Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BLOG ARCHIVE
▼ 2009 (102)
• ▼ December (6)
o Festschrift contribution submitted
o Play, love etc. - UiA Philosophy Forum in preparat...
o Work title: "I, wolf"
o Invitation to contribute to book by Nova Publisher...
o Expanding horizons: Interdisciplinary integration
o Lotman piece to be co-written by Dinda L. Gorlée
• ▼ November (9)
o Conference of the Nordic Society for Phenomenology...
o Contribution on Lotman to Norwegian-Estonian Fests...
o New colleagues
o Titles - books I would like to have written (or re...
o Course work on Uexküll - meetings at UiA - the phi...
o Committee for UiA Philosophy Forum
o Philosophy in Stavanger (siddisfilosofi)
o Philosophy in Kristiansand
o "An ageing giant" - Arne Næss in memory
• ▼ October (11)
o The wolf as scapegoat
o Co-editing of special issue on biosemiotics
o First semioethics interview published + "Meditatio...
o Proceedings of the world congress in semiotics 200...
o Poster presentation presentation
o Proceedings
o Animal play article to appear in December
o Mapping human impact
o Poster presentation on the notion of ecological fo...
o Chronicles in Norwegian media - wolf politics
o New wolf essay
• ▼ September (7)
o Annotated bibliography, 3rd quarter
o "Outline of an Uexküllian bio-ontology" referred t...
1
o On site in A Coruña, Spain
o The abstract book of the 2009 world congress in se...
o Reflection piece in Hortus Semioticus
o My first blurb
o Research assistant (UiA) - multimodality
• ▼ August (7)
o Presentation in TÜ seminar on the methodology of t...
o New timetable for "Semiotics of Perception"
o University teacher
o Report from China to appear in Norwegian media
o Where are the Estonians?
o Q & A with Paul Crutzen
o Copenhagen (WCEH)
• ▼ July (6)
o Existential universals
o Brian Goodwin (1931-2009)
o The Global Species
o Lecturer at University of Agder
o Brief report from Gathering in Biosemiotics 9, Pra...
o Climate change and the growth paradigm
• ▼ June (11)
o Defining biological meaning
o Tolerant Tartu
o Climate synthesis report
o 10th World Congress of Semiotics - Big Bad Wolf ac...
o Academic news in brief III: Attested, revised, and...
o Poster presentation in Tallinn in October
o Proceedings from World Congress, Helsinki/Imatra
o First ISI Web of Science publication
o First semioethics interview
o My question to Umberto Eco on science and fiction
o Most viewed at Scribd
• ▼ May (6)
o Wolves, traffic lights and cultural mix
o Exam season
o Biosemiotics abstract book - contrapunctuality
o Book, book chapter
o Umwelt ethics, deep ecology and Spinoza
o Academic news in brief II
o ▼ April (12)
Abstract to X Congreso mundial de semiótica
Reminiscences on Arne Näss
World Congress
New biosemiotic research project in spe
Food vs. Nature
Climate survey in The Guardian
Participation in research group
Three texts
2
Umwelt Transitions: Uexküll and Environmental Chan...
Rescheduling of wolf presentation
Update on Abram/Estonian media
Abstraction, cruelty and other aspects of animal p...
• ▼ March (10)
o Academic news in brief
o Petition to include ethical expertise in the IPCC
o My updated CV
o New blog - The Schopenhauer Experience
o Norwegian teacher
o Page numbers
o Climate publication - IOP Conference Series
o My poster for the congress Climate Change: Global ...
o Poster programme, Copenhagen
o Food vs. Nature
• ▼ February (12)
o Talk at Gatherings in Biosemiotics, Prague
o Global Voices: Estonia?
o Homepage for zoosemiotics project
o The nature view held by environmentalists
o Academic journals - open access publishing
o Web stats Utopian Realism
o SemioPhenomenon web stats
o David Abram's public lecture online
o Contrapuntuality - Gatherings in biosemiotics 2009...
o Estonian media
o Most viewed at Scribd ... and web stats
o My article "Umwelt Transitions: Uexküll and Enviro...
o ▼ January (5)
Now I have seen wolves
International participation at workshops
Arne Næss
First wolf article - Umwelt mapping
New research project in zoosemiotics
3
SUNDAY, 20 DECEMBER 2009
Morten Tønnessen: "Lek som sivilisasjonens opphav" (Play as the origin of civilization),
followed by discussion
Public lecture with invited lecturer, in town. Name and title T.B.A.
4
preparation of the February dialogue and the public event in March - February 2nd.
While events 1, 2 and 4 are "internal" (university area) events - though open to all - the 3rd
and 5th event will take place outside of campus, and aim at engaging a wider audience, in
each their way (strictly speaking, this may apply to event 3 more than to event 5, which will
nevertheless be made available for a general audience). The methodology for the dialogic
events has in the Norwegian context been further developed by amongst others Øyvind
Olsholt.
Besides talking at event 1, I will coordinate contacts for event 3, where we hope to gather
individuals from different faiths etc. - protestants, catholics, muslims, agnostics and atheists
- for a common philosophical dialogue.
Labels: animal play, belief, civilization, dialogue, emotion, faith, feeling, love, religion
I, Wolf:
The Ecology of Experience
6
I have agreed with Dinda L. Gorlée (the Netherlands) that we will cowrite my (now our)
aforementioned 2 pp contribution to a Norwegian-Estonian Festschrift, due for next spring.
She was a central figure in Norwegian semiotics in the mid-1980s - the only time (so far)
semiotics has flourished much in Norway.
/
NEW ORIENTATIONS: IN PHENOMENOLOGY
to be arranged at Södertörn University College
in Stockholm, April 22-24, 2010
Individual presentation
by Morten Tønnessen
Suggested title
Semiotics of Being and Uexküllian Phenomenology
/
German-Baltic biologist Jakob von Uexküll (1864-1944) did not regard himself as a
phenomenologist. Neither did he conceive of himself as a semiotician. Nevertheless, his
Umwelt terminology has of late been utilized and further developed within the framework of
7
semiotics and various other disciplines - and, as I will argue, essential points in his work can
fruitfully be taken to represent a distinctive Uexküllian phenomenology, characterized not
least by an assumption of the (in the realm of life) universal existence of a genuine first
person perspective, i.e., of experienced worlds.
This short article should be finished by December 20th. The Festschrift will be published in
2010, at the occasion of the independence day of the Republic of Estonia (February 24th).
New colleagues
Two more researchers have joined the research project "The Cultural Heritage of
Environmental Spaces. A Comparative Analysis Between Estonia and Norway" (the first
replacing Peder Anker as the Norwegian collaborator in a study of Estonian peat bogs etc.), in
which I take part with my Ph.D. work as a "main researcher". First, Finn Arne Jørgensen,
NTNU, who's involved in environmental history (and trying to establish a Norwegian network
within that field). I met him at the first world congress of environmental history in
Copenhagen in August. Second, Renata Sõukand - who happens to be one of the contributors
8
to the special issue of Biosemiotics for which I am one of two guest-editors ('Semiotics of
perception').
Ahonen, Pertti. 1989. The meaning of money: Comparing a Peircean and Saussurean
perspective. In Kevelson, R., ed., 13-29.
Anderson, Myrdene & Floyd Merrell, eds. 1991. On Semiotic Modeling. Berlin: Mouton de
Gruyter.
Balat, Michel & Janice Deledalle-Rhodes, eds. 1992. Signs of Humanity. Berlin: Mouton
de Gruyter.
Bär, Eugen 1981. Die Zeichenlehre von Thomas A. Sebeok. In Krampen, M., et al., eds.,
281-321.
Baudrillard, Jean. 1972. Pour une critique de l’économie politique du signe. Paris:
Gallimard. – Port. s.d. Para uma crítica da economia política do signo. Lisboa: Martins
Fontes.
Beck, Cave. 1657. The Universal Character, by Which All the Nations in the World May
Understand One Another’s Conceptions. London.
9
Bernard-Donals, Michael F. 1994. Mikhail Bakhtin Between Phenomenology and Marxism.
Cambridge: Univ. Press.
Bierman, Arthur K. 1962. That there are no iconic signs. Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research 23: 243-49.
Bonner, John Tyler. 1980. The Evolution of Culture in Animals. Princeton: Univ. Press.
Borsche, Tilman & Werner Stegmaier, eds. 1992. Zur Philosophie des Zeichens. Berlin:
de Gruyter.
Bouissac, Paul. 1989. What is a human? Ecological semiotics and the new animism.
Semiotica 77: 497-516.
Brown, Jerram L. & Gordon H. Orians. 1970. Spacing patterns in mobile animals. Annual
Review of Ecological Systems 1: 239-62.
Buczyńska-Garewicz, Hanna. 1984. The degenerate sign. In Borbé, T., ed., vol. 1, 43-50.
Bunn, James H. 1981. The Dimensionality of Signs, Tools, and Models. Bloomington:
Indiana Univ. Press.
Burkhardt, Dietrich, et al., eds. 1966. Signale der Tierwelt. München: Moos.
Busnel, René-Guy & André Classe. 1976. Whistled Languages. Berlin: Springer.
Carnap, Rudolf. (1928) 1961. Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Hamburg: Meiner.
Carterette, Edward C. & Morton P. Friedman, eds. 1976. Handbook of Perception. New
York: Academic Press.
Cheney, Dorothy & Robert M. Seyfarth. 1982. Recognition of individuals within and
between groups of free-ranging vervet monkeys. American Zoologist 22: 519-529.
Classen, Constance, David Howes & Anthony Synnott. 1994. Aroma: The Cultural History
of Smell. London: Routledge.
Coker, Wilson. 1972. Music and Meaning. New York: Free Press.
Colapietro, Vincent M. 1989. Peirce’s Approach to the Self. Albany: State Univ. of New
York Press.
10
Costadeau, Alphonse. (1717) 1983 (1717) 1983. Traité des signes, vol. 1,
ed. Le Guern-Forel, O. Bern: Lang.
Dawkins, Richard & John R. Krebs. 1978. Animal signals: Information or manipulation. In
Krebs, J. R. & N. B. Davies, eds., 282-309.
Deely, John N. 1974. The two approaches to language... Jean Poinsot’s semiotic. The
Thomist 38: 856-907.
Dirven, René. 1993. Metonymy and metaphor. Leuvense Bijdragen 82: 1-28.
Ebert, Theodor. 1987. The origin of the Stoic theory of signs in Sextus Empiricus. Oxford
Studies in Ancient Philosophy 5: 83-126.
Eco, Umberto 1984b. Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. Bloomington: Indiana
Univ. Press.
———. 1985a. How culture conditions the colors we see. In Blonsky, M., ed., 157-75.
Eimermacher, Karl, comp. 1974. Arbeiten sowjetischer Semiotiker der Moskauer und
Tartuer Schule (Auswahlbibliographie). Kronberg: Scriptor.
Ekman, Paul, ed. 1973. Darwin and Facial Expression. New York: Academic Press.
Emanuele, Pietro. 1982. Präsemiotik und Semiotik in Heidegger. Semiosis 25/26: 140-44.
Finlay, Marike. 1988. The Romantic Irony of Semiotics: Friedrich Schlegel and the Crisis
of Representation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fleischer, Michael. 1987. Hund und Mensch: Eine semiotische Analyse ihrer
Kommunikation. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
11
Fraasen, Bas C. van. 1985. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Time and Space. New
York: Columbia Univ. Press.
Gibson, James J. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Mifflin.
Katz, David. (1925) 1969. Der Aufbau der Tastwelt. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchgesellschaft.
Kelemen, János 1991. Kant’s semiotics. In Sebeok, T. A. & J. Umiker-Sebeok, eds., 201-
18.
Kiefer, Georg R. 1970. Zur Semiotisierung der Umwelt. Stuttgart: Diss. Phil.
Klinck, Dennis. 1993. The semiotics of money. In Kevelson, R., ed., 229-250.
Koch, Walter A. 1986c. Philosophie der Philologie und Semiotik. Literatur und Welt:
Versuche zur Interdisziplinarität der Philologie. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
———. 1989. The Well of Tears: A Biosemiotic Essay on the Roots of Horror, Comic, and
Pathos. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
Krampen, Martin, et al., eds. 1981. Die Welt als Zeichen: Klassiker der modernen
Semiotik. Berlin: Severin & Siedler.
Kruse, Felicia 1990. Nature and semiosis. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society
26.2: 211-224.
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago
Press.
Larsen, Hanne Hartvig, et al., eds. 1991. Marketing and Semiotics. Copenhagen:
Handelshøjskolen Forlag.
Lindgren, J. Ralph. 1993. The emergence of signs: The seminal convention of money. In
Kevelson, R., ed., 283-297.
Meier-Oeser, Stephan 1997a. Die Spur des Zeichens: Das Zeichen und seine Funktion in
der Philosophie des Mittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Merrell, Floyd 1996. Signs Grow: Semiosis and Life Processes. Toronto: Univ. Press.
Mick, David G. 1999. A global review of semiotic consumer research (= Working Paper,
Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Business).
Montagu, Ashley. 1971. Touching: The Human Significance of the Skin. New York:
Columbia Univ. Press.
Oehler, Klaus, ed. 1984. Zeichen und Realität. 3 vols. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Pittenger, Robert E., Charles F. Hockett & John J. Danehy. 1960. The First Five Minutes.
Ithaca, N.Y.: P. Martineau.
Presnell, Michael. 1983. Sign, Image, and Desire: Semiotic Phenomenology and the Film
Image. Ann Arbor: Univ. Microfilms Int.
13
Preziosi, Donald. 1979b. The Semiotics of the Built Environment. Bloomington: Indiana
Univ. Press.
Rosenthal, Sandra B. 1998. Phenomenological semiotics. In Posner, R., et al., eds., vol.
2, 2096-2112.
Santaella, Lucia. 1996c. Semiosphere: The growth of signs. Semiotica 109: 173-186.
Schiff, William & Emerson Foulke, eds. 1982. Tactual Perception: A Sourcebook.
Cambridge: Univ. Press.
Simmel, Georg. (1900) 1922. Philosophie des Geldes. München: Duncker & Humblot.
Thom, René. (1988) 1990. Esquisse d’une sémiophysique. – Ingl. 1990. Semiophysics: A
Sketch. Redwood City, Cal.: Addision-Wesley.
Valsiner, Jaan & Jüri Allik. 1982. General semiotic capabilities of the higher primates. In
Key, M. R., ed., 245-57.
Yaguello, Marina. 1991. Lunatic Lovers of Language: Imaginary Languages and their
Inventors. London: Athlone.
Zarcadoolas, Christina. 1983. How to Do Things with Linguistics, Semiotics, Speech Acts,
and Phenomenology. Ph. D. Thesis, Brown Univ. Ann Arbor: Univ. Microfilms Int.
14
Labels: bibliography, books, semiotics, tidsklemma, titles
“Uexküll and evolution” for many sounds like a topic that spells out a contradiction in terms.
That, I believe, does not necessarily have to be the case. Whereas some biosemioticians (e.g.
Stjernfelt 2001) have asserted that Uexküll was anti-evolution, others (e.g. Salthe 2001; Kull
2004) have concluded that he was anti-Darwinian, but not hostile to the idea of evolution as
such. Here I must agree with the latter group, as I hope will shine through in the rest of this
exposition. And not only do I think Uexküll was not anti-evolution (though, as I explain in
Tønnessen 2009, he was programmatically not historically-minded) – more than that; I believe
that an Uexküllian perspective might actually prove to be enriching within the field of
evolutionary theory. There’s proof that Uexküll did not only have negative, but also positive,
thought about evolution in his dictum (1928: 198) that “each new appearing functional cycle
verifies [the appearance of] a new animal species” (my translation).
Meanwhile, the committee for the UiA Philosophy Forum has held its first meeting (this
Monday).
So has - today - UiA's "Fagfilosofisk seksjon" (Academic philosophical section), consisting of the
philosophers at Department of religion, philosophy and history. The topic, which has been
discussed at one previous meeting as well and will be discussed further at the institute level
in December, concerns establishing new (more advanced) courses in philosophy as part of a
revised bachelor degree (which is today a bachelor in religion). One day, some say, we might
offer a master in philosophy. That would truly be of great value for the philosophy milieu at
UiA, and its attraction for students and scholars alike. Today only a one-year studium is
offered (apart from the broader introductory course, Examen Philosophicum).
Meanwhile ... I have finished (yesterday) a catalogue, or leaflet (4 pp), presenting the paid
services offered by my one-man company, SPØR FILOSOFEN (Ask the philosopher) - ranging
from lectures and courses via writing and editing to consultancy activities. You'll find it on
Scribd.
Håvard Løkke
Hege Stensland
Morten Tønnessen
The first meeting of the committee is likely to be arranged this Monday. The first Forum in
this round will likely take place in January.
Labels: forum, philosophy, styringsgruppa for Filosofisk forum, UiA, University of Agder
16
This term - starting November 27th or so - I will take part in the marking at Examen
Philosophicum at the University of Stavanger (the university of the town where I was born, on
the West coast of Norway), as an external examiner. Written exam is the genre, 3,000 words
the approximate length of the apparently 160 exam papers.
I am thus for the moment connected to no less than three universities - University of
Stavanger (as an external examiner), University of Agder (as a lecturer, research assistant,
and involved in philosophy forums) and University of Tartu (as a Ph.D. student, and
participant in research projects etc.).
Philosophy in Kristiansand
Today I met with Ralph Henk Vaags at UiA. We have agreed to restart 'Filosofisk fagforum'
[Forum for academic philosophy], as well as 'Filosofisk forskerforum' [Philosophical research
forum] at the University of Agder (in both cases it's the first time I'm partaking). For now the
plan for the former is to arrange monthly 2-hrs seminars next spring. The two of us expect to
form the responsible committee, along with a student representative.
Not bad for a mid-size Norwegian town whose biggest celebrity is a chimpanzee called Julius
(who happens to be one of the town's best painters, as well).
17
Posted by Morten Tønnessen at 08:28 0 comments
I have just come across the newsletter wherein my brief text "An ageing giant"
appears (p13).
An Ageing Giant
It is hard to summarize what Arne Næss has meant to me—first of all because he has
been so decisive in forming me as a practicing philosopher. For years I had difficulties
seeing where, at all, I would disagree with him (a problem I have now to some extent
overcome). I was early on inspired by his interpretation of Gandhi’s political ethics—
that’s how I made the leap from activist to student of philosophy. As is the case for so
many Norwegians, it was his work that introduced me to philosophy. A course in deep
ecology at Åkerøya in Norway in the late 1990s was central in giving me a more solid
basis for eco-philosophical reasoning (a couple years later Knut Olav Fossestøl,
another course participant, and I founded the “Eco-philosophical colloquium” at the
University of Oslo). By then Arne was already a familiar face for me as a philosophy
student—30 years after he retired as professor, he was still around offering public
lectures. In 2001 and 2003, I arranged public events with him myself. By 2003,
however, it was clear that this brilliant mind struggled to remain intellectually alert
and coherent. A request to partake in a proposal (concerning the Norwegian Petro-
fund) from the Green Party of Norway, for which I was the national secretary at the
time, was therefore revoked.
18
I interviewed him a couple of times. After the Åkerøya seminar I sent him my first
booklong philosophical manuscript, Dialog. He had agreed to comment it, but now I
got it returned, with an exact explanation: “372 pages!” I never knew whether to call
him Arne or Næss. Despite having met him around a dozen times, he never appeared—
with certainty—to recognize me (I wish he had). Today I have the fortune of being in
contact with some of his closest colleagues at the eco-scene. The last time I was in
contact with him (through Kit-Fai) was in 2006, when I was conducting a survey of
attitudes in the Norwegian environmentalist establishment—partly inspired by his own
little survey on attitudes to nature among Norwegian bureaucrats and others carried
out a generation or so earlier. As I heard the news of his death, I pondered home to
our house in Magé, Brazil, where we were at the time, and stepped into our outdoor
swimming pool, as the day darkened. A couple of bats joined me. I retreated to a
corner, offering the two nocturnal creatures (ecological!) space enough to rejoice
undisturbed in their playful bath.
My debate article "Ulven som syndebukk" [The wolf as scapegoat] is in print today in
the major Norwegian national daily Dagbladet.
19
Co-editing of special issue on biosemiotics
The special issue, which will feature articles in both English and Estonian and is
expected to appear as no. 7, 2010 (after no. 5 is published this year and no. 6 is
published as a regular number in the spring of 2010), will include an interview with
Kalevi Kull (link inactive at the time of writing this...), conducted by Riin Magnus and
me.
Pp57-80 "“Tell me, where is morality bred?” The Semioethics Interviews I: John Deely"
PDF here
Pp81-84: "Meditationes Semioticae: Signs grow – but should they? Semioethics and the
dominant semiosis of Homo sapiens sapiens" PDF here
20
At long last I have received the proceedings of the 9th congress of the IASS/AIS -
Helsinki-Imatra, 11-17 June, 2007, "Communication:
Understanding/Misunderstanding", edited by Eero Tarasti (associated editors: Paul
Forsell and Richard Littlefield). And quite a work it is, in 3 volumes (Acta Semiotica
Fennica XXXIV, International Semiotics Institute, Imatra/Semiotic Society of Finland,
Helsinki 2009).
My text "Where I end and you begin: The threshold of the self and the intrinsic value
of the phenomenal world" appears pp. 1798-1803 (vol. III). Here, for the first time in
Earth history (in print), I offer "a critique of a critique", namely of semioethics: "While
I agree with several of the foundational statements of a semioethics proper, i have
some critical remarks as to its present manifestation." I have now been engaged with
semioethics for 2 years plus, not least through this spring's first "semioethics
interviews" with John Deely, the first of which will sooner-than-ever be published.
The article also contains seeds to what I now call "semiotic economy".
David Agler
21
Gregory Bateson
Donald Favareau
Arne Næss
David Rothenberg
Proceedings
22
Last week I submitted my contribution to the 10th world congress in semiotics
proceedings, "The changing imagery of the big bad wolf".
I expect my article "Abstraction, cruelty and other aspects of animal play" to appear in
December, in the special issue on zoosemiotics of the journal Sign Systems Studies.
My poster presentation for the Oct. 22-24 Tallinn conference on Spatiality, memory and
visualization of human/nature relations (text only):
23
<!--[if !vml]-->(fig.)
<!--[endif]-->
The ecological footprint concept, on its hand, first introduced in 1996, is now being used by
WWF (LIVING PLANET REPORT) and developed methodologically by THE GLOBAL FOOTPRINT
NETWORK. Claimed to be a tool that makes sustainability measurable, it condenses a complex
array of consumption down into a single number.
The developers of the ecological footprint model stress that it includes only those aspects of
resource consumption and waste production for which the Earth has regenerative capacity.
What it does is converting consumption into the land used in production, along with the land
theoretically needed to sequester the greenhouse gases produced. By dividing ‘Humanity’s
Ecological Footprint’ (currently 2,7 ‘global hectares’ per person) by ‘World Biocapacity’ – which
is (oftentimes) modelled as being constant – we arrive at the conclusion that humanity as a
whole has been unsustainable (accumulating ‘ecological debt’) since the late 80s. When the
footprint of a country does not surpass its biocapacity, it is said to be sustainable.
<!--[if !vml]-->(fig.)
<!--[endif]-->
As we can see in the WWF figures below, global biocapacity is modelled as being potentially
decreasing (in case of sustained/accumulated ecological overshoot) or increasing (in case of
proper management).
<!--[if !vml]-->(fig.)
<!--[endif]-->
<!--[if !vml]-->(fig.)
<!--[endif]-->
The ecological footprint model has several limitations, not least the fact that there are many
environmental problems it cannot represent. It further says little or nothing about the
intensity of land use. From an ethical point of view, it is biased toward anthropocentricism in
assuming that ‘sustainability’ entails that humanity can exploit the Earth’s biocapacity fully.
It is also anthropocentric from a methodological point of view, since it represents human
consumption and ecosystem services only – both being purely human interests.
24
The human ontological niche concept, in contrast, is designed in order to display the
ecological relations in which humanity partakes. As Nathan Fiala (2008: 519) remarks, “better
measures of sustainability would address [environmental issues] directly”. Whereas the
simplicity of the ecological footprint is not only its greatest advantage but also its greatest
disadvantage, the human ontological niche concept is better suited to account for variety
within and across ecosystems, because its biggest advantage is its (qualitative, rather than
quantitative) specificity. It further allows for disparate ethical assumptions.
I will now model selected global environmental data to demonstrate how the human
ontological niche concept can be applied as a modelling tool scrutinizing human impact in
nature. The basic problem is this: How can we model human impact in nature – a crude,
aggregate measure – based on a theory of the phenomenological experiences of individual
creatures (be they human or non-human)?
<!--[if !vml]-->(fig.)
<!--[endif]-->
Above the global populations of selected livestock groups are represented in numerical terms
(data taken from Livestock’s long shadow, FAO 2006). How could we represent these global
data in qualitative terms?
<!--[if !vml]-->(fig.)
<!--[endif]-->
Here a few differences in the size of circles (3 categories) and thickness (3 categories) are
chosen to represent the relative importance of livestock groups and the character of our
relations to them. In more general terms some crucial traditional features of the human
ontological niche can be represented as depicted below (note that a positive attitude to
conservation can change the quality of our relation to big carnivores as well as to “wasteland”
species).
<!--[if !vml]-->(fig.)
<!--[endif]-->
25
Resources/individuals: While an ecological footprint approach tends to focus on biomass
(natural creatures qua resources), an ontological niche approach will tend to focus on
individuals/subjects, wherever there are individuals.
REFERENCES
→ Fiala, Nathan 2008. Measuring sustain-ability: Why the ecological footprint is bad
economics and bad environmental science. Ecological Economics 67: 519-525.
→ Uexküll, Jakob von 1920. Theoretische Biologie (first edition). Berlin: Julius Springer.
26
(ETF/ESF 7790) and METHODS OF BIOSEMIOTICS
(ETF/ESF 6669).
I am in the process of preparing my poster presentation for the CECT (Center of excellence in
cultural theory) II conference "Spatiality, memory and visualisation of culture/nature
relationships: theoretical aspects", entitled "Mapping human impact: Ecological footprint vs.
ontological niche".
Names of all poster presentations are to be found here, abstracts of oral presentations here.
Yesterday I wrote a chronicle entitled "Ulven som syndebukk" [The Wolf as a Scapegoat], that
I now submit to Dagbladet, Norway's third biggest national daily.
The political platform of the re-elected coalition government is said to be ready for
27
announcement in one and a half hour. According to preliminary news reports, Senterpartiet
(which has around 6 % of the vote) has not succeeded in its efforts to reach an agreement
with the two other governing parties according to which all remaining wolves would be shot,
and no wolves would be tolerated on Norwegian land.
I have recently finished an article entitled "Is a wolf wild as long as it does not know that it is
being thoroughly man-handled?". The essay has been submitted to Humanimalia.
Abstract: The animals of the recovering Scandinavian wolf population are evidently shy, but
thoroughly man-handled, by wildlife managers as well as illegal hunters and others. After
much wilderness has vanished, the current wolf population dwells in a so-called multi-use
environment. Their interaction with human artefacts and constructions is substantial. The
author argues that the long-term conservation goal should be not simply viability, but
independent viability - i.e., viability independent of the continued actions of humans.
28
Douglas W. MacCLEERY: American forests: A history of resilience and recovery. Forest
History Society, 1992. This publication offers a lot of interesting statistics and facts not
only since 1930 or so, when the proportion of US land that is forested has generally been
stable, after 300 years of deforestation, but also concerning times as far back as to year
1600 (even native indigenous forestry practices are briefly described). The last century
several wildlife species have recovered, not least due to the gradual introduction of
conservation measures. In conclusion, this work is a helpful source of references and
thoroughly examines the full implications of different attitudes to forests and utilization
of forest products. Though the situation of Norwegian forests is not identical with the
American situation, this book nevertheless provides useful knowledge about the
interconnections of conservation efforts and forestry practices/land use.
The Norwegian daily Nationen [The nation], Mon 31st of August – Wed 9th of September.
The latest national election in Norway took place September 14th. For 10 days close to
the conclusion of the election, I followed Nationen, Norway’s only national daily
devoted to matters of agriculture and rural policies. Every day in this period there were
articles etc. about carnivore policy; about half of the editions one of them featured on
the front page. In many rural areas, wolf and carnivore policy turned out to become one
of the defining topics of the electoral campaign, though only 3 parties (Senterpartiet,
Fremskrittspartiet and Sosialistisk Venstreparti) talked much about it. For the first time
the populist right-wing party Fremskrittspartiet competed seriously for the anti-wolf
votes – though Senterpartiet, traditionally the farmers’ party, still dominated the
discourse. The carnivore policy for 2009-2013 is now up for negotiations within the re-
elected coalition government, which consists of Arbeiderpartiet (the social democrats),
Senterpartiet and Sosialistisk Venstreparti (a left-wing party which supports wolf
conservation).
Paolo VIRNO: Natural-historical diagrams: The ‘new global’ movement and the biological
invariant. Pp. 131-147 in The Italian difference: Between nihilism and biopolitics (eds.
Lorenzo Chiesa and Alberto Toscano), Melbourne 2009: re.press. Translated from Italian
by Alberto Toscano. Virno’s notion of the natural-historical diagrams of human nature
refers to “concrete phenomena, socio-political states of affairs, historical events.” He
thus offers an empirical (or emergent) notion of human nature – which can be of
29
interest in the context of my depicting of a natural history of the phenomenal world.
Crucial in Virno’s observations is that ‘human nature’ as we know it places us as an
“indefinite animal”, an animal without any definitive natural environment. This, he
claims, explains our ‘instability’ as a species, and our constant urge for further
modifications of the environment. It would be interesting to integrate and try to
develop some of his main points in my own work.
Wendy WHEELER: The Whole Creature: Complexity, Biosemiotics and the Evolution of
Culture. London 2006: Lawrence & Wishart. In this valuable book, Wheeler outlines
some connections between biosemiotics and other complexity science on the one hand
and politics and cultural theory on the other. In the context of my work Wheeler’s book
represents an important step toward a proper understanding of the cultural implications
of competing scientific outlooks and worldviews. While Wheeler on some points
simplifies the connections between ‘capitalism’ and mainstream science, her portrayal
of the cultural and ethical (and political) implications of a world view of biosemiotic
relationism rather than one of capitalist atomism/individualism is in the main
informative and telling. The main message – which I do subscribe to – is that human
beings are social (and ecological) creatures which can not thrive – or correctly be
described on a theoretical level – as isolated individuals. Her stress of the social and
ecological aspects of cultural life bears implications not least for economic thought.
Full reference:
I have just arrived in A Coruña (Galicia), Spain, where the 10th world congress of
semiotics takes place. It has been a long journey. I have been travelling (first by
ferry, and then) by train - more than 3,000 km. It is my first time in Spain. Se my
approximate route here.
Friday I will be presenting my talk "The changing imagery of the big bad wolf" -
with examples from the Norwegian national election September 14th.
31
... is to be found here.
32
Reflection piece in Hortus Semioticus
Yesterday I finished a little article entitled "Signs grow - but should they? Semioethics
and the dominant semiosis of Homo sapiens sapiens".
My first blurb
Occasion: Paul Cobley (ed.): Realism for the 21st Century. A John Deely Reader -
to be published by Scranton University Press.
I have been assigned as a research assistant of the UiA (Agder University) research
project "Multimodalitet, leseopplæring og læremidler (MULL)" - "Multimodality,
reading training and educational materials". In this position I will have some work to
do this autumn and next spring, related first of all to dissemination of results. The
33
project sorts under the Department of Nordic and media Studies, Faculty of
Humanities and Education.
Title for my talk: "Methodological challenges in analyzing wolf ecology and wolf
management within a semiotic-phenomenological framework".
The seminar takes place at the department of semiotics, and will be organized by
Peeter Torop.
Date T.B.A.
Kati Lindström and I have just agreed with the editor-in-chief of Biosemiotics,
Marcello Barbieri, that the special issue "Semiotics of Perception", an outcome of the
SemioPhenomenon workshops in Tartu February 2009 ("The Ecology of Perception" and
"Animal Minds"), for which we are the guest editors, will be published as no. 2, 2010
(August) in stead of as no. 1, 2010 (April), as originally planned.
Contributors:
David Abram
34
John Deely
Kalevi Kull
Kati Lindström
Timo Maran
Silver Rattasepp
Morten Tønnessen
Wendy Wheeler
University teacher
35
Today I wrote the contract for teaching in the history of philosophy at Agder
University (UiA), Kristiansand, Norway this autumn. Hopefully I will be reassigned for
next spring (Kristiansand) and summer (Lesvos, Greece) at a later point.
First lecture took place this Monday, in the biggest auditorium of the university,
named after Henrik Ibsen, with some 200 students present - the second on Tuesday.
At the very first one, I took some time telling about the history of examen
philosophicum (which started out in Copenhagen in the 17th century) in Norway, not
least Arne Næss' role in modern times; and the ongoing debate on the place of
Ex.phil. in the Norwegian education system (after decades and centuries of revisions
and cuts).
I am now a:
- Ph.D. student
One of the talks I appreciated the most at the First World Congress of Environmental
History, in Copenhagen, August 4-8, was "The Rise, Development, and Influence of the
Environmental NGOs in China" by professor Xueqin Mei and Da Mao from Beijing,
China. I have composed an article based on their talk. This article has been accepted
for publication (possibly only in a few weeks) in a regional Norwegian newspaper with
fairly good circulation.
36
LABELS: C HI N A , E N VI RON M E N T A L HI ST ORY , E N V I RON M E NT A L M OV E M E N T ,
N G OS
I am here at the First World Congress of Environmental History as the only Estonian
representative (as a Norwegian Ph.D. Student at Department of Semiotics, University
of Tartu). This March I was in Copenhagen at an international climate conference,
with around 1,500 participants - as the only Estonian representative. Where are the
Estonians?
Here at the environmental history congress there are maybe 550 participants, judging
by the list of participants. Though scholars from Europe and the US dominate (along
with participants from Canada, Australia, New Zealand), there are some
representation of other regions of the world as well, South America and Asia (China,
Japan, India, Taiwan, Nepal ...) included. As for Africa, there's 9 participants (15 % of
world population, 1-2 % of world congress participants) - in addition to South Africa,
Nigeria, Egypt and Lesotho are represented (Lesotho 2, Estonia 1).
37
talk, entitled "The Anthropocene: Humans as a force in global environmental cycles".
A good talk it was (though in the context of climate change I would not pragmatically
allude to geo-engineering - which Crutzen did refer to in conclusion, "out of despair"
(being clear, to be fair, that it was only a "last resort", and that other solutions should
be sought).
I asked him a question in the Q & A session following Crutzen's talk. First I referred to
his mention of the incredible economic growth of the last century, and said I
understood his despair with regard to climate change. But what role has the economy
to play in this context? Is our current economic model viable, or not?
Paul Crutzen answered, after a moment of hesitation, that he though the current
economic crisis is evidence that our current economic model is not viable (laughter
from the audience).
Copenhagen (WCEH)
38
Same story with hotels (pensions and B&B are more often than not not even
mentioned as options - cf. the upcoming world congress in semiotics in La Coruna,
Spain).
/
As for the program, I am to be found at p.7 (program) and 183 (abstract).
380 Making yourself at home in nature: The conflict between public access to
land and leisure cabin ownership in Norway, 1850-2000
Finn Arne Jørgensen, fa@jorgensenweb.net, NTNU
/
473 Local knowledge in a global industry: the formation and movement of the
science of salmonaquaculture
Stephen Bocking, sbocking@trentu.ca, Trent University
/
914 War over Whales: Radical Environmentalist Organizations and Scientific
Knowledge in Whaling Controversies
Morten Haugdahl, morten.haugdahl@hf.ntnu.no, Norwegian University of
Science and Technology (NTNU)
39
/
959 The standard of living, consumption and the environment in Norway 1726-
2006
Kjell Bjørn Minde, kjell.minde@hsh.no, Stord University College
Existential universals
Contents:
"Semiotics of being"
"Universals of biosemiosis"
"On Earth - the natural setting of the human condition"
"On the alienation of the semiotic animal"
I just got the news that Brian Goodwin is dead, since July 15th.
40
B.G. held a PhD in theoretical biology. Among his books are How The Leopard
Changed Its Spots (1994). He liked climbing trees. B.G. will be remembered for his
pioneering contributions to theoretical biology and complexity science, not least
through his development of biological structuralism (incomplete Wikipedia-article
here). For many years at the end of his life (ten, or a bit more) Brian taught at
Schumacher College, UK. His latest title there was "Scholar in residence". In addition
to contributing to short courses he taught at their groundbreaking MSc in Holistic
science - for which he was of foundational importance, along with staff ecologist
(deep ecologist, James Lovelock-colleague) Stephan Harding.
Personally I encountered Goodwin at two occasions. First, when - the autumn of 1999
- I resided at Schumacher college for three months as a volunteer. B.G. was at that
point the main responsible for the newly created MSc in Holistic science, which I
believe was in its second year. Now and then I got to listen to his talks in the MSc or
in courses, or talk with him at dinner etc. My second encounter with Goodwin occured
in the summer/autumn of 2006. At the age of 75, he accepted an invitation to figure
in the advisory board of a Nordic-Baltic Research Network for Philosophy of Biology.
The network never got funding, and therefore never materialised. I was onboard as
the assigned secretary of this network.
I have just finished my journal article 'The Global Species', for New formations.
41
In this article I will attempt to demonstrate that the historical process of globalization -
in the long term - can be outlined in terms of the expanding and eventually practically
global range (occurrence) not only of our own species, but of several of our affiliated
species as well.
Contents:
The Ecosemiotics of Globalisation
The Beginnings of Globalisation
The Ecology of Capitalism
The Politics of Biosemiotics
I have agreed to give lectures this autumn at the Department of Religion, Philosophy and
History, Faculty of Humanities and Education, University of Agder (Norway). The lectures, in
the history of philosophy, are part of Examen Philosophicum (Ex.Phil.), the Norwegian
compulsory introduction to philosophy.
The 9th Gathering in biosemiotics took place in Prague, The Czech republic, June 30th-July
4th. 48 presentations were scheduled in the programme (abstract book here), a few of which
were cancelled.
Timo MARAN and Karel KLEISNER: "Semiotic selection, cooption, and good old Darwin: Is there
a common basis for the explanation of mimicry, sexual selection, and domestication?"
My talk, "On contrapuntuality: Semiotic niche vs. ontological niche: the case of the
Scandinavian wolf population" was given Friday 3rd of July - and went well, with positive
response and useful feedback.
43
I further enjoyed the spirited company of (among others) Myrdene ANDERSON, Luis Emileo
BRUNI, Sara CANNIZZARO, Paul COBLEY, Stephen PAIN, Riin MAGNUS, Rex ALEXANDER and
Prisca AUGUSTYN.
The next gatherings will be arranged the following places (main responsible in
parenthesis):
2010: Portugal ... (João Carlos MAJOR)
Stephen Purdey (University of Toronto) has composed a short text addressing "the link
between science and society regarding climate change" (email distributed via the adaptation-
list for participants at the March 2009 Copenhagen climate conference). More specifically, he
writes about "The Growth Paradigm" (cf. his book Economic Growth, the Environment and
International Relations, to be published in November by Routledge).
Excerpts:
44
Mitigating and adapting to the effects of climate change are important objectives, but
the biggest obstacle to achieving those objectives, and to successfully maintaining a
stable planetary climate, is the deep-seated commitment among policy-makers to
continuous economic growth.
... at its root, climate change is a socio-political, indeed a cultural issue and as such
requires from scientists a kind of social and moral awareness which often falls outside
their normal range of professional interests. ... Now scientists have the ... obligation of
pointing out that the core policy priority of governments around the world is at odds
with immutable physical laws which preclude unending economic growth.
Dear Stephen,
I do believe this is a very important point (see my article "The Statistician's Guide to
Utopia: The Future of Growth").
In this context I think it is further crucial to emphasize the shift in attention and
political priority that is going on today as part of the rising global awareness about
climate change, wherein climate issues tends to dominate and almost monopolize
environmental policies. Just think about energy: Even if we did manage to use only
45
renewable energy etc., that energy consumption (and the economic activity that goes
along with it) would, within a paradigm if never-ending growth, be likely to have severe
environmental consequences; even it the climate problem was hypothetically solved
(which is in itself a totally unrealistic assumption, of course).
By the way, have you read "Surviving 1,000 centuries: Can we do it?" - A very informing
book about the physical limits of our long-term global activities.
Best,
(morten tønnessen)
46
Here's my provisional definition of the concept of meaning within the life sciences (submitted
ahead of Gatherings in biosemiotics 9, to be arranged in Prague - where there will be an open
roundtable discussion on this very topic):
"It is the meaning-ful character of the encounter between physical, organic bodies and the
material externalization of their life worlds that mediates between the inner and the outer,
the self and the world."
Tolerant Tartu
I have joined the Tolerant Tartu Advocacy Network (Tolerantse Tartu eestkostevõrgustik).
According to its mission statement, the network "support, enhance and promote societal,
cultural and scientific activities in Estonia, specifically in Tartu."
The general aim of the project „Tolerant Tartu Advocacy Network" is to develop a model of
Tartu as a city of tolerance where people enjoy living together, regardless of their race,
ethnicity, religious beliefs, and other personal characteristics."
The synthesis report from the conference 'Climate Change: Global risks, challenges and
decisions' (Copenhagen, March 2009) has been published. It is written by Nicholas Stern,
Daniel M. Kammen, Katherine Richardson and nine others.
47
It is based on the 16 plenary talks given at the Congress as well as input from over 80 chairs
and co-chairs of the 58 parallel sessions held at the Congress.
The preface refers to the proceedings, where my abstract 'The nature view held by
environmentalists: Attitudes in the Norwegian environmental establishment' is included,
among 1,400 others. "Most of the approximately 2500 people attending the Congress were
researchers, many of whom have also been contributors to the IPCC reports. Participants
came from nearly 80 different countries" (I was there as the only representative from
Estonia).
I have been informed that my submission "The Changing Imagery of the Big Bad Wolf"
has been accepted for the 10th World Congress of Semiotics, to be arranged in A
Coruña, Spain, September 22-26. My presentation will take place September 25th.
1. The annual attestation review for doctoral students at Department of Semiotics will
take place this Friday. Last Thursday I submitted my 6 pp. Attestation review for the
academic year 2008-2009 (with a 'Revised plan of study and research' for the
academic year 2009-2010 included).
This will be my second poster presentation, following March's 'The nature view held by
environmentalists. Attitudes in the Norwegian environmental establishment'.
49
POSTED BY MORTEN TØNNESSEN AT 00: 54 0 C OM M E N T S
"The statistician's guide to Utopia: The future of growth" is listed as an ISI Web of
Science publication, since TRAMES is now indexed by them.
This Sunday I finished 'The Semioethics Interviews I: John Deely / 'Tell me, where is
morality bred?'" (31 pp. manuscript), submitted to Hortus Semioticus.
Contents:
A whole new beginning for ethics?
An explicit account of otherness (or: a pretty good reason for hitting someone)
50
“You may recognize otherness and still shoot the guy”
Illegitimate semiosis
A revolutionary of sorts
The University of Tartu has published a complete video of Umberto Eco's lecture in
Tartu May 6th, 'On the Ontology of Fictional Characters: a Semiotic Study'. My
question - and Eco's subsequent answer - is to be found in the interval 01:11:25 -
01:14:15.
MT Let me finish. First, it’s obvious of course that imagination and creativity
are fundamental traits of humans in many walks of life. And often in applied
science, we start out with imagining something that does not exist – it’s totally
51
mind-dependent; and then we carry it into life. So it actually turns into
something with a physical existence. Isn’t that the work of fiction?
UE No! I... Take, for instance the cold fusion. Typical example of a scientific
hoax. It was untrue. I don’t say that fiction is mistake – which is different.
Ptolemy believed in good faith the Earth was still immobile, huh? – and the Sun
turned. It was not making fiction – it was committing a mistake. Simple and
believed. I say that there is fiction when the author pretends to say the truth,
and asks you to pretend that you are believing it. In this case you are in a
fictional world. If not, it’s a lie. If I tell you there is an elephant outside, and you
naively go out to see whether it is there or not, that is not a case of fiction, I am
only a damn liar, that’s all. And you are too much naive, hehe. Except, you are
not Thomas Aquinas, because it seems that ... comrades told him, because he
was only studying, huh? – 'Thomas, there is an ass flying on the skies', and...
(mimics Thomas looking to the skies:) Uh? He went out to look, and, there was
not... they laughed: Ahaha... And he said, ‘I believed it was more, very similar...
that there was an ass flying.’ Then the monk lied, ehehehe...
Comment: Eco's definition of fiction, that "there is fiction when the author pretends
to say the truth, and asks you to pretend that you are believing it", is fine. His
counterexamples, however, do not appear to have anything to do with my question,
where I talk about fiction (within science) as having to do with something first
imagined and then made into be (as a physical existent). Eco's examples concerns
either a) mistaken scientific theories or b) Lies/jokes. Whether those qualify as
'fiction' is a separate issue.
52
1 (1) The Statistician's Guide to Utopia: The Future of growth 443 (255 = +188)
Latest additions: CV, Preludium til romanen HUFF, 'The Nature View Held by
Environmentalists' abstract/poster. For a full list of my uploaded documents, see here. For a
previous post on views on Scribd, see here.
[From Aftenposten's supplementary ad magazine on Estonia, May 27th, 2009 - Norwegian text:
Øyvind Rangøy (for transcription, see Utopisk Realisme)]
We meet Morten in the student town Tartu, and he would like to explain for us what semiotics is.
– A familiar example is traffic lights. It is one of the most obvious signs that most people can
53
understand. When you have green and red with yellow in between, most people know that this
has a conventional meaning. Green means go – and so on. But it is also a double-encoding, an
encoding according to the order. A quick glance at a traffic light, and you can easily get what
you are supposed to do. They are symbols with a random meaning that has simply been agreed
upon.
Semiotics is thus the study of the signs and the use of them, we are told. – But then we see how
many people today just look at the signs – traffic lights – and no longer at the traffic. This is for
me a sign of alienation, people are so overtly present in the reality of signs that they no longer
see the nature behind it, says Morten.
Semiotics is dealing with the functioning of signs, Morten explains, engaged. – And with the
context. Part of the first a semiotician will ask, is what context the signs function in.
– When there is talk of Tartu and semiotics, often the "Tartu-Moscow School" is mentioned. What
is that?
– This is a tradition or school in the area of semiotics which is primarily related to Juri Lotman’s
work and to semiotics of culture. Lotman and others develop models for society and how cultures
and subcultures can be analyzed. But another tradition of semiotics that Tartu and Estonia has is
related to the Baltic-German biologist Jakob von Uexküll. – This is more important in my own
work. He was the predecessor of the so-called biosemiotics, or semiotics of nature. In Estonia,
there is both a tradition of cultural semiotics and a tradition of natural semiotics – a kind of
philosophy of nature on the relationship between man and nature. This makes Tartu a potent
place in semiotics internationally.
54
CULTURAL ENCOUNTER AS MOTIVATION
It is no coincidence that the central persons in the Estonian tradition of semiotics have a diverse
cultural background, says Morten: – Juri Lotman was a Russian Jew. He had a complex
background, and ended up in Tartu because he was not tolerated in Russia. Soviet powers
allowed him to be in a kind of internal exile in the Empire's periphery, and Tartu had an old
university tradition. In the 60ies Lotman established the first international journal for semiotics –
Sign Systems Studies – which is still published in Tartu.
The other source of the semiotics tradition – Jakob von Uexküll, however, was from a German
cultural background and another time. He took his basic university education in Tartu, but was
later active elsewhere in Europe. He regarded himself as German, even though Estonia today
regards him as one of their own.
A Russian immigrant and a German emigrant are thus important in the Estonian project of
semiotics, and this, Morten thinks, is an important point: – The cultural mix was probably part of
motivation for these scholars.
INTERNATIONALIZATION
– Why hasn’t there been any foreign doctoral student in semiotics here before?
– Yes, why hasn’t anyone gone here on their own before, with that kind of ambition? It is only in
recent years that the University of Tartu has sought actively for foreign students at all levels.
Now, just like in Norway, there is an internationalization going on at the university here.
Currently there are only 5-600 international students here, of 15-20000.
Morten has some visits in Tartu behind him even before he started on his doctoral studies. This
year he came to start for real [not so exact...], and his Ph.D. should be completed in 2011. Until
then he lives permanently in Tartu with his wife Helena, who is from Brazil.
Tartu, with its about 100,000 inhabitants, is a great city to study, he says. – The students are
very visible on the urban scene. The city is also small enough to be pretty transparent when it
comes to the subjects I am involved in. It is a city that it is easy to feel at home in, just the right
55
size. At the same time, the institution of the University of Tartu is old and large enough to carry
the bulk of the Estonian academic tradition. Tartu is a kind of cultural capital.
Morten the semiotician also has a tip for those who might have become interested in what he is
doing. Namely that in the fall, the University of Tartu opens an English language master
programme in semiotics.
If you want to learn Estonian, Estonia is the obvious choice. But Estonian institutions further
have more than 100 approved international study programs in English. A usual path is 3 years
Bachelor + 2 years Master. Some study places are free of charge, if there are any tuition fees
Lånekassen can give support.
– ICT applications at the Tallinn Technical University and University of Tartu: Cyber Security and
Software Engineering.
– The Film Arts – Baltic Film and Media School (BFM), Tallinn.
56
Exam season
Lately I have finished a lot of compulsory course essays (5 the last couple of weeks). Here's a
list of all 10 compulsory essays I have completed this semester (latest ones marked with an x)
- 46 pp. all in all.
The 9th Gathering in Biosemiotics, to take place in Prague, June 30th - July 4th, has made its
abstract book available online. My abstract, 'On contrapuntuality. Semiotic niche vs.
ontological niche: the case of the Scandinavian wolf population', appears on p. 45. My talk is
scheduled to take place Friday, July 3rd, 16-16.30.
In this talk I will argue that the notions of ‘semiotic niche’ (Hoffmeyer) and
‘ontological niche’ (introduced by myself) are complementary concepts. While the
57
semiotic niche concept is best fitted to describe optimal ecological situations, in
which ecosystems are functional, the ontological niche concept is better fitted to
describe situations of ecosystem malfunction. The reason is that a ‘semiotic niche’
is plainly an expression of optimal (or desirable) ecological conditions and
relations, whereas the ontological niche depicts the set (or ‘gestalt’) of
contrapuntal relations that a being takes part in at any given point of natural
history.
In one sense, therefore, the semiotic niche is a general concept, whereas the
ontological niche is a specific concept. In situations where the ‘normal’ ecosystem
is not left intact, a concept of relational being, such as that of an ontological
niche, can be applied to exhibit in what way changing ecological conditions and
relations affect the viability of a population of animals, and literally change their
place in the world. Some examples will be provided in order to demonstrate the
importance of not confusing a manifest ontological niche with the partly
indiscernible semiotic niche.
One such example is the behaviour of Scandinavian wolves. Here, the semiotic
niche of these wolves would represent their behavioural repertoire. It would be
wrong, however, to assume that their current behaviour – as shy animals with a
taste for moose and an evident preference for forest-covered, uninhabited habitats
– simply reflects their general semiotic competence. Rather, it reflects how they
apply their semiotic competence in a certain ecological and cultural context. The
fact of the matter is that the behaviour of Scandinavian wolves to a substantial
degree reflects our approach to them. In the same way as the shyness of this
population results from our century-long hounding of wolves, their avoidance of
built-up areas reflects their (partly embodied) experience with encountering
people. Wolf behaviour in modern times, to cut a long history short, is just as
much an indicator of human behaviour as it is an expression of what it is like to be
a wolf.
58
Book, book chapter
1) My book proposal "The Growth Crisis: Norwegian Ecophilosophy and the Future of the
Growth Economy", submitted to Springer, is in preparation for being sent to review. I have
agreed to complete two sample chapters (ch. 1, on Zapffe, and ch. 7, on the future of
growth) by June 30th.
In the 30,000 character post 'Bioethics, Defining the Moral Subject and Spinoza', Kvond treats
my 2003 article 'Umwelt ethics' in impressive detail, mainly from a Spinozist point of view.
Outline:
An Ecology of Persons
59
In his essay Morten Tønnessen steers somewhat clear from Hoffmeyer’s wider embrace
in order to return to the rich heritage of Umwelt-thinking, and he tries to heal any
solipsistic phenomenological drag from the concept by postulating various zones of
“total Umwelt” expression. These are still phenomenological states, but simply
totalized by some measure. Personally, I don’t see the advantage of returning to
Idealism’s internal preoccupation and anchoring, something which ever must return to
the notion of a subject. Yet, Tønnessen also extracts from von Uexküll the important
idea that the animal and its Umwelt are inseparable. While this still leaves us on the
wrong side of the ledger, Tønnessen’s transfer from a terminology of “Tier-Umwelt-
monade” to “bioontological monad,” which he reads as counterpart to the biosphere[.]
POSTED BY MORTEN TØNNESSEN AT 07:05 3 COMMENTS
1. First step of co-editing (with Kati Lindström) the upcoming special issue of the journal
Biosemiotics, entitled 'Semiotics of Perception', is completed, as all abstracts have been
gathered and an introduction ('Being in the World of the Living - Semiotic Perspectives')
drafted.
2. Last Friday/Saturday I finished my Springer book proposal for the book 'The Growth Crisis:
Norwegian Ecophilosophy and the Future of the Growth Economy'. 10 pp. A Norwegian
language book proposal was finished in two versions over the course of the last couple of
weeks.
CHAPTERS:
1 Zapffe: The distraction economy
2 Kvaløy Setreng: Growth means crisis
3 Arne Næss: Sooner or later economic growth must end
4 Semiotic economy: An economy with room for the living
5 How we became so rich (and the Earth so poor)
6 How rich are we?
7 On the future of growth
60
3. The blogger Kvond recently posted 'Umwelt, Umwelten and The Animal Defined By Its
Relations', in which he discusses a few points from my 2003 article 'Umwelt ethics' (he also
refers to Kalevi Kull, John Deely, Paul Bains etc.). He finds that it is a wonderful outline of
the possibilities of the thought of an Uexküllian deep ecological ethics, "including an
informing critique of Uexküll’s actual political views, but it seems to lack a thorough
connection between the two streams, presenting more a juxtaposition." I see that point.
There is much to be said ... about what a Spinozist/Davidsonian analysis could contribute to
Morten Tønnessen’s Deep Ecology ethics, and even more to investigate in terms of just how
Exowelten could overlap, and with what consequence. I hope to have opened up an avenue of
extra-somatic interpretation of the real way that awareness crosses boundaries and resides in
organs of perception beyond what is well-considered our “body”.
4. This week there are two guests in town, both Italian - philosopher Carlo Brentari, who is
visiting the Jakob von Uexküll Centre and will be offering a 45 min. talk in a biosemiotics
seminar, and a certain Umberto Eco.
Morten Tønnessen
I have contributed with a little piece of text, entitled "An Ageing giant", to the
forthcoming May issue of ISEE (International Society for Environmental Ethics)
Newsletter - which will include a special section in memory of Arne Näss.
World Congress
I have registered for the 10th World Congress in Semiotics, to take place in A Coruña,
Galicia (Spain).
62
I will be participating on behalf of the research project Dynamical zoosemiotics and
animal representations.
I have submitted my article "Food vs. nature: How Human Taste Has Shaped Nature as
We Know It" to The Trumpeter - Journal of Ecosophy.
'World will not meet 2C warming target, climate change experts agree' is the headline
of The Guardian's article summarizing a survey/poll the british newspaper carried out.
The survey follows a scientific conference last month in Copenhagen, where a series
of studies were presented that suggested global warming could strike harder and
faster than realised.
The Guardian contacted all 1,756 people who registered to attend the conference and
asked for their opinions on the likely course of global warming. Of 261 experts who
63
responded, 200 were researchers in climate science and related fields. I belong to the
61 on other fields.
(1) Given the current growth in carbon emissions and range of mitigation options
available, do you think that global average temperature rise CAN be limited to
2C?
If we took the right measures today, that would quite likely be possible. The
chance of that happening, however, is remote. While there has been an
emerging concensus the last couple of years that 'something has to be done', the
discourse about what measures are the right ones has not progressed, but rather
worsened - not least as a consequence of the green-washing of any conceiveable
form of energy production (from nuclear energy to 'clean coal'), which has all
been re-branded as 'climate friendly'. As for now it seems like all major energy
sources will keep growing. With such a development, it is not remotely realistic
to limit global temperature rise to 2C.
(2) Do you think the world IS currently taking the necessary action to limit the
rise to 2C?
No. Some energy practices have to be excluded. Fossil fuel has to be phased out.
It doesn't matter how much renewable energy we produce, as long as it
supplements, rather than replaces, dirty energy. The world does not need 'more
energy'.
(3) Given the scale of current action and the likely political response over the
next few years do you think average temperature rise WILL be limited to 2C?
Probably not. A more fundamental societal change is likely to take more time to
occur - though 'tipping points' exist in human societies as well, I don't see the
constructive tendency in thought and attitudes that would be required.
64
(4) If yes, then what will bring about the required reduction in carbon emissions?
(CCS is not likely to be a solution. First of all, it continues our fossil era, meaning
that IF it doesn't work out, we will lose valuable time, and in the meantime we
will have increased the problem and grown even more dependent on fossil
solutions. Even if it did work out, it could only be applied where there are big
sources of emissions, meaning that a CCS strategy will favor big business and
centralization of infrastructure, and all the same legitimize smaller sources of
emissions, which taken together represent too high emissions already.)
(5) If no, then what do you think is the most realistic average temperature rise
we can expect this century?
The real lesson from our climate awareness should be that nature is not
something we can perfectly well predict and control. Is there a chance for a 2
degree increase? Yes. Is there a chance for a 5 degree increase? Maybe. With the
lack of caution in today's climate policies (where many see climate change as a
great business opportunity), we can only leave this question to future historians.
Is there a chance for a 1 degree increase? - Maybe - but that wouldn't necessarily
mean that 'all environmental problems were solved' - it is conceiveable indeed
that we can solve 'the climate problem', one way or another, and yet, a hundred
years from now, have more substantial environmental problems than today. With
current policies (and current thinking), we are likely to see increased
environmental pressure, overall, regardless of what happens with the climate.
Three texts
Yesterday I finished my compulsory course essay (in 'Ethics and Methodology of Science') 'Essay
on Induction' (2 pp).
This night/morning I finished my compulsory course essay (in 'Aristotelian Physics and Biology')
'On the Mathematician and the Student of Nature' (8 pp).
Right now I finished my abstract for the CECT conference 'Spatiality, memory and visualisation
of culture/nature relationships: Theoretical aspects', 'Mapping Human Impact: Ecological
Footprint vs. Ontological Niche '. Abstract:
66
In this presentation I will compare my ecosemiotic concept of a human
ontological niche with the concept of an ecological footprint, with respect to
how either of these can be applied as tools in mapping human impact in nature.
An ontological niche - a concept derived from Jakob von Uexküll's Umwelt
concept - can be defined as the set (or whole) of ecological relations (or
'contrapuntal relations', be they somatic, social or ecological) a being or life
form partakes in at a certain point in natural history. The ecological footprint
concept, on its hand, first introduced in 1996, is now being used by WWF (Living
Planet Report) and developed methodologically by the Global Footprint Network.
Claimed to be a tool that makes sustainability measurable, it condenses a
complex array of consumption down into a single number. The developers of the
ecological footprint model stress that it includes only those aspects of resource
consumption and waste production for which the Earth has regenerative
capacity. What is does is converting consumption into the land used in
production, along with the land theoretically needed to sequester the
greenhouse gases produced. By dividing 'Humanity's Ecological Footprint'
(currently 2,7 'global hectares' per person) by 'World Biocapacity' - which is
modelled as being constant - we arrive at the conclusion that humanity as a
whole has been unsustainable (accumulating 'ecological debt') since the late 80s.
When the footprint of a country does not surpass its biocapacity, it is said to be
sustainable.
The ecological footprint model has several limitations, not least the fact that
there are many environmental problems it cannot represent. It further says
nothing about the intensity of land use. From an ethical point of view it is biased
toward anthropocentricism in assuming that 'sustainability' entails that humanity
can exploit the Earth's biocapacity fully. Also from a methodological point of
view it is anthropocentric, as it represents human consumption and ecosystem
services only - both being purely human interests. The human ontological niche
concept, in contrast, is designed in order to display the ecological relations in
which humanity partakes. As Nathan Fiala (2008: 519) remarks, “better measures
of sustainability would address these issues [environmental issues] directly”.
67
Whereas the simplicity of the ecological footprint is not only its greatest
advantage but also its greatest disadvantage, the human ontological niche
concept is better suited to account for variety within and across ecosystems,
because its biggest advantage is its (qualitative, rather than quantitative)
specificity. It further allows for disparate ethical assumptions. Unlike the
ecological footprint, it will hardly result in an illusory certainty while in fact
misrepresenting ecological reality. After assessing the ecological footprint
concept, I will model selected global environmental data to demonstrate how
the human ontological niche concept can be applied as a modelling tool
scrutinizing human impact in nature.
Reference
Fiala, Nathan 2008. Measuring sustainability: Why the ecological footprint is bad
economics and bad environmental science. Ecological Economics 67: 519-525.
My article 'Umwelt Transitions: Uexküll and Environmental Change' is now awailable online in
full-text, courtesy of Biosemiotics/Springer.
Html-version here.
68
(Copenhagen, August 4-8), has apparently been rescheduled to the session 'Using and abusing
wild animals. Terrestrial and aquatic case studies', to take place August 5th.
- Cultural Behavior and Animals’ Life: The Relationship between the Tribute and Asiatic Lions’
Crisis (1400-1600)
Lei Kang
Peter Boomgaard
Karen Oslund
My blog post entitled "Estonian media", from February 13th, has been updated. It now
includes my brief, Estonian language introduction to David Abram's text, printed in Roheline
Värav (GreenGate).
I have finished my article on animal play, for the special issue on zoosemiotics of Sign Systems
Studies.
69
Abstraction, cruelty and other aspects of animal play
Exemplified by the playfulness of Muki and Maluca
The fun of playing resists all analysis, all logical interpretation […] Here we have to do with
an absolutely primary category of life, familiar to everybody at a glance right down to the
animal level […] Animals play so they must be more than merely mechanical things. We play
and know that we play, so we must be more than merely rational beings.
Abstract
Play behaviour is notorious for constituting a much debated, yet little clarified field of
research. In this article, attempts are made to reach conclusions on the relation
between human play and the play of other animals (especially cat play), as well as on
the very character of play. The concept of Umwelt is reviewed, as are definitions of
animal play, categorization of animal play and the role of meta-communication in
playful behaviour. For some play is a symbol of everything that is good. The author of
the current article does not deny that social morality may have originated from play
behaviour, but stresses the existence of cruelty play, which leads to additional
assumptions. Another notion that is treated in some detail is perceptual play, which
proves to demonstrate complex semiotic play that is related first of all to signification.
At the end of the article an alternative categorization of animal play is suggested, in
which the fundamental role of mind games is emphasized. Throughout the text
examples of play behaviour are offered by the two domestic cats Muki and Maluca.
70
At the Copenhagen congress on climate change I ran into a publisher from Springer.
- You don't happen to be giving books away for free today, do you? I said, hinting at 'Surviving
1,000 Centuries: Can We Do It?' in the book shelf.
- Of course, said the publisher - if you can tell me about the next book you plan to publish.
I am now preparing a book proposal entitled 'The Growth Crisis: Norwegian Ecophilosophy and
the Growth Economy', an idea I originally conceived of in terms of a Norwegian publication
only. I am very pleased that Springer shows interest in my work - not least since it has been
the publisher of many of the works by Arne Næss and Jakob von Uexküll. In that company - I
can feel at home.
Roger Parent recently visited Semiootika Osakond from Canada. I was there for three classes
of his course on The semiotics of cultural conflicts (a course which greatly inspired my wife,
who now appears to be just as semiotic as myself). Today I missed out on Martin Walter's
lecture on Poinsot, due to some confusion about summer/winter time - but we went for lunch
(where I had a delicious ceasar salad).
3. NEW FORMATIONS
I have agreed to submit an article to New Formations' special issue on Imperial Ecologies. My
article will address topics of globalization from an ecosemiotic (and largely historical) point of
view (with a view to the past as well as to the future), with emphasis of human settlers and
the ecology of capitalism.
71
I have signed a petition to include ethical expertise in the next report from the IPCC.
It is widely acknowledged…
…that ethical questions play a central role in climate science and policy. Most recently,
this is evidenced in the key messages resulting from the International Scientific
Congress on Climate Change in Copenhagen of March 2009.1 IPCC reports are full of
explicit and implicit references to ethical issues, particularly in the context of
discussions on sustainability. Important examples include:
- the relation of humans to nature and questions regarding the value of biodiversity and
natural services5
- value judgements that determine what is to count as a "key" vulnerability and what
level of anthropogenic interference with the climate system is to count as "dangerous"6
We observe…
…that in the IPCC assessment reports, ethical questions are not addressed with the same
rigour as other questions. The analysis of issues with strong ethical components is not
conducted on a comparable level of scientific quality as is the analysis of other issues. It
is indicative of this general observation that, for the references given for the examples
above, there is an almost complete lack of professional ethicists among the
coordinating, lead, and contributing authors.
72
We observe…
…that by now there is a large and growing literature on climate change written by
ethics specialists. The first survey article on climate ethics appeared in the most
prominent ethics journal five years ago,7 and bibliographies with relevant literature
take up many pages.8
We therefore suggest…
…that a chapter with a general overview of the ethical issues in climate change be
included in AR5. Such a chapter should not arrive at specific conclusions regarding the
morally "correct" climate policy, but should rather provide an analysis that can support
political decision-making and facilitate structured discussion. It should enumerate the
approaches available in the state of the art literature as well as portray the most
relevant arguments concerning all sides of the debate. Above all, authorities in the field
of ethics rather than social or natural scientists should prepare such a chapter. In case a
chapter on ethical issues should not become a reality, we urge that, at the very least, in
those chapters where ethical issues are expressly addressed, the expertise of
professionals in the field of ethics is sought and that such professionals be included in
the list of authors.
http://climatecongress.ku.dk/newsroom/congress_key_messages/
2 For example: AR4, WG III, chap. 13, especially 13.1.2; AR4, WG III, chap. 2.6 (for an earlier
3 For example: AR4, WG III, chap. 2.4.2.1. (for an earlier example, see: SAR, WG III, chap. 4)
4 For example: AR4, WG III, chap. 2.2 – 2.4 (for an earlier example, see: TAR, WG II, chap. 2.7).
6 For example: AR4, WG II, chap. 19.1.2.2; AR4, WG III, chap. 1.2.2
73
7 Gardiner, S. (2004). “Ethics and Global Climate Change,” Ethics 114: 555 – 600.
Among the many contributions by specialists in the field of normative science, salient examples of
- Caney, S., Gardiner, S., Jamieson, D. & Shue, S. (eds.) (2009). Climate Ethics (New York: Oxford
University Press).
- Page, E. (2006). Climate Change, Justice and Future Generations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
- Vanderheiden, S. (2008). Atmospheric Justice. A Political Theory of Climate Justice (New York:
My updated CV
1. PERSONAL DETAILS
2. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
3. LANGUAGE SKILLS
4. INFORMAL COMPETENCE
5. EDUCATION
6. ACADEMIC ACTIVITY
8. FILMOGRAPHY
My "band", The Schopenhauer Experience, now has its own blog. Here you'll find a complete
"discography", links to songs and music online etc.
My latest musical work - my first for more than a year - is entitled "No Words This Time".
Voice, but no lyrics.
Norwegian teacher
I have agreed with Tartu Rahvaülikool (Tartu Folk High School) that I will be offering a course
(4 hours per week, 54 hours all in all) in Norwegian this autumn. This will be the first
Norwegian course offered at Rahvaülikool ever (all in all they offer courses in 13 languages).
Page numbers
DOI 10.1007/s12304-008-9036-y
75
WEDNESDAY, 11 MARCH 2009
The abstract of my poster presentation 'The nature view held by environmentalists. Attitudes
in the Norwegian environmental establishment' is included in the digital (CD) Abstract Book of
the climate conference currently ongoing in Copenhagen, which has been distributed to about
2000 participants.
All abstracts have now been published in the open access journal IOP Conference Series: Earth
and Environmental Science, volume 6, 2009. Abstracts are organized by sessions. My session,
'Cultures, Values & World Perspectives as Factors in Responding to Climate Change' (session
57) is to be found here. My contribution, 'The nature view...', is, and will remain, available
online at the hyperlink hidden in the apparent depths of these characters.
My poster for the congress Climate Change: Global Risks, Challenges and
Decisions
76
This is the poster that I will be presenting at the congress 'Climate Change: Global Risks,
Challenges and Decisions' (Copenhagen, March 10-12, 2009). Entitled 'The Nature View Held by
Environmentalists: Attitudes in the Norwegian Environmental Establishment', it presents in
some detail the outcome of two of the questions from a survey dating back to 2006 which was
carried out among decision makers involved in the Norwegian environmental discourse.
Presented here are the findings on what natural entities - ranging from 'individual human
beings' to 'nature' - the respondents attributed value to, plus how they ranked 14 sources of
energy according to environmental friendliness.
The poster has also been uploaded to Scribd (word format). So has the abstract, which will be
made available to policy makers at December 2009 UN Climate summit, COP15.
77
Poster programme, Copenhagen
The detailed poster programme for the forthcoming scientific conference on climate change,
in preparation of the december UN climate summit, is now online.
While there are several presenters from Norway, I appear to be the only representative from
Estonia.
I have submitted an article, "Food vs. Nature. How Human Taste has Shaped Nature as We
Know It" to a coming special issue of Politics and Culture, on food sovereignty.
Other presenters include Marcello Barbieri, Stephen Pain, Paul Cobley, Myrdene Anderson and
many others.
The news blog Global Voices, which is written by more than 100 bloggers (see also Wikipedia),
is looking for a volunteer author/blogger to report from the blogosphere in Estonia.
Global Voices is a leading participatory media news room for voices from the developing
world. Begun in 2005 as a simple blog hosted at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society
at Harvard University, Global Voices has grown into a vibrant global community of more than
150 active volunteer authors and translators and more than 20 freelance part- time regional
and language editors.
The Estonian Science Foundation research grant "Dynamical zoosemiotics and animal
representations", where I am one of the main investigators, now has a homepage.
2. developing semiotic tools for analyzing sign relationships that extend beyond the
limits of culture; practical analysis of sample cases;
3. studying semiotic strategies and evolution of representative forms used for depicting
animals in myths, literature and visual culture;
The first major activity of the project was to arrange the Animal Minds workshop, Feb. 9.-10.
My poster presentation at the IARU World Congress on Climate Change: Global Risk,
Challenges and Decision (Copenhagen, March 10-12, 2009), " The nature view held by
environmentalists. Attitudes in the Norwegian environmental establishment" (poster board no.
P57.19) has been scheduled.
Another publishing house with an identical name (which published online as well as in print),
Academic Journals Inc., is apparently one of the biggest scientific publishers in Asia.
Data from the last couple of months, where there has been an average of 3 page loads from a
total of 2 unique visitors each day (all in all 284 page loads, 172 unique visitors, 151 of which
were first time visitors).
LOCATION OF VISITORS
1. Estonia (35 %)
2. USA (17 %)
3. Norway (13 %)
4. Brazil (9 %)
5. Canada (4 %)
6. UK (3 %)
6. Italy (3 %)
81
8. Netherlands (2 %)
8. Finland (2 %)
10. Denmark (2 %)
The 23 origin countries includes Nepal, India, Iran and Taiwan. Non-western countries
(including Brazil and Taiwan) accounts for 11-12 % of visits, North-America for 21-22 %.
9 out of 10 visits are first time visits, hardly 1 out of 10 have returned.
The SemioPhenomenon website has had visitors from at least 23 countries, 17-18 of
which are European. Most visiters have been from
1. Estonia (68 %)
2. Finland (7 %)
3. USA (5 %)
4. Italy (5 %)
5. Sweden (4 %)
Visits from non-European countries, US excluded, account for only 3 % (even when
Russia is included).
82
Close to 80 % of visits were first-time visits.
Recent visitors have found the site by way of 53 different keyword searches.
While three fourths of visits lasted shorter than 5 minutes, almost one out of five
lasted longer than an hour.
David Abram's public lecture at The University of Tartu Feb. 10th, 'Language and the
Ecology of Sensory Experience', which was part of the events SemioPhenomenon, is
now online at the university webpage.
I have just submitted an abstract for the 9th gathering in biosemiotics, to be arranged
in Prague, entitled "On contrapuntuality: Semiotic niche vs. ontological niche - the
case of the Scandinavian wolf population".
Estonian media
83
An announcement of the workshops in Tartu Postimees February 4th reads
"Semiootikakonverentsile tuleb mustkunstnik" (Magician comes to conference in
semiotics).
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::
On February 6th, ERR - Estonian Public broadcasting - published the following news
story online: (based on a 3 minute interview that aired on Vikerraadio at noon the
same day):
Peakorraldaja Tönnessen on ise norralane, kes õpib 2007. aastast Tartu Ülikoolis.
Idee konverents just Tartus pidada tuli talle Tartu Ülikooli semiootikaosakonna
ajaloolise tausta tõttu. Just seetõttu on Tartusse kohale tulnud ka oma ala
eksperdid. Peaesineja on Ameerika kultuuriökoloog David Abram, kes on tuntud
oma käsitluste poolest ühendada traditsioonilist fenomenoloogiat ökoloogiliste
teemadega.
84
saavad kaks loodusele keskenduvat mõtteviisi: ameeriklaste ökoloogiline
fenomenoloogia ja eestlaste biosemiootika," ütles Tönnessen.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Today, Feb. 13th, the first translation of David Abram into Estonian (excerpts from
"The Spell of the Sensuous. Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World")
appears in Roheline Värav (Green gate) under the headline "Lapsed nägid esimest
korda Linnuteed". The publication includes a brief introduction by me. The translation
was conducted by Signe Saumaawith help from Ehte Putang, Riin Magnus and Silver
Ratassepp.
David Abram
Tekst ilmub siin autori heakskiidul, ühtlasi palus David Abram selle pühendada
oma sõbrale ja kolleegile Arne Naessile, kes suri 96 aasta vanusena 12. jaanuaril
2009.
85
Morten Tønnessen
1 (1) The Statistician's Guide to Utopia: The Future of growth 255 (79)
Latest addition: Steps to a Semiotics of Being (my PPT presentation from the Animal
Minds workshop). For a full list of my uploaded documents, see here.
1. SemioPhenomenon 2,137
86
My article "Umwelt transitions: Uexküll and Environmental Change" has been published
online in the Springer journal Biosemiotics. Full text available for subscribers only
(first page, including abstract, freely available).
My first encounter with wolves (from a distance) took place in Kristiansand dyrepark
(Kristiansand Zoo, Norway), guided by Olav Åsland, their main responsible for keeping
the captive wolves. It's a pack of 6 wolves, born in 2002 (alpha male), 2005 (alpha
female) and 2008 (the four pups) respectively. They were being fed, with pieces of
horse meat. A lot of crows joined in on the eating. After a little time the wolves came
running to get hold of a few of the meat pieces, and then ran off to the heights in
order to eat undisturbed.
A curious male wolverine, at the other side of the path, had a good look at us, a few
meters from the fence.
87
The workshops are open for registration, see the event homepage - which by now
displays a full list of presenters (and most titles) as well as a brief introduction to
David Abram's phenomenology.
Arne Næss
He was the one who inspired me to adapt to philosophy. I had the fortune to meet
him - amongst other things, I conducted a couple of interviews with him, I arranged
two public talks in Oslo, and I attended a 3-day seminar on deep ecology.
Too great for his time, which was not mature for his thought, his instinct.
Too great for his (and my) country, which barely understood him, embracing only his
entertaining, clown-like side. In Norway everybody knew who he was - and yet hardly
anyone knew what he was all about. Though his persona in the Norwegian context out
shadowed his philosophy, he leaves behind him a philosophy that is internationally
greater than the image of his persona, and that remains alive and thriving - a seed
inspiring much needed change for our global civilization, at this critical point in
history.
88
My article "The Phenomenal Fields of Wolves on the Scandinavian Peninsula during
Their Recovery" has been finished and submitted to Journal of Comparative
Psychology, edited by Gordon M. Burghardt.
ABSTRACT
This study makes use of a typology of four phenomenal fields, with roots in the
work of Jakob von Uexküll (1864-1944), in a systematic assessment of modern
wolf ecology on the Scandinavian Peninsula, with emphasis on the wolves’
private experience. It shows that the wolves on the Scandinavian Peninsula are
shy animals which demonstrate clear preferences for forest-covered
environments and a diet dominated by moose (Alces alces). The findings of this
study suggest that wildlife management policy should be developed with a short-
term as well as a long-term perspective. While recovery is the logical
conservation goal in the short term, when a variant of human-dependent viability
is in many cases all that is achievable, to restore independent viability should be
the long-term goal for wildlife management.
KEYWORDS
Gray wolf Canis lupus, wolf ecology, wildlife management, Umwelt
89
About Me
Morten Tønnessen
• Wolf Land
Brief academic CV
• 8th annual conference of the Nordic society for phenomenology (Stockholm, April 22-
24, 2010)
Past events
• Climate change: Global Risks, Challanges and Decisions (Copenhagen, March 2009)
91
• Workshop: The Ecology of Perception. Landscapes in Culture and Nature (2009)
• Climate change
• Domestication
• Environmental history
• Environmentalism, activism
• Epistemology
• Ontology
• Semiotic economy
• Demography
• Existentialism
• Political philosophy
• Semiotic threshold
• Technology studies
My Blog List
Biosemiosis
3 months ago
BLOG ARCHIVE
• ▼ 2009 (102)
o ▼ December (6)
o ▼ November (9)
o ▼ October (11)
o ▼ September (7)
o ▼ August (7)
o ▼ July (6)
o ▼ June (11)
o ▼ May (6)
o ▼ April (12)
o ▼ March (10)
o ▼ February (12)
o ▼ January (5)
93
• ▼ 2008 (41)
o ▼ December (7)
o ▼ November (5)
o ▼ October (4)
o ▼ September (5)
o ▼ August (2)
o ▼ July (6)
o ▼ June (3)
o ▼ May (4)
o ▼ April (5)
2.015
• Reversing the Brain Drain (interview with president Toomas Hendrik Ilves)
• Umwelt ethics
94