Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PART I: PAPER 5
SET TEXT HAMLET
SHAKESPEARE
Aims of the Paper
Shakespeare is manifestly a great writer, perhaps the greatest ever to work with the English
language, and his influence on subsequent generations of poets, dramatists and novelistsin
England and abroadhas been immense. But the scale and quality of this achievement, and the
merits of particular parts of it, have been continuously debated by critics ever since Francis Meres,
in 1598, praised Shakespeare for 'mightily' enriching the English language, and called him one of the
best writers for lyric poetry, comedy and tragedy, as well as one of 'the most passionate among us
to bewaile and bemoane the perplexities of Love'. When his friend Ben Jonson proclaimed that
Shakespeare was 'not of an age but for all time', he cannot have foreseen the wealth of criticism that
would be built up as each succeeding 'age' interpreted and re-assessed the play for itself. In the
theatre too, discovery, re-thinkingand argumenthave been continuous.
The Part I paper gives students an opportunity to think both in detail and in broader terms about the
full range of Shakespeare's output, both as the product of a distinctive intellect at work in a rich
literary and historical context, and as that of a writer whose influence has been enormous. In order
to give students the chance to explore one work in depth, with particular attention to its language,
the Faculty identifies a set play (Hamlet) for close study in small groups. But it also encourages
examination of the entire canon, including the less well-known plays rarely encountered in school,
and the non-dramatic poems. Shakespeare's relation to other 16th- and 17th- century writers is also
an issue. (Here, the paper overlaps provocatively with the Part I 1500-1700 paper, with the
compulsory Tragedy paper in Part II, and with various Part II options.)
The Examination
In the examination itself, students are asked to answer three questions. In the first, they gloss
difficult or problematic words and phrases in passages taken from the set play, and write an essay
linked to one of these passages, either in the form of a commentary on it, or as a point of departure.
They then answer two other questions broader in scope.
Dr C J Burrow
Dr J L Fleming
Dr E P Griffiths
Dr J R Harvey
Dr D A Hillman
Dr M D Long
Texts
Early editions are reproduced in Shakespeare's Plays in Quarto (1981), ed. M.J.B. Allen and
Kenneth Muir, and Charlton Hinman, ed., The First Folio Shakespeare. The Norton Facsimile
(1968). The quarto and Folio texts can also be found on Early English Books Online (available via
the University Library website). Among one-volume texts, Peter Alexander's (1951) is the plain text
supplied in Tripos exams. The Riverside Shakespeare, ed. G. Blakemore Evans et al. (1974), now
available in a revised, slightly enlarged edition (1997), has some valuable introductions and notes. It
is the basis of The Harvard Concordance to Shakespeare, ed. Marvin Spevack (1973). William
Shakespeare: The Complete Works, ed. Stanley Wells and Gary Taylor (1986), diverged from
traditional practicemost spectacularly by providing two distinct texts of King Lear. The Oxford text
has been largely absorbed into The Norton Shakespeare, ed. Stephen Greenblatt et al. (1997), a
convenient one-volume paperback with up-to-date introductions and notes.
No series of individually edited plays and poems is uniformly commendable, though the
Oxford, New Penguin, New Cambridge and Arden 3rd series (all in progress) contain much of the
best work. Students focussing on particular texts should accustom themselves to comparing
editions, some of which will have better notes, others stronger introductions, and others again better
stage histories and accounts of performance. Those most interested in theatre and film should
consult the editions in the Shakespeare in Production series, published by Cambridge University
Press.
R.M. Frye,
Andrew Gurr,
Andrew Gurr,
Kim Hall,
Peter Holland,
Park Honan,
S.S. Hussey,
Grace Ioppolo,
Russell Jackson, ed.,
Simon Jarvis,
Critical Approaches
Brian Vickers, ed. Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage, 1623-1801, 6 vols (1974-81) recovers
material of value. There are various scholarly selections from Dr Johnson (e.g., ed. Woudhuysen)
and Coleridge (e.g., ed. Raysor). Hazlitts The Characters of Shakespeare's Plays (1817) is usually
worth consulting. Some of the following are works of high quality (e.g. Bradley on tragedy), whatever
you make of the method. Others are patchy, but might suggest lines of thought worth pursuing.
Much illuminating, essay-length work can also be found in volumes of the Casebook series, the
Longman Critical Readers series, and in the journals Shakespeare Quarterly, Shakespeare Survey
and Shakespeare Studies. Also recommended are the short book-length introductions in the Oxford
Shakespeare Topics series - one or two of which are picked out below.
Janet Adelman,
Catherine Alexander
& Stanley Wells, eds,
Linda Bamber
C.L. Barber
Anne Barton
Jonathan Bate,
John Bayley
Harry Berger, Jr.,
Philippa Berry
A.C. Bradley
Graham Bradshaw
Stanley Cavell
Lawrence Danson,
Philip Davis
Ian Donaldson,
Heather Dubrow,
Terry Eagleton,
T.S. Eliot,
William Empson
ed. David B. Pirie
Barbara Everett
Sigmund Freud
Northrop Frye
Marjorie Garber,
John Gillies
H. Granville-Barker
Stephen Greenblatt
Terence Hawkes,
Terence Hawkes,
Jean Howard and
Phyllis Rackin
G.K. Hunter
Lisa Jardine,
Emrys Jones
Copplia Kahn
Copplia Kahn,
Frank Kermode,
John Kerrigan,
G. Wilson Knight
L.C. Knights
F.R. Leavis
Michael Long,
Ania Loomba and
Martin Orkin, eds,
M.M. Mahood,
M.M. Mahood,
Philip McGuire
R.S. Miola
Louis Montrose,
Michael Neill
Winifred Nowottny
Stephen Orgel
Patricia Parker,
Patricia Parker and
Geoffrey Hartman, eds. Shakespeare and the Question of Theory (1985)
Annabel Patterson
Shakespeare and the Popular Voice (1989)
Norman Rabkin, Shakespeare and the Problem of Meaning (1981)
A.P. Rossiter
Angel with Horns (1961)
Kiernan Ryan
Shakespeare (3rd edn., 2001)
L.G. Salingar
Shakespeare and the Traditions of Comedy (1974)
Wilbur Sanders and
Howard Jacobson
Shakespeare's Magnanimity (1978)
Bruce R. Smith,
Shakespeare and Masculinity (2000)
Valerie Traub,
Desire and Anxiety: Circulations of Sexuality in Shakespearean Drama
(1992)
Helen Vendler
The Art of Shakespeares Sonnets (1997)
Robert Weimann,
Author's Pen and Actor's Voice: Playing and Writing in Shakespeare's
Theatre (2000)
HAMLET
For help with the Hamlet
http://www.english.cam.ac.uk/
glossing
exercise
see
Exegesis
on
the
Faculty
website
Maxwell E. Foster et al., The Play Behind the Play: Hamlet and Quarto One (London: Heinemann,
1998)
Selected criticism: (nb. also, Shakespeare Studies, Shakespeare Quarterly & Shakespeare
Survey)
ed. W. K. Wimsatt, Dr. Johnson on Shakespeare (London, 1969)
ed. Terence Hawkes, Coleridge on Shakespeare (London, 1969)
William Hazlitt, in The Characters of Shakespeare's Plays (1817) much reprinted
A. C. Bradley, in Shakespearean Tragedy (1904) also much reprinted
G. Wilson Knight, The Wheel of Fire (London, 1930: rev. edn, 1947)
T.S. Eliot, 'Hamlet', Selected Essays (London: Faber, 1932), pp. 141-6
John Dover Wilson, What Happens in Hamlet (Cambridge: CUP, 1935; repr. 1970)
Ernest Jones, Hamlet and Oedipus (1949)
Harry Levin, The Question of 'Hamlet' (New York, 1959)
Helen Gardner, in The Business of Criticism (Oxford, 1959)
Fredson Bowers, Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy, 1587-1642 (1959), chs. 1-3
Morris Weitz, Hamlet and the Philosophy of Literary Criticism (London: Faber, 1965)
Brian Vickers, The Artistry of Shakespeare's Prose (London, 1968), pp. 248-71
Jacques Lacan, 'Desire and the Interpretation of Desire in Hamlet', Yale French Studies 55-56
(1977), 11-52
James L. Calderwood, To Be and Not To Be: Negation and Metadrama in 'Hamlet' (New York, 1983)
Roland M. Frye, The Renaissance 'Hamlet': Issues and Responses in 1600 (Princeton: Princeton
U.P., 1984)
Jacqueline Rose, 'Sexuality in the reading of Shakespeare', Alternative Shakespeares, ed. J.
Drakakis (London, 1985)
Arthur McGee, The Elizabethan Hamlet (London: Yale University Press, 1987)
R. A. Foakes, Hamlet versus Lear: Cultural Politics and Shakespeare's Art (Cambridge: CUP, 1993)
Lisa Jardine, Reading Shakespeare Historically (London: Routledge, 1996), esp. chs. 2 & 9
John Kerrigan, 'Remember Me! Horestes, Hieronymo and Hamlet', ch. 7 in Revenge Tragedy:
Aeschylus to Armageddon (Oxford: OUP, 1996)
Michael Neill, Issues of Death: (Oxford: OUP, 1997), esp. chs. 6 and 7
Graham Bradshaw, 'State of Play', in The Shakespearean International Yearbook , vol. 1 ('Where
Are We Now in Shakespearean Studies?'), eds. Elton and Mucciolo (Ashgate, 1999)
Michael Pennington, Hamlet: A User's Guide (London: Nick Hern Books, 1996; repr. 2000)
John Lee, Shakespeare's Hamlet and the Controversies of Self (Oxford: OUP, 2000)
Stephen Greenblatt, Hamlet in Purgatory (2001)
Margreta de Grazia, 'Hamlet the Intellectual' in Helen Small, ed. The Public Intellectual (Oxford:
Blackwell, 2002)
HAMLET in performance:
ed. Gamini Salgado, Eyewitnesses of Shakespeare: First Hand Accounts of Performances 15901890 (Sussex University Press, 1975), pp. 233-56
ed. Stanley Wells, Shakespeare in the Theatre: An Anthology of Criticism (Oxford, 2000). Reprints
12 accounts of productions from Betterton to a 1985 Q1 Hamlet.
Harley Granville-Barker, Prefaces to Shakespeare, vol. 1, Hamlet (London, 1930)
ed. Alan Dent, Hamlet: The Film and the Play (London: World Film Publications, 1948) - on
Olivier's version
ed. Herbert Marshall, Hamlet through the ages: A Pictorial Record from 1709 (London: 1952)
L. Senelick, Gordon Craig's Moscow 'Hamlet': A Reconstruction (London: Greenwood Press, 1982)
Peter Davison, Hamlet: Text and Performance (London, 1983)
Alan C. Dessen, Elizabethan Stage Conventions and Modern Interpreters (Cambridge: CUP, 1984),
esp. pp. 150-5
John A. Mills, 'Hamlet' on Stage: The Great Tradition (London: Greenwood Press. 1985)
Marvin Rosenberg, The Masks of Hamlet (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1993)
eds. H. Klein & D. Daphinoff, Shakespeare Yearbook vol. 7: Hamlet on Screen (Lewiston: Mellen
Press, 1998)
Robert Hapgood, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark , Shakespeare in Production series (Cambridge: CUP,
1999). An edition of the play (conflated) with foot-notes recording particular theatre productions.
Some relevant non-Shakespearean plays:
John Pickering, Horestes (1567)
Thomas Kyd, The Spanish Tragedy (1587)
John Marston, Antonio's Revenge (1600)
Henry Chettle, Hoffman, or A Revenge for a Father (1602)
Thomas Middleton, The Revenger's Tragedy (1606) sometimes attributed to Tourneur
Cyril Tourneur, The Atheist's Tragedy, or The Honest Man's Revenge (1609)
George Chapman, The Revenge of Bussy d'Ambois (1610)
Anton Chekhov, Ivanov (1887-9), The Seagull (1896)
Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead (1966/7)
Most of the books on this list are available in the Faculty Library or on order. If you experience
difficulty in finding them please ask at the Library Issue Desk.
Subject Group Committee Convenor for 2005-2006:
10