Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Energy efficiency requirements for new housing were first introduced into the Building Code of Australia (BCA) Housing Provisions in
2003. The objective was to reduce energy use and hence greenhouse gas emissions. Since then, Australians have been able to enjoy
electricity and gas savings by living in energy efficient homes with reduced consumption of operational lighting, heating and cooling
energy.
2003
2013
2003-2013, A Comparison
Whats in a Star?[1]
NatHERS
Rating
The two hypothetical residential properties illustrated above - a 2003 house and a 2013 house - depict the evolution of a typical Australian
home. The changes reflect the implementation of stronger minimum energy efficiency requirements in the Building Code of Australia (BCA)[3],
increasing from a 3 to 6 star energy rating. Note: Values stated below are indicative only.
Energy Consumption
kWh/ m per annum
Thermal Performance
133
Windows
Insulation
63
2003
Standby
34
38
Cooking
Refrigeration
16
25
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
*
Other
Appliances
7
Lighting
Water Heating
[4]
6
Total min. R-Value
Coverage of BCA
Energy Efficiency
Requirements
Roof lights
Renewable or low
GHG intensity energy
2003
(no BCA requirements)
2013
2013
26
Heating
and Cooling
Typical Construction:
5.1
4
3
2
2.7
1.4
1
0
2.8
Roof &
Ceiling
External
walls
Artificial Lighting
Traditional
Incandescent
CFL or LED
2003
(no BCA requirements)
2013
Energy efficient
lighting solutions
Disclaimer: While the ABCB has made every effort to ensure that the material in this document is accurate and up to date, such material does in no way constitute the provision of professional advice.The ABCB gives no warranty or guarantee and accepts no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to the accuracy, reliability,
currency or completeness of any material contained herein. Users should seek appropriate independent professional advice prior to relying on, or entering into any commitment based on material within this document in relation to building or related activities. Its interpretation in no way overrides the approvals processes in any jurisidiction.