Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Mobile network operators (MNOs) have publicly supported being able to merge with other businesses in the
same country. Scale is critical if MNOs are to compete for 4G licences and roll out networks and services in line
with those of their competitors. At the same time, operators are under pressure to reduce costs in order to
address the margin impact of flat or declining revenue. This article argues that under certain conditions, network
sharing can be an attractive alternative to M&A, achieving a large proportion of the same cost benefits
(synergies), typically with lower regulatory hurdles and the opportunity for a gradual step-by-step approach as
opposed to an all-or-nothing transaction.
For more information, see Analysys Masons Mobile M&A in Western Europe may help to ease pressure on mobile retail
revenue.
For more information, see Analysys Masons Mobile in-market consolidation in Western Europe: impact of recent
mergers on margins and market share.
July 2014
Figure 1: Synergy value analysis for the TelefnicaE-Plus merger [Source: Telefnica, 2014]
Network
4
3
2
1
Total
Revenue
Operating (total)
Integration costs
Capex
Opex (total)
Network
Distribution
Network sharing can afford operators many of the same cost synergies as in-market M&A (see Figure 2) deep
network sharing, based on a NetCo model and transferring existing 2G/3G network assets into the joint venture
(JV), enables the JV to consolidate sites to a single grid, share backhaul, transfer and consolidate network
operation and maintenance activities, and optimise the pace of consolidation, equipment refreshes and new
deployments (for example, single visit, SRAN).
Figure 2: Key sources of network cost synergies [Source: Analysys Mason, 2014]
Depth of sharing
Examples
Passive
Active
Spectrum
Spectrum pooling
Consolidation
Shared operation
Joint maintenance
Network sharing deals have been subjected to much less onerous regulatory and competition reviews and
conditions than in-market consolidation deals. The participating operators continue to compete for customers in
the retail and wholesale markets. A wave of network outsourcing has convinced regulators that networks and
services can increasingly be seen as separate. Customers benefit from improved coverage, in particular in rural
areas.
3
4
Shared antennas are contingent upon spectrum adjacency and radio optimisation constraints.
Contingent upon spectrum adjacency.
July 2014
In deep network sharing agreements, the complexity of unwinding the agreement and (closely intertwined)
networks should that ever become necessary rises exponentially. Network sharing deals do not prevent
subsequent acquisitions by a third party (for example, Three Irelands acquisition of Telefnica Ireland), but
they increase the barriers, while also reducing the pressure for the sharing partners to merge.
Deep network sharing agreements active sharing, NetCo, consolidation are a viable route to realising a
significant proportion of the cost synergies normally associated with in-market M&A. The complexity of
sharing agreements and the implications on the operators subsequent M&A option space require careful
assessment by board-level executives.
Analysys Mason has a strong track record advising mobile operators, regulators, and financial
institutions worldwide, building on our deep commercial and technical expertise. We support clients in
assessing, valuing, structuring and implementing network sharing agreements between mobile operators
as an alternative to in-market consolidation, to realise cost synergies, as joint bid vehicle in nextgeneration spectrum auctions, and in shaping appropriate regulatory frameworks.
Find out more about our work on network sharing with mobile operators and regulators.
July 2014