Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Drought tolerance and thermal effect measurements for plants suitable for
extensive green roof planting in humid subtropical climates
T.-C. Liu a , G.-S. Shyu b , W.-T. Fang c , S.-Y. Liu a , B.-Y. Cheng d,
a
Department of Horticulture, National Chung Hsing University, 250, Kuokuang Rd., Taichung 402, Taiwan
Department of Environmental Management, Tungnan University, 152, Sec. 3, Beishen Rd., Shen-keng District, New Taipei City 222, Taiwan
c
Department of Leisure and Recreation Management, Chung Hua University, 707, Sec. 2, WuFu Rd., Hsinchu City 30012, Taiwan
d
Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Da-an District, Taipei City 106, Taiwan
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 8 October 2011
Received in revised form
25 November 2011
Accepted 26 November 2011
Keywords:
Thin layer green roof
Drought tolerant plant
Thermal effect measurement
CAM plant
a b s t r a c t
This study aims to investigate the physiology, endurance, and environmental thermal regulatory effects
of plants suitable for thin layer green roofs, to provide reference for plant selection in future green
roofs. Water conservation and drought tolerance experiments are carried out on 31 types of plants in
Taichung, in central Taiwan. The drought tolerance of various plants was investigated. Thermal effect
experiments were performed on 10 types of plants. The results from this study show that plants suitable
for thin layer green roofs resist drought conditions through physiological mechanisms such as succulent
foliage, surface cuticles, mucilaginous substances, hairs or spines, and the Crassulacean acid metabolism
(CAM). Plants that grew well came from the families Crassulaceae, Euphorbiaceae, and Portulacaceae.
When temperature reduction effectiveness was measured in regard to plant height, the best reductions
in temperature occurred in 35 cm plants, followed by 15 cm and then 10 cm plants. Green leafed plants
have better temperature reduction effects than purple/red leafed plants. The plants suggested in this
study are suitable for regions with subtropical climates. Selecting thin layer green roof plants that resist
drought, survive well, and decrease temperature effectively can adequately use water resources and
realize green building concepts such as ecological friendliness, energy conservation, carbon emissions
reduction, and water conservation.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Swift urban expansion has made green spaces relatively scarce.
Anthropogenic heat from motor vehicles, air conditioning, and factory equipment has been increasing relentlessly. Buildings and
roads built with materials with the characteristics of high heat
retention and absorption, combined with the disruption of wind
ows by tall buildings, increase the environmentally stored heat
in urban areas and create urban heating [13]. Climate record over
the last 100 years show that temperatures in Taiwan is increasing
at a signicantly higher rate than in other parts of the globe and in
the oceanic area surrounding Taiwan. The temperature difference
between day and night is twice the worldwide average [4,5]. These
signicant changes indicate that Taiwan is under the inuence of
a heat island effect. The heat island effect creates a vicious cycle
of urban energy concentration [4]. The heat from the city cannot
be removed, increasing the temperature and the use of air conditioning [6]. Indoor air conditioning and lighting make up 8% of
electricity use in Taiwan during the summer. According to statistics
from Taiwan Power Company (referred to as Tai-power), electricity consumption from air conditioning increases 6% for every 1
of outdoor temperature rise, which is a signicant amount of consumption.
Many researchers have indicated that the most effective way to
relive the worsening of urban thermal environments and reduce the
heat island effect is to increase the area of greenery [69]. Green
roong is a general technique that has been used in many countries around the world [10,11]. It is proven to be effective in both
hot and cold climates. Currently, its functions are widely utilized
and researched, especially for energy conservation and pollution
reduction. Urban greening is an effective approach in improving
the quality of living environments and reaching the important indicators for ecological harmony: energy conservation and reduction
of carbon emissions [12]. In recent years, the Taiwanese government has established many regulations to promote urban greening.
For urban land classied for use as parks, green spaces, or childrens
playgrounds, the area of greenery must not be lower than 10% of the
area for total development. Currently, however, this target ratio has
181
i. Plants are classied into one of ve categories of growth to analyze drought tolerance. The categories included normal growth,
stunt growth, obviously wilted apical leaves only, and dead.
ii. Days of normal growth for plants were graphed to visually represent the drought tolerance capabilities of different plants.
This study sought to understand the temperature reduction benets of different plant characteristics, individual height, and leaf
color. The capabilities for environmental heat modulation for different plants were analyzed by actual measurement and comparisons.
The test site was located on a rooftop of an 8 storey building, without shade from surrounding buildings. The plants could have been
inuenced by meteorological factors such as strong wind, cloud
cover, and solar radiation. These factors were not controlled, so
that the observational data could represent realistic scenarios.
2.4.1. Experimental apparatus and calibration
In this study, thermocouple wire and infrared thermal imagers
were used concurrently in prescribed positions for measurement
of plant characteristics in the thermal effect experiment, to investigate the inuence of plant characteristics on environmental
thermal regulation. The equipment used in this study included an
infrared thermal imager, a K type thermocouple wire, and a CR 800
data recorder.
All objects above 0 K (273.15 C) emitted infrared rays are
formed within the range of electromagnetic spectrum. According
to Plancks law, the certain amount of energy emitted by a black
body is determined as a function of frequency by its wavelength of
182
Table 1
Plant characteristic table for the 31 plants in the drought tolerance experiments.
Species
Plant height
Plant morphology
Leaf thickness
Leaf size
Creeping
Erection
Thin
Small
Mexico
Inter-American
Tropical Rainforest
South Africa
South America
Low
Setcreasea pallida
Rhoeo spathaceo cv.
Compacta
Setcreasea purpurea
Boom
Billbergia spp.
Kalanchoe thyrsiora
Kalanchoe longiora
var. coccinea
Echeveria
atropurpuream
Neoregelia Fireball
Portulacaria afra
Pachyveria
pachyphytoides
Walth
Portulacaria afra f.
variegata
Echeveria cv. Black
Prince
Echeveria cv.
Hanatsukiyo
Echeveria carnicolor
Echeveria
chihuahuaensis
Sedum nussbaumerianum
Bitter
Graptopetalum
paraguayense
Echeveria pulidonis
Sedum
pachyphyllum
Rose
Tagetes lemmonii
Aptenia cordifolia
Kalanchoe
hildebrandtii
Euphorbia
stenoclada
Pedilanthus
tithymaloides cv.
Nanus
Plectranthus
socotranum
Pogostemon cablin
cv. Variegata
Pogostemon cablin
(Blanco) Benth
Pedilanthus
tithymaloides (L.)
Poit
Gasteria gracilis
Baker
Kalanchoe milloti
Kalanchoe
fedtschenkoi
Mexico
Cultivation
Medium
High
Mexico
South America
South Africa
Mexico
Cultivation
Leaf color
Medium
Large
Green
Mexico
Mexico
Mexico
Mexico
Mexico, Guatemala,
South America
South Africa
Madagascar
Madagascar
Cultivation
Southeast Asia
India, Africa
Malaysia, India
Cultivation
Madagascar
Madagascar
Africa
2hc 2
1
5
ehc/kT 1
(1)
Mexico
Mexico
Mexico
Purple/red
Cultivation
spectral radiance. The law was named originally after Max Planck
(18581947) during 1900 [16,17]. Plancks law is written as following Eq. (1):
W (, T ) =
Thick
183
Table 2
Plant characteristic table for the 10 plants in the thermal effect experiments.
Species
Plant height
Low
Kalanchoe garambiensis
Bryophyllum pinnatum
Lam. Kurz
Ipomoea batata
Sedum lineare cv.
robustum
Callisia repens L.
Rhoeo spathaceo cv.
Compacta
Sansevieria trifasciata
cv. Hahnii
Zoysia matrella
Torilis japonica (Houtt.)
DC.
Ixora williamsii cv.
Tropical America
Horticultural
cultivars
Africa and Asia
Tropical Asia
Tropical South
America
Tropical Asia
High
Plant morphology
Leaf thickness
Leaf size
Creeping
Thin
Small
Americas
Tropical Africa
Tropical America
Europe
Medium
Erection
Leaf color
Medium
Large
green
Purple/red
Thick
Species
184
Aptenia cordifolia
Tagetes lemmonii
Pogostemon cablin (Blanco) Benth
Echeveria carnicolor
Pogostemon cablin cv. 'Variegata'
Plectranthus socotranum
Echeveria cv. Black Prince
Setcreasea Pallida
Graptopetalum paraguayense
Rhoeo spathaceo cv Compacta
Gasteria gracilis Baker
Sedum pachyphyllum Rose
Echeveria pulidonis
Echeveria chihuahuaensis
Neoregelia 'Fireball'
Echeveria atropurpuream
Pedilanthus thymaloides(L.) Poit
Setcreasea purpurea Boom
Pedilanthus thymaloides cv. 'Nanus'
Billbergia spp.
Echeveria cv. HANATSUKIYO
Pachyveria pachyphytoides Walth
Kalanchoe thyrsiora
Sedum nussbaumerianum Bier
Kalanchoe fedtschenkoi
Kalanchoe millo
Euphorbia stenoclada
Kalanchoe hildebrandi
Portulacaria afra f. variegata
Portulacaria afra
Kalanchoe longiora var.coccinea
10
15
20
20
32
32
32
40
41
66
70
70
70
70
70
70
82
82
87
87
97
108
108
112
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
day
Fig. 1. Days of normal growth for plants in drought tolerance experiment.
As can be seen in Fig. 1, the seven plants P. afra, P. afra f. variegate, E. stenoclada, K. longiora var. coccinea, K. hildebrandtii, K.
milloti, K. fedtschenkoi can grow well for at least 123 days; followed by S. nussbaumerianum Bitter (112 days), K. thyrsiora (108
days), and P. pachyphytoides Walth (108 days). These ten plants
are suitable for growing in the subtropical climate of Taiwan; and
will be able to adapt to the dry and hot environments on rooftops,
demonstrating high water utilization efciency during the experiments; and are suitable for growing in thin layer green roofs. The
nine plants A. cordifolia (10 days), T. lemmonii (15 days), P. cablin
(Blanco) Benth (20 days), E. carnicolor (20 days), P. socotranum
(32 days), P. cablin cv. Variegata (32 days), Echeveria cv. Black
Prince (32 days), S. pallida (40 days), and G. paraguayense (41 days)
could not grow well, and exhibited slowed down growth. They are
considered non drought tolerant in their inability to adapt to dry
environments.
Though plants with high drought tolerance belong to different
families and have different leaf morphologies, sizes, and colors,
each have their own respective drought coping mechanisms to
adapt to environmental stress. Their common point is that they
are all succulent plants with eshy leaves that serve as organs for
water storage. Drought tolerant plants are common in the genus
Kalanchoe under the family Crassulaceae. There are 200 species in
the genus Kalanchoe, which are mainly distributed in Madagascar
and tropical Africa, with a few species in Asia. They are succulent
herbaceous plants with characteristic adventitious buds that may
be grown into small plants. Easily bred, highly drought tolerant,
and simple to cultivate, they are the top choices for drought tolerant plants, and are well suited to a desert like rooftop microclimate
with large daily temperature variations.
3.3. Thermal effect analysis or different plants
We measured the thermal effects for nine plants, including
Zoysia matrella, Kalanchoe garambiensis, Torilis japonica (Houtt.)
DC., Bryophyllum pinnatum Lam. Kurz, R. spathaceo cv. Compacta,
Sedum lineare cv. robustum, Ixora williamsii cv., Sansevieria trifasciata cv. Hahnii, and Callisia repens L., by comparing the differences
in temperatures on leaf surfaces and below the plants. Leaf surface
temperatures were taken with infrared thermal imagers (Fig. 2(a)).
185
Fig. 2. Thermal effect analysis from infrared thermal imager on (a) nine types of plants; (b) Bryophyllum pinnatum of different plant heights; (c) Ipomoea batata of different
leaf colors.
186
Table 3
Thermal effect analysis for nine types of plants.
L, Temp. Max
UL, Temp. Max
G, Temp. Max
D, Temp. Max
L, Temp. Min
UL, Temp. Min
G, Temp. Min
D, Temp. Min
L, Temp. Mean
UL, Temp. Mean
G, Temp. Mean
D, Temp. Mean
Max(L vs. UL)
Min(L vs. UL)
Mean(L vs. UL)
Max(G vs. UL)
Min(G vs. UL)
Mean(G vs. UL)
T test (L vs. UL)
T test (G vs. UL)
T test (D vs. UL)
Zoysia
matrella.
Kalanchoe
garambiensis
Torilis japonica
(Houtt.) DC.
Bryophyllum
pinnatum Lam.
Kurz
Rhoeo
spathaceo cv.
Compacta
Sedum lineare
cv. robustum
Ixora williamsii
cv.
Sansevieria
trifasciata cv.
Hahnii
Callisia
repens L.
49.9
41.5
54.0
33.5
31.2
20.2
35.0
27.1
42.1
30.4
44.7
29.5
21.0
1.6
11.7
27.3
3.9
14.3
54.1
36.8
40.6
37.3
53.6
33.4
53.5
40.1
51.9
34.5
40.8
30.3
52.8
31.5
55.0
40.6
33.3
24.2
26.8
22.7
32.6
24.4
32.1
25.7
30.0
21.0
29.7
24.0
34.4
22.8
34.4
28.9
46.1
31.5
35.8
30.2
44.7
28.8
44.4
33.6
42.8
29.3
36.8
27.2
45.6
27.6
46.7
34.6
23.2
4.5
14.6
23.9
3.9
13.2
11.3
1.6
5.5
20.8
6.7
14.5
23.9
5.1
15.9
23.7
8.2
15.9
16.2
3.6
10.9
15.3
5.3
11.2
22.9
1.7
13.5
25.9
4.4
15.4
13.9
3.3
9.6
26.3
8.5
17.5
26.7
6.1
17.9
27.1
7.1
17.1
18.1
3.5
12.1
16.5
4.2
10.2
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
0.16
***
***
***
Note: L, leaf, UL, underneath, G, ground, D, daily. Temperature difference test by using T test.
Max indicate the difference maximum temperature with two measurements location.
Mix indicate the difference minimum temperature with two measurements location.
Mean indicate the difference median temperature with two measurements location.
* p < 0.05.
** p < 0.01.
***
p < 0.001.
Table 4
Thermal effect analysis for Bryophyllum pinnatum of different heights.
H 35 cm
H 15 cm
H 10 cm
L, Temp. Max
UL, Temp. Max
L, Temp. Min
UL, Temp. Min
L, Temp. Mean
UL, Temp. Mean
Max(L vs. UL)
Min(L vs. UL)
Mean(L vs. UL)
Max(G vs. UL)
Min(G vs. UL)
Mean(G vs. UL)
T test (L vs. UL)
T test (G vs. UL)
T test (D vs. UL)
38.0
30.7
20.2
23.8
29.7
27.3
13.84
5.91
2.4
22.88
9.2
16.0
38.5
32.4
22.9
27.2
31.8
30.0
8.66
6.03
1.8
18.75
9.13
13.4
40.1
33.1
24.7
27.6
33.6
30.4
8.92
4.7
3.2
17.93
8.5
12.9
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
0.20
**
T test
35 vs. 15
15 vs. 10
10 vs. 35
L
UL
***
***
***
***
***
***
Note: L, leaf, UL, underneath, G, ground, D, daily. Temperature difference test by using T test.
Max indicate the difference maximum temperature with two measurements location.
Mix indicate the difference minimum temperature with two measurements location.
Mean indicate the difference median temperature with two measurements location.
* p < 0.05.
**
p < 0.01.
***
p < 0.001.
Ground temperature
Daily temperature
50.1
33.5
37.3
28.2
43.4
30.1
(a)
Zoysia matrella.
55
45
40
35
30
25
me
55
(b)
Temperature C
50
45
40
35
30
55
10:30
10:40
10:50
11:00
11:10
11:20
11:30
11:40
11:50
12:00
12:10
12:20
12:30
12:40
12:50
13:00
13:10
13:20
13:30
25
20
(c)
daily temp.
me
50
Temperature C
Table 5
Thermal effect analysis for Ipomoea batata of different leaf colors.
Kalanchoe garambiensis
50
10:30
10:45
11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
13:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
Surface Temperature C
60
45
40
35
30
daily temp.
25
20
10:30
10:40
10:50
11:00
11:10
11:20
11:30
11:40
11:50
12:00
12:10
12:20
12:30
12:40
12:50
13:00
13:10
13:20
13:30
ground temp.
Time
187
L, Temp. Max
UL, Temp. Max
L, Temp. Min
UL, Temp. Min
L, Temp. Mean
UL, Temp. Mean
Max(L vs. UL)
Min(L vs. UL)
Mean(L vs. UL)
Max(G vs. UL)
Min(G vs. UL)
Mean(G vs. UL)
T test (L vs. UL)
T test (G vs. UL)
T test (D vs. UL)
T test (LG vs. LP)
T test (ULG vs. ULP)
Green
plant
Purple
plant
Ground
temperature
Daily
temperature
35.7
30.4
22.0
26.8
31.2
29.0
6.0
5.3
2.2
22.6
11.7
18.7
35.0
32.6
21.3
28.8
30.5
31.4
3.4
8.8
0.9
20.1
11.0
16.2
52.33
36.87
39.8
29.7
47.7
33.2
***
***
***
***
***
***
**
***
Fig. 3. Variation against time on plant leaf surface temperature and temperature
beneath plants for (a) nine types of plants; (b) Bryophyllum pinnatum of different
plant heights; (c) Ipomoea batata of different leaf colors.
3.5. Thermal effect analysis for plants with different leaf colors
188
[5] L.W. Lai, W.L. Cheng, Air temperature change due to human activities in
Taiwan for the past century, International Journal of Climatology 30 (2010)
432444.
[6] Q. Weng, S. Yang, Managing the adverse thermal effects of urban development
in a densely populated Chinese city, Journal of Environmental Management 70
(2004) 145156.
[7] J.E. Nichol, High-resolution surface temperature patterns related to urban
morphology in a tropical city: a satellite-based study, Journal of Applied Meteorology 35 (1996) 135146.
[8] N.H. Wong, Y. Chen, Study of green areas and urban heat island in a tropical
city, Habitat International 29 (2005) 547558.
[9] C.Y. Lin, F. Chen, J.C. Huang, W.C. Chen, Y.A. Liou, W.N. Chen, S.C. Liu, Urban
heat island effect and its impact on boundary layer development and landsea
circulation over northern Taiwan, Atmospheric Environment 42 (2008)
56355649.
[10] R.M. Lazzarin, F. Castellotti, F. Busato, Experimental measurements and numerical modeling of a green roof, Energy and Buildings 37 (2005) 12601267.
[11] J.S. Maclvor, J. Lundholm, Performance evaluation of native plants suited to
extensive green roof conditions in a maritime climate, Ecological Engineering
37 (2011) 407417.
[12] T. Carter, A. Keeler, Life-cycle costbenet analysis of extensive vegetated roof
systems, Journal of Environmental Management 87 (2008) 350363.
[13] A.K. Durhman, D.B. Rowe, C.L. Rugh, Effect of substrate depth on initial growth,
coverage, and survival of 25 succulent green roof plant taxa, HortScience 42
(2007) 588595.
[14] K.L. Getter, D.B. Rowe, The role of extensive green roofs in sustainable development, HortScience 41 (2006) 12761285.
[15] K.L. Getter, D.B. Rowe, Effect of substrate depth and planting season on sedum
plug survival on green roofs, Journal of Environmental Horticulture 25 (2007)
9599.
[16] M. Planck, The Theory of Heat Radiation (M. Masius, Trans.), second ed., P.
Blakistons Son & Co. OL7154661M, 1914.
[17] R. Vadivambal, D.S. Jayas, Applications of thermal imaging in agriculture and
food industrya review, Food Bioprocess Technology 4 (2011) 186199.
[18] N.P. Dunnett, N. Kingsbury, Planting Green Roofs and Living Walls, Timber Press,
Portland (OR), 2004.
[19] M. Kluge, Is, Sedum acre L. a CAM plant? Oceologia 29 (1977) 7783.
[20] H.S.J. Lee, H. Grifths, Induction and repression of CAM in Sedum telephium L.
in response to photoperiod and water stress, Journal of Experimental Botany
38 (1987) 834841.
[21] K.S. Lee, J. Kim, Changes in crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) of Sedum plants
with special reference to soil moisture conditions, Journal of Plant Biology 37
(1994) 915.
[22] Y.I. Lee, Stable isotopic composition of calcic paleosols of the Early Cretaceous
Hasandong Formation, southeastern Korea, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 150 (1999) 123133.
[23] J. Myster, R. Moe, Effect of diurnal temperature alternations on plant morphology in some greenhouse cropsa mini review, Scientia Horticulturae 62 (1995)
205215.