Republic of the Philippines

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
Inigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000

Pre-service Teachers Actual Teaching Rating

Name: Nurdine C. Salahuddin

Sem/SY: 2012-2013

Subject Taught: English 6

Date: _____________________________

Topic: ________________________________

Time & Section: ______________________

Cooperating School: Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School

Note: this will serve as a guide to the Cooperating Teacher and the TEI Practicum Supervisor in
assessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-service Teacher. Check the box below
that corresponds to each item.
Legend: 100-95 Excellent

88-83 Satisfactory

94-89 Very Satisfactory

77-72 Unsatisfactory

82-78 Fair

ITEM TO RATE
I. LESSON PLANNING
A. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms.
B. There was congruence between
1. Objective and subject matter
2. Objective and teaching procedure/ Strategies of teaching
3. Objective and formative test/evaluation
4. Objective assignment
II. TEACHING METHODS
A. Methods used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the
students.
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the
students capabilities.
C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.
D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching.
III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:
1. Attendance
2. Assignment/Homework
3. Practice Exercise
4. Group work/Project
5. Passing in and out of the room

VS

6. Correcting. Distributing and collecting papers

B. Order and discipline are present in the classroom
C. Visual aids are within easy reach of the teacher during his/her
teaching.
IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
A. The teacher spoke clearly with well-modulated voice.
B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.
C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teachers
skillful questioning.
D. He/she observed correct pronunciation.
E. The board work of the teacher was free from grammar and spelling.
F. The teachers handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was
legible enough to be read and understood.
V. TEACHERS PERSONALITY
A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tend to
disturb students attention.
C. The teachers personality is strong enough to command respect and
attention.

The pre-service teachers strength are:

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Comments/Suggestions for improvement:

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Final Rating (Tick One)

Satisfactory

Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO

(Master Teacher II)
Designation: Cooperating Teacher

Unsatisfactory

Republic of the Philippines

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
Inigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000

Pre-service Teachers Actual Teaching Rating

Name: Nurdine C. Salahuddin

Sem/SY: 2012-2013

Subject Taught: Hekasi 6

Date: _____________________________

Topic: ________________________________

Time & Section: ______________________

Cooperating School: Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School

Note: this will serve as a guide to the Cooperating Teacher and the TEI Practicum Supervisor in
assessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-service Teacher. Check the box below
that corresponds to each item.
Legend: 100-95 Excellent

88-83 Satisfactory

94-89 Very Satisfactory

77-72 Unsatisfactory

82-78 Fair

ITEM TO RATE
I. LESSON PLANNING
A. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms.
B. There was congruence between
1. Objective and subject matter
2. Objective and teaching procedure/ Strategies of teaching
3. Objective and formative test/evaluation
5. Objective assignment
II. TEACHING METHODS
A. Methods used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the
students.
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the
students capabilities.
C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.
D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching.
III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:
7. Attendance
8. Assignment/Homework
9. Practice Exercise
10. Group work/Project
11. Passing in and out of the room

VS

12. Correcting. Distributing and collecting papers

B. Order and discipline are present in the classroom
C. Visual aids are within easy reach of the teacher during his/her
teaching.
IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
A. The teacher spoke clearly with well-modulated voice.
B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.
C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teachers
skillful questioning.
D. He/she observed correct pronunciation.
E. The board work of the teacher was free from grammar and spelling.
F. The teachers handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was
legible enough to be read and understood.
V. TEACHERS PERSONALITY
A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tend to
disturb students attention.
C. The teachers personality is strong enough to command respect and
attention.

The pre-service teachers strength are:

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Comments/Suggestions for improvement:

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Final Rating (Tick One)

Satisfactory

Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO

(Master Teacher II)
Designation: Cooperating Teacher

Unsatisfactory

Republic of the Philippines

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
Inigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000

Pre-service Teachers Actual Teaching Rating

Name: Nurdine C. Salahuddin

Sem/SY: 2012-2013

Subject Taught: English 4

Date: _____________________________

Topic: ________________________________

Time & Section: ______________________

Cooperating School: Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School

Note: this will serve as a guide to the Cooperating Teacher and the TEI Practicum Supervisor in
assessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-service Teacher. Check the box below
that corresponds to each item.
Legend: 100-95 Excellent

88-83 Satisfactory

94-89 Very Satisfactory

77-72 Unsatisfactory

82-78 Fair

ITEM TO RATE
I. LESSON PLANNING
A. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms.
B. There was congruence between
1. Objective and subject matter
2. Objective and teaching procedure/ Strategies of teaching
3. Objective and formative test/evaluation
6. Objective assignment
II. TEACHING METHODS
A. Methods used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the
students.
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the
students capabilities.
C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.
D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching.
III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:
13. Attendance
14. Assignment/Homework
15. Practice Exercise
16. Group work/Project
17. Passing in and out of the room

VS

18. Correcting. Distributing and collecting papers

B. Order and discipline are present in the classroom
C. Visual aids are within easy reach of the teacher during his/her
teaching.
IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
A. The teacher spoke clearly with well-modulated voice.
B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.
C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teachers
skillful questioning.
D. He/she observed correct pronunciation.
E. The board work of the teacher was free from grammar and spelling.
F. The teachers handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was
legible enough to be read and understood.
V. TEACHERS PERSONALITY
A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tend to
disturb students attention.
C. The teachers personality is strong enough to command respect and
attention.

The pre-service teachers strength are:

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Comments/Suggestions for improvement:

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Final Rating (Tick One)

Satisfactory

Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO

(Master Teacher II)
Designation: Cooperating Teacher

Unsatisfactory

Republic of the Philippines

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
Inigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000

Pre-service Teachers Actual Teaching Rating

Name: Nurdine C. Salahuddin

Sem/SY: 2012-2013

Subject Taught: Science 4

Date: _____________________________

Topic: ________________________________

Time & Section: ______________________

Cooperating School: Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School

Note: this will serve as a guide to the Cooperating Teacher and the TEI Practicum Supervisor in
assessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-service Teacher. Check the box below
that corresponds to each item.
Legend: 100-95 Excellent

88-83 Satisfactory

94-89 Very Satisfactory

77-72 Unsatisfactory

82-78 Fair

ITEM TO RATE
I. LESSON PLANNING
A. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms.
B. There was congruence between
1. Objective and subject matter
2. Objective and teaching procedure/ Strategies of teaching
3. Objective and formative test/evaluation
7. Objective assignment
II. TEACHING METHODS
A. Methods used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the
students.
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the
students capabilities.
C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.
D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching.
III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:
19. Attendance
20. Assignment/Homework
21. Practice Exercise
22. Group work/Project
23. Passing in and out of the room

VS

24. Correcting. Distributing and collecting papers

B. Order and discipline are present in the classroom
C. Visual aids are within easy reach of the teacher during his/her
teaching.
IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
A. The teacher spoke clearly with well-modulated voice.
B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.
C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teachers
skillful questioning.
D. He/she observed correct pronunciation.
E. The board work of the teacher was free from grammar and spelling.
F. The teachers handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was
legible enough to be read and understood.
V. TEACHERS PERSONALITY
A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tend to
disturb students attention.
C. The teachers personality is strong enough to command respect and
attention.

The pre-service teachers strength are:

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Comments/Suggestions for improvement:

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Final Rating (Tick One)

Satisfactory

Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO

(Master Teacher II)
Designation: Cooperating Teacher

Unsatisfactory

Republic of the Philippines

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
Inigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000

Pre-service Teachers Actual Teaching Rating

Name: Nurdine C. Salahuddin

Sem/SY: 2012-2013

Subject Taught: Mathematics 4

Date: _____________________________

Topic: ________________________________

Time & Section: ______________________

Cooperating School: Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School

Note: this will serve as a guide to the Cooperating Teacher and the TEI Practicum Supervisor in
assessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-service Teacher. Check the box below
that corresponds to each item.
Legend: 100-95 Excellent

88-83 Satisfactory

94-89 Very Satisfactory

77-72 Unsatisfactory

82-78 Fair

ITEM TO RATE
I. LESSON PLANNING
A. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms.
B. There was congruence between
1. Objective and subject matter
2. Objective and teaching procedure/ Strategies of teaching
3. Objective and formative test/evaluation
8. Objective assignment
II. TEACHING METHODS
A. Methods used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the
students.
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the
students capabilities.
C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.
D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching.
III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:
25. Attendance
26. Assignment/Homework
27. Practice Exercise
28. Group work/Project
29. Passing in and out of the room

VS

30. Correcting. Distributing and collecting papers

B. Order and discipline are present in the classroom
C. Visual aids are within easy reach of the teacher during his/her
teaching.
IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
A. The teacher spoke clearly with well-modulated voice.
B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.
C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teachers
skillful questioning.
D. He/she observed correct pronunciation.
E. The board work of the teacher was free from grammar and spelling.
F. The teachers handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was
legible enough to be read and understood.
V. TEACHERS PERSONALITY
A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tend to
disturb students attention.
C. The teachers personality is strong enough to command respect and
attention.

The pre-service teachers strength are:

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Comments/Suggestions for improvement:

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Final Rating (Tick One)

Satisfactory

Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO

(Master Teacher II)
Designation: Cooperating Teacher

Unsatisfactory

Republic of the Philippines

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
Inigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000
Marking Guide for Instructional Materials
Pre-service Teacher: Nurdine C. Salahuddin
Sem/SY: 2012-2013
Cooperating Teacher:Ms. Anife S. Angelo
Date: ___________
Cooperating School: Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School
Direction: Check the box below that corresponds to each item.
Legend:

3- Definitely
2- Moderately
1- Not at all

(90 100)
(51 89)
(0 50)

ITEMS TO RATE

3
Definitely

2
Moderately

1
Not at all

1. It is big enough that can be seen by the farthest learner.

2. Colors of the materials are realistic and pleasant.
3. It facilitates learning.
4. It can stand several uses.
5. It is economical to produce.
6. It is light and easy to manipulate.
7. It is up to date.
8. It is related to the specific needs, problems and
experiences of the target learners.
9. It has originality.
10. It develops curiosity and sense of discovery in the
learners.
Comments/Suggestions: (Strengths and suggestions for improvement)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Rating: _____________________________
Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO
Designation: Master Teacher II

Republic of the Philippines

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
Inigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000

LESSON PLAN RUBRIC

Criteria/
Performance

Good
(3)

Formulating
objective

Defines objectives clearly

Adequately defines
objectives

Objectives are not

clearly stated

Organization
of lesson
presentation

Clearly links subject

matter to students
interest and experience

Adequately links subject

matter to students
interest and experience

Clearly identifies
sequential development
of activities

Adequately identifies
sequential development of
activities

Uses relevant examples

Accurately allocates time
to activities in
accordance to objectives

Adequately uses relevant

examples
Adequately allocates time
to activities in accordance
to objectives

Clearly indicates
transition procedure from
one activity to the next

Adequately indicates
transition procedure from
one activity to the next

Plans a variety of
teaching strategies
Relates subject matter
to other knowledge and
prior knowledge of the
students
Uses a wide range of
resources and learning
materials
Structure a wide variety
of materials to
stimulates students
interest and
achievement
Devises an appropriate
assessment task to
measure each students
progress
Measures students
progress accurately
using appropriate

Limited variety of
teaching strategies
Relates subject matter to
other knowledge

Subject does not link

subject matter to
students interest and
experience
Does not clearly
identifies sequential
development of
activities
Does not use relevant
examples
Does not allocate time
to activities in
accordance to
objectives
Does not indicate
transition procedure
from one activity to the
next
Does not plan a variety
of teaching strategies
Does not relate subject
matter to other
knowledge

Use of
learning
materials

Use of
evaluative
measures

Fair
(2)

Uses a wide range of

resources and learning
materials
Uses an appropriate
variety of materials to
stimulates students
interest and achievement
Devises an evaluative of
students progress
Measures students
progress using
appropriate authentic

Needs Improvement
(1)

Does not use a wide

range of resources and
learning materials
Does not structure an
appropriate variety of
materials to stimulates
students interest and
achievement
Does not devise
appropriate evaluation
students progress
Students progress is
not measured using
appropriate authentic

Rating

authentic assessment
methods
Uses a rubric fully
reflects the objectives
Total:
Rated by: MS. ANIFE S. ANGELO
Designation: Master Teacher II
Name of PST: Nurdine C. Salahuddin
Legend: 3 Good (95%)

assessment methods
Uses a rubric which
partially reflects the
objectives

assessment methods
Rubric does not reflect
the objectives

Subject Area ______________ Date: _____________

2 Fair (85%)
1 Needs Improvement (75%)