Sie sind auf Seite 1von 10

M&L Manufacturing

GSM 5113-Operations Management

Dr Affendy Abu Hassim

M&L Manufacturing
M&L Manufacturing makes various components for printers and
copiers. In addition to supplying these items to a major
manufacturer, the company distributes these and similar items to
office supply stores and computer stores as replacement parts for
printers and desktop copiers. In all, the company makes about 20
different items. The two markets (the major manufacturer and the
replacement market) require somewhat different handling.
For example, replacement products must be packaged
individually whereas products are shipped in bulk to the major
manufacturer.
The company does not use forecasts for production planning.

M&L Manufacturing
Because of competitive pressures and falling
profits, the manager has decided to undertake a
number of changes. One change is to introduce
more formal forecasting procedures in order to
improve production planning and inventory
management.

With that in mind, the manager wants to begin


forecasting for two products.

M&L Manufacturing
The manager has compiled data on product demand for the
two products from order records for the previous 14 weeks.
These are shown in the following table.

Questions
1. What are some of the potential benefits of a more formalized
approach to forecasting?

2. Prepare a weekly forecast for the next four weeks for each
product.
Briefly explain why you chose the methods you used. ( Hint:
For product 2, a simple approach, possibly some sort of naive/
intuitive approach, would be preferable to a technical approach
in view of the managers disdain of more technical methods.)

ANSWER #1.
The potential benefit of using a formalized
approach to forecasting is that it will be easier to
utilize the computer and easier to quantify the
information.
A less formalized approach is more likely to
utilize personal intuition. For small forecasting
problems, intuition may involve personal bias, which
may be reflected in the forecast.
As the forecasting problem gets larger, it will be
impossible to rely solely on a less formalized
approach because a persons intuition will be unable
to process the large quantity of information.

ANSWER #2.Product 1
Product 1
Plotting the data for Product 1 reveals a linear pattern with the
exception of demand in week 7. Demand in week 7 is unusually
high and does not fit the linear trend pattern of the remaining
data. Thus, the demand for the 7th week is considered an
outlier. There are different ways of dealing with outliers. A
simple and intuitive way is to replace the demand for the week
in question with the average demand from the previous week
and the next week in the time-series. Therefore in this case, the
demand of 90 in week 7 will be replaced with 71.5 = [(67 + 76)/2].

ANSWER #2.Product 1
t

t*Y

t2

50

50.00

54

108.00

57

171.00

60

240.00

16

64

320.00

25

67

402.00

36

71.5

500.50

49

76

608.00

64

79

711.00

81

10

82

820.00

100

11

85

935.00

121

12

87

1,044.00

144

13

92

1,196.00

169

14

96

1,344.00

196

105

1,020.5

8,449.50

1,015

Round b & a to two decimals:

n tY t Y 14(8,449.50) 105(1,020.5)

3.50
n t 2 ( t ) 2
14(1,015) (105) 2

Y b t 1,020.5 3.50(105)

46.64
n
14

Y = 46.64 + 3.50t

The next four forecasts (t = 15, 16, 17, 18) are:

Period

Forecast (T = 46.64 + 3.50t)

15

T = 46.64 + 3.50(15) = 99.14

16

T = 46.64 + 3.50(16) = 102.64

17

T = 46.64 + 3.50(17) = 106.14

18

T = 46.64 + 3.50(18) = 109.64

ANSWER #2 Product 2.
Product 2
Plotting the data for Product 2 yields a more complex pattern:
There is a spike once every four weeks; the values between the spikes are
fairly close to each other. In addition, the data appear to be increasing at
the rate of about one unit per week. An intuitive approach would be to use
the average of the three nonspike periods plus 1.0 to predict the next three
nonspike periods. Doing so for the data up to period 15 yields a very small
average forecast error (MAD = 0.54). Given the fact that we have only two
data points following the last spike, a reasonable forecast might be to use
the last three period average plus 1.0 (i.e., 43.33 to predict orders for
period 15, and use the average of the values for periods 13 and 14 plus 1.0
(i.e., 43.5 + 1.0 = 44.5) as a forecast for periods 17 and 18.

ANSWER #2.Product 2
The values of the spikes also seem to be increasing. The initial
increase was 1.0 and the second increase was 2.0. A naive
forecast here would be 49 + 2 = 51. However, the average
increase was 1.5. Using that would yield a value of 50.50. One
might even be tempted to project an increase of 3.0, although
either of the others seems more justifiable. Still, the fact that
there is a limited amount of data makes this forecast more risky.
Hence, the forecasts are:
Period

Forecast

15

43.33

16

50.50

17

44.50

18

44.50

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen