1

Running Head: LITERATURE REVIEW MATRIX

Literature Review Matrix: Action Research Proposal

Keith C. Quarles
EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research (MJI1433A)
Newton Miller
8-25-14

2
Running Head: LITERATURE REVIEW MATRIX

Internet Search Engine (Ask): Literature Review Matrix

Title and URL

Author Type Date of Summary of Source

of
of
PublicatSource Source ion
Blending Web 2.0 Thomas Article Copyrigh This article by Thomas Stone,Project design Architect explains
Technologies
Stone (PDF) t
how even though some technologies may be employed in the
with Traditional
2009
instructional/training design it may be necessary to re-evaluate
Formal Learning
the choice of technology tools utilized in order to provide the
http://www.traini
best blending of Web 2.0 technologies to fit a particular
nginstructional need. the articles provides tables which give
partners.com/dow
examples of technological integration into training and
nloads/elearning/
instruction for an organization.
Blending
%20Web
%202%5B1%5D.
0%20-%20Rev
%200409.pdf
How can Web 2.0 Mind Journal No Date This article found through Ask search engine explains how
help train your Resourc Article of
Web 2.0 technology has challenges and benefits and offer
employees?
es:
Publicat- useful tips for integrating Web 2.0 technologies into
http://www.mindr Institute
ion
organizational instruction, the article explains that the
esources.net/web/ of
majority of organizational learning occurs through informal
institutejournal5/ Learning
instruction and social media (web 2.0) is a form of
Article6.pdf
and
collaboration that is informal but effective.
Innovati
on
Web 2.0
Hyder Article Winter This article provides an in-depth study of the prospect of
http://www.hyder and
(PDF) 2010
employing Web 2.0 as an Instructional tool. The article
andassociates.co Associat
discusses the challenges, benefits and risks of using online
m/docs/HYDER es:
collaboration. the article also provides tips for using Web 2.0
winter10.pdf
Sharon
and a Q&A forum in which the author, Sharon Hyder provide
Hyder
expertise.
Social media Australi Article August This article explore the prospects/aspects of using social media
How to
an
31.2008 in instruction. The article addresses security issues, expense
http://webguide.g Govern
and the use of feedback from learners when strategically
ov.au/web-2ment
designing instructional; material to include the integration of
0/onlinesocial media for training/collaboration purposes.
consultation/socia
l-media/socialmedia-how-to/
Valerie Slide Copyrigh This slide presentation provides detailed listings of web 2.0
Lifelong
Kisiel share t 2014 technologies and some of the uses for social media, blogs, pod
Learning Thrives
casts, etc. The article also suggest RRS feeds as viable

3
Running Head: LITERATURE REVIEW MATRIX
in Web 2.0
Creative and
Inexpensive Ways
to Train Your
Staff
http://www.slides
hare.net/vkisiel/pr
esentationscreenshotspresentation

technological source for teachers/learners.

Proquest Literature Review Matrix

Title and URL

Author of Type of Date of

Source
Source \Publicatio
n
WEB 2.0
Capo, B. Journal Quarterly
technologies for H., &
Article Review of
classroom
Orellana,
Distance
instruction: High A.
Education
school teachers'
Copyright
perceptions and
2011
adoption factors.
Retrieved from
http://search.proq
uest.com/docview
/1014264690?
accountid=32521

Summary of Source

Capo and Orellana (2011) reports on studies conducted at

Miami Dade County High Schools in which teachers
were participants. The study was designed to discover
how, when and where teachers were employing Web 2.0
tools for class instruction. Predictor variables were used
in multiple regression but the finding were considered to
be correlated but not causal; thus, the study seemed more
traditional. The article could be considered as primary
source information since questionnaires were used to
solicit genuine information from
respondents/participants. The artificial failed to mention
direct input from students; yet, sampled teachers who
may have gathered input from students. input from
students.
WikiED: Using Frisch, J. Journal Journal of Frisk Et. Al (2013) sought to discover the effectiveness of
web 2.0 tools to K.,
Article College
using Web 2.0 technologies in teaching biology to
teach content and Jackson, P.
Science
undergraduate students. WIKIed Biology is a National
critical thinking. C., &
Teaching, Science Foundation created a model which is designed to
http://search.proq Murray, M.
(2013)
integrate Web 2.0 through a guided-course model in order
uest.com/docviewC.
to prove the validity of Web 2.0's ability to
/1437615463?
empower/motivate students to critically think and
accountid=32521
understand how the scientific process can add validity to
primary source information. The article does not mention
security issues to any significant level although it is a
major variable regarding the integration of online
collaborative tools in a classroom setting.
Using web 2.0 Pollacia, Journal Copyright Pollacia and McAllister (2009), Computer Information

4
Running Head: LITERATURE REVIEW MATRIX
technologies to L., &
Article (2009)
meet quality
McCalliste
matters(TM)
r, T.
(QM)
http://search.proq
uest.com/docview
/200118736?
accountid=32521

Systems professors at Northwest University, discusses

online instruction design by means of Quality Matters
(QM) integration into the actual online course/rubric
design. QM are standards set to measure the quality in
online or online/on-site instruction combination
courses/frameworks.In many instances, Web 2.0
technologies are the most appropriate for supporting this
course content. This paper will give an overview of the
QM Standards and Rubric; and demonstrate how Web 2.0
technologies may be utilized to meet QM requirements.
Web 2,0 is a common component of QM instructional
design according to the article. The paper offers graphic
illustration of online classroom design and cubics. The
paper does not go into any particular descriptive detail
into the particular types of Web 2.0 technology that may
be employed in a given situation and may be considered
as a secondary source of information,
Meaningful use Billings, Journal Copyright Billing (2012) discusses the use of various types of Web
of web 2.0 tools Diane M, Article (2012).
2,0 technology including social networks and offer tips
for teaching and EdD,R.N.,
for integrating technology tools into instructions. The
learning. The
F.A.A.N.
article provides a table listing various types of web 2.0
Journal of
technology and corresponding web sites. The article can
Continuing
be viewed as a secondary source of information. The
Education in
article does mention the safety issues concerned in using
Nursing, 43(4),
Web 2,0 technology in classrooms at any significant
152-3.
length.
doi:http://dx.doi.o
rg/10.3928/00220
124-20120327-11
Exploring the
Bustamant Journal Copyright Bustamanta and Moeller (2013) reports of a study that
unique case of a e, C., &
article (2013).
involved the use of Web 2,0 technological tools in
professional
Moeller, A.
teaching/learning of foreign languages. the review of
development
J.
literature revealed that few teachers use Web 2,0 tolls and
program on web
the ones that do fail to find creative ways to integrate
2.0 technologies
Web 2.0 into classroom instruction that add value to
for teachers of
teaching learning activities. The paper states that teachers
German.
are the focus of Web 2.0 instruction. Students are the
CALICO Journal,
primary focus ; yet, teachers must be held accountable for
30(1), 82-n/a.
instituting initiatives that promote advanced learning of
doi:http://dx.doi.o
students preferences.
rg/10.11139/cj.30
.1.82-104

5
Running Head: LITERATURE REVIEW MATRIX
Two Chosen Articles
Based on the credibility of the authors, usefulness, currency/timeliness and relevancy of
the information in the articles regarding my research proposal, I chose Web 2.0 by Sharon Hyder
from the Ask" Internet search engine and Meaningful Use of Web 2.0 Tools For Teaching and
Learning by Diane Billings from the Ashford University Library. via the literature review matrix
above.
I chose Web 2.0 by Sharon Hyder because it provides am expert, in-depth study of the
prospect of employing Web 2.0 as an Instructional tool. The article discusses the challenges,
benefits and risks of using online collaboration which will be useful in assessing the feasibility of
employing the online tool for our business ventures from practical, ethical and sociological
perspectives. The article also provides tips for using Web 2.0 and a Q&A forum in which the
author, Sharon Hyder provide expertise which may be useful in the formation of a technological
integration design for training/instruction. The article also gives advice on trends and
fundamentals of Web 2.0 integration which gives guidance for the action research proposal in
order to stay focused on relevant subject matter that may fit my particular research problem.
I chose the article Meaningful Use of Web 2.0 Tools for Teaching and Learning by
Billings because it professionally discusses the use of various types of Web 2,0 technology
including social networks and offer tips for integrating technology tools into instructions. The
article provides a table listing various types of web 2.0 technology and corresponding web sites.
The article can be viewed as a secondary source of information. The article does mention the
safety issues concerned in using Web 2,0 technology in classrooms at any significant length but
in combination with the Web 2.0 article the areas of benefits, challenges, risks and various types
of Web 2.0 tools are discussed/explained. The table provided in the article contains various types

6
Running Head: LITERATURE REVIEW MATRIX
of Web 2.0 technology in addition to the web sites on which they can be found are presented in
the article which may aid in the download/securing/utilization of applications that are webtechnology based and suit our business needs.

References
Australian Government. (2008). Social media How to. Retrieved from
http://webguide.gov.au/web-2-0/online-consultation/social-media/social-media-how-to/
Billings, Diane M, EdD,R.N., F.A.A.N. (2012). Meaningful use of web 2.0 tools for teaching and
learning. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 43(4), 152-3. Retrieved from
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20120327-11
Bustamante, C., & Moeller, A. J. (2013). Exploring the unique case of a professional
development program on web 2.0 technologies for teachers of German. CALICO Journal,
30(1), 82-n/a. Retrieved from doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.1.82-104
Capo, B. H., & Orellana, A. ( 2011). WEB 2.0 TECHNOLOGIES FOR CLASSROOM
INSTRUCTION: High school teachers' perceptions and adoption factors. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1014264690?accountid=3252
Frisch, J. K., Jackson, P. C., & Murray, M. C. (2013). WikiED: Using web 2.0 tools to teach
content and critical thinking. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.
com/docview/1437615463? accountid=32521
Hyder, S. (2013) Web 2.0. Retrieved from http://www.hyderandassociates.
com/docs/HYDERwinter10.pdf
Kisiel, V. (2014). Lifelong Learning Thrives in Web 2.0 Creative and Inexpensive Ways to Train
Your Staff. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/vkisiel/presentation-screenshotspresentation

7
Running Head: LITERATURE REVIEW MATRIX
Mind Resources: Institute of Learning and Innovation (N.D.). How can Web 2.0 help train your
employees? Retrieved from http://www.mindresources.et/web/institutejournal5/Article6.
pdf
Pollacia, L., & McCallister, T. (2009). Using web 2.0 technologies to meet quality matters(TM)
(QM). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/200118736?accountid=32521
Stone, T. (2014). Blending Web 2.0 Technologies with Traditional Formal Learning
Retrieved from http://www.training-partners.
com/downloads/elearning/Blending%20Web%202%5B1%5D.0%20-%20Rev%200409.
pdf