Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Project Proponent:
Prepared by:
November 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
2-3
46
7-8
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Project --------------------------------1.2 Geography ---------------------------------------------------1.3 Seismicity ----------------------------------------------------1.4 Location Map ------------------------------------------------
9
9
10
11
2 SITE INVESTIGATION
2.1 Rationale -----------------------------------------------------2.2 Field Reconnaissance ---------------------------------------2.3 Field Procedures ---------------------------------------------2.4 Field Sampling and Data Recording ----------------------2.5 Location of Boreholes and Test Pits ----------------------2.6 Field Test Results --------------------------------------------
12
12
12-14
14
14-15
16-21
3 LABORATORY TESTING
3.1 Laboratory Test Procedures ------------------------------3.2 Laboratory Test Results ------------------------------------
22
23-25
26
26-27
5 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Site Preparation and Grading ------------------------------5.2 Building Footing Design Recommendations ------------5.3 Road Pavement Design Parameters Recommendations
5.4 Signature Page -------------------------------------------------
28-29
29-30
30
31
6 LITERATURE REFERENCES
6.1 Literature References --------------------------------------
32
Page 2 of 38
7 APPENDICES
7.1 DCP Test Photographs -------------------------------------7.2 Laboratory Photographs -----------------------------------7.3 DCP Test Field Data, CBR & Bearing Calculations --7.4 Geotechnical Data Log --------------------------------------7.5 Determination of Water Content -------------------------7.6 Determination of Atterberg Limits -----------------------7.7 Particles Size Analysis ---------------------------------------
Page 3 of 38
33-37
38
6 sheets
1 sheet
1 sheet
10 sheets
22 sheets
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Program Management Unit (PMU) of the Federated States of Micronesia with
office at Palikir, State of Pohnpei, is represented by Mr. Marcelino Actouka as the Acting
Program Manager issued a Task Order No. 0001 on August 12, 2010 as part of IDP-A0004 to EMSPCO Engineering Consultants represented by Mr. Ernesto A. Capulong Jr. as
Principal. This task order is covered under the Indefinite-Delivery Contract for
Architectural and Engineering for Compact Infrastructural Grants Projects.
The site is vegetated with coconut trees and other local variety of trees and bushes.
Much of the exposed natural soil outcrops are characterized by brownish sandy silty soil.
Building Footing Design Recommendations
Taking the field results, laboratory results, analysis and findings into considerations, the
undersigned recommends the following:
1.
meters from the existing natural ground surface and it is further recommended that the
maximum usable bearing pressure is 1300 psf or 62 KPa which has an estimated
foundation settlement of 35 mm.
2.
differential settlement. It is also noted that foundation design criteria mentioned above is
limited to building foundation only and does not include equipment or machine
foundation.
3.
remove and replace method for footings at administration building, the following
suggested modification procedure are as follows to wit:
Over-excavate the foundation bed by at least 1.00 meter depth below the
footing.
Replace with imported materials compacted in lifts not exceeding 8
inches (200 mm) in thickness to a maximum of 95 percent of maximum
density as determined by ASTM Standard D-1557. In-place density shall
be determined in accordance with ASTM D-1556, D-2167, ASTM D2922, ASTM D-3017 or equivalent. In-situ compaction can also be
determined in accordance with ASTM D-7380 Standard Test Method
for Soil Compaction Determination at Shallow Depths using 5-lb (2.3 kg)
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer.
Replace with base course materials or equivalent deposited in layers of
200 mm in loose thickness.
Page 5 of 38
Average CBR
Remarks
BH-1/TP-1 Road
5.9
BH-2/TP-2 Road
25.3
ML Sandy Silt
BH-3/TP-3 Road
10.5
ML Sandy Silt
BH-4/TP-4 Road
10.7
ML Sandy Silt
BH-5/TP-5 Road
5.4
BH-6/TP-6 Road
6.8
BH-7/TP-7 Road
ML Sandy Silt
17.8
Page 6 of 38
TERMS OF REFEERENCE
Terms of Reference
The Program Management Unit (PMU) of the Federated States of Micronesia with
office at Palikir, State of Pohnpei, is represented by Mr. Marcelino Actouka as the Acting
Program Manager issued a Task Order No. 0001 on August 12, 2010 as part of IDP-A0004 to EMSPCO Engineering Consultants represented by Mr. Ernesto A. Capulong Jr. as
Principal. This task order is covered under the Indefinite-Delivery Contract for
Architectural and Engineering for Compact Infrastructural Grants Projects. This A-E
Statement of Work (SOW) includes geotechnical testing the four separate college
buildings in three states: Pohnpei, Kosrae and Chuuk:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
5. A-E shall backfilled properly all borings after completion of data collection.
6. A-E shall take precautions preserve all historical, archeological and cultural
resources encountered during the work.
7. A-E soils boring samples after laboratory testing shall be stored and
protected from undue environmental exposure for at least two years.
8. A-E Geotechnical Engineer shall manage the laboratory testing program.
Page 8 of 38
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Geography
Chuuk is formerly Truk, Ruk Hogoleu, Torres, Ugulat anf Lugulus and is an
island group in the south western part of the Pacific Ocean. It comprises one of the four
states of the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), along with Kosrae, Pohnpei and
Yap. Chuuk is the most is the most populous of the FSMs states. Geographically,
Chuuk is part of the larger Carolines Islands group. Chuuk means mountain and was
known mainly as Truk until 1990. The main population center of Chuuk state is the
Chuuk Lagoon, a large archipelago with mountainous islands surrounded by the string
of islets on a barrier reef. The two major geographical and dialectic divisions of the
Chuuk Lagoon are Faichuuk, the western islands, and Namoneas, the eastern islands.
Page 9 of 38
Seismicity
Chuuk State is located 7 25' 0 N, and 151 47 0 E approximately 1065 km
southeast from the Mariana Ridge at the eastern edge of the Philippine Plate, which is
forced to rise in elevation as the Pacific Plate dives below it in a northwesterly direction.
At the same time, the descending Pacific Plate, while dragging the eastern edge of the
Philippine Plate with it, forms the Mariana Trench where the two plates converge. The
Mariana Trench contains the greatest measured depth of the world's oceans, approximately
11 .3 km (37,000 feet), located to the southwest of Guam.
Time
Occurrence
Magn
Depth
itude
15:11:5 UTC
M5.5
33 km
17:02:12 UTC
M5.2
33 km
17:16:60 UTC
M5
33 km
5:40:41 UTC
M4.6
33 km
May 11,1999
5:04:54 UTC
M4.8
10 km
16:00:59 UTC
M4.7
10 km
10:38:39 UTC
M4.7
10 km
10:32:33 UTC
M4.9
10 km
The earthquake occurrences from 1998 to 2006 shows that the epicenter coordinates
is approximately at the vicinity of 5 24' N, and 149 37 E.
Page 10 of 38
Page 11 of 38
CHAPTER 2
SITE INVESTIGATION
Rationale
The objective of this geotechnical investigation is to determine subsurface soil
conditions at the proposed building footprint, parking lot and the access road of the new
FSM-COM campus. The field testing and laboratory testing will enable us to come-up
with the recommendations regarding the footing design parameters and the access road
pavement criteria.
Field Reconnaissance
Based on the available preliminary building and road layout, a quick field
reconnaissance was conducted to determine the number and the location of the boreholes
and test holes which were dependent on the available space in the area of interest.
This test method is used to assess in situ strength of undisturbed soil. The
penetration rate of the 8-kg DCP can be used to estimate in-situ CBR, Bearing Capacity, to
identify strata thickness, shear strength strata, and other material characteristics.
4. Apparatus:
The 8-kg DCP consists of the following components: a 15.8 mm diameter steel
drive rod with a replaceable point or disposable cone tip, a 8-kg hammer which is dropped
a fixed height of 575 mm, a coupler assembly, and a handle. The tip has an angle of 60
degrees and a diameter at base of 20 mm.
5. Testing Sequence:
Dropping the Hammer The DCP device is held in a vertical plumb position. The
operator raises the hammer until it makes only light contact with the handle. The hammer
shall not impact the handle when being raised. The hammer is then allowed to free-fall and
impact the anvil coupler assembly. The number of blows and corresponding penetrations
are recorded.
Depth of Penetration The depth of penetration will vary with application. For
typical highway applications, a penetration less than 900 mm will generally be adequate.
Refusal - The presence of large aggregates or rock strata will either stop further
penetration or deflect the drive rod. If after 5 blows, the device has not advanced more
than 2 mm or handle has deflected more than 75 mm from the vertical position, the test
shall be stopped, and the device moved to another test location. The new test location
should be a minimum of 300 mm from the prior location to minimize test error caused by
disturbance of the material.
Extraction Following completion of the test, the device should be extracted using
the extraction using the extraction jack when using a replaceable point tip. When using a
disposable cone, the device is extracted by driving the hammer upward against the handle.
Page 13 of 38
Page 14 of 38
Page 15 of 38
Corrected No. of
in inches
CBR
Allowable
Remarks
Blows per 6
Bearing
cone penetration
Capacity
(lbs/ft2)
6
638
12
1198
18
790
24
933
30
790
36
933
Remarks
Blows per 6
Bearing
cone penetration
Capacity
Layer Depth
Corrected No. of
in inches
CBR
(lbs/ft2)
6
790
ML-Sandy Silt
12
12
1444
ML-Sandy Silt
18
12
17
1789
ML-Sandy Silt
24
12
17
1789
ML-Sandy Silt
30
121
17
1789
ML-Sandy Silt
36
50
84
5170
ML-Sandy Silt
Page 16 of 38
Remarks
Blows per 6
Bearing
cone penetration
Capacity
Layer Depth
Corrected No. of
in inches
CBR
(lbs/ft2)
6
638
ML-Sandy Silts
12
472
ML-Sandy Silts
18
933
ML-Sandy Silts
24
10
14
1562
ML-Sandy Silts
30
12
17
1789
ML-Sandy Silts
36
14
20
2006
ML-Sandy Silts
Borehole No. 4A & 4B, Allowable Bearing Capacity using Factor of Safety FS =
2.0
Allowable
Remarks
Blows per 6
Bearing
cone penetration
Capacity
Layer Depth
Corrected No. of
in inches
CBR
(lbs/ft2)
6
790
ML-Sandy Silts
12
638
ML-Sandy Silts
18
1068
ML-Sandy Silt
24
10
14
1562
ML-Sandy Silt
30
11
15
1677
36
13
19
1899
Page 17 of 38
Corrected No. of
in inches
CBR
Allowable
Remarks
Blows per 6
Bearing
cone penetration
Capacity
(lbs/ft2)
6
638
12
790
18
790
24
1068
30
790
36
933
Remarks
Blows per 6
Bearing
cone penetration
Capacity
Layer Depth
Corrected No. of
in inches
CBR
(lbs/ft2)
6
1198
12
11
1323
18
1198
24
11
1323
30
61
1068
36
933
Page 18 of 38
Corrected No. of
in inches
CBR
Allowable
Remarks
Blows per 6
Bearing
cone penetration
Capacity
(lbs/ft2)
6
790
ML-Sandy Silts
12
790
ML-Sandy Silts
18
1198
ML-Sandy Silts
24
12
1444
ML-Sandy Silts
30
11
15
1677
ML-Sandy Silts
36
1198
ML-Sandy Silts
Remarks
Blows per 6
Bearing
cone penetration
Capacity
Layer Depth
Corrected No. of
in inches
CBR
(lbs/ft2)
6
638
12
1068
18
12
1444
24
13
19
1899
30
14
20
2006
36
26
40
3179
Page 19 of 38
Borehole No. 9, 9A, 9B, 9C, 9D, Allowable Bearing Capacity using Factor of
Safety FS = 2.0
Allowable
Remarks
Blows per 6
Bearing
cone penetration
Capacity
CBR < 10 or CH
Layer Depth
Corrected No. of
in inches
CBR
(lbs/ft2)
6
731
12
11
1372
18
790
24
933
30
790
36
933
42
905
48
905
54
1198
60
11
1323
66
10
14
1562
72
1198
78
10
1223
84
10
1223
90
1198
96
1198
102
933
108
790
114
905
120
1068
126
933
132
1068
Page 20 of 38
138
1198
144
11
1323
150
10
1261
156
10
1223
162
1068
168
1198
174
933
180
933
Page 21 of 38
CHAPTER 3
LABORATORY TESTING
Page 22 of 38
Sample
USCS
Depth,
No.
Symbol
inches
6 to
Grain Size
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Plastic Index
Moisture
Content
Description
SS1
36
MH
R4 = 0% ;
Sandy
R200= 47.6% ;
Elastic Silt
F200 = 52.4%
Grain Size
LL = 50.2%;
PL = 41%
PI = 9.18%
MC= 42.86%
Borehole No. 2
Layer
Sample
USCS
Depth,
No.
Symbol
inches
6 to
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Plastic Index
Moisture
Content
Description
SS2
36
ML
Sandy Silt
%
R4 = 0% ;
LL = 44.9%;
PL = 38.3%
PI = 6.57%
MC= 33.75%
R200= 49.3% ;
F200 = 50.7%
Borehole No. 3
Layer
Sample
USCS
Depth,
No.
Symbol
inches
6 to
Grain Size
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Plastic Index
Moisture
Content
Description
SS3
36
ML
Sandy Silt
%
R4 = 0% ;
LL = 45.6%;
PL = 34.6%
PI = 11.03%
MC= 32.73%
R200= 46.1% ;
F200 = 53.9%
Sample
USCS
Depth,
No.
Symbol
inches
6 to
Grain Size
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Plastic Index
Moisture
Content
Description
SS4A
24
ML
Sandy Silt
%
R4 = 0% ;
LL = 42.9%;
PL = 35.4%
PI = 7.52%
MC= 58.86%
LL = 59.1%;
PL = 46%
PI = 13.12%
MC= 57.1%
R200= 48.7% ;
F200 = 51.3%
24
MH
R4 = 0% ;
to
Sandy
R200= 46.6% ;
36
Elastic Silt
F200 = 53.4%
SS4B
Borehole No. 5
Page 23 of 38
Layer
Sample
USCS
Depth,
No.
Symbol
inches
6 to
Grain Size
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Plastic Index
Moisture
Content
Description
SS5
36
MH
R4 = 0% ;
Sandy
R200= 41.3% ;
Elastic Silt
F200 = 58.7%
Grain Size
LL = 67.6%;
PL = 53.8%
PI = 13.75%
MC= 59.03%
Borehole No. 6
Layer
Sample
USCS
Depth,
No.
Symbol
inches
6 to
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Plastic Index
Moisture
Content
Description
SS6
36
SM Silty
R4 =19.8% ;
Sand with
R200= 76.7% ;
Gravel
F200 = 23.3%
Grain Size
LL = 47.2%;
PL = 43.3%
PI = 3.94%
MC= 53.33%
Borehole No. 7
Layer
Sample
USCS
Depth,
No.
Symbol
inches
6 to
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Plastic Index
Moisture
Content
Description
SS7
36
ML
R4 = 12.6% ;
Sandy Silt
R200= 46.8% ;
LL = 36.3%;
PL = 31.7%
PI = 4.58%
MC= 46.92%
F200 = 53.2%
Borehole No. 8
Layer
Sample
USCS
Depth,
No.
Symbol
inches
6 to
36
Grain Size
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Plastic Index
Moisture
Content
Description
SS8
MH
R4 = 0% ;
Sandy
R200= 48.8% ;
Elastic Silt
F200 = 51.2%
LL = 59.5%;
Page 24 of 38
PL = 46.1%
PI = 13.43%
MC= 57.05%
Sample
USCS
Depth,
No.
Symbol
inches
6 to
SS9A
MH
R4 = 0.3% ;
Sandy
R200= 46.7% ;
Elastic Silt
F200 = 53.3%
R4 = 0% ;
to
Sandy
R200= 45.5% ;
72
Elastic Silt
F200 = 54.5%
MH
R4 = 0.3% ;
to
Sandy
R200= 46.7% ;
108
Elastic Silt
F200 = 53.3%
108
Plastic Limit
Plastic Index
Moisture
Content
%
MH
72
Liquid Limit
Description
36
36
Grain Size
SS9B
SS9C
MH
R4 = 0% ;
to
Sandy
R200= 45.5% ;
180
Elastic Silt
F200 = 54.5%
SS9D
LL = 57.1%;
PL = 42.5%
PI = 14.57%
MC= 57.05%
LL = 52.3%;
PL = 42.3%
PI = 10.06%
MC= 49.82%
LL = 57.1%;
PL = 42.5%
PI = 14.57%
MC= 53.39%
LL = 52.3%;
PL = 42.3%
PI = 10.06%
MC= 59.12%
Page 25 of 38
CHAPTER 4
EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS
The supposed building foundation has low allowable bearing capacities as shown
in the field test results of Chapter 2. This sandy elastic silt foundation will have enough
strength to support the proposed Two Story Administration Building on shallow
isolated spread footings but with much wider footing size. It is also necessary to
interconnect the footings with tie-beams to limit the differential settlement. The in-situ
foundation will have to be modified in order provided a stronger and more uniform soil
support foundation bed. The idea is to over-excavate the existing soil foundation by at
least one (1) meter and replace it with compacted engineered fill like sub-base course or
base course or other equivalent materials. This modification process will in effect
improved the bearing capacity at footing level by distancing from the in-situ sandy
elastic silt foundation.
The access road average CBR is 9.5 for sandy elastic silt subgrade and 13.9
Page 26 of 38
representative CBR for sandy silt subgrade, is quite a reasonable foundation base for
Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (PCCP). However, ML and MH subgrade are
typically considered as fair to poor. The pavement structure for this type of subgrade
shall include selected fill in addition to the typical section of PCC Pavement, that is,
subbase and concrete pavement.
Page 27 of 38
CHAPTER 5
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
meters from the existing natural ground surface and it is further recommended that the
maximum usable bearing pressure is 1300 psf or 62 KPa which has an estimated
foundation settlement of 35 mm.
2.
differential settlement. It is also noted that foundation design criteria mentioned above is
limited to building foundation only and does not include equipment or machine
foundation.
3.
remove and replace method for footings at administration building, the following
suggested modification procedure are as follows to wit:
Over-excavate the foundation bed by at least 1.00 meter depth below the
footing.
Replace with imported materials compacted in lifts not exceeding 8
inches (200 mm) in thickness to a maximum of 95 percent of maximum
density as determined by ASTM Standard D-1557. In-place density shall
Page 29 of 38
be determined in accordance with ASTM D-1556, D-2167, ASTM D2922, ASTM D-3017 or equivalent. In-situ compaction can also be
determined in accordance with ASTM D-7380 Standard Test Method
for Soil Compaction Determination at Shallow Depths using 5-lb (2.3 kg)
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer.
Replace with base course materials or equivalent deposited in layers of
200 mm in loose thickness.
It is strongly discourage not to use boulders as foundation improvement
due to difficulty of compaction and filling of voids.
Road Pavement Design Parameters Recommendations
Taking the field results, laboratory results, evaluation analysis into considerations,
the undersigned recommends the following:
1. Pavement Structural Parameters:
Location
Average CBR
Remarks
BH-1/TP-1 Road
5.9
BH-2/TP-2 Road
25.3
ML Sandy Silt
BH-3/TP-3 Road
10.5
ML Sandy Silt
BH-4/TP-4 Road
10.7
ML Sandy Silt
BH-5/TP-5 Road
5.4
BH-6/TP-6 Road
6.8
BH-7/TP-7 Road
ML Sandy Silt
17.8
Page 30 of 38
Prepared by:
Noted by:
Geotechnical Engineer
Principal
CE 564, SE 774
GUAM - PEALS
Page 31 of 38
CHAPTER 6
LITERATURE REFERENCES
ASTM Committee DO4 on Road and Paving Materials (2003, June). Standard Test
Method for Use of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Shallow Pavement
Applications. ASTM International,, pp. 1 7.
Kessler, K.C. (2001, January). Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Users Manual. Kessler
Soils Engineering Products, Inc., Springfield VA.
Wales,
Jimmy
(Founder)
Wikipedia
Internet
Free
Encyclopedia,
Website:
en.wikipedia.org
Earthquake
Hazard
Program,
U.S.
Geological
Survey
Website:
earthquake.usgs/earthquakes
Das, Braja (2006). Principles of Geotechnical Engineering 5th Edition, PWS Publishing
Company, ISBN 0-534-55144-0
Google Earth
Page 32 of 38
CHAPTER 7
APPENDICES
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Test Photographs:
BH-1 at ground level (Access Road):
Page 33 of 38
Page 34 of 38
Page 35 of 38
Page 36 of 38
Page 37 of 38
Laboratory Photographs:
Page 38 of 38
Location:
Test No.
10/25/2010
(Office)
(Date)
Monday, October 04, 2010
Hammer Weight :
17.6 lbs
Location:
Quick Rain
Ultimate Bearing Pressure - lbs/ft 2 by Portland Cement Association
Borehole No. 1
Borehole No. 2
Layer
Total No.
CBR
Thick
Dept
Correc
(all Correl ness
of
PR
h in Blow Correc ted
soils ated
in
inche s / 6" tion NOB/6 (mm/bl excl
qult
inche
ow)
s (Field Factor
"
CL,C (psf)
s
H)
)
Layer
Thick
ness
in
inche
s
No.
of
Blow
s / 6"
(Fiel
d)
100%
Ground Surface
Ground Surface
Ground Surface
6 ''
6 ''
100%
3.0
50.80
1276
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
12 ''
100%
7.0
21.77
2396
6 ''
12 ''
100%
9.0
16.93
12
2889
6 ''
18 ''
100%
4.0
38.10
1580
6 ''
18 ''
12
100%
12.0
12.70
17
3578
6 ''
24 ''
100%
5.0
30.48
1866
6 ''
24 ''
12
100%
12.0
12.70
17
3578
6 ''
30 ''
100%
4.0
38.10
1580
6 ''
30 ''
12
100%
12.0
12.70
17
3578
6 ''
36 ''
100%
5.0
30.48
1866
6 ''
36 ''
50
100%
50.0
3.05
84
10340
Average
4.7
5.9
Borehole No.8
Borehole No.3
Layer
Layer
Layer
Total No.
CBR
CBR
CBR
Thick
Thick Total No.
Thick
(all Correl ness
(all
Correc
Corre
(all Correl ness Depth of
Correc
of
ness
Depth
Correlat
Correc
PR
Corre
PR
Correc
PR
in
soils ated
ted
Blow
soils ated
soils
ted
cted
Blow
in
in
in
in
ed qult
(mm/bl
ction
(mm/bl
tion
tion
(mm/blo
inche
qult inche
qult
s / 6"
excl
excl
NOB/6
NOB/6
excl
NOB/6
s / 6"
inche
Factor
ow)
Factor
ow)
Factor
w)
(psf) inche inches
s
(Fiel
CL,C (psf)
CL,C
"
"
CL,C (psf)
"
(Fiel
s
s
s
d)
H)
H)
H)
d)
Total
Dept
h in
inche
s
4.0
1761
38.10
16.5
25.3
1580
6 ''
Ground Surface
6 ''
100%
3.0
50.80
6 ''
12 ''
100%
2.0
76.20
944
6 ''
18 ''
100%
5.0
30.48
1866
6 ''
24 ''
10
100%
10.0
15.24
14
3124
6 ''
30 ''
12
100%
12.0
12.70
17
3578
6 ''
36 ''
14
100%
14.0
10.89
20
4012
4257
7.7
10.5
1276
6 ''
Ground Surface
6 ''
100%
3.0
50.80
6 ''
12 ''
100%
6.0
25.40
2137
6 ''
6 ''
18 ''
100%
9.0
16.93
12
2889
6 ''
6 ''
24 ''
13
100%
13.0
11.72
19
3797
6 ''
6 ''
30 ''
14
100%
14.0
10.89
20
4012
6 ''
6 ''
36 ''
26
100%
26.0
5.86
40
6358
6 ''
2467
Total
CBR
Dept No. of
(all
Correc
Correla
PR
h in Blows / Correct ted
soils
ted q ult
(mm/blo
ion
inche
excl
NOB/6
6"
w)
Factor
(psf)
s
CL,C
"
(Field)
H)
11.8
17.1
1276
6 ''
3411
CBR Value for all soils except CL soils below CBR 10% and CH soils
CBR Value for CL soils (CBR < 10% )
CBR =1 / (.002871*PR)
JAIME ANONUEVO
KAE
TAKOCH
KIMPO
REISON
D-GSON
RANUCH
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
DCP OPERATOR
DCP OPERATOR
DCP OPERATOR
DCP OPERATOR
DCP OPERATOR
DCP OPERATOR
CBR Graphs
BH-1
CBR Graphs
BH-2
CBR Graphs
BH-3
CBR Graphs
10
100
25
50
80
20
40
60
15
Series1
4
2
Series1
40
20
0
2
BH-1
3000
12000
2500
10000
2000
8000
BH-2
BH-3
BH-8
7000
5000
6000
4000
5000
3000
1500
Series1
20
10
30
Series1
10
5
0
1
BH-8
4000
6000
Series1
Series1
1000
4000
500
2000
0
2
3000
Series1
2000
1000
0
1
Series1
2000
1000
0
1
0
1
Location:
Kind of Material:
10/25/2010
Date of Testing:
Sample Description:
Hammer Weight :
Location:
Borehole
Corrected No.
of Blows / 6"
CBR
17.6 lbs
Min. Allowable
Bearing Pressure
Max. Allowable
Bearing Pressure
BH-1
1276.02
638
-849
720723
-369
1645
BH-1
12
2396.15
1198
-289
83456
191
2205
BH-1
18
1580.42
790
-697
485468
-217
1798
BH-1
24
1865.70
933
-554
307042
-74
1940
BH-1
30
1580.42
790
-697
485468
-217
1798
BH-1
36
1865.70
933
-554
307042
-74
1940
BH-2
1580.42
790
-697
485468
-217
1798
BH-2
12
12
2888.57
1444
-43
1822
437
2452
BH-2
18
12
17
3577.65
1789
302
91119
781
2796
BH-2
10
24
12
17
3577.65
1789
302
91119
781
2796
BH-2
11
30
12
17
3577.65
1789
302
91119
781
2796
BH-2
12
36
50
84
10340.03
5170
3683
13564864
4163
6177
BH-3
13
1276.02
638
-849
720723
-369
1645
BH-3
14
12
943.85
472
-1015
1030307
-535
1479
BH-3
15
18
1865.70
933
-554
307042
-74
1940
BH-3
16
24
10
14
3124.01
1562
75
5631
555
2569
BH-3
17
30
12
17
3577.65
1789
302
91119
781
2796
BH-3
18
36
14
20
4012.22
2006
519
269510
999
3013
BH-8
19
1276.02
638
-849
720723
-369
1645
BH-8
20
12
2136.62
1068
-419
175271
61
2076
BH-8
21
18
12
2888.57
1444
-43
1822
437
2452
BH-8
22
24
13
19
3797.07
1899
412
169393
891
2906
BH-8
23
30
14
20
4012.22
2006
519
269510
999
3013
BH-8
24
36
26
40
6357.98
3179
1692
2862952
2172
4186
n=
24
(CBR)ave
15
(qall-(qall)ave)2 =
23338713
480
2494
(qult)ave=
2974
(qall)ave=
1487
SD = Standard Deviation
SD = ((qall-(qall)ave)2 / ( n -1 ))
1007.336
lbs/ft 2
1487
lbs/ft 2
(qall)min=
480
lbs/ft 2
(qall)max=
2494
lbs/ft 2
(qall)ave=
qall
FS
=
= Factor of Safety =
qult /FS
2.0
PREPARED BY:
ENGR. LIZARDO P. REMOJO, MEng, ASEP
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
Page 1 of 1
max=
1.5
inch
Location:
Test No.
10/25/2010
(Office)
(Date)
Monday, October 04, 2010
Hammer Weight :
17.6 lbs
Location:
Quick Rain
Ultimate Bearing Pressure - lbs/ft2 by Portland Cement Association
Borehole No. 4
Borehole No. 5
Borehole No.7
Total
Dept
h in
inche
s
6 ''
6 ''
100%
4.0
38.10
1580
6 ''
6 ''
100%
3.0
50.80
1276
6 ''
6 ''
100%
7.0
21.77
9 2396
6 ''
6 ''
100%
4.0
38.10
1580
6 ''
6 ''
12 ''
100%
3.0
50.80
1276
6 ''
12 ''
100%
4.0
38.10
1580
6 ''
12 ''
100%
8.0
19.05
11 2646
6 ''
12 ''
100%
4.0
38.10
1580
6 ''
6 ''
18 ''
100%
6.0
25.40
2137
6 ''
18 ''
100%
4.0
38.10
1580
6 ''
18 ''
100%
7.0
21.77
9 2396
6 ''
18 ''
100%
7.0
21.77
2396
6 ''
6 ''
24 ''
10
100%
10.0
15.24
14
3124
6 ''
24 ''
100%
6.0
25.40
2137
6 ''
24 ''
100%
8.0
19.05
11 2646
6 ''
24 ''
100%
9.0
16.93
12
2889
6 ''
6 ''
30 ''
11
100%
11.0
13.85
15
3353
6 ''
30 ''
100%
4.0
38.10
1580
6 ''
30 ''
100%
6.0
25.40
8 2137
6 ''
30 ''
11
100%
11.0
13.85
15
3353
6 ''
6 ''
36 ''
13
100%
13.0
11.72
19
3797
6 ''
36 ''
100%
5.0
30.48
1866
6 ''
36 ''
100%
5.0
30.48
6 1866
6 ''
36 ''
100%
7.0
21.77
2396
6 ''
No. of
Blows
/ 6"
(Field
)
Layer
CBR
Thick
Correc
(all Correl ness
Correc
PR
ted
soils ated
in
tion
(mm/blo
qult
NOB/6
excl
inche
Factor
w)
"
CL,C (psf)
s
H)
Borehole No.6
Layer
Thick
ness
in
inche
s
Total
Dept
h in
inche
s
Layer
Layer
Layer
Total No.
No.
CBR
CBR
CBR
Thick Total No.
Thick
Thick
of
Corre
of
Correc
(all
Correc
(all Correl ness Depth of
(all Correl ness
ness
Depth
Correlat
Corre
PR
Correc
PR
PR
in Blow Correc cted
Blow
Blow
ted
soils
ted
soils ated
soils ated
in
in
in
in
ed qult
ction
(mm/bl
tion
(mm/blo
tion
(mm/bl
inche
qult inche
qult
NOB/6
s / 6"
NOB/6
excl
s / 6"
NOB/6
excl
s / 6"
excl
inche
Factor
ow)
Factor
w)
ow)
(psf) inche inches
s (Field Factor
"
(Field
"
CL,C
(Fiel
"
CL,C (psf)
CL,C (psf)
s
s
s
)
H)
d)
H)
)
H)
Ground Surface
Ground Surface
Average
7.8
10.7
2545
Ground Surface
4.3
1.12
5.4
1670
Ground Surface
Ground Surface
6.8
9.0
2348
Total
CBR
Dept No. of
Correc
(all
Correla
PR
h in Blows / Correc ted
soils
ted qult
tion
(mm/blo
inche
6"
NOB/6
excl
Factor
w)
(psf)
s
(Field)
"
CL,C
H)
7.0
9.3
2366
CBR = 292 / PR
2
CBR = 1 /(.017019* PR)
CBR Value for all soils except CL soils below CBR 10% and CH soils
CBR Value for CL soils (CBR < 10% )
qult = 3.794*CBR.664
CBR =1 / (.002871*PR)
JAIME ANONUEVO
KAE
TAKOCH
KIMPO
REISON
D-GSON
RANUCH
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
DCP OPERATOR
DCP OPERATOR
DCP OPERATOR
DCP OPERATOR
DCP OPERATOR
DCP OPERATOR
CBR Graphs
BH-4
CBR Graphs
20
15
10
Series1
5
0
1
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
BH-6
CBR Graphs
12
10
8
6
Series1
Series1
4
2
0
BH-4
CBR Graphs
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
BH-5
BH-5
2500
3000
2000
2500
BH-6
Series1
1000
500
500
0
1
0
1
1500
Series1
1000
Series1
2000
1500
Series1
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
BH-7
BH-7
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Series1
Location:
Kind of Material:
10/25/2010
Date of Testing:
Sample Description:
Hammer Weight :
Location:
Corrected No.
of Blows / 6"
CBR
17.6 lbs
Min. Allowable
Bearing Pressure
Max. Allowable
Bearing Pressure
BH-4
1580.42
790
-326
106162
790
790
BH-4
12
1276.02
638
-478
228507
638
638
BH-4
18
2136.62
1068
-48
2278
1068
1068
BH-4
24
10
14
3124.01
1562
446
198888
1562
1562
BH-4
30
11
15
3353.47
1677
561
314387
1677
1677
BH-4
36
13
19
3797.07
1899
783
612312
1899
1899
BH-5
1276.02
638
-478
228507
638
638
BH-5
12
1580.42
790
-326
106162
790
790
BH-5
18
1580.42
790
-326
106162
790
790
BH-5
10
24
2136.62
1068
-48
2278
1068
1068
BH-5
11
30
1580.42
790
-326
106162
790
790
BH-5
12
36
1865.70
933
-183
33556
933
933
BH-6
13
2396.15
1198
82
6731
1198
1198
1323
BH-6
14
12
11
2646.32
1323
207
42900
1323
BH-6
15
18
2396.15
1198
82
6731
1198
1198
BH-6
16
24
11
2646.32
1323
207
42900
1323
1323
BH-6
17
30
2136.62
1068
-48
2278
1068
1068
BH-6
18
36
1865.70
933
-183
33556
933
933
BH-7
19
1580.42
790
-326
106162
790
790
BH-7
20
12
1580.42
790
-326
106162
790
790
BH-7
21
18
2396.15
1198
82
6731
1198
1198
BH-7
22
24
12
2888.57
1444
328
107749
1444
1444
BH-7
23
30
11
15
3353.47
1677
561
314387
1677
1677
BH-7
24
36
2396.15
1198
82
6731
1198
1198
(CBR)ave
(qall-(qall)ave)2 =
2828379
1116
1116
n=
24
(qult)ave=
2232
(qall)ave=
1116
SD = Standard Deviation
SD = ((qall-(qall)ave)2 / ( n -1 ))
350.675
lbs/ft 2
lbs/ft 2
(qall)ave=
1116
(qall)min=
765
lbs/ft 2
(qall)max=
1467
lbs/ft 2
qall
FS
qult /FS
=
= Factor of Safety =
2.0
max=
PREPARED BY:
ENGR. LIZARDO P. REMOJO, MEng, ASEP
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
Page 1 of 1
1.5
inch
Location:
Test No.
10/25/2010
(Office)
(Date)
Sample Description:
Hammer Weight :
17.6 lbs
Location:
Quick Rain
Ultimate Bearing Pressure - lbs/ft2 by Portland Cement Association
Borehole No. 9
Borehole No. 9A
Total
Dept
h in
inche
s
6 ''
6 ''
120%
3.6
42.33
1461
6 ''
6 ''
12 ''
120%
8.4
18.14
11
2744
6 ''
6 ''
18 ''
100%
4.0
38.10
1580
6 ''
6 ''
24 ''
100%
5.0
30.48
1866
6 ''
6 ''
30 ''
100%
4.0
38.10
1580
6 ''
6 ''
36 ''
100%
5.0
30.48
1866
6 ''
36 ''
6 ''
42 ''
6 ''
42 ''
120%
4.8
31.75
1810
6 ''
6 ''
48 ''
6 ''
48 ''
120%
4.8
31.75
1810
6 ''
6 ''
54 ''
6 ''
54 ''
100%
7.0
21.77
2396
6 ''
6 ''
60 ''
6 ''
60 ''
100%
8.0
19.05
11
2646
6 ''
6 ''
66 ''
6 ''
66 ''
10
100%
10.0
15.24
14
3124
6 ''
6 ''
72 ''
6 ''
72 ''
100%
7.0
21.77
2396
6 ''
6 ''
78 ''
6 ''
6 ''
84 ''
6 ''
No. of
Blows
/ 6"
(Field
)
Layer
CBR
Thick
(all Correl ness
Correc
PR
Correc
soils ated
ted
in
(mm/blo
tion
qult
excl
NOB/6
inche
w)
Factor
CL,C (psf)
"
s
H)
Total
Dept
h in
inche
s
Borehole No. 9D
Layer
Layer
Layer
Total No.
No.
CBR
CBR
CBR
Thick Total No.
Thick
Thick
of
(all Correl ness
Correc
(all Correl ness Depth of
Correc
(all Correl ness Depth of
Corre
PR
Corre
PR
Correc
PR
in Blow Correc cted
Blow
soils ated
ted
soils ated
ted
soils ated
Blow
in
in
in
in
tion
(mm/bl
ction
(mm/bl
tion
(mm/bl
qult inche inche s / 6"
qult
qult inche inches s / 6"
excl
s / 6"
NOB/6
excl
NOB/6
excl
NOB/6
inche
ow)
Factor
ow)
Factor
ow)
s (Field Factor
CL,C (psf)
(Field
"
CL,C (psf)
(Fiel
"
CL,C (psf)
"
s
s
s
H)
)
H)
d)
H)
)
Ground Surface
5.0
Borehole No. 9C
Borehole No. 9B
Layer
Thick
ness
in
inche
s
Ground Surface
Ground Surface
6.9
Total
CBR
Dept No. of
Correc
(all
Correla
PR
h in Blows / Correc ted
soils
ted qult
(mm/blo
tion
inche
NOB/6
excl
6"
w)
Factor
(psf)
s
"
CL,C
(Field)
H)
Ground Surface
Ground Surface
72 ''
6 ''
78 ''
120%
7.2
21.17
10 2447
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
84 ''
120%
7.2
21.17
10 2447
6 ''
90 ''
6 ''
6 ''
90 ''
100%
7.0
21.77
9 2396
6 ''
6 ''
96 ''
6 ''
6 ''
96 ''
100%
7.0
21.77
9 2396
6 ''
6 ''
102 ''
6 ''
6 ''
102 ''
100%
5.0
30.48
6 1866
6 ''
6 ''
108 ''
6 ''
6 ''
108 ''
100%
4.0
38.10
5 1580
6 ''
6 ''
114 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
120 ''
6 ''
6 ''
126 ''
6 ''
108 ''
6 ''
114 ''
120%
4.8
31.75
1810
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
120 ''
120%
6.0
25.40
2137
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
126 ''
100%
5.0
30.48
1866
6 ''
132 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
132 ''
100%
6.0
25.40
2137
6 ''
6 ''
138 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
138 ''
100%
7.0
21.77
2396
6 ''
6 ''
144 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
144 ''
100%
8.0
19.05
11
2646
6 ''
144 ''
6 ''
150 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
150 ''
250%
7.5
20.32
10
2522
6 ''
156 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
156 ''
120%
7.2
21.17
10
2447
6 ''
162 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
162 ''
100%
6.0
25.40
2137
6 ''
168 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
168 ''
100%
7.0
21.77
2396
6 ''
174 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
174 ''
100%
5.0
30.48
1866
6 ''
180 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
6 ''
180 ''
100%
5.0
30.48
1866
6.2
6.1
6.3
1.12
CBR = 292 / PR
CBR = 1 /(.017019* PR) 2
CBR Value for all soils except CL soils below CBR 10% and CH soils
CBR Value for CL soils (CBR < 10% )
qult = 3.794*CBR
CBR =1 / (.002871*PR)
.664
JAIME ANONUEVO
KAE
TAKOCH
KIMPO
REISON
D-GSON
RANUCH
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
DCP OPERATOR
DCP OPERATOR
DCP OPERATOR
DCP OPERATOR
DCP OPERATOR
DCP OPERATOR
Location:
Kind of Material:
10/25/2010
Date of Testing:
Sample Description:
Hammer Weight :
Location:
Borehole
Total Depth in
inches
17.6 lbs
Sunny
Corrected No.
of Blows / 6"
CBR
BH-9
1461.31
731
-347
120150
731
731
BH-9
12
11
2744.10
1372
295
86888
1372
1372
BH-9
18
1580.42
790
-287
82411
790
790
BH-9
24
1865.70
933
-144
20861
933
933
BH-9
30
1580.42
790
-287
82411
790
790
BH-9
36
1865.70
933
-144
20861
933
933
BH-9A
42
1809.91
905
-172
29697
905
905
BH-9A
48
1809.91
905
-172
29697
905
905
1198
BH-9A
54
2396.15
1198
121
14591
1198
BH-9A
10
60
11
2646.32
1323
246
60455
1323
1323
BH-9A
11
66
10
14
3124.01
1562
485
234954
1562
1562
BH-9A
12
72
2396.15
1198
121
14591
1198
1198
BH-9B
13
78
10
2446.88
1223
146
21362
1223
1223
BH-9B
14
84
10
2446.88
1223
146
21362
1223
1223
BH-9B
15
90
2396.15
1198
121
14591
1198
1198
BH-9B
16
96
2396.15
1198
121
14591
1198
1198
BH-9B
17
102
1865.70
933
-144
20861
933
933
BH-9B
18
108
1580.42
790
-287
82411
790
790
BH-9C
19
114
1809.91
905
-172
29697
905
905
BH-9C
20
120
2136.62
1068
-9
81
1068
1068
BH-9C
21
126
1865.70
933
-144
20861
933
933
BH-9C
22
132
2136.62
1068
-9
81
1068
1068
BH-9C
23
138
2396.15
1198
121
14591
1198
1198
BH-9C
24
144
11
2646.32
1323
246
60455
1323
1323
BH-9D
25
150
10
2522.30
1261
184
33808
1261
1261
BH-9D
26
156
10
2446.88
1223
146
21362
1223
1223
BH-9D
27
162
2136.62
1068
-9
81
1068
1068
BH-9D
28
168
2396.15
1198
121
14591
1198
1198
BH-9D
29
174
1865.70
933
-144
20861
933
933
BH-9D
30
180
1865.70
933
-144
20861
933
933
n=
30
(CBR) ave
(qall-(qall)ave)2 =
1210071
1077
1077
SD = Standard Deviation
SD = ((qall-(qall)ave)2 / ( n -1 ))
(qult)ave=
1785
(qall)ave=
204.271
1077
lbs/ft2
1077
lbs/ft2
(qall)min=
873
lbs/ft2
(qall)max=
1282
lbs/ft2
(qall)ave=
qall
FS
=
= Factor of Safety =
qult /FS
2.0
max=
PREPARED BY:
ENGR. LIZARDO P. REMOJO, MEng, ASEP
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
Page 1 of 1
1.5
inch
04-Oct-10
04-Oct-10
in 2 unit
DEPTH (m)
Average CPT
SAMPLE BOREHOLE / TEST Corrected
measured N NO.
HOLE
Blows
0.0 -0.9
SS1
BH-1 / TP-1
0.0 -0.9
SS2
BH-2 / TP-2
0.0 -0.9
SS3
BH-3 / TP-3
0.0 -0.6
SS4-A
BH-4A / TP-4A
0.6 -0.9
SS4-B
BH-4B / TP-4B
0.0 -0.9
SS5
BH-5 / TP-5
0.0 -0.9
SS6
BH-6 / TP-6
UNIFIED SOIL
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
(USCS)
SYM
SOIL OR ROCK
BOL
DESCRIPTION
4.7
MH
16.5
ML
Sandy Silt
7.7
ML
Sandy Silt
7.8
ML
Sandy Silt
7.8
MH
4.3
MH
6.8
SM
% R-RETAINED,
R4
R200
F-PASSING
.5R200
Plastic
Plastic
Plastic
Index
Index
Index
Plastic
from
from
from
Water
SOIL
Limit
Limit
Test
Chart
Chart
Content
CONSIS-
A - Line
U - Line
Cc
GRAIN SIZE
Unifor-
Coeffi-
ANALYSIS
mity
cient of
Liquid
% COARSE
Coeffi-
Grada-
cient
tion
Cu
Gravel
Sand
F200
Fraction
Fraction
SF/GF
ENCY
0.0%
47.6% 23.8%
52.4%
0.0%
47.6%
0.00
9.81
0.84
50.2%
41.0%
9.18%
22.06%
27.20%
42.86%
0.0%
49.3% 24.6%
50.7%
0.0%
49.3%
0.00
8.17
1.01
44.9%
38.3%
6.57%
18.17%
22.40%
33.75%
0.0%
46.1% 23.0%
53.9%
0.0%
46.1%
0.00
10.02
0.82
45.6%
34.6%
11.03%
18.71%
23.06%
32.73%
0.0%
48.7% 24.4%
51.3%
0.0%
48.7%
0.00
9.61
0.86
42.9%
35.4%
7.52%
16.71%
20.61%
58.86%
0.0%
46.6% 23.3%
53.4%
0.0%
46.6%
0.00
9.47
0.87
59.1%
46.0%
13.12%
28.53%
35.17%
57.10%
0.0%
41.3% 20.6%
58.7%
0.0%
41.3%
0.00
10.02
0.81
67.6%
53.8%
13.75%
34.72%
42.80%
59.03%
23.3%
19.8%
76.7%
3.88
56.32
1.10
47.2%
43.3%
3.94%
19.88%
24.51%
53.33%
53.2%
12.6%
46.8%
3.73
28.63
0.29
36.3%
31.7%
4.58%
11.88%
14.65%
46.92%
0.0%
48.8% 24.4%
51.2%
0.00%
48.75%
0.00
8.80
0.93
59.5%
46.1%
13.43%
28.83%
35.54%
57.05%
0.3%
46.7% 23.3%
53.3%
0.3%
46.68%
0.00
18.16
0.45
57.1%
42.5%
14.57%
27.06%
33.36%
57.05%
0.3%
46.7% 23.3%
53.3%
0.3%
46.68%
0.00
18.16
0.45
57.1%
42.5%
14.57%
27.06%
33.36%
57.77%
0.3%
45.5% 22.7%
54.5%
0.3%
45.45%
143.33
17.85
0.46
52.3%
42.3%
10.06%
23.59%
29.09%
49.82%
0.3%
46.7% 23.3%
53.3%
0.3%
46.7%
0.00
18.16
0.45
57.1%
42.5%
14.57%
27.06%
33.36%
53.39%
0.3%
45.5% 22.7%
54.5%
0.3%
45.5%
143.33
17.85
0.46
52.3%
42.3%
10.06%
23.59%
29.09%
59.12%
SS7
BH-7 / TP-7
0.0 -0.9
SS8
BH-8 / TP-8
0.0 - 0.9
SS9A
BH-9 / TP-9A
0.0 - 0.9
SS9A
BH-9A / TP-9A
0.9 - 1.8
SS9B
BH-9B / TP-9B
1.8 - 2.7
SS9C
BH-9C / TP-9C
2.7 - 3.6
SS9D
BH-9D / TP-9D
LEGEND :
SS ST CS -
9.3
ML
Sandy Silt
17.1
MH
MH
6.9
MH
6.2
MH
6.1
MH
6.3
MH
SOIL SAMPLE
SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE
CORE SAMPLE
NNS NA NP -
WT. of
Empty Can
(grams)
WT. of
Wet Sample
plus Can
(grams)
WT. of
Dry Sample
plus Can
(grams)
WT. of
Water
(grams)
WT. of
Dry Sample
(grams)
Water
Content
w,%
SS1
34.50
122.36
96.00
26.36
61.50
42.86%
SS2
29.50
105.07
86.00
19.07
56.50
33.75%
SS3
41.00
133.91
111.00
22.91
70.00
32.73%
SS4-A
33.50
138.35
99.50
38.85
66.00
58.86%
SS4-B
28.50
114.12
83.00
31.12
54.50
57.10%
SS5
30.50
127.51
91.50
36.01
61.00
59.03%
SS6
8.79
95.01
65.02
29.99
56.23
53.33%
SS7
23.00
128.05
94.50
33.55
71.50
46.92%
SS8
8.87
87.88
59.18
28.70
50.31
57.05%
SS9-A
22.50
76.93
57.00
19.93
34.50
57.77%
SS9-B
23.50
134.37
97.50
36.87
74.00
49.82%
SS9-C
30.00
127.40
93.50
33.90
63.50
53.39%
SS9-D
28.50
122.38
87.50
34.88
59.00
59.12%
Sample
LL1 (grams)
12.76
11.39
8.53
2.86
1.37
41
47.90%
0.4790
LL2 (grams)
11.67
10.52
8.25
2.27
1.15
27
50.66%
0.5066
LL3 (grams)
14.26
12.37
8.62
3.75
1.89
24
50.40%
0.5040
LL4 (grams)
13.33
11.73
8.47
3.26
1.60
20
49.08%
0.4908
LL
COMPUTATION :
Flow Index:
Flow Index, I =
F
ave
49.51%
90%
80%
70%
Flow Curve
60%
50.22%
50%
4
40%
w = - IF log (25/N1) + w1
(w1-w2) =
100%
30%
log ( N2 / N1)
IF1
0.0378
w1 =
50.40%
IF2
0.1521
N1 =
24
IF3
0.1074
w @ 25 =
Iave
0.09908
20%
50.22%
10%
0%
50.22%
10
15
20
25
30
35
PL1 (grams)
9.61
9.27
8.58
0.69
0.34
49.28%
w
Liquid Limit, LL
Plastic Limit, PL
Plasticity Index, PI
=
=
=
ave
41.05%
50.22%
41.05%
9.18%
PL2 (grams)
10.12
9.75
8.79
0.96
0.37
38.54%
PL3 (grams)
10.25
9.82
8.65
1.17
0.43
36.75%
PL4 (grams)
9.51
9.30
8.77
0.53
0.21
39.62%
40
45
50
55
LL1 (grams)
12.57
11.33
8.70
2.63
1.24
16
47.15%
0.4715
LL2 (grams)
13.54
12.14
8.81
3.33
1.40
24
42.04%
0.4204
LL3 (grams)
13.35
12.01
8.97
3.04
1.34
28
44.08%
0.4408
LL4 (grams)
13.00
11.67
8.70
2.97
1.33
32
44.78%
0.4478
LL
COMPUTATION :
Flow Index:
Flow Index, I =
F
ave
44.51%
90%
80%
Flow Curve
70%
44.89%
60%
4
50%
40%
w = - IF log (25/N1) + w1
(w1-w2) =
100%
30%
log ( N2 / N1)
IF1
0.0786
w1 =
44.08%
IF2
0.2900
N1 =
28
IF3
0.1263
w @ 25 =
Iave
0.16497
20%
44.89%
10%
0%
44.89%
10
15
20
25
30
35
PL1 (grams)
9.23
9.01
8.49
0.52
0.22
42.31%
w
Liquid Limit, LL
Plastic Limit, PL
Plasticity Index, PI
=
=
=
ave
38.32%
44.89%
38.32%
6.57%
PL2 (grams)
9.17
9.05
8.71
0.34
0.12
35.29%
PL3 (grams)
9.35
9.15
8.66
0.49
0.20
40.82%
PL4 (grams)
9.60
9.37
8.71
0.66
0.23
34.85%
40
45
50
55
LL1 (grams)
11.86
10.77
8.72
2.05
1.09
8
53.17%
0.5317
LL2 (grams)
11.59
10.70
8.66
2.04
0.89
15
43.63%
0.4363
LL3 (grams)
12.64
11.50
8.82
2.68
1.14
34
42.54%
0.4254
LL4 (grams)
11.84
10.87
8.48
2.39
0.97
42
40.59%
0.4059
LL
COMPUTATION :
Flow Index:
Flow Index, I =
F
ave
44.98%
90%
80%
Flow Curve
70%
45.62%
60%
4
3
50%
40%
w = - IF log (25/N1) + w1
(w1-w2) =
100%
30%
log ( N2 / N1)
IF1
0.1748
w1 =
42.54%
IF2
0.3496
N1 =
34
IF3
0.1692
w @ 25 =
Iave
0.23118
20%
45.62%
10%
0%
45.62%
10
15
20
25
30
35
PL1 (grams)
9.38
9.21
8.71
0.50
0.17
34.00%
w
Liquid Limit, LL
Plastic Limit, PL
Plasticity Index, PI
=
=
=
ave
34.59%
45.62%
34.59%
11.03%
PL2 (grams)
9.43
9.29
8.82
0.47
0.14
29.79%
PL3 (grams)
9.82
9.62
9.09
0.53
0.20
37.74%
PL4 (grams)
9.01
8.87
8.49
0.38
0.14
36.84%
40
45
50
55
LL1 (grams)
12.82
11.49
8.44
3.05
1.33
14
43.61%
0.4361
LL2 (grams)
13.66
12.20
8.80
3.40
1.46
24
42.94%
0.4294
LL3 (grams)
12.57
11.43
8.77
2.66
1.14
31
42.86%
0.4286
LL4 (grams)
12.71
11.51
8.76
2.75
1.20
41
43.64%
0.4364
LL
COMPUTATION :
Flow Index:
Flow Index, I =
F
ave
43.26%
90%
80%
70%
Flow Curve
42.90%
60%
50%
40%
w = - IF log (25/N1) + w1
(w1-w2) =
100%
30%
log ( N2 / N1)
IF1
IF2
IF3
Iave
w1 =
42.94%
0.0284
N1 =
24
0.0217
w @ 25 =
0.02507
20%
42.90%
10%
0%
42.90%
10
15
20
25
30
35
PL1 (grams)
9.16
9.03
8.67
0.36
0.13
36.11%
w
Liquid Limit, LL
Plastic Limit, PL
Plasticity Index, PI
=
=
=
ave
35.38%
42.90%
35.38%
7.52%
PL2 (grams)
9.05
8.91
8.56
0.35
0.14
40.00%
PL3 (grams)
9.57
9.40
8.87
0.53
0.17
32.08%
PL4 (grams)
9.40
9.27
8.88
0.39
0.13
33.33%
40
45
50
55
LL1 (grams)
14.34
12.20
8.71
3.49
2.14
40
61.32%
0.6132
LL2 (grams)
14.23
12.05
8.59
3.46
2.18
31
63.01%
0.6301
LL3 (grams)
13.86
11.78
8.67
3.11
2.08
27
66.88%
0.6688
LL4 (grams)
12.64
10.90
8.28
2.62
1.74
16
66.41%
0.6641
LL
COMPUTATION :
Flow Index:
Flow Index, I =
F
ave
64.40%
Flow Curve
90%
67.56%
80%
4
70%
3
2
60%
50%
40%
w = - IF log (25/N1) + w1
(w1-w2) =
100%
30%
log ( N2 / N1)
IF1
0.1280
w1 =
66.88%
IF2
0.1525
N1 =
27
IF3
0.3259
w @ 25 =
Iave
0.20212
20%
67.56%
10%
0%
67.56%
10
15
20
25
30
35
PL1 (grams)
10.13
9.53
8.45
1.08
0.60
55.56%
w
Liquid Limit, LL
Plastic Limit, PL
Plasticity Index, PI
=
=
=
ave
53.80%
67.56%
53.80%
13.75%
PL2 (grams)
10.42
9.80
8.68
1.12
0.62
55.36%
PL3 (grams)
10.30
9.72
8.61
1.11
0.58
52.25%
PL4 (grams)
9.98
9.60
8.87
0.73
0.38
52.05%
40
45
50
55
LL1 (grams)
12.35
10.90
8.20
2.70
1.45
10
53.70%
0.5370
1
LL
COMPUTATION :
Flow Index:
Flow Index, I =
F
ave
LL2 (grams)
14.30
12.49
8.72
3.77
1.81
22
48.01%
0.4801
LL3 (grams)
12.08
11.03
8.72
2.31
1.05
38
45.45%
0.4545
LL4 (grams)
13.80
12.18
8.70
3.48
1.62
43
46.55%
0.4655
48.43%
90%
Flow Curve
80%
47.23%
70%
60%
50%
2
40%
w = - IF log (25/N1) + w1
(w1-w2) =
100%
30%
log ( N2 / N1)
IF1
0.1129
w1 =
48.01%
IF2
0.1663
N1 =
22
IF3
0.1423
w @ 25 =
0.14048
Iave
ave.
20%
47.23%
10%
0%
47.23%
10
15
20
25
30
35
PL1 (grams)
10.64
10.12
8.99
1.13
0.52
46.02%
w
Liquid Limit, LL
Plastic Limit, PL
Plasticity Index, PI
=
=
=
ave
43.29%
47.23%
43.29%
3.94%
PL2 (grams)
9.70
9.44
8.81
0.63
0.26
41.27%
PL3 (grams)
9.40
9.19
8.70
0.49
0.21
42.86%
PL4 (grams)
10.19
9.82
8.96
0.86
0.37
43.02%
40
45
50
55
LL1 (grams)
12.41
11.34
8.41
2.93
1.07
11
36.52%
0.3652
1
LL
COMPUTATION :
Flow Index:
Flow Index, I =
F
ave
LL2 (grams)
14.73
13.06
8.53
4.53
1.67
16
36.87%
0.3687
LL3 (grams)
13.02
11.73
8.17
3.56
1.29
22
36.24%
0.3624
LL4 (grams)
14.84
13.25
8.94
4.31
1.59
30
36.89%
0.3689
36.63%
90%
Flow Curve
80%
36.27%
70%
60%
50%
40%
w = - IF log (25/N1) + w1
(w1-w2) =
100%
30%
log ( N2 / N1)
IF1
-0.0085
w1 =
36.24%
IF2
-0.0213
N1 =
22
IF3
0.0094
-0.00681
Iave
ave.
w @ 25 =
20%
36.27%
10%
0%
36.27%
10
15
20
25
30
35
PL1 (grams)
9.81
9.58
8.85
0.73
0.23
31.51%
w
Liquid Limit, LL
Plastic Limit, PL
Plasticity Index, PI
=
=
=
ave
31.70%
36.27%
31.70%
4.58%
PL2 (grams)
9.60
9.38
8.71
0.67
0.22
32.84%
PL3 (grams)
9.60
9.38
8.69
0.69
0.22
31.88%
PL4 (grams)
9.79
9.68
9.32
0.36
0.11
30.56%
40
45
50
55
LL1 (grams)
15.90
13.37
8.77
4.60
2.53
36
55.00%
0.5500
LL2 (grams)
14.73
12.54
8.83
3.71
2.19
30
59.03%
0.5903
LL3 (grams)
15.71
13.03
8.72
4.31
2.68
21
62.18%
0.6218
LL4 (grams)
14.39
12.15
8.72
3.43
2.24
14
65.31%
0.6531
LL
COMPUTATION :
Flow Index:
Flow Index, I =
F
ave
60.38%
90%
Flow Curve
80%
59.49%
4
70%
3
60%
50%
40%
w = - IF log (25/N1) + w1
(w1-w2) =
100%
30%
log ( N2 / N1)
IF1
0.2513
w1 =
62.18%
IF2
0.5089
N1 =
21
IF3
0.3068
w @ 25 =
Iave
0.35565
20%
59.49%
10%
0%
59.49%
10
15
20
25
30
35
PL1 (grams)
10.45
9.97
8.96
1.01
0.48
47.52%
w
Liquid Limit, LL
Plastic Limit, PL
Plasticity Index, PI
=
=
=
ave
46.06%
59.49%
46.06%
13.43%
PL2 (grams)
9.83
9.50
8.76
0.74
0.33
44.59%
PL3 (grams)
9.30
9.09
8.63
0.46
0.21
45.65%
PL4 (grams)
9.75
9.29
8.30
0.99
0.46
46.46%
40
45
50
55
LL1 (grams)
12.26
10.87
8.74
2.13
1.39
17
65.26%
0.6526
LL2 (grams)
11.84
10.57
8.61
1.96
1.27
23
64.80%
0.6480
LL3 (grams)
13.84
12.04
8.66
3.38
1.80
44
53.25%
0.5325
LL4 (grams)
13.44
11.68
8.50
3.18
1.76
31
55.35%
0.5535
LL
COMPUTATION :
Flow Index:
Flow Index, I =
F
ave
59.66%
Flow Curve
90%
80%
57.07%
1
70%
2
4
60%
50%
40%
w = - IF log (25/N1) + w1
(w1-w2) =
100%
30%
log ( N2 / N1)
IF1
0.3799
w1 =
55.35%
IF2
0.0352
N1 =
31
IF3
0.1375
w @ 25 =
Iave
0.18421
20%
57.07%
10%
0%
57.07%
10
15
20
25
30
35
PL1 (grams)
9.49
9.23
8.61
0.62
0.26
41.94%
w
Liquid Limit, LL
Plastic Limit, PL
Plasticity Index, PI
=
=
=
ave
42.50%
57.07%
42.50%
14.57%
PL2 (grams)
9.39
9.17
8.72
0.45
0.22
48.89%
PL3 (grams)
9.24
9.00
8.38
0.62
0.24
38.71%
PL4 (grams)
9.99
9.63
8.74
0.89
0.36
40.45%
40
45
50
55
LL1 (grams)
12.74
11.40
9.01
2.39
1.34
40
56.07%
0.5607
LL2 (grams)
14.54
12.51
8.50
4.01
2.03
27
50.62%
0.5062
LL3 (grams)
13.70
11.92
8.67
3.25
1.78
21
54.77%
0.5477
LL4 (grams)
14.25
12.08
8.47
3.61
2.17
16
60.11%
0.6011
LL
COMPUTATION :
Flow Index:
Flow Index, I =
F
ave
55.39%
Flow Curve
90%
80%
52.32%
70%
4
3
60%
1
2
50%
40%
w = - IF log (25/N1) + w1
(w1-w2) =
100%
30%
log ( N2 / N1)
IF1
0.4175
w1 =
54.77%
IF2
0.4523
N1 =
21
IF3
0.1016
w @ 25 =
Iave
0.32380
20%
52.32%
10%
0%
52.32%
10
15
20
25
30
35
PL1 (grams)
9.66
9.37
8.71
0.66
0.29
43.94%
w
Liquid Limit, LL
Plastic Limit, PL
Plasticity Index, PI
=
=
=
ave
42.26%
52.32%
42.26%
10.06%
PL2 (grams)
9.24
8.92
8.18
0.74
0.32
43.24%
PL3 (grams)
9.66
9.42
8.81
0.61
0.24
39.34%
PL4 (grams)
9.61
9.27
8.47
0.80
0.34
42.50%
40
45
50
55
LOCATION:
DATE:
TESTING BY :
EMPSCO ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
SAMPLE NO.
SS-1
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION :
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF CAN
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE
LOOSES :
Sieve No.
Sieve
Size
mm
Weight of
Weight of
Empty Sieve Sieve+ Soil
Retained (gms)
gms
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
By Weight
99.95
Weight
Percent
Retained
retained
Wt. Passing
CUMMULATIVE
Passing
Retained
gms
gms
REMARKS
1-1/2''
37.500
0.000%
278.450
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1"
25.400
0.000%
278.450
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/4"
19.050
0.000%
278.450
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1/2"
12.700
0.000%
278.450
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/8"
9.530
0.000%
278.450
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#4
4.760
0.000%
278.450
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#8
2.360
0.000%
278.450
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 10
2.000
0.000%
278.450
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 16
1.180
0.000%
278.450
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 20
0.840
# 30
0.590
# 40
0.420
# 50
0.297
507
507.0
482
482.0
411.5
408.0
438
382.5
0.000
0.000
3.500
55.500
1.257%
274.950
98.74%
1.26%
Sand
0.000%
274.950
98.74%
1.26%
Sand
19.932%
219.450
78.81%
21.19%
Sand
0.000%
219.450
78.81%
21.19%
Sand
# 60
0.274
366.0
378.5
12.500
4.489%
206.950
74.32%
25.68%
Sand
# 100
0.149
342.5
379.5
37.000
13.288%
169.950
61.03%
38.97%
Sand
# 200
0.074
334.5
358.5
24.000
8.619%
145.950
52.42%
47.58%
Sand
PAN
Wash Passing
No. 200
0.001
407.0
453
46.000
52.415%
0.000
0.00%
100.00%
Passing
Retained
99.95
Total Weight
278.450
D10 =
D30 =
D60 =
0.01493 mm
0.04278 mm
0.14649 mm
1 of 22
0.00%
% Gravel (GF) =
% Sand (SF) =
47.58%
% Fines =
52.42%
Coefficient of Uniformity,
Cu = D60/D10 =
Coefficient of Concavity, Cc
GRAVEL:
D302/(D10
R4 =
0.00%
R200 =
47.58%
9.81
D60) =
SAND:
0.84
SILT:
Coarse
3" - 3/4"
Coarse
#4 - #10
Fine
3/4" - #4
Medium
#10 - #40
Fine
#40 - #200
CLAY:
#200 - .005mm
< .005mm
Particle Size
Conversion
Item No. inches
ParticleSizeDistribution
120.00%
1 1-1/2''
PercentagePassing
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
Series1
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
1
1"
3/4"
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#8
# 10
# 16
# 20
# 30
# 40
# 50
# 60
# 100
# 200
PAN
PAN
19
20
21
22
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
ParticleSize(mm)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
2 of 22
LOCATION:
DATE:
TESTING BY :
EMPSCO ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
SAMPLE NO.
SS-2
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION :
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF CAN
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE
LOOSES :
Sieve No.
Sieve
Size
mm
Weight of
Weight of
Empty Sieve Sieve+ Soil
Retained (gms)
gms
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
By Weight
69.00
Weight
Percent
Retained
retained
Wt. Passing
CUMMULATIVE
Passing
Retained
gms
gms
REMARKS
1-1/2''
37.500
0.000%
374.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1"
25.400
0.000%
374.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/4"
19.050
0.000%
374.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1/2"
12.700
0.000%
374.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/8"
9.530
0.000%
374.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#4
4.760
0.000%
374.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#8
2.360
0.000%
374.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 10
2.000
0.000%
374.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 16
1.180
0.000%
374.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 20
0.840
# 30
0.590
# 40
0.420
# 50
0.297
507
507.0
482
482.0
436.5
408.0
414
382.5
0.000
0.000
28.500
31.500
7.610%
346.000
92.39%
7.61%
Sand
0.000%
346.000
92.39%
7.61%
Sand
8.411%
314.500
83.98%
16.02%
Sand
0.000%
314.500
83.98%
16.02%
Sand
# 60
0.274
366.0
381.5
15.500
4.139%
299.000
79.84%
20.16%
Sand
# 100
0.149
342.5
375
32.500
8.678%
266.500
71.16%
28.84%
Sand
# 200
0.074
334.5
411
76.500
20.427%
190.000
50.73%
49.27%
Sand
PAN
Wash Passing
No. 200
0.001
407.0
528
121.000
50.734%
0.000
0.00%
100.00%
Passing
Retained
69.00
Total Weight
374.500
D10 =
D30 =
D60 =
0.01539 mm
0.04417 mm
0.12579 mm
3 of 22
0.00%
% Gravel (GF) =
% Sand (SF) =
49.27%
% Fines =
50.73%
Coefficient of Uniformity,
Cu = D60/D10 =
Coefficient of Concavity, Cc
GRAVEL:
D302/(D10
R4 =
0.00%
R200 =
49.27%
8.17
D60) =
SAND:
1.01
SILT:
Coarse
3" - 3/4"
Coarse
#4 - #10
Fine
3/4" - #4
Medium
#10 - #40
Fine
#40 - #200
CLAY:
#200 - .005mm
< .005mm
Particle Size
Conversion
ParticleSizeDistribution
120.00%
PercentagePassing
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
Series1
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
ParticleSize(mm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1-1/2''
1"
3/4"
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#8
# 10
# 16
# 20
# 30
# 40
# 50
# 60
# 100
# 200
PAN
18
19
20
21
22
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
4 of 22
LOCATION:
DATE:
TESTING BY :
EMPSCO ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
SAMPLE NO.
SS-3
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION :
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF CAN
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE
LOOSES :
Sieve No.
Sieve
Size
mm
Weight of
Weight of
Empty Sieve Sieve+ Soil
Retained (gms)
gms
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
By Weight
187.00
Weight
Percent
Retained
retained
Wt. Passing
CUMMULATIVE
Passing
Retained
gms
gms
REMARKS
1-1/2''
37.500
0.000%
395.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1"
25.400
0.000%
395.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/4"
19.050
0.000%
395.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1/2"
12.700
0.000%
395.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/8"
9.530
0.000%
395.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#4
4.760
0.000%
395.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#8
2.360
0.000%
395.000
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 10
2.000
0.000%
395.000
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 16
1.180
0.000%
395.000
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 20
0.840
# 30
0.590
# 40
0.420
# 50
0.297
507
507.0
482
482.0
431
408.0
449.5
382.5
0.000
0.000
23.000
67.000
5.823%
372.000
94.18%
5.82%
Sand
0.000%
372.000
94.18%
5.82%
Sand
16.962%
305.000
77.22%
22.78%
Sand
0.000%
305.000
77.22%
22.78%
Sand
# 60
0.274
366.0
400.5
34.500
8.734%
270.500
68.48%
31.52%
Sand
# 100
0.149
342.5
370.5
28.000
7.089%
242.500
61.39%
38.61%
Sand
# 200
0.074
334.5
364
29.500
7.468%
213.000
53.92%
46.08%
Sand
PAN
Wash Passing
No. 200
0.001
407.0
433
26.000
53.924%
0.000
0.00%
100.00%
Passing
Retained
187.00
Total Weight
395.000
D10 =
D30 =
D60 =
0.01454 mm
0.04161 mm
0.14564 mm
5 of 22
0.00%
% Gravel (GF) =
% Sand (SF) =
46.08%
% Fines =
53.92%
Coefficient of Uniformity,
Cu = D60/D10 =
Coefficient of Concavity, Cc
GRAVEL:
D302/(D10
R4 =
0.00%
R200 =
46.08%
10.02
D60) =
SAND:
0.82
SILT:
Coarse
3" - 3/4"
Coarse
#4 - #10
Fine
3/4" - #4
Medium
#10 - #40
Fine
#40 - #200
CLAY:
#200 - .005mm
< .005mm
Particle Size
Conversion
ParticleSizeDistribution
120.00%
PercentagePassing
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
Series1
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
ParticleSize(mm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1-1/2''
1"
3/4"
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#8
# 10
# 16
# 20
# 30
# 40
# 50
# 60
# 100
# 200
PAN
18
19
20
21
22
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
6 of 22
LOCATION:
DATE:
TESTING BY :
EMPSCO ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
SAMPLE NO.
SS-4A
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION :
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF CAN
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE
LOOSES :
Sieve No.
Sieve
Size
mm
Weight of
Weight of
Empty Sieve Sieve+ Soil
Retained (gms)
gms
BOREHOLE 4A
320.50
249.00
30.00
290.50
219.00
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
By Weight
71.50
Weight
Percent
Retained
retained
Wt. Passing
CUMMULATIVE
Passing
Retained
gms
gms
REMARKS
1-1/2''
37.500
0.000%
290.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1"
25.400
0.000%
290.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/4"
19.050
0.000%
290.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1/2"
12.700
0.000%
290.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/8"
9.530
0.000%
290.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#4
4.760
0.000%
290.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#8
2.360
0.000%
290.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 10
2.000
0.000%
290.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 16
1.180
0.000%
290.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 20
0.840
# 30
0.590
# 40
0.420
# 50
0.297
507
507.0
482
482.0
408.0
411.5
433
382.5
0.000
0.000
3.500
50.500
1.205%
287.000
98.80%
1.20%
Sand
0.000%
287.000
98.80%
1.20%
Sand
17.384%
236.500
81.41%
18.59%
Sand
0.000%
236.500
81.41%
18.59%
Sand
# 60
0.274
366.0
391.5
25.500
8.778%
211.000
72.63%
27.37%
Sand
# 100
0.149
342.5
376
33.500
11.532%
177.500
61.10%
38.90%
Sand
# 200
0.074
334.5
363
28.500
9.811%
149.000
51.29%
48.71%
Sand
PAN
Wash Passing
No. 200
0.001
407.0
484.5
77.500
51.291%
0.000
0.00%
100.00%
Passing
Retained
71.50
Total Weight
290.500
D10 =
D30 =
D60 =
0.01523 mm
0.04370 mm
0.14633 mm
7 of 22
0.00%
% Gravel (GF) =
% Sand (SF) =
48.71%
% Fines =
51.29%
Coefficient of Uniformity,
Cu = D60/D10 =
Coefficient of Concavity, Cc
GRAVEL:
D302/(D10
R4 =
0.00%
R200 =
48.71%
9.61
D60) =
SAND:
0.86
SILT:
Coarse
3" - 3/4"
Coarse
#4 - #10
Fine
3/4" - #4
Medium
#10 - #40
Fine
#40 - #200
CLAY:
#200 - .005mm
< .005mm
Particle Size
Conversion
ParticleSizeDistribution
120.00%
PercentagePassing
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
Series1
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
ParticleSize(mm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1-1/2''
1"
3/4"
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#8
# 10
# 16
# 20
# 30
# 40
# 50
# 60
# 100
# 200
PAN
18
19
20
21
22
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
8 of 22
LOCATION:
DATE:
TESTING BY :
EMPSCO ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
SAMPLE NO.
SS-4B
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION :
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF CAN
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE
LOOSES :
Sieve No.
Sieve
Size
mm
Weight of
Weight of
Empty Sieve Sieve+ Soil
Retained (gms)
gms
BOREHOLE 4B
393.50
321.50
30.00
363.50
291.50
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
By Weight
72.00
Weight
Percent
Retained
retained
Wt. Passing
CUMMULATIVE
Passing
Retained
gms
gms
REMARKS
1-1/2''
37.500
0.000%
363.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1"
25.400
0.000%
363.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/4"
19.050
0.000%
363.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1/2"
12.700
0.000%
363.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/8"
9.530
0.000%
363.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#4
4.760
0.000%
363.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#8
2.360
0.000%
363.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 10
2.000
0.000%
363.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 16
1.180
0.000%
363.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 20
0.840
# 30
0.590
# 40
0.420
# 50
0.297
507
507.0
482
482.0
408.0
382.5
426.5
439.5
0.000
0.000
18.500
57.000
5.089%
345.000
94.91%
5.09%
Sand
0.000%
345.000
94.91%
5.09%
Sand
15.681%
288.000
79.23%
20.77%
Sand
0.000%
288.000
79.23%
20.77%
Sand
# 60
0.274
366.0
397.5
31.500
8.666%
256.500
70.56%
29.44%
Sand
# 100
0.149
342.5
365
22.500
6.190%
234.000
64.37%
35.63%
Sand
# 200
0.074
334.5
374.5
40.000
11.004%
194.000
53.37%
46.63%
Sand
PAN
Wash Passing
No. 200
0.001
407.0
529
122.000
53.370%
0.000
0.00%
100.00%
Passing
Retained
72.00
Total Weight
363.500
D10 =
D30 =
D60 =
0.01468 mm
0.04203 mm
0.13894 mm
9 of 22
0.00%
% Gravel (GF) =
% Sand (SF) =
46.63%
% Fines =
53.37%
Coefficient of Uniformity,
Cu = D60/D10 =
Coefficient of Concavity, Cc
GRAVEL:
D302/(D10
R4 =
0.00%
R200 =
46.63%
9.47
D60) =
SAND:
0.87
SILT:
Coarse
3" - 3/4"
Coarse
#4 - #10
Fine
3/4" - #4
Medium
#10 - #40
Fine
#40 - #200
CLAY:
#200 - .005mm
< .005mm
Particle Size
Conversion
ParticleSizeDistribution
120.00%
PercentagePassing
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
Series1
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
ParticleSize(mm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1-1/2''
1"
3/4"
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#8
# 10
# 16
# 20
# 30
# 40
# 50
# 60
# 100
# 200
PAN
18
19
20
21
22
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
10 of 22
LOCATION:
DATE:
TESTING BY :
EMPSCO ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
SAMPLE NO.
SS-5
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION :
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF CAN
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE
LOOSES :
Sieve No.
Sieve
Size
mm
Weight of
Weight of
Empty Sieve Sieve+ Soil
Retained (gms)
gms
BOREHOLE 5
268.50
146.50
30.00
238.50
116.50
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
By Weight
122.00
Weight
Percent
Retained
retained
Wt. Passing
CUMMULATIVE
Passing
Retained
gms
gms
REMARKS
1-1/2''
37.500
0.000%
238.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1"
25.400
0.000%
238.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/4"
19.050
0.000%
238.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1/2"
12.700
0.000%
238.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/8"
9.530
0.000%
238.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#4
4.760
0.000%
238.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#8
2.360
0.000%
238.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 10
2.000
0.000%
238.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 16
1.180
0.000%
238.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 20
0.840
# 30
0.590
# 40
0.420
# 50
0.297
507
507.0
482
482.0
408
408.0
416
382.5
0.000
0.000
0.000
33.500
0.000%
238.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
0.000%
238.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
14.046%
205.000
85.95%
14.05%
Sand
0.000%
205.000
85.95%
14.05%
Sand
# 60
0.274
366.0
387
21.000
8.805%
184.000
77.15%
22.85%
Sand
# 100
0.149
342.5
368
25.500
10.692%
158.500
66.46%
33.54%
Sand
# 200
0.074
334.5
353
18.500
7.757%
140.000
58.70%
41.30%
Sand
PAN
Wash Passing
No. 200
0.001
407.0
425
18.000
58.700%
0.000
0.00%
100.00%
Passing
Retained
122.00
Total Weight
238.500
D10 =
D30 =
D60 =
0.01344 mm
0.03831 mm
0.13462 mm
11 of 22
0.00%
% Gravel (GF) =
% Sand (SF) =
41.30%
% Fines =
58.70%
Coefficient of Uniformity,
Cu = D60/D10 =
Coefficient of Concavity, Cc
GRAVEL:
D302/(D10
R4 =
0.00%
R200 =
41.30%
10.02
D60) =
SAND:
0.81
SILT:
Coarse
3" - 3/4"
Coarse
#4 - #10
Fine
3/4" - #4
Medium
#10 - #40
Fine
#40 - #200
CLAY:
#200 - .005mm
< .005mm
Particle Size
Conversion
ParticleSizeDistribution
120.00%
PercentagePassing
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
Series1
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
ParticleSize(mm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1-1/2''
1"
3/4"
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#8
# 10
# 16
# 20
# 30
# 40
# 50
# 60
# 100
# 200
PAN
18
19
20
21
22
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
12 of 22
LOCATION:
DATE:
TESTING BY :
EMPSCO ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
SAMPLE NO.
SS-6
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION :
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF CAN
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE
LOOSES :
Sieve No.
Sieve
Size
mm
Weight of
Weight of
Empty Sieve Sieve+ Soil
Retained (gms)
gms
BOREHOLE 6
419.00
342.00
30.00
389.00
312.00
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
By Weight
77.00
Weight
Percent
Retained
retained
Wt. Passing
CUMMULATIVE
Passing
Retained
gms
gms
REMARKS
1-1/2''
37.500
0.000%
389.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1"
25.400
0.000%
389.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/4"
19.050
0.000%
389.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1/2"
12.700
0.000%
389.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/8"
9.530
0.000%
389.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#4
4.760
19.794%
312.000
80.21%
19.79%
Gravel
#8
2.360
0.000%
312.000
80.21%
19.79%
Sand
# 10
2.000
14.396%
256.000
65.81%
34.19%
Sand
# 16
1.180
0.000%
256.000
65.81%
34.19%
Sand
# 20
0.840
# 30
0.590
# 40
0.420
# 50
0.297
584
507.0
538
482.0
464
408.0
435.5
382.5
77.000
56.000
56.000
53.000
14.396%
200.000
51.41%
48.59%
Sand
0.000%
200.000
51.41%
48.59%
Sand
13.625%
147.000
37.79%
62.21%
Sand
0.000%
147.000
37.79%
62.21%
Sand
# 60
0.274
366.0
387.5
21.500
5.527%
125.500
32.26%
67.74%
Sand
# 100
0.149
342.5
364.5
22.000
5.656%
103.500
26.61%
73.39%
Sand
# 200
0.074
334.5
347.5
13.000
3.342%
90.500
23.26%
76.74%
Sand
PAN
Wash Passing
No. 200
0.001
407.0
420.5
13.500
23.265%
0.000
0.00%
100.00%
Passing
Retained
77.00
Total Weight
389.000
D10 =
D30 =
D60 =
0.03238 mm
0.25486 mm
1.82353 mm
13 of 22
% Gravel (GF) =
% Sand (SF) =
19.79%
% Fines =
23.26%
R4 =
19.79%
R200 =
76.74%
56.94%
Coefficient of Uniformity,
Cu = D60/D10 =
Coefficient of Concavity, Cc
GRAVEL:
D302/(D10
56.32
D60) =
SAND:
1.10
SILT:
Coarse
3" - 3/4"
Coarse
#4 - #10
Fine
3/4" - #4
Medium
#10 - #40
Fine
#40 - #200
CLAY:
#200 - .005mm
< .005mm
Particle Size
Conversion
ParticleSizeDistribution
120.00%
PercentagePassing
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
Series1
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
ParticleSize(mm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1-1/2''
1"
3/4"
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#8
# 10
# 16
# 20
# 30
# 40
# 50
# 60
# 100
# 200
PAN
18
19
20
21
22
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
14 of 22
LOCATION:
DATE:
TESTING BY :
EMPSCO ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
SAMPLE NO.
SS-7
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION :
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF CAN
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE
LOOSES :
Sieve No.
Sieve
Size
mm
Weight of
Weight of
Empty Sieve Sieve+ Soil
Retained (gms)
gms
BOREHOLE 7
416.50
209.50
30.50
386.00
179.00
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
By Weight
207.00
Weight
Percent
Retained
retained
Wt. Passing
CUMMULATIVE
Passing
Retained
gms
gms
REMARKS
1-1/2''
37.500
0.000%
386.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1"
25.400
0.000%
386.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/4"
19.050
0.000%
386.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1/2"
12.700
0.000%
386.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/8"
9.530
0.000%
386.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#4
4.760
12.565%
337.500
87.44%
12.56%
Gravel
#8
2.360
0.000%
337.500
87.44%
12.56%
Sand
# 10
2.000
4.534%
320.000
82.90%
17.10%
Sand
# 16
1.180
0.000%
320.000
82.90%
17.10%
Sand
# 20
0.840
# 30
0.590
# 40
0.420
# 50
0.297
555.5
507.0
499.5
482.0
452.5
408.0
425.5
382.5
48.500
17.500
44.500
43.000
11.528%
275.500
71.37%
28.63%
Sand
0.000%
275.500
71.37%
28.63%
Sand
11.140%
232.500
60.23%
39.77%
Sand
0.000%
232.500
60.23%
39.77%
Sand
# 60
0.274
366.0
379.5
13.500
3.497%
219.000
56.74%
43.26%
Sand
# 100
0.149
342.5
350.5
8.000
2.073%
211.000
54.66%
45.34%
Sand
# 200
0.074
334.5
338.5
4.000
1.036%
207.000
53.63%
46.37%
Sand
PAN
Wash Passing
No. 200
0.001
407.0
407
0.000
53.627%
0.000
0.00%
100.00%
Passing
Retained
207.00
Total Weight
386.000
D10 =
D30 =
D60 =
0.01461 mm
0.04184 mm
0.41838 mm
15 of 22
% Gravel (GF) =
% Sand (SF) =
12.56%
% Fines =
53.63%
R4 =
12.56%
R200 =
46.37%
33.81%
Coefficient of Uniformity,
Cu = D60/D10 =
Coefficient of Concavity, Cc
GRAVEL:
D302/(D10
28.63
D60) =
SAND:
0.29
SILT:
Coarse
3" - 3/4"
Coarse
#4 - #10
Fine
3/4" - #4
Medium
#10 - #40
Fine
#40 - #200
CLAY:
#200 - .005mm
< .005mm
Particle Size
Conversion
ParticleSizeDistribution
120.00%
PercentagePassing
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
Series1
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
ParticleSize(mm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1-1/2''
1"
3/4"
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#8
# 10
# 16
# 20
# 30
# 40
# 50
# 60
# 100
# 200
PAN
18
19
20
21
22
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
16 of 22
LOCATION:
DATE:
TESTING BY :
EMPSCO ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
SAMPLE NO.
SS-8
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION :
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF CAN
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE
LOOSES :
Sieve No.
Sieve
Size
mm
Weight of
Weight of
Empty Sieve Sieve+ Soil
Retained (gms)
gms
BOREHOLE 8
370.50
291.50
30.00
340.50
261.50
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
By Weight
79.00
Weight
Percent
Retained
retained
Wt. Passing
CUMMULATIVE
Passing
Retained
gms
gms
REMARKS
1-1/2''
37.500
0.000%
340.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1"
25.400
0.000%
340.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/4"
19.050
0.000%
340.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1/2"
12.700
0.000%
340.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/8"
9.530
0.000%
340.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#4
4.760
0.000%
340.500
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#8
2.360
0.000%
340.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 10
2.000
0.000%
340.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 16
1.180
0.000%
340.500
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 20
0.840
# 30
0.590
# 40
0.420
# 50
0.297
507
507.0
482
482.0
417.5
408.0
396.5
382.5
0.000
0.000
9.500
14.000
2.790%
331.000
97.21%
2.79%
Sand
0.000%
331.000
97.21%
2.79%
Sand
4.112%
317.000
93.10%
6.90%
Sand
0.000%
317.000
93.10%
6.90%
Sand
# 60
0.274
366.0
413.5
47.500
13.950%
269.500
79.15%
20.85%
Sand
# 100
0.149
342.5
385
42.500
12.482%
227.000
66.67%
33.33%
Sand
# 200
0.074
334.5
387
52.500
15.419%
174.500
51.25%
48.75%
Sand
PAN
Wash Passing
No. 200
0.001
407.0
502.5
95.500
51.248%
0.000
0.00%
100.00%
Passing
Retained
79.00
Total Weight
340.500
D10 =
D30 =
D60 =
0.01524 mm
0.04373 mm
0.13420 mm
17 of 22
0.00%
% Gravel (GF) =
% Sand (SF) =
48.75%
% Fines =
51.25%
Coefficient of Uniformity,
Cu = D60/D10 =
Coefficient of Concavity, Cc
GRAVEL:
D302/(D10
R4 =
0.00%
R200 =
48.75%
8.80
D60) =
SAND:
0.93
SILT:
Coarse
3" - 3/4"
Coarse
#4 - #10
Fine
3/4" - #4
Medium
#10 - #40
Fine
#40 - #200
CLAY:
#200 - .005mm
< .005mm
Particle Size
Conversion
ParticleSizeDistribution
120.00%
PercentagePassing
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
Series1
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
ParticleSize(mm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1-1/2''
1"
3/4"
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#8
# 10
# 16
# 20
# 30
# 40
# 50
# 60
# 100
# 200
PAN
18
19
20
21
22
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
18 of 22
LOCATION:
DATE:
TESTING BY :
EMPSCO ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
SAMPLE NO.
SS-9Afor BH-9A / TP-9A & SS-9C for BH-9C / TP-9C
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION :
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF CAN
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE
LOOSES :
Sieve No.
Sieve
Size
mm
Weight of
Weight of
Empty Sieve Sieve+ Soil
Retained (gms)
gms
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
By Weight
161.00
Weight
Percent
Retained
retained
Wt. Passing
CUMMULATIVE
Passing
Retained
gms
gms
REMARKS
1-1/2''
37.500
0.000%
331.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1"
25.400
0.000%
331.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/4"
19.050
0.000%
331.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1/2"
12.700
0.000%
331.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/8"
9.530
0.000%
331.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#4
4.760
0.000%
331.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#8
2.360
0.000%
331.000
100.00%
0.00%
Sand
# 10
2.000
2.719%
322.000
97.28%
2.72%
Sand
# 16
1.180
0.000%
322.000
97.28%
2.72%
Sand
# 20
0.840
# 30
0.590
# 40
0.420
# 50
0.297
507.0
482.0
408.0
382.5
507
491
436.5
441
0.000
9.000
28.500
58.500
8.610%
293.500
88.67%
11.33%
Sand
0.000%
293.500
88.67%
11.33%
Sand
17.674%
235.000
71.00%
29.00%
Sand
0.000%
235.000
71.00%
29.00%
Sand
# 60
0.274
366.0
397
31.000
9.366%
204.000
61.63%
38.37%
Sand
# 100
0.149
342.5
358.5
16.000
4.834%
188.000
56.80%
43.20%
Sand
# 200
0.074
334.5
346
11.500
3.474%
176.500
53.32%
46.68%
Sand
PAN
Wash Passing
No. 200
0.001
407.0
422.5
15.500
53.323%
0.000
0.00%
100.00%
Passing
Retained
161.00
Total Weight
331.000
D10 =
D30 =
D60 =
0.01469 mm
0.04207 mm
0.26677 mm
19 of 22
0.00%
% Gravel (GF) =
% Sand (SF) =
46.68%
% Fines =
53.32%
Coefficient of Uniformity,
Cu = D60/D10 =
Coefficient of Concavity, Cc
GRAVEL:
D302/(D10
R4 =
0.00%
R200 =
46.68%
18.16
D60) =
SAND:
0.45
SILT:
Coarse
3" - 3/4"
Coarse
#4 - #10
Fine
3/4" - #4
Medium
#10 - #40
Fine
#40 - #200
CLAY:
#200 - .005mm
< .005mm
Particle Size
Conversion
ParticleSizeDistribution
120.00%
PercentagePassing
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
Series1
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
ParticleSize(mm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1-1/2''
1"
3/4"
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#8
# 10
# 16
# 20
# 30
# 40
# 50
# 60
# 100
# 200
PAN
18
19
20
21
22
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
20 of 22
LOCATION:
DATE:
TESTING BY :
EMPSCO ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
SAMPLE NO.
SS-9B for BH-9B / TP-9B & SS-9D for BH-9D / TP-9D
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION :
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE+CAN
WT. OF CAN
WT. OF UNWASHED SAMPLE
WT. OF WASHED SAMPLE
LOOSES :
Sieve No.
Sieve
Size
mm
Weight of
Weight of
Empty Sieve Sieve+ Soil
Retained (gms)
gms
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
By Weight
223.00
Weight
Percent
Retained
retained
Wt. Passing
CUMMULATIVE
Passing
Retained
gms
gms
REMARKS
1-1/2''
37.500
0.000%
473.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1"
25.400
0.000%
473.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/4"
19.050
0.000%
473.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
1/2"
12.700
0.000%
473.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
3/8"
9.530
0.000%
473.000
100.00%
0.00%
Gravel
#4
4.760
0.317%
471.500
99.68%
0.32%
Gravel
#8
2.360
0.000%
471.500
99.68%
0.32%
Sand
# 10
2.000
1.374%
465.000
98.31%
1.69%
Sand
# 16
1.180
0.000%
465.000
98.31%
1.69%
Sand
# 20
0.840
# 30
0.590
# 40
0.420
# 50
0.297
507.0
482.0
408.0
382.5
508.5
488.5
440.5
463.5
1.500
6.500
32.500
81.000
6.871%
432.500
91.44%
8.56%
Sand
0.000%
432.500
91.44%
8.56%
Sand
17.125%
351.500
74.31%
25.69%
Sand
0.000%
351.500
74.31%
25.69%
Sand
Sand
# 60
0.274
366.0
414.5
48.500
10.254%
303.000
64.06%
35.94%
# 100
0.149
342.5
374
31.500
6.660%
271.500
57.40%
42.60%
Sand
# 200
0.074
334.5
348
13.500
2.854%
258.000
54.55%
45.45%
Sand
PAN
Wash Passing
No. 200
0.001
407.0
442
35.000
54.545%
0.000
0.00%
100.00%
Passing
Retained
223.00
Total Weight
473.000
D10 =
D30 =
D60 =
0.01438 mm
0.04115 mm
0.25670 mm
21 of 22
0.32%
% Gravel (GF) =
% Sand (SF) =
45.14%
% Fines =
54.55%
Coefficient of Uniformity,
Cu = D60/D10 =
Coefficient of Concavity, Cc
GRAVEL:
D302/(D10
R4 =
0.32%
R200 =
45.45%
17.85
D60) =
SAND:
0.46
SILT:
Coarse
3" - 3/4"
Coarse
#4 - #10
Fine
3/4" - #4
Medium
#10 - #40
Fine
#40 - #200
CLAY:
#200 - .005mm
< .005mm
Particle Size
Conversion
ParticleSizeDistribution
120.00%
PercentagePassing
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
Series1
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
ParticleSize(mm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1-1/2''
1"
3/4"
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#8
# 10
# 16
# 20
# 30
# 40
# 50
# 60
# 100
# 200
PAN
18
19
20
21
22
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
PAN
22 of 22