Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2 Filtration Fundarnenfals
(2.19)
Equation (2.19) contains three variables and four constants: time, filtrate volume and
pressure; and filtration area, viscosity, concentration and specific resistance. The last two
are constant only if the filter cake is incompressible. The equation can be solved
analytically only if one of the three variables is held constant. This reflects the physical
mode of operation of industrial filters; vacuum filtration tends to be at constant pressure
and pressure filtration is oRen under constant rate, at least until some predetermined
pressure has been achieved. Thus the following mathematical models are very relevant to
these filtrations.
the limits are given by: zero filtrate volume at zero time, V volume filtrate after time t,
thus:
(2.20)
In deriving Equation (2.20) any pressure loss due to the flow of filtrate through the
6lter medium has been neglected. This assumption can be removed by assuming that the
pressure drop in the medium APmcan be added to the pressure drop over the filter cake
h p ,to give the total or overall pressure drop:
AP
APc + APm
(2.21)
45
where Lm and k, are the medium ,depth and permeability, respectively. If the medium
resistance and depth remains constant during filtration these two constants can be
replaced by a single constant known as the medium resistance&, with units of m- :
This expression can be substituted into Equation (2.22), which can then be rearranged
and integrated:
After integration and rearrangement the following equation, known as the linearised
parabolic rate law results:
t
2A2AP
v+- @m
AAP
(2.23)
Equation (2.23) is a straight line, where t/V is the dependent and V is the independent
variable. Thus a graph of the experimental data points of t/Y against V permits
calculation of the gradient and intercept of Equation (2.23) muth, 19351:
The gradient and intercept are as follows:
Gradient
Clca
= ___
(2.24)
PRm
(2.25)
2AZAP
and
Intercept
= ___
AAP
Thus if the liquid viscosity, filter area, fitration pressure and mass of dry cake per unit
volume of filtrate, either fiom Equation (2.17) or (2.18), are known, the graphical values
can be used to calculate the cake specific resistance and filter medium resistance.
Worked Example: the data shown in Figure 2.7 were obtained from the constant
pressure period of a pilot scale plate and .frame filter press. Calculate the cake
resistance given: filter area 2.72 m, viscosity 10 Pa s, mass of dry cake per unit
volume filtrate 125 kg m-3 and filtrate pressure 3 bar. The specific resistance by
Equation (2.24) is 5 . 4 ~ 1 0 m kg-. The apparent medium resistance is 2 . 9 ~ 1 0 m-
by Equation (2.25). However, in this instance the medium resistance is a composite
term including the resistance to filtrate flow due to the cake formed during the
2Filtration Fundamentals
46
preceding constant rate filtration period on the filter press, in addition to the true
medium resistance.
3E
*
6000
20
5000
$?
4000
+k
0
.r(
c,
a2
c.,
2.
CI
0.024
0.039
3000
2000
+
0
.+
I&
327
418
472
538
0.071
0.088
0.096
0.106
0.14
It is important to realise that the above equations are applicable to both small-scale
laboratory test data and to fdl-scale industrial filters operating under conditions of
constant pressure filtration. Thus specific resistance and medium resistance are regarded
as two design variables which can be used to optimise filter throughput, or to scale up
laboratory data, as will be discussed fhther in Chapter 11. Further important details
regarding the filter medium resistance are discussed in Section 2.9, and these should be
read before any further conclusions are made regarding this variable.
There are various forms of the parabolic rate law in common use. One alternative is to
plot (t Hl )/ (V-VI) against Vl where tl and Vl are some arbitrary datum values of time and
filtrate volume. This is usefid if a long time has been taken in reaching the h a 1 and
constant value of pressure across the cake and cloth. It is also usefd in the analysis of
data in which a step change of the filtration pressure was performed, such as detailed in
Section 2.6. The value of the medium resistance calculated fkom Equation (2.25) under
these circumstances, has dubious meaning, however, as it represents both the medium
resistance and the resistance due to the cake deposited prior to the datum. Some
investigators work with the differential form of Equation (2.23), plotting the reciprocal
of the instantaneous filtrate rate q against volume of filtrate, which again produces a
straight line in accordance with equations (2.26) and (2.27):
(2.26)
47
i.e.:
1
_ = -
AA?
v+-1
go
(2.27)
where 40 is the filtrate rate at the start of the filtration when no cake is present. It is not,
however, the same as the medium resistance in the total absence of slurry to be atered, as
will be discussed in Section 2.9. Use of Equations (2.26) and (2.27) presents some
practical difEculties as the instantaneous filtrate flow rate usually has to be determined by
graphical merentiation (i.e taking tangents) of the filtrate volume-time curve. Such a
procedure is notoriously inaccurate.
Finally, one method which is readily applied to computer spreadsheet use is to consider
the incremental version of Equation (2.23). The sltration data is arranged into equal
volumes of filtrate, and the corresponding time for each increment is calculated. The
filtration starts at to and YO, the next increment is tl and Vl, and subsequent times are
measured after equal volumes of filtrate ( A v ) have been collected. The incremental
equation for the first increment can be represented as:
t,
a(AV) + b ( A V )
Thus the second difference in the times required to achieve the filtrate volumes can be
equated with the above, and rearranged to provide values of a and ultimately specific
resistance. This technique is best illustrated by the application of a Mereme table, which
is given below.
is more complex, but again does not require any
The equation or b, and hence R,,,,
graphical construction.
The advantage of the above procedure is that values of both specific resistance and
medium resistance can be calculated for each data point (or at least n-2 data points where
n is the total number of points). This helps to highlight any erroneous data points, and
provides some indication of the spread of experimental values for specific and
48
2 Filtration Fundamentals
medium resistances. Clearly, the mean value of specific and medium resistance can be
used in further computations, possibly combined with the lowest and highest values
taken fi-omthe differencetable as an indication of this measure of spread on these values.
The routine appears very complex on first viewing but lends itself to computer
spreadsheet application with, therefore, the minimum amount of repetitive calculation
once set up.
Table 2.1 Difference table for constant pressure filtration
Incremental equation
First difference
Second difference
tl= a(Av2+b(AV)
tz = a(2AQ2+b(2AV)
At2= 3a(Aq2+bAV
t3= a(3AV2+b(3AV)
At3= 5a(AV)+bAV
...
...
...
tn-l = (n-l)2a(AV)2+(n-1)b(AV)
At,,-l = (2n-3)a(AV)+b(AV
= (2n-l)a(AV)2+b(AV)
A(At) = 2a(AV)
A(At) = 2a(Av2
Constant