Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
Ker is a fermented milk that is produced by adding Ker grains, consisting of bacteria and yeasts, to milk. The aim of this study
was to determine the microbial population at different stages of traditional Ker production and Ker grain mass cultivation. Seven
different selective growth media, morphological and biochemical characteristics were used for the isolation and identication of the
microbes. The microbial numbers during Ker production varied between 4.6 103 and 2.6 108. A Zygosaccharomyces sp. was
isolated from traditional Ker grains and after the culturing conditions applied during the mass cultivation Candida lambica and C.
krusei were present. Although these two species are present in other fermented milks, this study is the rst to report their presence in
Ker. Species of Leuconostoc, Lactococcus, Lactobacillus and Cryptococcus were isolated from traditional grains. Lactobacillus
plantarum was present in the mass cultivated grains, but not in the traditional Ker grains.
r 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Ker grains; Mass cultivation; Lactic acid bacteria; Yeasts
1. Introduction
Ker is a fermented milk beverage that originated in
Eastern Europe. The starter culture used to produce this
beverage is an irregularly shaped, gelatinous white/
yellow grain (Guzel-Seydim, Seydim, & Greene, 2000).
These Ker grains have a varying and complex
microbial composition that includes species of yeasts,
lactic acid bacteria (LAB), acetic acid bacteria (AAB),
and mycelial fungi.
Ker is produced by the diverse spectrum of microbial
species present. Lactobacilli are present as the largest
portion (6580%) of the microbial population (Wouters, Ayad, Hugenholtz, & Smit, 2002), with lactococci
and yeasts making up the remaining portion of the
microbes present in the Ker grain. The population
Corresponding author. Tel.: +27 21 808 3654;
fax: +27 21 808 3510.
E-mail address: rcwit@sun.ac.za (R.C. Witthuhn).
0958-6946/$ - see front matter r 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.idairyj.2004.07.016
ARTICLE IN PRESS
384
ARTICLE IN PRESS
R.C. Witthuhn et al. / International Dairy Journal 15 (2005) 383389
385
Table 1
The enumeration values (cfu g 1) from traditionally produced and mass cultured Ker grains at different time intervals
Medium
3 d activation
20 d traditional
production
25 d traditional
production
30 d traditional
production
10 d mass
culturing
30 d traditional
production after
mass culturing
MRS
KCA+TTC
KCA+V
APM
YELN
Pal-P
MEA
YEC
2.0 108
2.1 108
1.2 104
2.6 108
2.1 108
4.6 103
NDa
0
1.2 107
1.2 107
1.6 106
1.4 107
2.6 105
NDa
1.8 105
4.3 104
1.7 107
3.5 106
1.1 106
3.2 106
1.6 105
NDa
1.4 104
1.6 104
1.6 107
3.1 106
1.2 106
2.2 106
1.0 105
NDa
1.1 104
9.0 104
1.8 107
1.6 108
1.3 106
4.0 107
1.8 108
2.4 104
NDa
8.2 107
7.6 106
3.1 107
8.0 106
1.4 107
1.8 105
2.0 102
NDa
1.2 104
ARTICLE IN PRESS
R.C. Witthuhn et al. / International Dairy Journal 15 (2005) 383389
386
Table 2
Identication of the isolates present in Ker grains after 3 d of activation and 20, 25 and 30 d of traditional Ker production
Isolate numbera
Identication
3 d activation
L1 1MS
L1 2MS
L1 1KT
L1 3YL
L1 1P
L1 2A
L1 2KT
L1 3KV
MF
Lactobacillus fermentum
Lactococcus lactis subsp.
Lactococcus lactis subsp.
Lactococcus lactis subsp.
Lactococcus lactis subsp.
Lactococcus lactis subsp.
Lactobacillus brevis 3
Lactobacillus brevis 3
Geotrichum candidum
20 d
L1 1MS
L1 1KV
L1 1KT
L1 2KV
Y1 1MA
Y1 1YC
Y1 3MA
Y1 2YC
Isolation medium
Identication (%)
MRS
MRS
KCA+TTC
YELN
Pal-P
APM
KCA+TTC
KCA+V
86.2
89.2
89.2
89.2
89.2
89.2
98.4
82.6
MRS
KCA+V
KCA+TTC
KCA+V
MEA
YEC
MEA
YEC
83.7
83.7
77.5
93.3
97.4
92.7
92.5
86.5
25 d
L2 2KT
L2 1KV
L2 2KV
L2 3MS
L2 4KV
Y2 2YC
Y2 1YL
KCA+TTC
KCA+V
KCA+V
MRS
KCA+V
YEC
YELN
83.7
83.7
83.7
45.9
48.9
97.3
92.7
30 d
L3 2KV
L3 1KV
L3 3MS
Y3 2YC
Y3 3YC
Y3 1MA
KCA+V
KCA+V
MRS
YEC
YEC
MEA
83.7
83.7
49.8
86.5
92.7
86.5
lactis
lactis
lactis
lactis
lactis
1
1
1
1
1
a
Isolate number: First two characterssample number; third characterisolated colony number; and last two charactersisolation medium
(MS=MRS-medium, KT=KCA+TTC-medium, KV=KCA+V-medium, A=APM-medium, YL=YELN-medium, P=Pal-P-medium,
YC=YEC-medium, and MA=MEA-medium).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
R.C. Witthuhn et al. / International Dairy Journal 15 (2005) 383389
importance of taking media selectivity into consideration when conclusions are made on the identity of
microbes solely on enumeration values, without any
further identication.
No yeasts were isolated from any of the Ker grains
that were actived for 3 d. Similarly, in studies on
commercial Ker it was reported that a small number
or no yeasts may be present in the Ker grains (Barnett,
Payne, & Yarrow, 1983). It may be that the yeasts have
not been introduced to the Ker grains at this early
stage (activation) or that, if they were present, they
might have been present in too low concentrations to be
isolated using plating procedures combined with the
Harrison disc method (Harrigan & McCance, 1976) for
the selection of the colonies.
Many factors that play an important role in establishing the unique microbial population of Ker grains
including the origin of Ker grains, how the grains are
handled, the type of milk used and the method by which
Ker is produced (Oberman & Libudzisz, 1998). In this
study it was also found that although initial growth of
certain colonies was observed on the media used for
microbial isolation, these colonies did not grow when
they were streaked out to obtain pure cultures. It could
be possible that these colonies, although present in the
grains, are not viable outside the rather complex Ker
grain environment.
The microbial species isolated after 10 d of mass
cultivation and these present after 30 d of Ker
production are depicted in Table 3. A mycelial fungus,
G. candidum, was also isolated after 3 d of activation
387
Table 3
Identication of the isolates present in Ker grains after 10 d of mass cultivation, followed by 30 d of traditional Ker production
Isolate numbera
Identication
Isolation medium
Identication (%)
10 d mass cultivation
L1 1MS
L1 2KT
L1 1KV
L1 3P
L1 1YC
Y1 1A
Y1 1YC
MF
Lactobacillus plantarum
Lactobacillus plantarum
Lactobacillus plantarum
Lactobacillus plantarum
Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis 1
Candida lambica
Candida krusei
Geotrichum candidum
MRS
MRS
KCA+V
Pal-P
YEC
APM
YEC
99.9
99.9
99.9
99.9
89.2
96.3
98.3
KCA+TTC
KCA+TTC
KCA+V
KCA+TTC
Pal-P
MRS
APM
YEC
YEC
86.2
86.2
78.4
78.4
93.1
93.1
99.7
99.7
99.9
Isolate number: First two characterssample number; third characterisolated colony number; and last two charactersisolation medium
(MS=MRS-medium, KT=KCA+TTC-medium, KV=KCA+V-medium, A=APM-medium, P=Pal-P-medium and YC=YEC-medium).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
R.C. Witthuhn et al. / International Dairy Journal 15 (2005) 383389
388
4. Conclusions
Leuconostoc mesenteroides
subsp. mesenteroides
(26.9%)
Lactobacillus fermentum
(98.2%)
Lactobacillus fermentum
(80.5%)
Lactococcus lactis
subsp. lactis
(32.4%)
Cryptococcus
humicolus
(4.0%)
Lactococcus lactis
subsp. lactis
(15.3%)
Zygosaccharomyces sp.
(40.4%)
(A)
Cryptococcus
humicolus
(1.6%)
(B)
(C)
Leuconostoc mesenteroides
subsp. cremoris
(34.2%)
Lactobacillus plantarum
(48.1%)
Lactococcus lactis
subsp. lactis
(81.4%)
Candida kefyr
(8.9%)
Candida lambica
(10.5%)
Candida krusei
(3.15%)
Lactobacillus fermentum
(18.6%)
(D)
Lactobacillus
fermentum
(21.1%)
Lactococcus lactis
subsp. lactis
(48.7%)
(E)
Lactocbacillus delbrueckii
subsp. delbrueckii
(35.8%)
(F)
Fig. 1. The average distribution frequency of the prevalent microbial population (Harrigan & McCance, 1976) of Ker grains on Aday 20, Bday
25 and Cday 30 of traditional Ker production; and after D3 d of activation, E10 d of mass cultivation, followed by F30 d of traditional Ker
production. Strains present in the Ker grains at a frequency of less than 1.0% were excluded.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
R.C. Witthuhn et al. / International Dairy Journal 15 (2005) 383389
Acknowledgements
The National Research Foundation (NRF), South
Africa and the University of Stellenbosch are thanked
for nancial support of this study.
References
Angulo, L., Lopez, E., & Lema, C. (1993). Microora present in ker
grains of the Galician region (north-west of Spain). Journal of
Dairy Research, 60, 263267.
Assadi, M. M., Pourahmad, R., & Moazami, N. (2000). Use of isolated
ker starter cultures in ker production. World Journal of
Microbiology and Biotechnology, 16, 541543.
Barnett, J. A., Payne, R. W., & Yarrow, D. (1983). Yeasts:
characteristics and identification. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Benkerroum, N., Misbah, M., Sandine, W. E., & Tandaoui, E. A.
(1993). Development and use of a selective medium for the
isolation of Leuconostoc spp. from vegetables and dairy products.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 59, 607609.
Cogan, T. M., Barbosa, M., Beuvier, E., Bianchi-Salvadore, B.,
Cocconcelli, P. S., Fernandes, I., Gomez, J., Gomez, R.,
Kalantzopoulos, G., Ledda, A., Medina, M., Rea, M. C., &
Rodriguez, E. (1997). Characterization of lactic acid bacteria in
artisanal dairy products. Journal of Dairy Research, 64, 409421.
DSMZ (2001). Acetobacter peroxydans medium: medium 254. Deutsche
Sammlung von mikroorganismen und Zelkulturen GmBH. Germany:
Braunschweig.
Fujisawa, T., Adachi, S., Toba, T., Arihara, K., & Mitsuoko, T.
(1988). Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens sp. nov. isolated from ker
grains. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 38, 1214.
Garrote, G. L., Abraham, A. G., & De Antoni, G. L. (1997).
Preservation of ker grains, a comparative study. LebensmittelWissenschaft und Technologie, 30, 7784.
Guzel-Seydim, Z., Seydim, A. C., & Greene, A. K. (2000). Organic
acids and volatile avor components evolved during refrigerated
storage of ker. Journal of Dairy Science, 83, 275277.
Harrigan, W. F., & McCance, M. E. (1976). Laboratory methods in
food and dairy microbiology. London: Academic Press.
389