Sie sind auf Seite 1von 312

Technical Report on

the June 30, 2012 Update of the Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves,
La India Gold Project, Municipality of Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico

North American Datum 27, UTM (Zone 12): 709,000 metres East, 3,174,000 metres North

PREPARED FOR

Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited


145 King Street East, Suite 400
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
M5C 2Y7
Telephone:
Facsimile:

/ 416.947.1212
/

416.367.4681

BY

Daniel Doucet, ing.


Tim Haldane, P.Eng.
Michel Julien, P.Eng.

August 31, 2012

Date and Signature Page


The data on which the contained Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimate for the La India
project is based were current as of the Effective Date, August 31, 2012. The undersigned are all
qualified persons and were responsible for preparing or supervising the preparation of parts of this
Technical Report, as described in Item 2.

(Signed by) Daniel Doucet

Date: October 12, 2012

Daniel Doucet, ing.


(OIQ #39106); (sealed)

(Signed by) Tim Haldane

Date: October 12, 2012

Tim Haldane, P.Eng.


(Arizona (Mining) #25048), (sealed)

(Signed by) Michel R. Julien

Date: October 12, 2012

Michel R. Julien, Eng., P.Eng. (QC, NL, NWT and Nunavut)


(OIQ #42119, PEGNL#03033, NAPEG), (sealed)

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


ii

Contents
DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE ..................................................................................................... II
ITEM 1.
SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 1
1.1
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION........................................................................... 1
1.2
GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND DEPOSIT TYPE ......................................................................... 1
1.3
EXPLORATION .................................................................................................................... 2
1.4
MINING METHODS .............................................................................................................. 2
1.5
RECOVERY METHODS ........................................................................................................ 3
1.6
MINERAL RESOURCE AND RESERVE ESTIMATES ................................................................. 3
1.7
INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS................................................................................. 5
1.8
RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................................... 6
ITEM 2.
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 8
TERMS OF REFERENCE ....................................................................................................... 8
2.1
2.2
SOURCES OF INFORMATION................................................................................................ 9
2.3
QUALIFIED PERSONS .......................................................................................................... 9
ITEM 3.

RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ......................................................................... 13

ITEM 4.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ..................................................... 14
4.1
AREA AND LOCATION ...................................................................................................... 14
4.2
CLAIMS AND TITLE .......................................................................................................... 15
4.3
SURFACE RIGHTS ............................................................................................................. 19
4.4
ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES ......................................................................................... 21
4.5
PERMITS .......................................................................................................................... 21
4.6
SIGNIFICANT FACTORS AND RISKS................................................................................... 23
ITEM 5.
ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE
AND PHYSIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................... 24
5.1
PHYSIOGRAPHY AND CLIMATE ........................................................................................ 24
5.2
INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................................................ 25
5.3
WATER SOURCES ............................................................................................................. 25
ITEM 6.
HISTORY...................................................................................................................... 28
6.1
EXPLORATION BY GRAYD RESOURCE CORP., 2004 THROUGH 2011 ................................ 29
6.2
RESOURCE ESTIMATES, 2008 THROUGH 2010 .................................................................. 30
ITEM 7.
GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION .......................................... 33
7.1
REGIONAL GEOLOGY ....................................................................................................... 33
7.2
LOCAL AND PROPERTY GEOLOGY ................................................................................... 35
7.3
MINERALIZATION ............................................................................................................ 38
ITEM 8.

DEPOSIT TYPE ........................................................................................................... 45

ITEM 9.

EXPLORATION .......................................................................................................... 47

ITEM 10. DRILLING .................................................................................................................... 47


10.1 DIAMOND DRILLING ........................................................................................................ 50
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
iii

10.2
10.3

REVERSE CIRCULATION DRILLING................................................................................... 51


RECOVERY FACTORS ....................................................................................................... 51

ITEM 11. SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY .................................. 53


11.1 SAMPLING METHOD, NATURE, SPACING, SECURITY AND ON-SITE PREPARATION ........... 53
11.2 SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ................................................. 54
11.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL PRACTICES ............................................ 57
11.4 OPINION ON ADEQUACY OF SAMPLE PREPARATION, SECURITY AND ANALYTICAL
PROCEDURES .............................................................................................................................. 66
11.5 RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................................................ 67
ITEM 12. DATA VERIFICATION .............................................................................................. 69
12.1 INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF DATABASE AND INDEPENDENT SAMPLING ................... 69
12.2 DIAMOND DRILL HOLE CORE RECOVERY ANALYSIS....................................................... 71
12.3 RC SAMPLE RECOVERY ANALYSIS .................................................................................. 74
12.4 OPINION ON ADEQUACY OF THE LA INDIA DRILL-HOLE DATABASE ................................ 77
ITEM 13. MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING ........................ 78
13.1 SAMPLE COMPOSITES TESTED ......................................................................................... 78
13.2 SAMPLE PREPARATION .................................................................................................... 78
13.3 ROCK DENSITY ................................................................................................................ 79
13.4 BOND WORK INDEX......................................................................................................... 79
13.5 HEAD ANALYSES ............................................................................................................. 79
13.6 BOTTLE ROLL LEACH TESTS............................................................................................ 80
13.7 GRAVITY CONCENTRATION ............................................................................................. 80
13.8 FLOTATION ...................................................................................................................... 80
13.9 AGGLOMERATION AND PERCOLATION TESTS .................................................................. 80
13.10 LABORATORY COLUMN LEACH TESTS FOR GOLD RECOVERY ..................................... 81
ITEM 14. MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES ..................................................................... 83
14.1 DATA ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................. 83
14.2 CORE VERSUS RC DRILL RESULTS .................................................................................. 86
14.3 COMPOSITES .................................................................................................................... 89
14.4 VARIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................. 90
14.5 BULK DENSITY ................................................................................................................ 92
14.6 BLOCK MODELS .............................................................................................................. 92
14.7 GRADE INTERPOLATION ................................................................................................... 93
14.8 CLASSIFICATION .............................................................................................................. 95
14.9 JUNE 30, 2012 RESOURCE ESTIMATE (INCLUSIVE OF RESERVES) .................................... 96
14.10 MODEL VERIFICATION ................................................................................................. 98
14.11 JUNE 30, 2012 RESOURCE ESTIMATE (EXCLUSIVE OF RESERVES)................................ 99
14.12 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................. 99
ITEM 15. MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES ...................................................................... 100
15.1 OPEN PIT OPTIMIZATION ............................................................................................... 100
15.2 PIT DESIGNS .................................................................................................................. 104
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
iv

15.3

LA INDIA MINERAL RESERVES AS OF JUNE 30, 2012 ..................................................... 104

ITEM 16. MINING OPERATIONS ........................................................................................... 107


16.1 MINING OPERATIONS ..................................................................................................... 107
16.2 MINE PRODUCTION SCHEDULE ...................................................................................... 114
16.3 MINE EQUIPMENT SELECTION AND FLEET REQUIREMENTS ........................................... 115
16.4 MINE PERSONNEL .......................................................................................................... 117
16.5 MINE OPERATING COST SUMMARY ............................................................................... 117
ITEM 17. RECOVERY METHODS .......................................................................................... 119
17.1 PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND DESIGN CRITERIA.............................................................. 119
17.2 PROCESS SERVICES ........................................................................................................ 123
ITEM 18. PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................. 125
18.1 ACCESS ROAD ............................................................................................................... 125
18.2 CAMP ............................................................................................................................. 125
18.3 CENTRAL OPERATING AREA .......................................................................................... 125
18.4 ORE PROCESSING FACILITIES ......................................................................................... 126
18.5 PAD AND PONDS ............................................................................................................ 127
18.6 SEWAGE AND WASTE..................................................................................................... 127
18.7 SECURITY AND FENCING ................................................................................................ 127
18.8 CONSTRUCTION ............................................................................................................. 127
ITEM 19. MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS .............................................................. 129
19.1 MAJOR CONTRACTS ....................................................................................................... 129
ITEM 20.
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, AND SOCIAL AND
COMMUNITY IMPACTS .............................................................................................................. 130
20.1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND ISSUES ......................................................................... 130
20.2 WASTE DISPOSAL, SITE MONITORING AND WATER NANAGEMENT ............................... 131
20.3 PROJECT PERMITTING..................................................................................................... 136
20.4 POTENTIAL SOCIAL OR COMMUNITY RELATED REQUIREMENTS AND PLANS ................. 136
20.5 MINE CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS ................................................................. 137
ITEM 21. CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ESTIMATES ............................................. 142
21.1 CAPITAL COSTS ............................................................................................................. 142
21.2 OPERATING COSTS......................................................................................................... 144
ITEM 22. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS .......................................................................................... 147
22.1 ASSUMPTIONS, ECONOMIC CRITERIA, AND INPUTS ........................................................ 147
22.2 CASH FLOW ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE................................................ 148
22.3 TAXES AND ROYALTIES ................................................................................................. 149
22.4 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ................................................................................................. 150
ITEM 23.

ADJACENT PROPERTIES...................................................................................... 151

ITEM 24.

OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION............................................ 153

ITEM 25.

INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS.......................................................... 153

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


v

ITEM 26.

RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................... 154

ITEM 27.

REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 155

NOTES TO INVESTORS REGARDING THE USE OF RESOURCES ................................... 160


APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................. 161
APPENDIX 12.1 CORE SAMPLES NOT USED FOR RESOURCE ESTIMATION ................................ 161
APPENDIX 12.2 RC SAMPLES NOT USED FOR RESOURCE ESTIMATION .................................... 171
APPENDIX 13.1 SUMMARY OF TEST WORK PERFORMED BY KCA ........................................... 215
APPENDIX 13.2 SAMPLE COMPOSITES TESTED ....................................................................... 218
APPENDIX 13.2A BULK DENSITY DATA FROM KAPPES CASSIDAY AND ASSOCIATES .............. 225
APPENDIX 13.3 SUMMARY BOTTLE ROLL LEACH TEST RESULTS PERFORMED BY KCA ....... 228
APPENDIX 13.4 LABORATORY COLUMN LEACH TEST WORK................................................. 230
APPENDIX 14.1 SEMI-VARIOGRAMS, MAIN AND NORTH ZONES OF LA INDIA DEPOSIT, GEOLOGICAL
DOMAINS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 12, 17, AND 18 ........................................................................................ 238
APPENDIX 14.2 INTERSECTIONS FROM THE MAIN AND NORTH ZONES OF LA INDIA DEPOSIT USED IN
RESOURCE ESTIMATION ............................................................................................................. 266
APPENDIX 17.1 DESIGN CRITERIA.......................................................................................... 286
APPENDIX 21.1 GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATION OPERATING COST DETAIL........................... 298

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


vi

LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 4.1 LOCATION MAP ................................................................................................................ 14
FIGURE 4.2 CONCESSION MAP. CLAIM REFERENCE NUMBERS AS IN TABLE 4.1 ................................... 17
FIGURE 4.3 SURFACE RIGHTS MAP, RESERVES AND RESOURCES AREA, LA INDIA PROJECT.................. 19
FIGURE 5.1 LA CHIPRIONA RESERVOIR AND INFILTRATION ZONE- LOCATED ON AEM PROPERTY..... 26
FIGURE 7.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGIC MAP, SUMMARIZED FROM SERVICIO GEOLOGICO MEXICANO (2009)
.............................................................................................................................................................. 34
FIGURE 7.2 VOLCANIC STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN OF THE LA INDIA AREA AS DETERMINED BY T.
LONGO .................................................................................................................................................. 36
FIGURE 7.3 DRILL-HOLE FENCE DIAGRAM THROUGH VIRUELA - LA CRUZ ZONE LOOKING NORTHEAST
.............................................................................................................................................................. 37
FIGURE 7.4 SECTION 706,300E, CIENEGUITA AREA, NORTH ZONE SHOWING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN
MINERALIZATION TYPE DOMAINS 12, 14 AND 18 LOOKING WEST .......................................................... 40
FIGURE 7.5 SECTION 3,179,175, CIENEGUITA AREA, NORTH ZONE SHOWING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN
MINERALIZATION TYPE DOMAINS 11, 12 AND 18 LOOKING NORTH ........................................................ 41
FIGURE 7.6 SECTION 3,176,600, LA VIRUELA AREA SHOWING TYPICAL MORPHOLOGIES AND SPATIAL
RELATIONSHIPS OF MAIN ZONE MINERALIZATION TYPE DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3 LOOKING NORTH ........... 43
FIGURE 7.7 SECTION 3,176,100, LA CRUZ AREA SHOWING TYPICAL MORPHOLOGIES AND SPATIAL
RELATIONSHIPS OF MAIN ZONE MINERALIZATION TYPE DOMAINS 5 AND 6 LOOKING NORTH ................ 44
FIGURE 7.8 SECTION 3,176,500N, LA VIRUELA WEST AREA SHOWING MORPHOLOGY OF MAIN ZONE
MINERALIZATION TYPE DOMAIN 7 LOOKING NORTH .............................................................................. 44
FIGURE 10.1 NORTH ZONE: LOCATION MAP OF THE COLLARS OF DIAMOND AND REVERSE
CIRCULATION DRILL HOLES USED IN THE JUNE 30, 2012 RESERVE AND RESOURCE ESTIMATE................ 48
FIGURE 10.2 MAIN ZONE: LOCATION MAP OF THE COLLARS OF DIAMOND AND REVERSE CIRCULATION
DRILL HOLES USED IN THE JUNE 30, 2012 RESERVE AND RESOURCE ESTIMATE ...................................... 49
FIGURE 11.1 GOLD ASSAYS, CERTIFIED BLANK SAMPLES .................................................................... 58
FIGURE 11.2 GOLD ASSAYS, CERTIFIED BLANKS AND SAMPLES IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING BLANKS,
2006 THROUGH MAY 23, 2012 DRILL PROGRAMS .................................................................................. 59
FIGURE 11.3 CHART OF PERCENT DIFFERENCE OF THE STANDARDS IN TABLE 11.3 FROM REFERENCE
VALUES, ALS CHEMEX ASSAY RESULTS, AS FUNCTION OF STANDARD REFERENCE VALUE IN PPM GOLD61
FIGURE 11.4 PERCENTILE PLOT OF ABSOLUTE RELATIVE DIFFERENCES OF FIELD, PREPARATION, AND
LAB DUPLICATES.................................................................................................................................... 62
FIGURE 11.5 PLOT COMPARING REGULAR FIRE ASSAY AND SCREEN FIRE ASSAY ANALYTICAL RESULTS.
.............................................................................................................................................................. 64
FIGURE 11.6 PLOT COMPARING ACME AND ALS CHEMEX FIRE ASSAY ANALYTICAL RESULTS ........... 65
FIGURE 11.7 PERCENT RELATIVE DIFFERENCE, ACME CHECK ASSAY VS. ALS CHEMEX ASSAY ........ 66
FIGURE 12.1 FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION, GOLD PPM, BY CORE RECOVERY CLASSIFICATION (>50% VS.
<50%) ................................................................................................................................................... 73
FIGURE 12.2 HISTOGRAM SHOWING RECOVERED RC SAMPLE WEIGHTS ............................................. 75
FIGURE 12.3 CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY, GOLD ASSAYS, LOW- AND HIGH-RECOVERY RC SAMPLE
DATASETS .............................................................................................................................................. 76
FIGURE 14.1 LOCATION MAP SHOWING MINERALIZED ZONES AND DRILL-HOLE COLLARS .................. 84
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
vii

FIGURE 14.2 LOGNORMAL CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY PLOT FOR GOLD IN CORE AND RC DRILL
SAMPLES, MAIN A ZONE ....................................................................................................................... 87
FIGURE 14.3 LOGNORMAL CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY PLOT FOR GOLD IN CORE AND RC DRILL
SAMPLES, MAIN B ZONE........................................................................................................................ 88
FIGURE 14.4 LOGNORMAL CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY PLOT FOR GOLD IN CORE AND RC DRILL
SAMPLES, NORTH ZONE ......................................................................................................................... 88
FIGURE 14.5 DISTRIBUTION OF THE SAMPLE LENGTH, USED TO DETERMINE THE COMPOSITE LENGTH 89
FIGURE 15.1 GEOTECHNICAL STRUCTURAL DOMAIN CONSIDERATIONS FOR LA INDIA PITS. NOTE THAT
SOUTH PIT INDICATES THE MAIN PIT. ............................................................................................... 102
FIGURE 16.1 BASE CASE OPEN PIT LERCHS-GROSSMANN SHELLS, AREAS FOR VALUE RANKING. ..... 108
FIGURE 16.2 NORTH ZONE DESIGN PITS USED FOR SCHEDULING, SEQUENCED BY VALUE RANKING
FROM HIGHEST RANKING (NP21) TO LOWEST RANKING (NP25) .......................................................... 109
FIGURE 16.3 MAIN ZONE DESIGN PITS USED FOR SCHEDULING, SEQUENCED BY VALUE RANKING FROM
HIGHEST RANKING (MP21) TO LOWEST RANKING (MP25)................................................................... 110
FIGURE 16.4 LA INDIA PROJECT ULTIMATE PIT DESIGNS IN THE NORTH ZONE AREA......................... 111
FIGURE 16.5 LA INDIA PROJECT ULTIMATE PIT DESIGNS IN THE MAIN ZONE AREA ........................... 112
FIGURE 16.6 PIT DESIGN SLOPE PARAMETER FOR NORTH AND MAIN PITS ........................................ 113
FIGURE 16.7 ULTIMATE MINE LAYOUT SHOWING ROADS, DUMPS, THE LEACH PAD AND OTHER
INFRASTRUCTURE. ADR PLANT = ADSORPTION/DESORPTION/REFINING PLANT. ................................ 114
FIGURE 17.1 SIMPLIFIED PROCESS FLOWSHEET FOR LA INDIA OPERATION ....................................... 120
FIGURE 18.1 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE FOR THE LA INDIA MINE PROJECT ...................................... 128
FIGURE 23.1 ADJACENT EXPLORATION PROPERTIES MAP .................................................................. 152

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


viii

List of Tables
TABLE 1.1 MINERAL RESOURCE AND RESERVE STATEMENT, LA INDIA OPEN PIT MINE PROJECT AS OF
JUNE 30, 2012 ......................................................................................................................................... 5
TABLE 2.1 RESPONSIBILITIES OF EACH QUALIFIED PERSON................................................................ 10
TABLE 4.1 LA INDIA PROJECT MINING CONCESSIONS .......................................................................... 16
TABLE 4.2 PERMITS REQUIRED FOR LA INDIA MINE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION ........................ 22
TABLE 6.1 EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES BY GRAYD RESOURCE CORP. ON LA INDIA PROPERTY FROM
JANUARY 2004 THROUGH NOVEMBER 20, 2011 .................................................................................... 29
TABLE 6.2 LA INDIA PROJECT NI43-101-COMPLIANT MINERAL INFERRED RESOURCE ESTIMATE BY
GRAYD RESOURCE CORP. AS OF FEBRUARY 2008 INCLUDING ALL MATERIAL TYPES IN ALL AREAS
(GRAY AND GIROUX, 2008)................................................................................................................... 30
TABLE 6.3 LA INDIA PROJECT NI43-101-COMPLIANT INDICATED RESOURCE ESTIMATE BY GRAYD
RESOURCE CORP. AS OF FEBRUARY 2009 INCLUDING OXIDE AND SULPHIDE MATERIAL IN ALL AREAS
(GRAY AND GIROUX, 2009)................................................................................................................... 31
TABLE 6.4 LA INDIA PROJECT NI43-101-COMPLIANT INFERRED RESOURCE ESTIMATE BY GRAYD
RESOURCE CORP. AS OF FEBRUARY 2009 INCLUDING OXIDE AND SULPHIDE MATERIAL IN ALL AREAS
(GRAY AND GIROUX, 2009)................................................................................................................... 31
TABLE 6.5 LA INDIA PROJECT NI43-101-COMPLIANT MEASURED AND INDICATED RESOURCE ESTIMATE
BY GRAYD RESOURCE CORP. AS OF MAY 2010 INCLUDING OXIDE AND SULPHIDE MATERIAL IN ALL
AREAS (GRAY AND GIROUX, 2010) ....................................................................................................... 32
TABLE 6.6 LA INDIA PROJECT NI43-101-COMPLIANT INFERRED RESOURCE ESTIMATE BY GRAYD
RESOURCE CORP. AS OF MAY 2010 INCLUDING OXIDE AND SULPHIDE MATERIAL IN ALL AREAS (GRAY
AND GIROUX, 2010) .............................................................................................................................. 32
TABLE 11.1 ELEMENT CONCENTRATIONS ANALYZED AND ANALYTICAL LIMITS. ................................ 57
TABLE 11.2 STANDARDS SED IN ASSAYS FOR THE LA INDIA QA/QC PROGRAM, 2004 THROUGH MAY
23, 2012 ................................................................................................................................................ 60
TABLE 11.3 SUMMARY OF ASSAY RESULTS OF CERTIFIED STANDARDS FROM 2004 THROUGH MAY 23,
2012 ...................................................................................................................................................... 61
TABLE 12.1 GOLD ASSAYS OF INDEPENDENT SAMPLES COLLECTED BY CONSULTANT MATTHEW GRAY
.............................................................................................................................................................. 71
TABLE 12.2 SUMMARY STATISTICS, DRILL CORE RECOVERY .............................................................. 72
TABLE 12.3 SUMMARY STATISTICS, GOLD ASSAYS, HIGH-RECOVERY (>50%) AND LOW-RECOVERY
(<50%) SAMPLE SUBSETS ...................................................................................................................... 73
TABLE 13.1 BOND WORK INDEX TEST RESULTS ................................................................................. 79
TABLE 13.2 SUMMARY OF LA INDIA GOLD AND SILVER RECOVERIES BY GEOLOGICAL DOMAIN ......... 81
TABLE 14.1 SUMMARY OF GOLD IN ASSAYS IN THE MAIN ZONE SORTED BY GEOLOGIC DOMAINS ...... 85
TABLE 14.2 CAPPING STRATEGY FOR MAIN ZONE .............................................................................. 85
TABLE 14.3 SUMMARY OF CAPPED GOLD IN ASSAYS IN MAIN ZONE ................................................... 85
TABLE 14.4 SUMMARY OF GOLD IN ASSAYS AT NORTH ZONE SORTED BY GEOLOGIC DOMAINS .......... 86
TABLE 14.5 CAPPING STRATEGY FOR NORTH ZONE ........................................................................... 86
TABLE 14.6 SUMMARY OF CAPPED GOLD IN ASSAYS IN NORTH ZONE ................................................ 86
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
ix

TABLE 14.7 SUMMARY OF GOLD IN 1.5-M COMPOSITES AT MAIN ZONE SORTED BY GEOLOGIC
DOMAINS ............................................................................................................................................... 89
TABLE 14.8 SUMMARY OF GOLD IN 1.5-M COMPOSITES AT NORTH ZONE SORTED BY GEOLOGIC
DOMAINS ............................................................................................................................................... 90
TABLE 14.9 SUMMARY OF SEMIVARIOGRAM PARAMETERS FOR GOLD ................................................ 90
TABLE 14.10 SUMMARY OF ROCK DENSITIES; SG = SPECIFIC GRAVITY ............................................... 92
TABLE 14.11 SUMMARY OF THE GRADE INTERPOLATION (ID2) PER SEARCH PARAMETERS NORTH
ZONE ..................................................................................................................................................... 93
TABLE 14.12 SUMMARY OF ID2 SEARCH PARAMETERS MAIN ZONE ................................................ 94
TABLE 14.13 COMPARISON OF THE JUNE 30, 2012 MEASURED, INDICATED AND INFERRED RESOURCES
ESTIMATES (INCLUSIVE OF RESERVES) TO THE DECEMBER 2010 RESOURCE ESTIMATE, MAIN AND NORTH
ZONES, INCLUDING OXIDE AND SULPHIDE MATERIAL ............................................................................. 97
TABLE 14.14 MINERAL RESOURCE COMPILATION, LA INDIA PROJECT, JUNE 30, 2012 (EXCLUSIVE OF
RESERVES) ............................................................................................................................................. 99
TABLE 15.1 LA INDIA PIT SLOPE PARAMETERS UTILIZED FOR PIT OPTIMIZATION .............................. 101
TABLE 15.2 ECONOMIC PARAMETERS USED FOR PIT OPTIMIZATION .................................................. 103
TABLE 15.3 PROBABLE RESERVES IN THE NORTH AND MAIN ZONES ................................................ 105
TABLE 15.4 MINERAL RESOURCE AND RESERVE STATEMENT, LA INDIA OPEN PIT MINE PROJECT AS OF
JUNE 30, 2012 ..................................................................................................................................... 106
TABLE 16.1 FEASIBILITY STUDY PIT DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR NORTH AND MAIN PITS ................... 113
TABLE 16.2 MINE PRODUCTION SCHEDULING PARAMETERS ............................................................. 115
TABLE 16.3 LIFE OF MINE PRODUCTION SCHEDULE .......................................................................... 115
TABLE 16.4 MAJOR MINING EQUIPMENT FLEET REQUIREMENTS ....................................................... 117
TABLE 16.5 YEARLY MINE OPERATING COSTS .................................................................................. 118
TABLE 17.1 PROCESS OPERATING COSTS ESTIMATE .......................................................................... 124
TABLE 20.1 CLOSURE COSTS, HEAP LEACH FACILITIES ..................................................................... 141
TABLE 21.1 LA INDIA MINE PROJECT CAPITAL EXPENDITURES ESTIMATE ......................................... 143
TABLE 21.2 PROCESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES ............................................. 144
TABLE 21.3 LA INDIA MINE PROJECT ESTIMATED OPERATING COSTS ................................................ 145
TABLE 21.4 ESTIMATED LA INDIA MINE PERSONNEL OVER THE LIFE OF MINE ................................. 146
TABLE 22.1 GOLD PRODUCTION FORECAST FOR THE LA INDIA MINE, 2013-2022 ............................. 147
TABLE 22.2 PRE-TAX CASH FLOWS FOR THE LA INDIA MINE BY YEAR ($ 000) .................................. 148
TABLE 22.3 LA INDIA INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN (IRR) AND NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV) SENSITIVITY
TO CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS AND THE GOLD PRICE ................................................................... 150

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


x

Item 1.

Summary

The La India gold-silver project in Sonora, Mexico, is a mine development project 100% controlled
by Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited (Agnico-Eagle). Agnico-Eagle is a publicly owned company based
in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, whose shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the New
York Stock Exchange, and is a Producing Issuer according to the rules and definitions provided by
the Canadian Securities Administrators.
Agnico-Eagle acquired the La India property in November 2011 as part of the acquisition of Grayd
Resource Corporation (Grayd). Grayd had explored the property since 2004 and had prepared a
preliminary economic assessment (PEA) of the La India project at the end of 2010 based on a June
2010 NI 43-101-compliant resource estimate.
Infill drilling at the La India project from November 2011 to May 23, 2012 allowed Agnico-Eagle to
confirm and expand the mineral resources reported in the December 2010 PEA. On August 31, 2012,
Agnico-Eagle staff completed a feasibility study for the construction of a multi-pit mine and heap
leach operation on the La India deposit. La Indias first mineral reserves were estimated as of June
30, 2012, based on the results of the feasibility study.
A September 4, 2012 news release announced that Agnico-Eagles Board of Directors had approved
the development of the La India mine on those initial reserves, based on the results of the economic
analysis in the feasibility study. This technical report summarizes the scientific and technical
information used to support those reserves. It has been prepared by Agnico-Eagles staff and
Qualified Persons based in Mexico at the Chihuahua regional office, and in Canada at the regional
office at Preissac, Quebec and the Toronto head office.

1.1 Property Description and Location


The La India property in the municipality of Sahuaripa, Sonora State, Mexico, comprises 57,614
hectares in 45 mining concessions; all of these claims are in good legal standing. The property is in
the Sierra Madre Mountains of northern Mexico, between the towns of Tarachi and Matarachi, and
approximately 210 km east-southeast of the city of Hermosillo. Most basic services are available in
Sahuaripa, 15 km to the north. Agnico-Eagles Pinos Altos and Creston Mascota mines are 70 km to
the southeast.
The topography consists of long ridges separated by steep V-shaped valleys ranging in elevation from
1,200 m to more than 2,000 m above sea level, with areas of low relief suitable for building minerelated infrastructure. The climate is semi-arid, with seasonal temperatures ranging from 35C to 2C. The area experiences torrential rainfall from July to September; the driest months are March to
May.

1.2 Geological setting and deposit type


The La India project lies within the Sierra Madre Occidental (SMO) province, a 2-km-thick,
regionally extensive Eocene to Miocene volcanic field. The volcanic field is comprised of two
distinct volcanic sequencesan older andesitic and dacitic series, and a younger pyroclasticLa India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
1

dominated rhyolitic series. Most significant metal occurrences in the SMO are hosted by the Lower
Series or the underlying Mesozoic strata.
The La India project lies within the western limits of the SMO in an area dominated by outcrops of
Lower Series andesitic to dacitic tuffs that were intruded by granodiorite and diorite stocks and
overlain by rhyolitic tuffs, basaltic andesite lavas, and a large pile of late conglomerates. These rocks
lie within a northwest-trending zone of Miocene extension.
The mineral occurrences present and being sought are volcanic-hosted, epithermal, high-sulphidation
gold-silver deposits, as veins and/or disseminated deposits. The North Zone comprising the
Cieneguita, Espaola, Cochis and La India areas is underlain by andesitic and felsic fragmental
volcanic strata. The silicified zones outcrop as prominent ridge-capping units and dip slopes, and are
30 to 60 m thick, with down-dip extent of 300 m or more. The Main Zone target area is comprised of
the La Viruela, La Cruz, and Cerro de Oro areas. Locally, auriferous hydrothermal breccias are
developed along high-angle faults and they appear to postdate all other alteration and mineralization
events. The North and Main zones have been the focus of drill-testing, and host the mineral resource
described in this report.

1.3 Exploration
The previous owner, Grayd Resource Corporation, commenced exploration of the La India property
in January 2004, and Agnico-Eagle has continued these activities since acquiring the project. Detailed
and regional geologic mapping and rock chip sampling has been conducted for approximately one
third of the claim block, with activities focused on the La India concessions, the Tarachi concessions,
the La Viruela - La Cruz area, and the central portion of the Triple A claim. Other exploration has
included airborne electromagnetic and magnetic geophysical surveys, photogrammetric topographic
mapping to 2-m contour intervals, terrestrial induced polarization geophysical surveys, diamond core
drilling, and reverse circulation drilling. Alteration zones have been rock chip sampled, and
representative samples of the alteration zones have been analyzed by short wave infrared
spectrography to determine alteration mineral assemblages.
The current mineral resource and reserve estimate used drill sample data from January 2004 to May
23, 2012, which included 189 diamond drill holes (16,647 m) and 631 reverse circulation drill holes
(54,470 m) at the North and Main zones of the La India deposit.

1.4 Mining methods


Due to the low-grade and near-surface nature of the La India mineral deposit, open pit mining has
been chosen as the most economic method to extract the ore. The August 2012 feasibility study
produced by Agnico-Eagle included determining the economic pit limits, detailed pit designs,
calculating in pit resources and production scheduling, based on a mineral resource model dated June
30, 2012. Mining, capital and operating cost estimates were estimated for the mine plan based on
actual costs from Agnico-Eagles Pinos Altos and Mascota mines.
The base case Lerchs-Grossmann (LG) analysis presented in Item 15 generated a number of pit shells
in the areas of the North and Main zones. Some of these pit shells are small distinct cones but are in
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
2

close proximity to each other and could be mined more efficiently when combined together. The
grouped LG pits were converted to three designed pits (North, Central and Main) using double
benching (two 6-m benches), a 7.6-m-wide berm between every double bench stack and 45 interramp slopes to get a truer estimate of waste rock and stripping ratio. Pit ramps should have a
maximum slope of 10% based on industry standards, and a bank face angle of 70 is assumed based
on rock types and geologic structures. The combined pits were modified to accommodate 90-tonne
off-road trucks. Access roads to the working areas will be single-lane at 9.2 m wide, but active
haulage roads will be 30 m wide, which is sufficient for two-way traffic with berms and ditches. This
provided the basis for scheduling annual production rates, used to estimate the mine equipment and
personnel requirements. It also reflects the sequence of mining the pits in order to allow the
construction of the leach pad that will be located just west of the North Zone.
The North pit will have final dimensions of 1,499 m long by approximately 952 m wide and 222 m
deep. The Central pit will have final dimensions of 525 m long by 340 m wide and 176 m deep. The
Main pit will measure 1,463 m long by 670 m wide and 304 m deep.
No preproduction stripping will be necessary as there is no waste capping the deposits. The overall
stripping ratio of waste to ore will be 0.99:1. Feed to the crushing plant and leach pad will total 44.6
million tonnes at a grade of 0.65 g/t gold over the life of the mine, which is projected at eight years.

1.5 Recovery Methods


Significant metallurgical testing has been conducted for La India project since 2007, including
representative samples from the different ore zones and varying lithologies. Crushing followed by
heap leaching and carbon adsorption was selected as the most favourable method for extracting gold
and silver from the La India ore. Higher grade material was tested for gravity concentration of gold
and silver, but poor results led to the rejection of this method of extraction.
An agglomeration and percolation test determined that a crush size of 100% -25 mm would be
satisfactory, to be achieved by a three-stage crushing plant. It was determined that cement should be
added to the crushed rock for pH control and additional stability of the heap.
Sample composites of the various Domains of mineralization were generated for the column and
bottle-roll leach tests. The weighted average gold recovery determined from these tests, excluding
high-sulphide materials was 85.1%. For the purposes of this technical report, a metallurgical gold
recovery of 80% was applied, reflecting a more conservative estimate to be expected from field
conditions vs. laboratory results.
The process flowsheet is based on an ore processing rate of 6.0 million dry tonnes per year (17,250
dry tonnes per day).

1.6 Mineral resource and reserve estimates


Subsequent to acquiring the project, Agnico-Eagle produced an internal mineral resource estimate for
the La India deposit by updating the previous ore models with new drilling results and using threeyear trailing averages for metals prices fixed as of May 1, 2012, at $1,342/ounce for gold and
$23.00/ounce for silver. This resource estimate was used in the economic analysis of the project.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
3

Following additional drilling through May 23, 2012, Agnico-Eagle completed the current resource
and reserve estimate for the oxide and sulphide resources in the Main and North zones of the La India
deposit as of June 30, 2012.
The database for the La India project consists of drill-hole data from the North Zone and the Main
Zone. Agnico-Eagles Technical Services group updated the Main Zone geological model,
differentiating six separate mineralized domains and one waste domain. The group also produced a
geologic solid model for the North Zone differentiating five separate mineralized domains, some
similar to the Main Zone, and a waste unit.
A study comparing core assays to RC assays including holes drilled through 2012, showed roughly
parallel grade distributions over all the grade classes, indicating that there appears to be no sampling
bias present.
Gold grades were interpolated into blocks containing some percentage of various domains by the
inverse distance squared (ID2) method. The final grade for the block was a weighted average of all
domains present inside the block. Tonnages were determined for each block based on the volume
multiplied by the weighted average specific gravity multiplied by the proportion of the block below
surface topography. Each block in the Main and North zones was also compared to the oxidation
surface established from drill logs. The proportion of the block above the oxide surface was used to
determine the tonnage of oxide material present.
For block models within the Main and North zones, the classification of a resource was measured if
it was estimated in Pass 1, or indicated if estimated in Pass 2, and inferred if estimated in Pass 3.
After this classification procedure was completed, blocks were examined visually, and isolated
pockets of inferred resources were upgraded to indicated resources. Moreover, the measured blocks
were included with the indicated resources.
The verification and the validation of the block model were done visually using DataMine software
where the solid model was reviewed on screen at every 10 m showing the block model results and the
composite values along the holes.
Indicated mineral resources were converted to reserves using a different set of parameters and
assumptions. The metals prices and currency exchange rate used to establish the cut-off grade for the
reserve were based on three-year trailing averages for the period ending June 30, 2012, of $1,379 per
ounce gold, $26.49 per ounce silver and MXP/US$ exchange rate of 13.00. The other economic
parameters were 80% metallurgical gold recovery, 5% mining dilution, and 100% mining recovery.
A net smelter return cut-off value of $7.10 per tonne was used with the metallurgical recovery rate to
determine an economic cut-off grade of 0.20 g/t gold, which defined the limits of an economic pit
(the probable reserves) during the optimization process.
Once the pit optimization was completed, a marginal cut-off grade of 0.15 g/t gold was
calculated. Any indicated resource blocks contained within the pit shells and with a grade of 0.15 g/t
gold or higher were reclassified as probable reserves.
Table 1.1 shows the reserves as well as the indicated and inferred resources for the North and Main
zones of the La India project as of June 30, 2012. The mineral reserve is estimated at 44.6 million
tonnes grading 0.65 g/t gold (0.93 million ounces of contained gold), all in the probable category,
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
4

using a 0.20 g/t gold cut-off grade. All reserves at La India are in oxide material. The indicated
mineral resource consists of 27.2 million tonnes grading 0.50 g/t gold (containing 0.44 million ounces
of gold), while the inferred resource consists of 103.4 million tonnes grading 0.34 g/t gold
(containing 1.14 million ounces of gold). The mineral resources do not include mineral reserves.

Table 1.1 Mineral resource and reserve statement, La India open pit mine project as of June 30, 2012
Category

Tonnes
(000s)

Mineral Reserves
Proven reserves

Gold grade
(g/t)

Contained gold
(000 oz)

Main Zone (oxide only)

26,820

0.61

528

North Zone (oxide only)

17,819

0.70

403

44,639

0.65

930

Main Zone

14,879

0.52

249

North Zone

12,364

0.47

186

Total measured and indicated mineral

27,243

0.50

435

Inferred mineral resource


Main zone

45,042

0.36

519

58,367

0.33

625

103,409

0.34

1,144

Probable reserves

Total proven & probable reserves


Mineral resources
Measured mineral resource
Indicated mineral resource

North zone
Total inferred mineral resource

Mineral reserves are reported using a 0.2-g/t in-situ gold cut-off.

1.7 Interpretation and conclusions


The La India project hosts a probable reserve comprising 930,000 ounces of gold contained in 44.64
million tonnes at a grade of 0.65 g/t gold. A metallurgical gold recovery of 80% was assumed, based
on third party reviews of the metallurgical test work completed to date. Engineering studies and
operating and capital cost estimates were developed to exploit only the oxide mineralization at La
India; no sulphide mineral was included in the analysis.
The key results below are based on the time period from construction (year PP) to closure, a $1,379
per ounce gold price, a $26.49 per ounce silver price, a MXP/US$ exchange rate of 13.00, and the
capital and operating costs detailed in this report:

$207-million after-tax net present value at a 5% discount rate

31% after-tax internal rate of return

Total cash cost of $497 per ounce of gold produced net of by-product silver credits

Initial capital cost of $157.6 million

Life of Mine capital cost of $183.4 million total

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


5

The La India project has high potential to be developed into a profitable mine, and the identified
probable reserve is economically significant, with an average annual production of 90,000 ounces of
gold over an eight-year mine life. The robust nature of the economics and the relatively low
sensitivity of the project to unforeseen variances in capital, operating costs and revenues are
sufficient for an investment decision to proceed with the construction of the project.

1.8 Recommendations
Work to date has identified probable reserves at La India likely to be of economic significance with
good potential to develop a profitable and economically significant mine. The economic potential of
the La India project is believed to be sufficiently robust to allow a construction decision and to
withstand unforeseen changes in operating costs, mineral resources, metallurgical behaviour, or
capital costs while maintaining a positive economic impact for Agnico-Eagle. It is therefore the
recommendation of Agnico-Eagle Mexico to approve the project for immediate construction.
Specific recommendations to further reduce project risk include:

complete an infill drilling program in the Main Zone and update the resource block model,
with the goal of upgrading the inferred resources to the measured or indicated resource
classifications;

complete a step-out drill program to increase the resource base to extend the mine life or
increase the production throughput;

develop infiltration galleries for project water supply;

continue acid rock drainage test work and develop a more detailed waste rock management
plan.

Opportunities exist to improve the economic performance of the project and should be investigated,
including:

continue geotechnical analysis of the pit slopes to determine if the pit slopes can be steepened,
which would cut costs;

evaluate the mining and processing of sulphide material. Three column tests of sulphide
material were completed in the past test campaigns. These included two of Domain 17
material and one of Domain 5 material. All were done with -25-mm material. The two column
tests on Domain 17 material had 40% and 60% recovery, and the Domain 5 test had 70%
recovery. The sulphide material immediately underlies the oxide material, and waste-to-ore
ratios would be low if the sulphide were mined. Further tests to confirm recoveries and
reagent costs are recommended.

increase resources. It is possible that the mineral resources at La India could be modestly
increased by step-out drilling in the Main Zone. There is also a possibility that the resource
grade in the Main Zone will increase when the block model is further revised to reflect the
sample intervals that are currently classified as "no data" due to low sample recovery.

mine plans and block models will be updated in mid-February 2013 for inclusion in AgnicoEagles resource and reserves statement as of December 31, 2012.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


6

explore for new resource areas. Exploration for new resource zones continues at La India and
the nearby Tarachi discovery. There is potential for finding more economic mineralization
within the La India property area, especially down-dip and along-strike from the known
deposits. The discovery of a new resource area could significantly change the La India project
economics.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


7

Item 2.

Introduction

The La India project in Sonora, Mexico, is a mine development project on a large property 100%
controlled by Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited (Agnico-Eagle). Agnico-Eagle is a publicly owned
company based in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, whose shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange
and the New York Stock Exchange, and is a producing issuer" according to the rules and definitions
provided by the Canadian Securities Administrators.

2.1 Terms of Reference


Agnico-Eagle Mines acquired the La India property in November 2011 as part of the acquisition of
Grayd Resource Corporation (Grayd). Grayd had explored the La India property since 2004 and had
prepared a preliminary economic assessment (PEA) of the La India project at the end of 2010 (Gray
et al., 2010) based on the June 2010 mineral resources (Gray and Giroux, 2010).
Infill drilling at the La India project from November 2011 to May 23, 2012 allowed Agnico-Eagle to
confirm and expand the mineral resources reported in the December 2010 PEA. On August 31, 2012,
Agnico-Eagle staff completed a feasibility study (Agnico-Eagle, 2012a) for the construction of a
multi-pit mine and heap leach operation on the La India gold-silver deposit. La Indias first mineral
reserves were estimated as of June 30, 2012, based on the results of the feasibility study.
As of June 30, 2012, the probable reserves at La India project are 44.6 million tonnes grading 0.65 g/t
gold (containing 930,000 ounces of gold), the indicated resources are 27.2 million tonnes grading
0.50 g/t gold (containing 436,000 ounces of gold), and the inferred resources are 103.4 million tonnes
grading 0.34 g/t gold (containing 1,144,000 ounces of gold). There are no proven reserves. The
reserves are exclusive of resources.
A September 4, 2012 news release (Agnico-Eagle, 2012b) announced that Agnico-Eagles Board of
Directors had approved the development of the La India mine on those initial reserves, based on the
results of the feasibility study. This technical report summarizes the scientific and technical
information used to support those reserves.
The current feasibility study anticipates total capital costs of $183 million including $25.8 million in
sustaining capital expenditures. Operating costs are estimated at $7.10 per tonne. The mine project is
expected to produce an average of 90,000 ounces of gold per year over its estimated eight-year mine
life, with additional silver credits. An after-tax internal rate of return of approximately 31% is
estimated based on the economic analysis. The open pit mine and heap leach will operate at an
average of 15,716 tonnes per day, and the processing is expected to achieve 80% metallurgical
recovery of gold. The waste to ore stripping ratio is estimated at 0.99:1. Life of mine cash costs are
expected to average $497 per ounce of gold.
This technical report has been prepared for Agnico-Eagle by the Companys staff and Qualified
Persons based in Mexico at the Chihuahua regional office, at the regional office at Preissac, Quebec
and the Toronto head office. The role and experience of the Qualified Persons is described below.
The report was prepared in compliance with the standards set out in the Canadian Securities
Administrators National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101), Companion Policy 43-101 CP and Form
43-101F1 and in conformity with generally accepted guidelines of the CIM for Exploration Best
Practices and Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practices. AgnicoLa India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
8

Eagle Mines Limited is a producing issuer and a long-time reporting issuer under the definitions
of NI 43-101.

2.2 Sources of Information


A feasibility study for a la India mining and heap leach operation based on the June 2012 mineral
reserves and resources was prepared in August 2012 by Agnico-Eagle staff utilizing the Grayd PEA
document as its base.
This technical report has been prepared in conjunction with the August 2012 La India mine project
feasibility study (Agnico-Eagle, 2012a). Both the technical report and feasibility study are based on
several sources, many prepared under the direction of the former owner of the La India property,
Grayd Resource Corporation.
Several technical reports including NI 43-101-compliant mineral resource estimates for the La India
project were prepared for Grayd including Ebert (2004), Gray (2006), Gray and Giroux (2008), Gray
and Giroux (2009), and Gray and Giroux (2010).
In July 2010, Grayd commissioned the preparation of a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) of
the La India project, based upon the NI 43-101-compliant resources as of June 2010. The PEA was
published on 6 December 2010 (Gray et al., 2010). The PEA utilized mineral resource and cost data
current as of December 6, 2010.
In the preparation of this report the authors have relied on the above sources as well as their own
observations and independent assay data, supplemented by information obtained through review of
both published and unpublished documents and maps. Additional sources of information regarding
location and dimensions of mineralized showings, mines, veins, and the mineralized grades, include:

geologic, geophysical, and assay data collected and published by the Consejo de Recursos
Naturales (National Resource Council) and its successor, the Servicio Geologico Mexicano
(Mexican Geological Survey), a Mexican Federal agency;
topographic and physiographic data collected and published by the Instituto Nacional de
Estadistica Geografica e Informatica (INEGI), a Mexican Federal Agency;
geologic, geophysical, and geochemical data contained in private maps and reports prepared
by Grayd Resource and/or Newmont Mining;
assay certificates provided by ALS Chemex Inc.;
metallurgical test data and analysis provided by Kappes, Cassiday and Associates;
acid rock drainage test data and analysis provided by SRK Consulting;
basic engineering design and costs provided by Kappes, Cassiday and Associates;
La India Heap Leach Facility - Basic Engineering Water Balance Evaluation provided by
Golder Associates.

2.3 Qualified Persons


The compilation of this technical report represents a collaborative effort by Agnico-Eagle staff and
independent consultants under the supervision of three Qualified Persons as defined by Canadian
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
9

National Instrument 43-101, in conformity with generally accepted CIM Exploration Best Practices
and Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practices guidelines. The three
Qualified Persons are Mr. Daniel Doucet, ing. (OIQ #39106), Mr. Tim Haldane, P.Eng. (Arizona
(Mining) #25048), and Mr. Michel Julien, Eng., P.Eng. (OIQ#42119, PEGNL#03033, NAPEG). The
Qualified Persons are all Agnico-Eagle employees at the regional office in Preissac, Quebec, or the
head office in Toronto, Ontario. Each Qualified Person retains the responsibility for their contribution
as indicated in Table 2.1. Their qualifications and site visits are summarized in the paragraphs below.
Table 2.1 Responsibilities of each Qualified Person
Qualified Person

Period visited la India project site

Responsible for items in this report

Daniel Doucet

four visits since August 2011

1 (part), 2 (part), 7-12, 14, 15 (part), 25-27 (part) and


appendices for items 12 and 14

Tim Haldane

five visits since November 2011

Michel Julien

one visit in August 2012

1 (part), 2 (part), 3, 4 (part), 5 (part), 6, 13, 15 (part), 1619, 21-24 and 25-27 (part) and appendices for items 13,
17 and 21
1 (part), 2 (part), 4 (part), 5 (part), 20 and 25-27 (part)

Mr. Daniel Doucet, ing. (Ordre des Ingeniers du Quebec #39106) is a Qualified Person who has been
employed by Agnico-Eagle since April 2006. He is currently the Corporate Director of Reserve
Development at the Companys regional office in Preissac, Quebec, Canada. He is a geological
engineer with 29 years of experience working in exploration and economic geology. He wrote and
supervised the preparation of items 7 through 12 inclusive and 14, and co-authored certain parts of
items 1, 2, 15 and 25 through 27 inclusive and the appendices for items 12 and 14 that pertain to
geology, reserves and resources and verification in this report. Since August 2011, he has visited and
inspected the La India project site four times for an average of three days per visit, auditing the
protocols for core logging and sampling.
Mr. Tim Haldane, P.Eng. (Arizona (Mining) #25048) is a Qualified Person and has been employed
by Agnico-Eagle since May 2006. He is currently Senior Vice-President, Latin America at the
Companys Latin American regional office in Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A. He is a metallurgical engineer
with 34 years of experience in mine operations and project development. He supervised the
preparation of all the mining, metallurgy, infrastructure, capital and operating cost data and economic
analysis sections of this report including items 1, 2, 4 (part), 5 (part), 6, 13, 15 (part), 16-19, 21-24
and 25-27 and the appendices for items 13, 17 and 21. Since November 2011, he has visited and
inspected the La India project site five times for an average of one day per visit, for the purposes of
project evaluation and management review.
Michel R. Julien, P.Eng. (Qc, NFLD, NWT and Nunavut), Ph.D. is a Qualified Person who has been
employed by Agnico-Eagle since October 2011. He is currently Corporate Director,
Environment. Mr. Julien holds a B.Eng. in mining engineering from cole Polytechique de
Montral, a Masters in Geo-Engineering from University of Minnesota and a Ph.D. in Mineral
Engineering from cole Polytechnique de Montral. He has over 22 years of experience in the field
of mining environmental and geotechnical engineering. Prior joining Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd., Mr.
Julien was a Principal at Golder Associates Ltd. and the leader of the mining
environmental/geotechnical engineering group in Montral. Over the years, he has been lead
designer and Project Director of many mine waste storage facilities and water management structures
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
10

around the world, and is therefore very familiar with mining environmental issues. He is also
Adjunct Professor (to be approved in the coming month) at University of Toronto and co-gives the
course Environmental Management in Mining (MIN430) at University of Toronto. He is Chairman
of the Board of the Institute for Mining and Environment (IRME) at Polytechnicque-UQAT. He is
the author or co-author of several articles over the years, and has been invited as guest lecturer on
several occasions. As the Qualified Person responsible for the environmental and community
relations aspects of the La India project in this report, he supervised the preparation for the
environment and community relations aspects of this report including items 1 (part), 2 (part), 4
(part), 5 (part), 20 and 25-27 (part). He visited the site on August 1-3, 2012 for a period of three days
to review site conditions and to better understand the planned project.

Definitions and Translations


ADR plant
ARD
AIF
Agnico-Eagle
aka
ASL
C
CIM
C.P.G.

CRM

CUS
DGM
gpt
gph
gpm
g/t
Grayd
Grayd Mexico
HLF
ICAP-OES
2
ID
INEGI
IRR
KCA
kg
km
kt
ktonne
kw
LOM
M
MIA

mm
Mt
NAD

Adsorption/desorption/refining plant
acid rock drainage
Annual Information Form
Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd.
also known as
Above sea level
degree Centigrade
Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum
Certified Professional Geologist by American Institute of
Professional Geologists
Consejo de Recursos Minerales (Natural Resources
Council)
Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Change of Land Use Permit)
Direccion General de Minas (Central Mining Department)
grams per tonne
gallons per hour
gallons per minute
grams per tonne
Grayd Resource Corporation
Resource Grayd de Mexico SA de CV
Heap leaching facility
(see tem 13)
Inverse Distance Squared method of grade interpolation
Instituto Nacional de Estadstica Geografa y Informtica
Internal Rate of Return
Kappes, Cassiday and Associates
kilogram
kilometre
kilotonne (tonnes x 1000)
kilotonne (tonnes x 1000)
kilowatt
life of mine
Million
Manifestacion de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact
Statement)
millimetres
million metric tonnes
North American Datum

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


11

NOM120

NPV
NSR
oz
PEA
ppm
RGM
ROM
SGM
SEDAR
SEMARNAT

SMO
tpd
tpy
USD
UTM

Norma Oficial Mexicana Ecological 1997-120 (Environmental


Regulation 120)
Net Present Value
Net Smelter Return
Troy Ounce
Preliminary Economic Assessment
parts per million
Resource Geosciences de Mexico SA de CV
Run-of-mine
Servicio Geologico Mexicano (Mexican Geological Survey)
System for Electronic Data Analysis and Retrieval
Secretaria del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales
(Secretary of the Environment and Natural Resources)
Sierra Madre Occidental
tonnes per day
tonnes per year
United States Dollar
Universal Transverse Mercatur

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


12

Item 3.

Reliance on Other Experts

The professional opinions expressed in this report are based in part on data and information generated
by and obtained from Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd., its subcontractors, previous operators of the project,
and public domain sources. The authors of this report have exercised all reasonable care in reviewing
the supplied information and believe that the basic information provided is accurate. Data that were
not generated by the authors have not been independently verified, except as noted in Item 12 of this
report. Where information from unverified sources is relevant to interpretations and discussions of
the economic potential of the project, the source of information is explicitly mentioned. Mining
concession legal information was obtained from Lic. Joel Gonzalez as assigned by Agnico-Eagle.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


13

Item 4.

Property Description and Location

4.1 Area and Location


The La India property comprises 57,614 hectares of mining concessions and is located in the
municipality of Sahuaripa, State of Sonora, Mexico, approximately 210 km east-southeast of the city
of Hermosillo, (Figure 4.1).

Figure 4.1 Location map

The centre of the project area is located at UTM Zone 12, 709,000E 3,174,000N, North American
Datum 27, or North Latitude 28o 40 41 West Longitude 108o 51 40, North American Datum 27
Mexico. All geographic references in this report utilize North American Datum 27 (NAD27) unless
otherwise stated.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


14

4.2 Claims and Title


Mining and exploration rights in Mexico are controlled by the Federal Government. Prior to 2006,
exploration and mining rights were assigned to third parties by the granting of exploration and
exploitation concessions, each with differing validity periods and tax and assessment obligations.
Mining law reform in December 2005 simplified the concession regime, and all new concessions are
mining concessions, which are valid for a 50-year period and are renewable. Upon enactment of the
mining law reform, all previously issued exploration and exploitation concessions automatically
converted to mining concessions with the effective date of title the same as that of the previously
titled exploration or exploitation concession. The mining concessions are administered by the
Direccion General de Minas (DGM), a subsecretariat of the cabinet-level Secretaria de Economia. To
maintain concessions in good legal standing, concession holders are obligated to pay semi-annual tax
payments and to annually file documentation of exploration or development work at the concession.
The La India project consists of 45 mining concessions covering in aggregate 57,614 hectares.
Concessions controlled by Agnico-Eagle are summarized in Table 4.1, and the concessions are shown
in Figure 4.2. All of these claims are in good legal standing.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


15

Table 4.1 La India project mining concessions


Reference
1
2

Title No.
217353
217354

Concession
La India
La India 1

Grant date
2-Jul-2002
2-Jul-2002

Expiry date
1-Jul-2052
1-Jul-2052

218560

Triple A

22-Nov-2002

21-Nov-2052

6,592

184078

Soledad

15-Feb-1989

14-Feb-2039

19

237125

La Viruela

29-Oct-2010

28-Oct-2060

237126

Continuacion S.E. de La Viruela

29-Oct-2010

28-Oct-2060

181940

Tayopita

15-Dec-1987

14-Dec-2037

18

201919

Ampliacion Soledad

11-Oct-1995

10-Oct-2045

114

187195

La Cruz

13-Jun-1990

12-Jun-2040

65

10

214526

San-Fer 1

2-Oct-2001

1-Oct-2051

72

11

216162

San-Fer 2

12-Apr-2002

11-Apr-2052

25

12

220792

San-Fer 3

7-Oct-2003

6-Oct-2053

51

13

221332

San-Fer 4 Fraccion 1

23-Jan-2004

22-Jan-2054

39

14

221333

San-Fer 4 Fraccion 2

23-Jan-2004

22-Jan-2054

40

15

221334

San-Fer 4 Fraccion 3

23-Jan-2004

22-Jan-2054

16

226630

El Pilar

3-Feb-2006

2-Feb-2056

17

226400

Sta. Cruz Pilar Fraccion 1

13-Jan-2006

12-Jan-2056

340

18

226401

Sta. Cruz Pilar Fraccion 2

13-Jan-2006

12-Jan-2056

217

19

226957

Tarachi

31-Mar-2006

30-Mar-2056

390

20

226956

Tarachi-1

31-Mar-2006

30-Mar-2056

100

21

226958

Tarachi-2

31-Mar-2006

30-Mar-2056

431

22

226959

Tarachi 3

31-Mar-2006

30-Mar-2056

337

23

227051

Tarachi Fracc. 1

18-Apr-2006

17-Apr-2056

92

24

227052

Tarachi Fracc. 2

18-Apr-2006

17-Apr-2056

25

227053

Tarachi Fracc. 3

18-Apr-2006

17-Apr-2056

20

26

233357

La Rumorosa

17-Feb-2009

16-Feb-2059

375

27

236441

Roka 2

30-Jun-2010

29-Jun-2060

278

28

227636

La Chivitas

18-Jul-2006

17-Jul-2056

174

29

227631

La Chivitas Fraccion 1

18-Jul-2006

17-Jul-2056

48

30

227632

La Chivitas Fraccion 2

18-Jul-2006

17-Jul-2056

47

31

227633

La Chivitas Fraccion 3

18-Jul-2006

17-Jul-2056

32

237850

Tayopa

17-May-2011

16-May-2061

33

237610

Salto Colorado

20-Apr-2011

19-Apr-2061

34

237851

El Otonal

17-May-2011

16-May-2061

35

237953

La Centella

30-Jun-2011

29-Jun-2061

76

36

238482

Tayopa 2

23-Sep-2011

22-Sep-2061

1,891

37

227113

La Chivitas Fraccion II

9-May-2006

8-May-2056

38

199007

San Javier

11-Feb-1994

10-Feb-2044

39

227163

La Chivitas

17-May-2006

16-May-2056

89

40

227112

La Chivitas Fraccion I

9-May-2006

8-May-2056

234

41

227176

La Chivitas

17-May-2006

16-May-2056

23

42

227630

El Tarachi

18-Jul-2006

17-Jul-2056

100

43

223235

El Tarachi

17-Nov-2004

16-Nov-2054

100

44

225306

La Texana

16-Aug-2005

15-Aug-2055

300

45

239975

Tayopa 5

16-Mar-2012

15-Mar-2062

1,633

Total Hectares

Hectares
358
119

16
16,521

10
11,524
400
14,146

5
171

57,614

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


16

Figure 4.2 Concession map. Claim reference numbers as in Table 4.1

The claims are currently controlled by Agnico-Eagle through its wholly-owned subsidiary Resource
Grayd de Mexico SA de CV (Grayd Mexico) by means of direct ownership via staking and by
executed purchase agreements. A summary of the claim ownership agreements follows:
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
17

La India and La India 1 Concessions - 100% interest in these two mining claims. A one-time bonus
payment of $0.50/oz gold on reserves that are proven and recoverable, as determined by a bankable
feasibility study, will be payable to the former owners of the property within nine months from the
commencement of production. The former owners will also retain a 1% net smelter royalty (NSR) on
the property, half of which may be purchased by Agnico-Eagle for $750,000. Agnico-Eagle plans to
purchase the 0.5% royalty prior to operations and therefore has included $750,000 in the economic
analysis (item 22) in this report.
Triple A Concession - 100% interest in this mining claim. The property is subject to a 2% NSR.
Agnico-Eagle can purchase half of the NSR at any time with a payment of $1,500,000.
La Cruz Concession - 100% interest in this mining claim. The property is subject to an underlying
1% NSR that may be purchased for $250,000. Agnico-Eagle plans to purchase the1% NSR prior to
operations and therefore has included $250,000 in the economic analysis (item 22) in this report.
La Viruela Claim Group - 100% interest in this group comprising the contiguous La Viruela,
Continuacin SE La Viruela, Soledad, Ampliacin Soledad, and Tayopita concessions. The property
is subject to an underlying 3% NSR that may be purchased for $250,000. Agnico-Eagle plans to
purchase the 3% NSR prior to operations and has included $250,000 in the economic analysis in this
report.
San Fer Claim Group - 100% interest in this group comprising the contiguous San Fer 1, San Fer 2,
San Fer 3, San Fer 4 Fracc.1, San Fer 4 Fracc. 2, and San Fer 4 Fracc. 3 concessions.
Pilar Claim Group - 100% interest in this group comprising the El Pilar, Sta. Cruz Pilar Fracc. 1,
and Sta. Cruz Pilar Fracc. 2 concessions,. The property is subject to a 2% NSR of which 1.5% can be
purchased for $3 million. These concessions do not host any of the mineral resources or reserves
estimated in items 14 and 15 of this technical report.
Tarachi Fraccion Claim Group - 100% interest in this group comprising the Tarachi Fracc. 1,
Tarachi Fracc. 2. and Tarachi Fracc. 3 concessions. The property is not subject to any NSR or further
obligations.
Tarachi Claim Group - 100% interest in group comprising the Tarachi, Tarachi-1, Tarachi-2 and
Tarachi-3 concessions. The property is subject to a 2% NSR of which 1.5% may be purchased by
Agnico-Eagle for $1,000,000. These concessions do not host any of the mineral resources or reserves
estimated in items 14 and 15 of this technical report.
Chivitas - Tayopa Claim Group - 100% interest in group comprising the La Chivitas, La Chivitas
Fracc 1, La Chivitas Fracc 2, La Chivitas Fracc 3, La Chivita Fracc II, and Tayopa concessions.
Pursuant to an agreement dated July 13, 2011, Grayd obtained the right to acquire 100% interest in
the concessions by making staged payments totaling $754,800 over a five-year period. The property
is subject to a 2% NSR of which 1% may be purchased by Agnico-Eagle for $1,000,000. These
concessions do not host any of the mineral resources or reserves estimated in items 14 and 15 of this
technical report.
San Javier Claim Group - 100 % interest in the group comprising the San Javier, La Chivitas (Title
227163), La Chivitas Fracc 1, La Chivitas (Title 227176), El Tarachi, El Tarachi (Title 223235) and
the La Texana (50% ownership) concessions. Pursuant to an agreement dated February 15, 2012,
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
18

Agnico-Eagle obtained the right to acquire 100% interest in the concessions by making staged
payments totaling $1,032,500 and equity shares of Agnico-Eagle worth $930,000 over a five-year
period. The property is subject to a 2% NRS that may be purchased by Agnico-Eagle for $2,000,000.
These concessions do not host any of the mineral resources or reserves estimated in items 14 and 15
of this technical report.
Salto Colorado Concession - 100% interest in this mining claim. The property is subject to a 2%
NSR of which 1% may be purchased at any time by Agnico-Eagle for $1,000,000.
Agnico-Eagle holds 100% interest in the La Rumorosa and Roka 2 concessions which were acquired
via concession applications (staking) in a lottery process.

4.3 Surface Rights


All of the estimated mineral reserves and resources lie within privately owned or possessed land
(Figure 4.3). Agnico-Eagle (under the name of Grayd Mexico) owns the surface rights encompassing
the North Zone of the La India deposit and has executed a long-term lease agreement (temporary
occupation) for surface rights required to develop and mine the Main Zone of the La India deposit.
For lands not owned directly, Agnico-Eagle has executed surface access lease agreements with the
property owners or possessors, allowing the company access to conduct exploration work.

Figure 4.3 Surface rights map, reserves and resources area, La India project

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


19

4.3.1 Ejido Lands


Ejidos are communal agrarian and/or ranching societies formed as part of the Mexican Governments
post-revolutionary agrarian reform policies. Ejido land is collectively owned by the Ejido members.
The collectively owned land may be leased but cannot be purchased by private parties or
corporations. Constitutional reforms enacted in the 1990s permit the Ejidos to privatize the
collectively owned land such that it may be freely combined, rented, or sold. Over 50% of the surface
area of Mexico is assigned to Ejidos, and most major mines in Mexico are developed on Ejido lands
where land tenure is secured by the mining companies via special lease arrangements defined by
Federal Mining Law as Temporary Occupations, or alternatively, via direct purchase of Ejido lands
that have been privatized following Federally prescribed procedures (PROCEDE).
Ejido lands are not required for development of the currently defined La India mineral resource.
However, in exploration areas away from the currently defined reserves and resources, the surface
rights are owned by the Matarachi Ejido, the Tarachi Eijdo, and various private land owners.
The Puertos and Cebadilla exploration targets lie partly within Ejido Matarachi lands. Agnico-Eagle
has conducted exploration on Matarachi Ejido lands under the auspices of a written exploration
contract with the community whereby exploration access is granted and the company pays
compensation of $5,000 per year. Additional compensation fees for road and drill pad construction
are negotiated on a case-by-case basis, commensurate with the value of the land affected.
No work is currently being undertaken on land owned by the Tarachi Eijdo. In the area of the Tarachi
deposit drilling, surface access for exploration is covered by separate agreements with private
landowners.
Development of subsurface water supplies may require access agreements and easements for wells
and related infrastructure located on lands not currently controlled by Agnico-Eagle.

4.3.2 Private Lands


Rancho Bronces y Bajios (also known as La Cieneguita) - The North Zone mineral reserve and
resource is entirely contained with this fee simple private property, owned directly by Grayd Mexico.
Rancho La Amargosa - The La India part of the North Zone resource is entirely contained within
this private property whose title was assigned to Grayd Mexico by judicial resolution. Agnico-Eagle
employees currently occupy the ranch house and ancillary buildings; the company has constructed
field camps, offices, and storage buildings on the property.
Rancho El Duraznito - Most of the Main Zone reserve and resource lies within this property. The
current possessor of the land is Casimiro Monge Carillo, the son of the deceased registered owner,
Casimiro Monge Willem. Agnico-Eagle has conducted exploration on the property under the auspices
of a written exploration contract with Casimiro Monge Carillo under which Agnico-Eagle was
allowed to conduct surface exploration including road construction and drilling in consideration for
annual payments.
In July 2012, Agnico-Eagle secured a long-term lease agreement (30-year temporary occupation)
with Casimiro Monge Carillo for the remaining surface rights required to develop and mine the Main
Zone deposit. Agnico-Eagle has submitted the formal request to expand the area in the present Land
Use Permit in order to continue with the project development of the Main Zone. These subsequent
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
20

permits are expected to be readily obtained, and are not necessary for the construction phase or for
the first several years of operation.

4.4 Environmental Liabilities


An environmental audit conducted in 2008 by Hermosillo-based consultants Bufete Minero y
Servicios del Noroeste SA de CV reported that no significant environmental liabilities are apparent in
the area of interest. Small abandoned mines and waste piles are present but are not generating acid
drainage. There are no plant facilities or tailings present within the project area. Since 2008, Bufete
Minero has conducted periodic site visits to audit the projects compliance with Mexican
environmental regulation NOM-120 and found the project compliant.
Agnico-Eagles purchase of surface rights north and outside the project boundaries includes lands
with historic mine workings and waste rock piles, and although Mexcian law does not hold current
owners liable for the damages caused by past operators, the company will assess the environmental
impacts of the historic workings on company-owned lands and take appropriate remedial action.

4.5 Permits
Exploration and mining activities in Mexico are subject to control by the Secretaria del Medio
Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Secretary of the Environment and Natural Resources), known by its
acronym SEMARNAT. The La India project is not included within any specially protected,
federally designated ecological zones; therefore, basic exploration activities are regulated under
Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-120-ECOL-1997. NOM120 allows for activities including mapping,
geochemical sampling, geophysical surveys, mechanized trenching, road-building and drilling. If
each particular activity does not exceed a defined threshold for surface disturbance (which varies by
activity), and if in aggregate these activities will affect less than 25% of the project surface area, the
project operator is required only to inform SEMARNAT in writing of the proposed exploration
activities. If after five days SEMARNAT has not formally objected, work may proceed immediately.
NOM120 defines the impact mitigation procedures that must be followed for each activity.
Most exploration activities can be permitted utilizing NOM120. Mine construction and operation
activities generally require preparation of:

a Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Statement), known by its acronym


MIA, and
a Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Land Use Change) permit, known by its acronym CUS.

Properly prepared MIA and CUS applications and mine operating permits for a project that does not
affect federally protected biospheres or ecological reserves can usually be approved in 12 months.
Prior to 2012, exploration work at La India was conducted under the auspices of NOM120. Because
the limits for surface disturbance permitted under NOM120 are being approached in the Main Zone,
further exploration or development work in the La Viruela-La Cruz area (part of the Main Zone) that
creates additional surface disturbance will require a CUS permit. This permit cannot be issued until
Agnico-Eagle has a formally registered surface rights agreement with the owner of legal record of the
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
21

affected land. Agnico-Eagle has secured a long-term lease agreement for the remaining surface rights
required and has submitted the formal request to expand the area in the present Land Use Permit in
order to continue with project development of the Main Zone. (See the Rancho El Duraznito property
discussion in item 4.3.2).
Baseline environmental studies of the La India project were completed in October 2008 by
independent environmental permitting consultants. The results of these studies show that project is
not located in an area with a special federal environmental protection designation, and no factors
have been identified that would be expected to hinder authorization of required Federal and State
environmental permits.
Permits that are required for the construction and operation of the La India mine are summarized in
Table 4.2. Agnico-Eagle has already obtained the CUS permit and a federally approved MIA permit
allowing for construction and operation of mining and processing facilities in the North Zone of the
La India deposit. No obstacles to obtaining the remaining permits for the La India project are
anticipated provided that Agnico-Eagle obtains required the surface rights, and the design and
mitigation criteria meet all applicable standards.

Table 4.2 Permits required for La India mine construction and operation
Permit
Environmental
Impact
Statement
(Manifiesto
de Impacto Ambiental
MIA)

Required for:
Construction,
operation
and
closure

Permitting Agency
SEMARNAT

Land Use Change Study


(Cambio de Uso de
Suelo CUS)
Risk Analysis Study
(Estudio
de
Riego
Ambiental ERA)
Municipal Authorization
for Construction
Explosive Handling and
Storage Permits

Construction
operation

and

SEMARNAT - CONAFOR

Construction
operation

and

SEMARNAT

Archaeological Release
Letter
Water Use Concession
Title

Construction
Construction
operation

and

CNA

Water Discharge Permit

Operation
maintenance
Operation
maintenance
Operation
maintenance
Construction

and

CNA

and

SEMARNAT

and

SEMARNAT

Unique Licence
Accident
Prevention
Plan
Quarry or Aggregate
Extraction Permit
Non-toxic
Waste
Disposal Permit

Construction
Construction
operation

Construction

and

SIUE;
Municipality of Sahuaripa
SEDENA,
Governors
Authorization,
Municipality of Sahuaripa
INAH

Status
Approved for construction and operation occupying
327.134 hectares for North Zone. Document DS-SGUGA-IA-0291-12.
Approval of permit for Main Zone expected in 6
months.
Approved for 327.134 hectares for North Zone.
Document DFS/SGPA/UARRN/044/2012. Approval of
permit for Main Zone expected in 6 months.
Approved for construction and operation of mining and
processing facilities occupying 327.134 hectares for
North Zone. Document DS-SG-UGA-IA-0291-12

Issued once federal permits are approved

Approved and issued as document CIS/DIR/263/09


(August 31, 2009)
Typically requires 3 months to obtain permit after
discovering and pump testing or otherwise verifying
water source
Typically requires 2 to 5 months to obtain permit

SIUE

MIA approval condition requires submission of request


for this permit within 6 months of initiation of operations
Submittal of plan required within 6 months of initiation
of operations
Typically requires one month to obtain permit

Municipality of Sahuaripa

Typically requires one month to obtain permit

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


22

4.6 Significant Factors and Risks


No other significant factors and risks are known that could affect access, title, or the right or ability to
develop, operate and close the La India mine.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


23

Item 5. Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources,


Infrastructure and Physiography
The property is located approximately 210 km east-southeast of the city of Hermosillo, in the eastern
portion of the State of Sonora, Mexico, in close proximity to the neighbouring State of Chihuahua. As
described in Item 4, sufficient surface rights have been secured by Agnico-Eagle to develop the
mining project.
Access is by road from Hermosillo and requires approximately seven hours of travel time. The first
150 km is via a paved road to the village of Arivechi. The remaining distance (approximately 60 km)
is on a gravel and dirt road. The road beyond Arivechi provides access not only to the property but
also to Alamos Gold Inc.s Mulatos gold mine.
The property is located between the towns of Tarachi and Matarachi (Figure 4.1). These towns offer
little infrastructure beyond rural telephone service and small federally subsidized grocery stores.
Most basic services are available in Sahuaripa, 15 km north of Arivechi on the way to Hermosillo.
The population of the district is estimated to be a few thousand with most of the inhabitants involved
in small mining operations, ranching, and/or subsistence farming.
An adequate supply of labour for mining operations can be drawn from the region, and technical and
professional staff will be recruited from within Mexico as required.
The nearest international airport is located at Hermosillo. Unpaved airstrips for light aircraft exist at
Matarachi, Tarachi, and the nearby Mulatos mine, but only the airstrip at the Mulatos mine is
currently active.

5.1 Physiography and Climate


The property is in the Sierra Madre Mountains of eastern Sonora. The topography consists of long
ridges separated by steep V-shaped valleys. Elevations range from 1,200 m to more than 2,000 m
above sea level. Areas of low relief in the western portion of the project area provide suitable
locations for plant sites, leach pads, waste dumps, and other mine-related infrastructure.
The climate in the area is semi-arid with variable seasonal temperatures ranging from 35oC in the
summer and -2oC in the winter, with occasional frost at higher elevations. The area experiences
torrential rainfall occurring from July to September; the driest months are March to May.
Exploration, construction and mining activities may be conducted year round, although summer rains
may cause occasional closings of river and arroyo crossings along the roads from Sahuaripa and
Yecora to the project. Since storm events are normally short in duration, interruptions to traffic most
often last only a few hours.
Vegetation in the area is varied. Vegetation at higher elevations consists of open pine forests, while
oak and cedar forests predominate at lower elevations. Poor soils and inconsistent precipitation limit
the viability of farming in the area.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


24

5.2 Infrastructure
Existing infrastructure in the project area is limited to the original Amargosa ranch house and a few
outlying buildings located between the North and Main zones that have served as the exploration
camp and core storage facilities for Grayd, as well as currently serving as the temporary camp for
Agnico-Eagles operations and regional exploration group. The existing ranch facilities are in the
same area where the new office, warehouse and truck shop facilities are going to be constructed
(Figure 16.7).
The closest line electrical power source is the federally owned and operated electric transmission grid
that extends as far as Arivechi, approximately 60 km from the project. Therefore the electricity
required for the project will be generated at an onsite power plant as described in Item 18.

5.3 Water Sources


Water supply has been identified as one of the key issues to resolve for the successful development of
the La India project. Based on average annual precipitation and evaporation, the makeup water
requirements at La India have been estimated to be 250,000 m3 per year for process and other site
uses (Golder Associates, 2012). In an extremely dry year, the makeup water requirements could
increase to 450,000 m3 per year.
Hydrogeological conditions in the La India region are not favourable for prolific aquifers and
underground water supplies. Drilling by Agnico-Eagle has yielded modest results; three wells could
potentially provide a total of approximately 90,000 m3 per year of supply water from the La India
site. These wells have not been operated on a continuous basis, and it is not known if their flow is
sustainable because drawdown calculations cannot be performed (no water table).
Seasonal rainfall in the La India area averages more than 1,000 mm per year occurring mainly during
the four-month period from June through September. Weather records in the region indicate that even
during extremely dry years there have been approximately 500 mm of rainfall in the area. Surface
water is therefore occasionally abundant during the heavy rainy season, as evidenced by erosion
features and actual experience by Agnico-Eagle at the La India site. According to the consultant,
these intense rainfall events and/or extremely wet climate years will require an excess storm water
storage pond with a capacity of 576,632 m3 in order to maintain a zero discharge water balance at the
heap leach facilities (Golder Associates, 2012). This storm water pond will therefore be an ideal
storage pond for makeup water and will be used for that dual purpose, with sufficient volume to
sustain operations even in an extremely dry year.
Discussions with technical and legal experts in Mexico have concluded that the legal process required
to obtain rights to surface water in this area is lengthy, expensive, and cannot be assured. Conversely
the rights to underground water are relatively easy to prove and obtain as long as they do not affect
the access to water of the neighbouring ranches and communities. As a result of this and based on
discussions with the experts, it has been decided that a hybrid approach would be best for the La
India project, using near-surface infiltration galleries constructed in sands and gravels associated with
the intermittent-flow stream areas. Several locations for infiltration galleries have been identified
nearby by experts from Bufete Minero y Servicios de Ingenieria SA de CV, and the process for
obtaining approval for the extraction of water from these areas has been initiated.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
25

The most viable location for an infiltration gallery is the La Chipriona reservoir, which is an existing
dam with a water supply situated on Agnico-Eagle property approximately 3.5 km north of the
proposed process plant, just east of where the access road to the project meets the road to Tarachi and
Matarachi (Figure 4.3). This area has been identified for its potential to provide approximately
200,000 m3 per year of water for use at La India. Another potential location for an infiltration gallery
has been identified approximately 30 km from La India at the confluence of the Iglesias and Tarachi
arroyos, which would likely be a more prolific source of water if needed. An aerial photo of the La
Chipriona reservoir is shown below (Figure 5.1).

Figure 5.1 La Chipriona Reservoir and Infiltration Zone- Located on AEM property

Precedent exists for other mining operations utilizing infiltration galleries in Mexico, including at the
El Sauzal mine in Chihuahua and more recently the Palmerejo mine in Chihuahua. The nearest
neighbour to La India is the Mulatos mine, which also employs infiltration galleries. Numerous mines
are in operation in the Sierra Madre region of Mexico, and it is commonly accepted that near-surface
infiltration water is the best available reliable supply for the operation requirements.
Additional opportunities for water collection at La India could include reuse of the contact water
from La India mine waste dumps, which could supply up to 30% of the required water supply during
operation. Due to the acid rock drainage tendencies of the waste rock, this impacted water would
normally require impoundment and treatment prior to release, but it is expected that a permit could be
received to reuse this water for dust control or process water supply rather than treating and
discharge. The application for the use of this water will be followed using legal processes. AgnicoEagle currently successfully manages contact water at the Pinos Altos mine in Mexico in a similar
manner.
The engineering water balance evaluation (Golder, 2012) indicates that the watershed and catchment
areas above the leach pad at La India will be able to sustain 100% of the project water requirements
during normal rainfall years after approximately three years of operation. Some of this water will be
diverted during the early years of operation, but it may be possible to recover this diverted water also
as part of the mining process, and an application will be made to legally secure that right.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


26

It is believed that there are several options available to generate a sufficient water supply to sustain
operation at La India, and based on conversations with experts, it is expected that these water sources
can be legally obtained prior to the onset of operations.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


27

Item 6.

History

The first gold discovery in the region, as recorded by Spanish colonials, was made in 1673 at
Ostimuri. The gold deposit at Mulatos was discovered by the Spaniards in 1806, but it is likely that
indigenous peoples exploited the native gold-bearing oxidized zone of the Mulatos deposit prior to
the colonial epoch. Small-scale mining has been semi-continuous in the district during the last two
centuries (Consejo de Recursos Minerales, 1992). Much of the early mining and all of the small-scale
present mining (hand-mining by local artisanal miners) targets oxidized fractures containing finegrained visible gold. The mineralization described for the mines in this section is not necessarily
indicative of the mineralization at the La India, Sonora property.
The most significant mining activity in the region has been from the Mulatos gold deposit, located
6.5 km from the property, which is reported to have produced over 400,000 oz gold prior to 1905
(Southworth,1905). Alamos Gold Inc., a TSX traded public company, now controls the Mulatos
deposit and operates a large-scale open pit mine there. The Mulatos mine was commissioned in 2008,
and produced 153,000 ounces of gold in 2011 (Alamos Gold Press Release, 9 January 2012, available
on SEDAR). The mine reported proven and probable reserves of 65.0 million tonnes grading 1.14
grams/tonne (g/t) gold containing 2.39 million oz gold as of December 31, 2011 (Alamos Gold
Mineral Reserve table, at www.alamosgold.com, May 2012). Alamos Gold states that these mineral
reserve estimates follow the required disclosure for reserves and resources outlined in NI43-101. The
estimates were obtained from sources believed to be reliable but cannot be verified.
Past mining activity on the present La India property included small underground mines and work on
prospects throughout the La Cruz and La Viruela areas. Local residents state that the La Cruz - La
Viruela property was intermittently mined at a small scale during the early 1920s and 1930s. On the
basis of the size of the mine workings, the author estimates no more than 10,000 tonnes of material
was extracted from all of the historic workings in the La Viruela -La Cruz area. There has been
modern exploration work in this area.
In the late 1980s, New Golden Sceptre Minerals and New Goliath Minerals completed approximately
2,000 m of percussion drilling. In the early 1990s Noranda acquired the rights to La Cruz - La
Viruela and completed 2,616 m of reverse circulation drilling. Drill logs and assay results generated
by these drill programs are not available, but Jenkins (1994) reported that at least 72 holes were
drilled, with at least 32 drill holes located in the La Viruela area and at least 35 at La Cruz. The drill
holes at La Viruela ranged from 20 to 126 m in depth, whereas the drill holes at La Cruz ranged from
21 to 102 m depth. Jenkins (1994) summarized drill results indicating that intercepts of >0.3 g/t gold
were common, with the most significant reported intercepts at La Viruela being 52 m @ 1.03 g/t and
38 m @ 2.68 g/t gold, whereas at La Cruz, the most significant drill intercepts were 20 m @ 6.15 g/t
and 24 m @ 1.17 g/t gold.
In 1993 San Fernando Mining Co. Ltd. acquired the property and conducted further drilling,
including 10 diamond drill holes totaling 2,268 m at La Viruela and 11 diamond drill holes at La
Cruz totaling 1,292 m (McDougall, 1995). Drill logs and assay results generated by the drill
programs are not available, but McDougall (1995) reported that the most significant intercepts
generated by San Fernando Mining Company Ltd. were 28 m @ 1.96 g/t gold at La Viruela and 27.5
m @ 2.24 g/t gold at La Cruz.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


28

6.1 Exploration by Grayd Resource Corp., 2004 through 2011


Grayd Resource Corp. actively explored the project from 2004 through its wholly-owned Mexican
subsidiary, Resource Grayd de Mexico SA de CV (Grayd Mexico), until Grayd was acquired by
Agnico-Eagle in November 2011. Work completed by Grayd included geologic mapping,
geochemical rock-chip sampling, airborne geophysical surveys, ground geophysical surveys,
photogrammetric topographic mapping, diamond drilling, reverse circulation drilling, baseline
environmental surveys, and metallurgical testing.
The exploration activities from January 2004 through November 20, 2011 are summarized in Table
6.1; the exploration work from January 2004 through mid-2010 was described in 6 December 2010
Preliminary Economic Assessment, La India Gold Project, Municipio of Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico
(Gray et al., 2010) and is summarized in item 6 of this report.
Table 6.1 Exploration activities by Grayd Resource Corp. on La India property from January 2004 through
November 20, 2011
Exploration Activity

Units

Reconnaissance Geologic Mapping

hectares

20,000

Detailed Geologic Mapping

hectares

4,200

Rock Chip Sampling

samples

9329

Stream Sediment Sampling

samples

58

Soil Sampling

samples

1193

Airborne Geophysical Survey

line-km

1,300

Photogrammetric Topography 2m CI

hectares

4,420

Ground Geophysical Survey-Mag

line-km

265

Ground Geophysical Survey-IP

line-km

100

Diamond Core Drilling La India and


Tarachi

drillholes

Reverse Circulation Drilling La India and


Tarachi

drillholes

metres
metres

Amount

169
20,001
633
65,274

6.1.1 Diamond Drilling


In 2004, Grayd completed 1,224 m of BTW (4.2 cm-diameter) diamond drilling in 11 drill holes
within the the northern portion of the La India claim blockthree holes at the La Cieneguita target
(North Zone), one at La Espaola (North Zone), and seven at the La India target (North Zone). Drill
targets were selected on the basis of rock chip geochemical anomalies and silica-alunite alteration
exposed in surface outcrops. All drill holes were inclined at approximately 50 degrees and most
were drilled due east in order to test interpreted northeast- and northwest-striking structures and
stratigraphic controls of gold distribution. Ten of the eleven drill holes intersected gold
mineralization (Gray, 2006).
In 2007 and 2008, Grayd completed 3,948 m of HQ and PQ diamond drilling in 54 holes. Seven of
the holes completed within the block model area were used exclusively for metallurgical testing.
Geologic information from the holes was used to guide interpretation of lithological and alteration
contacts, assays of core samples constrained the resource estimate, and core samples were used for
specific gravity determinations.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


29

In 2009, Grayd completed an additional 2,385 m of diamond drilling in 37 drill holes using a portable
hydraulic drill rig and NTW tools.
From January 2010 until the acquisition of the project by Agnico-Eagle in November 2011, Grayd
completed an additional 5,329 m of diamond drilling in 45 holes at La India using a portable
hydraulic drill rig and NTW tools. Agnico has continued the diamond drilling program and as of May
23, 2012 a total of 215 diamond core holes totaling 18,734 m have been completed by Grayd and
Agnico. This information was used for the Resources Update done in June 2012.

6.1.2 Reverse Circulation Drilling


In 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and through January 22, 2010, Grayd completed 45,334 m of 13.4cm-diameter reverse circulation drilling in 542 drill holes. Reverse circulation drilling was used both
for general exploration and for resource definition drilling. A total of 510 RC drill holes comprising
40,871 m are constrained the 2010 resource model.
Subsequent to the data cutoff date for the 2010 resource estimate until the time of the acquisition of
the project by Agnico-Eagle in November 2011, Grayd completed an additional 63 reverse
circulation drill holes totaling 7,553 m at La India.

6.2 Resource estimates, 2008 through 2010


In 2007 Grayd commissioned Giroux Consultants Ltd. and Resource Geosciences de Mexico SA de
CV (RGM) to provide an independent mineral resource estimate and NI43-101-compliant Technical
Report for the La India project. The model was constrained by 229 reverse circulation drill holes
totaling 20,632 m and three diamond drill holes totaling 142 m. The first 43-101-compliant mineral
resource for the La India project, published in February 2008 (Gray and Giroux, 2008), reported an
inferred resource containing 936,000 oz gold (36.8 million tonnes grading 0.79 g/t gold) calculated at
a 0.40-g/t cutoff grade (Table 6.2). Of this resource, 708,000 oz gold was contained in oxidized and
partly oxidized material.
Table 6.2 La India project NI43-101-compliant mineral inferred resource estimate by Grayd Resource Corp. as
of February 2008 including all material types in all areas (Gray and Giroux, 2008)
Au Cutoff

Tonnes > Cutoff

(g/t)

(tonnes)

Au (g/t)

Grade > Cutoff


Au (grams)

Au Ounces

0.10

196,710,000

0.301

59,300,000

1,906,000

0.20

92,440,000

0.482

44,500,000

1,432,000

0.30

55,490,000

0.641

35,600,000

1,143,000

0.40

36,790,000

0.791

29,100,000

936,000

0.50

26,130,000

0.933

24,400,000

783,000

0.60

19,730,000

1.058

20,900,000

671,000

0.70

14,860,000

1.192

17,700,000

569,000

0.80

11,630,000

1.315

15,300,000

492,000

0.90

9,220,000

1.438

13,300,000

426,000

1.00

7,490,000

1.550

11,600,000

373,000

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


30

After completing an additional 12,130 m of reverse circulation drilling and an additional 2,640 m of
diamond drilling, in August 2008 Grayd commissioned Giroux and RGM to create an updated NI-43101-compliant resource estimate for the project, which was published in February 2009 (Gray and
Giroux, 2009). The results were an indicated resource (Table 6.3) containing an estimated 654,000 oz
gold (20.3 million tonnes grading 0.86 g/t gold), and an inferred resource Table 6.4) containing an
estimated 375,000 oz gold (13.5 million tonnes grading 0.87 g/t gold), both calculated at a 0.40-g/t
cutoff grade. Of this indicated resource, 524,000 oz gold is in oxidized material, and 322,000 oz gold
in the inferred resource is in oxide material.
Table 6.3 La India project NI43-101-compliant indicated resource estimate by Grayd Resource Corp. as of
February 2009 including oxide and sulphide material in all areas (Gray and Giroux, 2009)
TOTAL ALL ZONES - INDICATED RESOURCE
Au Cutoff

Tonnes> Cutoff

(g/t)

(tonnes)

Au (g/t)

Grade > Cutoff


Au (grams)

Au Ounces

0.10

56,390,000

0.496

28,000,000

900,000

0.20

43,370,000

0.600

26,000,000

836,000

0.30

32,210,000

0.722

23,300,000

748,000

0.40

23,750,000

0.856

20,300,000

654,000

0.50

17,160,000

1.013

17,400,000

559,000

0.60

12,680,000

1.179

14,900,000

480,000

0.70

9,890,000

1.329

13,100,000

423,000

0.80

7,950,000

1.470

11,700,000

376,000

0.90

6,720,000

1.585

10,700,000

342,000

1.00

5,780,000

1.689

9,800,000

314,000

Table 6.4 La India project NI43-101-compliant inferred resource estimate by Grayd Resource Corp. as of
February 2009 including oxide and sulphide material in all areas (Gray and Giroux, 2009)
TOTAL ALL ZONES - INFERRED RESOURCE
Au Cutoff

Tonnes> Cutoff

Grade > Cutoff

(g/t)

(tonnes)

Au (g/t)

Au (grams)

Au Ounces

0.10

37,240,000

0.456

17,000,000

546,000

0.20

25,660,000

0.596

15,300,000

491,000

0.30

19,480,000

0.706

13,700,000

442,000

0.40

13,490,000

0.866

11,700,000

375,000

0.50

9,410,000

1.051

9,900,000

318,000

0.60

7,620,000

1.171

8,900,000

287,000

0.70

6,350,000

1.275

8,100,000

260,000

0.80

5,390,000

1.368

7,400,000

237,000

0.90

4,650,000

1.450

6,700,000

217,000

1.00

3,930,000

1.542

6,100,000

195,000

From then until January 2010, Grayd completed an additional 11,976 m of reverse circulation drilling
in 134 drill holes and an additional 2,444 m of diamond core drilling in 37 drill holes. In January
2010, Grayd commissioned RGM and Giroux to prepare an updated independent mineral resource
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
31

estimate and a NI43-101-compliant technical report for the La India project, which was published in
June 2010 (Gray and Giroux, 2010). The results were a measured and indicated resource (Table 6.5)
containing 760,000 oz gold (26.8 million tonnes grading 0.88 g/t gold), and an inferred resource
(Table 6.6) containing 506,000 oz gold (19.7 million tonnes grading 0.80 g/t gold), both calculated at
a 0.40-g/t cutoff grade. Of the indicated resource, 603,000 oz gold was in oxidized material, and
378,000 oz of gold in the inferred resource was in oxide material.
Table 6.5 La India project NI43-101-compliant measured and indicated resource estimate by Grayd Resource
Corp. as of May 2010 including oxide and sulphide material in all areas (Gray and Giroux, 2010)
TOTAL ALL ZONES MEASURED PLUS INDICATED RESOURCE
Au Cutoff

Tonnes> Cutoff

(g/t)

(tonnes)

Au (g/t)

Grade > Cutoff


Au (grams)

Au Ounces

0.10

61,650,000

0.517

31,900,000

1,024,000

0.20

48,230,000

0.619

29,900,000

960,000

0.30

36,090,000

0.745

26,900,000

864,000

0.40

26,770,000

0.883

23,600,000

760,000

0.50

20,180,000

1.025

20,700,000

665,000

0.60

15,570,000

1.167

18,200,000

584,000

0.70

12,250,000

1.308

16,000,000

515,000

0.80

9,870,000

1.443

14,200,000

458,000

0.90

8,100,000

1.573

12,700,000

410,000

1.00

6,800,000

1.693

11,500,000

370,000

Table 6.6 La India project NI43-101-compliant inferred resource estimate by Grayd Resource Corp. as of May
2010 including oxide and sulphide material in all areas (Gray and Giroux, 2010)
TOTAL ALL ZONES - INFERRED RESOURCE
Au Cutoff

Tonnes> Cutoff

Grade > Cutoff

(g/t)

(tonnes)

Au (g/t)

Au (grams)

Au Ounces

0.10

117,170,000

0.303

35,500,000

1,143,000

0.20

62,130,000

0.443

27,500,000

886,000

0.30

34,150,000

0.606

20,700,000

665,000

0.40

19,730,000

0.798

15,700,000

506,000

0.50

13,540,000

0.961

13,000,000

418,000

0.60

9,910,000

1.113

11,000,000

355,000

0.70

7,540,000

1.259

9,500,000

305,000

0.80

5,900,000

1.402

8,300,000

236,000

0.90

4,800,000

1.530

7,300,000

236,000

1.00

4,040,000

1.641

6,600,000

213,000

In July 2010, Grayd commissioned the preparation of a Preliminary Economic Assessment of the La
India project, based upon the NI43-101-compliant resources as of June 2010. The PEA was published
on December 6, 2010 (Gray et.al., 2010), based on the same resources that were estimated in Gray
and Giroux (2010), as shown in Table 6.5 and Table 6.6.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


32

Item 7.

Geological Setting and Mineralization

7.1 Regional Geology


The La India project lies within the Sierra Madre Occidental (SMO) province, a regionally extensive
Eocene to Miocene volcanic field, which extends southeast from the United States Mexico border
to central Mexico. The total thickness of the volcanic sequence is approximately 2 km, and it rests
upon Mesozoic clastic and calcareous sedimentary rock. The volcanic field is comprised of two
distinct volcanic sequences, an older andesitic and dacitic series, and a younger pyroclasticdominated rhyolitic series. The traditional nomenclature refers to these as the Serie Volcanica
Inferior (Lower Series) and Serie Volcanica Superior (Upper Series). The Lower Series is
approximately 1 km thick and is dominated by Paleocene and Eocene andesitic lavas and pyroclastic
deposits, with interbedded volcaniclastic strata. Silicic volcanic units are present but are a minor
component. The volcanic strata of the Lower Series are cut by calc-alkaline intrusives. The Upper
Series unconformably overlies the Lower Series with erosional disconformity, and comprises a 1-kmthick sequence dominated by Oligocene and early Miocene dacitic and rhyolitic pyroclastic strata and
volcaniclastic strata. Most significant metal occurrences in the SMO are hosted by rocks of the Lower
Series or the underlying Mesozoic strata.
The La India project lies within the western limits of the SMO in an area dominated by outcrops of
andesitic to dacitic tuffs that were intruded by granodiorite and diorite stocks and overlain by
rhyolitic tuffs, basaltic andesite lavas, and a large pile of late conglomerates. These rocks lie within a
northwest-trending zone of Miocene extension that disrupted the regional stratigraphy along northnorthwest-striking normal faults causing large-scale rotation of blocks with predominantly eastnortheast inclinations (Figure 7.1). Incised fluvial canyons have cut the uppermost strata and expose
the Lower Series volcanic strata.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


33

Figure 7.1 Regional geologic map, summarized from Servicio Geologico Mexicano (2009)

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


34

7.2 Local and Property Geology


The La India project area is underlain by the Lower Series volcanic sequence comprised of Paleocene
andesitic and dacitic volcanic rocks interbedded with epiclastic rocks of similar composition (Figure
7.2 and Figure 7.3). The andesitic volcanic rocks are the oldest Cenozoic rocks at La India and
include a lower sequence of lavas, tuffs and epiclastic rocks. Atop the andesite is an upper sequence
of biotite-pyroxene trachyandesitic and dacitic flow domes and tuffs. These rocks overlie the lower
andesites with erosional disconformity; fine-grained dacitic tuffs interbedded with epiclastic rocks
mark the contact. Two 40Ar/39Ar age determinations on plagioclase returned Paleocene ages for the
lower andesitic and upper dacitic sequences (62.6 Ma and 55.8 Ma, respectively). Dacite and feldspar
porphyries intruded the andesitic and dacitic volcanic rocks at La India (Longo, 2006a; Longo et al.,
2010), and a granodiorite intruded andesitic volcanic rocks at the southern limit of the project area
(Moore, 2006). Two 40Ar/39Ar ages of plagioclase from the porphyries yielded Eocene ages of 43.3
Ma and 36.9 Ma. Thick (100-500-m) deposits of rhyolitic ignimbrite overlie the older andesite and
dacite. These rocks are named the Nopal Ignimbrite, and one 40Ar/39Ar age of biotite yielded an upper
Eocene age of 33.9 Ma.

Figure 7.2 Geologic map encompassing the Cieneguita, La Viruela-La Cruz, and Cerro de Oro areas

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


35

Figure 7.3 Volcanic stratigraphic column of the La India area as determined by T. Longo

Upper Series rocks include basaltic andesite lavas and flow breccias that overlie the Nopal
ignimbrites with erosional disconformity. One 40Ar/39Ar age from a wholerock sample of lava yielded
an Oligocene age of 28.2 Ma. These lavas are both overlain by and interbedded with alluvial
conglomerates. Upper Series Oligocene rhyolitic ignimbrites have not been recognized within the
concession boundaries. The rocks at La India strike northwest and dip 25 to 30 degrees northeast in
the southern portion of the project area (Moore, 2005), and dip 15 to 25 degrees west and southwest
in the northern portion of the project area. The La India - La Viruela - La Cruz area comprises one of
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
36

several high-sulphidation epithermal mineralization centres recognized in the Mulatos district


(Staude, 2001).
Silica alteration is both stratiform and discordant. Stratiform layers of silica are localized at the base
of the dacitic tuffs within the epiclastic rocks (Figure 7.4). Silicification coincident with zones of
higher grade gold mineralization is controlled by high angle faults and fractures. Geological mapping
and surface rock chip sampling have identified zones of gold-bearing silica, silica alunite, and argillic
alteration from numerous localities within the project area. The most extensive surface outcrops of
altered and gold-bearing rock are found at the La India, La Viruela, La Cruz, Cerro de Oro, Espanola,
Cieneguita, Espanola, and Cochis areas; these have been the focus of drill testing, and host the
mineral resource described in this report. Another zone of outcropping gold mineralization has been
identified at the Los Tubos area located 2 km east of the La Cruz area. This area offers potential to
host additional resources, but this target has only been partially drill-tested and a resource has not
been demonstrated.

Figure 7.4 Drill-hole fence diagram through Viruela - La Cruz zone looking northeast

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


37

7.3 Mineralization
Numerous epithermal gold occurrences are exposed in small abandoned mines or exploration
workings throughout the La India property. Host rocks include hydrothermal breccias, andesite,
dacite porphyry, and volcaniclastic strata. Both high-angle structural and low-angle stratigraphic
controls are observed. Mineralized zones are characterized by alteration mineral assemblages that
include alunite, dickite and/or pyrophyllite, accompanied by intense silica replacement of the host
rock, with variable intensities of pyritization and/or hematization. Pyrite occurs both as
disseminations and in microveinlets. In oxidized zones, relict hematite-limonite-goethite after pyrite
is present. In some occurrences, primary hypogene specularite is associated with auriferous zones.
The mineral occurrences for which resources have been estimated, the North and Main Zones, are
described herein. Other mineral occurrences are described in Gray (2006).

7.3.1 North Zone comprising Cieneguita, Espaola, Cochis and La India areas
The North Zone is underlain by andesitic and felsic fragmental volcanic strata. Stratigraphically
controlled zones of silica alteration and gold mineralization are restricted to the felsic units and
outcrop extensively at the Cieneguita, Espaola, and Cochis areas. The mineralized strata dip gently
to the west, and the silicified zones outcrop as prominent ridge-capping units and dip slopes. The
silicified strata are 30 to 60 m thick, with down-dip extent of 300 m or more. The La Cieneguita zone
is semi-continuously exposed for over 1,300 m of strike length; erosional or fault-offset remnants of
the silicified zone are exposed at the Espaola and Cochis areas located to the east and southeast,
respectively. Oxidation is intense and complete throughout the total thickness of the mineralized
zone.
The inactive La India mine workings are developed in argillized porphyritic dacite intrusive that
underlies silicified felsic fragmental strata. The silicification appears to be controlled by both
stratigraphy and high-angle structures, and may be part of the silicified zone exposed to the north at
the La Espaola and La Cieneguita areas. In contrast to other mineralized zones in the region (where
gold is generally restricted to silicified zones), at the inactive La India mine significant gold
mineralization occurs in argillized volcanic units. The La India area is also unusual in that thus far, it
is the only gold occurrence in the project area that is also associated with disseminated copper
mineralization; drilling has demonstrated a gold-copper-molybdenum metal assemblage in
mineralized porphyry. Gold and copper mineralization is associated with quartz stockwork veinlets in
the dacite with quartz-sericite-tourmaline alteration. Coxcomb textured and drusy quartz veins with
molybdenite and pyrite that resemble D-veins in the dacite porphyry are found at depths of 200 to
300 m below surface.
North Zone mineralization type domains have been defined on the basis of alteration mineral
assemblages and the form or control of gold occurrence (Smit, 2008). The domain definitions have
been reviewed, and the mineralization type domains identified are appropriate for the deposit and
valid for resource estimation purposes. The domain descriptions presented by Smit (2008 and
personal communication) are summarized as follows:

Domain 11: Variably silica- and/or clay-altered dacite / dacite tuff. Stratigraphically overlies
the silicified dacite of Domain 12 and is probably the less altered equivalent.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


38

Domain 12: Massive silica+alunite-altered dacite tuff. Crosscutting field relationships indicate
that the massive silicification preceded the economically important gold deposition events,
and this unit is generally not significantly mineralized unless it is crosscut by high-angle
structures and fracture zones. Forms tabular continuous sheets that typically form dip slopes
and blanket the topographic surface. For purposes of metallurgical testing, this domain was
subdivided into Domain 12 comprised of material dominated by silica and Domain 12A
comprised of a mixture of silica and alunite. The silica-rich Domain 12 has higher densities
and lower average gold recoveries than Domain 12A.
Domain 14: Silica-clay-altered andesite, forming a stratiform and strata-bound layer lying
beneath the lower contact of the dacite unit of Domain 12 or Domain 18. The zone is typically
less than 10 m thick and exhibits a rapid gradational contact with increasing depth to
unmineralized andesite.
Domain 17: Mineralized porphyry comprising andesitic-dacitic feldspar porphyry that hosts
disseminated, stockwork, and irregular structurally controlled gold mineralization with
associated copper and molybdenum, occurring in the vicinity of the inactive La India mine
workings. A lack of drill-hole data precluded inclusion of Domain 17 in the 2009 resource
model, but subsequent drilling provided enough data to allow its use in the 2010 resource
model, which is used as the resource base for the economic evaluation in this report.
Domain 18: Silicified and clay-altered breccia, controlled by low-angle structural zones,
continuous and correlated between drill holes only in the north part of the Cieneguita area.
Occurs at the base of Domain 12 and is observed in drill core and underground workings as a
zone of brecciated massive silicified dacite and the underlying silica- and clay-altered
andesite, containing abundant hematite in fractures.

Additional drilling completed by Agnico-Eagle subsequent to acquiring the project has confirmed the
North Zone geologic model created by Grayd. However, Agnico-Eagle has interpreted that higher
grade portions of the mineralized domains occur at and parallel to the domain boundaries. AgnicoEagle is currently modelling these higher grade areas as separate sub-domains, with hard boundaries
imposed according to drill-hole assays used for resource estimation.
Figure 7.5 and Figure 7.6 demonstrate the typical morphology of the most significant North Zone ore
domains and the spatial relationships between them.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


39

Figure 7.5 Section 706,300E, Cieneguita area, North Zone showing relationships between mineralization type
Domains 12, 14 and 18 looking west

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


40

Figure 7.6 Section 3,179,175, Cieneguita area, North Zone showing relationships between mineralization type
Domains 11, 12 and 18 looking north

7.3.2 Main Zone comprising La Viruela, La Cruz and Cerro de Oro areas
The Main Zone target area is comprised of the La Viruela, La Cruz, and Cerro de Oro areas where
gold concentrations are hosted by six distinct mineralization type domains. The domains were
defined on the basis of alteration mineral assemblages and the form or control of gold occurrence
(Smit, 2008). These domain definitions have been reviewed, and the mineralization type domains
identified are appropriate for the deposit and valid for resource estimation purposes. The domain
descriptions presented by Smit (2008 and personal communication) are summarized as follows:

Domain 1: Dacite unit, variably altered to silica, clay and alunite mineral assemblages, in the
La Viruela and La Cruz areas. This domain is defined both by lithology and alteration.
Alteration is most intense in areas of high-angle structures and is in general most intense in
the La Viruela area. Where quartz phenocrysts are preserved, conclusive identification of the
dacite is possible, whereas in other cases the unit is defined on the basis of its consistent
stratigraphic position overlying the Domain 2 stratiform massive silica unit.
Domain 2: Massive silica unit, developed primarily in dacitic tuff, but also may be developed
in contact zone with andesites and dacites in the La Viruela and La Cruz areas. Forms intense

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


41

stratiform zones of silica-replaced rock, locally with hydrothermal clays. Field relationships
indicate that the massive silicification predated the economically important gold deposition
event. For purposes of metallurgical testing, this domain was subdivided into Domain 2
comprised of material dominated by silica, and Domain 2A comprised of a mixture of silica
and alunite. The silica-rich Domain 2 has higher densities and lower average gold recoveries
than Domain 2A.
Domain 3: Vuggy silica silica-alunite unit. Silica-alunite-altered rock, typically developed
in fine grained andesite tuffs, often with distinct vuggy silica texture, found in the La Viruela
area. Mapping and drill-hole data demonstrate that the distribution of this unit is controlled by
high-angle northeast-striking structures and by the lower contact of the Domain 2 massive
silica unit. It typically forms an irregular layer developed at the base of Domain 2 in the La
Viruela area and narrow high-angle tabular bodies that follow northeast structures. A silicaclay-altered andesite zone is present at La Viruela, occurring in gradational contact with the
lower contact of Domain 3, reflecting a decreasing alteration intensity in the andesite tuff. In
the La Cruz area, it occurs at the base of the Domain 2 massive silica unit. In the 2009
resource model this material was modeled separately as Domain 4, but subsequent drilling
and analysis showed that the silica-clay-altered zone is a gradational zone at the boundary of
the other domains, is volumetrically insignificant, and cannot be accurately modeled as a
distinct unit. Therefore, Domain 4 is no longer used in the resource model, and the
mineralized silica-clay-altered zones at the periphery of Domains 2 and 3 are included within
the respective domains.
Domain 5: Silica-clay-altered andesite with structurally controlled mineralization, found in
the Cerro de Oro and La Cruz areas, comprised of silica-clay-altered andesite with irregular
quarts veinlets and stockworks that cannot be specifically correlated between drill holes.
Occurs stratigraphically lower than Domain 2. Drill-hole data indicate that this alteration style
is at least in part centred about an andesitic-dacitic porphyry body. It also occurs peripherally
to the silica bodies (Domain 6) in the La Cruz area. Where unoxidized, it contains 3% to 5%
disseminated pyrite.
Domain 6: Silicified bodies, apparently controlled by structural zones that can be correlated
between drill holes in the Cerro de Oro and La Cruz areas, including the deep, high-grade La
Cruz sulphide zone.
Domain 7:Mineralized porphyry, comprising andesitic-dacitic feldspar porphyry that hosts
disseminated, stockwork, and irregular structurally controlled gold mineralization. A lack of
drill-hole data precluded inclusion of Domain 7 in the 2009 resource model, but subsequent
drilling provided adequate data to allow its use in the 2010 resource model, which is used as
the resource base for the economic evaluation in this report.

Figure 7.7, Figure 7.8 and Figure 7.9 demonstrate the typical morphology of the Main Zone
mineralization type domains and the spatial relationships between them as in the June 2012 resource
model.
Locally, auriferous hydrothermal breccias are developed along high angle faults and they appear to
postdate all other alteration and mineralization events. The silica-alunite alteration zones at La
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
42

Viruela and La Cruz are continuous for hundreds of metres along strike, but have been offset by
northwest-striking high-angle normal faults (Longo, 2006a, 2006b, 2006c). Oxidation extends to
depths of greater than 100 m along structural zones and the majority of the drill-tested mineralization
is oxide material. Highest grades and continuity of mineralization are found in the La Viruela area,
but mineralization of varying tenor and style is continuous between the La Viruela, La Cruz, and
Cerro de Oro areas.

Figure 7.7 Section 3,176,600, La Viruela area showing typical morphologies and spatial
relationships of Main Zone mineralization type Domains 1, 2, and 3 looking north

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


43

Figure 7.8 Section 3,176,100, La Cruz area showing typical morphologies and spatial relationships
of Main Zone mineralization type Domains 5 and 6 looking north

Figure 7.9 Section 3,176,500N, La Viruela West area showing morphology of Main Zone
mineralization type Domain 7 looking north

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


44

Item 8.

Deposit Type

The mineral occurrences present and being sought in the Cieneguita and La India areas of the North
Zone, as well as the Main Zone of the project area are volcanic-hosted, epithermal, high-sulphidation
(HS) gold-silver deposits. Such deposits may be present as veins and/or disseminated deposits. Some
of the most intensely studied and described HS deposits include Summitville, Colorado (Stoffregen,
1987; Gray and Coolbaugh, 1994), Goldfield, Nevada (Ransome, 1909; Ashley, 1974; Vikre, 1989),
Lepanto, Philippines (Hedenquist et al., 1998) and Julcani, Peru (Petersen et al., 1977; Deen et al.,
1994). Based on these studies and others, excellent compilations of general characteristics and
genetic and empirical models have been presented by Hayba et al. (1985), Heald et al. (1987), Berger
and Henley (1988) and Arribas (1995).
General characteristics of HS deposits include:

located within plutonic-volcanic arcs;


associated with intermediate calc-alkaline rocks, often in dome complexes;
alteration mineral assemblages indicative of high-temperature acidic hydrothermal fluids,
including an advanced argillic assemblage characterized by one or more of pyrophyllite,
alunite, dickite, kaolinite, and diaspore;
silicification and acid leaching of principal hydrothermal fluid conduits (forming the clichd
vuggy silica alteration);
presence of minerals indicative of high sulphidation states, principally the sulphosalt enargite
or its low-temperature polymorph luzonite;
economically important quantities of gold and/or silver and/or copper; and
alteration zoning typified by a central zone of silica alteration flanked by a zone of advanced
argillic alteration, which in turn is surrounded by illite-dominated argillic alteration.

Genetic models proposed for HS systems call upon shallow emplacement of an oxidized calc-alkaline
magma. As the magma crystallizes, a metal- and volatile-rich fluid phase exsolves and, at relatively
low confining pressures, will separate into a low-salinity vapour and a hypersaline liquid. The vapour
phase ascends and, when absorbed into connate or meteoric waters, forms a high-temperature,
sulphate-rich, acidic hydrothermal fluid. As this hydrothermal fluid ascends and cools, acidity
progressively increases, resulting in a vertical zonation where advanced argillic assemblages overlie
illite-dominated argillic assemblages. Neutralization and cooling of the fluid during lateral fluid flow
repeats this zoning pattern, with proximal silicified and leached zones flanked first by advanced
argillic alteration, and then by more distal illite-dominated alteration. As the hydrothermal system
evolves, younger, more reduced hydrothermal fluids, probably generated by interactions between
ascending hypersaline magmatic fluid and meteoric-water-dominated convection cells, then transport
and deposit metals (gold-silver-copper) along the same conduits utilized previously. Metals may be
sourced directly from the magmatic fluids or leached from country rocks.
Over of 250,000 ounces of gold per year is currently produced from this type of deposit in the Sierre
Madre region. Some currently exploited examples are listed below. The mineralization described for
the mines in this section is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization at the La India, Sonora
property.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


45

Mulatos, Sonora
Owned and operated by Alamos Gold Incorporated. Exploits a HS mixed oxide and sulphide orebody
by conventional open pit mining and heap leach methods. The mineral reserve at the time of mine
construction was stated as 36.4 million tonnes @ 1.64 g/t gold, for total contained gold of 1.9 million
ounces (M3 Engineering, 2004). In 2011 the Mulatos mine produced 153,000 ounces of gold
(Alamos Gold, 2012a); the remaining proven and probable reserve as of December 31, 2011 was 65.0
million tonnes @ 1.14 g/t gold, containing 2.39 million ounces gold (Alamos Gold, 2012b). The
estimates were obtained from sources believed to be reliable but cannot be verified.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


46

Item 9.

Exploration

The previous owner, Grayd Resource Corporation, commenced exploration of the La India property
in January 2004 and continued exploration activities up to the date of the acquisition of the project by
Agnico-Eagle in November 2011. The exploration work from January 2004 through November 2011
is summarized in Item 6 of this report.
Agnico-Eagle has since continued exploration and development activities at both La India project and
the adjoining Tarachi project. Exploration activities by Agnico-Eagle to date have included both
regional and detailed geologic mapping of the concessions, rock chip geochemical sampling,
diamond core drilling, and reverse circulation drilling.

Item 10. Drilling


Drilling campaigns were conducted on the La India project by Grayd Resource Corporation every
year from 2004 until its acquisition by Agnico-Eagle in November 2011. Agnico-Eagle has continued
drilling at the project up to the effective date of this report (September 4, 2012). Previous operators
conducted exploration drilling in the La Cruz and La Viruela areas of the Main Zone, as discussed in
Item 6 of this report, but drillhole logs and assay data from that work are not available and do not
form part of the project database.
For the purposes of the June 30, 2012 reserve and resource estimate, which is the basis of the
economic evaluation discussed in this report, data from 189 diamond drill holes totaling 16,647 m
and from 631 reverse circulation drill holes totaling 54,470 m with assay results available as of May
23, 2012 were included in the La India deposit database. The collars of all drill holes used in the June
30, 2012 reserve and resource estimate are located in Figure 10.1 and Figure 10.2. The intersections
from the diamond and reserve circulation drill holes in this database are listed in Appendix 14.2.
Holes DDH-07-15 through DDH-11-199 as well as RC-06-15 through RC-11-654 were drilled under
the supervision of Grayd Resource Corp. Agnico-Eagle supervised the drilling of holes DDH-11-200
through DDH-12-237 and IN-12-238 as well as RC-06-15 through RC-12-721, and INR-12-722
through INF-12-763. Figure 7.4 shows a typical cross section through the Viruela La Cruz areas of
the Main Zone.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


47

Figure 10.1 North Zone: Location map of the collars of diamond and reverse circulation drill holes used in the
June 30, 2012 reserve and resource estimate

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


48

Figure 10.2 Main Zone: Location map of the collars of diamond and reverse circulation drill holes used in the
June 30, 2012 reserve and resource estimate

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


49

10.1 Diamond Drilling


In 2004, Grayd completed 1,224 m of BTW (4.2-cm-diameter) diamond drilling in 11 drill holes.
Three of the holes were at the La Cieneguita target, one at La Espaola, and seven at the La India
target, which are all parts of the North Zone. Drill targets were selected on the basis of rock chip
geochemical anomalies and silica-alunite alteration exposed in surface outcrops. All drill holes were
inclined at approximately 50 degrees and most were drilled due east in order to test interpreted
northeast- and northwest-striking structures and stratigraphic controls of gold distribution. Ten of the
eleven drill holes intersected gold mineralization, results of which were presented in Gray (2006).
The drilling was conducted by Canrock Drilling Services SA de CV. The core logging and sampling
was conducted by staff geologists of Resource Geosciences de Mexico SA de CV (RGM), at the
project exploration camp on the La Amargosa ranch. The core was split with a diamond disk saw,
with one half sent for assay and the other half preserved in the core library, located at the La
Amargosa ranch and at the Hermosillo core shack. Core recoveries in mineralized zones averaged
greater than 85%.
In 2007 and 2008, Grayd completed 3,948 m of HQ- and PQ-diameter diamond drilling in 54 drill
holes. Seven of the drill holes completed within the block model area were used exclusively for
metallurgical testing and do not form part of the resource model database. Drilling was conducted by
Layne de Mexico SA de CV, a subsidiary of Layne Drilling Inc., and Britton Brothers Drilling, a
subsidiary of Boart Longyear. All drill-hole collars were surveyed using differential correction GPS
equipment. During drilling, Layne conducted downhole surveys using the Reflex downhole surveying
instrument. Data indicate that borehole deviation from the initial azimuth and inclination was
minimal, seldom exceeding a few degrees. Diamond core holes drilled by Britton Brothers were not
surveyed during drilling, but were later re-entered and gyroscopically surveyed by Silver State
Surveys of Oro Valley, Arizona. Core logging and sampling were conducted by consultant geologists
of RGM at the La Amargosa ranch. Core was split with a diamond disk saw, with one half sent for
assay and the other half preserved in the core library. Geologic information from the core holes was
used to guide interpretation of lithological and alteration contacts, assays of core samples constrained
the resource estimate, and core samples were used for specific gravity determinations.
In 2009, Grayd completed an additional 2,385 m of diamond core drilling in 37 drill holes. Drilling
was conducted by Energold Drilling using a person-portable hydraulic drill rig and NTW tools. After
drilling was completed, downhole orientations of diamond core holes were gyroscopically surveyed
by Silver State Surveys.
In the period January 2010, after the data cutoff date for the 2010 resource estimate and up until the
acquisition of the project by Agnico-Eagle in November 2011, Grayd completed an additional 5,329
m of diamond core drilling in 45 drill holes. Drilling was conducted by Energold Drilling using a
person-portable hydraulic drill rig and NTW tools. After drilling was completed, downhole
orientations of diamond core holes were gyroscopically surveyed by Silver State Surveys, and/or by
downhole Reflex survey instruments supplied by the drill contractor.
After acquiring the project, Agnico-Eagle added a second diamond drill contractor to the project,
Toro Drilling, to drill HQ-diameter holes. Agnico-Eagle completed an additional 14 diamond holes
totaling 999 m until the data cutoff date of May 23, 2012, utilizing the same logging and sampling
procedures previously established for the project. As of May 23, 2012, a total of 215 diamond holes
totaling 18,734 m had been completed by Grayd and Agnico-Eagle.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
50

10.2 Reverse Circulation Drilling


From 2005 through January 22, 2010, Grayd completed 45,334 m of 13.34-cm-diameter reverse
circulation drilling in 542 drillholes (Figure 10.1 and Figure 10.2). Drilling was conducted by Layne
de Mexico SA de CV. All drill-hole collars were surveyed using differential correction GPS
equipment. Silver State Surveys was contracted to conduct downhole gyroscopic surveys of the RC
drillholes. Downhole deviation of drillholes generally did not exceed a few degrees relative to the
planned azimuths and dips. The downhole survey data was included in the project database and
controlled the projection of drill-hole intercepts used in constructing the resource model. Logging of
drill cuttings and sampling was conducted by consultant geologists of RGM at the drill site. Samples
generated were split by cyclone and by rotary or Jones splitter. One quarter split of the sample was
sent for assay and the remainder was stored in a warehouse at the exploration camp. Reverse
circulation drilling was used both for general exploration and for resource definition drilling. A total
of 510 RC drill holes comprising 40,871 m were located within the resource area and constrained the
2010 resource model.
From January 22, 2010 until the time of its acquisition by Agnico-Eagle in November 2011, Grayd
completed an additional 63 reverse circulation drill holes totaling 7,553 m.
Agnico-Eagle has continued drilling at La India. From November 2011 until the data cutoff date for
this report, May 23, 2012, Agnico-Eagle completed an additional 41 reverse circulation drill holes
totaling 4,263 m utilizing the same drill contractor and same logging and sampling procedures
previously established for the project.
From January 2004 until May 23, 2012, a total of 648 reverse circulation drill holes totaling 55,616 m
had been completed by Grayd and Agnico-Eagle.

10.3 Recovery Factors


The average recovery for diamond drill core samples used in the 2010 resource estimate was 83% for
BQ-diameter core and 85% for HQ-diameter core. Faulted and fractured rock formations in the North
Zone created difficult drilling conditions and affected core recovery. Average core recovery for drill
holes in the Main Zone was 86%, whereas average core recovery for drill holes in the North Zone
was 82%. Although no statistical bias of gold assays was noted as a factor of core recovery, it is
recommended that 641 assays corresponding to samples taken from the intervals with less than 50%
recovery should be stricken from the database used for resource estimation.
Because of the variable nature of the rock types, fragmentation and void spaces, it was not possible to
quantify the recovery factors for the reverse circulation samples. Silver State Surveys was contracted
by Grayd to collect caliper measurements of borehole diameter on a select number of drill holes.
Silver State therefore tested 14 RC drill holes and collected caliper measurements on them, and and
re-entered them. Silver State advised Grayd that the borehole walls were stable and smooth and that
no formations likely to cause down-hole contamination were present. The borehole diameter at the
collar seldom varied by more than 10% from the bit diameter of 13.34 cm, and diameters generally
decreased downhole as a factor of bit wear. Diameter decrease of as much as 2.5 cm was observed.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
51

The average weight of quarter-split RC samples was 5.9 kg, which corresponds to approximately
50% of the estimated mass of a quarter-split of a 1-m-long, 0.127-m-diameter column without voids
and with a specific gravity of 2.5.
Low recovered sample weights were noted in instances where RC drill holes intersected structural
zones with open fractures. In these areas a lack of return air circulation caused a significant decrease
in return of cuttings to surface. The existence of open, through-going fractures was conclusively
indicated when air return was lost during drilling and drill-hole blowout was simultaneously seen at
nearby unplugged boreholes. Under these conditions, sample recovery at times dropped to zero.
Surface mapping and diamond core drilling provide conclusive evidence that structural zones are
typically sites of higher gold concentrations; thus, the zones of low RC sample recovery are often the
zones of greatest economic interest. There is no evidence that the low recovery samples are not
representative of the intervals being drilled. However, in order to have a higher confidence level in
the database used in the June 30, 2012 resource estimate, a minimum sample weight of 7.6 kg
(approximately equal to a 20% recovery) was set. A total of 2,804 RC samples classified as underweight
(less than 7.6 kg) were eliminated from the database, under the assumption that too much sample was
missing to consider these samples representative.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


52

Item 11. Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security


11.1 Sampling Method, Nature, Spacing, Security and On-site
Preparation
The methods used under the Grayd Resource Corporation ownershipship of the La India project
(2004-2011) are described in this item. Those methods and systems have been continued since
Agnico-Eagle acquired the project in November 2011. The on-site sampling, sample preparation and
security continue to be conducted by personnel of the consultant RGM under the supervision of
Agnico-Eagle senior managers. This section describes the methods of sampling (both surface rock
chip and drilling), the sample preparation and labeling, and security measures taken at the site to
ensure the quality of the samples sent to the laboratory for analysis. It also describes the analytical
procedures at the laboratory and the results of quality control actions taken to provide confidence in
the data.

11.1.1

Surface Rock Chip Sampling

Concurrent with geologic mapping, project geologists collect surface rock chip samples of
outcropping zones of altered and mineralized rock. In excess of 9,000 rock chip samples have
been collected and analyzed. The objective of the sampling is to characterize the mineral deposit
type(s) and to define zones of gold enrichment within the extensive alteration zones. Samples have
been collected from the entire project claim block. Surface sample locations are selected to be
representative of the geologic feature being investigated. Continuous channel samples are collected
by chipping and collecting rock along a line perpendicular to the orientation of the structure or
feature being sampled. The channel samples collected are 1 to 2 m in length. All samples are
collected by hand, using hardened steel chisels, picks and geological hammers. Samples are placed in
19-cm x 30-cm cloth drawstring sample bags. Sample weights vary from 1.5 kg to 2.5 kg. Sample
spacing is variable, depending on the exposure of the mineralized or altered rock. Samples are
numbered in ascending order, using sample numbers and sample tags provided by the analytical
laboratory. Sample locations are marked in the field with red spray paint, fluorescent plastic flagging,
and aluminum tags. Sample descriptions, location data, and multi-element assay data are captured in
digital format for importation into map-generation and interpretation software applications.
Surface sample data have not been used for estimation of the mineral resources.

11.1.2

Diamond Drill Core Sampling

Drill core is continuously sampled from beginning to end of the drill hole. Sample intervals are
typically 1 m, and vary from this only when geologic contacts are used to limit a sample interval or
poor recoveries force the grouping of sample intervals. The drill core diameter for drilling in 2004
was B thin wall (BTW, 4.2 cm). Drill core diameter for 2007 drilling was HQ (6.35 cm) and PQ (8.5
cm). Drill core diameter for the 2008 drilling was HQ. The core diameter for drilling from 2009
through the data cutoff date (May 23, 2012) has been NTW (5.71 cm) and HQ. Sample intervals are
marked on the core by project geologists according to the lithology and the domain model. One half
split of the core is collected for analysis and the other half is retained in the core library. Core is split
with a diamond disk saw.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
53

11.1.3

Reverse Circulation Drill Sampling

Industry standard sampling methods are utilized to collect the reverse circulation drill-hole samples.
Centre-return 5 (13.34 cm) diameter bits are used. Drilling is conducted dry unless significant
water production or hole plugging requires the use of wet drilling methods. While drilling in dry
conditions, compressed air is used to force drill cuttings up the drill string for collection. Cuttings are
forced into a cyclone and Jones splitter as drilling progresses. When drilling in wet conditions, water
and compressed air are injected into the hole to force cuttings up the drill string, and a rotary splitter
is employed. Samples are collected from the beginning to the end of the drill hole, at intervals of 1.52
m). Quarter-split sample weights are approximately 5.9 kg. Of a total of 33,358 m of reverse
circulation drilling used in the 2010 resource model, 3,078 metres (9.2% of total) was drilled using
wet methods.

11.1.4

Drill Sample Interval Parameters

Regular sample intervals of 1.52 m are used for reverse circulation drill holes. With few exceptions, a
1-m sample interval is used for diamond core holes. When geologic contacts between materials likely
to be of strikingly different grade are recognized in drill core, sample intervals are adjusted to avoid
mixing different mineralization types in a single sample.

11.1.5

Sample Security / Chain of Custody

Geologic descriptions of the sample, including nature of the sample, length of drill core or RC drill
sample, lithology, alteration, and mineralization, are captured in geologic field books or on drill log
forms. Samples are sealed in cloth bags with drawstring closures. Sample identification tags are
placed with each sample in the sample bag, and a matching tag is retained in a sample book. Samples
are stored on site in a locked warehouse at the exploration camp. Samples are picked up on site by
ALS Chemex for delivery to their Hermosillo preparation facility, or are transported by RGM
personnel to Hermosillo, Sonora, where they are delivered directly to ALS Chemex.

11.1.6

Personnel

Surface rock chip samples, drill core samples, and reverse circulation drill cutting samples have been
collected by project geologists and technicians employed by RGM or previously by geologists
employed by Newmont Mining. Senior managers from Grayd Resource Corporation and, since
November 2011, from Agnico-Eagle have supervised but have not been directly involved in drill-hole
sample collection or preparation, which is currently conducted by RGM personnel.

11.2 Sample Preparation and Analytical Procedures


11.2.1

Sample Preparation by Laboratory

Preparation work on the rock chip, diamond core and RD drilling samples is performed by ALS
Chemex, an independent, ISO9001:2000-certified international provider of analytical services to
mining and exploration companies. Sample preparation is conducted at the ALS Chemex facility in
Hermosillo, Sonora. Analyses are performed at the ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, British
Columbia.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
54

Each sample is dried and the entire sample is crushed to more than 70% passing a 2-mm (Tyler 10
mesh) screen. Using a riffle splitter, a split of up to 250 grams is taken and pulverized to more than
85% passing a 75-micron (Tyler 200 mesh) screen.

11.2.2

Analytical Techniques

Gold content is first analyzed utilizing standard fire assay fusion, followed by Atomic Absorption
Spectroscopy (AAS). For those samples that yield assays of more than 10,000 ppb gold (10 g/t gold),
the sample is assayed again utilizing standard fire assay fusion, followed by gravimetric analysis.
Metallic or screen fire assays are conducted on select samples, as described in Item 16 of this report.
The two standard fire assay methods used by the ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver and their
detection and upper limits are described below.

11.2.2.1

Fire Assay Method 1 for Gold

Metal:

Gold

Sample Decomposition:

Fire Assay Fusion

Analytical Method:

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS)

A prepared sample is fused with a mixture of lead oxide, sodium carbonate, borax, silica and other
reagents as required, inquarted with 6 mg of gold-free silver and then cupelled to yield a precious
metal bead.
The bead is digested for half an hour in dilute nitric acid. Hydrochloric acid is then added and the
solution is digested for an additional hour. The digested solution is cooled, diluted to 7.5 ml with
demineralized water, homogenized and then analyzed by atomic absorption spectrometry. The gold
detection limit is 5 ppb (0.005 g/t) and the upper limit is 10,000 ppb (10 g/t).

11.2.2.2

Fire Assay Method 2 for Gold

Metal:

Gold

Sample Decomposition:

Fire Assay Fusion

Analytical Method:

Gravimetric

A prepared sample is fused with a mixture of lead oxide, sodium carbonate, borax, silica and other
reagents in order to produce a lead button. The lead button containing the precious metals is cupelled
to remove the lead. The remaining gold and silver bead is parted in dilute nitric acid, annealed and
weighed as gold. Silver, if requested, is then determined by the difference in weights. Optionally,
blanks with known silver and gold content can be assayed at the same time to determine the
correction factor for silver loss in the fusion and cupellation. The gold detection limit is 50 ppb (0.05
g/t) and the upper limit is 1,000 g/t.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


55

11.2.2.3

ICP AES Analysis for Other Elements

All other elements listed below were analyzed utilizing Inductively Coupled Plasma - Atomic
Emission Spectroscopy (ICP - AES) methods. The method and the detection and upper limits for
each element are described in Table 11.1 below.
Sample Decomposition:
Analytical Method:

Nitric Aqua Regia Digestion

Inductively Coupled Plasma - Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP - AES)

A prepared sample (0.50 grams) is digested with aqua regia for at least one hour in a hot water bath.
After cooling, the resulting solution is diluted to 12.5 ml with demineralized water, mixed and
analyzed by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry. The analytical results are
corrected for inter-element spectral interferences.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


56

Table 11.1 Element concentrations analyzed and analytical limits.

Element

Symbol

Lower Detection
Limit

Upper
Detection Limit

Aluminum
Antimony

Al
Sb

0.01%
2 ppm

15%
1%

Arsenic

As

2 ppm

1%

Barium

Ba

10 ppm

1%

Beryllium

Be

0.5 ppm

0.01%

Bismuth

Bi

2 ppm

1%

Boron

10 ppm

10,000 ppm

Cadmium

Cd

0.5 ppm

0.05%

Calcium

Ca

0.01%

15%

Chromium

Cr

1 ppm

1%

Cobalt

Co

1 ppm

1%

Copper

Cu

1 ppm

1%

Gallium

Ga

10 ppm

1%

Iron

Fe

0.01%

15%

Lanthanum

La

10 ppm

1%

Lead

Pb

2 ppm

1%

Magnesium

Mg

0.01%

15%

Manganese

Mn

5 ppm

1%

Mercury

Hg

1 ppm

1%

Molybdenum

Mo

1 ppm

1%

Nickel

Ni

1 ppm

1%

Phosphorus

10 ppm

1%

Potassium

0.01%

10%

Scandium

Sc

1 ppm

1%

Silver

Ag

0.2 ppm

0.01%

Sodium

Na

0.01%

10%

Strontium

Sr

1 ppm

1%

Sulphur

0.01%

10%

Thallium

Tl

10 ppm

1%

Titanium

Ti

0.01%

10%

Tungsten

10 ppm

1%

Uranium

10 ppm

1%

Vanadium

1 ppm

1%

Zinc

Zn

2 ppm

1%

*
*
*

*Elements for which the digestion may be incomplete

11.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Practices


Throughout the drilling campaigns, Grayd and more recently Agnico-Eagle have implemented a
quality assurance and quality control program appropriate for an exploration and resource
development program. The methods of sample preparation, analysis and security of samples from La
India have been reviewed by external consultant Matthew Gray (Gray, 2012a,b).

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


57

11.3.1

Assays

11.3.1.1

Blanks

During the 2004 diamond drill program, project geologists inserted blank samples into the sample
stream at an interval of one blank sample every 50 samples on regular intervals. Blank material
during the 2004 diamond drill program was prepared from manually crushed post-mineral rhyolite
that outcrops in the project area. Numerous assays of the rhyolite prior to initiation of the drill
program failed to detect gold above the 0.005 ppm assay limit, however these blank samples are not
certified samples prepared by round robin laboratory testing of a bulk homogenized sample.
Detection of gold in these blank samples is not definitive proof of sample preparation or analytical
errors, as the possibility that the blank sample itself contains some gold cannot be completely
discounted. Nonetheless, these blank samples are an indicator of potential sample preparation and/or
analytical errors. Details and the compilation of the blank material are described in Gray et al., 2010
and the QA/QC reports from external consultant Matthew Gray (Gray, 2012a,b).
From 2004 through May 23, 2012, a total of 1,284 certified blanks, equivalent to approximately 2.4%
of all drill samples submitted for assay, were inserted into the drill sample stream and 1,181 (Figure
11.1 and Figure 11.2) of these blanks were preceded by a sample containing detectable gold. When
blank samples yielded anomalous gold concentrations, the blanks and samples in sequence were reassayed. If it is assumed that the blank samples truly are blank and do not contain gold above the
0.005-ppm detection limit, then these data are consistent with a slight and immaterial amount of
contamination during sample preparation. This possible contamination affects less than 6.5% of all
samples, is generally less than 0.02 g/t gold, and is notable only for the highest grade samples. The
data do not indicate any significant or material problems with the sample preparation or assay
procedures.

Figure 11.1 Gold assays, certified blank samples

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


58

Figure 11.2 Gold assays, certified blanks and samples immediately preceding blanks, 2006 through May 23, 2012
drill programs

11.3.1.2

Standards

During the reverse circulation and diamond drilling programs from 2004 through May 23, 2012,
standards were inserted into the sample stream approximately every 40 samples. The standards were
prepared and certified by CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Canada or Rocklabs Ltd. of New
Zealand. The standards were subjected to round robin testing and verification by multiple commercial
laboratories. The standards were in the form of pulps and were inserted into the sample stream after
the laboratory had completed its sample preparation, thus the standards serve to test the analytical
accuracy and precision of the lab, but do not address the issue of contamination during sample
preparation. Sixteen different standards of different gold grades were used (Table 11.2). A total of
1,411 standards, equivalent to approximately 2.6% of all drill program samples submitted for assay,
were certified reference standards.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


59

Table 11.2 Standards sed in assays for the La India QA/QC program, 2004 through May 23, 2012

Control standard failure was defined by a reported gold content outside of a 2-standard-deviation
range of the reference standard expected gold content. The failure of a control standard triggered an
investigation into the cause. In cases where the failure was not conclusively shown to be a result of a
transcription or labeling error, repeat analysis was performed for samples included in the same work
order as the failed control standard. If results from the repeat analyses differed significantly from the
original assays, they were used in the database.
A comparison of standard assay results from ALS Chemex to the certified assay means for the
standards (Table 11.3 and Figure 11.3) indicates that the assays obtained during the Grayd and
Agnico-Eagle drilling programs are reliable, although the ALS Chemex assays show a systematic but
immaterial bias related to gold grade range. Details of the results for these standards are presented in
Gray et al., 2010.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


60

Table 11.3 Summary of assay results of certified standards from 2004 through May 23, 2012

Figure 11.3 Chart of percent difference of the standards in Table 11.3 from reference values, ALS
Chemex assay results, as function of standard reference value in ppm gold

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


61

11.3.1.3

Field Duplicates Rig Splits

Field duplicates collected at the drill rig were inserted into the RC drill sample stream at a ratio of
one duplicate every 40 samples in the period 2004 through May 23, 2012. Field duplicates were not
collected from diamond drill holes. A total of 901 field duplicates, equivalent to approximately 1.7%
of all drill program samples, and 2.4% of all RC drill samples submitted for assay, were inserted into
the drill sample stream. Field duplicates consist of a quarter rig split of the RC drilling chips collected
from the same half split that yields the sample sent to the lab. Field duplicates were submitted blind
to the laboratory, i.e., the lab could not distinguish which samples were field duplicates because a
consistent policy on duplicate numeration was not followed. About 88% of the duplicates were
submitted as the sample immediately following the original sample, and the remainder were
submitted out of sequence with the original sample. To eliminate statistical noise associated with
assays at or near the detection limit, for statistical evaluation of the data set, sample pairs with mean
gold contents of less than three times the detection limit of 0.005 ppm were excluded. The rig split
duplicates showed an insignificant negative bias (~2%) compared to originals and 90% of rig split
duplicates had less than 38% absolute relative difference from originals (Figure 11.4). Both relative
and absolute values of differences are highest at lower grade ranges. The precision demonstrated by
the rig split duplicates is at the higher limits of normal ranges observed for gold deposits. The data
indicate the sampling is reliable and adequate for resource estimation purposes, but the suitability of
the reverse circulation sampling method should continue to be monitored and verified.

Figure 11.4 Percentile plot of absolute relative differences of field, preparation, and lab duplicates

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


62

11.3.1.4

Sample Preparation Duplicates Coarse Reject

A total of 1,136 sample preparation duplicates, equivalent to approximately 2% of all drill program
samples submitted for assay between 2004 and May 23, 2012, were inserted into the sample stream.
Preparation duplicates were prepared from a split of course reject material at the prep lab. To
eliminate the statistical noise associated with assays at or near the detection limits, for statistical
evaluation of the data set, sample pairs with mean gold contents of less than three times the detection
limit of 0.005 ppm were excluded. The sample preparation duplicates show less than 2.5% bias
compared to originals, and 90% of sample preparation duplicates have less than 19% absolute relative
difference from originals (Figure 11.4). Both relative and absolute values of differences are highest at
lower grade ranges. The precision demonstrated by the coarse reject duplicates is within normal
ranges observed for gold deposits, and the data indicate the sampling is reliable and adequate for
resource estimation purposes.

11.3.1.5

Lab Duplicates Pulps

A total of 2,034 lab duplicates, equivalent to approximately 4% of all drill program sample pulps
from 2004 to May 23, 2012, were re-assayed by ALS Chemex. Lab duplicates consist of a repeat
analysis of an already prepared and analyzed sample pulp. To eliminate the statistical noise
associated with assays at or near the detection limits, for statistical evaluation of the data set, sample
pairs with mean gold contents of less than three times the detection limit of 0.005 ppm were
excluded. The pulp re-assays show less than a 1% bias compared to the original assay, and 90% of
laboratory pulp duplicates have less than 14% absolute relative difference from originals (Figure
11.4). Both relative and absolute values of differences are highest at lower grade ranges. The
precision demonstrated by the pulp re-assays is within normal ranges observed for gold deposits, and
the data indicate the sampling is reliable and adequate for resource estimation purposes.

11.3.1.6

Comparison of the Precision of Field, Lab, and Assay Duplicates

In order, the field (rig), lab (preparation), and assay (pulp re-assay) duplicates demonstrate
progressively greater precision. At the 90th percentile, the absolute percent relative difference for the
original-duplicate data sets decreases from 36% to 19% to 14% respectively for the field (rig), lab
(prep), and assay duplicates (Figure 11.4). Universally accepted limits for what should be considered
adequate precision do not exist, although a widely used rule of thumb is that for field duplicates the
relative difference at the 90th percentile should correspond to less than 30%, for lab (prep) duplicates
less than 20%, and for assay duplicates less than 10%. Such precision is seldom encountered in
epithermal gold deposits, and the ranges of precision observed for the La India project are within
normal parameters. The La India data follow the expected sequential increase in precision and exhibit
no significant bias between duplicate and original data sets. La India duplicate assay data indicate
that sampling and assay procedures do not introduce bias or unacceptable error into the La India
assay database, and that the database is reliable and suitable for use in resource estimation.

11.3.1.7

Metallic (Screen) Fire Assays

ALS Chemex conducted metallic or screen fire assays on 176 samples selected from mineralized
intervals of varying grades. Metallic or screen fire assays test specifically for the occurrence of gold
in the coarse fraction of a sample and the possibility of an inhomogeneous distribution of coarse
particulate gold relative to the sample size (a phenomena commonly referred to as nugget effect).
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
63

Coarse reject material from the sample submitted to ALS Chemex for the regular fire assay was used.
The material was screened into two size fractions: >100 mesh and <100 mesh. Both fractions were
weighed. Multiple analyses of the fine fraction were performed and the entire coarse fraction was fire
assayed. Using the gold content determined for each size fraction and their respective weights, a gold
content for the entire sample was calculated. This gold content was then compared to the gold assay
returned by standard fire assay of the same sample. A comparison of results is shown in Figure 11.5.
Results from the two methods are nearly identical. The regression line between the two data sets has
a slope of 1.036 and a correlation coefficient of 0.972 and the overall mean and assay distribution for
the two data sets are similar, with a 5% difference in mean gold grade between the two sample
populations (table embedded in Figure 11.5). The data indicate that heterogeneous distribution of
gold or nugget effect is not a concern for the drill-hole data set. Because no significant bias is
present between the data sets, and the overwhelming majority of assays are standard fire assay, in
cases where both standard fire assay and metallics assays are available, the standard fire assays were
used in the resource model database.
20

Metallics vs. Standard Fire Assay

Au ppm, metallics assay

15

10

0
0

10

15

20

Au ppm, fire assay


perfect correlation line

Figure 11.5 Plot comparing regular fire assay and screen fire assay analytical results.

11.3.1.8

Check Assays

Subsequent to receipt of assay results from ALS Chemex, pulps were selected and sent to Acme
Analytical Laboratories in Vancouver, British Columbia for analyses. The objective of the testing
was to verify the results provided by ALS Chemex. Check assay data corresponding to drill holes
DDH10-164 through DDH12-272 and RC10-590 through INR12-739 were not available. As of May
23, 2012, a total of 904 pulps, corresponding to 2% of the database, were assayed by Acme, and
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
64

correspond to drilling through DDH10-163 and RC10-589. Results from the two labs are nearly
identical (Figure 11.6 and Figure 11.7), and the overall means for the two data sets are within 2.4%.
(table embedded in Figure 11.6). The data indicate that analytical results provided by ALS Chemex
are reliable and suitable for use in resource estimation.

Figure 11.6 Plot comparing Acme and ALS Chemex fire assay analytical results

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


65

Figure 11.7 Percent relative difference, ACME check assay vs. ALS Chemex assay

Check assays from drill holes completed through May 23, 2012 should be added to the database and
evaluated; the control sample data from these drill holes indicate that the ALS Chemex data are
reliable, and thus the lack of check assay data should not preclude use of the data.

11.3.1.9

Reverse Circulation Diamond Core Drill hole Twins

In order to analyze for bias caused by drilling methods, 30 reverse circulation diamond core drillhole twin sets were created and analyzed. Each set consists of one RC and one diamond drill hole,
drilled from the same drill pad at the same orientation. Separation between the two drill holes ranged
from 1 m to 8 m. Results are shown graphically in Gray et al. (2010). Most twins yield very similar
results; the variations observed between the paired drill-hole sets lie within the range expected for a
gold deposit with structural controls on gold distribution. A graphical analysis of the results shows no
bias between the drilling methods. A statistical review of the RC and DDH data sets (Gray and
Giroux, 2010) similarly found no bias between the RC and DDH data sets.

11.4 Opinion on Adequacy of Sample Preparation, Security and


Analytical Procedures
In the opinion of the author, the samples collected from the La India project are of high quality and
representative of the mineralized areas being evaluated. Sample preparation, security, and analytical
procedures used were adequate to insure the integrity and reliability of the sample database.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
66

The methods used under the Grayd Resource Corporation ownership of the La India project have
been continued since Agnico-Eagle acquired the project in November 2011. The on-site sampling,
sample preparation and security continue to be conducted by personnel of the consultant RGM under
the supervision of Agnico-Eagle senior managers. Samples are sealed in cloth bags with drawstring
closures. Sample identification tags are placed with each sample in the sample bag, and a matching
tag is retained in a sample book. Samples are stored on site in a locked warehouse at the exploration
camp. Samples are picked up from the site by ALS Chemex for delivery to its Hermosillo preparation
facility, or are transported by RGM personnel to Hermosillo, where they are delivered directly to
ALS Chemex.
Surface sample locations are selected to be representative of the geologic feature being investigated.
Continuous channel samples are collected by chipping and collecting rock along a line perpendicular
to the orientation of the structure or feature being sampled. Industry standard methods and best
professional judgment are used in collection of the rock chip samples; however, by their nature,
manually collected rock chip samples are of lesser quality than mechanically collected continuous
samples (i.e., cored or cut samples). The surface rock chip samples are of sufficient quality and
confidence to be used for preliminary assessments of the projects mineral potential, and serve to
indicate areas of mineralization; however surface samples are not used for purposes of resource
estimation.
Diamond and reverse circulation drill holes are selected to target specific geological or geophysical
features, with orientations selected to intersect the interpreted structural and/or stratigraphic controls
of mineralization. Because many drill holes have targeted zones hosting both northwest- and
northeast-striking structures, the majority of the drill holes have been drilled due east or due west in
order to test both orientations. With the exception of 54 reverse circulation drill sample intervals and
523 core samples of low recovery, drill sample recovery has been adequate to provide representative
results for the tested features.

11.5 Recommendations

Continue the QA/QC protocols currently in use at the project.


Remove from the resource estimation database 2,804 RC samples with low recovered sample
weights. This will conservatively affect the resource estimate, resulting in decreased average
grade and possibly fewer tonnes.
Remove from resource estimation database 641 diamond drillhole samples taken from
intervals of less than 50% core recovery. This will conservatively affect the resource estimate
(result in decreased average grade and possibly fewer tonnes).
Examine the representativeness of the lower recovery samples, both DDH core and RC chips,
via additional twin drill holes and utilization of drilling methods that yield higher recoveries
(e.g., PQ core, triple tube).
Determine the reason for, and appropriateness of, changing a mineralized interval in drill hole
RC09-477 as reported in the March 2, 2012 database to a barren interval as reported in the
May 23, 2012 database.
In light of the acceptable but relatively high variability demonstrated by RC field duplicates
(90% of duplicate-original pairs yield less than 36% absolute relative difference), be vigilant
in QA/QC controls of RC sampling methods and continually monitor QA/QC data to insure
that sample quality is acceptable and data reliable.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


67

Update the check assay database and continually evaluate performance and reliability of the
main assay lab, ALS Chemex.

Composite the DDH core recovery and assay composites to same down-hole intervals, matching as
closely as possible the actual sample interval, in order to better classify DDH core sample assays
relative to core recovery.
The sample recovered for first 6 m of most reverse circulation drill holes consists of blown out
cuttings captured at the collar during setting of the surface casing, and thus is not a true RC samples.
Where drill holes are collared in or near the bedrock surface, the top 6 m of these samples are
considered relevant data; 1,207 samples of this type are included in the database, but are tagged as
casing samples to allow for a separate treatment should it be deemed necessary. For the purposes of
the resource estimates presented in this report, these samples are treated identically to the true RC
samples.
Diamond core reverse circulation twin pairs are available for 30 sets of RC and DDH drill holes
drilled at approximately the same location. Variations between the mineralized intervals intersected
by the RC and diamond drill holes are within the expected normal range of variability and no bias of
gold intercepts related to drilling method has been observed. Statistical comparison of the entire RC
drill-hole database to the complete DDH database also indicates no bias between the sample sets, as
more fully discussed in Item 14.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


68

Item 12. Data Verification


The previous owner Grayd Resource Corporation conducted exploration drilling programs at the La
India project from 2004 through November 2011 when Grayd was acquired by Agnico-Eagle. No
data are available from exploration programs conducted prior to Grayds involvement with the
project, except historical summaries indicating that approximately 8,200 m of diamond core and
reverse circulation drilling was completed at the Main Zone of the La India deposit in the late 1980s
and early 1990s (Jenkins, 1994; McDougall, 1995). Historical data are not included in the drill-hole
database and are not used for estimating mineral resources at the project.
In diamond drill campaigns carried out from 2004 through May 23, 2012, Grayd and subsequently
Agnico-Eagle completed 18,734 m diamond core drilling in 215 drill-holes, and 55,616 m of reverse
circulation drilling in 648 drill holes at the Main and North zones of the La India gold project, as
described in Item 10 of this report.
Throughout the campaigns, Grayd and Agnico-Eagle followed a quality assurance and quality control
program appropriate for an exploration program. The results of the QA/QC program verify that the
analytical results of the drill samples are reliable and suitable for resource estimation purposes. Key
components of the QA/QC program are: systematic insertion into the sample stream of blank samples
and standards; analyses of duplicate samples; confirmatory assays by a second laboratory;
independent confirmatory sampling, and use of multiple analytical techniques to confirm validity of
results, as described in Item 11 of this report. Approximately 10% of the database was directly
verified by D. Doucet during the due diligence with included check assay samples of RC
intersections and core drilling. Moreover, the personnel of Agnico-Eagles Technical Services group
also verified the whole database during the conversion into DHLogger software.

12.1 Independent
Sampling

Verification

of

Database

and

Independent

In May 2012, external consultant Matthew Gray cross-checked the May 23, 2012 project database
against the original certified assay sheets and verified that the data were correctly transcribed. At that
time, the database contained data through drill holes RC12-696 and DDH12-214. For the QA/QC
review of the database used for the June 30, 2012 reserve and resource estimate, a database was
provided to Mr. Gray directly by an Agnico-Eagle geologist as a locked Access database file,
Exploration Viewer La India 23-05-2012.mdb, 397,116Kb, dated May 27, 2012. In order to verify
that the data starting with drill holes RC09-546 and DDH09-102 remained unchanged in the current
database, all core and RC chip assays through drill holes RC12-696 and DDH12-214 were extracted
and compared to the May 23, 2012 data, which was the last dataset that had been verified. Slight
variances that exceed rounding errors were noted indicating that modifications had been made to the
data previously verified. Data investigation revealed that 62 RC drill-hole assays and two diamond
drill core assays had been changed in the May 23, 2012 database compared to the March 2, 2012
database. Different sample certificates are noted for the changed assays, suggesting that sample
batches were re-assayed and the results from different assay certificates were incorporated into the
database. For most of the samples where changes of assays were noted, they were minor and
immaterial and are consistent with the slight changes expected when a sample is re-assayed.
However, for drill hole RC09-477, a 27.44-m mineralized interval reported in the March 2, 2012
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
69

database has been changed to a barren (less than detection limit) interval in the May 23, 2012
database. The validity of this change in the database needs to be verified by examining original
sample logs and assay certificates. With the exception of the 62 samples that were corrected, no
major variances that exceeded rounding errors were noted, indicating that no other modifications
were made to the data that had been previously verified.
For selected mineralized and barren drill-hole intercepts, assay certificates provided directly by ALS
Chemex were compared to the locked digital database and no discrepancies were noted. Because Mr.
Gray had access to original certificates corresponding to assays received only up to April 25, 2012, it
was not possible to verify the latest assay certificates included in the May 23, 2012 database.
At various times during field visits to the project, Mr. Gray collected rock chip samples from outcrop,
RC cuttings from the splitter at the drill rig, and drill cutting reject samples from the second split of
reverse circulation drill samples stored on site. The samples were delivered by the author to ALS
Chemex for assay. The resultant database is too small to allow for meaningful statistical analyses, but
the analytical results confirmed the gold mineralization indicated by previous sampling at the project,
as reported by Gray (2010).
Drill-hole assay data for drill holes RC-10-547 and later as well as DDH-10-103 and later are
contained in 102 assay certificates from ALS Chemex. The author randomly selected 21 of the
original assay certificates and compared them to the database. Subsequently, the author reviewed the
database and using the criteria of significant mineralized intercepts, selected an additional seven
assay certificates for review. All assay certificates were provided directly to the author by ALS
Chemex in the form of locked pdf files. Twenty eight assay certificates (27% of all assay certificates)
were directly checked against the digital database. No errors were discovered in the database, and it
faithfully reflects the certified assay data.
At various times during field visits to the project external consultant Matthew Gray collected rock
chip samples from outcrop, RC cuttings from the splitter at the drill rig, and drill cutting reject
samples from the second split of RC drill samples stored on site. The samples were delivered by him
to ALS Chemex for assay. That resultant database is too small to allow for meaningful statistical
analyses, but the analytical results confirmed the gold mineralization indicated by previous sampling
at the project, as summarized in Table 12.1.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


70

Table 12.1 Gold assays of independent samples collected by consultant Matthew Gray

Drillhole or
Surface
Sample
MAG-1
MAG-2
RC05-14
RC05-14
RC08-278
RC08-283
RC08-301
RC08-311
RC08-313
RC08-314
RC08-316
RC08-332
RC08-357
RC08-398
RC08-417
RC09-497
RC09-498
RC09-499
RC09-501
RC09-505
RC09-505
RC09-505
RC09-505

From
n/a
n/a

To
n/a
n/a
350
590
155
140
140
165
240
180
140
30
110
85
65
45
185
55
90
110
120
130
235

355
595
160
145
145
170
245
185
145
35
115
90
70
50
190
60
95
115
125
135
240

Sample ID
682429
682159
637566
637632
388825
429519
472525
515244
515390
515454
515518
516450
512556
641011
641714
497-45-50
498-185-190
499-55-60
501-90-95
505-110
505-120
505-120
505-235

Au gpt
independent
Au gpt
sample
original
Comment
0.64
0.89 surface sample
3.11
5.60 surface sample
8.64
7.97 La Cruz
1.28
1.14 La Cruz
41.60
36.90 Cieneguita
22.00
21.20 Cieneguita
0.81
0.95 Cerro de Oro
1.77
1.56 La Viruela
0.92
2.62 La Viruela
0.71
1.42 La Viruela
1.02
0.46 La Viruela
0.17
0.17 Cerro de Oro
3.09
3.66 Cieneguita
0.79
0.75 La Cruz
0.21
0.23 Cieneguita
0.23
0.24 La Viruela
1.01
1.08 La Viruela
0.17
0.17 La Viruela
0.06
0.07 La Viruela
0.36
0.17 La Viruela
0.32
0.30 La Viruela
0.30
0.29 La Viruela
0.53
0.94 La Viruela

12.2 Diamond Drill Hole Core Recovery Analysis


Previous resource estimates for the La India project did not use assays derived from core samples
with measured recoveries less than 31%, which was a threshold arbitrarily determined as the mean
core recovery minus two standard deviations. A statistical analysis of the data by external consultant
Gary Giroux (Gray et al., 2010) did not indicate any bias between the high and low recovery sample
subsets, but Mr. Giroux did not consider the low recovery samples to be representative and elected to
remove them from the database.
An analysis of core recovery for the current project database is summarized in Table 12.2. If the same
selection criterion as that used in the 2010 resource estimate is applied, i.e., a threshold of the mean
recovery minus 2 times the standard deviation, then core samples from intervals of less than 51.5%
recovery would be removed from the database used for resource estimation. The mean less 2 standard
deviations criterion previously applied was arbitrary. For this study a simpler but still arbitrary
subdivision of core samples was made. Sample subsets were selected using recoveries greater or less
than 50% with the objective of looking for grade bias between higher and lower recovery sample sets.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
71

The best analysis would result from compositing core recoveries and assays to the same down-hole
compositing interval, but that information is not available so instead the database was queried for
core recoveries greater and less than 50% and individual assays were mapped to intervals for which
recovery information was available. A total of 15,602 core assays were paired with recovery data and
analyzed.
Table 12.2 Summary statistics, drill core recovery

Note: five records with nonsensical data, assumed to be result of typographic errors during data capture, stricken from database.
Note: 40 records where recovery was calculated at >100%, assumed to be caused by slight in-box measurement errors, set to 100%.

Core samples for which at least 50% of the sample interval was obtained from intervals with
measured core recovery of less than 51.3% were selected from the database and analyzed in
comparison to samples collected from intervals with greater than 51.3% recovery. Note that sample
intervals are generally every 1 m whereas core recovery intervals correspond to the core barrel length
of each core run, up to a maximum of 3.05 m. Thus, many sample intervals partially overlap two core
recovery intervals. Manual inspection was used to select the appropriate grouping for the assay
samples that overlap two distinct recovery intervals. A total of 641 samples, out of a drill core assay
database of 15,602 samples, were selected into the low-recovery data subset.
Statistical analysis of the high- and low-recovery sample subsets described above indicates bias
between the two data sets, as shown by a comparison of the frequency distribution of gold assays of
the high recovery (>50%) and low recovery (<50%) databases. The low recovery dataset yields
higher gold assays at every point along the frequency distribution curve (Figure 12.1), and the low
recovery data subset yields a mean gold assay of 0.465 g/t, compared to 0.284 g/t for the higher
recovery data subset (Table 12.3). This statistically significant difference between gold assays of the
two datasets does not of itself indicate that one dataset is less representative or reliable than the other.
The highest grade gold mineralized zones at the La India project are typically hosted by structural
zones comprised of faulted and fractured rock. These zones would reasonably be expected to yield
both lower recoveries and higher gold assays than other zones. Thus the higher grade of the lowrecovery data subset might not be an artifact or result of non-representative samples, but to the
contrary may suggest that the resource model will be inappropriately biased towards a lower gold
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
72

grade if the low-recovery samples are not used in resource estimation. The same grade distribution
differences were observed for low- and high-recovery RC samples.

Figure 12.1 Frequency distribution, gold ppm, by core recovery classification (>50% vs. <50%)

Table 12.3 Summary statistics, gold assays, high-recovery (>50%) and low-recovery (<50%) sample subsets

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


73

In the absence of observable indications that lower recovery intervals are not representative, any
sample selection criterion based on core recovery is arbitrary. A recovery threshold for inclusion in
the database cannot be objectively determined, but for the purposes of the current resource modeling
exercise, it is recommended that 641 assays corresponding to samples taken from intervals of less
than 50% recovery should be stricken from the database used for resource estimation. These samples
are listed in Appendix 12.1 of this report. This restriction is arbitrary and conservative in that it
selectively removes a higher grade sample population from the dataset comprising 4.1% of the drill
core database.

12.3 RC Sample Recovery Analysis


Down-hole borehole diameters were not measured, so no accurate estimate of RC sample recovery
can be made. However, recovered sample weight can be used as a proxy for relative recovery. If a
borehole diameter equal to the bit size, 5.25 inches (13.3 cm), and a specific gravity of 2.5 are
assumed, 100% recovery from a 1.00-m sample interval should yield approximately 38 kg of sample.
True borehole widths exceed the bit diameter due to the eccentric motion of the bit and some caving
of borehole walls. Thus, a 100%-recovered 1-m interval sample should yield at least 38 kg of
material. ALS Chemex provided data on the received sample weight of each RC sample. Samples
sent to ALS Chemex for assay were 100%, 50%, or 25% splits collected at the drill rig. These data
were extracted from the database and used in conjunction with the reported sample interval length to
normalize all reported sample recoveries back to kilograms of sample recovered per 1.00-m interval
drilled. Results are summarized in Figure 12.2.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


74

Figure 12.2 Histogram showing recovered RC sample weights

Previous resource estimates for the La India project did not use assays derived from RC samples with
measured recoveries less than a threshold arbitrarily determined as the mean RC sample weight
minus 2.5 times standard deviations. No statistical analysis was made to check for bias between the
arbitrarily separated datasets, but the low recovery samples were not considered to be representative
and were removed from the database (Gray et al., 2010).
If the same statistical criteria are applied to the current dataset, all RC samples would be considered
valid based upon sample weight because the mean less 2.5 times standard deviations yields a negative
number.
If a threshold sample weight approximately equal to a 20% recovery is used (7.6 kg), then a total of
2,804 RC samples are classified as underweight. Summary statistics for the underweight and
acceptable weight samples show a significant bias between the two datasets, with the low sample
weight samples yielding a mean gold assay of 0.432 g/t compared to 0.304 g/t for the acceptable
weight samples. The frequency distribution charts of the two datasets show different grade
distributions and indicate that the two sample populations are statistically distinct (Figure 12.3).

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


75

Figure 12.3 Cumulative frequency, gold assays, low- and high-recovery RC sample datasets

Previous statistical studies of gold grade and RC sample recovery did not indicate significant
differences between high- and low-recovery datasets. The reason for the different conclusions
reached in this analysis is unknown. The current RC sample weight database differs from the
previous not just in the inclusion of new drilling but in the reporting of sample weights for earlier
generation RC drill holes. This additional data may be the cause for the differing result obtained in
this evaluation. There are no compelling geologic observations to suggest that the lower recovery
samples are not representative, and the higher grade bias of the lower recovery samples is
geologically reasonable. High-grade mineralized zones, especially in the North Zone, are associated
with broken structural zones where sample recovery is typically lower than average. In the absence of
observable indications that lower recovery intervals are not representative, any sample selection
criteria based on sample recovery is arbitrary. A recovery threshold for inclusion in the database
cannot be objectively determined. Previous resource estimates for the deposit have excluded lowrecovery samples from use in resource estimation. Therefore, to consistently apply sample selection
criteria based on RC sample weight as a proxy for recovery, then the author recommends that 2,804
assays corresponding to samples taken from intervals of less than 7.6 kg/m recovered sample be
stricken from the database used for resource estimation. These samples are listed in Appendix 12.2 of
this report. This restriction is arbitrary; removal of 2,804 assays comprising 7.6% of the RC sample
database will conservatively affect the resource estimate, causing average grade to decrease and
possible resulting in fewer estimated tonnes.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


76

12.4 Opinion on Adequacy of the La India Drill-hole Database


The digital drill-hole database for the La India gold deposit, comprising the Main and North zones,
inclusive of assay data available as of May 23, 2012, is reliable. The drill samples adequately
represent the material being tested, and the database is suitable for resource estimation purposes. The
lowest recovery RC and DDH samples exhibit a positive grade bias compared to higher recovery
samples, and although there is no compelling evidence that these samples are not representative,
conservative modeling of the deposit would preclude use of the lowest recovery samples.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


77

Item 13. Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing


Metallurgical tests have been conducted on the La India deposits gold-bearing rocks to determine the
physical characteristics and investigate the potential for gold and silver recovery using various
parameters. Heap leaching and carbon adsorption was selected based on favourable metallurgical
tests.
From 2007 until the present, the independent consultant Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (KCA) of
Reno, Nevada has conducted the metallurgical studies for the project on behalf of both Grayd
Resource Corporation and Agnico-Eagle. Metallurgical test work has included physical testing (rock
densities and Bond Work Index testing), head analysis, milled bottle roll leach tests, gravity
concentration, agglomeration and percolation, column leaching and environmental work. All sample
preparation, assaying and metallurgical studies have been performed utilizing accepted industry
standard procedures.
Results from metallurgical test work have been formally reported in reports prepared and issued by
KCA (Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2007a, 2007b, 2008; 2009; 2010a; 2010b). Samples selected
for testing represented the economically important mineralized domains. To date, a total of 28
column leach tests and 37 bottle roll leach tests have been completed.
A summary of the test work performed by KCA is presented in Appendix 13.1.
Results from metallurgical test work have been described in Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2007a,
2007b, 2008; 2009; 2010a; and 2010b. Samples were selected for testing from the areas considered to
be the economically important mineralized domains, defined in Item 7 of this report.
Based on the known locations of drill-hole samples used for column test work, the sample locations
used meet acceptable levels of representation.

13.1 Sample Composites Tested


Separate core interval samples were used to generate a total of 28 samples for column tests and 37
samples for bottle roll tests from metallurgical composites and reverse circulation and core drill-hole
rejects. These samples are representative of the different potential ore zones and varying lithologies
known to exist at La India. The column test sample composites and bottle roll test sample composites
are presented in Appendix 13.2 The origin and use of the composite samples from 2007 through 2010
are described in 6 December 2010 Preliminary Economic Assessment, La India Gold Project,
Municipio of Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico (Gray et al., 2010).

13.2 Sample Preparation


Upon receipt by KCA, each core interval for metallurgical testing was inventoried, weighed and
assigned a sample number. Sample preparation was completed to provide test material variably
crushed to 100% -50 mm, -25 mm, -12.5 mm or -9.5 mm for column leach testing. Bottle roll test
samples were prepared using 1,000-g portions of material. Material for bottle roll tests was either
pulverized to 80% passing 0.075 mm, or used as it was received.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


78

13.3 Rock Density


Rock density tests were completed on randomly selected pieces of whole HQ and PQ core. The
pieces for testing were approximately 5 to 8 cm long and were selected from each core interval
received from the La India project. The procedure utilized for rock density determination was based
upon ASTM Test Method C914, Standard Test Method for Rock Density and Volume of Solid
Refractories by Wax Immersion. The results are presented in Appendix 13.2a.
A total of 222 separate core interval samples were used for the rock density measurements. Densities
varied from a low of 1.33 g/cm3 to a high of 3.17 g/cm3 depending on the lithology and sample
location. These density measurements plus an additional 31 measurements from Domain 17 core and
surface rock samples were used in the geological and resource estimation models.

13.4 Bond Work Index


Test work was completed on each separate composite by Phillips Enterprises, LLC of Golden,
Colorado (Phillips) for rod-mill grindability tests, ball-mill grindability tests and abrasion tests. Table
13.1 summarizes the test results, showing that the rocks tested vary from hard (14 to 20) to very hard
(>20) in six of the ten rock types sampled.
Table 13.1 Bond Work Index test results
KCA Sample

Rod Mill Work

Ball Mill Work

Abrasion

16.74
7.24

18.6
6.62

0.7050
0.0080

8.62

9.55

0.2291

15.89

14.45

0.7404

10.00

11.65

0.4005

Massive silica - Cieneguita

19.19

25.14

0.7779

Viruela

11.99

14.64

0.3951

--

12.33

--

Cieneguita

16.56

20.32

0.5313

Espanola

16.50

21.32

0.5056

38308
38309

Description
Silica structure La Cruz and Cerro de Oro
Silica clay La Cruz

38310

Dacite SC/SA - Viruela

38311

Massive silica Viruela

38312

Andesite SA/SV

38313
41723
41724

Viruela high grade

41725
41726

13.5 Head Analyses


Head analyses were completed June 2011 on the composite samples. A weighted portion of the head
material was crushed to a nominal 1.70 mm. Two 500-gram portions were split out and pulverized
individually to -0.106 mm. Each pulverized portion was then assayed utilizing standard fire assay
methods for gold and silver.
A portion of one of the 500-gram pulverized portions for each separate composite was assayed semiquantitatively by means of an ICAP-OES for an additional series of elements and for whole rock
analyses. In addition to these semi-quantitative analyses, the samples were assayed by quantitative
methods for total carbon, total sulphur (sulphur speciation) and mercury. A cyanide-soluble copper
shake test was also conducted on a portion of the pulverized head material from each composite.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


79

Head screen analyses with assays by size fraction were completed on portions of head material
utilized for each separate column leach test. In general the head screen analyses did not show any
significant concentration of gold and silver in fine or coarse fractions of the samples tested.

13.6 Bottle Roll Leach Tests


A total of 37 bottle roll leach tests were conducted both on core composites and on some selected
rejects intervals from RC and core drilling. A weighted portion of the head material from each core
and RC drill interval composite was crushed to a nominal 1.70 mm and a 1,000-gram portion was
split out. The 1,000-gram portion was either pulverized or ball milled to -0.106 mm (80% -0.075
mm) and then utilized for a cyanide bottle roll leach test. Bottle roll tests on samples No. 44105,
44106, and 44107 were performed on material as-received (no crushing).
The results of the 37 bottle roll leach tests indicated an average 79.4% gold recovery and 46.8%
silver recovery. The results of bottle roll leach tests are presented in Appendix 13.3.

13.7 Gravity Concentration


A higher grade sample, the Cieneguita High-Grade (Domain 18) composite material, was the only
sample tested for gravity concentration processing. A 1,000-gram portion of the -1.70-mm crushed
material from the composite was milled utilizing a stainless steel ball mill to achieve an expected
grind of 80% -0.075 mm. The milled material was then run through a Falcon SB40 Concentrator.
Results indicated that 23% of the contained gold and 26% of the contained silver could be
concentrated into a portion weighing 26% by weight of the feed material. Due to the poor
concentration results, gravity testing was discontinued.

13.8 Flotation
Flotation tests were conducted on two sulphide-bearing samples. The rougher flotation tests were
completed on 500 grams of material that was ring- and puck-pulverized to 80% -0.106 mm. The
flotation tests were completed using a Denver D-1 Flotation machine. The results show that gold and
silver recovery in the flotation concentrate can be achieved. However, the grade of gold and silver in
the rougher concentrates is not high enough to make this product saleable.

13.9 Agglomeration and Percolation Tests


Agglomeration tests were initially completed on selected samples stage-crushed to 100% -12.5 mm
and 100% -9.5 mm. Each sample was tested with the addition of 0, 2, 4 and 8 kg of cement per dry
tonne of sample.
The percolation tests were conducted in small columns at a range of cement levels with no
compressive load applied. The purpose of the percolation tests was to examine the permeability of the
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
80

material under various agglomeration cement levels on stage-crushed material. Percolation problems
were not encountered. Subsequent testing strongly indicated that these crush sizes were finer than
actually required. Since the adopted crush size was determined to be 100% -25 mm (see Appendix
13.4), further testing of agglomeration was not done.
Although cement is not required, cement will be added to the crushed ore at La India instead of lime
for pH control. Cement was chosen because of the additional stability for the heap (although not
necessary) and the similar reagent costs for cement and lime. For pH control, about 1.5 times as
much cement is required compared to lime resulting in a cement requirement of 2.5 kg per tonne ore.

13.10 Laboratory Column Leach Tests for Gold Recovery


A total of 28 separate column leach tests were completed utilizing material from composites
generated from the core material. Column leach tests were conducted on material stage-crushed to
100% -50 mm, 100% -25 mm, 100% -12.5 mm and 100% -9.5 mm. Screen analyses with assays by
size fraction were completed on each separate column leach test residue. After screening, each size
fraction was weighed and pulverized. The individual pulverized samples were submitted for gold and
silver analysis by standard fire assay methods. Column test recovery results were based on carbon
assays vs. the calculated head (carbon assays + tail assays). Column leach test work is presented in
Appendix 13.4.
The results of the laboratory column leach tests were used to predict the gold and silver recoveries for
the various mineralization types known to exist at La India. Table 13.2 presents a summary of gold
and silver recoveries by Domain that are used for production estimates in Item 22 of this report.
Table 13.2 Summary of La India gold and silver recoveries by geological domain
Contained
Au
Distributed
4%
7%

Number of Column
Tests

Average Au
Recovery

Average Ag
Recovery

2
4

90%
69%

20%
21%

Average
Weighted Au
Recovery
2.2%
4.9%

84%

8%

5.6%

71%

7%

9.2%

Domain

Tonnes
Distributed

Domain 1
Domain 2

5%
9%

Domain 2A

7%

7%

Domain 3

7%

13%

Domain 4

No Samples Tested

Domain 5

18%

14%

89%

18%

12.1%

Domain 6

5%

8%

80%

41%

6.1%

Domains 7-10

No Samples Tested

Domain 11

5%

3%

No Samples Tested

90%1

Domain 12

6%

5%

65%

7%

3.3%

Domain 12A

24%

19%

97%

23%

18.7%

3%

4%

6%

5%

Domain 13
Domain 14

No Samples Tested

Domains 15 -16
Domain 17

2.7%

No Samples Tested

89%1

3.3%

No Samples Tested
3

Domain 18

4%

12%

Total

100%

100%

28

95%
94%

4.8%

19%
2

51%

12.2%
85.1%

1 - PEA assumed that Domains 11 and 14 leach similarly to Domains 1 and 5 respectively
2 - Only one column test at crush size of -9.5 mm

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


81

The gold recovery of 85.1% is the weighted average based on contained gold for each domain with
the respective domains gold recovery. For this analysis, all of the column test data were interpolated
to a crush size of 25 mm. The contained gold by domain was extracted from the 2010 Preliminary
Economic Assessment. High-sulphide materials were excluded from the analysis.
An overall project average gold recovery of 80% has been selected for the La India project for all
calculations in the economic analysis (Item 22) in for this report. This gold recovery is more
conservative than the laboratory test data average of 85.1% referenced above, reflecting a
conservative adjustment to accommodate field conditions that will be less controlled than a typical
laboratory environment.
Because of the scattered recoveries at different crush sizes, an analysis of the crush size vs. recovery
was also conducted (Appendix 13.4). Gold recovery and crush size data for all bottle roll tests and
column tests were compiled and plotted on a semi-log graph. From the test data, it was evident that
the gold recovery begins to noticeably decrease at crush sizes coarser than 5,000 microns (5 mm),
with significant recovery decreases being noticed at sizes coarser than 25,000 microns (25 mm). On
this basis, a crush size of 100% -25 mm was selected as the optimum particle size for heap leaching
at La India. This crush size is achievable using a three-stage crushing circuit as described in Item 17
of this report.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


82

Item 14. Mineral Resource Estimates


The June 30, 2012 mineral resource and reserve estimate for the La India deposit, which forms the
basis of this technical report, is the latest in a series of NI43-101-compliant mineral resources
estimates for the project. The previous estimates are summarized in Item 6 of this report.
In January 2010, La Indias then-owner Grayd Resource Corporation commissioned Giroux
Consultants Ltd. to complete an update of the La India project resource. This estimate was an update
of the one produced in February 2009 (Gray and Giroux, 2009) based on an additional drilling (Gray
and Giroux, 2010). The May 2010 resource estimate was the basis of a preliminary economic
assessment of the La India project completed in December 2010 (Gray et al., 2010).
Subsequent to acquiring the project in November 2011, Agnico-Eagle produced an internal mineral
resource estimate for the La India deposit by updating the previous ore models with new drilling
results and using three-year trailing averages for metals prices fixed as of May 1, 2012, at
$1,342/ounce for gold and $23.00/ounces for silver. This resource estimate was used in the economic
analysis of the project as described in Item 22 of this report. Following additional drilling through
May 23, 2012, Agnico-Eagle completed the current resource and reserve estimate for the oxide and
sulphide resources in the Main and North zones of the La India deposit as of June 30, 2012.
For the purposes of the June 30, 2012 resource estimate, the parameters of estimation previously
fixed by Giroux Consultants Ltd. were used and/or partially adjusted based on new geological
information. The June 15, 2010 technical report (Gray and Giroux, 2010) reviewed the methodology
and classification used for the May 2010 resource estimate, and confirmed that the work done in the
previous report was reasonable and appropriate and in accordance with the CIM guidelines for the
estimation, classification and reporting of resources and reserves that were adopted by CIM Council
on November 27, 2010.
This item of the report summarizes the methodology used by the Agnico-Eagle Technical Services
group in estimating the mineral resources for the La India project as of June 30, 2012. Agnico-Eagle
reports mineral resources exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral resources that are not mineral
reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
There are no known environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing,
political or other relevant factors that could materially affect the La India mineral resources estimate
as of June 30, 2012.

14.1 Data Analysis


The database for the La India project consists of drill-hole data from the two different mineralized
zones shown in Figure 14.1 -- the North Zone and the Main Zone. These two zones, while similar in
lithologies and alteration, are described independently due to their geographical separation.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


83

Figure 14.1 Location map showing mineralized zones and drill-hole collars

14.1.1

Main Zone

The Main Zone consists of the La Viruela, La Cruz, and Cerro de Oro areas. The May 23, 2012
database for this zone consists of 368 RC drill holes with a total length of 36,952 m, and 87 diamond
drill holes totaling 7,195 m.
A Main Zone geological model has been updated by Agnico-Eagles Technical Services group
following the interpretation by Grayd Resource geologists that differentiated six separate mineralized
domains, as described in Item 7 of this report, and one waste domain:
D1 = Dacite
D2 = Massive silica silica alunite
D3 = Vuggy silica silica alunite
D5 = Silica clay with structures
D6 = Silica bodies
D7 = Porphyry
D0 = Lower waste unit
Assays were back-tagged based on their location relative to these seven domains. Table 14.1
summarizes the assay statistics for each domain. Samples not assayed but within the mineralized
domains were assigned a value of 0.001 g/t gold. The assays for these units were evaluated using
lognormal cumulative frequency plots, PPlot and CV to determine the capping strategy.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


84

Table 14.1 Summary of gold in assays in the Main Zone sorted by geologic domains
Domain
Number of Samples
Mean Grade (g/t Au)

D1
3,217
0.25

D2
3,549
0.41

D3
1,814
1.29

D5
4,528
0.43

D6
1,061
1.23

D7
146
0.22

Waste
14,147
0.08

Standard Deviation

0.93

1.13

5.09

1.40

1.76

0.29

0.20

Minimum Value (g/t Au)

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.003

Maximum Value (g/t Au)

23.50

35.3

152.00

52.30

14.50

2.16

18.80

Coefficient of Variation

3.74

2.79

3.96

3.27

1.44

1.33

2.42

A similar exercise was conducted for gold in the remaining Main Zone domains. The capping
strategy is summarized in Table 14.2.
Table 14.2 Capping strategy for Main Zone
Domain

Strategy
PPlot, CV, quantiles
PPlot, CV, quantiles

Capping Level
(g/t Au)
5.0
6.0

Number of
Assays Capped
16
22

D1
D2
D3

PPlot, CV, quantiles

14.0

15

D5

PPlot, CV, quantiles

5.0

29

D6

PPlot, CV, quantiles

Not capped

D7

PPlot, CV, quantiles

Not capped

Waste

PPlot, CV, quantiles

2.5

Table 14.3 shows the effects of capping on each of the domains. The mean grade in Domains 1 to 7
was slightly reduced and the coefficient of variation was reduced to far more reasonable levels.
Table 14.3 Summary of capped gold in assays in Main Zone
Domain

D1

D2

D3

D5

D6

D7

Waste

Number of Samples
Mean Grade (g/t Au)

3,217
0.22

3,549
0.38

1,814
1.12

4,528
0.38

1,061
1.23

146
0.22

14,147
0.08

Standard Deviation

0.52

0.74

1.94

0.60

1.76

0.29

0.15

Minimum Value (g/t Au)

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.003

Maximum Value (g/t Au)

5.0

6.0

14.0

5.0

14.50

2.16

2.5

Coefficient of Variation

2.38

1.96

1.73

1.58

1.44

1.33

1.79

14.1.2

North Zone

The database for the North Zone through May 23, 2012 consists of 102 diamond drill holes totaling
9,452 m and a total of 263 RC holes totaling 17,518 m. The North Zone is made up of the Cieneguita,
El Cochi, La India and Espanola areas.
A geologic solid model was produced by Agnico-Eagles Technical Services group with some similar
units to the Main Zone outlined, as described in Item 7 of this report. Domains modeled include:
D11 - Dacite
D12 - Massive silica
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
85

D14 - Silica clay


D17 - Porphyry
D18 - Silica breccia
D0 - Lower waste unit
The assays were tagged with domain codes; the simple statistics for gold in each domain is presented
in Table 14.4. Samples not assayed but within the mineralized domains were assigned a value of 0.0
g/t gold.
Table 14.4 Summary of gold in assays at North Zone sorted by geologic domains
Domain
Number of Samples
Mean Grade (g/t Au)

D11

D12

D14

D18

Waste

470
0.67

2,117
0.65

321
0.50

916
1.52

15,083
0.11

Standard Deviation

0.96

1.02

0.63

6.58

0.32

Minimum Value (g/t Au)

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.003

Maximum Value (g/t Au)

8.39

16.30

6.79

128.50

11.35

Coefficient of Variation

1.28

1.57

1.25

4.32

2.92

The distribution of gold within each domain was examined using lognormal cumulative frequency
plots. A similar strategy was used in the North Zone domains as was used in the Main Zone domains.
The capping levels for each domain in the North Zone are shown in Table 14.5.
Table 14.5 Capping strategy for North Zone
Domain
D11
D12

Strategy
PPlot, CV, quantiles
PPlot, CV, quantiles

Capping Level
Not capped
Not capped

Number of

D14

PPlot, CV, quantiles

Not capped

D18

PPlot, CV, quantiles

15.0

10

Waste

PPlot, CV, quantiles

2.0

83

0
0

The effects of capping are presented in Table 14.6.


Table 14.6 Summary of capped gold in assays in North Zone
Domain
Number of Samples
Mean Grade (g/t Au)

D11

D12

D14

D18

Waste

470
0.67

2,117
0.65

321
0.50

916
1.19

15,083
0.10

Standard Deviation

0.86

1.02

0.63

2.37

0.22

Minimum Value (g/t Au)

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.003

Maximum Value (g/t Au)

8.39

16.30

6.79

15.00

2.0

Coefficient of Variation

1.28

1.57

1.25

1.99

2.12

14.2 Core versus RC Drill Results


Both diamond drill core and reverse circulation drilling methods have been utilized on this project. A
study comparing core assays to RC assays was completed in 2009 (Gray and Giroux, 2009). That
study is updated below with the 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 drill holes included. To determine if any
bias exists between the two drilling methods, the gold grade distributions for each method were
compared in several areas that contained both sampling types.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
86

Main A Zone -

706700 E to 707400 E and 3175850 N to 3176610 N

Main B Zone -

707020 E to 707350 E and 3175510 N to 3175660 N

North Zone

706200 E to 706900 E and 3178400 N to 3179300 N

0.1

0.5

1.0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

95

99.0

99.5

99.9

Using this graphical method to compare the results of the two styles of drilling demonstrates if a
sampling bias exists. Figure 14.2, Figure 14.3 and Figure 14.4 show the gold grades of the results in
the three areas. In all three cases the samples from the two types of drilling show roughly parallel
grade distributions over all the grade classes. The slight variations are well within reason, and there
appears to be no sampling bias present. The results of both RC and diamond drilling are therefore
used in this resource estimate.

2
10

10

10 1

10

Au in Core Holes
1

AU (g/t)

Au in RC Holes

0.1

0.5

1.0

10

20

-3

30

10
40

-3
50

10

60

-2

70

10

80

-2

90

10

95

-1

99.0

10

99.5

-1

99.9

10

Percent

MAIN A ZONE GOLD CORE VS RC

Figure 14.2 Lognormal cumulative frequency plot for gold in core and RC drill
samples, Main A Zone

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


87

0.1

0.5

1.0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

95

99.0

99.5

99.9

2
10

10

10

1
10

Au in Core Holes
1

AU (g/t)

Au in RC Holes

0.1

0.5

1.0

10

20

-3

30

10
40

-3
50

10

60

-2

70

10

80

-2

90

10

95

-1

99.0

10

99.5

-1

99.9

10

Percent

MAIN B ZONE GOLD CORE VS RC

0.1

0.5

1.0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

95

99.0

99.5

99.9

Figure 14.3 Lognormal cumulative frequency plot for gold in core and RC drill samples, Main B Zone

10

10

10

10

Au in Core Holes
1

AU (g/t)

0.1

0.5

1.0

10

20

-3

30

10
40

-3
50

10

60

-2

70

10

80

-2

90

-1

95

10

99.0

10

Au in RC Holes

99.5

-1

99.9

10

Percent

NORTH ZONE GOLD CORE VS RC

Figure 14.4 Lognormal cumulative frequency plot for gold in core and RC drill samples, North Zone

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


88

14.3 Composites
Based on the statistical distribution of sample lengths, uniform lengths of 1.5 m were used for the
composites respecting the boundaries of each Domain. The smaller intervals on the boundaries of
solids of less than 0.1 m length were combined with adjoining intervals to produce a uniform support
of 1.5 0.10 m. Figure 14.5 shows the distribution of the sample length. The statistics for gold in 1.5m composites for both zones are presented in Table 14.7 and Table 14.8. Assays from core holes with
recovery less than 50% and assays from RC holes with sample weights less than 7.5 kg were not used
to form composites, and in some cases where these assays were in strings, composites were not
formed at all.

Figure 14.5 Distribution of the sample length, used to determine the composite length

Table 14.7 Summary of gold in 1.5-m composites at Main Zone sorted by geologic domains
Domain
Number of Samples
Mean Grade (g/t Au)

D1
2,830
0.22

Standard Deviation

0.50

Minimum Value (g/t Au)

0.00

Maximum Value (g/t Au)

5.00

Coefficient of Variation

2.30

D2
3,204
0.38

D3
1,520
1.12

D5
4,329
0.37

D6
987
1.31

D7
144
0.23

Waste
9,794
0.10

0.71

1.85

0.00

0.00

0.57

1.86

0.27

0.14

0.00

0.00

0.00

6.00

0.00

14.00

5.00

13.63

1.87

2.5

1.86

1.66

1.51

1.42

1.20

1.47

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


89

Table 14.8 Summary of gold in 1.5-m composites at North Zone sorted by geologic domains
Domain
Number of Samples
Mean Grade (g/t Au)

D11

D12

D14

D18

D0

385
0.67

1828
0.64

285
0.51

828
1.19

12,745
0.10

Standard Deviation

0.78

0.95

0.62

2.28

0.21

Minimum Value (g/t Au)

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Maximum Value (g/t Au)

7.65

16.1

6.77

15.00

2.00

Coefficient of Variation

1.18

1.48

1.23

1.91

2.04

14.4 Variography
Based on the studies done by the external consultant Gary Giroux, Agnico-Eagles Technical
Services group made adjustments to obtain a better match between the Search Ellipsoid and the
domain models. The semivariograms made by Mr. Giroux are presented in Appendix 14.1. The
search parameters used are presented in Table 14.9.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


90

Table 14.9 Summary of semivariogram parameters for gold


SEARCH
PARAMETERS

Direction

Dip

80

-20

52

-20

30

50

-30

45

45

130

-25

130

-25

130

-25

Domain 1
Pass 1

60

50

30

Pass 2

120

100

60

Pass 3
Domain 2

240

200

120

Pass 1

65

45

20

Pass 2

130

90

40

Pass 3
Domain 3

260

180

80

Pass 1

40

20

15

Pass 2

80

40

30

Pass 3
Domain 5

160

80

60

Pass 1

45

40

30

Pass 2

90

80

60

Pass 3
Domain 6

180

160

120

Pass 1

40

32

25

Pass 2

80

64

50

Pass 3

160

128

100

Domain 7
Pass 1

80

50

30

Pass 2

160

100

60

Pass 3

320

200

120

Domain 11
Pass 1

60

50

30

Pass 2

120

100

60

Pass 3

240

200

120

Domain 12
Pass 1

60

50

30

Pass 2

120

100

60

Pass 3
Domain 14

240

200

120

Pass 1

60

50

30

Pass 2

120

100

60

Pass 3

240

200

120

Domain 18
Pass 1

35

25

10

Pass 2

70

50

20

Pass 3

140

100

40

Waste Main Zone


Pass 1

60

50

30

Pass 2

120

100

60

Pass 3

240

200

120

Waste North Zone


Pass 1

60

50

30

Pass 2

120

100

60

Pass 3

240

200

120

Notes:
Minimum
Requirement
(min):Report,
4
La IndiaSample
Project
Technical
31
Maximum Sample Requirement (max): 12
Maximum Samples Per Drill Hole (max key): 3

155

-25

80

-20

130

-25

August, 2012
91

The search parameters were changed by Agnico-Eagle following the geological interpretations and
observations but based on the parameters used by Grayd Resource for its December 2010 resource
estimate.

14.5 Bulk Density


Specific gravity determinations were made by consultant Kappes Cassiday & Associates. Its
procedure using wax immersion is documented in Appendix 13.2a. The results are summarized in
Table 14.10.
Table 14.10 Summary of rock densities; Sg = specific gravity
Domain

Number of
Measurements

Minimum
Sg (g/cm3)

Maximum
Sg (g/cm3)

Average
Sg (g/cm3)

D1 Dacite
D2 Massive silica - Main Zone

22
33

1.94
2.27

2.57
2.69

2.22
2.51

D2A Massive silica (alunite) - Main Zone

From D12A

D3 Andesite vuggy silica

59

1.88

3.17

2.28

D5 & D14 Silica clay

25

1.33

2.42

1.97

2.33

D6 Silica structure

22

2.24

2.57

2.39

D12 Massive silica - North Zone

16

2.56

2.85

2.63

D12A Massive silica (alunite) - North Zone

36

1.85

2.57

2.33

D7 & D17 Porphyry

31

2.15

2.63

2.38

No specific gravity determinations were taken in D18, the silica breccia / silica clay unit within the
North Zone. Since the unit is a mixture of silica (brecciated) and clay alteration, a combined specific
gravity was used. From D12 (massive silica) Sg = 2.63 and from Domain 14 (silica clay) Sg = 1.97,
an average Sg of 2.30 was determined. Since there are areas with brecciation and likely some open
spaces close to surface, the Sg for D18 was reduced (5%) to 2.18. Unit D0, the lower waste unit, was
assumed to have a Sg of 2.22, similar to dacite.
Within the block model, specific gravity was applied by domain, with blocks containing more than
one domain having a weighted average.
The resource estimate as of June 30, 2012 by Agnico-Eagle used the same bulk density factor used
previously by Grayd.

14.6 Block Models


Two block models with blocks 10 m x 10 m x 6 m high were superimposed upon the two geologic
models for the Main and North zones. The model origins are as follows:

MAIN ZONE
Lower Left Corner
(No Rotation)
Top of Model

706125 E
3175295 N
1906 Elev.

Column Size 10 m
Row Size 10 m
Level Size 6 m

138 cols.
151 rows
93 levels

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


92

NORTH ZONE
Lower Left Corner
(No Rotation)
Top of Model

705595 E
3177215 N
1907 Elev.

Column Size 10 m
Row Size 10 m
Level Size 6 m

211 cols.
243 rows
85 levels

For each model the proportion of each block below the topographic surface was recorded as well as
the proportion of each domain present.

14.7 Grade Interpolation


14.7.1

North Zone

Gold grades were interpolated into blocks containing some percentage of domains D11, D12, D14,
and D18 by the inverse distance squared (ID2) method. All domains used hard boundaries, so only
composites from a particular domain were used to estimate that domain. The list of the holes and the
average grade of each intersection are presented in Appendix 14.2. The ID2 exercise was completed
in a series of passes with an expanding search ellipse tied to the ranges of the domains
semivariogram. For Pass 1, a minimum of four composites were required within a search ellipse with
dimensions equal to one quarter of the semivariogram range. For blocks not estimated in Pass 1, a
second pass using a search ellipse with dimensions equal to half the semivariogram range in each
direction was used. A third pass used the full range. In all cases a maximum of three composites were
allowed from a single hole. In all cases, if more than 12 composites were found in any given pass, the
closest 12 were used. Gold grades inside the waste domains were also interpolated into blocks using
the same method. The final grade for the block was a weighted average of all domains present inside
the block. The ID2 search parameters and number of blocks estimated during each pass are shown in
Table 14.11.

Table 14.11 Summary of the grade interpolation (ID ) per search parameters North Zone
Domain

Pass

11
All Blocks
Estimated

1
2

Number
Estimated
3,781
4,783

60
120

Dist. Y
(m)
50
100

Dist. Z
(m)
30
60

12
All Blocks
Estimated

1
2

130/-25

240

200

120

130/-25
130/-25

60
120

50
100

30
60

14
All Blocks
Estimated

2,279

130/-25

240

200

120

2,518
1,810

130/-25
130/-25

60
120

50
100

30
60

18
All Blocks
Estimated

367

130/-25

240

200

120

1
2

1,974
3,416

155/-25
155/-25

35
70

25
50

10
20

422

155/-25

140

100

40

Azimuth/Dip

Dist. X (m)

130/-25
130/-25

595
14,234
11,195

3
1
2

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


93

14.7.2

Main Zone

Gold grades were interpolated into blocks containing some percentage of domains D1, D2, D3, D5,
D6 and D7 using the ID2 method. Each domain was estimated independently using hard boundaries
between the domains.
Estimation for gold was attempted in every block that had some proportion of a domain present. The
list of the holes and the average grade of each intersection are presented in Appendix 14.2. The
estimation procedure was completed in a series of passes with an expanding search ellipse. The
dimensions for the search ellipse were tied into the appropriate semivariogram for each domain. A
first pass in each domain used a search ellipse with dimensions equal to a quarter of the
semivariogram range. A minimum of four composites were necessary to estimate the block. Only
composites from the domain being estimated were used. For blocks not estimated in Pass 1, a second
pass was made using search ellipse dimensions equal to half the semivariogram range. Again a
minimum of four composites were required to estimate the block. A third pass was completed using
the full range and twice the semivariogram range, respectively. In all cases, if more than 12
composites were found in any given search, the closest 12 were used. A maximum of three
composites were allowed from any single drill hole.
Gold grades inside the waste domains were also interpolated into blocks using the same method. The
final grade for the block was a weighted average of all domains present inside the block. The ID2
search parameters and number of blocks estimated during each pass are shown in Table 14.12.
2

Table 14.12 Summary of ID search parameters Main Zone


Domain

Pass

D1
100% of Solid
Estimated

1
2

Number
Estimated
13572
15901

80/-20
80/-20

Dist. X
(m)
60
120

Dist. Y
(m)
50
100

Dist. Z
(m)
30.0
60.0

3
1
2

2676

80/-20

240

200

120.0

13417
8203

52/-20
52/-20

65
130

45
90

20
40

3718

52/-20

260

180

80

D3 Low Grade
100% of Solid
Estimated

1
2

5080
3553

030/0
030/0

40
80

20
40

15
30

1821

030/0

160

80

60

D5
100% of Solid
Estimated

1
2

16219
11758

50/-30
50/-30

45
90

40
80

30
60

2305

50/-30

180

160

120

D6
100% of Solid
Estimated

1
2

3123
1306

45/0
45/0

40
80

32
64

25
50

54

45/0

160

128

100

D7
100% of Solid
Estimated

1321

45/0

80

50

30

2624

45/0

160

100

60

683

45/0

320

120

120

D2 100% of Solid
Estimated

Azimuth/Dip

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


94

Tonnages were determined for each block based on the block volume (10 m x 10 m x 6 m) multiplied
by the weighted average specific gravity for the block multiplied by the proportion of the block
below surface topography. Each block in the Main and North zones was also compared to the
oxidation surface established from drill logs. The proportion of the block above the oxide surface was
used to determine the tonnage of oxide material present.

14.8 Classification
14.8.1

Introduction

In the current feasibility study (Agnico-Eagle, 2012), the mineralization of the La India project is
classified as mineral reserves and resources according to the following definition from National
Instrument 43-101 and the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves
adopted on November 27, 2010.
The terms measured, indicated and inferred are defined as follows:
A Mineral Resource is a concentration or occurrence of diamonds, natural solid inorganic material,
or natural solid fossilized organic material including base and precious metals, coal, and industrial
minerals in or on the Earth's crust in such form and quantity and of such a grade or quality that it has
reasonable prospects for economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics
and continuity of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological
evidence and knowledge.
An Inferred Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or
quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably
assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on limited
information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops,
trenches, pits, workings and drill holes.
An Indicated Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or
quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics can be estimated with a level of confidence
sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support mine
planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed
and reliable exploration and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from
locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough for
geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed.
A Measured Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or
quality, densities, shape, and physical characteristics are so well established that they can be
estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic
parameters, to support production planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit.
The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing information gathered
through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill
holes that are spaced closely enough to confirm both geological and grade continuity.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


95

14.8.2

Main Zone and North Zone Re-Classification

For block models within the Main and North zones in the June 30, 2012 reserves and resources
estimate, the classification of a resource was indicated if it was estimated in Pass 1, or inferred if
estimated in Pass 2.
After this classification procedure was completed, blocks were examined visually, and isolated
pockets of inferred resources were upgraded to indicated resources. Those reclassified indicated
resources are included inside the planning to define the probable reserves in this model.

14.9 June 30, 2012 Resource Estimate (Inclusive of Reserves)


The geologic continuity of the various zones within the La India deposit has been established through
diamond drilling, RC drilling and surface mapping. Grade continuity can be quantified by
semivariogram analysis and interpolated using the ID2 method.
The results have been tabulated for the portion of blocks within the mineralized domains. This
assumes mining could be done to the domain boundaries. Since the D0 unit of waste is a tabular slice
at the bottom of the model, it may be possible with good grade control to limit the amount of dilution
that including this unit would cause. The results of the June 30, 2012 estimate of mineral resources
inclusive of reserves are shown in Table 14.13, using a 0.2 g/t gold cut-off grade. This table compares
La India projects mineral resources as of June 30, 2012 with the resources as of December 2010,
divided into zones as well as oxide and sulphide material. As of June 30, 2012, the La India project
hosts an indicated resource estimated to contain 1,170,000 ounces of gold in 59.93 million tonnes at a
grade of 0.61 g/t gold, calculated at a 0.20-g/t cut-off grade. As well, the project hosts an inferred
resource containing 1,333,000 ounces gold in 111.2 million tonnes grading 0.37 g/t gold, calculated
at a 0.20-g/t cut-off grade. Note that these numbers take into account the reclassification of inferred
to indicated resources. This compilation includes mineral reserves, which are extracted from the
mineral resources in Item 15 of this report.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


96

Table 14.13 Comparison of the June 30, 2012 measured, indicated and inferred resources estimates (inclusive of
reserves) to the December 2010 resource estimate, Main and North zones, including oxide and sulphide material
December 2010
Category
Measured resources
Main zone (oxide only)

June 30, 2012 (interim)

Gold
(ounces)

Tonnes

Grade
(g/t Au)

127,000

3,730,000

1.06

127,000

3,730,000

1.06

Gold
(ounces)

Tonnes

Grade
(g/t Au)

North zone
Total Measured resources
Indicated resources
Main zone
oxide

252,000

9,110,000

0.86

457,000

22,069,000

0.64

sulphide

96,000

3,000,000

1.00

221,000

12,758,000

0.54

348,000

12,110,000

0.89

678,000

34,827,000

0.61

Main zone oxide + sulphide


North zone
oxide

255,000

9,430,000

0.84

343,000

15,078,000

0.71

sulphide

30,000

1,500,000

0.62

149,000

10,021,000

0.46

285,000

10,930,000

0.81

492,000

25,099,000

0.61

Total indicated resources

North zone oxide + sulphide

633,000

23,040,000

0.85

1,170,000

59,926,000

0.61

Total measured & indicated

760,000

26,771,000

0.88

1,170,000

59,926,000

0.61

Inferred resources
Main zone
oxide

189,000

7,957,000

0.74

284,000

17,761,000

0.50

sulphide

100,000

3,818,000

0.81

343,000

32,694,000

0.33

288,000

11,776,000

0.76

628,000

50,455,000

0.39

Main zone oxide + sulphide


North zone
oxide

190,000

6,385,000

0.92

204,000

13,577,000

0.47

sulphide

28,000

1,570,000

0.56

501,000

47,161,000

0.33

218,000

7,955,000

0.85

705,000

60,738,000

0.36

506,000

19,731,000

0.80

1,333,000

111,193,000

0.37

North zone oxide + sulphide


Total Inferred resources

Note: A cut-off grade of 0.4 g/t gold was used for the December 2010 resources. A 0.2-g/t gold cut-off grade was used for the June 30, 2012 resources.

14.9.1

Indicated Resources

Globally the indicated resources estimated as of June 30, 2012 show an increase of 54% to 1,170,000
ounces gold in comparison with 760,000 ounces gold estimated in measured and indicated resources
in December 2010. The infill drilling program in the Main and the North zones has confirmed the
previous indicated resource and has increased the conversion of the inferred to indicated resources.
Moreover, drilling done along the deep extension of the ore zones has added sulphide mineralization
at depth.
For both the Main and North zones, the material of each block above the oxidation surface is
classified as oxidized, and the material below is classified as sulphide. Of the indicated resources
as of June 30, 2012, an estimated 800,000 ounces gold (37.1 million tonnes at a grade of 0.67 g/t
gold) is contained in oxidized material, and an estimated 369,000 ounces gold (22.8 million tonnes at
a grade of 0.50 g/t gold) is contained in sulphide material.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


97

The Main Zone shows a global increase of 43% of the contained gold to 678,000 ounces versus
475,000 ounces (in measured and indicated resources). This increase is mainly due to the new
parameters used in estimation (such as the lower cut-off grade of 0.2 g/t gold) and the new ore
models, as well as the addition of the sulphide mineralization located under the oxide mineralization.
Globally the North Zone shows an increase of 73% of the contained gold to 492,000 ounces in
comparison with 285,000 ounces. This gain is mainly due of the new sulphide ore recognized along
the deep extension of the ore zone. The gold grade of the North Zone decreased by 25% (0.61 g/t
versus 0.81 g/t) due to the lower capping grade used in the June 30, 2012 estimate.

14.9.2

Inferred Resources

Globally the inferred resources estimated as of June 30, 2012 show an increase of 163% contained
gold to 1,333,000 ounces in comparison with 506,000 ounces estimated in December 2010. The infill
drilling program has validated the previous interpretation and defined a new extension of the ore
model that appears to be mainly in sulphide material. This variance is also explained by the lower
capping grade and the new model. Of the inferred resource as of June 30, 2012, an estimated 488,000
ounces gold (31.3 million tonnes grading 0.48 g/t gold) is contained in oxidized material, and an
estimated 845,000 ounces gold (79.9 million tonnes grading 0.33 g/t gold) is contained in sulphide
material.
The Main Zone shows a global increase of 118% of the contained gold to 628,000 ounces versus
288,000 ounces, mainly due to an increase in the tonnage of the sulphide resources. The oxide
mineralization returned an increase of 50% of the contained gold ounces, while the sulphide material
showed an increase of 243%.
Globally the North Zone shows an increase of 223% of the contained gold to 705,000 ounces in
comparison with 218,000 ounces in the December 2010 estimate. The contained gold in the oxide
mineralization increased by 14,000 ounces (7%), while the sulphide material increased by 473,000
ounces (1,690%). The increase in sulphide material can be explained by infill drilling along the deep
extension of the zone. In the June 2012 estimate, no hard boundary was used to limit the deeper part
of the resources.

14.10 Model Verification


The verification and the validation of the block model were done visually using Datamine software
where the solid model was reviewed on screen at every 10 m showing the block model results and the
composite values along the holes. The cross sections and level plans produced were reviewed by
several Agnico-Eagle geologists and by the qualified person for mineral resources. The exercise,
completed in June 2012, resulted in several changes to the geological three-dimensional models of
the North Zone and a few modifications were made to the Main Zone. A similar review of the current
model has established confidence in the grade interpolation based on the new modeling parameters
and new estimation parameters.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


98

14.11 June 30, 2012 Resource Estimate (Exclusive of Reserves)


The above compilation of La India resources as of June 30, 2012 is inclusive of mineral reserves.
Agnico-Eagles policy is to disclose mineral resources exclusive of mineral reserves. Therefore the
mineral reserves need to be removed from the resources compilation. The method of extracting
mineral reserves from mineral resources is described in Item 15 of this report. The remaining mineral
resources, exclusive of reserves, are shown in Table 14.14. (The full mineral resources and mineral
reserves statement can be found in Item 15.)
Table 14.14 Mineral resource compilation, La India project, June 30, 2012 (exclusive of reserves)
Resource category

Gold
(ounces)

Tonnage
(tonnes)

Grade
(g/t Au)

249,000
186,000
435,000

14,879,000
12,364,000
27,243,000

0.52
0.47
0.50

519,000
625,000
1,144,000

45,042,000
58,367,000
103,409,000

0.36
0.33
0.34

Mineral resources
Measured mineral resource
Indicated mineral resource
Main zone
North zone
Total measured and indicated
mineral resource
Inferred mineral resource
Main zone
North zone
Total inferred mineral resource

Mineral resources are reported using a 0.2-g/t in-situ gold cut-off.

14.12 Discussion
The area covered by the mineral resource model for the La India project is currently over 3 km long located on
the North and Main zones inside the oxide ore. Drill-hole spacing for the mineral resource model making up
the probable reserve category areas is now around 25 m in open pit areas. The inferred resource in the La India
resource model generally has a drill-hole spacing more than 50 m. The mineralized oxide zones in the La India
property area and specifically the North and Main zones areas seem to be continuous, so that conversion
drilling has usually confirmed the existence of the mineral resource and mineral reserves discovered by earlier,
more widely spaced exploration drilling.
Since November 2011, the resource estimation parameters used in the La India mineral resource and reserve
model have been reviewed by the Agnico-Eagle team to compare with the current ore control models. During
2012, the area of the North and Main zones was the target of an extensive drilling program, which confirmed
the continuity of the zones. Some of the new intercepts in this zone were among the best ever found on the La
India property. The best portions of the North and Main zones seem to have a similar 30-degree plunge
northward as is also typical of the lenses closer to surface. All features indicate that there are also sulphide ore
lenses that continue below the current North and Main zones.
There is significant potential for finding more economic mineralization within the La India property area,
especially down-dip and along-strike from the known deposits.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


99

Item 15. Mineral Reserve Estimates


In the current feasibility study (Agnico-Eagle, 2012), the mineralization of the La India project is
classified as mineral reserves and resources according to the definition from National Instrument 43101 and the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted on
November 27, 2010. The CIM definition for measured, indicated and inferred resources is given in
Item 14 of this report. The CIM definition for proven and probable mineral reserves follows:
Mineral Reserves are sub-divided in order of increasing confidence into Probable Mineral Reserves
and Proven Mineral Res erves. A Probable Mineral Reserve has a lower level of confidence than a
Proven Mineral Reserve.
A Mineral Reserve is the economically mineable part of a measured or indicated mineral resource
demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. This study must include adequate
information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic and other relevant factors that
demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified. A mineral reserve
includes diluting materials and allows for losses that may occur when the material is mined. A
Probable Mineral Reserve is the economically mineable part of an Indicated and, in some
circumstances, a Measured Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study.
A Proven Mineral Reserve is the economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource
demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study.
The CIM reporting standards do not allow an inferred resource to be included in reserve estimates;
the inferred resource has not been included in this item.

15.1 Open Pit Optimization


Open pit optimization was conducted on the three open pits planned at La India to determine the
optimal economic shapes of the pits in three dimensions. The three pits planned are the North and
Central pits on the North Zone, and the Main pit on the Main Zone. (See Item 16 of this report for
details.)
This task was undertaken using MineSight software, which is based on the Lerchs-Grossmann
algorithm. The method works on a block model of the deposit, and progressively constructs lists of
related blocks that should, or should not, be mined. The method uses the values of the blocks to
define a pit outline that has the highest possible total economic value, subject to the required pit
slopes defined as structure arcs in the software. Agnico-Eagle Mexico Engineering staff and AgnicoEagle Technical Services staff in Canada were responsible for the pit optimization using MineSight
software, and used established procedures that have been developed at other Agnico-Eagle mines in
Mexico.
This section describes the assumptions, parameters and methods used to calculate the block values.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


100

15.1.1

Geotechnical Parameters

The geotechnical parameters for the North and Main zones are presented in Table 15.1. The pit slopes
vary by sector, as shown by the topographic contours in Figure 15.1, with inter-ramp angles typically
at 45 to 50. The geotechnical studies were performed by independent consultant The Mine Group
Inc. (The Mine Group, 2012).
Table 15.1 La India pit slope parameters utilized for pit optimization
Bench stacking (@ 6m/bench) (metres)

North Zone
6x2 = 12

Main Zone
6x2 = 12

Bank face angle (degrees)

70

70

Berm width (metres)

7.6

7.5

Inter-ramp slope (degrees)

45

45

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


101

Figure 15.1 Geotechnical structural domain considerations for La India pits. Note that South pit indicates the
Main pit.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


102

15.1.2

Conversion of Mineral Resources into Mineral Reserves

The June 30, 2012, mineral reserves for the La India Project were estimated by converting mineral
resources into reserves using the parameters and assumptions presented below. Only the indicated
resources were considered for conversion into mineral reserves. Inferred mineral resources were not
considered.
The parameters used for pit optimization in determining the June 30, 2012 estimate are presented in
Table 15.2. The metals prices and currency exchange rate used to establish the cut-off grade for the
reserve were based on three-year trailing averages for the period ending June 30, 2012, of $1,379 per
ounce gold, $26.49 per ounce silver and MXP/US$ exchange rate of 13.00. For details about the
mining costs, see Item 16; for the processing costs see Item 17; and for the general and administrative
costs see Item 21 and Appendix 21.1.
Table 15.2 Economic parameters used for pit optimization
Gold price
Silver price

$ 1,379/oz
$26.49/oz

Exchange rate

$1.00 = 13.00 Mexican Peso

Metallurgical gold recovery

80% average

Mining dilution

5%

Mining recovery

100%

Mine-site costs
Processing cost

$3.86/tonne processed

Gen & Admin


Mining costs including definition
drilling costs
Total mine-site costs

$1.50/tonne ore
$1.74/tonne

Incremental bench costs

Not included, factored into avg. mining cost

Economic cut-off grade


Overall slope angle

0.20 g/t gold


North Zone: variable (see Fig. 15.2)
Main Zone: variable (see Fig. 15.3)

$7.10/tonne

The mineral reserves were derived from contiguous indicated resource blocks that are located inside
the designed open pit shell. The pit includes the blocks that have a grade above the economic cut-off
grade (0.20 g/t gold), which is based on the net smelter return (NSR) cut-off value ($7.10/tonne). The
calculation of the NSR cut-off value and the economic cut-off grade are described below.
The NSR cut-off value is calculated using the sum of the mining, processing, and Gen & Admin costs
listed in Table 15.2.
NSR cut-off value = mining cost/tonne + processing cost/tonne + G&A cost/tonne = $7.10/tonne

This NSR cut-off value is utilized, along with a metallurgical recovery of 80% (see Item 17) to define
the limits of economic value of the block during the optimization. The gold price used in this
evaluation is $1,379 per ounce, which is converted to $44.34 per gram ($1,379/oz / 31.104 g/oz). The
economic cut-off grade is calculated by the formula NSR cut-off value / gold price / metallurgical
recovery as follows:
Economic cut-off grade = ($7.10/tonne) / ($44.34/gram gold) / 80% = 0.20 g/t

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


103

The minimum cut-off grade is applied to the in situ NSR value of each block model, before dilution
and based on the gold and the silver recovery per ore type. In the open pit, the incremental material
that is inside the ore wireframes is added into mineral reserves.

15.2 Pit Designs


The pit shells produced with the Lerchs-Grossmann algorithm were used as a guideline for the pit
designs.
Mining will take place on 6 m-high benches with a final bench height of 12 m between berms, which
vary between 6 m and 9 m wide depending on the sector. Double-lane ramps will be 23 m wide to
accommodate 90-tonne-class mining trucks (CAT 777), and single-lane ramps will be 13.8 m wide.
Road gradients will be at a maximum of 10%. More detail about the pit designs can be found in Item
16 of this report.

15.3 La India Mineral Reserves as of June 30, 2012


As discussed above, an economic cut-off grade of 0.20 g/t gold was used to develop the optimized pit
shells.
Once the pit optimization was completed using the economic cut-off grade, a marginal cut-off grade
was calculated for lower grade material contained in the pits. The marginal cut-off grade considers
than any individual tonne of rock in the pit will be mined, regardless of its destination to a waste rock
stockpile or to the process plant. The marginal cut-off grade is therefore calculated the same way as
the economic cut-off grade but subtracting the mining costs from the NSR cut-off value; the
calculation is shown as follows:
Marginal cut-off grade = (NSR cut-off value $7.10 - Mining Costs $1.74) / ($44.34/gram gold) / 80% = 0.15 g/t

The marginal cut-off grade of 0.15 g/t gold was applied to the indicated resources (see Item 14)
contained within these pit shells. Any indicated resource blocks contained within the pit shells and
with a grade of 0.15 g/t gold or higher were classified as probable reserves.
The tonnes and grades reported take into account a mining recovery factor of 100% applied to the
gold ounces and 5% due to the impact of the mining dilution. The dilution factor of 5% is an estimate
supported by engineering studies set out in the La India feasibility study (August 2012). The metal
recovery and operating cost estimates are described in items 17 and 21 of this report. These
parameters will be reassessed using the results of future open pit mining operations for the La India
mine.
Table 15.3a and Table 15.3b show the probable reserves that were converted from indicated
resources within the optimized pit designs for the North Zone and the Main Zone, respectively,
broken down by geologic domains.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


104

Table 15.3 Probable reserves in the North and Main zones


Table 15.3a Probable reserves in the North Zone by domains; oxide material only
Geologic domain (North
11
12

Tonnes
509,000
6,805,000

Gold grade (g/t)


0.89
0.76

Contained

14

521,000

0.58

10,000

18

2,315,000

1.33

99,000

Waste mod (8)

7,669,000

0.46

114,000

Total/average

17,819,000

0.70

403,000

gold

15,000
166,000

Table 15.3b Probable reserves in the Main Zone by domains; oxide material only
Geologic domain (Main
1
2

Tonnes
2,598,000
7,913,000

Gold grade (g/t)


0.45
0.59

Contained
38,000
150,000

3,635,000

1.08

126,000

2,203,000

0.94

66,000

802,000

0.36

9,000

2,167,000

0.30

21,000

Waste mod (8)

7,502,000

0.48

117,000

Total/average

26,820,000

0.61

528,000

gold

Table 15.4 shows the combined reserves from the North and Main zones. Using the assumptions from
Table 15.2 and the positive results of the economic analysis presented in Item 22, the mineral
reserves for the La India project, dated June 30, 2012, are estimated at 44.6 million tonnes grading
0.65 g/t gold (0.93 million ounces of contained gold). The mineral reserves are all classified as
probable; there are no proven reserves at this time. All reserves at La India are in oxide material. The
mineral resources reported in this table are drawn from Table 14.14, and do not include the mineral
reserves. Based on the results of the La India project feasibility study (Agnico-Eagle, 2012a), the
mineral reserves and resources dated June 30, 2012, are not likely to be materially affected by recent
changes to mining, metallurgical, infrastructure, permitting and other relevant factors.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


105

Table 15.4 Mineral resource and reserve statement, La India open pit mine project as of June 30, 2012
Category
Mineral Reserves
Proven reserves

Tonnes
(000s)

Gold grade (g/t)

Contained gold (000


oz)

Probable reserves
Main Zone (oxide only)

26,820

0.61

528

North Zone (oxide only)

17,819

0.70

403

44,639

0.65

930

Total proven & probable reserves


Mineral resources
Measured mineral resource
Indicated mineral resource
Main Zone

14,879

0.52

249

North Zone

12,364

0.47

186

27,243

0.50

435

Main zone

45,042

0.36

519

North zone

58,367

0.33

625

103,409

0.34

1,144

Total measured
resource

and

indicated

mineral

Inferred mineral resource

Total inferred mineral resource

Mineral reserves are reported using a 0.2-g/t in-situ gold cut-off.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


106

Item 16. Mining Operations


Due to the low-grade and near-surface nature of the La India mineral deposit, open pit mining has
been chosen as the most economic method to extract the ore. The mine planning and engineering
work completed so far includes determining the economic pit limits, making detailed pit designs,
calculating in-pit resources, and determining production scheduling based on the current reserve
model. Mining, capital and operating costs have been estimated for the mine plan based on typical
costs for this type and size of operation. These components of the study are described in the
following sections.
A NI-43-101-compliant Preliminary Economic Assessment for the La India project was produced for
then-owner Grayd Resource Corporation dated December 6, 2010 (Gray et al., 2010). Since then,
Agnico-Eagle has produced a feasibility study (Agnico-Eagle, 2012) that included determining the
economic pit limits, detailed pit designs, calculating in pit resources and production scheduling,
based on the updated resource model dated June 30, 2012 as well as using larger mining equipment.
Independent consultant Gustavson Associates has reviewed the new life of mine (LOM) plan.

16.1

Mining Operations

The type and size of operation chosen for the La India project are very similar to the Agnico-Eagles
Pinos Altos and Mascota mines operating approximately 70 kms from the La India site. Mining,
capital and operating cost estimates were estimated for the mine plan based on actual costs from these
operations.

16.1.1

Mining Areas and Phases

The base case Lerchs-Grossmann (LG) analysis presented in Item 15 generated a number of pit shells
in the areas of the North and Main zones. These pit shells were prioritized by net value for purposes
of developing a mining sequence for a preliminary mine production schedule. Figure 16.1 illustrates
the LG shells and the pit areas used and ranked by net value.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


107

Figure 16.1 Base case open pit Lerchs-Grossmann shells, areas for value ranking.

Some of these pit shells are small distinct cones but are in close proximity to each other and could be
mined more efficiently when combined together. From the ranking of the smaller pit areas, in the
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
108

Main deposit a set of five pits, ranked from highest to lowest value, were designed: MP21, MP22,
MP23, MP24 and MP25. Similarly the North deposit pit sequence was defined by five additional sets
of pits, ranked from highest to lowest value: NP21, NP22, NP23, NP24, and NP25. Note that the
lower value LG pit shells were excluded from the production scheduling as being too small, too
distant from larger pits or too marginal in value.
The grouped LG pits were converted to designed pits using double benching and 45o inter-ramp
slopes to get a truer estimate of waste rock and stripping ratio. Pit ramps should have a maximum
slope of 10% based on industry standards, and a bank face angle of 70o is assumed based on rock
types and geologic structures identified during exploration and infill drilling campaigns. Figure 16.2
and Figure 16.3 display the ultimate design pits used for production scheduling, for the North and
Main zone areas, respectively.

Figure 16.2 North Zone design pits used for scheduling, sequenced by value ranking from highest ranking
(NP21) to lowest ranking (NP25)

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


109

Figure 16.3 Main Zone design pits used for scheduling, sequenced by value ranking From highest ranking
(MP21) to lowest ranking (MP25)

The combined pits in Figures 16.2 and 16.3 were modified to accommodate 90-tonne off-road trucks
and provided the basis for scheduling annual production rates.
Gustavson utilized DataMine software to produce year-by-year mine plans to demonstrate the
mining sequence and active mining areas for each year. The ultimate pits in the North and Main
zones are shown in Figure 16.4 and Figure 16.5, respectively. Once the pit parameters were
incorporated into the original topography of the La India mine site, a wireframe was built and then
compared with the original topography. That information was then compared with the block model to
verify the grade of the pits.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


110

Figure 16.4 La India project ultimate pit designs in the North Zone area

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


111

Figure 16.5 La India project ultimate pit designs in the Main Zone area

16.1.2

Detailed Pit Designs

The detailed designs for the pit areas indicated in Figure 16.4 and Figure 16.5 are based on the pit
design parameters listed in Table 16.1 and shown in Figure 16.6. The same parameters are used for
pits in the North and the Main zones. The North pit will have final dimensions of 1,499 m long by
approximately 952 m wide and 222 m deep, and the Central pit will have final dimensions of 525 m
long by 340 m wide and 176 m deep, as shown in Figure 16.4. The Main pit will measure 1,463 m
long by 670 m wide and 304 m deep as shown in Figure 16.5.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


112

Table 16.1 Feasibility study pit design parameters for North and Main pits
Inter-ramp slope (maximum)
Bank face angle
Bench stacking (@ 6m / bench)
Berm width (every 2nd bench)
Road grade (maximum)
Road width Double lane
Road width Single lane

45

70
2 (double-benches)
7.6 m
10%
13.8 m
9.2 m

Bench Height

Bench Height
Bank Face Angle

Berm Width

Inter-ramp Slope Angle

Berm Width

Figure 16.6 Pit design slope parameter for North and Main pits

The bench height used for the pit designs was based on the block height in the 3D model, which is 6
m. The pits are to be mined using double benching, i.e., two 6-m benches per stack, with a 7.6-mwide berm between every double bench stack, as shown in Figure 16.6. An overall 45o inter-ramp
slope is achieved using the 7.6 m berm width along with a 70o bank face angle. The geotechnical
studies were performed by independent consultant The Mine Group Inc. as illustrated in Figure 15.1.
Pit access and haulage roads are designed for 90-tonne off-highway haulage trucks (CAT 777 or
comparable). Access roads to the working areas will be single lane at 9.2 m wide, but active haulage
roads will be 30 m wide, which is the Caterpillar standard of four truck widths, and sufficient for
two-way traffic with berms and ditches.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


113

16.1.3

Mine Layout

Figure 16.7 displays the layout of the ultimate design pits used for production scheduling, along with
the locations for mine-site infrastructure. These include the mine access road, haulage roads, carbon
adsorption plant (ADR), truck shop location, leach pad, and prospective waste rock disposal sites.

Figure 16.7 Ultimate mine layout showing roads, dumps, the leach pad and other infrastructure. ADR Plant =
Adsorption/Desorption/Refining plant.

16.2 Mine Production Schedule


The mine production schedule for the La India project was developed from the probable reserves
contained within each of the design pit phases.
Table 16.2 summarizes the parameters used to generate the mine production schedule and,
subsequently, to estimate mine equipment and personnel requirements.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


114

Table 16.2 Mine production scheduling parameters


Combined annual ore and waste production rate
Annual crushing rate maximum

9 to 10 million tonnes
6 million tonnes

Mine operating hours per shift


Mine operating shifts per day
Mine operating days per week
Scheduled mine operating days per year

12
2
7
365

Number of mine crews

No preproduction stripping will be necessary as there is no waste capping the deposits. Ore
occurs on the surface, or near surface, in sufficient quantities to meet production requirements
immediately upon commencement of mining. However, a small portion of the NP25 pit
(1,245,481 tonnes of ore plus 1,404,520 tonnes of waste) will be mined during construction in
the preproduction period (prior to Year 1).
Feed to the crushing plant and leach pad will total 44.6 million tonnes at a grade of 0.65 g/t gold
over the life of the mine, which is projected at eight years. Table 16.3 summarizes the resulting
mine production schedule for the La India project. It is based on the mine planning and
engineering work that was completed in the feasibility study (Agnico-Eagle, 2012a) utilizing
larger mining equipment. It also reflects the sequence of mining the pits in order to allow the
construction of the leach pad that will be located just west of the North Zone.
Table 16.3 Life of Mine production schedule
LOM
PP
Year 1

Ore (tonnes)
1,245,481
5,809,000

Gold grade

Contained

Recovered

Waste

Stripping ratio

0.721
0.702

28,880
131,108

16,173
73,420

1,404,520
5,430,000

1.13
0.93

Total tonnes
2,650,000
11,239,000
12,580,000

Year 2

5,840,000

0.719

135,000

108,000

6,740,000

1.15

Year 3

5,840,000

0.612

114,886

91,909

6,760,000

1.16

12,600,000

Year 4

5,840,000

0.532

99,903

79,922

6,760,000

1.16

12,600,000

Year 5

5,840,000

0.582

109,189

87,351

6,760,001

1.16

12,600,000

Year 6

5,840,000

0.685

128,616

102,893

6,760,000

1.16

12,600,000

Year 7

5,840,000

0.672

126,175

100,940

1,870,000

0.32

7,710,000

Year 8

2,544,563

0.691

56,522

64,416

1,622,301

0.64

4,166,864

Year 9

19,199

TOTAL

44,639,044

0.648

930,277

744,222

44,106,822

0.99

88,745,865

16.3

Mine Equipment Selection and Fleet Requirements

For the purposes of equipment selection and cost estimation, open pit mining will be conducted
from 6-m benches using the following equipment fleet:

two 171-mm-diameter down-hole-hammer blast-hole drills


one 89 mm crawler-type percussion drill
two 11.5 m3 front-end loaders
seven 90-tonne off-highway haulage trucks
two 201-kW crawler dozers
one 306-kW crawler dozer

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


115

one 221-kW motor grader


one 193-kW motor grader
one 30,000-litre water truck

All major mining equipment will be diesel powered. Mobility is an important consideration in
equipment selection where multiple pits will be mined concurrently. Productivity calculations
were done in order to determine loader requirements. The mine equipment and personnel
requirements are derived from the design parameters presented in Table 16.1 and the work
schedule in Table 16.2. Mine road construction and general site preparation will be done using
the mining equipment during the mining cycle in the preproduction year; and as Table 16.3
shows, the ore and waste scheduled to be moved during preproduction is low, totaling about 2.6
million tonnes.
Ore will be hauled to the crusher located near the proposed leach pad. The crushed ore will then
be transported by conveyors and a stacker onto the leach pad.
Waste rock haulage will be directed to various sites as shown in Figure 16.7, but the location of
the dumps may change slightly during further design.
These dump sites were selected for their close proximity to mining areas, and their natural
confinement for re-grading and water management considerations. Storm run-off will not
require re-routing using additional drainage ditches since the natural drainage is sufficient to
handle the flow. Pits and waste rock dumps will be situated on higher ground away from major
drainages so that neither pits nor dumps are expected to flood.
Equipment productivities are derived dynamically by the scheduling program using predetermined cycle times for all haul routes. A loose density of 1.77 t/m3, equating to an average
30% swell, is used in waste dump sizing and unit productivity calculations for loading and
hauling equipment.
Blast-hole drill productivities are estimated at nearly 1,450 tonnes per hour using a blast-hole
pattern of 4.5 m by 5 m in ore areas and 4 m by 4 m in burden, with 0.8 m of subgrade drilling,
and an average powder factor of 0.24 kg per tonne of rock. Effective drill penetration rates of 27
m per hour are assumed. A fleet of two down-hole hammer blast-hole drills is estimated to cover
the required production plus down time and scheduling losses, with 1.4 drills operating on
average. A crawler-type percussion drill will also be needed for secondary breakage, road
construction and short-term backup to the primary blast-hole drills. Two 11.5-m3 front-end
loaders will serve as the primary loading units, each working with 90-tonne off-highway haul
trucks (having an effective payload of 90 tonnes). The productivity of this loader combination is
estimated at over 10,000,000 tonnes per year as shown in Table 16.3.
One-way ore haulage distances range from 1.2 km to 5.0 km, and the one-way waste rock
haulage is from 0.6 km to 2.3 km The detailed cycle-time analysis has defined a need for five
haul trucks in preproduction and the addition of two more haul trucks in Year 1 for a total of
seven haul trucks. The overall haul fleet utilization is expected to be approximately 72%.
Table 16.4 summarizes the major mine equipment requirements for the project and their schedule
of acquisition.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
116

Table 16.4 Major mining equipment fleet requirements


MINE EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION SCHEDULE (Capital Costs US$000)
Description

Unit Cost
US$

Primary (units):
Crawler Drills, 171-mm

1,066

Loaders, 12.0-cu-m

2,121

Trucks, 100-tonne

1,618

Sec. Drills, 89-mm

590

Dozers, 306-kW

950

Dozers, 201-kW

616

Graders, 221 and 193-kW

673

Water Truck, 30,000-liter

490

Ancillary (units):
Powder Truck,3.5-t

50

Powder Magazine, (120-t, 5-t)

60

AN Storage Bin, 60-t

100

Maintenance truck, 3.5-t

50

Loaders, 4.0-cu-m

500

Articulated Trucks, 35-tonne

400

Crawler Excavator, 2.1-cu-m

300

Backhoe/Loader, 1.1-cu-m

79

Fuel/Lube Truck

200

Shop Forklift

120

Light Plant

15

Pickup Truck, 0.5-t, 4-WD

30

Crew Van

60

Ambulance

150

Mobile Radios
Miscellaneous (units):
Shop Equipment

50

Mining Software

240

Water Storage (Dust Sup Sys)

50

Dewatering Pumps & Piping

25

Radio Com Base Station

50

Office & Misc Equipment

50

TOTAL

PP

2,132
4,242
8,090
590
950
1,150
1,346
490

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 6

Year 7

Year 8

3,637
697
-

50
120
200
50
500
400
300
79
400
120
60
210
120
150
32

200
240
150
50
100

50

75

22,442

4,334

25
25

50
50
25

25

100

25
-

Total

2,132
4,242
11,727
590
950
1,847
1,346
490

50
120
200
50
500
400
300
79
400
120
60
210
120
150
32

250
240
200

25
-

100
50
150

25

27,026

16.4 Mine Personnel


A rotating, three-crew system will be used to staff mine operations and maintenance labour
positions. These crews will work 12-hour shifts, with a work rotation of 14 days on and seven
days off. At full operation, the mine personnel requirements, including supervision and technical
staff, will total 135 employees.

16.5 Mine Operating Cost Summary


Based on the selected equipment and personnel schedule, the yearly per tonne operating cost for
the mine is presented in Table 16.5. These costs were calculated using the 2012 unit costs from
Agnico-Eagles operations at the Pinos Altos and Mascota mines in Mexico, which are very
similar to La India. The average life of mining cost is $1.74/tonne of material.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
117

Table 16.5 Yearly mine operating costs


Annual Operating and Maintenance Cost per Tonne of Material
Description

PP

Year 1

Supervision

0.05

0.05

0.07

Wages

0.18
0.20
0.32
0.10
0.20
0.01
0.06
0.03

0.21
0.14
0.29
0.10
0.20
0.01
0.08
0.03

0.28
0.15
0.30
0.10
0.27
0.01
0.11
0.03

1.15

0.03
0.08
0.05
0.09
0.16
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.53
1.68

Drilling
Blasting
Loading
Hauling
Services
Roads and Dumps
Misc. Pit Production
Operations Total
Supervision
Wages
Drilling
Loaders
Trucks
Dozers
Graders and Water Truck
Surface Equipment
Misc. Pit Equipment
Maintenance Total
Total Operating Costs

Year 2
Year 3
Operations

Year 4

Year 5

Year 6

Year 7

Year 8

0.06

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.27
0.15
0.29
0.10
0.25
0.01
0.10
0.03

0.22
0.14
0.28
0.10
0.20
0.01
0.08
0.03

0.23
0.14
0.28
0.10
0.27
0.01
0.08
0.03

0.22
0.14
0.29
0.10
0.27
0.01
0.08
0.03

0.22
0.14
0.29
0.10
0.27
0.01
0.08
0.03

0.22
0.14
0.29
0.10
0.27
0.01
0.08
0.03

1.10

1.31
1.26
Maintenance

1.10

1.19

1.19

1.19

1.19

0.04
0.11
0.05
0.09
0.15
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.57
1.67

0.05
0.14
0.07
0.12
0.18
0.06
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.73
2.04

0.04
0.11
0.06
0.09
0.11
0.05
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.54
1.64

0.04
0.11
0.06
0.07
0.12
0.05
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.53
1.72

0.04
0.10
0.05
0.08
0.11
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.50
1.69

0.04
0.10
0.05
0.07
0.12
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.50
1.69

0.04
0.10
0.04
0.05
0.12
0.05
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.48
1.67

0.05
0.13
0.07
0.11
0.15
0.06
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.67
1.93

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


118

Item 17. Recovery Methods


Significant metallurgical testing has been conducted for La India project since 2007, including
representative samples from the different ore zones and varying lithologies, described in Item 13
of this report. Heap leaching followed by carbon adsorption was selected as the most favourable
method for extracting gold and silver from the La India ore. Higher grade material was tested for
gravity concentration of gold and silver, but poor results led to the rejection of this method of
extraction. The flotation tests on sulphide-bearing samples resulted in concentrates too low for a
saleable product.
An agglomeration and percolation test determined that a crush size of 100% -25 mm would be
satisfactory. It was determined that cement should be added to the crushed rock for pH control
and additional stability of the heap.
Sample composites were generated for the column and bottle-roll leach tests. Different
geological domains gave varying silver and gold recovery results. An overall project average
gold recovery of 80% has been selected for the La India project as explained in Item 13.10.

17.1 Process Description and Design Criteria


The process flowsheet was selected based upon results of laboratory test work as detailed in Item
13. The process flowsheet includes a three-stage crushing plant followed by a heap leach
operation. Gold will be extracted from the leach solution by an Adsorption/Desorption/Refinery
(ADR) carbon plant. The detailed design criteria for the processing system at La India are found
in Appendix 17.1.
The process flowsheet is based on an ore processing rate of 6.0 million dry tonnes per year
(17,250 dry tonnes per day). A simplified process flowsheet is presented in Figure 17.1.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


119

Figure 17.1 Simplified process flowsheet for La India operation

17.1.1

Primary and Secondary Crushing and Screening

Run-of-mine (ROM) ore will be trucked from the mine to the crushing area. ROM ore will then
be stockpiled or direct dumped into a 150-tonne ROM feed bin; stockpiled ore will be fed to the
ROM feed bin using a loader. Ore in the ROM feed bin will be reclaimed using an apron feeder
that feeds a vibrating grizzly. The oversize material from the vibrating grizzly will be crushed
using a primary jaw crusher and will then rejoin the vibrating grizzly undersize material. The
primary crushed ore will be stockpiled in a canyon below the primary crushing area.
The crushed ore stockpile will have a live capacity of 18,600 tonnes and a total capacity of
58,000 tonnes. Crushed ore will be reclaimed from the pile by two apron feeders that will load
the primary crushed ore onto the primary crushed ore reclaim tunnel conveyor (Conveyor #3).
Conveyor #3 will transport ore to the single-deck secondary crusher vibrating screen. Screen
undersize material will bypass the secondary cone crusher and report directly to the screen tower
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
120

feed conveyor (Conveyor #4). Screen oversize material will feed a secondary cone crusher,
which will discharge onto the screen tower feed conveyor.

17.1.2

Tertiary Crushing and Screening

The screen tower feed conveyor will transfer material to the twin-screen tertiary screen tower.
Screen undersize material will be dropped directly on the screen tower undersize conveyor,
which will feed the crushed ore product stockpile stacker. Screen oversize material will be
conveyed to a surge bin, which will feed the three tertiary cone crushers. Product discharged
from the tertiary cone crushers will be collected by the recycle conveyor (Conveyor #12) and
transported to the screen tower feed conveyor to close the circuit. The final crushed product
(sized at 100% 25 mm) will be stockpiled and reclaimed from the stockpile using two apron
feeders and transferred to the product reclaim tunnel conveyor (Conveyor #16) where it will be
belt-agglomerated. A belt sampler will be positioned over Conveyor #16.
The final product crushed ore will be belt-agglomerated using cement for pH control and added
stability. Cement will be added at a rate of 2.5 kg/tonne from two 100-tonne cement silos.
Conveyor #16 will feed a series of overland conveyors.
The overland conveyor system will consist of four overland conveyors and one transfer
grasshopper conveyor that will transport the agglomerated ore to the heap-leach stacking line.
The final overland conveyor will feed a series of grasshopper conveyors (maximum of 23
required) that ultimately will feed the radial stacker for heap construction.

17.1.3

Heap Leach Pad

The leach pad design is based on a total capacity of 50 million dry tonnes. The final pad will be
approximately 545 m x 1,248 m built in two separate phases. Phase 1 will be approximately
388,585 m2 (545 m x 713 m). Phase 2, built in Year 2, will be 291,575 m2 (545 m x 535 m). The
ultimate height will be approximately 113 m (measured vertically from the maximum depth).
The leach pad liner system will consist of an 80 mil low density polyethylene (LDPE)
geomembrane overlying a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) on prepared subgrade. Compacted clay
may be used in some areas in place of GCL. It is anticipated that the ore will be stacked in lifts
that are 10 m high. As soon as an area of the pad is stacked with ore, piping and drip emitters
will be placed on the ore for distribution of the cyanide leach solution. The size of the area
placed under leach will vary depending on the configuration of the stacking plan. Solution
draining through the leach pad will be collected in a solution-collection ditch taht will route the
solution to the pregnant collection pond. A ditch diversion system will divert the natural runoff
from uphill catchment areas around the phased heap leach pad.

17.1.4

Solution Storage

Solution storage consists of a barren solution tank, a pregnant solution pond and an excess pond
(for use in emergencies). The pregnant solution pond will be sized at approximately 40,093 m3. It
will be double-lined and equipped with leak collection and recovery systems. The excess pond
will be designed to store rain water to minimize fresh water consumption and also to contain the
volume of solution that would be produced from a 100-year / 24-hour storm event. It will be
constructed during Phase 1 and will have a 576,632-m3 capacity in order to maintain a zero
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
121

discharge water balance at the heap leach facilities. In case of an extreme storm event excess
solution will be routed to the excess pond and later used to supply make-up water.

17.1.5

Carbon Adsorption

Gold-bearing (pregnant) solution will be pumped from the pregnant solution pond to a carbon
adsorption circuit. The carbon adsorption circuit will consist of two parallel trains of five
cascade-type carbon adsorption columns. Each carbon column will have a capacity of 3.5 tonnes
of activated carbon with a nominal solution flow of 555 m3/hour.
Pregnant solution will be pumped to the carbon adsorption feed head tank at the top of each train.
The solution flow downward will be countercurrent to the flow of carbon (which is pumped
upward); the solution overflow from the final column will discharge onto a carbon safety screen
to catch any entrained carbon. The barren solution from the final carbon column will be returned
to the barren solution tank, from which it will be either returned to the heap for leaching gold and
silver, or used for process or agglomeration solution purposes. Antiscalant will be added at the
pump suctions to prevent scaling. Cyanide solution will be added to the barren solution tank as
needed.
A magnetic flow meter equipped with a totalizer will measure the solution flow to each set of
carbon columns. Pregnant and barren solution samples will continuously be taken using wire
samplers. The wire samplers will be located at the feed inlet and discharge of each carbon
adsorption train.
Adsorption of gold and silver from the pregnant leach solution will be a continuous process.
Once the carbon in the first carbon column is adequately loaded with gold, the loaded carbon
will be advanced to the acid wash/desorption circuits. Carbon in each column will then be
advanced one column. Carbon in the fifth column will be replaced with either regenerated or
fresh carbon. Screw impeller pumps will be used to move the carbon up the train of columns.

17.1.6

Gold Recovery and Refining

The loaded carbon will be advanced to the loaded carbon screen for dewatering and then will be
transferred into an acid wash tank. Acid washing is used to remove any scale that accumulates on
the surface of the activated carbon by circulating a dilute acid solution through the bed of carbon.
The dilute acid will be produced in the acid mix tank and then circulated through the carbon.
Concentrated acid will be injected into the recycle stream until the pH is maintained between 1.0
and 2.0. The acid wash cycle will be complete after the pH stabilizes between 1.0 and 2.0
without acid addition for a minimum of one full hour of circulation.
At the conclusion of the acid wash cycle, the acid solution will be drained from the acid wash
tank into the acid recovery tank to be reused. The carbon will then be rinsed using a dilute
caustic solution to neutralize the residual acid solution. The wash solution will be discharged to
the barren solution tank. Washed carbon will be transferred to the carbon strip vessel.
A Zadra pressure elution, hot caustic desorption circuit will be used to strip metal values from
the carbon. The elution, or desorption, circuit will be sized to elute (or strip) a 7-tonne batch of
carbon into pregnant eluate solution. During the elution cycle, gold and silver values will be
continuously extracted by electrowinning from the pregnant eluate solution.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
122

After transferring loaded carbon to the strip vessel, a caustic soda strip solution containing
sodium hydroxide and sodium cyanide will be pumped through a series of two heat exchangers.
The first heat exchanger will use solution exiting the strip vessel during normal operation to
preheat solution, and the second will use heated solution from a solution boiler to bring the strip
solution up to the stripping temperature of 135oC before entering the bottom of the strip vessel.
Gold and silver values will be removed from the carbon in the strip vessel at an operating
temperature and pressure of 135oC and 340 kPa. Pregnant eluate solution leaving the top of the
strip vessel will flow through the heat-recovery heat exchanger to preheat solution going to the
elution vessel and then through the cooling heat exchanger before flowing to the electrowinning
area. Electrowinning will be performed using four electrowinning cells.
At the conclusion of the strip cycle, the stripped carbon will be pumped to the stripped carbon
dewatering screen. The dewatered carbon will be thermally regenerated in the carbon
reactivation kiln to maintain its activity.
Gold and silver will be plated onto stainless steel wool cathodes in the electrowinning cell. The
cathodes will be periodically removed from the cell and washed in the cathode wash box to
remove the gold-bearing sludge. The gold-bearing sludge will be pumped through the cathode
sludge filter press to remove water, and will then be dried and smelted in a tilting crucible fueloil-fired smelting furnace to produce gold-silver dor and slag. The dor will be transported to a
refiner for further purification. A slag granulation mill is planned for future purchase.

17.2 Process Services


17.2.1

Electrical Power

All electrical power for the La India operations will be supplied by four 1,230-kW diesel
generators at the site, with a fifth backup 1,230-kW generator. Total site attached power will be
6.6 MW, while the power demand for the operation is estimated at 4.8 MW.

17.2.2

Laboratory

An assay and metallurgical laboratory facility at the site will be equipped to perform sample
preparation and assays by atomic absorption, fire assay, and cyanide-soluble analyses. A
metallurgical testwork area for process optimization will also be included.

17.2.3

Requirements for energy, water and process materials

The main energy consumption at the La India operations will be in the processing of ore. The
heap leaching, crushing, conveying and ADR plant are estimated to require 1,367 MW of
electrical power when working at capacity.
Process water required for the heap leach and the operation of the plant will mostly come from
reusing and recycling process water. Additional makeup water may be required at an estimated
rate of 12 to 24 litres per second depending on the time of year. Using impacted water from the
mine and waste dumps as process makeup water instead of withdrawing clean water from off-site

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


123

would reduce the volume of impacted water to manage and conserve water in the region, as well
as conserving power.
The main process materials that will be required at the operation and their rate of use are listed in
Appendix 17.1. They include lime, sodium cyanide (for the heap leaching), antiscalant, caustic
soda (NaOH), carbon granules, hydrochloric acid, and fluxes (silica, borax, fluorspar, niter and
soda ash).
The process operating costs were developed for all of the different ore types, or Domains. The
costs were estimated by specific operating area and include crushing and conveying, leaching,
plant, refinery and laboratory including major consumables. The cost of process maintenance and
personnel including process supervision is included. A summary of the process operating cost
estimate is provided in Table 17.1.
Table 17.1 Process operating costs estimate

Heap leach supervision


Energy consumption

$/tonne
$
$

0.27
0.70

Met lab

0.03

Assay lab

0.15

Crushing

0.57

Ore reclaim and stacking

0.42

Heap leach system

0.69

Refinery

0.08

Carbon adsorption

0.11

Carbon stripping

0.04

Carbon regeneration

0.02

Services

0.09

Maintenance supervision

0.15

Maintenance wages

0.22

Crusher maintenance

0.11

Leach pad maintenance

0.01

Carbon plant maintenance

0.00

Desorption maintenance

0.02

Loaders

0.03

Tractors

0.04

Conveyors

0.05

Lab maintenance

0.01

Forklift and telehandler

0.00

Skid loader

0.00

Refinery

0.01

Miscellaneous

0.03

TOTAL Cost/Tonne

3.86

An additional $100,000/year from Year 3 through Year 8 for acid treatment and another
$4,023,000 leach pad rinsing costs in Year 9 brings the total average operating cost estimate for
processing to $4.01 per tonne of ore placed on the heap leach pad, for 44.6 million tonnes of ore
over the mine life (Table 16.3).
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
124

Item 18. Project Infrastructure


As of the date of this report, there is little existing infrastructure at the La India site, but the
construction and ordering of long-lead-time equipment will begin almost immediately. The
location of the planned infrastructure can be seen on Figure 16.7.

18.1 Access Road


The existing 4-km road connecting the La India mine site with the road used by the Mulatos
mine for access and transport of all materials will require upgrading to be suitable for large
trucks early in the construction phase of the project (Figure 4.3).

18.2 Camp
The tent-type construction camp / temporary operations camp will be one of the first items
needed in order to house the construction workers for the project. This will eventually be
replaced by the permanent operations camp built of more sturdy materials.
The permanent camp will tentatively include 39 trailers for lodging, two laundry modules, a
laundry water treatment facility, a sewage treatment system, one refrigerator and one freezer
container, two warehouses, and a dining hall with kitchen and recreation equipment. Each
lodging trailer will have four rooms each equipped with beds, a refrigerator, bathroom with
shower, and desk. Thirty-four of the lodging trailers will be designated as workers trailers with
two people per room; the remaining five trailers will be designated as management trailers and
will accommodate one person per room. There will be an estimated 365 employees working at
the mine, with two-thirds of them in camp at any one time.
The permanent camp will be about 800 m west-northwest of the Main Zone sufficiently removed
from the operations including the blasting and crushing activities to provide a quiet location.

18.3 Central Operating Area


Office space will initially be provided by portable trailers. These will be replaced by a permanent
office administration building and warehouse structure located close to the truck shop. There
will be offices for management, security and visiting contractors and consultants. Office trailers
will continue to be used at the Crushing and ADR plant areas.
The truck shop will be a very simple three-sided building with a metal roof and siding. The
truck shop walls along the sides and the back will be constructed using stacked 12-m-long
shipping containers for offices and storage similar to the shop at Agnico-Eagles Mascota mine.
Earthworks for the truck shop area will begin the first month of construction with the truck shop
being installed between months 3 and 4. It will be located in the central operating area in close
proximity to the administration building.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
125

The federally owned and operated electric transmission grid extends as far as the village of
Arivechi (approximately 60 km from the project). Therefore, an electrical power generation plant
will be installed at the mine site to supply the electrical requirements for the entire operation.
The power plant will consist of four 1,230-KW diesel power generation units with a fifth 1,230kW backup generator. The power plant will be located in the central operating area. Temporary
generators will be utilized until this facility is in operation.
A secure 100,000-litre, above-ground diesel fuel storage and dispensing facility will be built in
the central operating area near the truck shop. All fuel for operating equipment and vehicles will
be stored in this facility. The storage facility will be constructed within a concrete containment
designed to hold 110% of the fuel tank capacity. A lubricant and waste oil storage containment
area is also included as a separate facility near the truck shop.
A separate, secure 100,000-litre above-ground diesel fuel storage and dispensing facility will be
built nearby the power plant to supply the generators. The storage area will be constructed within
a concrete containment designed to hold 110% of the fuel tank capacity.

18.4 Ore Processing Facilities


The process flowsheet and details of the plant site are described in Item 17. The plant site will
consist of a crushing plant and related stockpiles, a heap leach pad and two ponds, a gold
recovery plant and a laboratory.
The crushing plant will be one of the critical-path items of the project and will require early
procurement of the crushing equipment. The primary crushing platform will be located in
difficult terrain: the crushing arrangement and platform design will use the natural topography as
much as possible to minimize the required earthworks. This design includes the primary crushed
ore stockpile being stacked in a canyon below the primary crushing plant. The crushed ore will
be reclaimed from the stockpile and fed into the secondary and tertiary screening and crushing
facility before conveying it to the leach pad.
The adsorption/desorption/refining (ADR) plant and equipment will be constructed both on- and
off-site. Specialty equipment including the electrowinning cells, smelting furnace, and the
elution vessel will be constructed off-site, but most other equipment will be built or assembled
on-site. The ADR plant is a long-lead-time item and will be ordered during the first month of
construction. An estimated 29 weeks is expected from the time the purchase order is issued to the
complete installation of the plant. The ADR plant will be located near the excess solution and
pregnant solution ponds.
A laboratory will be constructed adjacent to the administration building capable of assaying 150
rock samples per day. The laboratory will be a pre-engineered steel building with specialty
equipment sourced for installation. Included in the lab will be separate areas for sample
preparation, fire assay, metallurgical lab, wet lab, atomic absorption room, weighing room, and
offices. Installation of the laboratory is scheduled to begin at the end of month 5 and to be
complete three months before mining begins.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


126

18.5 Pad and Ponds


The heap leach pad and associated ponds will require the most extensive construction activities.
Golder Associates provided the geotechnical engineering design for the leach pad and solution
storage ponds and is continuing with the detailed engineering design for construction of these
facilities. Preliminary pad earthworks are scheduled to begin almost immediately. The pregnant
pond earthworks are scheduled to begin almost immediately after the completion of the pad
earthworks, followed immediately by the excess pond earthworks. The pad will be situated in a
gently-sloped valley with bedrock close to the surface. Geotechnical investigations from test pits
were conducted by Golder Associates in the area of the pad and ponds, as part of their scope of
work and no stability or other geotechnical problems have been identified. Golder also prepared
a detailed earthworks volumes estimate for the pad and pond construction (Golder, 2012a).
Insufficient clay has been located to provide for an underliner for the heap leach pad. Limited
quantities have been found and will be used as available, but for the purposes of this study, a
geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) is planned for installation under the low density polyethylene main
pad liner. See Item 17 for more details about the design of the leach pad and ponds.

18.6 Sewage and Waste


Sewage treatment systems will be constructed for the camps and for the administration /
warehouse / lab building complex. An incinerator and dump area for inert waste will be built to
handle camp and operational waste. A secure area will be constructed to store hazardous waste
until it can be transported off-site for disposal at appropriate facilities.

18.7 Security and Fencing


While there are few people currently living in the area around the La India site, a security fence
will be placed around the camp and the central operating area. Fencing to keep out animals,
especially cattle, will be constructed around the entire operational site.

18.8 Construction
From the start of construction in September 2012, it will take approximately 13 months to build
the project. A simplified construction schedule is presented in Figure 18.1. Costs for
construction are outlined in Item 21 of this report.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


127

Figure 18.1 Construction schedule for the La India mine project

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


128

Item 19. Market Studies and Contracts


Agnico-Eagle produces gold and silver in the form of dor bars requiring further refining. The
refined La India gold/silver will be sold on the Spot Market.

19.1 Major Contracts


Agnico-Eagle intends to proceed with the construction phase of the project. It has already
contracted with Golder Associates for the design of the leach pad, and with Kappes, Cassiday
and Associates for EPCM and the ADR plant. Agnico-Eagle is in the process of defining and
negotiating the following other major construction contracts:

Purchase of mining equipment


Explosives magazine
Crushing system
Process ponds
Construction and permanent camp facilities
Electric generation plant and distribution grid
Office, warehouse, and truck shop
Water system

As with all past and current contracts, Agnico-Eagle negotiates within industry norms and its
past and current experience at its other mines in Mexico. The company intends to utilize its own
personnel and equipment for mining and processing operations at the La India mining operation.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


129

Item 20. Environmental Studies, Permitting, and Social


and Community Impacts
A key objective is to design and build the La India mining operation in such a way that it does
not cause significant adverse effects to the environment or the community during construction,
operation, closure and post-closure. An outline of some of the key plans is given in this section,
together with the costs for environmental monitoring, management plans, environmental
protection measures, closure and reclamation.

20.1 Environmental Studies and Issues


An environmental audit was conducted in 2008 by Hermosillo-based consultants Bufete Minero
y Servicios del Noroeste SA de CV who reported that no significant environmental liabilities are
apparent. Small abandoned mines and waste rock piles are present but are not generating acid
drainage. There are no plant facilities present within the project area, nor are tailings piles
present at the project site. Since 2008, Bufete Minero has conducted periodic site visits to audit
the projects compliance with Mexican environmental regulation NOM-120, and found that the
project continues to be compliant.
Systematic sampling of surface waters draining the project area was conducted between October
2008 and December 2009 to establish baseline water quality for the project.
SRK Consulting conducted a study in June 2012 to characterize the potential for metal leaching
and acid rock drainage (ML/ARD) from waste rock and pit walls that is expected to result from
mining the La India deposit. The information from this study was also used for waste and water
management planning and assessment of possible project environmental effects.
Potential waste rock and pit wall samples were characterized by acid base accounting tests, trace
metal scans (ICP), optical petrography, Rietveld X-ray diffraction, electron microprobe and
meteoric water mobility procedure leach tests (both single-pass and sequential passes).
The deposit type at La India has been classified as a volcanic-hosted, epithermal, highsulphidation gold-silver deposit (see item 7). The deposit is extensively oxidized and is
characterized by intense silica replacement, minor to absent carbonates, and sulphur both as
primary sulphides (i.e., pyrite) and sulphates (i.e., alunite). The deposit is divided into the North
and Main zones, and within each zone are ore domains (defined in item 7). Characterization of
waste rock ML/ARD potential is related to these zones and also the deposit in general.
The rock samples at La India have been predominantly classified as potentially acid generating,
with a mixture of immediately soluble acidic sulphate minerals and additional potential for long
term ARD from sulphides. Arsenic, antimony, cadmium, copper and silver are elevated in the
majority of domains and, as a result, metal leaching potential exists. The one rock type exception
was the silica massive dacites from the North and Main zones (domains 12 and 2), which
because of low sulphur content (< 0.1%), were not classified as potentially acid generating.
However, element enrichment was present in two samples and ML potential still exists.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


130

Soluble contaminants were also identified in the leachate tests, with acidic pH and sulphate
dominating the water chemistry. Leachate from D12 samples were shown to have the least
impact on water quality of all the samples tested, although baseline water quality was still
exceeded in some instances. Overall, leachate chemistry was generally dependent on the
presence of alunite and pyrite as follows:

Samples with more alunite than pyrite generally exhibited aluminum buffering and
leachate pHs close to or greater than 4; and
Samples with more pyrite than alunite exhibited minimal buffering and leachate pHs
were close to or less than 3.

The primary potential air quality issue is dust potentially generated by equipment. Costs for
watering the road have been included in this study. An air quality monitoring program will be
initiated to monitor air quality around and on the site during operation.
Operational areas will be fenced prior starting operation as much as possible to keep animals out.
A No Hunting policy will be enforced during operation amongst workers. Waterfowl are not
common in the area. However, if required, a system to keep birds from landing in the operations
ponds will be devised.

20.2 Waste Disposal, Site Monitoring and Water Nanagement


20.2.1

Waste Handling

20.2.1.1

Mine Waste Dumps

The waste rock will be hauled to the waste dumps surrounding the different pits and within some
of the pits where production has been completed. The placement of waste rock will follow the
mine plan presented in Item 16. It is understood that the mine plan will be optimized with time
and that the currently envisioned placement strategy to develop waste dumps may evolve during
operation as it is often the case for any mine operation. Figure 16.7 displays the layout of the
mine site including prospective waste rock disposal sites.
Mine waste dumps will be reclaimed both during and post-mining. Mine roads and waste dumps
will be re-sloped, re-contoured, have topsoil added, and be re-seeded. Reclamation that can be
completed during production will allow the usage of mine equipment within the operating cost
framework, minimizing closure costs.
Post-mining closure costs have been estimated at $15 million, which is included as reclamation
in the capital costs (Item 21). Monitoring of slope stabilities will be provided until the slopes are
deemed stable.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


131

20.2.1.2

Disposal of Other Wastes

Special wastes such as waste oil, glycol coolant, solvent fluids, used oil filters, used batteries,
and contaminated fuel, will be handled, stored, transported, and disposed of in accordance with
appropriate hazardous waste regulations. A management plan will be developed to clearly
determine how specific materials will be disposed.
A site for temporary storage of recyclable materials will be established at the lay-down area.
Such items as scrap metal, tires, glass, recyclable plastics and drink containers will be separated,
containerized as appropriate, and temporarily stored in the lay-down area until sufficient
volumes are available for shipment to a recycling point. Non-recyclable and non-hazardous
waste will be buried in an on-site landfill.
Putrescible organic food wastes generated from the camp accommodation facilities will be
burned in an on-site incinerator. Ash produced by the incinerator will be buried in the on-site
landfill along with other inert non-recyclable materials.
The wastewater disposal systems for the camp and office areas will be engineered, constructed,
and maintained under the direction of a qualified professional. Detailed engineering for this
facility is currently underway. It is intended that this facility will become operational during the
construction period prior to start-up.
A location on the mine site will be designated as an outdoor storage area for items that may still
be of use for spare parts, such as spare equipment, equipment parts, vehicles and metal
components. Materials remaining in the boneyard at the end of mine life will either be shipped
off site for salvage value, or disposed of in the landfill if they meet the criteria for disposal at that
location.

20.2.2

Site Monitoring and Maintenance

After the completion of reclamation works, it is expected that the site will require regular
maintenance for approximately the first three years post-closure or until there are no longer signs
of changing conditions. During this period, the site will be inspected every three months.
Maintenance activities will be planned immediately following each wet season and each
unseasonal major storm event, to verify that the drainage and erosion-control measures are
working as planned, and to allow the recently revegetated areas to mature and properly take hold.
Maintenance work will consist of light manual labour and light equipment work to re-grade or
groom any areas showing signs of distress or erosion.
Once the site stops showing signs of seasonal degradation, the functionality of the facilities can
be considered robust and safe, and the geochemical performance matches predictive modeling,
then the inspection and maintenance activities can be reduced to annually and eventually to only
after unusually high rainfall periods.
The quality of the water draining from the heap will require monitoring and comparison to the
predicted chemistry. It is currently planned that a certain number of rinsings will be required to
remove any residual cyanide from the Heap Leaching Facility (HLF). If it were found from the
water quality that residual issues were remaining, additional rinsing and neutralization of the
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
132

heap could be envisioned. These additional works, if they were required, would extend the
maintenance period.
The ponds associated with the HLF will remain in service as long as needed. Water collected in
the ponds will be tested during each inspection, and if the quality does not meet discharge
standards then the water will be recirculated to the heap and/or evaporated. The ponds will likely
accumulate sediments and precipitates as water accumulates and evaporates. These sediments
will require periodic removal and burial within the heap. This may be needed for up to five
years following closure, depending upon the effectiveness of the erosion-control measures and
re-vegetation.
Maintaining a healthy, robust biological system will improve both the physical and geochemical
performance of the closed heap. Thus, the periodic inspections will focus on the health of the
vegetated areas. Re-seeding and replacement of some topsoil will be planned annually for
approximately the first three years.

20.2.3

Water Management

20.2.3.1

Surface Water Management

Systematic sampling of surface waters draining the project area will be conducted throughout the
life of the mine, the reclamation period and post-closure until it has been determined that
reclamation has been successful in preventing long-term effects on surface waters.
During operation, water diversion structures will be constructed to prevent surface water from
flowing into the pad, mine pits, waste dumps and other operational areas. Surface drainage from
disturbed areas that have no potential to produce chemical or metal contamination will be
directed into small ponds to allow sediments to settle before the water is discharged to the
environment.

20.2.3.1.1

Acid Rock Drainage

Additional studies will be required into ML/ARD in laboratories and on site in the coming years
to further assess the actual characteristics of the waste rock and long-term geochemical
behaviour of the proposed waste dumps. It is currently expected that the dumps of the Main
Zone will serve as large-scale test facilities and will be used to optimize placement techniques in
order to minimize long-term impacts. It is presently considered that some of these works will be
integrated through some research programs with Mexican universities.
Based on the results of this characterization program, the majority of waste rock at La India will
likely require contact water management during operation. Approximately 13% of the samples
tested are considered to have low ARD potential based on block modelling total sulphur,
although even certain samples with less than 0.1% total sulphur and leached antimony, arsenic
and nickel above baseline conditions may still require management.
In terms of a waste management strategy, the level of water treatment may be reduced if
segregation of the pyritic andesite domains (e.g. domain D0) is possible, although this would not
likely remove the need to treat water that has interacted with waste rock at La India.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
133

Despite these early findings, it is not expected that the waste dumps will represent important
contaminant sources in the long term. Based on the overall content of sulphides, contaminant
leaching should remain low in general for the different domains. Therefore, while ARD and ML
issues are recognized as possible, the current understanding is that the waste dumps will not
result in significant long-term environmental problems that cannot be properly managed by
appropriate planning. With a combination of additional testing (kinetic testing), placement
techniques of waste rock to minimize segregation and improved compaction, inclusion of
adequate surface water management techniques to minimize infiltration during rainy season and
establishment of an adapted cover, the overall long-term impacts of these facilities should be
minimal and no long-term treatment should be required. Experience gained at the Main Zone
will be applied to the other zones.

20.2.3.1.2

Surface Water Treatment

In view of the possibility of ARD and ML issues with waste rock, the consultant SRK was
retained to also provide a scoping level estimate of water treatment for the La India mine.
Modeling waste rock dump hydrology in arid or monsoonal climates is complex and for its
scoping level evaluation, SRK made simplifying assumptions based on its experience at similar
sites.
Rainfall at La India occurs primarily from June to September, with August generally being the
wettest month (Gray et al., 2010). Approximately 70% of the annual rainfall occurs during the
monsoon season. Evaporation rates are high, and the dumps are not expected to become saturated
over time. Most of the precipitation is expected to result in surface runoff. During the wet season
some of the precipitation will infiltrate the waste rock and result in delayed runoff that will
generally lag precipitation by about a month. Waste rock dumps at other sites in Sonora
generally do not become saturated nor do they produce seepage year-round; water that infiltrates
into the dump is assumed to seep from the toe of the dump. The delayed flow from the dump will
be much less than runoff that occurs during precipitation events.
Golder Associates prepared estimates of runoff from the waste rock dumps on site (Golder,
2012) using the United States Soil Conservation Service Curve Number method. The
hydrological analysis assumed that there is no seepage from the dumps. The average annual
precipitation is 1,022 mm. The estimated annual average runoff volume from the North Zone
dumps and the Main Zone dump were approximately 28,000 m3 and 62,000 m3, respectively.
For design purposes, the runoff from the waste rock dumps is considered to be acidic containing
concentrations of iron and aluminum with lesser amounts of copper, zinc, cobalt, cadmium and
arsenic. For the purposes of this study, the treatment objective is to return the water to current
(pre-mining) water quality in the receiving streams.
The addition of lime is the recommended water treatment method. It is the best available
conventional technology for treating acid rock drainage and is a proven and accepted method.
Lime will be used to raise the pH of the runoff water in order to precipitate metals as metal
hydroxides. The precipitates will settle in a pond, and the treated water will be discharged from
the pond. The sludge that accumulated in the ponds will have a very low density and will need to
be managed.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
134

The estimated total annual runoff volume from the proposed dumps for the La India project is
approximately 90,000 m3. For a conceptual-level cost estimate, a water treatment influent rate of
2,700 m3/day has been assumed. The average annual runoff volume could be treated in about 41
days at this treatment rate. This estimate assumes that the treatment system is operated 24 hours
per day and includes a 25% time contingency for start-up periods or when non-ideal operations
require the water to be retreated. The treatment system would likely be operated intermittently in
response to rainfall events as well as during the monsoon season.
The proposed treatment rate can be refined as additional project data become available. The rate
at which water needs to be treated is a function of runoff rate from the dumps and the capacity of
storm water ponds at the toe of the dumps and surge pond. The size of the surge pond and
treatment rate should be optimized as the project becomes better defined.
Runoff from the dumps is assumed to be collected in storm water ponds at the toe of the dumps.
These storm water collection ponds will be event ponds and will be sized according to local
regulations, corporate environmental standards or best practices (e.g., a one in 100-year event or
a one in 25-year, 24-hour event). This water will then be transferred to a surge pond from which
influent to the treatment plant will be drawn. Influent will be pumped from the surge pond to the
reaction tank.
Hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2) will be stored in a 20-tonne silo. Lime will be delivered to a lime
slurry tank by an auger to make up a 20% weight to volume slurry solution. Lime slurry will be
mixed with the influent in the reaction tank. The reaction tank will be agitated and aerated with
compressed air to facilitate the oxidation and precipitation of dissolved iron.
Water will be discharged from the reaction tank to the settling pond. Flocculant will be added to
the water and lime solution prior to discharge to the settling pond.
There will be two parallel lined settling ponds. Solids will settle as a sludge that will need to be
periodically removed from the ponds. Silt curtains can be deployed in the ponds perpendicular to
flow to enhance settling. Treated water will be discharged from the settling pond to the receiving
environment. Treated water will also be used as make-up water for mixing lime slurry and
flocculant.
SRK has assumed that lime addition alone will be able to reduce metal and arsenic
concentrations to meet the discharge criteria. Bench-scale testing will be needed at later stages of
water treatment evaluation to determine if additional treatment such as amending with additional
iron to co-precipitate arsenic is needed to meet discharge objectives.
Capital and operating costs for the surface water treatment facilities have been included in the
economic analysis of this report.
While the proposed water treatment method is standard practice for mine water treatment,
operating the site as a zero discharge facility should also be considered. Zero discharge facilities
are a standard operating practice in the southwest United States, northern Chile and southern
Peru. Freeport McMoRan copper and gold mines in Arizona (Sierrita, Bagdad, Morenci, Miami,
and Tohono) and New Mexico (Chino and Tyrone) retain all impacted storm water and use it as
makeup water in their leach circuits. Similarly, the Cerro Verde mine in northern Peru is a zero
discharge facility. All of the water that is collected on these sites is returned to processing.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
135

Using impacted water as process makeup water instead of withdrawing clean water from off-site
will obviously reduce the volume of impacted water to manage, and could conserve water in the
region. Impacted waste rock dump runoff intercepted in the storm water collection pond could
also be used in processing with or potentially without pre-treatment. Reusing impacted water in
processing conserves water and power and is as protective of the environment as water
treatment.

20.2.3.2

Groundwater Management

Groundwater effects could potentially come from the heap pad and ponds (if the liners leak).
Therefore, monitoring wells will be constructed below the heap leach pad. A systematic
sampling program will be developed to ensure any effects the operation has on groundwater are
detected and appropriate changes to the operation can be made to negate these effects.
Additional monitoring wells will also be installed around the waste rock dumps and the site in
general to monitor groundwater quality. Water sampling will be done according to a pre-defined
schedule. All data that will be obtained will be managed through a main database for the site and
will be reviewed periodically. The primary intent of these wells is to follow trends in
groundwater quality and, if required, allow for some adjustments to the closure plan for the site.

20.3 Project permitting


Prior to 2012, exploration work at La India was conducted under the auspices of NOM120ECOL-1997. Mine construction and operation generally requires preparation of a Manifesto de
Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Statement, MIA), and a Cambio de Uso de Suelo
(Land Use Change, CUS) permit. Further exploration or development work in the Main Zone
area will require a CUS permit. Agnico-Eagle recently acquired the surface rights needed for
further project development at the Main Zone. The company has already obtained a CUS permit
and a federally approved MIA permit allowing for construction and operation of mining and
processing facilities in the North Zone of the La India deposit.
Permits required for the construction and operation of a mine as described in this report are
summarized in Table 4.2, along with the status of the permit applications. No obstacles to
obtaining the remaining permits for the La India project are anticipated provided that AgnicoEagle obtains necessary surface rights, and design and mitigation criteria meet all applicable
standards.
Finally, Agnico-Eagle is knowledgeable of the Mexican regulations in terms of closure and will
apply the same approach to La India site that it followed to its other sites in the area.

20.4 Potential Social or Community Related Requirements and


Plans
It is Agnico-Eagles goal to make a significant and positive difference in the communities in
which it operates and in the lives of its employees. This commitment is one of the companys
core values to treat people and communities with respect.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
136

The challenge of building sustainable communities that endure includes providing young people
with the training and skills they need to gain employment, encouraging local businesses and
expanding economic development opportunities, and protecting the water, land and air.
The company works closely with local stakeholders to help individuals acquire new skills and
benefit from the opportunities provided by mining, allowing them to prosper in their own
communities. At its Pinos Altos mine 70 kilometres away in Chihuahua, Agnico-Eagle is
working closely with the neighbouring communities to develop alternative employment and
business opportunities and helping to diversify the local economy. The company provided
funding for equipment and a facility to help establish a local clothing manufacturer with the goal
of becoming a supplier to the mining industry. Presently 11 people are employed at the local
clothing business.
In much the same way, communities around the La India project are being included in the
development of the mine, starting by taking into account their primary social and economic
concerns and partnering with them in the training and employment of potential employees as
well as providing funding for special community needs.

20.5 Mine Closure Requirements and Costs


20.5.1

Reclamation

Reclamation will be undertaken during mining activities where possible, but the majority of
work will occur after the completion of mining and final gold recovery. The reclamation land use
objective will be to return the land to a natural revegetated habitat. The closure objectives
include securing the site, minimizing erosion and controlling fugitive dust. To accomplish these
objectives, the following key elements are included in the reclamation plan:

chemical stabilization of heap leach facilities, accomplished through rinsing and


neutralizing the heap;
physical stabilization, accomplished through slope grooming, and the application of
topsoil and revegetation;
control of surface waters to minimize issues with long-term erosion; and
monitoring effluent chemistry from the pad and water draining the mine waste and pit
areas.

Closure will be accomplished in three stages:

concurrent: measures implemented during the operating life of the project;


final: measures implemented after cessation of operations; and
post-closure: provides for short-term maintenance and long-term monitoring of the closed
facilities.

The key components of the reclamation plan are given in this section; further detail will be
required before construction commences. During operation, the reclamation plan will be revised
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
137

further. Reclamation will be optimized through ongoing monitoring and research programs that
will be established during the first years of operation.

20.5.1.1

Soil Handling

Topsoil harvested during construction will be stockpiled for future use. However, the site is
expected to be deficient in organic matter and other soils to support revegetation. Therefore,
materials that can easily support vegetation growth will be produced during operations by
combining compostable materials with suitable native soils and natural topsoil, and will be
stockpiled for future use. This process must start early since green wastes require time to
compost before they are suitable to use as soil amendments.
Possible sources for organic matter include:

chipped wood, bark and brush from site-clearing activities beginning with the initial site
clearing and including subsequent phases of expansion of the heap, waste dumps and
open pits;
composted organic fractions from solid wastes (especially food wastes) from the camp
and canteen; and
composted sewage sludge from the on-site disposal systems, ideally composted with the
solid waste organic fraction.

Reclamation capital costs include the purchase of a wood chipper and appropriate equipment.
Land farming is a commonly used method of soil remediation for hydrocarbon-contaminated
soil that relies on natural breakdown of hydrocarbons by microbial action. This is done by
spreading a shallow layer of contaminated soil onto a lined "bermed" area referred to as a biocell.
In the event of a minor hydrocarbon spill on site, the contaminated soil will be treated using a
biocell as authorized in the Hazardous Waste Regulations.

20.5.1.2

Camp, Central Operating Area, Mine Pits and Roads

All camp buildings will be removed upon completion of the operation and the area graded and
seeded.
Prior to reclamation, all hazardous material will be removed from the site. All equipment and
building in the central operating area, including the office and warehouse, truckshop, ADR plant,
generators and fuel-handling facility will be dismantled and removed, and the area graded and
seeded.
Water diversion structures around the mine pits will be upgraded if required to ensure long-term
operation. Material around the top of pits will be stabilized and fenced off if required. There will
be some concurrent reclamation with the partial backfilling of one north pit occurring as mining
progresses.
During reclamation, steep slopes on roads will be stabilized and any culverts removed. Drainage
bars will be constructed to keep water from flowing down the road bed. Except for the access
road, surfaces will be scarified and seeded.
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
138

Heap Leach Facilities Closure Activities


In the first five years of operation, detailed closure and monitoring plans will be developed
considering the as-built facilities and the projected as-stacked heap. These plans will be of
sufficient detail to allow the start of concurrent closure activities as well as planning for final
closure.
Laboratory and field data will be collected to support geochemical and heap neutralization
modeling and to allow accurate prediction of both the neutralization process and effluent
chemistry following closure. Laboratory testing will include leach columns and kinetic testing to
simulate long-term geochemistry. Drilling for representative samples for column tests is
currently being completed and samples will be sent to KCA; SRK will model the results to
predict heap water quality at closure. Field testing will include testing either pilot heaps or cells
created inside the commercial heap to verify the laboratory data. By year 7, geochemical
modeling will be completed to allow predictive modeling of effluent quality from the closed
heap.
As the leach pad expands, the lower portions of the surface water diversion systems will be in
their final locations, and then they will be upgraded to meet permanent standards for erosion and
storm size. This will also apply to the outlet structures and any associated erosion works. These
upgrades will begin in about year 5.
Once Phase 2 of the leach pad is constructed (estimated in year 6), portions of the Phase 1 heap
slopes will be in their permanent configuration and leaching will have ceased. At this time, final
grooming, capping and revegetation of these slopes will be implemented, along with associated
surface water and erosion controls.
The plans developed during concurrent closure will require final revisions to accommodate both
lessons learned and the final configuration of the heap and roads. This will also include final asbuilt surveys of the facilities.
The heap rinsing and neutralization process consists primarily of recirculating cleaner water
through the heap, and treating the effluent to reduce contained metals and neutralize the pH.
Initially the recirculated solutions will be process solutions, diluted by normal rainfall, with pH
buffered to normal leaching levels to allow complete extraction of gold, silver and other metals.
Mexican (NOM 1998) maximum permissible limits for effluent discharges and solids
composition will be used when applicable. Once the concentrations of soluble metals are
sufficiently low, the pH will be reduced to below 8.0 and rinsing will continue until the target
cyanide levels are achieved. Once the target levels for the controlled constituents (pH, metals
and cyanide) are reached, the heap will be allowed to sit idle through at least one wet season and
the effluent chemistry monitored to ensure the targets are maintained. If any constituent exceeds
the target, then rinsing will be repeated. If the geochemical modeling suggests any potential to
produce acidic drainage, then the post-rinse pH will be left elevated to offset this potential.
Industry history has shown that, with very few exceptions, the rinsing stage of a gold heap
produces more value in gold than the neutralization stage costs to complete. In fact, most large
gold heaps continue operating profitably in the rinse mode for years beyond the end of mining,
even with sustained low metal prices. Since this gold production is not recognized in the
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
139

economic forecast for the project, the value is properly credited against closure costs. Thus, the
closure cost estimate includes zero net cost for the rinsing/neutralization stage.
In most cases the heap slopes will remain in the as-stacked configuration, with only cleanup of
benches and minor regrading to promote proper drainage. In some cases where slope stability has
been an issue during operations, some flattening of the slopes may be required as part of final
closure. The required final slopes will be determined based on testing and analysis. In general,
the slopes of the heap will be angle-of-repose lifts followed by nominally flat benches to create a
stable overall slope. Some areas may be graded combining several benches to allow creation of
permanent access roads or other features. The lower portions of the entire perimeter of the heap
will be graded so that all exposed liner is covered.
The crest of the heap and the benches, as well as any disturbed ground in the vicinity (except
roads and diversions to that are to remain) will be covered with topsoil, supplemental nutrients as
needed, and seeded. For high-erosion-prone areas some rapid-growing annual species of exotics
may be used, but the revegetation plan will emphasize the use of locally harvested native species.
Experience has shown that locally harvested seeds have the highest survival rates and are the
best suited to local soil and climate factors. Over the heap, non-food species will be preferred to
avoid accumulation of any metals in the food chain. The cost estimate includes harvesting and
purchasing seed and purchasing fertilizer annually for the first three years; afterwards the
maturing vegetation will generate sufficient seed and organic mass to support robust growth.
The solution and emergency ponds and pump stations will remain in place and in service for the
first few years to allow management of heap effluents. They will be dismantled after they are no
longer necessary.
All equipment will be sold except for the light mobile equipment (truck, backhoe, bulldozer) to
remain on-site during the post-closure care and monitoring period.
Roads and diversion works that are to remain in service post-closure will be upgraded to meet
the closure design. Generally this will mean that the surfacing will be more robust and that the
dimensions of drainage facilities will be enlarged to meet a larger design storm. Culverts will be
replaced with surface crossings since culverts are only serviceable for 10-20 years (and are
targets for theft).
All fencing around the pad and pond areas will be removed following a transition period of
monitoring.
Heap drainage will be tested and, when it meets discharge objectives, it will be discharged to the
downstream drainages. Periods when the water cannot be discharged will be provided for in the
short term; in these cases, solution will be pumped on top of the heap as irrigation water for the
revegetated areas. Costs for this program will principally be pump maintenance and provision of
electrical power from the diesel-fueled generating station.
When the geochemistry of the heap effluent supports closing the ponds, they will be
decommissioned and closed.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


140

20.5.2

Closure Cost Estimates for Heap Leach Facilities

The costs for concurrent closure listed below are included in the normal operating and sustaining
capital cost estimates. The final and post-closure costs listed below are included in the $15million reclamation capital costs in Item 21. All cost estimates assume economies of scale
achieved by Agnico-Eagle and do not include contractor overhead, profit, or contingency, nor are
other indirect costs included. All activities requiring mobile equipment assume that the
operations fleet will still be available and thus the closure activities, or that any equipment to be
purchased at closure will be funded by the proceeds of selling used equipment for no net cost.
Closure costs for the heap leach facilities are as summarized in Table 20.1.

Table 20.1 Closure costs, heap leach facilities


Concurrent Closure:
Engineering Design (year 5)

$120,000

Monitoring Plans (physical, geochemical, biological; yr 5)

$35,000

Geochemical modeling (and supporting test work; yr 5)

$180,000

Topsoil generation (years 3 to 10)


Mobile equipment

$20,000

$20,000/year x 8 years

$160,000

TOTAL CONCURRENT CLOSURE:

$515,000

Final Closure:
Engineering Design, Survey, Monitoring Plans (yr 9)

$100,000

Heap Rinsing & Neutralization

-- 0 --

Slope Grooming, Stabilization, Topsoil & Revegetation


Seed & fertilizer, 3 yrs x $10,000/yr (yrs 10-12)
50 hectares x $15,000/ha (yrs 10-12)

$30,000
$750,000

Ponds & Pump Stations

-- 0 --

Physical & Mobile Equipment

-- 0 --

Roads, Diversion Works & Erosion Control


5 km x $30,000/km
TOTAL FINAL CLOSURE:

$150,000
$1,030,000

Post-Closure Monitoring & Care:


Physical, geochemical & biological monitoring & maintenance
Annually, first 3 years post-closure: $50,000/yr x 3 yrs

$150,000

Annually, years 4 to 10 post-closure: 20,000/yr x 7 yrs

$140,000

Surplus Water Management


Annually, first 3 years post-closure: $50,000/yr x 3 yrs

$150,000

TOTAL POST-CLOSURE:

$440,000

TOTAL CONCURRENT, FINAL & POST-CLOSURE:

$1,985,000

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


141

Item 21. Capital and Operating Cost Estimates


21.1 Capital Costs
The capital cost estimate for the La India mine project covers open pit mine construction and
development, heap leach pads and ponds, all surface infrastructure including on-site and off-site
facilities, gold recovery plant construction, and all closure costs associated with the project in its
entirety. The capital and operating costs presented in this item are a summary of the detailed
costs that are presented in the Feasibility Study of the La India Gold Project, Municipality of
Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico (Agnico-Eagle, 2012a). Operating costs were derived from current
and historical data from Agnico-Eagles Pinos Altos and Mascota mines.
The estimates use second quarter 2012 US dollars. No inflationary escalation factors have been
applied to these cost projections. All cost estimates for this study should be considered basic
engineering level in accuracy (i.e., 15%).
The operating life of the La India project is estimated at eight years with an average ore-stacking
rate of 15,716 tonnes per day. No preproduction stripping will be necessary as there is no waste
capping the deposits. Ore occurs on the surface, or near surface, in sufficient quantities to meet
production requirements immediately upon commencement of mining. However, a small portion
of the North pit (1,245,481 tonnes of ore plus 1,404,520 tonnes of waste) will be mined during
construction in the preproduction period (prior to Year 1).
In addition, a small amount of ore and waste will be mined from the westernmost part of the
North pit to allow the construction of Phase 1 of the leach pad. This ore will be stockpiled until
the crusher is commissioned. Initial gold production is expected to begin in late 2013, with
commercial gold production beginning in 2014 and final gold production in 2022.
The pre-production capital cost is estimated at $157.6 million, plus a sustaining capital cost of
$25.8 million, which includes $4.3 million for additional haul trucks and $7.1 million for the
construction of the second phase of the heap leach pad. Total capital costs are therefore estimated
to be $183.4 million over the Life of Mine model. Table 21.1 shows the breakdown of the capital
expenditures anticipated for the project including sustaining capital.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


142

Table 21.1 La India mine project capital expenditures estimate


Capital Estimate
Pre-production Capital
Environment permit & baseline
Definition drilling (preproduction)
Water development and water rights
KCA capital estimate

$(000s)
1,360
1,000
2,000
114,154

ARD treatment

1,000

Mine equipment

22,442

Owner's costs+ owner's contingency

11,800

Ore and waste removed for leach pad construction


Allowance for clearing/grubbing
Haul road construction
Main access road construction

801
1,230
851
919

Total PP Capital

157,556

Sustaining Capital

$(000s)

ARD treatment
Mine equipment
Allowance for clearing/grubbing

600
4,584
520

Phase 2 HLP $9.125M (Year 2 through Year 3)

7,125

Other ($1M/year - Year 1 through Year 8)

8,000

Reclamation
Salvage value (mine equipment only)
Total Sustaining Capital
Total Capital

15.0
-10.0
25,828
183,384

Item 16 of this report explains the estimated mine equipment costs (Table 16.4).
Item 17 explains the heap leaching and gold recovery methods and Item 18 describes the
proposed infrastructure. A summary of the process and infrastructure costs is provided in Table
21.2, as is shown as KCA capital estimate in Table 21.1.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


143

Table 21.2 Process and infrastructure capital expenditures

Site & utilities general


Power generation

$(000)
10,600
6,500

Plant water distribution

1,500

Mobile equipment

3,000

Air & fuel


Laboratory
Crushing
Agglomeration
Heap leach recovery plant
Refining

800
1,600
25,200
300
10,600
0

Heap leach conveying & stacking

11,700

Heap leach pads & ponds

16,000

Reagents
Spare parts
Contingency direct cost plus indirects
Plant total indirects
Initial fills
EPCM

0
1,600
11,800
6,500
800
5,400

Total

114,200

The truck shop, wash pad, tire shop, fuel and lubricant storage and pumping systems, mine
offices and power distribution systems are included in process and infrastructure costs.
The environment and reclamation costs are described in Item 20.

21.2 Operating Costs


The total operating costs over La Indias Life of Mine are estimated to be $397 million, as
summarized in Table 21.3. With silver credits, this amount is reduced to $370 million. Therefore,
the estimated operating cost for mining 44.6 million tonnes of ore over the Life of Mine (net of
silver credits) is $8.28/tonne. In addition there will be $2.1 million for royalty payments for part
of the North Zone and $4.6 million for definition drilling during operations.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


144

Table 21.3 La India mine project estimated operating costs


$/tonne

Total cost $(000s)

Mining
Open pit mining

1.19

Mining maintenance

0.55

105,608
48,810

Total mining (per tonne mined)

1.74

154,418

Processing (per tonne stacked)

3.86

179,162

G&A
Total Operating Cost

63,000
396,579

The mine operating cost estimates cover pit operations (i.e., drilling, blasting, loading and
hauling); waste dump maintenance; construction of internal haul roads, sumps and safety berms;
maintenance of all mine roads and safety berms; operating and maintenance labour; mine
department supervision; and other earthworks as may be required for day-to-day mining
operations. Total operating costs for mining are estimated to average $1.74 per tonne of material
moved, for 88.7 million tonnes of ore and waste over the mine life (Table 16.3).
The process operating costs were developed for all of the different ore types, or Domains. The
costs were estimated by specific operating area and include crushing and conveying, leaching,
plant, refinery and laboratory including major consumables. The cost of process maintenance and
personnel including process supervision is included. A summary of the process operating cost
estimate is provided in Table 17.1.
Costs not directly related to the mining of material or the crushing and leaching of ore and the
recovery and sales of gold have been grouped under General and Administration (G&A). This
includes the cost for housing workers in a camp and costs related to worker health and safety.
Senior management will consist of the General Manager and the Mine, Processing and
Administration Superintendents who will report directly to the General Manager. All
management costs for mining and processing are included in the mining and processing costs.
The costs for the General Manager and Administration Superintendent and related support are in
General and Administration costs. Average G&A operating costs are estimated at $8 million per
year as detailed in Appendix 21.1.
The total workforce at La India is estimated to be 365 at full production and is summarized in
Table 21.4 below.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


145

Table 21.4 Estimated La India mine personnel over the Life of Mine
PROJECT PERSONNEL SUMMARY
Description

Q4
PP

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 6

Year 7

Year 8

65
21

114

77
27
31
135

77
27
31
135

77
27
31
135

77
27
31
135

77
27
31
135

77
27
31
135

77
27
31
135

77
27
31
135

14
2

14
2

14
2

14
2

14
2

14
2

14
2

14
2

14
2

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

21
9
14
6
12
8
18
122

21
9
14
6
12
8
18
122

21
9
14
6
12
8
18
122

21
9
14
6
12
8
18
122

21
9
14
6
12
8
18
122

21
9
14
6
12
8
18
122

21
9
14
6
12
8
18
122

21
9
14
6
12
8
18
122

21
9
14
6
12
8
18
122

2
2
3
19
56
11
93

2
2
3
21
69
11
108

2
2
3
21
69
11
108

2
2
3
21
69
11
108

2
2
3
21
69
11
108

2
2
3
21
69
11
108

2
2
3
21
69
11
108

2
2
3
21
69
11
108

2
2
3
21
69
11
108

329

365

365

365

365

365

365

365

365

Mining
Mine Operations
Mine Maintenance
Mine Supervision & Technical

Total Mining Personnel


Process
Process Supervision
Metallurgy Laboratory
Assay Laboratory
Crushing
Ore Reclamation & Stacking
Heap Leach System
Refinery
Carbon Absortion ADR
Maintenance Supervision
Maintenance Technicians
Total Processing Personnel
G&A
General Management
Security
Community Relations
Finances
Administration & HR
Enviromental, Health & Safety
Total G&A Personnel
Total Project Personnel:

28

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


146

Item 22. Economic Analysis


This economic analysis is based on probable reserves of 44.6 million tonnes grading 0.65 g/t
gold (930,000 ounces of contained gold) reported for the La India deposit as of June 30, 2012
from a database that includes drilling results through May 23, 2012. Mine plans are based on
oxide material only; sulphide material was excluded from the plan.
Mine plans and block models will be updated in mid-February 2013 for inclusion in AgnicoEagles resource and reserves statement as of December 31, 2012.

22.1 Assumptions, Economic Criteria, and Inputs


The metal prices and foreign exchange rate used to calculate the reserve estimate are the historic
three-year averages (in accordance with SEC Industry Guide 7). For the period ending June 30,
2012, the historic three-year average gold and silver prices per ounce (London PM fix) were
$1,379 and $26.49/oz, respectively; the historic three-year exchange rate was US$1.00 = Mx
Peso 13.0.
Details of the pit optimization and mine production schedule are given in Item 16. The average
leach plant gold recovery is estimated at 80% using various ore types, as indicated by test work
described in Item 13 of this report. The rate of gold production is based on leach time estimates.
The mine will produce gold and silver in the form of dor bars requiring further refining. It is
expected that the contracted refinery will recover 100% of the gold. The refined gold will be sold
on the spot market by Agnico-Eagle.
The gold production forecast for the La India mine project is shown in Table 22.1. This includes
mining a total of 44.6 million tonnes of ore at an average gold grade of 0.65 g/t as well as 44.1
million tonnes of waste, resulting in a waste to ore ratio of 0.99:1. Pre-production (construction)
is estimated at 15 months, with initial startup estimated in October 2013. There will be a buildup
of inventory during the first 15 months. There will be a buildup of inventory during the first 15
months of operation.

Table 22.1 Gold production forecast for the La India mine, 2013-2022
Ore to Pad (000
tonnes)

Gold grade of ore


(g/t)

Contained gold (oz)

Gold recovered (oz)

PP
Year 1

1,245
5,809

0.72
0.70

28,880
131,108

16,173
73,420

Year 2

5,840

0.72

135,000

108,000

Year 3

0.61

114,886

91,909

Year 4

5,840
5,840

0.53

99,903

79,922

Year 5

5,840

0.58

109,189

87,351

Year 6

5,840

0.69

128,616

102,893

Year 7

5,840

0.67

126,175

100,940

Year 8

2,545

0.69

56,522

64,416

Year 9

19,199

44,639

0.65

930,277

744,222

LOM

Total

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


147

The open pit ore production will average 5.8 million tonnes annually from 2014 through 2020.
Gold production is expected to average 90,000 ounces per year. Silver production has been
assumed as 1.6 ounces of silver per ounce of gold produced, based on metallurgical testing.
Not all gold will be produced in the year the ore is stacked. Recoverable gold inventory is
assumed to stabilize after Year 1, and residual inventory will be recovered in Year 9.
Capital and operating costs are estimated in Item 21 of this report. The pre-production capital
cost estimate of $157.6 million and the sustaining capital cost estimate of $25.8 million as well
as the estimated operating costs of $8.28/tonne over the life of mine assume mining and
financing by the owner. Prices are given in constant second quarter 2012 US dollars with no
escalation applied to the operating costs, capital costs or revenue.

22.2 Cash Flow Analysis and Economic Performance


Based on the time period from construction through closure, on a stand-alone basis the project is
expected to return the pre-tax cash flows presented in Table 22.2. Total revenue and total net
cash flow are estimated to be $1,056 million and $471 million, respectively over the life of mine
modeled. Note that the project cash flow model is based on starting construction in the fourth
quarter of 2012. Mine life is estimated at eight years of production plus Year 9 of residual
production and the rinsing of the heaps.
Table 22.2 Pre-tax cash flows for the La India mine by year ($ 000)
Year
Year -1
PP

Capital Exp

Operating Exp

Revenue

35,961

Cash Flow
-35,961

121,595

11,593

22,897

-110,291

Year 1

5,934

50,719

103,922

47,269

Year 2

4,525

53,324

153,123

95,274

Year 3

4,625

53,458

130,220

72,137

Year 4

1,279

53,458

113,043

58,306

Year 5

1,211

53,458

123,973

69,304

Year 6

1,153

53,458

146,250

91,639

Year 7

1,077

44,950

143,474

97,447

Year 8

1,025

22,750

91,560

67,785

Year 9

5,000

4,023

27,288

18,265

183,385

401,192

1,055,750

471,173

TOTAL

The average LOM total cash cost comes to $497 per ounce of gold produced net of byproduct
silver credits, of which the capital cost would be US$245/oz gold produced.
The net smelter return (NSR) includes dor transportation and refining, and a 0.50% NSR royalty
from a portion of the North Zone. The $$1,250,000 cost for purchasing other NSRs as per
various agreements is not included in capital costs. Revenue and expenses are recognized at the
time of production. Income from the salvage value at the end of the projects life is estimated at
20% of the value of new mining and crushing equipment, and is expected to partly offset the
closure costs.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


148

Costs for land purchase, environment permit & baseline, feasibility study, detailed engineering
and conversion drilling will be incurred before the start of construction and therefore were not
included in determining the net present value and internal rate of return for the project.
The results of an economic analysis on a pre-tax basis indicate an internal rate of return (IRR) of
41% with a net present value (NPV) of $311 million at a discounted rate of 5%. The results on
an after-tax basis indicate an internal rate of return of 31% with a net present value of $207
million at a discounted rate of 5%.
In both the pre-tax and the after-tax basis, the cumulative net cash flow becomes positive during
Year 3 of operation.

22.3 Taxes and Royalties


The principal corporate taxes levied in Mexico include:

the greater of the regular income tax (ISR), and the single rate business tax or flat tax
(IETU), and
a value-added tax (VAT).

22.3.1

Income Tax and Single Rate Business Tax or Flat Tax

Mexicos corporate income tax is 30% through December 31, 2012. The rate will be reduced to
29% in 2013 and 28% in 2014 and future years. An income tax rate of 28% has been used in the
economic model.
Mexico also has a flat tax that applies to corporations. The flat tax is an alternative tax that does
not replace the corporate income tax and is calculated on a cash-flow basis, generally when
business receipts are collected and business expenditures, including capital expenditures, are
made. A flat tax rate of 17.5% has been used in the economic model.
Corporations are required to calculate both their income tax liability and their flat tax liability for
each fiscal year, and pay whichever is higher.

22.3.2

Value-added Tax

Value-added tax is assessed on the sale of goods and services, leasing and imports. The rate is
16% and is imposed on all activities conducted within Mexican territory, 11% in the
US/Mexican border region and 0% for all exports, which includes the sale of gold. Value-added
tax paid on purchases is refundable as long as the expenses are business related and are
deductible for income tax purposes. The economic model assumes a value-added tax rate of
16%, and that all value-added tax paid will be refunded.

22.3.3

Royalties

The only royalty expected at the La India mine during operation is a 0.50% NSR royalty from
the portion of the North Zone that overlies the La India concession. The other NSRs are
expected to be purchased for an aggregate of $1,250,000 before the start-up of mining, as
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
149

described in Item 4 of this report. Costs for purchasing NSRs as per various agreements are not
included in capital costs.

22.4 Sensitivity Analysis


The key economic risks of the La India project were examined by running cash flow sensitivities
on:

capital costs
operating costs
gold price

Sensitivities were calculated for a range of -30% to +30% variations of the base case parameters
of capital cost, operating cost, and gold price. All analyses were done with a net present value
with a discounted rate of 5%. The sensitivities of IRR and NPV to changes in these three
parameters are shown on Table 22.3.
Table 22.3 La India internal rate of return (IRR) and net present value (NPV) sensitivity to capital and
operating costs and the gold price
Pre-Tax IRR sensitivity
Change %
Capital costs
+30%
30%

Operating costs
32%

Gold price
63%

Base Case

41%

41%

41%

-30%

59%

50%

16%

Operating costs
$228 million

Gold price
$537 million

Pre-tax NPV 5% sensitivity


Change %
Capital costs
+30%
$262 million
Base Case

$311 million

$311 million

$311 million

-30%

$361 million

$394 million

$85 million

The projects IRR and NPV are most sensitive to variations in the gold price and recovered gold
(which have the same impact). This is followed by the operating costs, with the capital cost
having the least impact on the economics of the project.
The sensitivity analysis shows that the La India project economics are very robust using the base
case parameters, and would remain attractive in any reasonably foreseeable economic conditions
or change in the cost estimates given in this technical report.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


150

Item 23. Adjacent Properties


Numerous historic mine workings and prospects are present in the region that hosts the La India
project, but public domain or historic information is available only for the Mulatos mine property
owned by Alamos Gold Incorporated. Historic mining of silver ores is reported from the La
Chipriona mine, located 1.5 km north of La Indias North Zone, but production data are not
available.
The Mulatos mine property is immediately adjacent to, and partly surrounded by, the claims
comprising the La India gold project. The Mulatos mine is located 5.8 km southeast of the
nearest portion of the Agnico-Eagle claim block (Figure 23.1), and the El Yaqui deposit is
located 5.7 km east of the nearest portion of the Agnico-Eagle claim block. In 2011 the Mulatos
mine produced 153,000 ounces of gold (Alamos Gold, 2012a); a remaining proven and probable
reserve of 65.0 million tonnes grading 1.14 g/t gold (containing 2.39 million ounces of gold) was
reported as of December 31, 2011. This reserve includes both the Mulatos mine and the La
Yaqui and Cerro Pelon pits (Alamos Gold Mineral Reserve table available at
www.alamosgold.com, May 2012).
Alamos Gold has identified and partially drill-tested three exploration targets near the AgnicoEagle concessions. In an Alamos Gold press release (Alamos Gold, 2004, available on SEDAR),
Alamos Gold reported that reverse circulation drilling at Cerro El Realito, located 1,400 m east
of La Indias North Zone (Figure 23.1), yielded drill intercepts of as much as 24.4 m grading
5.98 g/t gold. An alteration zone extends to the boundary of the claims controlled by AgnicoEagle and is contiguous with the La India alteration zone.
In its 2005 annual report (Alamos Gold, 2006, available on SEDAR), Alamos Gold reported
summary results of reverse circulation drilling at the El Jaspe prospect. El Jaspe is surrounded on
the west, north and east sides by Agnico-Eagles Triple A claim, and at its closest point is only
500 m from the Triple A claim boundary (Figure 23.1). Alamos reported that drill holes
intersected a blind zone of gold-silver-copper mineralization hosted by pyritized and silicified
volcanic rock at El Jaspe. The down-dip extent of the mineralized zone projects toward the
Agnico-Eagle claims. Intercepts of 6.1 m grading 2.25 g/t gold, 7.6 m at 1.46 g/t gold, and 13.7
m at 0.85 g/t gold were reported.
In June 2011 Alamos Gold issued a press release (Alamos Gold, 2011, available on SEDAR) of
exploration results at the El Carricito target, located adjacent to and south of Agnico-Eagles El
Pilar concession. Alamos Gold reported exploration drill-hole intercepts of 71.65 m grading 0.52
g/t gold and 48.78 m at 0.31 g/t gold.
The author has not reviewed the data from Alamos Gold and therefore cannot comment on the
accuracy of these reported mineralized intercepts. The information for Alamos Gold was
obtained from sources believed to be reliable but cannot be verified. The mineralization
described for the adjacent properties is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization at the La
India property.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


151

Figure 23.1 Adjacent exploration properties map

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


152

Item 24. Other Relevant Data and Information


Agnico-Eagle is not aware of any other relevant data or information about the La India mine
project.

Item 25. Interpretation and Conclusions


The La India project hosts a probable reserve comprising 930,000 ounces of gold contained in
44.64 million tonnes at a grade of 0.65 g/t gold.
A metallurgical gold recovery of 80% was assumed for the purpose of this evaluation, based on
third party reviews of the metallurgical test work completed to date. Engineering studies and
operating and capital cost estimates were developed to exploit only the only oxide mineralization
at La India; no sulphide mineral was included in the analysis.
Key results are based on the time period from construction (year PP) to closure, a $1,379 per
ounce gold price, a $26.49 per ounce silver price, a MXP/US$ exchange rate of 13.00, and the
capital and operating costs detailed in this report:

$207-million after-tax net present value at a 5% discount rate


31% after-tax internal rate of return
Total cash cost is $497 per ounce of gold produced net of by-product silver credits
Initial capital cost of $157.6 million
Life of Mine capital cost of $183.4 million total

The La India project has high potential to be developed into a profitable mine, and the identified
probable reserve is economically significant, with an average annual production of 90,000
ounces of gold over an eight-year mine life. The robust nature of the economics and the
relatively low sensitivity of the project to unforeseen variances in capital, operating costs and
revenues are sufficient for an investment decision to proceed with the construction of the project.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


153

Item 26. Recommendations


Work to date has identified probable reserves at La India likely to be of economic significance
with good potential to develop a profitable and economically significant mine. The economic
potential of the La India project is believed to be sufficiently robust to allow a construction
decision and to withstand unforeseen changes in operating costs, mineral resources, metallurgical
behaviour, or capital costs while maintaining a positive economic impact for Agnico-Eagle. It is
therefore the recommendation of Agnico-Eagle Mexico to approve the project for immediate
construction.
Specific recommendations to further reduce project risk include:

complete an infill drilling program in the Main Zone and update the resource block
model, with the goal of upgrading the inferred resources to the measured or indicated
resource classifications;
complete a step-out drill program to increase the resource base to extend the mine life or
increase the production throughput;
develop infiltration galleries for project water supply;
continue ARD test work and develop a more detailed waste rock management plan.

Opportunities exist to improve the economic performance of the project and should be
investigated, including:

continue geotechnical analysis of the pit slopes to determine if the pit slopes can be
steepened, which would cut costs;
evaluation of mining and processing of sulphide material. Three column tests of sulphide
material were completed in the past test campaigns. These included two of Domain 17
material and one of Domain 5 material. All were done with -25-mm material. The two
column tests on Domain 17 material had 40% and 60% recovery, and the Domain 5 test
had 70% recovery. The sulphide material immediately underlies the oxide material, and
waste-to-ore ratios would be low if the sulphide were mined. Further tests to confirm
recoveries and reagent costs are recommended.
increase resources. It is likely that the mineral resources at La India could be modestly
increased by step-out drilling in the Main Zone. There is also a possibility that the
resource grade in the Main Zone will increase when the block model is further revised to
reflect the sample intervals that are currently classified as "no data" due to low sample
recovery.
mine plans and block models will be updated in mid-February 2013 for inclusion in
Agnico-Eagles resource and reserves statement as of December 31, 2012.
explore for new resource areas. Exploration for new resource zones continues at La India
and the nearby Tarachi discovery. There is significant potential for finding more
economic mineralization within the La India property area, especially down-dip and
along-strike from the known deposits. The discovery of a new resource area could
significantly change the La India project economics.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


154

Item 27. References


Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited, 2012a, Feasibility Study of La India Gold Project, Municipality of Sahuaripa, Sonora,
Mexico. 31 August, 2012. Internal document, 303 pages plus appendices A through E.
Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited, 2012b, Press release 4 September, 2012. Published on System for Electronic
Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.
Alamos Gold Incorporated, 2004, Press release dated 29 November 2004. Published on System for Electronic
Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.
Alamos Gold Incorporated, 2005, Quarterly Report, 3rd Quarter 2005. Published on System for Electronic Document
Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.
Alamos Gold Incorporated, 2006, 2005 Annual Report. Published on System for Electronic Document Analysis and
Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.
Alamos Gold Incorporated, 2011, Press release 21 June 2011. Published on System for Electronic Document
Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.
Alamos Gold Incorporated, 2012a, Press release 9 January 2012. Published on System for Electronic Document
Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.
Alamos Gold Incorporated, 2012b, 2011 Year-End Reserve Report. Published on Alamos Gold website,
http://www.alamosgold.com/our-mines-and-projects/mulatos-project/reserves-and-resources as of May
2012.
Albinson, T., Norman, D., Cole, D., an d Chomiak, B., 2001, Controls on formation of low-sulfidation epithermal
deposits in Mexico: Constraints from fluid inclusion and stable isotope data: in New Mines and Mineral
Discoveries in Mexico and Central America. Special Publication Number 8 of the Society of Economic
Geologists, p. 1-32.
Arribas, A., Jr., 1995, Characteristics of high-sulfidation epithermal deposits and their relation to magmatic fluid.
Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course Series, v. 23, p. 419-454.
Ashley, R.P., 1974, Goldfield mining district. Nevada Bureau of Mines Geologic Report 19, p. 49-66.
Berger, B.R., and Henley, R.W., 1989, Advances in the understanding of epithermal gold silver deposits with special
reference to the western United States: in The Geology of Gold Deposits: the Perspective in 1988. The
Society of Economic Geologists, Economic Geology Monograph 6, edited by W.R. Keays, W.R.H.
Ramsey, and D.I. Groves.
Bonham, H.F., Jr., 1988, Models for volcanic-hosted epithermal precious metal deposits: in Bulk minable precious
metal deposits of the western United States. Geological Society of Nevada, Symposium Proceedings,
edited by R.W. Schafer, J.J. Cooper, and P.G. Vikre.
Buchanan, L.J., 1981, Precious metal deposits associated with volcanic environments in the southwest: in Relation
of tectonics to ore deposits in the Southern Cordillera. Arizona Geological Society Digest, vol.14, edited by
W.R. Dickenson and W.D. Payne.
Consejo de Recursos Minerales, 1992, Monographia geologico-minera del Estado de Sonora. Secretaria de Energia,
Minas e Industria Paraestatal, Subsecretaria de Minas e Industria Basica, Mexico, publication M-8e, 220 p.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


155

Deen, J.A., Rye, R.O., Munoz, J.L., and Drexler, J.W., 1994, The magmatic hydrothermal system at Julcani, Peru:
Evidence from fluid inclusions and hydrogen and oxygen isotopes. Economic Geology, v. 89, p. 19241938.
Ebert, S.W., 2004, Technical report and exploration recommendations, La India Project, Mulatos District, Sonora.
Report prepared for Grayd Resource Corporation dated 30 March, 2004 for NI43-101 filing, published on
System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.
Foley, A., 2006a, La India Hoist EM acquisition report. Private report dated April 2006, prepared for Newmont
Mining Corporation and Grayd Resource Corporation, 6 p.
Foley, A., 2006b, La India Pole-Dipole acquisition report. Private report dated April 2006, prepared for Newmont
Mining Corporation and Grayd Resource Corporation, 31 p.
Giroux, G.H., 2012, Tarachi Resource Estimate. Private report prepared by Giroux Consultants Ltd. for AgnicoEagle Mines, February 2012, 33 p.
Goldcorp, 2006, El Sauzal 2005 reserve statement. Published on Goldcorp website, http://goldcorp.com.
Goldcorp, 2008, Goldcorp 2007 Annual Report. Published on Goldcorp website, http://goldcorp.com and available
on System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.
Goldcorp, 2012, 2011 Annual Report. Published on Goldcorp website, http://goldcorp.com and available on System
for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.
Golder Associates, 2012a, Technical memorandum: Take-off Quantities for the La India Leach Pad. Private report
dated 5 May, 2012 prepared for Agnico-Eagle Mines.
Golder Associates, 2012b, Technical memorandum: La India Heap Leach Facility Draft Basic Engineering Water
Balance Evaluation. Private report prepared by Rafael Luna and Michael Grass of Golder Associates dated
14 June, 2012 and 27 June, 2012 prepared for Agnico-Eagle Mines.
Gray, Matthew D., 2006, Summary report of the La India gold project. Technical report prepared for Grayd
Resource Corporation dated 14 July, 2006 for NI43-101 filing, 155 p., published on System for Electronic
Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.
Gray, Matthew D., 2012a, Drillhole database QA/QC report, La India Gold Project, Municipio of Sahuaripa,
Sonora, Mexico (Amendment of 21 March 2012 report to include discussion on sample recovery and
removal from database of low recovery samples). Private report dated 24 April 2012 prepared for AgnicoEagle Mines.
Gray, Matthew D., 2012b, Drillhole database QA/QC report, La India Gold Project, Municipio of Sahuaripa,
Sonora, Mexico, Database date 23 May 2012. Private report dated 19 June 2012 prepared for Agnico-Eagle
Mines.
Gray, M.D, and Giroux, G., 2008, February 2008 inferred mineral resource, La India gold project, Municipio of
Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico. Technical report prepared for Grayd Resource Corporation dated 22 February,
2008 for NI43-101 filing, 158 p., published on System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval
(SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.
Gray, M.D, and Giroux, G., 2009, February 2009 inferred mineral resource, La India gold project, Municipio of
Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico. Technical report prepared for Grayd Resource Corporation dated 26 March,
2009 for NI43-101 filing, 200 p., published on System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval
(SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


156

Gray, M.D, and Giroux, G., 2010, May 2010 measured, indicated and inferred mineral resource, La India gold
project, Municipio of Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico. Technical report prepared for Grayd Resource
Corporation dated 15 June, 2010 for NI43-101 filing, 237 p., published on System for Electronic Document
Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.
Gray et. al., 2010, 6 December 2010 Preliminary economic assessment, La India gold project, Municipio of
Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico. Technical report prepared for Grayd Resource Corporation dated 6 December,
2010 for NI43-101 filing, 374 p., published on System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval
(SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.
Gray, J.E., and Coolbaugh, M.F., 1994: Geology and geochemistry of Summitville, Colorado: An epithermal acidsulfate deposit in a volcanic dome. Economic Geology, v. 89, p. 1906-1923.
Hayba, D.O., Bethke, P.M., Heald, P., and Foley, N.K., 1985, Geologic, mineralogic, and geochemical
characteristics of volcanic-hosted epithermal precious metal deposits. Reviews in Economic Geology, v. 2,
p. 129-167.
Heald, P., Foley, N.K., and Hayba, D.O., 1987, Comparative anatomy of volcanic-hosted epithermal deposits: Scidsulfate and adularia-sericite types. Economic Geology, v. 82, p. 1-26.
Hedenquist, J.W., Arribas, A., Jr., and Reynolds, T.J., 1998, Evolution of an intrusion-centered hydrothermal
system: Far Southeast Lepanto porphyry and epithermal Cu-Au deposits, Philippines. Economic Geology,
v. 93, p. 373-404.
Jenkins, D.M., 1994, Geological report on La Viruela Project, Sonora State, Mexico. Private report dated 13 April,
1994 prepared for San Fernando Mining Company, 40 p.
Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2007a, La India project review: cyanide bottle roll tests. Private report dated 21
May, 2007 prepared by T.E. Albert of Kappes Cassiday and Associates for Grayd Resource Corporation.
Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2007b, Flotation Tests La India Project, KCA Project Code: 285 C/7900. Private
report dated 11 July, 2007 prepared by T.E. Albert of Kappes Cassiday and Associates for Grayd Resource
Corporation, 3 p.
Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2008, La India project, report of metallurgical testwork, September 2008, KCA
Project Code: 285 C/7900. Private report dated September 2008 prepared for Grayd Resource Resource
Corporation, 276 p.
Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2009, La India project, report of metallurgical testwork, October 2009, KCA
Project Code: 285 C/7900. Private report dated October 2009 prepared for Grayd Resource Corporation,
194 p.
Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2010a, Bottle roll leach test work - La India project, report of metallurgical
testwork, March 2010, KCA Project Code: 285 C/7900. Private report dated March 2010 prepared for
Grayd Resource Corporation, 4 p.
Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2010b, La India project, report of metallurgical testwork, May 2010, KCA Project
Code: 285 C/7900. Private report dated May 2010 prepared for Grayd Resource Corporation, 57 p.
Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2012, La India Project, Basic Engineering Design Report, May 24, 2012. Private
report dated 24 May, 2012 prepared for Agnico-Eagle Mines.
Longo, T., 2006a, La India field review report, 27 February 2006. Private report dated 27 February, 2006 prepared
for Newmont Mining Corporation and Grayd Resource Corporation, 43 p.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


157

Longo, T., 2006b, La India February 2006 monthly report, 28 February 2006. Private report dated 28 February, 2006
prepared for Newmont Mining Corporation and Grayd Resource Corporation, 6 p.
Longo, T., 2006c, La India progress report, 28 March 2006. Private report dated 28 March, 2006 prepared for
Newmont Mining Corporation and Grayd Resource Corporation, 9 p.
Longo, A.A., Paez-Beltran, E., Smit, H., Bourke, F.M., and Prefontaine, M., 2010, Geology of the La India Gold
Deposit, Mulatos District, Sonora, Mexico: in Great Basin Evolution and Metallogeny. Geological Society
of Nevada, Symposium Proceedings, Reno/Sparks, Nevada, May 14-22, 2010.
M3 Engineering, 2004, Technical report: The Estrella pit development, Mulatos, Sonora, Mexico. Technical report
prepared for Alamos Gold Corporation dated 14 July, 2007 for NI43-101 filing, 189 p., published on
System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.
McDougall, J.J., 1995, Progress Report #1 on La Viruela Project, Sonora State, Mexico. Private report dated 31
March, 1995 prepared for San Fernando Mining Company Ltd., 50 p.
The Mines Group, 2012, Preliminary kinematic pit slope design results. Technical memorandum dated August 6,
2012 prepared by Ken Myers of The Mines Group for Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited, 22 p.
Moore, S., 2005, Results and exploration concepts from geologic mapping, La India/La Viruela map areas. Private
report dated 6 December, 2005 prepared for Newmont Mining Corporation and Grayd Resource
Corporation, 6 p.
Moore, S., 2006, La India Project, Duraznito South area, results of mapping February 2006. Private report dated 18
March, 2006, prepared for Newmont Mining Corporation and Grayd Resource Corporation, 13 p.
Petersen, U., Noble, D.C., Arenas, M.J., and Goodell, P.C., 1977, Geology of the Julcani mining district, Peru.
Economic Geology, v. 72, p. 931-949.
Ransome, F.L., 1909, The association of alunite with gold in the Goldfield district. Economic Geology, v. 2, p. 667692.
Servicio Geologico Mexicano, 2009, Geology and Mineralization Map TECORIPA H12-12 Sonora Chihuahua.
Edited by Servicio Geologico Mexicano, March 2009.
Smit, Hans, 2008, La India Project domain determination, November 2008. Private report dated November 2008
prepared for Grayd Resource Corporation, 4 p.
Southworth, J.R., 1905, Las minas de Mexico ilustrado, Tomo IX Octubre 1905. Secretaria de Fomento
Colonizacion, Industria y Comercio, Gobierno de Mexico, 260 p.
SRK Consulting, 2012a, La India Characterization of Metal Leaching and Acid Rock Drainage Potential at the La
India Deposit, Sonora, Mexico - Phase III. Private report dated June 2012 prepared by Chris Kennedy of
SRK Consulting for Agnico-Eagle Mines.
SRK Consulting, 2012b, La India Run-off Water Treatment Scoping Assessment. Private report dated 15 June,
2012 prepared by Tom Sharp and Chris Kennedy of SRK Consulting for Agnico-Eagle Mines.
Staude, J.M., 2001, Geology, geochemistry, and formation of Au-(Cu) mineralization and advanced argillic
alteration in the Mulatos District, Sonora, Mexico: in New Mines and Mineral Discoveries in Mexico and
Central America. Society of Economic Geologists, Special Publication Number 8, p. 199-216.
Stoffregen, R.E., 1987, Genesis of acid-sulfate alteration and Au-Cu-Ag mineralization at Summitville, Colorado.
Economic Geology, v. 82, p. 1575-1591.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


158

Vikre, P.G., 1989, Ledge formation at the Sandstorm and Kendall gold mines, Goldfield, Nevada. Economic
Geology, v. 84, p. 2115-2138.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


159

Notes to Investors Regarding the Use of Resources


Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources
This Technical Report uses the terms "measured resources" and "indicated resources". We advise
investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") does not recognize them. Investors are cautioned not to
assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into
reserves.

Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Inferred Resources


This Technical Report also uses the term "inferred resources". We advise investors that while this term is
recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize it. "Inferred resources"
have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and
legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be
upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not
form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not
to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.

Cautionary Note To U.S. Investors


The SEC permits U.S. mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only those mineral
deposits that a company can economically and legally extract or produce. Agnico-Eagle uses certain
terms in this Technical Report, such as "measured", "indicated" and "inferred", and "resources", that the
SEC guidelines strictly prohibit U.S. registered companies from including in their filings with the SEC.
U.S. investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2011, which may be obtained from us, or from the SEC's website at:
http://sec.gov/edgar.shtml. A "final" or "bankable" feasibility study is required to meet the requirements
to designate reserves under Industry Guide 7. This feasibility study was recently completed.
Estimates for the La India project were calculated using historic three-year average metals prices and
foreign exchange rates in accordance with the SEC Industry Guide 7. Industry Guide 7 requires the use
of prices that reflect current economic conditions at the time of reserve determination, which the Staff of
the SEC has interpreted to mean historic three-year average prices. The assumptions used for the mineral
reserves estimates reported by Agnico-Eagle on September 4, 2012 were based on three-year average
prices for the period ending June 30, 2012 of $1,379 per ounce gold, $26.49 per ounce silver, and a
MXP/US$ exchange rate of 13.00.
The Canadian Securities Administrators' National Instrument 43-101 requires mining companies to
disclose reserves and resources using the subcategories of "proven" reserves, "probable" reserves,
"measured" resources, "indicated" resources and "inferred" resources. Mineral resources that are not
mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is
economically or legally mineable.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


160

Appendices
Appendix 12.1 Core samples not used for Resource
estimation
DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

DDH-07-12
DDH-07-13
DDH-07-13
DDH-07-13
DDH-07-13
DDH-07-15
DDH-07-16
DDH-07-17
DDH-07-17
DDH-07-19
DDH-07-21
DDH-07-21
DDH-07-21
DDH-07-23
DDH-07-26
DDH-07-27
DDH-07-27
DDH-07-28
DDH-07-28
DDH-07-28
DDH-07-28
DDH-07-28
DDH-07-28
DDH-07-30
DDH-07-37
DDH-07-37
DDH-07-37
DDH-07-37
DDH-07-37
DDH-07-38
DDH-07-38
DDH-07-38
DDH-07-39
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-42
DDH-08-42
DDH-08-42
DDH-08-42
DDH-08-42

From
(m)
0.00
0.00
7.00
8.00
75.00
7.00
53.00
53.00
59.00
5.00
26.00
27.00
31.00
6.00
11.00
37.00
51.00
0.00
47.00
50.00
51.00
52.00
67.00
0.00
0.00
6.00
10.00
21.00
34.00
0.00
21.00
22.00
32.00
6.09
20.00
22.00
24.00
26.00
28.00
30.00
31.00
32.00
33.00
35.00
38.00
40.00
42.00
45.00
48.00
49.00
54.00
55.00
56.00
70.00
72.00
73.00
74.00
75.00
77.00
79.00
4.57
8.00
9.00
14.00
16.00

To
(m)
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
76.00
8.00
54.00
54.00
60.00
6.00
27.00
29.00
32.00
7.20
12.00
38.00
52.00
1.20
48.00
51.00
52.00
53.00
68.00
1.00
1.30
7.00
11.00
22.00
35.00
1.00
22.00
23.00
34.00
8.00
22.00
24.00
26.00
28.00
30.00
31.00
32.00
33.00
35.00
38.00
40.00
42.00
45.00
48.00
49.00
50.00
55.00
56.00
57.00
72.00
73.00
74.00
75.00
77.00
79.00
81.38
6.00
9.00
11.00
16.00
18.00

greater than
50% rec
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no

LabJobNumber

SampleID

CH07100405
CH07100405
CH07100405
CH07100405
CH07100405
CH07100406
CH07100403
CH07100403
CH07100403
HE07110408
HE07115498
HE07115498
HE07115498
HE07115499
HE07116100
HE07116101
HE07116101
HE07116101
HE07116101
HE07116101
HE07116101
HE07116101
HE07116101
CH07121302
CH07121304
CH07121304
CH07121304
CH07121304
CH07121304
CH07121304
CH07121304
CH07121304
CH07121306
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715

313001
313167
313168
313169
313243
313310
313434
313567
313573
313709
313932
313933
313936
372062
372242
372346
372361
372393
372443
372446
372447
372448
372464
372587
372777
372785
372789
372800
372813
372832
372855
372856
388531
514001
514014
514015
514016
514017
514018
514019
514020
514021
514022
514023
514024
514025
514027
514028
514029
514030
514033
514034
514035
514046
514047
514048
514049
514050
514051
514052
514054
514057
514058
514062
514063

Au_Plot Ag_ppm Cu_ppm As_ppm Mo_ppm Zn_ppm


0.29
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.16
0.08
0.02
3.36
29.80
0.29
0.08
0.08
0.06
0.21
0.13
0.07
0.01
0.14
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.24
0.11
0.42
0.21
7.20
0.10
0.05
0.12
0.17
0.31
0.28
0.27
0.10
0.08
0.11
0.17
0.06
0.12
0.17
0.11
0.52
0.93
1.61
0.51
0.09
0.14
0.78
0.40
0.23
0.36
0.22
0.26
0.20
0.23
0.21
0.17
0.36
0.12
0.10
0.87
1.22

0.30
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.10
1.60
2.20
0.20
0.40
0.20
0.10
0.60
2.10
1.80
0.50
0.10
8.70
1.10
0.70
0.40
0.30
0.50
2.40
0.40
0.90
1.40
96.40
1.60
1.00
3.60
8.70
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.50
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.30
0.10
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.10
0.10
21.40
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.50
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.10

227
8
5
4
29
39
24
7
10
4
72
140
120
35
6
248
87
25
28
29
28
34
31
21
44
2
3
4
323
9
3
6
16
57
58
54
100
66
80
141
53
37
25
29
42
67
8
18
64
166
69
34
52
150
150
239
137
70
124
153
154
112
19
48
28

99
41
49
45
45
27
37
103
139
86
133
92
106
36
55
27
48
73
30
42
54
22
25
42
1690
14
24
19
6300
78
56
68
7
43
39
34
67
34
37
62
55
43
39
38
237
258
39
15
14
27
17
17
22
55
113
150
80
25
33
83
112
96
52
207
198

13
54
61
52
57
38
4
2
3
6
5
3
5
27
19
23
7
4
7
3
2
2
2
7
19
1
2
3
104
2
1
2
3
17
52
41
54
26
19
19
37
27
28
23
53
37
62
32
15
16
15
10
19
64
48
38
20
14
16
13
21
22
17
11
29

194
18
8
4
46
5
2
2
2
1
83
125
188
310
2
7
22
19
6
7
15
10
40
6
15
2
4
3
18
6
1
3
3
8
28
34
45
46
35
26
21
16
16
18
6
6
12
12
14
17
35
25
26
278
399
370
132
58
120
84
17
12
8
16
13

Dupe
Test
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


161

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

DDH-08-42
DDH-08-42
DDH-08-42
DDH-08-42
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-43
DDH-08-45
DDH-08-45
DDH-08-45
DDH-08-45
DDH-08-45
DDH-08-46
DDH-08-46
DDH-08-46
DDH-08-46
DDH-08-46
DDH-08-47
DDH-08-47
DDH-08-48
DDH-08-48
DDH-08-48
DDH-08-48
DDH-08-48
DDH-08-48
DDH-08-48
DDH-08-48
DDH-08-48
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-50
DDH-08-51
DDH-08-51
DDH-08-51
DDH-08-51
DDH-08-52
DDH-08-52

From
(m)
50.00
52.00
54.00
56.00
4.57
8.00
11.00
14.00
41.00
43.00
45.00
47.00
60.00
62.00
64.00
72.00
74.00
76.00
78.00
80.00
82.00
84.00
8.00
10.00
26.00
27.00
29.00
0.00
2.13
45.00
48.00
75.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
2.13
14.00
15.00
16.00
17.00
24.00
26.00
27.00
0.00
5.00
23.00
24.00
25.00
26.00
27.00
29.00
35.00
37.00
39.00
40.00
41.00
44.00
46.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
17.00
18.00
0.00
23.00

To
(m)
52.00
54.00
56.00
58.00
8.00
11.00
14.00
17.00
43.00
45.00
47.00
48.00
62.00
64.00
66.00
74.00
76.00
78.00
80.00
82.00
84.00
87.00
10.00
12.00
27.00
29.00
30.00
2.13
5.00
46.00
49.00
77.00
2.00
5.18
2.13
5.18
15.00
16.00
17.00
21.00
25.00
27.00
28.00
2.00
12.00
24.00
25.00
26.00
27.00
28.00
32.00
37.00
39.00
40.00
41.00
42.00
46.00
48.00
3.00
3.00
6.00
18.00
20.00
3.00
24.00

greater than
50% rec
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no

LabJobNumber

SampleID

HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093715
HE08093716
HE08093716
HE08093716
HE08093716
HE08093716
HE08093716
HE08093716
HE08093717
HE08093717
HE08093717
HE08093717
HE08093717
HE08093717
HE08093717
HE08093717
HE08093717
HE08093717
HE08093717
HE08093717
HE08093717
HE08093717
HE08098031
HE08098031
HE08098031
HE08098031
HE08098031
HE08098031
HE08098031
HE08098031
HE08098031
HE08098031
HE08123794
HE08098031
HE08098031
HE08098031
HE08123794
HE08102991
HE08109086
HE08109086
HE08109086
HE08109086
HE08109086
HE08109086

514097
514098
514099
514100
514128
514129
514130
514131
514156
514157
514158
514159
514174
514175
514176
514183
514184
514185
514186
514187
514188
514189
514324
514325
514339
514340
514341
514407
514408
514451
514454
514483
514488
514489
514550
514551
514562
514563
514564
514566
514570
514572
514573
514628
514632
514645
514646
514647
514648
514649
514651
514656
514657
514658
514659
514660
514663
514664
514724
514815
514816
514826
514827
514892
514913

Au_Plot Ag_ppm Cu_ppm As_ppm Mo_ppm Zn_ppm


0.37
0.51
0.38
0.22
0.05
0.02
1.16
0.70
0.21
0.34
0.15
0.13
0.02
0.07
0.02
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.01
0.08
0.07
0.02
0.04
0.10
0.03
0.25
0.05
0.05
3.52
0.39
0.22
0.17
0.04
0.17
0.55
0.37
0.13
0.09
0.12
0.21
0.10
0.11
0.12
1.97
0.10
0.16
0.13
0.09
0.09
0.22
0.07
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.24
0.53
0.18
0.10
0.09
0.05

0.10
0.10
0.10
0.40
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.40
0.10
0.50
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.40
0.40
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.30
0.10
2.40
1.60
1.70
1.30
1.30
0.90
0.70
0.40
1.10
1.40
0.90
0.80
1.40
0.60
1.20
0.80
0.90
1.00
0.80
2.00
1.30
3.20
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.40

145
84
232
124
7
6
2
2
84
11
27
18
77
54
44
20
21
15
386
495
273
195
12
35
12
4
8
66
22
3
3
33
48
12
11
6
7
4
3
3
4
4
4
5
10
12
4
4
15
3
9
16
5
5
9
5
6
10
4
1
1
0.5
1
2
3

102
80
82
60
47
77
52
53
149
134
157
169
377
317
81
48
39
40
38
62
113
104
96
108
38
96
73
40
41
43
88
226
181
104
82
68
215
134
52
52
56
186
180
65
17
48
42
77
61
55
90
120
30
8
5
11
31
111
111
47
30
18
48
53
66

22
24
36
23
62
83
41
39
363
50
23
31
2
4
2
11
3
7
3
1
6
6
0.5
0.5
2
6
12
2
6
8
7
11
4
5
10
22
3
1
1
1
3
5
4
14
5
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
1
2
1
1
2
4
14
4
6
3
7
2
9

7
7
17
14
5
6
10
8
71
31
70
88
16
30
40
79
84
137
129
96
111
61
1
1
4
3
2
8
2
1
1
1
1
74
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
4
1
1
8
4
1
1
1
1
1

Dupe
Test
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


162

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

DDH-08-52
DDH-08-52
DDH-08-52
DDH-08-53
DDH-08-53
DDH-08-53
DDH-08-53
DDH-08-54
DDH-08-55
DDH-08-55
DDH-08-55
DDH-08-55
DDH-08-55
DDH-08-55
DDH-08-55
DDH-08-55
DDH-08-56
DDH-08-56
DDH-08-56
DDH-08-56
DDH-08-56
DDH-08-56
DDH-08-56
DDH-08-57
DDH-08-57
DDH-08-57
DDH-08-57
DDH-08-57
DDH-08-58
DDH-08-58
DDH-08-58
DDH-08-58
DDH-08-58
DDH-08-58
DDH-08-58
DDH-08-58
DDH-08-58
DDH-08-59
DDH-08-59
DDH-08-59
DDH-08-59
DDH-08-59
DDH-08-59
DDH-08-60
DDH-08-60
DDH-08-60
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-62
DDH-08-62
DDH-08-62
DDH-08-62

From
(m)
24.00
35.00
39.00
0.00
3.00
26.00
28.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
39.00
40.00
41.00
44.00
47.00
49.00
0.00
19.00
20.00
21.00
37.00
38.00
39.00
16.00
17.00
19.00
20.00
21.00
0.00
4.00
8.00
9.00
13.00
32.00
33.00
34.00
35.00
0.00
2.00
3.00
10.00
12.00
62.10
0.00
2.00
3.00
0.00
1.20
3.05
5.00
7.00
8.00
12.00
14.00
15.00
16.00
26.00
27.00
28.00
32.00
34.00
0.00
10.00
13.00
14.00

To
(m)
25.00
38.00
40.00
3.00
6.00
28.00
30.00
2.00
3.00
5.00
40.00
41.00
44.00
47.00
49.00
51.00
2.00
20.00
21.00
22.00
38.00
39.00
40.00
17.00
18.00
20.00
21.00
21.45
4.00
5.00
9.00
10.00
14.00
33.00
34.00
35.00
39.00
2.00
3.00
5.00
12.00
13.00
65.00
2.00
3.00
4.15
1.20
3.05
5.00
7.00
8.00
10.00
14.00
15.00
16.00
17.00
27.00
28.00
29.00
34.00
35.00
7.10
13.00
14.00
15.00

greater than
50% rec
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no

LabJobNumber

SampleID

HE08109086
HE08109086
HE08109086
HE08109086
HE08109086
HE08109086
HE08109086
HE08114053
HE08114053
HE08114053
HE08114053
HE08132951
HE08114053
HE08114053
HE08132951
HE08114053
HE08114053
HE08114053
HE08114053
HE08114053
HE08114053
HE08114053
HE08114053
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08114054
HE08123292
HE08123292
HE08123292
HE08123292

514914
514926
514928
514976
514977
514998
514999
590027
590095
590096
590132
590133
590134
590135
590136
590137
590192
590212
590213
590214
590230
590231
590232
590262
590263
590265
590266
590267
590269
590270
590274
590275
590279
590300
590301
590302
590303
590322
590323
590324
590330
590331
590384
590409
590410
590411
590429
590430
590431
590432
590433
590434
590437
590438
590439
590441
590449
590450
590451
590456
590457
590489
590493
590494
590495

Au_Plot Ag_ppm Cu_ppm As_ppm Mo_ppm Zn_ppm


0.43
0.03
9.66
0.04
0.07
0.45
0.15
0.05
0.73
0.46
1.09
0.81
1.07
1.56
1.70
3.39
0.08
0.03
0.07
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.17
0.24
0.27
0.35
0.30
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.06
0.07
0.12
1.87
0.31
0.16
0.02
0.08
0.10
0.07
0.95
0.17
1.33
0.09
0.42
0.91
0.48
0.57
0.37
0.30
0.60
0.81
0.58
0.28
0.16
0.54
0.30
0.33
0.08
0.14
0.04
0.02
0.20

0.50
1.90
1.00
0.10
0.30
2.30
2.00
0.20
6.70
3.40
1.60
0.80
2.40
2.10
2.40
5.40
0.60
0.30
1.60
1.50
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.40
1.00
0.80
0.90
1.30
0.90
0.30
0.60
0.60
0.90
2.80
2.40
59.40
14.30
0.30
0.20
0.40
0.30
0.30
6.50
10.50
61.80
3.80
27.50
1.30
3.30
1.70
1.90
2.10
1.60
2.50
2.30
1.60
3.20
2.70
3.00
5.10
2.60
1.40
2.00
1.80
1.60

4
4
4
17
6
4
2
14
39
23
15
9
6
6
4
4
90
123
27
44
27
36
31
2
1
1
2
4
7
3
2
2
2
1
1
13
2
13
2
3
2
1
25
40
6
8
134
6
7
4
4
5
2
3
4
3
6
19
6
8
3
4
12
5
11

176
192
110
133
103
87
22
89
25
18
119
49
33
26
13
14
85
34
33
10
33
33
42
4
4
5
6
11
80
12
5
3
5
18
9
97
16
33
7
4
26
19
114
278
269
316
92
8
15
9
7
7
5
16
10
9
9
21
14
20
5
26
16
14
11

18
7
3
6
5
3
1
3
2
2
4
3
2
3
3
2
4
2
2
2
2
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
1
6
2
1
1
7
17
5
16
8
2
1
1
2
1
9
15
11
13
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
4
3
6
3
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
3
5
1
1
128
1
1
1
2
1
1
4
1
37
9
5
93
236
231
603
1
1
1
1
1
19
3
1
1
2
2
2
7
2
7
1
1
1
1
51
7
2
1
69
11
12
4
3
7
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
4
2
3
4
1
3

Dupe
Test
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


163

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

DDH-08-62
DDH-08-62
DDH-08-62
DDH-08-62
DDH-08-62
DDH-08-62
DDH-08-63
DDH-08-63
DDH-08-63
DDH-08-63
DDH-08-63
DDH-08-64
DDH-08-64
DDH-08-64
DDH-08-64
DDH-08-65
DDH-08-65
DDH-08-65
DDH-08-65
DDH-08-65
DDH-08-65
DDH-08-65
DDH-09-101
DDH-09-101
DDH-09-101
DDH-09-101
DDH-09-101
DDH-09-101
DDH-09-102
DDH-09-102
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-67
DDH-09-69
DDH-09-69
DDH-09-71
DDH-09-71
DDH-09-71
DDH-09-71
DDH-09-71
DDH-09-72
DDH-09-75
DDH-09-75
DDH-09-76
DDH-09-77
DDH-09-78
DDH-09-86
DDH-09-86
DDH-09-86
DDH-09-86
DDH-09-86
DDH-09-86
DDH-09-88

From
(m)
15.00
16.00
19.00
21.00
25.60
27.00
23.00
24.00
25.00
26.00
28.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
23.00
27.00
29.00
19.80
32.00
35.05
42.70
64.00
65.55
8.00
39.65
1.00
2.00
4.00
5.00
9.00
10.00
11.05
35.00
36.00
37.00
38.00
39.10
40.00
44.20
18.00
13.00
14.00
0.40
6.00
7.00
21.00
22.00
0.00
1.50
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
6.00
7.00
7.60
8.00
0.00

To
(m)
16.00
19.00
21.00
25.60
27.00
28.00
24.00
25.00
26.00
28.00
29.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
24.00
29.00
30.00
25.90
35.05
41.15
44.20
65.55
66.00
9.15
42.00
2.00
3.00
5.00
6.00
10.00
11.05
12.00
36.00
37.00
38.00
39.10
40.00
41.15
45.10
19.00
14.00
15.00
1.00
7.00
8.00
22.00
23.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
1.50
2.00
1.00
2.00
7.00
7.60
8.00
9.00
2.00

greater than
50% rec
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no

LabJobNumber

SampleID

HE08123292
HE08123292
HE08123292
HE08123292
HE08123292
HE08123292
HE08123292
HE08123292
HE08123292
HE08123292
HE08123292
HE08123291
HE08123291
HE08123291
HE08123291
HE08123832
HE08123832
HE08123832
HE08123832
HE08123832
HE08123832
HE08123832
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE10002751
HE10002751
HE09110339
HE09110339
HE09110339
HE09110339
HE09110339
HE09110339
HE09110339
HE09110339
HE09110339
HE09110339
HE09110339
HE09110339
HE09110339
HE09110339
HE09112427
HE09121338
HE09121338
HE09129841
HE09129841
HE09129841
HE09129841
HE09129841
HE09134805
HE09134807
HE09134807
HE09134808
HE09134808
HE09134809
HE09141177
HE09141177
HE09141177
HE09141177
HE09141177
HE09141177
HE09145093

590496
590498
590499
590500
642502
642503
642536
642537
642538
642539
642540
642572
642573
642574
642575
642626
642627
642628
642629
642651
642655
642656
887525
887532
887533
887536
887558
887559
887574
887608
840001
840002
840004
840005
840009
840010
840011
840037
840038
840039
840040
840041
840042
840043
840103
840239
840240
840374
840380
840381
840398
840399
840476
841005
841006
841076
841133
841168
841542
841543
841549
841550
841552
841553
841679

Au_Plot Ag_ppm Cu_ppm As_ppm Mo_ppm Zn_ppm


0.19
0.13
0.54
0.68
0.10
0.12
5.87
5.85
3.61
3.40
4.18
0.46
0.40
0.09
0.05
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.13
0.08
0.13
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.08
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.28
1.55
0.42
0.08
0.49
1.00
0.18
2.50
0.13
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.08
0.05
0.06
1.53
5.32
0.18
1.39
0.38
0.03
0.03
0.31
0.41
0.88
0.34
1.49
0.27
0.03
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.11
0.12
1.40

1.60
1.60
1.30
1.40
0.30
0.20
85.80
-100.00
-100.00
95.40
58.80
3.70
88.70
2.40
0.60
1.20
2.70
2.20
2.60
2.20
1.40
0.90
13.10
1.50
3.40
7.60
-100.00
72.00
0.60
0.40
0.40
0.70
0.20
0.20
1.00
0.80
1.20
0.90
1.40
1.20
1.50
1.30
1.50
3.10
0.10
0.80
0.90
1.40
0.80
0.10
1.40
1.50
0.80
2.40
3.10
3.40
1.20
1.20
0.30
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.70
0.50
0.80

11
15
5
10
48
78
17
16
11
18
18
2
493
10
3
3
9
4
3
1
2
1
21
6
10
37
485
143
3
1
3
5
3
2
7
8
9
5
4
6
6
5
3
7
0.5
10
9
6
7
31
3
4
4
45
50
37
32
32
2
0.5
2
0.5
2
0.5
3

10
10
7
46
249
360
169
239
227
122
68
72
54
42
38
20
21
23
34
13
40
17
1
10
5
13
47
50
2
1
80
59
26
23
66
52
54
181
59
163
114
156
118
11
64
18
71
34
31
88
62
63
54
116
127
50
217
45
129
49
91
66
94
43
43

1
1
2
7
3
16
3
6
5
5
5
3
3
12
10
1
3
2
3
2
5
4
1
2
2
3
43
5
1
1
10
14
9
9
10
7
7
3
1
2
1
2
2
1
13
4
16
7
4
8
2
2
3
3
3
3
33
10
10
5
12
18
21
4
8

3
4
2
10
35
27
4
4
6
3
2
1
3
11
18
9
10
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
469
502
1
1
2
2
4
2
3
1
2
1
2
1
1
4
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
3
8
6
14
1
1
1
1
1
1
3

Dupe
Test
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


164

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

DDH-09-89
DDH-09-89
DDH-09-92
DDH-09-92
DDH-09-93
DDH-09-93
DDH-09-93
DDH-09-93
DDH-09-93
DDH-09-93
DDH-09-93
DDH-09-93
DDH-09-93
DDH-09-93
DDH-09-93
DDH-09-93
DDH-09-93
DDH-09-94
DDH-09-94
DDH-09-94
DDH-09-94
DDH-09-94
DDH-09-95
DDH-09-95
DDH-09-96
DDH-09-96
DDH-09-96
DDH-09-96
DDH-09-96
DDH-09-96
DDH-09-96
DDH-09-96
DDH-09-97
DDH-09-97
DDH-09-97
DDH-09-97
DDH-09-97
DDH-09-98
DDH-09-98
DDH-09-98
DDH-09-98
DDH-09-98
DDH-09-98
DDH-09-98
DDH-09-98
DDH-09-98
DDH-09-98
DDH-09-98
DDH-09-98
DDH-09-98
DDH-09-98
DDH-09-98
DDH-09-98
DDH-09-99
DDH-09-99
DDH-09-99
DDH-09-99
DDH-10-104
DDH-10-107
DDH-10-107
DDH-10-107
DDH-10-107
DDH-10-108
DDH-10-108
DDH-10-108

From
(m)
0.00
1.00
7.00
8.00
13.00
15.25
16.75
18.30
19.00
21.00
25.90
27.45
28.95
30.50
33.00
33.55
35.05
5.90
7.00
12.00
13.70
15.25
1.00
2.00
41.00
42.00
46.00
50.30
51.85
54.90
62.00
63.00
9.00
10.65
30.00
53.00
54.00
0.00
1.50
7.00
9.15
14.00
15.25
16.75
18.30
19.80
26.45
30.50
36.60
38.00
39.65
41.15
45.00
0.00
1.00
41.00
42.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
44.00
45.00
3.00
4.00
9.00

To
(m)
1.00
2.00
8.00
9.00
15.25
16.75
18.30
19.00
20.00
22.85
27.45
28.95
30.50
32.00
33.55
35.05
36.60
7.00
7.90
13.70
15.25
17.00
2.00
3.00
42.00
43.00
47.25
51.85
54.90
56.40
63.00
64.30
10.65
12.20
31.00
54.00
54.90
1.50
3.05
9.15
10.65
15.25
16.75
18.30
19.80
21.35
30.50
36.60
37.20
39.65
41.15
42.70
47.25
1.00
2.00
42.00
43.00
3.05
1.00
2.00
45.00
46.00
4.00
5.00
10.00

greater than
50% rec
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no

LabJobNumber

SampleID

HE09145093
HE09145093
HE09145096
HE09145096
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145098
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE09145695
HE10008319
HE10016768
HE10016768
HE10016768
HE10016768
HE10016768
HE10016768
HE10016768

841739
841740
841962
841963
887030
887031
887032
887033
887034
887036
887037
887039
887041
887042
887044
887045
887046
887089
887090
887096
887097
887098
887150
887151
887266
887268
887272
887275
887276
887277
887284
887285
887306
887308
887330
887356
887357
887359
887361
887367
887368
887372
887373
887374
887375
887376
887381
887382
887384
887386
887387
887388
887391
887398
887399
887442
887443
887689
887849
887850
887895
887896
887917
887918
887923

Au_Plot Ag_ppm Cu_ppm As_ppm Mo_ppm Zn_ppm


0.10
0.04
0.19
0.15
0.95
0.76
1.06
1.57
1.21
0.51
1.32
1.53
4.01
3.81
3.11
4.81
3.50
0.82
1.73
0.53
0.53
0.32
0.01
0.00
1.68
0.25
0.10
0.79
0.49
0.38
0.22
9.54
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.12
0.18
0.19
0.17
0.10
0.17
0.06
0.09
0.30
0.06
0.05
0.09
0.05
0.68
1.42
0.41
10.95
10.55
0.04
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02

0.50
0.70
0.10
0.10
1.60
1.80
1.80
1.40
1.10
1.50
3.10
2.30
5.90
4.80
7.20
4.60
6.10
0.60
0.50
7.30
1.70
2.60
0.80
0.60
77.40
4.10
1.30
27.20
21.50
1.60
1.00
1.30
0.80
0.60
0.30
0.10
0.10
1.30
1.10
1.40
1.00
1.60
1.90
2.30
5.20
1.10
2.70
6.80
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
36.10
4.50
4.80
26.20
56.90
0.80
0.10
0.10
0.30
0.40
0.80
0.10
0.20

18
6
23
8
11
13
15
10
7
8
11
9
8
10
14
8
9
6
11
11
3
6
5
2
42
3
2
70
59
2
2
4
5
3
9
30
4
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
3
1
3
6
37
35
32
30
60
12
10
4
2
7
36
78
164
60
56
18
11

34
14
21
62
68
32
26
43
52
38
52
62
42
55
40
52
43
74
84
26
45
27
9
9
15
12
14
96
39
9
68
154
183
85
518
206
112
9
56
9
3
5
9
49
25
16
72
530
73
50
70
61
371
327
195
190
122
23
33
66
85
38
26
256
114

1
1
65
119
7
2
2
2
2
7
9
9
5
4
3
3
3
20
37
5
3
4
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
1
12
4
1
2
2
2
3
9
1
2
1
4
2
1
1
14
5
4
1
2
4
2
1
1
0.5
1
4
3
14
14
14
2
1
3
3
2
7
6

1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
17
5
1
1
1
1
1
7
8
4
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
9
6
168
411
184
213
73
1
1
1
1
7
1
1
8
3
1
2
1

Dupe
Test
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


165

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

DDH-10-108
DDH-10-108
DDH-10-109
DDH-10-109
DDH-10-109
DDH-10-111
DDH-10-111
DDH-10-111
DDH-10-111
DDH-10-112
DDH-10-112
DDH-10-112
DDH-10-113
DDH-10-113
DDH-10-115
DDH-10-115
DDH-10-115
DDH-10-118
DDH-10-118
DDH-10-118
DDH-10-118
DDH-10-118
DDH-10-118
DDH-10-119
DDH-10-119
DDH-10-119
DDH-10-119
DDH-10-119
DDH-10-119
DDH-10-119
DDH-10-119
DDH-10-120
DDH-10-120
DDH-10-120
DDH-10-120
DDH-10-120
DDH-10-121
DDH-10-130
DDH-10-130
DDH-10-130
DDH-10-130
DDH-10-130
DDH-10-130
DDH-10-130
DDH-10-130
DDH-10-130
DDH-10-130
DDH-10-130
DDH-10-131
DDH-10-131
DDH-10-131
DDH-10-131
DDH-10-131
DDH-10-131
DDH-10-131
DDH-10-131
DDH-10-132
DDH-10-132
DDH-10-132
DDH-10-132
DDH-10-132
DDH-10-132
DDH-10-132
DDH-10-132
DDH-10-132
DDH-10-132

From
(m)
10.00
11.00
0.00
44.20
45.50
22.85
69.00
74.70
77.75
1.50
6.00
7.20
70.00
71.00
0.00
43.80
45.20
0.00
1.60
56.00
61.00
63.50
65.55
0.00
19.00
21.35
23.25
38.00
39.00
50.00
56.40
8.90
25.10
28.20
39.65
41.15
0.00
0.00
20.00
27.00
30.00
31.00
33.00
42.00
47.00
49.00
51.00
53.00
0.00
1.50
38.00
41.00
46.00
50.00
51.85
70.00
13.70
14.50
17.20
41.00
42.00
46.00
53.00
54.00
61.00
70.00

To
(m)
11.00
12.20
2.00
45.50
46.30
24.70
70.50
76.25
79.50
3.00
7.20
8.00
71.00
72.00
1.50
45.20
46.00
1.60
3.16
57.95
62.50
65.55
66.00
1.50
21.35
23.25
25.00
39.00
40.00
53.00
57.95
10.65
28.20
29.20
41.15
42.70
2.00
4.00
21.00
29.00
31.00
33.00
35.00
43.00
49.00
51.00
52.00
55.00
1.50
4.55
39.65
42.70
47.25
51.85
53.35
71.65
14.50
15.25
18.00
42.00
43.00
47.00
54.00
55.00
62.00
71.00

greater than
50% rec
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no

LabJobNumber

SampleID

HE10016768
HE10016768
HE10020829
HE10020829
HE10020829
HE10021221
HE10021221
HE10021221
HE10021221
HE10026551
HE10026551
HE10026551
HE10026551
HE10026551
HE10026552
HE10026552
HE10026552
HE10028780
HE10028780
HE10028780
HE10028780
HE10028780
HE10028780
HE10028780
HE10028780
HE10028780
HE10028780
HE10028780
HE10028780
HE10028780
HE10028780
HE10029069
HE10029069
HE10029069
HE10029069
HE10029069
HE10033337
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10038479
HE10039120
HE10039120
HE10039120
HE10039120
HE10039120
HE10039120
HE10039120
HE10039120
HE10039120
HE10039120

887924
887925
887979
888029
888030
888159
888206
888210
888213
888237
888241
888243
888417
888418
888565
888610
888611
888732
888733
888790
888794
888796
888798
888823
888840
888841
888842
888857
888858
888870
888874
888910
888922
888924
888935
888936
888979
829306
829325
829332
829334
829335
829336
829341
829346
829347
829348
829350
829397
829398
829434
829436
829441
829445
829446
829465
886508
886509
886513
886538
886539
886543
886550
886551
886558
886568

Au_Plot Ag_ppm Cu_ppm As_ppm Mo_ppm Zn_ppm


0.01
0.11
0.03
0.29
0.49
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.00
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.38
5.42
0.08
0.09
0.80
0.23
0.11
0.02
0.01
0.33
0.35
0.08
0.11
0.10
0.05
0.01
0.09
0.19
0.11
0.05
3.38
0.22
0.15
0.21
0.03
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.08
0.08
0.12
0.42
0.29
0.07
0.09
0.05
0.06
0.10
0.10
0.14
0.43
0.15
0.06
0.05
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.10
0.15

0.20
0.80
0.30
0.20
0.60
2.10
0.30
0.80
0.10
2.10
2.60
2.10
7.80
3.30
1.40
0.60
19.30
11.30
1.50
1.50
17.60
2.10
4.50
2.60
0.60
3.20
0.30
1.30
0.90
-100.00
1.80
0.70
-100.00
2.80
0.90
2.60
0.20
0.80
1.10
1.70
2.30
0.80
1.00
1.60
1.00
1.20
0.70
1.50
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.90
0.50
0.20
0.20
0.70
0.30
0.10
0.10
0.80
5.90
1.50
1.40
0.90

10
22
23
1
23
86
50
103
9
203
155
84
724
2550
22
486
274
22
44
5
31
10
27
3
7
19
24
30
31
1835
5
3
217
12
20
9
2
50
906
778
891
200
306
126
63
117
59
481
34
47
243
383
347
392
461
185
187
220
376
241
164
181
260
194
200
109

174
49
711
90
35
42
17
45
6
110
78
56
40
96
16
45
575
173
408
4
2
25
51
25
390
272
443
152
659
107
13
34
529
317
121
84
60
73
84
115
103
37
70
35
31
43
22
172
82
42
10
18
33
15
205
17
216
223
56
13
12
54
62
45
61
54

15
5
68
5
5
4
2
6
0.5
14
24
8
5
4
5
16
7
25
13
3
1
7
6
0.5
30
6
2
0.5
0.5
3
1
5
15
17
3
5
2
31
1
1
3
0.5
1
1
1
1
1
2
148
13
24
49
19
11
21
0.5
6
20
2
5
4
3
26
13
16
23

2
1
8
1
1
870
74
67
57
4
10
8
9
72
1
1
1
16
35
1
1
1
1
5
38
42
145
46
58
3
5
1
8
8
10
6
1
4
65
61
90
30
124
1140
527
96
44
110
5
4
17
14
16
12
14
215
12
7
14
130
70
146
347
226
193
609

Dupe
Test
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


166

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

DDH-10-132
DDH-10-132
DDH-10-133
DDH-10-133
DDH-10-133
DDH-10-133
DDH-10-133
DDH-10-133
DDH-10-133
DDH-10-133
DDH-10-133
DDH-10-133
DDH-10-133
DDH-10-134
DDH-10-134
DDH-10-134
DDH-10-134
DDH-10-134
DDH-10-135
DDH-10-135
DDH-10-136
DDH-10-136
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-137
DDH-10-138
DDH-10-138
DDH-10-138
DDH-10-138
DDH-10-138
DDH-10-138
DDH-10-140
DDH-10-140
DDH-10-140
DDH-10-141
DDH-10-143
DDH-10-145
DDH-10-145
DDH-10-146
DDH-10-146
DDH-10-154
DDH-10-154
DDH-10-154
DDH-10-154

From
(m)
71.00
79.00
13.00
16.00
41.00
46.00
53.00
61.00
62.00
70.00
71.00
79.00
80.00
81.00
82.35
83.85
88.45
91.50
0.00
79.00
74.00
90.00
0.00
3.05
6.10
9.15
12.20
15.00
18.00
20.00
22.00
32.00
33.00
35.00
36.00
53.00
59.00
60.00
79.60
91.00
92.00
130.00
290.00
291.00
292.00
293.00
15.10
20.00
22.85
111.00
112.00
190.00
2.00
38.00
39.00
2.75
41.15
0.00
1.00
0.08
1.50
7.00
7.90
14.00
15.60

To
(m)
72.00
80.00
15.25
18.30
42.70
47.25
55.00
62.00
63.00
71.00
72.00
80.00
81.00
82.35
83.85
86.90
89.95
93.00
1.50
81.00
76.25
92.00
3.05
6.10
9.15
12.20
14.00
16.75
20.00
22.00
24.00
33.00
34.00
36.00
37.00
55.00
60.00
62.00
82.40
92.00
93.00
132.00
291.00
292.00
293.00
295.85
16.75
22.85
24.00
112.00
116.00
191.00
3.00
39.00
40.00
4.00
42.70
1.00
2.00
1.50
2.00
7.90
9.15
15.60
17.00

greater than
50% rec
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no

LabJobNumber

SampleID

HE10039120
HE10039120
HE10041165
HE10041165
HE10041165
HE10041165
HE10041165
HE10041165
HE10041165
HE10041165
HE10041165
HE10041165
HE10041165
HE10041165
HE10041165
HE10041165
HE10041165
HE10041165
HE10043553
HE10043553
HE10043552
HE10043552
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048721
HE10048722
HE10048722
HE10048722
HE10048722
HE10053327
HE10053327
HE10053327
HE10053327
HE10053327
HE10053328
HE10067830
HE10067831
HE10067831
HE10069439
HE10073951
HE10073953
HE10073953
HE10077550
HE10077550
HE10093511
HE10093511
HE10093511
HE10093511

886569
886578
886610
886612
886637
886642
886649
886655
886656
886664
886665
886673
886674
886830
886831
886832
886834
886836
886847
886930
39131
39146
39210
39211
39212
39213
39214
39216
39219
39221
39222
39231
39232
39234
39235
39252
39258
39259
39279
39288
39289
39331
39498
39499
39501
39502
39519
39523
39524
39615
39616
39695
39999
893035
893036
893155
893472
893731
893732
893898
893899
8805
8806
8811
8813

Au_Plot Ag_ppm Cu_ppm As_ppm Mo_ppm Zn_ppm


0.11
0.20
0.04
0.12
0.05
0.03
0.06
0.11
0.21
0.09
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.05
0.09
0.05
0.06
0.02
0.06
0.06
0.10
0.04
1.31
0.09
0.10
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.06
0.04
0.18
0.01
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.07
0.05
0.23
0.13
0.78
0.12
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.23
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.08
0.15
0.03
0.04

1.20
0.10
0.20
0.60
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.10
1.20
0.30
0.20
0.70
0.90
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.80
0.20
0.90
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.50
0.50
0.20
0.40
1.20
0.90
0.80
0.80
0.20
4.40
0.20
1.30
0.90
0.90
0.70
2.10
1.10
0.60
0.40
0.50
0.30
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.40
0.40
0.70
1.10
1.10
1.00
1.10
1.20

269
91
65
203
324
153
166
126
725
416
199
138
286
89
100
110
68
38
74
22
66
49
4
12
35
62
60
29
24
21
26
102
103
80
108
65
184
115
88
44
73
12
21
19
12
11
116
355
218
101
50
105
92
7
9
8
13
9
7
7
6
49
45
111
192

89
213
15
41
14
32
8
18
50
10
8
53
104
6
6
5
5
8
73
10
15
15
18
109
49
67
49
76
218
191
72
31
36
29
24
10
12
15
64
19
69
10
42
22
32
30
9
5
63
38
19
6
187
12
16
20
145
22
22
32
17
46
29
49
284

42
1
7
20
7
38
6
62
108
13
22
13
11
1
1
8
1
11
6
9
1
3
2
10
6
8
3
2
2
1
1
13
6
1
1
1
2
1
7
0.5
1
0.5
12
4
5
1
1
0.5
3
3
8
103
19
3
28
8
56
16
10
22
9
3
4
3
3

431
80
282
108
60
82
118
220
769
82
64
129
155
35
38
37
28
9
4
167
30
133
7
3
2
5
7
8
18
24
40
33
46
44
47
105
41
82
1410
286
167
181
44
11
155
20
18
64
141
214
75
29
6
3
4
2
3
5
5
16
29
2
3
39
82

Dupe
Test
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


167

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

DDH-10-154
DDH-10-155
DDH-10-155
DDH-10-155
DDH-10-155
DDH-10-155
DDH-10-155
DDH-10-155
DDH-10-155
DDH-10-156
DDH-10-156
DDH-10-156
DDH-10-156
DDH-10-156
DDH-10-156
DDH-10-156
DDH-10-156
DDH-10-156
DDH-10-156
DDH-10-156
DDH-10-156
DDH-11-200
DDH-11-202
DDH-11-202
DDH-11-202
DDH-11-202
DDH-11-202
DDH-11-202
DDH-11-202
DDH-11-203
DDH-11-203
DDH-11-203
DDH-11-204
DDH-11-205
DDH-11-205
DDH-11-205
DDH-11-206
DDH-11-206
DDH-11-206
DDH-11-207
DDH-11-207
DDH-11-207
DDH-11-207
DDH-11-207
DDH-11-207
DDH-11-207
DDH-11-207
DDH-11-207
DDH-12-208
DDH-12-208
DDH-12-208
DDH-12-208
DDH-12-208
DDH-12-209
DDH-12-209
DDH-12-209
DDH-12-209
DDH-12-209
DDH-12-218
DDH-12-234
DDH-12-234
DDH-12-234
IN-12-239
IN-12-239
IN-12-239

From
(m)
172.30
0.00
71.00
73.00
75.00
77.00
178.00
184.00
185.00
0.00
43.00
48.00
55.00
57.00
62.50
64.00
66.00
68.00
85.00
87.00
89.00
0.00
0.00
9.00
24.00
30.00
32.00
34.00
37.00
2.80
9.00
12.00
0.00
20.00
24.00
33.00
0.00
4.00
6.10
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
15.00
19.00
22.00
33.00
35.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
0.00
2.00
15.00
17.00
19.00
96.00
0.00
88.00
90.00
9.00
10.50
12.00

To
(m)
173.85
1.50
73.00
75.00
77.00
78.00
180.00
185.00
186.00
1.50
45.00
50.00
57.00
59.00
64.00
66.00
68.00
70.00
87.00
89.00
90.00
3.00
3.00
12.00
27.00
32.00
34.00
37.00
40.00
7.00
12.00
15.00
3.00
24.00
33.00
36.60
4.00
6.10
10.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
15.00
19.00
22.00
24.00
35.00
37.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
21.00
2.00
4.00
17.00
19.00
21.00
97.60
3.00
90.00
92.00
10.50
12.00
13.50

greater than
50% rec
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no

LabJobNumber

SampleID

HE10093511
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE10096719
HE11252316
HE11256248
HE11256248
HE11256248
HE11256248
HE11256248
HE11256248
HE11256248
HE11257197
HE11257197
HE11257197
HE11261846
HE11261847
HE11261847
HE11261847
HE11264800
HE11264800
HE11264800
HE11264801
HE11264801
HE11264801
HE11264801
HE11264801
HE11264801
HE11264801
HE11264801
HE11264801
HE12013920
HE12013920
HE12013920
HE12013920
HE12013920
HE12016528
HE12016528
HE12016528
HE12016528
HE12016528
HE12045864
HE12074376
HE12074376
HE12074376
GU12085538
GU12085538
GU12085538

8976
9414
9486
9487
9488
9489
9594
9601
9602
9604
9650
9655
9661
9662
9668
9669
9670
9671
9688
9689
9690
16973
17102
17109
17121
17124
17125
17126
17127
17147
17149
17151
17208
17297
17298
17299
17302
17303
17304
17330
17331
17332
17333
17334
17335
17336
17344
17345
17370
17371
17372
17373
17374
17637
17638
17651
17652
17653
860337
862116
862205
862206
163081
163082
163083

Au_Plot Ag_ppm Cu_ppm As_ppm Mo_ppm Zn_ppm


0.03
0.34
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.07
0.04
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.46
0.50
1.41
2.49
2.08
1.98
0.97
0.06
0.05
0.03
0.79
0.14
0.41
0.04
0.02
0.39
0.97
0.41
0.81
0.71
0.56
1.26
3.20
1.64
2.30
0.13
0.08
0.08
0.09
0.23
0.03
0.08
0.10
0.16
0.03
0.06
0.05
0.07
0.06
0.09
0.05
0.09
0.36
0.13

0.10
0.10
0.10
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.10
0.10
0.10
1.10
1.00
0.70
0.40
0.60
0.60
0.80
0.60
0.70
2.20
0.40
0.30
0.90
7.60
36.30
52.30
91.50
86.30
85.20
1.30
0.70
0.80
2.00
95.80
8.30
4.00
0.90
6.70
13.00
14.60
1.00
1.20
1.40
2.50
10.70
18.80
19.10
2.20
0.50
4.40
1.80
4.30
2.30
4.40
1.30
1.80
0.70
2.10
0.80
7.20
2.70
20.40
10.00
4.00
7.00
5.00

31
28
22
22
28
30
31
90
66
35
59
90
46
37
47
81
43
35
935
204
309
4
30
29
18
13
13
71
26
10
2
2
454
15
3
2
22
29
10
4
2
3
7
5
5
3
92
36
1
1
13
1
1
2
1
5
4
1
37
8
43
12
6.6
9.2
231

27
46
9
10
12
14
20
27
21
43
33
21
32
32
26
83
49
20
215
14
16
207
610
619
168
107
114
175
339
37
15
12
56
254
15
9
354
323
87
7
17
41
154
58
60
35
91
99
18
8
7
4
3
15
8
6
7
12
26
115
20
9
33.3
187
94.2

13
43
7
12
31
1
3
1
2
2
4
10
14
12
8
19
13
15
4
5
7
1
5
9
4
2
2
18
1
10
2
1
18
14
2
1
487
147
52
1
5
11
21
5
5
5
1
1
2
1
2
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
2
6
5
4.79
7.52
18.95

180
1
14
18
14
18
216
2520
186
1
23
17
35
33
22
61
28
30
19
6
7
2
13
12
6
5
5
920
491
17
1
1
53
8
1
1
23
22
8
2
3
9
34
5
16
4
367
62
1
2
12
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
5
7
146
6
4
61

Dupe
Test
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


168

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

IN-12-239
IN-12-239
IN-12-239
IN-12-239
IN-12-239
IN-12-239
IN-12-240
IN-12-240
IN-12-241
IN-12-241
IN-12-241
IN-12-242
IN-12-242
IN-12-242
IN-12-242
IN-12-242
IN-12-242
IN-12-242
IN-12-242
IN-12-242
IN-12-243
IN-12-243
IN-12-244
IN-12-244
IN-12-244
IN-12-244
IN-12-244
IN-12-244
IN-12-246
IN-12-246
IN-12-246
IN-12-246
IN-12-247
IN-12-247
IN-12-247
IN-12-248
IN-12-248
IN-12-248
IN-12-248
IN-12-248
IN-12-248
IN-12-248
IN-12-249
IN-12-249
IN-12-249
IN-12-249
IN-12-249
IN-12-249
IN-12-249
IN-12-249
IN-12-250
IN-12-253
IN-12-253
IN-12-255
IN-12-255
IN-12-255
IN-12-255
IN-12-255
IN-12-256
IN-12-256
IN-12-256
IN-12-256
IN-12-256
IN-12-257
IN-12-257

From
(m)
13.50
15.00
16.50
18.00
19.50
21.00
6.00
7.50
26.50
28.00
29.50
119.00
120.50
125.00
126.50
128.00
133.00
135.00
137.30
140.30
52.00
53.50
27.00
29.00
31.00
35.00
38.00
41.00
5.00
8.00
11.00
13.00
33.00
34.50
36.00
8.30
10.00
11.50
14.50
17.30
26.00
27.50
0.00
1.50
11.30
14.30
17.30
21.00
24.00
29.00
0.00
24.50
26.00
0.00
20.00
21.50
23.00
25.50
0.00
5.30
11.30
17.30
23.30
0.00
64.50

To
(m)
15.00
16.50
18.00
19.50
21.00
21.50
7.50
9.00
28.00
29.50
31.00
120.50
122.00
126.50
128.00
132.00
135.00
137.30
140.30
143.50
53.50
55.00
29.00
31.00
35.00
38.00
41.00
43.00
8.00
11.00
13.00
14.50
34.50
36.00
37.50
10.00
11.50
14.50
17.30
20.00
27.50
29.00
1.50
3.00
14.30
17.30
21.00
24.00
27.00
32.50
3.00
26.00
27.50
5.30
21.50
23.00
25.50
29.30
5.30
11.30
17.30
20.50
27.00
3.00
66.00

greater than
50% rec
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no

LabJobNumber

SampleID

GU12085538
GU12085538
GU12085538
GU12085538
GU12085538
GU12085538
GU12086371
GU12086371
GU12086373
GU12086373
GU12086373
GU12082204
GU12082204
GU12082204
GU12082204
GU12082204
GU12082204
GU12082204
GU12082204
GU12082204
ZA12088136
ZA12088136
GU12074338
GU12074338
GU12074338
GU12074338
GU12074338
GU12074338
ZA12090066
ZA12090066
ZA12090066
ZA12090066
ZA12088132
ZA12088132
ZA12088132
ZA12090068
ZA12090068
ZA12090068
ZA12090068
ZA12090068
ZA12090068
ZA12090068
GU12094344
GU12094344
GU12094344
GU12094344
GU12094344
GU12094344
GU12094344
GU12094344
ZA12090060
GU12094345
GU12094345
ZA12096024
ZA12096024
ZA12096024
ZA12096024
ZA12096024
ZA12096023
ZA12096023
ZA12096023
ZA12096023
ZA12096023
GU12094349
GU12094520

163084
163085
163086
163087
163088
163089
164092
164093
163180
163181
163182
167293
167294
167297
167298
167299
167301
167302
167303
167304
164187
164188
163242
163243
163244
163245
163246
163247
167325
167326
167327
167328
163319
163320
163321
167370
167371
167372
167373
167374
167381
167382
167391
167392
167393
167394
167395
167396
167397
167399
164369
163476
163477
167437
167450
167451
167452
167453
167456
167457
167458
167459
167462
163491
163552

Au_Plot Ag_ppm Cu_ppm As_ppm Mo_ppm Zn_ppm


0.09
0.12
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.17
0.10
0.07
0.04
0.02
0.07
0.10
0.06
0.06
0.07
0.14
0.04
0.12
0.08
0.15
0.05
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.01
1.26
0.09
0.07
0.14
0.20
0.02
0.13
0.06
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.11
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.12
0.35
0.34
0.01
0.29
0.12
0.14

4.00
25.00
48.00
94.00
48.00
9.00
6.00
7.00
3.00
2.00
3.00
6.00
7.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
3.00
10.00
3.00
20.00
9.00
3.00
24.00
1.00
1.00
4.00
79.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
9.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
3.00
6.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
0.50
3.00
0.50
1.00
6.00
5.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
3.00
1.00
29.00
12.00

243
379
330
401
267
78.3
1
1.4
979
739
211
168
254
14.1
32.2
174.5
49.3
356
91.2
279
14.2
24.4
119.5
4.9
5.9
81.2
52.7
7.8
10.8
3.2
3.1
3.8
2
4.3
3.4
18.9
22.7
36.8
5.9
9.5
7.5
5.4
4.9
9.1
26
38.3
34.9
40
55.3
97.3
54.6
19.9
16.3
5.8
49.4
43
50.2
85.4
18.7
9.9
20.3
84.5
82.4
16.2
21.7

76.6
93.9
79.9
80.5
87.1
270
18.1
13.2
49.7
54.7
144.5
23.8
17.8
14.4
20.4
27.2
20.6
59.9
43.1
59.6
27.9
43.2
10.9
7.6
17
22.5
30.4
26.3
65
140
290
362
60.5
80.3
95.6
59.9
139.5
128
73.2
148
62.4
122.5
51.2
76.5
47.4
49.2
48.1
47.4
65.5
361
24.3
65.1
97.4
88.1
50.7
61.4
140.5
155
154.5
112
133.5
49
197.5
168.5
16.2

18.45
14.1
8.46
6.17
5.88
5.71
1.27
1.19
14.4
17.35
14.4
7.96
6.71
5.39
8.09
5.2
5.7
25.7
7.81
9.71
9.07
12.25
38.1
1.82
3.27
4.61
4.02
3.83
2.7
1.88
2.62
3.92
1.63
1.09
1.16
4.67
7.37
2.61
2.86
2.87
0.94
1.25
6.14
5.07
2.41
3.51
1.95
2.81
2.36
2.56
1.06
1.97
1.43
5.75
1.71
1.93
2.65
2.46
14.85
10.95
9.19
1.82
6.15
2.38
3.84

28
198
83
20
12
96
1
1
317
20
5
3370
1560
28
7
13
10
27
8
200
8
14
25
1
1
2
1
1
221
57
70
92
2
2
2
82
111
262
138
161
1980
1040
10
11
77
93
107
135
181
1700
201
332
336
10
329
257
165
212
19
13
21
128
97
9
4

Dupe
Test
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


169

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

IN-12-257
IN-12-257
IN-12-258
IN-12-258
IN-12-258
IN-12-258
IN-12-258
IN-12-258
IN-12-258
IN-12-258
IN-12-258
IN-12-259
IN-12-259
IN-12-260
IN-12-260
IN-12-260
IN-12-260
IN-12-260
IN-12-261
IN-12-261
IN-12-261
IN-12-261
IN-12-263
IN-12-263
IN-12-265
IN-12-265
IN-12-265
IN-12-265
IN-12-265
IN-12-269
IN-12-269
IN-12-269
IN-12-269
IN-12-269
IN-12-270
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-271
IN-12-272

From
(m)
66.00
67.10
0.00
4.00
5.30
11.00
14.30
17.30
21.15
26.30
28.40
0.00
1.50
0.00
2.00
4.00
5.30
6.40
0.00
3.00
6.00
8.30
26.00
27.60
0.00
3.50
6.00
8.30
10.00
0.00
5.30
11.30
20.30
23.30
71.50
0.00
1.80
5.00
7.00
13.00
20.00
22.00
23.00
24.00
25.00
26.00
27.00
28.50
30.00
32.00
34.00
36.00
38.00
40.00
9.00

To
(m)
67.10
70.15
4.00
5.30
11.00
14.30
17.30
21.15
23.30
28.40
30.00
1.50
3.00
2.00
4.00
5.30
6.40
8.30
3.00
6.00
8.30
11.30
27.60
30.00
3.50
6.00
8.30
10.00
11.30
5.30
6.00
14.30
23.30
26.30
73.20
1.80
3.00
7.00
13.00
18.00
22.00
23.00
24.00
25.00
26.00
27.00
28.50
30.00
32.00
34.00
36.00
38.00
40.00
41.30
12.00

greater than
50% rec
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no

LabJobNumber

SampleID

GU12094520
GU12094520
ZA12096025
ZA12096025
ZA12096025
ZA12096025
ZA12096025
ZA12096025
ZA12096025
ZA12096025
ZA12096025
ZA12096026
ZA12096026
ZA12096400
ZA12096400
ZA12096400
ZA12096400
ZA12096400
ZA12098789
ZA12098789
ZA12098789
ZA12098789
ZA12098840
ZA12098840
ZA12098841
ZA12098841
ZA12098841
ZA12098841
ZA12098841
ZA12102739
ZA12102739
ZA12102739
ZA12102739
ZA12102739
ZA12102804
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099533
HE12099531

163553
163554
167466
167467
167468
167469
167470
167471
167472
167476
167477
164531
164532
167488
167489
167490
167491
167492
167507
167508
167509
167510
167556
167557
167565
167566
167567
167568
167569
167623
167624
167630
167637
167638
164881
167713
167714
167717
167718
167719
167722
167723
167724
167725
167726
167727
167728
167729
167730
167731
167732
167733
167734
167735
167769

Au_Plot Ag_ppm Cu_ppm As_ppm Mo_ppm Zn_ppm


0.62
0.28
0.12
0.05
0.16
0.06
0.28
0.22
0.18
0.77
0.36
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.06
0.10
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.28
0.39
0.12
0.07
0.16
0.36
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.34
1.10
0.41
0.50
0.72
0.64
2.22
3.15
0.25
0.20
0.12
0.09
0.23
0.87
0.08
0.08
0.15
0.28
0.23
0.14
0.33

13.00
11.00
9.00
0.50
9.00
5.00
3.00
5.00
5.00
17.00
3.00
1.00
0.50
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
2.00
0.50
5.00
10.00
5.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
7.00
8.00
11.00
17.00
18.00
22.00
15.00
27.00
0.50
1.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
9.00
6.00
3.00
0.50
2.00

27.4
34.9
19
17.1
16.5
7.8
5.3
5.5
4.1
22.3
14.3
5.2
4.9
16.3
14.1
11.5
7.1
15.6
38.9
66.5
63.2
70.5
31
27.8
3.2
8.8
13.2
6.9
5.8
10.3
11.4
17.1
14.1
37.8
31.8
4.6
7.7
6.2
10.1
16.7
114.5
32.2
48.8
34
49.8
20.1
51.3
14.9
6.6
3.8
4.5
6.9
8.2
3.4
8.4

139.5
67.7
222
289
75.6
123
69.1
122
119.5
616
442
523
409
123
132
82.4
173.5
230
188.5
381
293
325
107
303
32.4
100
309
76.1
180
165
69.7
59.3
20.8
33.8
105
248
169
93.2
111
368
471
1025
96.9
99.5
118.5
48
194
190
96.6
105.5
108.5
117
81.4
69.6
441

5.71
3.17
8.16
9.91
8.33
9.54
8.86
7.47
13.25
13.65
1.42
5.54
4.76
1.41
1.63
11.6
3.14
4.52
4.89
3.59
4.94
1.83
0.53
6.9
3.02
2.49
2.64
3.02
3.98
6.63
3.19
1.17
1.1
1.95
13.25
6.61
5.89
6.91
7.19
11.65
8.18
11
2.29
2.29
2.08
1.84
2.16
4.69
4.3
4.38
4.97
5.96
3.27
3.23
4.1

4
10
27
4
36
17
7
16
10
186
453
16
10
42
88
32
37
45
55
162
132
131
118
267
2
2
10
22
23
12
86
152
106
236
134
7
6
1
6
191
12
11
6
43
58
88
21
11
3
1
3
21
11
19
61

Dupe
Test
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


170

Appendix 12.2 RC samples not used for Resource


estimation
DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

INR-12-735
INR-12-738
RC-05-12
RC-05-12
RC-05-12
RC-05-13
RC-05-13
RC-05-13
RC-05-14
RC-05-14
RC-05-14
RC-05-14
RC-05-14
RC-05-14
RC-06-15
RC-06-15
RC-06-15
RC-06-15
RC-06-15
RC-06-15
RC-06-15
RC-06-15
RC-06-15
RC-06-15
RC-06-15
RC-06-15
RC-06-15
RC-06-16
RC-06-16
RC-06-16
RC-06-16
RC-06-16
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-17
RC-06-18
RC-06-18
RC-06-18
RC-06-18
RC-06-18
RC-06-18
RC-06-18
RC-06-19
RC-06-19
RC-06-19
RC-06-19
RC-06-19
RC-06-19
RC-06-19

From
(m)

To
(m)

3.05
0.00
9.14
172.21
181.36
3.05
126.49
131.06
184.40
187.45
225.55
240.79
243.84
249.94
4.57
24.38
25.91
28.96
45.72
51.82
118.87
181.36
205.74
211.84
217.93
242.32
243.84
3.05
36.58
123.44
141.73
161.54
3.05
6.10
74.68
76.20
77.72
79.25
80.77
91.44
97.54
102.11
105.16
111.25
112.78
114.30
115.82
141.73
143.26
144.78
149.35
3.05
4.57
129.54
132.59
135.64
144.78
153.92
4.57
9.14
33.53
38.10
187.45
190.50
193.55

4.57
1.52
10.67
173.74
182.88
4.57
128.02
132.59
185.93
188.98
227.08
242.32
245.36
251.46
6.10
25.91
27.43
30.48
47.24
53.34
120.40
182.88
207.26
213.36
219.46
243.84
245.36
4.57
38.10
124.97
143.26
163.07
4.57
7.62
76.20
77.72
79.25
80.77
82.30
92.96
99.06
103.63
106.68
112.78
114.30
115.82
117.35
143.26
144.78
146.30
150.88
4.57
6.10
131.06
134.11
137.16
146.30
155.45
6.10
10.67
35.05
39.62
188.98
192.02
195.07

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

169185
169303
637707
637817
637824
637403
637487
637490
637635
637637
637663
637673
637675
637679
668504
668517
668518
668520
668531
668535
668582
668624
668641
668645
668649
668666
668667
668685
668708
668767
668779
668793
668819
668821
668868
668869
668870
668871
668872
668879
668884
668887
668889
668893
668894
668895
668896
668914
668915
668916
668919
668933
668934
669020
669022
669024
669030
669036
669071
669074
669091
669094
669196
669198
669201

CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

1.80
2.80
1.72
1.68
2.80
1.96
2.78
2.20
2.24
2.70
1.96
2.46
2.12
2.56
1.74
2.20
2.52
2.14
1.84
2.08
2.58
2.70
1.88
1.62
1.06
2.06
1.78
1.36
2.54
2.60
1.20
2.82
1.06
1.82
2.38
2.08
1.44
2.52
0.09
2.76
2.72
0.09
0.68
1.22
0.26
2.50
2.08
0.20
1.02
2.66
2.90
1.90
0.18
2.00
2.34
2.54
1.96
2.04
2.20
2.62
0.13
0.13
1.72
2.12
2.52

0.028
0.080
0.032
0.063
0.075
0.003
0.316
0.024
3.050
0.265
0.264
0.320
0.113
0.099
0.003
0.124
2.530
0.967
0.049
1.255
0.061
0.029
0.015
0.008
0.005
0.024
0.008
0.060
0.210
0.095
0.283
0.220
0.511
0.375
0.154
0.180
0.197
0.190
0.309
0.281
0.160
0.254
0.258
0.268
0.251
0.498
0.895
1.130
0.810
0.901
2.010
0.006
0.069
0.053
0.010
0.010
0.024
0.017
0.181
0.946
0.318
0.312
0.073
0.083
0.106

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

7.20
11.20
6.88
6.72
11.20
7.84
11.12
8.80
8.96
10.80
7.84
9.84
8.48
10.24
6.96
8.80
10.08
8.56
7.36
8.32
10.32
10.80
7.52
6.48
4.24
8.24
7.12
5.44
10.16
10.40
4.80
11.28
4.24
7.28
9.52
8.32
5.76
10.08
0.36
11.04
10.88
0.36
2.72
4.88
1.04
10.00
8.32
0.80
4.08
10.64
11.60
7.60
0.72
8.00
9.36
10.16
7.84
8.16
8.80
10.48
0.52
0.52
6.88
8.48
10.08

4.74
7.37
4.50
4.39
7.37
5.16
7.27
5.75
5.86
7.06
5.12
6.43
5.58
6.74
4.55
5.75
6.63
5.63
4.84
5.47
6.75
7.11
4.95
4.26
2.77
5.42
4.68
3.58
6.68
6.80
3.14
7.37
2.79
4.79
6.26
5.47
3.76
6.63
0.24
7.26
7.16
0.24
1.79
3.19
0.68
6.58
5.44
0.52
2.68
7.00
7.58
5.00
0.47
5.26
6.16
6.68
5.16
5.33
5.75
6.85
0.34
0.34
4.50
5.58
6.63

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


171

DataSet

Hole_ID

From
(m)

To
(m)

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-06-19
RC-06-20
RC-06-20
RC-06-20
RC-06-26
RC-06-26
RC-06-29
RC-06-29
RC-06-29
RC-06-29
RC-06-29
RC-06-29
RC-06-29
RC-06-29
RC-06-29
RC-06-29
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-30
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-31
RC-06-32
RC-06-32
RC-06-32
RC-06-32
RC-06-32

196.60
22.86
68.58
147.83
1.52
6.10
3.05
4.57
6.10
32.00
33.53
35.05
54.86
67.06
71.63
105.16
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
15.24
18.29
21.34
25.91
36.58
39.62
42.67
44.20
59.44
60.96
62.48
70.10
71.63
74.68
80.77
3.05
4.57
6.10
10.67
15.24
18.29
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
39.62
41.15
44.20
45.72
48.77
50.29
53.34
54.86
59.44
64.01
74.68
54.86
62.48
64.01
68.58
70.10

198.12
24.38
70.10
149.35
3.05
7.62
4.57
6.10
7.62
33.53
35.05
36.58
56.39
68.58
73.15
106.68
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
16.76
19.81
22.86
27.43
38.10
41.15
44.20
45.72
60.96
62.48
64.01
71.63
73.15
76.20
82.30
4.57
6.10
7.62
12.19
16.76
19.81
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
41.15
42.67
45.72
47.24
50.29
51.82
54.86
56.39
60.96
65.53
76.20
56.39
64.01
68.58
70.10
71.63

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

669203
669232
669264
669318
670208
670211
681003
681004
681005
681023
681024
681025
681038
681048
681051
681073
681098
681099
681100
681101
681102
681103
681104
681106
681108
681110
681113
681120
681122
681124
681126
681136
681137
681138
681144
681145
681147
681151
681165
681166
681167
681170
681173
681175
681183
681184
681185
681186
681187
681190
681192
681194
681195
681197
681198
681200
681201
681204
681207
681214
681260
681265
681266
681267
681268

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

2.16
0.10
0.13
2.02
1.54
2.74
1.30
2.64
2.36
1.86
1.66
1.70
1.68
2.22
2.00
1.40
2.40
1.90
1.84
2.06
2.06
1.30
2.64
1.44
1.30
2.48
2.36
1.82
1.66
2.28
1.70
1.48
2.22
2.74
2.72
2.64
2.26
2.62
1.06
1.70
2.70
2.40
2.64
1.78
1.44
2.56
0.46
1.26
2.54
2.86
2.08
2.04
0.78
1.12
2.36
1.96
1.54
2.24
2.24
2.44
2.26
2.84
3.12
2.26
1.82

0.060
0.503
0.248
0.102
1.145
0.725
0.787
0.595
0.414
0.288
0.305
0.092
0.527
0.250
0.186
0.184
0.210
0.123
0.137
0.043
0.071
0.054
0.061
0.049
0.068
0.045
0.076
0.159
0.016
0.038
0.061
0.093
0.263
0.148
0.090
0.153
0.134
0.379
0.125
0.075
0.048
0.024
0.303
0.207
0.787
0.701
0.620
1.510
0.297
0.292
0.200
0.153
0.197
0.227
0.196
0.100
0.093
3.090
2.070
0.186
0.262
0.141
0.257
0.234
0.190

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

8.64
0.40
0.52
8.08
6.16
10.96
5.20
10.56
9.44
7.44
6.64
6.80
6.72
8.88
8.00
5.60
9.60
7.60
7.36
8.24
8.24
5.20
10.56
5.76
5.20
9.92
9.44
7.28
6.64
9.12
6.80
5.92
8.88
10.96
10.88
10.56
9.04
10.48
4.24
6.80
10.80
9.60
10.56
7.12
5.76
10.24
1.84
5.04
10.16
11.44
8.32
8.16
3.12
4.48
9.44
7.84
6.16
8.96
8.96
9.76
9.04
11.36
12.48
9.04
7.28

5.68
0.26
0.34
5.32
4.03
7.21
3.42
6.90
6.21
4.86
4.37
4.44
4.39
5.84
5.26
3.68
6.32
4.97
4.84
5.42
5.39
3.42
6.90
3.79
3.42
6.53
6.21
4.79
4.34
5.96
4.47
3.89
5.84
7.16
7.11
6.95
5.95
6.85
2.79
4.44
7.11
6.32
6.95
4.68
3.79
6.74
1.20
3.32
6.64
7.48
5.47
5.37
2.05
2.95
6.17
5.16
4.03
5.89
5.89
6.42
5.91
7.42
2.73
5.95
4.76

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


172

DataSet

Hole_ID

From
(m)

To
(m)

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-06-32
RC-06-32
RC-06-32
RC-06-32
RC-06-32
RC-06-32
RC-06-32
RC-06-32
RC-06-33
RC-06-33
RC-06-33
RC-06-33
RC-06-33
RC-06-33
RC-06-33
RC-06-34
RC-06-34
RC-06-34
RC-06-34
RC-06-34
RC-06-34
RC-06-35
RC-06-35
RC-06-35
RC-06-35
RC-06-35
RC-06-35
RC-06-35
RC-06-35
RC-06-35
RC-06-35
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-36
RC-06-37
RC-06-37
RC-06-37
RC-06-37
RC-06-37
RC-06-37
RC-06-37
RC-06-37
RC-06-37
RC-06-37
RC-06-37

79.25
83.82
85.34
92.96
94.49
96.01
99.06
102.11
1.52
3.05
25.91
36.58
65.53
70.10
96.01
3.05
10.67
13.72
16.76
59.44
68.58
3.05
21.34
22.86
28.96
54.86
59.44
62.48
91.44
94.49
96.01
3.05
15.24
16.76
62.48
64.01
67.06
70.10
73.15
74.68
76.20
77.72
82.30
86.87
91.44
92.96
94.49
96.01
97.54
99.06
100.58
102.11
103.63
105.16
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
13.72
15.24
18.29
22.86
28.96

80.77
85.34
86.87
94.49
96.01
97.54
100.58
103.63
3.05
4.57
27.43
38.10
67.06
71.63
97.54
4.57
12.19
15.24
18.29
60.96
70.10
4.57
22.86
24.38
30.48
56.39
60.96
64.01
92.96
96.01
97.54
4.57
16.76
18.29
64.01
65.53
68.58
71.63
74.68
76.20
77.72
79.25
83.82
88.39
92.96
94.49
96.01
97.54
99.06
100.58
102.11
103.63
105.16
106.68
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
15.24
16.76
19.81
24.38
30.48

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

681274
681277
681278
681284
681285
681286
681288
681290
681304
681305
681320
681327
681348
681351
681368
681388
681393
681395
681397
681425
681431
681435
681449
681450
681454
681471
681474
681477
681497
681499
681500
681513
681521
681522
681553
681554
681556
681558
681560
681561
681562
681563
681566
681569
681572
681573
681574
681575
681576
681577
681578
681579
681581
681582
681586
681587
681588
681589
681590
681591
681593
681594
681596
681599
681603

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

1.88
1.72
1.42
1.14
2.00
1.46
1.96
2.74
2.74
2.54
2.76
2.72
2.82
2.90
1.56
2.80
2.10
2.00
2.60
0.13
0.10
2.44
2.78
2.12
2.80
2.64
2.48
2.22
2.58
1.88
2.56
2.82
2.46
2.32
1.60
1.08
1.72
1.16
2.74
1.76
2.72
2.26
2.54
2.42
2.10
2.28
2.32
1.76
2.78
2.62
2.56
2.00
2.50
2.58
1.36
2.28
1.40
2.42
2.54
2.22
2.06
1.72
1.94
2.38
1.14

0.117
0.833
0.224
0.185
0.219
1.555
0.452
0.294
1.475
0.248
0.223
0.525
0.695
0.346
0.159
0.115
0.050
0.271
0.151
0.306
0.253
0.210
0.434
1.370
0.275
0.103
12.300
0.246
0.230
0.205
0.338
0.149
0.748
0.705
1.315
3.140
0.238
0.076
0.044
0.082
0.074
0.645
0.090
0.245
0.133
0.094
0.133
0.063
0.039
0.069
0.024
0.037
0.083
0.050
0.240
0.263
0.065
0.106
0.063
0.077
0.127
0.067
0.040
0.027
0.046

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

7.52
6.88
5.68
4.56
8.00
5.84
7.84
10.96
10.96
10.16
11.04
10.88
11.28
11.60
6.24
11.20
8.40
8.00
10.40
0.52
0.40
9.76
11.12
8.48
11.20
10.56
9.92
8.88
10.32
7.52
10.24
11.28
9.84
9.28
6.40
4.32
6.88
4.64
10.96
7.04
10.88
9.04
10.16
9.68
8.40
9.12
9.28
7.04
11.12
10.48
10.24
8.00
10.00
10.32
5.44
9.12
5.60
9.68
10.16
8.88
8.24
6.88
7.76
9.52
4.56

4.95
4.53
3.71
2.98
5.26
3.82
5.16
7.21
7.16
6.68
7.26
7.16
7.37
7.58
4.08
7.37
5.53
5.26
6.80
0.34
0.26
6.42
7.32
5.58
7.37
6.90
6.53
5.80
6.79
4.95
6.69
7.42
6.47
6.07
4.18
2.84
4.53
3.03
7.16
4.63
7.16
5.91
6.68
6.37
5.53
5.96
6.11
4.60
7.32
6.89
6.69
5.26
6.54
6.79
3.58
5.96
3.68
6.37
6.64
5.84
5.42
4.53
5.11
6.26
3.00

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


173

DataSet

Hole_ID

From
(m)

To
(m)

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-06-37
RC-06-37
RC-06-38
RC-06-38
RC-06-38
RC-06-38
RC-06-38
RC-06-38
RC-06-39
RC-06-39
RC-06-40
RC-06-40
RC-06-40
RC-06-41
RC-06-41
RC-06-41
RC-06-41
RC-06-42
RC-06-42
RC-06-43
RC-06-43
RC-06-43
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-45
RC-06-45
RC-06-45
RC-06-45
RC-06-45
RC-06-45
RC-06-45

35.05
39.62
10.67
12.19
33.53
97.54
114.30
115.82
4.57
68.58
22.86
36.58
42.67
4.57
62.48
64.01
83.82
74.68
76.20
24.38
25.91
59.44
3.05
4.57
6.10
12.19
13.72
19.81
22.86
71.63
73.15
76.20
77.72
80.77
83.82
85.34
86.87
88.39
96.01
99.06
100.58
102.11
103.63
105.16
106.68
108.20
112.78
114.30
115.82
118.87
120.40
121.92
123.44
126.49
144.78
150.88
153.92
156.97
3.05
71.63
82.30
86.87
88.39
89.92
135.64

36.58
41.15
12.19
13.72
35.05
99.06
115.82
117.35
6.10
70.10
24.38
38.10
44.20
6.10
64.01
65.53
85.34
76.20
77.72
25.91
27.43
60.96
4.57
6.10
7.62
13.72
15.24
21.34
24.38
73.15
74.68
77.72
79.25
82.30
85.34
86.87
88.39
89.92
97.54
100.58
102.11
103.63
105.16
106.68
108.20
109.73
114.30
115.82
117.35
120.40
121.92
123.44
124.97
128.02
146.30
152.40
155.45
158.50
4.57
73.15
83.82
88.39
89.92
91.44
137.16

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

681607
681610
681683
681684
681698
681743
681755
681756
681808
681852
681924
681933
681937
681986
715025
715026
715039
715096
715097
715123
715124
715148
715154
715155
715156
715160
715161
715165
715167
715200
715202
715204
715205
715207
715209
715210
715211
715212
715217
715219
715220
715221
715222
715223
715224
715226
715229
715230
715231
715233
715234
715235
715236
715238
715252
715256
715258
715260
715266
715313
715320
715323
715324
715325
715356

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

2.90
2.60
2.64
2.08
2.46
2.74
0.84
1.92
2.34
1.48
2.66
2.62
2.68
2.68
1.94
2.86
2.60
0.14
0.06
2.48
2.84
2.84
1.84
2.40
2.18
2.80
2.88
2.18
2.82
0.07
0.10
2.88
0.10
0.13
0.12
0.08
0.05
2.48
1.06
0.13
1.78
2.30
0.10
0.12
0.12
0.11
0.13
2.80
1.62
2.54
2.56
2.76
2.48
2.66
2.84
0.15
2.82
1.24
2.42
1.38
0.11
2.78
1.34
2.46
2.42

0.598
0.962
0.126
0.363
0.407
4.920
2.340
1.610
0.410
0.196
1.465
0.293
0.080
1.580
0.340
0.242
0.176
0.275
0.229
1.555
0.680
0.579
0.438
0.320
0.301
0.185
0.592
0.047
0.163
3.240
4.770
2.890
6.220
7.190
6.660
11.400
7.590
3.790
3.310
2.770
2.030
2.440
2.040
2.220
2.470
3.990
1.870
1.490
1.100
0.615
0.928
0.603
0.769
0.667
1.015
0.938
0.382
0.253
0.180
0.379
0.244
0.106
0.128
0.140
0.243

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

11.60
10.40
10.56
8.32
9.84
10.96
3.36
7.68
9.36
5.92
10.64
10.48
10.72
10.72
7.76
11.44
10.40
0.56
0.24
9.92
11.36
11.36
7.36
9.60
8.72
11.20
11.52
8.72
11.28
0.28
0.40
11.52
0.40
0.52
0.48
0.32
0.20
9.92
4.24
0.52
7.12
9.20
0.40
0.48
0.48
0.44
0.52
11.20
6.48
10.16
10.24
11.04
9.92
10.64
11.36
0.60
11.28
4.96
9.68
5.52
0.44
11.12
5.36
9.84
9.68

7.58
6.80
6.95
5.44
6.47
7.21
2.21
5.02
6.12
3.89
7.00
6.89
7.01
7.01
5.07
7.53
6.84
0.37
0.16
6.48
7.47
7.47
4.84
6.27
5.74
7.32
7.58
5.70
7.42
0.18
0.26
7.58
0.26
0.34
0.32
0.21
0.13
6.48
2.77
0.34
4.65
6.05
0.26
0.32
0.32
0.29
0.34
7.37
4.24
6.64
6.74
7.26
6.48
6.95
7.47
0.39
7.37
3.24
6.37
3.63
0.29
7.32
3.50
6.47
6.37

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


174

DataSet

Hole_ID

From
(m)

To
(m)

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-06-46
RC-06-46
RC-06-46
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-48
RC-06-48
RC-06-48
RC-06-48
RC-06-48
RC-06-48
RC-06-48
RC-06-49
RC-06-50
RC-06-51
RC-06-51
RC-06-51
RC-06-51
RC-06-51
RC-06-51
RC-06-51
RC-06-51
RC-06-51
RC-06-51

3.05
47.24
50.29
30.48
32.00
35.05
36.58
38.10
56.39
57.91
59.44
60.96
71.63
74.68
77.72
79.25
80.77
82.30
83.82
88.39
89.92
91.44
92.96
94.49
96.01
97.54
99.06
100.58
102.11
103.63
105.16
106.68
108.20
109.73
111.25
112.78
114.30
115.82
117.35
118.87
126.49
128.02
129.54
134.11
138.68
146.30
51.82
76.20
97.54
99.06
111.25
141.73
143.26
65.53
62.48
3.05
12.19
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
28.96
33.53

4.57
48.77
51.82
32.00
33.53
36.58
38.10
39.62
57.91
59.44
60.96
62.48
73.15
76.20
79.25
80.77
82.30
83.82
85.34
89.92
91.44
92.96
94.49
96.01
97.54
99.06
100.58
102.11
103.63
105.16
106.68
108.20
109.73
111.25
112.78
114.30
115.82
117.35
118.87
120.40
128.02
129.54
131.06
135.64
140.21
147.83
53.34
77.72
99.06
100.58
112.78
143.26
144.78
67.06
64.01
4.57
13.72
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
30.48
35.05

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

715362
715392
715395
715403
715404
715406
715407
715408
715421
715422
715423
715424
715431
715433
715435
715436
715437
715438
715439
715443
715444
715445
715446
715447
715448
715449
715450
715451
715452
715453
715454
715455
715456
715457
715458
715459
715460
715461
715462
715463
715468
715469
715470
715473
715476
715481
684020
684036
684051
684052
684060
684081
684082
684137
684198
684220
684226
684230
684231
684232
684233
684234
684235
684237
684240

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

2.56
2.86
1.68
2.86
1.78
1.10
1.40
2.50
2.28
0.86
2.36
2.88
2.48
1.66
1.70
1.28
0.98
0.76
2.22
1.70
2.26
0.09
0.76
1.56
1.82
1.70
0.58
2.78
2.52
1.78
2.30
1.86
1.50
1.98
2.40
1.80
0.84
0.40
0.48
2.26
2.30
2.78
2.68
2.38
2.64
2.76
0.14
0.16
0.12
0.17
2.20
0.14
2.38
2.78
2.70
2.68
2.76
2.36
2.90
2.30
1.36
2.54
2.10
2.82
2.56

0.343
2.080
3.200
0.447
0.363
0.267
0.041
0.014
3.810
7.170
5.120
3.860
1.060
0.261
0.301
0.219
0.219
0.227
0.404
1.030
0.630
0.518
0.445
0.414
0.502
0.325
0.461
0.209
0.160
0.129
0.106
0.057
0.036
0.026
0.024
0.026
0.054
0.035
0.073
0.041
0.015
0.046
0.078
0.047
0.059
0.136
0.735
0.678
0.201
0.221
0.103
0.286
0.166
0.076
0.047
0.083
0.242
0.031
0.057
0.030
0.072
0.036
0.100
0.274
0.035

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

10.24
11.44
6.72
11.44
7.12
4.40
5.60
10.00
9.12
3.44
9.44
11.52
9.92
6.64
6.80
5.12
3.92
3.04
8.88
6.80
9.04
0.36
3.04
6.24
7.28
6.80
2.32
11.12
10.08
7.12
9.20
7.44
6.00
7.92
9.60
7.20
3.36
1.60
1.92
9.04
9.20
11.12
10.72
9.52
10.56
11.04
0.56
0.64
0.48
0.68
8.80
0.56
9.52
11.12
10.80
10.72
11.04
9.44
11.60
9.20
5.44
10.16
8.40
11.28
10.24

6.74
7.48
4.39
7.53
4.65
2.88
3.68
6.58
6.00
2.25
6.21
7.58
6.53
4.37
4.44
3.37
2.56
2.00
5.84
4.44
5.95
0.24
1.99
4.11
4.76
4.47
1.53
7.27
6.63
4.65
6.05
4.89
3.92
5.21
6.27
4.74
2.21
1.05
1.26
5.91
6.01
7.32
7.05
6.22
6.90
7.22
0.37
0.42
0.32
0.45
5.75
0.37
6.26
7.27
7.06
7.05
7.22
6.21
7.58
6.05
3.58
6.64
5.53
7.42
6.74

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


175

DataSet

Hole_ID

From
(m)

To
(m)

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-06-51
RC-06-51
RC-06-51
RC-06-52
RC-06-52
RC-06-52
RC-06-56
RC-06-56
RC-06-56
RC-06-56
RC-06-57
RC-06-57
RC-06-58
RC-06-58
RC-06-58
RC-06-60
RC-06-60
RC-06-60
RC-06-60
RC-06-60
RC-06-60
RC-06-60
RC-06-60
RC-06-60
RC-06-60
RC-06-60
RC-06-61
RC-06-61
RC-06-61
RC-06-61
RC-06-61
RC-06-61
RC-06-62
RC-06-62
RC-06-62
RC-06-62
RC-06-62
RC-06-62
RC-06-63
RC-06-63
RC-06-64
RC-06-64
RC-06-64
RC-06-64
RC-06-64
RC-06-64
RC-06-64
RC-06-64
RC-06-64
RC-06-64
RC-06-64
RC-06-64
RC-06-64
RC-06-65
RC-06-65
RC-06-65
RC-06-65
RC-06-65
RC-06-65
RC-06-65
RC-06-65
RC-06-66
RC-06-67
RC-06-67
RC-06-67

44.20
45.72
60.96
6.10
7.62
9.14
48.77
50.29
51.82
62.48
9.14
16.76
9.14
16.76
19.81
9.14
10.67
15.24
22.86
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
33.53
35.05
36.58
18.29
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
83.82
3.05
4.57
7.62
12.19
13.72
15.24
3.05
6.10
71.63
77.72
85.34
88.39
91.44
97.54
100.58
102.11
103.63
106.68
108.20
112.78
137.16
42.67
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
57.91
60.96
108.20
3.05
3.05
4.57
30.48

45.72
47.24
62.48
7.62
9.14
10.67
50.29
51.82
53.34
64.01
10.67
18.29
10.67
18.29
21.34
10.67
12.19
16.76
24.38
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
35.05
36.58
38.10
19.81
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
85.34
4.57
6.10
9.14
13.72
15.24
16.76
4.57
7.62
73.15
79.25
86.87
89.92
92.96
99.06
102.11
103.63
105.16
108.20
109.73
114.30
138.68
44.20
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
59.44
62.48
109.73
4.57
4.57
6.10
32.00

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

684248
684249
684260
684282
684283
684284
684524
684525
684526
684534
684547
684552
684577
684583
684585
684638
684639
684643
684648
684650
684651
684652
684653
684654
684656
684657
684678
684702
684703
684704
684705
684723
680903
680904
680906
684735
684736
684737
684825
684827
684929
684933
684938
684941
684944
684948
684950
684951
684952
684954
684955
684958
684974
753007
753012
753013
753014
753015
753017
753019
753051
753081
753141
753142
753160

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

2.20
2.34
2.88
1.66
1.44
1.92
1.34
2.58
2.70
0.14
2.02
2.84
2.70
2.48
2.52
1.46
1.08
0.72
0.38
0.34
1.04
2.14
0.32
1.46
1.28
1.80
1.50
2.52
1.96
1.50
2.60
1.92
2.02
2.74
2.40
2.62
1.82
1.74
1.60
2.68
0.13
0.13
0.12
0.14
0.11
0.10
0.08
0.11
0.12
0.10
0.11
0.07
0.07
2.40
2.34
0.09
1.86
2.78
2.38
2.20
0.08
2.66
2.40
2.34
1.74

0.027
0.005
0.116
0.632
0.778
0.793
0.164
0.040
0.149
0.429
0.160
0.054
0.689
0.554
0.401
0.347
0.687
0.362
0.330
0.304
0.170
0.486
0.326
5.390
4.920
9.490
0.115
1.475
4.490
3.550
3.910
0.059
0.033
0.022
0.006
0.006
0.008
0.012
0.556
0.220
0.555
0.683
0.927
3.330
2.320
3.220
2.460
2.380
1.895
9.250
4.940
0.719
0.499
0.813
0.257
0.443
0.113
0.179
0.147
0.159
0.332
0.704
0.197
0.060
0.110

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

8.80
9.36
11.52
6.64
5.76
7.68
5.36
10.32
10.80
0.56
8.08
11.36
10.80
9.92
10.08
5.84
4.32
2.88
1.52
1.36
4.16
8.56
1.28
5.84
5.12
7.20
6.00
10.08
7.84
6.00
10.40
7.68
8.08
10.96
9.60
10.48
7.28
6.96
6.40
10.72
0.52
0.52
0.48
0.56
0.44
0.40
0.32
0.44
0.48
0.40
0.44
0.28
0.28
9.60
9.36
0.36
7.44
11.12
9.52
8.80
0.32
10.64
9.60
9.36
6.96

5.79
6.16
7.58
4.37
3.79
5.02
3.53
6.75
7.11
0.37
5.28
7.42
7.06
6.48
6.59
3.82
2.84
1.89
1.00
0.89
2.72
5.63
0.84
3.84
3.35
4.74
3.95
6.63
5.12
3.95
6.80
5.05
5.32
7.16
6.32
6.85
4.79
4.58
4.21
7.05
0.34
0.34
0.31
0.37
0.29
0.26
0.21
0.29
0.31
0.26
0.29
0.18
0.18
6.27
6.12
0.24
4.89
7.27
6.22
5.79
0.21
7.00
6.32
6.12
4.58

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


176

DataSet

Hole_ID

From
(m)

To
(m)

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-06-67
RC-06-67
RC-06-67
RC-06-67
RC-06-67
RC-06-67
RC-06-67
RC-06-67
RC-06-67
RC-06-67
RC-06-67
RC-06-68
RC-06-68
RC-06-68
RC-06-68
RC-06-68
RC-06-68
RC-06-68
RC-06-68
RC-06-68
RC-06-68
RC-06-68
RC-06-68
RC-06-68
RC-06-68
RC-06-68
RC-06-68
RC-06-69
RC-06-69
RC-06-69
RC-06-69
RC-06-69
RC-06-69
RC-06-69
RC-06-69
RC-06-69
RC-06-69
RC-06-69
RC-06-69
RC-06-69
RC-06-69
RC-06-70
RC-06-70
RC-06-70
RC-06-70
RC-06-70
RC-06-70
RC-06-71
RC-06-71
RC-06-71
RC-06-72
RC-06-72
RC-06-72
RC-06-72
RC-06-72
RC-06-72
RC-06-73
RC-06-73
RC-06-73
RC-06-73
RC-06-73
RC-06-73
RC-06-73
RC-06-73
RC-06-73

44.20
45.72
50.29
88.39
92.96
94.49
96.01
105.16
118.87
132.59
135.64
3.05
9.14
12.19
13.72
24.38
27.43
28.96
36.58
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
50.29
56.39
57.91
73.15
3.05
9.14
25.91
32.00
36.58
38.10
39.62
42.67
44.20
48.77
50.29
51.82
60.96
70.10
3.05
30.48
47.24
53.34
56.39
59.44
1.52
3.05
86.87
3.05
7.62
9.14
12.19
15.24
103.63
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
15.24
16.76

45.72
47.24
51.82
89.92
94.49
96.01
97.54
106.68
120.40
134.11
137.16
4.57
10.67
13.72
15.24
25.91
28.96
30.48
38.10
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
51.82
57.91
59.44
74.68
4.57
10.67
27.43
33.53
38.10
39.62
41.15
44.20
45.72
50.29
51.82
53.34
62.48
71.63
4.57
32.00
48.77
54.86
57.91
60.96
3.05
4.57
88.39
4.57
9.14
10.67
13.72
16.76
105.16
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
16.76
18.29

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

753169
753170
753173
753199
753202
753203
753204
753211
753220
753229
753231
753237
753242
753244
753246
753253
753255
753256
753261
753265
753266
753267
753268
753270
753274
753275
753286
753299
753303
753315
753319
753322
753323
753324
753326
753327
753330
753331
753332
753338
753345
753352
753371
753383
753387
753389
753391
753420
753421
753479
753494
753497
753498
753500
753502
753563
753570
753571
753572
753573
753574
753575
753576
753578
753581

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

2.74
2.24
1.66
2.18
2.02
2.68
2.82
2.08
2.74
2.12
2.20
1.62
2.76
2.80
2.84
2.88
2.20
1.82
2.86
2.72
2.70
2.74
2.74
2.64
2.72
2.36
1.38
2.12
2.48
2.74
2.80
2.44
2.80
2.50
2.54
2.70
2.70
2.34
2.88
2.76
2.90
1.96
2.78
1.90
2.56
1.98
2.88
2.20
2.64
1.96
1.88
2.58
2.38
2.72
2.62
2.84
2.10
2.18
1.90
1.64
1.92
2.62
2.04
2.46
2.14

0.890
0.889
0.027
0.047
0.153
0.428
0.385
0.075
0.098
0.009
0.003
0.497
0.114
0.085
0.071
0.104
1.095
0.119
0.283
0.100
0.101
0.095
0.050
0.033
0.026
0.027
0.017
0.027
0.155
0.150
0.208
0.158
0.168
0.131
0.172
0.122
0.115
0.157
0.210
0.136
0.196
0.042
0.374
0.140
1.865
0.206
0.080
0.318
0.224
0.054
2.870
4.320
3.080
1.545
0.114
0.032
0.345
0.286
0.213
0.202
0.179
0.358
0.244
1.065
1.635

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

10.96
8.96
6.64
8.72
8.08
10.72
11.28
8.32
10.96
8.48
8.80
6.48
11.04
11.20
11.36
11.52
8.80
7.28
11.44
10.88
10.80
10.96
10.96
10.56
10.88
9.44
5.52
8.48
9.92
10.96
11.20
9.76
11.20
10.00
10.16
10.80
10.80
9.36
11.52
11.04
11.60
7.84
11.12
7.60
10.24
7.92
11.52
8.80
10.56
7.84
7.52
10.32
9.52
10.88
10.48
11.36
8.40
8.72
7.60
6.56
7.68
10.48
8.16
9.84
8.56

7.21
5.89
4.34
5.70
5.28
7.05
7.37
5.47
7.16
5.58
5.79
4.26
7.22
7.32
7.47
7.53
5.75
4.79
7.53
7.11
7.11
7.21
7.16
6.90
7.16
6.17
3.61
5.58
6.48
7.21
7.32
6.42
7.37
6.54
6.64
7.11
7.11
6.12
7.58
7.26
7.58
5.16
7.32
4.97
6.74
5.21
7.58
5.75
6.95
5.16
4.95
6.79
6.22
7.11
6.89
7.42
5.53
5.70
5.00
4.32
5.02
6.89
5.33
6.47
5.59

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


177

DataSet

Hole_ID

From
(m)

To
(m)

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-06-73
RC-06-73
RC-06-73
RC-06-73
RC-06-73
RC-06-73
RC-06-73
RC-06-73
RC-06-73
RC-06-74
RC-06-74
RC-06-74
RC-06-74
RC-06-75
RC-06-75
RC-06-76
RC-06-76
RC-06-76
RC-06-76
RC-06-76
RC-06-76
RC-06-76
RC-06-77
RC-06-78
RC-06-78
RC-06-80
RC-06-81
RC-06-81
RC-06-81
RC-06-81
RC-06-81
RC-06-81
RC-06-81
RC-06-82
RC-06-82
RC-06-82
RC-06-82
RC-06-82
RC-06-82
RC-06-82
RC-06-82
RC-06-82
RC-06-82
RC-06-83
RC-06-83
RC-06-83
RC-06-83
RC-06-83
RC-06-83
RC-06-84
RC-06-86
RC-06-87
RC-06-88
RC-06-88
RC-06-88
RC-06-88
RC-06-88
RC-06-89
RC-06-89
RC-06-89
RC-06-89
RC-06-89
RC-06-89
RC-06-90
RC-06-90

18.29
19.81
22.86
28.96
33.53
35.05
39.62
41.15
96.01
3.05
53.34
77.72
83.82
3.05
45.72
3.05
7.62
10.67
16.76
19.81
21.34
51.82
70.10
35.05
57.91
144.78
3.05
76.20
79.25
80.77
85.34
86.87
88.39
3.05
12.19
16.76
19.81
24.38
25.91
36.58
51.82
60.96
62.48
3.05
7.62
9.14
12.19
16.76
18.29
3.05
3.05
3.05
3.05
6.10
9.14
10.67
12.19
3.05
67.06
74.68
76.20
77.72
79.25
53.34
74.68

19.81
21.34
24.38
30.48
35.05
36.58
41.15
42.67
97.54
4.57
54.86
79.25
85.34
4.57
47.24
4.57
9.14
12.19
18.29
21.34
22.86
53.34
71.63
36.58
59.44
146.30
4.57
77.72
80.77
82.30
86.87
88.39
89.92
4.57
13.72
18.29
21.34
25.91
27.43
38.10
53.34
62.48
64.01
4.57
9.14
10.67
13.72
18.29
19.81
4.57
4.57
4.57
4.57
7.62
10.67
12.19
13.72
4.57
68.58
76.20
77.72
79.25
80.77
54.86
76.20

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

753582
753583
753585
753589
753592
753593
753596
753597
753634
753663
753699
753715
753719
753725
753755
753774
753777
753779
753784
753786
753788
753808
753903
753932
753948
754129
754135
754185
754187
754188
754191
754192
754193
754238
754245
754248
754250
754253
754254
754262
754272
754278
754279
754296
754299
754300
754302
754305
754306
754309
754388
754450
754474
754477
754479
754481
754482
754511
754555
754560
754561
754562
754563
754602
754616

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

2.36
1.90
2.32
2.28
2.80
2.54
1.32
2.72
0.12
2.58
2.60
0.94
2.54
1.32
2.50
2.54
2.84
2.06
2.84
1.50
2.38
2.52
1.64
0.05
0.08
1.92
2.10
2.02
2.28
2.02
2.28
1.58
1.42
2.60
2.80
2.26
2.74
2.64
2.82
2.14
2.10
2.82
2.30
1.20
2.64
2.08
2.40
2.42
1.30
2.36
0.60
1.42
1.98
2.68
2.78
1.88
2.22
1.84
2.32
1.98
0.80
1.58
1.96
0.12
0.12

2.430
3.540
1.100
0.862
0.898
0.621
1.420
1.610
0.256
0.115
0.148
0.310
0.182
0.114
0.078
0.422
0.381
1.245
1.905
0.869
0.592
0.010
0.031
0.206
0.250
0.021
0.003
0.005
0.003
0.006
0.059
0.015
0.008
0.020
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.020
0.003
0.007
0.019
0.003
0.005
0.039
0.003
0.003
0.045
0.215
0.387
0.068
0.078
0.038
0.070
0.266
0.051
5.570
0.556
0.807
0.515
0.330
0.254
0.216

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

9.44
7.60
9.28
9.12
11.20
10.16
5.28
10.88
0.48
10.32
10.40
3.76
10.16
5.28
10.00
10.16
11.36
8.24
11.36
6.00
9.52
10.08
6.56
0.20
0.32
7.68
8.40
8.08
9.12
8.08
9.12
6.32
5.68
10.40
11.20
9.04
10.96
10.56
11.28
8.56
8.40
11.28
9.20
4.80
10.56
8.32
9.60
9.68
5.20
9.44
2.40
5.68
7.92
10.72
11.12
7.52
8.88
7.36
9.28
7.92
3.20
6.32
7.84
0.48
0.48

6.21
4.97
6.11
6.00
7.37
6.64
3.45
7.16
0.31
6.79
6.84
2.46
6.68
3.47
6.58
6.68
7.47
5.42
7.42
3.92
6.26
6.63
4.29
0.13
0.21
5.05
5.53
5.32
6.00
5.28
5.96
4.16
3.71
6.84
7.32
5.91
7.16
6.90
7.42
5.63
5.53
7.42
6.01
3.16
6.95
5.44
6.27
6.33
3.42
6.21
1.58
3.74
5.21
7.05
7.27
4.95
5.80
4.84
6.11
5.21
2.11
4.13
5.16
0.32
0.32

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


178

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-06-90
RC-06-90
RC-06-90
RC-06-91
RC-06-92
RC-06-94
RC-06-94
RC-06-94
RC-06-94
RC-06-94
RC-06-94
RC-06-94
RC-06-94
RC-06-94
RC-06-94
RC-06-95
RC-06-96
RC-06-96
RC-06-96
RC-06-96
RC-06-96
RC-06-96
RC-06-97
RC-07-100
RC-07-100
RC-07-100
RC-07-100
RC-07-100
RC-07-101
RC-07-101
RC-07-101
RC-07-101
RC-07-101
RC-07-102
RC-07-102
RC-07-102
RC-07-103
RC-07-103
RC-07-103
RC-07-103
RC-07-103
RC-07-103
RC-07-103
RC-07-103
RC-07-103
RC-07-103
RC-07-103
RC-07-103
RC-07-103
RC-07-104
RC-07-105
RC-07-105
RC-07-105
RC-07-105
RC-07-105
RC-07-105
RC-07-105
RC-07-106
RC-07-106
RC-07-106
RC-07-106
RC-07-106
RC-07-106
RC-07-106
RC-07-107

From
(m)
76.20
77.72
79.25
16.76
3.05
3.05
10.67
25.91
30.48
33.53
36.58
41.15
44.20
47.24
48.77
3.05
3.05
22.86
24.38
30.48
44.20
47.24
33.53
3.05
30.48
39.62
47.24
48.77
3.05
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
9.14
10.67
16.76
3.05
4.57
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
3.05
3.05
10.67
12.19
13.72
28.96
47.24
50.29
0.00
3.05
38.10
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
0.00

To
(m)
77.72
79.25
80.77
18.29
4.57
4.57
12.19
27.43
32.00
35.05
38.10
42.67
45.72
48.77
50.29
4.57
4.57
24.38
25.91
32.00
45.72
48.77
35.05
4.57
32.00
41.15
48.77
50.29
4.57
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
10.67
12.19
18.29
4.57
6.10
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
4.57
4.57
12.19
13.72
15.24
30.48
48.77
51.82
1.52
4.57
39.62
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
1.52

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

754617
754618
754619
754639
754688
754777
754783
754793
754796
754798
754800
754803
754805
754807
754808
754825
754866
754879
754881
754885
754895
754898
754928
756118
756136
756144
756149
756150
756153
756171
756172
756173
756174
756183
756184
756188
756219
756220
756228
756229
756230
756231
756232
756239
756241
756242
756243
756244
756245
756249
756276
756283
756284
756285
756296
756308
756310
756317
756319
756344
756351
756352
756353
756354
756435

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

0.13
0.12
0.13
2.70
2.22
1.84
2.42
2.68
2.80
2.36
2.14
2.70
1.30
0.98
2.38
0.48
1.82
2.04
2.48
2.80
2.78
2.74
2.34
2.12
2.64
2.24
2.72
1.54
2.60
1.36
2.10
0.68
1.10
2.78
2.08
2.32
1.96
2.50
1.14
2.06
0.64
1.84
2.34
1.98
1.94
1.34
2.12
2.36
2.90
2.20
2.58
1.38
2.46
2.28
1.08
2.04
2.16
1.66
2.16
0.08
2.50
1.48
0.82
0.98
2.18

0.461
0.544
0.266
0.120
1.300
0.344
0.319
0.497
0.248
0.033
0.017
0.039
0.078
0.047
0.059
0.167
0.199
0.051
0.057
0.077
1.130
1.215
0.125
2.010
0.210
0.254
0.446
0.405
1.660
0.602
1.190
1.405
0.666
0.056
0.027
0.185
0.087
0.038
0.136
0.149
0.164
0.647
0.149
7.950
3.400
2.410
1.495
0.812
0.675
1.350
0.043
2.070
0.315
0.091
0.467
0.044
0.050
0.188
0.306
0.778
0.278
0.184
0.462
0.095
0.048

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

0.52
0.48
0.52
10.80
8.88
7.36
9.68
10.72
11.20
9.44
8.56
10.80
5.20
3.92
9.52
1.92
7.28
8.16
9.92
11.20
11.12
10.96
9.36
8.48
10.56
8.96
10.88
6.16
10.40
5.44
8.40
2.72
4.40
11.12
8.32
9.28
7.84
10.00
4.56
8.24
2.56
7.36
9.36
7.92
7.76
5.36
8.48
9.44
11.60
8.80
10.32
5.52
9.84
9.12
4.32
8.16
8.64
6.64
8.64
0.32
10.00
5.92
3.28
3.92
8.72

0.34
0.31
0.34
7.06
5.84
4.84
6.37
7.05
7.37
6.21
5.63
7.11
3.42
2.56
6.26
1.26
4.79
5.37
6.48
7.37
7.32
7.16
6.16
5.58
6.95
5.86
7.11
4.05
6.84
3.58
5.53
1.78
2.89
7.27
5.47
6.07
5.16
6.54
2.98
5.42
1.67
4.84
6.16
5.18
5.11
3.50
5.58
6.21
7.58
5.79
6.79
3.63
6.43
6.00
2.84
5.33
5.65
4.37
5.68
0.21
6.58
3.87
2.16
2.58
5.74

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


179

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-07-107
RC-07-107
RC-07-107
RC-07-107
RC-07-107
RC-07-107
RC-07-107
RC-07-107
RC-07-107
RC-07-107
RC-07-107
RC-07-107
RC-07-107
RC-07-107
RC-07-108
RC-07-108
RC-07-108
RC-07-108
RC-07-109
RC-07-109
RC-07-109
RC-07-109
RC-07-110
RC-07-110
RC-07-111
RC-07-111
RC-07-111
RC-07-111
RC-07-111
RC-07-111
RC-07-111
RC-07-111
RC-07-111
RC-07-111
RC-07-113
RC-07-113
RC-07-115
RC-07-115
RC-07-115
RC-07-116
RC-07-117
RC-07-118
RC-07-118
RC-07-118
RC-07-118
RC-07-119
RC-07-119
RC-07-120
RC-07-120
RC-07-120
RC-07-120
RC-07-120
RC-07-120
RC-07-120
RC-07-120
RC-07-120
RC-07-120
RC-07-120
RC-07-120
RC-07-121
RC-07-122
RC-07-122
RC-07-123
RC-07-123
RC-07-124

From
(m)

To
(m)

3.05
57.91
67.06
74.68
89.92
91.44
92.96
94.49
97.54
100.58
105.16
108.20
114.30
117.35
0.00
28.96
30.48
32.00
0.00
4.57
7.62
9.14
3.05
4.57
0.00
1.52
3.05
6.10
7.62
19.81
22.86
24.38
80.77
82.30
3.05
21.34
3.05
12.19
109.73
3.05
3.05
3.05
24.38
25.91
38.10
3.05
41.15
3.05
42.67
47.24
59.44
60.96
62.48
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
96.01
4.57
3.05
10.67
12.19
42.67
42.67

4.57
59.44
68.58
76.20
91.44
92.96
94.49
96.01
99.06
102.11
106.68
109.73
115.82
118.87
1.52
30.48
32.00
33.53
1.52
6.10
9.14
10.67
4.57
6.10
1.52
3.05
4.57
7.62
9.14
21.34
24.38
25.91
82.30
83.82
4.57
22.86
4.57
13.72
111.25
4.57
4.57
4.57
25.91
27.43
39.62
4.57
42.67
4.57
44.20
48.77
60.96
62.48
64.01
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
97.54
6.10
4.57
12.19
13.72
44.20
44.20

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

756437
756476
756483
756488
756498
756499
756501
756502
756504
756506
756509
756511
756515
756517
756531
756552
756553
756554
756562
756565
756567
756568
756607
756608
756647
756648
756649
756651
756652
756660
756663
756664
756703
756704
756759
756773
756870
756877
756944
756952
12509
12589
12603
12604
12613
12643
12670
12698
12725
12729
12737
12738
12739
12743
12744
12745
12746
12747
12762
12773
12800
12805
12839
12860
12901

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

0.54
2.54
0.08
0.13
0.11
0.10
0.09
0.11
0.16
0.12
1.96
2.50
0.05
0.10
2.56
0.06
1.24
0.06
1.58
2.14
2.22
2.68
1.44
2.42
1.24
1.88
2.06
2.50
2.82
1.46
2.06
1.80
0.09
0.10
1.70
0.13
2.62
2.84
2.58
2.18
2.62
2.86
2.02
2.86
1.42
2.80
2.80
1.76
2.88
2.76
2.70
2.34
2.16
2.36
1.40
2.10
2.00
1.94
1.66
2.82
1.84
2.46
2.50
0.14
0.15

0.096
0.203
0.363
0.579
5.670
5.300
6.140
7.850
7.280
0.903
0.574
0.470
1.190
1.515
0.045
0.512
1.000
0.591
0.252
0.148
0.156
0.244
0.486
0.430
0.045
0.038
0.020
0.241
0.223
0.348
0.380
0.402
0.339
0.398
0.065
0.477
0.019
0.366
0.087
0.109
0.029
0.086
0.218
0.335
0.068
0.095
0.097
0.088
0.170
0.248
0.170
0.707
0.402
5.220
3.910
1.265
0.139
0.374
0.186
1.010
0.188
0.014
0.121
0.567
2.650

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

2.16
10.16
0.32
0.52
0.44
0.40
0.36
0.44
0.64
0.48
7.84
10.00
0.20
0.40
10.24
0.24
4.96
0.24
6.32
8.56
8.88
10.72
5.76
9.68
4.96
7.52
8.24
10.00
11.28
5.84
8.24
7.20
0.36
0.40
6.80
0.52
10.48
11.36
10.32
8.72
10.48
11.44
8.08
11.44
5.68
11.20
11.20
7.04
11.52
11.04
10.80
9.36
8.64
9.44
5.60
8.40
8.00
7.76
6.64
11.28
7.36
9.84
10.00
0.56
0.60

1.42
6.64
0.21
0.34
0.29
0.26
0.24
0.29
0.42
0.31
5.16
6.54
0.13
0.26
6.74
0.16
3.26
0.16
4.16
5.59
5.84
7.01
3.79
6.33
3.26
4.92
5.42
6.58
7.42
3.82
5.42
4.71
0.24
0.26
4.47
0.34
6.89
7.42
6.79
5.74
6.89
7.53
5.28
7.53
3.74
7.37
7.37
4.63
7.53
7.22
7.11
6.16
5.65
6.21
3.68
5.49
5.26
5.07
4.34
7.37
4.84
6.47
6.54
0.37
0.39

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


180

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-07-124
RC-07-124
RC-07-124
RC-07-127
RC-07-127
RC-07-127
RC-07-127
RC-07-127
RC-07-127
RC-07-127
RC-07-127
RC-07-127
RC-07-127
RC-07-127
RC-07-127
RC-07-127
RC-07-127
RC-07-127
RC-07-128
RC-07-129
RC-07-129
RC-07-129
RC-07-131
RC-07-131
RC-07-131
RC-07-133
RC-07-133
RC-07-134
RC-07-134
RC-07-134
RC-07-134
RC-07-135
RC-07-135
RC-07-135
RC-07-136
RC-07-137
RC-07-138
RC-07-138
RC-07-139
RC-07-139
RC-07-139
RC-07-140
RC-07-141
RC-07-141
RC-07-142
RC-07-142
RC-07-142
RC-07-143
RC-07-143
RC-07-144
RC-07-144
RC-07-144
RC-07-146
RC-07-146
RC-07-147
RC-07-147
RC-07-147
RC-07-147
RC-07-147
RC-07-147
RC-07-147
RC-07-147
RC-07-147
RC-07-147
RC-07-147

From
(m)

To
(m)

44.20
45.72
51.82
3.05
25.91
44.20
45.72
67.06
70.10
73.15
80.77
82.30
83.82
89.92
96.01
99.06
108.20
109.73
3.05
3.05
22.86
68.58
3.05
56.39
71.63
3.05
35.05
3.05
4.57
6.10
35.05
3.05
35.05
48.77
3.05
3.05
3.05
25.91
3.05
10.67
15.24
3.05
3.05
68.58
76.20
77.72
80.77
47.24
51.82
3.05
57.91
65.53
3.05
33.53
3.05
53.34
54.86
68.58
71.63
77.72
79.25
94.49
97.54
100.58
102.11

45.72
47.24
53.34
4.57
27.43
45.72
47.24
68.58
71.63
74.68
82.30
83.82
85.34
91.44
97.54
100.58
109.73
111.25
4.57
4.57
24.38
70.10
4.57
57.91
73.15
4.57
36.58
4.57
6.10
7.62
36.58
4.57
36.58
50.29
4.57
4.57
4.57
27.43
4.57
12.19
16.76
4.57
4.57
70.10
77.72
79.25
82.30
48.77
53.34
4.57
59.44
67.06
4.57
35.05
4.57
54.86
56.39
70.10
73.15
79.25
80.77
96.01
99.06
102.11
103.63

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

12902
12903
12907
13004
13019
13031
13032
13047
13050
13052
13057
13058
13059
13063
13067
13070
13076
13077
13083
13124
13138
13169
13252
13289
13299
13402
13424
13455
13456
13457
13477
13496
21519
21528
21538
21591
21633
21649
21670
21675
21678
21703
21739
21785
21845
21846
21848
21887
21890
21898
21935
21941
21995
22017
22028
22064
22065
22075
22077
22082
22083
22094
22096
22098
22099

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

0.14
0.16
0.13
2.32
0.12
0.12
0.13
0.08
0.08
0.13
0.12
0.14
0.11
0.13
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.18
1.26
2.40
2.80
0.13
1.70
2.88
2.78
2.58
2.70
2.08
0.94
2.82
1.30
2.38
1.78
0.12
2.30
2.72
2.38
0.10
2.04
2.88
2.82
2.34
2.22
0.08
0.12
0.14
0.10
1.98
0.11
2.44
0.12
2.26
1.38
0.11
1.60
0.09
0.11
0.07
0.11
2.56
2.34
2.24
2.70
2.84
2.78

1.560
0.552
0.675
0.495
0.394
0.206
0.310
5.770
8.510
5.550
1.915
2.200
2.080
2.060
1.060
0.239
0.627
0.428
0.299
0.740
1.010
0.455
0.009
0.015
0.018
0.015
0.055
0.518
0.960
1.475
0.785
0.164
0.218
1.340
0.015
0.381
0.098
3.150
0.285
0.065
0.054
0.072
0.245
0.340
3.350
2.940
2.320
1.945
0.539
0.055
0.590
0.114
0.065
0.663
0.287
0.227
0.205
0.573
0.524
0.897
0.948
1.440
1.400
1.200
1.560

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

0.56
0.64
0.52
9.28
0.48
0.48
0.52
0.32
0.32
0.52
0.48
0.56
0.44
0.52
0.72
0.64
0.56
0.72
5.04
9.60
11.20
0.52
6.80
11.52
11.12
10.32
10.80
8.32
3.76
11.28
5.20
9.52
7.12
0.48
9.20
10.88
9.52
0.40
8.16
11.52
11.28
9.36
8.88
0.32
0.48
0.56
0.40
7.92
0.44
9.76
0.48
9.04
5.52
0.44
6.40
0.36
0.44
0.28
0.44
10.24
9.36
8.96
10.80
11.36
11.12

0.37
0.42
0.34
6.11
0.32
0.32
0.34
0.21
0.21
0.34
0.31
0.37
0.29
0.34
0.47
0.42
0.37
0.47
3.32
6.32
7.37
0.34
4.47
7.58
7.32
6.79
7.06
5.47
2.46
7.42
3.40
6.26
4.65
0.32
6.05
7.16
6.26
0.26
5.37
7.58
7.42
6.16
5.84
0.21
0.32
0.37
0.26
5.18
0.29
6.42
0.31
5.91
3.63
0.29
4.21
0.24
0.29
0.18
0.29
6.69
6.16
5.89
7.11
7.42
7.32

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


181

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-07-147
RC-07-147
RC-07-147
RC-07-147
RC-07-148
RC-07-149
RC-07-150
RC-07-150
RC-07-150
RC-07-150
RC-07-150
RC-07-150
RC-07-150
RC-07-150
RC-07-151
RC-07-151
RC-07-152
RC-07-152
RC-07-153
RC-07-153
RC-07-154
RC-07-154
RC-07-154
RC-07-154
RC-07-154
RC-07-154
RC-07-154
RC-07-154
RC-07-154
RC-07-155
RC-07-155
RC-07-155
RC-07-155
RC-07-155
RC-07-155
RC-07-155
RC-07-155
RC-07-155
RC-07-155
RC-07-155
RC-07-155
RC-07-155
RC-07-155
RC-07-155
RC-07-155
RC-07-155
RC-07-156
RC-07-156
RC-07-156
RC-07-156
RC-07-157
RC-07-157
RC-07-157
RC-07-157
RC-07-157
RC-07-157
RC-07-157
RC-07-157
RC-07-157
RC-07-158
RC-07-158
RC-07-158
RC-07-159
RC-07-159
RC-07-159

From
(m)

To
(m)

108.20
109.73
112.78
117.35
54.86
3.05
3.05
13.72
16.76
44.20
48.77
56.39
67.06
74.68
3.05
50.29
41.15
82.30
3.05
77.72
59.44
60.96
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
0.00
1.52
3.05
18.29
19.81
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
57.91
59.44
60.96
74.68
102.11
115.82
117.35
118.87
45.72
48.77
53.34
65.53
3.05
4.57
45.72
47.24
54.86
56.39
62.48
65.53
70.10
3.05
28.96
53.34
1.52
3.05
25.91

109.73
111.25
114.30
118.87
56.39
4.57
4.57
15.24
18.29
45.72
50.29
57.91
68.58
76.20
4.57
51.82
42.67
83.82
4.57
79.25
60.96
62.48
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
1.52
3.05
4.57
19.81
21.34
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
59.44
60.96
62.48
76.20
103.63
117.35
118.87
120.40
47.24
50.29
54.86
67.06
4.57
6.10
47.24
48.77
56.39
57.91
64.01
67.06
71.63
4.57
30.48
54.86
3.05
4.57
27.43

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

22103
22104
22106
22109
22151
22154
22205
22212
22214
22233
22236
22242
22249
22255
22261
22294
22342
22371
22379
22432
22482
22483
22485
22486
22487
22488
22489
22490
22491
22492
22493
22494
89005
89006
89024
89025
89026
89028
89034
89035
89036
89046
89064
89074
89075
89076
89117
89119
89123
89131
89135
89136
89166
89167
89172
89173
89177
89179
89183
89194
89213
89229
89297
89298
89314

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

2.90
2.02
2.86
2.72
2.72
2.46
2.24
2.84
2.80
2.12
2.86
2.84
2.38
2.66
2.84
0.13
2.22
1.80
2.74
2.46
2.62
2.56
2.08
1.16
1.88
1.42
1.10
2.12
1.56
2.64
2.88
1.90
2.84
2.16
2.88
2.90
2.32
2.64
2.86
2.22
1.50
2.22
2.64
2.74
2.62
1.06
2.14
1.98
0.88
2.88
1.22
0.74
2.40
2.62
2.86
2.66
2.78
2.12
2.86
0.92
1.46
2.70
1.38
2.52
2.56

0.283
0.203
0.115
0.064
0.102
0.082
0.057
0.056
0.038
0.238
0.046
0.107
0.012
0.008
0.102
0.217
0.846
0.028
0.062
0.112
0.070
0.028
0.021
0.015
0.024
0.034
0.038
0.021
0.017
0.036
0.018
0.007
0.010
0.007
0.030
0.027
0.035
0.033
0.104
0.044
0.142
0.520
0.103
0.107
0.111
0.117
0.271
0.664
0.192
0.305
0.013
0.016
0.119
0.569
0.096
0.140
0.054
0.168
0.085
0.023
1.120
0.267
0.036
0.017
1.325

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

11.60
8.08
11.44
10.88
10.88
9.84
8.96
11.36
11.20
8.48
11.44
11.36
9.52
10.64
11.36
0.52
8.88
7.20
10.96
9.84
10.48
10.24
8.32
4.64
7.52
5.68
4.40
8.48
6.24
10.56
11.52
7.60
11.36
8.64
11.52
11.60
9.28
10.56
11.44
8.88
6.00
8.88
10.56
10.96
10.48
4.24
8.56
7.92
3.52
11.52
4.88
2.96
9.60
10.48
11.44
10.64
11.12
8.48
11.44
3.68
5.84
10.80
5.52
10.08
10.24

7.58
5.32
7.53
7.16
7.11
6.47
5.89
7.47
7.32
5.58
7.53
7.47
6.26
7.00
7.47
0.34
5.84
4.74
7.21
6.43
6.89
6.74
5.47
3.03
4.95
3.74
2.88
5.58
4.08
6.95
7.53
5.00
7.47
5.65
7.58
7.58
6.11
6.90
7.48
5.84
3.95
5.84
6.95
7.16
6.89
2.77
5.63
5.21
2.32
7.53
3.21
1.93
6.32
6.85
7.48
7.00
7.27
5.54
7.48
2.42
3.84
7.11
3.61
6.63
6.74

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


182

DataSet

Hole_ID

From
(m)

To
(m)

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-07-159
RC-07-159
RC-07-160
RC-07-160
RC-07-160
RC-07-160
RC-07-160
RC-07-161
RC-07-161
RC-07-161
RC-07-161
RC-07-161
RC-07-161
RC-07-161
RC-07-161
RC-07-162
RC-07-164
RC-07-165
RC-07-166
RC-07-166
RC-07-166
RC-07-166
RC-07-166
RC-07-168
RC-07-168
RC-07-168
RC-07-168
RC-07-168
RC-07-168
RC-07-168
RC-07-168
RC-07-168
RC-07-168
RC-07-168
RC-07-168
RC-07-168
RC-07-168
RC-07-169
RC-07-170
RC-07-171
RC-07-171
RC-07-171
RC-07-171
RC-07-171
RC-07-172
RC-07-172
RC-07-172
RC-07-172
RC-07-172
RC-07-173
RC-07-173
RC-07-173
RC-07-173
RC-07-173
RC-07-173
RC-07-174
RC-07-176
RC-07-177
RC-07-177
RC-07-177
RC-07-177
RC-07-177
RC-07-177
RC-07-179
RC-07-180

32.00
77.72
3.05
28.96
32.00
36.58
38.10
0.00
3.05
68.58
71.63
76.20
85.34
86.87
88.39
41.15
3.05
3.05
3.05
16.76
24.38
73.15
86.87
1.52
3.05
42.67
67.06
70.10
85.34
96.01
99.06
102.11
106.68
109.73
117.35
120.40
121.92
3.05
77.72
0.00
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
0.00
4.57
6.10
9.14
36.58
3.05
4.57
7.62
10.67
42.67
48.77
3.05
3.05
1.52
32.00
47.24
53.34
59.44
64.01
1.52
54.86

33.53
79.25
4.57
30.48
33.53
38.10
39.62
1.52
4.57
70.10
73.15
77.72
86.87
88.39
89.92
42.67
4.57
4.57
4.57
18.29
25.91
74.68
88.39
3.05
4.57
44.20
68.58
71.63
86.87
97.54
100.58
103.63
108.20
111.25
118.87
121.92
123.44
4.57
79.25
1.52
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
1.52
6.10
7.62
10.67
38.10
4.57
6.10
9.14
12.19
44.20
50.29
4.57
4.57
3.05
33.53
48.77
54.86
60.96
65.53
3.05
56.39

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

89318
89351
89409
89427
89429
89433
89434
89466
89468
89515
89516
89519
89526
89527
89528
89575
89702
89776
89824
89834
89841
89875
89885
89924
89925
89952
89969
89971
89983
89991
89993
89995
89998
111601
111606
111608
111610
111627
111839
111842
111844
111845
111846
111847
111888
111891
111892
111894
111912
111932
111933
111935
111937
111961
111965
111983
112089
112146
112168
112178
112183
112187
112190
112239
112298

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

2.00
2.86
2.58
2.56
2.86
2.76
2.24
1.84
2.66
1.96
2.84
2.32
1.38
1.92
1.04
0.12
2.52
2.68
1.34
2.68
1.92
2.50
2.76
2.04
2.60
2.10
2.06
1.20
0.07
2.10
0.09
0.13
0.09
0.06
0.13
0.12
0.12
1.48
0.09
2.44
1.44
2.28
2.12
2.30
2.68
2.22
2.68
2.30
0.10
0.98
1.42
1.46
2.10
2.58
2.76
2.12
2.20
2.42
2.64
2.58
2.40
1.98
2.00
0.34
2.12

0.148
0.777
0.028
0.102
0.544
0.089
0.083
0.092
1.850
94.800
7.040
0.151
0.133
0.275
0.200
0.656
0.065
0.055
1.365
0.467
1.185
0.052
0.073
0.719
0.565
0.205
0.164
0.164
0.295
1.275
1.640
1.490
0.872
1.910
1.270
0.871
0.819
0.115
0.260
0.098
0.091
0.153
0.176
0.092
0.091
0.121
0.113
0.079
0.474
0.102
0.107
0.197
0.184
2.370
0.721
0.132
0.207
0.069
0.017
0.186
0.158
0.061
0.169
0.116
0.140

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

8.00
11.44
10.32
10.24
11.44
11.04
8.96
7.36
10.64
7.84
11.36
9.28
5.52
7.68
4.16
0.48
10.08
10.72
5.36
10.72
7.68
10.00
11.04
8.16
10.40
8.40
8.24
4.80
0.28
8.40
0.36
0.52
0.36
0.24
0.52
0.48
0.48
5.92
0.36
9.76
5.76
9.12
8.48
9.20
10.72
8.88
10.72
9.20
0.40
3.92
5.68
5.84
8.40
10.32
11.04
8.48
8.80
9.68
10.56
10.32
9.60
7.92
8.00
1.36
8.48

5.23
7.48
6.79
6.74
7.48
7.26
5.89
4.84
7.00
5.16
7.47
6.11
3.61
5.05
2.72
0.32
6.63
7.05
3.53
7.01
5.02
6.54
7.26
5.33
6.84
5.49
5.42
3.14
0.18
5.49
0.24
0.34
0.24
0.16
0.34
0.32
0.32
3.89
0.24
6.42
3.79
5.96
5.58
6.05
7.05
5.80
7.05
6.01
0.26
2.58
3.71
3.84
5.53
6.75
7.26
5.58
5.79
6.33
6.90
6.75
6.32
5.21
5.26
0.89
5.54

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


183

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-07-182
RC-07-183
RC-07-183
RC-07-186
RC-07-186
RC-07-186
RC-07-187
RC-07-188
RC-07-188
RC-07-188
RC-07-188
RC-07-189
RC-07-189
RC-07-189
RC-07-189
RC-07-190
RC-07-190
RC-07-190
RC-07-190
RC-07-190
RC-07-191
RC-07-191
RC-07-191
RC-07-191
RC-07-191
RC-07-191
RC-07-192
RC-07-192
RC-07-192
RC-07-192
RC-07-192
RC-07-193
RC-07-193
RC-07-193
RC-07-193
RC-07-193
RC-07-194
RC-07-194
RC-07-194
RC-07-194
RC-07-194
RC-07-194
RC-07-194
RC-07-194
RC-07-195
RC-07-195
RC-07-196
RC-07-196
RC-07-196
RC-07-196
RC-07-196
RC-07-197
RC-07-197
RC-07-197
RC-07-197
RC-07-197
RC-07-197
RC-07-198
RC-07-198
RC-07-198
RC-07-198
RC-07-198
RC-07-199
RC-07-199
RC-07-199

From
(m)

To
(m)

3.05
38.10
80.77
0.00
56.39
117.35
3.05
0.00
7.62
9.14
18.29
1.52
3.05
9.14
10.67
3.05
7.62
9.14
10.67
38.10
4.57
6.10
7.62
16.76
18.29
22.86
3.05
15.24
16.76
19.81
22.86
9.14
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
12.19
21.34
22.86
25.91
39.62
50.29
51.82
53.34
4.57
28.96
10.67
16.76
18.29
19.81
39.62
3.05
4.57
12.19
15.24
16.76
44.20
7.62
21.34
22.86
24.38
28.96
9.14
15.24
18.29

4.57
39.62
82.30
1.52
57.91
118.87
4.57
1.52
9.14
10.67
19.81
3.05
4.57
10.67
12.19
4.57
9.14
10.67
12.19
39.62
6.10
7.62
9.14
18.29
19.81
24.38
4.57
16.76
18.29
21.34
24.38
10.67
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
13.72
22.86
24.38
27.43
41.15
51.82
53.34
54.86
6.10
30.48
12.19
18.29
19.81
21.34
41.15
4.57
6.10
13.72
16.76
18.29
45.72
9.14
22.86
24.38
25.91
30.48
10.67
16.76
19.81

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

112379
112487
81015
81200
81241
81284
81298
81338
81344
81345
81352
81382
81383
81387
81388
81508
81511
81512
81513
81533
81541
81542
81543
81549
81550
81551
81556
81566
81567
81569
81571
81599
81611
81612
81613
81614
81652
81658
81659
81661
81672
81679
81680
81681
81693
81707
81716
81721
81722
81723
81737
81745
81746
81751
81753
81754
81774
81782
358438
358439
358440
358444
81831
81835
81836

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

2.32
1.72
1.94
1.82
1.42
0.13
2.20
2.42
0.14
0.13
0.11
2.70
1.64
2.88
1.98
1.54
2.00
0.48
2.56
2.82
2.54
2.60
1.80
1.66
2.30
2.80
2.06
2.44
1.26
0.84
2.12
2.88
1.28
1.56
1.58
1.98
1.52
2.88
1.82
2.14
0.62
2.90
0.80
1.92
2.76
1.44
2.78
2.44
2.36
2.40
2.22
2.52
2.58
1.14
2.40
2.24
0.92
2.06
2.66
2.68
2.40
2.70
1.98
0.74
2.54

0.006
0.011
0.010
0.003
0.113
0.655
0.783
1.400
0.848
0.770
0.223
0.116
0.036
0.411
0.475
0.071
0.065
0.094
0.113
0.093
0.071
0.032
0.054
0.076
0.077
0.102
0.017
0.009
0.009
0.010
0.022
0.077
0.039
0.086
1.370
2.120
0.047
0.015
0.013
0.010
0.026
0.027
0.023
0.120
0.142
0.503
0.223
0.086
0.112
0.159
0.079
0.237
0.214
0.038
0.015
0.019
0.018
0.120
0.024
0.032
0.548
0.188
0.147
0.120
0.062

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

9.28
6.88
7.76
7.28
5.68
0.52
8.80
9.68
0.56
0.52
0.44
10.80
6.56
11.52
7.92
6.16
8.00
1.92
10.24
11.28
10.16
10.40
7.20
6.64
9.20
11.20
8.24
9.76
5.04
3.36
8.48
11.52
5.12
6.24
6.32
7.92
6.08
11.52
7.28
8.56
2.48
11.60
3.20
7.68
11.04
5.76
11.12
9.76
9.44
9.60
8.88
10.08
10.32
4.56
9.60
8.96
3.68
8.24
10.64
10.72
9.60
10.80
7.92
2.96
10.16

6.11
4.53
5.07
4.79
3.74
0.34
5.79
6.37
0.37
0.34
0.29
7.06
4.32
7.53
5.21
4.05
5.26
1.25
6.74
7.42
6.64
6.84
4.74
4.34
6.05
7.37
5.42
6.42
3.29
2.20
5.58
7.53
3.37
4.08
4.16
5.21
3.97
7.58
4.79
5.63
1.62
7.58
2.11
5.05
7.22
3.79
7.32
6.38
6.21
6.27
5.80
6.63
6.75
2.98
6.32
5.86
2.42
5.42
7.00
7.05
6.27
7.11
5.18
1.95
6.68

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


184

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-07-200
RC-07-202
RC-07-203
RC-07-203
RC-07-203
RC-07-203
RC-07-203
RC-07-203
RC-07-204
RC-07-206
RC-07-206
RC-07-207
RC-07-207
RC-07-208
RC-07-208
RC-07-209
RC-07-209
RC-07-209
RC-07-209
RC-07-209
RC-07-209
RC-07-209
RC-07-209
RC-07-209
RC-07-209
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210

From
(m)

To
(m)

6.10
21.34
3.05
4.57
6.10
9.14
10.67
53.34
3.05
0.00
35.05
0.00
6.10
0.00
12.19
3.05
6.10
7.62
89.92
92.96
106.68
109.73
115.82
117.35
164.59
121.92
123.44
124.97
152.40
153.92
155.45
156.97
158.50
160.02
161.54
163.07
164.59
166.12
169.16
170.69
172.21
173.74
175.26
176.78
178.31
179.83
181.36
182.88
184.40
185.93
187.45
190.50
192.02
195.07
196.60
198.12
201.17
202.69
204.22
208.79
210.31
213.36
214.88
216.41
217.93

7.62
22.86
4.57
6.10
7.62
10.67
12.19
54.86
4.57
1.52
36.58
1.52
7.62
1.52
13.72
4.57
7.62
9.14
91.44
94.49
108.20
111.25
117.35
118.87
166.12
123.44
124.97
126.49
153.92
155.45
156.97
158.50
160.02
161.54
163.07
164.59
166.12
167.64
170.69
172.21
173.74
175.26
176.78
178.31
179.83
181.36
182.88
184.40
185.93
187.45
188.98
192.02
193.55
196.60
198.12
199.64
202.69
204.22
205.74
210.31
211.84
214.88
216.41
217.93
219.46

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

81856
81919
81928
81929
81930
81932
81933
81963
81976
82025
82051
82087
82091
82127
82136
82163
82165
82166
82222
82224
82234
82236
82241
82242
82274
143179
143180
143181
143201
143202
143203
143204
143205
143206
143207
143208
143209
143210
143212
143213
143214
143215
143216
143217
143218
143219
143220
143222
143223
143224
143225
143227
143228
143230
143231
143232
143234
143235
143237
143241
143242
143244
143245
143246
143247

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

2.38
1.36
1.72
1.66
2.60
2.72
2.80
2.80
2.86
2.28
0.11
2.60
2.16
2.02
2.90
1.34
2.66
1.62
0.15
0.16
0.08
0.08
0.15
0.07
0.16
2.70
2.72
2.21
2.52
2.19
2.48
2.31
2.43
2.45
2.41
2.36
2.64
2.22
2.85
2.53
2.77
2.79
2.29
2.59
2.71
2.71
2.74
2.42
2.73
2.69
2.71
2.74
2.54
2.82
2.85
2.82
2.05
2.71
2.74
2.49
2.45
2.80
2.86
2.58
2.77

0.202
1.995
1.330
0.132
0.126
0.108
0.164
1.415
0.659
0.044
0.237
0.295
0.016
1.545
0.327
0.184
0.021
0.113
0.798
0.580
0.236
0.267
0.397
0.445
0.320
0.100
0.081
0.003
0.026
0.020
0.010
0.009
0.009
0.011
0.009
0.035
0.013
0.030
0.005
0.005
0.010
0.003
0.016
0.011
0.021
0.003
0.013
0.104
0.210
0.208
0.074
0.104
0.057
0.246
0.417
0.380
0.453
0.120
0.149
0.180
0.186
0.112
0.144
0.235
0.123

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

9.52
5.44
6.88
6.64
10.40
10.88
11.20
11.20
11.44
9.12
0.44
10.40
8.64
8.08
11.60
5.36
10.64
6.48
0.60
0.64
0.32
0.32
0.60
0.28
0.64
10.80
10.88
8.84
10.08
8.76
9.92
9.24
9.72
9.80
9.64
9.44
10.56
8.88
11.40
10.12
11.08
11.16
9.16
10.36
10.84
10.84
10.96
9.68
10.92
10.76
10.84
10.96
10.16
11.28
11.40
11.28
8.20
10.84
10.96
9.96
9.80
11.20
11.44
10.32
11.08

6.26
3.58
4.53
4.34
6.84
7.11
7.37
7.37
7.53
6.00
0.29
6.84
5.68
5.32
7.58
3.53
7.00
4.26
0.39
0.42
0.21
0.21
0.39
0.18
0.42
7.11
7.11
5.82
6.63
5.73
6.53
6.04
6.39
6.45
6.30
6.21
6.90
5.84
7.45
6.66
7.24
7.34
6.03
6.77
7.13
7.08
7.21
6.37
7.14
7.08
7.08
7.21
6.64
7.37
7.50
7.42
5.39
7.08
7.21
6.55
6.41
7.37
7.48
6.79
7.24

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


185

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-210
RC-07-211
RC-07-212
RC-07-212
RC-07-212
RC-07-213
RC-07-213
RC-07-213
RC-07-213
RC-07-213
RC-07-213
RC-07-214
RC-07-214
RC-07-214
RC-07-214
RC-07-214
RC-07-214
RC-07-214
RC-07-214
RC-07-215
RC-07-215
RC-07-215
RC-07-215
RC-07-216
RC-07-216
RC-07-216
RC-07-216
RC-07-216
RC-07-216
RC-07-216
RC-07-216
RC-07-216
RC-07-216
RC-07-216
RC-07-216
RC-07-216
RC-07-216
RC-07-217
RC-07-218
RC-07-218
RC-07-218
RC-07-219
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220

From
(m)

To
(m)

219.46
222.50
224.03
225.55
227.08
228.60
231.65
233.17
234.70
236.22
254.51
257.56
3.05
42.67
117.35
144.78
16.76
22.86
24.38
28.96
109.73
111.25
3.05
13.72
16.76
30.48
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
3.05
6.10
10.67
51.82
3.05
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
27.43
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
44.20
47.24
51.82
59.44
39.62
6.10
45.72
51.82
35.05
15.24
18.29
19.81
21.34
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
35.05
36.58

220.98
224.03
225.55
227.08
228.60
230.12
233.17
234.70
236.22
237.74
256.03
259.08
4.57
44.20
118.87
146.30
18.29
24.38
25.91
30.48
111.25
112.78
4.57
15.24
18.29
32.00
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
4.57
7.62
12.19
53.34
4.57
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
28.96
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
45.72
48.77
53.34
60.96
41.15
7.62
47.24
53.34
36.58
16.76
19.81
21.34
22.86
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
36.58
38.10

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

143248
143250
143251
143252
143253
143254
143256
143257
143258
143259
143272
143274
82389
82523
82575
82594
82611
82615
82616
82619
82676
82677
82694
82701
82703
82714
82717
82718
82719
82721
82744
82747
82750
82779
82795
82798
82799
82801
82802
82812
82818
82819
82820
82822
82825
82827
82830
82835
82875
82905
82932
82937
82976
82998
143001
143002
143003
143005
143006
143007
143008
143009
143010
143013
143014

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

2.51
2.57
2.32
2.39
2.59
2.37
2.78
2.76
2.38
2.81
2.48
2.46
2.40
2.84
2.80
2.58
2.54
2.68
2.56
2.52
1.36
1.78
2.54
2.80
2.90
0.19
0.06
0.18
0.07
0.16
2.34
2.30
2.86
0.23
2.17
2.59
2.39
1.87
2.90
2.85
0.18
0.14
0.11
0.12
0.12
2.42
0.33
2.73
2.78
2.33
1.11
0.22
2.19
2.34
2.47
2.35
2.34
2.82
2.75
2.89
2.49
2.28
2.76
2.13
2.78

0.140
0.098
0.123
0.128
0.138
0.119
0.111
0.099
0.077
0.093
0.077
0.052
0.127
0.387
0.143
0.197
0.051
0.305
0.176
0.316
0.095
0.070
0.890
0.644
0.113
0.808
2.060
1.020
0.748
0.581
0.231
0.301
0.177
0.255
0.566
2.980
2.910
0.668
0.175
0.142
3.470
13.350
14.400
10.350
2.130
0.133
0.104
0.078
0.044
0.033
0.104
3.420
0.693
0.130
0.171
0.318
0.266
0.262
0.194
0.756
2.360
2.940
1.095
0.269
0.223

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

10.04
10.28
9.28
9.56
10.36
9.48
11.12
11.04
9.52
11.24
9.92
9.84
9.60
11.36
11.20
10.32
10.16
10.72
10.24
10.08
5.44
7.12
10.16
11.20
11.60
0.76
0.24
0.72
0.28
0.64
9.36
9.20
11.44
0.92
8.68
10.36
9.56
7.48
11.60
11.40
0.72
0.56
0.44
0.48
0.48
9.68
1.32
10.92
11.12
9.32
4.44
0.88
8.76
9.36
9.88
9.40
9.36
11.28
11.00
11.56
9.96
9.12
11.04
8.52
11.12

6.61
6.72
6.11
6.25
6.82
6.24
7.32
7.22
6.26
7.39
6.53
6.47
6.32
7.42
7.37
6.79
6.64
7.05
6.69
6.63
3.58
4.65
6.68
7.37
7.58
0.50
0.16
0.47
0.18
0.42
6.16
6.05
7.53
0.61
5.71
6.82
6.25
4.92
7.58
7.45
0.47
0.37
0.29
0.31
0.32
6.33
0.87
7.18
7.27
6.13
2.92
0.58
5.73
6.16
6.50
6.14
6.16
7.37
7.24
7.56
6.55
6.00
7.22
5.57
7.32

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


186

DataSet

Hole_ID

From
(m)

To
(m)

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220

38.10
39.62
41.15
47.24
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
62.48
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
77.72
79.25
80.77
82.30
83.82
85.34
86.87
88.39
89.92
91.44
92.96
94.49
96.01
97.54
99.06
100.58
102.11
103.63
105.16
106.68
108.20
109.73
111.25
112.78
114.30
115.82
117.35
118.87
120.40
121.92
123.44
124.97
126.49
128.02
129.54
131.06
132.59
134.11
135.64
137.16
138.68
140.21
141.73
143.26
144.78

39.62
41.15
42.67
48.77
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
60.96
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
76.20
79.25
80.77
82.30
83.82
85.34
86.87
88.39
89.92
91.44
92.96
94.49
96.01
97.54
99.06
100.58
102.11
103.63
105.16
106.68
108.20
109.73
111.25
112.78
114.30
115.82
117.35
118.87
120.40
121.92
123.44
124.97
126.49
128.02
129.54
131.06
132.59
134.11
135.64
137.16
138.68
140.21
141.73
143.26
144.78
146.30

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

143015
143016
143017
143022
143024
143025
143026
143027
143028
143029
143030
143032
143033
143034
143035
143036
143037
143038
143039
143041
143043
143044
143045
143046
143047
143048
143049
143050
143051
143052
143053
143054
143055
143056
143057
143058
143059
143060
143061
143062
143063
143065
143066
143067
143068
143069
143070
143071
143072
143073
143074
143075
143076
143077
143078
143079
143081
143082
143083
143084
143085
143086
143087
143088
143089

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

2.78
2.89
2.47
2.52
2.76
2.77
2.49
2.77
2.27
2.45
2.51
2.72
2.66
2.48
2.78
2.64
2.38
2.27
2.79
2.40
2.74
2.06
2.42
2.17
2.58
2.52
2.45
2.36
2.82
2.66
2.19
2.48
2.04
2.40
2.02
2.81
2.39
1.77
2.56
2.09
2.40
1.97
1.93
2.25
2.25
2.46
2.01
1.94
1.96
2.72
2.53
1.76
1.98
2.39
2.31
2.34
1.95
1.94
2.13
2.08
2.02
2.75
1.80
1.93
2.30

0.371
1.035
0.360
0.061
0.061
0.062
0.054
0.053
0.041
0.037
0.047
0.054
0.045
0.034
0.054
0.032
0.031
0.023
0.022
0.023
0.030
0.030
0.022
0.032
0.034
0.035
0.019
0.029
0.035
0.038
0.042
0.044
0.026
0.022
0.017
0.011
0.007
0.010
0.014
0.009
0.003
0.015
0.013
0.003
0.006
0.003
0.006
0.007
0.005
0.005
0.007
0.009
0.022
0.035
0.033
0.087
0.013
0.017
0.021
0.086
0.034
0.039
0.031
0.034
0.056

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

11.12
11.56
9.88
10.08
11.04
11.08
9.96
11.08
9.08
9.80
10.04
10.88
10.64
9.92
11.12
10.56
9.52
9.08
11.16
9.60
10.96
8.24
9.68
8.68
10.32
10.08
9.80
9.44
11.28
10.64
8.76
9.92
8.16
9.60
8.08
11.24
9.56
7.08
10.24
8.36
9.60
7.88
7.72
9.00
9.00
9.84
8.04
7.76
7.84
10.88
10.12
7.04
7.92
9.56
9.24
9.36
7.80
7.76
8.52
8.32
8.08
11.00
7.20
7.72
9.20

7.32
7.56
6.50
6.59
7.22
7.29
6.55
7.24
5.97
6.41
6.61
7.11
7.00
6.48
7.32
6.95
6.22
5.97
7.29
6.32
7.16
5.42
6.33
5.71
6.79
6.59
6.45
6.17
7.42
7.00
5.73
6.53
5.33
6.32
5.32
7.35
6.29
4.63
6.74
5.50
6.27
5.18
5.05
5.92
5.92
6.43
5.29
5.07
5.16
7.16
6.61
4.63
5.18
6.29
6.08
6.12
5.13
5.07
5.61
5.47
5.28
7.24
4.71
5.08
6.05

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


187

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220

From
(m)

To
(m)

146.30
149.35
152.40
153.92
155.45
156.97
158.50
160.02
161.54
163.07
164.59
166.12
169.16
172.21
173.74
175.26
176.78
178.31
179.83
181.36
182.88
184.40
185.93
187.45
188.98
190.50
192.02
193.55
195.07
196.60
199.64
201.17
202.69
204.22
205.74
207.26
208.79
210.31
213.36
214.88
216.41
217.93
219.46
220.98
222.50
224.03
225.55
227.08
228.60
230.12
231.65
233.17
234.70
236.22
237.74
239.27
240.79
242.32
243.84
245.36
246.89
248.41
249.94
251.46
252.98

147.83
150.88
153.92
155.45
156.97
158.50
160.02
161.54
163.07
164.59
166.12
167.64
170.69
173.74
175.26
176.78
178.31
179.83
181.36
182.88
184.40
185.93
187.45
188.98
190.50
192.02
193.55
195.07
196.60
198.12
201.17
202.69
204.22
205.74
207.26
208.79
210.31
211.84
214.88
216.41
217.93
219.46
220.98
222.50
224.03
225.55
227.08
228.60
230.12
231.65
233.17
234.70
236.22
237.74
239.27
240.79
242.32
243.84
245.36
246.89
248.41
249.94
251.46
252.98
254.51

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

143090
143092
143094
143095
143096
143097
143098
143099
143100
143102
143103
143104
143106
143108
143109
143110
143111
143112
143113
143114
143115
143116
143117
143118
143119
143121
143122
143123
143124
143125
143127
143128
143129
143130
143131
143133
143134
143135
143137
143138
143139
143140
143142
143143
143144
143145
143146
143147
143148
143149
143150
143151
143152
143153
143154
143155
143156
143157
143158
143159
143161
143162
143163
143164
143165

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

2.18
2.50
2.29
2.69
2.53
2.24
2.51
2.64
1.59
2.46
2.46
2.87
2.85
2.84
2.68
2.75
2.48
2.53
2.61
2.52
2.12
2.78
2.26
2.21
2.27
1.62
2.88
2.01
2.59
1.88
2.46
2.52
2.05
2.48
2.01
1.93
2.63
2.25
1.87
2.62
2.26
2.13
2.21
2.64
2.36
2.28
2.28
2.24
2.68
2.65
1.90
2.25
2.05
2.19
2.44
2.20
2.69
2.50
2.43
2.35
2.17
2.51
2.46
2.10
2.42

0.034
0.014
0.016
0.026
0.027
0.012
0.013
0.011
0.012
0.014
0.014
0.009
0.009
0.011
0.006
0.013
0.008
0.015
0.009
0.012
0.013
0.013
0.006
0.003
0.007
0.030
0.060
0.053
0.064
0.069
0.083
0.081
0.090
0.150
0.078
0.079
0.075
0.101
0.061
0.067
0.045
0.047
0.046
0.074
0.071
0.076
0.072
0.051
0.049
0.066
0.090
0.076
0.071
0.062
0.049
0.054
0.039
0.043
0.040
0.054
0.044
0.075
0.060
0.062
0.054

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

8.72
10.00
9.16
10.76
10.12
8.96
10.04
10.56
6.36
9.84
9.84
11.48
11.40
11.36
10.72
11.00
9.92
10.12
10.44
10.08
8.48
11.12
9.04
8.84
9.08
6.48
11.52
8.04
10.36
7.52
9.84
10.08
8.20
9.92
8.04
7.72
10.52
9.00
7.48
10.48
9.04
8.52
8.84
10.56
9.44
9.12
9.12
8.96
10.72
10.60
7.60
9.00
8.20
8.76
9.76
8.80
10.76
10.00
9.72
9.40
8.68
10.04
9.84
8.40
9.68

5.70
6.54
6.03
7.03
6.66
5.86
6.61
6.95
4.16
6.47
6.43
7.55
7.45
7.42
7.05
7.24
6.48
6.66
6.82
6.63
5.58
7.27
5.95
5.78
5.97
4.26
7.53
5.29
6.77
4.95
6.43
6.63
5.36
6.53
5.29
5.05
6.92
5.88
4.92
6.85
5.95
5.57
5.82
6.95
6.17
6.00
5.96
5.89
7.05
6.93
5.00
5.88
5.39
5.76
6.38
5.79
7.03
6.58
6.39
6.14
5.71
6.56
6.47
5.53
6.33

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


188

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-220
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-221
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222

From
(m)

To
(m)

254.51
256.03
257.56
259.08
260.60
263.65
265.18
266.70
268.22
269.75
271.27
272.80
3.05
7.62
10.67
13.72
19.81
24.38
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
59.44
60.96
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
76.20
77.72
79.25
80.77
83.82
85.34
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81

256.03
257.56
259.08
260.60
262.13
265.18
266.70
268.22
269.75
271.27
272.80
274.32
4.57
9.14
12.19
15.24
21.34
25.91
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
60.96
62.48
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
76.20
77.72
79.25
80.77
82.30
85.34
86.87
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

143166
143167
143168
143169
143170
143172
143173
143174
143175
143176
143177
143178
143280
143284
143286
143289
143293
143297
143301
143302
143303
143304
143305
143306
143307
143308
143309
143310
143311
143312
143313
143314
143315
143316
143317
143318
143319
143322
143323
143325
143326
143327
143328
143329
143330
143331
143332
143333
143334
143335
143336
143338
143339
143343
143344
143346
143347
143348
143349
143350
143351
143352
143353
143354
143355

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

2.68
2.77
2.79
2.80
2.62
2.34
2.53
2.61
2.55
2.67
2.45
2.45
1.94
2.51
2.69
2.51
2.86
2.90
0.61
0.60
0.74
1.55
1.41
1.31
1.25
0.87
1.09
0.93
1.18
1.37
1.39
0.75
0.67
1.37
0.81
1.39
2.41
1.23
2.43
1.92
1.70
1.56
1.78
1.90
2.40
2.16
1.80
2.54
2.90
2.09
2.14
2.56
1.88
1.32
1.53
2.09
2.13
1.12
1.86
1.20
1.40
1.97
2.50
2.04
1.76

0.036
0.031
0.038
0.124
0.098
0.047
0.038
0.026
0.075
0.030
0.025
0.026
0.090
0.020
0.104
0.239
1.640
0.355
1.740
0.416
0.189
0.134
0.187
0.158
0.153
0.133
0.047
0.086
0.117
0.034
0.098
0.210
0.115
0.160
0.144
0.086
0.198
0.087
0.101
0.754
0.155
0.290
0.302
0.313
0.221
0.207
0.190
0.230
0.280
0.224
0.384
0.150
0.161
0.011
0.024
0.010
0.040
0.020
0.014
0.246
0.190
0.038
0.006
0.018
0.111

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

10.72
11.08
11.16
11.20
10.48
9.36
10.12
10.44
10.20
10.68
9.80
9.80
7.76
10.04
10.76
10.04
11.44
11.60
2.44
2.40
2.96
6.20
5.64
5.24
5.00
3.48
4.36
3.72
4.72
5.48
5.56
3.00
2.68
5.48
3.24
5.56
9.64
4.92
9.72
7.68
6.80
6.24
7.12
7.60
9.60
8.64
7.20
10.16
11.60
8.36
8.56
10.24
7.52
5.28
6.12
8.36
8.52
4.48
7.44
4.80
5.60
7.88
10.00
8.16
7.04

7.05
7.24
7.34
7.37
6.85
6.12
6.66
6.87
6.67
7.03
6.41
6.45
5.11
6.61
7.08
6.61
7.48
7.58
1.61
1.58
1.93
4.08
3.69
3.45
3.29
2.27
2.87
2.43
3.11
3.61
3.63
1.97
1.75
3.61
2.13
3.63
6.34
3.24
6.39
5.05
4.44
4.11
4.68
4.97
6.32
5.65
4.74
6.68
7.58
5.50
5.59
6.74
4.92
3.47
4.00
5.50
5.61
2.93
4.89
3.14
3.68
5.18
6.54
5.37
4.60

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


189

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-222
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-223
RC-07-224
RC-07-224
RC-07-224
RC-07-224
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225

From
(m)
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
3.05
4.57
7.62
9.14
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
3.05
4.57
22.86
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39

To
(m)
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
60.96
4.57
6.10
9.14
10.67
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
60.96
4.57
6.10
24.38
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

143356
143357
143358
143359
143360
143362
143363
143364
143365
143366
143367
143368
143369
143370
143371
143372
143373
143374
143375
143376
143377
143378
143379
143381
143382
143383
143386
143387
143389
143390
143402
143403
143404
143405
143406
143407
143408
143409
143410
143412
143413
143414
143416
143417
143418
143419
143421
143422
143423
143424
143425
143426
143429
143430
143444
143457
143501
143502
143503
143504
143505
143506
143507
143508
143509

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

1.62
2.00
2.22
1.92
2.35
1.74
0.55
0.48
1.28
1.34
0.01
0.51
2.02
1.26
1.02
0.01
1.69
1.98
0.98
1.74
1.50
1.28
1.57
1.56
0.39
0.59
1.21
1.61
0.04
2.22
1.65
1.96
1.30
2.12
1.32
1.36
0.54
1.09
2.18
1.59
1.76
0.64
0.68
0.67
0.77
0.85
1.14
1.35
0.75
1.35
2.22
2.43
2.40
1.21
0.26
2.78
1.05
0.92
1.29
0.96
1.21
0.97
0.99
1.32
1.54

0.057
0.084
0.028
0.014
0.016
0.030
0.034
0.042
0.026
0.030
0.067
0.026
0.021
0.023
0.026
0.019
0.016
0.014
0.016
0.014
0.022
0.230
0.013
0.011
0.009
0.007
0.079
0.034
0.092
0.290
0.027
0.024
0.036
0.025
0.030
0.115
0.048
0.067
0.090
0.088
0.090
0.047
0.415
0.055
0.023
0.013
0.033
0.034
0.049
0.075
0.104
0.035
0.029
0.070
0.385
0.023
0.082
0.190
0.209
0.134
0.119
0.102
0.108
0.142
0.054

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

6.48
8.00
8.88
7.68
9.40
6.96
2.20
1.92
5.12
5.36
0.03
2.04
8.08
5.04
4.08
0.03
6.76
7.92
3.92
6.96
6.00
5.12
6.28
6.24
1.56
2.36
4.84
6.44
0.14
8.88
6.60
7.84
5.20
8.48
5.28
5.44
2.16
4.36
8.72
6.36
7.04
2.56
2.72
2.68
3.08
3.40
4.56
5.40
3.00
5.40
8.88
9.72
9.60
4.84
1.04
11.12
4.20
3.68
5.16
3.84
4.84
3.88
3.96
5.28
6.16

4.26
5.26
5.80
5.05
6.14
4.58
1.45
1.25
3.37
3.50
0.02
1.34
5.28
3.32
2.67
0.02
4.45
5.18
2.58
4.55
3.95
3.37
4.10
4.11
1.02
1.55
3.18
4.21
0.09
5.80
4.34
5.12
3.42
5.58
3.45
3.58
1.41
2.87
5.74
4.18
4.60
1.68
1.79
1.75
2.03
2.22
3.00
3.55
1.96
3.55
5.80
6.39
6.32
3.16
0.68
7.27
2.76
2.42
3.37
2.53
3.16
2.55
2.61
3.45
4.05

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


190

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-225
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226

From
(m)

To
(m)

57.91
59.44
60.96
62.48
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
76.20
77.72
79.25
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
106.68
108.20
109.73
111.25
112.78
114.30
115.82
117.35
118.87
120.40
121.92
123.44
124.97
126.49
128.02
129.54
131.06
132.59
134.11
135.64
137.16
138.68

59.44
60.96
62.48
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
76.20
77.72
79.25
80.77
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
108.20
109.73
111.25
112.78
114.30
115.82
117.35
118.87
120.40
121.92
123.44
124.97
126.49
128.02
129.54
131.06
132.59
134.11
135.64
137.16
138.68
140.21

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

143510
143511
143512
143513
143514
143515
143517
143518
143519
143521
143522
143523
143524
143525
143526
143529
143530
143531
143532
143533
143534
143535
143536
143537
143538
143539
143541
143542
143543
143544
143545
143546
143547
143548
143549
143550
143551
143552
143553
143554
143555
143556
143557
143601
143602
143603
143604
143605
143606
143607
143608
143609
143610
143611
143612
143613
143614
143615
143616
143617
143618
143619
143621
143622
143623

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

1.18
1.04
1.64
1.15
1.22
1.10
0.26
1.09
1.50
1.22
1.49
1.03
1.71
1.16
1.38
1.31
1.23
1.34
1.53
1.36
2.46
1.52
1.38
2.09
0.80
0.99
2.37
1.49
1.39
1.70
1.61
1.25
1.38
1.59
1.41
1.79
1.15
1.82
1.61
1.29
1.83
2.09
2.78
1.37
1.25
1.75
1.22
1.22
1.66
1.26
2.41
2.06
1.02
1.44
1.15
0.99
1.13
1.38
1.23
0.87
1.19
1.36
1.58
0.32
0.85

0.070
0.067
0.405
0.532
0.630
0.707
2.070
1.760
0.057
0.012
0.020
0.012
0.007
0.023
0.011
0.447
0.703
0.589
0.679
0.485
0.365
0.544
0.250
0.343
0.238
0.382
0.317
0.284
0.173
0.190
0.217
0.123
0.116
0.410
0.219
0.370
0.804
0.995
0.967
0.409
0.407
0.154
0.140
0.010
0.006
0.022
0.065
0.083
0.020
0.024
0.025
0.018
0.031
0.011
0.046
0.010
0.089
0.030
0.039
0.017
0.019
0.010
0.060
0.188
0.314

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

4.72
4.16
6.56
4.60
4.88
4.40
1.04
4.36
6.00
4.88
5.96
4.12
6.84
4.64
5.52
5.24
4.92
5.36
6.12
5.44
9.84
6.08
5.52
8.36
3.20
3.96
9.48
5.96
5.56
6.80
6.44
5.00
5.52
6.36
5.64
7.16
4.60
7.28
6.44
5.16
7.32
8.36
11.12
5.48
5.00
7.00
4.88
4.88
6.64
5.04
9.64
8.24
4.08
5.76
4.60
3.96
4.52
5.52
4.92
3.48
4.76
5.44
6.32
1.28
3.40

3.08
2.74
4.32
3.01
3.21
2.88
0.68
2.87
3.92
3.21
3.90
2.71
4.50
3.03
3.63
3.45
3.22
3.53
4.03
3.56
6.47
3.97
3.63
5.50
2.09
2.61
6.20
3.92
3.66
4.44
4.24
3.27
3.63
4.18
3.69
4.71
3.01
4.79
4.24
3.37
4.82
5.46
7.32
3.61
3.27
4.61
3.19
3.21
4.37
3.29
6.34
5.39
2.68
3.79
3.01
2.61
2.95
3.63
3.24
2.27
3.13
3.56
4.16
0.84
2.22

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


191

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-226
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227

From
(m)

To
(m)

140.21
141.73
143.26
144.78
146.30
147.83
149.35
150.88
152.40
153.92
156.97
158.50
160.02
161.54
163.07
164.59
166.12
167.64
170.69
172.21
173.74
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
74.68
76.20
77.72
79.25
80.77
82.30
83.82
85.34
86.87
88.39
89.92
91.44
92.96
94.49
96.01
97.54
99.06
100.58
102.11
103.63
105.16

141.73
143.26
144.78
146.30
147.83
149.35
150.88
152.40
153.92
155.45
158.50
160.02
161.54
163.07
164.59
166.12
167.64
169.16
172.21
173.74
175.26
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
76.20
77.72
79.25
80.77
82.30
83.82
85.34
86.87
88.39
89.92
91.44
92.96
94.49
96.01
97.54
99.06
100.58
102.11
103.63
105.16
106.68

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

143624
143625
143626
143627
143628
143629
143630
143631
143632
143633
143635
143636
143637
143638
143639
143640
143642
143643
143645
143646
143647
143650
143651
143652
143653
143654
143655
143656
143657
143658
143659
143661
143663
143664
143665
143666
143667
143668
143669
143670
143671
143672
143673
143674
143701
143702
143703
143704
143705
143706
143707
143708
143709
143710
143711
143712
143713
143714
143715
143716
143717
143718
143719
143720
143722

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

1.11
0.48
0.61
0.83
0.76
1.41
0.93
0.44
0.79
1.29
2.51
1.66
1.38
1.90
2.52
2.25
2.30
2.01
1.79
1.98
1.75
2.31
1.88
2.01
2.78
2.20
2.15
2.66
1.98
2.44
1.96
2.10
2.64
2.28
2.70
2.22
2.50
2.86
2.60
2.16
2.46
2.00
1.48
2.00
2.20
1.79
1.40
1.58
1.70
1.77
2.20
1.98
2.28
2.36
1.86
2.18
2.32
2.40
2.58
2.56
2.72
2.52
2.62
2.42
2.08

0.107
0.061
0.090
0.087
0.067
0.089
0.077
0.031
0.067
0.063
0.063
0.346
0.224
0.050
0.112
0.096
0.092
0.036
0.164
0.092
0.060
0.073
0.017
0.034
0.011
0.028
0.072
0.083
0.062
0.049
0.032
0.044
0.102
0.080
0.104
0.077
0.057
0.089
0.101
0.087
0.099
0.087
0.110
0.131
0.078
0.055
0.025
0.051
0.057
0.024
0.041
0.031
0.040
0.043
0.055
0.022
0.028
0.027
0.051
0.058
0.057
0.100
0.164
0.308
0.114

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

4.44
1.92
2.44
3.32
3.04
5.64
3.72
1.76
3.16
5.16
10.04
6.64
5.52
7.60
10.08
9.00
9.20
8.04
7.16
7.92
7.00
9.24
7.52
8.04
11.12
8.80
8.60
10.64
7.92
9.76
7.84
8.40
10.56
9.12
10.80
8.88
10.00
11.44
10.40
8.64
9.84
8.00
5.92
8.00
8.80
7.16
5.60
6.32
6.80
7.08
8.80
7.92
9.12
9.44
7.44
8.72
9.28
9.60
10.32
10.24
10.88
10.08
10.48
9.68
8.32

2.92
1.25
1.61
2.18
1.99
3.71
2.43
1.16
2.08
3.37
6.56
4.37
3.63
4.97
6.63
5.88
6.05
5.29
4.71
5.18
4.61
6.08
4.92
5.29
7.32
5.75
5.66
6.95
5.21
6.42
5.12
5.53
6.90
6.00
7.11
5.80
6.58
7.48
6.84
5.68
6.43
5.26
3.87
5.26
5.79
4.71
3.66
4.16
4.44
4.66
5.79
5.18
6.00
6.17
4.89
5.74
6.07
6.32
6.75
6.74
7.16
6.59
6.89
6.33
5.47

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


192

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-227
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-228
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229

From
(m)

To
(m)

106.68
108.20
109.73
111.25
114.30
115.82
117.35
118.87
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
91.44
103.63
105.16
106.68
108.20

108.20
109.73
111.25
112.78
115.82
117.35
118.87
120.40
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
92.96
105.16
106.68
108.20
109.73

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

143723
143724
143725
143726
143728
143729
143730
143731
143734
143735
143736
143737
143738
143739
143741
143742
143743
143744
143745
143746
143747
143748
143749
143750
143751
143753
143754
143755
143756
143757
143758
143759
143760
143762
143763
143764
143765
143768
143769
143770
143771
143772
143773
143774
143775
143776
143777
143778
143779
143781
143782
143783
143784
143785
143786
143787
143788
143789
143790
143791
143831
143839
143840
143841
143842

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

2.52
2.62
2.88
2.90
2.24
2.34
2.44
2.70
2.76
2.62
2.34
2.50
2.48
2.20
2.00
2.10
1.82
2.32
2.04
1.72
2.02
1.98
2.04
2.24
1.94
2.14
1.76
1.96
2.06
2.26
2.00
2.46
2.50
1.90
2.00
2.18
2.24
2.14
2.66
2.38
2.74
2.10
2.22
2.10
2.16
2.28
2.24
1.76
1.80
2.14
2.16
2.64
2.14
1.72
2.34
2.14
2.16
1.94
2.06
2.38
2.62
1.46
0.22
1.32
1.82

0.115
0.072
0.043
0.050
0.037
0.027
0.048
0.046
0.330
0.071
0.074
0.078
0.092
0.044
0.028
0.021
0.032
0.034
0.027
0.030
0.039
0.026
0.013
0.015
0.020
0.016
0.020
0.010
0.033
0.027
0.023
0.016
0.020
0.066
0.129
0.046
0.181
0.049
0.046
0.300
0.128
0.023
0.007
0.007
0.006
0.009
0.014
0.011
0.008
0.017
0.018
0.013
0.012
0.011
0.014
0.019
0.013
0.013
0.011
0.014
1.060
0.201
0.420
0.369
0.345

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

10.08
10.48
11.52
11.60
8.96
9.36
9.76
10.80
11.04
10.48
9.36
10.00
9.92
8.80
8.00
8.40
7.28
9.28
8.16
6.88
8.08
7.92
8.16
8.96
7.76
8.56
7.04
7.84
8.24
9.04
8.00
9.84
10.00
7.60
8.00
8.72
8.96
8.56
10.64
9.52
10.96
8.40
8.88
8.40
8.64
9.12
8.96
7.04
7.20
8.56
8.64
10.56
8.56
6.88
9.36
8.56
8.64
7.76
8.24
9.52
10.48
5.84
0.88
5.28
7.28

6.63
6.85
7.58
7.58
5.89
6.12
6.42
7.06
7.26
6.85
6.16
6.58
6.48
5.79
5.23
5.53
4.79
6.07
5.37
4.50
5.32
5.21
5.33
5.89
5.07
5.63
4.63
5.12
5.42
5.91
5.26
6.47
6.54
5.00
5.23
5.74
5.89
5.63
6.95
6.26
7.21
5.49
5.84
5.49
5.68
6.00
5.86
4.63
4.71
5.63
5.68
6.90
5.63
4.50
6.16
5.63
5.65
5.11
5.39
6.26
6.89
3.82
0.58
3.47
4.76

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


193

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-229
RC-07-230
RC-07-230
RC-07-230
RC-07-231
RC-07-231
RC-07-231
RC-07-231
RC-07-231
RC-07-231
RC-07-231
RC-07-231
RC-07-231
RC-07-231
RC-07-231
RC-07-231
RC-07-231
RC-07-231
RC-07-231
RC-07-231
RC-07-231
RC-07-233
RC-07-233
RC-07-233
RC-07-233
RC-07-234
RC-07-235
RC-07-236
RC-07-236
RC-07-236
RC-07-236
RC-07-236
RC-07-236
RC-07-236
RC-07-237
RC-07-237
RC-07-237
RC-07-237
RC-07-237
RC-07-237
RC-07-238
RC-07-238
RC-07-238
RC-07-238
RC-07-238
RC-07-243
RC-07-249
RC-07-250
RC-07-250
RC-07-250
RC-07-251
RC-07-256
RC-07-257
RC-07-258
RC-07-261
RC-07-261
RC-07-263
RC-07-266
RC-07-266

From
(m)

To
(m)

109.73
111.25
112.78
114.30
115.82
117.35
118.87
24.38
28.96
70.10
9.14
19.81
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
57.91
59.44
60.96
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
77.72
28.96
44.20
65.53
82.30
28.96
60.96
3.05
6.10
9.14
15.24
18.29
25.91
117.35
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
12.19
48.77
3.05
10.67
12.19
13.72
21.34
62.48
6.10
3.05
4.57
44.20
3.05
39.62
24.38
62.48
4.57
6.10
4.57
73.15
85.34

111.25
112.78
114.30
115.82
117.35
118.87
120.40
25.91
30.48
71.63
10.67
21.34
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
59.44
60.96
62.48
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
79.25
30.48
45.72
67.06
83.82
30.48
62.48
4.57
7.62
10.67
16.76
19.81
27.43
118.87
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
13.72
50.29
4.57
12.19
13.72
15.24
22.86
64.01
7.62
4.57
6.10
45.72
4.57
41.15
25.91
64.01
6.10
7.62
6.10
74.68
86.87

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

143843
143844
143845
143846
143847
143848
143849
143868
143871
143901
143913
143920
143939
143941
143942
143943
143944
143945
143947
143948
143949
143951
143952
143953
143954
143955
143960
357054
357065
357079
357091
357141
357278
357284
357286
357288
357292
357294
357299
357363
357382
357383
357385
357386
357389
357415
357425
357431
357432
357433
357438
357808
358216
358224
358225
358253
358264
358432
358467
417541
417656
417657
417746
418031
418039

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

1.26
1.48
2.18
2.06
1.02
1.78
1.44
2.50
2.88
2.89
2.89
2.80
2.19
2.51
1.87
2.33
2.49
2.67
1.61
2.68
2.09
2.45
2.48
2.26
2.15
1.81
2.78
2.54
2.88
0.08
0.12
2.66
0.14
1.78
2.80
2.62
0.80
1.94
0.11
2.44
0.92
1.62
2.80
2.56
2.80
0.12
2.70
2.32
2.82
2.74
2.88
0.16
2.30
1.74
1.10
2.18
1.30
0.16
2.78
2.72
0.84
2.32
1.80
2.86
0.15

0.213
0.195
0.182
0.116
0.118
0.118
0.096
0.594
0.055
0.212
0.243
0.223
0.008
0.005
0.011
0.031
0.020
0.028
0.028
0.037
0.023
0.012
0.029
0.043
0.021
0.028
0.085
0.003
0.186
0.442
0.465
0.006
0.214
0.081
0.120
0.363
0.555
0.562
0.335
0.086
0.115
0.080
0.062
0.060
0.085
0.947
1.495
0.050
0.067
0.026
0.024
0.206
0.527
0.049
0.041
0.042
0.060
0.898
0.170
1.205
0.062
0.091
0.236
0.074
0.247

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

5.04
5.92
8.72
8.24
4.08
7.12
5.76
10.00
11.52
11.56
11.56
11.20
8.76
10.04
7.48
9.32
9.96
10.68
6.44
10.72
8.36
9.80
9.92
9.04
8.60
7.24
11.12
10.16
11.52
0.32
0.48
10.64
0.56
7.12
11.20
10.48
3.20
7.76
0.44
9.76
3.68
6.48
11.20
10.24
11.20
0.48
10.80
9.28
11.28
10.96
11.52
0.64
9.20
6.96
4.40
8.72
5.20
0.64
11.12
10.88
3.36
9.28
7.20
11.44
0.60

3.32
3.87
5.74
5.42
2.67
4.68
3.76
6.54
7.58
7.56
7.56
7.32
5.73
6.61
4.89
6.13
6.55
6.98
4.21
7.05
5.50
6.45
6.48
5.95
5.66
4.73
7.27
6.68
7.58
0.21
0.32
7.00
0.37
4.68
7.37
6.85
2.11
5.11
0.29
6.42
2.42
4.24
7.37
6.74
7.32
0.32
7.11
6.11
7.37
7.21
7.58
0.42
6.05
4.58
2.88
5.74
3.42
0.42
7.27
7.11
2.20
6.11
4.71
7.48
0.39

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


194

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-07-266
RC-07-268
RC-07-268
RC-07-268
RC-07-268
RC-07-268
RC-07-268
RC-07-268
RC-07-268
RC-07-268
RC-07-268
RC-07-268
RC-07-268
RC-07-268
RC-07-271
RC-07-271
RC-07-272
RC-07-273
RC-07-273
RC-07-98
RC-07-98
RC-07-98
RC-07-98
RC-07-98
RC-07-98
RC-07-98
RC-07-99
RC-08-277
RC-08-277
RC-08-277
RC-08-277
RC-08-278
RC-08-278
RC-08-278
RC-08-279
RC-08-279
RC-08-280
RC-08-280
RC-08-281
RC-08-281
RC-08-281
RC-08-282
RC-08-289
RC-08-294
RC-08-294
RC-08-298
RC-08-299
RC-08-304
RC-08-304
RC-08-306
RC-08-307
RC-08-307
RC-08-308
RC-08-309
RC-08-309
RC-08-309
RC-08-309
RC-08-309
RC-08-309
RC-08-309
RC-08-309
RC-08-309
RC-08-309
RC-08-309
RC-08-309

From
(m)

To
(m)

105.16
3.05
36.58
59.44
60.96
68.58
83.82
85.34
86.87
94.49
96.01
97.54
99.06
100.58
3.05
21.34
56.39
41.15
50.29
3.05
4.57
10.67
12.19
13.72
112.78
121.92
73.15
21.34
33.53
38.10
41.15
19.81
41.15
42.67
13.72
25.91
7.62
16.76
12.19
22.86
25.91
4.57
10.67
35.05
36.58
0.00
15.24
7.62
19.81
82.30
3.05
19.81
96.01
48.77
50.29
54.86
59.44
62.48
67.06
77.72
80.77
82.30
83.82
88.39
89.92

106.68
4.57
38.10
60.96
62.48
70.10
85.34
86.87
88.39
96.01
97.54
99.06
100.58
102.11
4.57
22.86
57.91
42.67
51.82
4.57
6.10
12.19
13.72
15.24
114.30
123.44
74.68
22.86
35.05
39.62
42.67
21.34
42.67
44.20
15.24
27.43
9.14
18.29
13.72
24.38
27.43
6.10
12.19
36.58
38.10
1.52
16.76
9.14
21.34
83.82
4.57
21.34
97.54
50.29
51.82
56.39
60.96
64.01
68.58
79.25
82.30
83.82
85.34
89.92
91.44

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

418053
418138
418162
418178
418179
418186
418196
418197
418198
418204
418205
418206
418207
418208
418424
418436
429037
429083
429089
754948
754949
754953
754954
754955
756023
756029
756099
388759
388769
388772
388774
388805
388821
388822
388850
388859
388873
388879
388909
388916
388918
388943
429707
471005
471006
471166
471261
472671
472679
472888
472905
472916
515039
515088
515089
515092
515095
515097
515101
515108
515110
515111
515112
515115
515116

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES

1.78
2.88
2.76
2.48
1.60
0.20
1.52
1.40
1.74
2.66
2.06
1.20
1.74
2.24
2.82
2.70
1.76
2.54
2.90
1.70
2.68
1.74
2.06
2.84
2.14
2.64
2.86
1.36
1.32
2.00
0.96
2.42
2.70
2.42
1.92
2.62
0.58
2.26
0.60
0.50
1.82
2.78
2.50
1.84
2.78
2.50
0.14
2.80
2.46
0.03
2.50
2.88
1.42
0.09
0.13
1.48
0.13
0.08
0.12
0.11
0.12
0.11
0.08
0.09
0.10

0.012
0.034
0.132
3.940
16.000
0.446
0.092
0.139
0.059
0.066
0.095
0.072
0.053
0.039
0.067
0.003
3.600
0.235
0.083
1.195
1.735
1.195
1.550
1.320
0.173
0.084
0.754
0.128
0.442
0.087
1.875
0.984
0.106
0.355
0.222
0.058
0.699
0.043
0.206
0.098
0.207
0.113
2.630
0.448
0.171
0.028
0.636
0.039
0.013
1.420
0.115
0.116
2.050
0.321
0.436
1.425
0.336
0.318
0.269
0.383
0.334
0.497
0.206
0.280
0.265

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

7.12
11.52
11.04
9.92
6.40
0.80
6.08
5.60
6.96
10.64
8.24
4.80
6.96
8.96
11.28
10.80
7.04
10.16
11.60
6.80
10.72
6.96
8.24
11.36
8.56
10.56
11.44
5.44
5.28
8.00
3.84
9.68
10.80
9.68
7.68
10.48
2.32
9.04
2.40
2.00
7.28
11.12
10.00
7.36
11.12
10.00
0.56
11.20
9.84
0.12
10.00
11.52
5.68
0.36
0.52
5.92
0.52
0.32
0.48
0.44
0.48
0.44
0.32
0.36
0.40

4.68
7.58
7.26
6.53
4.21
0.53
4.00
3.66
4.58
7.00
5.39
3.16
4.58
5.86
7.42
7.11
4.63
6.68
7.58
4.47
7.01
4.58
5.39
7.47
5.63
6.95
7.48
3.58
3.47
5.26
2.53
6.33
7.11
6.33
5.05
6.89
1.53
5.91
1.57
1.32
4.79
7.27
6.58
4.81
7.32
6.58
0.37
7.37
6.43
0.08
6.58
7.53
3.71
0.24
0.34
3.87
0.34
0.21
0.32
0.29
0.31
0.29
0.21
0.24
0.26

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


195

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-08-309
RC-08-310
RC-08-310
RC-08-310
RC-08-310
RC-08-310
RC-08-310
RC-08-310
RC-08-310
RC-08-310
RC-08-312
RC-08-313
RC-08-313
RC-08-313
RC-08-313
RC-08-316
RC-08-318
RC-08-318
RC-08-318
RC-08-319
RC-08-319
RC-08-319
RC-08-320
RC-08-320
RC-08-320
RC-08-320
RC-08-320
RC-08-320
RC-08-321
RC-08-321
RC-08-322
RC-08-322
RC-08-322
RC-08-322
RC-08-324
RC-08-325
RC-08-326
RC-08-327
RC-08-329
RC-08-329
RC-08-329
RC-08-329
RC-08-329
RC-08-332
RC-08-333
RC-08-334
RC-08-334
RC-08-335
RC-08-336
RC-08-336
RC-08-336
RC-08-336
RC-08-337
RC-08-337
RC-08-338
RC-08-339
RC-08-339
RC-08-339
RC-08-340
RC-08-341
RC-08-341
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342

From
(m)

To
(m)

92.96
3.05
4.57
6.10
9.14
10.67
12.19
18.29
19.81
30.48
59.44
39.62
41.15
71.63
79.25
10.67
13.72
18.29
38.10
53.34
54.86
56.39
10.67
16.76
47.24
53.34
56.39
57.91
6.10
22.86
53.34
64.01
121.92
126.49
19.81
60.96
9.14
22.86
4.57
6.10
9.14
32.00
89.92
60.96
22.86
13.72
36.58
30.48
6.10
7.62
39.62
42.67
3.05
4.57
3.05
3.05
4.57
6.10
24.38
16.76
30.48
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62

94.49
4.57
6.10
7.62
10.67
12.19
13.72
19.81
21.34
32.00
60.96
41.15
42.67
73.15
80.77
12.19
15.24
19.81
39.62
54.86
56.39
57.91
12.19
18.29
48.77
54.86
57.91
59.44
7.62
24.38
54.86
65.53
123.44
128.02
21.34
62.48
10.67
24.38
6.10
7.62
10.67
33.53
91.44
62.48
24.38
15.24
38.10
32.00
7.62
9.14
41.15
44.20
4.57
6.10
4.57
4.57
6.10
7.62
25.91
18.29
32.00
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

515118
515141
515142
515143
515145
515146
515147
515151
515152
515159
515318
515366
515367
515389
515394
515495
515623
515626
515639
515726
515727
515728
515737
515742
515764
515769
515771
515772
515799
515812
515872
515879
515921
515924
515991
516071
516097
516159
516263
516264
516265
516279
516322
516487
516515
516559
516576
516614
516638
516639
516663
516665
516675
516676
516737
516778
516779
516781
516827
516857
516867
516895
516896
516897
516898

CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES

0.13
1.52
2.42
2.76
2.58
2.22
2.50
2.88
2.10
2.02
0.10
1.60
2.12
1.84
0.09
2.64
2.56
2.66
2.34
2.50
0.54
1.32
2.70
2.50
2.42
2.76
2.28
2.88
1.86
2.02
2.74
2.14
2.22
2.32
2.68
2.80
2.74
2.34
1.70
1.34
0.42
1.62
2.66
2.58
2.82
1.44
0.08
0.15
1.12
2.56
1.70
2.58
2.64
2.02
2.80
2.54
2.70
2.52
2.52
0.16
2.64
2.38
1.30
1.04
1.00

0.824
0.262
0.244
0.758
0.649
1.735
0.397
0.144
0.675
0.200
0.587
0.091
0.052
0.152
0.875
0.061
0.008
0.015
0.162
0.003
0.031
0.038
0.245
0.176
0.009
0.094
0.193
0.167
0.042
0.024
0.022
0.044
0.208
0.030
1.290
0.075
0.051
0.154
0.585
0.397
0.393
1.275
0.041
0.037
0.051
0.012
0.365
0.273
0.262
0.361
0.107
0.122
0.147
0.120
0.172
0.807
1.100
0.838
0.156
0.302
0.056
0.012
0.008
0.007
0.006

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
4
4

0.52
6.08
9.68
11.04
10.32
8.88
10.00
11.52
8.40
8.08
0.40
6.40
8.48
7.36
0.36
10.56
10.24
10.64
9.36
10.00
2.16
5.28
10.80
10.00
9.68
11.04
9.12
11.52
7.44
8.08
10.96
8.56
8.88
9.28
10.72
11.20
10.96
9.36
6.80
5.36
1.68
6.48
10.64
10.32
11.28
5.76
0.32
0.60
4.48
10.24
6.80
10.32
10.56
8.08
11.20
10.16
10.80
10.08
10.08
0.64
10.56
9.52
1.30
4.16
4.00

0.34
4.00
6.33
7.26
6.75
5.84
6.54
7.58
5.49
5.32
0.26
4.18
5.58
4.84
0.24
6.95
6.74
7.00
6.16
6.58
1.41
3.47
7.11
6.54
6.33
7.26
6.00
7.53
4.89
5.32
7.21
5.63
5.84
6.07
7.01
7.37
7.16
6.16
4.44
3.53
1.10
4.24
7.00
6.79
7.42
3.79
0.21
0.39
2.95
6.74
4.44
6.75
6.95
5.28
7.37
6.68
7.06
6.63
6.59
0.42
6.95
6.26
0.85
2.74
2.63

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


196

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-342
RC-08-343
RC-08-343
RC-08-343
RC-08-343
RC-08-344
RC-08-345
RC-08-346
RC-08-346
RC-08-346
RC-08-346
RC-08-346
RC-08-346
RC-08-348
RC-08-348
RC-08-348
RC-08-349
RC-08-349
RC-08-349
RC-08-349
RC-08-350
RC-08-350
RC-08-351
RC-08-353
RC-08-353
RC-08-354
RC-08-354
RC-08-356
RC-08-357
RC-08-357
RC-08-358
RC-08-358
RC-08-358
RC-08-358
RC-08-358
RC-08-358
RC-08-358
RC-08-359
RC-08-359
RC-08-360
RC-08-360
RC-08-360
RC-08-360
RC-08-360
RC-08-360
RC-08-360

From
(m)

To
(m)

9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
18.29
42.67
44.20
50.29
53.34
56.39
60.96
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
76.20
19.81
48.77
94.49
100.58
16.76
3.05
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
10.67
19.81
7.62
16.76
25.91
3.05
4.57
10.67
28.96
3.05
9.14
13.72
35.05
36.58
10.67
32.00
28.96
16.76
36.58
7.62
13.72
15.24
16.76
19.81
21.34
22.86
18.29
19.81
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76

10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
19.81
44.20
45.72
51.82
54.86
57.91
62.48
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
76.20
77.72
21.34
50.29
96.01
102.11
18.29
4.57
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
12.19
21.34
9.14
18.29
27.43
4.57
6.10
12.19
30.48
4.57
10.67
15.24
36.58
38.10
12.19
33.53
30.48
18.29
38.10
9.14
15.24
16.76
18.29
21.34
22.86
24.38
19.81
21.34
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

516899
516901
516902
516903
516906
516924
516925
516929
516931
516933
516936
516938
516939
516941
516942
516943
516945
516946
516947
516948
517010
517031
517065
517069
517094
517122
517147
517148
517149
517150
517152
517159
517215
517222
517229
517254
517255
517259
517273
517293
517297
517331
517425
517426
517450
517466
512530
512547
512557
512564
512568
512569
512570
512572
512573
512574
512592
512593
512599
512601
512602
512603
512604
512606
512607

CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES

2.52
2.42
0.84
3.94
9.06
2.28
2.34
2.78
2.02
5.36
4.32
4.32
4.54
3.98
2.94
5.40
4.98
4.10
2.72
3.10
2.82
2.30
0.17
0.19
2.52
2.70
0.91
2.64
2.82
2.35
2.61
1.99
1.99
5.28
4.82
0.69
2.71
2.60
2.66
2.22
2.42
2.62
2.89
2.77
2.53
2.71
0.11
4.96
2.74
4.43
1.25
2.77
4.23
4.33
3.83
3.46
1.49
2.46
1.28
5.47
3.82
4.90
3.45
3.43
0.60

0.008
0.005
0.005
0.024
0.011
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.007
0.006
0.008
0.013
0.011
0.012
0.012
0.253
0.011
0.018
0.032
0.020
0.005
0.003
1.455
0.698
0.113
0.183
0.458
0.604
0.262
0.334
0.392
0.053
0.079
0.165
0.314
0.170
0.111
0.067
0.238
0.090
0.299
0.021
0.176
0.132
0.369
0.423
0.344
0.355
0.836
0.068
0.115
0.091
0.091
0.065
0.110
0.100
0.086
0.062
0.039
0.056
0.025
0.035
0.023
0.030
0.016

1
4
1
2
1
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1

2.52
9.68
0.84
7.88
9.06
9.12
9.36
11.12
8.08
10.72
8.64
8.64
9.08
7.96
5.88
10.80
9.96
8.20
5.44
6.20
11.28
9.20
0.68
0.76
10.08
10.80
3.64
10.56
11.28
9.40
10.44
7.96
7.96
10.56
9.64
2.76
10.84
10.40
10.64
8.88
9.68
10.48
11.56
11.08
10.12
5.42
0.44
9.92
2.74
8.86
1.25
5.54
8.46
8.66
7.66
6.92
1.49
2.46
2.56
10.94
7.64
9.80
3.45
6.86
0.60

1.65
6.37
0.55
5.18
5.96
5.96
6.16
7.27
5.32
7.05
5.68
5.68
5.93
5.24
3.87
7.06
6.55
5.36
3.58
4.08
7.37
6.05
0.45
0.50
6.59
7.11
2.39
6.90
7.42
6.18
6.87
5.20
5.24
6.90
6.34
1.82
7.08
6.84
7.00
5.84
6.33
6.89
7.56
7.29
6.66
3.54
0.29
6.48
1.80
5.83
0.82
3.64
5.53
5.66
5.04
4.55
0.98
1.61
1.68
7.15
5.03
6.41
2.27
4.51
0.39

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


197

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-08-360
RC-08-360
RC-08-360
RC-08-360
RC-08-361
RC-08-361
RC-08-361
RC-08-361
RC-08-361
RC-08-361
RC-08-361
RC-08-361
RC-08-362
RC-08-362
RC-08-362
RC-08-362
RC-08-362
RC-08-362
RC-08-362
RC-08-362
RC-08-362
RC-08-362
RC-08-362
RC-08-363
RC-08-363
RC-08-364
RC-08-364
RC-08-365
RC-08-365
RC-08-365
RC-08-365
RC-08-366
RC-08-366
RC-08-369
RC-08-371
RC-08-371
RC-08-371
RC-08-371
RC-08-371
RC-08-371
RC-08-371
RC-08-371
RC-08-371
RC-08-371
RC-08-371
RC-08-371
RC-08-372
RC-08-372
RC-08-372
RC-08-372
RC-08-372
RC-08-373
RC-08-373
RC-08-373
RC-08-373
RC-08-373
RC-08-373
RC-08-373
RC-08-373
RC-08-375
RC-08-375
RC-08-376
RC-08-376
RC-08-376
RC-08-376

From
(m)
24.38
25.91
36.58
39.62
13.72
16.76
18.29
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
3.05
10.67
12.19
13.72
18.29
21.34
25.91
32.00
35.05
38.10
41.15
4.57
6.10
13.72
22.86
13.72
21.34
22.86
38.10
9.14
10.67
3.05
13.72
15.24
16.76
28.96
35.05
36.58
38.10
41.15
42.67
56.39
62.48
70.10
4.57
7.62
10.67
16.76
21.34
25.91
32.00
35.05
36.58
39.62
41.15
42.67
53.34
3.05
35.05
19.81
35.05
36.58
38.10

To
(m)
25.91
27.43
38.10
41.15
15.24
18.29
19.81
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
4.57
12.19
13.72
15.24
19.81
22.86
27.43
33.53
36.58
39.62
42.67
6.10
7.62
15.24
24.38
15.24
22.86
24.38
39.62
10.67
12.19
4.57
15.24
16.76
18.29
30.48
36.58
38.10
39.62
42.67
44.20
57.91
64.01
71.63
6.10
9.14
12.19
18.29
22.86
27.43
33.53
36.58
38.10
41.15
42.67
44.20
54.86
4.57
36.58
21.34
36.58
38.10
39.62

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

512608
512609
512611
512612
512622
512624
512625
512632
512633
512634
512635
512636
512655
512661
512662
512663
512665
512667
512670
512675
512677
512679
512682
512689
512690
512808
512810
512845
512850
512851
512863
512892
512893
512971
521039
521041
521042
521050
521054
521055
521056
521058
521059
521069
521073
521078
521091
521093
521095
521099
521103
521128
521132
521134
521135
521137
521138
521139
521148
521181
521204
521248
521258
521259
521261

CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES

1.04
5.17
4.57
3.23
5.10
4.15
2.91
4.86
4.34
2.42
1.65
5.00
4.15
2.32
2.35
5.73
2.85
3.37
2.80
3.66
4.12
3.83
3.42
2.71
2.14
2.65
1.49
2.07
1.70
2.88
2.58
2.28
2.77
2.47
5.44
5.67
5.29
3.84
3.75
5.67
5.20
5.67
3.22
5.59
5.65
5.52
5.75
4.89
4.67
3.47
5.02
5.52
4.24
5.21
1.14
5.75
4.12
4.48
5.32
5.03
4.31
4.55
5.24
5.65
3.99

0.021
0.017
0.137
3.050
0.043
0.073
0.615
0.059
0.079
0.049
0.057
0.114
0.086
0.109
0.067
0.042
0.016
0.018
0.011
0.021
0.008
0.012
0.026
0.064
0.054
0.027
0.409
0.058
0.212
0.022
0.465
0.028
0.018
0.455
0.053
0.059
0.065
0.121
0.125
0.585
1.355
1.970
2.470
0.133
0.832
0.130
0.210
0.563
0.087
0.279
0.457
0.045
0.201
2.670
3.040
0.680
1.040
0.911
0.257
0.418
0.273
0.023
0.663
1.625
3.910

1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
4
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1

1.04
10.34
9.14
6.46
10.20
8.30
5.82
9.72
8.68
4.84
3.30
10.00
4.15
4.64
4.70
11.46
2.85
6.74
11.20
3.66
8.24
7.66
6.84
10.84
8.56
10.60
5.96
8.28
6.80
11.52
10.32
9.12
11.08
9.88
10.88
11.34
10.58
7.68
7.50
11.34
10.40
11.34
6.44
11.18
11.30
11.04
11.50
9.78
9.34
6.94
10.04
11.04
8.48
10.42
2.28
11.50
8.24
8.96
10.64
10.06
8.62
9.10
10.48
11.30
3.99

0.68
6.80
6.01
4.22
6.71
5.42
3.83
6.39
5.71
3.16
2.17
6.54
2.73
3.05
3.07
7.54
1.88
4.43
7.37
2.39
5.39
5.04
4.50
7.08
5.63
6.97
3.92
5.45
4.47
7.58
6.79
5.96
7.29
6.50
7.16
7.46
6.92
5.05
4.90
7.46
6.84
7.46
4.21
7.36
7.39
7.22
7.52
6.43
6.14
4.54
6.61
7.26
5.54
6.81
1.50
7.52
5.42
5.86
7.00
6.62
5.63
5.95
6.85
7.43
2.63

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


198

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-08-376
RC-08-376
RC-08-376
RC-08-377
RC-08-377
RC-08-377
RC-08-377
RC-08-377
RC-08-377
RC-08-377
RC-08-377
RC-08-377
RC-08-377
RC-08-377
RC-08-377
RC-08-377
RC-08-377
RC-08-377
RC-08-377
RC-08-377
RC-08-378
RC-08-378
RC-08-378
RC-08-378
RC-08-378
RC-08-378
RC-08-379
RC-08-379
RC-08-379
RC-08-380
RC-08-380
RC-08-380
RC-08-380
RC-08-380
RC-08-380
RC-08-380
RC-08-380
RC-08-380
RC-08-382
RC-08-383
RC-08-383
RC-08-383
RC-08-383
RC-08-383
RC-08-384
RC-08-384
RC-08-385
RC-08-385
RC-08-385
RC-08-385
RC-08-386
RC-08-386
RC-08-386
RC-08-386
RC-08-386
RC-08-387
RC-08-387
RC-08-387
RC-08-388
RC-08-388
RC-08-388
RC-08-388
RC-08-388
RC-08-388
RC-08-388

From
(m)
39.62
41.15
42.67
35.05
38.10
39.62
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
60.96
62.48
64.01
68.58
70.10
15.24
16.76
19.81
22.86
28.96
32.00
4.57
9.14
19.81
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
35.05
38.10
42.67
48.77
16.76
7.62
10.67
13.72
15.24
18.29
9.14
16.76
0.00
4.57
10.67
25.91
4.57
9.14
41.15
59.44
74.68
6.10
7.62
10.67
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72

To
(m)
41.15
42.67
44.20
36.58
39.62
41.15
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
60.96
62.48
64.01
65.53
70.10
71.63
16.76
18.29
21.34
24.38
30.48
33.53
6.10
10.67
21.34
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
36.58
39.62
44.20
50.29
18.29
9.14
12.19
15.24
16.76
19.81
10.67
18.29
1.52
6.10
12.19
27.43
6.10
10.67
42.67
60.96
76.20
7.62
9.14
12.19
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

521262
521263
521264
521299
521302
521303
521309
521310
521311
521312
521313
521314
521315
521316
521317
521318
521319
521321
521324
521325
521336
521337
521339
521343
521347
521349
521369
521372
521379
521398
521399
521401
521402
521403
521406
521408
521411
521415
521433
521451
521453
521455
521456
521458
521478
521484
521492
521495
521499
590511
590521
590524
590547
590559
590570
590576
590578
590581
590596
590597
590598
590599
590601
590602
590603

CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES

5.11
4.95
4.55
5.72
3.46
4.25
5.63
3.29
3.99
4.48
7.59
4.40
5.93
7.32
7.96
6.53
10.47
7.51
3.96
9.43
4.38
5.18
4.84
5.68
4.23
5.58
4.88
5.59
4.91
5.27
4.77
4.85
4.57
5.09
6.11
4.86
2.96
4.80
5.59
5.19
4.97
4.12
3.55
5.43
4.99
5.56
2.76
5.50
5.49
4.69
5.24
5.47
0.80
4.84
5.73
5.30
4.24
4.69
0.09
5.30
4.94
4.16
5.52
5.09
7.71

3.620
4.030
3.780
0.281
0.801
0.914
0.171
0.261
0.909
1.960
0.393
0.409
0.145
0.167
0.258
0.284
0.162
0.069
0.013
0.026
1.265
0.549
0.138
0.054
0.028
0.053
0.017
0.012
0.003
0.066
0.108
0.115
0.119
0.322
0.041
0.067
0.107
0.009
0.163
0.103
0.176
0.115
0.043
0.104
2.130
0.168
0.017
0.731
0.431
0.038
0.222
0.490
0.034
0.021
0.003
2.780
0.266
0.012
0.201
0.197
0.031
0.028
0.019
0.005
0.003

1
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
1

5.11
4.95
9.10
11.44
6.92
8.50
5.63
6.58
7.98
8.96
7.59
4.40
5.93
7.32
7.96
6.53
10.47
7.51
3.96
9.43
8.76
10.36
9.68
11.36
8.46
11.16
9.76
11.18
9.82
10.54
9.54
9.70
9.14
10.18
6.11
9.72
5.92
9.60
11.18
10.38
9.94
8.24
7.10
10.86
9.98
11.12
5.52
11.00
10.98
9.38
10.48
10.94
1.60
9.68
11.46
10.60
8.48
9.38
0.09
5.30
9.88
8.32
11.04
10.18
7.71

3.34
3.26
5.95
7.48
4.55
5.56
3.68
4.33
5.22
5.89
4.99
2.88
3.90
4.78
5.24
4.30
6.84
4.94
2.61
6.16
5.76
6.77
6.33
7.47
5.57
7.29
6.38
7.31
6.42
6.89
6.28
6.34
6.01
6.70
3.99
6.39
3.87
6.32
7.31
6.83
6.54
5.42
4.67
7.14
6.52
7.27
3.63
7.19
7.22
6.17
6.85
7.15
1.05
6.37
7.54
6.97
5.58
6.17
0.06
3.49
6.50
5.44
7.26
6.65
5.07

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


199

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-08-388
RC-08-390
RC-08-390
RC-08-391
RC-08-391
RC-08-391
RC-08-391
RC-08-392
RC-08-392
RC-08-393
RC-08-393
RC-08-393
RC-08-393
RC-08-393
RC-08-393
RC-08-394
RC-08-394
RC-08-394
RC-08-394
RC-08-394
RC-08-395
RC-08-395
RC-08-396
RC-08-396
RC-08-396
RC-08-396
RC-08-396
RC-08-397
RC-08-397
RC-08-397
RC-08-398
RC-08-399
RC-08-399
RC-08-399
RC-08-400
RC-08-400
RC-08-400
RC-08-401
RC-08-403
RC-08-403
RC-08-403
RC-08-403
RC-08-404
RC-08-405
RC-08-406
RC-08-406
RC-08-407
RC-08-408
RC-08-408
RC-08-409
RC-08-409
RC-08-409
RC-08-409
RC-08-410
RC-08-410
RC-08-412
RC-08-412
RC-08-412
RC-08-412
RC-08-414
RC-08-414
RC-08-414
RC-08-414
RC-08-414
RC-08-414

From
(m)
32.00
4.57
24.38
50.29
56.39
59.44
62.48
10.67
19.81
7.62
10.67
13.72
19.81
21.34
32.00
25.91
30.48
32.00
44.20
50.29
7.62
36.58
7.62
10.67
15.24
38.10
62.48
4.57
32.00
35.05
4.57
7.62
9.14
10.67
4.57
6.10
54.86
51.82
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
7.62
7.62
28.96
32.00
7.62
7.62
16.76
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
10.67
13.72
27.43
41.15
59.44
67.06
38.10
51.82
54.86
59.44
71.63
74.68

To
(m)
33.53
6.10
25.91
51.82
57.91
60.96
64.01
12.19
21.34
9.14
12.19
15.24
21.34
22.86
33.53
27.43
32.00
33.53
45.72
51.82
9.14
38.10
9.14
12.19
16.76
39.62
64.01
6.10
33.53
36.58
6.10
9.14
10.67
12.19
6.10
7.62
56.39
53.34
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
9.14
9.14
30.48
33.53
9.14
9.14
18.29
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
12.19
15.24
28.96
42.67
60.96
68.58
39.62
53.34
56.39
60.96
73.15
76.20

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

590615
590667
590681
590719
590724
590726
590728
590737
590744
590762
590764
590766
590771
590772
590779
590807
590810
590811
590819
590824
590839
590861
590882
590884
590887
590904
590919
590946
590966
590968
590995
641053
641054
641055
641104
641105
641139
641179
641299
641301
641302
641303
641309
641351
641398
641401
641417
641442
641448
641466
641467
641468
641469
641494
641496
641521
641530
641544
641548
641579
641589
641591
641594
641603
641605

CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES

4.97
4.53
5.60
5.66
0.16
4.30
5.35
5.69
5.02
3.86
3.76
3.70
8.56
4.41
2.89
5.30
4.64
5.34
5.21
2.57
5.33
0.10
3.58
4.52
5.75
5.70
5.71
4.80
5.46
5.63
5.64
2.07
5.49
5.54
4.40
5.62
5.13
3.04
3.79
4.86
4.05
1.29
4.13
5.75
4.01
5.10
3.22
5.55
3.96
4.88
4.00
0.78
5.79
5.20
4.35
5.73
6.36
5.63
6.09
4.39
5.65
10.32
5.48
5.55
2.09

0.127
0.594
0.628
0.388
0.309
0.030
0.045
0.011
0.049
0.695
0.519
0.373
0.179
0.175
0.007
1.860
1.580
0.808
0.491
0.075
0.124
0.236
0.082
0.194
0.784
2.300
0.164
0.410
0.886
0.861
0.171
0.111
0.041
0.056
0.416
0.601
0.167
0.014
0.286
0.326
0.473
0.445
1.300
0.318
0.007
0.044
0.019
0.007
0.052
0.088
0.037
0.340
0.093
0.014
0.047
0.545
0.363
1.595
5.820
0.048
1.700
2.700
0.460
0.188
0.458

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1

9.94
9.06
11.20
11.32
0.32
8.60
10.70
11.38
10.04
7.72
7.52
7.40
8.56
8.82
5.78
10.60
9.28
10.68
10.42
5.14
10.66
0.20
7.16
9.04
11.50
11.40
11.42
9.60
10.92
11.26
11.28
2.07
10.98
11.08
8.80
11.24
10.26
6.08
7.58
4.86
4.05
1.29
8.26
11.50
8.02
10.20
6.44
11.10
7.92
9.76
8.00
0.78
11.58
10.40
8.70
11.46
6.36
11.26
6.09
8.78
11.30
10.32
5.48
11.10
2.09

6.50
5.92
7.32
7.40
0.21
5.66
6.99
7.49
6.56
5.08
4.95
4.87
5.59
5.80
3.78
6.97
6.11
6.98
6.86
3.36
7.01
0.13
4.71
5.95
7.57
7.50
7.46
6.27
7.14
7.36
7.37
1.36
7.18
7.29
5.75
7.39
6.71
4.00
4.95
3.20
2.66
0.84
5.43
7.57
5.28
6.67
4.24
7.30
5.18
6.42
5.23
0.51
7.57
6.84
5.72
7.49
4.18
7.41
4.01
5.78
7.43
6.75
3.61
7.30
1.38

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


200

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-08-414
RC-08-414
RC-08-414
RC-08-415
RC-08-415
RC-08-417
RC-09-420
RC-09-420
RC-09-420
RC-09-420
RC-09-420
RC-09-420
RC-09-420
RC-09-420
RC-09-420
RC-09-420
RC-09-420
RC-09-420
RC-09-421
RC-09-421
RC-09-421
RC-09-421
RC-09-421
RC-09-422
RC-09-422
RC-09-422
RC-09-422
RC-09-422
RC-09-423
RC-09-423
RC-09-423
RC-09-423
RC-09-423
RC-09-423
RC-09-424
RC-09-424
RC-09-424
RC-09-424
RC-09-424
RC-09-424
RC-09-424
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-425
RC-09-426
RC-09-426
RC-09-426
RC-09-426
RC-09-426
RC-09-426

From
(m)

To
(m)

76.20
99.06
102.11
42.67
47.24
54.86
0.00
1.52
3.05
4.57
6.10
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
44.20
51.82
0.00
1.52
3.05
4.57
6.10
73.15
77.72
79.25
80.77
82.30
4.57
48.77
51.82
53.34
56.39
59.44
4.57
6.10
9.14
10.67
13.72
16.76
18.29
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
28.96
30.48
32.00
65.53
86.87
88.39
96.01
120.40
36.58
108.20
114.30
126.49
143.26
144.78

77.72
100.58
103.63
44.20
48.77
56.39
1.52
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
45.72
53.34
1.52
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
74.68
79.25
80.77
82.30
83.82
6.10
50.29
53.34
54.86
57.91
60.96
6.10
7.62
10.67
12.19
15.24
18.29
19.81
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
30.48
32.00
33.53
67.06
88.39
89.92
97.54
121.92
38.10
109.73
115.82
128.02
144.78
146.30

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

641607
641623
641625
641656
641659
641739
631001
631002
631003
631004
631005
631007
631008
631009
631010
631011
631032
631037
631062
631063
631064
631065
631067
631159
631163
631164
631165
631166
631174
631206
631208
631209
631211
631213
631221
631222
631224
631225
631227
631229
631230
631318
631319
631321
631322
631323
631324
631325
631326
631327
631329
631332
631333
631334
631357
631372
631373
631378
631395
631426
631475
631479
631488
631499
632001

CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES

2.78
1.32
2.03
3.12
3.34
4.60
4.40
3.58
0.34
4.84
5.18
1.82
0.90
0.78
2.30
0.70
0.11
0.12
5.50
3.76
2.88
2.08
4.92
0.11
0.11
0.12
0.14
0.12
1.70
4.68
2.60
0.80
3.58
5.68
4.74
4.54
2.20
4.46
3.18
3.86
5.72
5.80
3.16
4.18
3.10
2.02
3.02
3.20
5.42
2.44
5.42
0.14
2.42
4.42
4.36
3.06
5.32
2.90
3.40
2.33
2.59
2.54
2.34
4.27
5.15

0.121
0.164
0.114
1.865
0.560
0.003
0.012
0.023
0.010
0.006
0.006
0.026
0.097
0.100
0.051
0.053
0.932
0.216
0.094
0.045
0.081
0.177
0.344
0.369
0.679
0.477
0.322
0.285
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.011
0.010
0.003
0.006
0.018
0.003
0.013
0.010
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.116
0.039
0.006
0.029
0.212
0.611
0.151
0.048
0.084
0.245
0.228
0.125
0.257
0.172
0.025
0.017
0.003
0.013
0.619

1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
2
2

2.78
1.32
2.03
3.12
6.68
9.20
8.80
7.16
0.34
9.68
10.36
3.64
1.80
3.12
9.20
2.80
0.44
0.48
11.00
7.52
5.76
4.16
9.84
0.44
0.44
0.48
0.56
0.48
6.80
9.36
5.20
1.60
7.16
11.36
9.48
9.08
4.40
8.92
6.36
7.72
11.44
11.60
6.32
8.36
6.20
4.04
3.02
3.20
10.84
4.88
10.84
0.28
2.42
8.84
8.72
6.12
10.64
5.80
6.80
9.32
10.36
10.16
9.36
8.54
10.30

1.83
0.87
1.34
2.04
4.37
6.01
5.79
4.68
0.22
6.33
6.82
2.38
1.18
2.04
6.05
1.84
0.29
0.32
7.24
4.92
3.79
2.72
6.47
0.29
0.29
0.32
0.37
0.32
4.44
6.16
3.42
1.05
4.71
7.47
6.20
5.97
2.88
5.87
4.18
5.05
7.53
7.58
4.16
5.50
4.05
2.66
1.99
2.09
7.13
3.21
7.08
0.18
1.59
5.78
5.70
4.03
6.95
3.79
4.47
6.13
6.77
6.68
6.12
5.62
6.78

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


201

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-09-426
RC-09-426
RC-09-426
RC-09-427
RC-09-427
RC-09-427
RC-09-427
RC-09-427
RC-09-427
RC-09-427
RC-09-427
RC-09-427
RC-09-427
RC-09-427
RC-09-427
RC-09-427
RC-09-427
RC-09-427
RC-09-427
RC-09-428
RC-09-428
RC-09-428
RC-09-429
RC-09-429
RC-09-429
RC-09-429
RC-09-429
RC-09-429
RC-09-429
RC-09-429
RC-09-429
RC-09-429
RC-09-429
RC-09-429
RC-09-430
RC-09-430
RC-09-430
RC-09-430
RC-09-430
RC-09-430
RC-09-430
RC-09-430
RC-09-430
RC-09-430
RC-09-430
RC-09-431
RC-09-431
RC-09-432
RC-09-432
RC-09-432
RC-09-432
RC-09-432
RC-09-432
RC-09-432
RC-09-432
RC-09-432
RC-09-432
RC-09-435
RC-09-435
RC-09-436
RC-09-439
RC-09-440
RC-09-441
RC-09-441
RC-09-441

From
(m)

To
(m)

147.83
150.88
152.40
4.57
13.72
28.96
32.00
33.53
35.05
41.15
42.67
44.20
74.68
77.72
102.11
103.63
105.16
126.49
128.02
4.57
6.10
7.62
32.00
33.53
48.77
50.29
54.86
56.39
114.30
190.50
193.55
208.79
224.03
274.32
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
71.63
85.34
92.96
35.05
48.77
3.05
19.81
21.34
25.91
88.39
89.92
91.44
92.96
97.54
103.63
4.57
6.10
4.57
4.57
4.57
92.96
117.35
120.40

149.35
152.40
153.92
6.10
15.24
30.48
33.53
35.05
36.58
42.67
44.20
45.72
76.20
79.25
103.63
105.16
106.68
128.02
129.54
6.10
7.62
9.14
33.53
35.05
50.29
51.82
56.39
57.91
115.82
192.02
195.07
210.31
225.55
275.84
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
73.15
86.87
94.49
36.58
50.29
4.57
21.34
22.86
27.43
89.92
91.44
92.96
94.49
99.06
105.16
6.10
7.62
6.10
6.10
6.10
94.49
118.87
121.92

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

632003
632005
632006
632053
632059
632070
632072
632073
632074
632078
632079
632081
632103
632105
632123
632124
632125
632139
632140
632151
632152
632153
632322
632323
632334
632335
632338
632339
632379
632433
632435
632446
632456
633308
632473
632474
632475
632476
632477
632478
632479
632481
633019
633029
633034
633079
633089
633122
633134
633135
633138
633183
633184
633185
633186
633189
633193
633347
633348
633404
634024
634089
634172
634190
634192

CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES

5.70
5.10
5.60
1.59
3.98
5.41
4.63
5.10
5.40
5.52
5.31
5.36
5.59
0.18
0.13
0.11
0.12
5.60
4.62
3.73
2.42
2.65
1.72
4.59
3.11
4.00
4.63
4.57
2.72
4.88
5.76
5.05
5.51
5.54
1.74
1.97
2.36
1.00
1.37
3.09
2.66
2.86
2.37
4.87
0.12
2.10
0.14
4.81
5.59
4.78
3.69
0.06
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.11
0.13
2.62
4.96
2.59
4.60
1.50
0.20
1.74
5.26

0.022
0.009
0.100
0.003
0.019
0.014
0.306
0.129
0.075
0.097
0.075
0.089
0.033
0.281
0.639
0.444
1.095
0.083
0.078
0.005
0.003
0.005
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.015
0.006
0.013
0.023
0.021
0.085
0.019
0.073
0.210
0.088
0.205
4.170
0.217
1.525
0.184
0.136
0.177
1.335
0.374
0.408
0.241
0.357
0.209
0.003
0.003
0.141
0.019
0.093
0.276
0.544
0.155

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
4
2
4
4
4
2

11.40
10.20
11.20
3.18
7.96
10.82
9.26
10.20
10.80
11.04
10.62
10.72
11.18
0.36
0.26
0.22
0.24
11.20
9.24
7.46
4.84
5.30
3.44
9.18
6.22
8.00
9.26
9.14
10.88
9.76
11.52
10.10
11.02
11.08
1.74
1.97
4.72
2.00
2.74
6.18
5.32
5.72
4.74
9.74
0.48
8.40
0.56
9.62
11.18
9.56
7.38
0.24
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.44
0.52
5.24
9.92
10.36
9.20
6.00
0.80
6.96
10.52

7.50
6.71
7.37
2.08
5.24
7.12
6.05
6.71
7.06
7.26
6.94
7.05
7.36
0.24
0.17
0.14
0.16
7.32
6.08
4.88
3.18
3.49
2.25
6.04
4.09
5.23
6.05
6.01
7.16
6.42
7.58
6.64
7.25
7.29
1.14
1.30
3.08
1.32
1.79
4.07
3.50
3.74
3.12
6.37
0.31
5.49
0.37
6.33
7.31
6.29
4.86
0.16
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.29
0.34
3.42
6.53
6.77
6.01
3.92
0.52
4.58
6.92

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


202

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-09-446
RC-09-446
RC-09-446
RC-09-447
RC-09-447
RC-09-447
RC-09-447
RC-09-447
RC-09-447
RC-09-447
RC-09-447
RC-09-447
RC-09-447
RC-09-447
RC-09-448
RC-09-450
RC-09-451
RC-09-452
RC-09-452
RC-09-454
RC-09-455
RC-09-456
RC-09-456
RC-09-456
RC-09-456
RC-09-456
RC-09-456
RC-09-456
RC-09-456
RC-09-456
RC-09-456
RC-09-458
RC-09-458
RC-09-459
RC-09-460
RC-09-460
RC-09-461
RC-09-461
RC-09-461
RC-09-462
RC-09-462
RC-09-462
RC-09-462
RC-09-462
RC-09-462
RC-09-466
RC-09-467
RC-09-467
RC-09-473
RC-09-473
RC-09-473
RC-09-474
RC-09-474
RC-09-474
RC-09-474
RC-09-474
RC-09-474
RC-09-474
RC-09-474
RC-09-475
RC-09-475
RC-09-475
RC-09-476
RC-09-476
RC-09-476

From
(m)

To
(m)

59.44
68.58
71.63
62.48
65.53
71.63
76.20
77.72
80.77
94.49
108.20
112.78
117.35
118.87
82.30
53.34
32.00
44.20
56.39
33.53
106.68
80.77
82.30
83.82
85.34
86.87
88.39
92.96
100.58
105.16
120.40
12.19
53.34
134.11
4.57
38.10
51.82
92.96
94.49
27.43
42.67
44.20
48.77
54.86
56.39
36.58
7.62
9.14
102.11
123.44
124.97
42.67
65.53
68.58
70.10
89.92
114.30
126.49
131.06
30.48
59.44
80.77
22.86
70.10
73.15

60.96
70.10
73.15
64.01
67.06
73.15
77.72
79.25
82.30
96.01
109.73
114.30
118.87
120.40
83.82
54.86
33.53
45.72
57.91
35.05
108.20
82.30
83.82
85.34
86.87
88.39
89.92
94.49
102.11
106.68
121.92
13.72
54.86
135.64
6.10
39.62
53.34
94.49
96.01
28.96
44.20
45.72
50.29
56.39
57.91
38.10
9.14
10.67
103.63
124.97
126.49
44.20
67.06
70.10
71.63
91.44
115.82
128.02
132.59
32.00
60.96
82.30
24.38
71.63
74.68

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

768156
768163
768165
768241
768243
768247
768250
768251
768253
768263
768272
768275
768278
768279
768359
768478
768515
768591
768599
768717
768799
768893
768894
768895
768896
768897
768898
768902
768907
768910
768921
769013
769043
769165
769199
769223
769327
769355
769356
769376
769387
769388
769391
769395
769396
836059
836094
836095
863678
863694
863695
863730
863746
863748
863749
863763
863781
863789
863792
863824
863844
863859
863883
865824
863918

CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES

2.82
4.09
1.87
1.91
3.96
3.15
3.40
5.70
4.02
5.38
4.82
4.97
5.61
5.70
2.84
0.15
0.15
0.17
2.02
0.24
5.28
2.77
2.55
3.95
4.59
3.81
2.90
5.18
4.93
5.04
5.38
1.88
0.16
2.20
3.28
0.11
0.12
1.77
2.16
2.33
2.43
2.26
1.80
0.13
2.25
2.59
1.04
2.65
4.85
2.60
0.09
0.09
0.09
2.80
2.54
1.64
0.04
0.04
1.60
0.08
2.84
0.12
0.08
4.77
0.08

0.102
0.041
0.076
0.591
0.148
0.032
0.055
0.015
0.054
0.007
0.012
0.058
0.017
0.010
0.006
0.509
0.286
0.262
0.157
0.202
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.028
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.124
0.213
0.141
0.178
1.420
0.206
0.278
0.138
4.280
0.055
0.343
0.214
0.349
0.320
0.020
0.015
0.010
0.005
0.006
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.136
0.016
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.013
0.003
0.003
1.175
2.890
1.695

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
2
4
4
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
4
2
4

5.64
8.18
3.74
3.82
7.92
6.30
6.80
11.40
8.04
10.76
9.64
9.94
11.22
11.40
5.68
0.60
0.60
0.68
8.08
0.96
10.56
5.54
5.10
7.90
9.18
7.62
5.80
10.36
9.86
10.08
10.76
7.52
0.64
8.80
6.56
0.44
0.48
1.77
2.16
9.32
9.72
9.04
7.20
0.52
9.00
10.36
4.16
10.60
9.70
5.20
0.18
0.36
0.36
11.20
10.16
6.56
0.16
0.16
6.40
0.32
11.36
0.12
0.32
9.54
0.32

3.71
5.38
2.46
2.50
5.18
4.14
4.47
7.45
5.25
7.08
6.30
6.54
7.38
7.45
3.74
0.39
0.39
0.45
5.32
0.63
6.95
3.62
3.36
5.20
6.00
5.01
3.79
6.77
6.44
6.63
7.08
4.92
0.42
5.75
4.29
0.29
0.32
1.16
1.42
6.09
6.35
5.95
4.74
0.34
5.92
6.82
2.74
6.93
6.38
3.40
0.12
0.24
0.24
7.37
6.64
4.32
0.11
0.10
4.18
0.21
7.47
0.08
0.21
6.24
0.21

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


203

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-09-476
RC-09-476
RC-09-476
RC-09-477
RC-09-477
RC-09-477
RC-09-477
RC-09-477
RC-09-478
RC-09-479
RC-09-479
RC-09-479
RC-09-479
RC-09-479
RC-09-480
RC-09-480
RC-09-480
RC-09-480
RC-09-480
RC-09-480
RC-09-480
RC-09-480
RC-09-480
RC-09-481
RC-09-481
RC-09-481
RC-09-481
RC-09-482
RC-09-482
RC-09-487
RC-09-489
RC-09-490
RC-09-492
RC-09-493
RC-09-493
RC-09-495
RC-09-496
RC-09-496
RC-09-497
RC-09-498
RC-09-498
RC-09-498
RC-09-499
RC-09-500
RC-09-501
RC-09-501
RC-09-501
RC-09-502
RC-09-502
RC-09-502
RC-09-502
RC-09-502
RC-09-503
RC-09-503
RC-09-505
RC-09-505
RC-09-506
RC-09-509
RC-09-509
RC-09-509
RC-09-509
RC-09-510
RC-09-510
RC-09-511
RC-09-511

From
(m)

To
(m)

89.92
94.49
137.16
22.86
24.38
30.48
62.48
80.77
32.00
10.67
13.72
25.91
114.30
115.82
25.91
27.43
30.48
36.58
51.82
54.86
56.39
60.96
68.58
38.10
41.15
42.67
59.44
21.34
22.86
9.14
7.62
48.77
50.29
62.48
70.10
33.53
4.57
28.96
32.00
4.57
28.96
30.48
9.14
21.34
19.81
35.05
39.62
4.57
6.10
10.67
12.19
16.76
4.57
13.72
4.57
74.68
44.20
6.10
7.62
9.14
12.19
9.14
10.67
28.96
30.48

91.44
96.01
138.68
24.38
25.91
32.00
64.01
82.30
33.53
12.19
15.24
27.43
115.82
117.35
27.43
28.96
32.00
38.10
53.34
56.39
57.91
62.48
70.10
39.62
42.67
44.20
60.96
22.86
24.38
10.67
9.14
50.29
51.82
64.01
71.63
35.05
6.10
30.48
33.53
6.10
30.48
32.00
10.67
22.86
21.34
36.58
41.15
6.10
7.62
12.19
13.72
18.29
6.10
15.24
6.10
76.20
45.72
7.62
9.14
10.67
13.72
10.67
12.19
30.48
32.00

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

863930
863933
863963
863981
863982
863986
842008
842022
842053
842085
842087
842095
842158
842159
842181
842182
842184
842188
842199
842202
842203
842206
842211
842241
842243
842244
842255
842277
842278
842551
842651
842716
842784
842835
842841
842916
842933
842951
842985
842997
864015
864016
864051
864101
864137
864148
864151
864182
864183
864186
864187
864191
864219
864226
864334
864384
864428
864543
864544
864545
864547
864588
864589
864646
864647

CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES

0.08
2.21
0.19
0.12
2.71
1.70
0.12
0.20
0.11
0.15
0.14
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.15
0.15
0.16
0.13
0.13
0.14
0.15
0.17
0.13
0.13
0.09
0.13
0.14
4.07
4.67
2.93
2.83
0.12
0.19
0.10
0.09
0.14
2.30
2.09
0.16
2.29
2.39
0.11
0.09
0.09
0.06
0.08
1.74
1.62
0.06
3.88
0.06
4.82
2.88
4.88
4.57
0.13
4.26
3.41
4.61
3.76
4.42
2.67
5.24
5.76
2.32

0.390
0.094
0.577
1.500
0.009
0.003
0.497
0.588
0.238
3.640
0.551
0.599
0.218
0.362
0.254
0.353
0.296
0.332
0.277
0.374
0.724
0.353
0.212
0.989
1.115
1.255
1.240
0.078
0.090
0.062
0.050
0.251
0.363
0.823
0.213
0.692
0.159
0.239
0.692
1.145
0.054
0.090
0.248
1.170
0.267
0.068
0.070
0.159
0.130
0.038
0.109
0.026
3.520
0.100
0.040
0.444
0.022
0.280
0.207
0.177
0.030
0.123
0.154
0.788
0.507

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
4
1
2
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1

0.32
8.84
0.76
0.48
10.84
6.80
0.48
0.80
0.44
0.60
0.56
0.56
0.52
0.48
0.60
0.60
0.64
0.52
0.52
0.56
0.60
0.68
0.52
0.52
0.36
0.52
0.56
4.07
4.67
2.93
11.32
0.48
0.76
0.40
0.36
0.56
9.20
8.36
0.64
9.16
9.56
0.44
0.36
0.36
0.24
0.32
6.96
6.48
0.24
7.76
0.12
9.64
11.52
4.88
9.14
0.52
4.26
3.41
4.61
7.52
8.84
5.34
5.24
5.76
2.32

0.21
5.82
0.50
0.32
7.08
4.47
0.31
0.52
0.29
0.39
0.37
0.37
0.34
0.31
0.39
0.39
0.42
0.34
0.34
0.37
0.39
0.45
0.34
0.34
0.24
0.34
0.37
2.68
3.07
1.92
7.45
0.32
0.50
0.26
0.24
0.37
6.01
5.50
0.42
5.99
6.29
0.29
0.24
0.24
0.16
0.21
4.55
4.24
0.16
5.11
0.08
6.30
7.53
3.21
5.97
0.34
2.80
2.24
3.03
4.92
5.78
3.49
3.45
3.79
1.53

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


204

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-09-511
RC-09-513
RC-09-513
RC-09-513
RC-09-513
RC-09-513
RC-09-513
RC-09-514
RC-09-514
RC-09-514
RC-09-514
RC-09-514
RC-09-514
RC-09-514
RC-09-514
RC-09-514
RC-09-514
RC-09-514
RC-09-514
RC-09-514
RC-09-514
RC-09-514
RC-09-514
RC-09-514
RC-09-515
RC-09-515
RC-09-515
RC-09-515
RC-09-515
RC-09-515
RC-09-515
RC-09-515
RC-09-515
RC-09-515
RC-09-515
RC-09-515
RC-09-515
RC-09-515
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-516
RC-09-523
RC-09-524
RC-09-524
RC-09-534
RC-09-539
RC-09-539
RC-09-539
RC-09-541
RC-09-544

From
(m)

To
(m)

32.00
7.62
15.24
19.81
22.86
25.91
28.96
4.57
6.10
7.62
10.67
12.19
15.24
16.76
24.38
28.96
30.48
32.00
35.05
50.29
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
16.76
18.29
19.81
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
44.20
45.72
47.24
53.34
56.39
57.91
4.57
18.29
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
41.15
45.72
47.24
48.77
56.39
57.91
59.44
65.53
6.10
4.57
7.62
114.30
4.57
7.62
9.14
28.96
28.96

33.53
9.14
16.76
21.34
24.38
27.43
30.48
6.10
7.62
9.14
12.19
13.72
16.76
18.29
25.91
30.48
32.00
33.53
36.58
51.82
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
18.29
19.81
21.34
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
45.72
47.24
48.77
54.86
57.91
59.44
6.10
19.81
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
42.67
47.24
48.77
50.29
57.91
59.44
60.96
67.06
7.62
6.10
9.14
115.82
6.10
9.14
10.67
30.48
30.48

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

864648
864716
864722
864723
864724
864726
864728
864732
864733
864734
864735
864736
864738
864739
864742
864745
864746
864747
864749
864761
864762
864763
864764
864765
864768
864769
864770
864772
864773
864774
864775
864776
864787
864788
864789
864794
864796
864797
864799
864801
864803
864804
864805
864806
864811
864812
864813
864814
864816
864819
864821
864822
864828
864829
864830
864834
866249
865092
865094
865539
865835
865836
865837
865946
866081

CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES

4.94
4.95
5.57
2.83
7.91
4.82
2.14
5.72
0.96
6.68
2.32
4.45
8.89
2.02
8.24
3.97
3.32
1.68
5.63
4.41
6.69
7.82
7.40
4.94
6.48
11.50
6.11
5.42
5.45
5.25
5.53
5.40
5.33
3.62
5.75
5.66
5.41
5.64
2.05
4.91
9.02
8.73
4.89
4.76
8.37
3.98
8.19
9.22
5.16
4.28
4.61
4.79
5.60
5.04
3.98
5.72
2.56
4.88
4.56
2.97
6.56
1.95
5.10
4.45
0.15

0.301
0.253
0.024
0.039
0.082
0.125
1.615
0.054
0.495
0.115
0.057
0.029
0.066
0.029
0.025
0.173
0.793
1.010
1.360
0.167
0.026
0.013
0.003
0.033
0.187
0.615
1.765
0.193
1.235
0.319
0.082
0.133
0.047
0.039
0.093
0.006
0.003
0.003
0.053
0.148
3.150
3.410
0.879
0.747
0.093
0.324
0.056
0.081
0.011
0.280
0.121
0.266
0.549
0.233
0.015
0.006
0.167
0.163
0.089
0.360
0.090
0.088
0.227
3.310
6.010

1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
4

4.94
9.90
5.57
2.83
7.91
9.64
2.14
5.72
0.96
6.68
2.32
4.45
8.89
2.02
8.24
7.94
3.32
1.68
11.26
8.82
6.69
7.82
7.40
4.94
6.48
11.50
6.11
10.84
10.90
10.50
11.06
10.80
10.66
7.24
11.50
11.32
10.82
11.28
2.05
4.91
9.02
8.73
4.89
9.52
8.37
7.96
8.19
9.22
10.32
8.56
9.22
9.58
11.20
10.08
7.96
11.44
10.24
9.76
9.12
5.94
6.56
1.95
10.20
4.45
0.60

3.23
6.51
3.66
1.85
5.20
6.34
1.41
3.74
0.63
4.39
1.53
2.91
5.85
1.32
5.39
5.22
2.18
1.10
7.36
5.76
4.40
5.11
4.87
3.23
4.24
7.57
3.99
7.13
7.12
6.91
7.23
7.11
7.01
4.76
7.52
7.45
7.12
7.37
1.34
3.23
5.93
5.74
3.20
6.26
5.51
5.20
5.39
6.07
6.79
5.63
6.03
6.30
7.37
6.59
5.24
7.48
6.74
6.38
6.00
3.91
4.29
1.28
6.67
2.93
0.39

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


205

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-09-544
RC-09-544
RC-09-544
RC-09-545
RC-09-545
RC-09-545
RC-09-545
RC-09-545
RC-09-545
RC-09-545
RC-09-546
RC-09-546
RC-09-546
RC-09-546
RC-09-546
RC-09-546
RC-09-546
RC-10-547
RC-10-551
RC-10-551
RC-10-557
RC-10-557
RC-10-557
RC-10-557
RC-10-557
RC-10-557
RC-10-557
RC-10-557
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-561
RC-10-562
RC-10-564
RC-10-565
RC-10-565
RC-10-565
RC-10-566
RC-10-566
RC-10-566
RC-10-567
RC-10-568
RC-10-568
RC-10-569
RC-10-570
RC-10-571
RC-10-571
RC-10-572
RC-10-573

From
(m)

To
(m)

33.53
73.15
79.25
45.72
56.39
57.91
59.44
65.53
68.58
86.87
42.67
44.20
45.72
60.96
62.48
67.06
68.58
4.57
83.82
86.87
9.14
53.34
83.82
92.96
103.63
134.11
143.26
146.30
169.16
204.22
205.74
213.36
214.88
217.93
225.55
233.17
236.22
237.74
240.79
242.32
243.84
245.36
246.89
248.41
249.94
286.51
289.56
292.61
88.39
10.67
115.82
118.87
123.44
3.05
51.82
59.44
3.05
3.05
57.91
3.05
3.05
3.05
86.87
3.05
3.05

35.05
74.68
80.77
47.24
57.91
59.44
60.96
67.06
70.10
88.39
44.20
45.72
47.24
62.48
64.01
68.58
70.10
6.10
85.34
88.39
10.67
54.86
85.34
94.49
105.16
135.64
144.78
147.83
170.69
205.74
207.26
214.88
216.41
219.46
227.08
234.70
237.74
239.27
242.32
243.84
245.36
246.89
248.41
249.94
251.46
288.04
291.08
294.13
89.92
12.19
117.35
120.40
124.97
4.57
53.34
60.96
4.57
4.57
59.44
4.57
4.57
4.57
88.39
4.57
4.57

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

866084
866112
866116
866152
866159
866161
866162
866166
866168
866181
866217
866218
866219
866228
866229
866233
866234
866259
866493
866495
28314
28346
28367
28374
28382
28403
28409
28412
28756
29042
29043
29048
29049
29052
29057
29063
29065
29066
29068
29069
29070
29071
29072
29073
29074
29099
29102
29104
28839
29122
29361
29363
29366
29503
29537
29543
29579
29664
29703
29736
29852
29927
29987
7012
7089

CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES

0.15
0.16
0.14
0.09
0.11
0.15
0.14
0.14
0.13
0.15
0.14
1.26
1.62
0.16
0.16
0.15
0.16
2.20
4.61
5.38
2.63
1.18
2.60
2.52
2.55
2.85
2.49
2.43
3.41
5.23
4.51
4.25
5.73
5.49
5.58
5.51
4.98
5.37
5.15
5.30
3.56
3.74
4.29
4.51
4.17
3.36
3.04
4.77
2.85
2.86
1.42
2.72
1.79
1.64
1.18
1.35
1.61
2.28
2.88
2.04
1.39
1.67
2.78
1.64
2.36

0.221
0.208
0.286
0.406
0.384
3.800
2.130
0.417
1.415
0.218
0.216
0.366
0.450
0.244
0.222
0.455
0.285
0.009
0.104
0.168
0.264
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.128
0.073
0.024
0.029
0.035
0.042
0.109
0.025
0.054
0.031
0.026
0.027
0.030
0.042
0.041
0.028
0.043
0.010
0.009
0.022
0.241
0.013
0.147
0.034
0.006
0.077
0.080
0.036
0.086
0.003
0.006
0.022
0.020
0.091
0.266
0.067
0.019

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

0.60
0.64
0.56
0.36
0.44
0.60
0.56
0.56
0.52
0.60
0.56
2.52
3.24
0.64
0.64
0.60
0.64
8.80
9.22
10.76
10.52
4.72
10.40
10.08
10.20
11.40
9.96
9.72
6.82
10.46
9.02
8.50
11.46
10.98
11.16
11.02
9.96
10.74
10.30
10.60
7.12
7.48
8.58
9.02
8.34
6.72
6.08
9.54
11.40
11.44
5.68
10.88
7.16
6.56
4.72
5.40
6.44
9.12
11.52
8.16
5.56
6.68
11.12
6.56
9.44

0.39
0.42
0.37
0.24
0.29
0.39
0.37
0.37
0.34
0.39
0.37
1.66
2.13
0.42
0.42
0.39
0.42
5.75
6.07
7.08
6.88
3.11
6.84
6.59
6.67
7.45
6.55
6.35
4.46
6.88
5.93
5.59
7.49
7.18
7.29
7.20
6.55
7.02
6.73
6.97
4.68
4.89
5.64
5.90
5.49
4.39
4.00
6.28
7.45
7.53
3.71
7.11
4.68
4.32
3.11
3.55
4.24
6.00
7.53
5.37
3.66
4.39
7.32
4.32
6.21

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


206

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-10-573
RC-10-574
RC-10-575
RC-10-575
RC-10-575
RC-10-575
RC-10-575
RC-10-575
RC-10-575
RC-10-575
RC-10-575
RC-10-575
RC-11-656
RC-11-657
RC-11-658
RC-11-658
RC-11-658
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-659
RC-11-660
RC-11-660
RC-11-660
RC-11-660
RC-11-661
RC-11-661
RC-11-661
RC-11-661
RC-11-661
RC-11-661
RC-11-661
RC-11-661
RC-11-661
RC-11-662
RC-11-662
RC-11-662
RC-11-662
RC-11-662
RC-11-662
RC-11-662
RC-11-662
RC-11-662

From
(m)
9.14
3.05
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
28.96
3.05
33.53
3.05
6.10
9.14
0.00
1.52
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
33.53
35.05
44.20
45.72
24.38
27.43
28.96
30.48
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
54.86
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
24.38
35.05
51.82
53.34
64.01

To
(m)
10.67
4.57
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
30.48
4.57
35.05
4.57
7.62
10.67
1.52
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
35.05
36.58
45.72
47.24
25.91
28.96
30.48
32.00
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
56.39
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
25.91
36.58
53.34
54.86
65.53

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

7094
7135
7177
7178
7253
7254
7182
7255
7256
7257
7258
7196
276173
276246
276265
276267
276269
276328
276329
276330
276331
276332
276333
276334
276335
276336
276337
276338
276339
276341
276342
276343
276344
276345
276346
276347
276348
276349
276351
276352
276353
276354
276355
276381
276382
276388
276389
276418
276421
276422
276423
276425
276426
276427
276428
276441
276447
276448
276449
276450
276463
276471
276483
276484
276491

CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES

2.88
1.47
1.03
2.12
1.81
2.01
2.61
1.89
1.74
1.71
1.73
1.25
2.87
1.82
0.83
2.50
2.77
1.69
10.32
4.83
11.17
10.85
8.59
8.54
11.12
9.22
2.95
11.15
11.14
10.90
10.39
8.36
9.98
10.43
7.49
10.35
9.56
6.63
11.37
10.42
10.98
9.08
9.71
2.24
1.73
2.53
1.44
1.53
1.23
1.69
1.87
1.62
2.69
2.21
1.12
2.19
1.11
2.66
0.85
1.12
1.58
2.41
1.27
1.03
2.69

0.079
0.289
0.115
0.103
0.300
0.330
0.169
0.240
0.120
0.180
0.040
0.086
0.326
1.335
0.363
0.115
0.248
0.320
0.194
0.015
0.003
0.003
0.007
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.006
0.011
0.003
0.003
0.027
0.051
0.006
0.003
0.006
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.072
0.136
0.458
0.412
0.007
0.018
0.106
0.129
0.036
0.018
0.010
0.016
0.022
0.078
0.083
0.100
0.098
0.086
0.056
0.038
0.010
0.583

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

11.52
5.88
4.12
8.48
7.24
8.04
10.44
7.56
6.96
6.84
6.92
5.00
11.48
7.28
3.32
10.00
11.08
1.69
10.32
4.83
11.17
10.85
8.59
8.54
11.12
9.22
2.95
11.15
11.14
10.90
10.39
8.36
9.98
10.43
7.49
10.35
9.56
6.63
11.37
10.42
10.98
9.08
9.71
8.96
6.92
10.12
5.76
6.12
4.92
6.76
7.48
6.48
10.76
8.84
4.48
8.76
4.44
10.64
3.40
4.48
6.32
9.64
5.08
4.12
10.76

7.53
3.87
2.71
5.54
4.75
5.28
6.82
4.96
4.57
4.49
4.54
3.29
7.55
4.79
2.18
6.58
7.24
1.11
6.75
3.18
7.30
7.14
5.65
5.58
7.32
6.03
1.94
7.34
7.28
7.17
6.79
5.50
6.57
6.82
4.93
6.76
6.29
4.36
7.43
6.86
7.18
5.97
6.39
5.89
4.52
6.66
3.79
4.00
3.22
4.45
4.92
4.26
7.03
5.82
2.95
5.73
2.92
6.95
2.24
2.95
4.13
6.30
3.34
2.71
7.08

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


207

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-11-662
RC-11-662
RC-11-662
RC-11-663
RC-11-663
RC-11-666
RC-11-667
RC-11-668
RC-11-669
RC-11-669
RC-11-669
RC-11-670
RC-11-673
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-677
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678

From
(m)

To
(m)

65.53
67.06
68.58
25.91
27.43
74.68
99.06
32.00
3.05
4.57
100.58
88.39
57.91
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
60.96
62.48
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05

67.06
68.58
70.10
27.43
28.96
76.20
100.58
33.53
4.57
6.10
102.11
89.92
59.44
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
60.96
62.48
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

276492
276493
276494
276521
276522
276719
271830
271868
276935
276936
22504
22581
22815
866576
866577
866578
866579
866581
866582
866583
866584
866585
866586
866587
866588
866589
866590
866591
866592
866593
866594
866595
866596
866597
866598
866599
866601
866602
866603
866604
866605
866606
866607
866611
866612
866613
866614
866615
866616
866617
866618
866619
866621
866622
866623
866624
866625
866626
866627
866628
866629
866630
866631
866632
866633

CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-100%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES

0.86
1.16
2.20
1.38
1.52
7.89
2.72
2.59
1.98
2.08
1.34
2.81
1.25
0.19
0.25
0.23
0.25
0.26
0.24
0.21
0.20
0.24
0.21
0.19
0.16
0.21
0.24
0.24
0.20
0.19
0.28
0.19
0.23
0.25
0.23
0.22
0.19
0.23
0.17
0.18
0.22
0.23
0.19
0.22
0.20
0.15
0.20
0.21
0.24
0.21
0.22
0.23
0.26
0.21
0.27
0.19
0.26
0.26
0.25
0.27
0.25
0.20
0.21
0.25
0.23

0.056
0.028
0.132
3.980
3.090
0.023
0.003
0.094
0.011
0.017
0.003
0.012
0.003
0.036
0.105
1.040
0.106
0.005
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.005
0.045
0.007
0.006
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.005
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.151
0.006
0.417
0.129
0.053
0.036
0.051
0.042
0.219
0.222
0.235
0.161
0.100
0.123
0.280
0.099
0.077
0.110
0.087
0.044
0.041
0.072

4
4
4
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

3.44
4.64
8.80
5.52
6.08
7.89
10.88
10.36
7.92
8.32
5.36
11.24
5.00
0.76
1.00
0.92
1.00
1.04
0.96
0.84
0.80
0.96
0.84
0.76
0.64
0.84
0.96
0.96
0.80
0.76
1.12
0.76
0.92
1.00
0.92
0.88
0.76
0.92
0.68
0.72
0.88
0.92
0.76
0.88
0.80
0.60
0.80
0.84
0.96
0.84
0.88
0.92
1.04
0.84
1.08
0.76
1.04
1.04
1.00
1.08
1.00
0.80
0.84
1.00
0.92

2.25
3.05
5.79
3.63
3.97
5.19
7.16
6.77
5.21
5.44
3.50
7.35
3.27
0.50
0.66
0.60
0.66
0.68
0.63
0.55
0.52
0.63
0.55
0.50
0.42
0.55
0.63
0.63
0.53
0.50
0.73
0.50
0.60
0.66
0.61
0.58
0.50
0.60
0.45
0.47
0.58
0.61
0.50
0.58
0.52
0.39
0.53
0.55
0.63
0.55
0.58
0.61
0.68
0.55
0.71
0.50
0.68
0.68
0.66
0.71
0.66
0.53
0.55
0.66
0.60

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


208

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-678
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679

From
(m)

To
(m)

36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
60.96
62.48
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
76.20
77.72
79.25
80.77
82.30
83.82
85.34
86.87
88.39
89.92
91.44
92.96
94.49
96.01
97.54
99.06
100.58
102.11
103.63
105.16
106.68
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96

38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
60.96
62.48
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
76.20
77.72
79.25
80.77
82.30
83.82
85.34
86.87
88.39
89.92
91.44
92.96
94.49
96.01
97.54
99.06
100.58
102.11
103.63
105.16
106.68
108.20
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

866634
866635
866636
866637
866638
866639
866641
866642
866643
866644
866645
866646
866647
866648
866649
866651
866652
866653
866654
866655
866656
866657
866658
866659
866661
866662
866663
866664
866665
866666
866667
866668
866669
866670
866671
866672
866673
866674
866675
866676
866677
866678
866679
866681
866682
866683
866684
866687
866688
866689
866691
866692
866693
866694
866695
866696
866697
866698
866699
866701
866702
866703
866704
866705
866706

CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES

0.25
0.21
0.22
0.17
0.22
0.21
0.20
0.19
0.21
0.26
0.22
0.23
0.21
0.18
0.17
0.22
0.22
0.20
0.21
0.23
0.23
0.27
0.22
0.23
0.21
0.18
0.21
0.21
0.17
0.20
0.24
0.20
0.21
0.22
0.24
0.21
0.24
0.22
0.23
0.23
0.18
0.26
0.20
0.22
0.25
0.19
0.23
0.23
0.15
0.20
0.20
0.19
0.23
0.24
0.22
0.23
0.19
0.23
0.20
0.22
0.23
0.13
0.16
0.17
0.19

0.103
0.191
0.090
0.129
0.347
1.025
5.380
0.348
0.210
0.061
0.194
0.223
0.038
0.028
0.078
0.112
0.029
0.049
0.026
0.072
0.014
0.125
0.088
0.011
0.008
0.007
0.022
0.184
0.299
0.418
0.063
0.008
0.045
0.010
0.016
0.040
0.123
0.762
0.317
1.300
1.215
0.693
0.124
0.083
0.200
0.003
0.003
0.184
0.361
0.092
0.066
0.009
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.021
0.107
0.148

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

Normalized
Weight
1.00
0.84
0.88
0.68
0.88
0.84
0.80
0.76
0.84
1.04
0.88
0.92
0.84
0.72
0.68
0.88
0.88
0.80
0.84
0.92
0.92
1.08
0.88
0.92
0.84
0.72
0.84
0.84
0.68
0.80
0.96
0.80
0.84
0.88
0.96
0.84
0.96
0.88
0.92
0.92
0.72
1.04
0.80
0.88
1.00
0.76
0.92
0.92
0.60
0.80
0.80
0.76
0.92
0.96
0.88
0.92
0.76
0.92
0.80
0.88
0.92
0.52
0.64
0.68
0.76

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length
0.66
0.55
0.58
0.45
0.58
0.55
0.53
0.50
0.55
0.68
0.58
0.61
0.55
0.47
0.44
0.58
0.58
0.52
0.55
0.60
0.61
0.71
0.58
0.61
0.55
0.47
0.55
0.55
0.45
0.52
0.63
0.53
0.55
0.58
0.63
0.55
0.63
0.58
0.61
0.60
0.47
0.68
0.52
0.58
0.65
0.50
0.61
0.61
0.39
0.53
0.53
0.50
0.61
0.63
0.58
0.61
0.50
0.61
0.52
0.58
0.61
0.34
0.42
0.44
0.50

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


209

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-679
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680

From
(m)

To
(m)

30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
60.96
62.48
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
76.20
77.72
79.25
80.77
82.30
83.82
85.34
86.87
88.39
89.92
91.44
92.96
94.49
96.01
97.54
99.06
100.58
102.11
103.63
105.16
106.68
108.20
109.73
111.25
112.78
114.30
115.82
117.35
118.87
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67

32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
60.96
62.48
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
76.20
77.72
79.25
80.77
82.30
83.82
85.34
86.87
88.39
89.92
91.44
92.96
94.49
96.01
97.54
99.06
100.58
102.11
103.63
105.16
106.68
108.20
109.73
111.25
112.78
114.30
115.82
117.35
118.87
120.40
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

866707
866708
866709
866710
866711
866712
866713
866714
866715
866716
866717
866718
866719
866721
866722
866723
866724
866725
866726
866727
866728
866729
866731
866732
866733
866734
866735
866736
866737
866738
866739
866741
866742
866743
866744
866745
866746
866747
866748
866749
866750
866751
866752
866753
866754
866755
866756
866757
866758
866759
866761
866762
866763
866764
866765
866766
866767
866768
866769
866773
866774
866775
866776
866777
866778

CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES

0.14
0.15
0.14
0.14
0.16
0.15
0.16
0.15
0.16
0.19
0.19
0.21
0.18
0.20
0.21
0.25
0.19
0.17
0.22
0.20
0.20
0.22
0.15
0.21
0.23
0.14
0.22
0.18
0.21
0.20
0.22
0.21
0.22
0.24
0.22
0.17
0.21
0.15
0.14
0.21
0.23
0.23
0.14
0.24
0.11
0.14
0.22
0.22
0.19
0.21
0.17
0.16
0.17
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.16
0.15
0.16
0.15
0.18
0.18
0.12
0.17
0.24

0.078
0.055
0.036
0.032
0.057
0.046
0.109
0.283
0.076
0.169
0.053
0.036
0.050
0.031
0.026
0.044
0.111
0.153
0.105
0.122
0.247
0.099
0.089
0.059
0.044
0.320
0.157
0.504
0.333
0.231
0.676
0.186
0.075
0.128
0.047
0.078
0.030
0.204
0.189
0.114
0.059
0.049
0.080
0.049
0.066
0.128
0.134
0.033
0.238
0.158
0.905
0.917
1.235
1.005
0.162
0.560
0.521
0.057
0.061
0.046
0.080
0.200
0.021
0.003
0.006

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

Normalized
Weight
0.56
0.60
0.56
0.56
0.64
0.60
0.64
0.60
0.64
0.76
0.76
0.84
0.72
0.80
0.84
1.00
0.76
0.68
0.88
0.80
0.80
0.88
0.60
0.84
0.92
0.56
0.88
0.72
0.84
0.80
0.88
0.84
0.88
0.96
0.88
0.68
0.84
0.60
0.56
0.84
0.92
0.92
0.56
0.96
0.44
0.56
0.88
0.88
0.76
0.84
0.68
0.64
0.68
0.72
0.64
0.56
0.64
0.60
0.64
0.60
0.72
0.72
0.48
0.68
0.96

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length
0.37
0.39
0.37
0.37
0.42
0.39
0.42
0.39
0.42
0.50
0.50
0.55
0.47
0.52
0.55
0.66
0.50
0.45
0.58
0.53
0.53
0.58
0.39
0.55
0.61
0.37
0.58
0.47
0.55
0.53
0.58
0.55
0.58
0.63
0.58
0.45
0.55
0.39
0.37
0.55
0.61
0.60
0.37
0.63
0.29
0.37
0.58
0.58
0.50
0.55
0.45
0.42
0.45
0.47
0.42
0.37
0.42
0.39
0.42
0.39
0.47
0.47
0.32
0.44
0.63

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


210

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-680
RC-11-682
RC-11-682
RC-11-682
RC-11-685
RC-12-688
RC-12-688
RC-12-688
RC-12-688
RC-12-688
RC-12-688
RC-12-688
RC-12-688
RC-12-691
RC-12-691
RC-12-691
RC-12-691
RC-12-691
RC-12-691
RC-12-691
RC-12-691
RC-12-691
RC-12-692
RC-12-692
RC-12-693
RC-12-693
RC-12-693
RC-12-693
RC-12-696
RC-12-696
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707

From
(m)

To
(m)

12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
28.96
30.48
32.00
3.05
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
65.53
73.15
86.87
6.10
25.91
38.10
41.15
42.67
44.20
47.24
50.29
143.26
16.76
73.15
9.14
44.20
50.29
117.35
24.38
103.63
62.48
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
76.20
77.72
79.25
80.77
82.30
83.82
85.34

13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
30.48
32.00
33.53
4.57
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
67.06
74.68
88.39
7.62
27.43
39.62
42.67
44.20
45.72
48.77
51.82
144.78
18.29
74.68
10.67
45.72
51.82
118.87
25.91
105.16
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
76.20
77.72
79.25
80.77
82.30
83.82
85.34
86.87

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

866779
866781
866782
866783
866784
866785
866786
866787
866788
866789
866790
866791
866792
866793
866794
866795
866796
866797
866798
866799
866901
866902
866903
867050
867329
867331
867332
867333
867334
867372
867377
867387
867636
867651
867659
867662
867663
867664
867666
867668
867734
867752
867792
868017
868042
868046
868094
868312
868367
862726
862727
862728
862729
862730
862731
862732
862733
862734
862735
862736
862737
862738
862739
862741
862742

CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES

0.22
0.26
0.14
0.08
0.27
0.23
0.18
0.18
0.25
0.17
0.17
0.16
0.07
0.18
0.19
0.16
0.21
0.20
0.17
0.20
0.19
0.24
0.16
2.00
2.30
1.72
2.03
2.52
1.07
2.86
2.52
2.26
2.52
1.95
0.75
2.07
1.96
1.59
2.31
2.19
0.98
2.43
2.34
1.66
2.56
1.25
2.41
2.86
2.23
1.82
2.07
2.14
1.27
1.94
1.93
1.90
1.19
1.80
1.66
1.20
2.25
1.76
2.41
2.26
2.17

0.032
0.003
0.012
0.010
0.020
0.003
0.003
0.005
0.003
0.003
0.006
0.008
0.009
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.850
0.504
0.409
0.041
0.003
0.003
0.044
0.011
0.006
0.148
0.027
0.112
0.003
0.080
0.003
0.155
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.053
0.145
0.149
0.130
0.237
0.241
0.997
0.111
0.067
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

0.88
1.04
0.56
0.32
1.08
0.92
0.72
0.72
1.00
0.68
0.68
0.64
0.28
0.72
0.76
0.64
0.84
0.80
0.68
0.80
0.76
0.96
0.64
8.00
9.20
6.88
8.12
10.08
4.28
11.44
10.08
9.04
10.08
7.80
3.00
8.28
7.84
6.36
9.24
8.76
3.92
9.72
9.36
6.64
10.24
5.00
9.64
11.44
8.92
7.28
8.28
8.56
5.08
7.76
7.72
7.60
4.76
7.20
6.64
4.80
9.00
7.04
9.64
9.04
8.68

0.58
0.68
0.37
0.21
0.71
0.60
0.47
0.47
0.65
0.45
0.44
0.42
0.18
0.47
0.50
0.42
0.55
0.53
0.44
0.53
0.50
0.63
0.42
5.26
6.05
4.53
5.31
6.63
2.80
7.48
6.59
5.95
6.63
5.13
1.97
5.45
5.12
4.18
6.04
5.73
2.58
6.35
6.12
4.34
6.74
3.27
6.34
7.48
5.83
4.76
5.45
5.59
3.34
5.11
5.05
5.00
3.11
4.74
4.37
3.14
5.92
4.60
6.34
5.95
5.67

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


211

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-707
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-708
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709

From
(m)
86.87
88.39
89.92
91.44
92.96
94.49
4.57
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
3.05
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29

To
(m)
88.39
89.92
91.44
92.96
94.49
96.01
6.10
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
4.57
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
38.10
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

862743
862744
862745
862746
862747
862748
862753
862755
862756
862757
862758
862759
862761
862762
862763
862764
862765
862766
862767
862768
862769
862770
862771
862772
862773
862774
862775
862776
862777
862778
862779
862781
862782
862783
862784
862787
862788
862789
862791
862792
862794
862795
862796
862797
862799
862801
862802
862803
862804
862805
862806
862807
862808
862809
862810
862811
862812
862813
862814
862815
862816
862817
862818
862819
862821

CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES

1.85
2.49
2.65
2.25
2.26
1.96
2.73
2.52
2.61
2.53
2.42
2.63
2.60
2.71
2.37
2.32
2.78
2.61
2.50
2.60
2.73
2.60
2.76
2.55
2.49
2.77
2.68
2.67
2.42
2.53
2.78
2.83
2.88
2.73
2.77
2.67
2.77
2.38
2.86
2.86
2.83
2.80
2.70
2.83
2.72
2.00
2.17
1.82
1.84
1.91
1.98
2.13
2.14
1.98
2.08
2.18
2.03
1.98
2.14
2.15
1.87
1.93
2.11
1.90
1.70

0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.006
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.006
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.012
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.023
0.003
0.355
0.099
0.574
0.496
0.486
0.232
0.085
0.039
0.076
0.080
0.268
0.041
0.027
0.056
0.113
0.167
0.087
0.257
0.215
0.214
0.011
0.016
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.066
0.003
0.007
0.003
0.003

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

7.40
9.96
10.60
9.00
9.04
7.84
10.92
10.08
10.44
10.12
9.68
10.52
10.40
10.84
9.48
9.28
11.12
10.44
10.00
10.40
10.92
10.40
11.04
10.20
9.96
11.08
10.72
10.68
9.68
10.12
11.12
11.32
11.52
10.92
11.08
10.68
11.08
9.52
11.44
11.44
11.32
11.20
10.80
11.32
10.88
8.00
8.68
7.28
7.36
7.64
7.92
8.52
8.56
7.92
8.32
8.72
8.12
7.92
8.56
8.60
7.48
7.72
8.44
7.60
6.80

4.87
6.51
6.97
5.92
5.91
5.16
7.14
6.63
6.82
6.66
6.33
6.92
6.84
7.08
6.24
6.07
7.32
6.87
6.54
6.84
7.14
6.84
7.26
6.67
6.55
7.24
7.05
7.03
6.33
6.66
7.27
7.45
7.58
7.14
7.29
7.03
7.24
6.26
7.53
7.48
7.40
7.37
7.11
7.40
7.11
5.26
5.71
4.76
4.84
4.99
5.21
5.61
5.59
5.21
5.44
5.74
5.34
5.18
5.63
5.62
4.92
5.08
5.52
5.00
4.44

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


212

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-709
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-710
RC-12-712
RC-12-712
RC-12-712
RC-12-712
RC-12-712

From
(m)
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
39.62
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
60.96
62.48
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
76.20
77.72
79.25
80.77
82.30
83.82
85.34
86.87
88.39
89.92
6.10
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19

To
(m)
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
60.96
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72
15.24
16.76
18.29
19.81
21.34
22.86
24.38
25.91
27.43
28.96
30.48
32.00
33.53
35.05
36.58
41.15
42.67
44.20
45.72
47.24
48.77
50.29
51.82
53.34
54.86
56.39
57.91
59.44
60.96
62.48
64.01
65.53
67.06
68.58
70.10
71.63
73.15
74.68
76.20
77.72
79.25
80.77
82.30
83.82
85.34
86.87
88.39
89.92
91.44
7.62
9.14
10.67
12.19
13.72

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

862822
862823
862824
862825
862826
862827
862833
862834
862835
862836
862837
862838
862839
862841
862842
862843
862844
862845
862846
862847
862848
862849
862850
862851
862852
862853
862856
862857
862858
862859
862861
862862
862863
862864
862865
862866
862867
862868
862869
862871
862872
862873
862874
862875
862876
862877
862878
862879
862881
862882
862883
862884
862885
862886
862887
862888
862889
862890
862891
862892
862927
862928
862929
862930
862931

CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES

2.15
1.95
1.50
2.07
1.72
1.73
1.94
2.07
2.46
2.24
1.91
2.33
2.26
2.17
2.33
2.53
1.97
2.37
2.40
1.91
1.84
1.97
2.05
2.13
2.03
1.71
1.91
2.13
1.96
2.12
1.82
2.20
1.81
1.62
2.06
1.90
1.70
1.92
1.91
1.82
1.78
1.60
2.09
1.84
2.12
1.95
1.41
2.50
2.36
2.03
2.67
2.02
2.30
2.24
2.29
1.97
1.87
2.09
2.07
2.21
2.74
2.75
2.13
2.62
1.96

0.003
0.003
0.005
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.023
0.034
0.089
0.600
0.585
1.280
2.320
1.780
1.095
0.687
0.567
0.072
0.056
0.030
0.049
0.392
0.478
0.075
0.141
0.062
0.097
0.135
0.093
0.018
0.035
0.024
0.011
0.037
0.003
0.064
0.005
0.111
0.011
0.070
0.003
0.006
0.007
0.015
0.010
0.047
0.042
0.047
0.047
0.019
0.024
0.008
0.043
0.030
0.012
0.003
0.007
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.019
0.021
0.007
0.006
0.005

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

8.60
7.80
6.00
8.28
6.88
6.92
7.76
8.28
9.84
8.96
7.64
9.32
9.04
8.68
9.32
10.12
7.88
9.48
9.60
7.64
7.36
7.88
8.20
8.52
8.12
6.84
7.64
8.52
7.84
8.48
7.28
8.80
7.24
6.48
8.24
7.60
6.80
7.68
7.64
7.28
7.12
6.40
8.36
7.36
8.48
7.80
5.64
10.00
9.44
8.12
10.68
8.08
9.20
8.96
9.16
7.88
7.48
8.36
8.28
8.84
10.96
11.00
8.52
10.48
7.84

5.66
5.13
3.92
5.45
4.50
4.55
5.11
5.45
6.43
5.89
4.99
6.13
5.95
5.67
6.13
6.61
5.18
6.24
6.27
5.03
4.81
5.18
5.39
5.57
5.34
4.47
4.99
5.61
5.12
5.58
4.79
5.75
4.76
4.24
5.42
5.00
4.44
5.05
4.99
4.79
4.68
4.18
5.50
4.81
5.58
5.13
3.69
6.58
6.17
5.34
7.03
5.28
6.05
5.86
6.03
5.18
4.89
5.50
5.41
5.82
7.21
7.24
5.57
6.89
5.12

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


213

DataSet

Hole_ID

La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India
La India

RC-12-712
RC-12-712
RC-12-713
RC-12-713
RC-12-717
RC-12-718
RC-12-719
RC-12-719
RC-12-719
RC-12-719

From
(m)

To
(m)

15.24
16.76
3.05
4.57
0.00
3.05
4.57
53.34
65.53
108.20

16.76
18.29
4.57
6.10
1.52
4.57
6.10
54.86
67.06
109.73

SampleID

Sample_Type

Recvd Wt

Au_Plot

Normalization
Factor

Normalized
Weight

Normalized Wt per meter


by Perc and Interval Length

862933
862934
862956
862957
863207
863289
863378
863413
863422
863452

CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-50%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES
CHIPS-25%JONES

2.71
2.04
2.30
2.81
3.73
2.39
1.87
2.85
2.18
2.74

0.003
0.003
0.008
0.006
0.030
0.166
0.439
0.003
0.003
0.120

4
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
4

10.84
8.16
9.20
11.24
7.46
9.56
7.48
11.40
8.72
10.96

7.13
5.33
6.05
7.35
4.91
6.29
4.89
7.50
5.70
7.16

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


214

Appendix 13.1 Summary of test work performed by KCA


KCA May 2007

Eight composite samples of mineralized reject from four reverse circulation holes drilled
in 2006
Bottle rolls at 80% minus 0.075 mm for each composite at 96 hr
Flotation tests on two sulfide composites

KCA July 2007

Two single stage rougher flotation tests on sulfide composites from KCA May 2007 test
work

KCA September 2008

Seven composite samples from 152 bags of HQ and PQ core material.


Rock density tests on randomly selected pieces of whole HQ and PQ core.
Bond work index test work on material crushed to minus 50 mm from each composited,
with the exception of one high grade composite. A 20 kg portion of crushed material for
each composite was sent to Phillips Enterprises for rod mill grindability tests, ball mill
grindability tests, and abrasion tests.
Head analyses for gold and silver for each composite with a portion of pulverized head
split being assayed for an additional series of elements for a whole rock analysis.
Bottle roll leach tests for each composite at 80% minus 0.075 mm.
Gravity concentration test on the high grade composite at P80 0.075 mm.
Agglomeration test work on four 2-kilogram portions from each of the composites,
excluding the high grade composite at a crush size of minus 12.5 mm with additions of 0,
2, 4, and 8 kilograms of cement per metric tonne of ore for the four tests, respectively.
A total of 13 column leach tests conducted on material crushed to 100% minus 50 mm
and 12.5 mm for each of the six non-high grade composites; a single column test at 12.5
mm was conducted utilizing the high grade composite.
Acid base accounting test work was performed on a pulverized portion of the head
material from each of the seven composites and a weighted portion of the tailings
material from each separate column leach test pulverized to 100% minus 0.106 mm to
determine acid generating potential.

KCA 2009

Four composites from 24 bags of material containing 74 tagged intervals of split HQ core
Rock density tests were completed on a single piece of split HQ core from each tagged
interval
Bond work index test work was completed on a weighted portion of material from each
composite crushed to minus 25 mm; a portion of stage crushed material from each
composite was sent to Phillips Enterprises, LLC for rod mill grindability tests, ball mill
grindability tests, and abrasion tests
Head analysis for each composite

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


215

Bottle roll tests on each composite at 80% minus 0.075 mm was performed
Agglomeration and percolation tests were performed on three of the four composites at a
crush size of minus 9.5 mm and cement additions of 0, 2, 4, and 6 kilograms of cement
per metric tonne of dry ore
A total of seven separate column tests using material from the four composites with
material crushed to minus 25 mm and 9.5mm
Environmental test work was conducted on three of the column leach tests

KCA March 2010

Seven separate core composites from two boxes of material consisting of nominal 6.3
mm RC cuttings with mostly fines
Head analyses were completed on the seven composites
Bottle roll tests on material size 80% passing 0.075 mm was conducted for each
composite

KCA March 2010

Three samples
Head screen analyses on the three samples
A total of three bottle roll tests were completed on the samples with the material as
received (no crushing)

KCA March 2010

Two samples from assay rejects


Bottle roll tests on each sample at 80% minus 0.075 mm was performed

KCA May 2010

Two samples were prepared from 12 bags of split HQ core from Domain 2-LC, Zone
LC-2, and Domain 2-VR, Zone D2
Head analyses were completed on the two samples
Bottle roll tests on material size 80% passing 0.075 mm for 96 hours was conducted on
the two samples
Cyanide shake tests on the two samples were performed
A total of two column tests (one for each sample) were performed at a crush size of 100%
passing 25 mm for a 66 day leach period

KCA June 2010

One composite of sulfide material from Domain 5


Head analysis were conducted
One bottle roll at crush size of 80% passing 0.075 mm for a 96 our period was conducted
on the sulfide sample
A cyanide shake test was performed on the sulfide composite
A column test at 100% passing 25 mm for a 64 day period was conducted

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


216

KCA September 2010

Three samples (oxide, mixed, and sulfide) from eighteen 5 gallon buckets containing 48
tagged intervals of split NQ core
Head analyses were completed
A total of three bottle roll tests (one for each composite) at 100% passing 0.106 mm for
96 hr were conducted
Cyanide shake tests were performed for each composite
Three separate column tests using material from the three core composites at 100%
passing 25 mm
Rock density test work on randomly selected pieces of core was performed
Comminution test work was performed

KCA June 2011

Two samples of reject feed material from 2010 KCA test work
A total of two column tests were performed at crush size of 100% passing 12.5 mm were
conducted

KCA 2011

Two separate samples from eight boxes of bulk material


Liner puncture test work performed

KCA 2011 Tarachi

Nine composite samples from 35 samples of crushed reject material from the La IndiaTarachi Zone
Head Analyses conducted
A total of nine bottle rolls tests (one on each composite) at crush size 80% passing 0.075
mm

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


217

Appendix 13.2 Sample Composites Tested


The column test sample composites are presented in Table 13.2.1 and the bottle roll test sample
composites are presented in Table 13.2.2.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


218

Table 13.2.1 Column Test Samples

KCA Sample No.

Sample Description

Source DDH

Interval
(meters)

Sample type

DDH07-32
DDHO7-25

0-19.3
1-5.9

PQ/HQ

1.12

0-19.3
1-5.9
19.3-28.0
5.9-34.5
5.9-25.5
21.5-32.0
8.6-29.0
0.0-17.0
2.0-12.0
11.0-18.0
21.5-32.0
8.6-29.0
0.0-17.0
2.0-12.0
11.0-18.0
19.3-28.0
5.9-34.5
5.9-25.5
51.0-60.0
49.0-56.0
25.0-33.0
43.0-51.0
51.0-60.0
49.0-56.0
25.0-33.0
43.0-51.0
16-34
34-72
37-55
53-60
24-35

PQ/HQ

0.97

PQ/HQ/HQ

0.98

HQ Core

0.71

HQ Core

0.72

PQ/HQ /HQ

1.06

HQ Core

1.04

HQ Core

1.44

HQ Core
HQ Core

1.55
13.25

PQ/HQ

2.35

HQ Core

1.65

PQ/HQ

2.27

HQ Core

0.45

HQ Core

0.51

Core

0.4

38310 C

Dacite SC/SA Viruela

38310 C

Dacite SC/SA Viruela

38311 D

Silica Massive Viruela

DDH07-32
DDHO7-25
DDH07-32
DDHO7-25
DDH07-31

Domain 2-VR, Zone D2

DDH-09-67 DDH09-68 DDH-09-69


DDH-09-70 DDH09-71

43748

43748

Domain 2-VR, Zone D2

38311 D

Silica Massive Viruela

DDH-09-67 DDH09-68 DDH-09-69


DDH-09-70 DDH09-71
DDH07-32
DDHO7-25
DDH07-31

Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2

DDH-09-82 DDH09-83 DDH-09-84


DDH-08-46

Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2

DDH-09-82 DDH09-83 DDH-09-84


DDH-08-46

43747

43747

41723 B
41724 B

Viruela
Viruela

38312 E

Andesite SA/SV

41723 A

Viruela

38312 E

Andesite SA/SV

38309 B

Silica Clay La Cruz

38309 B

Silica Clay La Cruz

44108

D5 - Sulfide Composite

DDH-08-48 DDH08-50 DDH-08-51


DDH-08-52 DDH08-53
DDH-08-50
DDH07-32
52.0-78.0
DDHO7-25
34.5-42.3
16-34
34-72
DDH-08-48 DDH37-55
08-50 DDH-08-51
53-60
DDH-08-52 DDH24-35
08-53
DDH07-32
52.0-78.0
DDHO7-25
34.5-42.3
DDH07-33
13-39
7DDHO7-34
31.0
DDH07-33
13-39
7DDHO7-34
31.0
DDH-08-41
51.0-72.0
DDH-08-42
61.0-71.0

Calculated Au
Head g Au/MT

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


219

Table 13.2.1 - Column Test Samples - Continued


KCA Sample No.

Sample Description

38313 F

Silica Structure La Cruz


and Cerro do Oro
Silica Structure La Cruz
and Cerro do Oro
Silica MassiveCieneguita
Silica MassiveCieneguita

41725 B

Cieneguita

41726 B

Espanola

41725 A

Cieneguita

38308 A
38308 A
38313 F

Source DDH

Interval
(meters)

DDH07-36
DDHO7-33
DDH07-36
DDHO7-33

0-35 54.360.8
0-35 54.360.8

DDHO7-40
DDHO7-40
DDH-08-59 DDH08-60 DDH-08-64
DDH-08-61 DDH08-63

44725
44726
44727

DDH-08-59 DDH08-60 DDH-08-64


DDH-08-61 DDH08-63
Espanola
DDH-10-113
DDH-10-114
D17 - Oxide Composite
D17 - Mixed Composite
DDH-10-113
D17 - Sulfide Composite
DDH-10-113

38314 G

Cieneguita - High Grade

41726 A

DDHO7-40

Sample type

Calculated Au
Head g Au/MT

HQ Core

1.77

HQ Core

1.71

0.0-34.0

HQ Core

0.40

0.0-34.0
25-66
4.2-19.1
22-42
11-41
13-44
25-66
4.2-19.1
22-42
11-41
13-44
0.0-26.0
0.5-42.0
26.0-54.0
54.0-81.0
34.0-36.5
36.5-39.4
39.4-40.9

HQ Core

0.39

HQ Core

1.09

HQ Core

1.04

HQ Core

1.08

HQ Core

1.16

NQ Core
NQ Core
NQ Core

0.85
0.75
0.82

HQ Core

9.01

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


220

Table 13.2.2 Bottle Roll Test Samples

KCA Sample No.


36372 A
36372 B
36372 C
36372 D
36372 E
36372 F
36372 G
36372 H
38308
38309
38310

38311
38312
38313

38314

Sample Description
670125-670133
670146-670155
715200-715209
715223-715232
715414-715423
715441-715448
684282-684290
684294-684302
Silica Structure La Cruz
and Cerro do Oro

Source DDH
RC-06-25
RC-06-25
RC-06-44
RC-06-44
RC-06-47
RC-06-47
RC-06-52
RC-06-52
DDH07-36
DDHO7-33
DDH07-33
DDHO7-34
Silica Clay La Cruz
DDH07-32
Dacite SC/SA Viruela DDHO7-25
DDH07-32
DDHO7-25
Silica Massive Viruela DDH07-31
DDH07-32
DDHO7-25
Andesite SA/SV
Silica Massive- Cienegui DDHO7-40

41726

Cieneguita - High Grade DDHO7-40


DDH-08-48
DDH-08-50
DDH-08-51
DDH-08-52
DDH-08-53
DDH-08-50
DDH-08-59
DDH-08-60
DDH-08-64
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-63

43359

LI09-1

RC-09-447

43360

LI09-2

RC-09-476

41723
41724

41725

Interval
(meters)
1.5-15.2
32-45.7
71.6-85.3
105.2-118.9
47.2-61.0
85.3-97.5
6.1-19.8
22.9-36.6
0-35
54.3-60.8
13-39
7-31.0
0-19.3
1-5.9
19.3-28.0
5.9-34.5
5.9-25.5
52.0-78.0
34.5-42.3
0.0-34.0
34.0-36.5
36.5-39.4
39.4-40.9
16.0-34 .0
34.0-72.0
37.0-55.0
53.0-60.0
24.0-35.0
25.0-66 .0
4.2-19.1
22.0-42.0
11.0-41.0
13.0-44.0
18.3-19.8
22.9-24.4
27.4-29.0
32.0-33.5
36.6-38.1
1.5-3.1
6.1-7.6
10.7-12.2
15.2-16.8
19.8-21.63
24.4-25.9

Sample type
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC

Calculated Au Head
g Au/MT
5.01
2.88
5.35
2.08
4.21
9.17
0.78
4.40

HQ Core

1.74

HQ Core

0.44

PQ/HQ

1.10

PQ/HQ/HQ

0.93

PQ/HQ
HQ Core

2.31
0.41

HQ Core

8.30

HQ Core
HQ Core

1.57
12.85

HQ Core

0.89

HQ Core

1.02

RC Reject

0.53

RC Reject

0.93

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


221

Table 13.2.2 Bottle Roll Test Samples Continued


KCA Sample No. Sample Description

Source DDH

43361

LI09-3

RC-09-476

43362

LI09-4

RC-09-476

43363

LI09-5

RC-09-477

43364

LI09-6

RC-09-477

43365

LI09-7

43747

43748

43792

43793

RC-09-453
DDH-09-82
DDH-09-83
DDH-09-84
Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2 DDH-08-46
DDH-09-67
DDH-09-68
DDH-09-69
DDH-09-70
Domain 2-VR, Zone D2 DDH-09-71
841174
741176
841100
841102
841104
HE 09140093
841191
941193
941113
841110
HE 09140094

Interval
(meters)
29.0-30.5
33.5-35.1
38.1-39.6
42.7-44.2
42.7-48.8
47.2-48.8
51.8-53.3
56.4-57.9
61.0-62.5
65.5-67.1
74.7-76.2
79.3-80.8
83.8-85.3
3.1-4.6
7.6-9.1
12.2-13.7
16.8-18.3
21.3-22.9
25.9-27.4
30.5-32.0
35.1-36.6
39.6-41.2
44.2-45.7
47.2-48.8
32.0-33.5
35.1-36.6
38.1-39.6
41.2-42.7
44.2-45.7
51.0-60.0
49.0-56.0
25.0-33.0
43.0-51.0
21.5-32.0
8.6-29.0
0.0-17.0
2.0-12.0
11.0-18.0

Sample type

Calculated Au Head
g Au/MT

RC Reject

0.81

RC Reject

0.93

RC Reject

1.16

RC Reject

0.36

RC Reject

0.84

HQ Core

0.93

HQ Core

0.74

Assay Reject

0.62

Assay Reject

1.46

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


222

Table 13.2.2 Bottle Roll Test Samples Continued


KCA Sample No. Sample Description

Source DDH

44105

LI-BR-10-1

RC-09-476

44106

LI-BR-10-2

RC-09-476

44107

LI-BR-10-3

44108
44725
44726
44727

RC-09-477
DDH-08-41
D5 - Sulfide composite DDH-08-42
DDH-10-113
D17 - Oxide Composite DDH-10-114
D17 - Mixed Composite DDH-10-113
D17 - Sulfide Composite DDH-10-113

Interval
(meters) Sample type
5.0-10.0
20.0-25.0
35.0-40.0
50.0-55.0
65.0-70.0
80.0-85.0
RC Reject
95.0-100.0
110.0-115.0
125.0-130.0
140.0-145.0
155.0-160.0
170.0-175.0 RC Reject
10.0-15.0
25.0-30.0
40.0-45.0
55.0-60.0
70.0-75.0
85.0-90.0
100.0-105.0 RC Reject
51.0-72.0
61.0-71.0
Core
0.0-26.0
0.5-42.0
NQ Core
26.0-54.0
NQ Core
54.0-81.0
NQ Core

Calculated Au Head
g Au/MT

0.791

0.763

0.877
0.33
0.91
0.47
0.8

Whole core from 2007 drillholes (HQ and one PQ diameter) was used to generate 8 separate
composites for testing. The composites were used for bottle roll leach tests and each composite
was used to create -12.5 and a -50mm samples for column leach tests, excepting one composite
of D18 that was only column tested at -12.5 mm. (13 column and 7 bottle roll tests total). In
addition, the 7 composites were used for a suite of physical and environmental test work.
In 2009, 4 composites were created using half core from 2008 drilling (HQ diameter). These
were used for bottle roll leach tests and for column leach testing at -9.5 mm and -25mm,
excepting one composite of high grade material that was only tested at -15.5 mm. (7 column and
4 bottle roll tests total). In addition, the 4 composites were used for a suite of physical and
environmental test work.
In 2010, six test programs were conducted. In these six test programs the following composites
and samples were generated for testing:

Two composites were created from half core from 2009 HQ diameter drillholes
Seven samples were taken from nominal 6.3 mm RC cuttings
Three samples documented as LI-BR-10-1, LI-BR-10-2, and LI-BR-10-3
Two samples were taken from assay rejects

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


223

One composite of sulfide material from Domain 5


Three samples from half split NQ core were used for bottle roll and column leach tests

Using these samples a total of 18 bottle roll tests and 6 column tests were conducted.
In 2011 two samples of reject feed material from 2010 test work were used to conduct two
column tests at a finer crush size of 100% passing 12.5 mm.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


224

Appendix 13.2a Bulk density data from Kappes Cassiday


and Associates
Rock Density Test Work
Rock density tests were completed on randomly selected pieces of whole HQ and PQ core. The
pieces selected were approximately 5 to 8 cm in length and were selected from each core interval
received from the La India Project.
The procedure utilized by KCA for rock density determination is based upon the ASTM Method
C914, Standard Test Method for Rock Density and Volume of Solid Refractories by Wax
Immersion. A summary of the average rock density for each composite sample is presented in
Table 13.2.3.

Table 13.2.3 Summary of Composite Rock Densities


KCA Sample
Nos.
38301 A-V
38302 A-Y
38303 A-V
38304 A-GG
38305 A-DD
38306 A-P

Composite
A
B
C
D
E
F

Description
Silica Structure - La Cruz and Cerro de Oro
Silica Clay - La Cruz
Dacite - SC/SA - Viruela
Silica Massive - Viruela
Andesite - SA/SV
Silica Massive - Cieneguita

Average Density,
g/cm3
2.39
1.97
2.22
2.51
2.19
2.63

Rock Density Test Procedure


Rock densities were determined utilizing the wax immersion test method.
required for the test method and the general procedure are outlined as follows:

The equipment

For each refractory to be characterized several representative specimens should be chosen.


These specimens may be whole shapes or broken pieces and should exhibit sufficient structural
integrity to permit handling. Loose particles and soil should be removed from the specimens
prior to testing.
An apparatus used for melting wax is required. A container heated by hot water, preferably
thermostatically controlled, is satisfactory. The water should be heated to only slightly above the
melting point of the wax to avoid flashing of the wax vapors. Vapors given off by molten wax
ignite spontaneously at above 400F (205C) and should not be allowed to come in contact with
the heating element or open flame. The container should be large enough to permit the dipping
of the specimen into the melted wax so that a uniform surface coating of wax is achieved.
Fully refined paraffin wax that has a known constant density, K, that does not change after
repeated melting and cooling cycles is required. The paraffin waxes generally used are
commercially available and have density values in the range of 0.87 to 0.91 g/cm3. These waxes
melt at approximately 135F (57C).
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
225

A balance capable of determining the weights of the specimens to a minimum of four significant
Figures is required. Thus, specimens weighing from 100 to 999 g should be weighed to a
minimum of one decimal place. Those from 10 to 99 g should be weighed to two decimal places
and so on.
The individual test specimen was dried to a constant weight by heating to 105 - 110C to remove
entrapped moisture which would affect the rock density determination. Any loose material or
soil was removed from the test specimen.
An initial weight, W, of the test specimen in grams was measured to four significant Figures and
the weight recorded.
The test specimen was then coated with wax by dipping the specimen into the container of
melted wax. Care was taken not to entrap air bubbles under the wax. If found, these bubbles
were pressed out so that the wax conformed exactly to the surface of the specimen. Holes in the
wax coating were closed by additional dipping in the melted wax so that the surface was
completely sealed.
A wax coated weight, P, of the test specimen in grams to four significant Figures was taken and
the weight recorded. The balance was then counterbalanced with a device to suspend the
specimen in place while immersed in water, Figure 13.2.1.

Figure 13.2.1 Counterbalance Device Utilized for Water Immersion Weight

Rock

Water

Balance

The weight of the wax-coated specimen suspended in water, S, in grams to four significant
Figures was determined and the weight recorded. The total volume, V1, of the wax coated test
specimen (specimen including the wax coating) was calculated in cubic centimetres as follows;
V1 = P S

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


226

This assumes that 1 cubic centimetre (cm3) of water weighs 1.0 gram. This is true to within 3
parts per thousand (ppt) for distilled water at room temperature.
The volume of the wax coating on the test specimen, V2, was calculated in cubic centimetres as
follows;
V2 = (P W)/K
3

Where K = density of the wax, g/cm .

The volume of the test specimen, V, was then calculated by subtracting the volume of the wax
coating from the total volume as calculated in step 11 above.
V = V1 V2

The rock density, D, of the test specimen in grams per cubic centimetres (g/cm3) was calculated
as the quotient of the initial weight divided by the volume of the test specimen, excluding the
volume of wax.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


227

Appendix 13.3 Summary Bottle Roll Leach Test Results


Performed by KCA
Table 13.3.1 Bottle Roll Leach Test Results Gold
KCA Sample KCA Test
No.
No.

Description

36372 A

36373 A

LA06-01

36372 B

36373 B

LA06-02

Average Head
Calculated Head, Extracted, Average Tails, Extracted, %
Assay, gms/Au
gms/Au MT
gms/Au MT gms/Au MT
Au
MT
5.50
5.01
4.62
0.40
92%
3.17

2.88

2.76

0.12

96%

Days of
Leach

Addition
Consumption
NaCN, kg/MT Ca(OH)2 , kg/MT

0.31

1.50

0.52

1.50

36372 C

36373 C

LA06-03

5.45

5.35

0.27

5.08

5%

1.09

2.00

36372 D

36373 D

LA06-04

2.16

2.08

0.14

1.94

7%

3.00

1.50

36372 E

36374 A

LA06-05

4.34

4.21

3.85

0.36

92%

0.41

2.00

36372 F

36374 B

LA06-06

9.22

9.17

8.54

0.64

93%

0.95

3.00

36372 G

36374 C

LA06-07

0.81

0.78

0.73

0.05

94%

0.94

5.00

36372 H

36373 D

LA06-08

4.82

4.40

4.19

0.21

95%

0.22

1.00

38308

38361 A

Silica Structure - La Cruz and Cerro de Oro

1.69

1.74

1.38

0.36

79%

0.27

1.00

38309

38361 B

0.48

0.44

0.39

<0.10

89%

1.05

2.50

38310

38361 C

Silica Clay - La Cruz


Dacite - SC/SA - Viruela

1.24

1.10

1.01

0.09

92%

0.20

1.00

38311

38362 A

Silica Massive - Viruela

1.15

0.93

0.80

0.14

85%

0.22

1.00

38312

38362 B

Andesite - SA/SV

2.45

2.31

1.96

0.35

85%

0.17

1.00

38313

38362 C

Silica Massive - Cieneguita

0.40

0.41

0.36

<0.10

88%

0.27

1.00

38314
41723

38362 D
41901 A

Cieneguita - High Grade


Viruela

9.00
1.35

8.30
1.57

7.48
1.44

0.82
0.13

90%
92

4
4

1.07
1.15

1.00

41724

41901 B

Viruela High Grade

12.88

12.85

12.42

0.43

97

0.89

1.00

41725

41901 C

Cieneguita

1.11

0.89

0.83

0.06

94

0.33

1.00

41726
43359

41901 D
43367 A

Espanola
LI09-1

1.03

1.02

0.97

0.05

95

0.54

0.53

0.20

0.33

38

4
4

0.51
6.81

1.00
10.00

43360

43367 B

LI09-2

0.92

0.93

0.82

0.11

88

1.00

3.00

43361

43367 C

LI09-3

1.04

0.81

0.64

0.18

78

4.17

2.00

43362

43368 A

LI09-4

1.11

0.93

0.78

0.15

83

3.95

3.00

3.00

43363

43368 B

LI09-5

1.26

1.16

1.13

0.03

97

0.83

3.00

43364

43368 C

LI09-6

0.40

0.36

0.31

0.05

86

1.69

3.00

43365

43368 D

LI09-7

0.85

0.84

0.49

0.35

58

2.01

6.00

43747

43776 A

Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2

0.84

0.93

0.86

0.06

93%

1.78

1.50

43748

43776 B

Domain 2-VR, Zone D2

0.59

0.74

0.69

0.05

93%

1.55

1.00

43792

44110A

HE 09140093
HE 09140094

0.42

0.19
0.41

1.17
1.14

2.00

1.06

69%
72%

0.62
1.46

44136 A

LI-BR-10-1

0.791

0.732

0.059

93%

0.23

2.50

43793
44105

1.50

44106

44136 B

LI-BR-10-2

0.763

0.345

0.418

45%

3.15

1.50

44107

44136 C

LI-BR-10-3

0.877

0.765

0.111

87%

0.28

2.00

44108

44137 A

D5 Sulfide Composite

0.41

0.33

0.21

0.11

65%

1.72

8.00

44725

44734A

D17 - Oxide Composite

0.91

0.85

0.07

93%

0.22

3.00

44726

44734B

D17 - Mixed Composite

44727

44734C

D17 - Sulfide Composite

0.47

0.29

0.18

62%

3.67

1.50

0.80

0.61

0.19

77%

3.21

2.00

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


228

Table 13.3.2 Bottle Roll Leach Test Results Silver


Average Head
Calculated Head,
Assay, gms/Ag
gms/Ag MT
MT
4.8
6.7

KCA Sample
No.

KCA Test
No.

Description

36372 A

36373 A

LA06-01

36372 B

36373 B

LA06-02

20.2

18.4

36372 C

36373 C

LA06-03

18.2

16.7

36372 D

36373 D

LA06-04

15.1

36372 E

36374 A

LA06-05

36372 F

36374 B

36372 G

Addition
Consumption
NaCN, kg/MT Ca(OH)2 , kg/MT

Extracted,
gms/Ag MT

Average Tails,
gms/Ag MT

Extracted, %
Ag

Days of
Leach

5.8

0.8

87%

0.31

1.50

17.5

0.8

95%

0.52

1.50

2.8

13.9

17%

1.09

2.00

10.0

3.0

7.1

30%

3.00

1.50

14.4

11.9

11.1

0.8

93%

0.41

2.00

LA06-06

2.7

1.2

0.3

0.8

26%

0.95

3.00

36374 C

LA06-07

2.7

2.1

1.2

0.8

59%

0.94

5.00

36372 H

36373 D

LA06-08

2.0

4.6

3.7

0.8

81%

0.22

1.00

38308

38361 A

Silica Structure - La Cruz and Cerro de Oro

11.3

9.9

7.8

2.1

78%

0.27

1.00

38309

38361 B

<1.7

2.0

0.4

1.6

21%

1.05

2.50

38310

38361 C

Silica Clay - La Cruz


Dacite - SC/SA - Viruela

<1.7

1.7

0.8

0.9

49%

0.20

1.00

38311

38362 A

Silica Massive - Viruela

3.9

2.7

1.9

0.9

69%

0.22

1.00

38312

38362 B

Andesite - SA/SV

13.5

7.5

2.7

4.8

36%

0.17

1.00

38313

38362 C

Silica Massive - Cieneguita

5.7

6.0

2.4

3.6

40%

0.27

1.00

38314
41723

38362 D
41901 A

Cieneguita - High Grade

117.9
16.5

105.5
15.6

57.2
2.9

48.3
12.7

54%
19

4
4

1.07
1.15

1.00

41724

41901 B

Viruela High Grade

8.0

8.3

1.5

6.9

18

0.89

1.00

41725

41901 C

Cieneguita

17.1

17.9

8.5

9.4

47

0.33

1.00

41726

41901 D

23.5

12.0

11.5

51

43367 A

Espanola
LI09-1

23.1

43359

1.4

0.9

0.2

0.7

23

4
4

0.51
6.81

1.00
10.00

43360

43367 B

LI09-2

4.3

2.7

1.3

1.4

49

1.00

3.00

43361

43367 C

LI09-3

3.8

2.6

1.9

0.7

74

4.17

2.00

43362

43368 A

LI09-4

3.4

3.4

2.7

0.7

80

3.95

3.00

43363

43368 B

LI09-5

3.1

3.4

1.1

1.2

48

0.83

3.00

43364

43368 C

LI09-6

1.7

1.2

0.5

0.7

43

1.69

3.00

43365

43368 D

LI09-7

1.2

0.9

0.2

0.7

21

2.01

6.00

43747

43776 A

Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2

5.7

4.9

0.9

3.9

19%

1.78

1.50

43748

43776 B

Domain 2-VR, Zone D2

5.1

5.8

2.2

3.6

38%

1.55

1.00

43792

43776 B

3.6

0.9

2.7

24%

1.17

2.00

Viruela

3.00

43793

44110A

HE 09140093
HE 09140094

1.5

1.1

0.4

38%

1.14

1.50

44105

44136 A

LI-BR-10-1

3.7

1.1

2.6

30%

0.23

2.50

44106

44136 B

LI-BR-10-2

2.9

1.5

1.4

52%

3.15

1.50

44107

44136 C

LI-BR-10-3

2.2

0.7

1.5

31%

0.28

2.00

44108

44137 A

D5 Sulfide Composite

1.6

2.8

0.6

2.2

20%

96

1.72

8.00

44725

44734A

D17 - Oxide Composite

3.5

1.8

1.7

51%

0.22

3.00

44726

44734B

D17 - Mixed Composite

2.4

1.0

1.4

42%

3.67

1.50

44727

44734C

D17 - Sulfide Composite

9.0

7.1

1.9

79%

3.21

2.00

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


229

Appendix 13.4 Laboratory Column Leach Test Work


The results of the laboratory column leach tests were used to establish recoveries for the various
ore types known to exist at La India.
Tables 13.4.1 and 13.4.2 present the results of the column leach tests conducted by KCA for gold
and silver, respectively. Test numbers refer to KCA test numbers.
Extraction vs. Time curves for gold and silver are shown in Figures 13.4.1 and 13.4.2.
Figures 13.4.3, 13.4.4, 13.4.5, and 13.4.6 show the extraction vs. time for gold and for silver for
the Main and North pits, respectively, by domain.
Figure 13.4.7 show the column leach test results by ore domain

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


230

Table 13.4.1 Column Leach Test Results - Gold


KCA Sample
No.

KCA Test
No.

38308 A

38315

38308 B

38318

38309 A

38321

Description
Silica Structure - La Cruz &
Cerro de Oro
Silica Structure - La Cruz &
Cerro de Oro
Silica Clay - La Cruz

Average Head
Assay, gms/Au
MT

Calculated Head,
gms/Au MT

Extracted,
gms/Au MT

1.69

1.65

1.25

0.40

1.69

1.76

1.43

0.33

0.48

0.47

0.42

<0.10

Days of
Leach

Consumption
NaCN, kg/MT

Addition
Ca(OH)2 , kg/MT

76%

126

0.57

1.00

81%

140

0.88

2.00

89%

126

2.43

2.01

Average Tails, Extracted, %


gms/Au MT
Au

38309 B

38324

Silica Clay - La Cruz

0.48

0.45

0.45

<0.10

89%

126

2.03

0.00

38310 A

38327

Dacite - SC/SA - Viruela

1.24

0.92

0.83

<0.10

90%

126

0.86

2.00

38310 B

38330

Dacite - SC/SA - Viruela

1.24

1.08

0.97

0.11

90%

126

1.29

0.00

38311 A

38333

Silica Massive - Viruela

1.15

1.10

0.44

0.66

40%

126

0.64

1.00

38311 B

38336

Silica Massive - Viruela

1.15

0.84

0.56

0.28

67%

126

0.78

2.00

38312 A

38339

Andesite - SA/SV

2.45

2.45

1.20

1.00

49%

126

0.68

1.33

38312 B

38342

Andesite - SA/SV

2.45

2.27

1.46

0.81

64%

126

1.03

3.00

38313 A

38345

Silica Massive - Cieneguita

0.40

0.40

0.16

0.19

40%

126

0.57

1.00

38313 B

38348

Silica Massive - Cieneguita

0.40

0.37

0.22

0.15

60%

140

1.03

2.00

38314 A

38351

Cieneguita - High Grade

9.00

8.09

7.54

0.55

93%

126

3.19

3.00

41723 A

41902

Viruela

--

1.53

1.20

0.33

78%

91

0.81

2.01

41723 B

41905

Viruela

1.35

1.43

1.10

0.33

77%

104

0.77

0.00

41724 B

41908

Viruela High Grade

12.88

13.01

12.23

0.78

94%

91

1.60

0.00

41725 A

41911

Cieneguita

--

1.04

1.00

0.04

96%

91

0.82

2.01

41725 B

41914

Cieneguita

1.11

0.98

0.92

0.06

94%

104

0.92

0.00

41726 A

41917

Espanola

--

1.05

1.01

0.04

96%

91

0.88

2.10

41726 B
43747A

41920
43768

Espanola
Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2

1.03
0.84

0.96
1.30

0.89
1.07

0.07
0.23

93%
82%

104
66

0.83
0.67

0.00
2.01

43748A

43771

Domain 2-VR, Zone D2

0.59

0.64

0.50

0.14

78%

66

0.76

2.00

44108
44725 A

44130
44759

D5 Sulfide Composite
D17-Oxide Composite

0.47

0.35
0.78

0.24
0.74

0.12
0.04

70%
95%

64
76

2.72
1.50

6.14
2.02

44726 A

44762

D17-Mixed Composite

0.57

0.66

0.21

0.45

32%

76

2.63

2.03

44727 A

44765

D17-Sulfide Composite

0.94

0.71

0.38

0.33

53%

76

2.31

3.04

43747 B

48514

Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2

0.841

0.964

0.805

0.159

84%

45

0.63

2.00

43748 B

48517

Domain 2-VR, Zone D2

0.591

0.673

0.543

0.130

81%

45

0.43

2.00

0.78

Table 13.4.2 Column Leach Test Results Silver


KCA Sample KCA Test
No.
No.

Description

Average Head
Assay, gms/Ag MT

Calculated Head,
gms/Ag MT

Extracted,
gms/Ag MT

Average Tails,
gms/Ag MT

Extracted, %
Ag

Days of
Leach

Consumption
NaCN, kg/MT

Addition
Ca(OH)2 , kg/MT

--

8.5

2.7

5.8

30%

126

0.57

1.00

--

9.2

4.2

5.0

44%

140

0.88

2.00

--

1.1

0.1

1.0

9%

126

2.43

2.01

38308 B

38318

38309 A

38321

Silica Structure - La Cruz &


Cerro de Oro
Silica Structure - La Cruz &
Cerro de Oro
Silica Clay - La Cruz

38309 B

38324

Silica Clay - La Cruz

--

1.6

0.4

1.2

8%

126

2.03

0.00

38310 A

38327

Dacite - SC/SA - Viruela

--

1.4

0.2

1.2

17%

126

0.86

2.00

38308 A

38315

38310 B

38330

Dacite - SC/SA - Viruela

--

1.3

0.2

1.1

24%

126

1.29

0.00

38311 A

38333

Silica Massive - Viruela

--

1.9

0.2

1.7

13%

126

0.64

1.00

38311 B

38336

Silica Massive - Viruela

--

2.9

0.5

2.4

18%

126

0.78

2.00

38312 A

38339

Andesite - SA/SV

--

9.9

1.0

8.9

10%

126

0.68

1.33

38312 B

38342

Andesite - SA/SV

--

8.2

1.2

7.0

16%

126

1.03

3.00

38313 A

38345

Silica Massive - Cieneguita

--

5.9

0.3

5.6

5%

126

0.57

1.00

38313 B

38348

Silica Massive - Cieneguita

--

5.2

0.4

4.8

8%

140

1.03

2.00

38314 A

38351

Cieneguita - High Grade

--

110.2

56.4

53.8

52%

126

3.19

3.00

41723 A

41902

Viruela

--

14.3

0.2

14.1

2%

91

0.81

2.01

41723 B

41905

Viruela

16.5

14.6

0.3

14.3

2%

104

0.77

0.00

41724 B

41908

Viruela High Grade

8.0

8.0

0.3

7.6

4%

91

1.60

0.00

41725 A

41911

Cieneguita

--

17.8

3.5

14.3

20%

91

0.82

2.01

41725 B

41914

Cieneguita

17.1

17.4

4.6

12.8

26%

104

0.92

0.00

41726 A

41917

Espanola

--

17.4

4.5

12.9

26%

91

0.88

2.10

41726 B

41920

Espanola

23.1

21.3

5.4

15.9

25%

104

0.83

0.00

43747A

43768

Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2

--

3.8

0.3

3.5

8%

66

0.67

2.01

43748A

43771

Domain 2-VR, Zone D2

--

5.6

1.8

3.8

32%

66

0.76

2.00

44108

44130

D5 Sulfide Composite

--

1.1

0.5

0.6

45%

64

2.72

6.14

44725 A

44759

D17-Oxide Composite

4.3

5.8

1.1

4.7

19%

76

1.50

2.02

44726 A

44762

D17-Mixed Composite

2.2

2.1

0.4

1.7

18%

76

2.63

2.03

44727 A

44765

D17-Sulfide Composite

6.7

8.8

2.7

6.1

31%

76

2.31

3.04

43747 B

48514

Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2

3.51

3.31

0.18

3.13

5%

45

0.63

2.00

43748 B

48517

Domain 2-VR, Zone D2

2.66

4.38

1.57

2.81

36%

45

0.43

2.00

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


231

Figure 13.4.1 Column Leach Test Extraction vs. Time Gold

Figure 13.4.2 Column Leach Test Extraction vs. Time Silver

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


232

Figure 13.4.3 Column Leach Test Extraction vs. Time by Domain Main Pit Gold

Figure 13.4.4 Column Leach Test Extraction vs. Time by Domain Main Pit Silver

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


233

Figure 13.4.5 Column Leach Test Extraction vs. Time by Domain North Pit Gold

Figure 13.4.6 Column Leach Test Extraction vs. Time by Domain North Pit Silver

Several column tests were noted to have lower recoveries. A close examination of these tests
shows that many of these low recoveries were associated with samples high in sulfides, or
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
234

samples with a coarser crush. These samples are labeled on the Extraction vs. Time leach curve
graphs.
Table 13.4.3 presents the column test results by Domain which were used to determine gold
recovery, major reagent consumption, and abrasion index.
Table 13.4.3 Column Leach Test Results by Ore Domain
Domain

KCA Test #

Domain 1

38330

Domain 1

38327

% of
Tonnes

% of
Ounces

5%

4%

Particle Size Au Recovery


12.5
50

Domain 1 Avg.
Domain 2

38336

Domain 2

48517

Domain 2

43771

Domain 2

38333

12.5
9%

7%

48514

Domain 2A

43768

7%

7%

41905

Domain 3

41908

Domain 3

38342

Domain 3
Domain 3

91.0%

90.3%

Lime Addition
(kg/t)

Abrasion Index
Ai/g

1.29

0.00

0.2291

0.86

2.00

0.2291

90.5%

1.08

1.00

0.2291

71.0%

0.78

1.00

0.7408

0.43

2.00

0.76

82.0%

25

81.0%

50

46.0%

0.64

1.00

0.7408

70.0%

0.65

1.50

0.7408

12.5

85.0%

25

84.0%

Domain 2A Avg.
Domain 3

90.0%

NaCN Cons.
Kg/MT

12.5

Domain 2 Avg.
Domain 2A

Domain Recovery
Recovery @ -25mm

69.1%

84.0%

0.63

2.00

0.67

2.01

84.5%

0.65

2.01

9.5

79.0%

0.77

9.5

94.0%

1.60

12.5

66.0%

1.03

3.00

0.4005

41902

25

80.0%

38339

50

56.0%
75.0%

0.98

1.20

0.3987

Domain 5

38324

12.5

89.0%

2.03

0.00

0.0080

Domain 5

38321

50

90.0%

2.43

2.26

0.0080

Domain 5

44130

25

70.0%

2.72

6.14

83.0%

2.39

2.80

0.0080

Domain 6

38318

12.5

81.0%

0.88

2.00

0.7050

Domain 6

38315

7%

13%

Domain 3 Avg.

18%

14%

Domain 5 Avg.
5%

8%

50

Domain 6 Avg.
Domain 12

38348
38345

6%

5%

12.5

62.0%

50

51.0%

9.5

Domain 12 Avg.
41914

Domain 12A

41920

Domain 12A

41911

Domain 12A

41917

24%

19%

79.7%

Domain 17

44759

Domain 17

44762

Domain 17

44765

6%

5%

12%

0.53

1.00

0.7050

0.71

1.50

0.7050

2.00

0.7779
0.7779

56.5%

0.80

1.50

0.7779

95.0%

0.92

0.5313

93.0%

64.9%

96.5%

0.83

0.5056

0.82

2.01

0.5313

97.0%

0.88

2.10

0.5056

95.3%

0.86

1.03

0.5185

25

95.0%

1.50

2.02

0.0517

25

40.0%

2.63

2.03

0.0290

25

60.0%

95.0%

65.0%
4%

0.3951
0.4005

1.00

96.0%

Domain 17 Avg.
38351

2.01
1.00

1.03

25
25

0.81
0.68

0.57

9.5

Domain 12A Avg.

Domain 18

89.3%

79.0%

Domain 12

Domain 12A

77.0%

70.9%

12.5

94.0%

94.0%

2.31

3.04

0.0175

2.15

2.36

0.0327

3.22

3.03

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


235

Test results on the same composites show similar recoveries between -12.5mm and -50mm
columns for Domains 1, 5 and 6. Recoveries were higher for Domains 2, 3 and 12 in the 12.5mm columns in comparison to the -50mm columns. Testing at -9.5 mm and -25mm on the
same composites showed similar recoveries for Domains 3 and 12A. The recoveries for Domain
2 and Domain 3 at -25mm showed improved recoveries compared to column tests at -12.5mm
(These are on different composites). Because of the scattered recoveries at different crush sizes,
an analysis of the crush size vs. recovery was conducted. For this review recovery and crush size
data for all bottle roll tests and column tests were compiled and plotted on a semi-log graph.
Sulfide samples and composites (shown in green), including three column tests and six bottle roll
tests were excluded from this analysis. Two additional bottle roll tests were excluded (shown in
purple) due to uncharacteristically low recoveries. One of the low recoveries is associated with a
high copper content (500-650 ppm in solution), and the other sample lacks a description in the
lab report and is believed to be high in sulfides. Two of the sulfide samples that were not
included in the analysis had exceptionally low recoveries (5% and 7%). These recoveries are
believed to be so low as a result of having exceptionally high sulfide sulphur (5.87% and 4.57%,
respectively). A trend line was plotted to show the correlation of the crush size vs. the recovery.
The results of the analysis are shown in Figure 13.4.7.

La India P100 Crush Size vs. Recovery


No Deduction Lab to Field

120%
100%

Coarse Crush (50 mm)

Target Crush

% Recovery

80%
60%

Sulfides

40%

Non-Sulfide

High Copper
500 ppm in solution

No Description -

20%
0%
10

100

1000

10000

100000

Size (microns)
Figure 13.4.7 Column Leach Test Results by Ore Domain

From the test data the recovery begins to noticeably decrease at crush sizes coarser than 5 mm
with significant recovery decreases being noticed at sizes coarser than 25 mm. A crush size of
100% -25mm has been selected as the optimum crush size for this project. In practice, crushing
to 100% -25 mm using a tertiary crushing setup is very practical and can be achieved without
requiring excessive equipment. Based on the data the expected recovery at a crush size of 100% 25 mm (without field deduct) would be about 78.5%. This recovery is less than the weighted
La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012
236

average recovery from the column test work, but the weighted average recovery takes into
account each domain, their average recovery, and the percentage of the overall ore body this
represents.

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


237

Appendix 14.1 Semi-variograms, Main and North zones of


La India deposit, geological domains 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 12, 17, and
18

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


238

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


239

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


240

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


241

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


242

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


243

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


244

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


245

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


246

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


247

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


248

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


249

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


250

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


251

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


252

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


253

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


254

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


255

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


256

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


257

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


258

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


259

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


260

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


261

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


262

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


263

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


264

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


265

Appendix 14.2 Intersections from the Main and North


zones of La India deposit used in resource estimation
Domain
Main Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

DDH-07-15
DDH-07-16
DDH-07-17
DDH-07-18
DDH-07-19
DDH-07-20
DDH-07-24
DDH-07-29
DDH-07-30
DDH-08-44
DDH-08-45
DDH-08-46
DDH-08-47
DDH-08-48
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-50
DDH-08-51
DDH-08-52
DDH-08-54
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-67
DDH-09-68
DDH-09-71
DDH-09-72
DDH-09-73
DDH-09-79
DDH-09-80
DDH-09-81
DDH-09-82
DDH-09-83
DDH-09-84
DDH-09-85
DDH-09-86
DDH-09-87
DDH-09-90
DDH-09-91
DDH-09-92
DDH-09-94
RC-06-15
RC-06-30
RC-06-31
RC-06-32
RC-06-40
RC-06-41
RC-06-42
RC-06-43
RC-06-68
RC-06-91
RC-06-92
RC-07-112
RC-07-113
RC-07-116
RC-07-117
RC-07-118
RC-07-119
RC-07-120
RC-07-122
RC-07-123
RC-07-124
RC-07-125
RC-07-130
RC-07-131
RC-07-132

3.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.52
0.00
5.00
5.18
5.18
2.00
3.00
6.00
3.00
22.00
0.00
0.00
0.40
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.40
3.55
0.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

37.00
31.00
20.00
45.00
14.00
57.00
98.00
11.00
5.75
33.00
34.00
35.00
42.00
9.00
5.00
4.00
10.00
20.00
32.00
9.00
21.50
8.60
10.00
23.65
12.20
25.00
30.50
36.45
48.00
22.00
24.00
23.30
6.00
31.60
4.00
15.00
4.00
9.10
51.82
28.96
15.24
19.81
19.81
15.24
22.86
4.57
3.05
9.14
3.05
16.76
3.05
28.96
45.72
13.72
3.05
24.38
6.10
6.10
15.24
25.91
4.57
102.11
89.92

Average grade Core Lenght


Au (g/t)
(m)
0.07
0.45
0.70
0.13
0.65
0.07
0.05
0.05
0.40
0.02
0.04
0.10
0.38
1.44
0.57
0.73
0.31
0.12
0.34
0.27
1.94
0.53
0.28
0.22
0.39
0.42
0.15
0.22
0.01
0.04
0.08
0.31
0.13
0.44
0.16
0.43
0.05
0.20
0.39
0.05
0.09
0.15
6.03
0.99
0.48
0.56
0.38
0.12
0.29
1.17
0.39
0.16
0.16
0.12
0.07
0.69
0.58
0.69
0.41
1.56
0.10
0.06
0.11

34.00
28.00
20.00
45.00
14.00
57.00
98.00
11.00
4.75
31.48
34.00
30.00
36.82
3.82
3.00
1.00
4.00
17.00
10.00
9.00
21.50
8.20
9.00
22.65
12.20
25.00
30.50
35.45
46.60
18.45
24.00
23.30
4.00
31.60
4.00
15.00
4.00
6.60
51.82
28.96
15.24
19.81
19.81
15.24
22.86
4.57
3.05
9.14
3.05
16.76
3.05
28.96
45.72
13.72
3.05
24.38
6.10
6.10
15.24
25.91
4.57
102.11
89.92

Coordonnate of the Intersection


X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

707 334.50
706 983.87
706 867.67
707 005.98
706 828.18
707 304.43
706 558.35
707 120.79
706 855.31
707 241.69
707 205.72
707 341.06
707 004.51
706 900.42
706 893.64
706 954.28
706 908.94
706 799.34
706 817.23
706 885.13
706 843.71
706 893.01
706 888.98
706 801.58
706 844.01
706 941.71
707 016.11
707 037.89
707 240.57
707 352.17
707 276.96
707 000.26
706 848.42
706 804.79
706 912.66
706 970.50
707 361.88
706 890.04
706 578.20
707 330.30
707 339.24
707 340.73
706 851.21
706 857.31
706 841.29
706 875.01
706 803.24
706 957.42
706 862.57
706 871.18
706 859.32
707 019.90
707 009.56
706 952.30
706 952.84
706 819.11
706 873.09
706 891.18
706 911.78
706 953.66
706 776.82
706 554.17
706 518.51

3 176 324.72
3 176 562.57
3 176 606.38
3 176 456.08
3 176 515.93
3 176 356.55
3 176 351.91
3 176 425.24
3 176 423.03
3 176 431.06
3 176 528.75
3 176 460.08
3 176 563.14
3 176 553.42
3 176 549.58
3 176 410.70
3 176 460.41
3 176 526.34
3 176 464.01
3 176 574.17
3 176 571.67
3 176 553.10
3 176 520.48
3 176 554.32
3 176 472.28
3 176 577.51
3 176 459.18
3 176 485.38
3 176 417.27
3 176 372.21
3 176 475.28
3 176 489.34
3 176 472.21
3 176 479.95
3 176 413.83
3 176 416.29
3 176 405.81
3 176 555.26
3 176 350.88
3 176 287.56
3 176 279.30
3 176 320.43
3 176 567.84
3 176 568.30
3 176 568.14
3 176 607.81
3 176 619.02
3 176 415.49
3 176 420.15
3 176 398.62
3 176 422.48
3 176 453.18
3 176 452.73
3 176 521.06
3 176 418.04
3 176 512.81
3 176 506.01
3 176 551.36
3 176 601.16
3 176 579.80
3 176 343.35
3 176 353.25
3 176 417.22

1 805.05
1 846.94
1 847.78
1 821.87
1 824.11
1 800.97
1 713.28
1 831.31
1 779.39
1 794.29
1 820.44
1 826.51
1 845.38
1 833.22
1 835.58
1 803.51
1 808.84
1 813.00
1 783.82
1 842.18
1 829.46
1 834.13
1 818.69
1 816.14
1 803.75
1 849.57
1 824.96
1 832.80
1 787.83
1 810.02
1 811.71
1 833.98
1 805.32
1 796.91
1 793.62
1 804.25
1 823.21
1 833.30
1 740.92
1 796.36
1 799.14
1 811.05
1 831.44
1 836.64
1 832.07
1 853.44
1 824.22
1 803.94
1 782.70
1 777.96
1 781.49
1 829.45
1 828.20
1 839.43
1 805.62
1 821.00
1 811.90
1 835.00
1 851.43
1 849.99
1 734.96
1 717.27
1 733.00

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


266

Domain
Main Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

RC-07-133
RC-07-134
RC-07-135
RC-07-136
RC-07-137
RC-07-138
RC-07-140
RC-07-141
RC-07-142
RC-07-143
RC-07-144
RC-07-145
RC-07-147
RC-07-148
RC-07-149
RC-07-152
RC-07-153
RC-07-154
RC-07-155
RC-07-158
RC-07-159
RC-07-160
RC-07-161
RC-07-182
RC-07-183
RC-07-184
RC-07-185
RC-07-186
RC-07-211
RC-07-212
RC-07-213
RC-07-214
RC-07-215
RC-07-216
RC-07-217
RC-07-220
RC-07-221
RC-07-225
RC-07-226
RC-07-229
RC-07-230
RC-07-231
RC-07-234
RC-07-244
RC-07-245
RC-07-257
RC-07-259
RC-07-265
RC-07-266
RC-07-267
RC-07-268
RC-07-269
RC-08-297
RC-08-306
RC-08-308
RC-08-309
RC-08-310
RC-08-311
RC-08-312
RC-08-313
RC-08-314
RC-08-315
RC-08-316

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
13.72
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.57
1.52
4.57
0.00
1.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.52
1.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.52
1.52
0.00
0.00
1.52
1.52
3.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

33.53
13.72
33.53
3.05
7.62
3.05
12.19
6.10
15.24
19.81
13.72
25.91
32.00
19.81
1.52
35.05
41.15
64.01
56.39
21.34
15.24
19.81
38.10
117.35
163.07
67.06
89.92
92.96
30.48
35.05
15.24
6.10
3.05
7.62
10.67
24.38
19.81
9.14
3.05
3.05
24.38
3.05
42.67
30.48
13.72
10.67
36.58
12.19
38.10
18.29
22.86
38.10
51.82
36.58
39.62
15.24
18.29
15.24
28.96
39.62
4.57
6.10
7.62

Average grade Core Lenght


Au (g/t)
(m)
0.09
0.98
0.23
0.09
0.42
0.54
0.26
0.29
0.75
2.93
0.28
0.70
0.78
0.66
0.03
0.10
0.33
0.06
0.07
0.07
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.07
0.06
0.59
0.29
0.23
0.55
1.83
0.84
0.17
0.23
0.12
0.29
0.45
0.11
0.14
0.07
0.01
0.07
0.12
0.30
0.16
0.07
0.02
0.39
0.09
0.06
0.03
0.09
0.78
0.38
0.45
0.41
0.75
0.13
0.17
0.07
0.20

33.53
13.72
33.53
3.05
7.62
3.05
12.19
6.10
15.24
19.81
13.72
12.19
32.00
19.81
1.52
35.05
41.15
64.01
51.82
19.82
10.67
19.81
36.58
117.35
163.07
67.06
89.92
91.44
30.48
35.05
15.24
6.10
3.05
7.62
10.67
24.38
19.81
9.14
3.05
3.05
22.86
1.53
42.67
30.48
13.72
9.15
35.06
12.19
38.10
16.77
21.34
35.05
51.82
36.58
39.62
15.24
16.77
15.24
28.96
39.62
4.57
6.10
7.62

Coordonnate of the Intersection


X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

706 454.96
706 880.76
707 030.31
707 048.98
706 945.63
706 906.85
706 903.25
706 948.05
706 829.05
706 785.87
706 898.53
706 818.25
706 986.93
706 869.53
707 116.58
707 327.30
707 333.01
707 283.78
707 303.00
707 352.71
707 352.10
707 357.03
707 337.68
706 609.26
706 655.02
706 675.31
706 473.87
706 504.44
707 028.90
706 973.88
706 949.00
706 803.28
706 806.08
706 795.88
706 932.08
707 043.51
706 853.86
706 952.54
706 956.09
707 346.18
707 359.10
707 352.67
707 241.57
707 198.78
706 959.03
707 103.99
707 122.48
707 271.93
707 184.06
707 043.31
707 273.66
707 227.97
707 183.50
707 128.40
707 029.95
706 909.85
706 820.56
706 917.88
707 026.07
707 002.69
706 950.77
706 956.68
706 960.53

3 176 474.19
3 176 608.00
3 176 454.29
3 176 554.90
3 176 476.26
3 176 515.15
3 176 459.88
3 176 412.93
3 176 514.49
3 176 540.98
3 176 460.77
3 176 463.98
3 176 560.48
3 176 604.90
3 176 425.03
3 176 473.01
3 176 452.56
3 176 379.25
3 176 356.96
3 176 373.40
3 176 377.51
3 176 374.14
3 176 323.81
3 176 263.07
3 176 191.52
3 176 238.84
3 176 343.49
3 176 344.62
3 176 519.11
3 176 558.94
3 176 521.07
3 176 619.90
3 176 622.48
3 176 584.88
3 176 476.05
3 176 556.44
3 176 365.88
3 176 410.22
3 176 577.31
3 176 380.62
3 176 505.26
3 176 512.55
3 176 415.75
3 176 530.09
3 176 449.23
3 176 630.90
3 176 631.79
3 176 541.97
3 176 536.78
3 176 425.87
3 176 478.69
3 176 437.79
3 176 492.58
3 176 574.18
3 176 552.74
3 176 599.98
3 176 518.58
3 176 600.54
3 176 515.18
3 176 457.12
3 176 410.50
3 176 410.26
3 176 409.23

1 743.95
1 850.69
1 830.79
1 867.12
1 825.03
1 824.49
1 810.17
1 804.09
1 822.87
1 807.66
1 810.85
1 789.17
1 853.72
1 847.82
1 836.23
1 829.84
1 832.89
1 792.42
1 796.49
1 813.58
1 810.45
1 812.13
1 807.13
1 695.98
1 683.23
1 710.98
1 718.54
1 700.92
1 849.22
1 850.37
1 835.86
1 822.92
1 824.39
1 814.23
1 823.94
1 852.94
1 759.13
1 803.65
1 861.74
1 820.06
1 834.97
1 842.90
1 786.69
1 819.22
1 811.74
1 827.46
1 819.39
1 827.89
1 819.07
1 814.68
1 816.00
1 790.83
1 811.49
1 842.27
1 852.46
1 851.33
1 823.63
1 853.18
1 846.12
1 821.60
1 802.89
1 801.15
1 803.58

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


267

Domain
Main Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

RC-08-317
RC-08-318
RC-08-323
RC-08-324
RC-08-342
RC-08-343
RC-08-401
RC-09-424
RC-09-425
RC-09-427
RC-09-431
RC-09-432
RC-09-439
RC-09-449
RC-09-450
RC-09-458
RC-09-459
RC-09-460
RC-09-462
RC-09-463
RC-09-485
RC-09-486
RC-09-487
RC-09-497
RC-09-498
RC-09-499
RC-09-500
RC-09-501
RC-09-504
RC-09-505
RC-09-507
RC-10-571
RC-12-686
RC-12-687
RC-12-688
RC-12-689
RC-12-690
RC-12-691
RC-12-696
RC-12-697
RC-12-698
DDH-07-15
DDH-07-16
DDH-07-17
DDH-07-18
DDH-07-19
DDH-07-20
DDH-07-29
DDH-07-30
DDH-07-35
DDH-08-44
DDH-08-45
DDH-08-46
DDH-08-47
DDH-08-48
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-50
DDH-08-51
DDH-08-52
DDH-08-53
DDH-08-54
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-67

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.05
4.57
3.05
3.05
3.05
4.57
6.10
4.57
6.10
37.00
31.00
20.00
45.00
14.00
57.00
11.00
5.75
0.00
33.00
34.00
35.00
42.00
9.00
12.00
4.00
10.00
20.00
6.00
32.00
12.00
21.50

13.72
21.34
9.14
4.57
47.24
60.96
89.92
92.96
53.34
71.63
30.48
6.10
16.76
4.57
13.72
10.67
15.24
21.34
22.86
12.19
51.82
18.29
39.62
12.19
16.76
9.14
16.76
25.91
12.19
33.53
25.91
54.86
45.72
99.06
51.82
70.10
70.10
80.77
38.10
71.63
115.82
65.00
38.00
50.00
64.00
50.00
77.00
26.00
22.00
33.00
46.00
68.00
53.00
51.00
26.00
52.00
33.00
37.00
52.00
16.00
44.00
48.75
55.00

Average grade Core Lenght


Au (g/t)
(m)
0.43
0.03
0.10
0.21
0.03
0.01
0.05
0.11
0.08
0.09
1.09
1.02
0.08
0.14
0.46
0.06
0.12
0.13
0.76
0.35
0.04
0.10
0.04
0.65
1.45
0.27
0.80
0.39
0.10
0.13
0.21
0.14
0.14
0.16
0.03
0.14
0.02
0.13
0.28
0.15
0.17
0.16
0.05
0.50
0.07
0.30
0.21
0.40
0.71
1.42
0.21
0.13
0.81
0.25
0.22
0.13
0.14
0.10
0.21
0.02
2.56
0.23
0.42

13.72
21.34
9.14
4.57
47.24
60.96
89.92
92.96
53.34
71.63
30.48
6.10
16.76
4.57
13.72
10.67
15.24
21.34
22.86
12.19
51.82
16.77
39.62
12.19
16.76
9.14
16.76
25.91
12.19
33.53
25.91
54.86
42.67
94.49
48.77
67.05
67.05
76.20
32.00
67.06
109.72
28.00
7.00
30.00
19.00
36.00
20.00
15.00
16.25
33.00
13.00
34.00
18.00
9.00
17.00
40.00
29.00
27.00
32.00
10.00
12.00
36.75
33.50

Coordonnate of the Intersection


X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

706 847.89
706 866.25
706 780.29
706 774.78
706 501.37
706 322.62
706 417.87
706 650.81
706 682.32
706 427.44
707 059.38
706 882.12
706 968.70
707 077.66
706 909.65
707 274.13
707 268.36
707 275.58
706 867.88
706 829.84
707 188.79
707 294.54
707 274.87
706 936.94
706 839.00
706 936.49
706 926.45
706 965.65
707 096.63
707 129.64
706 991.60
706 333.86
706 349.56
706 542.31
706 508.02
706 496.97
706 477.97
706 374.17
707 222.10
707 204.47
707 188.56
707 338.41
706 983.54
706 851.94
706 985.25
706 840.29
707 303.93
707 120.78
706 855.24
706 852.51
707 256.37
707 226.45
707 354.10
707 018.86
706 907.66
706 874.83
706 954.05
706 917.49
706 813.60
706 741.82
706 824.44
706 870.68
706 833.85

3 176 370.21
3 176 372.36
3 176 347.76
3 176 341.80
3 176 053.96
3 176 323.36
3 176 154.22
3 176 066.84
3 176 004.93
3 176 163.20
3 176 497.23
3 176 604.78
3 176 444.95
3 176 592.09
3 176 605.69
3 176 543.50
3 176 486.42
3 176 477.06
3 176 610.55
3 176 514.22
3 176 540.15
3 176 515.05
3 176 389.44
3 176 526.99
3 176 533.31
3 176 479.50
3 176 595.51
3 176 580.88
3 176 476.50
3 176 543.76
3 176 496.89
3 176 324.38
3 176 346.61
3 176 060.98
3 176 060.27
3 176 109.09
3 176 107.28
3 176 204.89
3 176 568.22
3 176 568.38
3 176 565.20
3 176 320.43
3 176 562.52
3 176 606.60
3 176 458.18
3 176 517.48
3 176 357.64
3 176 425.31
3 176 422.98
3 176 315.69
3 176 432.43
3 176 530.06
3 176 460.67
3 176 563.72
3 176 553.85
3 176 549.98
3 176 410.59
3 176 460.82
3 176 526.47
3 176 452.67
3 176 463.97
3 176 588.06
3 176 582.64

1 762.52
1 757.69
1 734.26
1 735.46
1 631.95
1 646.14
1 602.82
1 618.33
1 619.91
1 626.33
1 844.07
1 852.67
1 811.24
1 853.50
1 852.82
1 828.56
1 816.76
1 814.63
1 845.49
1 824.25
1 810.96
1 826.05
1 798.82
1 837.40
1 824.00
1 824.04
1 854.37
1 848.55
1 854.60
1 850.60
1 833.57
1 666.64
1 664.04
1 617.35
1 639.11
1 643.62
1 626.07
1 626.98
1 830.40
1 810.76
1 800.68
1 768.26
1 829.45
1 828.35
1 797.58
1 801.44
1 762.48
1 818.31
1 768.89
1 726.35
1 777.64
1 794.80
1 804.60
1 827.52
1 824.41
1 811.89
1 788.51
1 799.06
1 795.92
1 793.54
1 775.52
1 818.25
1 811.01

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


268

Domain
Main Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

DDH-09-68
DDH-09-69
DDH-09-70
DDH-09-71
DDH-09-72
DDH-09-73
DDH-09-79
DDH-09-80
DDH-09-81
DDH-09-82
DDH-09-83
DDH-09-84
DDH-09-85
DDH-09-86
DDH-09-87
DDH-09-88
DDH-09-89
DDH-09-90
DDH-09-91
DDH-09-92
DDH-09-94
RC-06-24
RC-06-30
RC-06-31
RC-06-32
RC-06-33
RC-06-40
RC-06-41
RC-06-42
RC-06-43
RC-06-63
RC-06-67
RC-06-68
RC-06-75
RC-06-79
RC-06-83
RC-06-84
RC-06-85
RC-06-86
RC-06-87
RC-06-91
RC-06-92
RC-06-93
RC-07-110
RC-07-112
RC-07-113
RC-07-116
RC-07-117
RC-07-118
RC-07-119
RC-07-120
RC-07-122
RC-07-123
RC-07-124
RC-07-125
RC-07-129
RC-07-130
RC-07-131
RC-07-132
RC-07-133
RC-07-134
RC-07-135
RC-07-137

8.60
10.00
6.00
10.00
23.65
12.20
25.00
30.50
36.45
48.00
22.00
24.00
23.30
9.00
31.60
2.00
2.00
4.00
15.00
4.00
9.10
1.52
28.96
16.76
19.81
0.00
19.81
15.24
22.86
4.57
0.00
0.00
4.57
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.52
9.14
4.57
0.00
6.10
16.76
4.57
28.96
45.72
13.72
4.57
24.38
6.10
6.10
15.24
25.91
0.00
4.57
102.11
89.92
33.53
13.72
33.53
7.62

34.80
17.00
13.00
32.00
55.00
47.00
40.00
34.00
46.00
71.00
62.00
33.00
46.50
43.00
44.00
39.00
29.00
40.60
36.30
44.00
45.00
22.86
85.34
44.20
73.15
59.44
42.67
48.77
64.01
33.53
10.67
18.29
24.38
3.05
33.53
12.19
33.53
42.67
57.91
16.76
41.15
19.81
32.00
7.62
48.77
16.76
35.05
67.06
42.67
41.15
57.91
21.34
27.43
33.53
28.96
3.05
9.14
105.16
92.96
47.24
32.00
48.77
42.67

Average grade Core Lenght


Au (g/t)
(m)
0.32
0.79
0.72
0.40
0.39
0.44
0.54
0.11
0.04
0.77
0.18
0.44
0.26
0.46
0.26
0.23
0.16
0.10
0.09
0.27
0.30
0.31
0.25
0.28
0.39
0.60
0.86
0.29
0.26
0.73
0.74
0.11
0.20
0.07
0.20
0.02
0.29
0.29
0.30
0.93
0.22
1.23
0.09
0.22
0.67
0.62
0.02
0.05
0.22
0.18
0.26
0.10
0.39
0.57
0.21
4.49
0.41
0.02
0.07
0.38
0.49
0.41
0.16

26.20
7.00
7.00
22.00
31.35
34.80
15.00
3.50
9.55
23.00
40.00
9.00
23.20
34.00
12.40
37.00
27.00
36.60
21.30
40.00
35.90
21.34
56.38
27.44
53.34
59.44
22.86
33.53
41.15
28.96
10.67
18.29
19.81
3.05
33.53
12.19
33.53
42.67
57.91
15.24
32.01
15.24
32.00
1.52
32.01
12.19
6.09
21.34
28.95
36.58
33.53
15.24
21.33
18.29
3.05
3.05
4.57
3.05
3.04
13.71
18.28
15.24
35.05

Coordonnate of the Intersection


X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

706 889.18
706 962.31
706 972.41
706 884.03
706 792.04
706 835.95
706 934.80
707 011.09
707 032.75
707 256.26
707 362.53
707 280.56
706 992.39
706 845.63
706 799.04
706 770.79
706 738.79
706 903.16
706 965.69
707 356.75
706 883.41
707 197.69
707 307.83
707 338.94
707 361.86
707 351.48
706 851.21
706 874.40
706 823.17
706 875.01
706 872.58
706 737.83
706 803.36
707 224.61
707 179.18
707 222.53
707 167.53
707 161.02
707 165.56
707 135.65
706 967.41
706 869.63
707 139.83
707 094.20
706 871.18
706 859.32
707 020.21
706 981.91
706 968.08
706 952.84
706 819.11
706 873.09
706 891.34
706 911.78
706 953.66
706 876.17
706 776.88
706 553.12
706 517.72
706 455.41
706 891.53
707 048.10
706 959.34

3 176 557.30
3 176 622.44
3 176 611.69
3 176 526.21
3 176 564.60
3 176 480.75
3 176 584.66
3 176 464.36
3 176 491.04
3 176 401.43
3 176 361.49
3 176 470.89
3 176 498.40
3 176 475.21
3 176 485.56
3 176 588.85
3 176 442.40
3 176 423.17
3 176 420.61
3 176 410.68
3 176 561.82
3 175 541.93
3 176 308.50
3 176 279.10
3 176 300.72
3 176 267.50
3 176 567.84
3 176 569.19
3 176 568.13
3 176 607.81
3 176 310.72
3 176 452.18
3 176 618.92
3 175 534.88
3 175 518.32
3 175 533.94
3 175 464.23
3 175 464.29
3 175 455.93
3 175 597.04
3 176 416.01
3 176 420.47
3 176 323.76
3 175 637.21
3 176 398.62
3 176 422.48
3 176 452.65
3 176 451.77
3 176 520.01
3 176 418.04
3 176 512.81
3 176 506.01
3 176 551.12
3 176 601.16
3 176 579.80
3 176 310.76
3 176 343.30
3 176 352.64
3 176 417.03
3 176 473.99
3 176 608.37
3 176 454.07
3 176 476.02

1 817.90
1 834.33
1 837.78
1 805.45
1 793.07
1 783.37
1 832.22
1 809.57
1 811.64
1 761.11
1 784.89
1 796.21
1 814.06
1 783.71
1 776.43
1 789.93
1 788.41
1 778.30
1 787.29
1 811.13
1 822.30
1 691.16
1 765.65
1 776.28
1 776.61
1 784.91
1 810.48
1 817.70
1 805.72
1 833.24
1 733.47
1 795.58
1 812.41
1 688.55
1 684.13
1 683.35
1 671.50
1 658.65
1 667.52
1 702.11
1 790.49
1 774.71
1 778.76
1 715.96
1 753.58
1 772.35
1 806.60
1 795.21
1 820.38
1 784.28
1 785.57
1 802.76
1 823.19
1 834.67
1 835.51
1 737.19
1 730.39
1 658.23
1 686.53
1 716.15
1 837.85
1 808.92
1 808.69

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


269

Domain
Main Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

RC-07-138
RC-07-139
RC-07-140
RC-07-141
RC-07-142
RC-07-143
RC-07-144
RC-07-145
RC-07-146
RC-07-147
RC-07-148
RC-07-149
RC-07-150
RC-07-152
RC-07-153
RC-07-155
RC-07-158
RC-07-159
RC-07-160
RC-07-161
RC-07-178
RC-07-179
RC-07-180
RC-07-181
RC-07-186
RC-07-211
RC-07-212
RC-07-213
RC-07-214
RC-07-215
RC-07-216
RC-07-217
RC-07-218
RC-07-219
RC-07-220
RC-07-221
RC-07-225
RC-07-229
RC-07-230
RC-07-231
RC-07-232
RC-07-234
RC-07-238
RC-07-244
RC-07-245
RC-07-247
RC-07-257
RC-07-258
RC-07-259
RC-07-265
RC-07-266
RC-07-267
RC-07-268
RC-07-269
RC-07-270
RC-07-98
RC-07-99
RC-08-297
RC-08-299
RC-08-306
RC-08-308
RC-08-309
RC-08-310

4.57
0.00
12.19
6.10
15.24
19.81
13.72
25.91
0.00
32.00
19.81
1.52
0.00
35.05
41.15
56.39
21.34
15.24
19.81
38.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
92.96
30.48
35.05
15.24
6.10
4.57
13.72
10.67
0.00
0.00
33.53
21.34
9.14
38.10
25.91
3.05
0.00
42.67
0.00
30.48
13.72
0.00
10.67
1.52
36.58
12.19
38.10
18.29
22.86
38.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
51.82
1.52
36.58
39.62
15.24
21.34

24.38
25.91
25.91
54.86
50.29
47.24
51.82
50.29
21.34
42.67
53.34
54.86
41.15
50.29
59.44
77.72
59.44
48.77
41.15
68.58
16.76
13.72
16.76
9.14
123.44
41.15
54.86
33.53
25.91
33.53
27.43
48.77
51.82
16.76
35.05
28.96
44.20
57.91
38.10
19.81
22.86
68.58
27.43
80.77
38.10
41.15
59.44
65.53
80.77
30.48
88.39
36.58
33.53
56.39
32.00
28.96
42.67
67.06
15.24
85.34
59.44
35.05
54.86

Average grade Core Lenght


Au (g/t)
(m)
0.17
0.10
0.08
0.40
0.35
1.50
0.27
1.83
0.30
0.12
0.76
0.20
0.16
1.26
0.33
0.14
1.04
0.61
2.12
0.57
0.56
0.24
0.10
0.44
0.40
0.06
0.45
0.20
1.00
0.22
0.09
0.08
0.18
0.10
0.99
3.57
0.24
0.15
1.89
0.33
0.37
2.06
0.19
0.82
0.07
0.35
0.47
0.46
0.86
0.20
0.12
0.37
1.18
4.52
0.12
1.09
0.63
0.24
0.27
0.32
0.17
0.60
0.30

19.81
25.91
13.72
48.76
35.05
27.43
38.10
24.38
21.34
10.67
33.53
53.34
41.15
15.24
18.29
21.33
38.10
33.53
21.34
30.48
16.76
13.72
16.76
9.14
30.48
10.67
19.81
18.29
19.81
28.96
13.71
38.10
51.82
16.76
1.52
7.62
35.06
19.81
12.19
16.76
22.86
25.91
27.43
50.29
24.38
41.15
48.77
64.01
44.19
18.29
50.29
18.29
10.67
18.29
32.00
28.96
42.67
15.24
13.72
48.76
19.82
19.81
33.52

Coordonnate of the Intersection


X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

706 915.47
706 883.62
706 903.25
706 932.02
706 842.48
706 785.99
706 882.80
706 830.14
706 690.32
706 986.42
706 852.56
707 107.43
707 090.39
707 327.80
707 349.43
707 302.32
707 364.97
707 352.10
707 372.02
707 343.36
706 619.53
706 614.02
706 688.73
706 681.65
706 504.44
707 028.34
706 956.75
706 949.00
706 811.36
706 799.82
706 795.88
706 913.48
706 713.15
706 791.73
707 043.26
706 852.88
706 948.28
707 330.48
707 366.55
707 352.73
707 344.66
707 253.87
707 102.78
707 199.16
706 949.77
706 397.69
707 104.86
707 071.08
707 149.01
707 271.99
707 162.57
707 037.46
707 273.48
707 219.76
707 021.39
706 860.71
706 873.15
707 183.08
707 150.25
707 128.14
707 012.04
706 910.04
706 808.24

3 176 515.73
3 176 505.09
3 176 459.88
3 176 413.54
3 176 514.83
3 176 541.17
3 176 460.87
3 176 464.47
3 176 487.19
3 176 560.48
3 176 604.00
3 176 425.15
3 176 371.47
3 176 488.50
3 176 440.49
3 176 357.04
3 176 361.97
3 176 377.51
3 176 374.66
3 176 320.06
3 176 471.41
3 176 471.26
3 176 431.25
3 176 431.15
3 176 344.62
3 176 519.07
3 176 558.34
3 176 521.07
3 176 620.18
3 176 621.94
3 176 584.88
3 176 475.75
3 176 454.04
3 176 396.31
3 176 556.16
3 176 360.45
3 176 398.44
3 176 396.68
3 176 496.81
3 176 512.59
3 176 521.22
3 176 403.72
3 176 372.73
3 176 530.39
3 176 448.53
3 176 497.67
3 176 630.66
3 176 629.08
3 176 632.97
3 176 541.90
3 176 559.97
3 176 426.44
3 176 478.84
3 176 445.23
3 176 356.86
3 176 310.26
3 176 292.10
3 176 492.89
3 176 318.56
3 176 573.80
3 176 551.18
3 176 599.48
3 176 519.16

1 814.85
1 806.64
1 796.07
1 782.31
1 801.62
1 784.04
1 788.40
1 775.28
1 791.33
1 826.29
1 827.27
1 824.05
1 795.14
1 810.53
1 800.71
1 762.21
1 784.54
1 789.49
1 791.48
1 766.16
1 765.04
1 767.59
1 765.52
1 767.30
1 639.96
1 822.93
1 829.94
1 819.48
1 813.29
1 813.50
1 797.47
1 800.77
1 782.80
1 771.11
1 834.28
1 744.52
1 785.45
1 779.38
1 821.04
1 834.51
1 835.61
1 762.00
1 794.85
1 778.84
1 795.10
1 718.67
1 803.48
1 796.05
1 789.97
1 812.65
1 777.06
1 798.16
1 795.81
1 766.57
1 776.04
1 729.84
1 721.41
1 777.96
1 783.02
1 788.57
1 828.79
1 833.82
1 801.28

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


270

Domain
Main Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

RC-08-311
RC-08-312
RC-08-313
RC-08-314
RC-08-315
RC-08-316
RC-08-318
RC-08-319
RC-08-323
RC-08-324
RC-08-325
RC-08-326
RC-08-327
RC-08-328
RC-08-329
RC-08-330
RC-08-331
RC-08-342
RC-08-343
RC-08-401
RC-09-421
RC-09-424
RC-09-427
RC-09-431
RC-09-432
RC-09-439
RC-09-449
RC-09-450
RC-09-458
RC-09-459
RC-09-460
RC-09-462
RC-09-463
RC-09-485
RC-09-486
RC-09-487
RC-09-497
RC-09-498
RC-09-499
RC-09-500
RC-09-501
RC-09-502
RC-09-503
RC-09-505
RC-09-507
RC-10-570
RC-10-571
RC-12-686
RC-12-687
RC-12-688
RC-12-689
RC-12-690
RC-12-691
RC-12-696
RC-12-697
RC-12-698
DDH-07-15
DDH-07-16
DDH-07-17
DDH-07-18
DDH-07-19
DDH-07-30
DDH-07-35

15.24
28.96
42.67
4.57
6.10
7.62
21.34
1.52
9.14
4.57
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
18.29
1.52
47.24
60.96
89.92
7.62
92.96
71.63
30.48
6.10
16.76
4.57
13.72
10.67
15.24
21.34
22.86
12.19
51.82
18.29
39.62
12.19
16.76
10.67
16.76
25.91
0.00
0.00
33.53
25.91
7.62
54.86
45.72
99.06
50.29
70.10
70.10
80.77
38.10
71.63
115.82
65.00
38.00
50.00
64.00
50.00
22.00
33.00

33.53
53.34
59.44
45.72
10.67
39.62
50.29
13.72
16.76
24.38
4.57
39.62
42.67
51.82
41.15
25.91
51.82
134.11
76.20
103.63
15.24
121.92
102.11
38.10
28.96
38.10
9.14
30.48
28.96
45.72
32.00
42.67
59.44
83.82
36.58
57.91
30.48
50.29
32.00
36.58
39.62
25.91
19.81
77.72
48.77
9.14
76.20
64.01
146.30
123.44
129.54
114.30
105.16
60.96
105.16
137.16
71.00
97.00
80.15
101.00
89.00
25.00
43.00

Average grade Core Lenght


Au (g/t)
(m)
0.73
0.13
0.08
0.13
1.89
0.18
0.42
0.62
0.81
0.38
0.38
0.25
0.26
0.15
0.35
0.22
0.16
0.07
0.15
0.52
0.13
0.20
0.73
2.19
0.85
0.07
0.05
0.51
0.24
0.29
1.28
0.56
0.43
0.16
0.20
0.73
0.18
0.31
0.12
0.64
0.21
0.14
0.04
0.40
0.20
0.02
0.50
1.07
0.51
0.20
0.20
0.19
0.04
0.18
0.05
0.02
1.24
0.76
3.18
1.20
1.49
1.55
0.87

18.29
24.38
16.77
41.15
4.57
32.00
28.95
12.20
7.62
19.81
4.57
39.62
42.67
51.82
41.15
7.62
50.30
86.87
15.24
13.71
7.62
28.96
30.48
7.62
22.86
21.34
4.57
16.76
18.29
30.48
10.66
19.81
47.25
32.00
18.29
18.29
18.29
33.53
21.33
19.82
13.71
25.91
19.81
44.19
22.86
1.52
21.34
18.29
47.24
73.15
59.44
44.20
24.39
22.86
33.53
21.34
6.00
59.00
30.15
37.00
39.00
3.00
10.00

Coordonnate of the Intersection


X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

706 928.65
707 012.43
706 987.04
706 942.95
706 958.40
706 965.27
706 882.05
706 747.60
706 785.80
706 775.84
707 126.00
707 134.37
707 081.41
707 149.03
707 073.62
707 064.23
707 076.10
706 488.47
706 322.62
706 418.77
706 321.85
706 652.05
706 427.44
707 054.68
706 885.60
706 974.58
707 076.62
706 909.75
707 274.13
707 259.19
707 275.58
706 861.24
706 839.42
707 176.81
707 300.37
707 283.71
706 933.25
706 831.24
706 930.64
706 920.79
706 974.22
706 882.48
706 741.22
707 107.44
707 003.18
706 479.06
706 366.47
706 366.15
706 585.60
706 508.70
706 544.08
706 476.84
706 409.37
707 238.54
707 204.69
707 214.57
707 340.16
706 982.86
706 835.69
706 967.09
706 858.03
706 855.14
706 839.13

3 176 600.54
3 176 516.25
3 176 461.87
3 176 410.50
3 176 410.30
3 176 408.49
3 176 374.23
3 176 520.95
3 176 347.40
3 176 333.81
3 175 414.68
3 175 472.09
3 175 488.29
3 175 449.62
3 175 487.26
3 175 560.39
3 175 523.41
3 176 041.06
3 176 323.36
3 176 154.30
3 176 527.59
3 176 067.50
3 176 163.20
3 176 503.15
3 176 600.83
3 176 438.75
3 176 593.10
3 176 612.78
3 176 543.50
3 176 496.38
3 176 477.06
3 176 617.04
3 176 505.16
3 176 552.56
3 176 509.20
3 176 382.65
3 176 530.68
3 176 542.59
3 176 485.56
3 176 601.62
3 176 580.88
3 176 499.64
3 176 450.54
3 176 564.85
3 176 486.57
3 176 533.32
3 176 325.24
3 176 347.42
3 176 061.46
3 176 058.20
3 176 113.35
3 176 106.79
3 176 203.01
3 176 567.43
3 176 568.52
3 176 563.17
3 176 318.43
3 176 562.47
3 176 606.80
3 176 460.21
3 176 519.70
3 176 422.94
3 176 316.14

1 840.34
1 823.23
1 794.98
1 781.41
1 796.10
1 790.73
1 740.24
1 789.58
1 727.95
1 722.53
1 651.07
1 655.48
1 657.44
1 657.80
1 657.70
1 668.04
1 668.87
1 581.82
1 610.32
1 554.82
1 676.36
1 540.24
1 574.89
1 825.75
1 836.35
1 790.45
1 849.17
1 839.33
1 817.51
1 798.34
1 795.96
1 828.86
1 797.62
1 772.79
1 810.59
1 766.80
1 823.08
1 801.96
1 809.54
1 840.70
1 833.27
1 803.97
1 793.50
1 805.55
1 814.76
1 717.57
1 628.87
1 638.50
1 561.30
1 575.53
1 586.39
1 570.47
1 582.02
1 810.40
1 760.47
1 766.62
1 751.46
1 797.20
1 808.33
1 776.37
1 768.47
1 759.26
1 709.53

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


271

Domain
Main Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

DDH-08-44
DDH-08-48
DDH-08-49
DDH-08-50
DDH-08-51
DDH-08-52
DDH-08-53
DDH-09-66
DDH-09-67
DDH-09-68
DDH-09-69
DDH-09-70
DDH-09-71
DDH-09-72
DDH-09-73
DDH-09-75
DDH-09-76
DDH-09-77
DDH-09-78
DDH-09-79
DDH-09-80
DDH-09-81
DDH-09-84
DDH-09-85
DDH-09-87
DDH-09-88
DDH-09-89
DDH-09-90
DDH-09-91
DDH-09-94
RC-06-31
RC-06-32
RC-06-33
RC-06-35
RC-06-40
RC-06-41
RC-06-42
RC-06-43
RC-06-63
RC-06-66
RC-06-67
RC-06-68
RC-06-91
RC-06-92
RC-07-113
RC-07-114
RC-07-116
RC-07-117
RC-07-118
RC-07-119
RC-07-120
RC-07-121
RC-07-122
RC-07-123
RC-07-124
RC-07-125
RC-07-130
RC-07-133
RC-07-134
RC-07-135
RC-07-137
RC-07-138
RC-07-139

46.00
28.00
52.00
33.00
37.00
52.00
16.00
48.75
55.00
34.80
17.00
13.00
32.00
55.00
47.00
4.00
4.00
1.50
2.00
40.00
34.00
46.00
33.00
46.50
44.00
39.00
29.00
40.60
36.30
45.00
51.82
73.15
59.44
56.39
44.20
48.77
64.01
33.53
10.67
0.00
18.29
25.91
41.15
19.81
16.76
0.00
35.05
67.06
42.67
42.67
57.91
0.00
21.34
27.43
33.53
28.96
9.14
47.24
32.00
50.29
42.67
24.38
25.91

51.00
43.00
95.00
83.00
57.00
62.00
45.00
78.00
68.50
54.00
30.90
69.00
76.00
60.00
52.75
31.00
46.00
18.00
31.00
54.60
62.00
81.00
36.95
61.00
51.00
45.00
33.00
54.00
59.00
53.00
77.72
102.11
73.15
67.06
88.39
68.58
74.68
47.24
21.34
7.62
35.05
33.53
65.53
25.91
21.34
10.67
41.15
97.54
64.01
64.01
67.06
19.81
38.10
42.67
51.82
57.91
18.29
50.29
56.39
51.82
60.96
28.96
30.48

Average grade Core Lenght


Au (g/t)
(m)
0.39
0.57
0.87
6.26
1.03
1.41
0.94
0.50
0.73
1.62
0.98
0.43
1.90
2.00
0.24
0.42
0.65
0.91
0.71
0.61
0.34
0.21
0.06
0.03
1.06
0.25
0.86
0.44
0.92
0.94
1.32
0.29
0.59
2.95
0.91
0.76
0.68
0.35
0.47
0.14
0.78
2.16
0.78
0.22
1.11
0.28
0.14
0.77
0.95
5.99
1.12
0.43
3.33
2.10
0.77
1.22
1.87
0.45
0.65
0.12
0.06
0.89
0.48

5.00
15.00
43.00
50.00
20.00
10.00
29.00
29.25
13.50
19.20
13.90
56.00
44.00
5.00
5.75
27.00
42.00
16.50
29.00
14.60
28.00
35.00
3.95
14.50
7.00
6.00
4.00
13.40
22.70
8.00
25.90
28.96
13.71
10.67
44.19
19.81
10.67
13.71
10.67
7.62
16.76
7.62
24.38
6.10
4.58
10.67
6.10
30.48
21.34
21.34
9.15
19.81
16.76
15.24
18.29
28.95
9.15
3.05
24.39
1.53
18.29
4.58
4.57

Coordonnate of the Intersection


X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

707 262.32
706 918.44
706 849.03
706 953.57
706 934.61
706 828.49
706 753.94
706 857.65
706 823.99
706 884.17
706 958.84
706 982.36
706 873.60
706 785.61
706 829.01
706 893.47
706 866.20
706 824.44
706 812.73
706 929.65
707 006.91
707 026.92
707 282.03
706 986.37
706 796.52
706 763.76
706 744.32
706 891.47
706 959.95
706 870.43
707 338.41
707 377.80
707 367.08
707 304.26
706 851.21
706 893.84
706 809.17
706 875.01
706 872.48
706 820.43
706 737.83
706 803.65
706 986.10
706 876.63
706 859.32
706 822.63
707 020.34
706 965.26
706 982.76
706 952.84
706 819.11
706 763.00
706 873.09
706 891.78
706 911.78
706 953.66
706 776.95
706 455.58
706 902.54
707 056.01
706 976.48
706 923.64
706 894.29

3 176 432.95
3 176 554.50
3 176 550.43
3 176 410.35
3 176 461.64
3 176 526.69
3 176 452.87
3 176 600.55
3 176 593.44
3 176 562.82
3 176 626.36
3 176 601.10
3 176 538.32
3 176 571.47
3 176 488.05
3 176 652.04
3 176 653.01
3 176 657.39
3 176 658.43
3 176 589.86
3 176 468.69
3 176 497.54
3 176 469.19
3 176 505.47
3 176 488.07
3 176 597.12
3 176 436.06
3 176 434.69
3 176 425.83
3 176 574.65
3 176 278.78
3 176 285.85
3 176 252.94
3 176 269.38
3 176 567.84
3 176 570.12
3 176 568.04
3 176 607.81
3 176 310.83
3 176 397.83
3 176 452.18
3 176 618.77
3 176 416.87
3 176 420.71
3 176 422.48
3 176 392.50
3 176 452.56
3 176 451.18
3 176 518.98
3 176 418.04
3 176 512.81
3 176 471.00
3 176 506.01
3 176 550.56
3 176 601.16
3 176 579.80
3 176 343.18
3 176 473.90
3 176 608.76
3 176 453.95
3 176 475.72
3 176 516.30
3 176 504.99

1 770.91
1 811.29
1 779.07
1 749.02
1 779.50
1 778.07
1 779.91
1 796.63
1 792.61
1 796.46
1 825.57
1 812.63
1 777.16
1 777.52
1 765.78
1 808.87
1 800.26
1 801.57
1 794.81
1 819.36
1 796.65
1 787.78
1 790.14
1 798.68
1 767.40
1 771.37
1 775.40
1 759.44
1 766.71
1 800.76
1 742.00
1 750.64
1 747.96
1 745.85
1 772.00
1 795.75
1 783.92
1 815.34
1 722.80
1 772.18
1 773.49
1 796.41
1 764.53
1 766.66
1 763.96
1 769.96
1 800.50
1 775.37
1 802.39
1 753.80
1 766.90
1 798.38
1 785.61
1 803.02
1 815.24
1 819.51
1 723.53
1 705.48
1 824.71
1 799.15
1 788.26
1 805.81
1 793.71

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


272

Domain
Main Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

RC-07-140
RC-07-141
RC-07-142
RC-07-143
RC-07-144
RC-07-146
RC-07-147
RC-07-148
RC-07-161
RC-07-177
RC-07-180
RC-07-181
RC-07-187
RC-07-188
RC-07-208
RC-07-211
RC-07-212
RC-07-213
RC-07-214
RC-07-215
RC-07-216
RC-07-217
RC-07-219
RC-07-224
RC-07-226
RC-07-230
RC-07-245
RC-07-247
RC-07-264
RC-07-265
RC-07-267
RC-07-268
RC-07-270
RC-07-98
RC-07-99
RC-08-308
RC-08-309
RC-08-310
RC-08-311
RC-08-312
RC-08-313
RC-08-314
RC-08-316
RC-08-317
RC-08-319
RC-08-321
RC-08-322
RC-08-341
RC-08-342
RC-08-343
RC-08-401
RC-09-421
RC-09-431
RC-09-432
RC-09-439
RC-09-450
RC-09-459
RC-09-460
RC-09-462
RC-09-463
RC-09-497
RC-09-498
RC-09-499

25.91
54.86
50.29
48.77
51.82
21.34
42.67
53.34
73.15
0.00
16.76
9.14
0.00
1.52
1.52
41.15
54.86
33.53
25.91
33.53
28.96
48.77
16.76
0.00
45.72
38.10
38.10
41.15
10.67
30.48
36.58
33.53
32.00
28.96
42.67
59.44
35.05
54.86
33.53
53.34
59.44
45.72
39.62
24.38
13.72
9.14
0.00
0.00
134.11
76.20
103.63
15.24
38.10
28.96
30.48
30.48
45.72
32.00
45.72
59.44
30.48
50.29
32.00

47.24
68.58
86.87
51.82
57.91
39.62
117.35
54.86
74.68
1.52
30.48
12.19
12.19
22.86
28.96
50.29
59.44
42.67
48.77
50.29
47.24
59.44
24.38
27.43
59.44
50.29
50.29
54.86
13.72
48.77
41.15
71.63
42.67
42.67
73.15
102.11
114.30
77.72
79.25
59.44
96.01
64.01
45.72
25.91
18.29
28.96
16.76
16.76
144.78
106.68
105.16
28.96
48.77
112.78
80.77
73.15
54.86
76.20
54.86
73.15
38.10
60.96
48.77

Average grade Core Lenght


Au (g/t)
(m)
1.54
1.37
2.75
14.08
2.27
0.41
0.65
0.12
2.20
0.16
1.90
0.58
0.61
0.33
0.39
0.29
0.58
0.62
1.36
0.44
0.13
0.59
0.40
0.61
0.13
1.13
1.89
1.06
0.16
0.12
0.42
0.86
0.71
2.27
1.61
1.73
0.91
1.86
1.61
0.04
0.54
1.49
2.07
0.15
0.30
0.11
0.78
0.39
1.57
1.28
0.07
0.50
0.64
4.93
0.72
0.53
0.45
1.46
0.43
2.71
0.26
2.10
1.37

21.33
13.72
36.58
3.05
6.09
18.28
74.68
1.52
1.53
1.52
13.72
3.05
12.19
21.34
27.44
9.14
4.58
9.14
22.86
16.76
18.28
10.67
7.62
27.43
13.72
12.19
12.19
13.71
3.05
18.29
4.57
38.10
10.67
13.71
30.48
42.67
79.25
22.86
45.72
6.10
36.57
18.29
6.10
1.53
4.57
19.82
16.76
16.76
10.67
30.48
1.53
13.72
10.67
83.82
50.29
42.67
9.14
44.20
9.14
13.71
7.62
10.67
16.77

Coordonnate of the Intersection


X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

706 903.25
706 913.69
706 864.83
706 786.11
706 870.31
706 690.32
706 985.25
706 841.50
707 346.16
706 721.89
706 698.59
706 681.55
706 786.49
706 824.92
706 905.92
707 028.14
706 948.43
706 949.00
706 824.58
706 785.97
706 795.88
706 902.03
706 791.79
706 754.35
706 955.60
707 372.14
706 940.66
706 387.91
706 960.16
707 271.82
707 033.75
707 272.96
707 011.44
706 844.52
706 873.43
706 991.38
706 910.21
706 793.80
706 949.23
707 004.70
706 974.06
706 932.79
706 973.97
706 836.50
706 747.80
706 743.03
706 760.30
706 882.24
706 473.45
706 322.62
706 418.92
706 316.84
707 052.71
706 898.93
706 978.69
706 909.90
707 251.25
707 275.58
706 854.70
706 848.97
706 930.30
706 824.01
706 924.10

3 176 459.88
3 176 414.29
3 176 515.12
3 176 541.24
3 176 460.63
3 176 487.19
3 176 561.33
3 176 603.41
3 176 318.30
3 176 374.21
3 176 431.26
3 176 431.11
3 176 685.80
3 176 718.80
3 176 267.72
3 176 519.02
3 176 558.05
3 176 521.07
3 176 620.64
3 176 620.72
3 176 584.88
3 176 475.59
3 176 391.89
3 176 502.21
3 176 577.52
3 176 490.66
3 176 447.83
3 176 495.78
3 176 714.00
3 176 542.09
3 176 426.78
3 176 479.12
3 176 358.00
3 176 310.13
3 176 269.01
3 176 549.50
3 176 598.28
3 176 519.56
3 176 600.54
3 176 516.85
3 176 465.81
3 176 410.50
3 176 407.13
3 176 369.82
3 176 521.12
3 176 534.48
3 176 310.14
3 176 209.32
3 176 026.04
3 176 323.36
3 176 154.30
3 176 529.41
3 176 505.64
3 176 586.07
3 176 434.49
3 176 624.85
3 176 504.78
3 176 477.06
3 176 623.61
3 176 496.05
3 176 533.63
3 176 551.14
3 176 492.38

1 778.55
1 757.03
1 767.07
1 767.28
1 770.18
1 766.19
1 781.74
1 813.69
1 745.86
1 744.02
1 753.90
1 761.21
1 771.17
1 757.37
1 702.24
1 813.03
1 820.01
1 805.38
1 797.53
1 789.42
1 778.80
1 785.56
1 759.75
1 788.92
1 810.68
1 810.62
1 779.27
1 693.11
1 759.75
1 794.37
1 787.36
1 771.06
1 757.21
1 712.12
1 693.06
1 801.00
1 785.83
1 773.17
1 815.82
1 810.11
1 772.90
1 753.48
1 767.18
1 748.22
1 781.20
1 766.13
1 702.66
1 679.18
1 523.47
1 584.03
1 547.21
1 667.12
1 818.00
1 776.32
1 775.58
1 816.41
1 782.26
1 771.58
1 811.79
1 770.15
1 811.62
1 781.15
1 793.00

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


273

Domain
Main Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

RC-09-500
RC-09-501
RC-09-502
RC-09-503
RC-09-507
RC-10-571
RC-12-686
RC-12-688
RC-12-690
RC-12-691
RC-12-696
DDH-07-12
DDH-07-13
DDH-07-14
DDH-07-21
DDH-07-22
DDH-07-23
DDH-07-26
DDH-07-29
DDH-08-41
DDH-08-42
DDH-08-43
RC-05-14
RC-06-16
RC-06-17
RC-06-19
RC-06-20
RC-06-21
RC-06-29
RC-06-34
RC-06-35
RC-06-36
RC-06-37
RC-06-44
RC-06-45
RC-06-46
RC-06-47
RC-06-48
RC-06-51
RC-06-63
RC-06-64
RC-06-65
RC-06-69
RC-06-70
RC-06-74
RC-06-78
RC-06-89
RC-06-90
RC-06-94
RC-07-106
RC-07-107
RC-07-108
RC-07-111
RC-07-126
RC-07-127
RC-07-128
RC-07-129
RC-07-151
RC-07-156
RC-07-157
RC-07-162
RC-07-168
RC-07-170

36.58
41.15
25.91
19.81
48.77
76.20
64.01
123.44
114.30
105.16
60.96
6.00
9.00
3.00
12.00
6.00
1.65
0.00
82.00
8.00
6.00
17.00
0.00
1.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
33.53
0.00
0.00
38.10
0.00
1.52
0.00
1.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.52
1.52
1.52
4.57
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.57
0.00
36.58
27.43
0.00
0.00
0.00

53.34
45.72
32.00
41.15
57.91
100.58
88.39
128.02
118.87
115.82
83.82
155.00
84.65
53.30
67.00
65.00
28.00
70.00
99.20
70.00
84.43
90.53
249.94
35.05
167.64
41.15
141.73
35.05
97.54
68.58
54.86
89.92
135.64
156.97
103.63
62.48
88.39
160.02
10.67
50.29
141.73
147.83
64.01
71.63
89.92
118.87
83.82
91.44
28.96
170.69
135.64
44.20
89.92
48.77
114.30
10.67
89.92
77.72
68.58
83.82
141.73
144.78
80.77

Average grade Core Lenght


Au (g/t)
(m)
0.79
0.25
0.41
2.07
1.66
1.04
0.39
0.45
0.49
0.05
0.39
0.26
0.93
0.50
0.50
0.13
0.55
0.60
0.06
0.46
0.53
0.55
0.18
0.36
0.87
0.35
0.26
0.26
0.38
0.55
4.18
0.77
0.24
0.20
0.47
0.67
4.35
0.35
0.27
0.09
0.62
0.31
0.17
0.11
0.23
0.52
1.28
0.41
0.51
0.28
0.30
0.27
0.26
0.44
0.28
0.20
0.24
0.39
0.18
0.12
0.33
0.41
0.30

16.76
4.57
6.09
21.34
9.14
24.38
24.38
4.58
4.57
10.66
22.86
149.00
75.65
50.30
55.00
59.00
26.35
70.00
17.20
62.00
78.43
73.53
249.94
33.53
167.64
41.15
141.73
35.05
97.54
68.58
54.86
89.92
134.12
156.97
103.63
62.48
54.86
160.02
10.67
12.19
141.73
146.31
64.01
70.11
89.92
118.87
83.82
91.44
28.96
169.17
134.12
42.68
85.35
48.77
114.30
10.67
85.35
77.72
32.00
56.39
141.73
144.78
80.77

Coordonnate of the Intersection


X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

706 913.54
706 978.50
706 886.53
706 748.50
707 010.78
706 380.82
706 378.64
706 509.22
706 476.26
706 420.14
707 252.82
707 225.10
707 269.15
707 076.34
707 082.68
707 216.42
707 331.36
706 927.77
707 120.65
707 032.39
707 245.93
707 305.52
707 174.51
707 251.24
707 160.99
706 993.59
706 933.73
706 974.13
707 246.39
707 305.97
707 305.23
707 279.49
707 201.52
707 215.17
707 244.39
707 270.80
707 266.09
707 162.77
707 374.52
706 872.26
707 147.56
707 103.50
707 217.48
707 184.29
706 898.60
707 116.65
707 270.79
707 043.02
707 332.75
707 084.01
707 166.52
707 240.75
707 246.57
707 213.81
707 142.96
707 281.00
706 905.29
707 061.00
707 281.75
707 255.97
707 251.13
707 087.34
707 049.56

3 176 609.39
3 176 580.95
3 176 495.59
3 176 443.26
3 176 479.80
3 176 325.86
3 176 348.43
3 176 056.67
3 176 106.32
3 176 202.24
3 176 566.64
3 176 174.08
3 176 223.27
3 176 200.30
3 176 279.60
3 175 955.15
3 176 004.21
3 175 869.83
3 176 425.63
3 176 037.87
3 176 153.30
3 176 226.16
3 176 186.07
3 175 982.81
3 176 151.09
3 175 875.91
3 175 873.40
3 175 874.26
3 176 214.02
3 176 224.22
3 176 241.38
3 176 246.36
3 176 192.77
3 176 182.44
3 176 152.92
3 176 188.17
3 176 199.55
3 176 238.84
3 175 962.61
3 176 311.09
3 176 192.45
3 176 170.45
3 175 955.79
3 175 893.15
3 175 873.92
3 176 221.11
3 176 222.26
3 176 236.48
3 176 002.05
3 176 193.78
3 176 178.73
3 176 247.39
3 176 245.24
3 176 100.50
3 176 135.96
3 175 935.00
3 176 311.78
3 176 281.19
3 176 269.30
3 176 293.67
3 176 152.58
3 176 121.14
3 176 023.75

1 823.09
1 825.18
1 788.22
1 775.68
1 802.41
1 611.58
1 621.24
1 532.13
1 546.09
1 568.21
1 792.56
1 686.06
1 742.38
1 721.92
1 733.93
1 722.01
1 719.23
1 675.73
1 746.21
1 667.12
1 743.78
1 757.43
1 673.99
1 728.22
1 719.32
1 679.68
1 649.88
1 676.75
1 759.10
1 756.23
1 773.88
1 757.52
1 743.16
1 700.35
1 735.58
1 758.54
1 728.40
1 690.04
1 708.49
1 694.61
1 674.14
1 689.09
1 725.08
1 747.89
1 664.92
1 697.05
1 761.71
1 709.23
1 715.04
1 668.29
1 699.60
1 777.73
1 758.24
1 748.79
1 683.79
1 713.46
1 702.46
1 743.01
1 784.85
1 771.37
1 722.45
1 658.33
1 637.70

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


274

Domain
Main Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6

RC-07-171
RC-07-172
RC-07-173
RC-07-174
RC-07-175
RC-07-176
RC-07-209
RC-07-233
RC-07-235
RC-07-236
RC-07-237
RC-07-239
RC-07-240
RC-07-241
RC-07-242
RC-07-243
RC-07-246
RC-07-271
RC-08-298
RC-08-299
RC-08-300
RC-08-302
RC-08-303
RC-08-333
RC-08-334
RC-08-335
RC-08-336
RC-08-337
RC-08-338
RC-08-339
RC-08-340
RC-08-396
RC-08-397
RC-08-398
RC-08-399
RC-08-400
RC-09-451
RC-09-452
RC-09-453
RC-09-454
RC-09-457
RC-09-461
RC-09-488
RC-09-489
RC-09-490
RC-09-492
RC-09-493
RC-09-494
RC-09-495
RC-09-508
RC-09-509
RC-09-510
RC-09-511
RC-12-692
RC-12-693
RC-12-694
RC-12-695
DDH-07-12
DDH-07-27
DDH-07-28
DDH-08-55
DDH-09-93
RC-05-14

1.52
1.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
21.34
0.00
0.00
1.52
0.00
0.00
1.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
28.96
48.77
48.77
12.19
0.00
1.52
0.00
0.00
1.52
9.14
1.52
4.57
0.00
1.52
1.52
6.10
1.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.52
0.00
22.86
28.96
41.15
35.05
1.52
1.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.57
4.57
3.05
4.57
75.00
0.00
1.20
5.00
0.40
102.11

65.53
60.96
33.53
10.67
70.10
12.19
169.16
85.34
65.53
28.96
59.44
65.53
25.91
12.19
22.86
108.20
25.91
71.63
79.25
65.53
82.30
59.44
59.44
42.67
39.62
42.67
54.86
76.20
21.34
19.81
50.29
96.01
48.77
77.72
74.68
59.44
77.72
53.34
56.39
33.53
39.62
92.96
62.48
50.29
56.39
59.44
70.10
71.63
51.82
64.01
12.19
54.86
48.77
42.67
185.93
131.06
74.68
135.00
40.00
35.00
102.80
60.75
187.45

Average grade Core Lenght


Au (g/t)
(m)
0.19
0.22
0.41
0.11
0.45
0.12
0.29
0.20
0.15
0.27
0.47
0.18
0.19
0.36
0.24
0.29
0.16
0.38
0.02
0.17
0.15
0.34
0.26
0.24
0.27
0.20
1.36
0.31
0.17
0.53
0.18
0.32
0.36
0.36
0.16
0.32
0.13
0.18
0.16
0.20
0.29
0.18
0.32
0.05
0.24
0.45
0.67
0.33
0.66
1.93
0.28
0.26
0.30
0.39
0.41
0.53
0.30
3.15
1.31
0.32
1.02
1.27
2.59

64.01
59.44
33.53
10.67
70.10
12.19
169.16
64.00
65.53
28.96
57.92
65.53
25.91
10.67
22.86
108.20
25.91
42.67
30.48
16.76
70.11
59.44
57.92
42.67
39.62
41.15
45.72
74.68
16.77
19.81
48.77
94.49
42.67
76.20
74.68
59.44
77.72
53.34
56.39
32.01
39.62
70.10
33.52
9.14
21.34
57.92
68.58
71.63
51.82
64.01
12.19
54.86
48.77
38.10
181.36
128.01
70.11
60.00
40.00
33.80
97.80
60.35
85.34

Coordonnate of the Intersection


X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

706 929.40
706 944.08
706 957.02
706 997.10
707 007.84
706 994.05
707 062.80
707 220.52
707 287.89
706 983.52
707 015.14
707 087.84
707 317.21
707 334.06
707 244.36
707 165.80
706 839.67
707 195.24
707 179.43
707 152.27
707 192.60
707 070.37
707 031.40
707 107.43
707 059.13
707 047.91
707 035.05
706 975.08
706 946.22
706 960.76
707 001.41
707 002.40
706 996.67
707 069.95
707 001.43
707 136.38
706 842.24
706 810.17
706 966.88
706 868.01
706 771.18
707 246.36
707 255.43
707 212.04
707 206.02
707 214.44
707 285.94
707 180.97
707 296.77
707 106.19
706 911.63
706 964.51
706 939.15
706 974.93
707 048.85
707 082.86
707 094.53
707 224.79
707 040.50
707 228.31
707 331.60
707 331.77
707 164.13

3 176 325.87
3 176 326.55
3 176 327.34
3 176 318.13
3 176 283.32
3 176 321.21
3 176 152.10
3 176 343.80
3 176 231.46
3 176 086.05
3 176 196.98
3 176 283.50
3 176 051.52
3 176 128.39
3 176 059.99
3 176 110.78
3 176 012.26
3 176 384.72
3 176 416.77
3 176 319.49
3 176 304.89
3 175 997.90
3 175 975.68
3 175 781.04
3 175 949.08
3 175 959.85
3 176 036.15
3 176 303.93
3 176 244.50
3 176 207.89
3 176 155.29
3 176 064.49
3 176 039.95
3 176 057.31
3 175 932.32
3 176 111.57
3 175 865.96
3 175 895.31
3 175 790.08
3 175 806.48
3 175 973.66
3 176 315.78
3 176 345.81
3 176 370.16
3 176 337.29
3 176 228.42
3 176 152.24
3 176 055.79
3 176 144.63
3 176 041.51
3 175 999.92
3 176 141.54
3 175 858.26
3 176 195.22
3 176 093.64
3 176 041.98
3 176 239.84
3 176 175.24
3 175 642.67
3 175 524.35
3 175 554.92
3 175 561.78
3 176 185.71

1 717.10
1 705.74
1 722.74
1 732.30
1 703.03
1 732.01
1 655.74
1 752.02
1 745.01
1 679.68
1 701.78
1 735.51
1 725.61
1 736.72
1 741.74
1 690.44
1 629.48
1 754.71
1 756.44
1 734.30
1 755.17
1 674.51
1 685.31
1 697.05
1 690.61
1 681.77
1 674.81
1 704.47
1 692.72
1 690.41
1 685.11
1 662.58
1 663.60
1 690.05
1 674.09
1 708.67
1 633.80
1 630.46
1 637.35
1 640.55
1 597.21
1 762.68
1 773.36
1 763.61
1 755.36
1 745.73
1 741.11
1 730.01
1 730.78
1 682.60
1 648.76
1 684.87
1 674.44
1 684.11
1 644.09
1 619.54
1 719.87
1 673.90
1 678.43
1 674.90
1 621.24
1 628.07
1 661.62

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


275

Domain
Main Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7

RC-06-25
RC-06-26
RC-06-44
RC-06-49
RC-06-50
RC-06-52
RC-06-53
RC-06-54
RC-06-64
RC-06-71
RC-06-72
RC-06-73
RC-06-75
RC-06-76
RC-06-96
RC-07-107
RC-07-109
RC-07-110
RC-07-127
RC-07-166
RC-07-168
RC-07-272
RC-07-273
RC-07-274
RC-08-301
RC-08-330
RC-08-332
RC-12-693
RC-12-694
RC-09-420
RC-09-422
RC-09-430

0.00
3.05
70.10
0.00
3.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.57
0.00
0.00
86.87
1.52
0.00
64.01
0.00
94.49
1.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
131.06
106.68
7.62
0.00
0.00

47.24
39.62
144.78
12.19
38.10
38.10
60.96
41.15
112.78
51.82
50.29
111.25
30.48
88.39
47.24
120.40
56.39
3.05
96.01
51.82
129.54
71.63
65.53
38.10
51.82
18.29
30.48
179.83
129.54
86.87
77.72
92.96

Average grade Core Lenght


Au (g/t)
(m)
3.04
0.25
2.52
0.52
1.66
2.34
1.16
1.40
1.78
1.34
0.77
1.16
0.99
0.25
0.17
1.91
0.28
0.51
2.60
0.32
1.77
1.98
0.57
0.66
0.36
0.13
0.41
0.32
0.12
0.30
0.20
0.18

47.24
36.57
74.68
12.19
35.05
38.10
60.96
41.15
112.78
51.82
50.29
111.25
25.91
88.39
47.24
33.53
54.87
3.05
32.00
51.82
35.05
70.11
65.53
38.10
51.82
18.29
30.48
48.77
22.86
79.25
77.72
92.96

Coordonnate of the Intersection


X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

707 042.77
707 076.93
707 212.17
707 360.76
707 354.20
707 232.11
707 026.26
707 037.13
707 096.59
707 048.15
707 032.29
707 332.97
707 233.72
707 331.18
707 309.95
707 180.61
707 069.81
707 091.82
707 143.61
707 003.43
707 087.01
706 944.83
706 944.53
706 984.46
706 965.69
707 064.23
707 021.03
707 073.84
707 082.88
706 334.00
706 355.73
706 363.43

3 175 658.97
3 175 647.04
3 176 185.35
3 175 669.28
3 175 651.90
3 175 530.51
3 175 653.08
3 175 644.32
3 175 914.42
3 175 633.62
3 175 632.46
3 175 551.45
3 175 536.71
3 175 572.76
3 175 568.82
3 176 166.81
3 175 609.67
3 175 639.68
3 176 136.44
3 175 655.83
3 176 120.77
3 175 610.74
3 175 634.19
3 175 631.04
3 175 603.60
3 175 560.39
3 175 562.61
3 176 061.94
3 176 042.31
3 176 404.00
3 176 509.96
3 176 410.42

1 687.82
1 710.22
1 675.94
1 652.89
1 642.12
1 678.36
1 679.64
1 686.57
1 670.29
1 696.13
1 693.11
1 617.45
1 675.54
1 632.07
1 639.22
1 665.40
1 700.23
1 720.04
1 661.33
1 675.51
1 616.43
1 635.56
1 651.78
1 666.21
1 656.46
1 681.00
1 672.84
1 598.99
1 593.10
1 645.47
1 637.69
1 648.48

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


276

Domain
North Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

Average
grade
Au (g/t)

Core
Lenght
(m)

X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

11420
11420
11420
11420
11420
11420
11420
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11500
11509
11509
11509
11509
11509
11509
12100
12100
12110
12110
12110
12120
12120
12160
12160

DDH-10-120
DDH-12-229
INR-12-726
RC-09-440
RC-09-543
RC-11-658
RC-11-662
DDH-11-200
DDH-12-211
DDH-12-212
DDH-12-213
DDH-12-214
DDH-12-215
DDH-12-216
DDH-12-217
DDH-12-218
DDH-12-219
DDH-12-220
DDH-12-222
DDH-12-231
DDH-12-232
DDH-12-233
IN-12-238
IN-12-242
IN-12-243
INR-12-722
INR-12-724
RC-09-441
RC-09-445
RC-09-446
RC-09-447
RC-09-527
RC-09-533
RC-09-534
RC-09-535
RC-10-549
RC-11-665
RC-11-666
RC-11-667
RC-11-670
RC-11-671
RC-11-674
RC-12-719
DDH-11-200
DDH-12-211
DDH-12-212
DDH-12-213
RC-11-674
RC-12-718
RC-08-348
RC-08-349
RC-08-351
RC-08-352
RC-08-353
RC-08-345
RC-08-346
DDH-09-101
DDH-09-102

16.50
8.00
10.64
7.62
6.10
0.00
22.86
5.00
0.00
13.00
11.00
0.00
1.00
4.00
9.00
6.00
32.00
32.00
10.00
31.00
20.00
56.00
23.00
35.00
12.00
16.73
34.96
16.76
0.00
32.00
6.10
22.86
0.00
18.29
42.67
0.00
27.43
36.58
32.00
28.96
9.14
4.57
3.05
47.00
28.00
62.00
69.00
68.58
24.38
24.38
22.86
6.10
19.81
19.81
4.57
1.52
56.00
47.00

25.10
14.00
16.72
13.72
10.67
6.10
32.00
42.00
8.00
54.00
39.00
11.00
11.00
17.00
14.00
34.00
40.00
40.00
15.00
36.00
25.00
61.00
30.00
40.00
17.00
28.89
42.56
21.34
16.76
36.58
38.10
33.53
22.86
28.96
51.82
3.05
36.58
47.24
38.10
35.05
15.24
62.48
9.14
60.00
48.00
72.00
76.00
74.68
77.72
28.96
27.43
9.14
32.00
25.91
13.72
18.29
61.00
53.00

1.50
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.58
0.24
0.24
0.95
0.28
0.78
0.91
1.33
0.93
0.33
0.05
0.51
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.86
0.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.35
0.63
0.31
0.38
0.01
0.75
0.31
0.40
0.01
0.00
0.78
0.87
0.00
0.23
0.88
0.22
0.40
1.35
0.90
3.40
0.40
0.65
0.24
0.42
0.42
0.83
0.25
0.56
3.30
0.16
0.40

8.60
6.00
6.08
6.10
4.57
6.10
9.14
37.00
8.00
41.00
28.00
11.00
10.00
13.00
5.00
28.00
8.00
8.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
7.00
5.00
5.00
12.16
7.60
4.58
16.76
4.58
32.00
10.67
22.86
10.67
9.15
3.05
9.15
10.66
6.10
6.09
6.10
57.91
6.09
13.00
20.00
10.00
7.00
6.10
53.34
4.58
4.57
3.04
12.19
6.10
9.15
16.77
5.00
6.00

706 150.76
706 126.71
706 082.00
706 103.25
706 159.29
706 107.35
706 195.68
705 861.95
705 838.18
705 813.68
705 808.41
705 875.88
705 843.74
705 743.74
705 779.70
705 865.40
705 946.51
705 927.34
706 024.25
705 909.55
705 880.81
705 859.86
705 718.00
705 724.00
706 037.00
705 874.00
705 919.00
706 016.21
705 933.26
705 899.63
705 728.84
705 972.69
705 860.88
705 858.83
705 823.91
705 742.41
705 833.63
705 809.01
705 840.13
705 995.21
706 008.64
705 815.44
705 757.00
705 872.05
705 852.46
705 824.58
705 824.91
705 828.69
705 812.76
706 751.85
706 757.92
706 897.19
706 837.73
706 845.03
706 651.51
706 651.98
706 082.48
706 083.55

3 178 989.00
3 179 072.12
3 179 055.00
3 179 020.07
3 179 084.26
3 179 008.31
3 178 970.30
3 179 305.96
3 179 373.95
3 179 356.37
3 179 258.37
3 179 220.10
3 179 199.55
3 179 207.43
3 179 072.02
3 179 081.55
3 179 016.27
3 178 983.17
3 178 891.16
3 178 863.18
3 178 799.95
3 178 709.72
3 179 065.00
3 179 009.00
3 178 610.00
3 179 118.00
3 178 958.00
3 178 852.03
3 179 111.65
3 178 929.27
3 179 274.54
3 179 055.13
3 179 149.59
3 179 030.15
3 178 943.06
3 179 138.19
3 179 002.44
3 178 850.79
3 178 602.96
3 178 718.64
3 178 865.63
3 179 308.43
3 179 175.03
3 179 306.49
3 179 374.10
3 179 356.74
3 179 258.59
3 179 308.90
3 179 400.25
3 177 795.24
3 177 846.96
3 177 980.79
3 177 910.80
3 177 966.59
3 177 914.21
3 177 940.15
3 178 353.94
3 178 214.31

1 671.21
1 679.06
1 659.32
1 663.31
1 692.94
1 673.74
1 683.62
1 587.87
1 601.00
1 558.27
1 554.23
1 593.99
1 580.97
1 564.26
1 554.35
1 574.76
1 575.09
1 562.32
1 610.39
1 554.83
1 546.75
1 494.97
1 535.50
1 518.50
1 566.50
1 586.19
1 554.24
1 599.20
1 608.41
1 544.92
1 550.54
1 595.26
1 579.01
1 557.48
1 525.43
1 561.52
1 542.93
1 511.44
1 507.85
1 554.79
1 608.64
1 549.72
1 559.65
1 559.63
1 570.14
1 526.60
1 509.69
1 514.00
1 541.57
1 675.54
1 686.09
1 738.66
1 708.22
1 722.93
1 648.50
1 653.98
1 557.18
1 540.59

Coordonnate of the Intersection

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


277

Domain
North Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

Average
grade
Au (g/t)

Core
Lenght
(m)

X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

12160
12160
12160
12160
12183
12210
12210
12210
12210
12210
12210
12210
12210
12210
12210
12210
12225
12225
12230
12230
12230
12230
12230
12230
12230
12230
12230
12233
12233
12233
12233
12233
12233
12233
12233
12240
12240
12240
12240
12243
12243
12243
12250
12250
12250
12250
12250
12250
12250
12300
12300
12300
12300
12300
12300
12300
12300
12300

DDH-11-183
DDH-11-184
DDH-11-185
IN-12-244
RC-08-350
IN-12-248
IN-12-249
IN-12-252
IN-12-255
RC-08-292
RC-08-384
RC-08-385
RC-08-386
RC-08-407
RC-12-701
RC-12-702
RC-06-55
RC-06-56
DDH-04-10
DDH-08-63
DDH-11-203
DDH-11-204
RC-08-288
RC-08-395
RC-08-402
RC-08-403
RC-08-404
DDH-04-10
DDH-08-63
DDH-08-63
DDH-11-203
DDH-11-204
RC-08-395
RC-08-402
RC-08-404
DDH-08-61
DDH-08-61
RC-08-289
RC-08-391
DDH-08-61
RC-08-289
RC-08-391
DDH-08-62
RC-06-58
RC-08-284
RC-08-285
RC-08-286
RC-08-393
RC-08-394
DDH-07-39
DDH-08-59
DDH-08-64
RC-06-61
RC-07-100
RC-07-101
RC-07-102
RC-07-203
RC-08-370

35.00
31.00
54.00
67.00
4.57
0.00
0.00
1.00
5.30
0.00
6.10
1.52
0.00
1.52
0.00
1.52
0.00
0.00
9.14
1.00
7.00
7.00
6.10
0.00
13.72
3.05
3.05
21.00
15.00
29.00
17.00
28.00
12.19
35.05
28.96
10.00
17.00
0.00
3.05
29.00
21.34
16.76
7.10
0.00
0.00
1.52
1.52
6.10
3.05
0.00
5.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

40.00
35.00
58.00
73.00
9.14
7.50
3.00
9.00
12.00
12.19
15.24
16.76
24.38
6.10
7.62
12.19
6.10
10.67
17.00
7.00
17.00
25.00
12.19
7.62
21.34
12.19
18.29
26.25
23.00
33.00
30.00
36.00
32.00
41.15
33.53
12.00
26.00
19.81
10.67
41.00
38.10
35.05
10.00
27.43
12.19
30.48
10.67
19.81
44.20
9.00
6.00
6.00
7.62
9.14
9.14
6.10
3.05
10.67

0.57
0.17
0.16
0.00
1.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.20
1.03
1.02
0.40
1.19
0.39
0.75
0.29
0.42
1.08
0.17
0.48
0.73
0.65
0.71
1.21
0.69
1.28
0.82
2.01
0.92
1.03
0.42
1.34
0.51
0.96
1.06
0.53
0.53
0.50
0.35
1.78
0.99
0.03
1.02
1.11
1.70
0.90
0.35
1.59
1.05
0.02
0.04
0.62
0.75
0.99
0.36
0.25
0.70

5.00
4.00
4.00
6.00
4.57
7.50
3.00
8.00
6.70
12.19
9.14
15.24
24.38
4.58
7.62
10.67
6.10
10.67
7.86
6.00
10.00
18.00
6.09
7.62
7.62
9.14
15.24
5.25
8.00
4.00
13.00
8.00
19.81
6.10
4.57
2.00
9.00
19.81
7.62
12.00
16.76
18.29
2.90
27.43
12.19
28.96
9.15
13.71
41.15
9.00
1.00
2.00
7.62
9.14
9.14
6.10
3.05
10.67

705 969.98
705 969.09
705 965.90
706 089.00
706 717.69
706 739.00
706 766.00
706 795.00
706 785.00
706 790.55
706 754.20
706 790.51
706 764.82
706 854.09
706 777.62
706 833.88
706 918.10
706 921.30
706 840.40
706 858.95
706 805.55
706 844.34
706 796.32
706 860.51
706 848.19
706 820.14
706 821.63
706 847.18
706 866.45
706 872.45
706 809.55
706 849.74
706 869.65
706 858.47
706 832.49
706 703.41
706 698.16
706 697.71
706 693.43
706 691.79
706 688.64
706 686.92
706 738.52
706 733.89
706 681.20
706 689.40
706 704.39
706 668.29
706 684.66
706 484.82
706 391.54
706 466.41
706 483.44
706 482.71
706 488.10
706 465.40
706 407.86
706 481.25

3 178 351.02
3 178 223.04
3 178 307.65
3 178 279.00
3 178 046.74
3 178 436.00
3 178 396.00
3 178 378.00
3 178 358.00
3 178 552.66
3 178 338.21
3 178 432.75
3 178 492.11
3 178 537.80
3 178 477.80
3 178 537.94
3 178 792.71
3 178 788.81
3 178 683.29
3 178 729.69
3 178 732.92
3 178 770.56
3 178 786.47
3 178 733.06
3 178 798.38
3 178 853.60
3 178 851.02
3 178 683.53
3 178 729.69
3 178 729.69
3 178 733.09
3 178 770.63
3 178 733.06
3 178 798.38
3 178 851.02
3 178 760.59
3 178 760.59
3 178 762.79
3 178 724.08
3 178 760.59
3 178 762.81
3 178 724.08
3 178 991.54
3 178 995.11
3 178 862.77
3 178 915.21
3 178 944.23
3 178 859.33
3 178 946.16
3 178 465.93
3 178 510.00
3 178 630.27
3 178 544.84
3 178 464.58
3 178 462.79
3 178 631.74
3 178 450.52
3 178 462.21

1 528.87
1 520.45
1 509.94
1 545.00
1 672.93
1 665.25
1 665.50
1 669.00
1 665.35
1 707.10
1 660.72
1 673.67
1 681.85
1 701.66
1 686.72
1 704.76
1 790.57
1 788.65
1 740.50
1 770.71
1 743.99
1 762.32
1 746.53
1 771.16
1 760.92
1 772.97
1 771.25
1 732.41
1 757.72
1 747.32
1 733.21
1 747.26
1 755.33
1 743.10
1 752.44
1 730.45
1 721.36
1 730.43
1 728.12
1 710.32
1 713.68
1 710.23
1 773.40
1 768.50
1 738.91
1 746.92
1 762.66
1 733.60
1 744.57
1 683.46
1 664.47
1 703.38
1 699.39
1 683.13
1 683.15
1 704.98
1 667.24
1 682.88

Coordonnate of the Intersection

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


278

Domain
North Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

Average
grade
Au (g/t)

Core
Lenght
(m)

X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

12300
12300
12300
12300
12300
12300
12300
12300
12300
12300
12300
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12305
12310
12310
12310
12310
12310
12320
12320
12320
12320
12320
12320
12320
12320
12320
12320
12320
12320
12320
12320
12320
12320
12320
12320
12320

RC-08-371
RC-08-372
RC-08-373
RC-08-374
RC-08-375
RC-08-376
RC-08-377
RC-08-414
RC-08-415
RC-11-683
RC-11-684
DDH-07-39
DDH-08-58
DDH-08-59
DDH-08-64
DDH-11-207
RC-06-61
RC-06-61
RC-07-100
RC-07-101
RC-07-102
RC-07-203
RC-08-370
RC-08-371
RC-08-373
RC-08-374
RC-08-375
RC-08-376
RC-08-376
RC-08-377
RC-08-414
RC-08-415
RC-11-683
RC-11-684
RC-07-103
RC-07-204
RC-08-378
RC-08-416
RC-11-682
DDH-08-60
DDH-11-206
RC-07-104
RC-07-196
RC-07-197
RC-07-198
RC-07-199
RC-07-200
RC-07-201
RC-07-202
RC-07-255
RC-07-256
RC-08-380
RC-08-382
RC-08-383
RC-08-417
RC-08-418
RC-11-681
RC-12-709

0.00
1.52
1.52
0.00
1.52
0.00
1.52
3.05
1.52
0.00
0.00
11.00
18.00
25.00
22.00
5.00
25.91
59.44
12.19
12.19
22.86
27.43
16.76
39.62
33.53
16.76
25.91
27.43
44.20
25.91
44.20
35.05
22.86
32.00
24.38
1.52
12.19
15.24
10.67
4.15
10.00
0.00
3.05
6.10
0.00
6.10
0.00
1.52
0.00
3.05
1.52
7.62
1.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.57
10.67

12.19
10.67
9.14
6.10
15.24
6.10
12.19
10.67
9.14
13.72
12.19
32.00
32.00
80.00
45.00
33.00
53.34
77.72
47.24
28.96
45.72
68.58
25.91
77.72
65.53
24.38
41.15
35.05
50.29
47.24
82.30
65.53
60.96
73.15
32.00
18.29
15.24
21.34
19.81
19.05
15.00
12.19
9.14
7.62
7.62
12.19
16.76
7.62
4.57
7.62
32.00
12.19
7.62
4.57
9.14
16.76
13.72
12.19

1.07
0.27
0.29
0.34
0.34
0.29
2.06
0.45
0.43
0.25
0.42
0.55
0.20
0.92
0.77
1.83
0.96
0.38
0.31
0.52
0.87
0.69
0.34
0.37
0.64
0.33
0.91
1.25
1.91
0.34
0.48
0.47
0.78
0.74
0.77
0.62
0.25
0.47
2.48
0.50
0.76
0.61
0.29
0.14
0.47
0.30
0.82
0.39
0.36
0.94
0.56
0.36
0.18
0.32
0.71
0.50
0.65
0.39

12.19
9.15
7.62
6.10
13.72
6.10
10.67
7.62
7.62
13.72
12.19
21.00
14.00
55.00
23.00
28.00
27.43
18.28
35.05
16.77
22.86
41.15
9.15
38.10
32.00
7.62
15.24
7.62
6.09
21.33
38.10
30.48
38.10
41.15
7.62
16.77
3.05
6.10
9.14
14.90
5.00
12.19
6.09
1.52
7.62
6.09
16.76
6.10
4.57
4.57
30.48
4.57
6.10
4.57
9.14
16.76
9.15
1.52

706 469.15
706 456.31
706 458.95
706 470.07
706 446.21
706 466.56
706 392.75
706 454.56
706 459.07
706 415.82
706 488.16
706 490.63
706 388.49
706 425.30
706 477.15
706 463.47
706 483.44
706 483.44
706 482.39
706 493.58
706 476.95
706 407.86
706 472.72
706 500.53
706 437.99
706 478.61
706 435.76
706 466.31
706 465.85
706 392.98
706 435.02
706 437.73
706 436.31
706 510.60
706 382.73
706 402.79
706 387.16
706 350.18
706 344.09
706 265.14
706 372.84
706 366.32
706 256.31
706 250.51
706 302.08
706 306.54
706 301.73
706 334.81
706 301.78
706 249.24
706 258.06
706 256.40
706 342.56
706 336.85
706 333.05
706 311.57
706 254.95
706 252.66

3 178 498.42
3 178 495.99
3 178 545.25
3 178 599.97
3 178 643.90
3 178 600.33
3 178 496.19
3 178 498.54
3 178 546.63
3 178 452.16
3 178 545.61
3 178 465.93
3 178 510.57
3 178 510.00
3 178 632.00
3 178 678.88
3 178 544.84
3 178 544.84
3 178 464.75
3 178 462.53
3 178 630.82
3 178 450.52
3 178 462.05
3 178 497.92
3 178 545.25
3 178 600.93
3 178 644.22
3 178 600.62
3 178 600.73
3 178 498.04
3 178 498.54
3 178 546.63
3 178 452.50
3 178 547.17
3 178 519.41
3 178 597.92
3 178 543.63
3 178 521.15
3 178 506.43
3 178 741.89
3 178 737.71
3 178 737.92
3 178 650.26
3 178 494.49
3 178 543.77
3 178 593.76
3 178 696.82
3 178 649.26
3 178 479.03
3 178 698.98
3 178 742.01
3 178 600.70
3 178 604.00
3 178 652.53
3 178 711.12
3 178 743.36
3 178 556.40
3 178 526.76

1 688.22
1 685.28
1 694.33
1 701.60
1 701.41
1 701.16
1 662.51
1 685.31
1 694.95
1 666.73
1 700.86
1 667.49
1 643.66
1 624.23
1 677.04
1 699.05
1 663.58
1 634.62
1 654.56
1 667.71
1 675.96
1 617.71
1 669.35
1 647.50
1 658.04
1 686.34
1 674.82
1 672.98
1 656.98
1 632.08
1 631.61
1 658.00
1 638.32
1 660.20
1 640.54
1 674.31
1 657.05
1 634.47
1 633.53
1 658.82
1 706.00
1 708.37
1 639.45
1 629.53
1 646.79
1 650.03
1 665.12
1 674.59
1 630.49
1 648.66
1 650.93
1 631.94
1 668.05
1 677.06
1 683.96
1 678.20
1 631.15
1 628.10

Coordonnate of the Intersection

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


279

Domain
North Zone

Hole ID

12330
12330
12330
12330
12330
12330
12330
12330
12330
12330
12330
12330
12330
12330
12330
12330
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12333
12423
12423
12423
12423
12423
12423
12423
12435
12435
12435
12440
12440
12440
12440
12440
12440
12440
12440
12440

DDH-07-38
DDH-08-65
DDH-09-96
RC-07-105
RC-07-193
RC-07-195
RC-07-249
RC-07-254
RC-08-278
RC-08-364
RC-08-365
RC-08-367
RC-08-368
RC-08-369
RC-09-512
RC-09-513
DDH-04-07
DDH-04-08
DDH-04-09
DDH-07-37
DDH-09-98
RC-06-59
RC-06-60
RC-07-189
RC-07-191
RC-07-252
RC-08-279
RC-08-280
RC-08-281
RC-08-354
RC-08-355
RC-08-356
RC-08-357
RC-08-361
RC-08-411
RC-08-412
RC-08-413
RC-09-515
RC-09-540
DDH-10-118
DDH-10-119
DDH-10-120
DDH-12-230
RC-09-525
RC-11-662
RC-11-685
DDH-12-221
DDH-12-225
RC-11-672
DDH-12-225
DDH-12-226
DDH-12-227
RC-09-438
RC-09-464
RC-09-526
RC-11-672
RC-11-675
RC-11-676

FROM
(m)
4.00
31.00
28.00
6.10
32.00
7.62
1.52
0.00
18.29
24.38
15.24
10.67
6.10
1.52
1.52
4.57
5.00
1.57
0.00
1.30
4.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.57
4.57
9.14
9.14
1.52
0.00
6.10
1.52
9.14
1.52
0.00
3.05
0.00
0.00
66.00
63.00
69.00
66.00
47.24
76.20
76.20
92.00
82.00
103.63
62.45
4.00
0.00
1.52
0.00
0.00
67.06
22.86
1.52

TO
(m)
10.00
37.35
41.00
10.67
41.15
12.19
6.10
10.67
24.38
35.05
19.81
24.38
21.34
13.72
4.57
12.19
14.00
14.60
17.11
20.00
7.00
16.76
21.34
9.14
4.57
9.14
9.14
13.72
19.81
13.72
12.19
13.72
19.81
16.76
4.57
19.81
7.62
1.52
10.67
71.10
67.00
73.90
73.00
59.44
79.25
80.77
99.00
111.00
108.20
68.00
39.00
14.00
15.24
6.10
15.24
71.63
28.96
6.10

Average
grade
Au (g/t)

Core
Lenght
(m)

X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

2.92
0.63
1.95
2.70
3.15
0.29
0.12
0.47
0.33
0.57
0.87
0.44
0.26
0.33
0.16
0.60
1.91
0.31
0.43
0.42
0.22
0.56
0.48
0.24
0.24
0.18
0.21
0.45
0.38
0.50
1.21
0.75
0.50
0.17
0.24
0.27
0.19
0.13
1.80
0.62
0.30
0.73
1.88
0.69
0.33
0.12
0.18
0.26
0.77
0.11
0.32
0.27
0.27
0.23
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.31

6.00
6.35
13.00
4.57
9.15
4.57
4.58
10.67
6.09
10.67
4.57
13.71
15.24
12.20
3.05
7.62
9.00
13.03
17.11
18.70
2.25
16.76
21.34
9.14
4.57
4.57
4.57
4.58
10.67
12.20
12.19
7.62
18.29
7.62
3.05
19.81
4.57
1.52
10.67
5.10
4.00
4.90
7.00
12.20
3.05
4.57
7.00
29.00
4.57
5.55
35.00
14.00
13.72
6.10
15.24
4.57
6.10
4.58

706 338.96
706 266.11
706 272.10
706 338.08
706 259.30
706 242.62
706 269.17
706 253.48
706 300.56
706 202.39
706 312.39
706 291.90
706 235.28
706 275.60
706 210.16
706 249.60
706 256.10
706 227.04
706 261.26
706 255.18
706 234.18
706 263.25
706 256.54
706 272.00
706 269.11
706 277.32
706 281.83
706 228.67
706 245.09
706 219.91
706 256.46
706 298.44
706 249.36
706 250.97
706 253.09
706 249.05
706 236.23
706 198.40
706 220.68
706 119.78
706 166.26
706 167.93
706 123.15
706 136.27
706 215.28
706 126.77
706 021.96
706 033.23
706 073.14
706 033.23
705 986.18
706 040.07
706 051.46
706 045.73
706 022.87
706 059.98
706 010.08
706 079.38

3 178 905.66
3 178 901.49
3 178 901.53
3 178 908.38
3 178 903.60
3 178 859.23
3 178 848.40
3 178 820.79
3 178 906.12
3 178 899.19
3 178 903.52
3 178 852.03
3 178 819.94
3 178 811.86
3 178 821.77
3 178 858.27
3 179 202.21
3 179 176.14
3 179 126.61
3 179 122.38
3 179 083.82
3 179 124.89
3 179 122.82
3 179 220.00
3 179 047.07
3 179 073.06
3 179 086.32
3 179 084.84
3 179 046.64
3 179 175.39
3 179 204.45
3 179 082.13
3 179 116.81
3 179 046.55
3 179 116.91
3 179 120.48
3 179 082.61
3 179 049.88
3 179 208.27
3 178 919.81
3 178 927.31
3 178 990.10
3 178 885.83
3 178 861.65
3 178 970.87
3 178 951.35
3 179 031.84
3 178 988.02
3 178 960.95
3 178 988.02
3 179 131.48
3 179 212.06
3 179 068.70
3 179 233.58
3 179 159.23
3 178 959.63
3 179 102.86
3 179 100.01

1 724.85
1 681.32
1 680.96
1 723.68
1 673.46
1 690.29
1 696.67
1 683.21
1 703.37
1 672.71
1 708.18
1 688.96
1 675.36
1 685.36
1 679.71
1 692.37
1 739.49
1 718.13
1 737.89
1 735.16
1 729.89
1 738.35
1 732.92
1 742.47
1 739.17
1 740.36
1 739.91
1 722.98
1 723.13
1 714.95
1 740.77
1 745.58
1 735.54
1 724.42
1 742.29
1 738.83
1 729.99
1 716.13
1 719.93
1 591.42
1 615.91
1 623.57
1 585.47
1 595.69
1 636.90
1 592.42
1 541.78
1 549.77
1 538.44
1 579.05
1 621.86
1 662.83
1 648.86
1 667.26
1 643.09
1 572.53
1 622.75
1 670.13

Coordonnate of the Intersection

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


280

Domain
North Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

Average
grade
Au (g/t)

Core
Lenght
(m)

X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

12440
12443
12443
12443
12443
12443
12443
12443
12443
12450
12450
12450
12460
12460
12460
12460
12460
12460
12460
12460
12460
12460
12465
12465
12465
12465
12465
12465
12465
12465
12465
12465
12465
12465
12465
12465
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503

RC-11-677
DDH-12-226
DDH-12-227
INR-12-725
RC-09-438
RC-09-464
RC-09-526
RC-11-675
RC-11-676
RC-09-437
RC-09-521
RC-09-522
DDH-11-201
INR-12-723
RC-09-442
RC-09-443
RC-09-444
RC-09-528
RC-09-529
RC-09-532
RC-11-656
RC-11-657
DDH-11-201
DDH-12-210
DDH-12-235
INR-12-723
RC-09-442
RC-09-443
RC-09-444
RC-09-528
RC-09-529
RC-09-530
RC-09-531
RC-09-532
RC-11-656
RC-11-657
DDH-12-213
DDH-12-214
DDH-12-215
DDH-12-216
DDH-12-217
DDH-12-218
DDH-12-219
DDH-12-220
DDH-12-222
DDH-12-231
DDH-12-232
DDH-12-233
DDH-12-234
IN-12-238
IN-12-242
IN-12-243
INR-12-722
INR-12-724
RC-09-441
RC-09-445
RC-09-446
RC-09-447

7.62
41.00
34.00
36.48
47.24
28.96
35.05
57.91
32.00
0.00
4.57
1.52
2.00
9.12
4.57
0.00
1.52
0.00
1.52
0.00
1.52
0.00
25.00
0.00
2.00
28.88
18.29
21.34
33.53
25.91
15.24
0.00
1.52
10.67
36.58
27.43
51.00
16.40
16.00
24.00
44.00
70.00
91.00
90.00
66.00
58.00
46.00
73.00
58.00
75.00
82.00
56.00
85.48
77.65
53.34
80.77
73.15
60.96

18.29
65.00
39.00
44.08
51.82
35.05
42.67
62.48
36.58
9.14
19.81
6.10
18.00
22.80
9.14
16.76
27.43
19.81
9.14
10.67
30.48
24.38
40.00
11.00
15.00
38.00
24.38
27.43
42.67
30.48
30.48
4.57
6.10
19.81
41.15
42.67
56.00
45.00
70.00
35.00
56.00
79.00
98.00
94.00
70.00
62.00
50.00
78.00
61.00
86.00
88.00
61.00
94.66
83.73
57.91
92.96
77.72
65.53

0.38
0.50
0.06
0.00
0.22
0.35
1.26
0.38
0.16
0.52
1.46
0.77
0.39
0.00
0.23
0.83
0.53
0.82
0.80
0.37
0.58
1.22
0.64
0.26
0.30
0.00
0.33
0.67
0.72
0.73
0.57
0.35
0.22
0.56
0.22
0.51
0.21
0.29
0.70
0.27
0.23
0.07
0.09
0.18
0.15
0.32
0.08
0.27
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.70
0.35
0.08

10.67
24.00
5.00
7.60
4.58
6.09
7.62
4.57
4.58
9.14
15.24
4.58
16.00
13.68
4.57
16.76
25.91
19.81
7.62
10.67
28.96
24.38
15.00
11.00
13.00
9.12
6.09
6.09
9.14
4.57
15.24
4.57
4.58
9.14
4.57
15.24
5.00
28.60
54.00
11.00
12.00
9.00
7.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
3.00
11.00
6.00
5.00
9.18
6.08
4.57
12.19
4.57
4.57

706 077.87
705 999.48
706 052.46
706 082.00
706 072.04
706 044.69
706 034.02
706 021.19
706 089.07
706 065.71
706 103.34
706 061.95
705 901.86
705 964.00
705 943.82
705 970.31
705 936.12
705 912.68
705 914.59
705 988.54
705 921.58
705 975.76
705 909.70
705 901.72
705 884.06
705 964.00
705 943.82
705 970.50
705 947.69
705 919.33
705 921.02
705 965.25
705 985.16
705 992.00
705 931.13
705 983.81
705 818.33
705 886.27
705 859.13
705 750.32
705 797.07
705 888.10
705 980.06
705 950.43
706 047.58
705 920.94
705 891.78
705 865.51
705 821.76
705 718.00
705 724.00
706 037.00
705 874.00
705 919.00
706 031.24
705 935.50
705 899.32
705 730.98

3 179 153.84
3 179 130.65
3 179 211.92
3 179 120.00
3 179 068.70
3 179 233.42
3 179 160.26
3 179 103.10
3 179 100.28
3 179 325.94
3 179 305.26
3 179 277.61
3 179 310.91
3 179 282.00
3 179 347.05
3 179 254.99
3 179 177.52
3 179 253.73
3 179 353.83
3 179 318.01
3 179 203.65
3 179 207.06
3 179 311.44
3 179 401.51
3 179 442.07
3 179 282.00
3 179 347.05
3 179 255.07
3 179 176.31
3 179 253.94
3 179 354.35
3 179 416.23
3 179 379.87
3 179 318.23
3 179 204.02
3 179 207.14
3 179 258.50
3 179 220.35
3 179 199.63
3 179 207.53
3 179 072.11
3 179 081.90
3 179 016.27
3 178 984.29
3 178 891.66
3 178 863.51
3 178 800.05
3 178 709.76
3 179 145.64
3 179 065.00
3 179 009.00
3 178 610.00
3 179 118.00
3 178 958.00
3 178 850.79
3 179 112.00
3 178 931.22
3 179 274.92

1 666.43
1 593.32
1 636.05
1 640.72
1 613.23
1 638.33
1 613.93
1 590.32
1 641.23
1 684.35
1 686.37
1 678.57
1 615.12
1 626.04
1 630.71
1 618.78
1 606.41
1 597.25
1 626.05
1 641.96
1 606.62
1 614.33
1 594.04
1 626.28
1 612.07
1 608.56
1 616.23
1 602.78
1 585.85
1 580.21
1 609.75
1 640.45
1 647.15
1 632.69
1 579.28
1 593.34
1 527.51
1 571.04
1 547.33
1 546.44
1 518.04
1 525.22
1 527.17
1 511.31
1 560.03
1 530.90
1 523.73
1 478.94
1 514.37
1 481.50
1 471.00
1 522.50
1 518.93
1 512.31
1 565.88
1 529.96
1 503.82
1 509.46

Coordonnate of the Intersection

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


281

Domain
North Zone

Hole ID

12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12503
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12506
12509
12509
12509
12509
12509
12509
12512
12512
12512
12512
14150
14150
14186
14186
14200
14200
14220
14220
14220
14220
14236
14236

RC-09-448
RC-09-533
RC-09-534
RC-09-535
RC-11-665
RC-11-666
RC-11-667
RC-11-670
RC-11-671
RC-12-719
RC-12-720
DDH-12-217
DDH-12-218
DDH-12-219
DDH-12-219
DDH-12-220
DDH-12-221
DDH-12-231
DDH-12-232
DDH-12-233
DDH-12-234
IN-12-238
IN-12-242
IN-12-243
INR-12-724
RC-09-441
RC-09-446
RC-09-448
RC-09-533
RC-09-534
RC-09-535
RC-11-665
RC-11-666
RC-11-667
RC-11-670
RC-12-720
DDH-12-217
DDH-12-219
DDH-12-219
DDH-12-220
DDH-12-234
RC-12-719
INR-12-724
RC-09-446
RC-09-535
RC-11-666
RC-08-295
RC-08-296
RC-08-347
RC-08-350
RC-08-387
RC-08-388
RC-06-55
RC-06-56
RC-06-57
RC-08-406
DDH-04-10
DDH-08-63

FROM
(m)
48.77
59.44
70.10
74.68
77.72
65.53
71.63
62.48
71.63
41.15
86.87
107.40
101.77
100.65
107.00
107.00
111.00
119.00
99.00
86.00
85.00
115.00
104.00
101.00
108.18
94.49
105.16
91.44
94.49
111.25
112.78
99.06
112.78
106.68
97.54
115.82
130.00
136.00
145.00
124.00
127.00
132.59
1.52
0.00
0.00
4.57
30.48
22.86
44.20
27.43
1.52
3.05
15.24
10.67
10.67
0.00
42.60
37.00

TO
(m)
53.34
64.01
82.30
80.77
83.82
70.10
76.20
68.58
76.20
50.29
91.44
112.00
115.00
106.00
123.00
112.00
126.00
132.00
107.00
103.00
88.00
119.00
110.00
107.00
114.26
117.35
109.73
99.06
100.58
114.30
117.35
105.16
118.87
111.25
103.63
121.92
131.15
144.00
172.00
141.00
140.30
146.30
9.12
3.05
9.14
28.96
42.67
28.96
53.34
39.62
6.10
4.57
32.00
22.86
15.24
10.67
49.80
53.00

Average
grade
Au (g/t)

Core
Lenght
(m)

X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

0.22
0.19
0.32
0.42
0.10
0.30
0.03
0.15
0.12
0.02
0.00
0.14
0.25
1.39
0.42
0.34
0.31
0.34
0.41
0.31
1.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.44
0.20
0.60
0.27
0.16
0.34
0.28
0.40
0.37
0.43
0.02
0.00
0.48
0.47
0.49
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.01
0.87
0.37
0.62
0.11
0.30
0.37
0.38
0.29
0.46
0.40
0.35
0.29
0.33
0.29

4.57
4.57
12.20
6.09
6.10
4.57
4.57
6.10
4.57
9.14
4.57
4.60
13.23
5.35
16.00
5.00
15.00
13.00
8.00
17.00
3.00
4.00
6.00
6.00
6.08
22.86
4.57
7.62
6.09
3.05
4.57
6.10
6.09
4.57
6.09
6.10
1.15
8.00
27.00
17.00
13.30
13.71
7.60
3.05
9.14
24.39
12.19
6.10
9.14
12.19
4.58
1.52
16.76
12.19
4.57
10.67
7.20
16.00

706 021.83
705 879.72
705 878.08
705 838.58
705 853.13
705 819.35
705 854.70
706 006.34
706 010.22
705 771.13
705 745.18
705 821.56
705 902.18
705 985.12
705 991.82
705 957.52
706 031.95
705 948.60
705 914.91
705 872.41
705 833.37
705 718.00
705 724.00
706 037.00
705 919.00
706 051.94
705 898.95
706 024.95
705 892.75
705 891.48
705 856.53
705 862.03
705 840.19
705 868.49
706 017.88
705 755.54
705 830.32
706 006.16
706 016.77
705 966.82
705 849.21
705 802.76
705 919.00
705 900.00
705 802.75
705 799.52
706 327.47
706 362.49
706 775.83
706 711.15
706 901.12
706 891.70
706 907.82
706 921.53
706 889.52
706 911.90
706 861.68
706 879.45

3 178 572.23
3 179 149.75
3 179 030.77
3 178 943.96
3 179 003.91
3 178 851.67
3 178 602.94
3 178 718.45
3 178 887.54
3 179 175.07
3 178 929.34
3 179 072.01
3 179 082.25
3 179 016.27
3 179 016.27
3 178 984.73
3 179 032.22
3 178 864.32
3 178 800.85
3 178 709.81
3 179 145.38
3 179 065.00
3 179 009.00
3 178 610.00
3 178 958.00
3 178 849.77
3 178 932.74
3 178 573.02
3 179 149.62
3 179 031.19
3 178 945.09
3 179 004.80
3 178 853.38
3 178 603.27
3 178 717.62
3 178 931.17
3 179 071.99
3 179 016.27
3 179 016.27
3 178 985.34
3 179 149.35
3 179 176.26
3 178 958.00
3 178 928.04
3 178 941.95
3 178 850.32
3 178 095.01
3 178 181.01
3 178 064.07
3 178 054.48
3 178 438.81
3 178 401.92
3 178 792.35
3 178 782.26
3 178 872.85
3 178 905.43
3 178 684.04
3 178 729.69

1 510.05
1 532.37
1 508.56
1 498.73
1 498.27
1 487.70
1 471.82
1 523.17
1 550.96
1 522.22
1 470.22
1 465.52
1 494.40
1 519.94
1 510.38
1 495.32
1 521.07
1 471.53
1 473.84
1 459.11
1 489.99
1 445.00
1 449.00
1 477.00
1 481.78
1 520.05
1 471.85
1 465.97
1 499.02
1 474.53
1 466.01
1 478.90
1 444.50
1 439.60
1 490.08
1 442.43
1 446.57
1 489.90
1 474.74
1 474.29
1 446.61
1 434.00
1 587.68
1 577.66
1 562.47
1 534.72
1 609.18
1 636.09
1 666.49
1 648.26
1 681.52
1 682.48
1 772.75
1 779.29
1 781.20
1 788.14
1 715.12
1 735.20

Coordonnate of the Intersection

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


282

Domain
North Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

Average
grade
Au (g/t)

Core
Lenght
(m)

X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

14236
14236
14236
14236
14236
14246
14246
14246
14246
14246
14260
14260
14260
14325
14325
14325
14325
14325
14325
14325
14325
14325
14325
14325
14325
14325
14325
14325
14325
14325
14325
14400
14400
14400
14400
14400
14400
14400
14400
14400
14400
14455
14455
14455
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336

DDH-11-203
DDH-11-204
RC-08-395
RC-08-402
RC-08-404
DDH-08-61
RC-08-289
RC-08-291
RC-08-390
RC-08-391
RC-08-290
RC-08-392
RC-12-706
DDH-11-206
RC-07-104
RC-07-196
RC-07-197
RC-07-198
RC-07-199
RC-07-200
RC-07-201
RC-07-202
RC-07-202
RC-07-255
RC-07-256
RC-08-380
RC-08-382
RC-08-383
RC-08-417
RC-08-418
RC-11-681
DDH-12-208
DDH-12-237
IN-12-239
IN-12-240
IN-12-251
RC-09-517
RC-09-518
RC-11-668
RC-11-669
RC-11-673
RC-09-437
RC-09-521
RC-09-522
DDH-04-07
DDH-04-08
DDH-04-09
DDH-07-37
DDH-07-37
DDH-07-38
DDH-09-95
DDH-09-96
DDH-09-97
DDH-09-98
RC-06-59
RC-06-60
RC-07-105
RC-07-189

31.00
40.00
33.53
47.24
35.05
50.00
51.82
6.10
0.00
42.67
27.43
0.00
9.14
22.00
21.34
41.15
35.05
25.91
27.43
25.91
19.81
18.29
22.86
27.43
41.15
32.00
19.81
19.81
18.29
24.38
24.38
22.00
37.00
10.50
34.00
24.00
22.86
16.76
6.10
44.20
15.24
21.34
22.86
10.67
21.40
25.35
20.00
22.00
35.00
24.00
51.00
47.25
40.00
37.20
18.29
21.34
24.38
12.19

35.00
62.00
47.24
57.91
42.67
59.00
65.53
32.00
24.38
59.44
36.58
7.62
22.86
26.00
27.43
45.72
39.62
33.53
33.53
30.48
30.48
21.34
24.38
33.53
47.24
35.05
24.38
25.91
22.86
28.96
28.96
36.00
42.00
15.00
39.00
33.00
27.43
21.34
18.29
48.77
19.81
27.43
27.43
18.29
46.00
32.10
27.88
34.00
43.00
53.00
56.00
65.00
47.40
51.85
33.53
42.67
50.29
24.38

0.53
0.36
0.31
0.44
0.49
0.33
0.39
0.70
0.74
0.40
0.65
0.65
0.58
0.00
0.88
0.75
0.29
0.39
0.55
1.32
1.32
2.07
2.03
0.87
0.39
0.10
0.25
0.33
0.16
0.34
0.18
0.38
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.26
0.39
1.32
0.19
0.23
0.01
0.32
0.40
0.34
1.15
2.34
1.39
5.50
0.25
0.22
1.40
5.57
1.17
2.06
0.68
0.74
0.41

4.00
22.00
13.71
10.67
7.62
9.00
13.71
25.90
24.38
16.77
9.15
7.62
13.72
4.00
6.09
4.57
4.57
7.62
6.10
4.57
10.67
3.05
1.52
6.10
6.09
3.05
4.57
6.10
4.57
4.58
4.58
14.00
5.00
4.50
5.00
9.00
4.57
4.58
12.19
4.57
4.57
6.09
4.57
7.62
24.60
6.75
7.88
12.00
8.00
29.00
5.00
17.75
7.40
14.65
15.24
21.33
25.91
12.19

706 812.86
706 856.04
706 878.03
706 865.71
706 836.30
706 681.66
706 675.61
706 724.16
706 707.46
706 677.80
706 755.65
706 822.58
706 771.06
706 378.56
706 366.80
706 269.08
706 260.92
706 310.94
706 313.70
706 308.76
706 334.38
706 307.77
706 309.07
706 249.91
706 258.60
706 256.40
706 348.56
706 350.29
706 341.05
706 320.72
706 261.08
706 111.40
706 099.08
706 182.00
706 114.00
706 132.00
706 181.09
706 184.76
706 089.61
706 087.88
706 177.40
706 075.80
706 103.34
706 065.65
706 271.65
706 237.35
706 270.72
706 254.81
706 254.52
706 348.22
706 296.47
706 286.20
706 239.06
706 258.41
706 273.70
706 255.96
706 348.23
706 272.00

3 178 733.25
3 178 770.80
3 178 733.06
3 178 798.38
3 178 851.02
3 178 760.59
3 178 763.14
3 178 694.23
3 178 667.57
3 178 724.08
3 178 694.00
3 178 653.26
3 178 667.80
3 178 737.94
3 178 738.11
3 178 650.71
3 178 494.86
3 178 544.07
3 178 594.01
3 178 697.07
3 178 649.36
3 178 479.24
3 178 479.28
3 178 698.44
3 178 742.77
3 178 600.70
3 178 604.00
3 178 652.22
3 178 711.12
3 178 743.36
3 178 556.22
3 178 794.89
3 178 761.33
3 178 719.00
3 178 649.00
3 178 766.00
3 178 694.67
3 178 785.76
3 178 527.20
3 178 706.07
3 178 555.33
3 179 325.04
3 179 305.26
3 179 277.73
3 179 202.76
3 179 176.50
3 179 129.50
3 179 122.28
3 179 122.28
3 178 906.28
3 178 954.16
3 178 901.35
3 178 999.21
3 179 083.82
3 179 127.83
3 179 122.75
3 178 908.73
3 179 220.00

1 724.31
1 729.33
1 740.80
1 730.57
1 745.85
1 692.78
1 687.83
1 716.52
1 719.24
1 685.16
1 701.57
1 733.00
1 717.68
1 696.02
1 688.94
1 604.36
1 600.90
1 622.44
1 630.34
1 645.79
1 654.02
1 614.02
1 610.44
1 623.53
1 623.51
1 608.32
1 651.58
1 661.48
1 670.10
1 662.36
1 614.73
1 599.47
1 590.98
1 621.25
1 570.60
1 604.50
1 613.84
1 639.48
1 561.93
1 554.16
1 594.25
1 667.32
1 673.42
1 668.56
1 720.95
1 700.25
1 726.10
1 716.74
1 705.74
1 694.75
1 675.02
1 663.80
1 684.02
1 701.01
1 724.58
1 713.50
1 695.76
1 728.00

Coordonnate of the Intersection

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


283

Domain
North Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

Average
grade
Au (g/t)

Core
Lenght
(m)

X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18336
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426

RC-07-190
RC-07-192
RC-07-193
RC-07-194
RC-07-195
RC-07-250
RC-07-252
RC-07-253
RC-07-254
RC-08-276
RC-08-277
RC-08-278
RC-08-279
RC-08-280
RC-08-281
RC-08-282
RC-08-283
RC-08-294
RC-08-354
RC-08-355
RC-08-356
RC-08-356
RC-08-357
RC-08-358
RC-08-361
RC-08-362
RC-08-362
RC-08-364
RC-08-365
RC-08-365
RC-08-367
RC-08-368
RC-08-369
RC-08-412
RC-09-512
RC-09-513
RC-09-514
RC-09-515
RC-09-516
RC-09-540
RC-11-660
RC-11-661
DDH-09-100
DDH-09-99
DDH-10-118
DDH-10-119
DDH-10-120
DDH-11-202
DDH-12-229
DDH-12-230
DDH-12-236
RC-08-354
RC-09-436
RC-09-515
RC-09-516
RC-09-519
RC-09-520
RC-09-523

15.24
39.62
39.62
54.86
25.91
42.67
16.76
7.62
28.96
19.81
22.86
44.20
15.24
30.48
36.58
35.05
41.15
38.10
21.34
18.29
25.91
30.48
30.48
25.91
36.58
39.62
42.67
35.05
36.58
39.62
35.05
36.58
27.43
24.38
22.86
27.43
33.53
21.34
19.81
10.67
38.10
45.72
24.00
7.00
47.75
46.50
53.00
3.00
45.00
44.00
31.00
41.15
6.10
39.62
50.29
0.00
6.10
7.62

35.05
45.72
57.91
59.44
32.00
50.29
35.05
21.34
39.62
25.91
41.15
68.58
33.53
39.62
48.77
41.15
51.82
44.20
41.15
24.38
28.96
32.00
35.05
32.00
41.15
41.15
47.24
45.72
38.10
65.53
39.62
41.15
41.15
65.53
27.43
32.00
48.77
22.86
21.34
35.05
44.20
50.29
35.50
50.00
52.10
50.00
57.95
30.00
75.00
53.00
65.00
44.20
47.24
44.20
56.39
33.53
44.20
53.34

0.90
30.14
0.71
0.37
1.79
33.65
0.62
2.53
0.42
0.25
0.73
6.10
2.62
0.36
2.71
1.38
4.75
1.93
0.84
0.28
1.08
0.17
1.40
0.59
0.75
0.01
0.93
0.29
2.19
0.45
0.15
0.38
1.92
0.76
0.07
1.38
0.72
0.09
4.42
0.75
1.69
1.19
0.70
0.61
0.27
0.18
1.18
1.87
0.38
0.79
0.90
0.15
0.40
0.46
0.40
0.64
1.80
1.81

19.81
6.10
18.29
4.58
6.09
7.62
18.29
13.72
10.66
6.10
18.29
24.38
18.29
9.14
12.19
6.10
10.67
6.10
19.81
6.09
3.05
1.52
4.57
6.09
4.57
1.53
4.57
10.67
1.52
25.91
4.57
4.57
13.72
41.15
4.57
4.57
15.24
1.52
1.53
24.38
6.10
4.57
11.50
43.00
4.35
3.50
4.95
27.00
30.00
9.00
34.00
3.05
41.14
4.58
6.10
33.53
38.10
45.72

706 314.60
706 271.19
706 263.47
706 299.76
706 242.62
706 261.95
706 283.61
706 361.52
706 263.16
706 336.71
706 338.02
706 300.56
706 281.83
706 228.67
706 245.09
706 266.71
706 238.98
706 234.60
706 219.77
706 256.46
706 298.44
706 298.44
706 237.49
706 299.23
706 261.50
706 237.14
706 235.39
706 202.39
706 320.40
706 326.38
706 291.90
706 222.29
706 284.37
706 232.79
706 210.65
706 258.07
706 203.72
706 206.22
706 198.54
706 220.70
706 313.47
706 270.54
706 161.91
706 198.96
706 113.20
706 160.79
706 162.55
706 198.56
706 147.09
706 114.66
706 186.20
706 219.79
706 169.59
706 213.48
706 210.97
706 219.67
706 163.95
706 175.33

3 179 003.30
3 179 000.02
3 178 903.74
3 178 948.54
3 178 859.23
3 178 958.19
3 179 072.81
3 178 948.02
3 178 821.12
3 178 988.99
3 178 947.09
3 178 906.12
3 179 086.32
3 179 084.84
3 179 046.64
3 179 029.08
3 178 946.63
3 178 998.79
3 179 175.14
3 179 204.45
3 179 082.13
3 179 082.13
3 179 118.03
3 179 053.14
3 179 050.04
3 178 997.24
3 178 997.30
3 178 899.19
3 178 903.39
3 178 903.43
3 178 852.03
3 178 821.47
3 178 812.41
3 179 120.48
3 178 821.80
3 178 858.56
3 178 937.58
3 179 049.87
3 179 010.80
3 179 208.36
3 178 978.48
3 178 970.07
3 179 343.89
3 179 321.52
3 178 920.13
3 178 927.61
3 178 989.76
3 179 206.13
3 179 072.32
3 178 886.23
3 179 124.52
3 179 174.92
3 179 143.90
3 179 049.85
3 179 010.45
3 179 149.79
3 179 287.55
3 179 188.19

1 716.50
1 688.74
1 662.01
1 672.34
1 670.85
1 672.84
1 722.39
1 723.22
1 655.93
1 719.10
1 704.60
1 667.93
1 721.23
1 699.36
1 694.17
1 699.32
1 665.94
1 685.63
1 692.47
1 725.53
1 728.06
1 724.25
1 717.85
1 719.76
1 701.85
1 689.07
1 684.85
1 662.04
1 690.06
1 676.05
1 669.15
1 653.88
1 658.17
1 703.95
1 657.61
1 672.79
1 665.35
1 696.28
1 695.05
1 702.40
1 697.73
1 677.87
1 712.28
1 724.26
1 608.84
1 631.74
1 638.61
1 700.91
1 634.50
1 604.67
1 672.92
1 681.80
1 675.13
1 677.85
1 664.74
1 704.72
1 693.47
1 672.27

Coordonnate of the Intersection

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


284

Domain
North Zone

Hole ID

FROM
(m)

TO
(m)

Average
grade
Au (g/t)

Core
Lenght
(m)

X (m)

Y (m)

Z (m)

18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18426
18446
18446

RC-09-524
RC-09-525
RC-09-537
RC-09-538
RC-09-539
RC-09-541
RC-09-542
RC-09-543
RC-11-658
RC-11-662
RC-11-663
RC-11-664
RC-11-685
DDH-12-227
RC-09-464

3.05
25.91
18.29
0.00
10.67
1.52
0.00
36.58
53.34
57.91
0.00
4.57
50.29
46.00
42.67

50.29
38.10
50.29
54.86
24.38
35.05
21.34
57.91
59.44
60.96
33.53
48.77
54.86
50.00
47.24

0.30
0.45
0.25
1.51
1.21
2.03
0.50
0.60
0.32
0.12
3.54
1.17
0.35
0.25
3.62

47.24
12.19
32.00
54.86
13.71
33.53
21.34
21.33
6.10
3.05
33.53
44.20
4.57
4.00
4.57

706 114.69
706 128.57
706 127.42
706 158.04
706 122.42
706 184.39
706 219.35
706 173.17
706 126.34
706 208.20
706 194.68
706 140.21
706 117.69
706 057.25
706 044.08

3 179 157.04
3 178 861.71
3 179 255.05
3 179 224.47
3 179 387.37
3 179 250.86
3 179 271.73
3 179 084.42
3 179 008.48
3 178 970.66
3 179 281.47
3 179 188.57
3 178 951.20
3 179 211.86
3 179 233.22

1 665.85
1 615.58
1 660.51
1 671.27
1 688.27
1 687.95
1 717.41
1 656.65
1 624.30
1 653.76
1 703.77
1 666.39
1 616.68
1 625.60
1 625.39

Coordonnate of the Intersection

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


285

Appendix 17.1 Design Criteria


General Site Conditions
Location
Country
Coordinates
Near to
Nearest Major City
State
Elevation
Meteorology
Climate
Average Minimum, C
Average Maximum C
Rainfall Average Annual, mm
Wet Season (July-August) Wettest Month, mm
Dry Season (November-June) Driest Month, mm
Maximum 24 hr Event, mm
Max Snowfall Event, mm
Evaporation Annual Pan, mm
Prevailing Wind Direction
General
Seismic Zone
Power Incoming
Distribution
Medium Voltage
Low Voltage
Control Voltage
Water Source
Water Quality
Fuel
Mining
General
Base Case Mineable Reserve
Production Schedule
Production Rate
Life of Mine, Years
Average Grade Au/Ag
Ore types

Mexico
28 53 N 108 53 W
15.5 km Northwest of Mulatos Mine
Hermosillo
Sonora
1,550masl

Sub Alpine Sierra Madre


-2
35
1012.5
296
9.5
180
1,431.7
East-Southeast

TBD
Genset
4160 v
4160 v
480 V, 60 Hz
220/110 V
Groundwater Well(s) ?
???
Diesel/Gasoline

50,000,000mt
365 d
6.296 MTPA/ 17,250mtpd
8
0.7 /4.5 g/t
Dacite, Andesite, Massive Silica Flooded Breccia, some
clays

Strip Ratio
In Situ Bulk Density
Moisture content, wt%

0.54:1
3
1.97-2.63 g/cm
3.5

Crushing
General
Production Schedule
System Utilization
System Availability
Overall System Availability
Production Rate Design

365 d
87%
86%
75%
958mt/hr

Conveyor Design
Conveyor Speed
ROM Ore Bulk Density
ROM Size

(2 m/s Max)
1.6 t/m3 TBC
-600 mm

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


286

Final Crushed Ore Product Size


Crushed Ore Product Bulk Density
No. of Crushing Stages
Ball Mill W.I. (kWh/st)
Low
High
Average
Abrasion Index, Ai
Low
High
Average

P100 -25mm
1.40
3

6.62
25.14
14.91
0.01
0.78
0.41

Dust Suppression System


Type

Water Spray

Primary Crushing
ROM Stockpile Capacity
ROM Feed Bin
Bin Feed Method
Haul Truck Size
Oversize Protection
Rock Breaker
Apron Feeder
Vibrating Grizzly Feeder
Primary Crusher Type
Size
Cross-Belt magnet
Metal Detector

~50,000 t
Steel Structure
Direct Truck-Dump and Loader
CAT 777
Grizzly
At Jaw Crusher Station
48x30
Yes 5x8
Jaw Crusher
JC5460
Yes
Yes

Crushed Ore Stockpile


Live Capacity
Total Capacity
Angle of Repose
Angle of Drawdown
Reclaim Tunnel
Reclaim Feeders

18,600 Confirmed
58,000 Confirmed
37 degrees
65 degrees
Modular Steel TBC
2 ea. Apron Feeders

Secondary Crushing
Screen
No. of Screens
Size
Scalping Screen Opening
Secondary Crushing Type
No. of Secondary Crushers

Vibrating Single Deck


1
Simplicity 6x16 or Equiv.
75 mm
MVP 550 S/C
1

Tertiary Crushing
Screen
No. of Screens
Size
Scalping Screen Opening
Secondary Crusher Type
No. of Tertiary Crushers
Crushed Ore Stockpile
Live Capacity
Total Capacity
Angle of Repose
Angle of Drawdown
Reclaim Tunnel
Reclaim Feeders

Vibrating Double Deck


2
Simplicity 8x24 or Equiv.
MVP 450X S/MF or Equiv.
3

590
6,520
o
37
o
65
Modular-Steel
2 ea. Apron Feeders

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


287

Crushed Ore Bulk Density

1.40 t/m

Agglomeration
Type
CementAddition Rate kg/t
Rate Control
Cement Addition tonnes/day
Truck Delivery Size, tonnes
Daily Consumption, Trucks
Storage Capacity, Days
Storage Capacity, tonnes
Agglomeration Solution
Agglomeration Solution Addition Nominal m3/hr
Agglomeration Solution Addition Design m3/hr

Cement / Belt Agglomeration


2.5
Belt Scale
43
25
2
4
200 (2 ea. 100 tonne Silos)
Barren Solution
100
125

Conveying and Stacking


Stacking Rate
Type
Design Belt Capacity
Design Capacity Motor (20% over Crushing
Design)
Width
Stacker Length, m
Lift Height
Number of Lifts
Setback Between Lifts
Angle of Repose
Stacking Width
Surface Preparation After Stacking
Crushed Ore Stacked Density
Leach Pad
Type
Construction
Clay Permeability, cm/seg.
Liner System

17,250 mtpd
Overlands, Portable Field Conveyors, HIC, Radial
Stacker
958 TPH
1,150 TPH
42
42.7
10 m TBC
11 TBC
10 m TBC
o
37
~80 m
D8
1.40

Multiple Lift, Single Use


TwoPhases
6
1x10
Single 1.5 mm LLDPE on GCL overlain with 0.6 m of 19
mm minus drain cover fill at base area- draincoil only on
slopes

Heap Operation
Ore Feed Rate
Leaching Cycle
Leaching Schedule
Active Leach Area
Solution Application Method
Solution Application Rate
Gold Recovery, average LOM
Silver Recovery, average LOM
Average Gold Leached, kg/day / oz/day
Average Silver Leached, kg/day / oz/day
2
Average Pregnant Solution Grade @ 10 L/hr/m
(Au/ Ag )

17,250tpd
90 d
365 d
110,880 m2
Drip Tube and Sprinkler
2
10 L/h/m
80%
19%
9.66 / 310
14.75 / 474
0.36 / 0.55 g/tsoln. (0.92 ppm total)

Pump Availability, %
Barren SolnNaCN Grade, ppm
Wet Season Ore Absorption %
Dry Season Ore Absorption %
Annual Drip Tube Evaporation Rate %
Annual Sprinkler Evaporation Rate %
24-hr Drain Down Avg., L/t

98
200
3
7
2
6
20.33

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


288

Solution Storage
General
Storage Type
Pregnant solution
Barren solution
Event solution
Leak Detection / Collection
Pregnant Pond
Liner
Volume
Pond Depth (m)
Pond side slopes
Pregnant Pond Pump
Type
Number of Pumps
Installed/ operating/standby
Nominal / Design Flow Rate m3/hr
Total Dynamic Head m
Agglomeration Pump
Type
Number of Pumps
Installed/ operating/standby
Nominal / Design Flow Rate m3/hr
Total Dynamic Head m
Barren Solution Tank
Capacity (minutes at nominal barren flow)
Operating freeboard, metres
H:D, m
Barren Heap Leach Pumps
Type
Number of Pumps
Installed/ operating/standby
VFD
Nominal/ Design Flow Rate m3/hr
Main Header Pipeline Size
Total Dynamic Head m
Process Solution Pump
Process Uses
Type
Number of Pumps
3
Nominal/Design Flow Rate, m /hr
Excess Solution Pond
Liner

Pond
Tank
Pond
Yes

Double liner 60 mil HDPE over geonet over 60 mil HDPE


over GCL or 0.3 m clay
41,093 m3 confirmed
10 TBC
2.5 H to 1V

Submersible - Slide Mount/skid


2/2/0 + warehouse spare
1150 / 1380
TBD

Horizontal at Barren Tank


2/1/1
100/125
TBD

30
1
9:9

Horizontal Split Case Double Suction


3/2/1 TBC
Yes
1150 / 1380
16
TBD

Carbon boost, tank fill elution, etc.


Horizontal Centrifugal
1 + warehouse spare
100/125 TBC

Volume Sizing
Pond Depth (m)
Pond side slopes

Double liner 60 mil HDPE over geonet over 60 mil HDPE


over GCL or 0.3 m clay
576,632 m3 confirmed
10 TBC
2.5 H to 1V

Event Pond Pump


Type
Number of Pumps

Submersible Pump on Slide


1

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


289

Design Flow Rate, m /hr

400 m3/hr TBC

Heap Leach Recovery Circuit


General
Recovery Plant Type
Operating Schedule
Operating Availability

ADR
365 d
98%

Adsorption Section
Flowrate Pregnant From Heap
Average / Design m3/hr
Pregnant Solution Feed Grade to Adsorption
Adsorbtion Efficiency
Average Gold on Carbon, kg/day / oz/day
Average Silver on Carbon, kg/day / oz/day
Carbon Loading, g Au+Ag per tonne carbon
3
2
2
Specific Adsorption Flowrate,m /hr/m (gpm/ft )

1110/ 1332
0.36 Au / 0.55 Ag g/tsoln. (0.92 ppm total)
95%
9.2 / 295
14.0 / 450
5,000
61 (25)

Carbon Adsorption Columns


Type
Number of Trains
Number of Columns/Train
3
Design Flow Rate per Train, m /hr
Column Diameter, m
Column Height, m
Carbon Depth, m
Step-down between Columns, m
Tonnes Carbon per Column
Column Material of Construction
Distribution Plates & Bubble Caps
Inter-column Flow Control Method

Cascade
2
5
621 max
3.3 TBC
3.3 TBC
0.83 dead, 2.1 exp max TBC
0.4 TBC
3.5
steel
Yes
Dart Valve

Carbon Advance Pump


Type
Number of Pumps
Carbon Transfer Time, minutes

Screw
1
30-45

Carbon Advance Rate to Acid Wash Tank

7 tonne batch every 48 hrs TBC

Carbon Safety Screen


Type
Quantity
Screen Retention Size, Mesh

Stationary
2 ea. (1 each train)
65

Solution Samplers
Type
Quantity

Wire
2

Carbon Columns Area Sump Pump


Pump Type
3
Design Flow Rate, m /hr

Vertical Sump
15 TBC

Acid Wash Section


Type
Number of Acid Wash Columns
Carbon Capacity per Column tonnes
Acid Wash Column Material of Construction
Acid Wash Concentration HCL %

Hydrochloric Acid
1
7
Carbon Steel Tank with FRP or Rubber Liner System
3

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


290

Wash Schedule
Washes per Week / vessel
Acid Wash Time, hrs

Every Elution Cycle


3-4
4 to 6

Acid Storage
Qty
3
Volume (working), m

NA
Drums or Tote Bins

Acid Mix Tank


Qty
3
Volume (working), m
Material of Construction

1
TBD
Carbon Steel Tank with FRP or Rubber Liner System

Acid Wash Pump


Pump Type
3
Design Flow Rate, m /hr
Quantity, installed / operating / standby

Magnetic drive, seal-less


TBD
2/1/1

Acid Transfer Pump


Pump Type
3
Design Flow Rate, m /hr

Barrel Pump
1.5 TBC

Acid Area Sump Pump


Pump Type
3
Design Flow Rate, m /hr

Vertical sump
10

Neutralization
Type
Caustic Concentration, % by weight
Caustic Addition Point
3

Design Solution Flow Rate, m /hr


End Neutralization pH
Carbon Advance Pump
Type
Number of Pumps
Carbon Transfer Time, minutes
Elution Section
Type
Number of Elution Columns
Carbon Capacity per Elution Column (tonnes)
Elution Column Material of Construction
Elution Column Insulation

Caustic soda rinse


25
To acid mix tank (spent solution after raw water rinse).
Caustic neutralization solution to be circulated using the
acid wash pump
TBD
7 to 8

Screw (Hydrostal or similar)


1
30 45

Design Eluate Solution Flow Rate, m /hr


Elution Temperature, C (max)
Elution Design Pressure
Elutions per Week
Elution Time, hrs

Pressure Zadra
1
7
Stainless Steel
50 mm (minimum) R-14 waterproof w/ stainless steel
cladding
28
135/150
690 kPa
5-6
12-16

Eluant Storage Tank


Type
Quantity
3
Volume (working), m

Closed-top, vented
1
28 TBC

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


291

Material of
Construction
Tank Insulation
Working Temperature,

Carbon Steel

50 mm (minimum) R-14 waterproof w/ stainless steel


cladding
95

Eluant Pump
Pump Type
Quantity op/standby
3
Design Flow Rate, m /hr
Operating Temp., C

Horizontal Centrifugal
1/1
28
95

Elution Drain Pump


Pump Type
3
Design Flow Rate, m /hr

Horizontal Centrifugal
20

Stripped Carbon Transfer Pump


Number of Pumps
Carbon Transfer Time, minutes

Screw Pump or recessed impeller


1
30-45

Elution Area Sump Pump


Pump Type
3
Design Flow Rate, m /hr

Vertical Sump
10

Eluant Solution Heater


Type
Quantity
Service

Hot Water Boiler


1
Diesel

Eluant Solution Samplers


Type
Quantity

Wire
2

Electrowinning Section
Electrowinning Cells
Type
Number of Cells
3
Solution Flow Rate m /hr
Solution Temp., C
Au + Ag Recovery(per pass thrucell)
Type of Steel Wool

Fiberglass or Polypropylene
2
28 (14 ea.)
85
+/- 70%
Stainless

Rectifiers
Type
Qty
Operating Voltage

Thyristor (SCR)
1
0-6 VDC

Electrowinning Cell Exhaust Fan


Qty
Fan Type

1
reclined

Barren Eluant Return Pump


Qty
Pump Type
3
Design Flow Rate, m /hr/pump
Operating Temp., C

1
Horizontal Centrifugal
28
85

Electrowinning Area Sump Pump

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


292

Pump Type
3
Design Flow Rate, m /hr
Refinery Section
Smelting Furnace
Type
Metal Production, kg
Au+Ag/wk
Fuel
Melts per Month
Pour Method System

Vertical Sump
10

Fuel Oil Fired, Crucible


168
Diesel
7-8
Manual with Cascade Mold

Bag House Dust Collector

Yes

Drying Oven, size, m3

TBD

Flux Mixer
Type

No- Manual mix

Slag Crusher / System

No - Future

Carbon Regeneration Section


Carbon Regeneration Kiln Dewatering Screen
Type
Screen Material
Carbon Regeneration Kiln
Type

Stationary
Stainless Steel

Percent of Carbon Regenerated per Cycle


Throughput Rate, kg/hr / kg/day
3
Feed Hopper Capacity, tonnes (m )
Retention Time at Temp.(min)
Carbon Moisture, % to Kiln

Horizontal Rotary w/ feed hopper and pre-drier, indirect


diesel-fired
33%approx
50 / 1,200
7
10
20

Regeneration Kiln Off-Gas Scrubber


Type

No

Carbon Quench Tank


Type
Storage capacity, t Carbon

Cylindrical, cone bottom 45


7 TBC

Carbon Handling
Carbon Transfer Pump
Type
Number of Pumps
Carbon Transfer Time, minutes

Screw (Hydrostal or similar)


1
30-45

Carbon Sizing Screen


Type
Screen Material
Mesh Size

Vibrating
Stainless Steel
20

Carbon Storage Tank


Type
Storage capacity, t Carbon
New Carbon Attritioning Tank
Type
Capacity, t Carbon

Cylindrical, cone bottom 45


7
Cylindrical, cone bottom 45
1

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


293

Agitated?, yes/no

Yes

Carbon Attritioning Agitator


Type
Batch Size, t Carbon

Top mount/Fixed speed


1

Carbon Fines Tank


Type
3
Tank volume reqd, m

Cylindrical, cone bottom 45


24 TBC

Carbon Fines Filter Press


Type
Volume

Recessed Plate
Sufficient for 1 week of fines collection on average

Carbon Fines Filter Press Feed Pump


Pump Type
3
Design Flow Rate, m /hr
Carbon Handling Area Sump Pump

Horizontal Centrifugal
15 TBC
Shared with Carbon Columns Area

Reagents and Consumables


Lime
Cement Addition , kg/t
Addition Point
Addition Method
Consumption, kg per day, nominal
3
Bulk density, kg/m
Truck size, t
Selected silo size,
truckloads
3
Selected silo size, t (m )
Total silo capacity, days

2.5
Dry fed onto conveyor
Screw feeder from silo onto belt, controlled by
weightometer
43,125
0.88
25 TBC
4
2 ea.100
4-5

Sodium Cyanide (Heap Leach)


Specific Gravity
3
Bulk Density, t/m
Consumption, kg/t
Consumption, kg/d,nominal
Form
Container configuration
Container size, kg
Reagent storage capacity, days

1.60
0.75 to 0.90
0.41
7,072
Briquette
Solid, in bulk bags
1000 kg Boxes
70 t dry storage (double stack), 10 days

Cyanide Mix Tank


Mix capacity, t NaCN
3
Tank volume reqd, m
Agitated?, yes/no

7
25 (working)
yes

Cyanide Transfer Pump


Pump Type
3
Design Flow Rate, m /hr
Quantity, installed / operating / standby

Horizontal Centrifugal, seal-less


20
2/1/1

Cyanide Storage Tank


Tank Capacity, days
3
Tank volume reqd, m

1.5 (max)
37

Cyanide Metering Pumps- Barren

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


294

Locations
Pump
Variable Speed
Nominal flow, L/min
Design flow, L/min
Quantity, installed / operating / standby

CN area to Barren Tank


Metering
Yes
TBD
TBD
2/1/1

Cyanide Metering Pumps- Strip Circuit


Locations
Pump
Variable Speed
3
Nominal flow, m /hr
3
Design flow, m /hr
Quantity, installed / operating / standby

CN area to Eluate Storage Tank


Metering
Yes
0.5
1
1/1/ 0

Cyanide Area Sump Pump


Pump Type
3
Design Flow Rate, m /hr

Vertical Sump
10

Antiscalant (as required)


Type
Form
Container
Average Addition Rate
Addition Points
Specific Gravity, solution
Consumption total, kg/t nominal
Consumption total, kg/d nominal
Reagent Storage Capacity, days

TBD
Liquid
3
1 m Tote Bins
6 ppm
Barren and pregnant pump suctions
1.0
0.019 TBC
327 TBC
30 (10 tote bins)

Antiscalant Metering Pumps


Type
Variable Speed
Addition Method
Nominal flow, mL/min
Design flow, mL/min
Antiscalant dosing range , ppm
Quantity, installed / operating / standby
Caustic Soda (NaOH
Consumption, kg/d
(nominal)
Form
Container configuration
Reagent Storage Capacity, days
Caustic Mix/Storage Tank
Configuration
Mix capacity, kgNaOH
Mix Concentration, % by weight
Tank Capacity, days
3
Tank volume required, m (working)
Agitated?, yes/no

Diaphragm
Yes
Individual pumps for each addition point

0 to 20
2 / 2 /0

60.4 (total)
Pearls or Flakes
Bags
50
Cylindrical, flat bottom covered tank
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Yes, during mixing

Caustic Mix Tank Agitator


Type

Single axial flow impeller

Caustic Transfer/Metering Pumps


Pump Type

Horizontal centrifugal or peristaltic

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


295

Design Flow Rate, m /hr


Variable Speed y/n
Solution s.g.
Addition Points
Quantity, installed / operating / standby

Varies depending on addition point


Yes
1.22
Cyanide Mixing, Eluant Storage Tank and Acid Wash
1/1/0

Type
Size, Makeup
Consumption, kg/t/strip
Consumption, kg/d, nominal
Container configuration
Container size, kg

Coconut Shell
6 x 12 mesh
30
105(average) TBC
Bulk bags
500

Carbon

Hydrochloric Acid
Delivered Concentration, % by weight
Consumption, L/day, nominal
Delivery Container Configuration
Acid Wash Conc., % by weight
Reagent Storage Capacity, days
Fluxes
Flux ratio, kg flux/kg Au+Ag
Flux mix, %
Silica
Borax
Fluorspar
Niter
Soda Ash
Flux reagents requirements, kg/d, nominal
Silica
Borax
Fluorspar
Niter
Soda Ash
Total
Container Size, kg
Storage Capacity, days
Raw Water
Source
3
Consumption, Nominal / Design m /h
Well Pump
Pump Type
3
Nominal/ Design Flow Rate, m /hr
Quantity, installed / operating / standby

28 to 35
TBD
3
1 m Tote bins or bulk
3 to 5
TBD

1.5 : 1
100
25
40
0
20
15
9
14.4
0.0
7.2
5.4
36
25 or 50 kg bags
60

Water Well

100 (provisional max heap only requirement), approx


150 for site
1

Pit Dewatering Pump (Mine Area)


Pump Type
3
Design Flow Rate,m /hr
Quantity, installed / operating / standby

Potable Water
Source
3
Consumption, m /h

Water Treatment

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


296

Potable Water Treatment Pump


Pump Type
3
Design Flow Rate, m /hr
Quantity, installed / operating / standby

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

Potable Water Treatment System


Type
3
Design Flow Rate, m /hr

N/A
N/A
N/A

Potable Water Tank


3
Tank Volume, m
Material of Construction

N/A
N/A
N/A

Potable Water Distribution Pump


Pump Type
3
Design Flow Rate, m /hr
Quantity, installed / operating / standby

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

Air
Crushing Plant Air Compressor
Quantity
3
Design flow, actual m /h
Design discharge

pressure, kPa

1
175
700

pressure, kPa

1
15
620

Type
ADR Instrument Air Compressor
Quantity
3
Design flow, actual m /h
Design discharge
Instrument Air Dryer
3
Design Flow, m /hr
Design Discharge
Pressure, kPa

15
620

Carbon Press, Sludge Press and Cyanide ISO


Blow-Down Compressor
Compressor Type
3
Design Flow, m /hr
Design Discharge
Blow Down Time, hr

Reciprocating
125
518
1-4

Fuels
Fuel Delivery Pump
Specific Gravity of Fuel Oil
Nominal / Design flow, L/h

0.9
116/166

Fuel Oil Day Tanks


Number of Tanks
Tank Working Volume,
Sanitary
System Type

1
50
Sewage Treatment Plant

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


297

Appendix 21.1 General and administration operating cost


detail
General and Administration

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2023

13,318

13,318

13,318

13,318

13,318

13,318

13,318

13,318

5,041

3,600

3,600

3,600

3,600

3,600

3,600

3,600

3,600

1,363

6210 - General Materials

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

227

6245 - Uniform and Pers. equipment

900

900

900

900

900

900

900

900

341

192,550

192,550

192,550

192,550

192,550

192,550

192,550

192,550

72,880

37901 - Human Resourc es


6010 - Labor - Regular
6125 - Consultants - General

8010 - Salary - Regular

8120 - Office Supplies

8027 - Shares Incentive Plan

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

1,136

8195 - Travelling

3,500

3,500

3,500

3,500

3,500

3,500

3,500

3,500

1,325

8246 - Other external services

4,800

4,800

4,800

4,800

4,800

4,800

4,800

4,800

1,817

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

227

47,340

47,340

47,340

47,340

47,340

47,340

47,340

47,340

17,918

8301 - Fuel / Gasolina


8405 - Recreational Activities
8410 - Social Club Activities

18,000

18,000

18,000

18,000

18,000

18,000

18,000

18,000

6,813

8430 - Recruiting, Relocation Expense

15,750

15,750

15,750

15,750

15,750

15,750

15,750

15,750

5,961

8435 - Official Papers, publications


8445 - Promotional Items
8470 - Occupational Hygiene

4,500

4,500

4,500

4,500

4,500

4,500

4,500

4,500

1,703

38,750

38,750

38,750

38,750

38,750

38,750

38,750

38,750

14,667

8475 - Clinical Appraisals

21,500

21,500

21,500

21,500

21,500

21,500

21,500

21,500

8,138

8480 - Doctors & Consultants

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

4,542

4,399

4,399

4,399

4,399

4,399

4,399

4,399

4,399

1,665

385,107

385,107

385,107

385,107

385,107

385,107

385,107

385,107

145,763

8510 - Employees Training


Transfer Salary to Mascota
Transfer Salary to Exloracion
Total 37901 - Human Resources
37903 - Community Relations
6010 - Labor - Regular

22,868

22,868

22,868

22,868

22,868

22,868

22,868

22,868

8,655

6110 - Labor contractor

7,200

7,200

7,200

7,200

7,200

7,200

7,200

7,200

2,725

6210 - General Materials

4,200

4,200

4,200

4,200

4,200

4,200

4,200

4,200

1,590

915

915

915

915

915

915

915

915

346

183,547

183,547

183,547

183,547

183,547

183,547

183,547

183,547

69,473

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

2,271

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

189

9,158

9,158

9,158

9,158

9,158

9,158

9,158

9,158

3,466

6016 - Taxes

6245 - Uniforms and personal equipment


8010 - Salary
8035 - Memberships - Miscellaneous
8056 - Commnication expenses
8100 - Municipality taxes
8120 - Office supplies
8195 - Travelling
8212 - Misc. Travel, visit, Corporate
8220 - Consulting
8240 - Legal

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

568

12,100

12,100

12,100

12,100

12,100

12,100

12,100

12,100

4,580

48,935

48,935

48,935

48,935

48,935

48,935

48,935

48,935

18,522

7,600

7,600

7,600

7,600

7,600

7,600

7,600

7,600

2,877

8275 - Transport freight

10,650

10,650

10,650

10,650

10,650

10,650

10,650

10,650

4,031

8301 - Fuel / Gasolina

14,400

14,400

14,400

14,400

14,400

14,400

14,400

14,400

5,450

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

3,634

48,000

48,000

48,000

48,000

48,000

48,000

48,000

48,000

18,168

8415 - Sponsoring

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

568

8510 - Training

3,406

3,406

3,406

3,406

3,406

3,406

3,406

3,406

1,289

8304 - car repair and maintenance


8402 - Community Support

8610.- Software
8616 - Computer suplies
8705 - Permits

884

884

884

884

884

884

884

884

334

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

681

394,762

394,762

394,762

394,762

394,762

394,762

394,762

394,762

149,418
481,356

Transfer Exploraciomes salary


Transfer Mascota salary
Total 37903 - Community Relations
37905 - Operation Camp
6010 - Labor - Regular

1,271,746

1,271,746

1,271,746

1,271,746

1,271,746

1,271,746

1,271,746

1,271,746

6110 - Labor - Contractors

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

4,542

6117 - Equipment Repairs

24,000

24,000

24,000

24,000

24,000

24,000

24,000

24,000

9,084

6210 - General Materials

9,000

9,000

9,000

9,000

9,000

9,000

9,000

9,000

3,407

6245 - Uniform and Pers. equipment

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

1,136

27,840

27,840

27,840

27,840

27,840

27,840

27,840

27,840

10,537

6250 - Electricity (distribution)


6426 - Water supply (rigths)
8010 - Salary - Regular
8210 - Meals & Entertainment

83,661

83,661

83,661

83,661

83,661

83,661

83,661

83,661

31,666

984,000

984,000

984,000

984,000

984,000

984,000

984,000

984,000

372,444

8301 - CarFuel

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

4,542

8304 - Car Repair & Mtce

11,700

11,700

11,700

11,700

11,700

11,700

11,700

11,700

4,428

8510 - Employees Training

29,044

29,044

29,044

29,044

29,044

29,044

29,044

29,044

10,993

2,467,990

2,467,990

2,467,990

2,467,990

2,467,990

2,467,990

2,467,990

2,467,990

934,134

Transfer to Exploracion
Trabsfer to Construccion - Proyecto del Tiro?
Total 37905 - Operation Camp

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012

298

General and Administration

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2023

37907 - Camp Offic es


6210 - General Materials

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

1,136

5,700

5,700

5,700

5,700

5,700

5,700

5,700

5,700

2,157

6245 - Personal Protection Equip.


6275 - Transport Freight
6525 - Spare Parts & Others

8056 - Communications Expense

8107 - Office Maintenance

7,200

7,200

7,200

7,200

7,200

7,200

7,200

7,200

2,725

8120 - Office Supplies

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

1,136

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

11,355

8122 - Utilities, Gas and Electricity


8301 - Fuel / Gasolina

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

227

7904 - general transfer Gas LP y Servicios a Taller

(15,575)

(15,575)

(15,575)

(15,575)

(15,575)

(15,575)

(15,575)

(15,575)

(5,895)

Total 37907 - Camp Offices

33,925

33,925

33,925

33,925

33,925

33,925

33,925

33,925

12,841

63,587

63,587

63,587

63,587

63,587

63,587

63,587

63,587

24,068

8005 - Salary - Management

647,881

647,881

647,881

647,881

647,881

647,881

647,881

647,881

245,223

8010 - Salary - Regular

37910 - Hermosillo Offic e


6010 - Labor - Regular
8001 - Salary

118,652

118,652

118,652

118,652

118,652

118,652

118,652

118,652

44,910

8040 - Office Rent

42,000

42,000

42,000

42,000

42,000

42,000

42,000

42,000

15,897

8056 - Communications Expense

18,000

18,000

18,000

18,000

18,000

18,000

18,000

18,000

6,813

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

1,136

8107 - Office - Maintenance

7,800

7,800

7,800

7,800

7,800

7,800

7,800

7,800

2,952

8120 - Office Supplies

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

2,271

8122 - Utilities, Gas and Electricity

4,800

4,800

4,800

4,800

4,800

4,800

4,800

4,800

1,817

18,000

18,000

18,000

18,000

18,000

18,000

18,000

18,000

6,813
1,136

8060 - Postage & Courier Expenses


8085 - Professional Memberships

8140 - Miscellaneous Expenses


8195 - Travelling
8210 - Meals & Entertainment

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

8212 - Misc. Travel, visit, Corporate

24,000

24,000

24,000

24,000

24,000

24,000

24,000

24,000

9,084

8240 - Legal

24,600

24,600

24,600

24,600

24,600

24,600

24,600

24,600

9,311

8301 - Carfuel

2,280

2,280

2,280

2,280

2,280

2,280

2,280

2,280

863

8304 - Car Repair & Mtce

3,600

3,600

3,600

3,600

3,600

3,600

3,600

3,600

1,363

8510 - Employees Training

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

3,634

996,800

996,800

996,800

996,800

996,800

996,800

996,800

996,800

377,289

Total 37910 - Hermosillo Office


37912 - Sec urity Guards
6010 - Labor - Regular

6110 - Labor - Contractors

9,000

9,000

9,000

9,000

9,000

9,000

9,000

9,000

3,407

6210 - General Materials

2,400

2,400

2,400

2,400

2,400

2,400

2,400

2,400

908

6245 - Uniform and Pers. equipment

1,650

1,650

1,650

1,650

1,650

1,650

1,650

1,650

625

113,369

113,369

113,369

113,369

113,369

113,369

113,369

113,369

42,910

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

681

298,554

298,554

298,554

298,554

298,554

298,554

298,554

298,554

113,003

8301 - Fuel

3,900

3,900

3,900

3,900

3,900

3,900

3,900

3,900

1,476

8304 - Car Repair & Mtce

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

3,634

8510 - Employees Training

5,843

5,843

5,843

5,843

5,843

5,843

5,843

5,843

2,211

446,116

446,116

446,116

446,116

446,116

446,116

446,116

446,116

168,855

8010 - Salary - Regular


8058 - Office Equip Repairs & Mtce
8210 - Meals & Entertainment
8234 - Service Charges

Transfer to Mascota 22%


Transfer to Exploracion 10%
Transfer to Construccion and projects 3%
Total 37912 - Security Guards

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


299

General and Administration

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2023

37913 - Health Safety


6010 - Labor-Regular
6210 - General Materials
6245 - Uniform and Pers. equipment
6272 - Vehicule Maintenance
7904 - General Transfer

15,501

15,501

15,501

15,501

15,501

15,501

15,501

15,501

5,867

9,357

9,357

9,357

9,357

9,357

9,357

9,357

9,357

3,542

12,483

12,483

12,483

12,483

12,483

12,483

12,483

12,483

4,725

371,440

371,440

371,440

371,440

371,440

371,440

371,440

371,440

140,590

1,277

1,277

1,277

1,277

1,277

1,277

1,277

1,277

483

638

638

638

638

638

638

638

638

242

22,212

22,212

22,212

22,212

22,212

22,212

22,212

22,212

8,407

8120 - Office Supplies

3,574

3,574

3,574

3,574

3,574

3,574

3,574

3,574

1,353

8140 - Miscellaneous Expenses

6,383

6,383

6,383

6,383

6,383

6,383

6,383

6,383

2,416

8195 - Travelling

8,181

8,181

8,181

8,181

8,181

8,181

8,181

8,181

3,096

8220 - Consulting

6,809

6,809

6,809

6,809

6,809

6,809

6,809

6,809

2,577

8301 - Fuel / Gasolina

7,989

7,989

7,989

7,989

7,989

7,989

7,989

7,989

3,024

8460 - Personnal Protection Equip.

2,764

2,764

2,764

2,764

2,764

2,764

2,764

2,764

1,046

8465 - Security Awards

3,830

3,830

3,830

3,830

3,830

3,830

3,830

3,830

1,450

8480 - Doctors & Consultants

1,532

1,532

1,532

1,532

1,532

1,532

1,532

1,532

580

71,957

71,957

71,957

71,957

71,957

71,957

71,957

71,957

27,236

8510 - Employees Training

7,689

7,689

7,689

7,689

7,689

7,689

7,689

7,689

2,910

8512 - Training / Materiel

5,106

5,106

5,106

5,106

5,106

5,106

5,106

5,106

1,933

8520 - Air ambulance Expenses

1,021

1,021

1,021

1,021

1,021

1,021

1,021

1,021

387

8605 - Computers

1,277

1,277

1,277

1,277

1,277

1,277

1,277

1,277

483

8750 - Hazardous Waste management

4,596

4,596

4,596

4,596

4,596

4,596

4,596

4,596

1,739

565,616

565,616

565,616

565,616

565,616

565,616

565,616

565,616

214,086

8010 - Salary-Regular
8050 - Stationery & Supplies
8057 - Office Equipment
8059 - Other Equipment

8490 - Clinical Material

7904 - General Transfer to proces (recarga extintores)


7904 - General Transfer to UG (recarga extintores)
7904 - General Transfer to OP (recarga extintores)
7904 - General Transfer to Camp (recarga extintores)
Total 37913 - Health Safety
37915 - Vehic ule T ransportation
6010 - Labor - Regular

84,783

84,783

84,783

84,783

84,783

84,783

84,783

84,783

32,090

6110 - Labor - Contractors

65,974

65,974

65,974

65,974

65,974

65,974

65,974

65,974

24,971
227

6210 - General Materials

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

1,080

1,080

1,080

1,080

1,080

1,080

1,080

1,080

409

6268 - Aircraft Rental

96,240

96,240

96,240

96,240

96,240

96,240

96,240

96,240

36,427

6245 - Uniform and Pers. equipment


8010 - Salary - Regular

37,262

37,262

37,262

37,262

37,262

37,262

37,262

37,262

14,104

8070 - License & taxes

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

1,136

8120 - Office Supplies

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

227

8195 - Travelling

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

227

51,000

51,000

51,000

51,000

51,000

51,000

51,000

51,000

19,304

8301 - Carfuel
8302 - Car insurance/ tax

28,079

28,079

28,079

28,079

28,079

28,079

28,079

28,079

10,628

8304 - Car Repair & Mtce

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

11,355

8510 - Employees Training

2,266

2,266

2,266

2,266

2,266

2,266

2,266

2,266

858

401,485

401,485

401,485

401,485

401,485

401,485

401,485

401,485

151,962
11,355

Transfer to Mascota
Total 37915 - Vehicule Transportation
37917 - Expats Housing
8522 - Expat Fees

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

6010 - Labor - Regular

10,285

10,285

10,285

10,285

10,285

10,285

10,285

10,285

3,893

Total 37917 - Expats Housing

40,285

40,285

40,285

40,285

40,285

40,285

40,285

40,285

15,248

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


300

General and Administration

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2023

127,175

127,175

127,175

127,175

127,175

127,175

127,175

127,175

48,136

1,200

1,200

1,200

1,200

1,200

1,200

1,200

1,200

454

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

227

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

681

6275 - Transport Freight

6525 - Spare Parts & Others

37920 - W arehouse
6010 - Labor - Regular
6210 - General Materials
6220 - Tools
6245 - Uniform and Pers. equipment

8010 - Salary - Regular

141,494

141,494

141,494

141,494

141,494

141,494

141,494

141,494

53,555

8057 - Office Equipment

1,360

1,360

1,360

1,360

1,360

1,360

1,360

1,360

515

8120 - Office Supplies

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

1,800

681

8140 - Miscellaneous Expenses

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

227

8195 - Travelling

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

227

8301 - Carfuel

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

1,136

8304 - Car Repair & Mtce

5,400

5,400

5,400

5,400

5,400

5,400

5,400

5,400

2,044

8510 - Employees Training

7,633

7,633

7,633

7,633

7,633

7,633

7,633

7,633

2,889

292,662

292,662

292,662

292,662

292,662

292,662

292,662

292,662

110,773

Total 37920 - Warehouse


37921 - Purc hasing
6010 - Labor - Regular
6210 - General Materials
6245 - Uniform and Pers. equipment
6275 - transport freigth
6525 - Spare Parts & Others
8010 - Salary - Regular
8057 - Office Equipment

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

227

900

900

900

900

900

900

900

900

341

9,000

9,000

9,000

9,000

9,000

9,000

9,000

9,000

3,407

197,030

197,030

197,030

197,030

197,030

197,030

197,030

197,030

74,576

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

227

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

4,542

1,200

1,200

1,200

1,200

1,200

1,200

1,200

1,200

454

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

227

8195 - Travelling

2,400

2,400

2,400

2,400

2,400

2,400

2,400

2,400

908

8220 - Consulting

2,100

2,100

2,100

2,100

2,100

2,100

2,100

2,100

795

8276 - Inbound Freight

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

2,271

8301 - Carfuel

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

227

8460 - Personnal Protection Equip.

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

227

5,292

5,292

5,292

5,292

5,292

5,292

5,292

5,292

2,003

500

500

238,922

239,422

238,922

238,922

238,922

238,922

238,922

238,922

90,932

169,566

169,566

169,566

169,566

169,566

169,566

169,566

169,566

64,181

23,883

23,883

23,883

23,883

23,883

23,883

23,883

23,883

9,040

7,700

7,700

7,700

7,700

7,700

7,700

7,700

7,700

2,914

484,809

484,809

484,809

484,809

484,809

484,809

484,809

484,809

183,500

8061 - Customs fees


8120 - Office Supplies
8140 - Miscellaneous Expenses

8510 - Employees Training


8605-Computers
Transfer to Mascota 18%
Total 37920 - Purchasing
37930 - T ec hnic al Serv ic es
6010 - Labor - Regular
6210 - General Materials
6245 - Personal Protection Equip.
8010 - Salary - Regular
8058 - Office Equip Repairs & Mtce

11,550

11,550

11,550

11,550

11,550

11,550

11,550

11,550

4,372

8059 - Other Equipment

11,100

11,100

11,100

11,100

11,100

11,100

11,100

11,100

4,201

8076 - Software Support

44,667

44,667

44,667

44,667

44,667

44,667

44,667

44,667

16,906

8120 - Office supplies

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

1,136

8195 - Travelling

2,600

2,600

2,600

2,600

2,600

2,600

2,600

2,600

984

8200 - Hotel and Lodging

5,310

5,310

5,310

5,310

5,310

5,310

5,310

5,310

2,010

8205 - Aifare

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

2,271

8210 - Meals and Entertainment

4,500

4,500

4,500

4,500

4,500

4,500

4,500

4,500

1,703

8212 - Misc, Travel Visit Corporate

9,500

9,500

9,500

9,500

9,500

9,500

9,500

9,500

3,596

35,500

35,500

35,500

35,500

35,500

35,500

35,500

35,500

13,437

8220 - Consulting
8275 - Freigth / Transportation

1,750

1,750

1,750

1,750

1,750

1,750

1,750

1,750

662

8301 - Fuel / Gasolina

6,900

6,900

6,900

6,900

6,900

6,900

6,900

6,900

2,612

8304 - Car Maintenance


8510 - Employees Training
8512 - Training / Material
8610 - Software
8615 - Computers Supplies
Total 37930 - Technical Services

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

9,600

3,634

26,863

26,863

26,863

26,863

26,863

26,863

26,863

26,863

10,168

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

600

227

5,000

5,000

5,000

5,000

5,000

5,000

5,000

5,000

1,893

7,030

7,030

7,030

7,030

7,030

7,030

7,030

7,030

2,661

877,427

877,427

877,427

877,427

877,427

877,427

877,427

877,427

332,106

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


301

General and Administration

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2023

37950 - IT
6010 - Labor - Regular

6210 - General Materials

6218 - Mobile Radios & Parts

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

2,271

6245 - Uniform and Pers. equipment

1,200

1,200

1,200

1,200

1,200

1,200

1,200

1,200

454

83,661

83,661

83,661

83,661

83,661

83,661

83,661

83,661

31,666

8010 - Salary - Regular


8054 - Equipment Rentals
8056 - Communications Expense
8058 - Office Equip Repairs & Mtce

175,980

175,980

175,980

175,980

175,980

175,980

175,980

175,980

66,608

29,500

29,500

29,500

29,500

29,500

29,500

29,500

29,500

11,166

8079 - Consumables

7,200

7,200

7,200

7,200

7,200

7,200

7,200

7,200

2,725

8081 - Faxes/ photocopiers/ printers

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

2,271

8082 - Network Costs

27,000

27,000

27,000

27,000

27,000

27,000

27,000

27,000

10,220

8120 - Office Supplies

1,000

1,000

1,000

1,000

1,000

1,000

1,000

1,000

379

8140 - Miscellaneous Expenses

4,800

4,800

4,800

4,800

4,800

4,800

4,800

4,800

1,817

8195 - Travelling

11,000

11,000

11,000

11,000

11,000

11,000

11,000

11,000

4,164

8220 - Consulting

14,860

14,860

14,860

14,860

14,860

14,860

14,860

14,860

5,625

1,260

1,260

1,260

1,260

1,260

1,260

1,260

1,260

477

3,738

3,738

3,738

3,738

3,738

3,738

3,738

3,738

1,415

23,100

23,100

23,100

23,100

23,100

23,100

23,100

23,100

8,743

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

568

58,606

58,606

58,606

58,606

58,606

58,606

58,606

58,606

22,182

8234 - Service Charges


8304 - Car Repair & Mtce
8460 - Personnal Protection Equip.
8510 - Employees Training
8605 - Computers
8615 - Computers Supplies
8620 - Service Contract
8607 - Server Hardware Costs
8610 - Software Purchases
Total 37950 - IT

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

6,000

2,271

44,889

44,889

44,889

44,889

44,889

44,889

44,889

44,889

16,991

507,293

507,293

507,293

507,293

507,293

507,293

507,293

507,293

192,010

37960 - E nv iro nme nt


6010 - Labor

73,455

73,455

73,455

73,455

73,455

73,455

73,455

73,455

27,803

6110 - Labor contractor

22,054

22,054

22,054

22,054

22,054

22,054

22,054

22,054

8,347

2,995

2,995

2,995

2,995

2,995

2,995

2,995

2,995

1,133

51,588

51,588

51,588

51,588

51,588

51,588

51,588

51,588

19,526

6245 - Uniforms and safety equipment


8010 - Salary
8056 - Commnication expenses
8120 - office supplies

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

284

2,765

2,765

2,765

2,765

2,765

2,765

2,765

2,765

1,047

8175 - Misc expenses

16,243

16,243

16,243

16,243

16,243

16,243

16,243

16,243

6,148

8195 - Travelling

24,787

24,787

24,787

24,787

24,787

24,787

24,787

24,787

9,382

8220 - Consulting

43,649

115,320

115,320

115,320

115,320

115,320

115,320

115,320

115,320

8240 - Legal

1,787

1,787

1,787

1,787

1,787

1,787

1,787

1,787

676

8301 - Combustible

9,420

9,420

9,420

9,420

9,420

9,420

9,420

9,420

3,565

8304 - Car repair and maintenance

6,612

6,612

6,612

6,612

6,612

6,612

6,612

6,612

2,503

8510 - Training

4,472

4,472

4,472

4,472

4,472

4,472

4,472

4,472

1,693

884

884

884

884

884

884

884

884

334

2,300

2,300

2,300

2,300

2,300

2,300

2,300

2,300

871

14,255

14,255

14,255

14,255

14,255

14,255

14,255

14,255

5,396

1,201

1,201

1,201

1,201

1,201

1,201

1,201

1,201

455

23,968

23,968

23,968

23,968

23,968

23,968

23,968

23,968

9,072

8610 - Software
8616 - Computer suppliers
xxxx - Heavy equipment maintenance
8705 - Permits
8720 - Revegetation
8735 - Environmental audits

8750 - Hazardous Waste management

8748 - Sign posting


8954 - Equipment rental

792

792

792

792

792

792

792

792

300

17,903

17,903

17,903

17,903

17,903

17,903

17,903

17,903

6,776

Transfers ARO

(45,031)

(45,031)

(45,031)

(45,031)

(45,031)

(45,031)

(45,031)

(45,031)

(17,044)

Total 37960 - Environment

348,519

348,519

348,519

348,519

348,519

348,519

348,519

348,519

131,915

7,996,910

7,997,410

7,996,910

7,996,910

7,996,910

7,996,910

7,996,910

7,996,910

3,027,331

T otal Administration

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012


302

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen