George 1

Agey George (140038)

Miss. Sharon Pillai

BA English Honours 1

October 9, 2014

Discuss Ghare Baire as a Critique of Extremist and Expedient Nationalism.
Rabindranath Tagore was born in 1861, a period during which the
nationalist movement in India against the British rule was crystallising and
gaining momentum. In 1857, only four years before the poet was born, the
first military uprising for self-rule broke out in India. In 1905, the
Swadeshi movement started on Tagore‟s doorstep, as a response to the
British policy of partitioning Bengal. (2)

“Ghare Baire” is a critique of the extremist and expedient nature of nationalism by India‟s
incandescent writer and Asia‟s first Nobel Laureate, Rabindranath Tagore (1861-1941).
“Patriotism cannot be our final spiritual shelter; my refuge is humanity. I will not buy glass for
the price of diamonds, and I will never allow patriotism to triumph over humanity as long as I
live” (quoted. in Sen 86). Tagore denounced patriotism that, like religious formalism, “breeds
sectarian arrogance, mutual misunderstanding and a spirit of persecution” (5).
In a letter to C.F. Andres, written from New York, he explained, “This is the ugliest side of
patriotism. For in small minds, patriotism dissociates itself from the higher ideal of humanity. It
becomes the magnification of self, on a stupendous scale— magnifying our vulgarity, cruelty,
greed; dethroning God, to put up this bloated self in its place” (5).

and believes that if he wants something. supports extreme nationalism. is patriotic but wouldn‟t place nation above truth or conscience. a traditional "pativatra" who worships her husband [Nikhilesh] and wants to be no where except in her home. As the two men negotiate the demands of the nationalist project through different means… to accomplish the common end. present a fundamental opposition between the two contesting ideologies. death and destruction. but yet the utter contradiction occurs.. including this novel. .George 2 This anti-nationalistic sentiment— as quoted by Mohammad A. through the characterizations of the three main protagonists. as change harbingers. Bimala is portrayed with a “physiological and psychological resemblance of the nation” (3) to represent the “dilemmatic view on nationalism” (3) and this signifies the crossroad of changes in fate of the entire nation in that era. “The two modernists. must choose between the two men and their respective visions. an idealistic landowner.. Nikhilesh.” (7) The story unfolds as Bimala. reduced to an incomplete. The Home and The World tries to deal with three distinctive ideologies about nationalism. and places humanity above the limitations induced by nationalism. even if he has to force others. monolithic and unipolar ideology ” (2) .” in most of his writings. as Tagore himself was highly patriotic and penned 'his' notions about a patriotic nationalist through his characters.. Quayum “. whereas Sandip.that nationalism is a source of war and carnage. like the protagonist Nikhilesh (Home and The World) who championed “the doctrine of non-violence well before Gandhi . he must struggle for it. rather than a concept encouraging a more united vision of the country or the world— remains at the heart of Tagore‟s imagination.

goes to illustrate the . Tagore here. She too. that can only appeal to the minds of the Hindus. including violently protesting. with his flamboyance and jingoistic rhetoric appeals to her own sense of patriotism. instead of “bailing the poor out of their pitiable condition. the phrase „Bande Mataram‟” (1). “Gradually. of the citizens who lacked a fairly incisive political understanding of the movement. the image of Bengal or India as a woman and a goddess. we find her [Bimala] obsessively drawn towards Sandip who. ignoring Muslim population. they worsened their condition by forcing the poison of patriotism down their throat” (8). make a goddess of her [India]” (6). “Tagore vehemently opposes the idea of turning the nation into a goddess for it was a superfluous deification of nation. capable of gathering large crowds. conducts a multidimensional analysis. Sandip argues that “True patriotism will never be roused in our countrymen unless they can visualise the motherland…. but are drawn to it like „flies to flame‟ merely excited by the desire of basking in the glory of being a patriot and an insensate love for tyranny. and most frequently of all.George 3 Throughout the narrative Tagore also identifies several of those "emblems of nationalism: bonfires. forcing the poor traders to stop dealing with foreign good and burning them up in bonfires and even stealing her husband‟s money. An insidious act of invoking the nation as visual image.”(1) Captivated by Sandip‟s magnificent and dominating persona-an ambitious leader. to portray the dangers of such iconography. firstly. all in the name of „the love for the nation‟. blinded by the impulsive passion becomes willing to do anything for this „noble cause‟. hypnotizing the masses with powerful speeches and using phrase "Bande Mataram" with deep sense of patriotic passion.

disinterested action (as advised by Krishna to Arjuna in The Bhagavad Gita). as he brings numerous loopholes into the spot light. and use violence as a fetish for personal gain. completely shutting out the possibility of any other point of view. “…gradually becoming self-obsessed and vainglorious in their cause. did not support the idea of a divided nation and destruction in the name of the Swadeshi” (8) Nikhilesh does not use „the force of his will‟ unlike Sandip. thus their early optimism is replaced later by a sense of nada. also the heartless practice “…of denouncing commodities (even people like Mrs. losing sight of their dharma of dispassionate. which prompts oneself to declare himself as “an Indian first. Tagore also uses Nikhilesh to make the readers aware of the perils of nationalist chauvinism. a citizen of the world second. “both the benevolent landlords tried to establish alternate economies to help the poor. even though he has the power to do that as he thinks that it violates human rights and human.” which would then lead to other corollaries invoking caste and creed and so on. He points out these hidden pitfalls of the nationalist movements.Gilby as English commodities) simplistically as “foreign” is in fact the .George 4 exclusivist and sectarian nature of the movement.” (2) Nikhilesh acts as Tagore‟s mouthpiece and brings out a lot of his own views in the matter. Tagore captures the paradoxes of the Swadeshi movement and in turn nationalism." (1) This precise harm is also caused by of the over-use of „Bande Mataram‟ as it dominates over any other forms of expression. created by overzealous tendencies of the apparent „public heroes‟ who become “so unscrupulous that they do not hesitate to abuse the movement for personal and political gain” (1). The reasons cited for such a remark is the striking similarity between real life Tagore and the fictitious character of Nikhilesh.

Tagore too had a hard time. which stifles the innate and instinctive human conscience. convincing his ideas to people and this attempt on Tagore‟s part earned him “the flak of the critics and the Bengali bhadralok readers who branded the Nobel laureate as an anti-Nationalist. But like Nikhilesh. Bimala‟s and Nikhilesh‟s fate is not known.” ― Rabindranath Tagore. this is clever representation of Tagore‟s anxiety and skepticism towards the future of India. which could only arouse passions” (2). shamelessly overemphasizing commercial and political aspects.” (8) This explains Nikhilesh‟s rejection of the extreme nationalism. sacrificing righteousness and conscience. is the goal of human history. Yet.” (3) Yet. just as Bimala realizes that her devotion to Sandip is not appropriate since. Nationalism . Home and The World stands on Tagore‟s hopes that people will eventually open their eyes to reconsider extreme nationalism. nor the fierce self-idolatry of nationworship. and nationalism is put on a pedestal. “The novel dramatises how exploitation.George 5 intolerance towards the country‟s pluralism and multiplicity. a traitor and an ally of the British. “Nikhilesh‟s morality was vastly superior to Sandip‟s empty sloganmongering.” (2) “Neither the colourless vagueness of cosmopolitanism. violence and killing become ritual acts when the individual sacrifices his self to an abstraction. Nikhilesh calls into question both the constructed aspect of nationalism. at the expense of man‟s morality.

New York (8) Tagore Dualistic Modernity and the Illegitimacy of Nationalism in Tagore's The Home and the World.pdf.V Wadhawan . 4. The Home and the World.ac. Robert B.the-criterion. “Tagore and His India. Mohammad A. http://www. "Reading Tagore: Seductions and Perils of Nationalism" Asiatic. Rabindranath. (5) Quayum. June 2010 (4) Tagore. Rabindranath. (3) Aikant. No. Amartya. Silvers and Barbara Epstein.com .George 6 Works Cited (1)Tagore. 1997 (2)The Home and the World: “A critique of Nationalism and the Swadeshi”. Selected Letters of Rabindranath Tagore. India: A Mosaic. All references to the text are from this edition.sgtbkhalsadu. “Rabindranath Tagore’s Critique of Nationalism” Imagining “One World”: (6) Riza Sovia Nur Priandhita. Vol. 1. University Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. translated by Surendranath Tagore.” Ed.in/colleges/tutorial/112703052009120709. Inayatul Fariha “The Representation of Indian Nationalism in Rabindranath Tagore’s The Home and The World” State University of Malang (7) Sen. Satish C.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful