Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.

: 21948-2012

Christopher-Earl: Strunks Affidavit in support of Note of Issue Page 1 of 3
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS Index No.: 21948 / 2012
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x

Christopher-Earl : Strunk in esse Filed November 14, 2012
593 Vanderbilt Avenue 281 Brooklyn New York 11238

Petitioner,

-against-

Hakeem Jeffries , Grace Meng, Felix Ortiz, Bill DeBlasio, PETITIONERS
Walter Cooper, Keith L.T. Wright, Christine C. Quinn,
William Thompson, Scott Stringer, Emily Giske, AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF
Anne Marie Anzalone, Archie Spigner, George Gresham,
Ruben Diaz, Jr.; Ken Jenkins; Mario Cilento; NOTE OF ISSUE WITH
Gerald D. Jennings; Byron Brown ; Robert Duffy;
Joseph Morelle; Scott Adams ; Stephanie Miner; Steve Bellone; CERTIFICATE OF READINESS
Irene Stein; Sheila Comar; and Kirsten Gillibrand
FOR TRIAL OF ISSUES AND
Respondents.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------x FOR PARTIAL SEVERANCE

STATE OF NEW YORK )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KINGS )

Accordingly, I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:

To: Hon. David I. Schmidt J .S.C. Part 1,
Hon. Arthur M. Schack J .S.C. Part 27,

1. This is Petitioners affidavit in support of his note of issue and certificate of readiness by CPLR 3402
for a trial of issues by December 14, 2012 with partial severance for the benefit of captioned Respondent
electors of the New York State Legislatures Electoral College and members of Congress before the deadline
to vote by December 17, 2012, and after J anuary 3, 2013 for candidates for the office of President of the
United States, and that whether by casting a vote for Barack Obama each may be charged with the crime of
accessory after the fact of a felony committed on or about 25 April 2011 by persons as yet named, aided and
abetted by White House Counsel Bob Bauer, White House Press Secretary J ay Carney and Barack Obama who
during the 27 April 2012 White House Press Conference, see the transcript evidence herein (seeExhibit 1),
expressly presented a forged instrument to the People of the United States, a crime compounded by spoliation,
concealment, perjury, tampering with the public record, intimidation of witnesses and other crimes.
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012

Christopher-Earl: Strunks Affidavit in support of Note of Issue Page 2 of 3
TRIAL OF THE FACTS
2. That Petitioner requires a trial of the facts of a crime before December 17, 2012 essential for the
proper execution of the Electoral College vote, say on December 13, 2012, and at which Petitioner will bring
only one expert witness for testimony by Typographer Graphics Expert Paul Edward Irey from Delray Beach
Florida to testify solely as to the nature of the forgery referenced above without determination of who the
perpetrators are per se, as that is a criminal matter for authorities with jurisdiction.
3. That expert testimony by Paul Edward Irey is based upon the Affidavit with Exhibits A through D
affirmed December 4, 2012, and herewith (see Exhibit 2) that is res ipso loquitur.
4. Petitioner contends that the body of the crime complained of has been brought to the attention of
Respondents and various district attorneys with authority and jurisdiction to further investigate, and that the
testimony deals with the fact that in 1961, well before computers or such other technologies that may be in use
today, that ANY birth certificate paperwork was done either by hand and or on forms designed for use with the
mechanical typewriter technology that was then widely used, rendering a forgery detectible; and that testimony
presents the proof of forgery in the context of then mechanical technology in use, and also to prove the forged
instrument is of current manufacturer, that the forgers use of the Unsharp Mask software by Adobe to create a
Halo around lettering thus also sets the chain of custody of the forgery along with where it was manufactured.
5. That Respondent public officers as if Elector Public Officers and private US Citizens have duty as to
matters of law and facts and when in violation of law must be held accountable or would infringe the trust due
the People of New York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom
and Liberty, any elelctor who would commit a crimne by adiding and abbetting a felony is incompatibkle. as to
New York State law as applies to the public officer oath, duties and obligation with use of NYS Civil Service
Law 105A and is to be barred as a person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States.
6. That it is a well-settled common law rule that a public officer cannot hold two incompatible offices
simultaneously (Matter of Smith v Dillon, 267 App. Div. 39, 43 [1943]). This rule seeks to prevent offices of
public trust from accumulating in a single individual. Two offices are incompatible if one is subordinate to the
other or there is an inherent inconsistency between the two offices (see People ex rel. Ryan v Green, 58 NY



































Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012


Christopher-Earl: Strunks AFFIDAVIT in support of Note of Issue


Exhibit 1
Get Email Updates Contact Us
Home Briefing Room Press Briefings Search WhiteHouse.gov
For Immediate Release April 27, 2011
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011
James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
8:48 A.M. EDT
MR. CARNEY: Good morning, everybody. You can read the paperwork we just handed out in a minute. Let me
just get started. Thank you for coming this morning. I have with me today Dan Pfeiffer, the Presidents Director of
Communications, as well as Bob Bauer, the Presidents White House Counsel, who will have a few things to say
about the documents we handed to you today. And then we'll take your questions. I remind you this is off camera
and only pen and pad, not for audio. And I give you Dan Pfeiffer.
MR. PFEIFFER: Thanks, Jay. What you have in front of you now is a packet of papers that includes the
Presidents long-formbirth certificate fromthe state of Hawaii, the original birth certificate that the President
requested and we posted online in 2008, and then the correspondence between the Presidents counsel and the
Hawaii State Department of Health that led to the release of those documents.
If you would just give me a minute to -- indulge me a second to walk through a little of the history here, since all
of you weren't around in 2008 when we originally released the Presidents birth certificate, I will do that. And then
Bob Bauer will walk through the timeline of how we acquired these documents.
In 2008, in response to media inquiries, the Presidents campaign requested his birth certificate fromthe state of
BLOG POSTS ON THI S I SSUE
March 11, 2012 8:04 PMEDT
Call with President Karzai Following the
Report of Afghan Civilian Casualties
President Obama reached
out to President Karzai
Sunday following the
reported killing and
sounding of Afghan
civilians.
March 11, 2012 9:00 AMEDT
From the Archives: Tsunami in Japan
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne...
1 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM
Hawaii. We received that document; we posted it on the website. That document was then inspected by
independent fact checkers, who came to the campaign headquarters and inspected the document -- independent
fact checkers did, and declared that it was proof positive that the President was born in Hawaii.
To be clear, the document we presented on the Presidents website in 2008 is his birth certificate. It is the piece
of paper that every Hawaiian receives when they contact the state to request a birth certificate. It is the birth
certificate they take to the Department of Motor Vehicles to get their drivers license and that they take to the federal
government to get their passport. It is the legally recognized document.
That essentially -- for those of you who followed the campaign closely know that solved the issue. We didnt
spend any time talking about this after that. There may have been some very fringe discussion out there, but as a
campaign issue it was settled and it was --
Q When you posted this did you post the other side of it where the signature is?
MR. PFEIFFER: Yes.
Q Because it is not here and that's been an issue.
MR. PFEIFFER: We posted both sides and when it was looked at it was looked at by -- the fact checkers came
to headquarters and actually examined the document we had.
That settled the issue. In recent weeks, the issue has risen again as some folks have begun raising a question
about the original -- about the long-formbirth certificate you now have in front of you. And Bob will explain why --
the extraordinary steps we had to take to receive that and the legal restraints that are in place there.
But it became an issue again. And it went to -- essentially the discussion transcended fromthe nether regions of
the Internet into mainstreampolitical debate in this country. It became something that when both Republicans and
Democrats were talking to the media they were asked about. It was a constant discussion on mainstreamnews
organizations. And the President believed that it was becoming a distraction fromthe major issues we're having in
this country.
And he was particularly struck by the fact that right after the Republicans released their budget framework and
the President released his, we were prepared to have a very important, very vigorous debate in this country about
the future of the country, the direction were going to take, how were doing to deal with very important issues like
education, Medicare, how were going to deal with taxes in this country. And that should -- thats the debate we
should be having yet.
Facebook
Twitter
Flickr
Google+
YouTube
Vimeo
iTunes
LinkedIn
Alook back at the U.S. response to the devastating
earthquake and tsunami that hit Japan in March of
2011.
March 10, 2012 6:30 AMEDT
Weekly Address: Investing in a Clean
Energy Future
Speaking froma factory in Virginia, President
Obama talks about how companies are creating
more jobs in the United States, making better
products than ever before, and how many are
developing new technologies that are reducing our
dependence on foreign oil and saving families
money at the pump.
VIEWALL RELATED BLOG POSTS
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne...
2 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM
What was really dominating a lot of discussion was this fake controversy, essentially, a sideshow, that was
distracting fromthis real issue. And an example of that would be when major Democrats and Republicans went onto
mainstreamnews organizations to talk about their budget plans -- including the President -- they were asked about
this. They were asked about what they thought about the controversy. They were asked if they believed the
President was born in the United States. And it was really a distraction.
That really struck the President, led himto ask his counsel to look into whether we could ask the state of Hawaii
to release the long-formcertificate, which is not something they generally do. And he did that despite the fact that it
probably was not in his long-term-- it would have been in his -- probably in his long-termpolitical interests to allow
this birther debate to dominate discussion in the Republican Party for months to come. But he thought even though
it might have been good politics, he thought it was bad for the country. And so he asked counsel to look into this.
And now Ill have Bob explain that, and then well take your questions.
MR. CARNEY: I just want to -- sorry, I meant to mention at the top, as some of you may have seen, the
President will be coming to the briefing roomat 9:45 a.m., making a brief statement about this -- not taking
questions, but just wanted to let you know.
MR. PFEIFFER: And he will use this as an opportunity to make a larger point about what this debate says about
our politics.
Go ahead, Bob.
MR. BAUER: Early last week the decision was made to review the legal basis for seeking a waiver fromthe
longstanding prohibition in the state Department of Health on releasing the long-formbirth certificate. And so we
undertook a legal analysis and determined a waiver request could be made that we had the grounds upon which to
make that request.
And by Thursday of last week, I spoke to private counsel to the President and asked her to contact the State
Department of Health and to have a conversation about any requirements, further requirements, that they thought
we had to satisfy to lodge that waiver request. She had that conversation with the state Department of Health on
Thursday -- counsel in question is Judy Corley at the law firmof Perkins Coie, and you have a copy of the letter she
subsequently sent to the department with the Presidents written request.
The department outlined the requirements for the President to make this request. He signed a letter making that
request on Friday afternoon upon returning fromthe West Coast. And private counsel forwarded his written request
-- written, signed request -- along with a letter fromcounsel, to the state Department of Health on Friday.
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne...
3 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM
The department, as I understood it, after reviewing the law and reviewing the grounds asserted in the request,
came to the conclusion that a waiver could be appropriately granted. We were advised that the long-formbirth
certificate could be copied and made available to us as early as Monday, April 25th -- the day before yesterday. And
we made arrangements for counsel to travel to Honolulu to pick it up and it was returned to the White House
yesterday afternoon.
Let me emphasize again, there is a specific statute that governs access to and inspection of vital records in the
state of Hawaii. The birth certificate that we posted online is, in fact, and always has been, and remains, the legal
birth certificate of the President that would be used for all legal purposes that any resident of Hawaii would want to
use a birth certificate for.
However, there is legal authority in the department to make exceptions to the general policy on not releasing the
long-formbirth certificate. The policy in question, by the way, on non-release has been in effect since the
mid-1980s, I understand. So while I cannot tell you what the entire history of exceptions has been, it is a limited
one. This is one of very few that I understand have been granted for the reasons set out in private counsels letter.
MR. PFEIFFER: We'll be happy to take some questions.
Q I guess I just want to make sure that were clear on this. Even though this one says certificate of live birth
on here, this is different than the other certificate of live birth that weve seen?
MR. PFEIFFER: Yes. The second page there is the one that was posted on the Internet.
Q Okay.
MR. PFEIFFER: And that is a copy of the one that has been kept at the Hawaii Department of Health.
Q Okay. And this is the one that would be referred to -- that people have been asking for that is the birth
certificate?
MR. PFEIFFER: They are both -- the second one is the birth certificate. The one on the top is what is referred
to as the long-formbirth certificate. As you can see -- and Bob can walk you through it -- it contains some additional
information that is not on the second page, which was the birth certificate which was released during the campaign.
If you could just explain the difference.
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne...
4 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM
MR. BAUER: Theres a difference between a certificate and a certification. The certification is simply a
verification of certain information thats in the original birth certificate. The birth certificate, as you can see, has
signatures at the bottomfromthe attending physician, the local registrar, who essentially oversees the maintenance
of the records. It contains some additional information also -- that is to say, the original birth certificate -- it contains
some additional information like the ages of the parents, birthplaces, residence, street address, the name of the
hospital.
The core information thats required for legal purposes and that is put into the actual certification thats a
computer-generated document, which we posted in 2008, that information is abstracted, if you will, fromthe original
birth certificate, put into the computerized short-formcertification, and made available to Hawaiian residents at their
request.
So the long form, which is a certificate, has more information, but the short formhas the information thats legally
sufficient for all the relevant purposes.
Q This first one has never been released publicly, correct?
MR. BAUER: Thats correct. It is in a bound volume in the records at the state Department of Health in Hawaii.
Q Bob, can you explain why President Obama let this drag on for four years? Was it Donald Trump that
prompted you to issue this?
MR. BAUER: Ill let Dan --
MR. PFEIFFER: Sure.
Q I know you expected that question, right? (Laughter.)
MR. PFEIFFER: He even said you would be the one who would ask it. (Laughter.)
I dont think this dragged on for four years because this was a resolved -- for those of you who remember the
campaign, this issue was resolved in 2008. And it has not been an issue, none of you have asked about it, called
about it, reported on it until the last few weeks.
And as I said earlier, it probably would have been -- a lot of the pundits out there have talked about the fact that
this whole birther debate has been really bad for the Republican Party and would probably be good for the
President politically. But despite that, the President, as I said, was struck by how this was crowding out the debate,
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne...
5 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM
particularly around the budget, on important issues, and was an example of the sort of sideshows that our politics
focuses on instead of the real challenges that we have to confront as a country.
And so thats why he made this decision now, because it became an issue that transcended sort of this -- it
essentially was something that was talked about, as I said, fromthe nether regions of the Internet onto mainstream
network newscasts. In fact, Jay has been asked about this just yesterday in this room.
Q So I guess the implication is that you did get political advantage by having not released this until today, over
the course of the last four years?
MR. PFEIFFER: There has been -- no one that I can recall actually asked us to -- we were asked to release the
Presidents birth certificate in 2008. We did that. And then no one -- it never -- up until a few weeks ago, there was
never an issue about that that wasnt the birth certificate fromany credible individual or media outlet. And it hasnt
been until -- I mean, Jay was asked about this yesterday --
Q When you say that, you mean certification -- you released the certification?
MR. PFEIFFER: When any Hawaiian wants -- requests their birth certificate because they want to get a drivers
license, they want to get a passport, they do exactly what the President did in 2008. And thats what that is. And we
released that. And thats what any Hawaiian would do to release their birth certificate. And that was good enough
for everyone until very recently this became a question again. And so the President made this decision. Hell talk to
you more about his thinking on that.
Q And this is going to sound -- I mean, you can just anticipate what people are going to -- remain
unconvinced. Theyre going to say that this is just a photocopy of a piece of paper, you could have typed anything
in there. Will the actual certificate be on display or viewable at any -- (laughter.)
Q Will the President be holding it?
MR. PFEIFFER: He will not, and I will not leave it here for himto do so. But it will -- the State Department of
Health in Hawaii will obviously attest that that is a -- what they have on file. As Bob said, its in a book in Hawaii.
MR. BAUER: And youll see the letter fromthe director of the Health Department that states that she oversaw
the copy and is attesting to --
Q But do you understand that this could quiet the conspiracy theorists?
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne...
6 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM
MR. PFEIFFER: There will always be some selection of people who will believe something, and that's not the
issue. The issue is that this is not a discussion that is just happening among conspiracy theorists. Its happening
here in this room; its happening on all of the networks. And its something that, as I said, every major political figure
of both parties whos actually out trying to talk about real issues is asked about this by the media. And so the
President decided to release this. And I'll leave it to others to decide whether theres still -- there will be some who
still have a different -- have a conspiracy about this.
Q Youve got two certified copies, according to this study. You have these physical --
MR. PFEIFFER: Yes. I showed you one. Just one.
Q You showed us a photocopy of one.
MR. PFEIFFER: No, I showed you --
Q Does that have a stamp?
MR. PFEIFFER: It has a seal on it.
Q Why does this rise to the level of a presidential statement?
MR. PFEIFFER: The President -- this in itself -- when you hear the President I think youll understand the point
hes making. That will be in not too long.
Q Did the President change his own mind about this? In other words, was he advocating during the campaign
lets just put it out there and get it over with, or was this an internal shift in thinking based -- in other words, was it
the President who steadfastly during the campaign said this is ridiculous, I don't want to give this any more ground,
and has now changed his mind? Or is this the --
MR. PFEIFFER: Lets be very clear. You were there for the campaign. There was never a question about the
original birth certificate during the campaign. It was a settled issue. I was there for the original decision to release
the birth certificate. I was there when we posted it online. I'mnot sure I even knew there was an original one that
was different than the one we posted online because it wasnt an issue. So it wasnt like -- lets be very clear. We
were asked for the Presidents birth certificate in 2008; we released the Presidents birth certificate; and it was
done. That was it.
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne...
7 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM
And so there hasnt been a discussion about this other document for years. Its only been in the last few weeks.
And so to your second question, the President decided to do this and he'll talk about this when he gets here --
decided to do it at the timeline that Bob laid out because it was a -- this was a sideshow that was distracting from
the real challenges that we're facing.
Its not just a sideshow for him; its a sideshow for our entire politics that have become focused on this.
Q Not to give Donald Trump more publicity than he has, but is he the person who sort of -- sort of that bridge
between what you're calling a fringe and the mainstream? Do you think that hes the reason why this tripped the
switch to a level where you now have to deal with something you thought was dealt with?
MR. PFEIFFER: Its not for me to say why mainstreammedia organizations began to cover this debate. Theyll
have to answer that for themselves.
Q How concerned were you about running against Donald Trump in a general election?
MR. PFEIFFER: I'd refer any questions on the election to the campaign.
Q Can you address the reports of Petraeus to the CIAand DOD --
MR. PFEIFFER: You get points for that, Carol. (Laughter.)
MR. CARNEY: Yes. I don't have -- but youll be disappointed to learn that I don't have a personnel
announcement for you. The President will be addressing this -- questions about personnel tomorrow.
Q Dan, was there a debate about whether or not this deserved being discussed by the White House, whether
or not -- and I'mgoing back to the birth certificate. I lose points, I understand. But was there debate about whether
or not this was worthy of the White House?
MR. PFEIFFER: The point I'd make is that we weren't the ones who -- we're not the first ones to bring this up in
this room. Jay has been asked questions about this; the President has been asked about it in media interviews.
And so that wasnt a decision that we made, and the President made the decision to do this and he made the
decision to -- and when he comes down here this morning he'll talk to you about why he thinks theres an important
point to be made here.
Q Getting back to the personnel announcements, does the President understand that these announcements
have been made and sourced satisfactorily for most news organizations before he speaks up and hes not letting his
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne...
8 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM
White House corroborate?
MR. CARNEY: I don't have a comment on that for you, Bill. (Laughter.)
Q I mean, this is such BS. Its all out there and you guys are -- okay, the President is going to talk about this
tomorrow so we can't say anything.
MR. CARNEY: Bill, you're free to make phone calls everywhere you can. I'mjust saying that we don't have a
personnel announcement for you today.
Q And he'll tomorrow, he'll cover all the aforementioned switches?
MR. CARNEY: We'll have a personnel announcement tomorrow.
Q Jay, yesterday you talked about failsafe triggers as sort of a positive alternative to spending cuts. I'm
wondering if the White House has any openness to including that, because its a White House proposal, including
that in any legislation that would raise the debt ceiling limit.
MR. CARNEY: Well, what we've said very clearly, and I think Secretary Geithner said it eloquently yesterday, it
is a dangerous, risky idea to hold hostage any other -- hold hostage, rather, raising the debt ceiling, a vote on
raising the debt ceiling, to any other piece of legislation. The commitment this President has to moving aggressively
towards a comprehensive deficit reduction plan is clear. It will be clear again when the Vice President convenes a
meeting, bipartisan, bicameral meeting, next week. And he hopes that progress will be made on that very quickly.
In terms of negotiating what that would look like, I think the negotiators should do that, led by the Vice President,
Republicans and Democrats together. But again, explicitly linking or holding hostage the absolute necessity of
raising the debt ceiling to any other piece of legislation and declaring that we'll tank the U.S. economy and perhaps
the global economy if we don't get this specific thing that we want, I think is a dangerous and unprecedented thing to
do.
And we're confident, remain confident, that the leaders of both parties in Congress, as well as the President, will
agree with the President, as I have said many times, that we do not have an alternative to raising the debt ceiling
because, as many have said, outside observers, economists and businessmen and women, the impact of that would
be calamitous at best.
Q So even though its your own proposal that you guys endorsed you don't want to see it as part of the final
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne...
9 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM
package?
MR. CARNEY: I'mnot negotiating individual pieces of a package that we hope Republicans and Democrats can
come together around fromthis podium. But again, we believe its essential to -- the President believes -- that's one
of the reasons why we're doing this right now -- we believe that these are big debates that need to be had. They
can be contentious, argumentative, serious, comprehensive, detailed, because theyre important; theyre all about
Americas future. And theyre about visions of this country and where we're going that need to be debated. And this
debate was being crowded out in many ways by a sideshow.
And he looks forward to having a debate on the real issues that Americans want us to talk about -- long-term
economic plans, deficit reduction, investments in the kinds of things that will help this economy grow and create
jobs, dealing with our energy needs, a long-termenergy plan. These are all issues that have been sidetracked at
least in the public debate by some of the issues that we're talking about this morning.
Q Is there a concern that more and more people were actually starting to believe its sideshow -- I mean,
people have been asking about --
MR. CARNEY: I will let the President speak for himself, but what Dan was saying and I think is important is that
the issue here is that the President feels that this was bad for the country; that its not healthy for our political
debate, when we have so many important issues that Americans care about, that affect their lives, to be drawn into
sideshows about fallacies that have been disproven with the full weight of a legal document for several years.
So, again, as Dan said, and a lot of political pundits have said, you could say that it would be good politics,
smart politics, for the President to let this play out. He cares more about whats good for the country. He wants the
debate on the issues. He wants the focus on the issues that Americans care about.
Q Jay, the President yesterday said that he had been talking to oil exporters about increasing output. Who
specifically has he been talking --
MR. CARNEY: Well, I said -- I want to clarify. I said several times I believe fromthis podiumwhen asked
questions about our overall handling of the issue of high gas prices that we've had conversations with oil-producing
states and allies and those conversations continue. I don't have specific the President spoke with this leader or
other government officials spoke with others, but those are ongoing conversations that, of course, we would be
having in a situation like this.
Q Do you guys have any comment on the NATO soldiers that were killed in Afghanistan and any confirmation
on whether there were Americans?
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne...
10 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM
MR. CARNEY: I don't have anything for you on that this morning.
Q Just quickly, back on the birth certificate, yesterday you said this was a settled issue. So --
MR. CARNEY: Well, as Dan said, again, it has been a settled issue.
MR. PFEIFFER: Froma factual point of view, its absolutely a settled issue. But the fact that it was a settled
issue did not keep it frombecoming a major part of the political discussion in this town for the last several weeks
here. So theres absolutely no question that what the President released in 2008 was his birth certificate and
answered that question, and many of your organizations have done excellent reporting which proved that to be the
case. But it continued; the President thought it was a sideshow and chose to take this step today for the reasons
Bob laid out.
Q Aside fromthe policy distractions that was presented, did you have some concern because it was sort of
reaching back into the mainstreamnews coverage that this could become a factor in the 2012 election with centrist
voters?
MR. PFEIFFER: No.
Q Just to clarify what this document is --
MR. PFEIFFER: This is the -- the letter first and the two certified copies -- this is one of those. This is the same
thing you have a copy of as the first page of your packet.
Q How did it get here?
MR. PFEIFFER: As Bob said, it arrived by plane -- the Presidents personal counsel went to Hawaii and brought
it back and we got it last night.
Q Last night?
MR. PFEIFFER: Last night.
Q What time?
MR. PFEIFFER: Between 4:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m.
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne...
11 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM
Q When did you decide to do this gaggle?
MR. PFEIFFER: Whats that?
Q When was this gaggle put on -- when was this planned?
MR. PFEIFFER: Whatever time you received your guidance suggesting that it would be this time tomorrow
morning.
Q Are these letters supposed to demonstrate the legal steps that were involved in releasing it to the White
House counsel?
MR. BAUER: The letters that you have, the personal request fromthe President, along with the accompanying
letter fromprivate counsel, is merely meant to document the legal path to getting the waiver of that policy so we
could get the long-formcertificate.
Q The waiver of Hawaii state government policy?
MR. BAUER: Right. The non-release of the long-formcertificate, which has been in effect since the 1980s -- a
natural question would have been, well, what did you do to obtain the waiver, and those letters represent the
request.
Q Well, isnt it true that anybody who was born in Hawaii can write this letter? I mean, that's all there is to the
waiver process?
MR. BAUER: No. Let me just explain once again because I also noticed, by the way, in one report already the
wrong certificate was actually posted on the website. The certificate with the signatures at the bottom-- and that's a
key difference between the short formand the long form-- the long formhas signatures at the bottomfromthe
attending physician, the local registrar, and the mother, is the original birth certificate, which sits in a bound volume
in the State Department of Health.
The short fromis a computerized abstract, and that's the legal birth certificate we requested in 2008 and that
Hawaiians are entitled to. Since the mid-1980s, the State Department of Health, for administrative reasons, only
provides to people who request their birth certificate the short form. They do not provide the long form.
So in order for us to obtain the long form, we had to have a waiver. We had to actually determine that there was
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne...
12 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM
a legal basis for providing it, and then ask themto exercise their authority to provide us with the long form. The
steps required to accomplish that were a letter fromthe person with the direct and vital interest -- the President -- so
you have a letter fromthe President, and then there was an accompanying letter fromcounsel basically formalizing
the request. So the reason we included that is that those were legal steps we took to obtain the long formby way of
this waiver.
Q Do we have the letter fromthe President --
MR. BAUER: Its in the packet.
Q And you went to Hawaii?
MR. BAUER: I did not go to Hawaii. The counsel, Judy Corley, who signed the -- the Presidents personal
counsel at Perkins Coie, Judy Corley, whose letter -- signed letter of request is in your packet, traveled to Honolulu
and picked up the birth certificate.
Q Aquestion on the situation regarding the Defense of Marriage Act. Yesterday Attorney General Eric Holder
rejected attacks on Paul Clement, who is taking up defense of the statute on behalf of the U.S. House. Paul
Clement has taken a lot of heat fromthe LGBT community for volunteering to take up defense of DOMA. Eric
Holder said, Paul Clement is a great lawyer and has done a lot of really great things for this nation. In taking on the
representation -- representing Congress in connection with DOMA, I think he is doing that which lawyers do when
were at our best. That criticismI think was very misplaced. And Holder went on to compare the criticismof
Clement to attacks on the Justice Department lawyers for their past for detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Does the
President share Eric Holders views on this?
MR. CARNEY: We do share Eric Holders views on this. We think -- as we said fromthe beginning when we
talked about -- when I did fromthis podium-- about the decision no longer fromthe administration to defend the
Defense of Marriage Act, that we would support efforts by Congress if they so chose to defend it. And so I have
nothing to add to the Attorney Generals comments.
Q Following Mondays Af-Pak Situation Roommeeting, what is the Presidents assessment of the situation in
Afghanistan and Pakistan? And does he think that July drawdown is still on?
MR. CARNEY: The Presidents policy, which included the beginning of a transition -- beginning of a drawdown
of American troops, is absolutely still on track. I dont have anything additionally fromthe meeting yesterday beyond
what weve said. But the policy remains as it was.
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne...
13 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM
MR. EARNEST: Jay, we should wrap it up here.
MR. CARNEY: Yes. Last one, yes.
Q Given the comments of the Pakistani official quoted in the Wall Street Journal, is Pakistan still a U.S. ally,
and to what extent?
MR. CARNEY: Pakistan is still a U.S. ally.
Thanks.
END 9:18 A.M. EDT
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne...
14 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM



































Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012


Christopher-Earl: Strunks AFFIDAVIT in support of Note of Issue


Exhibit 2


page 9 page 9

































Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012


Paul Edward Ireys AFFIDAVIT


Exhibit A




































Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012


Paul Edward Ireys AFFIDAVIT


Exhibit B





































Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012


Paul Edward Ireys AFFIDAVIT


Exhibit C






































Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012


Paul Edward Ireys AFFIDAVIT


Exhibit D
From:
To:
1051324 1051324 1051324
Re: binder 11 ...
Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:26 AM
"Henry Wayland Blake" <hwblake@bellsouth.net>
"Paul Irey" <pauledwardirey@gmail.com>, "Doug Vogt" <Diehold@comcast.net>,
orly.taitz@gmail.com, cestrunck@yahoo.com, "Chito Papa" <rajska7@gmail.com>
3 Files (1688KB)

DearPaul,

Ithinkyouhaveproposedthemostprobablescenariobasedonthecreaonandledatesofthe
associatedcourtdocuments.

1.ThepapercopyoftheTeppertoFuddy3pageleerwasdated05/26/2012.

2.Theelectronicversionofthis3pageleerappearedonScribdon06/06/2012

3.TheTepperfourpageelectronicdocument10513240131.pdf(sameas351.pdf)wascreatedon
06/04/2012andwaslastmodiedon06/06/2012.Pages13ofthisdocumentarethe3electronic
pagesoftheTeppertoFuddyleerthatappearedonScribdon06/06/2012.The4thelectronicpageis
theTepperpage4,LFCOLB.ThisfourpagedocumentwasledinMSon06/06/2012.

4.WereallydontknowwhentheTepperpage4LFCOLBwascreated.

5.ThepapercopyoftheonepageOnakatoTeppervericaonleerwasdated05/31/2012.

6.Theelectronicversion,whichiscourtdocument352,wascreatedon06/04/2012andwaslast
modiedon06/06/2012.ThisonepageelectronicdocumentwasledinMSon06/06/2012.

IbelievethatthemostlikelyscenarioisthatTeppercreatedapapercopyofhisthreepageleerto
Fuddyon05/26/2012.HeaachedapaperprintoutcopyoftheoriginalWHLFCOLBandmailedthis
fourpagepapercopytoFuddy.

TepperandOnakathencollaboratedtoaltertheWHLFCOLBtocreatetheTepperpage4LFCOLB.

On06/04/2012,Teppercreatedthedocuments10513240131.pdf(sameas351)and352.

Hethenledthetwodocuments351and352inMSon06/06/2012.

WereallydontknowtheindividualaconsofeitherTepperorOnakawithregardsthemodicaonsof
theWHLFCOLBPDFimageletocreatethealteredLFCOLBPDFimagele.Onakamayhavemodied
theWHLFCOLBandthensentthealteredPDFimagetoTepperasaonepagePDFimagele.Thereis
Re: binder 11 ... - Yahoo! Mail http://us.mc1257.mail.yahoo.com/mc/showMessage?sMid=12&filterBy=&...
1 of 3 12/4/2012 3:13 PM
nothinginhisvericaonleerthatindicatesthatheaachedthisalteredLFCOLBtohisvericaon
leer.However,hisleerdoesrefertotheLFCOLBcopythatwaspurportedlyaachedtothefourpage
requestleerfromTeppertoFuddy.

Alternavely,TeppermighthavehadsomeoneelsemodifytheWHLFCOLBPDFimagetocreatethe
alteredPDFimage.ThatmightexplainwhytheMETADATAwasnotenrelyerasedfromhisfourpage
electronicdocument.WeknowthatascannerwasusedsoTeppersforgerwouldhavehadtohave
somemeansofresizingascannedandalteredimageoftheWHLFCOLBbacktothecorrectsizeto
matchareal1961CercateofLiveBirthprintedform.

Iamnowcertainthatthe21addedobjectswhichareinvisibleinAdobeReaderpreexistedbefore
06/04/2012asaseparatePDFimage.The21objectsinclude12linesegements,2broadlinestrikeouts
and7Blackredaconrectangles.ThisredaconpageissmallerthantheLFCOLBimagepagesize.I
havesuccessfullyseparatedthissmallerredaconimagefromtheaenedandalteredWHLFCOLB
imageinbothAdobeIllustratorCS6andInkscape.IhaveaachedmylatestscreenshotsfromAdobe
Illustratorasproof.Thescreenshot[105132401131_ss3.jpg]aachedshowstheredaconpageslid
otheLFCOLBimagepagetotheright.Thebackgroundoftheredaconpageistransparent.

SoanalternavescenariowouldbethatTepperhadhisforgermodifytheWHLFCOLBandOnaka
providedtheredaconimagetoassistTeppersforgerresizehisscannedimage.Thiswouldlessen
OnakasinvolvementwiththecreaonofthefraudulentLFCOLBTepperpage4LFCOLB.

SoscenarioAwouldbethatOnakadidthedeedandscenarioBwouldbethattheycollaboratedtodo
thedeed.

EitherwaytheybothareguiltyofaempngtopulloabaitandswitchonJudgeWingate.They
substutedtheTepperpage4LFCOLBfortheWHLFCOLBanddidnttellJudgeWingateaboutthe
switch.

Icanprovideanotarizedcopyofmyswornadavitwheneveryouneedit.Also,Icanprovideanyofmy
screenshotsasrequired.Iwouldprefernottotesfybecauseofpersonalreasons.Ialsobelievethat.if
Iweretotesfy,thenIwouldquicklybecomeapunchingbagforthedefensebecauseIdonthavean
ITcercateandIhavenevertesedasaforensicexpert.

Sincerely,

Henry

From:PaulIrey
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 5:54 AM
To: doug@vectorpub.com ; orly.taitz@gmail.com ; cestrunck@yahoo.com ; hwblake@bellsouth.net
Subject: binder 11 ...

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7763 (20121204)
__________
Re: binder 11 ... - Yahoo! Mail http://us.mc1257.mail.yahoo.com/mc/showMessage?sMid=12&filterBy=&...
2 of 3 12/4/2012 3:13 PM



































Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012


Christopher-Earl: Strunks AFFIDAVIT in support of Note of Issue


Exhibit 3

Strunk v J effries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.; 21948 / 2012
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
STATE OF NEW YORK )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ULSTER )
Accordingly, I, H. William Van Allen, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:
a. Amover 18years of age and not a party to this action.
b. Myplace of business is located at 351 North Road Hurley NewYork 12243.
c. On November 14, 2012, Christopher Strunk instructed me to serve a true conformed copy of the NOTICE OF
PETITION, PETITION with AFFIDAVIT OF VERIFICATION affirmed November 13,2012 along with a
NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY
INJ UNCTION PENDING A DECLARATORY INJ UNCTION ON ISSUE OF LAW AS TO ELECTORS
DECLARATORY RELIEF AS TO ELECTORS, a Notice of Petitioner's intent to filean order to show cause
application at the Kings County Supreme Court Building at 10AMon the 10
th
Floor intake at 360 Adams Street on
Monday November 19,2012 placing a complete set in a properly addressed to each respondent listed below for
delivery by USPS by certified mail with request for return receipt for proof of service.
d. On November 14, 2012, I caused each copy with proper postage for service by certified mail on the listed Electors and
where each envelope was properly addressed with the Notification "URGENT LEGAL SERVICE" and "PERSONAL &
CONFIDENTIAL"in the lower left hand corner of the envelop that was then deposited with the USPS for service upon:
1. Hakeem J effries 35Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238
2. Grace Mengofl47l4 34thAvenue -- Flushing, NY 11354
3. Felix Ortiz 189B33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232
4. Bill DeBlasioof 442 lith Street -- Brooklyn. NY 11215
5. Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #[2G -- New York. NY 10025
6. KeithL.T. Wright of2225 FifthAvenue -- New York. NY 10037
7. Christine C. Quinn of263 Ninth Avenue. #3A -- New York, NY 10001
8. WilliamThompson of 106West 121st Street -- New York. NY 10027
9. Scott Stringer of 155West 71st Street. #3A -- New York, NY 10023
10. Emily Giske01'440 West 24thStreet -- New York, NY 10014
11. Anne Marie Anzaloue 2827 48th Street -- Astoria. NY 11103
12. Archie Spigner of 11210 175thStreet -- J amaica, N'r' 11433
13. George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466
14. Ruben Diaz, J r. of820 Boyton Avenue. #6D -- Bronx. NY 10473
15. Ken J enkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers. NY 10710
16. Mario Cilento 3Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962
17. Gerald D. J ennings of 1135New Scotland Road -- Albany. NY 12208
18. Byron Brown 14Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208
19. Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610
20. J oseph Morelle of 133Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609
21. Scott Adams of 11Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127
22. Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224
23. SteveBellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704
24. Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850
25. Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849;
26. Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Office 478 Russell Washington, DC 20510
Sworn to before me
This i day of November 2012
~<-Drl Q ~k.o-~
tary Pubhc
CM I RR No 7012101000068749741
CM I RR No 7012101000068749819
CM I RR No 7012101000068749758
CM I RR No 7012101000068749765
CM I RR No 7012101000068749956
CM I RR No 7012101000068749826
CM I RR No 7012101000068749833
CM IRR No 7012101000068749840
CM I RR No 7012101000068749857
CM I RR No 7012101000068749864
CM I RR No 7012101000068749901
CM IRR No 7012101000068750242
CM I RR No 7012101000068749963
CM I RR No 7012101000068749796
CM I RR No 7012101000068749949
CM I RR No 7012101000068749895
CM I RR No 7012101000068749970
CM I RR No 7012101000068749802
CM IRR No 7012101000068749772
CM I RR No 7012101000068749789
CM I RR No 7012101000068749871
CM I RR No 7012101000068749888
CM I RR No 7012101000068749918
CM I RR No 7012101 000068749925
CM I RR No 7012101000068749932
C" ! Rl ' N~' : ' 00006R7499R7
/#~
/;l.v~2r;;/
rlliam Van Allen ~
J UDITHS.MA YHON
NOTARYPUBUC, STAT; OF NEW YORK
NO.01MA60B5585
QUALIFIED INULSTER COUNTY/'(j
COMMISSION EXPIRES J UtY 14, 20__
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 WSSC for Kings county Index No.; 21 948 / 2012
0
, - AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
STATE OF NEW YORK )
) ss.
TY OF KINGS )
Aecordingly, I, I
Rou&e efi ALL being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of pe jury:
over 18 year s of age a n d not a part y t o t hi s action.
6J5 f/& K 1 1 ZoG
place of busi ness i s located at
November 30, 2012, Christopher St r unk i nst ruct ed me t o serve a true conformed copy of t he PETITIONER'S
-- >OND AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF OSC with EXHIBITS annexed AFFIRMED November 30, 2012 al ong with a copy
of t he NOTICE OF PETITION, PETITION with AFFIDAVIT OF VERIFICATION affirmed November 13, 2012
placing a complete s et i n a properly addressed envelope t o each respondent listed below for delivery by USPS regular
mail.
d. On November 30, 2012, I caused each copy wi t h proper postage for service by first cl ass mail o n t he listed Electors And
where each envelope was properly addressed with t he Notification "URGENT LEGAL SERVICE" a n d PERSONAL 8a
CONFIDENTJAL" i n t he lower left h a n d c ome r of the envelop t ha t wa s then deposited with the USPS for service upon:
1. Andrew M. Cuomo 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, NY 12202
2. Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany, NY 12208
3. George Gresham 13 13 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466
4. Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473
5. Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208
6. Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232
7. Hakeern Jeffi-ies 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238
8. Bill DeBlasio of442 1 lth Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215
9. Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 146 10
10. Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609
11. Tom DiNapoli 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201
12. Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue, #8F -- New York, NY 10025
13. Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025
14. Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand Street, #5A -- New York,,NY 10002
15. Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York, NY 10037
16. Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A -- New York, NY 10001
17. William Thompson of 106 West 12 1 st Street -- New York, NY 10027
18. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A --New York, NY 10023
19. Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 10014
20. Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 -
21. Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224
22. Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962
23. Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11 103
24. Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354
25. Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433
26. Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704
27. Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850
28. Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849
29. Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710
30. Joshua Pepper NYSAssiatant Attorney General Office of Attorney General 120 Broadway NY NY 10171
31 KLQ~TV CrfCtVrc/@(l VtWQ $f =f =I C@r LEqB E ~ ~ S ~ L ~ W H Wmy18
KAMAL P. SON1
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 01 SO6089949
: .,
Qualified in Kings C0unly
Commission Expires March 31. 201 5


































Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012


Christopher-Earl: Strunks AFFIDAVIT in support of Note of Issue


Exhibit 4


-QUEST FOR JUDICIAL INTERVENTION"
UCS-840 (31201 1)
Supreme COURT, COUNTY OF Kings
&V. rc/ 2012
Index No: 2 1 ?* Zo(a Date Index Issued:
I B Y m o n e n .
against-
For Court Clerk Use Only:
IAS tntry Uate
- JuageAssigned
CAPTION:
Enter the complete case caption. Do notuse et a1or et am. If mae space is
required, attach a caption nder sheet.
KJI Uate
- -
H~, <C?G&' I J C F * ~ ~ , G/~ALC mgNG, BI LL DEBWSa,uvryEZ
ICe~yfl b a T d VfltGc+s, CHRLTT~NE Cdu~ul j W~ L U P M 7kn.,mahl, seun J ~ ~ , ~ G ~ ~ ~
c m( c y GJSI CE, PUPIF )MANE ~ru&ddWt?, -)+&c,-rrG SRGNGR &wsk ~ ~ - e l y
f
RVDIN D f ~ 2 JQ. , ~ A ~ L C U CrLFWaf - & A J , ~ - 199- B M* ) ~ 2
1266'- Wf-py, J o ~ n u
s-~t~/yrq;repp~~~ n ~ . ~ . l r n ~ S ? F ~ ;E WK ~ r ;
I=& ~ WN 54GcW W P l ( l f i - m W ~ t ~ ~ / p p , ~ Q p o
Dhnch@$l ~ea; bf nI ent (s)
% ,, . . . , *. - ? ' . - - ,
NATURE OF ACTION 'OR-~OCEE~ING:" : Check.ONEbox-only andspecifywh6re iniicated. ' ' ' , ' - ; 3=, C" .-
Is this adionlproceedrng being filed post-judgment? 0 @ If yes, judgment date:
MATRIMONIAL
0 Contested
0 Uncontested
NOTE: For all Matrimonial actions where the parties have children under
the age of 18, complete and attach the MATRIMONIAL RJI Addendum.
TORTS
0 Asbestos
0 Breast Implant
0 Enmment al :
(SPem)
0 Medical, Dental, or Pediatric Malpractice
0 Motor Vehlde
0 products ~sbi l i ty.
(~PeclfY)
0 Other Neglglrgence:
(specrty)
0 Other Profess~onal Malpractice:
( s a w )
0 Other Tort
( ~pec~t y)
OTHER MATTERS SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
Certmcate of lncorporat~onlDissolut~on [see NOTE under Commerctal] 0 CPLR Article 75 (Arbltrat~on) [see NOTE under Commercial]
0 Emergency Medical Treatment CPLR Artlcle 78 (Body or Officer)
COMMERCIAL 3 2:; -
0 Buslness Ent~ty (including corporations, partnerships, L*S, et
0 Contract
d- -
z r
0 Insurance (where Insurer is a party, except arbitration)=
m
0 ucc (including sales, negotiable instruments) C a3 ?-
0 Other Commercial: a
(tpecity)
NOTE: For Commercial Div~sion assignment requests 122 NYCRR 5
202.70(d)]. complete and attach the COMMERCIAL DIV RJI Addendum.
REAL PROPERTY:
Haw many pmperbes does the application include?
0 Condemnat~on
0 Foreclosure
property Address:
S m Address CW State Zip
NOTE: For Foreclosure actions invdvlng a one- to four-family, omer-
occupied, residential property, or an owner-occupied condominium, '
complete and attach the FORECLOSURE RJI Addendum.
0 Tax Certiorari - Section: Block: Lot:
0 Other Real Properly:
(~peclty)
0 Habeas Corpus
0 Local Court Appeal
0 Mechanic's Lien
0 Name Change
0 Pistol Perrn~t Revocation Heanng
0 Sale or Finance of ReligiouslNot-for-Profit Property
0-
(spadfy)
9 ~l ect i on Law
0 MHL Article 9.60 (Kendra's Law)
0 MHL Arbcle 10 (Sex Offender Confinement-initial)
0 MHL Article 10 (Sex Offender Confinement-Rewew)
0 MHL Article 81 (Guardianship)
0 Other Mental Hygiene:
( ~ Wl t y )
0 Other Special ?peeding:
-/ . bpeuty)
STAfus <X ACTION OR.PROCCE~INU: ' . .Answer YES or NO for EVERY q&&on ~ ~ b e n t e i additional iiformation where indcafed
I YES I NO
Has a summons and complaint or suhmons wlnotice been filed?
8) 0 ' If yes, date filed:
l 2
ClAL INTERVENTION: Cheek ONE box onlyAND ~rdtl'iiljnformation where indicated.
nfmr's Cornwmtse
0 Note of Issue and/or Certificate of Readiness
0 Nobe of h4tdical. Dental. or Pediatric Malpractice Date lssue Joined:
0 Nobce df Motion Relief Sought: Return Date:
0 N o w of Petition Relief Sought: Return Date:
=order to show cause Relief Sought: m o . wf/% /PJ"paH pm. Return Date: 9 % 6 L z
0 Other Ex Parte Application Relief Sought: A@=.
0 Poor Persora Application
0 Request for Preliminary Conference
0 Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Settlement Conference
0 Wnt d Habeas Corpus
0 - (sPeafY):
RUATEDCASES:
List any r el at edact i : Fm IGl-Mlial actions, k;elude&y-m4ated'~drninal andhx Famlly Court cases. - , ; . ;- , , ,-.
If additional space is-required, complek and attach the R31 Addendum. %Ifmorre.'leave blank.
. - " C L - T
- . z 7 e 2 - -
Case Ti l e
S%WM~ Cf. wvfl
,krcr r k~ &%"lr36fl
%PI < v PYSBO Y
Court
Kt@J-svf
LC
1 1 .
IndexlCase No.
296' f f -
- z,EcjB
'I-q by E
Z ~ I - a a a
PARTIES:
'If addifionalspace isrequired, complete andattach the.RJMW.@dwi'. , & L A ; ;J , ; . : -
,
: - A- . S. ." , ,*$ *- . ' <'$ -$,' s'-.c
- ? * l h 4
For partieswthout an attorney, check"UnlRep- box AND entecparly address, Mane"Tiumberand&ailld&lrss&4n * ~ t t k ~ =$ace. . . ..-
Judge (if assigned)
S ~ H ~ L Q ~ J S C
1 I!
Y C H ~ ~ C ~ C -I sc
Relationship to Instant Case
r r - + - e 8 ~ m i e 4 mL-na& C J R ~ er J
k c rcL/F 2 m ~ ~ C T ( 6 ~
CG am - RP- 1 2 - s x -
Un-
Rep
Parties:
L~st parties in caption order and
Indicate pa* role(s) (e.g
3rd-party plaintiff).
'%U@It;
l ast Name
CMA IS ~9P-r Wk.
Attorneys:
Provide name, firm name, business address, phone number and e-mail
address of all attorneys that have appeared in the case.
, 5Tgl / r Jl K
Last Name
~,4&s7A@-H3C- LgPC
Flrst Name
~tl p - t v?NTt " -
Finn N me F ~ n t Name
NO
lssue
Joined
(YIN):
DYES
Primary Role:
Secondary Rde (tf any):
&~ ~ = FKI 6
LastNan?
Insurance Carrier(s):
37 vw-3 We Bmq$d - i t
Stred Address c b Stste
BW-QOL-~TA Phone 7 Fax - ~ f i R o r ~ z ~ @ emall
hat Name Mllms
THERE ARE AMD
D
I AFFIRM
HAVE BEEN NO RELATED ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS, NOR H UDfClAL m Y BEB(
FILED IN THIS ACTION OR PROCEEDING.
Dated: ( 0 / &, mlz-
22%- SIGNATURE
~F- RG~x~~MM
FE cfie (c~wjq px ac +* h d < F ~ E
ATTORNEY REGISTRATION NUMBER PRINT OR TYPE NAME
'..
M&E-J
F i i Name
pnnurV Rob: - p e r .
Sacaday Role (if any):
Last Name
Fbdllar*
Rimay Role:
secondary Rob (if any):
L.rt Name
Flmt Na m
Primary Role:
Secondary Role (It any):
UNDER THE PENALTY OF
YES
Finn Name
Stmt A d d m cftr st.b,
Phone Fax d
LatHrru Fhtltrac
Rml l m
Street Mdron car -
Phane k d
hst Name FiP'
OW
OYES
om,
Fkmthm
S W Address ctr &
Phone Fax .J
OW
PERJURY THAT, TO MY KNOWLEDGE, OTHER THAN AS MUTED Asov+

































Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012


Christopher-Earl: Strunks AFFIDAVIT in support of Note of Issue


Exhibit 5