Shop No.

2010_Sales
(Thousand of
Rs.)

2011_Sales
(Thousand of
Rs.)

Region

Type of Shop

8
9
10
13
18
21
22
27
40
42
44
45
51
55
57
58
4
14
15
17
30
43
47
1
28
34
35
41
56
29
60
25
38
46
53
3
5
7
11
12
16
20
32
37
48
50
52
59
2

73
54
74
67
63
58
78
62
74
64
70
63
62
70
61
67
69
58
53
65
58
54
60
59
63
63
57
51
62
60
83
75
73
65
63
68
77
62
75
68
72
65
58
59
67
59
62
69
61

74
66
63
62
57
60
73
71
58
65
69
78
75
67
74
59
77
80
70
63
58
71
60
64
52
55
61
75
59
71
75
64
75
65
55
85
86
72
69
85
69
85
72
70
75
86
68
75
56

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

Code
1
2
3
4

Code
1
2

6
23
26
33
39
49
54
19
24
31
36

62
65
56
60
64
61
57
54
67
59
67

66
62
80
76
76
79
67
73
72
75
76

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

Region
Northern
Eastern
Western
Southern

Type
Urban Shops
Rural Shops

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

2010_Sales (Thousand of75
Rs.)
Mean
63.70968 64.10714
Variance
56.0129 33.06217
Observations
31
28
Pooled Variance
45.1415
Hypothesized Mean Difference
0
df
57
t Stat
-0.22691
P(T<=t) one-tail
0.410654
t Critical one-tail 1.672029
P(T<=t) two-tail
0.821309
t Critical two-tail
2.002465

Answer
1. the average of urban sales
2. the total no. of observation
3. t critical value is 2.002465
4. t calculated value is -0.226
since you can see t calculate
5.Urban sales gave less resu
6. The same result is also en
p = 0.821309

1. the average of urban sales is 63.71%, where as the average of rural sales is 64.107%.
2. the total no. of observations is 31 for urban sales and 29 for rural.
3. t critical value is 2.002465
4. t calculated value is -0.22691
since you can see t calculated value is lower than t critical value
5.Urban sales gave less results and Rural sales gave better reults
6. The same result is also endorse by the P value of the output.
p = 0.821309

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

2011_Sales (Thousand of64
Rs.)
Mean
66.51613 73.21429
Variance
57.7914 68.4709
Observations
31
28
Pooled Variance
62.85011
Hypothesized Mean Difference
0
df
57
t Stat
-3.24068
P(T<=t) one-tail
0.000996
t Critical one-tail
1.672029
P(T<=t) two-tail
0.001993
t Critical two-tail
2.002465

Answer
1. the average of urban sales is 66.
2. the total no. of observations is 31
3. t critical value is 2.002465
4. t calculated value is -3.224
since you can see t calculated value
5.Urban sales gave less results and
6. The same result is also endorse
p = 0.001993

age of urban sales is 66.516%, where as the average of rural sales is 73.214%.
no. of observations is 31 for urban sales and 28 for rural.
value is 2.002465
ted value is -3.224
can see t calculated value is lower than t critical value
ales gave less results and Rural sales gave better reults
me result is also endorse by the P value of the output.

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

2010_Sales2011_Sales
(Thousand of
(Thousand
Rs.)
of Rs.)
Mean
64.08333
69.6
Variance
45.7048 72.44746
Observations
60
60
Pooled Variance
59.07613
Hypothesized Mean Difference
0
df
118
t Stat
-3.93126
P(T<=t) one-tail
7.15E-05
t Critical one-tail
1.65787
P(T<=t) two-tail
0.000143
t Critical two-tail
1.980272

Answer
1. the average of urban sales is 64.
2. the total no. of observations is 60
3. t critical value is 1.980272
4. t calculated value is -3.93126
since you can see t calculated value
5.2010 sales gave less results and
6. The same result is also endorse
p = 0.000143

age of urban sales is 64.0833%, where as the average of rural sales is 69.6%.
no. of observations is 60 for urban sales and 60 for rural.
value is 1.980272
ted value is -3.93126
can see t calculated value is lower than t critical value
es gave less results and 2011 sales gave better reults
me result is also endorse by the P value of the output.