Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
School of Civil Engineering, Laboratory of Reinforced Concrete, National Technical University of Athens, Iroon Polytechniou 5, 157 73 Zografou, Greece
Department of Civil Engineering, Materials Laboratory, Frederick University, 7 Y. Frederickou Str., 1036 Nicosia, Cyprus
c
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Cyprus, 75 Kallipoleos Str., P.O. Box 20537, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
b
h i g h l i g h t s
" Reproducibility of similar mixtures is possible between different laboratories.
" Open porosity and sorptivity appear to be slightly sensitive to local materials.
" Different local materials appear to have a low impact on chloride penetrability.
" Water-to-binder ratio correlates well with all mechanical and durability properties.
" Higher silica fume percentages improve all mechanical and durability properties.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 10 April 2012
Received in revised form 17 September 2012
Accepted 25 September 2012
Available online 5 December 2012
Keywords:
Self-compacting concrete
Reproducibility
Durability
Chloride penetrability
Porosity
Sorptivity
a b s t r a c t
The present study intends to evaluate the sensitivity of self-compacting concrete (SCC) mixtures, cast in
two different laboratories of the European Union, with a focus on rheological parameters, mechanical
characteristics and durability properties. Six SCC mixtures with different water-to-binder ratios and silica
fume levels of cement replacement and two normally vibrated concrete (NVC) mixtures have been compared. It has been found that the reproducibility of similar mixtures is possible, when using different constituent materials that conform to the European Standards. Comparable rheological, mechanical and
durability properties can be achieved. Open porosity and sorptivity appear to be more sensitive than
chloride penetrability.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Self-compacting concrete (SCC) robustness can be dened as
the ability of the material to maintain its fresh properties regardless of some small changes in the contents of its mixture ingredients [1].
Due to its complex mix design, the incorporation of supplementary cementitious materials and higher dosage of chemical admixtures, SCC may be more prone to variations of its behaviour than
ordinary normally vibrated concrete (NVC).
Corresponding author. Tel.: +30 210 772 1210, mobile: +30 6947 61 62 47.
E-mail addresses: gskas@teemail.gr (I.P. Skas), eng.ak@frederick.ac.cy (A.
Kanellopoulos), ctrezos@central.ntua.gr (K.G. Trezos), petrou@ucy.ac.cy (M.F.
Petrou).
0950-0618/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.100
208
mixtures have been designed using three different water-to-binder (w/b) ratios,
i.e. 0.45, 0.50 and 0.60, while the rest three mixtures had a common w/b ratio of
0.50, but they were designed with varying silica fume level of cement replacement,
i.e. 7%, 15% and 20% substitution of cement by volume. The two NVC mixtures of
each laboratory were designed according to typical conditions in each country
and they represent two different slump categories (S1, S4/S5). Tables 4 and 5 summarize the mixture proportions for all concrete mixtures for the two laboratories.
The aim of the mixture design between the two laboratories included same strength
class mixtures with similar rheological characteristics, in order to further compare
their durability properties.
The cement content has been uniformly selected as 350 kg/m3 for all SCC mixtures in both laboratories. Hereby, it should be pointed out that the scope of the research has been the comparison of the SCC mixtures, while the NVC mixtures have
been mainly cast in order to have a typical measure, separately for each country.
Thus, the NVC mixtures were designed on the basis of typical compositions that
are being used in the two different countries and are not directly comparable to
each other. Specically, the cement content was 400 kg/m3 for UCY and 360 kg/
m3 for NTUA mixtures, while water-to-binder ratios reached 0.50 and 0.56,
respectively.
The aggregate distribution for the control compositions has been designed, in
order to reach comparable mixture grading curves. It should be noted that the total
aggregate content of all SCC mixtures has been kept constant (15501570 kg/m3),
while the corresponding aggregate content of NVC mixtures has been designed
according to the local typical compositions of each country (1625 kg/m3 and
1800 kg/m3 for UCY and NTUA NVC mixtures, respectively). The nal grading curves
are presented in Fig. 2 for both SCC and NVC mixtures of each laboratory. It should
be noted that UCY mixtures present a ner grading for particle sizes below 2 mm
and a coarser grading for particle sizes above 2 mm. The difference between the
two laboratories in the 0.1251.0 mm area is considered to be small and it is not
expected to signicantly affect the porosity and the pore size distribution. The major difference in the aggregate properties of the two laboratories is the absorption
(see Table 2). Specically, the absorption values of UCY aggregates (up to 4.5%)
are considerably higher than the corresponding values of NTUA aggregates. This
may affect the porosity and the pore size distribution, and it is depicted in the
experimental durability results.
Limestone powder has been incorporated to all SCC mixtures in both laboratories. The powder content has been uniformly set to 175 kg/m3 for all SCC mixtures
and it is not included in the mixture grading curves.
3. Experimental procedures
UCY
NTUA
SiO2 (%)
Density (tn/m3)
Specic surface (BET)
Grading
<200 lm
<90 lm
<63 lm
95
2.20
2030
96
2.20
24.2
66%
19%
6%
90%
75%
65%
209
Symbol
Fine sand
Sand
Fine gravel
Medium Gravel
fs
s
g1
g2
UCY
NTUA
UCY
NTUA
2.76
2.80
2.70
2.70
2.66
2.66
2.65
2.0
0.6
4.5
4.0
0.9
1.1
1.0
Table 3
Physical properties of ne limestone powder.
Property
UCY
NTUA
CaCO3 purity
Fineness
<18 lm
<2 lm
Specic gravity
96%
97.6%
96%
7%
2.8 g/cm3
97%
15%
2.7 g/cm3
Table 4
Mixture proportions in kg/m3 (UCY).
Description
Cement
Water
Limestone powder
Silica fume
Medium gravel 8/20
Small gravel 4/10
Sand 0/4
Fine sand 0/2
pce Superplasticizer
pn Superplasticizer
c
w
lp
sf
g2
g1
s
fs
pce
pn
Water/binder ratio
Total mass
w/b
W
SCC1
SCC2
SCC3
SCC4
SCC5
SCC6
NVC1
NVC2
350
210
175
350
175
175
350
157
175
491
280
500
300
13.0
301
175
175
49
491
280
500
300
9.3
400
200
491
280
500
300
7.2
313
175
175
37
491
280
500
300
8.0
400
200
491
280
500
300
6.1
333
175
175
17
491
280
500
300
8.0
110
560
275
680
110
560
275
680
0.60
2312
0.50
2278
0.45
2266
0.50
2279
0.50
2279
0.50
2280
0.50
2225
6.4
0.50
2231
Table 5
Mixture proportions in kg/m3 (NTUA).
Description
Cement
Water
Limestone powder
Silica fume
Medium gravel 8/20
Small gravel 4/8
Sand 0/4
Fine sand 0/2
pce Superplasticizer
pn Superplasticizer
c
w
lp
sf
g2
g1
s
fs
pce
pn
Water/binder ratio
Total mass
w/b
W
SCC1
SCC2
SCC3
SCC4
SCC5
SCC6
NVC1
NVC2
350
210
175
350
175
175
350
157
175
350
150
1050
301
175
175
49
350
150
1050
360
200
350
150
1050
313
175
175
37
350
150
1050
360
200
350
150
1050
333
175
175
17
350
150
1050
495
225
1080
495
225
1080
3.4
6.1
10.8
4.5
6.8
7.3
0.60
2288
0.50
2256
0.45
2243
0.50
2255
0.50
2257
0.50
2257
2.2
0.56
2360
0.56
2362
210
13670:2009 [14], as well as in the European Guidelines for SelfCompacting Concrete [4] for NVC and SCC mixtures, respectively.
More specically, SCC moulds were not mechanically consolidated
during casting and were lled with sequential pours of SCC using a
scoop. NVC moulds were lled on an electric motor vibrating table
in two layers, each being followed by adequate mechanical vibration (about 12 s each). In total, ve standard cube moulds
(100 100 100 mm), one standard prism (cross section
100 100 mm, length L = 500 mm) and one standard cylindrical
mould (diameter D = 100, height H = 200 mm) have been cast and
treated for each different mixture produced in each laboratory
for the purpose of the present study. Specically, for each mixture
and each laboratory, four out of the ve cube specimens were used
for the determination of the compressive strength, while the other
cube specimen was used for the successive estimation of the open
porosity and the sorptivity. Considering that both the open porosity and the sorptivity testing procedures require the desiccation of
the specimen and that the rst method concerns only weight measurements, which not further afict the specimen, the same cube
has been used in order to limit any possible uncertainties due to
material intrinsic deviations. Thus, the results comparison and correlation is more applicable. Standard segments (diameter D = 100,
height H = 50 mm) extracted by the middle zone of each cylindrical
specimen were used for the determination of the chloride
penetrability.
The test specimens in each laboratory were left to set for 20 h
after casting and then they were demoulded and received the same
treatment. All concrete specimens were cured in a water tank (tap
water), with a water temperature of 20 C 2 C, as described by
EN 12390-2:2009 [13], until the age of testing (28 days).
3.4. Hardened concrete testing
At the end of the curing period, the specimens were removed
from the water tank and were tested for the evaluation of their
mechanical and durability properties. For the comparison of the
hardened concrete, between the two laboratories, the following
tests have been carried out.
3.4.1. Mechanical properties
From each concrete mixture, four out of the ve standard cubes
(100 100 100 mm) were used to determine conventional compressive strength, fcc (N/mm2), according to EN 12390-3:2009 [15].
All cubic specimens were tested on a servo hydraulic compression
frame that conforms to EN 12390-4:2009 [16]. In addition, the
prismatic
mould
(cross
section
100 100 mm,
length
L = 500 mm) was used for the determination of exural strength,
f (N/mm2), as described by EN 12390-5:2009 [17]. It is also worth
mentioning that in UCY the prismatic specimens were tested in
3.4.2.2. Sorptivity. Placing one of cube specimens surface in a marginal contact with water, sorptivity has been estimated as described by RILEM TC 116-PCD [19], which constitutes specimen
weight change due to water uptake (capillary absorption). In total,
16 recordings have been made for each specimen in predened
intervals. The test duration has been set to 4 h.
3.4.2.3. Chloride penetrability. The chloride penetrability of concrete
mixtures has been determined using two different methods, ASTM
C1202-09 [20] and NordTest Build 492 [21], for UCY and NTUA,
respectively.
ASTM C1202-09 [20], also known as Rapid Chloride Permeability Test (RCPT), is a qualitative method which includes the laboratory evaluation of the electrical conductance of concrete specimens
in order to provide a rapid indication of their resistance to the penetration of chloride ions. As it has been found, the total electric
charge, Q (C: Coulomb), passing through a conventionally sized
concrete specimen under a 60 V dc potential difference across its
ends for a 6-h period, is related to the chloride ion resistivity of
the material, according to Table 6. It should be pointed out that
the cathode solution is set to 3% sodium chloride (NaCl) by mass,
while the anode solution is set to 0.3 N sodium hydroxide (NaOH).
One segment (diameter D = 100, height H = 50 mm) extracted by
the middle zone of a standard cylindrical specimen (diameter
D = 100, height H = 200 mm) has been tested for each SCC and
NVC mixture produced in UCY.
On the other hand, NordTest Build 492 [21] is a quantitative
method which determines the chloride migration coefcient of
concrete specimens, using a non-steady-state migration experiment. One segment (diameter D = 100, height H = 50 mm) extracted by the middle zone of a conventional 100 mm 200 mm
cylindrical specimen is maintained under a potential difference
varying from 10 to 60 V dc (usually in between 10 and 30 V dc)
for a period ranging from 6 to 96 h (usually 24 h). In this case
the cathode solution is set to 10% sodium chloride (NaCl) by mass,
while the anode solution is set similarly to the rst method to 0.3 N
sodium hydroxide (NaOH). The obtained chloride migration coefcient, Dnssm (10 12 m/s2), is a measure of the resistance of the
tested material to chloride penetration. One concrete segment
has been tested for each SCC and NVC mixture produced in NTUA.
For the determination of the chloride penetration depth a colorimetric method is being used, the chemical mechanism of which
can be found in literature [2224]. The tested specimen is axially
split into two pieces and one of the two fractured surfaces is
sprayed with a 0.1 M silver nitrate (AgNO3) solution. The depth
of chloride penetration is determined from the colour change in
the area where the presence of chlorides chemically leads to the
formation of silver chloride. As it is stated in Gjrv [25], Nilsson
et al. [26] has additionally proposed a ranking of concrete resistance to chloride penetration in proportion to the chloride diffusivity, as shown in Table 7.
211
Table 6
Chloride ion penetrability based on charge passed (according to [20]).
Charge passed Q (C)
>4000
20004000
10002000
1001000
<100
High
Moderate
Low
Very low
Negligible
Table 7
Resistance to chloride penetration based on the 28-day chloride diffusivity
(according to [26]).
Chloride diffusivity Dnssm
(10 12 m2/s)
Resistance to chloride
penetration
>15
1015
510
2.55
<2.5
Low
Moderate
High
Very high
Extremely high
Table 8
Fresh properties and classication (UCY).
Description
Symbol
Slump
Slump class
Slump-ow
Slump-ow class
Slump-ow time
Viscosity class
V-funnel ow time
V-funnel ow time 5 min
V-funnel viscosity class
L-box ratio
L-box
Fresh visual stability index
S (mm)
SF (mm)
t500 (s)
tv (s)
tv 5 min (s)
PA ()
FVSI
SCC1
SCC2
SCC3
SCC4
SCC5
SCC6
770
SF3
1.0
VS1
2.6
5.0
VF1
1.00
PL2
0
782
SF3
2.2
VS2
8.0
9.5
VF1
0.97
PL2
0
735
SF2
1.8
VS1
23.0
38.0
VF2
0.98
PL2
0
783
SF3
1.8
VS1
7.8
9.9
VF1
0.96
PL2
0
725
SF2
2.0
VS2
7.7
10.6
VF1
0.94
PL2
0
788
SF3
2.0
VS2
8.1
11.0
VF2
0.97
PL2
0
SCC1
SCC2
SCC3
SCC4
SCC5
SCC6
NVC1
NVC2
49
S2
200
S4
NVC1
NVC2
55
S2
270
>S5
680
SF2
Table 9
Fresh properties and classication (NTUA).
Description
Symbol
Slump
Slump class
Slump-ow
Slump-ow class
Slump-ow time
Viscosity class
V-funnel ow time
V-funnel ow time 5 min
V-funnel viscosity class
L-box ratio
L-box
Fresh visual stability index
S (mm)
SF (mm)
t500 (s)
tv (s)
tv 5 min (s)
PA ()
FVSI
810
SF3
1.0
VS1
1.5
1.8
VF1
1.00
PL2
0
770
SF3
2.0
VS2
7.3
7.5
VF1
1.00
PL2
0
595
SF1
2.1
VS2
25.0
37.7
VF2
n/aa
n/aa
0
740
SF2
0.8
VS1
3.6
4.4
VF1
0.95
PL2
0
750
SF2
1.0
VS1
4.1
5.0
VF1
0.94
PL2
0
830
SF3
1.4
VS1
2.5
2.9
VF1
1.00
PL2
1
212
The Fresh Visual Stability Indices, FVSI, for all SCC mixtures ranged from 0 to 1, ensuring high stability and no evidence of considerable segregation or bleeding.
4.2. Mechanical properties
4.2.1. Individual property analysis
The compressive and exural strengths for all concrete mixtures of the two laboratories are presented in Tables 10 and 11.
The coefcient of determination values, based on a linear correlation of the different mechanical and durability properties, are presented in Table 12. The coefcient of determination values above
the diagonal correspond to the UCY properties and below the diagonal to NTUA properties. The diagonal values correspond to correlations between properties of the two laboratories. Coefcient of
determination values determined after excluding some property
values are listed below the ones determined based on all property
values.
The compressive strengths, fcc (N/mm2), presented in Tables 10
and 11 are average values of four specimens. Based on the standard
deviation reported in the same tables, the average coefcient of
variation (standard deviation/mean value) is very low, and it is
2.6% for UCY mixtures and 3.1% for NTUA mixtures.
Mixtures SCC1, SCC2 and SCC3 have a varying water-to-binder
ratio (w/b = 0.60, 0.50 and 0.45) and have no silica fume content.
Results from both laboratories, UCY and NTUA, show (see Tables
10 and 11) a resembling decrease of the compressive strength with
the increase of w/b. In the case of UCY the lower coefcient of
determination compared to NTUA (0.77 vs. 0.93, see Table 12) is
caused by mixture SCC3 (w/b = 0.45), which developed a lowerthan-expected compressive strength compared with the strength
values developed by mixtures with w/b = 0.50. On the other hand,
the exural strength, f (N/mm2), is decreasing more steeply for
NTUA mixtures, but this could be explained by the especially high
exural strength value of UCY SCC1 (w/b = 0.60), which is about
12.5% of the corresponding compressive strength.
Mixtures SCC2, SCC4, SCC5 and SCC6 have a common waterto-binder ratio (w/b = 0.50), while their silica fume level varies
from 0 to 20%, respectively. As it can be seen in Tables 10 and 12
the increase of compressive strength is very similar for both UCY
and NTUA mixtures, presenting only a minor difference in the rate
of increase, which is due to the greater deviation of values at the
edge points (0% and 20% silica fume by binder volume). The absence of silica fume (sf = 0%) leads to a compressive strength of
63.4 and 66.0 N/mm2 for UCY and NTUA, respectively, whereas
the mixtures including the highest silica fume level of replacement
(sf = 20%) develop a compressive strength of 78.2 and 75.3 N/mm2
for UCY and NTUA, respectively. The coefcients of determination
are excellent for both cases (R2 = 0.980.99). For the case of exural
Table 10
Mechanical properties (UCY).
Description
Symbol
SCC1
SCC2
SCC3
SCC4
SCC5
SCC6
NVC1
NVC2
Compressive strength
Flexural strength
fcc (N/mm2)
f (N/mm2)
44.3 (2.1a)
5.5
63.4 (2.0)
6.1
60.2 (1.6)
7.4
70.1 (1.8)
6.0
75.4 (1.2)
6.9
78.2 (1.7)
6.7
56.1 (1.2)
6.0
64.4 (1.1)
6.5
SCC1
SCC2
SCC3
SCC4
SCC5
SCC6
NVC1
NVC2
66.0 (1.2)
6.7
76.5 (2.3)
8.4
70.3 (2.0)
6.8
74.1 (1.6)
4.8
75.3 (2.6)
6.0
54.1 (1.4)
5.7
62.6 (1.3)
6.7
Table 11
Mechanical properties (NTUA).
Description
Compressive strength
Flexural strength
a
Symbol
2
fcc (N/mm )
f (N/mm2)
49.5 (3.4 )
3.5
213
Table 12
Coefcients of determination (R2) for the correlations between measured properties.
214
f/fcc. As it can be extracted from this gure, the pairs for both cases
of SCC1 (w/b = 0.60 for sf = 0%) and SCC5 (sf = 15%, w/b = 0.50) are
far remote than it was expected. For the rst case of SCC1 this
could be explained by a combination of opposite radical values between the two laboratories. For UCY the normalized exural
strength reaches 12.4%, while for NTUA the corresponding percentage is 7.1%. As far as SCC5 is concerned, this mixture seems to develop a reasonable normalized exural strength value for the case
of UCY, which is close to the similar mixtures containing silica
fume. This was expected due to the fact that the silica fume level
does not seem to be affecting the exural strength, as it was explained previously. On the other hand, for the case of NTUA, the
normalized exural strength of SCC5 seems to develop an unexpectedly low value (6.5%). Conclusively, by excluding the peak values 6.5% for SCC5 [NTUA] and 12.4% for SCC1 [UCY], the correlation
of all other SCC mixtures lead to a linear regression with a coefcient of determination resulted that equals R2 = 0.62. It should be
noted that the exural strength in the case of NTUA was measured
in a four-point bending test instead of the three-point bending test
utilized in UCY.
4.3. Durability properties
4.3.1. Individual property analysis
Three durability properties (open porosity, sorptivity and electric charge) of the concrete mixtures produced in both laboratories
are presented and evaluated in Tables 1214. The non-steady state
migration coefcient, Dnssm (10 12 m/s2), will be commented on
for NTUA mixtures and the electric charge, Q (C), will be discussed
for the case of UCY.
The open porosity, p (%), is compared for SCC mixtures between
the two laboratories. A clear increase of the porosity is observed as
the water-to-binder ratio is increased. The rate of the increase is
higher for NTUA mixtures and values seem to converge for higher
Table 13
Durability properties (UCY).
Description
Symbol
SCC1
SCC2
SCC3
SCC4
SCC5
SCC6
NVC1
NVC2
Open porosity
Sorptivity
Electric charge
p (%)
i (mm/min1/2)
Q (C)
19.0
0.088
6373
18.0
0.079
4235
17.0
0.075
4195
16.0
0.072
1862
14.5
0.069
897
13.5
0.064
710
20.5
0.147
4932
20.0
0.131
5181
Table 14
Durability properties (NTUA).
Description
Symbol
SCC1
SCC2
SCC3
SCC4
SCC5
SCC6
NVC1
NVC2
Open porosity
Sorptivity
Non-steady state migration coefcient
p (%)
i (mm/min1/2)
Dnssm (10 12 m2/s)
18.5
0.147
29.86
15.5
0.063
19.22
13.5
0.050
18.23
16.0
0.081
11.92
17.0
0.065
7.33
12.5
0.068
5.18
17.0
0.150
15.76
17.5
0.122
16.52
215
Acknowledgements
The work conducted at UCY was supported by the University of
Cyprus Internal Grant for Large Scale Multi-Disciplinary projects.
The raw materials for the production of the concrete mixtures at
NTUA have been provided by BASF Hellas, Dionyssomarble Group
and Interbeton Building Materials S.A.
References
[1] ACBM. The Center for Advanced Cement Based Materials White Paper: selfconsolidating concrete. In: Lange DA, editor. Northwestern University: The
Center of Advanced Cement Based Materials; 2007.
[2] EN 206. Concrete part 1: specication, performance, production and
conformity (EN 2061); 2000.
[3] EN 206. Concrete part 9: additional rules for self-compacting concrete (SCC)
(FprEN 2069); 2010.
[4] BIBM, CEMBUREAU, ERMCO, EFCA, EFNARC. The European Guidelines for SelfCompact Concrete Specication, Production and Use; 2005. <http://
www.efca.info> or <http://www.efnarc.org>.
[5] EN 12350. Testing fresh concrete part 2: slump test (EN 12350-2); 2009.
[6] EN 12350. Testing fresh concrete part 8: self-compacting concrete slumpow test (EN 12350-8); 2010.
[7] EN 12350. Testing fresh concrete part 9: self-compacting concrete V-funnel
test (EN 12350-9); 2010.
216
[8] EN 12350. Testing fresh concrete part 10: self-compacting concrete L-box
test (EN 12350-10); 2010.
[9] EN 197. Cement part 1: composition, specications and conformity criteria
for common cements; 2000.
[10] EN 1097. Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates part 6:
determination of particle density and water absorption (EN 1097-6); 2000.
[11] EN 934. Admixtures for concrete, mortar and grout part 2: concrete
admixtures. Denitions, requirements, conformity, marking and labelling (EN
934-2); 2009.
[12] ASTM C1611. Standard test method for slump ow of self-consolidating
concrete. Annual book of ASTM Standards 2007. Section 04. V04.02: Concrete
and aggregates; 2007.
[13] EN 12390. Testing hardened concrete part 2: making and curing specimens
for strength tests (EN 12390-2); 2009.
[14] EN 13670. Execution of concrete structures; 2009.
[15] EN 12390. Testing hardened concrete part 3: compressive strength of test
specimens (EN 12390-3); 2009.
[16] EN 12390. Testing hardened concrete part 4: compressive strength.
Specication for testing machines (EN 12390-4); 2009.
[17] EN 12390. Testing hardened concrete part 5: exural strength of test
specimens (EN 12390-5); 2009.
[18] ASTM C642. Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in
hardened concrete; 1997.