Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ABSORBERS, VIBRATION
V Steffen, Jr and D Rade, Federal University of
Uberlandia, Uberlandia, Brazil
Copyright # 2001 Academic Press
doi:10.1006/rwvb.2001.0176
Introduction
Dynamic vibration absorbers (DVAs), also called
Vibration Neutralizers or Tuned Mass Dampers, are
mechanical appendages comprising inertia, stiffness,
and damping elements which, once connected to a
given structure or machine, named herein the primary
system, are capable of absorbing the vibratory energy
at the connection point. As a result, the primary
system can be protected from excessively high vibration levels. In practice, DVAs can be included in the
original system design or can be added to an existing
system, often as part of a remedial course of action.
Since their invention by Frahm at the beginning of
the twentieth century, dynamic vibration absorbers
have been extensively used to mitigate vibrations in
various types of mechanical systems. A very wellknown application is the so-called Stockbridge damper, widely used to reduce wind-induced vibrations in
overhead power transmission lines. In a remarkable
engineering application, a 400-ton absorber has been
designed for Citicorp Center, a 274-m high office
building in New York City, for suppressing primarily
the contribution of the first vibration mode in windinduced oscillations. In a similar application, two
300-ton DVAs have been installed in the John Hancock Tower, in Boston, Massachussets. The dynamics
of television towers are particularly favorable for the
use of pendulum-like DVAs, which have been
applied, for example, to the towers of Alma-Ata
and Riga, in the former Soviet Union.
Due to their technological relevance both in the
academic and industrial domains, DVAs are still a
subject of permanent interest. New applications
include devices used to stabilize ship roll motion, to
improve the comfort of users when walking on pedestrian bridges, to attenuate vibrations transmitted
from the main rotor to the cockpit of helicopters,
and to improve machine tool operation conditions, to
mention just a few examples. Military applications
have also been developed. The use of DVAs to reduce
the dynamic forces transmitted to an aircraft due to
high rates of fire imposed on the canon motion can be
mentioned as another example.
In practical applications, DVAs can be found in
various configurations, intended for the attenuation
of either rectilinear or angular motion. The simplest
setup is that formed by a single mass attached to the
primary system through a linear spring. This configuration is named the `undamped dynamic vibration
absorber'. As will be shown later, in designing an
undamped DVA to attenuate harmonic vibrations,
the values of its physical parameters (stiffness and
inertia) must be chosen according to the value of the
excitation frequency and it is then said that the DVA
is tuned. The undamped DVA may become ineffective
when the excitation frequency deviates, even slightly,
from the nominal tuning frequency. In order to provide a mechanism for energy dissipation and to
enlarge the effective bandwidth of the absorber,
damping can be introduced into the DVA. In most
applications, a viscous damping model is used,
although viscoelastic and Coulomb-type dampers
can be found in certain cases. In general, a DVA is
designed to attenuate vibrations generated by a
purely harmonic excitation. However, in several
situations, vibrations are produced by periodic forces
containing various harmonic components. In this
case, multiple DVAs can be used, each one tuned to
a specific frequency component. It is also possible to
use distributed-parameter structural elements, such as
beams or plates, as dynamic absorbers. Besides the
ease of physical realization, the main interest in
using these configurations is related to the fact that
the DVA can be tuned to various frequency values
simultaneously.
10 ABSORBERS, VIBRATION
f t F0 e
mp xp kp ka xp ka xa f
2b
3a
xa t Xa eiot
3b
Upon substitution of eqns [3] in eqns [2], the following set of frequency-dependent algebraic equations
involving the amplitudes of the harmonic responses is
obtained:
Xp mp o2 kp ka ka Xa F0
4a
ka Xp Xa ma o2 ka 0
4b
Figure 1 illustrates an undamped two-degree-of-freedom system, where the subsystem (mp ; kp ) represents
the primary system, whose vibrations are to be attenuated, and the subsystem (ma ; ka ) represents the
dynamic vibration absorber. The primary system is
assumed to be excited by an external harmonic force
with constant amplitude and constant circular frequency, given by:
iot
ma xa ka xa xp 0
2a
Xp
Xp st
i
1 o=oa 2
h
i
2 ih
1 o=oa 2 ka kp
1 ka kp o op
5a
Xa
Xp st
1
i
2 ih
1 ka kp o op
1 o=oa 2 ka kp
5b
where:
s
op
kp
mp
r
oa
ka
ma
F0
Xp st
kp
ABSORBERS, VIBRATION 11
Xa jooa
F0
ka
ma mp
9a
X
1
a
Xp st 1 g2 1 g2 m m
9b
Figure 2 Typical variation of the amplitude of the response of the primary Xp with the excitation frequency o for
oa =op 0:8; ma =mp 0:1.
12 ABSORBERS, VIBRATION
Figure 3 Typical variation of the amplitude of the response of the primary Xp with the excitation frequency o for
oa =op 1:0; m 0:1.
mp xp kp xp ka xp xa ca x_ p x_ a F0 eiot
s
2
m
m
4
11a
10
ma xa ka xa xp ca x_ a x_ p 0
11b
ABSORBERS, VIBRATION 13
Xp F0
ka ma o2 ioca
kp mp o2 ka ma o2 ma ka o2 ioca kp mp o2 ma o2
Xa F0
ka ioca
kp mp o2 ka ma o2 ma ka o2 ioca kp mp o2 ma o2
2zg2 g2 f 2
13a
jX j
a
Xp
s( st
2zg2 f 4
2
13b
Figure 5 illustrates a typical variation of the amplitude Xp with the forcing frequency ratio, for different
values of the damping factor z. As can be seen, for
z 0 the system behaves like an undamped twodegree-of-freedom system, with response amplitudes
tending to increase indefinitely at each of the two
resonance frequencies. As the amount of damping is
progressively increased, the system behaves like a
typical damped two-degree-of-freedom system and
eventually exhibits the apparent behavior of a single-degree-of-freedom system with mass m1 m2
when the two masses become virtually connected
through the dashpot. It can also be seen that all curves
intercept at points P and Q, named `invariant points'.
Eqn [13b] can be expressed as:
jX j
a
Xp st
12a
s
Az2 B
Cz2 D
13c
12b
z2P
m3
m=m 2
81 m
z2Q
m3
m=m 2
81 m3
3m
81 m3
#
15
14 ABSORBERS, VIBRATION
Figure 5 Influence of damping on the frequency response of the primary mass f 1, m 1=20.
Figure 6 Frequency response of the primary mass for different values of the damping ratio and f 0:90.
mp xp cp ca x_ p ca x_ a kp ka xp ka xa F
16a
ma xa ca x_ a ca x_ p ka xa ka xp 0
16b
ABSORBERS, VIBRATION 15
Figure 7 Frequency response of the primary mass for different values of the damping ratio and f 0:952.
u(
)
u
2
Xp
2 f 2 2
u
2z
g
g
a
t
2
2
Xp st
2za g1 g2 mg2 2zp mgf 2 g2 mf 2 g2 g2 1g2 f 2
where:
za
ca
2ma op
and zp
cp
2ma op
17
ratio and absorber damping ratio, numerical optimization has to be carried out. For this purpose an
objective function related to the maximum response
amplitude must be defined and minimized with
respect to the DVA parameters. Such an optimization
procedure was implemented by Warburton and Yorinde, resulting in the values presented in Table 1. It
can be seen that, for small values of the primary
system damping, little influence of this damping on
is
the values of the optimal parameters fopt and zopt
a
noticed.
16 ABSORBERS, VIBRATION
Table 1 Optimal values of DVA parameters for viscously damped primary systems
Mass
ratio
Primary system
damping
Optimal values
zp cp =2mp op
fopt
zopt ca =2ma oa
g1
g2
0.01
0
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.1
0.9901
0.9886
0.9869
0.9807
0.9663
0.061
0.062
0.064
0.068
0.073
0.960
0.956
0.953
0.942
0.923
1.030
1.032
1.033
1.034
1.030
0.1
0
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.1
0.9091
0.9051
0.9009
0.8875
0.8619
0.185
0.187
0.188
0.193
0.199
0.848
0.843
0.838
0.823
0.795
1.059
1.058
1.058
1.054
1.043
1.0
0
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.1
0.499
0.494
0.489
0.473
0.446
0.448
0.448
0.449
0.454
0.455
0.487
0.481
0.476
0.462
0.434
0.928
0.924
0.921
0.904
0.882
Adapted with permission from Warburton GB and Yorinde EO (1980) Optimum absorber parameters for simple systems. Earthquake Engineering and
Structural Dynamics, 8: 197217. John Wiley.
18a
18b
xc t ccn qn t
18c
ABSORBERS, VIBRATION 17
Mn o2n
19a
Mn
c2cn
23a
Keff n Mn o2n
19b
23b
2
2zn gn 2 g2n fn2
jX c j
ccn cfn
24
2
2
Xest n
2zn gn 2 g2n 1 meff n g2n meff n fn2 g2n g2n 1 g2n fn2
nth vibration mode of the primary system. In order to
formulate a generalized substructuring theory, the
following quantities are defined for the coupled system (primary system + DVA):
. Kinetic energy: T 12 x_ T Mx_ 12 ma x_ 2a
. Strain energy: V 12 xT Kx 12 ka xa xc 2
. Rayleigh dissipation function:
F 12 ca x_ a x_ c 2
. Virtual work of the excitation force:
W nc F ei!t xf
20a
20b
20c
20d
Mp o2n ka c2cn qn ka ccn xa cfn Feiot
21a
Ma xa ca ccn q_ n ca x_ a ka ccn qn ka xa 0 21b
At this point the concepts of effective mass (Meff n
and effective stiffness (Keff n are introduced, according to:
1
_2
2 Meff n xc
12 x_ T Mx_
22a
1
2
2 keff n xc
12 xT Kx
22b
meff n
Xest n
ma
Meff n
F0
Keff n
o
gn
on
s
ka
oa
ma
fn
zn
oa
on
ca
2ma on
25
18 ABSORBERS, VIBRATION
Mp
2:54
1:37
c2sc 1:362
s s
3meff
3 0:02
0:09
zopt
81 meff
81 0:02
2
oa
) ka ma fopt o2 3:85 104 N m1
fopt
o2
1
1
0:98
fopt
1 meff 1 0:02
ma meff Meff 0:02 1:37 0:03 kg
ca
) ca 6:25 N m1 s
zopt
2ma o2
Meff
Figure 11 shows the frequency response for the coordinate to which the optimal DVA is attached,
superimposed on the same frequency response of
the primary system without the DVA. It can be seen
that the resonance peak corresponding to the second
natural frequency has been significantly damped.
Figure 12 shows the plots of the frequency response
in the vicinity of the second natural frequency for
different values of the damping ratio and a unique
value of the tuning ratio, demonstrating the existence
of the invariant points.
Value
Young modulus
Mass density
Beam length
Cross-section width
Cross-section height
Second moment of area
about x axis
Total mass
Mode-shape component
1
2
3
46.10
184.2
414.3
70.84
1.36
71.33
ABSORBERS, VIBRATION 19
Figure 12 Illustration of the invariant points in the vicinity of the second natural frequency.
26a
Jg y JOf_ Way 0
26b
20 ABSORBERS, VIBRATION
Figure 13 (A) Scheme of a torsional system with DVA and (B) equivalent rectilinear system.
Translational
system
Torsional
system
mp (kg)
Jp (kg m2)
71
kp (N m
ma (kg)
ka (N m71)
ca (N.s m71)
27
Ja (kg m2)
kTa (N.m rad71)
cTa (N.m.s rad71)
f F eiot
28a
y Y eiot
28b
Wa o2 Jg
Ts
kr o2 Js Wa o2 Jg JOo2
29
ABSORBERS, VIBRATION 21
s
Wa
o
Jg
30
J
R l
l
kT y t
2 y
1 c
mRl
mRl l R
R
mRl
31a
1
R O2 R
yc
c0
l
l
31b
y Y einOt
c einOt
32
and manipulation of eqns [31] leads to the following relation between the amplitudes of torsional
vibration of the shaft and oscillation of the pendulum:
Y
R ln2
2
n l R
33
22 ABSORBERS, VIBRATION
Figure 15 Scheme of a centrifugal pendulum DVA applied to a rotating system. (A) Top view; (B) side view.
ABSORBERS, VIBRATION 23
where:
8
a0
>
>
>
>
< a1
a2
>
>
a
>
>
: 3
a4
ma a mpma a
mp ma ca b cp ma a
kp ma a cp ca b ka g mp ma
cp ka g kp ca b
kp ka g
37
As in every application of active control, it is important to carry out a study of the stability of the system.
Using the RouthHurwitz stability criterion, based on
the expressions of the coefficients of the characteristic
equation, as given by eqn [37], it can be shown that
stability is ensured, provided that the following inequalities are satisfied by the feedback gains:
a>
35
where:
M
C
K
ma a
a
mp a
cp ca b ca b
c a b
kp ka g
ka g
ka g
xp
f
F
xa
0
38a
b > ca
38b
g > ka
38c
F0
a0 o4 ia1 o3 a2 o2 ia3 o a4
ca b
ka g
39
As can be seen in the previous equations, the parameters b and g can be interpreted as damping and
stiffness parameters, which are added to the corresponding passive elements of the absorber. The same
interpretation cannot be given the parameter a, since
it also appears in the off-diagonal positions of the
mass matrix.
The characteristic equation of the system is written
in the Laplace domain as:
a 0 s 4 a 1 s 3 a2 s 2 a3 s a4 0
mp ma
mp ma
36
o2
ka g
ma a
40
24 ABSORBERS, VIBRATION
Xp kp 2
F0
2zg
g2
2
2zg2 g2 f 2
2
mg2 mg2 f 2
g2
1 g 2
2
f 2
41
where:
ma
;
m
mp
r
oa
g o=op ;
ka g
;
ma a
s
op
kp
mp
ca b
2ma op
f oa =op ;
42
Eqn [41] has the same form as eqn [13a] developed
for purely passive DVAs. As a result, the optimization
procedure based on the invariant points also holds for
the active DVA. Thus, assuming that the values of the
passive elements are not varied, the optimization of
the DVA can be achieved by finding an optimal set of
feedback gains. Introducing eqns [42] into eqns [14]
and [15], the following expressions for the optimal
gains are obtained:
gopt
s"
bopt 2
op
1m
2
3m
8 1 m 3
ma ka
43a
o p m a ca
43b
kp 10 000 N m1 ;
cp 0
ka 1000 N m1 ;
ca 0
bopt 3:36 Ns m1
In the previous sections, only DVAs comprising stiffness and damping elements exhibiting linear behavior
have been considered. However, studies have demonstrated that nonlinear DVAs generally provide a
suppression bandwidth much larger than linear
absorbers. As a result, in spite of a more involved
theory and design procedure, nonlinear vibration
absorbers have received much attention lately.
Although only harmonic excitations were considered here, the reader should be aware of the fact that
dynamic vibration absorbers have been extensively
used to attenuate other types of vibrations, such as
transient and random. In such cases, the optimal
design is generally carried on by using time domainbased procedures.
The study and development of techniques related
to smart materials represent new possibilities of
vibration reduction in mechanics and mechatronics.
The physical properties of such materials can be
modified by controlled modifications of some environmental parameters. To mention a few examples,
the viscosity (damping capacity) of electrorheological
and magnetorheological fluids can be varied by
applying external electric and magnetic fields, respectively. The geometry of components made of shape
memory alloys can be changed by applying temperature variations. Some researchers have considered the
possibility of using such smart materials to conceive
self-tunable adaptive vibration absorbers. Furthermore, the possibility of dissipating mechanical energy
with piezoelectric material, such as piezoelectric ceramics, shunted with passive electrical components has
been investigated by various authors in this decade.
The four basic kinds of shunt circuits are: inductive,
resistive, capacitive, and switched. If a piezoelectric
element is attached to a structure, it is strained as the
structure deforms and part of the vibration energy is
converted into electrical energy. The piezoelectric
element behaves electrically as a capacitor and can
be combined with a so-called shunt network in order
to perform vibration control. Shunting with a resistor
and inductor forms a RLC circuit introducing an
electrical resonance which, in the optimal case, is
tuned to structural resonances. The scheme of such
an arrangement is depicted in Figure 18. The inductor
is used to tune the shunt circuit to a given resonance
of the structure and the resistor is responsible for peak
amplitude reduction of a particular mode. The inductive shunt or resonant circuit shunt presents a vibration suppression effect that is very similar to the
classical dynamic vibration absorber. The classical
DVA stores part of the kinetic energy of the primary
ABSORBERS, VIBRATION 25
Nomenclature
f
g
J
l
W
X
m
c
t
F
O
tuning factor
forcing frequency ratio
inertia
length
weight
amplitude
mass ratio
angular coordinate
precession angle
external excitation torque
roll angle
rotational speed/angular velocity
Further Reading
Den Hartog JP (1956) Mechanical Vibrations, 4th edn.
McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Hagood NW and von Flotow A (1991) Damping of
structural vibrations with piezoelectric materials and
passive electrical networks. Journal of Sound and
Vibration 146: 243268.
Harris CM (1988) Shock and Vibration Handbook, 3rd
edn, McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Inman DJ (1989) Vibration with Control, Measurement
and Stability. Prentice-Hall.
Korenev BG and Reznikov LM (1993) Dynamic Vibration
ACTIVE ABSORBERS
See ABSORBERS, ACTIVE
Introduction
In civil engineering structural applications, active,
semiactive, and hybrid structural control systems
are a natural evolution of passive control technologies such as base isolation and passive energy dissipation. The possible use of active control systems and
some combinations of passive and active systems, socalled hybrid systems, as a means of structural protection against wind and seismic loads has received
considerable attention in recent years. Active/hybrid
control systems are force delivery devices integrated
with real-time processing evaluators/controllers and
sensors within the structure. They act simultaneously
with the hazardous excitation to provide enhanced
structural behavior for improved service and safety.
Remarkable progress has been made over the last 20
years. As will be discussed in the following sections,
research to date has reached the stage where active
systems have been installed in full-scale structures.
Active systems have also been used temporarily in
construction of bridges or large-span structures (e.g.,
lifelines, roofs) where no other means can provide
adequate protection.
The purpose of this article is to provide an assessment of the state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice
of this exciting, and still evolving, technology. Also
included in the discussion are some basic concepts,
the types of active control systems being used and
deployed, and their advantages and limitations in the
context of seismic design and retrofit of civil engineering structures.