Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
(29.1)
(29.2)
where A is a constant, m(t) is the modulating signal, and fc is the carrier frequency.
The modulation index is defined as [1]
m=
| min m(t ) |
A
(29.3)
(29.4)
(29.5)
29.1
(29.6)
(29.7)
Si =
A2 A2 K 2 Pm
+
2
2
(29.8)
where P m is the average power of m(t). Substituting equation (29.7) into equation
(29.6), we get
v(t)
(29.10)
(29.11)
(29.9)
where
(t) = tan-1
y( t )
A[1 + Km(t )] + x (t )
(29.12)
and
(29.13)
(29.14)
Ignoring the first term arising from the carrier signal, the output signal power is
So =
A2 K 2 Pm
2
(29.15)
29.2
Let G n(f) be the power spectral density of the narrowband noise n(t) shown in Figure
29.3.
Figure 29.3 Narrowband noise power spectral density.
The mean noise power entering the envelope detector is
E[n(t)2 ] = N i
Gn(f) df
fc + B
fc + B
n0
n
=
2 df + 20 df
fc B
fc B
= n0B + n0B
= 2n0B
(29.16)
= Gy(f)
= 2 Gn(f + fc)
= n0
(29.17)
(29.18)
Gx(f) df
B
= 2n0B
(29.19)
(29.20)
29.3
a2
If m(t) = am cos 2fct, then Pm = m , K = m / am, and
2
So
m 2 Si
=
No
2 + m 2 Ni
(29.21)
For large input SNR and a fixed modulation index, the output S N R is directly
proportional to the input SNR. When the input SNR << 1, the envelope signal is
primarily dominated by the envelope of the noise signal and the modulating signal is badly
mutilated. Under this circumstance, it is meaningless to talk about output SNR. The loss
of the modulating signal at low input SNR is called the threshold effect. The threshold
occurs when the input SNR < 10 dB. It can be shown that, for a small input SNR, the
output SNR of the envelope detector is proportional to the squared input SNR [2, 3].
Figure 29.4 shows a typical asymptotic signal-to-noise characteristic for an envelope
detector.
Figure 29.4 Asymptotic signal-to-noise characteristic for envelope detector.
Performance of Frequency Modulation [1, 3, 4]
Let kf be a constant and mf(t) be the modulating signal. A frequency-modulated signal
is given by [1]
sc(t)
(29.22)
= A cos (t)
(29.23)
where
t1
(29.24)
m f(t)dt
(29.25)
and
d (t )
= k fm f(t)
dt
(29.26)
29.4
d (t )
f = max | 1
|
2 dt
(29.27)
(29.28)
(t)
k am
= f
sin 2 fm t
2 fm
(29.29)
= f sin 2 fm t
(29.30)
sc(t)
(29.31)
Si =
A2
2
(29.32)
and
(t) = kf
t1
m f(t)dt = f sin 2 fm t
(29.33)
Differentiating both sides with respect to time and solving for mf(t), we get
m f(t) =
2fm f
kf
cos 2fm t
2
(29.34)
29.5
(29.35)
(29.36)
where
(29.37)
(29.38)
where
(t) = tan-1
y( t )
x (t ) + A
(29.39)
and
(29.40)
Setting K = 1 and taking the derivative of (t), the output of the differentiator is given
by
v(t)
= -sin(t)
d (t )
dt
(29.41)
29.6
= -sin(t) [2fc +
d ( t )
]
dt
d (t )
dt
where
d (t )
= =
dt
dy(t )
dx (t )
y( t )
dt
dt
2
2
y(t ) + [ x (t ) + A]
[ x (t ) + A]
(29.42)
(29.43)
1 dy(t )
. We can ignore the
A dt
first term arising from the carrier frequency, which can be removed by a blocking
capacitor. Thus, y(t) must be the noise signal at the input of the differentiator with a
transfer function
H(f) =
2f
j
A
Proof.
Taking the Fourier transform of
2f
2f
j Y(f) = H(f)Y(f) where H(f) =
j.
A
A
d (t )
=
dt
1 dy(t )
d (t )
, we get F [
] =
A dt
dt
Q.E.D.
29.7
Let G n(f) be the power spectral density of the narrowband noise n(t) shown in Figure
29.7 (a).
Figure 29.7 Narrowband noise power spectral density.
The mean noise power entering the differentiator is
E[n(t)2 ] = N i
Gn(f) df
B
BT
fc + T
+ fc
2 n
2
n0
0 df +
=
df
2
2
B
B
T fc
fc T
2
2
= n0BT + n0BT
= 2n0BT
(29.44)
Let G x (f) and G y (f) be the power spectral densities of the quadrature components
x(t) and y(t) of the noise n(t). The noise power spectral density at the output of the
differentiator is given by
G (f)
= |H(f)|2 Gy(f)
2f 2
Gy(f)
=
A
2f 2
= 2
Gn(f + fc)
A
2f 2
=
n0
A
G (f) df =
B
2(2 )2 n0 3
=
B
3 A2
2(2 )2 n0 3
B
3 A2
(29.45)
29.8
2
3
2
2
No 2 k f 2(2 ) no B
2 Ni
Ni
(k f )
(k f )
(29.46)
As increases, the bandwidth increases and the output SNR increases. For a fixed input
SNR, an improvement in output SNR is possible with FM systems. Can we keep
improving the output SNR by simply increasing ? If the modulating signal bandwidth
and the carrier power are fixed, more noise must be accepted by the limiter when we
increase . Eventually, the noise power becomes comparable with the carrier signal
power. Equation (29.46) does not hold anymore and the noise is found to take over the
system. A so called threshold effect occurs at a certain input SNR. For anglemodulated systems it is common to call the input SNR the carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR).
Figure 29.8 shows a typical signal-to-noise characteristic for a frequency discriminator.
Figure 29.8 Signal-to-noise characteristic for frequency discriminator.
To avoid the threshold effect, the CNR > 10 dB and > 1/3 for output SNR > CNR.
It should be noted that we cannot improve the output SNR of narrowband FM systems
( << /2).
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
29.9
v ( t ) = A [1+K m ( t )] cos 2 f c t + n ( t )
e ( t ) ~ A [1+ K m ( t )] + x ( t )
AM + BPF
noise
LPF
~
~
~
~
~
Envelope
detector
f c + B Hz
B Hz
y (t )
|v ( t )|
x (t )
A [1 + K m ( t )]
(t )
Figure 29.2 Phasor diagram for AM signals plus narrowband noise.
G n (f )
n 0 /2
2B
2B
Frequency
- fc
fc
29.10
Asymptote
v ( t ) = cos[ 2 f c t + ( t )]
v ' ( t ) = - [2 f c +
FM +
noise
Limiter
d/dt
Envelope
detector
Frequency discriminator
d (t )
] sin[ 2 fc t + ( t )]
dt
d (t )
e ( t ) = [ 2 fc +
]
dt
LPF
~
~
B Hz
y (t)
G y (f )
Differentiator
f
H (f ) = 2
j
A
.
dy ( t )
=1
A dt
2 f 2
) G y (f)
G . ( f ) = (
A
29.11
G n (f )
n 0 /2
BT
BT
Frequency
0
(a)
-f c
fc
.
G (f)
-BT -B
2
(2
f 2
) n0
A
Frequency
B BT
2
0
(b)
S o / N o (dB)
Threshold = 4
=2
30
=1
AM
20
10
0
10
20
30
Input
CNR (dB)
29.12