Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
COLUMNA
Jessica Cruz Demeyer
OBJETIVOS DE LA PONENCIA
A.- IDENTIFICAR NECESIDADES GENERADAS EN EL MBITO PRE Y
POST QUIRRGICO.
B.- JUSTIFICAR LA NECESIDAD DE UNA ACTUACIN
FISIOTERAPUTICA INMEDIATA A DIFERENTES NIVELES.
LA EDUCACININFORMACIN
DISMINUYE LA
ANGUSTIA
APORTA CONFIANZA
Y
SEGURIDAD
EVITA CONDUCTAS
INADAPTADAS
El estado previo del paciente tiene que ver frecuentemente con las
complicaciones a largo plazo (18)
QU SUCEDE EN UNA
CIRUGA? ( 31, 32)
Acto Quirrgico ( w fibras
fsicas w tnicas)
ACTUACIN
FISIOTERAPUTICA
Iniciar un despertar
muscular y potenciar las
Proceso Inflamatorio y su
aferencias disminuidas
resolucin. Mediadores locales de
la inflamacin estimulacin
nociceptiva hiperalgesia
Mantener libre la raz
perifrica/ alodinea
nerviosa descomprimida
infiltracin y
proliferacin fibroblastos/sntesis
quirrgicamente para su
de colgeno/tejido de
granulacin
= cambios
mejor funcin neural
isqumicos alt. conduccin
Dolor postoperatorio
Controlar el dolor
Reposo relativo
CONDICIONANTES EXTRAS DE LA
MINIMAMENTE INVASIVA
EJERCICIOS
1. Activacin de la propulsin
venosa mediante actividad
muscular, marcha y
respiraciones abdminodiafragmticas en
decbito. Ms all del
postoperatorio inmediato
estiramientos
msculoarticulares y
trabajo de fascias.
EJERCICIOS
2.
2.
Despertar muscular
Potenciar aferencias
disminuidas.
Inicio de la estabilizacin.
Trabajo propioceptivo en
funcin de cada regin:
a) La regin cervical inferior
asegura el soporte de la
cabeza, es piloto direccional
de los rganos de los
sentidos y tiene una funcin
importante en la
expresividad corporal.
EJERCICIOS
b)
EJERCICIOS (12,18,33)
CONCLUSIONES
BIBLIOGRAFA
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
BIBLIOGRAFA
11. Ostelo RW, de Vet HC, Waddell G, Kerckhoffs MR, Leffers P, van Tulder M. Rehabilitation following first-tima lumbar
disc surgery: a systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collabortion. Spine. 2003; 28(3): 209-18
12. Richard F. Ellis, B Phty. Neural Mobilization: a systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials with an Analysis
of Therapeutic Efficacy. The Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy. 2008. 16 (1): 8-22
13. Dolan P, Greenfield K, Nelson RJ, Nelson IW. Can exercise therapy improve the outcome of microdiscectomy. Spine.
2000. 25(12):1523-1532
14. Ostelo Rw, Costa LO, Maher CG, de Vet HC, van Tulder MW. Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery. Chochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2008. 8;(4): CD003007
15. Williamson E, White L, Rushton A. A survey of post-operative manegement for patients following first time lumbar
discectomy. Eur Spine. 2007. 16(6): 795-802.
16. Kulig K, Beneck GJ, Selkowitz DM, Poprvich JM Jr, Ge TT, Poppert EM et al. An intensive, progressive exercise
program reduces disability and improves functional performance in patients after single-level lumbar
microdiscectomy. Phys Ther. 2009. 89(11):1145-57
17. Filiz M, Cakamak A, Ozcan E. The efectiveness of exercise programmes after lumbar disc surgery: a randomised
controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2005. 19(1): 4-11
18. Axel Schafer, Toby Hall, Gerd Muller, Kathryn Briffa. Outcomes differ between subgroups of patients with low back
pain and leg pain following neural manual therapy: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J. 2011. 20: 482-490.
19. Danielsen JM, Johnsen R, Kibsgaard SK, Hellevik E. Early aggressive exercise for postoperative rehabilitation after
discectomy. Spine, 2000. 25(8): 1015-20
20. Delitto A, Gwendolyn S. Exercice-based therapy for low back pain. Uptodate literature review 18.2. 2010
21. Johansson AC, Linton SJ, Bergkvist L, Nilsson O, Cornefjord M. Clinic-based training in comparison to home
based training after first-time lumbar disc surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine. 2009. 18(3):398-409.
22. Nitin N, Bahatia MD. Long-Term Outcomes and Complications Following Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spine
Surgery. Seminaris in Spine Surgery. 2009. 21(3): 177-184
BIBLIOGRAFA
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
Waddell G, Burton AK. Concepts of rehabilitation for the management of common health problems. London: The
Stationery Office; 2004.
WHO (2001) International Classification of funcioning, disability and health. World Health Organisation, Geneva.
Taylor MW. Return to work following back surgery: a review. Am j Ind Med. 1989; 16:79-88.
Zhu X, Parnianpour M, Nordin M, Kahanovitz N. Hsitochemistry and morphology of erector spinae muscle in lumbar disc
herniation. Spine. 1989; 14:391-397.
Magnusson ML, Pope MH, Wilder DG, Szpalski M, Spratt K. Is there a rational basis for post-surgical lifting
restriction?Current understanding. Eur Spine J. 1999; 8: 170-178.
Kahanovitz N, Viola K, Muculloch J. Limited surgical discectomy and microdiscetomy. A clinical comparison. Spine. 1989;
14: 79-81.
Long DM. Decision making in lumbar disc disease. Clin Neurosurg. 1992; 39: 36-51.
Greenfield K, O Neill C, Findlay G, Nelson RJ (2005). Health economic evaluation ofa a randomised clinical trial
comparing lumbar microdiscectomy with conservative management. In: Porceedings of international Society for the
Study of the lumbar Spine, New York.
Bhavani-Shankar Kodali, Jasmeet S Oberoi. Management of postoperative pain. Uptodate literatur review. 2010
Shigeru Kobayashi, Kenechi Takeno, Takafumi Yayama, Kouske Awara, Tsuyoshi Miyaki, Alexander Guerrero, Hisatoshi
Baba. Pathomechanisms of Sciatica in Lumbar disc herniation: effect of periradicular Adhesive Tissue on
Electrophysiological Values by and Intraoperative Straight Leg Raising Test. Spine. 2004; 35 (22): 2004-2014.
Sahar M. Adel. Efficacy of Neural Mobilization in Treatment of Low back Dysfunctions. Journal of American Science.
2011; 7(4): 566-573.