Verdict of Abdul Quader Molla, A Travesty of Justice in Bangladesh - Radiance Viewsweekly

02/11/2014 Verdict of Abdul Quader Molla, A Travesty of Justice in Bangladesh | Radiance Viewsweekly
http://radianceweekly.in/portal/issue/radiance-is-50-now-scholars-recognise-its-contributions/article/verdict-of-abdul-quader-molla-a-travesty-of-justice-in-bangladesh/ 1/9
COVER-STORY EDITORIAL GUIDANCE-I GUIDANCE-II INSIDE INDIA MUSLIM WORLD BOOK REVIEW HEALTHCARE AUTHORS
ARCHIVES SIGNS OF ALLAH
Search Radiance Viewsweekly ABOUT US SUBSCRIBE NOW GIFT A SUBSCRIPTION ADVERTISEMENT TARRIF CONTACT
01-11-2014 | 11:42pm IST

Abdul Quader Molla
You are here: Home / Vol. LI No.27 / Verdict of Abdul Quader Molla, A Travesty of Justice in Bangladesh
Verdict of Abdul Quader Molla, A Travesty of Justice in
Bangladesh
6 Oct 2013 0 comments
By MOHAMMAD HOSSAIN
It was an unheard of feat in the history of judiciary in Bangladesh that a prisoner was
sentenced to death in an appeal to the highest court and then stripped of his right to appeal
the very same sentence. Defying logic and all manner of common sense, the Supreme Court
on 18 September sentenced Abdul Quader Molla, a senior member of the biggest Islamic party
in the country, the Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami, to death for allegedly committing crimes
against humanity during the nations 1971 independence war against Pakistan.
It is worth mentioning here that the veteran politician was earlier sentenced to life
imprisonment for crimes against humanity by the Bangladeshi International Crimes Tribunal
(ICT) on 5 February 2013. Following due course of law, both the defence and prosecution
challenged the sentence to the Supreme Court. The appellate division dismissed the appeal
made by Mollas lawyers against his conviction on five counts of crimes against humanity while
positively focusing the prosecution appeal for a death penalty. The appellate division, in an
unusual move, ramped up his punishment and changed it from life imprisonment to a death
penalty.
The reactions to the appeal verdict have been mixed, but they showcase a widening rift in the
country between supporters of the incumbent Awami League government led by Prime
Minister Sheikh Hasina and those of the opposition led by ex-Prime Minister Khaleda Zia. This
Share |
B'DESH SCENARIO
comes at a time when both camps gear up for facing each other over the issue of national
elections which the present government says will be held by the beginning of next year.
It is worth mentioning that the issue of elections has been a subject of controversy since the present government abolished the caretaker system
through a comfortable majority in the Parliament back in June 2011. Since then, the opposition has regularly taken to the streets in a bid to put
forward their demands for the reinstatement of the caretaker system, arguing against the neutrality of any polls that may be held under a
partisan government. Many in the opposition see the war crimes trials as being a tool used to divert the public attention from the above issue.
Coupled with the glaring flaws on the trial of Abdul Quader Molla and the other accused at the ICT trials, and the fact that the almost all
defendants are members of the opposition parties Jamaat and BNP, the conviction that the trials are politically motivated is only bound to get
stronger.

BACKDROP OF CONTROVERSIES
Controversy at the International Crimes Tribunal, a domestic court set up to try the war criminals of 1971 started as early back in mid-December
last year, when the disgraced Chairman of the tribunal resigned in lieu of his connection with the Skypegate scandal that was exposed by the
Economist in detail in The trial of a Birth of a Nation. The defence was prevented from calling more than 6 witnesses and the case was promptly
rushed towards judgment in February this year.
The verdict of life imprisonment for Abdul Quader Molla resulted in an uproar of public sentiment, a result of a barrage of the emotional hype
that had been fuelled by the government and media since the incumbent government had come to power. Emotion prevailed over reason, as
thousands came out onto the streets of Dhaka, particularly at Shahbag, enraged at what they perceived to be a compromise on rightful justice,
oblivious to the merit or lack thereof of a trial that was more than 40 years behind schedule.
The law as it stood at the time of conviction did not permit any prosecution appeal for a higher sentence. In an unprecedented move, the ruling
party made the move to amend the associated law to allow the prosecution to appeal. The amendment was passed following Prime Minister
Sheikh Hasinas remarkable statement in parliament, as a result of mass demonstrations on the streets of Dhaka that the tribunal judges should
listen to the sentiment of the people.

THE FINAL JUDGEMENT
As experts noted, the appellate division focused on building on previous convictions, as the court upheld unanimously that his acquittal on
charge no. 4 should be reversed and should stand as a conviction, and most significantly that, by a majority, the sentence on charge no. 6 (the
murder of a family), should be changed from life imprisonment to a death penalty.
The case as it stood before the appellate division was an extremely weak one. Three of the five charges against Mr. Molla relied totally on
hearsay evidence. The charge for which Mr. Molla was sentenced by the appellate division to hang was based on the testimony of a single
witness, who was a 13-year-old at the time, and against whose testimony there was no corroborating evidence whatsoever. At the end of the day,
it stood out that those who had labelled Abdul Quader Molla the Butcher of Mirpur all these years simply had a lone hearsay account to prove it.

FINAL NAIL IN COFFIN OF JUSTICE
Abbas Faiz, Amnesty Internationals Bangladesh Researcher was expressing his concern when he said, This is the first known case of a prisoner
sentenced to death directly by the highest court in Bangladesh. It is also the first known death sentence in Bangladesh with no right of appeal.
The concerns of Amnesty are genuine. The imposition of the death sentence without the possibility of appeal is incompatible with Bangladeshs
obligations under international human rights law. Not only does such a sentence defy human rights laws, but it also needs to be taken into
cognizance that one human rights violation does not cancel out another.
The grounds for conviction of such nature were weak from the very moment clear evidence emerged of the government meddling in the matters
of the tribunal back in 2012. In retrospect, few can turn back and say they witnessed a fair trial. Few can say that they witnessed something more
than a show of political vendetta.
[Mohammad Hossain is a Bangladesh based blogger and commentator on social and political affairs of Bangladesh.]
Leave A Reply
Name
E-mail
comment
Submit
Also See
TOWARDS REALISING SIR
SYEDS DREAM
CRICKET HOW CROOKED? ILM AND AALIM ISLAMIC FINANCE A
SUCCESS STORY FROM
MEW...
You Are Reading
Vol. LI No.27, 06 Oct 2013
More in the issue
Go To Current Issue
Radiance is 50 Now,
Scholars Recognise
Its Contributions
0
What Ails National
0
What Ails National
Integration
Council?
Spectrum of
Humanity
0
PLAYING THE REPO
CARD Growth or
Inflation control
0
M for Muzaffarnagar 1
The Ashes 2013 0
Shun Doubtful Things 0
The Ultimate Success 0
ASEEMANAD, OTHERS FOUND
GUILTY UNDER DIFFERENT
SECTIONS OF IPC
0
JIH FLAYS SHIELDING OF TAINTED 0
POLITICIANS, HAILS SC RULING
ANCESTORS SLAUGHTERED COW ON
EVERY FESTIVE OCCASION:
ANANTHAMURTHY
0
HIBA AN ACCURATE WAY TO
TRANSFER PROPERTIES
0
WHY NOT DELIMITATION
COMMITTEE: ASK MUSLIM LEADERS
0
WILL EXTEND SUPPORT TO GROUPS
WORKING FOR MINORITY STATUS;
AMU-VC
0
HM WRITES TO CMS OVER ILLEGAL
ARRESTS
0
MAHARASHTRA TO SHAME
UNCARING CHILDREN
0
SUDANESE PREZ DENIED US VISA;
KHARTOUM SUMMONED US
CHARGE DAFFAIRES
0
SHOE THROWN AS ROUHANI
RETURNS AFTER OBAMA CALL
0
EGYPTS CENTRAL BANK CONFIRMS
ECONOMIC ACHIEVEMENTS UNDER
MORSI
0
EU CALLS ON EGYPT TO CLARIFY
COURT ORDER BANNING IKHWAN
0
GERMANY CALLS ON EGYPT TO
REINTEGRATE BROTHERHOOD
0
RELIGIOUS PARTY BAN SHOWS 0
PANELS SECULARIST FACE
SALAFIST LEADERS BLAST CALLS
FOR NEW EGYPT CONSTITUTION
0
ETHICA LAUNCHES ISLAMIC
FINANCE CERTIFICATION IN OMAN
0
Iqbals Message to
Muslim Youth
0
Shindes letter reflective of
Congress dirty tricks
0
Involve great minds for Muslim
cause
0
Unforgettable lesson for Islamic
movements
0
Blessings 0
JIH to Adopt 1000
Mazaffarnagar Riot-
hit Families
0
Lets Say No to
Dowry
0
Most Popular Latest Comments
COVER STORY EDITORIAL GUIDANCE-I GUIDANCE-II INSIDE INDIA MUSLIM WORLD
Regional
Implications of US-
Iranian
Rapprochement
0
New York Times
Fiction On Obamas
Letter to Rouhani
0
Personal Laws are Identity of
Muslims: SQR Ilyas
3
Anti-Communal Forum Need of the
Hour
2
Rogue Elements Dangerous for
Unity and Prosperity: Advocate
Paracha
1
Expanding Shadows of Hate
1
Dont Let Leaders Spoil Independent
Identity of SC: Fali Nariman
1
2014 Radiance Viewsweekly Powered by: imagine360

Verdict of Abdul Quader Molla, A Travesty of Justice in Bangladesh - Radiance Viewsweekly

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Verdict of Abdul Quader Molla, A Travesty of Justice in Bangladesh - Radiance Viewsweekly

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

02/11/2014 Verdict of Abdul Quader Molla, A Travesty of Justice in Bangladesh | Radiance Viewsweekly

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen