
each landscape island. The submitted site plan and landscape plan illustrate three landscape islands
where six islands are required and zero 24-inch box trees where six trees are required.

The existing trash enclosure is located adjacent to the south building elevation and is only visible
Irom an undeveloped lot to the south. The applicant is proposing to relocate the trash enclosure
within the Iront yard setback, at the northwest corner oI the site, which is visible Irom Vegas Drive.
According to Title 19.08.040, trash enclosures are to be located away Irom the street Iront and
screened Irom view oI rights-oI-way. The applicant is requesting a second Exception to address the
trash enclosure issue.

The proposed Clinic use is appropriate Ior this zoning district; however, the proposed site
modiIications to Iacilitate the Clinic use are unsuitable Ior this site. According to the submitted
justiIication letter, the design oI the parking lot, which results in a parking deIiciency and
VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 PR1-56036]
GK


inadequate landscaping, is due to the limited size oI the site area. The applicant has not provided
justiIication Ior the requests and only reiterates that the subject site is too small Ior the Clinic use. In
addition, the applicant is not proposing to architecturally enhance the existing Ilat, plain and
unsightly structure. StaII recommends denial, as the Variance and exception requests demonstrate
that the proposed site modiIications will overbuild the site.




resolution.

No evidence oI a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the applicant
has created a selI-imposed hardship by proposing to overbuild the site. An alternative use with a
less intense parking requirement would allow the subject site to conIorm to Title 19
requirements. In view oI the absence oI any hardships imposed by the site`s physical
characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant`s hardship is preIerential in nature, and it is
thereby outside the realm oI NRS Chapter 278 Ior granting oI Variances.



VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 PR1-56036]
GK


Although the proposed Clinic use is compatible with the area, the proposed site
modiIications to Iacilitate the Clinic use include a Variance request and two exception
requests, which illustrates that the development is incompatible with the surrounding area.


The proposed development is inconsistent with Title 19 parking, landscape, and trash
enclosure standards.


Primary access Irom the subject site is Irom Vegas Drive, an 80-Ioot wide Major Collector
as designated by the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways. The right-oI-way would serve
as adequate to meet the traIIic needs Ior this development.


The proposed building materials Ior the trash enclosure and wall are appropriate Ior the
area and Ior the City. The applicant is not providing any landscape materials.


The applicant is not proposing any alterations to the existing building elevations and is not
providing any additional landscaping. The existing commercial building is box-like and
monolithic with no architectural Ieatures to provide visual interest.

general welfare.

Development oI the site is subject to all applicable codes, permitting and inspection,
thereby securing the public health, saIety and general welIare.


NOTICES MAILED 73
VAR-56142 and SDR-56145 PR1-56036]
GK

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
09/25/14
PRJ-56036
VAR-56142
Page 1 of 2 9/29/2014 11:11:50 AM
Applicant Email: rarolin@cox.net
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: Rolin
Rep First Name: Rene
Applicant State: NV
Rep Address: 8465 W. Sahara, 111-147
Rep Email: rarolin@cox.net
Rep Fax:
Rep State: NV
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: (702) 499-4555
Rep Zip: 89117
Project Name ABBA MEDICAL CENTER
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 1 (LOIS TARKANIAN), WARD 5 (RICKI Y. BARLOW)
ProjectAddress (Location): 1585 NORTH DECATUR BLVD
Application/Petition For: SDR for site modifications, Parking Variance, and Trash Enclosure location Variance at 1585 North
Decatur Blvd
Applicant First Name: Rene
Applicant Address: 8465 W. Sahara, 111-147
Applicant Last Name: Rolin
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
VAR-56142, VAR-56143 and SDR-56145
Page 2 of 2 9/29/2014 11:11:50 AM
I Accept:
Yes
CONTRERAS JULIE 1585 N DECATUR LAS VEGAS, NV 89108
Rene Rolin MIXT Consulting Managing Partner rarolin@cox.net
VAR-56142, VAR-56143 and SDR-56145
E
X
IS
TIN
G
E
LE
C
P
A
D
E
X
IS
TIN
G
E
LE
C
P
A
D
-
1
- 2

-
2
A
7
.1
- 2
S
P
-
0
0
1
S
I
T
E

P
L
A
N
N

S
I
T
E

P
L
A
N

K
E
Y
N
O
T
E
S
S
H
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
A B B A M E D I C A L C E N T E R
R
E
V

D
A
T
E

I
S
S
U
E
1 5 8 5 N . D E C A T U R
L A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 0 8
-
-
-
1
0
/
0
8
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
3
6
V
A
R
-
5
6
1
4
2

&

S
D
R
-
5
6
1
4
5

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
E
X
IS
TIN
G
E
LE
C
P
A
D
E
X
IS
TIN
G
E
LE
C
P
A
D

L
P
0
0
1
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
P
L
A
N
N

L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E

P
L
A
N

K
E
Y
N
O
T
E
S
S
H
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
R
E
V

D
A
T
E

I
S
S
U
E
1 5 8 5 N . D E C A T U R
L A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 0 8
-
-
-
1
0
/
0
8
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
3
6
V
A
R
-
5
6
1
4
2

&

S
D
R
-
5
6
1
4
5

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
E
V
0
0
1
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
S
H
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
R
E
V

D
A
T
E

I
S
S
U
E
1 5 8 5 N . D E C A T U R
L A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 0 8
-
-
-
0
9
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
3
6
V
A
R
-
5
6
1
4
2
,

V
A
R
-
5
6
1
4
3

a
n
d

S
D
R
-
5
6
1
4
5

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-
1
2
0

B
IL
L
IN
G
-
1
2
1

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

-
1
2
2

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
-
1
3
0

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
-
1
2
9

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
-
1
3
1

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
-
1
2
7

D
O
C
T
O
R
'S
-
1
2
5

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
-
1
2
4

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
-
1
2
3

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
-
1
1
5

E
X
A
M
-
1
1
6

E
X
A
M
-
1
1
7

E
X
A
M

-
1
1
8

E
X
A
M
-
1
1
9

X
-R
A
Y
-
1
3
3

N
U
R
S
E
-
1
1
2

E
X
A
M
-
1
0
5

E
X
A
M
F
P
0
0
1
F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N
S
H
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
R
E
V

D
A
T
E

I
S
S
U
E
1 5 8 5 N . D E C A T U R
L A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 0 8
-
-
-
N

-
1
0
5
E
X
A
M
0
9
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
3
6
V
A
R
-
5
6
1
4
2
,

V
A
R
-
5
6
1
4
3

a
n
d

S
D
R
-
5
6
1
4
5

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
V
A
P
-
1
4
Z

[
P
P
J
-
0
3
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-
1
4

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

J
U
L
I
E

C
O
N
T
P
E
P
A
S

1

N
O
P
T
H

D
E
C
A
T
U
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

V
A
P
-
1
4
Z

[
P
P
J
-
0
3
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-
1
4

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

J
U
L
I
E

C
O
N
T
P
E
P
A
S

1

N
O
P
T
H

D
E
C
A
T
U
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

V
A
P
-
1
4
Z

[
P
P
J
-
0
3
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-
1
4

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

J
U
L
I
E

C
O
N
T
P
E
P
A
S

1

N
O
P
T
H

D
E
C
A
T
U
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

V
A
P
-
1
4
Z

[
P
P
J
-
0
3
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-
1
4

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

J
U
L
I
E

C
O
N
T
P
E
P
A
S

1

N
O
P
T
H

D
E
C
A
T
U
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

V
A
P
-
1
4
Z

[
P
P
J
-
0
3
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-
1
4

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

J
U
L
I
E

C
O
N
T
P
E
P
A
S

1

N
O
P
T
H

D
E
C
A
T
U
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

September 24, 2014
City of Las Vegas, Building and Safety - Planning Department Planning Commission Meeting
333 North Rancho Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89106
Re: CLV Project Number: PRJ - 56036

Abba Medical Center, 1585 North Decatur
City of Las Vegas Planning Commission,

The Abba Medical Center is proposing to occupy the existing building at 1585 N. Decatur Blvd., (APN#138-25-503-004) as
an outpatient medical clinic. The existing building was previously occupied by a bank with access to the current dirt lot to
the buildings south side. Use classification remains the same as C-1.
The vehicular and pedestrian entrance to the building is only available from Vegas Drive on the north, backside of the
building. The west existing curb cut/driveway along Vegas Drive will be re-constructed to realign with the newly striped
parking lot. The actual pedestrian access into the building is located on the south side.
Per a letter received from John Alabado on September 3, 2014 (Planner 1, Building and Safety Dept) the trash enclosure (block
walls with screened gates) is unacceptable in its proposed location at the accessible north side of the property. Due to the
limited area on the site, the required parking spaces and drive aisles the only location for the trash enclosure is along Vegas
Drive. Following a meeting with Greg Kapovich (Planner 1, Planning) we have relocated the trash enclosure to the northwest
corner of the parking lot so that it is hidden from view by the fence along Vegas Drive and the enclosure itself faces away
from the traffic headed east on Vegas Drive.
The Abba Medical Center will operate from 8 AM to 7 PM. The Owner required sliding gates integrated into the proposed
surrounding fencing, due to the excessive vandalism in the area, will be opened prior to 8 AM and will remain so during
business hours. The parking quantity is not met due to the limited site area; a variance is necessary to have 2 less spaces
than required. The site currently does not have any landscape. The Owner prefers to remain water smart and to not be
required to provide any landscaping except for rock in the required parking lot fingers.
Please advise at your earliest convenience of how this issue may be resolved. The Owner is anxious to open this practice
and aid the community as needed in this area.
Regards,
Rene A. Rolin
MIXT Consulting
702.499.4555. rarolin@cox.net
On behalf of Owner Franklin Akioyame
09/25/14
PRJ-56036
VAR-56142, VAR-56143 & SDR-56145 XXXXXXXX

Agenda tem No.: 33.


SUB1ECT:
SDR-56145 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-56142 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JULIE CONTRERAS - For possible action on a request
Ior a Site Development Plan Review FOR THE RESTRIPING, FENCING AND TRASH
ENCLOSURE MOVEMENT WITHIN THE SITE FOR AN EXISTING 5,100 SQUARE-FOOT
COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH AN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW A TRASH ENCLOSURE
ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY at 1585 North Decatur Boulevard (APN 138-25-503-
004), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-56036|. StaII recommends
DENIAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
09/25/14
PRJ-56036
SDR-56145

Agenda tem No.: 34.


SUB1ECT:
VAR-56129 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CSN HOLDINGS, LLC -
OWNER: SDF PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request Ior a Variance TO
ALLOW 278 PARKING SPACES WHERE 299 SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 4.1 acres at
9010-9080 West Cheyenne Avenue (APNs 138-08-417-003, 006, 008, 010, 011, 012 and 018
through 022), O (OIIice) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-54542|. StaII recommends DENIAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

VAR-56129 PR1-54542]
JB


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: CSN HOLDINGS, LLC - OWNER: SDF
PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
VAR-56129 StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved subject to
conditions:

`` CONDITIONS ``

VAk-512 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to the approved conditions Ior Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
18660).




VAR-56129 PR1-54542]
JB

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Variance to allow 278 parking spaces where 299 parking spaces are
required Ior a commercial development at 9010 9080 West Cheyenne Avenue. The commercial
development consists oI a mixture oI General OIIice and Medical OIIice land uses. The applicant
has proposed to convert a 10,720 square-Ioot building within the development, which was
previously utilized as a General OIIice land use to a Medical OIIice land use at 9050 West
Cheyenne Avenue. The conversion Irom a General OIIice to a Medical OIIice land use
intensiIies the required parking on-site. The proposed Variance is selI-imposed as the proposed
use is too intense Ior the site to accommodate; thereIore, staII recommends denial. II the
application is denied, the 10,270 square-Ioot tenant space cannot be utilized as a Medical OIIice.

ISSUES

A Variance is required to allow 278 parking spaces where 299 parking spaces are
required


The Planning Commission tabled a request Ior a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-0008-02) to amend a portion oI the Centennial Hills Sector Plan Irom
ML (Medium Low Density Residential) to O (OIIice) on 2.5 acres adjacent to
the north side oI Cheyenne Avenue, approximately 600 Ieet east oI Fort
Apache Road. StaII recommended denial oI the request.
04/25/02
The Planning Commission tabled a request Ior a Rezoning (Z-0022-02) Irom
U (Undeveloped) |ML (Medium Low Density Residential) General Plan
designation| to O (OIIice) on 2.5 acres adjacent to the north side oI Cheyenne
Avenue, approximately 600 Ieet east oI Fort Apache Road. StaII
recommended denial oI the request.
08/21/02
0011-02) to amend a portion oI the Centennial Hills Sector Plan Irom ML
(Medium Low Density Residential) to O (OIIice) on 10.00 acres adjacent to
the northwest and northeast corner oI Campbell Road and Cheyenne Avenue.
Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
VAR-56129 PR1-54542]
JB


The City Council also approved a request Ior a Rezoning (Z-0063-02) Irom U
(Undeveloped) |ML (Medium Low Density Residential) General Plan
designation| to O (OIIice) on 5.0 acres adjacent to the northwest corner oI
Cheyenne Avenue and Campbell Road. The previous action on the site (Z-
0022-02) was expunged. Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
08/04/04
The City Council approved the request Ior an Extension oI Time (EOT-4691)
on an approved Rezoning (Z-0063-02) Irom U (Undeveloped) |ML (Medium
Low Density Residential) General Plan designation| to O (OIIice) on 2.68
acres adjacent to the north side oI Cheyenne Avenue, approximately 340 Ieet
west oI Campbell Road.
The City Council approved the request Ior a Rezoning (ZON-4699) Irom U
(Undeveloped) |O (OIIice) General Plan designation| to O (OIIice) on 2.5
acres adjacent to the northwest corner oI Cheyenne Avenue and Campbell
Road. The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
09/15/04
The City Council approved a Vacation (VAC-4700) application Ior a Petition
to Vacate U.S. Government Patent Easements generally located west oI
Campbell Road, north oI Cheyenne Avenue. The Planning Commission and
12/02/04
The Planning Commission approved a request Ior a Tentative Map (TMP-
5356) Ior a one-lot commercial subdivision on 5.36 acres adjacent to
northwest corner oI Cheyenne Avenue and Campbell Road. StaII
10763) to change the land use designation on this site Irom O (OIIice) and SC
(Service Commercial) to ML (Medium Low Density Residential) at 9167,
9092, and 9040 West Cheyenne Avenue. The Planning Commission
(Undeveloped) |O (OIIice) Master Plan designation| under resolution oI
intent to O (OIIice) and U (Undeveloped) |SC (Service Commercial) Master
Plan designation| under resolution oI intent to N-S (Neighborhood Service) to
R-PD7 (Residential Planned Development 7 Units per Acre) at 9167, 9092,
and 9040 West Cheyenne Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended
denial oI the request.
03/01/06
The City Council approved a request Ior a Variance (VAR-10765) to allow
21,864 square Ieet oI open space where 40,364 square Ieet is the minimum
amount oI open space required Ior a proposed single-Iamily development at
9167, 9092, and 9040 West Cheyenne Avenue. The Planning Commission
VAR-56129 PR1-54542]
JB



(SDR-10769) Ior a proposed 56-lot single-Iamily residential development.
The City Council approved SDR-10769 Ior a maximum oI 55 lots at 9167,
9092, and 9040 West Cheyenne Avenue. The Planning Commission and staII
recommended denial.
03/23/06
11664) Ior a 55-lot single-Iamily residential subdivision on 7.80 acres at
9167, 9092, and 9040 West Cheyenne Avenue. StaII recommended approval.
The City Council approved request Ior a General Plan Amendment (GPA-
14417) to change the land use designation on this site Irom ML (Medium
Low Density Residential), to O (OIIice) at 9040 and 9092 West Cheyenne
Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended approval oI the request.
The City Council approved request Ior a Rezoning (ZON-14420) Irom U
(Undeveloped) |ML (Medium-Low Density Residential) Master Plan
designation| under Resolution oI Intent to R-PD7 (Residential Planned
Development - 7 Units per Acre) to O (OIIice) at 9040 and 9092 West
Cheyenne Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended approval oI the
request.
09/06/06
The City Council approved request Ior a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-14423) Ior a proposed 58,400 square-Ioot oIIice development at 9040
and 9092 West Cheyenne Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended
10/05/06
16175) Ior a one-lot commercial subdivision on 5.0 acres at 9040 and 9092
West Cheyenne Avenue.
33 percent lot coverage where 30 percent is the maximum lot coverage
allowed at 9040 and 9092 West Cheyenne Avenue. The Planning
02/21/07
(SDR-18660) Ior a proposed 60,160 square-Ioot oIIice development at the
northeast corner oI Campbell Road and Cheyenne Avenue. The Planning
06/14/07
The Planning Commission approved a request Ior a Variance (VAR-21733) to
allow a Iive-Ioot corner side yard setback Irom the south property line where
15 Ieet is the minimum corner side yard setback required Ior a proposed
10,720 square-Ioot oIIice building on 5.0 acres at the northwest corner oI
Campbell Road and Cheyenne Avenue. StaII recommended approval oI the
request.
VAR-56129 PR1-54542]
JB


01/07/09
Ior a 10,000 square-Ioot commercial recreation/amusement (indoor gym) use
with a waiver to allow the business to open at 6:00 am where 8:00 am is
allowed at 9070 West Cheyenne Avenue. The Planning Commission
10/07/14
The Planning Department StaII administratively approved a request Ior an
amended parking-lot striping plan associated with Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-18660) which increased the overall parking provided on-site
Irom 267 parking spaces to 278 parking spaces.

08/05/08 138-08-417-003 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.

06/05/02
A business license (#P55-00868) was issued Ior a Medical OIIice
(S.P.O.R.T.S.) at 9070 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite #100. The license is
still active.
07/18/03
A business license (#P55-00641) was issued Ior a Medical OIIice (Meadows
Pediatrics) at 9030 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite #120. The license is still
active.
02/11/05
A business license (#P50-01218) was issued Ior a General OIIice (Solomon
Dwiggins & Freer) at 9060 West Cheyenne Avenue. The license is still active.
11/10/05
A business license (#P55-00348) was issued Ior a Medical OIIice (Forte
Family Practice) at 9010 West Cheyenne Avenue. The license is still active.
11/22/06
A business license (#P55-00980) was issued Ior a Medical OIIice (Tottori
Allergy and Asthma Associates) at 9020 West Cheyenne Avenue. The license
is still active.
VAR-56129 PR1-54542]
JB

03/16/09
A business license (#H08-00072) was issued Ior an Indoor Recreation Facility
(Eclipse Fitness) at 9070 West Cheyenne Avenue. The license is still active.
09/14/09
A business license (#A02-00641) was issued Ior a General OIIice (Senior
LiIestyle Living) at 9030 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite #120. The license is
still active.
04/11/11
A business license (#P55-01587) was issued Ior a Medical OIIice (Heppler
Audiology) at 9080 West Cheyenne Avenue. The license is still active.
05/21/13
A business license (#P50-03133) was issued Ior a General OIIice (Stone Law
OIIices) at 9060 West Cheyenne Avenue. The license is still active.
01/08/14
A business license (#P55-01937) was issued Ior a Medical OIIice (Fyzical) at
9080 West Cheyenne Avenue. The license is still active.
01/13/14
A business license (#P55-01940) was issued Ior a Medical OIIice (Children`s
Bone and Spine Surgeons) at 9050 West Cheyenne Avenue. The license is
still active.

06/11/14
A pre-application meeting was held via email with the applicant to discuss the
submittal process Ior a parking Variance related to a proposed Medical OIIice
use.


Field Check
10/06/14
A routine Iield check was conducted by staII and Iound a well maintained
commercial development.

Site Area
Net Acres 4.10

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property
Commercial
Development
O (OIIice) O (OIIice)
VAR-56129 PR1-54542]
JB

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
North
Single-Family
Residential
ML (Medium Low
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)
South
Single-Family
Residential
ML (Medium Low
P-C (Planned Community)
East OIIice Buildings O (OIIice)
P-R (ProIessional OIIice
and Parking)
West Undeveloped
ML (Medium Low
U (Undeveloped) Zone
|ML (Medium Low
General Plan designation|

Trails N/A


Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
9010 West Cheyenne Avenue
Medical
OIIice
8,000 SF
1:200 SF
up to
2,000 SF,
then 1:175
SF.
45

VAR-56129 PR1-54542]
JB


Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Medical
OIIice
5,000 SF
1:200 SF
up to
2,000 SF,
then 1:175
SF.
28

Medical
OIIice
4,762 SF
1:200 SF
up to
2,000 SF,
then 1:175
SF.
26

General
OIIice
5,958 SF 1:300 SF 20

Medical
OIIice
10,720 SF
1:200 SF
up to
2,000 SF,
then 1:175
SF.
60

General
OIIice
10,720 SF 1:300 SF 36

Medical
OIIice
10,000 SF
1:200 SF
up to
2,000 SF,
then 1:175
SF.
56

Medical
OIIice
5,000 SF
1:200 SF
up to
2,000 SF,
then 1:175
SF.
28


278

N
Percent Deviation 7
VAR-56129 PR1-54542]
JB


ANALYSIS

This is a request Ior a Variance to allow 278 parking spaces where 299 parking spaces are
required Ior a commercial development at 9010 9080 West Cheyenne Avenue. The commercial
development consists oI a mixture oI General OIIice and Medical OIIice land uses. The applicant
has proposed to convert a 10,720 square-Ioot building within the development which was
previously utilized as a General OIIice land use to a Medical OIIice land use at 9050 West
Cheyenne Avenue. The conversion Irom a General OIIice to a Medical OIIice land use
intensiIies the required parking on-site. The proposed Variance is selI-imposed as the proposed
use is too intense Ior the site to accommodate; thereIore, staII recommends denial. II the
application is denied, the 10,270 square-Ioot tenant space cannot be utilized as a Medical OIIice.
The required parking Ior the tenants is 299 parking spaces, however only 278 parking spaces are
provided on the subject site, which is why a Variance Ior parking has been requested. Since the
subject location can be utilized with a land use with a less intense parking requirement staII has
determined that the proposed Variance is selI-imposed; thereIore, staII recommends denial.




resolution.

No evidence oI a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the applicant
has created a selI-imposed hardship by proposing to add a land use which requires additional
parking on the subject site. A less intense land use would allow conIormance to the Title 19
requirements. In view oI the absence oI any hardships imposed by the site`s physical
characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant`s hardship is preIerential in nature, and it is
thereby outside the realm oI NRS Chapter 278 Ior granting oI Variances.
VAR-56129 PR1-54542]
JB



NOTICES MAILED 414

APPROVALS 2

PROTESTS 0
09/24/14
PRJ-54542
VAR-56129
09/24/14
PRJ-54542
VAR-56129
09/24/14
PRJ-54542
VAR-56129
09/24/14
PRJ-54542
VAR-56129
09/24/14
PRJ-54542
VAR-56129
09/24/14
PRJ-54542
VAR-56129
09/24/14
PRJ-54542
VAR-56129

FFPW Medical Development, LLC
138-08-417-020 & 138-08-417-022
10/01/14
PRJ-54542
VAR-56129
10/01/14
PRJ-54542
VAR-56129
10/02/14
PRJ-54542
VAR-56129
09/24/14
PRJ-54542
11/04/14 PC
VAR-56129
09/24/14
PRJ-54542
11/04/14 PC
VAR-56129
09/24/14
PRJ-54542
11/04/14 PC
VAR-56129
09/24/14
PRJ-54542
11/04/14 PC
VAR-56129
09/24/14
PRJ-54542
11/04/14 PC
VAR-56129
09/24/14
PRJ-54542
11/04/14 PC
VAR-56129
09/24/14
PRJ-54542
11/04/14 PC
VAR-56129

FFPW Medical Development, LLC
138-08-417-020 & 138-08-417-022
10/01/14
PRJ-54542
11/04/14 PC
VAR-56129
10/01/14
PRJ-54542
11/04/14 PC
VAR-56129
10/02/14
PRJ-54542
11/04/14 PC
VAR-56129
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G

'B
'
1
0
,
0
0
0

S
.
F
.
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G

'A
'
5
,
0
0
0

S
.
F
.
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G

'C
'
1
0
,
7
2
0

S
.
F
.
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G

'G
'
5
,
0
0
0

S
.
F
.
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G

'F
'
8
,
0
0
0

S
.
F
.
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G

'D
'
1
0
,
7
2
0

S
.
F
.
2
-
S
T
O
R
Y
O
F
F
I
C
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G

'E
'
1
0
,
7
2
0

S
.
F
.
G
E
N
E
R
A
L

O
F
F
I
C
E

M
E
D
I
C
A
L

O
F
F
I
C
E

M
E
D
I
C
A
L

O
F
F
I
C
E

M
E
D
I
C
A
L

O
F
F
I
C
E

M
E
D
I
C
A
L

O
F
F
I
C
E

M
E
D
I
C
A
L

O
F
F
I
C
E
M
E
D
.

4
,
7
6
2
s
f
G
E
N
E
R
A
L

O
F
F
I
C
E
5
,
9
5
8
s
f
9
0
7
0

9
0
8
0

9
0
6
0

9
0
5
0

9
0
3
0

9
0
1
0

9
0
2
0

A
R
E
A
/
P
A
R
K
I
N
G

S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
U
S
E

M
E
D
IC
A
L
L
E
A
S
E
'A
'
A
R
E
A

5
,0
0
0
S
.F
.
H
E
IG
H
T

1
-S
T
O
R
Y

P
K
G
.R
A
T
IO

1
/2
0
0

P
K
G
.R
E
Q
'D
.
2
,0
0
0
S
.F
.
1
0
1
/1
7
5

3
,0
0
0
S
.F
.
1
8
T
O
T
A
L
P
K
G
. R
E
Q
'D
P
E
R
B
U
IL
D
IN
G
2
8
B
U
IL
D
IN
G
- 'A
' - (9
0
8
0
)
U
S
E

M
E
D
IC
A
L
L
E
A
S
E
'B
'
A
R
E
A

1
0
,0
0
0
S
.F
.
H
E
IG
H
T

1
-S
T
O
R
Y

P
K
G
.R
A
T
IO

1
/2
0
0

P
K
G
.R
E
Q
'D
.
2
,0
0
0
S
.F
.
1
0
1
/1
7
5

8
,0
0
0
S
.F
.
4
6
T
O
T
A
L
P
K
G
. R
E
Q
'D
P
E
R
B
U
IL
D
IN
G
5
6
B
U
IL
D
IN
G
- 'B
' - (9
0
7
0
)
U
S
E

M
E
D
IC
A
L
L
E
A
S
E
'D
'
A
R
E
A

1
0
,7
2
0
S
.F
.
H
E
IG
H
T

2
-S
T
O
R
Y

P
K
G
.R
A
T
IO

1
/2
0
0

P
K
G
.R
E
Q
'D
.
2
,0
0
0
S
.F
.
1
0
1
/1
7
5

8
,7
2
0
S
.F
.
5
0
T
O
T
A
L
P
K
G
. R
E
Q
'D
P
E
R
B
U
IL
D
IN
G
6
0
B
U
IL
D
IN
G
- 'D
' - (9
0
5
0
)
U
S
E

M
E
D
IC
A
L
L
E
A
S
E
'E
'
A
R
E
A

H
E
IG
H
T

2
-S
T
O
R
Y

P
K
G
.R
A
T
IO

1
/2
0
0

P
K
G
.R
E
Q
'D
.
2
,0
0
0
S
.F
.
1
0
1
/1
7
5

2
,7
6
2
S
.F
.
1
6
T
O
T
A
L
P
K
G
. R
E
Q
'D
P
E
R
B
U
IL
D
IN
G

4
6
B
U
IL
D
IN
G
- 'E
' - 1
0
,7
2
0
S
.F
. T
O
T
A
L
- (9
0
3
0
)
4
,7
6
2
S
.F
.
1
/3
0
0

5
,9
5
8
S
.F
.
2
0
O
F
F
IC
E
L
E
A
S
E
'E
'
U
S
E

M
E
D
IC
A
L
L
E
A
S
E
'F
'
A
R
E
A

8
,0
0
0
S
.F
.
H
E
IG
H
T

1
-S
T
O
R
Y

P
K
G
.R
A
T
IO

1
/2
0
0

P
K
G
.R
E
Q
'D
.
2
,0
0
0
S
.F
.
1
0
1
/1
7
5

6
,0
0
0
S
.F
.
3
5
T
O
T
A
L
P
K
G
. R
E
Q
'D
P
E
R
B
U
IL
D
IN
G
4
5
B
U
IL
D
IN
G
- 'F
' - (9
0
1
0
)
U
S
E

M
E
D
IC
A
L
L
E
A
S
E
'G
'
A
R
E
A

5
,0
0
0
S
.F
.
H
E
IG
H
T

1
-S
T
O
R
Y

P
K
G
.R
A
T
IO

1
/2
0
0

P
K
G
.R
E
Q
'D
.
2
,0
0
0
S
.F
.
1
0
1
/1
7
5

3
,0
0
0
S
.F
.
1
8
T
O
T
A
L
P
K
G
. R
E
Q
'D
P
E
R
B
U
IL
D
IN
G
2
8
B
U
IL
D
IN
G
- 'G
' - (9
0
2
0
)
T
O
T
A
L
P
A
R
K
IN
G
R
E
Q
U
IR
E
D
F
O
R
A
L
L
B
U
IL
D
IN
G
S

2
9
9
T
O
T
A
L
P
A
R
K
IN
G
P
R
O
V
ID
E
D
F
O
R
A
L
L
B
U
IL
D
IN
G
S

2
7
8
P
R
O
V
ID
E
D
T
O
T
A
L
:
A
P
N
#
:
S
IT
E
A
C
R
E
A
G
E
:
1
8
1
,0
5
9
S
.F
., 4
.1
6
A
C
R
E
S
2
7
8
S
P
A
C
E
S
B
U
IL
D
IN
G
C
O
V
E
R
A
G
E
:
2
7
.3
%
1
3
8
-0
8
-4
0
1
-0
3
2
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
A
C
C
E
S
S
IB
L
E
P
A
R
K
IN
G
S
P
A
C
E
S
- 1
9
'0
"x
1
8
'-0
":
8
S
P
A
C
E
S
(M
a
x
) 3
0
%
8
3
C
O
M
P
A
C
T
P
A
R
K
IN
G
S
P
A
C
E
S
- 8
'-0
"x
1
8
'-0
":
6
5
S
P
A
C
E
S
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
P
A
R
K
IN
G
S
P
A
C
E
S
- 9
'-0
"x
1
8
'-0
":
2
0
4
S
P
A
C
E
S
P
R
O
V
ID
E
D
P
A
R
K
IN
G
:
V
A
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
IB
L
E
P
A
R
K
IN
G
S
P
A
C
E
S
:
1
S
P
A
C
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
O
F
S
P
A
C
E
S
F
O
R
P
A
R
K
IN
G
V
A
R
IA
N
C
E

2
1

m
a
r
k

D
A
T
E
:

1
4
0
0
0
6
6
.
L
V
P
R
O
J
E
C
T

N
O
:

D
W
G

F
I
L
E
:
D
R
A
W
N

B
Y
:

C
H
E
C
K
E
D

B
Y
:

D
R
A
W
I
N
G

S
C
A
L
E
:

1
7
7
1

E
.
F
L
A
M
I
N
G
O

R
D
,
S
u
i
t
e

A
1
0
6
L
A
S

V
E
G
A
S
,
N
V

8
9
1
1
9
P
h
o
n
e
:
(
7
0
2
)

4
3
4
-9
6
9
5
F
a
x
:
(
8
7
7
)

4
7
6
-9
6
6
1
in
f
o
@
m
il
l
e
r
-a
ip
.c
o
m
d
a
t
e

in
it
ia
ls

p
h
a
s
e
d
a
t
e

c
o
m
m
e
n
t
C S N H O L D I N G S , L L C
P A R K I N G V A R I A N C E
9 0 5 0 W E S T C H E Y E N N E A V E N U E
L A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 2 9
G
W
M
0
5
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
4
A
S
1
0
1
H
S
1
"

=

3
0
'-
0
"
S
I
T
E

P
L
A
N
1
0
/
0
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
5
4
2
V
A
R
-
5
6
1
2
9

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
V
A
P
-
1
Z
9

[
P
P
J
-
4
Z
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

C
S
N

H
O
L
D
I
N
S
S

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

S
D
F

P
P
O
P
E
P
T
I
E
S

L
L
C

E
T

A
L

9
0
1
0
-
9
0
0

W
E
S
T

C
H
E
Y
E
N
N
E

A
V
E
N
U
E

V
A
P
-
1
Z
9

[
P
P
J
-
4
Z
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

C
S
N

H
O
L
D
I
N
S
S

L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

S
D
F

P
P
O
P
E
P
T
I
E
S

L
L
C

E
T

A
L

9
0
1
0
-
9
0
0

W
E
S
T

C
H
E
Y
E
N
N
E

A
V
E
N
U
E

Utah

California
1771 E Flamingo Road

A106
Las Vegas, NV 89119
P 702.434.9695
F 877.476-9661
An Architectural Corporation
September 23,2014
City of Las Vegas

Planning Department
223 N Rancho Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106
Regarding: Justification Letter for Pre-Application Conference

9050 West Cheyenne, APN no: 138-08-401-032
CSN Holdings. LLC
The current facility located at 9050 West Cheyenne, was a part of a development of mixed offices and
medical offices as approved under SDR-14423. Building D ( as shown in approved drawings, located at
9050 W Cheyenne) has a vacant second level. The owner of the building CSN Holdings, has a physical
therapy tenant interested in the space, but the building is parked as a Office as 1/300. We respectfully
request a variance to re-strip a portion of the parking lot to compact spaces, which as shown on the site
exhibit would require total combined 299 parking stalls. The re-configuration of the striping would gain
some more parking stalls and require a variance for (21) stalls.
The proposed physical therapy suite location was chosen to serve not only the surrounding area but the
existing medical tenants occupying the development. It is fair to assume that patients visiting an office in the
development will be visiting multiple offices in a single visit.
We respectuflly request consideration and approval of the proposed parking lot configuration.
Himansu Shroff
Himansu Shroff
Miller Architectural Corporation

10/09/14
PRJ-54542
VAR-56129 - REVISED

Agenda tem No.: 35.


SUB1ECT:
SUP-56134 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: RODNEY
ATAMIAN - OWNER: SUNSTONE BUFFALO, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a
Special Use Permit FOR AN ALTERNATIVE PARKING ANALYSIS TO ALLOW ZERO
ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES WHERE 32 ADDITIONAL SPACES ARE REQUIRED
FOR A PROPOSED GENERAL PERSONAL SERVICE USE (NAIL SALON) at 2400 North
BuIIalo Drive, Suite #130 (APN 138-15-402-001), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1
(Tarkanian) |PRJ-55975|. StaII recommends DENIAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos

SUP-56134 PR1-55975]
GK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: RODNEY ATAMIAN - OWNER: SUNSTONE
BUFFALO, LLC


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
conditions:

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-5134 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. The alternative parking standard as detailed on the submitted parking demand analysis date
stamped 10/15/14 is hereby approved. The alternative parking standard is valid Ior the
duration oI the General Personal Service use (Nail Salon) at the site. The alternative parking
standard shall expire when the use ceases.


3. To allow zero parking spaces where 32 additional parking spaces are required is hereby
approved.

SaIety.



SUP-56134 PR1-55975]
GK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is proposing to locate a General Personal Service use (Nail Salon) within an
existing 13,796 square-Ioot commercial building at 2400 North BuIIalo Drive, Suite #130. The
use is permissible in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zone; however the proposal does not comply
with minimum parking requirements. The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit Ior an
Alternative Parking Standard to allow zero spaces where 32 additional spaces are needed. The
submitted alternative parking standard study recommends a parking ratio oI 1.22 parking stalls
per nail salon station, rather than two parking stalls per station as outlined by Title 19.12. The
recommended parking ratio would result in a required 20 parking spaces, which is a lesser
parking demand but does not support the applicant`s request to provide zero additional parking
spaces. StaII recommends denial, as the applicant has not provided data to demonstrate a unique
operation oI a General Personal Service use to warrant zero additional spaces. II denied, the
General Personal Service use (Nail Salon) would not be allowed to locate at the subject site.

ISSUES

A Special Use Permit is needed to allow zero parking spaces where 32 additional parking
spaces are required Ior a proposed General Personal Service use (Nail Salon) under the
Alternative Parking Standard-Parking Demand Analysis.
The proposed alternative parking standard oI 1.22 parking spaces per Nail Salon station
would result in 20 required parking spaces Ior the proposed General Personal Service use,
which does not substantiate the applicant`s request to provide zero additional parking
spaces.


The City Council approved a Rezoning Irom U (Undeveloped) to C-1
(Limited Commercial) on 3.88 acres adjacent to the northeast and southeast
corners oI Smoke Ranch Road and BuIIalo Drive. Planning Commission and
05/05/04
two 15,300 square-Ioot commercial retail buildings at the northeast and
southeast corners oI Smoke Ranch Road and BuIIalo Drive. Planning
SUP-56134 PR1-55975]
GK

The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-3896) Ior a liquor
establishment (tavern) use with a waiver Irom the 1,500-Ioot distance
separation requirement Irom an existing school, church and city park at the
northeast corner oI Smoke Ranch Road and BuIIalo Drive. Planning
Commission recommended approval. StaII recommended denial.
02/06/08
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-25476) Ior an Auto
Title Loan use with a waiver to allow a 94-Ioot distance separation Irom a
residential use where 200 Ieet is required at 2400 North BuIIalo Drive, Suite
#135. Planning Commission and staII recommended denial.
09/21/11
The City Council approved an Extension oI Time (EOT-42455) Ior a tavern
use at 2400 North BuIIalo Drive. StaII recommended approval.


A building permit (#709824) was issued Ior a retail shell building at 2400
North BuIIalo Drive. The permit received a Iinal inspection on 01/06/06.
12/29/04 A building permit (#709825) was issued Ior onsite improvements at 2400
North BuIIalo Drive. The permit did not receive a Iinal inspection and expired
on 06/17/06.
10/22/07
A business license (G50-00959) was issued Ior a General Personal Service
use (Beauty Salon) at 2400 North BuIIalo Drive, Suite #105. The license is
still active.
08/25/10
A business license (R09-01581) was issued Ior a restaurant use at 2400 North
BuIIalo Drive, Suite #145. The license is still active.
02/23/11
A business license (N02-00169) was issued Ior an Auto Title Loan use at
2400 North BuIIalo Drive, Suite #140. The license is still active.
01/11/12
A code enIorcement citation (#109342) was issued Ior non-permitted banners
and Ilags at 2400 North BuIIalo Drive. The citation was resolved on 01/31/12.
04/04/12
A business license (L16-00366) was issued Ior a Liquor Establishment,
Tavern use at 2400 North BuIIalo Drive, Suite #125. The license is still
active.
07/28/14
A building permit (#265912) Ior a tenant improvement Ior a proposed
General Personal Service use (Nail Salon) was denied by staII due to
insuIIicient parking.
SUP-56134 PR1-55975]
GK


09/09/14
StaII conducted a pre-application meeting with the representative to discuss
the parking demand at 2400 North BuIIalo Drive. The representative stated
that a parking study could be conducted to prove the general personal service
use (nail salon) would not require 32 additional parking spaces. StaII
discussed the submittal requirements Ior a Special Use Permit.


Field Check
10/02/14
StaII conducted a routine Iield check and noted a well maintained commercial
building Iree oI trash, debris and graIIiti.

Site Area
Gross Acres 2.04

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Liquor
Establishment
(Tavern)
SpeciIied
Restaurant
Subject Property
General Personal
Service (Beauty
Salon)
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North
OIIice, Other Than
Listed
LI/R (Light
Industry/Research)
C-PB (Central Business
Park)
General Retail
South
Health Club
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
East Undeveloped
SC (Service
Commercial)
U (Undeveloped)
West
Single-Family
Residential
ML (Medium Low
R-PD5 (Residentially
Units per Acre)
SUP-56134 PR1-55975]
GK


Trails N/A


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
BuIIalo Drive Primary Arterial
and Highways
100 Feet Y
Smoke Ranch Road Primary Arterial
and Highways
100 Feet Y

Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
5 Beauty
Stations
3:Station
General
Personal
Service
(Beauty Salon)
Suite #105
2 Nail
Stations
2: Station
19
3,630 SF 1:200 SF
Liquor
Establishment,
Tavern
Suite #125
3,420 SF 1:50 SF
87
Auto Title
Loan
Suite #140
1,475 SF 1:250 SF 6

SUP-56134 PR1-55975]
GK

Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
886 SF 1:200 SF Restaurant
Suite #145 800 SF 1:50 SF
21
Proposed
General
Personal
Service (Nail
Salon)
16 Stations 2: Station 32


123

N
Loading
Spaces
2 2 Y
Percent Deviation 25.5

ANALYSIS

Currently, the subject site consists oI an existing 13,796 square-Ioot commercial building at 2400
North BuIIalo Drive. The subject site is located within the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district. The C-1 (Limited Commercial) zone is designed to provide local services Ior area
residents. This category allows retail, service, automotive, wholesale, oIIice and other general
business uses oI a medium-to-low intensity character.

The applicant is proposing to locate a General Personal Service use (Nail Salon) within an
existing 1,605 square-Ioot suite at 2400 North BuIIalo Drive, Suite #130. The use is permissible
in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zone; however the proposal does not comply with minimum
parking requirements. The existing 13,796 square-Ioot commercial building currently
accommodates a Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use, a restaurant use, an auto title loan use, and
an existing General Personal Service use (Beauty Salon). In total, the commercial building
requires 133 parking spaces and only provides 123 spaces, resulting in a non-conIorming site.
According to Title 19.12, a General Personal Service use (Nail Salon) requires two parking
spaces per nail salon station. The applicant`s proposal Ior 16 nail stations would result in a net
increase oI 32 additional required parking spaces. The non-conIorming site cannot accommodate
the required additional parking spaces. As a result, the applicant has conducted a parking demand
analysis to demonstrate the proposed General Personal Service use (Nail Salon) is a unique
operation requiring a lesser parking demand than the parking requirements outlined in Title
19.12.
SUP-56134 PR1-55975]
GK


The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit Ior an Alternative Parking Standard to allow
zero spaces where 32 additional spaces are needed. The submitted alternative parking standard
study, date stamped 10/15/14 recommends a parking ratio oI 1.22 parking stalls per nail salon
station, rather than two parking stalls per station as outlined by Title 19.12. The recommended
parking ratio would result in a required 20 parking spaces, which is a lesser parking demand than
the 32 parking spaces required. However, the provided alternative parking ratio oI 1.22 spaces
per station does not support the applicant`s request to provide zero additional parking spaces. In
addition, neither the submitted parking study nor the justiIication letter provide justiIication
substantiating that the proposed nail salon is a unique operation Irom similar uses. StaII
recommends denial, as the applicant has not provided data to demonstrate a unique operation oI a
General Personal Service use to warrant zero additional spaces.




The proposed General Personal Service use (Nail Salon) is permissible in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district and can be conducted in a manner that is compatible and
harmonious with the existing surrounding land uses.


Although the proposed General Personal Service use (Nail Salon) is appropriate Ior the
commercial site, the proposal cannot adhere to minimum parking requirements as outlined
by Title 19.12. The submitted parking study does not substantiate an allowance oI zero
additional parking spaces where 32 spaces are required. As a result, the proposed use is too
intense Ior the subject site.


Site access is provided by BuIIalo Drive and Smoke Ranch Road, which are both 100-Ioot
wide Primary Arterials as classiIied by the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways. Both
roadways provide adequate capacity to serve the proposed and existing uses on the subject
site.
SUP-56134 PR1-55975]
GK


General Plan.



The use does not comply with minimum parking requirements as outlined by Title 19.12.
As a result, the proposed General Personal Service use (Nail Salon) is too intense Ior the
subject site.


NOTICES MAILED 264

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 2
09/24/14
PRJ-55975
SUP-56134
Page 1 of 2 9/29/2014 11:46:54 AM
Applicant Email: rod@citysunstone.com
Rep Last Name: Goodheart
Rep First Name: David
Rep Address: 410 S. Rampart Blvd. Suite #350
Rep Email: davidg@citysunstone.com
Rep Fax: (702) 405-9775
Rep State: Nevada
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: (702) 405-0333
Rep Zip: 89145
Project Name SUP FOR ALTERNATIVE PARKING STUDY
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 1 (LOIS TARKANIAN), WARD 4 (STAVROS S. ANTHONY)
ProjectAddress (Location): 2400 N BUFFALO DRIVE
Application/Petition For: SUP for alternative parking study at 2400 North Buffalo Drive
Applicant First Name: Rod
Applicant Address: 410 S. Rampart Blvd. Suite #350
Applicant Last Name: Atamian
Lots/Units: 6
Gross Acres: 2.04
SUP-56134
Page 2 of 2 9/29/2014 11:46:54 AM
I Accept:
Yes
SUNSTONE BUFFALO L L C 1930 VILLAGE CENTER CIR #861 LAS VEGAS, NV 89134-6299
Rod Atamian City Sunstone Properties Managing Partner davidg@citysunstone.com
SUP-56134
10/01/14
PRJ-55975
SUP-56134 - REVISED
10/01/14
PRJ-55975
SUP-56134 - REVISED
09/24/14
PRJ-55975
SUP-56134
09/24/14
PRJ-55975
SUP-56134
09/24/14
PRJ-55975
SUP-56134
09/24/14
PRJ-55975
SUP-56134
09/24/14
PRJ-55975
SUP-56134
09/24/14
PRJ-55975
SUP-56134
10/15/14
PRJ-55975 SUP-56134
10/15/14
PRJ-55975
SUP-56134
10/15/14
PRJ-55975
SUP-56134
10/15/14
PRJ-55975
SUP-56134
10/15/14
PRJ-55975
SUP-56134
S
U
P
-
1
3
4

[
P
P
J
-
9
7
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

P
O
D
N
E
Y

A
T
A
M
I
A
N

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

S
U
N
S
T
O
N
E

U
F
F
A
L
O

L
L
C

Z
4
0
0

N
O
P
T
H

U
F
F
A
L
O

D
P
I
V
E

S
U
I
T
E

1
3
0

09/24/14
PRJ-55975
SUP-56134

Agenda tem No.: 36.


SUB1ECT:
LV ASSET HOLDINGS, LTD. - OWNER: HUGH H. TOLOUI - For possible action on a
request Ior a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 6,100 SQUARE-FOOT CAR
WASH, FULL SERVICE OR AUTO DETAILING WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-
FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE WHERE EIGHT
FEET IS REQUIRED AND ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE WEST
PROPERTY LINE WHERE FIFTEEN FEET IS REQUIRED on 1.36 acres at the northeast
corner oI Joann Way and Cheyenne Avenue (APN 138-12-801-016), C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-56033|. StaII recommends DENIAL.



RECOMMENDATION:

4. Photos
6. Clark County Department oI Aviation Comments

SDR-56167 PR1-56033]
JB


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: LV ASSET HOLDINGS, LTD. - OWNER: HUGH
H. TOLOUI


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SDR-56167 StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved subject to
conditions:

`` CONDITIONS ``

SDk-517 CONDIIIONS

Planning


2. All development shall be in conIormance with the site plan, landscape plan, and building

3. A Waiver Irom Title 19.08.080 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-Ioot landscape buIIer
along the east property line where eight Ieet is required and zero-Ioot landscape buIIer along
the west property line where 15 Ieet is required.

SaIety.

SDR-56167 PR1-56033]
JB

Conditions Page Two



8. Prior to or at the time oI submittal Ior any building permit, the applicant shall provide
written veriIication by the FAA and/or the Clark County Department oI Aviation oI the
Iollowing: Applicant is required to Iile a valid FAA Form 7460-1, "Notice oI Proposed
Construction or Alteration" with the FAA, in accordance with 14 CFR Part 77, or submit to
the Clark County Director oI Aviation a 'Property Owner`s Shielding Determination
Statement and request written concurrence Irom the Clark County Department oI Aviation.

9. No Building Permit or other construction permit shall be issued Ior any structure greater
than 35 Ieet above the surIace oI land that, based upon the FAA`s 7460 airspace
determination (the outcome oI Iiling the FAA Form 7460-1) would (a) constitute a hazard to
air navigation, (b) would result in an increase to minimum Ilight altitudes during any phase
oI Ilight (unless approved by the Department oI Aviation), or (c) would otherwise be
determined to pose a signiIicant adverse impact on airport or aircraIt operations.

10. Applicant is advised that FAA`s airspace determinations are dependent on petitions by any
interested party and the height that will not present a hazard as determined by the FAA may
change based on these comments.

11. Applicant is advised that the FAA`s airspace determinations include expiration dates and
that the separate airspace determinations will be needed Ior construction cranes or other
temporary equipment.


Public Works

13. In accordance with code requirements oI Title 13.56, remove all unused driveways and
substandard street improvements and replace with new improvements meeting current City
Standards concurrent with development oI this site. All existing paving damaged or
removed by this development shall be restored at its original location and to its original
width concurrent with development oI this site.
SDR-56167 PR1-56033]
JB



15. Unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer, construct sidewalk on at least one side oI all
access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets concurrent with development
oI this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend Irom the sidewalk on the public street to
the Iirst intersection oI the on-site roadway network and shall be terminated on-site with a
handicap ramp.

16. Contact the City Engineer`s OIIice at 229-6272 to coordinate the development oI this
project with the 'City oI Las Vegas Sewer Rehabilitation Group N project and any other
public improvement projects adjacent to this site. Comply with the recommendations oI the
City Engineer.

discuss Iire requirements Ior the proposed use oI this Iacility.

18. Obtain an Occupancy Permit Irom the Nevada Department oI Transportation Ior all
landscaping and private improvements, iI any, in the Cheyenne Avenue public right-oI-way.

Department oI Public Works prior to the issuance oI any building or grading permits,
submittal oI any construction drawings or the submittal oI a Map subdividing this site,
whichever may occur Iirst. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the
approved drainage plan/study. The developer oI this site shall be responsible to construct
such neighborhood or local drainage Iacility improvements as are recommended by the City
oI Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study
concurrent with development oI this site. This site is within a FEMA designated Flood
Zone A.

SDR-56167 PR1-56033]
JB

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review Ior a proposed Car Wash, Full Service or
Auto Detailing use totaling 6,100 square Ieet on 1.36 acres at the northeast corner oI Cheyenne
Avenue and Joann Way. The applicant has requested Waivers to allow a zero-Ioot landscape
buIIer along the east property line where eight Ieet is required and zero-Ioot landscape buIIer
along the west property line where 15 Ieet is required. The applicant has also proposed to create
a new ingress/egress onto Joann Way, which is adjacent to existing multi-Iamily residential uses.
StaII has determined the proposed landscaping Waivers and new ingress/egress onto the adjacent
residential street will have a negative impact to the surrounding residential development to the
west. ThereIore, staII is recommends denial oI this project.

ISSUES

A Waiver oI Title 19.08.070 landscaping requirements have been requested to allow a
zero-Ioot landscape buIIer along the east property line where eight Ieet is required, staII
does not support this Waiver.
A Waiver oI Title 19.08.070 landscaping requirements have been requested to allow
zero-Ioot landscape buIIer along the west property line where 15 Ieet is required, staII
does not support this Waiver.


04/28/64
The City Planning Commission approved a request Ior Annexation (A-0002-
64) oI property generally located east oI Tonopah Highway, south oI Craig
Road and west oI Decatur Boulevard.
10/07/97
The Board oI Zoning Adjustment denied a request Ior a Variance (V-0084-97)
to allow a second Ireestanding sign oI 60 square Ieet in conjunction with a
proposed Iast Iood restaurant where only one Ireestanding sign is allowed on
property located on the northwest corner oI Cheyenne Ave and Rancho Drive.
10/08/97
The Planning Department administratively approved a request Ior a Site
Development Plan Review (SD-0019-97) to allow a proposed 2,478 square-
Ioot Iast Iood restaurant with drive- thru on property located on the west side oI
Rancho Drive approximately 300 Ieet north oI Cheyenne Ave.
SDR-56167 PR1-56033]
JB

04/12/99
The City Council approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (U-0009-99) Ior
the sale oI packaged liquor Ior oII-premise consumption in conjunction with a
proposed supermarket on this site. The Planning Commission recommended
06/07/00
The City Council approved an Extension oI Time |U-0009-99(1)| oI an
approved Special Use Permit (U-0009-99) Ior the sale oI packaged liquor Ior
oII-premise consumption in conjunction with a proposed supermarket on the
northeast corner oI the intersection oI Cheyenne Avenue and Joann Way.
02/14/02
The Planning Commission denied a Site Development Plan Review (SD-
0079-01) Ior a proposed 4,050 square-Ioot Used Motor Vehicle Dealership on
1.36 acres, located adjacent to the northeast corner oI Cheyenne Avenue and
Joann Way.
03/20/02
The City Council approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (U-0159-01) Ior
Used Motor Vehicle Sales located adjacent to the northeast corner oI Cheyenne
Avenue and Joann Way. The Planning Commission recommended denial oI the
request 02/14/02
04/17/02
The City Council approved the Site Development Plan Review (SD-0079-01)
Ior a proposed 4,050 square-Ioot Used Motor Vehicle Dealership on 1.36
acres, located adjacent to the northeast corner oI Cheyenne Avenue and Joann
Way. The Planning Commission recommended denial oI the request 02/14/02
09/13/07
Review (SDR-23554) Ior a proposed 11,000 square-Ioot retail development
with waivers to allow no landscape buIIer along the north and east property
line where eight Ieet is required and to allow a ten-Ioot landscape buIIer along
the west property line where 15 Ieet is required on 1.36 acres at the northeast
corner oI Joann Way and Cheyenne Avenue. StaII recommended approval oI
the request.


06/02/04
A code enIorcement case (#15879) was opened on the site as it is being used
as a dumping ground. The case was resolved on 06/09/04.
08/01/06
A code enIorcement case (#45065) was opened to check Ior weeds, trash and
debris. The case was resolved on 08/29/06.
SDR-56167 PR1-56033]
JB


09/18/14
StaII met with the applicant to review the requirements submittal procedures
Ior a Site Development Plan Review Ior a proposed 6,100 square-Ioot Car
Wash, Full Service or Auto Detailing use with waivers oI the required
landscape buIIer widths.


Field Check
10/07/14
During a routine site inspection staII noticed the subject site has the site also
has overgrown weeds growing and debris scattered throughout the property.

Site Area
Net Acres 1.36

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
GC (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
North
Auto Repair Garage,
Major
GC (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
General Retail/Auto
Repair Garage,
Minor
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
South
Car Wash
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
East Restaurants
GC (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
West
Multi-Family
Residential
M (Medium Density
Residential)
R-4 (High Density
Residential)

SDR-56167 PR1-56033]
JB

A-O (Airport Overlay) District (35 Feet and 70 Feet) Y
Trails N/A


Min. Setbacks
Front
Side
Corner
Rear
10 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
48 Feet
72 Feet
215 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
Trash Enclosure
Screened, Gated, w/
a RooI or Trellis
Screened,
Gated, w/ a
RooI or
Trellis
Y

Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

BuIIer Trees:
North
South
East
West
4 Trees
13 Trees
11 Trees
11 Trees
5 Trees
14 Trees
0 Trees
0 Trees
Y
Y
N*
N*
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 39 Trees 19 Trees N`
Parking Area Trees
2 Trees 3 Trees Y
SDR-56167 PR1-56033]
JB

Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

Min. Zone Width
North
South
East
West
8 Feet
15 Feet
8 Feet
15 Feet
8 Feet
15 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
Y
Y
N*
N*
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential Not Indicated
Not adjacent
to
Residential
The applicant has requestea Waivers to allow a :ero-foot lanascape buffer along the east
property line where eight feet is requirea ana :ero-foot lanascape buffer along the west property
line where 15 feet is requirea.

Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Cheyenne Avenue Expressway
Master Plan oI Streets &
Highways
100 Feet N
Joann Way Local Street
Master Plan oI Streets &
Highways
50 Feet Y

Parking Requirement
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Car Wash,
Full Service
6,100 SF
(1,600 SF
Independent
oI Vehicle
Stacking)
1:150 SF
Independent
OI Vehicle
Stacking
11

SDR-56167 PR1-56033]
JB


Waivers
An eight-Ioot landscape buIIer
is required along all interior lot
lines
landscaping buIIer
adjacent to eastern
property line
Denial
A 15-Ioot landscape buIIer is
required adjacent to the right-oI-
way
landscaping buIIer
adjacent to western
property line adjacent
to Joann Way
Denial

ANALYSIS

The subject site is located in a C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district, which allows Ior retail
and commercial uses oI an intense character. The applicant has proposed to develop the site with
a Full Service Car Wash use totaling 6,100 square Ieet on 1.36 acres at the northeast corner oI
Cheyenne Avenue and Joann Way.

The proposed site design complies with all applicable Title19.08.070 site design requirements
pertaining to building setbacks, which requires a 10-Ioot distance separation Irom the Iront, side
and corner property lines and a 20-Ioot distance separation Irom the rear property line. The
proposed building will cover approximately 11 oI the 1.36 acres site, which is below the 50
lot coverage maximum allowed by code. The proposed building is 28 Ieet in height measured to
the top oI the parapet. The submitted building elevations indicate the building Iaades will have
dark beige and light beige stucco Iinish, purple and yellow trim and decorative stone stacked
veneer accents.

The site will provide 25 total parking spaces with two handicapped parking spaces, which
exceeds the 11 spaces required by Title 19.12.010 Ior a Car Wash, Full Service or Auto Detailing
use land use. The parking area also provides 11 additional parking spaces adjacent to the east
property line, which would require cars to back-out onto the adjacent parcels to the east which
share a 35-Ioot ingress/egress easement with the subject property created by Parcel Map File 89,
Page 85. Since these 11 spaces do not Iunction completely on the subject property they do not to
comply with Title 19.08 standards and were not added to the overall parking calculation. The
applicant has also proposed to create a new ingress/egress onto Joann Way, which is adjacent to
existing multi-Iamily residential uses.

The applicant has requested Waivers to allow a zero-Ioot landscape buIIer along the east
property line where eight Ieet is required and zero-Ioot landscape buIIer along the west property
line where 15 Ieet is required. The eastern property line oI the subject parcel abuts the property
SDR-56167 PR1-56033]
JB


line oI the two commercial lots located to the east. All three parcels were created by Parcel Map
File 89, Page 85 and share a common 35-Ioot ingress/egress easement, which is located on the
eastern perimeter oI the subject site. There is also an existing 70-Ioot drainage easement that runs
along the western perimeter oI the subject parcel, which will prevent the installation oI
landscaping adjacent to the western perimeter oI the property.

StaII has determined the proposed landscaping Waivers and new ingress/egress onto the adjacent
residential street; will create a cut through lane Ior additional traIIic onto the residential street
with no visual mitigation causing a negative impact to the surrounding commercial and
residential development. ThereIore, staII is recommends denial oI this project.




StaII has determined the proposed landscaping Waivers and new ingress/egress onto the
adjacent residential street Joann Way; is not compatible and will have a negative impact to
the surrounding commercial and residential development in the area.


The proposed commercial development is consistent with the General Plan and complies
with all Title 19 development standards; with the exception oI the requested Waivers to
allow a zero-Ioot landscape buIIer along the east property line where eight Ieet is required
and zero-Ioot landscape buIIer along the west property line where 15 Ieet is required. StaII
has determined the proposed landscaping Waivers are not compatible and with the
surrounding commercial and residential development in the area.


The applicant has proposed access to the site Irom Cheyenne Avenue, which is classiIied
by the City oI Las Vegas Master Plan oI Streets and Highways, as a 150-Ioot Expressway
and Joann Way a 50-Ioot Local Street. StaII has determined the proposed new
ingress/egress onto the adjacent residential street Joann Way will have a negative impact to
the surrounding residential development in the area.
SDR-56167 PR1-56033]
JB



The project design and style are appropriate Ior the subject location and will be
harmonious with buildings in the surrounding area. The submitted building elevations
indicate the building Iaades will have dark beige and light beige stucco Iinish, purple and
yellow trim and decorative stone stacked veneer accents. The primary tree species utilized
Ior landscaping are the 24 box Chilean Mesquite and 24 box Mediterranean Fan Palms,
which are consistent with the Southern Nevada Regional Plan Coalition Regional Plant
List.


The design characteristics oI the proposed building elevations are not unsightly and are
compatible with development in the area. The proposed materials are suitable Ior the
surrounding commercial and residential uses and the desert environment.

general welfare.

The proposed commercial development will be subject to inspections in order to protect
the public health, saIety and general welIare by City staII.


NOTICES MAILED 115

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
09/25/14
PRJ-56033
SDR-56167
09/25/14
PRJ-56033
SDR-56167
Page 1 of 2 9/25/2014 5:09:36 PM
Applicant Email: demetrius@lvassetholdings.com
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: McWhorter
Rep First Name: Demetrius
Rep Address: 2600 Bryant Ave
Rep Email: demetrius@lvassetholdings.com
Rep Fax:
Rep State: Nevada
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: (702)373-2279
Rep Zip: 89102
Project Name EXPRESS CAR WASH - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 5 (RICKI Y. BARLOW), WARD 6 (STEVEN D. ROSS)
ProjectAddress (Location): N/A
Application/Petition For: Express Car Wash - Site Development Plan Review
Applicant First Name: Demetrius
Applicant Address: 2600 Bryant Ave
Applicant Last Name: McWhorter
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres: 1.36
VAR-56168 & SDR-56167 XXXXXXXXX
Page 2 of 2 9/25/2014 5:09:36 PM
I Accept:
Yes
TOLOUI HUGH H 1872 EAGLE PEAK AVE CLAYTON, CA 94517-1802
Demetrius McWhorter LV Asset Holdings, Limited Managing Member demetrius@lvassetholdings.com
VAR-56168 & SDR-56167 XXXXXXXXX
1
0
/
0
7
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
3
3
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
6
7

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
0
/
0
7
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
3
3
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
6
7

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
0
/
0
7
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
3
3
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
6
7

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
0
/
0
7
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
3
3
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
6
7

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
0
/
0
7
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
3
3
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
6
7

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
0
/
0
7
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
0
3
3
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
6
7

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
SDR 56167
LV Asset Holdings, LLC
NEC Cheyenne Avenue & Joann Way
Proposed 5 stall car wash/auto self-detail facility.
RATE/#
UNIT TOTAL
CAR WASH, SELF SERVICE [STALL] 5
108.00 540
Cheyenne Avenue
Joann Way
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 21
Cheyenne Avenue 51,800
Joann Way 13,040
This project is expected to add about 540 trips per day on Cheyenne Ave. & Joann Wy. Currently, Cheyenne is at about
71 percent of capacity and Joann is at less than 1 percent of capacity. With this project, Cheyenne is expected to be at
about 72 percent of capacity and Joann to be at about 4 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this project will add about 40 trips in the peak hour, or about three every two minutes.
S
U
P
-
7

[
P
P
J
-
0
3
3
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

L
V

A
S
S
E
T

H
O
L
D
I
N
S
S

L
T
D
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

H
U
S
H

H
,

T
O
L
O
U
I

N
O
P
T
H
E
A
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

J
O
A
N
N

W
A
Y

A
N
D

C
H
E
Y
E
N
N
E

A
V
E
N
U
E

S
U
P
-
7

[
P
P
J
-
0
3
3
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

L
V

A
S
S
E
T

H
O
L
D
I
N
S
S

L
T
D
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

H
U
S
H

H
,

T
O
L
O
U
I

N
O
P
T
H
E
A
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

J
O
A
N
N

W
A
Y

A
N
D

C
H
E
Y
E
N
N
E

A
V
E
N
U
E

S
U
P
-
7

[
P
P
J
-
0
3
3
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

L
V

A
S
S
E
T

H
O
L
D
I
N
S
S

L
T
D
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

H
U
S
H

H
,

T
O
L
O
U
I

N
O
P
T
H
E
A
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

J
O
A
N
N

W
A
Y

A
N
D

C
H
E
Y
E
N
N
E

A
V
E
N
U
E

S
U
P
-
7

[
P
P
J
-
0
3
3
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

L
V

A
S
S
E
T

H
O
L
D
I
N
S
S

L
T
D
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

H
U
S
H

H
,

T
O
L
O
U
I

N
O
P
T
H
E
A
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

J
O
A
N
N

W
A
Y

A
N
D

C
H
E
Y
E
N
N
E

A
V
E
N
U
E

S
U
P
-
7

[
P
P
J
-
0
3
3
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

L
V

A
S
S
E
T

H
O
L
D
I
N
S
S

L
T
D
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

H
U
S
H

H
,

T
O
L
O
U
I

N
O
P
T
H
E
A
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

J
O
A
N
N

W
A
Y

A
N
D

C
H
E
Y
E
N
N
E

A
V
E
N
U
E

10/07/14
PRJ-56033
SDR-56167 - REVISED
10/07/14
PRJ-56033
SDR-56167 - REVISED
CITY OF LAS VEGAS
PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL
RECOMMENDATIONS / COMMENTS
FROM: CLARK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION
APPLICATION NUMBERS: SDR-56167
PROJECT: CAR WASH
LOCATION: 138-12-801-016
MEETING DATES: NOVEMBER 4, 2014 PLANNING COMMISSION &
DECEMBER 17, 2014 City Council
COMMENTS:
Federal Aviation Regulations (Title 14, Part 77) require that the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) be notified before the construction or alteration of any building or structure greater than
200 feet in height ( 77.13(a)(1)) or that will exceed a slope of 100:1 for a distance of 20,000
feet from the nearest point of any airport runway greater than 3,200 feet in length ( 77.13
(a)(2)(i)). Such notification allows the FAA to determine what impact, if any, the proposed
development will have upon navigable airspace, and allows the FAA to determine whether the
development requires obstruction marking or lighting.
The proposed development will exceed the 100:1 notice requirement for the North Las Vegas
Airport (VGT). Therefore, as required by 14 CFR Part 77, the FAA must be notified of the
proposed construction or alteration. The CCDOA requests that the City of Las Vegas impose
the conditions listed below for the project:
x Applicant is required to file a valid FAA Form 7460-1, "Notice of Proposed Construction
or Alteration" with the FAA, in accordance with 14 CFR Part 77, or submit to the Clark
County Director of Aviation a Property Owners Shielding Determination Statement
and request written concurrence from the Clark County Department of Aviation;
x No Building Permit or other construction permit shall be issued for any structure greater
than 35 feet above the surface of land that, based upon the FAAs 7460 airspace
determination (the outcome of filing the FAA Form 7460-1) would (a) constitute a hazard
to air navigation, (b) would result in an increase to minimum flight altitudes during any
phase of flight (unless approved by the Department of Aviation), or (c) would otherwise
be determined to pose a significant adverse impact on airport or aircraft operations.
x Applicant is advised that FAAs airspace determinations are dependent on petitions by
any interested party and the height that will not present a hazard as determined by the
FAA may change based on these comments.
x Applicant is advised that the FAAs airspace determinations include expiration dates and
that the separate airspace determinations will be needed for construction cranes or other

Agenda tem No.: 37.


SUB1ECT:
CARLOS ADLEY - OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request Ior a
Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 20-STORY MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING 84,942 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE, 162
RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND A 171 SPACE PARKING GARAGE on 1.23 acres at 601
Fremont Street (APN 139-34-611-018), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-



RECOMMENDATION:

1. Agenda Summary Page
4. Photos
6. Clark County Department oI Aviation Comments

SDR-56172 PR1-56112]
YK


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: CARLOS ADLEY - OWNER: CITY OF LAS
VEGAS


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL

`` CONDITIONS ``

SDk-5172 CONDIIIONS

Planning


2. All development shall be in conIormance with the landscape plans, building elevations and
Iloor plans, date stamped 09/25/14, and site plans, date stamped 10/08/14, except as
amended by conditions herein.

3. All required street landscape trees shall be 36-inch box trees and a minimum oI 25 Ieet in
height at time oI planting.

4. An Aerial Encroachment Agreement is required prior to any building permits being issued.

5. Applicant is required to Iile a valid FAA Form 7460-1, "Notice oI Proposed Construction or
Alteration" with the FAA, in accordance with 14 CFR Part 77, or submit to the Clark
County Director oI Aviation a 'Property Owner`s Shielding Determination Statement and
request written concurrence Irom the Clark County Department oI Aviation.
SDR-56172 PR1-56112]
YK

Conditions Page Two

6. No Building Permit or other construction permit shall be issued Ior any structure greater
than 35 Ieet above the surIace oI land that, based upon the FAA`s 7460 airspace
determination (the outcome oI Iiling the FAA Form 7460-1) would (a) constitute a hazard to
air navigation, (b) would result in an increase to minimum Ilight altitudes during any phase
oI Ilight (unless approved by the Department oI Aviation), or (c) would otherwise be
determined to pose a signiIicant adverse impact on airport or aircraIt operations.

7. Applicant is advised that FAA`s airspace determinations are dependent on petitions by any
interested party and the height that will not present a hazard as determined by the FAA may
change based on these comments.

8. Applicant is advised that the FAA`s airspace determinations include expiration dates and
that the separate airspace determinations will be needed Ior construction cranes or other

SaIety.


most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The mapping
action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance oI any building permits.



14. A Comprehensive Construction Staging Plan shall be submitted to the Department oI
Planning Ior review and approval prior to the issuance oI any building permits. The
Construction Staging Plan shall include the Iollowing inIormation: Design and location oI
construction trailer(s); design and location oI construction Iencing; all proposed temporary
construction signage; location oI materials staging area; and the location and design oI
parking Ior all construction workers.
SDR-56172 PR1-56112]
YK


15. Prospective buyers shall be inIormed that views may be obscured by Iuture adjacent
development and this inIormation shall be included in project CC & R`s.

16. Prior to the submittal oI a building permit application, the applicant shall meet with
Department oI Planning staII to develop a comprehensive address plan Ior the subject site.
A copy oI the approved address plan shall be submitted with any Iuture building permit
applications related to the site.


Public Works

18. Dedicate a 10 Ioot radius on the northeast corner oI 6th Street and Carson Avenue prior to
the issuance oI any permits.

19. In accordance with code requirements oI Title 13.56, remove all unused driveways and
substandard improvements on 6th Street and replace with new improvements meeting
current Downtown Centennial Standards concurrent with development oI this site, except as
amended herein. All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be
restored at its original location and to its original width concurrent with development oI this
site.


21. Prior to the approval oI Construction drawings Ior this site, sign a Covenant Running with
Land agreement Ior the possible Iuture installation oI any oII-site improvements per
requirements oI the Downtown Centennial Plan that are deIerred by this action including
undergrounding oI all existing overhead utility lines adjacent to this site not placed
underground with this development. The Covenant agreement must be recorded with the
County Recorder and a copy oI the recorded document must be provided to the City prior to
the issuance oI building permits Ior this site.

22. Coordinate with both the Parking and EnIorcement Division (702-229-6432) oI the
Department oI Economic Urban Development and the TraIIic Division oI the Department oI
Public Works (702-229-6327) to determine requirements Ior removing public parking stalls
along 6th Street prior to the issuance oI permits Ior this site. Comply with the
recommendations oI the Parking and EnIorcement Division and the TraIIic Division.
SDR-56172 PR1-56112]
YK

Conditions Page Four

23. A 20-Ioot vertical clearance must be maintained above the surIace oI the Public Sewer
Easement adjacent to the north end oI this site and no permanent structures or vegetation
greater than 3 Ieet is allowed in the Public Sewer Easement. Alternatively, submit an
abandonment and relocation plan Ior the public sewer main and submit a Petition oI
Vacation request to vacate the public sewer easement. Prior to submittal oI construction
drawings Ior this site, contact the Sanitary Sewer Planning Section oI the Department oI
Public Works to determine an acceptable connection point to public sewer, and to determine
iI any downstream capacity improvements need to be constructed with this development.

24. Prior to the release oI a Final Map Ior recordation on this site, the property owner must
contact the Special Improvement District Section oI the Department oI Public Works (702-
229-2136) and sign a notarized aIIidavit acknowledging and agreeing to a per lot assessment
oI all lots that will be created through a Final Map Ior this site. The City shall prepare an
apportionment report Iollowing recordation oI the Final Map and this apportionment report
must be signed by the property owner prior to the release oI any building permits Ior this
site.

discuss Iire requirements Ior this site.

26. Submit an Encroachment Agreement Ior landscaping and private improvements, iI any, in
the 6th Street and Carson Avenue public rights- oI-way prior to this issuance oI permits Ior
these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy Ior the term oI the
Encroachment Agreement and add the City oI Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity on
this insurance policy. II requested by the City, the applicant shall remove property
encroaching in the public right- oI way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms oI
the City's Encroachment Agreement. The installation and maintenance oI all private
improvements in the public right oI way shall be the responsibility oI the adjacent property
owner(s) and shall be transIerred with the sale oI the property Ior the entire term oI the
Encroachment Agreement. Coordinate all requirements Ior the Encroachment Agreement
with the Land Development Section oI the Department oI Building and SaIety (229-4836).

27. Contact the City Engineer`s OIIice at 229-6272 to coordinate the development oI this
project with the 'Downtown Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements - 6th Street and the
'Downtown Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements -Carson projects and any other public
improvement projects adjacent to this site. Comply with the recommendations oI the City
Engineer.
SDR-56172 PR1-56112]
YK

Conditions Page Five

28. A TraIIic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department oI Public
Works prior to the issuance oI any building or grading permits, submittal oI any
construction drawings or the recordation oI a Map subdividing this site, whichever may
occur Iirst. Comply with the recommendations oI the approved TraIIic Impact Analysis
prior to occupancy oI the site. The TraIIic Impact Analysis shall also include a section
addressing Standard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and #234.3 to determine additional right-oI-
way requirements Ior bus turnouts adjacent to this site, iI any; dedicate all areas
recommended by the approved TraIIic Impact Analysis. All additional rights oI way
required by Standard Drawing #201.1 Ior exclusive right turn lanes and dual leIt turn lanes
shall be dedicated prior to or concurrent with the commencement oI on site development
activities unless speciIically noted as not required in the approved TraIIic Impact Analysis.
Phased compliance will be allowed iI recommended by the approved TraIIic Impact
Analysis. No recommendation oI the approved TraIIic Impact Analysis, nor compliance
therewith, shall be deemed to modiIy or eliminate any condition oI approval imposed by the
Planning Commission or the City Council on the development oI this site.

29. Meet with the Flood Control Section oI the Department oI Public Works Ior assistance with
establishing Iinished Iloor elevations and drainage paths Ior this site prior to submittal oI
construction plans, the issuance oI any building or grading permits or the submittal oI a map
Ior this site, whichever may occur Iirst. Provide and improve all drainage ways as
recommended.

SDR-56172 PR1-56112]
YK

`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review Ior a proposed 20-story, Mixed-Use
development consisting oI commercial, hotel and residential units on a portion oI 1.92 acres at
601 Fremont Street. The building will be constructed on the south side oI the lot, where a
surIace parking lot is currently located. It will Iront onto 6th Street and will receive a new
address once permits are obtained. Retail space will be located on the Iirst and second levels oI
the building, with residential units located on levels three through ten. The hotel lobby and
associated amenities is located on the eleventh level with the rooms on levels twelve through
twenty. The project is designed to meet all code requirements under the Downtown Centennial
Plan standards. StaII recommends approval oI the request. II denied, no building permits would
be issued Ior the project as proposed.

ISSUES

Provided landscape plans call Ior 24-inch box trees Ior the streetscape, where code
requires a minimum oI 36-inch box trees. A condition has been added to address this
issue.
An Aerial Encroachment Agreement Ior architectural embellishments is required. A
condition has been added to address this issue.


12/16/64
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0100-64) to C-2 (General
Commercial) on this property as part oI a larger request.
07/05/00
The City Council approved the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan and
Overlay. The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-11028) Ior a Mixed-Use
project at 601 East Fremont Street. The Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval. This approval expired without being exercised.
03/15/06
a proposed Mixed-Use development consisting oI two 35-story buildings with
25,000 square Ieet oI commercial, 163 hotel/condominium units and 464
residential units; and Waivers oI the Downtown Centennial Plan build-to line,
landscape and step back requirements on 1.92 acres at 601 Fremont Street. The
Planning Commission and staII recommended approval. This approval expired
without being exercised.
SDR-56172 PR1-56112]
YK


The Downtown Entertainment Overlay District Design Review Committee
(DEOD-DRC) approved a request Ior a Master Sign Plan and Exterior
Elevation Review (ARC-15449) Ior Iour proposed projecting signs and a wall
sign at a proposed Tavern-Limited Establishment, with waivers to allow Iour
projecting signs where two are allowed at 601 Fremont Street. StaII
recommended approval. This approval has expired.
09/20/06
The City Council approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-15037) Ior
a proposed Tavern-Limited Establishment at 601 Fremont Street. The Planning
09/05/07
The DEOD-DRC approved a request Ior a Master Sign Plan and Exterior
Elevation Review (ARC-23943) Ior one proposed projecting sign, two wall
signs and three canopy (wall) signs at a proposed Tavern-Limited
Establishment, with waivers to allow a projecting sign to exceed 32 square Ieet,
to allow a sign to encroach 12.5 Ieet into public right-oI-way where 8 Ieet is
allowed and to allow no neon and/or animation where 50 percent is required at
601 Fremont Street. StaII recommended approval. This approval has expired.
03/11/08
The DEOD-DRC approved a request Ior a Master Sign Plan and Exterior
Elevation Review (ARC-27073) Ior a proposed projecting marquee sign, two
electronic message units and border neon, at an approved Tavern-Limited
Establishment, with a waiver to allow projection oI 11.5 Ieet where 8 Ieet is
allowed at 601 Fremont Street. StaII recommended approval. This approval
has expired.
11/07/07
The City Council approved an Extension oI Time (EOT-24712) oI an approved
Special Use Permit (SUP-15037) Ior a proposed Tavern-Limited Establishment
at 601 Fremont Street. The Planning Department staII recommended approval.
10/07/09
The City Council approved an Extension oI Time (EOT-35796) oI an approved
Special Use Permit (SUP-15037) Ior a proposed Tavern-Limited Establishment
at 601 Fremont Street. The Planning Department staII recommended approval.
06/28/11
Department oI Planning staII administratively approved a Minor Amendment
(SUP-41937) oI a previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-15037) Ior the
addition oI 2,700 square Ieet oI Iloor area to a proposed 11,085 square-Ioot
Tavern-Limited Establishment at 601 Fremont Street.
11/15/11
The Downtown Design Review Committee (DDRC) approved a sign design
review (ARC-43659) Ior a projecting sign Ior an approved Tavern-Limited
Establishment at 601 Fremont Street. StaII recommended approval.
04/17/12
The DDRC approved a sign design review (ARC-44579) Ior a 441 square-Ioot
projecting marquee sign at an approved Tavern-Limited Establishment at 601
Fremont Street. StaII recommended approval.
11/13/12
The Department oI Planning approved a Minor Amendment to an approved
Sign Design Review (ARC-44579) to change the color, logo and lettering styles
on an approved projecting marquee sign at 601 Fremont Street.
SDR-56172 PR1-56112]
YK


12/05/12
The City Council approved an Encroachment request Ior private improvements
(signs) within the Fremont Street and Sixth Street rights-oI-way adjacent to 601
Fremont Street.


No building permits have been issued Ior this proposed project.

09/22/14
StaII met with the applicant on a proposed 20-story, Mixed-Use project with a
Vacation oI the adjacent alley. StaII spoke with the applicant and encouraged
them not to vacate the alley as there would be no beneIit Ior their project.
The applicant agreed. All Downtown Centennial Plan standards will be met.
There were no major issues noted with the proposal.


Field Check
10/06/14
StaII visited the site and Iound a Ienced parking lot on the south portion oI the
parcel and a three-story building on the north portion oI the parcel. The
property was secure and clean.

Site Area
Net Acres 1.92

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Use Designation
Subject Property
Tavern-Limited
Establishment
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
SDR-56172 PR1-56112]
YK

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Use Designation
Hotel
North
Gaming
Establishment, Non-
restricted
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
South
Multi-Family
Residential
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
General Retail Store
Hotel East
Parking Facility
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
Tavern-Limited
Establishments West
Restaurant
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)

Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District Y
Downtown Entertainment Overlay District Y
Live/Work Overlay District N/A
Trails Y


Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and the Downtown Centennial Plan, the following standards apply:
Min. Setbacks
Front
Side
Corner
Rear

70 aligned along
Property Line
0 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet

100 aligned along
Property Line
0 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet

Y
Y
Y
Y

SDR-56172 PR1-56112]
YK


Trash Enclosure
Screened, Gated, w/ a
RooI or Trellis
Enclosed in
Building
Y

Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Fremont Street Secondary Collector
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
80 Y
Sixth Street Secondary Collector
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
80 Y
Carson Avenue Secondary Collector
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
80 Y

Downtown Centennial Plan Streetscape Standards
Provide a 10-Ioot wide sidewalk A 10-Ioot wide sidewalk Y
Provide a Iive-Ioot wide amenity area
between back oI curb and sidewalk
A Iive-Ioot wide amenity area is
provided Irom back oI curb to the
sidewalk
Y
Provide 36-inch box trees 15-to-20 Ieet on
center in amenity area.
By Condition Y

Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Hotel 128
1/guest
room
128
108
1.2 spaces
per unit
130
Residential
18
1.75
spaces per
unit
32

SDR-56172 PR1-56112]
YK


Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
36
2 spaces
per unit
72

Guests
1 per
every 6
units
39

General
Commercial
84,942 SF
1 per 250
SF
340


171

Y *
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 726 15 165 6 Y *
*Projects located within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subject to the
automatic application oI parking requirements. However, the above table should be used to illustrate
the requirements oI an analogous project in another location in the City.

ANALYSIS

The subject property is zoned C-2 (General Commercial); however, development standards and
uses Ior the property are dictated by the Downtown Centennial Plan. The structure will generally
conIorm to the development standards listed in the Centennial Plan.

Title 19.06.060 exempts properties within the Downtown Centennial Plan area Irom the
automatic application oI Residential Adjacency Standards. The parcel is located approximately
1,950 Ieet Irom the nearest R-1 (Single Family Residential) property, which lies to the south oI
the subject site.

(FAA) be notiIied beIore the construction or alteration oI any building or structure greater than
200 Ieet in height ( 77.13(a)(1)) or that will exceed a slope oI 100:1 Ior a distance oI 20,000
Ieet Irom the nearest point oI any airport runway greater than 3,200 Ieet in length ( 77.13
(a)(2)(i)). Such notiIication allows the FAA to determine what impact, iI any, the proposed
development requires obstruction marking or lighting. Four conditions have been added to
address these concerns.
SDR-56172 PR1-56112]
YK


This site currently is developed with a building housing two active taverns on the north end oI
the site and a large surIace parking lot on the south end. The applicant proposes to construct a
Mixed-Use 20-story tower with 84,942 square Ieet oI commercial space, 128 hotel rooms and
162 residential units where the surIace parking lot is located. The buildings will not be
connected at this time.

The commercial space is shown at the ground and second Iloor levels, with parking shown on
three subterranean levels. The residential and hotel uses are shown on the 4th through 20
th

levels. Access to the site is provided by a pedestrian entrance on 6th Street and vehicle access
oII Carson Avenue.

The development calls Ior 741 parking spaces per Title 19 parking standards. However, projects
in the Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay can provide less iI warranted. The applicant is
proposing to provide 171 parking spaces with this project, with six spaces being dedicated Ior
handicap parking. No loading spaces are being provided, as the adjacent alley on the eastside oI
the building will accommodate this need. The applicant states in the justiIication letter that
additional public parking garages and nearby mass transit lines will provide adequate parking Ior
this urban downtown project.

The elevations depict a Iaade oI geometric design Iormed Irom perIorated metal panels and
recessed Igu glass. The color pallet reIlects blue and grey tones with some exposed concrete.
There are architectural elements that will require an Aerial Encroachment Agreement and a
condition has been added to address this issue.

The Clark County School District reports that the project will generate 42 students in the school
system. This will include 22 in elementary, 9 in middle and 10 in high school. Currently, the
local high school, Rancho High School is over capacity by 505 students. This project will
exacerbate this problem.




The proposed uses are compatible with other adjacent development in the area. While the
proposed structure will be taller than other buildings in the immediate vicinity, it is
consistent with other development that is proposed or underway in the downtown area.
SDR-56172 PR1-56112]
YK



The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, Title 19, and is generally
consistent with the Downtown Centennial Plan.


Fremont Street, 6th Street and Carson Avenue are Iully developed streets that will not be
negatively impacted by the proposed development.


The proposed building materials and landscape materials are appropriate Ior the area and
Ior the City.


The design oI the elevations is appropriate to the diIIerent Iunctions and unit types within
the building, and will be compatible with other development in the downtown area.

general welfare.

The project will be subject to inspections, and appropriate measures will be taken to
protect public health, saIety, and general welIare.


NOTICES MAILED 121

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0
2
0
'-
0
"

2
3
9
'-
6
"
1
0
'-
0
"
5
'-
0
"
1
4
3
'-
6
"
2
4
9
'-
6
"
3
9
9
'-
2
"

S
P
1
0
2
Sh
e
e
t N
o
.
Sh
e
e
t Title
:
P
ro
je
c
t Title
:
R
E
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
D
A
T
E

D
E
S
C
R
IP
T
IO
N
R
E
V
#

K
E
Y

P
L
A
N
D
ra
w
n
b
y
:
C
h
e
c
ke
d
b
y
:
D
a
te
:
Sc
a
le
:
LW
I P
ro
je
c
t N
o
:
L
A
N
G
D
O
N

W
I
L
S
O
N
I
N
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
1
0
5
5
W
IL
S
H
IR
E
B
L
V
D
, S
U
IT
E
1
5
0
0
,
L
O
S
A
N
G
E
L
E
S
, C
A
L
IF
O
R
N
IA
9
0
0
1
7
-2
4
4
9
1
-(2
1
3
) 2
5
0
-1
1
8
6
C
o
n
su
lta
n
t's Sta
m
p
:
0
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
4
C
o
n
su
lta
n
ts:
1
/1
6
" =
1
'-0
"
T
h
e

C
e
n
t
r
a
l

a
t
6
0
1

F
r
e
m
o
n
t
M
i
x
e
d

U
s
e

T
o
w
e
r
0
8'
16'
32'
S
I
T
E

P
L
A
N
Sh
e
e
t
N
o
.
D
ra
w
n
b
y
:
DDDDDDDDDD
aaaaaaaa
tttttttttteeeeeeee
::::::::
Sc
a
le
:
1
/1
6
"
=
1
'-0
"
16'
32'
1
0
/
0
8
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
6
1
1
2
S
D
R
-
5
6
1
7
2

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
School Development Tracking Form
Date Filed Application Number Entity
Company Name
Contact Name
Contact Mailing Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Mobile Fax Email
Project Name
Project Description
APN's
Approved Disapproved
Real Property Management
4190 McLeod Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89121
Single-Family Units (1) x 0.195 = x 0.102 = x 0.135 =
Multi-Family Units (2) x 0.135 = x 0.056 = x 0.062 =
Resort Condo Units (3)
http://ccsd.net/departments/real-property
Student Yield Elementary School Middle School High School
Total
(1) Single Family unit is defined as single family detached home, mobile home, and town homes.
(2) Multi-Family unit is defined as apartment, multiplexes, and condominiums.
(3) Resort Condominium units for tracking purposes only.
* To be completed by CCSD
Name
Schools Serving the Area*
Address Grade Capacity Enrollment Site Date
* CCSD Comments
10/01/2014 PRJ-56112 LV
The Central
The Central
601 Fremont
139-34-611-018
0 0 0
162
22 9 10
22 9
10
Hollingsworth ES 1776 E. Ogden Ave K-5 728 686 05/16/14
Fremont MS 6-8 1100 E. St. Louis Ave 1336 855 05/16/14
Rancho HS 1900 Searles Ave 9-12 2511 3016 05/16/14
Rancho HS was over capacity for the 2013-14 school year. Rancho is 28.2% over capacity for the
2014 projected enrollment. No new schools are planned for the area.
SDR-56172
SDR 56172
Carlos Adley
601 Fremont Street
Proposed mixed use development with 84.942 thousand square foot of retail development and 162 residential units.
RATE/#
UNIT TOTAL
APARTMENT [DWELL] 162
6.65 1,077
RATE/#
UNIT TOTAL
[1000 SF]
84.942
42.94 3,647
Total Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT
RATE/#
UNIT TOTAL
[1000 SF]
84.942
42.94 4,724
Fremont Street
Las Vegas Boulevard
6th Street
Carson Avenue
Fremont Street 16,300
Las Vegas Boulevard 34,500
6th Street 13,040
Carson Avenue 25,875
This project is expected to increase traffic by about 4,724 trips per day on Fremont St., Las Vegas Blvd., 6th St. & Carson
Ave. Currently, Fremont is at about 18 percent of capacity, Las Vegas is at about 67 percent of capacity, 6th is at about
20 percent of capacity and Carson is at about 13 percent of capacity. With this project, Fremont is expected to be at about
47 percent of capacity, Las Vegas to be at about 81 percent of capacity, 6th to be at about 56 percent of capacity and
Carson to be at about 31 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this project will add about 417 trips in the peak hour, or about seven every minute.
S
D
P
-
1
7
Z

[
P
P
J
-
1
1
Z
j

-

S
I
T
E

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N

P
E
V
I
E
W

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

C
A
P
L
O
S

A
D
L
E
Y

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

C
I
T
Y

O
F

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S

0
1

F
P
E
M
O
N
T

S
T
P
E
E
T

10/01/14
PRJ-56112
SDR-56172 - REVISED

J ustification Letter The Central
PRJ 56112 Mixed Use Tower 2
Issuc
The Central at 601 Fremont Project is comprised of a 20-Story Mixed Use Tower with additional 3-stories
of parking. The project aligns itself with the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plans Urban Design Goals
and more specifically with the Goals and Definition of the District 9 Fremont East District. This is
achieved by creating a diverse mix of uses on site which include Retail-Restaurant, Live-Music and
Entertainment Venue, Residential Live-Work, and Hotel Spaces. The 20-story tower will have a curated
retail and restaurant on the first three levels creating pedestrian opportunities to access the project
without going through a formal lobby space. The mix of living residents, working creative professionals,
and hotel guests coupled with the pedestrian level retail energy encourages a constant level of activity
on the site. The Central Tower has been designed to maximize the property and provide a
contemporary solution to living by providing all amenities needed on-site. A little bit of old will be
preserved with the new tower by keeping the former Sears Department store brick building intact and
allowing ground level connectivity to the new structure. The entrance of the project will be on 6
th
Street
between Carson and Fremont Streets. The Project is applying for a Site Development Plan and Special
Use Permit. The total number of parking spaces provided is 171 which primarily serves a residential and
hotel uses. The balance of the parking requirements for retail and event venues will be provided by
public parking and off-site valet services on vacant lots surrounding the site and other parking garages.
Public Mass Transit options are readily available for convenient access to the site.
Intoon
The project consists of a total of 730, 747 square feet of built up space with the following programmatic
areas:
3 - Levels of Retail
2 - Levels of Ballroom and Live Music Venue
10 - Levels of Live-Work Residential and Commercial 162 Units
5 - Levels of Hotel - 128 Keys
3 - Levels of Subterranean Parking -171 Parking spaces
The project will have the following operational and employment goals:
# ot Lp|oyccs]kcsdcns:
Employees: 100-125
Residential Unit Mix: 162 Units 1 Bed 108/2 Bed 18/3 Bed 36
212 Bedrooms
nous ot Cpcon
Retail: 7am-2am
Restaurants: 24 hours
Hotel: 24 Hours
Residential: Private Access 24 Hours
S| uscs opccd by pp|cn
Fremont Country Club and Backstage Bar and Billiards on 601 Fremont Site.
kcqucd Sc Lccnscs
Transient Lodging Establishment License
Site.
10/01/14
PRJ-56112
SDR-56172 - REVISED

Intoon (Connucd
Susnb|y (t pp|cb|c,- t ycs, p|csc cxp|n cs No
Will this project participate in the City of Las Vegas Green Building
Program?(Newly constructed buildings are eligible; find on the web at:
http://www.lasvegasnevada.gov/sustaininglasvegas/default.htm.)
cs s ncw|y consuccd bu|dng hs po[cc w|| to||ow LLLD
sndds nd pcpc n hc cncgy ccd nd cbc pog s
ou|ncd n hc Cy ot Ls Vcgs Gccn 8u|dng og .
k

Will this project be constructed to LEED or other equivalent standards?

cs hs po[cc w|| bc consuccd nu ot LLLD S|vc
Sndd.
k

Will this project utilize alternative energy sources or water savings

measures?(Examples: solar, wind, xeriscape)
cs hs po[cc w|| u|tc |cnvc cncgy souccs whcc possb|c
such s V pnc|s, wnd ubncs, nd xcscpc whccvc |ndscpc s
ncopocd.
k

Is there connectivity to adjacent parcels? (Automobile or pedestrian)

1hcc w|| bc soc tuuc connccvy to pcdcsns bcwccn hc
cxsng nd ncw bu|dng on sc s wc|| s hc d[ccn pcc|s.
k

Will the proposed project qualify as a walkable community (for

Residential and MixedUse projects only)?(Walkable communities allow
residents to access community amenities needed to conduct routine
activities of daily life within a mile.)
1hc 601 Icon sc qu|tcs s vcy w|kb|c c. 1hc csdcn|
uscs nd hc ddcd c| nd cncncn vcnucs w|| nccsc
pcdcsn cvy to hc Icon Scc cncncn codo.
Accodng o w|kscoc.co:
01 lrem os o wo/k cre f89 u f100. 1is /coi is very
wo/kob/e s ms errods co be occmp/ised f.
1is /coi is i e ww eiqbrd i Los veqos. Neorby
porks ic/ude Mork u Pork, nerioqe Pork od nuridqe circ/e
Pork.
Neorby sc/s ic/ude Los veqos 4codemy fleroio/ udies,
Perfrmiq od visuo/ 4rs, Los veqos 4codemy od lirs 6d
eperd Luero c/.

k

Will this project meet the intent of the Urban Forestry Initiative?
(Is there a landscapewaiver requested that will result in the loss of tree
canopy coverage?)
1hc po[cc w|| cc hc ncn ot hc ubn tocsy nvc by
ddng ccs nd cducng hc hc s|nd cttcc.
k
Is the project using any means of sustainable construction?
(Examples: Covered parking, light color palate, building orientation, etc.)
1hc po[cc w|| u|tc susnb|c consucon pcccs nd u|tc
|gh co|o p|cc, dccp cccsscd cxco w|| to xu shdng,
nd |ow voc c|s.
k
Will the project provide any bicycle parking?
cs hc po[cc w|| povdc bcyc|c pkng.
k
Will the project provide any electric vehicle recharging stations?
1hc po[cc w|| povdc S pkng to C|cn A Vchc|cs nd
pcccngc ot hosc pkng s||s w|| hvc c|ccc cchgng sons.
k
10/01/14
PRJ-56112
SDR-56172 - REVISED

Indngs
The proposed development fits the criteria for Site Development Plans, Special Use Determinations, and
Vacations. The project will comply as follows:
The use is harmonious with compatible with adjacent development in the area.
The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, The Design Standards
Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and the Downtown Centennial Plan.
Site access and circulation will not negatively impact the roadways and neighborhood traffic.
Building design and character is appropriate and consistent with the surrounding context.
All measures to make sure public safety and health are maintained have been taken in the
design of the project and will be ensured for the construction of the project as well.
The density will enhance the surrounding neighborhood with more pedestrian activity.
10/01/14
PRJ-56112
SDR-56172 - REVISED
CITY OF LAS VEGAS
PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL
RECOMMENDATIONS / COMMENTS
FROM: CLARK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION
APPLICATION NUMBERS: SDR-56172
PROJECT: 20-STORY MIXED-USE
LOCATION: 139-34-611-018
MEETING DATES: NOVEMBER 4, 2014 PLANNING COMMISSION &
DECEMBER 17, 2014 CITY COUNCIL
COMMENTS:
(FAA) be notified before the construction or alteration of any building or structure greater than
200 feet in height ( 77.13(a)(1)) or that will exceed a slope of 100:1 for a distance of 20,000
feet from the nearest point of any airport runway greater than 3,200 feet in length ( 77.13
(a)(2)(i)). Such notification allows the FAA to determine what impact, if any, the proposed
development requires obstruction marking or lighting.
The proposed development is greater than 200 feet in height. Therefore, as required by 14 CFR
Part 77, the FAA must be notified of the proposed construction or alteration. The CCDOA
requests that the City of Las Vegas impose the conditions listed below for the project:
x Applicant is required to file a valid FAA Form 7460-1, "Notice of Proposed Construction
or Alteration" with the FAA, in accordance with 14 CFR Part 77, or submit to the Clark
County Director of Aviation a Property Owners Shielding Determination Statement
and request written concurrence from the Clark County Department of Aviation;
x No Building Permit or other construction permit shall be issued for any structure greater
than 35 feet above the surface of land that, based upon the FAAs 7460 airspace
determination (the outcome of filing the FAA Form 7460-1) would (a) constitute a hazard
to air navigation, (b) would result in an increase to minimum flight altitudes during any
phase of flight (unless approved by the Department of Aviation), or (c) would otherwise
be determined to pose a significant adverse impact on airport or aircraft operations.
x Applicant is advised that FAAs airspace determinations are dependent on petitions by
any interested party and the height that will not present a hazard as determined by the
FAA may change based on these comments.
x Applicant is advised that the FAAs airspace determinations include expiration dates and
that the separate airspace determinations will be needed for construction cranes or other

Agenda tem No.: 38.


SUB1ECT:
DIR-56334 - DIRECTORS BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY
OF LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request to approve the 2015 Planning Commission
Meeting schedule. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

P.C.: FINAL ACTION


RECOMMENDATION:

1. DRAFT 2015 Planning Commission Meeting Schedule

* GPA CYCLES
DRAFTED 09.30.14

2015
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULE
[A Pre-Application Conference shall take place before the Application Closing Day]

AppIication
CIosing Day
PIanning Commission
Meeting Date
NOVEMBER 26, 2014 JANUARY 13, 2015*
DECEMBER 24, 2014 FEBRUARY 10, 2015
JANUARY 22, 2015 MARCH 10, 2015
FEBRUARY 26, 2015 APRL 14, 2015*
MARCH 26, 2015 MAY 12, 2015
APRL 23, 2015 JUNE 9, 2015
MAY 28, 2015 JULY 14, 2015*
JUNE 25, 2015 AUGUST 11, 2015
JULY 23, 2015 SEPTEMBER 8, 2015
AUGUST 27, 2015 OCTOBER 13, 2015*
SEPTEMBER 17, 2015 NOVEMBER 3, 2015
OCTOBER 22, 2015 DECEMBER 8, 2015
NOVEMBER 25, 2015 JANUARY 12, 2016*
DECEMBER 31, 2015 FEBRUARY 9, 2016

AppIications MUST BE submitted by 4:00 P.M. on CLOSING DAYS
AppIications WILL BE accepted untiI 5:00 P.M. on NON-CLOSING DAYS
CaII (702) 229-6301 for additionaI information

D E P A R T M E N T O F P L A N N I N G

Agenda tem No.: 39.


SUB1ECT:
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE
AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAY BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS SCHEDULED
FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE
YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE
SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS
ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

11.04.14 PC Packet

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

11.04.14 PC Packet

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Planning Commission November 4, 2014 - Page 1

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

To City Of Las Vegas Planning Division

Thank you very much for your consideration.

To whom it may concern:

We appreciate your consideration in this process.

3 2 ' - 9 " 1 6 4 ' - 4 "

City of Las Vegas

Re: Shared Parking Analysis for Symphony Park Parcel L

The Symphony Park Parcel L development is a proposed shared use development

Figure 1: Parking Required

Figure 2: Shared Parking Calculations

Weekday Free Spaces

Weekend Free Spaces

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments.

Landon Christopherson, P.E.

September 24, 2014

Mr. Michael Saltzman,

RE: Symphony Park Design Review Committee Design Development review of

Dear Mr. Saltzman,

The Design Development submittal is preliminarily APPROVED subject to the

Conditions Required for Final Design Development Approval:

5. A revised parking justification letter, to be approved by the Planning Department, that

Drawing Review Comments: to be incorporated (drawings dated September 15,

1. Site/Grading Plans 1 & 2:

d. In the Grading Construction Notes, note 6 refers to a standard Clark County

sidewalks will vary

2. Level 1 Floor Plan (FP001):

a. Pedestrians at the south end of the handicap parking, as well as parking

3. Level 2 Floor Plan (FP002):

4. South Elevation (EV003):

5. West Elevation (EV004):

a. Approved subject to comment 3a above and revised canopy heights mentioned

6. Landscape Plan (LP001):

g. On general or detailed landscape plans the required continuous tree trenches

7. Details- Site (DT001):

a. Detail 1 is generally acceptable in concept to the SP-DRC, however the sidewalk

Scott Carter, Chairman

cc. Courtney Mooney, City of Las Vegas Department of Planning

City of Las Vegas

RE: Symphony Park Parcel L Site Development Plan Review

To Whom It May Concern:

The proposed set backs are as follows:

Rear 0 where 0 is permitted

Using The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) has released the 4

We respectfully request the consideration of the following waivers:

September 30, 2014

Barton T. Anderson, P.E.

To whom it may concern:

Re: CLV Project Number: PRJ - 56036

City of Las Vegas Planning Commission,

1771 E Flamingo Road

City of Las Vegas

Regarding: Justification Letter for Pre-Application Conference

Miller Architectural Corporation

Will this project be constructed to LEED or other equivalent standards?

Will this project utilize alternative energy sources or water savings

Is there connectivity to adjacent parcels? (Automobile or pedestrian)

Will the proposed project qualify as a walkable community (for

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen