Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ABSTRACT
Concrete is the widely used building material in the
world. River sand has been the most popular choice for
fine aggregate in concrete in the past. Scarcity of good
quality Natural River sand due to depletion of resources
and destruction due to environment consideration as made
concrete manufactures to look of suitable alternative fine
aggregate. To meet the demand of construction industry
excessive quarrying of sand from river beds is taking
place causing the depletion of sand resources. This fact
has forced the government to lay down in destructions on
sand quarrying process resulting in the scarcity and
significant increase in its cost. The cheapest & the easiest
way of getting natural sand is by crushing natural sand
stone to get artificial sand of desired size and grade which
would be free from all impurities. So as to overcome this
problem, it is very much essential to utilize the hardened
concrete waste materials in concrete construction. In this
study, the attempt is made to check the properties of
hardened concrete waste as a replacement of concrete
with conventional concrete and also used chemical
admixture to increase the strength.
Keywords Natural sand, hardened concrete waste,
manufactured sand, Admixtures.
1. INTRODUCTION
Concrete has been around for many centuries, the first
known use of a material resembling concrete was by the
Minoan civilization around 2000 BC. During the early
stages of the Roman Empire around 300 BC, the Romans
discovered that mixing a sandy volcanic ash with lime
mortar created a hard water resistance substance which we
now known as concrete. Concrete is the widely used
building material in the world. River sand has been the
most popular choice for the fine aggregate in concrete in
the past, but overuse of this material lead to
environmental concerns, reduction of sources and an
increase in price. Quarry dust has been proposed as an
alternative to river sand that gives additional benefit to
concrete (P. Devi, et al., [1]). A well processed
2. MATERIALS
2.1. CEMENT
Ordinary Portland cement of 53 grade from the local
market was used and tested for physical and chemical
properties as per IS: 4031 -1988 and found to be
193
www.ijete.org
Properties
1.
2.
3.
Normal consistency
Initial setting time
Compressive
strength
7 days
14 days
28 days
Specific gravity
4.
Limiting
values
30%
35 mins
37 N/mm2
47 N/mm2
53 N/mm2
z3.10
10
mm
4.75
mm
2.36
mm
1.18
mm
600
Cumula
tive
%
weight
retaine
d
in
Gms
%
assisg
Cum
ulati
ve
%
weig
ht
retai
ned
0
100
10
10
99
20.7
5
57.8
5
93.1
5
1000
79.25
197.5
207.5
371.0
578.5
300
353.0
931.5
150
68.5
1000
1585
1690
I.S.S
eive
size
Result
2.72
2.613
Rem
arks
40mm
20mm
10mm
4.75mm
2.36m
1.18mm
m
600
300
150
100
Zone
II
Weig
ht
aggre
gate
retain
ed in
Gms
0
0
270
4250
0
0
Cumula
tive %
weight
retained
in Gms
Cumula
tive %
weight
retained
% of
passi
ng
0
0
750
5000
5000
5000
0
0
15
100
100
100
100
100
85
0
0
0
0
0
0
5000
5000
5000
100
100
100
0
0
0
42.15
6.85
0
Property
Fineness modulus
Specific gravity
Bulk density (Kg/m3)
Loose
Compact
Result
6.15
2.625
1475
1690
194
www.ijete.org
Characteristics
Silica,sio2
Alumina
Iron oxide
Lime
Magnesia
Sulfur trioxide
Surface area m2/kg
Specimen
Ceme
nt(kg)
Sand
(Kg)
Crushed Coarse
concrete aggregate
(45%) Kg (kg)
Cube
Cylinder
Prism
4.05
1.88
6
2.67
1.24
3.96
2.187
1.02
3.24
Percentage
49-67
26-28
4-10
0.7-3.6
0.3-2.6
0.1-2.6
230-600
2.4. GROUND
GRANULATED
FURNACE SLAG (GGBS)
BLAST
Fig. 3.1. Raw material(hardened concrete)
Characteristics
Specific gravity
Fineness
Glass content
percent
Bulk density
Color
10.53
4.88
15.6
Properties
2.91
330
93
1100
Grey
Characteristics
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
SiO2
Al2O3
CaO
Fe2O3
MgO
SO3
CaO/SiO2
Loss on ignition
Requirements
(BS:6699)
32-42
7.16
32-45
0.1-1.5
14 Max
2.5 Max
1.4 Max
3 Max
40
35
30
25
20
15
3 days
40
7 days
10
35
28 days
30
25
Normal Replaced
With
concrete Concrete chemicals
without
chemicals
20
3 days
15
7 days
10
28 days
Normal Replaced
concrete concrete
without
chemical
With
chemical
www.ijete.org
7
6
3 days
7 days
28 days
3
2
1
0
3days
7 days
0.5
28 days
0
Normal Replaced
With
concrete concrete chemical
without
5.0. CONCLUSION
In fact increased use of concrete almost in all type of
construction work, it initiates a demand of natural river
sand. To reduce the sand demand, using crushed hardened
concrete waste by the process of utilization of waste
material which is dumped near by the construction places
& important places.
From the experimental studies, the following conclusions
were drawn:
www.ijete.org
REFERENCES
Journal Papers:
[1] P. Devi, V.Rajkumar and K.Kannan, Inhibitive effect
of organic inhibitors in concrete containing quarry dust as
fine aggregate,
International Journal of Advances in Engineering
Sciences, 1(2), 2012,1-7.
[2] Amol B. Tardale, Surekha Shivaji Patil,an
d N.J. Pathak, Feasibility study of replacement of cement
and sand in concrete and mortar by ecosphere material,
International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering,
ISSN: 0974-5904, 6(4), 2011, 920-923.
[3] Chandana Suresh, Katakam Bala Krishna, P. Sri
Lakshmi Sai Teja and S. Kanakambara Rao, Partial
replacement of sand with quarry dust in concrete,
International Journal of Innovative Technology and
Exploring Engineering, ISSN: 2278-30745, 6(2), 2013,
254-258.
[4] Krishna Rao S., ChandrasekarRao T. and Saravana P.,
Effect of manufacture sand on strength characteristics of
roller compacted concrete, International Journal of
Engineering Research and Technology, ISSN: 2278-0181,
2(2), 2013, 88-90.
[5] Bahoria B.V., Parbat D.K. & Naganaik P.B.,
Replacement of natural sand in concrete by waste
products : a state of art, Journal of Environmental
Research & Development, 4A (7), 2013, 1651-1656.
[6] Mohd Monish, Vikas Srivastava, V.C. Agarwal, P.K.
Mehta & Rakesh kumar, Demlished waste as coarse
aggregate in concrete, Youth Education and Research
Trust, 2013,540-542.
[7] M.L.V. Prasad and P. Rathish kumar, Mechaical
properties of fibre reinforced concretes produced from
198
www.ijete.org