Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
www.elsevier.com/locate/ygyno
Case Report
Abstract
Background. Trachelectomy is a conservative but locally radical procedure associated with a high risk of preterm delivery.
Case. A 28-year-old patient with cervical cancer FIGO stage IB1 was treated with laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy followed by
trachelectomy. Three years later, she conceived spontaneously. In consideration of the high risk of preterm delivery, the cervical status was
evaluated by transvaginal ultrasonography. At 16 weeks gestation, we observed the cerclage suture correctly placed at the level of the
internal cervical os and a neo-cervical segment length of 1.5 cm. Thereafter, serial ultrasound measurements showed preservation of the
cervical competence. The patient achieved an uneventful pregnancy and delivered by elective cesarean section at 37 weeks.
Conclusion. Transvaginal scans to evaluate the competence of the neo-cervix may contribute to the management and counseling of
patients after trachelectomy.
D 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Cervical cancer; Fertility; Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy; Pregnancy; Trachelectomy
Introduction
Case report
576
Table 1
Pregnancy outcome and gestational age at delivery after radical trachelectomy
Authors (years)
Number
of patients
Number of
pregnancies
Gestational age
at delivery (weeks)
N (%) deliveries at
z36 weeks gestation
4
1
4
13
1
8
1
1
4
3
40
5
1
5
20
1
14
1
1
4
3
55
2
0
2
10
1
4
0
1
1
1
22
(50%)
(66%)*
(NA)*
(40%)*
(25%)
(33%)
(58%)*
Miscarriage (<20 weeks gestation); *miscarriages have been excluded; NA = not available.
Discussion
The most important issue for the patient and her physician following a treatment for cancer is the cure rate. The
Fig. 1. Endovaginal ultrasonography of cervix after radical trachelectomy (34 weeks gestation). Calipers mark the internal and external os. The distance
between the calipers was considered as the neocervical length (1.5 cm). The cerclage can be seen in cross-sections.
577
Acknowledgment
We thank Mrs. Rosemary Sudan for editorial assistance.
References
[1] Roy M, Plante M. Pregnancies after radical vaginal trachelectomy for
early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1494 6.
[2] Martin XJ, Golfier F, Romestaing P, Raudrant D. First case of pregnancy after radical trachelectomy and pelvic irradiation. Gynecol
Oncol 1999;74:286 7.
[3] Covens A, Shaw P, Murphy J, DePetrillo D, Lickrish G, Lafranboise
S, et al. Is radical trachelectomy a safe alternative to radical hysterectomy for patients with stage IA B carcinoma of the cervix? Cancer
1999;86:2273 9.
[4] Dargent D, Martin X, Sacchetoni A, Mathevet P. Laparoscopic vaginal radical trachelectomy. A treatment to preserve the fertility of
cervical carcinoma patients. Cancer 2000;88:1877 82.
[5] Burnham A, Venkitaraman U, Street P. Successful pregnancy following trachelectomy and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Gynaecol Endosc 2000;9:73 4.
[6] Shepherd JH, Mould T, Oram DH. Radical trachelectomy in early
stage carcinoma of the cervix: outcome as judged by recurrence and
fertility rates. BJOG 2001;108:882 5.
[7] Alexopoulos E, Efkarpidis S, Fay TN, Williamson KM. Pregnancy
following radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for
Stage I cervical adenocarcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;
81:791 2.
[8] Rodriguez M, Guimares O, Rose PG. Radical abdominal trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with uterine conservation and
subsequent pregnancy in the treatment of early invasive cervical
cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:370 4.
[9] Schlaerth JB, Spirtos NM, Schlaerth AC. Radical trachelectomy and
pelvic lymphadenectomy with uterine preservation in the treatment of
cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:29 34.
[10] Burnett AF, Roman LD, OMeara AT, Morrow CP. Radical vaginal
trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for preservation of fertility in early cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2003;88:419 23.
[11] Saling E. Der fruhe totale Muttermundsverschluss zur Vermeidung
habitueller Aborte und Fruhgeburten. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 1981;
1852:259 61.