400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001 U.S.A.
Tel: (724) 776-4841 Fax: (724) 776-5760
SAE TECHNICAL PAPER SERIES 1999-01-0191 Common Rail System (CR-System) for Passenger Car DI Diesel Engines; Experiences with Applications for Series Production Projects Ulrich Flaig, Wilhelm Polach and Gerhard Ziegler Robert Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart Reprinted From: Technology for Diesel Fuel Injection and Sprays (SP-1415) International Congress and Exposition Detroit, Michigan March 1-4, 1999 The appearance of this ISSN code at the bottom of this page indicates SAEs consent that copies of the paper may be made for personal or internal use of specific clients. This consent is given on the condition, however, that the copier pay a $7.00 per article copy fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Operations Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 for copying beyond that permitted by Sec- tions 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying such as copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works, or for resale. SAE routinely stocks printed papers for a period of three years following date of publication. Direct your orders to SAE Customer Sales and Satisfaction Department. Quantity reprint rates can be obtained from the Customer Sales and Satisfaction Department. To request permission to reprint a technical paper or permission to use copyrighted SAE publications in other works, contact the SAE Publications Group. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. ISSN 0148-7191 Copyright 1999 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. Positions and opinions advanced in this paper are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of SAE. The author is solely responsible for the content of the paper. A process is available by which discussions will be printed with the paper if it is published in SAE Transactions. For permission to publish this paper in full or in part, contact the SAE Publications Group. Persons wishing to submit papers to be considered for presentation or publication through SAE should send the manuscript or a 300 word abstract of a proposed manuscript to: Secretary, Engineering Meetings Board, SAE. Printed in USA All SAE papers, standards, and selected books are abstracted and indexed in the Global Mobility Database 1 1999-01-0191 Common Rail System (CR-System) for Passenger Car DI Diesel Engines; Experiences with Applications for Series Production Projects Ulrich Flaig, Wilhelm Polach and Gerhard Ziegler Robert Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart Copyright 1999 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. ABSTRACT Bosch introduced the Common Rail Injection System for passenger car DI-Diesel engines in June 1997 for series production. Bosch is currently working on a fairly high number of follow-up projects with customers around the world. The major differences of Common Rail System com- pared to standard Diesel injection equipment are the free choice of the injection pressure and timing as well as the benefit of the now available pilot injection at almost all operating points. The objective of the CR-System is to reduce the com- bustion noise significantly, and to improve the torque curve, especially in the lower engine speed range. Simul- taneously, the emissions must be kept in the first step within the limits posted by the European legislation for the year 2000. This paper presents combustion related application expe- rience as well as the advantages to the customer in terms of torque, power, fuel economy and noise. The effects of EGR on the timing and quantity of the pilot injection with respect to combustion noise and smoke is presented. Also included are the Common Rail System- specific demands on the nozzle as a crucial component of the system. It is believed that the emission results achieved and the possibility of meeting even stricter emission standards shows the potential of the Common Rail System. SUMMARY/INTRODUCTION In answer to the demand of continuously lowered exhaust emission standards, careful use of ever-diminishing resources and the wish to improve driveability and noise of vehicles with Diesel engines, Bosch is offering a range of new solenoid-valve-controlled High Pressure Injection Systems. One of these new injection systems is the Common Rail System. The CR-System is one in which the high injection pres- sure is available at all times and not only during the injec- tion periods. The pressure level itself can be freely selected through- out the complete engine operation range. Another advantage is the benefit of the pilot injection which has a significant effect on reducing noise of direct- injection Diesel engines. 2 Figure 1. System layout DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEM The Common Rail injection system is modular. A mechanically or electrically driven feed pump delivers the fuel through a fuel filter to the High Pressure Pump . HIGH PRESSURE PUMP The engine driven High Pressure Pump operates as a 3-plunger radial-piston pump. The current maximum system pressure of 1350 bar, and the operating pressure is controlled by the pres- sure regulator valve. RAIL AND PIPES High pressure pipes connect the High Pressure Pump with the accumulator, called the rail. Attached to the rail are the Rail Pressure Sensor for the acquisition of the rail pressure and the Pressure Limiter Valve which protects the components from excessive pressure. INJECTOR The interior design of the injector (Figure 2), is nearly identical for different applications. However, the nozzle, direction of spray, number and diameter of spray holes and the injector body must be specifically adapted to suit to the design of the cylinder head of the engine used. Figure 2. Injector 3 Figure 3. Block Diagram of the High Pressure Control The opening and closing of the nozzle is hydraulically controlled by the modulation of the pressure in the injec- tion control chamber, and this process is directed by a very fast solenoid valve. Even during pilot injections, the solenoid valve is fully opened. This is necessary to minimize the influence of production tolerances on the injected quantity. With this layout only the nozzle needle is operated ballistically. The reproducibility or stroke-to-stroke spread of the injected fuel quantity depends largely on the friction of moving parts. Therefore the nozzle needles have been coated with carbon in the area of the guides. Further- more, the seat geometry of the Common Rail nozzle ensures that the small fuel quantities for the pilot injection remain constant throughout engine lifetime. ECU The ECU is based on a platform concept both for the mechanical and electronic parts. ECUs for Common Rail Systems are characterized by the sophisticated power stages which operate the sole- noid valves of the injectors and the rail pressure closed- loop control. SENSORS All sensors and actuators of a Common Rail System with the exception of the Rail Pressure Sen- sor are taken from the existing Diesel injection systems. The fuel pressure is measured by the Rail Pressure Sen- sor and in this first generation adjusted by the Pressure Regulator Valve to the correct stationary or dynamic setpoint in accordance with the engine operating condi- tions such as engine speed, load and temperature. Figure 3 shows a Block Diagram of the High Pressure Control function. We distinguish between three tasks within the High Pres- sure Control function: - Rail pressure setpoint - Rail pressure control and - Rail pressure monitoring The engine speed, the injected fuel quantity, the air pres- sure, the intake air temperature and the coolant tempera- ture all have an influence on rail pressure setpoint. This setpoint acts as an input for the Rail Pressure Control. In addition, the current rail pressure, engine start, moni- tored by the Rail Pressure Sensor and the coolant tem- perature are conveyed directly to the Rail Pressure Control. 4 The Rail Pressure Monitoring compares the current rail pressure and the setpoint of the Rail Pressure Control. Furthermore, the engine speed, the engine start, coolant temperature and rail pressure values are also conveyed directly to the Rail Pressure Monitoring. APPLICATION The design of the Common Rail injection system leads to advantages for its use in Diesel passenger cars. Some striking points are illustrated in this section. THE APPLICATION PROCESS The geometry of the combustion chamber, the swirl, the amount of fuel quan- tity at rated speed and the injection pressure are the input parameters which define the nozzle. During application the next step is to measure the engine characteristics by extensive variation of the parameters (start of pilot and main injection, pilot and main injection quantity, position of pilot injection relative to the main injection, rail pressure, EGR-rate). In the current production ECU of the Common Rail Sys- tem, there are about 4000 variables representing either a constant, a set of constants or two or three-dimensional maps. About half of the variables are used for engine functions. The others are used for system monitoring including European On Board Diagnostics (EOBD). The optimization process is usually time consuming because of the large number of interdependent parame- ters. An example is the tradeoff between emissions (NO x and particulate matter) and noise, which are all influenced by rail pressure and pilot injection. LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM WITH FILTERING The low pressure system (Figure 4) connects the High Pressure Injection components to the fuel tank and ensures that the system is supplied with fuel of required quality, quan- tity, and at the correct pressure and temperature. The configuration of the low pressure system varies depend- ing upon the type of vehicle. For fuel quality, the fuel filter and water separator are utilized as is the feed pump for correct quantity and pressure. The quantity and pressure are determined to ensure ample delivery to the High Pressure Pump as well as for cooling and lubricating of the pump. The feed pump may be driven mechanically with integrated pressure limitation. The fuel recirculates from the high pressure components to the tank through a backflow pipe, which may terminate in a fuel jet pump if necessary. The return flow quantity is defined by the amount required to cool and lubricate the High Pressure Pump, the overflow amount spilled off by the pressure control valve and the leakage and control quantities of the injectors. The heat produced when the fuel, which is under high pressure, is spilled off, can be removed by a fuel cooler if necessary. With the help of a fuel recircula- tion valve, the backflow fuel can heat the filter when ambient temperatures are low. A filter heater or coolant heat exchanger may also be provided for this purpose. Figure 4. First generation Common Rail with Fuel Cooler and Temperature Sensor 5 DRIVE TORQUE OF HIGH PRESSURE PUMP The drive torque of all cam driven High Pressure Injection systems needs careful design and testing for durability because of the high peak to peak values. The Common Rail System, in which the pressure does not have to be built up within the injection period , enables a much tamer cam design. The effects of this can be seen in lower drive-torque peaks. With a maximum drive torque of approximately 15 Nm, the Common Rail System requires little load for the High Pressure Pump drive. The drive torque does not jump from positive to negative val- ues, thereby, eliminating backlash in gears. The advan- tages are reduced wear and less mechanical noise. DESIGN OF A CR SYSTEM BY SIMULATION The fol- lowing main parameters of a Common Rail System must be fixed: - Injector: nozzle flow rate - Pump: delivery volume, gear ratio pump/engine - Rail: volume - Pipes: length The first step is to define the nozzle flow rate. The small- est nozzle flow which guarantees the injection quantity and injection duration for the maximum rail pressure of 1350 bar can be designed with the aid of hydraulic simu- lation tools for Common Rail Systems. Figure 5. Required Rail Volume versus the injected Fuel Quality With knowledge of the full load injection quantities and rail pressure as a function of speed, the necessary size of the High Pressure Pump can be calculated depending on the defined gear ratio. Higher gear ratio results in a better efficiency and smaller size of the High Pressure Pump. Figure 6. Simulation Common Rail 6 Depending on the maximum injection quantity, the mini- mal rail volume can be determined. With the help of hydraulic simulation to model the pressure waves in the system, the dimensions of the pipes and the rail can be optimized (Figure 6). Figure 7. Injection pressure map Both figures show the hydraulic behaviour (pressure, flow rates) of CR-Systems with High Pressure Pump (gear ratio 2/3, pressure regulator valve (DRV) mounted at the rail, 4 Common Rail Injectors (CRI)) over one cam revolu- tion at rated speed with main and pilot injection. Rail pressure oscillations resulting from the injections are smaller than 50 bar. Rail volume of 30 cm 3 is sufficient to provide the desired injection quantity. Pump pressure oszillations with higher frequency result- ing from the pump-to-rail pipe reach maximum 1400 bar. The maximum pressure at the injector inlet resulting from the rail-to-CRI pipe remains below 1450 bar. With the selected layout (length and diameter) of both pipes the pressure remains below the durability border of the components. RAIL PRESSURE Having fixed the nozzle data the application comes to determine the setpoints of the rail pressure for all operating conditions. The competing cri- teria are: - Emissions and torque depending on soot number - Fuel consumption - Noise Figure 7 shows rail pressures for a 1.9 liter Diesel engine with a Bosch High Pressure Distributor Pump as well as with a Bosch Common Rail System. It can be seen that, for the most part, due to low emis- sions higher pressures must be selected for the part load range in the Common Rail System. This is necessary to achieve higher torque values in the low speed range. This enables particulate emissions to be lowered by better penetration and atomization of the fuel in the combustion chamber. Consequently, this permits higher exhaust-gas recirculation rates in order to reduce NO x emissions. 7 Figure 8. Start times Comparison Common Rail, VP44 and VP37 Rail pressure determines startup behavior (see Figure 8). Below 0 C, the startup behavior of a CR system is better than that of a conventional Diesel injection system. Above 0 C, the startup time of the engine with a Com- mon Rail System is about 0.8 seconds, approximately the same time as that of engines with conventional distributor pumps. At these temperatures, startup behavior depends on rail pressure buildup. The smaller the rail volume, the faster the rail pressure builds up at a given pump capac- ity, and, therefore, the startup time is shorter. At low temperatures (T < -20 C), the startup times are shorter than those with conventional distributor pumps. In a specific application, the engine achieves a speed of 800 rpm in approximately 3s at 30 C. The possibility of setting the start of injection to its optimum point for star- tup and running up is an advantage of the Common Rail System. HIGH PRESSURE PUMP The Bosch High Pressure Pump of the first generation is a 3-plunger radial piston pump with an inner cam drive and an integrated High Pressure Control valve. The High Pressure Pump has a continuous delivery be- havior resulting from the three overlapping pump strokes. Rail pressure ripples can be minimized in combination with a High Pressure Control valve. The delivery value of the pump can be varied by different cam lifts. The High Pressure Pump concept fits all applications up to 8 cylinders and requires no synchronization of pump to engine because of its continuous delivery behavior. PILOT INJECTION Pilot injection may occur up to 90 crank angle before top dead center. For a start of injec- tion in advance of 40 crank angle before TDC, fuel may reach the surface of the pistons and cylinder wall and excessively dilute the lubricant. The pressure traces of combustion with and without pilot injection as well as nozzle needle lift are depicted in Figure 9. Figure 9. Influence of pilot Injection on cylinder pressure During pilot injection, a small fuel quantity (1...3 mm 3 ) is injected into the cylinder, which preconditions the com- bustion chamber, thereby improving the efficiency of the combustion. The following results are achieved: - Combustion pressure is increased by means of a pre reaction or partial combustion, whereby - the ignition delay of the main injection is shortened, and - the rise and peaks in cylinder pressure are dimin- ished (softer combustion). 8 These effects reduce combustion noise, fuel consump- tion and, occasionally, emissions. Without pilot injection, pressure rises very steeply at the start of combustion and features a sharp peak in maximum pressure. The steep pressure increase and sharp peak contribute considerably to the combustion noise of a Diesel engine. Pilot injection only contributes indirectly - by shortening the ignition delay - to the torque buildup of the engine. From an emissions standpoint, a later start of injection is desired although this increases fuel consumption through later combustion. With pilot injection combustion occurs earlier because of shorter ignition delay thereby reducing the fuel consumption (Figure 10: Start of injection (SOI) between 0 CA to 10CA BTDC). If the pilot injection occurs too early, then this can produce a negative torque which increase fuel consumption. (Figure 10: SOI before 20CA) The calculation of setpoints for timing and fuel quantity of the pilot injection with regard to main injection is a com- plex function comprising many input variables, such as start of injection and fuel quantity of the main injection, exhaust-gas recirculation rate, engine speed, engine temperature, etc. Figure 10. Specific fuel consumption As can be seen from Figure 11 the noise improvement is in the range of 2 to 3 dB(A). But a tradeoff with particulate and HC emission has to be regarded carefully when selecting the position of the pilot injection. Diesel engines with High Pressure Injection systems can misfire sometimes directly after start, because of poor combustion conditions. The pilot injection can eliminate the risk of misfire by reducing the ignition delay of the main combustion. This results in a dramatic decrease in white smoke emissions (70-80%). The engine warms up without vibration and with lower emissions. Figure 11. Noise emission 9 Figure 12. Effects of start of injection, Exhaust-gas Recirculation and rail pressure on Soot-NO x curves EXHAUST-GAS RECIRCULATION (EGR) With the EGR, part of the exhaust gas is directed back into the intake manifold. This lowers the oxygen content, the com- bustion speed, the peak temperature at the flame front and consequently the NO x emissions. The effects of EGR can be further enhanced by cooling the recirculated exhaust gas with engine coolant. If, however, the quantity of recirculated exhaust gas is too high (proportion over 40 %), soot, CO and HC emissions and fuel consumption increase due to the lack of oxygen. With the SOI, EGR and rail pressure as application parameters of the system, the soot-NO x tradeoff can be manipulated in a wide range (see Figure 12) for a typical operating point. At a constant rail pressure the NO x emis- sion can be reduced with an earlier SOI keeping constant soot values constant. Keeping the SOI late (limited by a significant increase of fuel consumption) , and then increasing EGR quantities can further decrease NO x with a tradeoff of more soot. Finally through an increase of rail pressure the NO x and soot values can be reduced and, thereby, keep the relationship of both emissions constant (corresponds to the EURO III limits) (see Figure 12). BENEFITS TO THE ENGINE MANUFACTURER The use of Common Rail results in the following system advantages for the engine designer/manu-facturer: The system is suitable for applications of engines from three to eight cylinders. However, for eight cylinder engines a master slave concept for the ECU is used. The master slave concept is used because of the greater CPU-Power needed for the eight cylinder engine. Each of the two ECU's operates four of the eight injectors. The two ECU's communicate using a fast CAN-Bus (Control- ler Area Network). Up to now the Bosch Common Rail System is used on engines with a displacement range from 0.27 to 0.62 l per cylinder (passenger car applications), in naturally-aspi- rated and supercharged engines. Conventional pump-line-nozzle-systems always need hydraulic adaptation (cams, relief valve or orifice check valve, length and diameter of pipes, nozzle opening pres- sure, etc.). With the Common Rail System, these prob- lems are virtually reduced. A further advantage of the CR-System is that the pump must not be timed with the engine camshaft. Conse- quently, the engine designer has more freedom with the choice of the drive system. The Common Rail System provides a unique potential for multiple injections. Its necessity and benefit must be demonstrated by further development. Common Rail Systems offer high injection pressures at low engine speeds resulting in improved engine torque as well as reduced noise levels. 10 OUTLOOK Experience in serial production with the first generation of Common Rail Systems provides a solid foundation for further development. The next generation is already under development. The maximum injection pressure - currently 1350 bar - will be raised to 1600 bar. In the sec- ond generation Bosch runs for a reduction in the level of fuel temperature and to improve the efficiency of the High Pressure Pump. A new High Pressure Pump - concept with fuel delivery control is generally employed. Improved actuators, i.e. solenoid valve and related components, ensure even more precise injections which result in par- ticular, in smaller fuel quantity tolerances. Besides further optimizing solenoid valve technology, Bosch has been actively developing piezoelectric actua- tors for numerous years. Extremely short switching times of < 100 s can be achieved. Consequently, pilot injected fuel quantities below 1 mm3/stroke can be attained. The serial introduction of a system with piezoelectric actuator is planned for 2002. In the year 2000, all passenger car Diesel engines in Europe must comply with the EURO III emission stan- dard. Almost all Diesel passenger cars in series produc- tion with the Bosch Common Rail System already satisfy this requirement. The much more stringent Euro IV emis- sion standard, which will probably come into effect in the year 2005, necessitates further improvements to the engine, injection system and fuel. The fuel injection equipment is an important element in the attainment of this goal. REFERENCES 1. Gerhard Strump, Mario Ricco, Common Rail An Attrac- tive Fuel Injection System for Passenger Car DI Diesel Engines, SAE 960870. 2. K. Krieger, K. Hummel, Fortschritt Berichte VDI, Bosch - Common Rail: Neue Erkenntnisse und weitere Heraus- forderungen, 19. Internationales Wiener Motorensympo- sium Wien, 7.-8.5.1998. 3. Ralf Isenburg, Micha Mnzenmay, Diesel Speicherein- spritzsystem Common Rail, BOSCH Techn. Information 1997. 4. Peter L. Herzog, Common Rail Einspritztechnik Gegen- wart und Zukunftspotential, ETH Zrich, 1997. 5. Dr. A. Peters, W.Ptz, Der neue Vierzylinder-Dieselmotor OM611 mit, Common Rail Einspritzung, MTZ 58 (1997), 12. 6. Hoffmann, Hummel, Maderstein, Peters, Das Common Rail Einspritzsystem ein neues Kapitel der Dieseleinspritztec- hnik, MTZ 58 (1997), 10. 7. Dr. R. Imarsio, Dr. R. Rinolfi, Die Potentiale direktein- spritzender Dieselmotoren der 3. Generation fr Personen- kraftwagen. Motor und Umwelt, AVL-Tagung 1997.