Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Identitiesare con('cptuallv n-rore-cornplex than thev mav at first appear.From onc point
of view, they deline w.hosomehodS'isin tcrms ol a trait, rvhich rnight bc anvthing from, lirr
instance,a physical featurc of'thc bocly,a bcliel, a gencalogy or a cultural prcfercncc. In
effectthey idcntifv by placing indiviclualsinto groups w'ho sharc that tr.rit. And this has a
consequencc:it mcans that identitv is r'ron at the pricc of rcduc;inginclividuality.Mr,iclen-
tity asa man, for instancr, both dclines nre anrl lunps mc uith 50 pcr ccnt (roughlv) of
the population, radicallv rcducing nl' particularity. Furtherrnorc thc traits chosen tc-r
ascribeidentity to an individual arc ahvavscontingent, sincc rvhatclcr trait is choscn to
Iix identitv. another one coulcl havc bcen chosen, evcn if it seerns'natural' to idcntil'r'
peoplebv. for instancc,thcir gcnder (and it seernsas i{ all kno*'n socictiesdo in thct idcn-
tify people bv gendcr). Identitics, then, are not given in tcrms of w-hatindivi<lualsare as a
whole, but in terms of more or lessarbitrarilv selcctccllbaturesthat thev possess.For thc
mostpart, inclividualshavc little po$'crrto choosc rvhat leatures rvill bc uscclto idc-ntifv
them - thesearc determinecl socialh.,{rom thc outsidc.
From the point ol'r'icr,r'of inclivicluals,it mav stem as if, becausc idcntitics arc:
external, partial and
collcctivising, thcv clislocateone fiom oncself. The v anchor r.r'ho
I o u a r e t o o n l l a p a r t t , f v o u r . . l f . Y " t , l r o n r t h e o t h t ' r s i r l c .o f r o u r S C h
, c , a u s , .i n r l i ri . l -
ualsexist socially
in and through their iclentities, ll.ithout an iclentity therc is no such
jring as a sociallysituatctl ;ndiiidual. Socierties,
identitics and inilividuals clo not cxist
tndepenclently
of one anothcr, anclat a thcorctical ]evcl, it is mcaninglcssto criticisc
lQentities
in gencral lor clepriving incliviclualsol'inclividualitr',just as it is \1rong to
that inclividualscornprise nothing Lrut thcir itlcntities. Identitics arc not s()
, :ont:nd
tnuchthe
t nrediationbctlrecn inrlivi<lualsan<lsocit:tvas constitutivc of that rclation.
I*
ril
3in 145
Il
-
-
IDENTITY T DEBATING IDENTITY
rt-lrtions bt'tu'ccn thosc using tht-- i<lcntitt <lescriptor .rncl thosc to rr honr thc recognitionat all.'l'his is thc srrrl<l of priratc moo<ls,de'sirts.1n(lthoughts,xhich rnav
tlcsc:riptor ap1;lies.Thus, tirr instancc, it mattcrs a grcat rlcal lrhrthcr an .\rnerican not even bc- cr>nsciousllarti(ulatc(l at all, nht-rt- I mat' scc'tn to bc tnost tlllstlt
black pe-rsonis callcd a niggcr, an Alrican Amcrican, a black, a Nigro, ctr'- E.rchof Sometimesthis space-is associatcclu'ith lrcc'clom or rcsistancc,but thcre is no prrticttlar'
thcsc tcrrns rnarksan iclcntitv n'hich is both the salne as (in that it rn.rrksout thc samc o1'.rslimiting r.ithcr
reasonrvhy that shoulclbt' so.At bcst, il social irlcntitics .tre cr,rnccive'cl
than enabling (and it nrakesmorc scnse to rL-gardtl-rt-mas sitnultant--ortslv lirnitillg antl
group) antl tlifl'crcnt from (in that it has cliffercnt connotations) each o['thc othcr
tlrms. Ancl cach of thcse tcrms rnav ch.rngcits rneaningcl.-penrlingon uho is usingit, enabling), thcn thc scll'outsiclc i<lcntitv cscapcsthc limits of iclcntitr'. But at a cost
t47
146
rll IDENTITY DEBATING IDENTITY
il ri 'ruling
bcing as such univcrsal hurnanncss.Thc Enlightcnrncnt, as thc historical nro'rcn1 blocs' (in AngloPhonc countrit's WASPS IWhitt- Anglo-Saron
fieqemonic
lr thal clerprivetl rcligion ancltraclitionol thcir sor:i.rland political authoritr',harl iroli.allr. u'asgr.rduallv diminishc<I.Wc arc alrcadvquitc I'anriliaru ith this historr',
pritcstantsl)
( s o i t * a s a r g u c d l r ' o n s o l i c l a t ctrhl c n o r m a t i r i t v o f t h c n h i t t ' n r a l c b v r l c l a i r l t * i t i r aspccts u ith thc historv of posttnoclcrnismantl qlobalisation:\Mrrl<l
which sharesmany
Go<l anclhiston' out of tl'rt:picturc, ht- stoo<lat thc rrorlcl's ccntrc.as thc pr.irilegcrl r.nomcnt in tire <lcclincof'clit<' hcgemclnvfirr rarious reasons.The
War II rvasa kc'-v
bcart:r of reason.Ccrtainlr, an<lthis is tht'mort- imi)ortant political point in Asia shoued that the'Wcst uas not invincilrlc.The US mili
th,, u ltit,. early Japanesevictories
helerosc-'xual
man was the locus of'authoritv and ponerr, uith an acccssto thc public depcndcnc\, ort African Amcrican troops anil the subst:qucnt GI Bill (u'hich
tary's
sphcre and to political and econornic gooclsqrantcd to no othcr groul). Arnrerl 1.ith in tht--North but not in tht' South) helpcd rc-ene-rgiscthe cir.il
helped racial cqualitr,
rerelation of thc Holoc.rust siqnilicantlv clirninish.'tlthtr
this strcrnginterl;retation of histon and politics, idcntitl gr()ul)s,inc'lutlingtt'urilists, rights rno.,cment. Ar-rclthe
gars and lcsbians,and various c-thnicgrriups, hare incrcasinqlvsincc thc sixtics 6ccn aplpealot racist politi.s, basicallvcastingit bcr<rn<lthe palc ofthc rcspcctablcat leastin
ablc to llnd spaccslr'iLhin thc public sphcre anclcr.cn thc lormal politicralal)l)aratuscsro its most ovcrt forms.Thc dccolonisationof thc lifties alsodc'nte<lEuropeanhcgcmont,
asscrtanclstruggle lbr rvantsantl nerccis that tht-r'havc bv r.irtuc o1'thcir nralginaliscrl and the South Asian sub contincnt's long struggle for indepcndcnce \\'as cspeciallv
idcntitl or to rcsist constraintsinrposcriupon thcnr bv virtuc ol thcir iclcntitr. important to that, as \\'as,later, thc vicrtorvof'Vie'tn.rmcse comnrunistsovcr, lirst, thc
lt is also sonretimessaid that idcntitv politics arc lucllcd bv the clesirclirr'rccogni- Frencha.rdthen the USA. Morc concrctclv, the uomcn's moscmerlt w'ascn.'rblecl bv a
tion' (Tiylor 199.t1(thr: street u'ord for u'hich is'rcspcct'), but in most casc'sthcl hayc series of economic ancl technological dcvelopm(-nts: relativc afllucncc, nerr clcr.ices
also been motivatecl bv more than that by thc desire-fbr acccss,libcrtv anrl lair, forwashing, clcaning, cooking, the oral c()ntraccptivcrand so on, all of vrhicrhgradualh'
unprejucliccdtreatnrcnt. Noncthclcss to thc clegree'thatidcntitl politics tlr>r'5
invn1.,,,. shiftedthe balance ol-por.r,ertret*t-cn the genclcrsin e'r'crvdavlif c or at lcast did so in
the claim th.,rta ct-'rtaincultural inrisibilin,of thc iclcntitv-{roup lrt- rt-r'titied,it r.vill advancedinclustrialnations. Similarlr suburbanisationplaved a kcv rolc in tht' crncr
contain a componcnt of recognition that is lacking in other lorms of politits, and it is gence of thc gay liberation mo\'cment since it allou'ed strong gaY comrnunitics to
important not to undervaluc respect'svalue. Furthcrmorc, u'hcre particular iclcntities flourish in certain inner citv neighbourhoods. And as n'c have sccn, the culture and
havebeen marginaliscdor demoniscd bv thc most povvcrlul qroups in a socit'tr',idcn- media industries themsclves accclcrate scgmentation and identitv formation b1'
'c'onscit>usness
titl politjcs can inr'olr.e raising', that is thc critiquc ol ncgatilc quicklytargetingparticular iclcntitiesas spccilic, de-limited c()nsunrermarkets.
and un<loingthc psvchic damagcinvolvcd in idt-ntitvingu'ith thcm.
stercotvpers Cultural studics has oftcn been rcgarded (and cspeciallv in thc USA) as thc acaclc-
It is rvorth pausing a moment to considcr in morc clctail w.hv idcntitr' politics micisation of identity politics (ancl thcrefbre an inheritor of this historv), but in far:t it
of the
bccamc so limiliar a part of the socialanil political lanclscapeir"rthe last clcc'.rdes hasbeen split betu'een tu,o sidcs: one that has allicd itself ivith mar-qinal or suborcli
tu'cntieth ccntur\'. ln qcncral thcrc are t\l,o kinds of cxplanationslbr thc emr-rgcnce ol nated identitics; anothcr that has unclcrstoorl idcntities as lirrnrs of constraint and
political forrnationsof this kincl: ()nestresscsthe agcncv o1-thccommutritv .rn.lirrcliritl- rigidity or even as part of the social structur.rtion of hcgcrnonr'.Hcnce thcrc havc bcen
ualsinvolvcd; the othcr analyscsthc iargcr socialconditions that maclethc-nc.r'politics repeatedattemptsto articulatc a'post-identity' cultural politics bv turning to concepts
instancefi'onr historr',uas suchashybridity, attempts that l>ecamemore an<lmore influcntial through thc cightics
and its fbrms of associationpossible.Thus,to takc a I'an"rous
and Dineties,fuellcd bv an incrcasinglvconcretc senseofidentitv politics' conceptual
the British abolitionist movemcltt empor.vcredbv slavcsand tl-reirsupP()rtt'rsor is lt to
and political dilficulties.
be unclcrstooclas a consequcnceof thc relativc economic'inr-fllcicncvof'slavct'r'(scc
.l tlitl .{ttican We can sumrnarise these difllc.ulties as follou s:
James 963; Bl.rckburn 1988)r In terms of modcrn iclcntitY politics:
on
Arnericans, \\.onlen, gavs and lcsbians, and thc disabled lirrrn political assotiaticttts
1 Identity politics tends to erase intcrnal tliffcrcnces.l'hus lcminism I'ailed to mark
thc basisof thcir autonomous u'ill fbr libcratior-r,or ilicl thev organise then-rst'llcspolit-
t1 the differcnce bctrveen womcn of diffcrcnt classesor <>lrlil-lercnt ethnicitie s, or
icalll bccausethcr uerc cnableclto <lo so bv circumstanc:cs7 Irt fact u'c dr>tl'thav-c
indeeddiffcrent attitudL-stou.arclsl-cmininitv itsclf, a failurc that almost cripplcti
make a hard c'ler,isionbe-tu'ccnthcsc altcrnativcs.The u'ill .irrclcncrgv ol'rnarginalisctl
t h em o v c m e n t .
groups has been crucial to identitv politic,sbut, n.ncthclcss, such politi, s ocrcurreu
-) ^ tt ver)
nhcn it dicl bccauseof larger forccs and Opcninqs,rvith thc balanccbctu't-cn'push'and similar point: idcntitv politics oltcn assumesthat an iclcntitv is an esscncc
'puII' tttat there exists an essential (or
cs.
f'actorsdilli'ring in difli'rent <'ircumstanc authcntic) rvav ol being a \voman, a Maori, an
Asian, etc. Hybriditv thcorv hclps clisabusc of this notion, as vye shall sec
T'hc cmcrqcnr,c of ()ccitlcr.rtaliclcnlin,Politics in tlic scr.cnticscan bc."g.ltO*::"j us
colonlat below.
lnomcnt in a long history clurilg u,hich tl-leauthoritt, ol r'ariousnational au<l
148 149
IDENTITY DEBATING IDENTITY
I r l c n t i t r ' p o l i t i c st t ' n < l st o s r r r k l r v t h c p r i r r c i p l co l ' c x t : l u s i o nl.t l c n t i t i c st c . t l t o u ith thc situation in uhich thcr arc p.'rlbrnrccl or othcru'isc acrtc<l
b. into negotiation
strut'turccl lrl re<lucingor rlcnronisingparti('ular otht.rs, t ithcr in t..rscsrrlrtr,. than th.rt:in a p<>st-N'{arxist turn, it is strl;Posr-<l
that indir i<lualsanrl gr()ups
upon.Mot"
sociallt rlonrinant irlcntitics arc bcing lirrmcd (thc conc(.1)t,r1'tl.r,,,r.hir.. thr.ir idrntitv all thc rnorc intensclv bcc.ruscidcntitv as such is alu avsa littlc
,r.1" Jn urr"ra
largcl_vbasctl on r-ilifving gr()ul)s u ith othcr skin coloirrs) ()r in r.rs(,s\\lror(, no i<lt-ntitr'<irclers a u'hole suhjct'tivitv or fbrms.r sc(urc gr()urxl for all
outof reach
idcntitv gr()ups arc r-'ng.rgc<l in a politics ol'emancipalir>n(lcnrinisn-rlr.asunrlcr To put this in othcr terrnrs:hvbrirlitv thcorv thir-rksof iclcntin n()t as r
lfe_practices.
llrcssul'cto rcPrc'sent all nrc-nas serxists). trait sharcclacrossgr()ups,lrut as a Practitr's'hosc mcaning and el]i'ct
ma*er, a stable
ldcntit_vp<iliticstenclsto ovcrlook i<lt'r'rtitir:s
aroun<livhich livcs arc actr-rallr.
lii.c<1. m u l J t i n gr s i t s t o n l c x t t l r l n q c s '
i sc o n s t a n t l v
In everlclal lile , onc of tht- m,rrc inrl)ortant idcntitic.sthat in<liritlu.rlshlr.c 'hybriditv'? For variousrcasons.Lct's first takc up the conccpt's thcorisation
is But wh1.
lx,thc pairl u-ork that thev <lo.(This has l>ccnof mort inlt rcst to soci_
cle'terrninccl critic Homi Bhabha,u'ho camc to thc question of idcntitv
by the influcntial postcolonial
ologl than to cultural stuclies,in part becausc cultural stutlics h.rs ottcr trcrn tlrrough his intercst in colonialism. Bhabhaargued that'strbaltcrn' idcntities are rcgu)arlr'
drivcn bl the u-ill to politicisc idcntitics anclhas bccn rclativclv unintc.rc'stc<l
in articulated in tcrms that are not thcir ovr-n but are thosc of thc dominant laction.
c1uestir>ns paitl u ork. )
c otrccr-nit.tg (,subaltern' is a term uscd originalh ll Grarnsci but r.vhichno* usuallv rcft-rs to thost'
Whcn a political or social movrmcnt is grounclcclon iclerrtitr',thc tonlcnt o1'thc socialgroups n'ith the ieast pou'cr of all, cspeciallv colonised peoplcs.) Uncler crolo
'ide-r-rtitr''
tr-nrlst<il>cenrphasiscrlan<lthe inrport.rnr-c'olorganisationan(l l)ro(css nialism,subaltcrn identitr is not a pur-ctxprcssion ol'its ou,n distinct charactcr.Rather,
in achicr-ingpolitical entls is ncelcctc(l.This is lrccausci<le-ntitr'politicsarc oltcn the identity of subaltcrn troups is articulated in signif\'ing practices that imitate an<l
''displace
sirnullancr>uslv crirrccrnt'tlto incrcascthc intcnsitl of grouP soliclaritl arxl to lulfil concepts(or discourscs)that har.ebt-en artic:ulaterlLrvthe coloniscr. ln imitating
iclcntitics in idc'ntitr'politics arc ncithcr
clain'rsto rights. Ftrrthcrnlorc, l>t-causc anddeflectingdominant iclentitic'sancl<liscourses,so Bhabh.l'sargumcnt gocs, thc hvlrrid
n e r g o t i a b l ne ( ) r ( \ \ i t h i n I i m i t s , )a b l c t o b c t - x p a r - r r l ct <
olintlurlc thost'uho rlon't subalternsubvertsthe opprcssor outsidc anv lormal political struggle. Hvbridiscd idt--nti-
sharc thc iclcntitr',identitl politics t:an lapscinto riqirlitr anclcauscli.rgmcnt.rtion ties acquired by the dominated cause ambivalcnce. Ancl thel' call into clucstion the
to opt'ratc rl ithin.
of'the sharcrlgrountl that politrt s in ct'rtain t'onjunt:turcst'tcc<ls naturalness arrdlegitimacr, of hcgemonic idcntitics lsee Bh.rbha199,t).
This tcn<lcn<_iis most marked n he'nan iclcnlitv is ascribetl in tcrtrs o[ .rcultttrc,as Second,in a rathcr difl'crent account, hl'briclitv is a ustful concrcptlrecause- groups
n c u'ill sce in thc scction on mrrlticulturalisrr-r. urd individuals clo not har.c a single idcntitl but scvcral. In particular, as Stuart Hall
h i s t o r i c so r t r a < l i t i o n su h i c h . r n l ' . '
I r l c n t i t v p o l i t i c s t t : n d st o i n v c n t l c g i t i r r r a t i n q arguedin his w,orkon ethnicitr',thc tcrm 'black' in l3ritainpullcrl togc'thcrr rliou: r cr\'
(the n cornme rciallr cxpkritcd. l'trhaps national iclt'rrtiticsare the most different groups coming liom various placcs arouncl thc u.orlcl. And its hctcrogcncrtv
1>oliticallv )
o b v i o u si n s t a r r c co I t h i s , s i n c c ' i r r i c n t c c l t r a c l i t i o n . in
'h l r . ' b e . n t s p l r i a l l r s t r ( ) l ) q lentit power.It mcant lor instanccthat the 'black' idcntitv could not call upon m\ ths o1'
'invcntion' tart.rn 'rntl aPastto consolidatcitseil',anclthat it coulcl not easilvsettlc back into assumptionso1'
tht-.irc.asc. Tht- n-rostf'arnouserxarnplcis thc r>l'tht-'Scottish
sharedculture.This'differcnce in unitr'' <lcnrandcrla politics ol
k i l t a s a r r i m p o r t a n t s i g n i l i c r o fn a t i o n a li < { c n t i t r ' , f l r s t b E
r nglishtlothitrgtr'rttttlat- Droct'ssin r hich n hat
wasdifferent between mcmbcrs of
turcrs clurilg thc e'iglttct-pthcclltury an<lthgt b' SirWaltcr St.,tt's work on lrtrhall' one iclentit\, \\:asas inrportant as u'hat vras sharccl,
antl a n d w h i c hp r c v c n l c r l
, r l c u l t u r a l n a t i o n a l i s r nr l u r i n g t h c c a r l ' n i n c t t - r n t l rc c t ) t u l ' \ ( s tt H o h s b a nr r r a r r r k i r r , lo l r r r , , n , , l i 1 h i r ' , r l t u r , ' l r t , t o m i irtrsgo l r j c t l i v t ( 5 1u , u ' t
Hall 19921 It requirccl
t { a n g c r1 9 8 3 ) . ulliur-r..,s; antl cxchangesLrctw'ccndilie'rentgroups in situations
wherea politi..al
gr(,up \\ a\ li,rn,.d , rn it s lr.rsis.
to tr! arld tltt".on""pi*
l ) e r h a P s c u l t u r a l s t u r l i c s ' s t l ' o n g c s t a t t c l l t l ) t t o a < l < l r c s st h e s c ' P r o b l c n r s \ \ a s ,^^ hur" [-rc.-ncriticiseclbecausc,lirr all their ope]nncss,the.vrcnrarrr
tor* a iog;c an<1politics of opposition ir.ru.hich iclentitiesrcmain, at l>asc,
r r - t l - r i t ' r ki r l c n t i t r j n s u t h a u . t - r ' t l i . r 1 t h c c o n c ' c p t l o s l i 1 s r i g i r i i t r . - l ' h i s . r t r t ' n r | t lI:O "O.t
'hrlrrirli[ '
v a r i o u s l i r r r - r - r st,h r m . s t * i < 1 . 1 ' r l i s s c r ' i n a t c r l r l s h i c l r i , t l r l ' . a i " g , , t - 1 o l oni an,rth..r'ancl<letcrnrining o1'social action. Thus, in thc rvorclsot
f:|""t-!()-
'u'itics -li ) 1" ttt"" h1'britlitr''aluavs reitcratcs ancl rcinlbrccs thc clvnamicsot thc s.rmc
[ u t a r - r < l t h girs * f i a t S t t r a r t H a l ] r . a l l c r l i' <lillir'e.cc' (l lall l9ii7, 1$b:rrtYoung,
t)r conllictual
c a s q s , i t l c n t i t y i s c 6 n t , < . i y q t lr r 6 1 a s e f i x e t l t n a r k c r l x t t i n 1 t ' r t l l s o l t h c l l r o t c s s c s "aon,r-t
u l r < r : t .t r . n s i ' n sa r r , ld i r i s i . n : i l r ( ( . l l J (t r i , r i t . , , r r n a r r t i t l r . . t i t l l
thcsc (Young I 99 5, 27) Thc conCr:ptol hvlrrirlit-r.<loc'snor n'rovesulllcicntlr,
thcon'
P t - r l i > r r r l a n c . c sl } $hit.h iclClrtities arc lirrntcrl. Acc'orcling to this tilli*' Past
( ()llstallt I r L l t Jtiolr this critiqu('is rather rc.nr.r'ecltl-om c.vcrrr[.rr'lifi'nl.rcrt'somucl.r
t h t ' r n c a n i n q a n < ll i r r c c o l . t l l i t l < ' r t t i t i e s . r r c i n q ordered
;":::itypolitics.-But
l)r()( csscsart.cr>ntinual: ' r l ' cl l o t b/v '.'\,,!rL,L).
i . r ^ ^ , ; . ; . . . rt
r . sccnlsto bc nraking a thcorclical anrl utopian rathcr than a
( a l t h e u g h t h c - r ' s 6 n t e t i p t c s c h . 1 ' r g c n r 6 r c s l p y l - t t l t . i r t a t g t h c r 1 i 1 ' r c s ) .l t l t ' t l t i t i c s Dtam^ ,
cnter
havc to ,F**tpo,'n,
j u s t g i r t ' n , r r . t . h , r s . ' t r , t l r t ' r 6 a r c t . l r t ' t ' t r l < t t ' < 1 ,l r t r f t 6 i s t l r c . r t l st h a t t h c - l
r50 t5l
IDENTITY
1 cxist in socictv u'ithout a proper name, u'ithout being locatcd u.ithin ,h"
idcntitr'-granting institutions into *hich one is born: familv or [1n grrrrp, pation,
I
,"; ;;
t52 153