Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Since we have the expected return of the stock, the revised expected return can be determined using
the innovation, or surprise, in the risk factors. So, the revised expected return is:
R = 11% + 1.2(4.2% 3%) 0.8(4.6% 4.5%)
R = 12.36%
2.
a.
b.
The unsystematic return is the return that occurs because of a firm specific factor such as the
bad news about the company. So, the unsystematic return of the stock is 2.6 percent. The
total return is the expected return, plus the two components of unexpected return: the
systematic risk portion of return and the unsystematic portion. So, the total return of the stock
is:
R R m
a.
b.
The unsystematic is the return that occurs because of a firm specific factor such as the
increase in market share. If is the unsystematic risk portion of the return, then:
= 0.36(27% 23%)
= 1.44%
c.
The total return is the expected return, plus the two components of unexpected return: the
systematic risk portion of return and the unsystematic portion. So, the total return of the stock
is:
R R m
The beta for a particular risk factor in a portfolio is the weighted average of the betas of the assets.
This is true whether the betas are from a single factor model or a multifactor model. So, the betas of
the portfolio are:
F1 = .20(1.20) + .20(0.80) + .60(0.95)
B175
F1 = 0.97
F2 = .20(0.90) + .20(1.40) + .60(0.05)
F2 = 0.43
F3 = .20(0.20) + .20(0.30) + .60(1.50)
F3 = 0.88
So, the expression for the return of the portfolio is:
Ri = 5% + 0.97 F1 + 0.43 F2 + 0.88 F3
Which means the return of the portfolio is:
Ri = 5% + 0.97(5.50%) + 0.43(4.20%) + 0.88(4.90%)
Ri = 16.45%
5.
6.
a.
B176
Stock C:
RC RC C ( RM R M ) C
Since we don't have the actual market return or unsystematic risk, we will get aformula with
those values as unknowns:
RP = .30RA + .45RB + .30RC
RP = .30[10.5% + 1.2(RM 14.2%) + A] + .45[13.0% + 0.98(RM 14.2%) + B]
+ .25[15.7% + 1.37(RM 14.2%) + C
RP = .30(10.5%) + .45(13%) + .25(15.7%) + [.30(1.2) + .45(.98) + .25(1.37)]
(RM 14.2%)+ .30 A + .45 B + .30 C
RP = 12.925% + 1.1435(RM 14.2%) + .30 A + .45 B + .30 C
c.
Using the market model, if the return on the market is 15 percent and the systematic risk is
zero, the return for each individual stock is:
RA = 10.5% + 1.20(15% 14.2%)
RA = 11.46%
RB = 13% + 0.98(15% 14.2%)
RB = 13.78%
RC = 15.70% + 1.37(15% 14.2%)
RC = 16.80%
To calculate the return on the portfolio, we can use the equation from part b, so:
RP = 12.925% + 1.1435(15% 14.2%)
RP = 13.84%
Alternatively, to find the portfolio return, we can use the return of each asset and its portfolio
weight, or:
RP = X1R1 + X2R2 + X3R3
RP= .30(11.46%) + .45(13.78%) + .25(16.80%)
RP = 13.84%
7.
a.
Since five stocks have the same expected returns and the same betas, the portfolio also has
the same expected return and beta. However, the unsystematic risks might be different, so the
expected return of the portfolio is:
RP = 11% + 0.84F1 + 1.69F2 + (1/5)( 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5)
B177
b.
Consider the expected return equation of a portfolio of five assets we calculated in part a.
Since we now have a very large number of stocks in the portfolio, as:
N , (1/N) 0
But, the Js are infinite, so:
(1/N)( 1 + 2 + 3 + 4+..+ N) 0
Thus:
R P 11% 0.84 F1 1.69 F2
8.
To determine which investment an investor would prefer, you must compute the variance of
portfolios created by many stocks from either market. Because you know that diversification is good,
it is reasonable to assume that once an investor has chosen the market in which she will invest, she
will buy many stocks in that market.
Known:
EF = 0 and = 0.10
E = 0 and S i = 0.20 for all i
If we assume the stocks in the portfolio are equallyweighted, the weight of each stock is
Xi =
1
, that is:
N
1
for all i
N
If a portfolio is composed of N stocks each forming 1/N proportion of the portfolio, the return on the
portfolio is 1/N times the sum of the returns on the N stocks. To find the variance of the respective
portfolios in the 2 markets, we need to use the definition of variance from Statistics:
Var(x) = E[x E(x)]2
In our case:
Var(RP) = E[RP E(RP)]2
Note however, to use this, first we must find RP and E(RP). So, using the assumption about equal
weights and then substituting in the known equation for Ri:
1
Ri
N
1
RP =
(0.10 + F + i)
N
1
RP = 0.10 + F +
i
N
RP =
B178
and
E(a) = a
Now use the above to find E(RP):
1
E ( RP ) E 0.10 F i
N
1
E ( RP ) 0.10 E ( F ) E ( i )
N
1
E ( R P ) 0.10 (0) (0)
N
E(RP) = 0.10
Next, substitute both of these results into the original equation for variance:
Var(RP) = E[RP E(RP)]2
Var(RP) = E 0.10 E ( F )
Var(RP) = E E ( F )
1
i
N
2
Var(RP) = E 2 F 2 F
2
2
Var(RP) = E F
1
i 0.10
N
1
1
2 ( ) 2
N
N
1 2
1
(1 )Cov( i , j )
N
N
Finally, since we can have as many stocks in each market as we want, in the limit, as N ,
1
0, so we get:
N
2
2
Var(RP) = Cov( i , j )
and, since:
Cov ( i , j ) i j ( i , j )
B179
Substitute
( 1i , 1 j ) =
Var(R1P) = 0.0225
Var(R2P) = 0.0025
Since Var(R1P) > Var(R2P), and expected returns are equal, a risk averse investor will prefer to
invest in the second market.
b.
If we assume
( 1 i , 1 j ) = 0.9, and
( 1 i , 1 j )
If we assume
( 1 i , 1 j ) = 0, and
( 1 i , 1 j )
B180
d.
Since the expected returns are equal, indifference implies that the variances of the portfolios
in the two markets are also equal. So, set the variance equations equal, and solve for
thecorrelation of one market in terms of the other:
Var(R1P)= Var(R2P))
0.0225 + 0.04
( 1i , 1 j ) = 0.0025 + 0.04
( 2 i , 2 j ) =
( 1 i , 1 j ) + 0.5
( 2 i , 2 j )
Therefore, for any set of correlations that have this relationship (as found in part c), a risk
adverse investor will be indifferent between the two markets.
12.9
a.
In order to find standard deviation, , you must first find the Variance, since Var .
Recall from Statistics a property of Variance:
If: Z~ a X~ Y~
~ , ~ ,an ~ are random variables, then:
where a is a constant, and Z
X
Y
~
~
~
Var ( Z ) a 2 Var( X ) Var (Y )
b.
Var ( i )
, so you get:
N
Var(Ri) = i2 Var(RM)
So, the variances for the assets are:
B181
A2 = 0.72(.0121) = 0.005929
B2 = 1.22(.0121) = 0.017424
C2 = 1.52(.0121) = 0.027225
c.
10.
d.
If short selling is allowed, rational investors will sell short asset C, causing the price of asset
C to decrease until no arbitrage opportunity exists. In other words, the price of asset C should
decrease until the return becomes 14.25 percent.
a.
Let:
X1= the proportion of Security 1 in the portfolio and
X2= the proportion of Security 2 in the portfolio
and note that since the weights must sum to 1.0,
X 1= 1 X 2
Recall that the beta for a portfolio (or in this case the beta for a factor) is the
weighted average of the security betas, so
P1 = X111 + X2 21
P1 = X111 + (1X1) 21
Now, apply the condition given in the hint that the return of the portfolio does not depend on
F1. This means that the portfolio beta for that factor will be 0, so:
P1 = X111 + X2 21
P1 = 0 = X1(1.0) + (1 X1)(0.5)
and solving for X1 and X2:
B182
X 1= 1
X 2= 2
Thus, sell short Security 1 and buy Security 2.
To find the expected return on that portfolio, use
RP = X1R1 + X2R2
so applying the above:
E(RP) = 1(20%) + 2(20%)
E(RP) = 20%
P1 = 1(1) + 2(0.5)
P1 = 0
b.
c.
The portfolio in part b provides a risk free return of 10%, which is higher than the 5% return
provided by the risk free security. To take advantage of this opportunity, borrow at the risk
free rate of 5% and invest the funds in a portfolio built by selling short security four and
buying security three with weights (3,2) as in part b.
d.
First assume that the risk free security will not change. The price of security four (that
everyone is trying to sell short) will decrease, and the price of security three (that everyone is
trying to buy) will increase. Hence the return of security four will increase and the return of
security three will decrease.
The alternative is that the prices of securities three and four will remain the same, and the
price of the riskfree security drops until its return is 10%.
B183
Finally, a combined movement of all security prices is also possible. The prices of security
four and the riskfree security will decrease and the price of security three will increase until
the opportunity disappears.
B184
MINI CASE The Fama-French Multifactor Model and Mutual Fund Returns
NOTE: The example below shows the results for returns between January 2001 and December 2005.
The actual answer to the case will change based on current market conditions.
1.
For a largecompany stock fund, we would expect the beta for the market risk premium to be near
one since large company returns account for a large part of the total market return on a marketvalue
basis. We would expect the betas for the SMB and HML risk factors to be low, and possibly
negative, since large company stock returns are not highly related to small company stock returns
and large company stocks tend to be more oriented toward value stocks.
2.
The following shows the results of the regression estimates for the period between January 2001 and
December 2005. The actual answer to the case will change based on current market returns.
Fidelity Magellan:
Regression Statistics
Multiple R
R Square
Adjusted R Square
Standard Error
Observations
0.98136
0.96306
0.96108
0.00876
60
ANOVA
Regression
Residual
Total
df
3
56
59
SS
0.111927178
0.004292802
0.116219979
Coefficients
Intercept
MktRF
SMB
HML
0.00080
0.98379
0.20016
0.07497
Standard
Error
0.00123
0.02991
0.03985
0.04202
MS
0.037309
7.67E05
F
486.7002
t Stat
0.64652
32.89282
5.02241
1.78426
Pvalue
0.52059
0.00000
0.00001
0.07980
MS
0.02465
0.00035
F
70.63527
Significance F
4.60021E40
0.88937
0.79097
0.77977
0.01868
60
ANOVA
Regression
Residual
Total
df
3
56
59
SS
0.07396
0.01954
0.09350
Significance F
4.99566E19
B185
Coefficients
Intercept
MktRF
SMB
HML
0.00944
0.73959
0.43843
0.35001
Standard
Error
0.00263
0.06382
0.08504
0.08965
t Stat
3.59433
11.58912
5.15571
3.90414
Pvalue
0.00069
0.00000
0.00000
0.00026
MS
0.03894
0.00069
F
56.31373
t Stat
0.58715
8.96478
5.79182
1.54484
Pvalue
0.55946
0.00000
0.00000
0.12802
0.86663
0.75105
0.73771
0.02630
60
ANOVA
Regression
Residual
Total
df
3
56
59
SS
0.11682
0.03872
0.155539609
Coefficients
Intercept
MktRF
SMB
HML
0.00217
0.80529
0.69327
0.19495
Standard
Error
0.00370
0.08983
0.11970
0.12619
Significance F
6.50745E17
3.
4.
If the market is efficient, all assets should have an alpha of zero. In this case, only one of the three
funds has a positive alpha, so the evidence provided here against market efficiency is limited. We
should note that the alpha for the Fidelity LowPriced Stock Fund is extremely large, 0.94 percent
per month, or just over 11 percent per year. It is still possible that the model misspecification
problem exists and that other risk factors are present that we are not examining in this regression
model.
5.
On a riskadjusted basis, the Fidelity LowPriced Stock Fund performed the best over this period
since it was the only fund with a positive alpha.
B186