1

CSA-S16-09
Modifications to Clause 27
(& modifications to NBCC 2010) (& modifications to NBCC 2010)
Robert Tremblay
cole Polytechnique, Montral
CIV6510
Gnie parasismique
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique, Montral
Gnie parasismique
Hiver 2012
S16-09 Article 27
27.1 General Requirements
27.2 - 4 Moment-Resisting Frames g
27.5 - 6 Concentrically Braced Frames
27.7 Eccentrically Braced Frames
27.8 Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames
27 9 - 10 Plate Walls (Type D & Type LD) 27.9 - 10 Plate Walls (Type D & Type LD)
27.11 Conventional Construction
27.12 Special Seismic Constructions
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 2
2
27.1 General Requirements
Scope of Clause 27
U li it i i f Upper limit on seismic forces
Gravity load carrying systems
R
y
F
y
for HSS members (bracing members)
Stability effects Stability effects
Protected zones
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 3
Scope of Clause 27
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 4
3
Upper limit on seismic forces
S16-01
Harmonisation entre CSA-S16 et CNBC :
S16-01
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 5
CNBC 2005
CNBC 2010
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 6
4
Design shear forces for splices
in gravity columns
Rotation dans
les assemblages
Flexion dans les poteaux
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 7
S16-01
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 8
5
R
y
F
y
for HSS members
Liu, J ., Sabelli, R., Brockenbrough, R.L., Fraser, T.
200 E d i ld d il h i 2007. Expected yield stress and tensile strength ratios
for determination of expected member capacity in 2005
AISC seismic provisions. AISC Eng. J ., 1
st
Quarter, pp.
15-25.
Schimdt, B.J . and Bratleet,F.M. 2002. Review of
resistance factor for steel: data collection. Can. J .
Civ. Eng. , 29, pp. 98-108.
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 9
AISC 2005 :
S16-09
1.4 x 345
= 480 MPa
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 10
6
S16-09
Axial loads imposed by bracing members
Net section failure for bracing members
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 11
Stability effects
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 12
7
x x
F H
V
V
U V
V'
y
y 2
y
Notional Loads + P-delta effects (U
2
) for:
2
x U
A
A
EC /h
y
f
max
1
1.3 R V / |
y r
No notional loads
& P d lt ff t (U ) f
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 13
1.3 R V / |
1.3 R V / |
y
y
r
r
& no P-delta effects (U
2
) for:
Protected zones
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 14
8
S16-09
MRFs
CBFs
EBFs

R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 15

S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 16
9
Protected zones
27.2-4 MRFs
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 17
Minimum KL/r value for HSS bracing
members
27.5 & 6 CBFs
Axial loads imposed by bracing members
(clarifications & simplifications)
Bracing members meeting columns
between floors
Protected zones
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 18
10
.

f
-0 4
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
P

/

A
g
F
y

f
Minimum KL/r for HSS bracing members
15
20
25
F
r
a
c
t
u
r
e
,

f
y
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
o / o
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10
o / o
KL/r = 93
HSS 127x76x4.8
KL/r = 142
HSS 76x76x4.8
y y
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
o / o
-1.2
-0.8
-0.4 P
KL/r = 42
HSS 254x254x12
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Brace Slenderness, = (Fy / Fe)
0.5
0
5
10
D
u
c
t
i
l
i
t
y

a
t

F

f
= 2.4 + 8.3
Northridge 1994
P. Maranian, Brandow & Assoc.
Tremblay (2002)
cole Polytechnique 2008
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 19
S16-09
L
L
N
L
H
KL
out
0.9 L
H
KL
in
0.5 L
N
KL
out
0.5 L
H
KL
in
0.5 L
N
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 20
11
Axial loads imposed by bracing members
C
P
f
P
f
C
P
f
P
f
T
u
C
u
T
u
C
u
1.0
T
u
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
o / o
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
P

/

A
g
F
y
y
HSS 127x76x4.78
G40.21-350W (CAT. C)
KL/r = 93 C
u
C
u
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 21
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 22
12
Braces meeting columns between floors
R R
o d f
A
S16-09 Only permitted for Type LD (R
d
= 2.0)
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 23
27.7 EBFs
Built-up rectangular tubular link beams
Class of beam outside the link Class of beam outside the link
Flexural demand on columns
Protected zones
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 24
13
Built-up rectangular tubular link beams
Contreventement non requis
pour le segment ductile !
Berman, J.W, and Bruneau, M. 2008. Tubular Links for
Eccentrically Braced Frames I: Finite Element Parametric Study.
ASCE J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 134, No. 5, pp. 692-701.
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 25
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 26
14
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 27
...
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 28
15
Class for beams outside the links
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 29
Flexural demand on columns
S16-01
S16-09 (propos)
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 30
16
1.0
2.0
V
y
27.8 Buckling Restrained Braced Frames
(New Clause)
-12.0 -8.0 -4.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0
A / Ay
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
V

/

V
P. Bolduc, cole Polytechnique 2002
Qubec City (1999)
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 31
R = 3.0
T = 0.57 s
1750
4660
R = 4.0
T = 0.72 s
1330
2800
CBF BRBF
8 740
0 3380
2330
5 530
0 2200
1400
18 210
1990 7390
9 590
100 3910
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 32
17
Expected behaviour
Configurations & height limits
Sections on :
g g
Factored resistance of BRB members
Axial loads imposed by BRB members
Design of connections, beams, and
l columns
Testing requirements
Protected zones
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 33
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 34
18
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 35
NBCC 2010 (proposed)
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 36
19
27.9 Plate Walls (Type D)
Storey shear resistance
Optimized design of infill plates
Corner cut-outs
Capacity design requirements
Protected zones Protected zones
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 37
Storey shear resistance
o
V
mf
V
o
+ = =
w
V
o
V
r
= V
rw
V
rw
= | 0.5 F
y
w L sin(2o) > V
f
V
rmf
= 2 | M
pb
/ h
s
> 0.25 V
f
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 38
20
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 39
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 40
21
Optimization of infill plates
Use of thin infill plates
Berman, J.W. and Bruneau, M. 2005. Experimental
Investigation of Light-Gauge Steel Plate Shear
Walls. ASCE J. of Struct. Eng., 131, 2, 259-267.
0.9 mm thick ASTM A1008 (cold-rolled, carbon, commercial
steel sheet)
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 41
Perforated infill plates
Vian, D. and Bruneau, M. 2004. Testing of Special
LYS Steel Plate Shear walls. Proc. 13
th
WCEE,
Vancouver, BC. Paper No. 978.
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 42
Purba, R. and Bruneau, M. 2007. Design
Recommendations for Perforated Steel
Plate Shear Walls. Report MCEER-07-0011,
SUNY Buffalo, NY.
22
S16-09
+ information on stiffness calculation given
in the Commentary
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 43
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 44
23
Corner cut-outs
Vian, D. and Bruneau, M. 2004. Testing of Special
LYS Steel Plate Shear walls. Proc. 13
th
WCEE,
Vancouver, BC. Paper No. 978.
Purba, R. and Bruneau, M. 2007.
Design Recommendations for
Perforated Steel Plate Shear
Walls. Report MCEER-07-0011,
SUNY Buffalo, NY.
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 45
S16-09
See the Commentary for information on the design of the
arching reinforcement and of the beams and columns
adjacent to corner cut-outs
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 46
24
Capacity design
1.1R M'
V
C
C
o
y
i+1
pb,i
b,i
bl,i
b i
T
w,i+1
Gravity
T
w,i +1 T
w,i +1
Gravity

1.1R M'
V
C
o
y
i
p
br,i
b,i
L'
T
w,i
T
w
= R
y
F
y
w < forces corresponding to R
o
R
d
= 1.3
L'
T
w,i T
w,i
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 47
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 48
25
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 49
27.10 Limited ductility (Type LD)
plate walls
New clause
Additional requirements have been
introduced to ensure adequate inelastic
response
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 50
26
S16-01
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 51
CNBC 2010 (proposed)
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 52
27
27.11 Conventional Construction
Harmonization with NBCC for metal roof
deck diaphragms deck diaphragms
Structures taller than 15 m
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 53
Design of diaphragms
S16-09 (no change)
Harmonization between CSA-S16 & NBCC:
=> Loads obtained using R
d
R
o
= 1.95 (if ductile connections)
R
d
R
o
= 1.30 (otherwise)
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 54
28
NBCC 2010 (proposed)
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 55
Structures taller than 15 m
NBCC 2010 (proposed)
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 56
29
S16-09
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 57