Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Ali ibn Ismail ibn Abi Bishr Ishaq ibn Salim, Abu al-Hasan
al-Ashari al-Yamani al-Basri al-Baghdadi (260-324), a
descendent of the Yemeni Companion Abu Musa al-Ash`ari, was
in the first half of his scholarly career a disciple of the Mu`tazili
teacher Abu `Ali al-Jubbai, whose doctrines he abandoned in his
fortieth year after asking him a question al-Jubbai failed to
resolve over the issue of the supposed divine obligation to
abandon the good for the sake of the better (al-slih wa alaslah). At that time he adopted the doctrines of the sifatiyya,
those of Ahl al-Sunna who assert that the divine Attributes are
obligatorily characterized by perfection, unchanging, and without
beginning, but He is under no obligation whatsoever to abandon
the good for the sake of the better. He left Basra and came to
Baghdad, and took fiqh from the Shafi`i jurist Abu Ishaq alMarwazi (d. 340). He devoted the next twenty-four years to the
refutation of "the Mu`tazila, the Rafida, the Jahmiyya, the
Khawarij, and the rest of the various kinds of innovators" in the
words of al-Khatib. His student Bundar related that his yearly
expenditure was a meager seventeen dirhams.
Among al-Ash`aris books up to the year 320 as listed by himself
in al-`Umad ("The Supports"):
Adab al-Jadal ("The Etiquette of Disputation").
Al-Asma wa al-Ahkam ("The Names and the Rulings"),
which describes the divergences in the terminology of
the scholars and their understanding of the general and
the particular.
Al-Dafi` li al-Muhadhdhab ("The Repelling of `The
Emendation"), a refutation of al-Khalidis book by that
title.
Al-Funun ("The Disciplines"), a refutation of atheists. A
second book bearing that title was also written, on the
disciplines of kalm.
Al-Fusul ("The Sub-Headings") in twelve volumes, a
http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/misc/al_ashari.htm
1/12
9/12/2014
2/12
9/12/2014
3/12
9/12/2014
4/12
9/12/2014
5/12
9/12/2014
http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/misc/al_ashari.htm
6/12
9/12/2014
7/12
9/12/2014
http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/misc/al_ashari.htm
8/12
9/12/2014
9/12
9/12/2014
10/12
9/12/2014
with the Jahmiyya, that the Quran was created. Imam al-Tahawi
stated that Abu Hanifa held the opposite position in his Mu`taqad
Abi Hanifa or "Abu Hanifas Creed," also known as the `Aqida
Tahawiyya. Nor did al-Ash`ari mention Abu Hanifa in the chapter
on those who held the Quran was created in his Maqalat alIslamiyyin. Al-Ash`ari lived in Baghdad the seat of the
Caliphate and home of the Hanafi school at a time the Hanafi
school had long been the state creed and would probably have
been executed or exiled for making such a charge. Furthermore,
al-Bayhaqi stated that "al-Ash`ari used to defend the positions of
the past Imams such as Abu Hanifa and Sufyan al-Thawri among
the Kufans." The charge of the Ibana is therefore almost certainly
a later interpolation, as enmity against the Imam al-A`zam and
his school and followers typifies fanatic Hanbalis and their "Salafi"
successors.
There are also blatant errors which al-Ash`ari the heresiographer
and former Mu`tazili would never commit, such as the attribution
to the Mu`tazila as a whole of the belief that Allah Almighty and
Exalted is everywhere, when he himself reports in his Maqalat
that the vast majority of the Mu`tazila said, like Ahl al-Sunna,
that it was the controlling disposal (tadbr) of Allah Almighty and
Exalted that was everywhere. Furthermore, there is apparently
no known chain of transmission for the Ibana from the Imam
despite its ostensible fame and the abundance of his students,
nor do any of his first or second-generation students such as
Ibn Furak make any mention of it. Finally, Imam al-Qushayris
Shikaya Ahl al-Sunna bi Hikaya Ma Nalahum Min al-Mihna
provides an additional external sign that the tampering of alAsh`aris Ibana took place possibly as early as the fifth century:
They have attributed despicable positions to al-Ash`ari
and claimed he had said certain things of which there is
not one iota in his books. Nor can such sayings be found
reported in any of the books of the scholars of kalm
who either supported him or opposed him, from the
earliest times to our own whether directly quoted or
paraphrased. All of that is misrepresentation, forgery,
and unmitigated calumny!
http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/misc/al_ashari.htm
11/12
9/12/2014
http://www.masud.co.uk
http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/misc/al_ashari.htm
12/12